acos: much ado about nothing (?)

59
Chicago - March 29-30, 2012 2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Upload: fawzia

Post on 09-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?). Moderator: Douglass G. Hewitt, Esq., Partner, Kubasiak, Fylstra, Thorpe & Rotunno, P.C. Panelists: Bradford A. Buxton, President, BTB Associates, LLC Ciara Ryan Frost, Esq., Partner, Kerns, Frost & Pearlman, LLC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

ACOs:Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Page 2: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Moderator:Douglass G. Hewitt, Esq., Partner, Kubasiak, Fylstra, Thorpe &

Rotunno, P.C.

Panelists:Bradford A. Buxton, President, BTB Associates, LLC

Ciara Ryan Frost, Esq., Partner, Kerns, Frost & Pearlman, LLC

Kristin D. McMahon, Esq., Chief Claims Officer, IronHealth

Page 3: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”)

Public Law 111 -148, signed March 23, 2010

Page 4: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Overview of PPACA

• Sweeping 2,000+ page overhaul of U.S. health care system (not including the implementing regulations, some of which remain to be issued/finalized)

• Aims to reform health care:♦ delivery♦ financing♦ insurance

4

Page 5: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Key PPACA Objectives

• Access to health care for all Americans• Improve quality of health care

• Lower cost of health care

5

Page 6: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

PPACA Timeline

• Staggered deadlines for implementation between 2010 and 2018

• Myriad regulations issued since PPACA passage• Judicial challenges to PPACA

6

Page 7: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Title III – Improving The Quality and Efficiency of Health Care

• Strives to transform the U.S. health care delivery system:♦ links payment to quality outcomes under Medicare♦ creates Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMI)♦ Accountable Care Organization (“ACO”) initiatives

7

Page 8: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

ACOs

8

Three Letter Acronym of the Year

Hot Topic in American Health Policy

Page 9: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

ACOs Defined

9

A group of physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers who assume responsibility for the quality and cost of healthcare for a defined population attributed to them on the basis of patients' use of healthcare services. If the ACO meets quality benchmarks and reduces per-beneficiary spending below what would otherwise have been expected, it will receive a share of the savings

Page 10: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

Impetus for ACOsAmerica’s Broken Health System

• US health expenditures -$2.6 trillion in 2010, over ten times the $256 billion spent in 1980

• Health care accounts for 16% of the US GDP, the highest among the world’s industrialized nations without improved outcome

Ineffective System for Paying Healthcare Providers• Payment for volume on a fee for service basis rather than for value on a fee for

outcome basis.

10

Page 11: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Impetus for ACOs (cont’d)

“In the US, we hold no one accountable for our problems. Accountability is as fragmented as care, itself; each separate piece tries to craft excellence, but only within its own walls.

Meanwhile, patients and carers wander among the fragments. No one manages their journey, and they are too often lost,

forgotten, bewildered.” - Dr. Donald Berwick, former CMS Administrator

Source: Donald M. Berwick, “A Transatlantic Review of the NHS at 60,” http://www.pnhp.org/news/2010/may/a-transatlantic-review-of-the-nhs-at-6-, July 1, 2008.

11

Page 12: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL SymposiumJa

pan

Aust

ralia

Nor

way

U.K

.

Spai

n

Ital

y

Sw

eden

Net

her

lands

Can

ada

Aust

ria

Ger

man

ySw

itze

rlan

d

Bel

giu

m

Fran

ce

U.S

.A.

0%

200%

400%

600%

800%

1000%

1200%

1400%

1600%

1800%

810.0% 850.0% 850.0% 870.0% 900.0% 910.0% 940.0% 990.0%1040.0%1050.0%1050.0%1070.0%1110.0%1120.0%

1600.0%

Total Health Expenditure as a Share of GDP,

U.S. and Selected Countries, 2008

As

Perc

en

tag

e o

f G

DP

Source: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010), "OECD Health Data", OECD Health Statistics (database). doi: 10.1787/data-00350-en (Accessed on 14 February 2011).Notes: Data from Australia and Japan are 2007 data. Figures for Belgium, Canada, Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland, are OECD estimates. Numbers are PPP adjusted.

12

Page 13: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

13

Page 14: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

THE PURPOSE OF ACOs

“The creation of ACOs is one of the first delivery-reform initiatives that will be implemented under the ACA. Its

purpose is to foster change in patient care so as to accelerate progress towards a three part aim: better care for individuals,

better health for populations, and slower growth in costs through improvement in care.”

-Dr. Donald Berwick

14

Page 15: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Types of ACOs

• Medicare

1. Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP)2. Advanced Payment Model

• Commercial (Private Insurers/Payors Health Systems)

• Pioneer – Hybrid Advanced Model

15

Page 16: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

The Shared Savings Proposed Rule

• Issued March 31, 2011• 65 Quality Measures• 2 alternative tracks (one-sided, shifting to two-sided in year 3 and

two-sided)• 2% threshold above minimum savings rate of 2%-3.9%• Maximum Shared Savings Cap: 7.5% or 10%• 25% withhold by CMS for years 1 and 2

16

Page 17: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Response to the Medicare Shared Savings Proposed Rule

17

Page 18: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP)• MSSP ACOs must meet HHS/CMS eligibility criteria, including:

♦ assume responsibility for Medicare patient population of 5000 or more beneficiaries for at least three years

♦ adequate primary care physician participation ♦ a formal legal structure for receipt/distribution of shared savings♦ shared governance over clinical and administrative processes; and ♦ processes to promote evidence-based medicine, coordinated care and

patient engagement

18

Page 19: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) (cont’d)

• If the ACO’s costs are lower than the benchmark set by the MSSP, it receives (in addition to normal fee for service payment amounts) an additional payment that reflects a portion of the savings

♦ Track I Model: Shared Savings Only♦ Track II Model: Shared Savings and Shared Losses

• By the end of 2012, at least 2,000,000 people are expected to be enrolled in MSSP ACOs

19

Page 20: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

The Shared Program Final Issued October 20, 2011

• 33 quality measures

• 2 alternative tracks (one sided for all 3 years and two sided)

• No 2% threshold above minimum savings rate of 2 to 3.9% (i.e., First dollars savings)

• Increase in maximum sharing rate: 50-60%

• Maximum Shared Savings Cap: 10-15%

• No 25% withhold by CMS

20

Page 21: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Advanced Payment Model

• Part of the MSSP

• Provide additional support to physician-owned and rural providers who would benefit from added start-up capital to establish the needed infrastructure in the form of additional staff or information technology

• Upfront funding by CMS’ Innovation Center of $170M to support up to 50 ACOs

• Eligible participants must be:

♦ ACOs that do not include any inpatient facilities and have less than $50 million in total annual revenue; or

♦ ACOs in which inpatient facilities are critical access hospitals and/or Medicare low-volume rural hospitals and have less than $80 million in total annual revenue

21

Page 22: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Commercially/Privately Sponsored Accountable Care Collaborations

• Private Payors including BCBS Plans, large for profit health insurance carriers (e.g., CIGNA, AETNA) and health care systems launching pilot programs across the country

• Radical departure from traditional fee for service approach• CareFirst Blue Cross Blue Shield, dominant insurer in the

Washington DC • Advocate Health Care (Chicago based) and BCBS IL formed one

of the nations largest ACOs, AdvocateCare22

Page 23: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Pioneer ACO Model CMS Innovation Center initiative

Eligibility-healthcare organizations experienced in providing coordinated, patient centered care to Medicare beneficiaries (a minimum of 15,000 Medicare Part A and B beneficiaries) in an ACO type environment

Approximately 32 organizations have been designated as Pioneer ACO Models including: Banner Health, Beth Israel Deaconess, Dartmouth Hitchcock, and Presbyterian Healthcare Services.

Differences between Pioneer ACO Model and MSSP:

♦ First two years of Pioneer are shared savings payment with higher levels of savings and risk than Shared Savings Program;

♦ By end of second year, Pioneer ACO must enter into similar payment contracts with insurers and health plans constituting 50% of ACO revenue.

23

Page 24: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Common Characteristics of Successful ACOs

• Broader patient access to care, including extended evening and weekend hours

• Case management and Disease management services

• Electronic Medical Records to better track medical history

• Embedded Care Coordinators

• Data Analytics

• Shared savings and in some cases losses with the Payor of medical services

24

Page 25: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

25

ACO Configurations Abound

ACO

Health System

MedicalGroups

ACO

Medical Groups

HospitalHealthInsurer

Page 26: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

ACOs—Initial Barriers to Entry

• Antitrust concerns

• Start Up Costs—IT Technology

• Ability of specialists and primary care physicians to work together and accept a reallocation of healthcare dollars therein increasing the reimbursement levels of primary care physicians

26

Page 27: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Are ACOs Different Than HMOs?• ACOs have quality metrics that were not part of the Managed

Care model of the 1990s

• ACOs do not purport to limit patient choice of providers or act as gate keepers to prevent patients from specialist care

• Specialist care is encouraged; although will be more closely followed by the primary care physician

27

Page 28: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Sample ACO Organizational Components:

Health

System/Hospital

Potential

Partners

Hospitals, Diagnostic/ Therapeutic Service

Centers

ACO Resources Physician Organizations

Alternate Health Service Organizations

Health Information Communication Connectivity Network

EHRs, Interfaces, Communication Hubs

Patient Centric CDRs (Beneficiary)

Population Health Data Warehouse

Call Centers

Care Coordinators

Employed Groups

PHO Physicians

Aligned Physicians – Ind

Physicians - Ind

Specialists

FQHCSafety Net

MS

MS

MS

Not MS

MS

Potential

Partners

system

Connections PMS EHR Claims

clearinghouse

Information Results Reports Orders Scripts Referrals Eligibility Claims Appointments CCRs Other

LTCSNF

HomeHealth

Hospice

ClinicalPharma

HomeBasedCare

RehabCenter

28

Page 29: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Provider-Payor Challenges

• Current Market-Place

• What’s to Come in Reform

• Payment migration and Provider Accountability

• What it takes to win

29

Page 30: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Reform has sparked reform. But results won’t happen without reduction in costs.

At its roots, the ACO model is about changing the reimbursement structure of the U.S.

healthcare system toward one that pays for the quality of care delivered (and, by

derivative, the outcomes achieved) versus the units of service provided.

- Beyond ACOs: The Pending Risk Shift to Providers, William Blair

Hospitals with strong market power and higher private-payor and other revenues have less

pressure to constrain their costs. Thus, these hospitals have higher costs per unit of service, which can lead to losses on Medicare patients.

Hospitals under more financial pressure—with less market share and less ability to charge higher private rates—often constrain costs and can

generate profits on Medicare patients.- MedPac, Health Affairs, May 2010

Blue Shield of California gives $20M in ACO Help

- Healthcare IT News, October 18, 2011

30

Page 31: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Market Environment | Health Reform

2012 Highlights

Encouraging Integrated Health Systems

Linking payment to quality outcomes

Reducing avoidable hospital readmissions

2013 Highlights

Improving preventative health coverage

Encouraging provider collaboration Increasing Medicaid for primary care Fee for patient-centered outcomes

research

Health care organizations can expect to see impacts to their customers, products, markets, and margins .

31

Page 32: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

ACOs require a shift in provider accountability and a migration from focus on revenue cycle management to cost management

Source: Healthways 2010

Revenue Cycle Management Cost Management/liability

32

Page 33: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

The current system cannot sustain itself without a focus on cost management and lowering

the total cost of careHospitals and Specialists

Improved Patient Care Efficiency Use of Lower-Cost Treatments Reduction in Adverse Events Reduction in Preventable Readmissions

Primary Care Practices

Improved Prevention & Early Diagnosis

Improved Practice Efficiency Reduction in Unnecessary Testing

and Referrals Reduction in Preventable ER Visits

and Admissions

$Lower Total Health

Care Cost

All Providers

Improved Management of Complex Patients

Use of Lower Cost Settings & Providers

33

Page 34: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Requirements for Success• As provider risk expands, requirements for risk management become more complex:

• Reimbursement and Network Management: ♦ Multiple risk sharing arrangements from global rates to percent of premium, network

contracting and management• Care/Population Management:

♦ HIS, PCMH, IOP, Data Integration (EMR), Nurse Managers • Administration

♦ MSO Services (claims, eligibility, etc.)• Financial/Risk Management

♦ Risk based capital, actuarial, underwriting, financial reporting, compliance and auditing

• Regulatory/Legal

34

Page 35: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Requirements for Success | Lessons from the 1980s

In the 1980s when payors shared risk there were multiple provider failures and liability concerns.

• What level of risk assumed?

• When moving from fee for service to risk, what is impact on cost delivery structure?

• Does the Integrated Health System cover all services necessary to assume risk?

• Do patient coverage policies outline expectations for members re: coverage and delivery expectations?

• Role of insurance company versus delivery system in risk arrangement (reinsurance/liability/coverage)?

• Role of Partners (administrative, ownership, risk, etc.)

35

Page 36: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

The landscape is complex and choosing partners requires understanding oneself and the target partner. Three types of partners meet different sets of needs.

• Vertical:♦ Knowledge and tools for managing care (administrative services)

• Horizontal:♦ Partners include other hospital systems, organized physician

entities, and community organizations within target service areas or clinical specialties

• Global:♦ Global Partners are entities who bring attributes of both horizontal

and vertical partners

36

Page 37: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Structure + High Value Efficiencies = Ability to Take Risk and Increase Margin

Providers and payors require a structure in the new, transformed state• Leadership must determine how broad they want to provide their

integrated health system services• Determine organization (i.e. physician vs. strategic partnership)

Providers must consider the balance between geography and provider services offered• Evaluate services, people, contractual status (risk/no risk) by

geographical regions

37

Page 38: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Structure + High Value Efficiencies = Ability to Take Risk and Increase Margin

• Providers must inventory what tools, skills and capabilities they have today, determine the gaps in current systems and how to fill those gaps♦ Understand what is required and how to fulfill need in technology, people

and organization (buy, build, partner)

• Understand best partnership options in order to build a effective and efficient risk taking network♦ Also define who owns lives today to help access network and partnership

options. Is it realistic to have a competitor also be a partner?

38

Page 39: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

ACO Liability Exposures• Vary, depending on the:

♦ Activities/services of the ACO and its constituentparticipants

♦ ACO’s organization/legal structure, and

♦ Applicable state law

39

Page 40: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

ACO Liability Exposures• Similar to historical MCO liability exposures in many respects,

except:

♦ patients may obtain care from providers outside the ACO without any cost or coverage penalty,

♦ financial incentives are tied to quality performance metrics

40

Page 41: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

ACO Liability Exposures

• Some heightened exposure based upon ACO’s:♦ ‘accountability’ for quality of care♦ increased involvement in coordination of care♦ increased control over ACO participants

41

Page 42: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Activities/Services Most Likely to Give Rise to Claims Against ACOs

• Medical treatment• Coordination of care/case management• Medical necessity or other coverage determinations• Utilization review (if applicable)• Provider selection / contracting / termination / payment• Claims processing/payment (if applicable)• Billing• Employment practices• Compliance with state and federal laws, including HIPAA, HITECH and PPACA

42

Page 43: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

43

Common Sources of ACO Liability (Claimants)

ACO

Competitors

Regulators

Employees

Other(e.g., payor,

vendor)

Patients

Providers

Page 44: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Patient Claims Against ACOs• Medical negligence (direct or vicarious liability)• Negligence or misconduct in:

♦ utilization review♦ case management/coordination of care♦ selection/peer review/credentialing of participating providers♦ medical necessity or coverage determination

• Breach of contract• Breach of fiduciary duty (including failure to disclose financial incentives)• Breach of privacy• Other (including statutory violations)

44

Page 45: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Provider Claims Against ACOs

• Breach of provider contract

• Negligence or other misconduct related to:♦ provider selection/contracting♦ provider deselection/termination♦ provider compensation, including bonus or incentive

payments

• Cross-claims for indemnification

45

Page 46: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Regulator Claims Against ACOs• Violations of:

♦PPACA (Note PPACA penalty provisions)♦False Claims Act or other federal fraud and abuse

laws♦Federal or state antitrust laws♦HIPAA, HITECH or other federal or state privacy laws♦State licensure, solvency or other laws

46

Page 47: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Employee Claims Against ACOs (including Claims by employed providers)

• Wrongful termination• Discrimination• Breach of contract• Misrepresentation• Whistleblower claims alleging False Claims Act violations

47

Page 48: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Competitor Claims Against ACOs

• Violation of federal or state antitrust laws (Note, Final ACO Antitrust Policy Statement provides for an Antitrust Safety Zone)

• Unfair competition

• Tortious interference with contractual or business relations

48

Page 49: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

New or Heightened Exposures Après PPACA

• Violation of PPACA or implementing regulations:♦ MLR rebate obligations♦ Penalties for non-compliance with claims processing and

appeals regulations♦ Other

• Compliance is key

49

Page 50: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

50

ERISA Preemption in the Wake of PPACA?

Increase in PopulationInsured Under IndividualHealth Policies

ERISA Preemption Defense

Page 51: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Relationship Between PPACA, ERISA And OtherFederal and State Laws?

• Interplay between PPACA and other federal and state laws unclear in many respects

• PPACA preserves ERISA preemption, but ERISA does not apply to individual health insurance markets

• PPACA preempts state laws that would “prevent the application of” Title I♦ Sets a “floor” for state regulation♦ Does not preempt state licensure, solvency and other ‘health-insurance

laws’• Full employment for lawyers

51

Page 52: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

52

Newton’s Law of Motion

For every action, there is an equal and opposition reaction.

Page 53: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

53

Increase in Integration of and Coordination by Providers

Liability for medical and managed care mishaps Antitrust Exposure

Page 54: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Chicago - March 29-30, 2012

2012 PLUS Medical PL Symposium

54

Effects of PPACA on Health Insurance Market

PPACA Litigation

TraditionalManaged CareLitigation

Regulatory Activity

Page 55: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Litigation Over Historically Controversial Health Insurer Practices Should Decline As PPACA Eliminates Or Regulates Those Practices

• Lifetime and annual limits

• Rescission (post claims underwriting)

• Explanations of coverage, including disclosures of cost-sharing, common benefit scenarios, provider payment methodologies (“usual customary and reasonable rates”)

55

Page 56: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Insurance Coverage & ACOs • Types of Exposures Presented

♦ D&O ♦ E&O♦ Professional Liability♦ Third and First Party Privacy Protection♦ General Liability ♦ EPL♦ Fiduciary

• Critical to understand the ACO’s corporate structure

56

Page 57: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Insurance Coverage & ACOs

Necessary to perform GAP analysis to determine whether existing healthcare entity’s Insurance Program provides seamless coverage to the ACO activities

Policy exclusions could vitiate coverage if an insured provider files suit against the ACO challenging compensation or bonus structure (e.g., Insured v. Insured)

Consider purchase of separate stand alone product to expressly cover ACO Services and corresponding liability exposures

57

Page 58: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

US Supreme Court to Rule on Two Major PPACA Provisions

58

• Individual Mandate

• The Medicaid Expansion

Page 59: ACOs: Much Ado about Nothing (?)

Douglass G. Hewitt Ciara Ryan Frost, Esq.Kubasiak, Fylstra, Thorpe & Rotund, P.C. Kerns, Frost & Pearlman, LLC20 S. Clark Street, 29th Floor 70 West Madison, Suite

5350Chicago, IL 60603 Chicago, IL 60602(312) 630-9600 (312) [email protected] [email protected]

Bradford Buxton Kristin D. McMahon, Esq.BTB Associates, LLC Chief Claims Officer594 North Woodland Lane IronHealthNorthfield, IL 60093 175 Powder Forest Drive(847) 400-7450 Simsbury, CT [email protected] (860) 408-7812

[email protected]