achieving environmental goals through utility-based ... 2... · achieving environmental goals...
TRANSCRIPT
ACHIEVING ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS THROUGH UTILITY-BASED INCENTIVE
PROGRAMS
1
San Pedro River, Arizona. Photo Credit: The Nature Conservancy
Salt River, Arizona. Photo Credit: Brittany Choate
Rushing Rivers Program: Conservation Savings
for Instream Flow
Water Resources Research Center
Webinar – May 10, 2012
Drew Beckwith, Water Policy Manager
(720) 763-3726
RRP Schematic
WTP
WWTP
Mountain View
5
6
RRP Initial Screen
SCREENING CRITERION WEIGHT
Strength of community connection to the stream 20%
Opportunity for saved water to stay in the stream for a meaningful distance
20%
Strength of physical relationship between municipal diversion and target stream reach
10%
Extent to which conservation savings could result in meaningful streamflow enhancement
15%
Additional factors increasing community’s likelihood of embracing program
20%
Additional factors increasing water utility’s likelihood of embracing program
10%
Other factors increasing implementation ease 5%
7
RRP Ranking
CRITERION
COMMUNITY SCORE #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8
Pagosa Springs 90% H H M H H H M H
Breckenridge 85% H H M H M H H M
Winter Park 73% H H L H H M M M
Steamboat Spgs 70% H H M M H M M M
Glenwood Spgs 60% M H M L M M H H
Gunnison 58% H H L L L M H H
Crested Butte 55% M M M L M H H M
Aspen 55% H H M L M H L L
Eagle 48% M M M L M M M H
Telluride 35% H L L L M H L L
8
Pagosa Area WSD
80 mi2 service area
~2,000 AFY
~7,000 taps
Majority residential
Significant 2nd homes
San Juan River!
9
Bill Communication
You saved 3,700 gallons this month by comparison
to last year.
Mountain View residents’ conservation efforts kept
10,000,000 gallons more water in the river this month.
10
PAWSD Bill (old)
11
PAWSD Bill (new?)
Change in Use (gallons)
12
Outreach
13
Questions & Comments
Consultant report available 1-page handout available
Drew Beckwith
(720) 763-3726
14
Santa Fe Watershed Management Project
(Water is for… Collaboration)
Santa Fe’s Water Supply System
285
25
Santa Fe
Upper Santa Fe Watershed
Wastewater Treatment
Plant
Canyon Rd. Water Treatment
Plant
Buckman Well Field
City Well Field
Nichols Res.
McClure Res.
Treated Effluent
Buckman Direct Diversion (2011)
Santa Fe’s Water Supply System
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000 1
99
5
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
20
35
20
40
20
45
Ac
re-F
ee
t Y
ea
r
Ground Water
Conserved Water
San Juan-Chama Water via
the Buckman Direct Diversion
Santa Fe River
Gap between Demand and Available Supply
Historical Projected
Water Use
Watershed Property Ownership
Cerro Grande Fire, May 2000
Watershed Stand Conditions Prior to Treatment
• Dense ponderosa pine forests – Average 500 to 1,000
trees per acre, compared with 10-50 trees per acre historically in Southwest pine forests
– Suppression of tree growth and herbaceous vegetation
• Many small trees less than 16” in diameter
• Few fire resistant large trees
• Poor habitat
Watershed Fire History Study
Credit: Ellis Margolis, 2009. University of Arizona Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research
Risk of Catastrophic Fire in Watershed
Pacheco Fire, June-July 2011
$9-10 million
Las Conchas Fire, June-Aug. 2011
$40 million
• Costs to fight fire
• Impact to water supply
– Damage to infrastructure
– Loss and replacement of source
• Impact to local economy
– Tourism is 40% of economy
– Peak months June-August
– P.A. $320 million/yr
Initial Forest Treatment Work
• NEPA initiated in fall of
2000
• September 2001, EIS
completed
• Treat up to $7,270
acres in non-wilderness
• $7 million federal funds
• Project monitoring,
Technical Advisory
Group
Watershed Treatment 2002-2011
• Total of 5,500 acres treated in
ponderosa pine zone:
• Hand Thinning and
Mastication (chunking)
• Pile burning
• Broadcast burning
• Re-broadcast burn in 2,000
acres
The Challenge:
• Provide a framework for long-term
maintenance work in treated areas (PP);
• Treat areas in Wilderness that pose significant
wildfire risk (MC), not included in 2001 EIS
• Long-term monitoring
• Education and Outreach
• Long-term financial model
Now What?
USFS Collaborative Forestry
Restoration Program (CFRP)
• Partners:
– City of Santa Fe Water Division and Fire Department
– USFS Espanola District
– Santa Fe Watershed Association
– The Nature Conservancy
• Comprehensive 20-yr
plan with innovative
payment for
ecosystem services
financial model
The Product: Santa Fe Municipal Watershed
Management Plan
•Water Management: Monitor and analyze watery quantity
& quality, stream habitat assessment and improvement,
infrastructure upgrades;
•Education and Outreach: Educational watershed classes
for 5th graders, guided hikes for adults, educational
publications, utility bill stuffers, video production, public
meetings and public opinion survey;
•Financial Management: City cost share forest work with
USFS through collection agreement, and payment for
ecosystem services;
•Vegetation Management: Maintenance burning every 5-7
years in ponderosa pine areas already treated, NEPA
Environmental Assessment, and fuels reduction work in
4,000 acres of mixed conifer located in wilderness.
Payment for Ecosystem Services
City Utility Bill • Water customers are the
beneficiaries of a healthy
watershed
• Indirect valuation:
ecosystem service =
cost of watershed
maintenance/monitoring
($200,000/yr)
• Utility rate payer impact
$6.50/yr (range $3.13 to
$9.40)
Payment for Ecosystem Services
cont. • Another rate increase?
– Recent 48% increase for BDD, 4 yr phase-in
• Not so fast…
– Water Trust Board $1.3 mil. grant
• Evaluation of project funding alternatives to PES
– Rate increase
– Bond
– Absorb in existing Water Utility operating budget
PES Implementation
• Existing rate increase will cover long-term project costs
• What to call it? – “Water Source Protection Fund”
Final thoughts: collaboration requires
•A lot of energy and trust
•Everyone needs to leave some of their
preconceptions at the door – not always easy
•Early and frequent engagement in the process of
developing a shared vision: makes people/groups
feel valued (because they are)
• Not all projects allow for necessary time to
gather a collective understanding of what needs
to be done- if you need to rush, may be better to
use more traditional methods of planning.
Conserve to Enhance (C2E): An Innovative Voluntary Mechanism
36
Program development funded by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. Current funding includes Walton Family
Foundation.
How C2E Works 1. Water is conserved (at homes & businesses)
2. Money saved through water conservation
3. Money donated to a C2E fund
4. Money used to implement environmental enhancement projects
Water saved through conservation efforts
Donations support environmental enhancement
Tapping into Motivation
37
• Why should I save water?
• How do I save water?
• How are these things connected?
The environment can be a significant motivator that makes these connections.
Environmental Goals
38
• Meaningful, new funding for local projects
• Wide range of projects • Instream flows, green
infrastructure, stream restoration – whatever a community is interested in
• But maintain a connection to water!
Beaver Creek, AZ. Photo credit: Brittany Choate
• Connect personal water savings to river enhancement
• Raise awareness about community benefits of riparian & river systems
• Provide additional water for riparian restoration
• Increase local water conservation
• Inspire community engagement in restoration projects
Setting Goals: The Tucson Example
Tucson Environmental Enhancement Priorities
• Located in Tucson
• Existing project
• Public visitation
• Ecosystem Enhancement
• Funding Source
• Permits
Recipient Site Selection Process
• Identified 15 local restoration projects
• RFP to select recipient sites
• 3 sites asked to make presentations to Board
• 2 sites selected as C2E recipient sites
• Narrowed down to one site due to feasibility of project completion & benefit
41 Atturbury Wash, Tucson, AZ (Candice Rupprecht)
Flexibility & Adaptability
• Riparian Preservation & Restoration Listening Sessions, Summer 2011
– Large scale projects: $ & don’t need water
– Small scale (neighborhood) projects: need $, expertise, maybe water
• Tucson C2E expanding to include funding for neighborhood scale projects
Tanque Verde Creek, Arizona. (Candice Rupprecht)
Tucson Water Checkbox program announcement, June 2011
43
Expanding the Reach