acknowledgement urban greenway: riparian meadows, mounds ... · every environmental problem (in...

1
Holcim Awards 2005 Comment of the Holcim Awards 2005 jury for North America Project data Author Further authors Project description by author Relevance to target issues (by author) Quantum change and transferability Urban Greenway: Riparian Meadows, Mounds, and Rooms,Warren, USA Interface Ecosystems: Recombining Stream Morphology and Urban Morphology Riparian Meadows, Mounds, and Rooms proposes a green- way along a second-order urban stream, combining inno- vations in stream design and watershed management with community development. Most environmental planning has not factored urban systems and their fuel- subsidized economies into ecosystem design. Recognizing the absence of productive feedback from the city to the environment, the project developed an interface model for sustainable watershed functions within human-domi- nated ecosystems. This integrated planning model yields symbiotic improvements in both ecological and urban services. Alignment of Stream and Urban Metabolisms Stream modeling began with assessment of the 17 prima- ry ecological services provided by streams and identified possibilities for improving those services through ecolo- gical engineering. Stream restoration corrects community infrastructure problems caused by flooding, erosion, se- wage infiltration, and groundwater pollution. Restoration strategies dampen excessive stream flow through recla- mation of lost urban floodplains, and formation of the riffle-pool-glide algorithm present in healthy stream or- ganization. Urban floodplains sequester floodwaters and treat polluted urban stormwater runoff, while providing new aquifer recharge capacity. Stabilization of stream flow is complimented by the creation of a vegetated ri- parian edge to enhance critical eco-tone nutrient cycling; return of stream sinuosity; and strategic bank armoring to prevent excessive erosion and sediment transport. Ecological vs Structural Solutions Ecological solutions are effective alternatives to stream management models relying on structural solutions like stream channelization, culverting, paved bank armoring, and floodplain elimination. Distinguished by their neigh- borhood contexts and fluvial profiles, new stream rea- ches are developed from riparian corridor improvements, becoming a community development platform. Reach 1: The City Park Arbor Room proposes enhancement of the existing park as an arbor room featuring a restored ripari- an corridor with a willow bosque. This phreatophyte tree bosque captures excess groundwater through natural hydraulic control known as „solar pump and treat“. Reach 2: Floodplain Park proposes conversion of the city mainte- nance yard to a wet meadow, restoring the stream“s natu- ral floodplain while creating mounded pocket parks. Reach 3: YMCA Green Street proposes „daylighting“ the piped stream and planting a riparian zone as a new community „green street“. Watersheds as combined infrastructural and ecological systems suggest that urban infrastructure, when submitted to an ecological approach, may be more intelligent- and cost less. In addition to solving for the community“s individual circumstances, Riparian Meadows, Mounds, and Rooms devised a transferable land-use model for watershed ma- nagement practices based on ecological engineering so- lutions, rather than classic civil management models (see comparisons between the two models in our Recommen- ded Stream Design Practices for Interface Ecosystems). The model is based on a typical stream cross-section as it passes through human-dominated contexts. Recommen- ded space and programmatic criteria for healthy bankfull (stream), riparian bank, floodplain, upland community, and processes related to sinuosity and erosion/deposition are illustrated for use in any community land ordinance. Every environmental problem (in this case, flooding, pol- lution, sewage infiltration) is an extension of how people relate to one another. First, the project has created a pu- blic awareness of the relationship between watershed in- tegrity and community infrastructure problems. Second, it redistributes community investments monopolized by commercial interests on Main Street to other public ve- nues. The project begins with assessment of the 17 primary ecological services provided by riparian ecosystems with recommendations for increasing those services related especially to water quality, pollution mitigation, increased biodiversity, nutrient cycling, enhanced ecological refugia, soil formation, erosion control, disturbance regulation, re- creation, and improved urban services. Ecological engineering solutions are based on self-organi- zing natural processes rather than unaffordable and capi- tal-intensive infrastructural solutions that exacerbate the very problems stream management attempts to resolve. Our watershed solution provides corrective measures and allows the city to enroll in the Federal Emergency Ma- nagement Agency“s National Flood Insurance Program, so the community no longer has to devote a significant portion of its general fund for flood reparations to local property owners. Meanwhile, urban stormwater inputs and floodwaters are absorbed through floodplain catch- ment systems (treating polluted water) 60% less costly than engineered transport infrastructure, which simply transfers the problem elsewhere. Natural processes are capital-enhancing over time. Complimenting traditional street-and-block fabrics, the integrity of urban form can also issue from self-organizing landscape media and biological processes in interface ecosystems. The new family of urban forms that result from refitting ecosystems to human-dominated contexts results in unique expressions of holistic settlement pat- terns. Stream restoration as a community development platform Recommended stream design practices in interface ecosystems Stream dysfunctions Watershed reclamation design Urban greenway plan Project succession Reach 1: City park arbor room Reach 2: Floodplain park Floodplain park: Flood event Reach 3: YMCA green s treet Urban planning June 2006 Type of project Start of construction Name Profession Organization City, Country Prof. Stephen Luoni Urban planner University of Arkansas Community Design Center Fayetteville, AR, USA Prof. Aaron Gabriel, Dean Jeff Shannon, Prof. Mark Boyer, Dr. Marty Matlock, Bob Morgan, Laura Chioldi, Alan Noah-Navarro, Jena Rimkus The project is commended for its ambitious effort to resolve severe community infrastructural problems caused by flooding, erosion, sewage infiltration and groundwater pollution. Additionally, the solution convincingly offers the possibility for developing attractive recreational areas that serve to strengthen the ecosystem and increase biodiversity. Acute sensitivity is displayed toward urban ecology and toward the challenging measures required to enhance the quality of life, thus providing important lessons in environmental sustainability. The approach introduces a novel and innovative systematicity in context analysis to an American audience. The scope of the research is also worthy of merit, addressing a diversity of ecological issues such as improvement of water quality, mitigation of pollution, increasing biodiversity, nutrient cycling, enhancing soil formation, as well as controlling erosion. A sensitive social agenda is also pursued at the level of providing environmentally responsive recreation amenities and improving public services. The integrity of urban form is enhanced by a self-organizing landscape that incorporates both media and biological processes in a synthesized ecosystem. Holcim Regional Awards 2005, North America, 6 Ethical standards and social equity Ecological quality and energy conservation Economic performance and compatibility Contextual response and aesthetic impact Acknowledgement

Upload: others

Post on 12-Oct-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Holcim Awards 2005

Comment of the Holcim Awards 2005 jury for North AmericaComment of the Holcim Awards 2005 jury for North America

Project data

Author

Further authors

Project description by authorProject description by author Relevance to target issues (by author)Relevance to target issues (by author)

Quantum change and transferability

Urban Greenway: Riparian Meadows, Mounds, and Rooms,Warren, USA

Interface Ecosystems: Recombining Stream Morphology and Urban MorphologyRiparian Meadows, Mounds, and Rooms proposes a green-way along a second-order urban stream, combining inno-vations in stream design and watershed management with community development. Most environmental planning has not factored urban systems and their fuel-subsidized economies into ecosystem design. Recognizing the absence of productive feedback from the city to the environment, the project developed an interface model for sustainable watershed functions within human-domi-nated ecosystems. This integrated planning model yields symbiotic improvements in both ecological and urban services.

Alignment of Stream and Urban MetabolismsStream modeling began with assessment of the 17 prima-ry ecological services provided by streams and identifi ed possibilities for improving those services through ecolo-gical engineering. Stream restoration corrects community infrastructure problems caused by fl ooding, erosion, se-wage infi ltration, and groundwater pollution. Restoration strategies dampen excessive stream fl ow through recla-mation of lost urban fl oodplains, and formation of the riffl e-pool-glide algorithm present in healthy stream or-ganization. Urban fl oodplains sequester fl oodwaters and treat polluted urban stormwater runoff, while providing new aquifer recharge capacity. Stabilization of stream fl ow is complimented by the creation of a vegetated ri-parian edge to enhance critical eco-tone nutrient cycling; return of stream sinuosity; and strategic bank armoring to prevent excessive erosion and sediment transport.

Ecological vs Structural SolutionsEcological solutions are effective alternatives to stream management models relying on structural solutions like stream channelization, culverting, paved bank armoring, and fl oodplain elimination. Distinguished by their neigh-borhood contexts and fl uvial profi les, new stream rea-ches are developed from riparian corridor improvements, becoming a community development platform. Reach 1: The City Park Arbor Room proposes enhancement of the existing park as an arbor room featuring a restored ripari-an corridor with a willow bosque. This phreatophyte tree bosque captures excess groundwater through natural hydraulic control known as „solar pump and treat“. Reach 2: Floodplain Park proposes conversion of the city mainte-nance yard to a wet meadow, restoring the stream“s natu-ral fl oodplain while creating mounded pocket parks. Reach 3: YMCA Green Street proposes „daylighting“ the piped stream and planting a riparian zone as a new community „green street“. Watersheds as combined infrastructural and ecological systems suggest that urban infrastructure, when submitted to an ecological approach, may be more intelligent- and cost less.

In addition to solving for the community“s individual circumstances, Riparian Meadows, Mounds, and Rooms devised a transferable land-use model for watershed ma-nagement practices based on ecological engineering so-lutions, rather than classic civil management models (see comparisons between the two models in our Recommen-ded Stream Design Practices for Interface Ecosystems). The model is based on a typical stream cross-section as it passes through human-dominated contexts. Recommen-ded space and programmatic criteria for healthy bankfull (stream), riparian bank, fl oodplain, upland community, and processes related to sinuosity and erosion/deposition are illustrated for use in any community land ordinance.

Every environmental problem (in this case, fl ooding, pol-lution, sewage infi ltration) is an extension of how people relate to one another. First, the project has created a pu-blic awareness of the relationship between watershed in-tegrity and community infrastructure problems. Second, it redistributes community investments monopolized by commercial interests on Main Street to other public ve-nues.

The project begins with assessment of the 17 primary ecological services provided by riparian ecosystems with recommendations for increasing those services related especially to water quality, pollution mitigation, increased biodiversity, nutrient cycling, enhanced ecological refugia, soil formation, erosion control, disturbance regulation, re-creation, and improved urban services.

Ecological engineering solutions are based on self-organi-zing natural processes rather than unaffordable and capi-tal-intensive infrastructural solutions that exacerbate the very problems stream management attempts to resolve. Our watershed solution provides corrective measures and allows the city to enroll in the Federal Emergency Ma-nagement Agency“s National Flood Insurance Program, so the community no longer has to devote a signifi cant portion of its general fund for fl ood reparations to local property owners. Meanwhile, urban stormwater inputs and fl oodwaters are absorbed through fl oodplain catch-ment systems (treating polluted water) 60% less costly than engineered transport infrastructure, which simply transfers the problem elsewhere. Natural processes are capital-enhancing over time.

Complimenting traditional street-and-block fabrics, the integrity of urban form can also issue from self-organizing landscape media and biological processes in interface ecosystems. The new family of urban forms that result from refi tting ecosystems to human-dominated contexts results in unique expressions of holistic settlement pat-terns.

Stream restoration as a community development platform

Recommended stream design practices in interface ecosystems

Stream dysfunctions Watershed reclamation design

Urban greenway plan Project succession

Reach 1: City park arbor room Reach 2: Floodplain park

Floodplain park: Flood event Reach 3: YMCA green s treet

Urban planningJune 2006

Type of projectStart of construction

NameProfessionOrganization

City, Country

Prof. Stephen LuoniUrban plannerUniversity of ArkansasCommunity Design CenterFayetteville, AR, USA

Prof. Aaron Gabriel, Dean Jeff Shannon, Prof. Mark Boyer, Dr. Marty Matlock, Bob Morgan, Laura Chioldi, Alan Noah-Navarro, Jena Rimkus

The project is commended for its ambitious effort to resolve severe community infrastructural problems caused by fl ooding, erosion, sewage infi ltration and groundwater pollution. Additionally, the solution convincingly offers the possibility for developing attractive recreational areas that serve to strengthen the ecosystem and increase biodiversity. Acute sensitivity is displayed toward urban ecology and toward the challenging measures required to enhance the quality of life, thus providing important lessons in environmental sustainability. The approach introduces a novel and innovative systematicity in context analysis to an American audience. The scope of the research is also worthy of merit, addressing a diversity of ecological issues such as improvement of water quality, mitigation of pollution, increasing biodiversity, nutrient cycling, enhancing soil formation, as well as controlling erosion. A sensitive social agenda is also pursued at the level of providing environmentally responsive recreation amenities and improving public services. The integrity of urban form is enhanced by a self-organizing landscape that incorporates both media and biological processes in a synthesized ecosystem.

Hol

cim

Reg

iona

l Aw

ards

200

5, N

orth

Am

eric

a, 6

Ethical standards and social equity

Ecological quality and energy conservation

Economic performance and compatibility

Contextual response and aesthetic impact

A c k n o w l e d g e m e n t