acute coronary syndromes - european society of...
TRANSCRIPT
Lars RydénKarolinska InstitutetStockholm, Sweden
Management of diabetes in patients with
coronary artery disease
Acute coronary
syndromes
Changing fenotype
Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndromes
OGTT
75 g glucose in 200 ml water
Capillary blood glucose
before and 120 min after
glucose ingestion
GAMI
Study design
Patientsn= 181 MI, no diabetes
B-glucose <11.1 mmol/L
Controls
n=185
OGTT at dischargen = 168
Abnormal 67%
DM
33%
NGT
33%
IGT
34%
GAMI
Results
(Norhammar et al. Lancet. 2002;359:2140)
NGT
65%
DM11%
IGT
24%
Controlsn = 185
(Bartnik et al J Intern Med. 2004; 256: 288)
Abnormal 35%
10
8
6
4
2
0
* ***
***
***
***Patients n=145
Controls n=185
Mm
ol or
pm
ol/L
Metabolic variables in the GAMI trialPatients with AMI without diabetes vs. age and sex matched controls
(Bartnik et al J Intern Med 2004; 256:288)
The MI patient now and thenSecular trends in the risk factor pattern
Risk factor 1963 2003
Smoking (%) 56
Regular phys act (%) 32
Stress 17 17
Body Mass Index 24.8
Waist circumference (cm) 87
S-Cholesterol (mmol/l) 6.4
S-Triglycerides (mmol/l) 1.3
Blood pressure (mmHg) 138/91
Diabetes (%) 3.6
50 year old men in Gothenburg
24
26.8
95
1.7
6.6
22
5.5
135/85
(Wilhelmsen et al. J Intern Med 2008;263:636)
The patient with myocardial infarction now and thenSecular trends in risk factor pattern
Lean, stressed,
chain-smoking CEO
Passed time
Sedenatary, overweight labourer
with the metabolic syndrome
Present time
Changing fenotype
Influence on prognosis
Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndromes
The Swedish CCU registry 1995-2006
Time trends in 1-year mortality in AMI-patients
with and without diabetes
(Norhammar et al Heart . 2007; 93:1577 )
(Norhammar et al data on file 2003-2006)
No
Yes
Diabetes
1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007
Mo
rta
lity (
%)
S-Creatinine (40 mmol/L)
Previous CHF
Previous MI
Smoking
Gender (Male = 1)
Diabetes duration (one year)
Age (ten years)
Updated FBG (+3 mmol/L)
0.5 1 3
HR p
1.20 <0.001
2.14 <0.001
1.00 0.64
0.89 0.40
1.14 0.48
1.18 0.26
1.71 <0.001
1.13 <0.001
2
Log scale
Predictors of death in patients with diabetes
and myocardial infarction
(Malmberg et al. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:650)
From DIGAMI 2Independent risk predictors for mortality
(Norhammar et al Diabetes Care 1999, 22: 1827)
Admission glucose predicts mortality in MI patients
without known diabetes
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 months
Event free survival (%)
2P = 0.0029 (Log-Rank test)
P-glucose median
7.4 mmol/l
P-glucose > median
7.4 mmol/l
(Sinnaeve et al. Arch Intern Med 2009;169: 402)
Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events n= 57 406
Admission glucose n=22.001 Fasting glucose n=13.526
Age (years) 65 67 68 66 66
Sex (female; %) 32 32 37 40 43
History of DM (%) 12 20 54 80 73
STEMI 35 43 44 42 39
NSTEMI 33 34 35 33 37
Unstable angina 32 24 22 25 25
F-glucose (mmol/l) 5.6 5.6-6.9 7-11 11-16.6 >16.7
Proportion (%) 41 32 21 5 1
Predictors of death in patients with
acute coronary syndromes
Glucose level (mmol/l)
5.6-6.9 Admission
Fasting
7.0-10.9 Admission
Fasting
11.0-16.4 Admission
Fasting
16.5 Admission
Fasting
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Adjusted OR for in-hospital death
(Sinnaeve et al. Arch Intern Med 2009;169: 402)
40
20
00 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 months
2P= 0.0029 (Log-Rank test)
5.5 11.1 16.7
16
12
8
4
022
Pro
babili
tyof death
(%
)
Fasting Glucose (mmol/l)
Diabetes
All
No diabetes
Predictors of death in patients with
acute coronary syndromes
DAG*
PKC activation
TGF Basal membrane
thickening
cPLA2 Increased
PG’s membrane
Na+/K+ATP-ase permeability
VEGF PKC Cellular growth &
neovascularisation
ANP BNP
TGF Cardiomyopathy
PAI-1 Fibrinolysis
Vascular occlusion
Decreased
ET-1 blood flow &
() eNOS vascular reactivity
PDH inactivation
* = DAG = DiAcylGlycerol
Linking dysglycemia to cardiovascular disease
(Brownlee Nature 2001;414:813)
(Garcia Soriano et al Nature Medicine 2001;7:1)
Changing fenotype
Influence on prognosis
Benefits with glucose lowering therapy
In acute coronary syndromes
Cardiovascular long-term safety
Hyperglycemia and acute coronary syndromes
Efficacy of different glucose lowering drugs
Biguanides
Sulfonylureas
Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors
Glitazones (TZDs)
Incretin enhancers/GLP-analogs
0.5 - 1.0
1.0 - 1.5
Insulin 1.0 - 2.0
1.0 – 1.3
1.0 - 1.5
1.0 - 1.5
Documented glucose lowering capacity
Drug Decrease in HbA1c (%)
Rationale for insulin administration in ACS patients
Potential
benefits with
insulin
in acute illness
Antihrombotic
TF PAI-1
Glucose
lowering
Vasodilation
Platelet inhibition
NO-release
eNOS cAMP
Antioxidant
ROS
Cardioprotective
Neuroprotective
Antiapoptocic
Antiinflammatory
NF-B MCP-1
ICAM 1 CRP
(After Dandona et al Rev Cardiovasc Med 2006; 7: S25)
Rationale for insulin administration in ACS patients
Glucose-Insulin-Potassium for Acute Myocardial Infarction:
Continuing Controversy Over Cardioprotection
Robert A Kloner and Richard W Nesto
Circulation 2008; 117: 2523 – 2533
Rationale for insulin administration in ACS patients
Metabolic modulationGlucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion (GIK)
Metabolic controlGlucose lowering
Myocardial infarction
STEMI
n = 20 201
Infusion 24 hours
25 % glucose
Insulin 50 IU/L
80 mEq/L potassium
Rate 1.5 ml/kg/h
HR=1.03 (0.95-1.13) p=0.45
Metabolic modulation with GIK in myocardial infarction
The CREATE-ECLA study
(CREATE-ECLA investigators JAMA 2005;293:437)
Plasma Glucose
mmol/L
9.0 10.4 8.2 8.6 7.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
APG 6h 24h
Infusion
Control
Glucose-insulin-potassium in myocardial infarction
The CREATE-ECLA study
(CREATE-ECLA investigators JAMA 2005;293:437)
RR = 0.72 [0.92-0.55] p = 0.011
Absolute reduction 11%
Controls
Intensive
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Year
Mortality
Mean follow-up 3.4 år (1.6-5.6)
(Malmberg for DIGAMI study group Brit Med J 1997, 314:1512)
Long-term mortality in DIGAMI 1
Reduction in HbA1c 1%
Glucose loweringPatients with myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes
Group 1 (insulin+insulin)
Group 2 (insulin+conventional)
Group 3 (conventional)
(Malmberg et al Eur Heart J 2005;26:650)
Suspect MI + Type 2 diabetesor B-glucose >11 mmol/L
Long-term outcome in DIGAMI 2
Glucose loweringPatients with myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes
Group 1 (insulin+insulin)
Group 2 (insulin+conventional)
Group 3 (conventional)
Number at risk474 367 299 254 202 154 87473 381 317 261 225 170 91306 241 214 175 145 119 80Group 3
Group 1Group 2
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 Years0
Group 1 vs Group 3
HR = 1.22 (0.95 - 1.56) p = 0.115
Event ra
te (
%)
(Malmberg et al Eur Heart J 2005;26:650)
Long-term outcome in DIGAMI 2
Glucose loweringPatients with myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
mmol/L
Baseline 24 h 3 6 12 18 24 30 36 months0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
No Group 1 469 454 329 313 295 228 197 144 114Group 2 469 452 331 320 304 219 195 151 108Group 3 304 282 214 199 184 154 125 98 77
*
DIGAMI 2Blood glucose over time by treatment group
(Malmberg et al Eur Heart J 2005;26:650)
1.93 (1.18-1.3.17)
1.48 (1.09-1.99)
≥6.6 mmol/L/ ≥120 mg/dl
(n=276; 107 deaths)
3.1-6.5 mmol/L/ 56-119 mg/dl
(n=364; 101 deaths)
≤3.0 mmol/L/ ≤55 mg/dl
(n=44; 20 deaths)
Reference
-3.5 -2.5 -1.5 -.5 .5 1.5 2.5 3.5
Hypoglycemia and acute coronary syndromes
(Svensson et al Eur Heart J 2005;26:1255)
Lowest blood glucose during hospitalisation for MI
713 patients with diabetes
Adjusted 2-year mortality
Symptomatic hypoglycemia during hospitalisation
in DIGAMI 2
(Mellbin et al. Heart 2009; 95:721)
0.50 0.70 1.00 1.45 2.00 4.00
Unadjusted
Unadjusted
Unadjusted
Unadjusted:Adjusted
UnadjustedAdjusted
UnadjustedAdjusted
0.50 0.70 1.00 1.45 2.00 4.00
Symptomatic hypoglycemia during hospitalisation
in DIGAMI 2
Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, diabetes duration, previous MI, CHF,
renal function, PCI and CABG and updated mean fasting glucose
Symptomatic hypoglycemia n=45
Cardiovascular mortality
(Mellbin et al. Heart 2009; 95:721)
Total mortality
Death/Stroke/Reinfarction
Hypoglycaemic events identifies patients at high
risk by other reasons
e.g. low body weight and long diabetes duration
Insulin and cardiovascular events in DIGAMI 2
(Mellbin et al. Europ Heart J 2008; 29:166)
Impact of various glucose lowering treatments on CV-events
Composite MI and stroke
Glucose lowering treatment in myocardial infarction
Impact of various
glucose lowering
treatments on
mortality, morbidity and
malignancies during
extended follow up
Median 4.1 years
(interquartile range = 2.6–5.4
max 8.3)
Insulin and cardiovascular events in DIGAMI 2
(Mellbin and Rydén Data on file )
Insulin and malignancies in DIGAMI 2
(Mellbin and Rydén Data on file )
(Deedwania et al. Circulation 2008;17:1610)
Glycemic control and acute coronary syndromesSummary of studies in patients with ACS and hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia and Acute coronary Syndrome. A Scientific Statement
from the American Heart Association Diabetes Committee
of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism
P Deewania, Kosiborod M, Barret E, Ceriello A, Isley W, Mazzone T
and Raskin P
Circulation 2008; 17:1610
Study Glucose difference Outcome
(intensive vs. control)
DIGAMI I 9.6 vs 11.7 mmol/l (24-h) 1- year mortality 19 vs 26%
DIGAMI 2 No significant 2-year mortality no differenceTarget not reached intensive group
CREATE-ECLAHigher 24 h-glucose in GIK-group 30-day mortality no difference
(8.6 vs. 7.5 mmol/l)
”Control of hyperglycemia may be more critical
than the dose of insulin administered”
Glycemic control and acute coronary syndromesSummary of studies in patients with ACS and hyperglycemia
Metabolic support with high dose GIK has no role in the treatment of ST-elevation AMI
Hyperglycaemia is an important independent risk factor for future events following AMI
Diabetic patients should have an intensive glucose control after an AMI. Normalisation!?
Hypoglycaemic episodes during hospitalization do not influence long-term prognosis. Some patients more vulnerable
Agents used for long-term glucose control may play an important role for future morbidity and mortality
Thanks for the attention!!!
Management of diabetes in patients with
coronary artery disease
Acute coronary
syndromes