adam s. levy, et al. v. thomas gutierrez, et al. 14-cv...

161
EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 161

Upload: others

Post on 07-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

EXHIBIT 1

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 1 of 161

Page 2: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

ADAM S. LEVY on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS GUTIERREZ, RICHARD J. GAYNOR, RAJA BAL, J. MICHAL CONAWAY, KATHLEEN A. COTE, ERNEST L. GODSHALK, MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL, MARY PETROVICH, ROBERT E. SWITZ, NOEL G. WATSON, THOMAS WROE, JR., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., CANACCORD GENUITY INC., AND APPLE, INC.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL

ECF CASE

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT WITH INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Individual Defendants, dated as of

January 26, 2018 (the “Stipulation”) is entered into between (a) lead plaintiff Douglas Kurz (“Lead

Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself and the Settlement Class (defined below); (b) Strategic Master

Fund (Cayman) Limited and Highmark Limited, in respect of its Segregated Account Highmark

Fixed Income 2 (the “Securities Act Plaintiffs”); and (c) defendants Thomas Gutierrez

(“Gutierrez”), Richard Gaynor (“Gaynor”), Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal (“Bal”), Hoil Kim

(“Kim”), Daniel W. Squiller (“Squiller”), J. Michal Conaway (“Conaway”), Kathleen A. Cote

(“Cote”), Ernest L. Godshalk (“Godshalk”), Matthew E. Massengill (“Massengill”), Mary

Petrovich (“Petrovich”), Robert E. Switz (“Switz”), Noel G. Watson (“Watson”), and Thomas

Wroe, Jr. (“Wroe”) (collectively, the “Individual Defendants,” and together with Lead Plaintiff

and the Securities Act Plaintiffs, the “Settling Parties”), and embodies the terms and conditions of

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 2 of 161

Page 3: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

2

the settlement between the Settling Parties.1 Subject to the approval of the Court and the terms

and conditions expressly provided herein, this Stipulation is intended to fully, finally, and forever

compromise, settle, release, resolve, and dismiss with prejudice the Released Claims (as defined

below), subject to the approval of the Court and the terms and conditions set forth in this

Stipulation.

This Stipulation does not settle or otherwise impact (a) any of the claims asserted in the

Action (defined below) against Defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co.

LLC (f/k/a Goldman Sachs & Co.), and Canaccord Genuity Inc. (collectively, the “Underwriter

Defendants”), which are the subject of a proposed settlement with the Underwriter Defendants (the

“Underwriter Defendant Settlement”) or (b) any of the claims asserted in the Action against

Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”), which Lead Plaintiff continues to prosecute.

WHEREAS:

A. Beginning on or about October 9, 2014, multiple putative securities class action

complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (the

“Court”). By Order dated February 4, 2015, the Court consolidated the related actions into the

present action (the “Action”).

B. Pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77z-

1 and 78u-4, as amended (the “PSLRA”), notice to the public was issued setting forth the deadline

by which putative class members could move the Court to be appointed to act as lead plaintiff. On

May 20, 2015, the Court entered an Order appointing Douglas Kurz as Lead Plaintiff in the Action,

1 All terms with initial capitalization not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in ¶ 1 herein.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 3 of 161

Page 4: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

3

and approving Lead Plaintiff’s selection of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP as Lead

Counsel and Orr & Reno as Local Counsel.

C. On July 20, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed and served the Consolidated Class Action

Complaint (the “Complaint”), which included Vance K. Opperman (“Opperman”), and the

Securities Act Plaintiffs as additional named plaintiffs (together, the “Additional Named

Plaintiffs”; and together with Lead Plaintiff, the “Plaintiffs”). The Complaint asserted (a) claims

under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5

promulgated thereunder, against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, and Gutierrez; (b) claims under § 20(a)

of the Exchange Act against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, Gutierrez, Kim, Squiller, and Apple; (c)

claims under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) against Defendants Gaynor,

Bal, Gutierrez, Conaway, Cote, Godshalk, Massengill, Petrovich, Switz, Watson, Wroe, and the

Underwriter Defendants; (d) claims under § 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Underwriter

Defendants; and (e) claims under § 15 of the Securities Act against Defendants Gaynor, Kim,

Gutierrez, Squiller, Conaway, Cote, Godshalk, Massengill, Petrovich, Switz, Watson, Wroe, and

Apple.

D. On October 7, 2015, the Individual Defendants (and the other Defendants) filed and

served their motions to dismiss the Complaint. On December 18, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed and

served his papers in opposition to the motions to dismiss; on March 2, 2016, the Individual

Defendants (and the other Defendants) filed and served their reply papers; and, on March 22, 2016,

Lead Plaintiff filed his sur-reply.

E. On March 17, 2017, Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and the

Underwriter Defendants entered into a Memorandum of Understanding memorializing their

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 5: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

4

agreement in principle to settle the Action as against the Underwriter Defendants for $9,700,000

in cash (the “Underwriter Defendant Settlement”).

F. On May 4, 2017, the Court entered its Memorandum Opinion denying in part and

granting in part the motions to dismiss filed by the Individual Defendants and Apple, and denying

the Underwriter Defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice to their ability to re-submit the

motion if necessary. Lead Plaintiff’s remaining claims following the Court’s ruling on Defendants’

Motions to Dismiss include: (i) claims under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act against

Defendants Bal, Gaynor, and Gutierrez; (ii) claims under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act

against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, Gutierrez, Kim, and Squiller; (iii) a claim under Section 20(a) of

the Exchange Act against Apple; (iv) claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act against

Defendants Gaynor, Bal, Gutierrez, Conaway, Cote, Godshalk, Massengill, Petrovich, Switz,

Watson, Wroe, and the Underwriter Defendants; (v) claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities

Act against the Underwriter Defendants; (vi) claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against

Defendants Gutierrez, Gaynor, Kim, and Squiller; and (vii) a claim under Section 15 of the

Securities Act against Apple.

G. On August 18, 2017, Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and the

Underwriter Defendants entered into the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Settling

Underwriter Defendants (the “Underwriter Defendant Stipulation”) setting forth the final terms

and conditions of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement. On September 11, 2017, Lead Plaintiff

moved for preliminary approval of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

H. On October 2, 2017, Lead Counsel and the remaining Defendants’ Counsel

participated in a full day mediation session before retired United States District Court Judge Layn

R. Phillips (the “Mediator”). In advance of that session, the parties exchanged detailed mediation

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 5 of 161

Page 6: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

5

statements and exhibits to the Mediator, which addressed the issues of both liability and damages.

As a result of extensive, arm’s-length negotiations at the mediation session, the parties reached an

agreement in principle to settle the Action as against the Individual Defendants for $27,000,000 in

cash.

I. On October 13, 2017, Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants entered into a

Settlement Term Sheet (the “Term Sheet”) memorializing the Settling Parties’ agreement to settle

the Action as against the Individual Defendants, subject to the negotiation of the terms of a formal,

final stipulation of settlement and approval of the Court.

J. On November 10, 2017, the Settling Parties informed the Court that they had

reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the claims against the Individual Defendants, asked the

Court to adjourn the Individual Defendants’ deadline to file their Answer(s), and requested that

the Court adjudicate preliminary approval of this Settlement with the Individual Defendants

together with preliminary approval of the Underwriter Defendants. ECF No. 163. The Court

granted the relief requested in the Notice of Partial Settlement on November 13, 2017, and by

Orders dated December 20, 2017 and January 16, 2017, granted the Settling Parties’ request to

extend the deadline by which they would finalize the settlement documentation for this Settlement.

K. This Stipulation (together with the exhibits hereto) reflects the final and binding

agreement between the Settling Parties.

L. Based upon their investigation, prosecution, and settlement of the case, Lead

Plaintiff and Lead Counsel have concluded that the terms and conditions of this Stipulation are

fair, reasonable, and adequate to Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Class, and in their best interests.

Based on Lead Plaintiff’s direct oversight of the prosecution of this matter and with the advice of

his counsel, Lead Plaintiff has agreed to settle and release the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims (as

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 6 of 161

Page 7: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

6

defined below) as against the Individual Defendant Releasees pursuant to the terms and provisions

of this Stipulation, after considering, among other things: (a) the substantial financial benefit that

the Settlement Class will receive under the proposed Settlement; and (b) the significant risks and

costs of continued litigation and trial.

M. All of the Individual Defendants deny, and continue to deny, that they have

committed any act or omission giving rise to any liability under the Exchange Act or the Securities

Act. Specifically, the Individual Defendants expressly have denied, and continue to deny, each

and all of the claims alleged by Lead Plaintiff in the Action, including without limitation, any

liability arising out of any of the conduct, statements, acts, or omissions alleged, or that could have

been alleged, in the Action. The Individual Defendants also have denied, and continue to deny,

among other allegations, the allegations that Lead Plaintiff or the Settlement Class have suffered

any damage, or that the Lead Plaintiff or the Settlement Class were harmed by the conduct alleged

in the Action or that could have been alleged as part of the Action. In addition, the Individual

Defendants maintain that they have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Action.

N. As set forth below, neither the Settlement nor any of the terms of this Stipulation

shall constitute an admission or finding of any fault, liability, wrongdoing, or damage whatsoever

or any infirmity in the defenses that the Individual Defendants have, or could have, asserted. The

Individual Defendants are entering into this Stipulation solely to eliminate the burden and expense

of further litigation. The Individual Defendants have determined that it is desirable and beneficial

to them that the Action be settled in the manner and upon the terms and conditions set forth in this

Stipulation. Similarly, this Stipulation shall in no event be construed or deemed to be evidence of

or an admission or concession on the part of Plaintiffs of any infirmity in any of the claims asserted

in the Action, or an admission or concession that any of the Individual Defendants’ defenses to

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 7 of 161

Page 8: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

7

liability had any merit. Each of the Settling Parties recognizes and acknowledges, however, that

the Action has been initiated, filed, and prosecuted by Plaintiffs in good faith and defended by the

Individual Defendants in good faith, and that the Action as to the Individual Defendants is being

voluntarily settled with the advice of counsel.

NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Lead

Plaintiff (individually and on behalf of the Settlement Class) and the Individual Defendants, by

and through their respective undersigned attorneys and subject to the approval of the Court

pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that, in consideration of the benefits

flowing to the Settling Parties from the Settlement, all Released Plaintiffs’ Claims as against the

Individual Defendant Releasees and all Released Individual Defendants’ Claims as against the

Plaintiff Releasees shall be settled and released, upon and subject to the terms and conditions set

forth below.

DEFINITIONS

1. As used in this Stipulation and any exhibits attached hereto and made a part hereof,

the following capitalized terms shall have the following meanings:

(a) “Action” means the consolidated securities class action in the matter styled

Levy v. Gutierrez, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL, and includes all actions consolidated therein.

(b) “Additional Named Plaintiffs” means Vance K. Opperman and the

Securities Act Plaintiffs.

(c) “Apple” means defendant Apple, Inc.

(d) “Authorized Claimant” means a Settlement Class Member who or which

submits a Proof of Claim Form to the Claims Administrator that is approved by the Court for

payment from the Net Settlement Fund.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 8 of 161

Page 9: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

8

(e) “Claim” means a Proof of Claim Form submitted to the Claims

Administrator.

(f) “Claim Form” or “Proof of Claim Form” means the form, substantially in

the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2 to Exhibit A, that a Claimant must complete and submit to

the Claims Administrator in order to be eligible to share in a distribution of the Net Settlement

Fund and the net proceeds of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement (and, if applicable, the net

proceeds of any other recoveries obtained in the Action).

(g) “Claimant” means a person or entity who or which submits a Claim Form

to the Claims Administrator seeking to be eligible to share in the Net Settlement Fund and the net

proceeds of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement (and, if applicable, the net proceeds of any other

recoveries obtained in the Action).

(h) “Claims Administrator” means the firm retained by Lead Plaintiff and Lead

Counsel, subject to approval of the Court, to provide all notices approved by the Court to potential

class members in the Action and to administer settlements or other recoveries achieved in the

Action.

(i) “Class Distribution Order” means an order entered by the Court authorizing

and directing that the Net Settlement Fund be distributed, in whole or in part, to Authorized

Claimants.

(j) “Complaint” means the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed in the

Action on July 20, 2015.

(k) “Court” means the United States District Court for the District of New

Hampshire.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 9 of 161

Page 10: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

9

(l) “Davis Action” means the action captioned Davis v. Gutierrez, et al., Civil

Action No. 1:17-cv-147-JL (D.N.H.).

(m) “Defendants” means the Individual Defendants, the Underwriter

Defendants, and Apple.

(n) “Effective Date” with respect to the Settlement means the first date by

which all of the events and conditions specified in ¶ 37 of this Stipulation have been met and have

occurred or have been waived.

(o) “Escrow Account” means an account maintained at Valley National Bank

wherein the Settlement Amount shall be deposited and held in escrow under the control of Lead

Counsel.

(p) “Escrow Agent” means Valley National Bank.

(q) “Escrow Agreement” means the agreement between Lead Counsel and the

Escrow Agent setting forth the terms under which the Escrow Agent shall maintain the Escrow

Account.

(r) “Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claims” means (i) any claims by any governmental

entity arising out of any governmental investigation of GTAT, the Individual Defendants, or any

of GTAT’s respective former or current officers or directors relating to the wrongful conduct

alleged in the Action;2 (ii) any claims asserted, or which may be asserted, in the Action against

any of the Underwriter Defendants or Apple; (iii) any claims of any person or entity who or which

submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court; (iv) any

2 For the avoidance of doubt, the above-referenced exclusion for claims by any governmental entity is set forth above only to clarify that the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not affect the rights that any governmental entity may have to assert a claim against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees, and it does not preserve for any Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member any right to assert a claim on the basis of that exclusion from the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 10 of 161

Page 11: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

10

claims asserted in the Davis Action; and (v) any claims relating to the enforcement of the

Settlement.

(s) “Excluded Individual Defendants’ Claims” means (i) any claims against

any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Settlement Class that

is accepted by the Court; and (ii) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement.

(t) “Final,” with respect to the Judgment, or any other court order, means when

the last of the following shall occur: (i) the expiration of the time to file a motion to alter or amend

the Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) without any such motion having been

filed; (ii) if no appeal is filed, the expiration date of the time provided for filing or noticing any

appeal under the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, i.e., thirty (30) days after entry of the

judgment or order; or (iii) if a motion to alter or amend is filed or if there is an appeal from the

judgment or order, (a) the date of final dismissal of all such motions or appeals, or the final

dismissal of any proceeding on certiorari or otherwise, or (b) the date the judgment or order is

finally affirmed on a motion or appeal, the expiration of the time to file a petition for a writ of

certiorari or other form of review, or the denial of a writ of certiorari or other form of review, and,

if certiorari or other form of review is granted, the date of final affirmance following review

pursuant to that grant. However, any appeal or proceeding seeking subsequent judicial review

pertaining solely to an order issued with respect to (i) attorneys’ fees, costs or expenses, or (ii) the

plan of allocation of Settlement proceeds (as submitted or subsequently modified), shall not in any

way delay or preclude the Judgment from becoming Final.

(u) “GTAT” means GT Advanced Technologies Inc.

(v) “GTAT Call Options” means publicly traded call options on GTAT

Common Stock.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 11 of 161

Page 12: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

11

(w) “GTAT Put Options” means publicly traded put options on GTAT Common

Stock.

(x) “GTAT Securities” means GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes,

GTAT Call Options, and GTAT Put Options.

(y) “GTAT Senior Notes” means GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due

2020.

(z) “Immediate Family” means children, stepchildren, parents, stepparents,

spouses, siblings, mothers-in-law, fathers-in-law, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, brothers-in-law,

and sisters-in-law. As used in this definition, “spouse” shall mean a husband, a wife, or a partner

in a state-recognized domestic relationship or civil union.

(aa) “Individual Defendants” means defendants Thomas Gutierrez, Richard

Gaynor, Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal, Hoil Kim, and Daniel W. Squiller (the “Officer Defendants”)

and defendants J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill,

Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson, and Thomas Wroe, Jr. (the “Director

Defendants”).

(bb) “Individual Defendants’ Counsel” means the laws firm of Ropes & Gray

LLP, counsel for Hoil Kim; Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, counsel for Thomas Gutierrez, Daniel

Squiller, and Richard Gaynor; Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, counsel for Kanwardev Raja Singh

Bal; and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, counsel for J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote,

Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson,

and Thomas Wroe, Jr.

(cc) “Individual Defendant Releasees” means (i) the Individual Defendants and

their attorneys, (ii) the respective Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors,

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 12 of 161

Page 13: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

12

estates, administrators, beneficiaries, agents, affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors,

predecessors-in-interest, successors, successors-in-interest, assigns, attorneys, advisors, and

associates of each of the foregoing, (iii) all current and former directors, officers, and employees

of GTAT, and (iv) the Insureds, in their capacities as such; provided, however, that the Individual

Defendant Releasees do not include the Underwriter Defendants or Apple.

(dd) “Investment Vehicle” means any investment company or pooled

investment fund, including, but not limited to, mutual fund families, exchange-traded funds, fund

of funds, and hedge funds, in which any of the Underwriter Defendants have, has, or may have a

direct or indirect interest, or as to which any of their respective affiliates may act as an investment

advisor but of which any of the Underwriter Defendants or any of their respective affiliates is not

a majority owner or does not hold a majority beneficial interest. This definition of Investment

Vehicle does not bring into the Settlement Class any of the Underwriter Defendants themselves.

(ee) “Insureds” means any and all insured persons or entities under the following

directors and officers liability insurance policies issued to GTAT for the period September 30,

2014 to September 30, 2015: ACE Policy No. G24571580 004; National Union Policy No. 01-

585-01-37; Continental Policy No. 425181360; National Casualty Policy No. XMO1400627;

Federal Insurance Policy No. 8224-4350; and XL Policy No. ELU136045-14.

(ff) “Judgment” means the final judgment, substantially in the form attached

hereto as Exhibit B, to be entered by the Court approving the Settlement.

(gg) “Lead Counsel” means the law firm of Bernstein Litowitz Berger &

Grossmann LLP.

(hh) “Lead Plaintiff” means Douglas Kurz.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 13 of 161

Page 14: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

13

(ii) “Litigation Expenses” means reasonable costs and expenses incurred in

connection with commencing, prosecuting, and settling the Action (which may include the costs

and expenses of Plaintiffs directly related to their representation of the Settlement Class), for which

Lead Counsel intends to apply to the Court for reimbursement from the Settlement Fund.

(jj) “Local Counsel” means Orr & Reno P.A.

(kk) “Net Settlement Fund” means the Settlement Fund less: (i) any Taxes and

Tax Expenses; (ii) any Notice and Administration Costs; (iii) any Litigation Expenses awarded by

the Court; and (iv) any attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court.

(ll) “Notice” means the Notice of (i) Pendency of Class Action and Certification

of Settlement Classes; (ii) Proposed Settlements with Individual Defendants and Underwriter

Defendants; (iii) Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation

Expenses; and (iv) Settlement Fairness Hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as

Exhibit 1 to Exhibit A, which is to be mailed to Settlement Class Members.

(mm) “Notice and Administration Costs” means the reasonable costs, fees, and

expenses that are incurred by the Claims Administrator and/or Lead Counsel in connection with:

(i) providing notices to the Settlement Class (including, without limitation, mailing of the Notice

to Settlement Class Members and publication of the Summary Notice); and (ii) administering the

Settlement, including but not limited to the Claims process, as well as the reasonable costs, fees,

and expenses incurred in connection with the Escrow Account.

(nn) “Officer” means any officer as that term is defined in Securities and

Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f).

(oo) “Plaintiffs” means Lead Plaintiff and the Additional Named Plaintiffs.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 14 of 161

Page 15: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

14

(pp) “Plaintiffs’ Counsel” means Lead Counsel and all other legal counsel who,

at the direction and under the supervision of Lead Counsel, performed services on behalf of the

Settlement Class in the Action.

(qq) “Plaintiff Releasees” means (i) Plaintiffs, their attorneys, and all other

Settlement Class Members; (ii) the current and former parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors,

predecessors, assigns, and assignees of each of the foregoing in (i); and (iii) the current and former

officers, directors, Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, estates,

administrators, beneficiaries, agents, affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors, predecessors-in-

interest, successors, successors-in-interest, assigns, attorneys, advisors, and associates of the each

of the foregoing in (i) and (ii), in their capacities as such.

(rr) “Plan of Allocation” means the proposed plan set forth in the Notice to be

utilized for determining the allocation of the Net Settlement Fund and the net proceeds of the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

(ss) “Preliminary Approval Order” means the order, substantially in the form

attached hereto as Exhibit A, to be entered by the Court preliminarily approving the Settlement

and directing that notice of the Settlement be provided to the Settlement Class.

(tt) “PSLRA” means the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15

U.S.C. §§ 77z-1 and 78u-4, as amended.

(uu) “Released Claims” means all Released Plaintiffs’ Claims and Released

Individual Defendants’ Claims.

(vv) “Released Individual Defendants’ Claims” means all claims and causes of

action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising

under federal, state, common, or foreign law, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution,

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 15 of 161

Page 16: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

15

prosecution, or settlement of the claims against the Individual Defendants. Released Individual

Defendants’ Claims do not include any Excluded Individual Defendants’ Claims.

(ww) “Released Plaintiffs’ Claims” or “Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’

Claims” means any and all claims, rights, duties, controversies, obligations, demands, actions, debts,

sums of money, suits, contracts, agreements, promises, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities,

allegations, arguments, and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims

or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory, administrative,

or foreign law, or any other law, rule or regulation, at law or in equity, whether class or individual

in nature, whether fixed or contingent, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether liquidated or

unliquidated, whether matured or unmatured, that Plaintiffs or any other member of the Settlement

Class (a) asserted in the Action, or (b) could have asserted in any forum that arise out of, are based

upon, or relate to the allegations, transactions, acts, facts, matters, occurrences, statements,

representations or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint and that relate to

the purchase or acquisition of GTAT publicly traded Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, or

GTAT Call Options, or the sale of GTAT Put Options, during the Settlement Class Period.

Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not cover or include any Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claims.

(xx) “Releasee(s)” means each and any of the Individual Defendant Releasees

and each and any of the Plaintiff Releasees.

(yy) “Releases” means the releases set forth in ¶¶ 5-7 of this Stipulation.

(zz) “Securities Act Plaintiffs” means named plaintiffs Strategic Master Fund

(Cayman) Limited and Highmark Limited, in respect of its Segregated Account Highmark Fixed

Income 2.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 16 of 161

Page 17: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

16

(aaa) “Settlement” means the resolution of the Action as against the Individual

Defendants on the terms and conditions set forth in this Stipulation.

(bbb) “Settlement Amount” or “Individual Defendant Settlement Amount” means

Twenty Seven Million Dollars ($27,000,000.00) in cash to be paid by wire transfer or check to the

Escrow Account pursuant to ¶ 9 of this Stipulation.

(ccc) “Settlement Class” or “Individual Defendant Settlement Class” means all

persons and entities who or which from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard

Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired publicly

traded GTAT common stock (“GTAT Common Stock”) and/or GTAT Senior Notes, purchased or

otherwise acquired GTAT Call Options, or sold (wrote) publicly traded GTAT Put Options, and

were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants; GTAT; the affiliates

and subsidiaries of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple; the Officers, directors, and

partners of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple during the Class Period; members of

the Immediate Family of any excluded person; the heirs, successors, and assigns of any excluded

person or entity; and any entity in which any excluded person or entity has or had during the Class

Period a controlling interest; provided, however, that any Investment Vehicle (as defined herein)

shall not be deemed an excluded person or entity by definition. Also excluded from the Settlement

Class are any persons and entities who or which exclude themselves from the Settlement Class by

submitting a request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court.

(ddd) “Settlement Class Member” or “Individual Defendant Settlement Class

Member” means each person and entity who or which is a member of the Settlement Class.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 17 of 161

Page 18: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

17

(eee) “Settlement Class Period,” “Individual Defendant Settlement Class Period,”

or “Class Period” means the period from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard

Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive.

(fff) “Settlement Fund” or “Individual Defendant Settlement Fund” means the

Settlement Amount plus any and all interest earned thereon.

(ggg) “Settlement Hearing” means the hearing set by the Court under

Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to consider final approval of the Settlement.

(hhh) “Settling Parties” means (i) the Individual Defendants and (ii) Lead Plaintiff

and the Securities Act Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class.

(iii) “Summary Notice” means the Summary Notice of (i) Pendency of Class

Action and Certification of Settlement Classes; (ii) Proposed Settlements with Individual

Defendants and Underwriter Defendants; (iii) Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and

Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; and (iv) Settlement Fairness Hearing, substantially in the

form attached hereto as Exhibit 3 to Exhibit A, to be published as set forth in the Preliminary

Approval Order.

(jjj) “Taxes” means: (i) all federal, state, and/or local taxes of any kind

(including any estimated taxes, interest or penalties thereon) arising with respect to any income

earned by the Settlement Fund, including any including any taxes or tax detriments that may be

imposed upon the Released Persons or their counsel with respect to any income earned by the

Settlement Fund for any period after the deposit of the Settlement Amount in the Escrow Account

during which the Settlement Fund does not qualify as a “qualified settlement fund” for federal or

state income tax purposes; and (ii) all taxes imposed on payments by the Settlement Fund,

including withholding taxes.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 18 of 161

Page 19: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

18

(kkk) “Tax Expenses” means the expenses and costs incurred by Lead Counsel in

connection with determining the amount of, and paying, any taxes owed by the Settlement Fund

(including, without limitation, expenses of tax attorneys and/or accountants and mailing and

distribution costs and expenses relating to filing (or failing to file) tax returns for the Settlement

Fund.

(lll) “Underwriter Defendant Settlement” means the resolution of the Action as

against the Underwriter Defendants on the terms and conditions set forth in the Underwriter

Defendant Stipulation.

(mmm) “Underwriter Defendant Stipulation” means the Stipulation and

Agreement of Settlement with Settling Underwriter Defendants filed with the Court on September

11, 2017, and the Supplement thereto dated January 26, 2018.

(nnn) “Underwriter Defendants’” means defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC,

Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC (f/k/a Goldman, Sachs & Co.), and Canaccord Genuity Inc.

(ooo) “Unknown Claims” means any Released Plaintiffs’ Claims which Plaintiffs

or any other Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at

the time of the release of such claims, and any Released Individual Defendants’ Claims which any

Individual Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in his, her, or its favor at the time of the

release of such claims, which, if known by him, her, or it, might have affected his, her, or its

decision(s) with respect to this Settlement. With respect to any and all Released Claims, the

Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and

the Individual Defendants shall expressly waive, and each of the other Settlement Class Members

shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the Judgment shall have expressly waived,

any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 19 of 161

Page 20: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

19

United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable, or

equivalent to California Civil Code §1542, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.

The Settling Parties acknowledge that they may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different

from those which he, she, it or their counsel now knows or believes to be true with respect to the

subject matter of the Released Claims, but, upon the Effective Date of the Settlement, the Settling

Parties shall expressly settle and release, and each Settlement Class Member shall be deemed to

have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, settled and released any and all Released Claims

without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts.

Plaintiffs and the Individual Defendants acknowledge, and each of the other Settlement Class

Members shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver

was separately bargained for and a key element of the Settlement.

CLASS CERTIFICATION

2. Solely for purposes of the Settlement and for no other purpose, the Individual

Defendants stipulate and agree to: (a) certification of the Action as a class action pursuant to

Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of the Settlement Class;

(b) certification of Lead Plaintiff as Class Representative for the Settlement Class; and

(c) appointment of Lead Counsel as Class Counsel for the Settlement Class pursuant to Rule 23(g)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

3. Promptly upon execution of this Stipulation, Lead Plaintiff will move for

preliminary approval of the Settlement, certification of the Settlement Class for settlement

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 20 of 161

Page 21: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

20

purposes only, and the scheduling of a hearing for consideration of final approval of the Settlement,

which motion shall be unopposed by the Individual Defendants. Concurrently with the motion for

preliminary approval, Lead Plaintiff shall apply to the Court for, and the Individual Defendants

shall agree to, entry of the Preliminary Approval Order, substantially in the form attached hereto

as Exhibit A.

RELEASE OF CLAIMS

4. The obligations incurred pursuant to this Stipulation are in consideration of: (i) the

full and final disposition of the Action as against the Individual Defendants only; and (ii) the

Releases provided for herein.

5. Pursuant to the Judgment, without further action by anyone, upon the Effective

Date of the Settlement, Plaintiffs and each of the other Settlement Class Members, on behalf of

themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and

assigns in their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of the

Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved,

relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (including

Unknown Claims) against the Individual Defendants and the other Individual Defendant

Releasees, whether or not such Settlement Class Member executes and delivers the Proof of Claim

Form or shares in the Net Settlement Fund. Any Proof of Claim Form that is executed by a

Settlement Class Member shall include a release that permanently bars and enjoins such Settlement

Class Member from bringing any action asserting any of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against

any and all Individual Defendant Releasees. This Release shall not apply to any Excluded

Plaintiffs’ Claim.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 21 of 161

Page 22: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

21

6. If the Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date occurs, any

Settlement Class Member who or which does not timely and validly request exclusion from the

Settlement Class in the manner stated in the Preliminary Approval order: (a) shall be deemed to

have waived his, or her its right to be excluded from the Settlement Class; (b) shall be forever

barred from requesting exclusion from the Settlement Class in this or any other proceeding;

(c) shall be bound by the provisions of this Stipulation, the Settlement, and all proceedings,

determinations, orders, and judgments in the Action relating to the Settlement, whether favorable

or unfavorable to the Settlement Class, including but not limited to, the Judgment, and the release

of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against the Individual Defendant Releasees provided for therein;

and (d) shall be barred and enjoined from commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any of the

Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees.

7. Pursuant to the Judgment, without further action by anyone, upon the Effective

Date of the Settlement, the Individual Defendants, on behalf of themselves, and their respective

heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such,

shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of the Judgment shall have, fully, finally and

forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and

every Released Individual Defendants’ Claim (including Unknown Claims) against Lead Plaintiff

and the other Plaintiff Releasees, and shall forever be barred and enjoined from commencing,

maintaining, or prosecuting any or all of the Released Individual Defendants’ Claims against any

of the Plaintiff Releasees. This Release shall not apply to any Excluded Individual Defendants’

Claim.

8. Notwithstanding ¶¶ 5-7 above, nothing in the Judgment shall bar any action by any

of the Settling Parties to enforce or effectuate the terms of this Stipulation or the Judgment.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 22 of 161

Page 23: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

22

THE SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION

9. In consideration of the full settlement of the claims asserted in the Action against

the Individual Defendants and the Release specified in ¶¶ 5-6 above, the Individual Defendants

shall cause their insurance carriers to deposit the Settlement Amount into the Escrow Account

within twelve (12) business days of the later of: (a) the entry of the Preliminary Approval Order

substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A; or (b) the provision to Individual

Defendants’ Counsel of all information necessary to effectuate a transfer of funds to the Escrow

Account, including the bank name and ABA routing number, account number, and a signed Form

W-9 reflecting the taxpayer identification number for the Settlement Fund.

10. If the entire Settlement Amount is not timely deposited into the Escrow Account,

Lead Plaintiff may terminate the Settlement but only if: (a) Lead Counsel has notified Individual

Defendants’ Counsel of Lead Counsel’s intention to terminate the Settlement, and (b) the entire

Settlement Amount is not transferred to the Escrow Account within five (5) business days after

Individual Defendants’ Counsel receipt of such notice. If the Settlement is terminated pursuant to

this ¶ 10, the provisions of ¶ 39 below shall apply.

11. The Individual Defendants shall cause their insurance carriers to deposit the

Settlement Amount into the Escrow Account pursuant to ¶ 9 above, but shall have no individual

obligation to make any payment into the Settlement Fund, and shall have no responsibility or

liability with respect to the Escrow Account or the monies maintained in the Escrow Account,

including, without limitation, any responsibility or liability related to any fees, Taxes, Tax

Expenses, investment decisions, maintenance, supervision or distribution of any portion of the

Settlement Amount. Other than their payment obligation described in ¶ 9 above, the Individual

Defendants’ insurance carriers shall have no obligation to make any payment into the Escrow

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 23 of 161

Page 24: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

23

Account pursuant to this Stipulation, and shall have no responsibility or liability with respect to

the Escrow Account or the funds maintained in the Escrow Account, including, without limitation,

any responsibility or liability related to any fees, Taxes, Tax Expenses, investment decisions,

maintenance, supervision or distribution of any portion of the Settlement Amount.

USE OF SETTLEMENT FUND

12. The Settlement Fund shall be used to pay: (a) any Taxes and Tax Expenses; (b) any

Notice and Administration Costs; (c) any Litigation Expenses awarded by the Court; and (d) any

attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court. The balance remaining in the Settlement Fund, that is, the

Net Settlement Fund, shall be distributed to Authorized Claimants as provided in ¶¶ 23-34 below.

13. Except as provided herein or pursuant to orders of the Court, the Net Settlement

Fund shall remain in the Escrow Account prior to the Effective Date. All funds held by the Escrow

Agent shall be deemed to be in the custody of the Court and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction

of the Court until such time as the funds shall be distributed or returned pursuant to the terms of

this Stipulation and/or further order of the Court. The Escrow Agent shall invest any funds in the

Escrow Account exclusively in United States Treasury Bills (or a mutual fund invested solely in

such instruments) and shall collect and reinvest all interest accrued thereon, except that any

residual cash balances up to the amount that is insured by the FDIC may be deposited in any

account that is fully insured by the FDIC. In the event that the yield on United States Treasury

Bills is negative, in lieu of purchasing such Treasury Bills, all or any portion of the funds held by

the Escrow Agent may be deposited in any account that is fully insured by the FDIC or backed by

the full faith and credit of the United States. Additionally, if short-term placement of the funds is

necessary, all or any portion of the funds held by the Escrow Agent may be deposited in any

account that is fully insured by the FDIC or backed by the full faith and credit of the United States.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 24 of 161

Page 25: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

24

All risks related to the investment of the Settlement Fund shall be borne solely by the Settlement

Fund, and the Individual Defendant Releasees (as defined above) shall have no responsibility for,

interest in, or liability whatsoever with respect to investment decisions or the actions of the Escrow

Agent, or any transactions executed by the Escrow Agent.

14. The Escrow Agent shall not disburse the Settlement Fund except as provided in this

Stipulation. The Settling Parties agree that the Settlement Fund is intended to be a Qualified

Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1 and that Lead Counsel,

as administrator of the Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-

2(k)(3), shall be solely responsible for filing or causing to be filed all informational and other tax

returns as may be necessary or appropriate (including, without limitation, the returns described in

Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-2(k)) for the Settlement Fund. Lead Counsel shall also be

responsible for causing payment to be made from the Settlement Fund of any Taxes or Tax

Expenses owed with respect to the Settlement Fund. The Individual Defendant Releasees shall

not have any liability or responsibility for any such Taxes or Tax Expenses. Upon written request,

the Individual Defendants will provide to Lead Counsel the statement described in Treasury

Regulation § 1.468B-3(e). Lead Counsel, as administrator of the Settlement Fund within the

meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-2(k)(3), shall timely make such elections as are

necessary or advisable to carry out this paragraph, including, as necessary, making a “relation back

election,” as described in Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1(j), to cause the Qualified Settlement

Fund to come into existence at the earliest allowable date, and shall take or cause to be taken all

actions as may be necessary or appropriate in connection therewith.

15. All Taxes and Tax Expenses shall be paid out of the Settlement Fund, and in all

events the Individual Defendant Releasees and their counsel shall have no liability or responsibility

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 25 of 161

Page 26: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

25

whatsoever for the payment of Taxes or Tax Expenses. The Settlement Fund shall indemnify and

hold each of the Individual Defendant Releasees and their counsel harmless for Taxes and Tax

Expenses (including, without limitation, taxes payable by reason of any such indemnification).

Further, Taxes and Tax Expenses shall be timely paid by Lead Counsel out of the Settlement Fund

without prior order from the Court and Lead Counsel shall be authorized (notwithstanding

anything herein to the contrary) to withhold from distribution to Authorized Claimants any funds

necessary to pay such amounts, including the establishment of adequate reserves for any Taxes

and Tax Expenses (as well as any amounts that may be required to be withheld under Treas. Reg.

§1.468B-2(l)(2)). The Settling Parties hereto agree to cooperate with the Escrow Agent, each

other, and their tax attorneys and accountants to the extent reasonably necessary to carry out the

provisions of ¶¶ 14 and 15 of this Stipulation.

16. The Settlement is not a claims-made settlement. Upon the occurrence of the

Effective Date, no Individual Defendant, Individual Defendant Releasee, Individual Defendants’

insurance carrier, or any other person or entity who or which paid any portion of the Settlement

Amount shall have any right to the return of the Settlement Fund or any portion thereof for any

reason whatsoever, including without limitation, the number of Claim Forms submitted, the

collective amount of Recognized Claims of Authorized Claimants, the percentage of recovery of

losses, or the amounts to be paid to Authorized Claimants from the Net Settlement Fund.

17. Notwithstanding the fact that the Effective Date of the Settlement has not yet

occurred, Lead Counsel may pay from the Settlement Fund, without further approval from the

Individual Defendants or further order of the Court, all Notice and Administration Costs actually

incurred and paid or payable. Such costs and expenses shall include, without limitation, the actual

costs of printing and mailing the Notice, publishing the Summary Notice, reimbursements to

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 26 of 161

Page 27: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

26

nominee owners for forwarding the Notice to their beneficial owners, the administrative expenses

incurred and fees charged by the Claims Administrator in connection with providing notice,

administering the Settlement (including processing the submitted Claims), and the fees, if any, of

the Escrow Agent. In the event that the Settlement is terminated pursuant to the terms of this

Stipulation, all Notice and Administration Costs paid or incurred, including any related fees, shall

not be returned or repaid to the Individual Defendants, any of the other Individual Defendant

Releasees, the Individual Defendants’ insurance carriers, or any other person or entity who or

which paid any portion of the Settlement Amount. All Notice and Administration Costs paid or

incurred, including any related fees, shall be fairly allocated among the Settlement Fund and the

settlement proceeds from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES

18. Lead Counsel will apply to the Court for a collective award of attorneys’ fees to

Plaintiffs’ Counsel to be paid from (and out of) the Settlement Fund. Lead Counsel also will apply

to the Court for reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, which may include a request pursuant to

the PSLRA for reimbursement of Plaintiffs’ reasonable costs and expenses directly related to their

representation of the Settlement Class, to be paid from (and out of) the Settlement Fund. Lead

Counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses is not the subject

of any agreement between the Individual Defendants and Lead Plaintiff other than what is set forth

in this Stipulation.

19. Any attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses that are awarded by the Court shall be

paid to Lead Counsel immediately upon final approval of the Settlement by the Court and the

Court’s entry of the order awarding such fees and Litigation Expenses, notwithstanding the

existence of any timely filed objections thereto, or potential for appeal therefrom, or collateral

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 27 of 161

Page 28: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

27

attack on the Settlement or any part thereof, subject to Lead Counsel’s obligation to make

appropriate refunds or repayments to the Settlement Fund, plus accrued interest at the same net

rate as is earned by the Settlement Fund, if the Settlement is terminated pursuant to the terms of

this Stipulation or if, as a result of any appeal or further proceedings on remand, or successful

collateral attack, the award of attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses is reduced or reversed

and such order reducing or reversing the award has become Final. Lead Counsel shall make the

appropriate refund or repayment in full no later than twenty (20) business days after: (a) receiving

from Individual Defendants’ Counsel notice of the termination of the Settlement; or (b) any order

reducing or reversing the award of attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses has become Final.

Any refunds required pursuant to this section shall be the joint and several obligation of Lead

Counsel, Plaintiff’s Counsel, and Plaintiff that received fees or expenses to make appropriate

refunds or repayments to the Settlement Fund. Each such Lead Counsel, Plaintiff’s Counsel, or

Plaintiff receiving fees and expenses, as a condition of receiving such fees and expenses, on behalf

of itself and each partner and/or shareholder of it, agrees that such person or entity and its partners,

shareholders, and/or members are subject to the jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of

enforcing the provisions of this paragraph.

20. An award of attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses is not a necessary term of

this Stipulation, is not a condition of the Settlement embodied herein, and shall be considered

separately from the Court’s consideration of the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the

Settlement. Neither Lead Plaintiff nor Lead Counsel may cancel or terminate the Settlement based

on this Court’s or any appellate court’s ruling with respect to attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation

Expenses, and any appeal from any order awarding attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses or

any reversal or modification of any such order shall not affect or delay the finality of the Judgment.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 28 of 161

Page 29: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

28

21. Lead Counsel shall allocate the attorneys’ fees awarded amongst Plaintiffs’

Counsel in a manner which it, in good faith, believes reflects the contributions of such counsel to

the institution, prosecution, and settlement of the Action. The Individual Defendant Releasees

shall have no responsibility for or liability whatsoever with respect to the allocation or award of

attorneys’ fees or Litigation Expenses.

22. The attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses that are awarded to Plaintiffs’ Counsel

pursuant to this Stipulation shall be payable solely from the Settlement Fund. The Individual

Defendant shall have no responsibility for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to, any

payment of attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses to Plaintiffs’ Counsel pursuant to this

Stipulation. With the sole exception of their obligation to pay the Settlement Amount into the

Escrow Account as provided for in ¶ 9 above, the Individual Defendants’ insurers also shall have

no responsibility for, and no liability whatsoever with respect to, any payment of attorneys’ fees

and/or Litigation Expenses to Plaintiffs’ Counsel pursuant to this Stipulation.

NOTICE AND SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION

23. As part of the Preliminary Approval Order, Lead Plaintiff shall seek appointment

of a Claims Administrator. The Claims Administrator shall administer the Settlement, including

but not limited to the process of receiving, reviewing, and approving or denying Claims, under

Lead Counsel’s supervision and subject to the jurisdiction of the Court. Other than the Individual

Defendants’ obligation to assist Lead Counsel and the Claims Administrator in securing GTAT’s

securities holders records as provided in ¶ 24 below, none of the Individual Defendants, nor any

other Individual Defendant Releasees, shall have any involvement in or any responsibility,

authority, or liability whatsoever for the selection of the Claims Administrator, the Plan of

Allocation, the administration of the Settlement, the Claims process, or disbursement of the Net

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 29 of 161

Page 30: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

29

Settlement Fund, and shall have no liability whatsoever to any person or entity, including, but not

limited to, Lead Plaintiff, any other Settlement Class Members, or Lead Counsel in connection

with the foregoing. Individual Defendants’ Counsel shall cooperate in the administration of the

Settlement to the extent reasonably necessary to effectuate its terms.

24. In accordance with the terms of the Preliminary Approval Order to be entered by

the Court, Lead Counsel shall cause the Claims Administrator to mail the Notice to those members

of the Settlement Class as may be identified through reasonable effort. Lead Counsel shall also

cause the Claims Administrator to have the Summary Notice published in accordance with the

terms of the Preliminary Approval Order to be entered by the Court. For the purposes of

identifying and providing notice to the Settlement Class, the Individual Defendants will assist Lead

Counsel and the Claims Administrator in securing GTAT’s security lists (consisting of names and

addresses) of the holders of GTAT Securities during the Settlement Class Period.

25. The Claims Administrator shall receive Claims and determine first, whether the

Claim is a valid Claim, in whole or part, and second, each Authorized Claimant’s pro rata share

of the Net Settlement Fund as calculated pursuant to the proposed Plan of Allocation set forth in

the Notice attached hereto as Exhibit 1 to Exhibit A (or such other plan of allocation as the Court

approves).

26. The Plan of Allocation proposed in the Notice is not a necessary term of the

Settlement or of this Stipulation and it is not a condition of the Settlement or of this Stipulation

that any particular plan of allocation be approved by the Court. Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel

may not cancel or terminate the Settlement (or this Stipulation) based on the Court’s or any

appellate court’s ruling with respect to the Plan of Allocation or any other plan of allocation in this

Action. The Individual Defendants and the other Defendant Releasees shall not object in any way

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 30 of 161

Page 31: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

30

to the Plan of Allocation or to any other plan of allocation in this Action. No Individual Defendant,

nor any other Individual Defendant Releasees, shall have any involvement with or liability,

obligation or responsibility whatsoever for the application of the Court-approved plan of

allocation.

27. Any Settlement Class Member who or which does not submit a valid Claim Form

will not be entitled to receive any distribution from the Net Settlement Fund, but will otherwise be

bound by all of the terms of this Stipulation and Settlement, including the terms of the Judgment

to be entered in the Action and the Releases provided for herein and therein, and will be

permanently barred and enjoined from bringing any action, claim, or other proceeding of any kind

against the Individual Defendant Releasees with respect to the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims in the

event that the Effective Date occurs with respect to the Settlement.

28. Lead Counsel shall be responsible for supervising the administration of the

Settlement and the disbursement of the Net Settlement Fund subject to Court approval. No

Individual Defendant, or any other Individual Defendant Releasees, shall be permitted to review,

contest, or object to any Claim Form, or any decision of the Claims Administrator or Lead Counsel

with respect to accepting or rejecting any Claim for payment by a Settlement Class Member. Lead

Counsel shall have the right, but not the obligation, to waive what it deems to be formal or technical

defects in any Claim Forms submitted in the interests of achieving substantial justice.

29. For purposes of determining the extent, if any, to which a Settlement Class Member

shall be entitled to be treated as an Authorized Claimant, the following conditions shall apply:

(a) Each Settlement Class Member shall be required to submit a Claim Form

supported by such documents as are designated therein, including proof of the Claimant’s loss, or

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 31 of 161

Page 32: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

31

such other documents or proof as the Claims Administrator or Lead Counsel, in their discretion,

may deem acceptable;

(b) All Claims must be submitted by the date set by the Court in the Preliminary

Approval Order and specified in the Notice. Any Settlement Class Member who or which does

not timely and validly submit a Claim or whose Claim is not otherwise approved by the Court shall

be forever barred from receiving any distribution from the Net Settlement Fund or payment

pursuant to this Stipulation, but shall in all other respects be bound by all of the terms of this

Stipulation and the Settlement, including the terms of the Judgment and the Releases provided for

herein and therein, and will be permanently barred and enjoined from bringing any action, claim,

or other proceeding of any kind against any Individual Defendant Releasees with respect to any

Released Plaintiffs’ Claim. Provided that it is mailed by the claim-submission deadline, a Claim

Form shall be deemed to be submitted when postmarked, if received with a postmark indicated on

the envelope and if mailed by first-class mail and addressed in accordance with the instructions

thereon. In all other cases, the Claim Form shall be deemed to have been submitted on the date

when actually received by the Claims Administrator;

(c) Each Claim Form shall be submitted to and reviewed by the Claims

Administrator who shall determine in accordance with this Stipulation and the plan of allocation

the extent, if any, to which each Claim shall be allowed, subject to review by the Court pursuant

to subparagraph (e) below as necessary;

(d) Claim Forms that do not meet the submission requirements may be rejected.

Prior to rejecting a Claim in whole or in part, the Claims Administrator shall communicate with

the Claimant in writing, to give the Claimant the chance to remedy any curable deficiencies in the

Claim Form submitted. The Claims Administrator shall notify, in a timely fashion and in writing,

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 32 of 161

Page 33: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

32

all Claimants whose Claim the Claims Administrator proposes to reject in whole or in part, setting

forth the reasons therefor, and shall indicate in such notice that the Claimant whose Claim is to be

rejected has the right to a review by the Court if the Claimant so desires and complies with the

requirements of subparagraph (e) below; and

(e) If any Claimant whose Claim has been rejected in whole or in part desires

to contest such rejection, the Claimant must, within twenty (20) days after the date of mailing of

the notice required in subparagraph (d) above, serve upon the Claims Administrator a notice and

statement of reasons indicating the Claimant’s grounds for contesting the rejection along with any

supporting documentation, and requesting a review thereof by the Court. If a dispute concerning

a Claim cannot be otherwise resolved, Lead Counsel shall thereafter present the request for review

to the Court.

30. Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court

with respect to the Claimant’s Claim, and the Claim will be subject to investigation and discovery

under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provided, however, that such investigation and

discovery shall be limited to that Claimant’s status as a Settlement Class Member and the validity

and amount of the Claimant’s Claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of this Action

or of the Settlement in connection with the processing of Claim Forms.

31. Lead Counsel will apply to the Court, on notice to Individual Defendants’ Counsel,

for a Class Distribution Order: (a) approving the Claims Administrator’s administrative

determinations concerning the acceptance and rejection of the Claims submitted; (b) approving

payment of any administration fees and expenses associated with the administration of the

Settlement from the Escrow Account; and (c) if the Effective Date has occurred, directing payment

of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants from the Escrow Account.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 33 of 161

Page 34: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

33

32. Payment pursuant to the Class Distribution Order shall be final and conclusive

against all Settlement Class Members. All Settlement Class Members whose Claims are not

approved by the Court for payment shall be barred from participating in distributions from the Net

Settlement Fund, but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of this Stipulation and the

Settlement, including the terms of the Judgment to be entered in this Action and the Releases

provided for herein and therein, and will be permanently barred and enjoined from bringing any

action against any and all Individual Defendant Releasees with respect to any and all of the

Released Plaintiffs’ Claims.

33. No person or entity shall have any claim against Lead Plaintiff, Plaintiffs’ Counsel,

the Claims Administrator or any other agent designated by Lead Counsel, or the Individual

Defendant Releasees and/or their respective counsel, arising from distributions made substantially

in accordance with the Stipulation, the plan of allocation approved by the Court, or any order of

the Court. Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants, and their respective counsel, and Lead

Plaintiff’s damages expert and all other Releasees shall have no liability whatsoever for the

investment or distribution of the Settlement Fund or the Net Settlement Fund, the plan of

allocation, or the determination, administration, calculation, or payment of any claim or

nonperformance of the Claims Administrator, the payment or withholding of Taxes (including

interest and penalties) or Tax Expenses owed by the Settlement Fund, or any losses incurred in

connection therewith.

34. All proceedings with respect to the administration, processing, and determination

of Claims and the determination of all controversies relating thereto, including disputed questions

of law and fact with respect to the validity of Claims, shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the

Court. All Settlement Class Members, other Claimants, and the Settling Parties expressly waive

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 34 of 161

Page 35: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

34

trial by jury (to the extent any such right may exist) and any right of appeal or review with respect

to such determinations.

TERMS OF THE JUDGMENT

35. If the Settlement contemplated by this Stipulation is approved by the Court, Lead

Counsel and Individual Defendants’ Counsel shall request that the Court enter a Judgment,

substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B.

36. The Judgment shall contain a bar order (“Bar Order”) substantially in the form set

forth in Exhibit B that shall, upon the Effective Date, to the fullest extent provided by law, bar all

future claims and claims over by any individual or entity against any of the Individual Defendant

Releasees, and by the Individual Defendant Releasees against any individual or entity, for

(a) contribution or indemnity (or any other claim or claim over, however denominated on

whatsoever theory) arising out of or related to the claims or allegations asserted by Plaintiffs in the

Action, or (b) any other claim of any type, whether arising under state, federal, common, or foreign

law, for which the injury claimed is that person’s or entity’s actual or threatened liability to

Plaintiffs and/or members of the Settlement Class; provided, however, the Bar Order shall not

(a) release any of the Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claims; or (b) preclude the Individual Defendants from

seeking to enforce any rights of contribution or indemnification that any Individual Defendant may

have under any contract, and/or that any Individual Defendant may have against GTAT or any

successor entity, including but not limited to under any corporate charter, bylaw, or contract. The

Bar Order shall also provide that any final verdict or judgment that may be obtained by or on behalf

of the Settlement Class or a Settlement Class Member against any individual or entity subject to

the Bar Order shall be reduced by the greater of: (a) an amount that corresponds to the percentage

of responsibility of the Individual Defendants for common damages; or (b) the amount paid by or

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 35 of 161

Page 36: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

35

on behalf of the Individual Defendants to the Settlement Class or Settlement Class Member for

common damages. Nothing in the Bar Order or this Stipulation shall release any proofs of claim

that any of the Individual Defendants filed in the GTAT bankruptcy.

CONDITIONS OF SETTLEMENT AND EFFECT OF DISAPPROVAL, CANCELLATION OR TERMINATION

37. The Effective Date of the Settlement shall be deemed to occur on the occurrence or

waiver of all of the following events:

(a) the Court has entered the Preliminary Approval Order, substantially in the

form set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, as required by ¶ 3 above;

(b) the Settlement Amount has been deposited into the Escrow Account in

accordance with the provisions of ¶ 9 above;

(c) the Individual Defendants have not exercised their option to terminate the

Settlement pursuant ¶¶ 40 and 41 of this Stipulation;

(d) Lead Plaintiff has not exercised his option to terminate the Settlement

pursuant to ¶¶ 10 and 40 of this Stipulation; and

(e) the Court has approved the Settlement as described herein, following notice

to the Settlement Class and a hearing, as prescribed by Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, and entered the Judgment and the Judgment has become Final.

38. Upon the occurrence of all of the events referenced in ¶ 37 above, any and all

remaining interest or right of the Individual Defendants or their insurance carriers in or to the

Settlement Fund, if any, shall be absolutely and forever extinguished and the Releases herein shall

be effective.

39. If (i) the Individual Defendants exercise their right to terminate the Settlement as

provided in this Stipulation; (ii) Lead Plaintiff exercises his right to terminate the Settlement as

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 36 of 161

Page 37: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

36

provided in this Stipulation; (iii) the Court disapproves the Settlement; or (iv) the Effective Date

as to the Settlement otherwise fails to occur, then:

(a) the Settlement and the relevant portions of this Stipulation shall be canceled

and terminated;

(b) Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants shall revert to their respective

positions in the Action as of immediately prior to the execution of the Term Sheet on October 13,

2017;

(c) the terms and provisions of this Stipulation, with the exception of this ¶ 39

and ¶¶ 17, 19, 43 and 63 of this Stipulation, shall have no further force and effect with respect to

the Settling Parties and shall not be used in the Action or in any other proceeding for any purpose,

and any Judgment or order entered by the Court in accordance with the terms of this Stipulation

shall be treated as vacated, nunc pro tunc; and

(d) within five (5) business days after joint written notification of termination

is sent by Individual Defendants’ Counsel and Lead Counsel to the Escrow Agent, the Settlement

Fund (including accrued interest thereon and change in value as a result of the investment of the

Settlement Fund, and any funds received by Lead Counsel consistent with ¶ 19 above), less any

Notice and Administration Costs actually incurred, paid, or payable and less any Taxes and Tax

Expenses paid, due, or owing, shall be returned by the Escrow Agent to the parties who contributed

to the payment of the Settlement Amount in the same proportions as their respective contributions

as instructed by Individual Defendants’ Counsel. In the event that the funds received by Lead

Counsel consistent with ¶ 19 above have not been returned to the Settlement Fund within the five

(5) business days specified in this paragraph, those funds shall be returned by the Escrow Agent

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 37 of 161

Page 38: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

37

to the Individual Defendants (or such persons or entities as Individual Defendants’ Counsel may

direct) immediately upon their deposit into the Escrow Account consistent with ¶ 19 above.

40. It is further stipulated and agreed that Lead Plaintiff, on the one hand, and the

Individual Defendants (provided the Individual Defendant unanimously agree amongst

themselves), on the other hand, shall each have the right to terminate the Settlement and this

Stipulation, by providing written notice of their election to do so (“Termination Notice”) to the

other Settling Parties within thirty (30) days of: (a) the Court’s final refusal to enter the Preliminary

Approval Order in any material respect; (b) the Court’s final refusal to approve the Settlement or

any material part thereof; (c) the Court’s final refusal to enter the Judgment in any material respect

as to the Settlement; or (d) the date upon which the Judgment is modified or reversed in any

material respect by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit or the United States

Supreme Court, and the provisions of ¶ 39 above shall apply. However, any decision or

proceeding, whether in this Court or any appellate court, with respect to an application for

attorneys’ fees or reimbursement of Litigation Expenses or with respect to any plan of allocation

shall not be considered material to the Settlement, shall not affect the finality of the Judgment and

shall not be grounds for termination of the Settlement.

41. In addition to the grounds set forth in ¶ 40 above, the Individual Defendants,

provided they unanimously agree amongst themselves, shall have the unilateral right to terminate

the Settlement in the event that Settlement Class Members timely and validly requesting exclusion

from the Settlement Class meet the conditions set forth in the Individual Defendants’ confidential

supplemental agreement with Lead Plaintiff (the “Supplemental Agreement”), in accordance with

the terms of that agreement. The Supplemental Agreement, which is being executed concurrently

herewith, shall not be filed with the Court and its terms shall not be disclosed in any other manner

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 38 of 161

Page 39: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

38

(other than the statements herein and in the Notice, to the extent necessary, or as otherwise

provided in the Supplemental Agreement) unless and until the Court otherwise directs or a dispute

arises between Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants concerning its interpretation or

application, in which event the Settling Parties shall submit the Supplemental Agreement to the

Court in camera and request that the Court afford it confidential treatment.

DISCOVERY

42. In connection with the Settlement, the Individual Defendants have agreed to

provide limited discovery to Lead Plaintiff. The Individual Defendants agreed to produce and

have produced to Lead Counsel within twenty (20) days following the signing of the Term Sheet,

copies of (i) all documents produced by Individual Defendants directly or on their behalf by their

counsel to the Trustee in the Davis Action; (ii) all transcripts of depositions in the Individual

Defendants’ possession, custody or control taken in the Davis Action and in any investigatory

proceeding relating to these matters; and (iii) all documents produced by the Individual Defendants

directly or on their behalf by their counsel to the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or any

other investigative authority. The Individual Defendants also agree that for a period of one

hundred-twenty (120) calendar days following the filing of the motion for preliminary approval of

this Settlement, the Individual Defendants shall make themselves available for a reasonable

number of depositions to occur at an agreed upon time and location convenient to the Settling

Parties.

NO ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING

43. Neither the Term Sheet, this Stipulation (whether or not consummated), including

the exhibits hereto and the Plan of Allocation contained therein (or any other plan of allocation

that may be approved by the Court), the negotiations leading to the execution of the Term Sheet

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 39 of 161

Page 40: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

39

and this Stipulation, nor any proceedings taken pursuant to or in connection with the Term Sheet,

this Stipulation, and/or approval of the Settlement (including any arguments proffered in

connection therewith):

(a) shall be offered against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees as

evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, any presumption, concession, or

admission by any of the Individual Defendant Releasees with respect to the truth of any fact alleged

by Lead Plaintiff or the validity of any claim that was or could have been asserted or the deficiency

of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in this Action or in any other litigation,

or of any liability, negligence, fault, or other wrongdoing of any kind of any of the Individual

Defendant Releasees or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the Individual

Defendant Releasees, in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding, other than such

proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Stipulation;

(b) shall be offered against any of the Plaintiff Releasees, as evidence of, or

construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, any presumption, concession, or admission by any of

the Plaintiff Releasees that any of their claims are without merit, that any of the Individual

Defendant Releasees had meritorious defenses, or that damages recoverable in the Action would

not have exceeded the Settlement Amount or with respect to any liability, negligence, fault, or

wrongdoing of any kind, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the

Plaintiff Releasees, in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding, other than such

proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of this Stipulation; or

(c) shall be construed against any of the Releasees as an admission, concession,

or presumption that the consideration to be given hereunder represents the amount which could be

or would have been recovered after trial; provided, however, that if this Stipulation is approved by

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 40 of 161

Page 41: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

40

the Court, the Settling Parties and the Releasees and their respective counsel may refer to it to

effectuate the protections from liability granted hereunder or otherwise to enforce the terms of the

Settlement.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

44. All of the exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated by reference as though

fully set forth herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that there exists a conflict or

inconsistency between the terms of this Stipulation and the terms of any exhibit attached hereto,

the terms of the Stipulation shall prevail.

45. In the event of the entry of a final order of a court of competent jurisdiction

determining the transfer of money to the Settlement Fund or any portion thereof by or on behalf

of any Individual Defendant to be a preference, voidable transfer, fraudulent transfer, or similar

transaction and any portion thereof is required to be returned and is in fact returned, and such

amount that is in fact returned is not promptly deposited into the Settlement Fund by others, then,

at the election of Lead Plaintiff, the Settling Parties shall jointly move the Court to vacate and set

aside the Releases given and the Judgment entered pursuant to this Stipulation in which event the

Releases and Judgment shall be null and void, and the Settling Parties shall revert to their

respective positions in the Action as of immediately prior to the execution of the Term Sheet on

October 13, 2017 and any cash amounts in the Settlement Fund (less any Taxes and Tax Expenses

paid, due or owing with respect to the Settlement Fund and less any Notice and Administration

Costs actually incurred, paid or payable) shall be returned as provided in ¶ 39 above.

46. The Settling Parties intend this Stipulation and the Settlement to be a final and

complete resolution of all disputes asserted or which could be asserted by Lead Plaintiff and any

other Settlement Class Members against the Individual Defendant Releasees with respect to the

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 41 of 161

Page 42: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

41

Released Plaintiffs’ Claims. Accordingly, Lead Plaintiff and his counsel and the Individual

Defendants and their counsel agree not to assert in any forum that this Action was brought by Lead

Plaintiff or defended by the Individual Defendants in bad faith or without a reasonable basis. No

Settling Party shall assert any claims of any violation of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure relating to the institution, prosecution, defense, or settlement of this Action. The

Settling Parties agree that the amounts paid and the other terms of the Settlement were negotiated

at arm’s length and in good faith by the Settling Parties, including through a mediation process

supervised and conducted by the Mediator, and reflect the Settlement that was reached voluntarily

after extensive negotiations and consultation with experienced legal counsel, who were fully

competent to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their respective clients’ claims or defenses.

47. While retaining their right to deny that the claims asserted in the Action were

meritorious, the Individual Defendants and their counsel, in any statement made to any media

representative (whether or not for attribution) will not assert that the Action was commenced or

prosecuted in bad faith, nor will they deny that the Action was commenced and prosecuted in good

faith and is being settled voluntarily after consultation with competent legal counsel. In all events,

Plaintiffs and their counsel and the Individual Defendants and their counsel shall not make any

accusations of wrongful or actionable conduct by any Settling Party concerning the prosecution,

defense, and resolution of the Action, and shall not otherwise suggest that the Settlement

constitutes an admission of any claim or defense alleged.

48. The terms of the Settlement, as reflected in this Stipulation, may not be modified

or amended, nor may any of its provisions be waived except by a writing signed on behalf of both

Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants (or their successors-in-interest).

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 42 of 161

Page 43: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

42

49. The headings herein are used for the purpose of convenience only and are not meant

to have legal effect.

50. Pending approval of the Court of this Stipulation and its exhibits, all proceedings

in this Action shall be stayed with respect to the Individual Defendants (except as provided in ¶ 42

above) and all members of the Settlement Class shall be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any

of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees.

51. The administration and consummation of the Settlement as embodied in this

Stipulation shall be under the authority of the Court, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the

purpose of entering orders providing for awards of attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses to

Plaintiffs’ Counsel and enforcing the terms of this Stipulation, the Plan of Allocation (or such other

plan of allocation as may be approved by the Court), and the distribution of the Net Settlement

Fund to Settlement Class Members.

52. The waiver by one Settling Party of any breach of this Stipulation by any other

Settling Party shall not be deemed a waiver of any other prior or subsequent breach of this

Stipulation.

53. This Stipulation and its exhibits and the Supplemental Agreement constitute the

entire agreement among Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants concerning the Settlement

and this Stipulation and its exhibits. All Settling Parties acknowledge that no other agreements,

representations, warranties, or inducements have been made by any Settling Party concerning this

Stipulation, its exhibits, or the Supplemental Agreement other than those contained and

memorialized in such documents.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 43 of 161

Page 44: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

43

54. This Stipulation may be executed in one or more counterparts, including by

signature transmitted via facsimile, or by a .pdf/.tif image of the signature transmitted via email.

All executed counterparts and each of them shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.

55. This Stipulation shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and

assigns of the Settling Parties, including any and all Releasees and any corporation, partnership,

or other entity into or with which any Settling Party may merge, consolidate, or reorganize.

56. The construction, interpretation, operation, effect, and validity of this Stipulation,

the Supplemental Agreement, and all documents necessary to effectuate it shall be governed by

the internal laws of the State of New Hampshire without regard to conflicts of laws, except to the

extent that federal law requires that federal law govern.

57. Any action arising under or to enforce this Stipulation or any portion thereof, shall

be commenced and maintained only in the Court.

58. This Stipulation shall not be construed more strictly against one Settling Party than

another merely by virtue of the fact that it, or any part of it, may have been prepared by counsel

for one of the Settling Parties, it being recognized that it is the result of arm’s-length negotiations

between the Settling Parties and all Settling Parties have contributed substantially and materially

to the preparation of this Stipulation.

59. All counsel and any other person executing this Stipulation and any of the exhibits

hereto, or any related Settlement documents, warrant and represent that they have the full authority

to do so and that they have the authority to take appropriate action required or permitted to be

taken pursuant to the Stipulation to effectuate its terms.

60. Lead Counsel and Individual Defendants’ Counsel agree to cooperate fully with

one another in seeking Court approval of the Preliminary Approval Order and the Settlement, as

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 44 of 161

Page 45: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

44

embodied in this Stipulation, and to use best efforts to promptly agree upon and execute all such

other documentation as may be reasonably required to obtain final approval by the Court of the

Settlement.

61. If any Settling Party is required to give notice to another Settling Party under this

Stipulation, such notice shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given upon

receipt of hand delivery or facsimile or email transmission, with confirmation of receipt. Notice

shall be provided as follows:

If to Lead Plaintiff or Lead Counsel: Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP Attn: John C. Browne, Esq. 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020 Telephone: (212) 554-1400 Facsimile: (212) 554-1444 Email: [email protected]

If to the Individual Defendants or Individual Defendants’ Counsel:

Counsel for Hoil Kim: Ropes & Gray LLP Attn: Randall W. Bodner, Esq. 800 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02199 Telephone: (617) 951-7000 Facsimile: (617) 951-7050 [email protected] Counsel for Thomas Gutierrez, Daniel Squiller, or Richard Gaynor or Counsel for Thomas Guiterrez, Daniel Squiller, and Richard Gaynor: Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Attn: Jordan D. Hershman, Esq. One Federal Street Boston, MA 02110-1726 Telephone: (617) 951-8455 Facsimile: (617) 951-8736 [email protected] Counsel for Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal or Counsel for Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal:

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 45 of 161

Page 46: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

45

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Attn: Ian D. Roffman, Esq. 155 Seaport Blvd. Boston, MA 02210 Telephone: (617) 439-2000 Facsimile: (317) 310-9000 [email protected] Counsel for J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson, or Thomas Wroe, Jr. or Counsel for J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson, and Thomas Wroe, Jr.:

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Attn: David A. Katz, Esq. 51 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 403-1309 Facsimile: (212) 403-2000 [email protected]

62. Except as otherwise provided herein, each Settling Party shall bear its own costs.

63. Whether or not the Stipulation is approved by the Court and whether or not the

Stipulation is consummated, or the Effective Date occurs, the Settling Parties and their counsel

shall use their best efforts to keep all negotiations, discussions, acts performed, agreements, drafts,

documents signed, and proceedings in connection with the Stipulation confidential.

64. All agreements made and orders entered during the course of this Action relating

to the confidentiality of information shall survive this Settlement.

65. No opinion or advice concerning the tax consequences of the proposed Settlement

to individual Settlement Class Members is being given or will be given by the Settling Parties or

their counsel; nor is any representation or warranty in this regard made by virtue of this Stipulation.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 46 of 161

Page 47: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 47 of 161

Page 48: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 48 of 161

Page 49: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 49 of 161

Page 50: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 50 of 161

Page 51: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 51 of 161

Page 52: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

EXHIBIT A

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 52 of 161

Page 53: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

ADAM S. LEVY on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS GUTIERREZ, RICHARD J. GAYNOR, RAJA BAL, J. MICHAL CONAWAY, KATHLEEN A. COTE, ERNEST L. GODSHALK, MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL, MARY PETROVICH, ROBERT E. SWITZ, NOEL G. WATSON, THOMAS WROE, JR., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., CANACCORD GENUITY INC., AND APPLE, INC.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL

ECF CASE

[PROPOSED] ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending in this Court entitled Levy v.

Gutierrez, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL (the “Action”);

WHEREAS, (a) Lead Plaintiff Douglas Kurz (“Lead Plaintiff”) and named plaintiffs

Strategic Master Fund (Cayman) Limited (“Strategic Master Fund”), and Highmark Limited, in

respect of its Segregated Account Highmark Fixed Income 2 (“Highmark Limited,” and together

with Strategic Master Fund, the “Securities Act Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the

Individual Defendant Settlement Class (defined below), and (b) defendants Thomas Gutierrez,

Richard Gaynor, Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal, Hoil Kim, Daniel W. Squiller, J. Michal Conaway,

Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz,

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 53 of 161

Page 54: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

2

Noel G. Watson, and Thomas Wroe, Jr. (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) have

determined to settle all claims asserted against the Individual Defendants in this Action with

prejudice on the terms and conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement

With Individual Defendants dated January 26, 2018 (the “Individual Defendant Stipulation”),

subject to approval of this Court (the “Individual Defendant Settlement”).

WHEREAS, (a) Lead Plaintiff and the Securities Act Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves

and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class (defined below); and (b) defendants Morgan

Stanley & Co. LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC (f/k/a Goldman, Sachs & Co.), and Canaccord

Genuity Inc. (collectively, the “Underwriter Defendants”) have determined to settle all claims

asserted against the Underwriter Defendants in this Action with prejudice on the terms and

conditions set forth in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Settling Underwriter

Defendants dated August 18, 2017, and the Supplement thereto dated January 26, 2018 (the

“Underwriter Defendant Stipulation”), subject to approval of this Court (the “Underwriter

Defendant Settlement”);

WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Order, (a) the Individual Defendant Stipulation and

the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation shall be collectively referred to as the “Stipulations”;

(b) the Individual Defendant Settlement and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement shall be

collectively referred to as the “Settlements”; (c) the Individual Defendants and the Underwriter

Defendants shall be collectively referred to as the “Settling Defendants”; (d) the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class shall be

collectively referred to as the “Settlement Classes”; (e) members of the Individual Defendant

Settlement Class shall be referred to as Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members;

members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class shall be referred to as Underwriter

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 54 of 161

Page 55: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

3

Defendant Settlements Class Members, and Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members and

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members shall be collectively referred to as

“Settlement Class Members”; (f) the Settling Defendants, Lead Plaintiff, and the Securities Act

Plaintiffs, shall be collectively referred to as the “Settling Parties”; and (g) unless otherwise

defined herein, all other capitalized words contained herein shall have the same meanings as set

forth in the respective Stipulations;

WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff has made an application, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order preliminarily approving the Settlements in accordance

with the respective Stipulations, certifying the Settlement Classes for purposes of the respective

Settlements only, and allowing notice to Settlement Class Members as more fully described

herein; and

WHEREAS, the Court has read and considered: (a) Lead Plaintiff’s motion for

preliminary approval of the Settlements, and the papers filed and arguments made in connection

therewith; and (b) the Stipulations and the respective exhibits attached thereto.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Certification of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class

(a) Class Certification for Settlement Purposes – Pursuant to Rule 23(a)

and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court certifies, solely for purposes of

effectuating the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement, a class consisting of all persons and

entities who or which from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on

October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded

GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (“GTAT”) common stock (“GTAT Common Stock”) and/or

GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 (“GTAT Senior Notes”), purchased or

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 55 of 161

Page 56: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

4

otherwise acquired publicly traded call options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Call

Options”), or sold (wrote) publicly traded put options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Put

Options”), and were damaged thereby (the “Individual Defendant Settlement Class”). Excluded

from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class are the Individual Defendants, the Underwriter

Defendants, and defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple,” and together with the Individual Defendants

and Underwriter Defendants, the “Defendants”); GTAT; the affiliates and subsidiaries of the

Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple; the Officers, directors, and partners of the

Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple during the Class Period; members of the Immediate

Family of any excluded person; the heirs, successors, and assigns of any excluded person or

entity; and any entity in which any excluded person or entity has or had during the Class Period a

controlling interest; provided, however, that any Investment Vehicle (as defined in the Individual

Defendant Stipulation) shall not be deemed an excluded person or entity by definition. Also

excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class are any persons and entities who or

which exclude themselves by submitting a request for exclusion that is accepted by the Court.

(b) Class Findings – Solely for purposes of the proposed Individual

Defendant Settlement, the Court finds that each element required for certification of the

Individual Defendant Settlement Class pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure has been met: (a) the members of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class are so

numerous that their joinder in the Action would be impracticable; (b) there are questions of law

and fact common to the Individual Defendant Settlement Class which predominate over any

individual questions; (c) the claims of Lead Plaintiff and the Securities Act Plaintiffs in the

Action are typical of the claims of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class; (d) Lead Plaintiff,

the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and Lead Counsel have and will fairly and adequately represent and

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 56 of 161

Page 57: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

5

protect the interests of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class; and (e) a class action is

superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the Action.

(c) The Court hereby finds and concludes that pursuant to Rule 23 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the purposes of the Individual Defendant Settlement

only, Plaintiffs Douglas Kurz, Strategic Master Fund, and Highmark Limited are adequate class

representatives and certifies them as Class Representatives for the Individual Defendant

Settlement Class. The Court also appoints Lead Counsel as Class Counsel for the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class, pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. Certification of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class

(a) Class Certification for Settlement Purposes – Pursuant to Rule 23(a)

and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court certifies, solely for purposes of

effectuating the proposed Underwriter Defendant Settlement, a class consisting of all persons

and entities who or which from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on

October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired (i) GTAT

Senior Notes pursuant or traceable to GTAT’s December 2013 registration statement and

prospectus supplement for the GTAT Senior Notes’ offering (the “Senior Notes Offering”)

and/or (ii) shares of GTAT Common Stock pursuant or traceable to GTAT’s December 2013

registration statement and prospectus supplement for the secondary offering of GTAT common

stock (the “Common Stock Secondary Offering”) (the “Underwriter Defendant Settlement

Class”). Excluded from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class are Defendants; GTAT; the

affiliates and subsidiaries of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple; the Officers,

directors, and partners of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple during the Class

Period; members of the Immediate Family of any excluded person; the heirs, successors, and

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 57 of 161

Page 58: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

6

assigns of any excluded person or entity; and any entity in which any excluded person or entity

has or had during the Class Period a controlling interest; provided, however, that any Investment

Vehicle (as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation) shall not be deemed an excluded

person or entity by definition. Also excluded from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class

are any persons and entities who or which exclude themselves by submitting a request for

exclusion that is accepted by the Court after notice to the Settling Underwriter Defendants.

(b) Class Findings – Solely for purposes of the proposed Underwriter

Defendant Settlement, the Court finds that each element required for certification of the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure has been met: (a) the members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class are so

numerous that their joinder in the Action would be impracticable; (b) there are questions of law

and fact common to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class which predominate over any

individual questions; (c) the claims of Lead Plaintiff and the Securities Act Plaintiffs in the

Action are typical of the claims of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class; (d) Lead

Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and Lead Counsel have and will fairly and adequately

represent and protect the interests of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class; and (e) a class

action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the Action.

(c) The Court hereby finds and concludes that pursuant to Rule 23 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the purposes of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement

only, Plaintiffs Douglas Kurz, Strategic Master Fund, and Highmark Limited are adequate class

representatives and certifies them as Class Representatives for the Underwriter Defendant

Settlement Class. The Court also appoints Lead Counsel as Class Counsel for the Underwriter

Defendant Settlement Class, pursuant to Rule 23(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 58 of 161

Page 59: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

7

3. Preliminary Approval of the Individual Defendant Settlement – The Court

hereby preliminarily approves the Individual Defendant Settlement, as embodied in the

Individual Defendant Stipulation, as being fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing to be

conducted as described below.

4. Preliminary Approval of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement – The Court

hereby preliminarily approves the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, as embodied in the

Underwriter Defendant Stipulation, as being fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Underwriter

Defendant Settlement Class, subject to further consideration at the Settlement Hearing to be

conducted as described below.

5. Settlement Hearing – The Court will hold a settlement hearing (the “Settlement

Hearing”) on _____________, 2018 at __:__ _.m. in Courtroom 2 of the United States District

Court for the District of New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301, for the

following purposes: (a) to determine whether the proposed Settlements on the terms and

conditions provided for in the respective Stipulations are fair, reasonable and adequate to the

respective Settlement Classes, and should be approved by the Court; (b) to determine whether

the Judgments substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B to each of the Stipulations should

be entered dismissing the Action with prejudice against the respective Settling Defendants; (c) to

determine whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlements is fair and

reasonable and should be approved by the Court; (d) to determine whether the motion by Lead

Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses should be

approved; and (e) to consider any other matters that may properly be brought before the Court in

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 59 of 161

Page 60: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

8

connection with the Settlements. Notice of the Settlements and the Settlement Hearing shall be

given to Settlement Class Members as set forth in paragraph 7 of this Order.

6. The Court may adjourn the Settlement Hearing without further notice to

Settlement Class Members, and may approve the proposed Settlements with such modifications

as the affected Settling Parties may agree to, if appropriate, without further notice to Settlement

Class Members. The Court further reserves the right to (a) enter the Judgment approving the

Individual Defendant Settlement and dismissing the Complaint on the merits and with prejudice

as against the Individual Defendants, and (b) enter the Judgment approving the Underwriter

Defendant Settlement and dismissing the Complaint on the merits and with prejudice as against

the Settling Underwriter Defendants, regardless of whether it has approved the Plan of

Allocation or awarded attorneys’ fees and expenses.

7. Retention of Claims Administrator and Manner of Giving Notice – Lead

Counsel is hereby authorized to retain Garden City Group, LLC (“GCG” or the “Claims

Administrator”) to supervise and administer the notice procedure in connection with the

proposed Settlements and any other settlement or other recovery that may be achieved in this

Action as well as the processing of Claims as more fully set forth below. Notice of the

Settlements and the Settlement Hearing shall be given by Lead Counsel as follows:

(a) not later than twenty (20) business days after the date of entry of this

Order (the “Notice Date”), the Claims Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice of

(I) Pendency of Class Action and Certification of Settlement Classes; (II) Proposed Settlements

with Individual Defendants and Underwriter Defendants; (III) Motion for an Award of

Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; and (IV) Settlement Fairness

Hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 1 (the “Notice”), and the Proof of

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 60 of 161

Page 61: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

9

Claim and Release Form, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the “Claim

Form,” and together with the Notice, the “Notice Packet”), to be mailed by first-class mail to

brokers and other nominees who, during the Class Period, may have purchased or otherwise

acquired GTAT Common Stock and/or GTAT Senior Notes, purchased or otherwise acquired

GTAT Call Options, or sold (wrote) publicly traded GTAT Put Options for the benefit of persons

or entities other than themselves;

(b) contemporaneously with the mailing of the Notice Packet, the Claims

Administrator shall cause a copy of the Notice and Claim Form to be posted on a website to be

developed for the Settlements, from which copies of the Notice and Claim Form can be

downloaded;

(c) not later than ten (10) business days after the Notice Date, the Claims

Administrator shall cause the Summary Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Certification

of Settlement Classes; (II) Proposed Settlements with Individual Defendants and Underwriter

Defendants; (III) Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation

Expenses; and (IV) Settlement Fairness Hearing, substantially in the form attached hereto as

Exhibit 3 (the “Summary Notice”), to be published once in The Wall Street Journal and to be

transmitted once over the PR Newswire; and

(d) not later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing,

Lead Counsel shall serve on counsel for the Individual Defendants and Underwriter Defendants

and file with the Court proof, by affidavit or declaration, of such mailing and publication.

8. Approval of Form and Content of Notice – The Court: (a) approves, as to form

and content, the Notice, the Claim Form, and the Summary Notice, attached hereto as Exhibits 1,

2, and 3, respectively; and (b) finds that the mailing and distribution of the Notice and Claim

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 61 of 161

Page 62: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

10

Form and the publication of the Summary Notice in the manner and form set forth in paragraph 7

of this Order: (i) is the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (ii) constitutes notice

that is reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Settlement Class Members of

the pendency of the Action and the certification of the Settlement Classes, of the effect of the

proposed Settlements (including the Releases to be provided thereunder), of Lead Counsel’s

motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, of their right

to object to the Settlements, the Plan of Allocation, and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’

fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, of their right to exclude themselves from the

Settlement Classes, and of their right to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (iii) constitutes due,

adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled to receive notice of the

proposed Settlements; and (iv) satisfies the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), the Private

Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77z-1, 78u-4, as amended, and all other

applicable law and rules. The date and time of the Settlement Hearing shall be included in the

Notice and Summary Notice before they are mailed and published, respectively.

9. Nominee Procedures – Brokers and other nominees who, during the Class

Period, may have purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock and/or GTAT Senior

Notes, purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Call Options, or sold (wrote) publicly traded

GTAT Put Options shall (a) within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, request

from the Claims Administrator sufficient copies of the Notice to forward to all such beneficial

owners and within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of those Notices forward them to all

such beneficial owners; or (b) within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the Notice, send a

list of the names and addresses of all such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator in

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 62 of 161

Page 63: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

11

which event the Claims Administrator shall promptly mail the Notice to such individuals or

entities. Nominees who elect to send the Notice to their beneficial owners shall send a statement

to the Claims Administrator confirming that the mailing was made and shall retain their mailing

records for use in connection with any further notices that may be provided in the Action. Upon

full compliance with this Order, such nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable

expenses actually incurred in complying with this Order by providing the Claims Administrator

with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. Such

properly documented expenses incurred by nominees in compliance with the terms of this Order

shall be paid from the Settlement Funds, with any disputes as to the reasonableness or

documentation of expenses incurred subject to review by the Court.

10. Participation in the Settlements – Individual Defendant Settlement Class

Members who or which wish to participate in the Individual Defendant Settlement and to be

eligible to receive a distribution from the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund and

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members who or which wish to participate in the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement and to be eligible to receive a distribution from the

Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund must complete and submit a Claim Form in

accordance with the instructions contained therein. Unless the Court orders otherwise, all Claim

Forms must be postmarked no later than one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after the Notice

Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lead Counsel may, at its discretion, accept for processing

late Claims provided such acceptance does not delay the distribution of the Net Settlement Funds

to Authorized Claimants. By submitting a Claim, a person or entity shall be deemed to have

submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to his, her, or its Claim and the subject

matter of the applicable Settlements.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 63 of 161

Page 64: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

12

11. Each Claim Form submitted must satisfy the following conditions: (a) it must be

properly completed, signed, and submitted in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions

of the preceding paragraph; (b) it must be accompanied by adequate supporting documentation

for the transactions and holdings reported therein, in the form of broker confirmation slips,

broker account statements, an authorized statement from the broker containing the transactional

and holding information found in a broker confirmation slip or account statement, or such other

documentation as is deemed adequate by Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator; (c) if the

person executing the Claim Form is acting in a representative capacity, a certification of his, her

or its current authority to act on behalf of the Settlement Class Member must be included in the

Claim Form to the satisfaction of Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator; and (d) the Claim

Form must be complete and contain no material deletions or modifications of any of the printed

matter contained therein and must be signed under penalty of perjury.

12. Any Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member who or which does not

timely and validly submit a Claim or whose Claim is not otherwise approved by the Court:

(a) shall be deemed to have waived his, her or its right to share in the Individual Defendant Net

Settlement Fund; (b) shall be forever barred from participating in any distributions therefrom;

(c) shall be bound by the provisions of the Individual Defendant Stipulation and Individual

Defendant Settlement and all proceedings, determinations, orders, and judgments in the Action

relating thereto, including, without limitation, the Judgment entered with respect to the

Individual Defendant Settlement and the Releases provided for therein, whether favorable or

unfavorable to the Individual Defendant Settlement Class; and (d) shall be forever barred from

commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any of the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’

Claims against each and all of the Individual Defendant Releasees, as more fully described in the

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 64 of 161

Page 65: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

13

Individual Defendant Stipulation and the Notice. Any Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class

Member that does not timely and validly submit a Claim Form or whose Claim is not otherwise

approved by the Court: (a) shall be deemed to have waived his, her or its right to share in the

Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund; (b) shall be forever barred from participating in

any distributions therefrom; (c) shall be bound by the provisions of the Underwriter Defendant

Stipulation and Underwriter Defendant Settlement and all proceedings, determinations, orders,

and judgments in the Action relating thereto, including, without limitation, the Judgment entered

with respect to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement and the Releases provided for therein,

whether favorable or unfavorable to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class; and (d) shall

be forever barred from commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any of the Underwriter

Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against each and all of the Settling Underwriter

Defendants’ Releasees, as more fully described in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation and the

Notice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, late Claim Forms may be accepted for processing as set

forth in paragraph 10 above.

13. Exclusion From the Settlement Classes – Any putative Individual Defendant

Settlement Class Member who wishes to exclude himself, herself, or itself from the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class and/or any putative Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class

Member who wishes to exclude himself, herself, or itself from the Underwriter Defendant

Settlement Class must request exclusion in writing within the time and in the manner set forth in

the Notice, which shall provide that: (a) any such request for exclusion from the respective

Settlement Classes must be mailed or delivered such that it is received no later than twenty-one

(21) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing, to: GTAT Securities Litigation,

EXCLUSIONS, c/o GCG, P.O. Box 10463, Dublin, OH 43017-4063; and (b) each request for

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 65 of 161

Page 66: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

14

exclusion must (i) state the name, address and telephone number of the person or entity

requesting exclusion, and in the case of entities the name and telephone number of the

appropriate contact person; (ii) with respect to putative members of the Individual Defendant

Settlement Class who wish to request exclusion from that class, state that such person or entity

“requests exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class in Levy v. Gutierrez, et al.,

Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL (GTAT Securities Litigation)” and, with respect to putative

members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class who wish to request exclusion from

that class, state that such person or entity “requests exclusion from the Underwriter Defendant

Settlement Class in Levy v. Gutierrez, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL (GTAT Securities

Litigation)”; (iii) state the amount of each GTAT Security (in terms of number of shares of

GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Call Options, GTAT Put Options, and/or face value of GTAT

Senior Notes) that the person or entity requesting exclusion purchased/acquired and/or sold

during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time

on October 6, 2014, inclusive), as well as the dates and prices of each such purchase/acquisition

and sale; (iv) with respect to any Class Period purchases of GTAT Common Stock and/or GTAT

Senior Notes, identify any shares of GTAT Common Stock purchased in or traceable to the

Common Stock Secondary Offering and/or any GTAT Senior Notes purchased in or traceable to

the Senior Notes Offering; and (v) be signed by the person or entity requesting exclusion or an

authorized representative. A request for exclusion shall not be effective unless it provides all the

required information and is received within the time stated above, or is otherwise accepted by the

Court. Every putative Settlement Class Member shall have the right to request exclusion from

both of the Settlement Classes, as well as the right to exclude themselves from one Settlement

Class while remaining a member of the other Settlement Class.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 66 of 161

Page 67: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

15

14. Any person or entity who or which timely and validly requests exclusion from the

Individual Defendant Settlement Class in compliance with the terms stated in this Order and is

excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class shall not be a member of the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class, shall not be bound by the terms of the Individual Defendant

Settlement or any orders or judgments in the Action relating to the Individual Defendant

Settlement, and shall not receive any payment out of the Individual Defendant Settlement Net

Settlement Fund. Any person or entity who or which timely and validly requests exclusion from

the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class in compliance with the terms stated in this Order

and is excluded from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class shall not be a member of the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, shall not be bound by the terms of the Underwriter

Defendant Settlement or any orders or judgments in the Action relating to the Underwriter

Defendant Settlement, and shall not receive any payment out of the Underwriter Defendant Net

Settlement Fund.

15. Any Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member who or which does not

timely and validly request exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class in the

manner stated in this Order: (a) shall be deemed to have waived his, her, or its right to be

excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class; (b) shall be forever barred from

requesting exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class in this or any other

proceeding; (c) shall be bound by the provisions of the Individual Defendant Stipulation, the

Individual Defendant Settlement, and all proceedings, determinations, orders, and judgments in

the Action relating to the Individual Defendant Settlement, including, but not limited to, the

Judgment entered with respect to the Individual Defendant Settlement and the Releases provided

for therein whether favorable or unfavorable to the Individual Defendant Settlement Class; and

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 67 of 161

Page 68: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

16

(d) shall be barred from commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any of the Individual

Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against each and all of the Individual Defendant

Releasees, as more fully described in the Individual Defendant Stipulation and the Notice. Any

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member who or which does not timely and validly

request exclusion from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class in the manner stated in this

Order: (a) shall be deemed to have waived his, her, or its right to be excluded from the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class; (b) shall be forever barred from requesting exclusion

from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class in this or any other proceeding; (c) shall be

bound by the provisions of the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation, the Underwriter Defendant

Settlement, and all proceedings, determinations, orders, and judgments in the Action relating to

the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, including, but not limited to, the Judgment entered with

respect to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement and the Releases provided for therein whether

favorable or unfavorable to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class; and (d) shall be barred

from commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any of the Underwriter Defendant Released

Plaintiffs’ Claims against each and all of the Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees, as

more fully described in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation and the Notice.

16. Appearance and Objections at Settlement Hearing – Any Settlement Class

Member who or which does not request exclusion from the Settlement Class(es) that apply to

him, her, or it may enter an appearance in the Action, at his, her, or its own expense, individually

or through counsel of his, her, or its own choice, by filing with the Clerk of Court and delivering

a notice of appearance: (a) to both Lead Counsel and Individual Defendants’ Counsel if the

purpose of the appearance is to object to the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement; (b) to

both Lead Counsel and Underwriter Defendants’ Counsel if the purpose of the appearance is to

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 68 of 161

Page 69: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

17

object to the proposed Underwriter Defendant Settlement; and (c) to Lead Counsel if the purpose

of the appearance is to object to the proposed Plan of Allocation and/or Lead Counsel’s motion

for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses. Any notice of

appearance must be filed with the Clerk of the Court and delivered to the required counsel at the

addresses set forth in paragraph 17 below, such that it is received no later than twenty-one (21)

calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing, or as the Court may otherwise direct. Any

Settlement Class Member who or which does not enter an appearance will be represented by

Lead Counsel.

17. Any member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class who or which does not

request exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class may file a written objection to

the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement and show cause, if he, she, or it has any cause,

why the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement should not be approved; any member of the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class who or which does not request exclusion from the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class may file a written objection to the proposed

Underwriter Defendant Settlement and show cause, if he, she, or it has any cause, why the

proposed Underwriter Defendant Settlement should not be approved; and any member of the

Individual Settlement Class and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class may object to the

proposed Plan of Allocation and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and

reimbursement of Litigation Expenses and show cause, if he, she, or it has any cause, why the

proposed Plan of Allocation and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and

reimbursement of Litigation Expenses should not be approved; provided, however, that no

Settlement Class Member shall be heard or entitled to contest the approval of the terms and

conditions of the proposed Settlements that apply to him, her, or it, the proposed Plan of

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 69 of 161

Page 70: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

18

Allocation, and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of

Litigation Expenses, unless that person or entity has (a) filed a written objection with the Court

and served copies of such objection on Lead Counsel, (b) if the objection is to the Individual

Defendant Settlement, on Individual Defendants’ Counsel, and (c) if the objection is to the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement, on Underwriter Defendants’ Counsel, at the addresses set

forth below such that they are received no later than twenty-one (21) calendar days prior to the

Settlement Hearing.

Lead Plaintiff’s Counsel

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP Attn: John C. Browne, Esq.

1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020

Telephone: (212) 554-1400 Facsimile: (212) 554-1444

Email: [email protected]

Individual Defendants’ Counsel

Counsel for Hoil Kim:

Ropes & Gray LLP Attn: Randall W. Bodner, Esq.

800 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02199

Telephone: (617) 951-7000 Facsimile: (617) 951-7050

[email protected]

Counsel for Thomas Gutierrez, Daniel Squiller, or Richard Gaynor:

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Attn: Jordan D. Hershman, Esq.

One Federal Street Boston, MA 02110-1726

Telephone: (617) 951-8455 Facsimile: (617) 951-8736

[email protected]

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 70 of 161

Page 71: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

19

Counsel for Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal:

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Attn: Ian D. Roffman, Esq.

155 Seaport Blvd. Boston, MA 02210

Telephone: (617) 439-2000 Facsimile: (317) 310-9000

[email protected]

Counsel for J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson, or Thomas Wroe, Jr.:

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz Attn: David A. Katz, Esq.

51 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019

Telephone: 212-403-1309 Facsimile: (212) 403-2000

[email protected]

Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Counsel

Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP Richard A. Rosen, Esq.

1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019-6064

18. Any objections, filings, and other submissions by the objecting Settlement Class

Member: (a) must state the name, address, and telephone number of the person or entity

objecting and must be signed by the objector; (b) must contain a statement of the Settlement

Class Member’s objection or objections, and the specific reasons for each objection, including

any legal and evidentiary support the Settlement Class Member wishes to bring to the Court’s

attention; and (c) must include documents sufficient to prove Settlement Class membership,

including the amount of each GTAT Security (in terms of number of shares of GTAT Common

Stock, GTAT Call Options, GTAT Put Options, and/or face value of GTAT Senior Notes) that

the person or entity requesting exclusion purchased/acquired and/or sold during the Class Period

(i.e., from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014,

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 71 of 161

Page 72: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

20

inclusive), as well as the dates and prices of each such purchase/acquisition and sale, and with

respect to members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, identification of those shares

of GTAT Common Stock purchased in or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering

and/or those GTAT Senior Notes purchased in or traceable to the Senior Notes Offering.

Objectors who enter an appearance and desire to present evidence at the Settlement Hearing in

support of their objection must include in their written objection or notice of appearance the

identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and any exhibits they intend to introduce into

evidence at the hearing.

19. Any Settlement Class Member who or which does not make his, her, or its

objection in the manner provided herein shall be deemed to have waived his, her, or its right to

object to any aspect of the proposed Settlements that apply to him, her, or it, the proposed Plan

of Allocation, and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement

of Litigation Expenses and shall be forever barred and foreclosed from objecting to the fairness,

reasonableness, or adequacy of the applicable proposed Settlements, the proposed Plan of

Allocation, and/or the requested attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses, or from otherwise being

heard concerning the applicable proposed Settlements, the Plan of Allocation, and/or the

requested attorneys’ fees and Litigation Expenses in this or any other proceeding.

20. Stay and Temporary Injunction – Until otherwise ordered by the Court, the

Court stays all proceedings in the Action between the respective Settling Parties other than

proceedings necessary to carry out or enforce the terms and conditions of the respective

Stipulations. Pending final determination of whether the respective Settlements should be

approved, the Court hereby: (a) bars and enjoins Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and

all other members of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, from commencing, maintaining,

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 72 of 161

Page 73: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

21

or prosecuting any and all of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims, as defined in the Individual

Defendant Stipulation, against each and all of the Individual Defendant Releasees, as defined in

the Individual Defendant Stipulation; and (b) bars and enjoins Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act

Plaintiffs, and all other members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, from

commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any and all of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims, as

defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation, against each and all of the Settling

Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees, as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation.

21. Settlement Administration Fees and Expenses – All reasonable costs incurred

in identifying Settlement Class Members and notifying them of the Settlements as well as in

administering the Settlements shall be paid as set forth in the Stipulations without further order

of the Court.

22. Settlement Funds – The contents of the Settlement Funds held by Valley

National Bank (which the Court approves as the Escrow Agent), shall be deemed and considered

to be in custodia legis of the Court, and shall remain subject to the jurisdiction of the Court, until

such time as they shall be distributed pursuant to the respective Stipulations and/or further

order(s) of the Court. No person other than Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members and

Plaintiffs’ counsel shall have any right to any portion of or distribution of the Individual

Defendant Settlement Fund and no person other than Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class

Members and Plaintiffs’ counsel shall have any right to any portion of or distribution of the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement Fund, unless otherwise ordered by the Court or otherwise

provided in the respective Stipulations.

23. Taxes – Lead Counsel is authorized and directed to prepare any tax returns and

any other tax reporting form for or in respect to the Settlement Funds, to pay from the Settlement

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 73 of 161

Page 74: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

22

Funds any Taxes owed with respect to the Settlement Funds, and to otherwise perform all

obligations with respect to Taxes and any reporting or filings in respect thereof without further

order of the Court in a manner consistent with the provisions of the respective Stipulations.

24. Termination of Settlement – If either of the Settlements is terminated pursuant

to the terms of the respective Stipulations or is not approved, or the Effective Date otherwise

fails to occur as to either of the Settlements, this Order shall become null and void as to that

particular Settlement and, shall be without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiffs, the Settlement

Class Members and the affected Settling Defendants, all of whom shall revert to their respective

positions in the Action as provided for in the relevant Stipulation(s). If one of the Settlements is

terminated (or is not approved or the Effective Date otherwise fails to occur as to that

Settlement) but not the other, this Order shall remain in full force as to that other surviving

Settlement, which shall be consummated according to the terms set forth herein.

25. Use of this Order – (a) With respect to the Individual Defendant Settlement,

neither this Order, the Term Sheet (as defined in the Individual Defendant Stipulation), the MOU

(as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation), the Stipulations (whether or not

consummated), including the exhibits thereto and the Plan of Allocation contained therein (or

any other plan of allocation that may be approved by the Court), the negotiations leading to the

execution of the Term Sheet, the MOU, and the Stipulations, nor any proceedings taken pursuant

to or in connection with the Term Sheet, the MOU, the Stipulations, and/or approval of the

Settlements (including any arguments proffered in connection therewith): (i) shall be offered

against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to

be evidence of, any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Individual Defendant

Releasees with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Lead Plaintiff or the validity of any

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 74 of 161

Page 75: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

23

claim that was or could have been asserted or the deficiency of any defense that has been or

could have been asserted in this Action or in any other litigation; (ii) shall be offered against any

of the Individual Defendant Releasees as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence

of any liability, negligence, fault, or other wrongdoing of any kind of any of the Individual

Defendant Releasees or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of the

Individual Defendant Releasees, in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding,

other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Individual

Defendant Stipulation; (iii) shall be offered against any of the Plaintiff Releasees, as evidence of,

or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, any presumption, concession, or admission by any

of the Plaintiff Releasees that any of their claims are without merit, that any of the Individual

Defendant Releasees had meritorious defenses, or that damages recoverable under the Complaint

would not have exceeded the Individual Defendant Settlement Amount or with respect to any

liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind, or in any way referred to for any other

reason as against any of the Plaintiff Releasees, in any civil, criminal, or administrative action or

proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the

Individual Defendant Stipulation; or (iv) shall be construed against any of the Releasees as an

admission, concession, or presumption that the consideration to be given under the Individual

Defendant Stipulation represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after

trial; provided, however, that if the Individual Defendant Stipulation is approved by the Court,

the Settling Parties and the Releasees and their respective counsel may refer to it to effectuate the

protections from liability granted under thereunder or otherwise to enforce the terms of the

Individual Defendant Settlement; and (b) with respect to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement,

neither this Order, the Term Sheet, the MOU, the Stipulations (whether or not consummated),

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 75 of 161

Page 76: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

24

including the exhibits thereto and the Plan of Allocation contained therein (or any other plan of

allocation that may be approved by the Court), the negotiations leading to the execution of the

Term Sheet, MOU, and the Stipulations, nor any proceedings taken pursuant to or in connection

with the Term Sheet, MOU, the Stipulations, and/or approval of the Settlements (including any

arguments proffered in connection therewith): (i) shall be offered against any of the Settling

Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of,

any presumption, concession, or admission by any of the Settling Underwriter Defendants’

Releasees with respect to the truth of any fact alleged by Plaintiffs or the validity of any claim

that was or could have been asserted or the deficiency of any defense that has been or could have

been asserted in this Action or in any other litigation; (ii) shall be offered against any of the

Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees as evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of

any liability, negligence, fault, or other wrongdoing of any kind of any of the Settling

Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any

of the Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees, in any civil, criminal, or administrative action

or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of

the Stipulation; (iii) shall be offered against any of the Plaintiffs’ Releasees, as evidence of, or

construed as, or deemed to be evidence of, any presumption, concession, or admission by any of

the Plaintiffs’ Releasees that any of their claims are without merit, that any of the Settling

Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees had meritorious defenses, or that damages recoverable under

the Complaint would not have exceeded the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Amount or with

respect to any liability, negligence, fault, or wrongdoing of any kind, or in any way referred to

for any other reason as against any of the Plaintiffs’ Releasees, in any civil, criminal, or

administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 76 of 161

Page 77: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

25

effectuate the provisions of the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation; or (iv) shall be construed

against any of the Releasees as an admission, concession, or presumption that the consideration

to be given under the Stipulation represents the amount which could be or would have been

recovered after trial; provided, however, that if the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation is

approved by the Court, the Settling Parties and the Releasees and their respective counsel may

refer to it to effectuate the protections from liability granted under thereunder or otherwise to

enforce the terms of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

26. Supporting Papers – Lead Counsel shall file and serve the opening papers in

support of the proposed Settlements, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and Lead Counsel’s

motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses no later than

thirty-five (35) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing; and reply papers, if any, shall be

filed and served no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Settlement Hearing.

27. The Court retains jurisdiction to consider all further applications arising out of or

connected with the proposed Settlements.

SO ORDERED this _________ day of __________________, 2018.

________________________________________ The Honorable Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 77 of 161

Page 78: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

EXHIBIT A-1

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 78 of 161

Page 79: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

ADAM S. LEVY on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS GUTIERREZ, RICHARD J. GAYNOR, RAJA BAL, J. MICHAL CONAWAY, KATHLEEN A. COTE, ERNEST L. GODSHALK, MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL, MARY PETROVICH, ROBERT E. SWITZ, NOEL G. WATSON, THOMAS WROE, JR., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., CANACCORD GENUITY INC., AND APPLE, INC.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL

ECF CASE

NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES; (II) PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS WITH INDIVIDUAL

DEFENDANTS AND UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS; (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION

EXPENSES; AND (IV) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES: Please be advised that your rights may be affected by the above-captioned securities class action (the “Action”) pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (the “Court”), if, during the period from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”), you purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (“GTAT”) common stock (“GTAT Common Stock”) and/or publicly traded GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 (“GTAT Senior Notes”), purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded call options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Call Options”), and/or sold (wrote) publicly traded put options on GTAT common stock

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 79 of 161

Page 80: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

2

(“GTAT Put Options”).1 The full definitions of the Settlement Classes certified by the Court are set forth in ¶ 25 below.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENTS: Please also be advised that the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff Douglas Kurz (“Lead Plaintiff”) and additional named plaintiffs Strategic Master Fund (Cayman) Limited (“Strategic Master Fund”) and Highmark Limited, in respect of its Segregated Account Highmark Fixed Income 2 (“Highmark Limited”) (Highmark Limited and Strategic Master Fund together are the “Securities Act Plaintiffs,” and together with Lead Plaintiff, the “Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Individual Defendant Settlement Class (as defined in ¶ 25 below), have reached a proposed settlement of the Action with the Individual Defendants2

for $27,000,000 in cash (the “Individual Defendant Settlement”) to settle claims brought under both the Securities Act (as defined in ¶ 14 below) and the Exchange Act (as defined in ¶ 14 below) relating to GTAT’s secondary public offering of common stock and initial public offering of GTAT Senior Notes in December 2013 (respectively, “Common Stock Secondary Offering” and “Senior Notes Offering”) and to the trading of GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes during the Class Period. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and the Underwriter Settlement Class (as defined in ¶ 25 below), have also reached a proposed settlement of the Action with the Underwriter Defendants3 for $9,700,000 in cash (the “Underwriter Defendant Settlement” and, together with the Individual Defendant Settlement, the “Settlements”) to settle claims brought under the Securities Act only that relate solely to the Common Stock Secondary Offering and the Senior Notes Offering. The Individual Defendant Settlement, if approved, will resolve all claims in the Action as against the Individual Defendants, and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, if approved, will resolve all claims in the Action as against the Underwriter Defendants. The proposed Settlements will be considered independently by the Court and will only resolve claims against the defendants covered by the respective Settlements. The proposed Settlements do not settle any of the claims asserted against the remaining defendant in the Action, Apple, Inc. (“Apple” or the “Non-Settling Defendant”),4 which Lead Plaintiff continues to prosecute.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. This Notice explains important rights you may have, including the possible receipt of cash from the proposed Settlements. If you are

1 Any capitalized terms used in this Notice that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Individual Defendants dated January 26, 2018 (the “Individual Defendant Stipulation”) and the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Settling Underwriter Defendants dated August 18, 2017, together with the Supplement thereto dated January 26, 2018 (the “Underwriter Defendant Stipulation”), which are available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com. 2 The “Individual Defendants” consist of defendants Thomas Gutierrez, Richard Gaynor, Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal, Hoil Kim, and Daniel W. Squiller (collectively, the “Officer Defendants”) and defendants J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson, and Thomas Wroe, Jr. (collectively, the “Director Defendants”). 3 The “Underwriter Defendants” consist of defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC (f/k/a Goldman, Sachs & Co.), and Canaccord Genuity Inc. 4 The Individual Defendants, Underwriter Defendants, and Apple are collectively referred to as “Defendants”. The Individual Defendants and Underwriter Defendants are collectively referred to as “Settling Defendants”.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 80 of 161

Page 81: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

3

a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class,5 your legal rights will be affected whether or not you act. If you have any questions about this Notice, the proposed Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlements, or your eligibility to participate in these proposed Settlements, please DO NOT contact the Court, GTAT, Defendants, or their counsel. All questions should be directed to Lead Counsel or the Claims Administrator (see ¶ 56 below).

1. Description of the Action and the Settlement Classes: This Notice relates to proposed Settlements in a pending securities class action brought by investors alleging that Defendants violated the federal securities laws by, among other things, making false and misleading statements regarding GTAT or were statutorily liable for false and misleading statements in GTAT’s offering materials for GTAT’s Senior Notes Offering and Common Stock Secondary Offering. A more detailed description of the Action and the claims asserted against the Individual Defendants and the Underwriter Defendants (and against the remaining Defendant in the Action, Apple), is set forth in ¶¶ 11-24 below. The Individual Defendant Settlement, if approved by the Court, will settle the claims of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, as defined in ¶ 25 below, as against Individual Defendants only. The Underwriter Defendant Settlement, if approved by the Court, will settle the claims of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, as defined in ¶ 25 below, as against the Underwriter Defendants only.

2. Statement of the Settlement Classes’ Recoveries: Subject to Court approval, Plaintiffs on behalf of themselves and the other members of the respective relevant Settlement Classes, have agreed to settle with the Individual Defendants in exchange for a payment of $27,000,000 in cash (the “Individual Defendant Settlement Amount”) and to settle with the Underwriter Defendants in exchange for a payment of $9,700,000 in cash (the “Underwriter Defendant Settlement Amount”), such amounts to be deposited into separate escrow accounts for the benefit of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, respectively. The respective Net Settlement Funds (i.e., the respective Settlement Amounts plus any and all interest earned thereon (the “Settlement Funds”) less (i) any Taxes, (ii) any Notice and Administration Costs, (iii) any Litigation Expenses awarded by the Court, and (iv) any attorneys’ fees awarded by the Court) will be distributed in accordance with the plan of allocation that is approved by the Court. Lead Plaintiff’s proposed plan of allocation for the distribution of the net settlement proceeds (the “Plan of Allocation”) is attached at the end of this Notice.

3. Estimate of Average Amount of Recovery Per Share, Note, or Option: Lead Plaintiff’s damages expert estimates that that the conduct at issue in the Action affected approximately 153,104,782 shares of GTAT Common Stock, approximately 219,474 GTAT Senior Notes, and approximately 101,793,200 GTAT Call Options purchased, and approximately

5 Members of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class are referred to as “Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members” and members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class are referred to as “Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members”. Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members and Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members shall be collectively referred to as “Settlement Class Members”.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 81 of 161

Page 82: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

4

81,674,600 GTAT Put Options sold (written), during the Class Period.6 Assuming both Settlements are approved, if all eligible Settlement Class Members elect to participate in the Settlements, the estimated average recovery from the Settlements (before the deduction of the amounts set forth in ¶ 2 above) would be: (i) approximately $0.14 per affected share of GTAT Common Stock; (ii) approximately $53.18 per affected GTAT Senior Note; (iii) approximately $0.01 per affected GTAT Call Option; and (iv) approximately $0.04 per affected GTAT Put Option.7 Settlement Class Members should note, however, that the foregoing average recovery per share, note, or option is only an estimate. Some Settlement Class Members may recover more or less than these estimated amounts depending on, among other factors, which GTAT Securities they purchased/acquired or sold, when and at what prices they purchased/acquired or sold their GTAT Securities, and the total number of valid Claim Forms submitted. Distributions to eligible Settlement Class Members will be made based on the Plan of Allocation attached to this Notice or such other plan of allocation as may be approved by the Court.

4. Statement of Potential Outcome of Case and Potential Damages: The Settling Parties for each of the proposed Settlements do not agree on the average amount of damages per share, note, or option that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiff were to prevail on the claims asserted in the Action against the Individual Defendants or the Underwriter Defendants, as applicable. Among other things, neither the Individual Defendants nor the Underwriter Defendants agree with Lead Plaintiff’s assertions that: (i) they violated the federal securities laws; (ii) they made false or misleading statements; or (iii) damages were suffered by members of the respective Settlement Classes as a result of their alleged conduct.

5. Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses: Plaintiffs’ Counsel, who have been prosecuting the Action on a fully contingent basis since October 2014, have not received any payment of attorneys’ fees for their representation of the Settlement Classes nor have they been reimbursed for the litigation expenses necessarily incurred to prosecute the Action. Before final approval of the Settlements, Court-appointed Lead Counsel, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys’ fees on behalf of all Plaintiffs’ Counsel in an amount not to exceed 22% of each Settlement Fund. Lead Counsel will also apply for reimbursement of litigation expenses in an amount not exceed $450,000 (which may include an application for reimbursement of the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Plaintiffs

6 All options-related amounts in this paragraph are per share of the underlying security (i.e., 1/100 of a contract). 7 Assuming all eligible Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members elect to participate in the Individual Defendant Settlement, the estimated average recovery solely with respect to the IndividualDefendant Settlement (before the deduction of the amounts set forth in ¶ 2 above) would be: (i) approximately $0.13 per affected share of GTAT Common Stock; (ii) approximately $10.44 per affected GTAT Senior Note; (iii) approximately $0.01 per affected GTAT Call Option; and (iv) approximately $0.04 per affected GTAT Put Option. Assuming all eligible Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members elect to participate in the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, the estimated average recovery solely with respect to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement (before the deduction of the amounts set forth in ¶ 2 above) would be: (i) approximately $0.16 per affected share of GTAT Common Stock; and (ii) approximately $46.08 per affected GTAT Senior Note.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 82 of 161

Page 83: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

5

directly related to their representation of the Settlement Classes) to be paid from the Settlement Funds.8

The Court will determine the amount of any award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses. Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses. Assuming both Settlements are approved, if the Court approves Lead Counsel’s fee and expense application, the average cost per share, note, or option for attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses would be: (i) approximately $0.03 per affected share of GTAT Common Stock; (ii) approximately $12.35 per affected GTAT Senior Note; (iii) approximately $0.002 per affected GTAT Call Option; and (iv) approximately $0.009 per affected GTAT Put Option.9

6. Identification of Attorneys’ Representatives: Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Classes are represented by John C. Browne, Esq. of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor, New York, NY 10020, 1-800-380-8496, [email protected]

7. Reasons for the Settlements: Lead Plaintiff’s principal reason for entering into the Settlements is the substantial immediate cash benefit for the respective Settlement Classes without the risk or the delays inherent in further litigation. Moreover, the substantial cash benefits provided under the proposed Settlements must be considered against the significant risk that a smaller recovery – or indeed no recovery at all – against the Individual Defendants and/or the Underwriter Defendants might be achieved after contested motions, a trial of the Action, and likely appeals that would follow a trial, a process that could be expected to last several years. The Individual Defendants and Underwriter Defendants deny all allegations of wrongdoing or liability whatsoever and they are entering into their respective Settlements solely to eliminate the uncertainty, burden, and expense of further protracted litigation.

8 Should the Court not approve the Individual Defendant Settlement or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, attorneys’ fees will be paid only on the Settlement Fund created by the approved Settlement. Similarly, approved litigation expenses will be paid from the Settlement Fund created by the approved Settlement. 9 With respect to the Individual Defendant Settlement only, if the Court approves Lead Counsel’s fee and expense application, the average cost per share, note, or option would be: (i) approximately $0.03 per affected share of GTAT Common Stock; (ii) approximately $2.43 per affected GTAT Senior Note; (iii) approximately $0.002 per affected GTAT Call Option; and (iv) approximately $0.009 per affected GTAT Put Option. With respect to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement only, if the Court approves Lead Counsel’s fee and expense application from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Fund, the average cost per share or note would be: (i) approximately $0.04 per affected share of GTAT Common Stock; and (ii) approximately $10.70 per affected GTAT Senior Note.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 83 of 161

Page 84: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

6

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENTS:

SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN ________________, 2018

This is the only way to be eligible to receive a payment from the proceeds of the Individual Defendant Settlement or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement. If you are a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class and you remain in Settlement Class(es) in which are a member, you will be bound by the applicable Settlements as approved by the Court and, as applicable, you will give up any Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims that you have against the Individual Defendants and the other Individual Defendant Releasees (as discussed in ¶ 32 below) and any Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims that you have against the Underwriter Defendants and the other Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees (as discussed in ¶ 33 below), so it is in your interest to submit a Claim Form.

EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT CLASS(ES) THAT APPLY TO YOU BY SUBMITTING A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR EXCLUSION SO THAT IT IS RECEIVED NO LATER THAN ________________, 2018.

If you request to be excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, you will not be eligible to receive any payment from the Individual Defendant Settlement Fund. Similarly, if you request to be excluded from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, you will not be eligible to receive any payment from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Fund. Requesting exclusion is the only option that allows you ever to be part of any other lawsuit against the Individual Defendants or any of the other Individual Defendant Releasees or against the Underwriter Defendants or any of the other Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees concerning the respective Released Plaintiffs’ Claims.

OBJECT TO THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT, THE UNDERWRITER DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT, THE PLAN OF ALLOCATION, OR THE REQUEST FOR FEES AND LITIGATION EXPENSES BY SUBMITTING A WRITTEN OBJECTION SO THAT IT IS RECEIVED NO LATER THAN ________________, 2018.

If you do not like the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement, the proposed Underwriter Defendant Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or the request for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, you may write to the Court and explain why you do not like them. You cannot object to the Individual Defendant Settlement or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement unless you are a member of the Settlement Class that applies to that Settlement and do not exclude yourself.

GO TO A HEARING ON ___________, AND FILE A

Filing a written objection and notice of intention to appear by ________________, 2018 allows you to speak

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 84 of 161

Page 85: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

7

NOTICE OF INTENTION TO APPEAR SO THAT IT IS RECEIVED NO LATER THAN ________________, 2018.

in Court, at the discretion of the Court, about the fairness of the Individual Defendant Settlement if you are a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, the Underwriter Defendant Settlement if you are a member of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, or the Plan of Allocation and/or the request for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses if you are a member of one or both Settlement Classes. If you submit a written objection, you may (but you do not have to) attend the hearing and, at the discretion of the Court, speak to the Court about your objection.

DO NOTHING. If you are a member of one or both of the Settlement Classes and do not submit a valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the net proceeds of the Settlement(s) obtained on behalf of the Class(es) in which you are a member. You will, however, remain a member of the Settlement Class(es) that apply to you, which means that you give up your right to sue about the claims that are resolved by the applicable Settlements and you will be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court with respect to those Settlements.

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS

Why Did I Get This Notice? Page __ What Is This Case About? Page __ How Do I Know If I Am Affected By The Proposed Settlements? Who Is Included In The Individual Defendant And Underwriter Defendant Settlement Classes? Page __ What Are Lead Plaintiff’s Reasons For The Proposed Settlements? Page __ What Might Happen If There Were No Settlements? Page __ How Are Settlement Class Members Affected By The Action And The Respective Settlements? Page __ How Much Will My Payment From The Settlements Be?

How Do I Participate In The Settlements? What Do I Need To Do? Page __ What Payment Are The Attorneys Seeking? How Will The Lawyers Be Paid? Page __ What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of One Or Both Of The Settlement Classes? How Do I Exclude Myself? Page __ When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Proposed Settlements? Do I Have To Come To The Hearing? How Do I Object? May I Speak At The Hearing If I Don’t Like The Settlements? Page __ What If I Bought GTAT Securities On Someone Else’s Behalf? Page __

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 85 of 161

Page 86: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

8

Can I See The Court File? Whom Should I Contact If I Have Questions? Page __

WHY DID I GET THIS NOTICE?

8. The Court directed that this Notice be mailed to you because you or someone in your family or an investment account for which you serve as a custodian may have purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and/or GTAT Call Options, and/or sold (wrote) GTAT Put Options, during the Class Period. The Court has directed us to send you this Notice because, as a potential Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member, you have a right to know about your options before the Court rules on the proposed Settlements and to understand how this class action lawsuit may generally affect your legal rights.

9. The purpose of this Notice is to inform you of the existence of this case, that it is a class action, how you might be affected, and how to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class(es) if you wish to so do. It is also being sent to inform you of the terms of the proposed Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Settlements and of a hearing to be held by the Court to consider the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed Settlements, the proposed Plan of Allocation, and the motion by Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses (the “Settlement Fairness Hearing”). See ¶¶ 46-47 below for details about the Settlement Fairness Hearing, including the date and location of the hearing.

10. The issuance of this Notice is not an expression of any opinion by the Court concerning the merits of any claim in the Action, and the Court still has to decide whether to approve the proposed Settlements. If the Court approves the proposed Plan of Allocation (or some other plan of allocation), then payments pursuant to the approved Settlements and the Court-approved plan of allocation will be made to Authorized Claimants after any appeals are resolved and after the completion of all claims processing. Please be patient, as this process can take some time to complete.

WHAT IS THIS CASE ABOUT?

11. This is a securities class action brought against certain of the executive officers and directors of technology company GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (“GTAT” or the “Company”); the underwriters of the Company’s public offering of 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 (the “Senior Notes Offering”) and its secondary public offering of common stock (the “Common Stock Offering”), both conducted on or about December 4, 2013; and Apple. The Action alleges, among other things, that during the Class Period and/or in the offering materials for the Offerings, Defendants misled investors about the true nature, progress, and success of GTAT’s joint venture agreement with Apple for the production of sapphire material. The Action further alleges that GTAT investors suffered economic harm when the truth about the Apple agreement was revealed upon the Company’s filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection on October 6, 2014.10

10 As a result of the Company’s filing for bankruptcy protection, GTAT was not named as a defendant in this action.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 86 of 161

Page 87: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

9

12. This litigation was commenced on or about October 9, 2014, with the filing of multiple putative securities class action complaints in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire (the “Court”). By Order dated February 4, 2015, the Court consolidated the related actions into the above-captioned Action.

13. Pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77z-1 and 78u-4, as amended (the “PSLRA”), notice to the public was issued setting forth the deadline by which putative class members could move the Court to be appointed to act as lead plaintiff. On May 20, 2015, the Court entered an Order appointing Douglas Kurz as Lead Plaintiff in the Action, and approving Lead Plaintiff’s selection of Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP as Lead Counsel and Orr & Reno as Local Counsel.

14. On July 20, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed and served the Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”), which included the Securities Act Plaintiffs and Vance K. Opperman as additional named plaintiffs. The Complaint asserted (i) claims under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, and Gutierrez; (ii) claims under § 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, Gutierrez, Kim, Squiller, and Apple; (iii) claims under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) against Defendants Gaynor, Bal, Gutierrez, Conaway, Cote, Godshalk, Massengill, Petrovich, Switz, Watson, Wroe, and the Underwriter Defendants; (iv) claims under § 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Underwriter Defendants; and (v) claims under § 15 of the Securities Act against Defendants Gaynor, Kim, Gutierrez, Squiller, Conaway, Cote, Godshalk, Massengill, Petrovich, Switz, Watson, Wroe, and Apple.

15. On October 7, 2015, Defendants filed and served their motions to dismiss the Complaint. On December 18, 2015, Lead Plaintiff filed and served his papers in opposition to the motions to dismiss; on March 2, 2016, Defendants filed and served their reply papers; and, on March 22, 2016, Lead Plaintiff filed his sur-reply.

16. On March 17, 2017, following extensive, arm’s-length negotiations, Plaintiffs and the Underwriter Defendants entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “Underwriter Defendant MOU”) memorializing the settling parties’ agreement in principle to settle the Action as against the Settling Underwriter Defendants for $9,700,000 in cash. Pursuant to the Underwriter Defendant MOU, the agreement to settle was conditioned on Plaintiffs confirming the fairness, reasonableness, and adequacy of the Underwriter Settlement based on due-diligence discovery to be provided by the Underwriter Defendants, including the production of certain documents and information regarding the allegations and claims asserted against the Underwriter Defendants in the Complaint. The settling parties agreed that any ruling by the Court in this Action, other than a ruling relating specifically to the Settlement, would not affect the validity or finality of the Settlement.

17. Following the execution of the Underwriter Defendant MOU, Lead Counsel reviewed, as part of the due-diligence discovery provided by the Underwriter Defendants, approximately 13,500 documents totaling approximately 70,000 pages from the files of the Underwriter Defendants concerning the Senior Notes Offering and the Common Stock Offering, and, based on this review, Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel confirmed that the Underwriter Defendant Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 87 of 161

Page 88: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

10

18. On May 4, 2017, the Court entered its Memorandum Opinion denying in part and granting in part the motions to dismiss filed by the Individual Defendants and Apple, and denying the Underwriter Defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice to their ability to re-submit the motion if necessary.11 Plaintiffs’ remaining claims following the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss include: (i) claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, and Gutierrez; (ii) claims under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act against Defendants Bal, Gaynor, Gutierrez, Kim, and Squiller; (iii) a claim under Section 20(a) of the ‘34 Act against Apple; (iv) claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act against Defendants Gaynor, Bal, Gutierrez, Conaway, Cote, Godshalk, Massengill, Petrovich, Switz, Watson, Wroe, and the Underwriter Defendants; (v) claims under Section 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act against the Underwriter Defendants; (vi) claims under Section 15 of the Securities Act against Defendants Gutierrez, Gaynor, Kim, and Squiller; and (vii) a claim under Section 15 of the Securities Act against Apple.

19. On August 18, 2017, Plaintiffs and the Underwriter Defendants entered into the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Settling Underwriter Defendants (the “Underwriter Defendant Stipulation”) setting forth the final terms and conditions of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement. The Underwriter Defendant Stipulation can be viewed at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

20. On October 2, 2017, Lead Counsel and the remaining Defendants’ Counsel participated in a full day mediation session before retired United States District Court Judge Layn R. Phillips (the “Mediator”). In advance of that session, the parties exchanged detailed mediation statements and exhibits to the Mediator, which addressed the issues of both liability and damages. As a result of extensive, arm’s-length negotiations at the mediation session, Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants reached an agreement in principle to settle the Action as against the Individual Defendants for $27,000,000 in cash, which was memorialized in a Settlement Term Sheet (the “Individual Defendant Term Sheet”) executed on October 13, 2017.

21. On January 26, 2018, Plaintiffs and the Individual Defendants entered into the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with Individual Defendants (the “Individual Defendant Stipulation”) setting forth the final terms and conditions of the Individual Defendant Settlement. The Individual Defendant Stipulation can be viewed at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

22. In connection with the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Individual Defendants agreed to produce and have produced to Lead Counsel within twenty (20) days following the signing of the Individual Defendant Term Sheet copies of (i) all documents produced by Individual Defendants directly or on their behalf by their counsel to the Trustee in Davis v. Gutierrez, et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-147-JL (D.N.H.) (the “Davis Action”); (ii) all transcripts of depositions in the Individual Defendants’ possession, custody or control taken in the Davis Action and in any investigatory proceeding relating to these matters; and (iii) all documents produced by the Individual Defendants directly or on their behalf by their counsel to

11 Upon reaching their agreement-in-principle to settle the Action, the parties to the Underwriter Settlement informed the Court that they had reached a settlement and requested that the Court refrain from ruling on the Underwriter Defendants’ motion to dismiss while the parties engaged in due-diligence discovery. Accordingly, in its May 4, 2017 Memorandum Opinion, the Court denied the Underwriter Defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice to their ability to re-submit the motion if necessary.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 88 of 161

Page 89: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

11

the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or any other investigative authority. The Individual Defendants also agreed that for a period of one hundred-twenty (120) calendar days following the filing of the motion for preliminary approval of the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Individual Defendants will make themselves available for a reasonable number of depositions to occur at an agreed upon time and location convenient to the settling parties.

23. The Settling Defendants have entered into their respective Stipulations solely to eliminate the uncertainty, burden, and expense of further protracted litigation. Each of the Settling Defendants denies any wrongdoing.

24. On __________, 201__, the Court preliminarily approved both the Individual Defendant Settlement and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, authorized this Notice to be disseminated to potential Settlement Class Members, and scheduled the Settlement Fairness Hearing to consider whether to grant final approval to the Settlements.

HOW DO I KNOW IF I AM AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS? WHO IS INCLUDED IN THE UNDERWRITER DEFENDANT AND INDIVIDUAL

DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT CLASSES?

25. If you are a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, you are subject to the terms of the applicable Settlements, unless you timely request to be excluded.

The Individual Defendant Settlement Class consists of: all persons and entities who or which from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded GTAT common stock (“GTAT Common Stock”) and/or publicly traded GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 (“GTAT Senior Notes”), purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded call options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Call Options”), and/or sold (wrote) publicly traded put options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Put Options”), and were damaged thereby.

The Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class consists of:

all persons and entities who or which from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired (i) GTAT Senior Notes pursuant or traceable to GTAT’s December 2013 registration statement and prospectus supplement for the GTAT Senior Notes’ offering (the “Senior Notes Offering”) and/or (ii) shares of GTAT Common Stock pursuant or traceable to GTAT’s December 2013 registration statement and prospectus supplement for the secondary offering of GTAT common stock (the “Common Stock Secondary Offering”).

Excluded from both the Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Settlement Classes by definition are:

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 89 of 161

Page 90: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

12

Defendants; GTAT; the affiliates and subsidiaries of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple; the Officers,12 directors, and partners of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple during the Class Period; members of the Immediate Family13 of any excluded person; the heirs, successors, and assigns of any excluded person or entity; and any entity in which any excluded person or entity has or had during the Class Period a controlling interest; provided, however, that any Investment Vehicle14 shall not be deemed an excluded person or entity by definition. Also excluded from both the Individual Defendant and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Classes are any persons or entities who or which exclude themselves by submitting a valid and timely request for exclusion from the Settlement Classes in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Notice. See “What if I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of One Or Both Of The Settlement Classes? How Do I Exclude Myself,” on page [__] below.

RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE DOES NOT MEAN THAT YOU ARE AN INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER OR AN UNDERWRITER DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER OR THAT YOU WILL BE ENTITLED TO RECEIVE PROCEEDS FROM THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT OR THE UNDERWRITER DEFENDANT SETTLEMENT.

IF YOU ARE A SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBER AND YOU WISH TO BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF PROCEEDS FROM THE SETTLEMENT(S) PERTAINING TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS(ES) IN WHICH YOU ARE A MEMBER, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT THE CLAIM FORM THAT IS BEING DISTRIBUTED WITH THIS NOTICE AND THE REQUIRED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AS SET FORTH THEREIN POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN ________________, 2018.

WHAT ARE LEAD PLAINTIFF’S REASONS FOR THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS?

26. Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel believe that the claims asserted against the Individual Defendants and the Underwriter Defendants have merit. They recognize, however, the expense

12 “Officer” means any officer as that term is defined in Securities and Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f). 13 “Immediate Family” means children, stepchildren, parents, stepparents, spouses, siblings, mothers-in-law, fathers-in-law, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, brothers-in-law, and sisters-in-law. As used in this definition, “spouse” shall mean a husband, a wife, or a partner in a state-recognized domestic relationship or civil union. 14 “Investment Vehicle” means any investment company or pooled investment fund, including, but not limited to, mutual fund families, exchange-traded funds, fund of funds, and hedge funds, in which any of the Underwriter Defendants have, has, or may have a direct or indirect interest, or as to which any of their respective affiliates may act as an investment advisor but of which any of the Underwriter Defendants or any of their respective affiliates is not a majority owner or does not hold a majority beneficial interest. This definition of Investment Vehicle does not bring into the Settlement Class any of the Underwriter Defendants themselves.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 90 of 161

Page 91: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

13

and length of continued proceedings necessary to pursue their claims against these Defendants through trial and appeals, as well as the very substantial risks they would face in establishing liability and damages. For example, with respect to claims under § 10(b) of the Exchange Act, Plaintiffs faced significant risks in proving that the alleged false statements made by the Individual Defendants during the Class Period were intentionally or recklessly made. Also, with respect to claims under § 11 of the Securities Act, Plaintiffs faced significant challenges associated with establishing that there were material misstatements and omissions in the public securities offering documents at issue and that the Underwriter Defendants’ failed to conduct adequate due diligence. In addition, Plaintiffs faced challenges with respect to proving loss causation and class-wide damages. Furthermore, Plaintiffs would have to prevail at several stages in this litigation – motions for summary judgment, trial, and if they prevailed on those, on the appeals that were likely to follow. Finally, with respect to the Individual Defendants, Lead Plaintiff recognized that there was a significant risk that the Individual Defendants would be unable to pay in whole or in part any ultimate judgment in this case. Thus, there were very significant risks attendant to the continued prosecution of the claims against the Settling Defendants.

27. In light of these risks, the amounts of the Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Settlements and the certainty of recovery to the Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Settlement Classes, Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel believe that the proposed Settlements are fair, reasonable and adequate, and in the best interests of the Settlement Classes. Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel believe that the Settlements provide a substantial benefit to the respective Settlement Classes, namely $27,000,000 in cash to the Individual Defendant Settlement Class (less the various deductions described in this Notice) and $9,700,000 in cash to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class (less the various deductions described in this Notice), as compared to the risk that the claims in the Action against the Individual Defendants and/or the Underwriter Defendants might produce a smaller, or no recovery, after summary judgment, trial, and appeals.

28. The Settling Defendants have denied the claims asserted against them in the Action and deny having engaged in any wrongdoing or violation of law of any kind whatsoever. The Settling Defendants have agreed to their respective Settlements solely to eliminate the uncertainty, burden, and expense of continued litigation. Accordingly, the Settlements may not be construed as an admission of any wrongdoing by the Settling Defendants.

WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN IF THERE WERE NO SETTLEMENTS?

29. If there were no Settlements and Plaintiffs failed to establish any essential legal or factual element of their claims against the Individual Defendants and the Underwriter Defendants, neither Plaintiffs nor the other members of the respective Settlement Classes would recover anything from the Individual Defendants or the Underwriter Defendants. Also, if the Individual Defendants or the Underwriter Defendants were successful in proving any of their defenses, either on the Underwriter Defendant’s pending motion to dismiss, or with respect to both the Individual Defendants and the Underwriter Defendants on motions for summary judgment, at trial, or on appeal, the Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Settlement Classes could recover substantially less than the amounts provided in the respective Settlements, or nothing at all.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 91 of 161

Page 92: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

14

HOW ARE SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS AFFECTED BY THE ACTION AND THE RESPECTIVE SETTLEMENTS?

30. If you are an Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member or Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member, you are represented by Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel, unless you enter an appearance through counsel of your own choice at your own expense. You are not required to retain your own counsel, but if you choose to do so, such counsel must file a notice of appearance on your behalf and must serve copies of his or her appearance on the attorneys listed in the section entitled, “When And Where Will The Court Decide Whether To Approve The Proposed Settlements?,” below.

31. If you are an Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member and you do not exclude yourself from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, you will be bound by any orders issued by the Court relating to the Individual Defendant Settlement, and if you are an Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member and you do not exclude yourself from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, you will be bound by any orders issued by the Court relating to you the Underwriter Defendant Settlements.15

32. If the Individual Defendant Settlement is approved, the Court will enter a judgment (the “Individual Defendant Judgment”). The Individual Defendant Judgment will dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Individual Defendants and will provide that, upon the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement, Plaintiffs and each of the other Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim16 against the

15 If you are an Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member and do not wish to remain a member of the Settlement Class(es) in which you are member, you may exclude yourself from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class by following the instructions in the section entitled, “What If I Do Not Want To Be A Member Of The Individual Defendant Settlement Class Or The Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class? How Do I Exclude Myself?,” below. 16 “Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims” means any and all claims, rights, duties, controversies, obligations, demands, actions, debts, sums of money, suits, contracts, agreements, promises, damages, losses, judgments, liabilities, allegations, arguments, and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory, administrative, or foreign law, or any other law, rule or regulation, at law or in equity, whether class or individual in nature, whether fixed or contingent, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether liquidated or unliquidated, whether matured or unmatured, that Plaintiffs or any other member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class (i) asserted in the Action, or (ii) could have asserted in any forum that arise out of, are based upon, or relate to the allegations, transactions, acts, facts, matters, occurrences, statements, representations or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint and that relate to the purchase or acquisition of GTAT publicly traded common stock, GTAT Senior Notes, or GTAT Call Options, or the sale of GTAT Put Options, during the Class Period. Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not cover or include: (i) any claims by any governmental entity arising out of any governmental investigation of GTAT, the Individual Defendants, or any of GTAT’s respective former or

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 92 of 161

Page 93: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

15

Individual Defendants and the other Individual Defendant Releasees,17 and will forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any or all of the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees.

33. If the Underwriter Defendant Settlement is approved, the Court will enter a judgment (the “Underwriter Defendant Judgment”). The Underwriter Defendant Judgment will dismiss with prejudice the claims against the Settling Underwriter Defendants (as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation) and will provide that, upon the Effective Date of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs and each of the other Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally, and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim18

against the Settling Underwriter Defendants and the other Settling Underwriter Defendants’

current officers or directors relating to the wrongful conduct alleged in the Action; (ii) any claims asserted, or which may be asserted, in the Action against any of the Underwriter Defendants or Apple; (iii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court; (iv) any claims asserted in the Davis Action; and (v) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Individual Defendant Settlement. For the avoidance of doubt, the above-referenced exclusion for claims by any governmental entity is set forth above only to clarify that the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not affect the rights that any governmental entity may have to assert a claim against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees, and it does not preserve for any Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member any right to assert a claim on the basis of that exclusion from the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims. 17 “Individual Defendant Releasees” means (i) the Individual Defendants and their attorneys, (ii) the respective Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, estates, administrators, beneficiaries, agents, affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors, predecessors-in-interest, successors, successors-in-interest, assigns, attorneys, advisors, and associates of each of the foregoing, (iii) all current and former directors, officers, and employees of GTAT, and (iv) the Insureds (as defined in the Individual Defendant Stipulation), in their capacities as such; provided, however, that the Individual Defendant Releasees do not include the Underwriter Defendants or Apple. 18 “Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim” means all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, that were or could have been asserted in the Action arising out of or relating to (i) the purchase, acquisition, sale, or holding of GTAT Senior Notes or GTAT Common Stock by Plaintiffs and/or Settlement Class Members during the Class Period, and (ii) the facts, matters, allegations, transactions, events, disclosures, statements, acts, or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint. Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not cover or include: (i) any claims asserted, or which may be asserted, in the Action against any of the Non-Settling Defendants (as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation) or any person or entity with whom or which Lead Plaintiff has a tolling agreement; (ii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court after notice to the Settling Underwriter Defendants; and (iii) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 93 of 161

Page 94: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

16

Releasees,19 and will forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees.

34. “Unknown Claims” means any (i) Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims which Lead Plaintiff or any other Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, (ii) any Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims which Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, or any other Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member does not know or suspect to exist in his, her or its favor at the time of the release of such claims, (iii) any Released Individual Defendants’ Claims (as defined in footnote 21 below) which any Individual Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in its favor at the time of the release of such claims, and (iv) and any Released Underwriter Defendants’ Claims (as defined in footnote 23 below) which any Underwriter Defendant does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of the release of such claims, which, if known by him, her or it, might have affected his, her or its decision(s) with respect to the Individual Defendant Settlement or Underwriter Defendant Settlement, as applicable. With respect to any and all Released Claims (as collectively defined in the Stipulations), including Unknown Claims, the respective Settling Parties stipulate and agree that, upon the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement and upon the Effective Date of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, the Individual Defendants, and the Underwriter Defendants shall be deemed to have expressly waived, and each of the other respective Settlement Class Members shall be deemed to have waived, and by operation of the respective Judgments shall have expressly waived, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law or foreign law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to California Civil Code §1542, which provides:

A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.

Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, the Individual Defendants, and the Underwriter Defendants acknowledge, and each of the other Settlement Class Members shall be deemed by operation of law to have acknowledged, that the foregoing waiver was separately bargained for and a material element of the respective Settlements.20

19 “Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees” means (i) the Settling Underwriter Defendants; (ii) the current and former parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, and assignees of each of the Settling Underwriter Defendants; and (iii) the current and former officers, directors, agents, employees, attorneys, and advisors of each of the foregoing in (i) and (ii), in their capacities as such. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees do not include any of the Non-Settling Defendants (as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation). 20 With respect to the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Settling Parties acknowledge that they may hereafter discover facts in addition to or different from those which he, she, it or their counsel now knows or believes to be true with respect to the subject matter of the Released Claims, but, upon the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Settling Parties shall expressly settle and release, and

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 94 of 161

Page 95: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

17

35. The Individual Defendant Judgment will also provide that, upon the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Individual Defendants, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Individual Defendants’ Claim21

against Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and the other Individual Defendant Plaintiff Releasees,22 and will forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, maintaining, or prosecuting any or all of the Released Individual Defendant Claims against any of the Individual Defendant Plaintiff Releasees.

36. The Underwriter Defendant Judgment will also provide that, upon the Effective Date of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, the Settling Underwriter Defendants, on behalf of themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, will have fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, and discharged each and every Released Underwriter Defendants’ Claim23 against Lead Plaintiff, the Securities Act Plaintiffs, and the other Underwriter Defendant Plaintiffs’ Releasees,24 and will forever be barred and enjoined from

each Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Judgment shall have, settled and released any and all of the Released Claims without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts. 21 “Released Individual Defendants’ Claims” means all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims against the Individual Defendants. Released Individual Defendants’ Claims do not include: (i) any claims against any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court; and (ii) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Individual Defendant Settlement. 22 “Individual Defendant Plaintiff Releasees” means (i) Plaintiffs, their attorneys, and all other Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members; (ii) the current and former parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, and assignees of each of the foregoing in (i); and (iii) the current and former officers, directors, Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, estates, administrators, beneficiaries, agents, affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors, predecessors-in-interest, successors, successors-in-interest, assigns, attorneys, advisors, and associates of the each of the foregoing in (i) and (ii), in their capacities as such. 23 “Released Underwriter Defendants’ Claims” means all claims and causes of action of every nature and description, whether known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, common, or foreign law, that arise out of or relate in any way to the institution, prosecution, or settlement of the claims against the Settling Underwriter Defendants. Released Underwriter Defendants’ Claims do not include: (i) any claims against any person or entity who or which submits a request for exclusion from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court after notice to the Underwriter Defendants; and (ii) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement. 24 “Underwriter Defendant Plaintiffs’ Releasees” means (i) Plaintiffs, their respective attorneys, and all other Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members; (ii) the current and former parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, and assignees of each of the foregoing in (i); and (iii) the current and former officers, directors, agents, employees, attorneys, and advisors of the each of the foregoing in (i) and (ii), in their capacities as such.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 95 of 161

Page 96: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

18

prosecuting any or all of the Released Underwriter Defendants’ Claims against any of the Underwriter Defendant Plaintiffs’ Releasees.

HOW MUCH WILL MY PAYMENT FROM THE SETTLEMENTS BE? HOW DO I PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENTS? WHAT DO I NEED TO DO?

37. At this time, it is not possible to make any determination as to how much any individual Settlement Class Member may receive from the proceeds of the Settlement(s) in which he, she, or it is eligible to participate. The proposed plan for the distribution of the settlement proceeds and what Settlement Class Members must do to be eligible to participate in the recoveries is set forth in the Plan of Allocation attached to this Notice.

38. To be eligible for a payment from the proceeds of the Individual Defendant Settlement, you must be a member of the Individual Settlement Class, and to be eligible for a payment from the proceeds of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, you must be a member of the Underwriter Settlement Class. To be eligible for a payment from the Settlement(s), you must timely complete and return the Claim Form with adequate supporting documentation postmarked no later than ________________, 2018. Details of the requirements and process for submitting a Claim Form are set forth in the Plan of Allocation and in the Claim Form which accompanies this Notice. If you are a member of one or both of the Settlement Classes and do not submit a valid Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the proceeds of the Settlement(s) obtained on behalf of the Settlement Class(es) in which you are a member.

WHAT PAYMENT ARE THE ATTORNEYS SEEKING? HOW WILL THE LAWYERS BE PAID?

39. Plaintiffs’ Counsel have not received any payment for their services in pursuing claims on behalf of the Settlement Classes in the Action, nor have Plaintiffs’ Counsel been reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses. Before final approval of the Settlements, Lead Counsel will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys’ fees for all Plaintiffs’ Counsel in an amount not to exceed 22% of each Settlement Fund. At the same time, Lead Counsel also intends to apply for reimbursement of litigation expenses from the Settlement Funds in an amount not to exceed $450,000, which may include an application for reimbursement of the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by Plaintiffs directly related to their representation of the Settlement Classes.

40. The Court will determine the amount of any award of attorneys’ fees or reimbursement of litigation expenses. Should the Court approve only one of the two Settlements, attorneys’ fees will be paid only on the approved Settlement and the litigation expenses approved by the Court will be paid from the Settlement Fund created by the approved Settlement. Settlement Class Members are not personally liable for any such fees or expenses.

WHAT IF I DO NOT WANT TO BE A MEMBER OF ONE OR BOTH OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASSES? HOW DO I EXCLUDE MYSELF?

41. Each Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member will be bound by the determinations, orders and judgments in this Action relating to the Individual Defendant Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such person or entity submits a written request for exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class that is accepted by the

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 96 of 161

Page 97: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

19

Court. Similarly, each Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member will be bound by the determinations, orders and judgments in this Action relating to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, whether favorable or unfavorable, unless such person or entity submits a written request for exclusion from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court. You have the right to exclude yourself from one of the Settlement Classes, while remaining a member of the other Settlement Class.

42. Each request for exclusion must be in writing and must be mailed or delivered to GTAT Securities Litigation, EXCLUSIONS, c/o GCG, P.O. Box 10463, Dublin, OH 43017-4063, such that it is received no later than ________________, 2018. You will not be able to exclude yourself from either of the Settlement Classes after that date. Each request for exclusion must: (i) state the name, address and telephone number of the person or entity requesting exclusion, and in the case of entities the name and telephone number of the appropriate contact person; (ii) for Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members who wish to request exclusion from that class, state that such person or entity “requests exclusion from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class in Levy v. Gutierrez, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL (GTAT Securities Litigation)”; (iii) for Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members who wish to request exclusion from that class, state that such person or entity “requests exclusion from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class in Levy v. Gutierrez, et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL (GTAT Securities Litigation)”; (iv) state the amount of each GTAT Security (in terms of number of shares of GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Call Options, GTAT Put Options, and/or face value of GTAT Senior Notes) that the person or entity requesting exclusion purchased/acquired and/or sold during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive), as well as the dates and prices of each such purchase/acquisition and sale; (v) with respect to any Class Period purchases of GTAT Common Stock and/or GTAT Senior Notes, identify any shares of GTAT Common Stock purchased in or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering and/or any GTAT Senior Notes purchased in or traceable to the Senior Notes Offering; and (vi) be signed by the person or entity requesting exclusion or an authorized representative. A request for exclusion shall not be valid and effective unless it provides all the information called for in this paragraph and is received within the time stated above, or is otherwise accepted by the Court.

43. If you do not want to be part of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, you must follow these instructions for exclusion even if you have pending, or later file, another lawsuit, arbitration, or other proceeding relating to any Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees or any Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim against any of the Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees. Excluding yourself from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class is the only option that allows you to be part of any other lawsuit against any of the Individual Defendants or any of the other Individual Defendant Releasees concerning the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims, and excluding yourself from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class is the only option that allows you to be part of any other lawsuit against any of the Settling Underwriter Defendants or any of the other Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees concerning the Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims. Please note, however, if you decide to exclude yourself from the either of the Settlement Classes, you may be time-barred from asserting certain of the claims covered by the Action by a statute of repose.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 97 of 161

Page 98: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

20

44. If you are excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, you will not be eligible to receive any payment from the proceeds of the Individual Defendant Settlement Fund. Similarly, if you are excluded from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, you will not be eligible to receive any payment from the proceeds of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Fund.

45. The Individual Defendants have the right to terminate the Individual Defendant Settlement, and the Underwriter Defendants have the right to terminate the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, if valid and timely requests for exclusion are received from persons and entities entitled to be members of applicable Settlement Class in an amount that exceeds the amounts agreed to by Lead Plaintiff and the Individual Defendants and Lead Plaintiff and the Underwriter Defendants, respectively.

WHEN AND WHERE WILL THE COURT DECIDE WHETHER TO APPROVE THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT AND THE UNDERWRITER DEFENDANT

SETTLEMENTS? DO I HAVE TO COME TO THE HEARING? HOW DO I OBJECT? MAY I SPEAK AT THE HEARING IF I DON’T LIKE THE SETTLEMENTS?

46. Settlement Class Members do not need to attend the Settlement Fairness Hearing. The Court will consider any submission made in accordance with the provisions below even if a Settlement Class Member does not attend the hearing. Settlement Class Members can participate in the Settlements without attending the Settlement Fairness Hearing. Please Note: The date and time of the Settlement Fairness Hearing may change without further written notice to the Settlement Classes. You should monitor the Court’s docket and the website maintained by the Claims Administrator, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com, before making plans to attend the Settlement Fairness Hearing. You may also confirm the date and time of the Settlement Fairness Hearing by contacting Lead Counsel.

47. The Settlement Fairness Hearing will be held on ___________, 2018 at _:__ _.m., before the Honorable Joseph N. Laplante at the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Courtroom 2, 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301-3941. The Court reserves the right to approve the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses, and/or any other related matter at or after the Settlement Fairness Hearing without further notice to Settlement Class Members.

48. Only members of the Individual Defendant Class (i.e., any person or entity that comes with the definition of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and does not request exclusion from that class) may object to the Individual Defendant Settlement. Similarly, only members of the Underwriter Defendant Class (i.e., any person or entity that comes with the definition of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class and does not request exclusion from that class) may object to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement. However, any member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class or Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class may object to the proposed Plan of Allocation and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for an award of attorneys’ fees or reimbursement of expenses. Objections must be in writing. You must file any written objection, together with copies of all other papers and briefs supporting the objection, with the Clerk’s Office at the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire at the address set forth below on or before ________________, 2018. You must also mail the papers to Lead

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 98 of 161

Page 99: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

21

Counsel and, if it is to one or both of the Settlements to which you are objecting, to the applicable designated Defendants’ Counsel as well at the addresses set forth below so that the papers are received on or before ________________, 2018.

Clerk’s Office

U.S. District Court District of New Hampshire Clerk of the Court 55 Pleasant Street, Room 110 Concord, NH 03301-3941

Lead Counsel

Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP John C. Browne, Esq. 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor New York, NY 10020

Individual Defendants’ Counsel

Ropes & Gray LLPRandall W. Bodner, Esq. 800 Boylston Street Boston, MA 02199

Morgan, Lewis, & Bockius LLP Jordan D. Hershman, Esq. One Federal Street Boston, MA 02110-1726

Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz David A. Katz, Esq. 51 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP Ian D. Roffman, Esq. 155 Seaport Blvd. Boston, MA 02210

Underwriter Defendants’ Counsel

Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLPRichard A. Rosen, Esq. 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019-6064

49. Any objection: (i) must state the name, address, and telephone number of the person or entity objecting and must be signed by the objector; (ii) must contain a statement of the Settlement Class Member’s objection or objections, and the specific reasons for each objection, including any legal and evidentiary support the Settlement Class Member wishes to bring to the Court’s attention; and (iii) must include documents sufficient to prove Settlement Class membership, including the amount of each GTAT Security (in terms of number of shares of GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Call Options, GTAT Put Options, and/or face value of GTAT Senior Notes) that the person or entity requesting exclusion purchased/acquired and/or sold during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive), as well as the dates and prices of each such purchase/acquisition and sale, and with respect to Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members, identification of those shares of GTAT Common Stock purchased in or traceable to the Common Stock

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 99 of 161

Page 100: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

22

Secondary Offering and/or those GTAT Senior Notes purchased in or traceable to the Senior Notes Offering.

50. You may not object to the Individual Defendant Settlement if you exclude yourself from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class or if you are not a member of that class. Similarly, you may not object to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement if you exclude yourself from the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class or if you are not a member of that class. Further, you may not object to the Plan of Allocation and/or the motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses unless you are a member of at least one of the Settlement Classes and do not exclude yourself from that Settlement Class.

51. You may file a written objection without having to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. You may not, however, appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing to present your objection unless you first filed and served a written objection in accordance with the procedures described above, unless the Court orders otherwise.

52. If you wish to be heard orally at the hearing, you must also file a notice of appearance with the Clerk’s Office and serve it on Lead Counsel and, if it is the Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement about which you wish to be heard, on Individual Defendants’ Counsel and/or the Underwriter Defendants’ Counsel, as applicable, at the addresses set forth above so that it is received on or before ________________, 2018. Persons who intend to object and desire to present evidence at the Settlement Fairness Hearing must include in their written objection or notice of appearance the identity of any witnesses they may call to testify and any exhibits they intend to introduce into evidence at the hearing. Such persons may be heard orally at the discretion of the Court.

53. You are not required to hire an attorney to represent you in making written objections or in appearing at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. However, if you decide to hire an attorney, it will be at your own expense, and that attorney must file a notice of appearance with the Court and serve it on Lead Counsel and, if it is the Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement to which you are objecting, on Individual Defendants’ Counsel and/or the Underwriter Defendants’ Counsel, as applicable, at the addresses set forth in ¶ 48 above so that the notice is received on or before ________________, 2018.

54. Unless the Court orders otherwise, any Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member who does not object to the Individual Defendant Settlement and any Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member who does not object to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement in the manner described above will be deemed to have waived any objection to the Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement, as applicable, and shall be forever foreclosed from making any objection to the proposed Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement, and any member of the Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class who does not object to the proposed Plan of Allocation or requested attorneys’ fees and expenses in the manner described above will be deemed to have waived any objection to the proposed Plan of Allocation or the requested fees and expenses and shall be forever foreclosed from making any such objection. Settlement Class Members do not need to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing or take any other action to indicate their approval.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 100 of 161

Page 101: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

23

WHAT IF I BOUGHT GTAT SECURITIES ON SOMEONE ELSE’S BEHALF?

55. If, during the period from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive, you purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock and/or GTAT Senior Notes, purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Call Options, and/or sold (wrote) GTAT Put Options, for the beneficial interest of persons or organizations other than yourself, you must either (a) within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of this Notice, request from the Claims Administrator sufficient copies of the Notice to forward to all such beneficial owners and within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of those Notices forward them to all such beneficial owners; or (b) within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of this Notice, provide a list of the names and addresses of all such beneficial owners to GTAT Securities Litigation, c/o GCG, P.O. Box 10463, Dublin, OH 43017-4063. If you choose the first option, you must send a statement to the Claims Administrator confirming that the mailing was made and you must retain your mailing records for use in connection with any further notices that may be provided in the Action. If you choose the second option, the Claims Administrator will send a copy of the Notice to the beneficial owners. Upon full compliance with these directions, such nominees may seek reimbursement of their reasonable expenses actually incurred, by providing the Claims Administrator with proper documentation supporting the expenses for which reimbursement is sought. Copies of this Notice may also be obtained from the website maintained by the Claims Administrator, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com, by calling the Claims Administrator toll-free at 1-866-562-8790, or by emailing the Claims Administrator at [email protected].

CAN I SEE THE COURT FILE? WHOM SHOULD I CONTACT IF I HAVE QUESTIONS?

56. This Notice contains only a summary of the terms of the proposed Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Settlements. For more detailed information about the matters involved in this Action, you are referred to the papers on file in the Action, including the Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Stipulations, which may be inspected during regular office hours at the Office of the Clerk, United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301. Additionally, copies of the Individual Defendant and Underwriter Defendant Stipulations, and any related orders entered by the Court, will be posted on the website maintained by the Claims Administrator, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

Requests for the Notice Packet should be made to:

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice Packet, should be made to Lead Counsel:

GTAT Securities Litigationc/o GCG

P.O. Box 10463 Dublin, OH 43017-4063

1-866-562-8790 [email protected] www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com

John C. Browne, Esq. BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER

& GROSSMANN LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor

New York, NY 10020 1-800-380-8496

[email protected]

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 101 of 161

Page 102: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

24

DO NOT CALL OR WRITE THE COURT, THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT, GTAT, DEFENDANTS OR THEIR COUNSEL REGARDING THIS NOTICE.

Dated: _________, 2018 By Order of the Court United States District Court New Hampshire

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 102 of 161

Page 103: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

PROPOSED PLAN OF ALLOCATION 1. If approved by the Court, the plan of allocation set forth below (the “Plan of

Allocation”) will determine how the net proceeds of the Settlements will be distributed to members of the respective Settlement Classes who submit timely and valid Claims.1

GENERAL PROVISIONS 2. At this time, it is not possible to make any determination as to how much a

Settlement Class Member may receive from the Settlement(s) in which he, she or it is eligible. 3. If the Individual Defendant Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective

Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement occurs, the Individual Defendant Settlement Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to Authorized Claimants who are members of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class. Similarly, if the Underwriter Defendant Settlement is approved by the Court and the Effective Date of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement occurs, the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to Authorized Claimants who are members of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class. Please note, the same claim form will be used for purposes of calculating Claims for both settlements. Thus, even if you are a member of both settlement classes, you should only submit one claim form.

4. The respective Net Settlement Funds will not be distributed unless and until the Court has approved the Settlement and a plan of allocation, and the time for any petition for rehearing, appeal or review, whether by certiorari or otherwise, has expired.

5. Neither the Settling Defendants nor any other person or entity that paid any portion of their respective Settlement Amounts on their behalf are entitled to get back any portion of their Settlement Fund once the Court’s Order approving their Settlement becomes Final. The Settling Defendants shall not have any liability, obligation, or responsibility for the administration of their respective Settlements or disbursement of the respective Net Settlement Funds or the Plan of Allocation or such other plan of allocation as may be approved by the Court.

6. Approval of the Settlements is independent from approval of a plan of allocation. Any determination as to a plan of allocation will not affect the Settlements, if approved.

7. Unless the Court otherwise orders, any Settlement Class Member who fails to submit a Proof of Claim and Release Form (“Claim Form”) postmarked no later than _________, 2018 shall be forever barred from receiving payments pursuant to the Settlement(s) that apply to him, her or it but will in all other respects remain a member of the applicable Settlement Class(es) in which he, she, or it is a member and be subject to the provisions of the applicable Stipulations, including the terms of any Judgments entered and releases given.

8. The Court has reserved continuing jurisdiction to allow, disallow, or adjust the Claim of any Settlement Class Member on equitable grounds.

1 Unless otherwise defined in this Plan of Allocation or the Notice, the capitalized terms herein shall have the same meanings as they have in the Individual Defendant Stipulation and the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 103 of 161

Page 104: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

2

9. The Court has also reserved the right to modify the Plan of Allocation without further notice to Settlement Class Members. Any Orders regarding a modification of the Plan of Allocation will be posted on the settlement website, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

10. Payment pursuant to the plan of allocation approved by the Court shall be conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No person or entity shall have any claim against Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, the Claims Administrator or other agent designated by Plaintiffs’ Counsel arising from distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulations, the plan of allocation that is approved by the Court, or further orders of the Court. Plaintiffs, the Settling Defendants, their respective counsel, and all other Individual Defendants’ Releasees and Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the investment or distribution of their respective Settlement Funds or Net Settlement Funds, the Plan of Allocation or such other plan of allocation as may be approved by the Court, or the determination, administration, calculation, or payment of any claim or nonperformance of the Claims Administrator, the payment or withholding of taxes owed by the respective Settlement Funds, or any losses incurred in connection therewith.

11. Each Claimant shall be deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to his, her or its Claim.

12. Each Claim must provide all of the information requested therein and provide sufficient supporting documentation as stated therein.

13. Participants in and beneficiaries of a plan covered by ERISA (“ERISA Plan”) should NOT include any information relating to their transactions in GTAT Securities held through an ERISA Plan in any Claim that they may submit in this Action. They should include ONLY those securities that they purchased, acquired, or sold outside of an ERISA Plan. Claims based on any ERISA Plan’s purchases, acquisitions, or sales of GTAT Securities during the Class Period may be made by the plan’s trustees. To the extent any of the Defendants or any of the other persons or entities excluded from one or both of the Settlement Classes are participants in an ERISA Plan, such persons or entities shall not receive, either directly or indirectly, any portion of the recovery that may be obtained from the Settlements by an ERISA Plan.

14. The objective of the Plan of Allocation is to equitably distribute the respective Net Settlement Funds to those Settlement Class Members who suffered economic losses as a result of the alleged violations of the federal securities laws. The Plan of Allocation generally measures the amount of loss that a Settlement Class Member can claim for purposes of making pro rataallocations of the cash in the respective Net Settlement Funds to Authorized Claimants who are members of the class for which the fund was created. The Plan of Allocation is not a formal damage analysis.

15. The calculations made pursuant to the Plan of Allocation are not intended to be estimates of, nor indicative of, the amounts that Settlement Class Members might have been able to recover after a trial. Nor are the calculations pursuant to the Plan of Allocation intended to be estimates of the amounts that will be paid to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the Settlements. The computations under the Plan of Allocation are only a method to weigh the claims of Claimants against one another for the purposes of making pro rata allocations of the Net Settlement Funds.

16. As discussed above, claims were asserted in the Action against the Individual Defendants under both the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, while claims were asserted against

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 104 of 161

Page 105: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

3

the Underwriter Defendants under the Securities Act only. Accordingly, the Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund will be allocated among eligible Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members based solely on the Securities Act Calculations set forth below, while the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund will be allocated among eligible Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members based on both the Exchange Act and Securities Act Calculations set forth below.

SECURITIES ACT CALCULATIONS 17. Securities Act claims were asserted with respect to (i) shares of GTAT Common

Stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period pursuant or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering; and (ii) GTAT Senior Notes purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period pursuant or traceable to the Senior Notes Offering. For shares of GTAT Common Stock to be traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering and potentially eligible for recovery under Section 11 of the Securities Act, the shares must have been purchased directly from an underwriter at the $8.65 issue price as part of the Secondary Offering, which occurred on or about December 4, 2013. Since the Senior Notes Offering was an initial offering of the security, all GTAT Notes purchased from the initial offering date of the security through the end of the Class Period are traceable to the Senior Notes Offering and potentially eligible for recovery under Section 11 of the Securities Act.

18. The claims asserted in the Action under Section 11 of the Securities Act serve as the basis for the calculation of the Securities Act Recognized Loss Amounts under the Plan of Allocation. Section 11 of the Securities Act provides a statutory formula for the calculation of damages under that provision. The formulas stated below, which were developed by Lead Plaintiff’s damages expert, generally track the statutory formula.

GTAT Common Stock

19. Based on the formulas stated below, a “Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount” will be calculated for each purchase of GTAT Common Stock pursuant or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering. If a Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount calculates to a negative number or zero under the formula below, that number will be zero.

20. For GTAT Common Stock purchased pursuant or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering (“GTAT Common Stock Offering Shares”),2 and

(i) Sold before October 9, 2014,3 the Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the purchase price (not to exceed $8.65, the issue price of the Common Stock Secondary Offering) minus the sale price.

2 As noted in ¶ 17 above, for shares of GTAT Common Stock to be traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering, which occurred on or about December 4, 2013, the shares must have been purchased directly from an underwriter as part of the Secondary Offering at the $8.65 issue price. 3 For purposes of the statutory calculations, October 9, 2014, the date of filing of the initial complaint in the Action, is the date of suit. For GTAT Common Stock Offering Shares, October 9, 2014 is also the proxy date for the date of judgment because after October 9, 2014 the price of GTAT Common Stock never traded above $1.29, the closing price on that date.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 105 of 161

Page 106: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

4

(ii) Held as of the close of trading on October 9, 2014, the Recognized Loss Amount will be the purchase price (not to exceed $8.65, the issue price of the Common Stock Secondary Offering) minus $1.29.

GTAT Senior Notes 21. Based on the formulas stated below, a “Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount”

will be calculated for each purchase/acquisition of GTAT Senior Notes during the Class Period. If a Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount calculates to a negative number or zero under the formula below, that number will be zero.

22. For each GTAT Senior Note purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period (i.e., notes purchased/acquired from the initial offering date of the security through 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014),4 and

(i) Sold before October 9, 2014, the Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the purchase/acquisition price (not to exceed $1,000, the issue price of the Senior Notes Offering) minus the sale price.

(ii) Sold from October 9, 2014 through and including the close of trading on May 18, 2015,5 the Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the purchase/acquisition price (not to exceed $1,000, the issue price of the Senior Notes Offering) minus the sale price (not to be less than $310, the closing price of GTAT Senior Notes on October 9, 2014).

(iii) Held as of the close of trading on May 18, 2015, the Recognized Loss Amount will be the purchase/acquisition price (not to exceed $1,000, the issue price of the Senior Notes Offering) minus $310.

EXCHANGE ACT CALCULATIONS23. Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act serves as the basis for the calculation of

Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts under the Plan of Allocation. In developing the Plan of Allocation, Lead Plaintiff’s damages expert calculated the estimated amount of artificial inflation in the closing prices of GTAT Securities which allegedly was proximately caused by Defendants’ alleged false and misleading statements and material omissions. In calculating the estimated artificial inflation allegedly caused by Defendants’ alleged misrepresentations and omissions, Lead Plaintiff’s damages expert considered price changes in GTAT Securities in reaction to certain public announcements allegedly revealing the truth concerning Defendants’ alleged misrepresentations and material omissions, adjusting for price changes that were attributable to market or industry forces. The estimated artificial inflation in GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes is stated in Tables A-1 and A-2 below. The estimated artificial inflation in GTAT

4 As noted in ¶ 17 above, all GTAT Notes purchased from the initial offering date of the security through the end of the Class Period are traceable to the Senior Notes Offering and potentially eligible for recovery under Section 11 of the Securities Act 5 For purposes of the statutory calculations, May 18, 2015 is proxy date for the date of judgment because after May 18, 2015 the price of GTAT Senior Notes never traded above $310, the closing price on October 9, 2014.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 106 of 161

Page 107: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

5

Call Options is stated in Table C, which is available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com, and the estimated artificial deflation in GTAT Put Options is stated in Table D, which is also available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

24. For losses to be compensable damages under Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act, the disclosure of the allegedly misrepresented information must be, among other things, the cause of the decline in the price or value of the security. In this case, Lead Plaintiff alleges that Defendants made false statements and omitted material facts during the period between November 5, 2013 and October 6, 2014 9:40 a.m. EST, inclusive, which had the effect of artificially inflating the prices of GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call Options, and artificially deflating the price of GTAT Put Options. Lead Plaintiff further alleges that corrective information was released to the market at 1:12 p.m. EST on September 9, 2014 and at 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, which partially removed the artificial inflation from the price of GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call Options, and partially removed artificial deflation from the price of GTAT Put Options on September 9, 2014, September 10, 2014, and October 6, 2014.6

25. Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts for transactions in GTAT Securities are calculated under the Plan of Allocation based primarily on the difference in the amount of alleged artificial inflation (or deflation in the case of put options) in the respective prices of the GTAT Securities at the time of purchase or acquisition and at the time of sale or the difference between the actual purchase/acquisition price and sale price. Accordingly, in order to have an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount under the Plan of Allocation, an Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member who or which purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, or GTAT Call Options, or sold/wrote GTAT Put Options, prior to the first alleged corrective disclosure, which occurred at 1:12 p.m. EST on September 9, 2014, must have held the respective GTAT Security (or with respect to GTAT Call Options and GTAT Put Options (collectively, “GTAT Options”), not closed out his, her or its position in the security) through at least that time. A Settlement Class Member who purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, or GTAT Call Options, or sold/wrote GTAT Put Options, at or after 1:12 p.m. EST on September 9, 2014, must have held the respective GTAT Security (or with respect to GTAT Options, not closed out his, her or its position in the security) through at least the second alleged corrective disclosure, which occurred at 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014.

GTAT Common Stock 26. Based on the formula stated below, an “Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount”

will be calculated for each purchase or acquisition of GTAT Common Stock that is listed on the Claim Form and for which adequate documentation is provided. If an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount calculates to a negative number or zero under the formula below, that number will be zero.

27. For each share of GTAT Common Stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014), and:

6 With respect to the alleged partial corrective disclosure that occurred on September 9, 2014, the alleged artificial inflation was removed from the price of GTAT Common Stock over two days: September 9, 2014 and September 10, 2014.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 107 of 161

Page 108: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

6

(i) Sold before September 9, 2014 or on September 9, 2014 before 1:12 p.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be $0.00.

(ii) Sold from September 9, 2014 at or after 1:12 p.m. EST through and including the close of trading on October 3, 2014 or on October 6, 2014 before 9:40 a.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table A-1 minusthe amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of sale as stated in Table A-2; or (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the sale price.

(iii) Sold on October 6, 2014 at or after 9:40 a.m. EST through and including the close of trading on January 2, 2015, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the least of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table A-1; (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the average closing price between October 6, 2014 and the date of sale as stated in Table B below; or (iii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the sale price.

(iv) Held as of the close of trading on January 2, 2015, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table A-1; or (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus $0.51.7

28. For each share of GTAT Common Stock traceable to the Secondary Offering that has both a Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount and an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the greater of: (i) the product of the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount (as calculated pursuant to ¶ 27 above) multiplied by 0.93; or (ii) the product of the Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount (as calculated pursuant to ¶ 20 above) multiplied by 0.93.

GTAT Senior Notes 29. Based on the formula stated below, an “Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount”

will be calculated for each purchase or acquisition of GTAT Senior Notes that is listed on the Claim Form and for which adequate documentation is provided. If an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount calculates to a negative number or zero under the formula below, that number will be zero.

7 Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(1) of the Exchange Act, “in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the market price of a security, the award of damages to the plaintiff shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the subject security and the mean trading price of that security during the 90-day look-back period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated to the market.” Consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Act, Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts are reduced to an appropriate extent by taking into account the closing prices of the security during the 90-day look-back period, October 6, 2014 through and including January 2, 2015. The mean (average) closing price for GTAT Common Stock during this 90-day look-back period was $0.51.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 108 of 161

Page 109: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

7

30. For each GTAT Senior Note purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014), and:

(i) Sold before September 9, 2014 or on September 9, 2014 before 1:12 p.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be $0.00.

(ii) Sold from September 9, 2014 at or after 1:12 p.m. EST through and including the close of trading on October 3, 2014 or on October 6, 2014 before 9:40 a.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per note on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table A-1 minusthe amount of artificial inflation per note on the date of sale as stated in Table A-2; or (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the sale price.

(iii) Sold on October 6, 2014 at or after 9:40 a.m. EST through and including the close of trading on January 2, 2015, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will will be the least of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per note on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table A-1; (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the average closing price between October 6, 2014 and the date of sale as stated in Table B below; or (iii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the sale price.

(iv) Held as of the close of trading on January 2, 2015, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per note on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table A-1; or (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus $395.14.8

31. All GTAT Senior Notes are traceable to the Offering and have both a Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount and an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount. For GTAT Senior Notes, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the greater of (i) the product of the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount (as calculated pursuant to ¶ 30 above) multiplied by 0.93; or (ii) the product of the Securities Act Recognized Loss Amount (as calculated pursuant to ¶ 22 above) multiplied by 0.93.

GTAT Call and Put Options 32. Exchange-traded options are traded in units called “contracts” which entitle the

holder to buy (in the case of a call option) or sell (in the case of a put option) 100 shares of the underlying security, which in this case is GTAT Common Stock. Throughout this Plan of Allocation, all price quotations are per share of the underlying security (i.e., 1/100 of a contract).

33. Each option contract specifies a strike price and an expiration date. Contracts with the same strike price and expiration date are referred to as a “series” and each series represents a different security that trades in the market and has its own market price (and thus artificial inflation or deflation). Under the Plan of Allocation, the dollar artificial inflation per share (i.e., 1/100 of a

8 As explained in footnote 7 above, Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts are reduced to an appropriate extent by taking into account the closing prices of the security during the 90-day look-back period, October 6, 2014 through and including January 2, 2015. The mean (average) closing price for GTAT Notes during this 90-day look-back period was $395.14.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 109 of 161

Page 110: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

8

contract) for each series of GTAT Call Options and the dollar artificial deflation per share (i.e., 1/100 of a contract) for each series of GTAT Put Options has been calculated by Lead Plaintiff’s damages expert. Table C, available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com, sets forth the dollar artificial inflation per share in GTAT Call Options during the Class Period. Table D, also available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com, sets forth the dollar artificial deflation per share in GTAT Put Options during the Class Period. Tables C and D list only series of exchange-traded GTAT Options that expired on or after September 9, 2014 – the date of the first alleged corrective disclosure. Transactions in GTAT Options that expired before September 9, 2014 have an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount of zero under the Plan of Allocation. Any GTAT Options traded during the Class Period that are not found on Tables C and D have an Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount of zero under the Plan of Allocation.

34. For each GTAT Call Option purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014), and:

(i) closed (through sale, exercise, or expiration) before September 9, 2014 or on September 9, 2014 before 1:12 p.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be $0.00.

(ii) closed (through sale, exercise, or expiration) during the period from September 9, 2014 at or after 1:12 p.m. EST through and including the close of trading on October 3, 2014 or on October 6, 2014 before 9:40 a.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table C (available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com) minus the amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of close as stated in Table C; or (ii) if closed through sale, the purchase/acquisition price minus the sale price, or if closed through exercise or expiration, the purchase/acquisition price minus the value per option on the date of exercise or expiration.9

(iii) open after 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial inflation per share on the date of purchase/acquisition as stated in Table C (available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com); or (ii) the purchase/acquisition price minus the closing price of that option on October 6, 2016 (i.e., the “Holding Price”) as stated in Table C.

35. For each GTAT Put Option sold (written) during the Class Period (i.e., from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014), and:

(i) closed (through purchase, exercise, or expiration) before September 9, 2014 or on September 9, 2014 before 1:12 p.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be calculated, which will be $0.00.

9 The “value” of the call option on the date of exercise or expiration shall be the closing price of GTAT Common Stock on the date of exercise or expiration minus the strike price of the option. If this number is less than zero, the value of the call option is zero.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 110 of 161

Page 111: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

9

(ii) closed (through purchase, exercise, or expiration) during the period from September 9, 2014 at or after 1:12 p.m. EST through and including the close of trading on October 3, 2014 or on October 6, 2014 before 9:40 a.m. EST, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial deflation per share on the date of sale (writing) as stated in Table D (available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com) minus the amount of artificial deflation per share on the date of close as stated in Table D; or (ii) if closed through purchase, the purchase price minus the sale price, or if closed through exercise or expiration, the value per option on the date of exercise or expiration10 minus the sale price.

(iii) open after 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amount will be the lesser of: (i) the amount of artificial deflation per share on the date of sale (writing) as stated in Table D (available at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com); or (ii) the closing price on October 6, 2014 (i.e., the “Holding Price”) as stated in Table D below minus the sale price.

36. Maximum Recovery for Options: The Settlement proceeds available for GTAT Call Options purchased during the Class Period and GTAT Put Options sold (written) during the Class Period shall be limited to a total amount equal to 15% of the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund. Thus, if the cumulative Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts for GTAT Call Options and GTAT Put Options exceeds 15% of all Exchange Act Recognized Claims, then the Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts calculated for option transactions will be reduced proportionately until they collectively equal 15% of all Exchange Act Recognized Claims. In the unlikely event that the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund, allocated as such, is sufficient to pay 100% of the GTAT Common Stock and Senior Note-based claims, any excess amount will be used to pay the balance on the remaining option-based claims.

ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS

37. Calculation of Claimant’s “Exchange Act Recognized Claim”: A Claimant’s “Exchange Act Recognized Claim” will be the sum of his, her or its Exchange Act Recognized Loss Amounts as calculated above with respect to all GTAT Securities.

38. Calculation of Claimant’s “Securities Act Recognized Claim”: A Claimant’s “Securities Act Recognized Claim” will be the sum of his, her or its Securities Act Recognized Loss Amounts as calculated above with respect to all GTAT Common Stock Offering Shares and GTAT Notes.

39. FIFO Matching: If a Settlement Class Member made more than one purchase/acquisition or sale of any GTAT Security during the Class Period, all purchases/acquisitions and sales of the like security will be matched on a First In, First Out (“FIFO”) basis. With respect to GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call

10 The “value” of the put option on the date of exercise or expiration shall be the strike price of the option minus the closing price of GTAT Common Stock on the date of exercise or expiration. If this number is less than zero, the value of the put option is zero.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 111 of 161

Page 112: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

10

Options, sales will be matched first against any holdings at the beginning of the Class Period, and then against purchases/acquisitions in chronological order, beginning with the earliest purchase/acquisition made during the Class Period. For GTAT Put Options, purchases will be matched first to close out positions open at the beginning of the Class Period, and then against GTAT Put Options sold (written) during the Class Period in chronological order.

40. “Purchase/Sale” Dates: Purchases or acquisitions and sales of GTAT Securities will be deemed to have occurred on the “contract” or “trade” date as opposed to the “settlement” or “payment” date. The receipt or grant by gift, inheritance, or operation of law of GTAT Securities during the Class Period shall not be deemed a purchase, acquisition or sale of these GTAT Securities for the calculation of a Claimant’s Recognized Loss Amount, nor shall the receipt or grant be deemed an assignment of any claim relating to the purchase/acquisition/sale of such GTAT Securities unless (i) the donor or decedent purchased or otherwise acquired or sold such GTAT Securities during the Class Period; (ii) the instrument of gift or assignment specifically provides that it is intended to transfer such rights; and (iii) no Claim was submitted by or on behalf of the donor, on behalf of the decedent, or by anyone else with respect to such GTAT Securities.

41. Short Sales: With respect to GTAT Common Stock, the date of covering a “short sale” is deemed to be the date of purchase or acquisition of the common stock. The date of a “short sale” is deemed to be the date of sale of the GTAT common stock. In accordance with the Plan of Allocation, however, the Recognized Loss Amount on “short sales” and the purchases covering “short sales” is zero.

42. In the event that a Claimant has an opening short position in GTAT Common Stock, the earliest purchases or acquisitions of GTAT Common Stock during the Class Period will be matched against such opening short position, and not be entitled to a recovery, until that short position is fully covered.

43. If a Settlement Class Member has “written” GTAT Call Options, thereby having a short position in the call options, the date of covering such a written position is deemed to be the date of purchase or acquisition of the call option. The date on which the call option was written is deemed to be the date of sale of the call option. In accordance with the Plan of Allocation, however, the Recognized Loss Amount on “written” GTAT Call Options is zero. In the event that a Claimant has an opening written position in GTAT Call Options, the earliest purchases or acquisitions of like call options during the Class Period will be matched against such opening written position, and not be entitled to a recovery, until that written position is fully covered.

44. If a Settlement Class Member has purchased or acquired GTAT Put Options, thereby having a long position in the put options, the date of purchase/acquisition is deemed to be the date of purchase/acquisition of the put option. The date on which the put option was sold, exercised, or expired is deemed to be the date of sale of the put option. In accordance with the Plan of Allocation, however, the Recognized Loss Amount on purchased/acquired GTAT Put Options is zero. In the event that a Claimant has an opening long position in GTAT Put Options, the earliest sales or dispositions of like put options during the Class Period will be matched against such opening position, and not be entitled to a recovery, until that long position is fully covered.

45. Common Stock Purchased/Sold Through the Exercise of Options: With respect to GTAT Common Stock purchased or sold through the exercise of an option, the purchase/sale date of the common stock is the exercise date of the option and the purchase/sale price is the exercise price of the option.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 112 of 161

Page 113: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

11

46. Exchange Act Market Gains and Losses: With respect to all GTAT Common Stock shares, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call Options purchased or acquired, or GTAT Put Options sold, during the Class Period, the Claims Administrator will determine if the Claimant had an “Exchange Act Market Gain” or an “Exchange Act Market Loss” with respect to his, her, or its overall transactions during the Class Period in those shares, notes, and options. For purposes of making this calculation, with respect to GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call Options, the Claims Administrator shall determine the difference between (i) the Claimant’s Total Purchase Amount11 and (ii) the sum of the Claimant’s Sales Proceeds12 and the Claimant’s Holding Value.13 For GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call Options, if the Claimant’s Total Purchase Amount minus the sum of the Claimant’s Sales Proceeds and the Holding Value is a positive number, that number will be the Claimant’s “Exchange Act Market Loss”; if the number is a negative number or zero, that number will be the Claimant’s “Exchange Act Market Gain”. With respect to GTAT Put Options, the Claims Administrator shall determine the difference between (i) the sum of the Claimant’s Total Purchase Amount14 and the Claimant’s Holding Value15 and (ii) the Claimant’s Sales Proceeds.16 For GTAT Put Options, if the sum of the Claimant’s Total Purchase Amount and the Claimant’s Holding Value minus the Claimant’s Sales Proceeds is a positive number, that number will be the Claimant’s “Exchange Act Market Loss”; if the number is a negative number or zero, that number will be the Claimant’s “Exchange Act Market Gain”.

11 For GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes, and GTAT Call Options, the “Total Purchase Amount” is the total amount the Claimant paid (excluding all fees, taxes and commissions) for all such GTAT securities purchased/acquired during the Class Period. 12 For GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Call Options, the Claims Administrator shall match any sales of such GTAT securities during the Class Period first against the Claimant’s opening position in the like GTAT securities (the proceeds of those sales will not be considered for purposes of calculating market gains or losses). The total amount received for sales of the remaining like GTAT securities sold during the Class Period is the “Total Sales Proceeds.” 13 The Claims Administrator shall ascribe a “Holding Value” of $0.80 to each share of GTAT Common Stock purchased/acquired during the Class Period that was still held as of 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014. For any GTAT Senior Note purchased/acquired during the Class Period that was still held as of 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, the Claims Administrator shall ascribe a “Holding Value” of $315.00. For each GTAT Call Option purchased/acquired during the Class Period that was still open as of 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, the Claims Administrator shall ascribe a “Holding Value” for that option which shall be the Holding Price set forth on Table C. 14 For GTAT Put Options, the Claims Administrator shall match any purchases/acquisitions during the Class Period to close out positions in put options first against the Claimant’s opening position in put options (the total amount paid with respect to those purchases/acquisitions will not be considered for purposes of calculating market gains or losses). The total amount paid for the remaining purchases/acquisitions during the Class Period to close out positions in put options is the “Total Purchase Amount.” 15 For each GTAT Put Option sold (written) during the Class Period that was still open as of 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, the Claims Administrator shall ascribe a “Holding Value” for that option which shall be the Holding Price set forth on Table D. 16 For GTAT Put Options, the total amount received for put options sold (written) during the Class Period is the “Total Sales Proceeds.”

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 113 of 161

Page 114: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

12

47. If a Claimant had an Exchange Act Market Gain with respect to his, her, or its overall transactions in GTAT Securities during the Class Period, the value of the Claimant’s Exchange Act Recognized Claim will be zero, and the Claimant will in any event be bound by the Settlements. If a Claimant suffered an overall Exchange Act Market Loss with respect to his, her, or its overall transactions in GTAT Securities during the Class Period but that Exchange Act Market Loss was less than the Claimant’s Exchange Act Recognized Claim, then the Claimant’s Exchange Act Recognized Claim will be limited to the amount of the Exchange Act Market Loss.

48. Securities Act Market Gains and Losses: With respect to all GTAT Common Stock Offering Shares and all GTAT Senior Notes (together, the “GTAT Offering Securities”) purchased during the Class Period, the Claims Administrator will determine if the Claimant had a “Securities Act Market Gain” or a “Securities Act Market Loss” with respect to his, her, or its overall transactions during the Class Period in those shares and notes. For purposes of making this calculation, with respect to GTAT Offering Securities, the Claims Administrator shall determine the difference between (i) the Claimant’s Total Offering Purchase Amount17 and (ii) the sum of the Claimant’s Total Offering Sales Proceeds18 and the Claimant’s Offering Holding Value.19 For GTAT Offering Securities, if the Claimant’s Total Offering Purchase Amount minus the sum of the Claimant’s Total Offering Sales Proceeds and the Offering Holding Value is a positive number, that number will be the Claimant’s “Securities Act Market Loss”; if the number is a negative number or zero, that number will be the Claimant’s “Securities Act Market Gain”.

49. If a Claimant had a Securities Act Market Gain with respect to his, her, or its overall transactions in GTAT Offering Securities during the Class Period, the value of the Claimant’s Securities Act Recognized Loss will be zero, and the Claimant will in any event be bound by the Settlements. If a Claimant suffered an overall Securities Act Market Loss with respect to his, her, or its overall transactions in Offering Securities during the Class Period but that Securities Act Market Loss was less than the Claimant’s Securities Act Recognized Claim, then the Claimant’s Securities Act Recognized Claim will be limited to the amount of the Securities Act Market Loss.

50. Allocation of the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund: Each Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member who submits a Claim that is approved by the Court for payment from the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund will be an “Individual Defendant Authorized Claimant”. Each Individual Defendant Authorized Claimant will receive a pro ratashare of the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund, which will be his, her or its Exchange Act Recognized Claim divided by the sum total of the Exchange Act Recognized Claims of all

17 For GTAT Offering Securities, the “Total Offering Purchase Amount” is the total amount the Claimant paid (excluding all fees, taxes and commissions) for all such Offering Securities purchased/acquired during the Class Period. 18 The total amount received for sales of GTAT Offering Securities sold during the Class Period is the “Total Offering Sales Proceeds.” 19 The Claims Administrator shall ascribe a “Holding Value” of $0.80 to each share of GTAT Common Stock Offering Shares purchased in the Common Stock Secondary Offering that was still held as of 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014. For any GTAT Senior Note purchased/acquired during the Class Period that was still held as of 9:40 a.m. EST on October 6, 2014, the Claims Administrator shall ascribe a “Holding Value” of $315.00.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 114 of 161

Page 115: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

13

Individual Defendant Authorized Claimants, multiplied by the total amount in the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund.

51. Allocation of the Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund: Each Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Member who submits a Claim that is approved by the Court for payment from the Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund will be an “Underwriter Defendant Authorized Claimant”. Each Underwriter Defendant Authorized Claimant will receive a pro rata share of the Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund, which will be his, her or its Securities Act Recognized Claim divided by the sum total of the Securities Act Recognized Claims of all Underwriter Defendant Authorized Claimants, multiplied by the total amount in the Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund.

52. Distribution Amount: The Distribution Amount paid to an Authorized Claimant will be the sum of (i) his, her or its pro rata share, if any, of the Individual Defendant Net Settlement Fund; and (ii) his, her or its pro rata share, if any, of the Underwriter Defendant Net Settlement Fund. If an Authorized Claimant’s Distribution Amount calculates to less than $10.00, no distribution will be made to that Authorized Claimant.

53. After the initial distribution of the Net Settlement Funds, the Claims Administrator will make reasonable and diligent efforts to have Authorized Claimants cash their distribution checks. To the extent any monies remain in the Net Settlement Funds nine (9) months after the initial distribution, if Lead Counsel, in consultation with the Claims Administrator, determines that it is cost-effective to do so, the Claims Administrator will conduct a re-distribution of the funds remaining after payment of any unpaid fees and expenses incurred in administering the Settlement, including for such re-distribution, to Authorized Claimants who have cashed their initial distributions and who would receive at least $10.00 from such re-distribution. Additional re-distributions to Authorized Claimants who have cashed their prior checks and who would receive at least $10.00 on such additional re-distributions may occur thereafter if Lead Counsel, in consultation with the Claims Administrator, determines that additional re-distributions, after the deduction of any additional fees and expenses incurred in administering the Settlement, including for such re-distributions, would be cost-effective. At such time as it is determined that the re-distribution of funds remaining in the Net Settlement Funds is not cost-effective, the remaining balance will be contributed to non-sectarian, not-for-profit organization(s), to be recommended by Lead Counsel and approved by the Court.

54. Payment pursuant to the Plan of Allocation, or such other plan of allocation as may be approved by the Court, shall be conclusive against all Authorized Claimants. No person shall have any claim against Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs’ Counsel, Lead Plaintiff’s damages expert, the Individual Defendants (or their counsel), the Underwriter Defendants (or their counsel), or any of the other Plaintiffs’ Releasees or Settling Defendants’ Releasees, or the Claims Administrator or other agent designated by Lead Counsel arising from distributions made substantially in accordance with the Stipulation, the plan of allocation approved by the Court, or further Orders of the Court. Plaintiffs, the Individual Defendants, and the Underwriter Defendants, and their respective counsel, and all other Settling Defendants’ Releasees, shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever for the investment or distribution of their respective Settlement Fund or Net Settlement Fund; the plan of allocation; the determination, administration, calculation, or payment of any Claim or nonperformance of the Claims Administrator; the payment or withholding of Taxes; or any losses incurred in connection therewith.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 115 of 161

Page 116: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

14

55. The Plan of Allocation set forth herein is the plan that is being proposed to the Court for its approval by Lead Plaintiff after consultation with its damages expert. The Court may approve this plan as proposed or it may modify the Plan of Allocation without further notice to the Settlement Classes. Any Orders regarding any modification of the Plan of Allocation will be posted on the settlement website, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 116 of 161

Page 117: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

15

TABLE A-1

Estimated Artificial Inflation in GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. EST October 6, 2014

With Respect to Purchases/Acquisitions of GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes

Date

Artificial Inflation

per Share

Artificial Inflation per Note

Date

Artificial Inflation

per Share

Artificial Inflation per Note

Date

Artificial Inflation

per Share

Artificial Inflation per Note

11/5/2013 $9.59 N/A 1/14/2014 $8.63 $652.36 3/24/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/6/2013 $9.34 N/A 1/15/2014 $8.65 $677.36 3/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/7/2013 $8.80 N/A 1/16/2014 $8.71 $679.86 3/26/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/8/2013 $8.96 N/A 1/17/2014 $8.55 $647.13 3/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03

11/11/2013 $9.73 N/A 1/21/2014 $8.77 $646.11 3/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/12/2013 $9.46 N/A 1/22/2014 $8.71 $669.86 3/31/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/13/2013 $9.89 N/A 1/23/2014 $8.50 $674.86 4/1/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/14/2013 $9.79 N/A 1/24/2014 $8.58 $650.84 4/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/15/2013 $9.68 N/A 1/27/2014 $9.16 $684.06 4/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/18/2013 $9.42 N/A 1/28/2014 $9.31 $695.40 4/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/19/2013 $9.05 N/A 1/29/2014 $9.12 $722.36 4/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/20/2013 $8.93 N/A 1/30/2014 $9.57 $709.86 4/8/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/21/2013 $9.41 N/A 1/31/2014 $9.76 $728.61 4/9/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/22/2013 $9.31 N/A 2/3/2014 $9.26 $698.65 4/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/25/2013 $9.35 N/A 2/4/2014 $9.06 $689.86 4/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/26/2013 $9.49 N/A 2/5/2014 $8.67 $689.86 4/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/27/2013 $9.31 N/A 2/6/2014 $8.94 $684.86 4/15/2014 $13.89 $1,075.86 11/29/2013 $9.30 N/A 2/7/2014 $10.23 $763.86 4/16/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/2/2013 $9.43 N/A 2/10/2014 $11.23 $834.86 4/17/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/3/2013 $8.77 N/A 2/11/2014 $10.37 $783.30 4/21/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/4/2013 $8.41 N/A 2/12/2014 $10.67 $808.06 4/22/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/5/2013 $8.38 $635.36 2/13/2014 $11.20 $807.36 4/23/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/6/2013 $8.16 $612.52 2/14/2014 $11.16 $824.86 4/24/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/9/2013 $7.86 $616.26 2/18/2014 $12.13 $896.11 4/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03

12/10/2013 $8.04 $612.36 2/19/2014 $11.72 $887.78 4/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/11/2013 $7.71 $612.36 2/20/2014 $11.99 $881.11 4/29/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/12/2013 $7.54 $619.86 2/21/2014 $11.60 $877.94 4/30/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/13/2013 $7.51 $577.36 2/24/2014 $13.63 $1,011.66 5/1/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/16/2013 $7.88 $604.86 2/25/2014 $13.35 $1,001.86 5/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/17/2013 $7.99 $606.61 2/26/2014 $13.89 $1,038.77 5/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/18/2013 $7.98 $593.70 2/27/2014 $13.89 $1,029.86 5/6/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/19/2013 $8.03 $593.70 2/28/2014 $13.82 $1,024.44 5/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/20/2013 $7.86 $592.99 3/3/2014 $13.89 $1,069.84 5/8/2014 $13.77 $1,028.71 12/23/2013 $8.06 $606.11 3/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/9/2014 $12.70 $974.06 12/24/2013 $8.10 $604.86 3/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/12/2014 $12.90 $990.39 12/26/2013 $7.96 $604.86 3/6/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/13/2014 $13.77 $990.39 12/27/2013 $8.06 $628.36 3/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/14/2014 $13.37 $1,036.34 12/30/2013 $8.29 $614.86 3/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/15/2014 $13.18 $1,036.34 12/31/2013 $8.21 $619.86 3/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/16/2014 $13.38 $1,001.11 1/2/2014 $8.61 $637.64 3/12/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/19/2014 $13.68 $1,001.11 1/3/2014 $8.81 $648.66 3/13/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/20/2014 $13.51 $1,034.02 1/6/2014 $8.52 $676.11 3/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/21/2014 $13.89 $1,045.24 1/7/2014 $8.80 $664.86 3/17/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/22/2014 $13.89 $1,087.72 1/8/2014 $8.96 $668.73 3/18/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/23/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 1/9/2014 $8.79 $670.49 3/19/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 1/10/2014 $8.81 $661.11 3/20/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 1/13/2014 $8.23 $623.98 3/21/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/29/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 117 of 161

Page 118: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

16

TABLE A-1 (continued)

Date Artificial Inflation per Share

Artificial Inflation per

Note Date

Artificial Inflation per Share

Artificial Inflation per

Note 5/30/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/7/2014 $13.89 $1,096.78 6/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/8/2014 $13.89 $1,096.78 6/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/12/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/13/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/6/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/9/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/15/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/18/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/19/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/12/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/20/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/13/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/21/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/16/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/22/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/17/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/18/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/26/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/19/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/20/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/23/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/29/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/24/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/26/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/30/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/8/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 7/1/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/9/2014: purchased/acquired

before 1:12 p.m. EST $13.89 $1,102.03 7/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 7/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/9/2014: purchased/acquired

at or after 1:12 p.m. EST $9.68 $767.54 7/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 7/8/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/10/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/9/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/11/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/12/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/15/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/16/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/15/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/17/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/16/2014 $13.89 $1,075.30 9/18/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/17/2014 $13.79 $1,086.09 9/19/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/18/2014 $13.89 $1,064.86 9/22/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/21/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/23/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/22/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/24/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/23/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/25/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/24/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/26/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/25/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/29/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/28/2014 $13.72 $1,057.48 9/30/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/29/2014 $13.23 $994.81 10/1/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/30/2014 $13.89 $1,042.59 10/2/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/31/2014 $13.33 $1,012.47 10/3/2014 $9.68 $767.54 8/1/2014 $13.44 $998.85 10/6/2014:

purchased/acquired before 9:40 a.m. EST

$9.68 $767.54 8/4/2014 $13.62 $994.66 8/5/2014 $13.89 $1,070.71 10/6/2014:

purchased/acquired at or after 9:40 a.m. EST

$0.00 $0.00 8/6/2014 $13.89 $1,085.88

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 118 of 161

Page 119: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

17

TABLE A-2

Estimated Artificial Inflation in GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. EST October 6, 2014

With Respect to Sales of GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes

Date

Artificial Inflation

per Share

Artificial Inflation per Note

Date

Artificial Inflation

per Share

Artificial Inflation per Note

Date

Artificial Inflation

per Share

Artificial Inflation per Note

11/5/2013 $9.59 N/A 1/14/2014 $8.63 $652.36 3/24/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/6/2013 $9.34 N/A 1/15/2014 $8.65 $677.36 3/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/7/2013 $8.80 N/A 1/16/2014 $8.71 $679.86 3/26/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/8/2013 $8.96 N/A 1/17/2014 $8.55 $647.13 3/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03

11/11/2013 $9.73 N/A 1/21/2014 $8.77 $646.11 3/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/12/2013 $9.46 N/A 1/22/2014 $8.71 $669.86 3/31/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/13/2013 $9.89 N/A 1/23/2014 $8.50 $674.86 4/1/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/14/2013 $9.79 N/A 1/24/2014 $8.58 $650.84 4/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/15/2013 $9.68 N/A 1/27/2014 $9.16 $684.06 4/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/18/2013 $9.42 N/A 1/28/2014 $9.31 $695.40 4/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/19/2013 $9.05 N/A 1/29/2014 $9.12 $722.36 4/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/20/2013 $8.93 N/A 1/30/2014 $9.57 $709.86 4/8/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/21/2013 $9.41 N/A 1/31/2014 $9.76 $728.61 4/9/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/22/2013 $9.31 N/A 2/3/2014 $9.26 $698.65 4/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/25/2013 $9.35 N/A 2/4/2014 $9.06 $689.86 4/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/26/2013 $9.49 N/A 2/5/2014 $8.67 $689.86 4/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 11/27/2013 $9.31 N/A 2/6/2014 $8.94 $684.86 4/15/2014 $13.89 $1,075.86 11/29/2013 $9.30 N/A 2/7/2014 $10.23 $763.86 4/16/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/2/2013 $9.43 N/A 2/10/2014 $11.23 $834.86 4/17/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/3/2013 $8.77 N/A 2/11/2014 $10.37 $783.30 4/21/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/4/2013 $8.41 N/A 2/12/2014 $10.67 $808.06 4/22/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/5/2013 $8.38 $635.36 2/13/2014 $11.20 $807.36 4/23/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/6/2013 $8.16 $612.52 2/14/2014 $11.16 $824.86 4/24/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/9/2013 $7.86 $616.26 2/18/2014 $12.13 $896.11 4/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03

12/10/2013 $8.04 $612.36 2/19/2014 $11.72 $887.78 4/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/11/2013 $7.71 $612.36 2/20/2014 $11.99 $881.11 4/29/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/12/2013 $7.54 $619.86 2/21/2014 $11.60 $877.94 4/30/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/13/2013 $7.51 $577.36 2/24/2014 $13.63 $1,011.66 5/1/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/16/2013 $7.88 $604.86 2/25/2014 $13.35 $1,001.86 5/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/17/2013 $7.99 $606.61 2/26/2014 $13.89 $1,038.77 5/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/18/2013 $7.98 $593.70 2/27/2014 $13.89 $1,029.86 5/6/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/19/2013 $8.03 $593.70 2/28/2014 $13.82 $1,024.44 5/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 12/20/2013 $7.86 $592.99 3/3/2014 $13.89 $1,069.84 5/8/2014 $13.77 $1,028.71 12/23/2013 $8.06 $606.11 3/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/9/2014 $12.70 $974.06 12/24/2013 $8.10 $604.86 3/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/12/2014 $12.90 $990.39 12/26/2013 $7.96 $604.86 3/6/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/13/2014 $13.77 $990.39 12/27/2013 $8.06 $628.36 3/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/14/2014 $13.37 $1,036.34 12/30/2013 $8.29 $614.86 3/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/15/2014 $13.18 $1,036.34 12/31/2013 $8.21 $619.86 3/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/16/2014 $13.38 $1,001.11 1/2/2014 $8.61 $637.64 3/12/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/19/2014 $13.68 $1,001.11 1/3/2014 $8.81 $648.66 3/13/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/20/2014 $13.51 $1,034.02 1/6/2014 $8.52 $676.11 3/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/21/2014 $13.89 $1,045.24 1/7/2014 $8.80 $664.86 3/17/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/22/2014 $13.89 $1,087.72 1/8/2014 $8.96 $668.73 3/18/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/23/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 1/9/2014 $8.79 $670.49 3/19/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 1/10/2014 $8.81 $661.11 3/20/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 1/13/2014 $8.23 $623.98 3/21/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 5/29/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 119 of 161

Page 120: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

18

TABLE A-2 (continued)

Date Artificial Inflation per Share

Artificial Inflation per

Note Date

Artificial Inflation per Share

Artificial Inflation per

Note 5/30/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/7/2014 $13.89 $1,096.78 6/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/8/2014 $13.89 $1,096.78 6/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/12/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/13/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/6/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/9/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/15/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/18/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/19/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/12/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/20/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/13/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/21/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/16/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/22/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/17/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/18/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/26/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/19/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/20/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/28/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/23/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 8/29/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/24/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/25/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/26/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/4/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/27/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/5/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 6/30/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/8/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 7/1/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/9/2014: purchased/acquired

before 1:12 p.m. EST $13.89 $1,102.03 7/2/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 7/3/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/9/2014: purchased/acquired

at or after 1:12 p.m. EST $12.15 $931.98 7/7/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 7/8/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/10/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/9/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/11/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/10/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/12/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/11/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/15/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/14/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/16/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/15/2014 $13.89 $1,102.03 9/17/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/16/2014 $13.89 $1,075.30 9/18/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/17/2014 $13.79 $1,086.09 9/19/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/18/2014 $13.89 $1,064.86 9/22/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/21/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/23/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/22/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/24/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/23/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/25/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/24/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/26/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/25/2014 $13.89 $1,057.48 9/29/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/28/2014 $13.72 $1,057.48 9/30/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/29/2014 $13.23 $994.81 10/1/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/30/2014 $13.89 $1,042.59 10/2/2014 $9.68 $767.54 7/31/2014 $13.33 $1,012.47 10/3/2014 $9.68 $767.54 8/1/2014 $13.44 $998.85 10/6/2014: purchased/acquired

before 9:40 a.m. EST $9.68 $767.54 8/4/2014 $13.62 $994.66 8/5/2014 $13.89 $1,070.71 10/6/2014: purchased/acquired

at or after 9:40 a.m. EST $0.00 $0.00 8/6/2014 $13.89 $1,085.88

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 120 of 161

Page 121: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

19

TABLE B

90-Day Lookback Table for GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes (GTAT Common Stock and GTAT Senior Notes Average Closing Price

October 6, 2014 – January 2, 2015)

Date

Average Closing Price

of GTAT Common

Stock Between

October 6, 2014 and

Date Shown

Average Closing Price

of GTAT Senior Notes

Between October 6, 2014 and

Date Shown

Date

Average Closing Price

of GTAT Common

Stock Between

October 6, 2014 and

Date Shown

Average Closing Price

of GTAT Senior Notes

Between October 6, 2014 and

Date Shown

10/6/2014 $0.80 $315.00 11/18/2014 $0.60 $350.73 10/7/2014 $1.01 $348.75 11/19/2014 $0.60 $353.19 10/8/2014 $1.04 $349.17 11/20/2014 $0.60 $353.19 10/9/2014 $1.10 $339.38 11/21/2014 $0.59 $353.19

10/10/2014 $1.04 $320.01 11/24/2014 $0.59 $355.55 10/13/2014 $0.93 $320.01 11/25/2014 $0.59 $357.54 10/14/2014 $0.86 $296.67 11/26/2014 $0.58 $357.54 10/15/2014 $0.81 $281.50 11/28/2014 $0.58 $357.54 10/16/2014 $0.76 $281.50 12/1/2014 $0.57 $359.36 10/17/2014 $0.72 $272.57 12/2/2014 $0.57 $362.78 10/20/2014 $0.69 $265.56 12/3/2014 $0.57 $365.37 10/21/2014 $0.68 $274.50 12/4/2014 $0.56 $367.95 10/22/2014 $0.67 $288.75 12/5/2014 $0.56 $367.95 10/23/2014 $0.68 $303.02 12/8/2014 $0.55 $370.97 10/24/2014 $0.69 $316.73 12/9/2014 $0.55 $372.92 10/27/2014 $0.70 $316.73 12/10/2014 $0.54 $375.24 10/28/2014 $0.70 $326.40 12/11/2014 $0.54 $377.33 10/29/2014 $0.69 $334.64 12/12/2014 $0.53 $377.33 10/30/2014 $0.67 $334.64 12/15/2014 $0.53 $381.02 10/31/2014 $0.67 $338.72 12/16/2014 $0.53 $384.02 11/3/2014 $0.67 $338.72 12/17/2014 $0.53 $386.84 11/4/2014 $0.66 $340.56 12/18/2014 $0.53 $386.84 11/5/2014 $0.66 $345.53 12/19/2014 $0.52 $386.84 11/6/2014 $0.65 $348.14 12/22/2014 $0.52 $386.84 11/7/2014 $0.65 $350.73 12/23/2014 $0.52 $386.84

11/10/2014 $0.64 $350.73 12/24/2014 $0.52 $390.00 11/11/2014 $0.63 $350.73 12/26/2014 $0.52 $390.00 11/12/2014 $0.62 $350.73 12/29/2014 $0.51 $390.00 11/13/2014 $0.62 $350.73 12/30/2014 $0.51 $390.00 11/14/2014 $0.61 $350.73 12/31/2014 $0.51 $392.36 11/17/2014 $0.61 $350.73 1/2/2015 $0.51 $395.14

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 121 of 161

Page 122: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

EXHIBIT A-2

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 122 of 161

Page 123: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

GTAT Securities Litigation

c/o GCG P.O. Box 10463

Dublin, OH 43017-4063

1-866-562-8790 [email protected] www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM

TO BE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A SHARE OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND(S) IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND SIGN THIS PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM (“CLAIM FORM”) AND MAIL IT BY PREPAID, FIRST-CLASS MAIL TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS, POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN _____________, 2018.

FAILURE TO SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM FORM BY THE DATE SPECIFIED WILL SUBJECT YOUR CLAIM TO REJECTION AND MAY PRECLUDE YOU FROM BEING ELIGIBLE TO RECOVER ANY MONEY IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS.

DO NOT MAIL OR DELIVER YOUR CLAIM FORM TO THE COURT, THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, OR THEIR COUNSEL. SUBMIT YOUR CLAIM FORM ONLY TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR AT THE ADDRESS SET FORTH ABOVE.

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE #

PART I – CLAIMANT INFORMATION ___

PART II – GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS ___

PART III – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT COMMON STOCK ___

PART IV – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT 3.00% CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES DUE 2020

___

PART V – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT CALL OPTIONS ___

PART VI – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT PUT OPTIONS ___

PART VII – RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND SIGNATURE ___

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 123 of 161

Page 124: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 2

PART I – CLAIMANT INFORMATION

The Claims Administrator will use this information for all communications regarding this Claim Form. If this information changes, you MUST notify the Claims Administrator in writing at the address above. Complete names of all persons and entities must be provided. Claimant Names(s) (as the name(s) should appear on check, if eligible for payment; if the securities are jointly owned, the names of all beneficial owners must be provided):

Name of Person the Claims Administrator Should Contact Regarding this Claim Form (Must Be Provided):

Mailing Address – Line 1: Street Address/P.O. Box:

Mailing Address – Line 2 (If Applicable): Apartment/Suite/Floor Number:

City:

State/Province: Zip Code: Country (if other than U.S.): Last 4 digits of Claimant Social Security/Taxpayer Identification Number:1

Daytime Telephone Number: Evening Telephone Number:

Email address (E-mail address is not required, but if you provide it you authorize the Claims Administrator to use it in providing you with information relevant to this claim.):

1 The last four digits of the taxpayer identification number (TIN), consisting of a valid Social Security Number (SSN) for individuals or Employer Identification Number (EIN) for business entities, trusts, estates, etc., and telephone number of the beneficial owner(s) may be used in verifying this claim.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 124 of 161

Page 125: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 3

PART II – GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. It is important that you completely read and understand the Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Certification of Settlement Classes; (II) Proposed Settlements with Individual Defendants and Underwriter Defendants; (III) Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; and (IV) Settlement Fairness Hearing (the “Notice”) that accompanies this Claim Form, including the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Funds attached to the Notice (the “Plan of Allocation”). The Notice describes the proposed Settlements, how Settlement Class Members are affected by the Settlements that apply to them, and the manner in which the Net Settlement Funds will be distributed if the Settlements and Plan of Allocation are approved by the Court. The Notice also contains the definitions of many of the defined terms (which are indicated by initial capital letters) used in this Claim Form. By signing and submitting this Claim Form, you will be certifying that you have read and that you understand the Notice, including the terms of the releases described therein and provided for herein.

2. YOU ARE ONLY ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SETTLEMENT(S) APPLICABLE TO THE SETTLEMENT CLASS(ES) IN WHICH YOU ARE A MEMBER (see the definition of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and the definition of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class on page __ of the Notice, which set forth who is included in and who is excluded from the respective Settlement Classes). Thus, to be eligible for a payment from the proceeds of the Individual Defendant Settlement, you must be a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, and to be eligible for a payment from the proceeds of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, you must be a member of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

3. By submitting this Claim Form, you will be making a request to share in the proceeds of the Settlements described in the Notice that are applicable to you. IF YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER OF OR MORE ONE OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASSES, DO NOT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM. You may not, directly or indirectly, participate in the Individual Defendant Settlement if you are not a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class or if you, or someone acting on your behalf, submitted a request for exclusion from that class, and you may not, directly or indirectly, participate in the Underwriter Defendant Settlement if you are not a member of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class or if you, or someone acting on your behalf, submitted a request for exclusion from that class.

4. Submission of this Claim Form does not guarantee that you will share in the proceeds of the Settlement(s) that apply to you. The distribution of the Net Settlement Funds will be governed by the Plan of Allocation, if it is approved by the Court, or by such other plan of allocation as the Court approves.

5. Use the Schedules of Transactions in Parts III to VI of this Claim Form to supply all required details of your transaction(s) (including free transfers and deliveries) in and holdings of the applicable GTAT Securities. On these schedules, provide all of the requested information with respect to your holdings, purchases, acquisitions, and sales of the applicable GTAT Securities, whether such transactions resulted in a profit or a loss. Failure to report all transaction and holding information during the requested time periods may result in the rejection of your claim.

6. You are required to submit genuine and sufficient documentation for all of your transactions in and holdings of the applicable GTAT Securities set forth in the Schedules of Transactions in Part III to VI of this Claim Form. Documentation may consist of copies of brokerage confirmation slips or monthly brokerage account statements, or an authorized statement from your broker containing the transactional and holding

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 125 of 161

Page 126: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 4

information found in a broker confirmation slip or account statement. The Settling Parties and the Claims Administrator do not independently have information about your investments in GTAT Securities. IF SUCH DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IN YOUR POSSESSION, PLEASE OBTAIN COPIES OF THE DOCUMENTS OR EQUIVALENT DOCUMENTS FROM YOUR BROKER. FAILURE TO SUPPLY THIS DOCUMENTATION MAY RESULT IN THE REJECTION OF YOUR CLAIM. DO NOT SEND ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS. Please keep a copy of all documents that you send to the Claims Administrator. Also, do not highlight any portion of the Claim Form or any supporting documents.

7. Please Note: Documentation Requirement for Shares of GTAT Common Stock purchased pursuant or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering: If you purchased GTAT Common Stock pursuant or traceable to the Common Stock Secondary Offering, which occurred on or about December 4, 2013, you must submit trade confirmations indicating that the shares were purchased directly from an underwriter as part of the Common Stock Secondary Offering at the $8.65 issue price.

8. Please Note: Additional Documentation Requirement Regarding Purchases/Acquisitions and Sales of GTAT Call and Put Options on September 9, 2014 and October 6, 2014: If you purchased/acquired GTAT Call Options, or sold (wrote) GTAT Put Options, on September 9, 2014 or October 6, 2014, you will also be required to submit supporting documentation that shows the time of day, Eastern Standard Time, when the transaction occurred.

9. All joint beneficial owners each must sign this Claim Form and their names must appear as “Claimants” in Part I of this Claim Form. The complete name(s) of the beneficial owner(s) must be entered. If you purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes or GTAT Call Options, or sold (wrote) GTAT Put Options, during the Class Period and held the securities in your name, you are the beneficial owner as well as the record owner. If you purchased or otherwise acquired GTAT Common Stock, GTAT Senior Notes or GTAT Call Options, or sold (wrote) GTAT Put Options, during the Class Period and the securities were registered in the name of a third party, such as a nominee or brokerage firm, you are the beneficial owner of these shares, but the third party is the record owner. The beneficial owner, not the record owner, must sign this Claim Form.

10. One Claim should be submitted for each separate legal entity. Separate Claim Forms should be submitted for each separate legal entity (e.g., a claim from joint owners should not include separate transactions of just one of the joint owners, and an individual should not combine his or her IRA transactions with transactions made solely in the individual’s name). Conversely, a single Claim Form should be submitted on behalf of one legal entity including all transactions made by that entity on one Claim Form, no matter how many separate accounts that entity has (e.g., a corporation with multiple brokerage accounts should include all transactions made in all accounts on one Claim Form).

11. Agents, executors, administrators, guardians, and trustees must complete and sign the Claim Form on behalf of persons represented by them, and they must:

(a) expressly state the capacity in which they are acting; (b) identify the name, account number, Social Security Number (or taxpayer identification

number), address and telephone number of the beneficial owner of (or other person or entity on whose behalf they are acting with respect to) the GTAT Securities; and

(c) furnish herewith evidence of their authority to bind to the Claim Form the person or entity on whose behalf they are acting. (Authority to complete and sign a Claim Form

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 126 of 161

Page 127: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 5

cannot be established by stockbrokers demonstrating only that they have discretionary authority to trade securities in another person’s accounts.)

12. By submitting a signed Claim Form, you will be swearing that you: (a) own(ed) the GTAT Securities you have listed in the Claim Form; or (b) are expressly authorized to act on behalf of the owner thereof.

13. By submitting a signed Claim Form, you will be swearing to the truth of the statements contained therein and the genuineness of the documents attached thereto, subject to penalties of perjury under the laws of the United States of America. The making of false statements, or the submission of forged or fraudulent documentation, will result in the rejection of your claim and may subject you to civil liability or criminal prosecution.

14. If the Court approves the Settlement(s), payments to eligible Authorized Claimants pursuant to the Plan of Allocation (or such other plan of allocation as the Court approves) will be made after any appeals are resolved, and after the completion of all claims processing. The claims process will take substantial time to complete fully and fairly. Please be patient.

15. Please note: As set forth in the Plan of Allocation, each Authorized Claimant shall receive his, her or its pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund(s) pertaining to the Settlement Class(es) in which he, she or it is a member. If the total prorated payment to any Authorized Claimant calculates to less than $10.00, it will not be included in the calculation and no distribution will be made to that Authorized Claimant.

16. If you have questions concerning the Claim Form, or need additional copies of the Claim Form or the Notice, you may contact the Claims Administrator, GCG, at the above address, by email at [email protected], or by toll-free phone at 1-866-562-8790, or you can visit the Settlement website, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com, where copies of the Claim Form and Notice are available for downloading.

17. NOTICE REGARDING ELECTRONIC FILES: Certain claimants with large numbers of transactions may request, or may be requested, to submit information regarding their transactions in electronic files. To obtain the mandatory electronic filing requirements and file layout, you may visit the settlement website at www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com or you may email the Claims Administrator’s electronic filing department at [email protected]. Any file not in accordance with the required electronic filing format will be subject to rejection. Only one claim should be submitted for each separate legal entity (see paragraph 10 above) and the complete name of the beneficial owner of the securities must be entered where called for (see paragraph 9 above). No electronic files will be considered to have been properly submitted unless the Claims Administrator issues an email to that effect. Do not assume that your file has been received until you receive this email. If you do not receive such an email within 10 days of your submission, you should contact the Claims Administrator’s electronic filing department at [email protected] to inquire about your file and confirm it was received.

IMPORTANT: PLEASE NOTE

YOUR CLAIM IS NOT DEEMED FILED UNTIL YOU RECEIVE AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT POSTCARD. THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR WILL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF YOUR CLAIM FORM BY MAIL, WITHIN 60 DAYS. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE AN

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 127 of 161

Page 128: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 6

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT POSTCARD WITHIN 60 DAYS, CALL THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR TOLL FREE AT 1-866-562-8790.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 128 of 161

Page 129: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 7

PART III – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT COMMON STOCK Complete this Part III if and only if you purchased or acquired publicly traded GTAT common stock (“GTAT Common Stock”) during the period from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. Please be sure to include proper documentation with your Claim Form as described in detail in Part II – General Instructions, paragraph 6, above. Do not include information regarding securities other than GTAT Common Stock in this section. 1. HOLDINGS AS OF NOVEMBER 5, 2013 – State the total number of shares of GTAT Common Stock held as of the opening of trading on November 5, 2013. (Must be documented.) If none, write “zero” or “0.” ____________________

Confirm Proof of Position Enclosed

○ 2. PURCHASES/ACQUISITIONS FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list each and every purchase/acquisition (including free receipts) of GTAT Common Stock from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.) Date of Purchase/

Acquisition (List

Chronologically) (Month/Day/Year)

Number of Shares Purchased/Acquired

Purchase/Acquisition Price Per Share

Total Purchase/ Acquisition Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

Confirm Proof of Purchase Enclosed

/ / $ $ ○

/ / $ $ ○

/ / $ $ ○

/ / $ $ ○

3. PURCHASES/ACQUISITIONS FROM AFTER 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 THROUGH JANUARY 2, 20152 – State the total number of shares of GTAT Common Stock purchased/acquired (including free receipts) from after 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014 through and including the close of trading on January 2, 2015. (Must be documented.) If none, write “zero” or “0.” ____________________ 4. SALES FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH JANUARY 2, 2015 – Separately list each and every sale/disposition (including free deliveries) of GTAT Common Stock from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including the close of trading on January 2, 2015. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

Date of Sale (List

Chronologically) (Month/Day/Year)

Number of Shares Sold

Sale Price Per Share

Total Sale Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

Confirm Proof of Sale Enclosed

/ / $ $ ○

/ / $ $ ○

2 Please note: Information requested with respect to your purchases/acquisitions of GTAT Common Stock from after 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014 through and including January 2, 2015 is needed in order to balance your claim; purchases during this period, however, are not eligible transactions and will not be used for purposes of calculating Recognized Loss Amounts pursuant to the Plan of Allocation.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 129 of 161

Page 130: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 8

/ / $ $ ○

/ / $ $ ○

5. HOLDINGS AS OF JANUARY 2, 2015 – State the total number of shares of GTAT Common Stock held as of the close of trading on January 2, 2015. (Must be documented.) If none, write “zero” or “0.” ________________

Confirm Proof of Position Enclosed

○ IF YOU REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SPACE FOR THE SCHEDULE ABOVE, ATTACH EXTRA SCHEDULES IN THE SAME FORMAT. PRINT THE BENEFICIAL OWNER’S FULL NAME AND LAST FOUR DIGITS OF SOCIAL SECURITY/TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ON EACH ADDITIONAL PAGE. IF YOU DO ATTACH EXTRA SCHEDULES, CHECK THIS BOX

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 130 of 161

Page 131: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 9

PART IV – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT 3.00% CONVERTIBLE SENIOR NOTES DUE 2020

Complete this Part IV if and only if you purchased or acquired GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 (“GTAT Senior Notes”) during the period from the initial offering of the GTAT Senior Notes, which occurred on or about December 4, 2013, through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. Please include proper documentation with your Claim Form as described in detail in Part II – General Instructions, paragraph 6, above. Do not include information regarding securities other than GTAT Senior Notes in this section. 1. PURCHASES/ACQUISITIONS FROM INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING THROUGH 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list each and every purchase or acquisition (including free receipts) of GTAT Senior Notes from the initial public offering of the GTAT Senior Notes which occurred on or about December 4, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

Date of Purchase/ Acquisition (List Chronologically)

(Month/Day/Year)

Face Value of Notes Purchased/Acquired

Purchase/Acquisition Price Per $1,000 Face Value

Total Purchase/ Acquisition Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

/ / $ $ $

/ / $ $ $

/ / $ $ $

/ / $ $ $

2. PURCHASES/ACQUISITIONS FROM AFTER 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 THROUGH MAY 18, 20153 – State the total face value of GTAT Senior Notes purchased or acquired (including free receipts) from after 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014 through and including the close of trading on May 18, 2015. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

3. SALES FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH MAY 18, 2015 – Separately list each and every sale or disposition (including free deliveries) of GTAT Senior Notes from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including the close of trading on May 18, 2015. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

3 Please note: Information requested with respect to your purchases/acquisitions of GTAT Senior Notes Due 2020 from after 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014 through and including the close of trading on May 18, 2015 is needed in order to balance your claim; purchases during this period, however, are not eligible transactions and will not be used for purposes of calculating Recognized Loss Amounts pursuant to the Plan of Allocation.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 131 of 161

Page 132: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 10

Date of Sale (List Chronologically)

(Month/Day/Year)

Face Value of Notes Sold Sale Price Per $1,000 Face Value

Total Sale Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

/ / $ $ $

/ / $ $ $

/ / $ $ $

/ / $ $ $

4. HOLDINGS AS OF MAY 18, 2015 – State the total face value of GTAT Senior Notes held as of the close of trading on May 18, 2015. (Must be documented.) ____________________

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL SPACE TO LIST YOUR TRANSACTIONS YOU MUST PHOTOCOPY THIS PAGE AND CHECK THIS BOX

PRINT THE BENEFICIAL OWNER’S FULL NAME AND LAST FOUR DIGITS OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY/TAXPAYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ON EACH ADDITIONAL PAGE.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 132 of 161

Page 133: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 11

PART V– SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT CALL OPTIONS Complete this Part V if and only if you purchased or acquired publicly traded call options on GTAT Common Stock (“GTAT Call Options”) during the period from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. Please include proper documentation with your Claim Form as described in detail in Part II – General Instructions, paragraph 6, above. Do not include information regarding securities other than GTAT Call Options in this section. 1. HOLDINGS AS OF NOVEMBER 5, 2013 – Separately list all positions in GTAT Call Option contracts in which you had an open interest as of the opening of trading on November 5, 2013. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

○ Strike Price of Call

Option Contract Expiration Date of Call Option Contract

(Month/Day/Year) Number of Call Option Contracts in

Which You Had an Open Interest

$ / / $ / / $ / / $ / / 2. PURCHASES/ACQUISITIONS FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list each and every purchase and acquisition (including free receipts) of GTAT Call Option contracts from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.) Date of Purchase/

Acquisition (List

Chronologically) (Month/Day/Year)

Strike Price of Call Option

Contract

Expiration Date of Call

Option Contract

(Month/Day/ Year)

Number of Call Option Contracts

Purchased/Acquired

Purchase/ Acquisition Price Per

Call Option

Contract

Total Purchase/ Acquisitio

n Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and

fees)

Insert an “E” if

Exercised

Insert an “X” if

Expired

Exercise Date (Month/

Day/ Year)

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 133 of 161

Page 134: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 12

3. SALES FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list each and every sale or disposition (including free deliveries) of GTAT Call Options from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

Date of Sale (List

Chronologically) (Month/Day/Year)

Strike Price of Call Option

Contract

Expiration Date of Call Option

Contract (Month/Day/Year)

Number of Call Option

Contracts Sold

Sale Price Per Call Option

Contract

Total Sale Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

/ / $ / / $ $

/ / $ / / $ $

/ / $ / / $ $

/ / $ / / $ $

4. HOLDINGS AS OF 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list all positions in GTAT Call Option contracts in which you had an open interest as of 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

○ Strike Price of Call Option

Contract

Expiration Date of Call Option Contract (Month/Day/Year)

Number of Call Option Contracts in Which You Had an Open Interest

$ / / $ / / $ / / $ / /

IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL SPACE TO LIST YOUR TRANSACTIONS/HOLDINGS YOU MUST

PHOTOCOPY THIS PAGE AND CHECK THIS BOX IF YOU DO NOT CHECK THIS BOX THESE ADDITIONAL PAGES WILL NOT BE REVIEWED

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 134 of 161

Page 135: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 13

PART VI – SCHEDULE OF TRANSACTIONS IN GTAT PUT OPTIONS

Complete this Part VI if and only if you sold (wrote) publicly traded put options on GTAT Common Stock (“GTAT Put Options”) during the period from November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. Please include proper documentation with your Claim Form as described in detail in Part II – General Instructions, paragraph 6, above. Do not include information regarding securities other than GTAT Put Options in this section.

1. HOLDINGS AS OF NOVEMBER 5, 2013 – Separately list all positions in GTAT Put Option contracts in which you had an open interest as of the opening of trading on November 5, 2013. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

○ Strike Price of Put Option Contract

Expiration Date of Put Option Contract (Month/Day/Year)

Number of Put Option Contracts in Which You Had an Open Interest

$ / / $ / / $ / / $ / / 2. SALES (WRITING) FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list each and every sale (writing) (including free deliveries) of GTAT Put Option contracts from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.)

Date of Sale (Writing)

(List Chronologically)

(Month/Day/Year)

Strike Price of Put Option Contract

Expiration Date of Put

Option Contract

(Month/Day/ Year)

Number of Put Option Contracts

Sold (Written)

Sale Price Per Put Option

Contract

Total Sale Price

(excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

Insert an “E” if Exercised

Insert an “X” if

Expired

Exercise Date (Month/

Day/ Year)

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

/ / $ / / $ $ / /

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 135 of 161

Page 136: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 14

3. PURCHASES/ACQUISITIONS FROM NOVEMBER 5, 2013 THROUGH 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list each and every purchase and acquisition (including free receipts) of GTAT Put Option contacts from after the opening of trading on November 5, 2013 through and including 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

Date of Purchase/ Acquisition

(List Chronologically)

(Month/Day/Year)

Strike Price of Put Option Contract

Expiration Date of Put Option Contract

(Month/Day/Year)

Number of Put Option Contracts

Purchased/ Acquired

Purchase/ Acquisition

Price Per Put Option Contract

Total Purchase/ Acquisition Price (excluding taxes,

commissions, and fees)

/ / $ / / $ $

/ / $ / / $ $

/ / $ / / $ $

/ / $ / / $ $

4. HOLDINGS AS OF 9:40 A.M. EASTERN STANDARD TIME ON OCTOBER 6, 2014 – Separately list all positions in GTAT Put Option contracts in which you had an open interest as of 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014. (Must be documented.)

IF NONE, CHECK HERE

○ Strike Price of Put Option

Contract

Expiration Date of Put Option Contract (Month/Day/Year)

Number of Put Option Contracts in Which You Had an Open

Interest

$ / / $ / / $ / / $ / /

IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL SPACE TO LIST YOUR TRANSACTIONS/HOLDINGS YOU MUST

PHOTOCOPY THIS PAGE AND CHECK THIS BOX IF YOU DO NOT CHECK THIS BOX THESE ADDITIONAL PAGES WILL NOT BE REVIEWED

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 136 of 161

Page 137: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 15

PART VII - RELEASE OF CLAIMS AND SIGNATURE

YOU MUST ALSO READ THE RELEASE AND CERTIFICATION BELOW AND SIGN ON PAGE __ OF THIS CLAIM FORM.

Release of Claims by Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members: I (we) hereby acknowledge that, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Individual Defendant Stipulation, upon the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement, I (we), on behalf of myself (ourselves) and my (our) heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of the Judgment entered with respect to the Individual Defendant Settlement, shall have, fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, discharged and dismissed each and every Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (as defined in the Individual Defendant Stipulation and the Notice) against the Individual Defendants and the other Individual Defendant Releasees, and shall forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees. Release of Claims by Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class Members: I (we) hereby acknowledge that, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation, upon the Effective Date of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, I (we), on behalf of myself (ourselves) and my (our) heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of the Judgment entered with respect to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement shall have, fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived, discharged and dismissed each and every Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation and the Notice) against the Settling Underwriter Defendants and the other Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees, and shall forever be barred and enjoined from prosecuting any or all of the Underwriter Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Settling Underwriter Defendants’ Releasees. CERTIFICATION By signing and submitting this Claim Form, the claimant(s) or the person(s) who represent(s) the claimant(s) agree(s) to the release above and certifies (certify) as follows:

1. that I (we) have read and understand the contents of the Notice and this Claim Form, including the releases provided for in the respective Settlements and the terms of the Plan of Allocation;

2. that the claimant(s) is a (are) member(s) of one or more of the Settlement Classes, as defined in the Notice, and is (are) not excluded by definition from such Settlement Class(es) as set forth in the Notice;

3. that the claimant has not submitted request(s) for exclusion from the Settlement Class(es) in which he, she or it would otherwise be a member;

4. that I (we) owned the GTAT Securities identified in the Claim Form and have not assigned the claims with respect to those securities to another, or that, in signing and submitting this Claim Form, I (we) have the authority to act on behalf of the owner(s) thereof;

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 137 of 161

Page 138: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 16

5. that the claimant(s) has (have) not submitted any other claim covering the same purchases or sales of GTAT Securities and knows (know) of no other person having done so on the claimant’s (claimants’) behalf;

6. that the claimant(s) submit(s) to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to claimant’s (claimants’) claim and for purposes of enforcing the releases set forth herein;

7. that I (we) agree to furnish such additional information with respect to this Claim Form as Lead Counsel, the Claims Administrator or the Court may require;

8. that the claimant(s) waive(s) the right to trial by jury, to the extent it exists, agree(s) to the determination by the Court of the validity or amount of this Claim and waives any right of appeal or review with respect to such determination;

9. that I (we) acknowledge that the claimant(s) will be bound by and subject to the terms of any judgment(s) that may be entered in the Action; and

10. that the claimant(s) is (are) NOT subject to backup withholding under the provisions of Section 3406(a)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code because (a) the claimant(s) is (are) exempt from backup withholding or (b) the claimant(s) has (have) not been notified by the IRS that he/she/it is subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends or (c) the IRS has notified the claimant(s) that he/she/it is no longer subject to backup withholding. If the IRS has notified the claimant(s) that he/she/it is subject to backup withholding, please strike out the language in the preceding sentence indicating that the claim is not subject to backup withholding in the certification above. UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY, I (WE) CERTIFY THAT ALL OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ME (US) ON THIS CLAIM FORM IS TRUE, CORRECT, AND COMPLETE, AND THAT THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED HEREWITH ARE TRUE AND CORRECT COPIES OF WHAT THEY PURPORT TO BE.

Signature of claimant Date

Print claimant name here

Signature of joint claimant, if any Date

Print joint claimant name here

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 138 of 161

Page 139: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 17

If the claimant is other than an individual, or is not the person completing this form, the following also must be provided:

Signature of person signing on behalf of claimant Date

Print name of person signing on behalf of claimant here

Capacity of person signing on behalf of claimant, if other than an individual, e.g., executor, president, trustee, custodian, etc. (Must provide evidence of authority to act on behalf of claimant – see paragraph 11 on page __ of this Claim Form.)

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 139 of 161

Page 140: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Page 18

REMINDER CHECKLIST: 1. Sign the above release and certification. If this Claim Form is being made on behalf of joint claimants, then

both must sign. 2. Attach only copies of acceptable supporting documentation as these documents will not be returned to you. 3. Do not highlight any portion of the Claim Form or any supporting documents. 4. Keep copies of the completed Claim Form and documentation for your own records. 5. The Claims Administrator will acknowledge receipt of your Claim Form by mail, within 60 days. Your

claim is not deemed filed until you receive an acknowledgement postcard. If you do not receive an acknowledgement postcard within 60 days, please call the Claims Administrator toll-free at 1-866-562-8790.

6. If your address changes in the future, or if this Claim Form was sent to an old or incorrect address, you must

send the Claims Administrator written notification of your new address. If you change your name, inform the Claims Administrator.

7. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your claim, please contact the Claims Administrator at the address below, by email at [email protected], or by toll-free phone at 1-866-562-8790 or you may visit www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com. DO NOT call GTAT or any of the other Defendants or their counsel with questions regarding your claim.

THIS CLAIM FORM MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL, POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN _________________, 2018, ADDRESSED AS FOLLOWS:

GTAT Securities Litigation c/o GCG

P.O. Box 10463 Dublin, OH 43017-4063

A Claim Form received by the Claims Administrator shall be deemed to have been submitted when posted, if a postmark date on or before _________________, 2018 is indicated on the envelope and it is mailed First Class, and addressed in accordance with the above instructions. In all other cases, a Claim Form shall be deemed to have been submitted when actually received by the Claims Administrator. You should be aware that it will take a significant amount of time to fully process all of the Claim Forms. Please be patient and notify the Claims Administrator of any change of address. #1153683

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 140 of 161

Page 141: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

EXHIBIT A-3

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 141 of 161

Page 142: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Exhibit 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

ADAM S. LEVY on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS GUTIERREZ, RICHARD J. GAYNOR, RAJA BAL, J. MICHAL CONAWAY, KATHLEEN A. COTE, ERNEST L. GODSHALK, MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL, MARY PETROVICH, ROBERT E. SWITZ, NOEL G. WATSON, THOMAS WROE, JR., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., CANACCORD GENUITY INC., AND APPLE, INC.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL

ECF CASE

SUMMARY NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES; (II) PROPOSED SETTLEMENTS WITH INDIVIDUAL

DEFENDANTS AND UNDERWRITER DEFENDANTS; (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION

EXPENSES; AND (IV) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

TO: (a) All persons and entities who or which from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive (the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded GT Advanced Technologies Inc. (“GTAT”) common stock (“GTAT Common Stock”) and/or publicly traded GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020 (“GTAT Senior Notes”), purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded call options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Call Options”), and/or sold (wrote) publicly traded put options on GTAT common stock (“GTAT Put Options”), and were damaged thereby (the “Individual Defendant Settlement Class”); and

(b) All persons and entities who, during the Class Period, purchased or otherwise acquired (i) GTAT Senior Notes pursuant or traceable to GTAT’s December 2013 registration statement and prospectus supplement for the GTAT Senior Notes’ offering and/or (ii) shares of GTAT Common Stock pursuant or traceable to GTAT’s December 2013 registration statement and prospectus

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 142 of 161

Page 143: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

2

supplement for the secondary offering of GTAT common stock (the “Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class”).

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE AFFECTED BY A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT PENDING IN THIS COURT.

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and an Order of the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, that the above-captioned action (the “Action”) has been certified as a class action for the purposes of settlement only on behalf of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, except for certain persons and entities who are excluded from those Settlement Classes by definition as set forth in the full printed Notice of (I) Pendency of Class Action and Certification of Settlement Classes; (II) Proposed Settlements with Individual Defendants and Underwriter Defendants; (III) Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; and (IV) Settlement Fairness Hearing (the “Notice”).

YOU ARE ALSO NOTIFIED that (i) the Court-appointed Lead Plaintiff Douglas Kurz (“Lead Plaintiff”) and additional named plaintiffs Strategic Master Fund (Cayman) Limited (“Strategic Master Fund”) and Highmark Limited, in respect of its Segregated Account Highmark Fixed Income 2 (“Highmark Limited”)), on behalf of themselves and the Individual Defendant Settlement Class, have reached a proposed settlement of the Action with defendants Thomas Gutierrez, Richard Gaynor, Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal, Hoil Kim, and Daniel W. Squiller, J. Michal Conaway, Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz, Noel G. Watson, and Thomas Wroe, Jr. (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”) for $27,000,000 in cash (the “Individual Defendant Settlement”); and (ii) Lead Plaintiff and additional named plaintiffs Strategic Master Fund and Highmark Limited, on behalf of themselves and the Underwriter Settlement Class, have reached a proposed settlement of the Action with defendants Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC (f/k/a Goldman, Sachs & Co.), and Canaccord Genuity Inc. (the “Underwriter Defendants”) for $9,700,000 in cash (the “Underwriter Defendant Settlement” and, together with the Individual Defendant Settlement, the “Settlements”). These proposed Settlements will be considered independently by the Court and they do not resolve any of the claims asserted against the remaining defendant in the Action, Apple, Inc.

A hearing will be held on ___________, 2018 at _:__ _.m., before the Honorable Joseph N. Laplante at the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire, Courtroom 2, 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301-3941, to determine: (i) whether the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (ii) whether the proposed Underwriter Defendant Settlement should be approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate; (iii) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice as against the Individual Defendants and the Releases specified and described in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Individual Defendants dated January 26, 2018 (and in the Notice) should be granted; (iv) whether the Action should be dismissed with prejudice as against the Underwriter Defendants and the Releases specified and described in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Settling Underwriter Defendants dated August 18, 2017 (and in the Notice) should be granted; (v) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation for the proceeds of the Settlements is fair and reasonable and should be approved; and (vi) whether Lead Counsel’s

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 143 of 161

Page 144: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

3

application for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses should be approved.

If you are a member of the Individual Defendant and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class, your rights will be affected by the proposed Settlement(s) that apply to you and any orders or judgments related to those Settlements, and you may be entitled to share in the Individual Defendant and/or Underwriter Defendant Settlement Funds. If you have not yet received the Notice and Claim Form, you may obtain copies of these documents by contacting the Claims Administrator at GTAT Securities Litigation, c/o GCG, P.O. Box 10463, Dublin, OH 43017-4063, by toll-free phone at 1-866-562-879, or by email at [email protected]. Copies of the Notice can also be downloaded from the website maintained by the Claims Administrator, www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com.

If you are a member of one or both Settlement Classes, in order to be eligible to receive a payment under the proposed Settlement(s) that apply to you, you must submit a Claim Form postmarked no later than _______________, 2018. If you are a Settlement Class Member and do not submit a proper Claim Form, you will not be eligible to share in the distribution of the net proceeds of the Settlement(s) but you will nevertheless be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action related to the Settlement(s) that apply to you.

If you are a member of one or both Settlement Classes and wish to exclude yourself from the Settlement Class(es) that apply to you, you must submit a written request for exclusion such that it is received no later than _______________, 2018, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice. If you are a member of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class and properly exclude yourself from that class, you will not be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action relating to the Individual Defendant Settlement, and you will not be eligible to share in the proceeds of the Individual Defendant Settlement. If you are a member of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement Class and properly exclude yourself from that class, you will not be bound by any judgments or orders entered by the Court in the Action relating to the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, and you will not be eligible to share in the proceeds of the Underwriter Defendant Settlement.

Any objections to the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement, the proposed Underwriter Defendant Settlement, the proposed Plan of Allocation, or Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of litigation expenses must be filed with the Court and delivered to Lead Counsel and, if the objection is to the Individual Defendant Settlement and/or the Underwriter Defendant Settlement, to designated counsel for those Settling Defendants such that they are received no later than _______________, 2018, in accordance with the instructions set forth in the Notice.

Please do not contact the Court, GTAT, Defendants, or their counsel regarding this notice. All questions about this notice, the proposed Settlements, or your eligibility to participate in the Settlements should be directed to the Claims Administrator or Lead Counsel.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 144 of 161

Page 145: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

4

Requests for the Notice and Claim Form should be made to:

GTAT Securities Litigation c/o GCG

P.O. Box 10463 Dublin, OH 43017-4063

1-866-562-8790 [email protected] www.GTATSecuritiesLitigation.com

Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice and Claim Form, should be made to Lead Counsel:

John C. Browne, Esq. BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER

& GROSSMANN LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 44th Floor

New York, NY 10020 1-800-380-8496

[email protected]

By Order of the Court

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 145 of 161

Page 146: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

EXHIBIT B

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 146 of 161

Page 147: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

Exhibit B UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

ADAM S. LEVY on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS GUTIERREZ, RICHARD J. GAYNOR, RAJA BAL, J. MICHAL CONAWAY, KATHLEEN A. COTE, ERNEST L. GODSHALK, MATTHEW E. MASSENGILL, MARY PETROVICH, ROBERT E. SWITZ, NOEL G. WATSON, THOMAS WROE, JR., MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., CANACCORD GENUITY INC., AND APPLE, INC.,

Defendants.

No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL

ECF CASE

JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS

WHEREAS, a consolidated class action is pending in this Court entitled Levy v. Gutierrez,

et al., Case No. 1:14-cv-00443-JL (the “Action”);

WHEREAS, (a) Lead Plaintiff Douglas Kurz (“Lead Plaintiff”) and named plaintiffs

Strategic Master Fund (Cayman) Limited (“Strategic Master Fund”) and Highmark Limited, in

respect of its Segregated Account Highmark Fixed Income 2 (“Highmark Limited,” and together

with Strategic Master Fund, the “Securities Act Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the

Individual Defendant Settlement Class (defined below), and (b) defendants Thomas Gutierrez,

Richard Gaynor, Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal, Hoil Kim, Daniel W. Squiller, J. Michal Conaway,

Kathleen A. Cote, Ernest L. Godshalk, Matthew E. Massengill, Mary Petrovich, Robert E. Switz,

Noel G. Watson, and Thomas Wroe, Jr. (collectively, the “Individual Defendants,” and together

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 147 of 161

Page 148: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

2

with Lead Plaintiff and the Securities Act Plaintiffs, the “Settling Parties”) have entered into a

Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Individual Defendants dated January 26, 2018 (the

“Individual Defendant Stipulation”), that provides for a complete dismissal with prejudice of the

claims asserted against the Individual Defendants in the Action on the terms and conditions set

forth in the Individual Defendant Stipulation, subject to the approval of this Court (the “Individual

Defendant Settlement”);

WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined in this Judgment, the capitalized terms herein shall

have the same meaning as they have in the Individual Defendant Stipulation;

WHEREAS, by Order dated _________ __, 2018 (the “Preliminary Approval Order”), this

Court: (a) preliminarily approved the Individual Defendant Settlement; (b) certified the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class solely for purposes of effectuating the Individual Defendant

Settlement; (c) ordered that notice of the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement be provided

to potential Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members; (d) provided Individual Defendant

Settlement Class Members with the opportunity either to exclude themselves from the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class or to object to the proposed Individual Defendant Settlement; and

(e) scheduled a hearing regarding final approval of the Individual Defendant Settlement;

WHEREAS, due and adequate notice has been given to the Individual Defendant

Settlement Class;

WHEREAS, the Court conducted a hearing on _________ __, 2018 (the “Settlement

Hearing”) to consider, among other things, (a) whether the terms and conditions of the Individual

Defendant Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate to the Individual Defendant Settlement

Class, and should therefore be approved; and (b) whether a judgment should be entered dismissing

the Action with prejudice as against the Individual Defendants; and

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 148 of 161

Page 149: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

3

WHEREAS, the Court having reviewed and considered the Individual Defendant

Stipulation, all papers filed and proceedings held herein in connection with the Individual

Defendant Settlement, all oral and written comments received regarding the Individual Defendant

Settlement, and the record in the Action, and good cause appearing therefor;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. Jurisdiction – The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the Action, and

all matters relating to the Individual Defendant Settlement, as well as personal jurisdiction over all

of the Settling Parties and each of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members.

2. Incorporation of Settlement Documents – This Judgment incorporates and makes

a part hereof: (a) the Individual Defendant Stipulation filed with the Court on January 26, 2018;

and (b) the Notice and the Summary Notice, both of which were filed with the Court on

_____________, 2018.

3. Class Certification for Settlement Purposes – The Court hereby affirms its

determinations in the Preliminary Approval Order certifying, for the purposes of the Settlement

only, the Action as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and (b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure on behalf of the Settlement Class consisting of all persons and entities who or which

from November 5, 2013 through 9:40 a.m. Eastern Standard Time on October 6, 2014, inclusive

(the “Class Period”) purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded GTAT common stock and/or

GTAT 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2020, purchased or otherwise acquired publicly

traded call options on GTAT common stock, or sold (wrote) publicly traded put options on GTAT

common stock, and were damaged thereby. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Defendants;

GTAT; the affiliates and subsidiaries of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple; the

Officers, directors, and partners of the Underwriter Defendants, GTAT, and Apple during the Class

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 149 of 161

Page 150: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

4

Period; members of the Immediate Family of any excluded person; the heirs, successors, and

assigns of any excluded person or entity; and any entity in which any excluded person or entity

has or had during the Class Period a controlling interest; provided, however, that any Investment

Vehicle (as defined in the Individual Defendant Stipulation) shall not be deemed an excluded

person or entity by definition. [Also excluded from the Settlement Class are the persons and

entities listed on Exhibit 1 hereto who or which are excluded pursuant to a request for exclusion

accepted by the Court.]

4. Adequacy of Representation – Pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, and for the purposes of the Settlement only, the Court hereby affirms its determinations

in the Preliminary Approval Order certifying Lead Plaintiff Douglas Kurz and Securities Act

Plaintiffs Strategic Master Fund and Highmark Limited as Class Representative for the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class and appointing Lead Counsel Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann

LLP as Class Counsel for the Individual Defendant Settlement Class. Lead Plaintiff, the Securities

Act Plaintiffs, and Lead Counsel have fairly and adequately represented the Individual Defendant

Settlement Class both in terms of litigating the Action and for purposes of entering into and

implementing the Settlement and have satisfied the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 23(a)(4) and 23(g), respectively.

5. Notice – The Court finds that the dissemination of the Notice and the publication

of the Summary Notice: (a) were implemented in accordance with the Preliminary Approval

Order; (b) constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances; (c) constituted notice

that was reasonably calculated, under the circumstances, to apprise Individual Defendant

Settlement Class Members of (i) the pendency of the Action; (ii) the effect of the proposed

Settlement (including the Releases to be provided thereunder); (iii) Lead Counsel’s motion for an

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 150 of 161

Page 151: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

5

award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; (iv) their right to object to any

aspect of the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation, and/or Lead Counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees

and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses; (v) their right to exclude themselves from the

Settlement Class; and (vi) their right to appear at the Settlement Hearing; (d) constituted due,

adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled to receive notice of the proposed

Settlement; and (e) satisfied the requirements of Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

the United States Constitution (including the Due Process Clause), the Private Securities Litigation

Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77z-1, 78u-4, as amended (the “PSLRA”), and all other

applicable law and rules.

6. Final Settlement Approval and Dismissal of Claims – Pursuant to, and in

accordance with, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this Court hereby fully and

finally approves the Individual Defendant Settlement set forth in the Individual Defendant

Stipulation in all respects (including, without limitation: the amount of the Settlement; the Releases

provided for therein including the release of the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims

as against the Individual Defendant Releasees; and the dismissal with prejudice of the claims

asserted against the Individual Defendants in the Action), and finds that the Individual Defendant

Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate to the Individual Defendant Settlement

Class. The Settling Parties are directed to implement, perform and consummate the Individual

Defendant Settlement in accordance with the terms and provisions contained in the Individual

Defendant Stipulation.

7. The Action and all of the claims asserted against the Individual Defendants in the

Action by Plaintiffs and the other Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members are hereby

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 151 of 161

Page 152: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

6

dismissed with prejudice. The Settling Parties shall bear their own costs and expenses, except as

otherwise expressly provided in the Individual Defendant Stipulation.

8. Binding Effect – The terms of the Individual Defendant Stipulation and of this

Judgment shall be forever binding on the Individual Defendants, Plaintiffs and all other Settlement

Class Members (regardless of whether or not any individual Settlement Class Member submits a

Proof of Claim Form or seeks or obtains a distribution from the Individual Defendant Net

Settlement Fund), as well as their respective successors and assigns. [The persons and entities

listed on Exhibit 1 hereto are excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class pursuant

to a request for exclusion accepted by the Court and are not bound by the terms of the Individual

Defendant Stipulation or this Judgment.]

9. Releases – The Releases set forth in paragraphs 5 - 7 of the Individual Defendant

Stipulation, together with the definitions contained in paragraph 1 of the Individual Defendant

Stipulation relating thereto, are expressly incorporated herein in all respects. For avoidance of

doubt, “Individual Defendant Releasees” means (i) the Individual Defendants and their attorneys,

(ii) the respective Immediate Family members, heirs, trusts, trustees, executors, estates,

administrators, beneficiaries, agents, affiliates, insurers, reinsurers, predecessors, predecessors-in-

interest, successors, successors-in-interest, assigns, attorneys, advisors, and associates of each of

the foregoing, (iii) all current and former directors, officers, and employees of GTAT, and (iv) the

Insureds, in their capacities as such; provided, however, that the Individual Defendant Releasees

do not include the Underwriter Defendants or Apple. “Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’

Claims” means any and all claims, rights, duties, controversies, obligations, demands, actions,

debts, sums of money, suits, contracts, agreements, promises, damages, losses, judgments,

liabilities, allegations, arguments, and causes of action of every nature and description, whether

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 152 of 161

Page 153: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

7

known claims or Unknown Claims, whether arising under federal, state, local, common, statutory,

administrative, or foreign law, or any other law, rule or regulation, at law or in equity, whether

class or individual in nature, whether fixed or contingent, whether accrued or unaccrued, whether

liquidated or unliquidated, whether matured or unmatured, that Plaintiffs or any other member of

the Settlement Class (a) asserted in the Action, or (b) could have asserted in any forum that arise

out of, are based upon, or relate to the allegations, transactions, acts, facts, matters, occurrences,

statements, representations or omissions involved, set forth, or referred to in the Complaint and

that relate to the purchase or acquisition of GTAT publicly traded common stock, GTAT Senior

Notes, or GTAT Call Options, or the sale of GTAT Put Options, during the Settlement Class

Period. Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not cover or include any Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claims.

“Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claims” means (i) any claims by any governmental entity arising out of any

governmental investigation of GTAT, the Individual Defendants, or any of GTAT’s respective

former or current officers or directors relating to the wrongful conduct alleged in the Action;1 (ii)

any claims asserted, or which may be asserted, in the Action against any of the Underwriter

Defendants or Apple; (iii) any claims of any person or entity who or which submits a request for

exclusion from the Settlement Class that is accepted by the Court; (iv) any claims asserted in the

Davis Action; and (v) any claims relating to the enforcement of the Settlement. The Releases are

effective as of the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement. Accordingly, this Court

orders that:

1 For the avoidance of doubt, the above-referenced exclusion for claims by any governmental entity is set forth above only to clarify that the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims do not affect the rights that any governmental entity may have to assert a claim against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees, and it does not preserve for any Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member any right to assert a claim on the basis of that exclusion from the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 153 of 161

Page 154: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

8

(a) Without further action by anyone, and subject to paragraph 10 below, upon

the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement, Plaintiffs and each of the other

Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members, on behalf of themselves, and their respective

heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and assigns in their capacities as such,

shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of this Judgment shall have, fully, finally

and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved, relinquished, waived and discharged each

and every Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claim (including Unknown Claims) against

the Individual Defendants and the other Individual Defendant Releasees, and shall forever be

barred and enjoined from the assertion, institution, maintenance, prosecution, or enforcement of

any or all of the Individual Defendant Released Plaintiffs’ Claims against any of the Individual

Defendant Releasees. This Release shall not apply to any Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claim.

(b) Without further action by anyone, and subject to paragraph 10 below, upon

the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement, the Individual Defendants, on behalf of

themselves, and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, predecessors, successors, and

assigns in their capacities as such, shall be deemed to have, and by operation of law and of this

Judgment shall have, fully, finally and forever compromised, settled, released, resolved,

relinquished, waived and discharged each and every Released Individual Defendants’ Claim

against Plaintiffs and the other Plaintiff Releasees, and shall forever be barred and enjoined from

the assertion, institution, maintenance, prosecution, or enforcement of any or all of the Released

Individual Defendants’ Claims against any of the Plaintiff Releasees. This Release shall not apply

to any Excluded Individual Defendants’ Claim.

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 154 of 161

Page 155: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

9

10. Notwithstanding paragraphs 9(a) – (b) above, nothing in this Judgment shall bar

any action by any of the Settling Parties to enforce or effectuate the terms of the Individual

Defendant Stipulation or this Judgment.

11. Bar Order – Upon the Effective Date, to the fullest extent provided by law, the

Individual Defendant Releasees are hereby discharged from and the Court hereby bars all future

claims and claims over by any individual or entity against any of the Individual Defendant

Releasees, and by the Individual Defendant Releasees against any individual or entity, for (a)

contribution or indemnity (or any other claim or claim over, however denominated on whatsoever

theory) arising out of or related to the claims or allegations asserted by Plaintiffs in the Action, or

(b) any other claim of any type, whether arising under state, federal, common, or foreign law, for

which the injury claimed is that person’s or entity’s actual or threatened liability to Plaintiffs and/or

members of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class (the “Bar Order”); provided, however, the

Bar Order shall not (a) release any of the Excluded Plaintiffs’ Claims; or (b) preclude the

Individual Defendants from seeking to enforce any rights of contribution or indemnification that

any Individual Defendant may have under any contract, and/or that any Individual Defendant may

have against GTAT or any successor entity, including but not limited to under any corporate

charter, bylaw, or contract.

12. Judgment Reduction – Any final verdict or judgment that may be obtained by or

on behalf of the Individual Defendant Settlement Class or an Individual Defendant Settlement

Class Member against any person or entity subject to the Bar Order shall be reduced by the greater

of: (a) an amount that corresponds to the percentage of responsibility of the Individual Defendants

for common damages; or (b) the amount paid by or on behalf of the Individual Defendants to the

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 155 of 161

Page 156: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

10

Individual Defendant Settlement Class or Individual Defendant Settlement Class Member for

common damages.

13. Rule 11 Findings – The Court finds and concludes that the Settling Parties and

their respective counsel have complied in all respects with the requirements of Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in connection with the institution, prosecution, defense, and

settlement of the Action.

14. No Admissions – Neither this Judgment, the Term Sheet, the Individual Defendant

Stipulation (whether or not consummated), including the exhibits thereto and the Plan of

Allocation contained therein (or any other plan of allocation that may be approved by the Court),

the MOU (as defined in the Underwriter Defendant Stipulation), the Underwriter Defendant

Stipulation (together with the Individual Defendant Stipulation, the “Stipulations”), including the

exhibits thereto and the Plan of Allocation contained therein (or any other plan of allocation that

may be approved by the Court), the negotiations leading to the execution of the Term Sheet, the

MOU, or the Stipulations, nor any proceedings taken pursuant to or in connection with the Term

Sheet, the MOU, the Stipulations and/or approval of the Individual Defendants Settlement or the

Underwriter Defendant Settlement (including any arguments proffered in connection therewith):

(a) shall be offered against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees as

evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or

admission by any of the Individual Defendant Releasees with respect to the truth of any fact alleged

by Lead Plaintiff or the validity of any claim that was or could have been asserted or the deficiency

of any defense that has been or could have been asserted in this Action or in any other litigation;

(b) shall be offered against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees as

evidence of, or construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any liability, negligence, fault, or other

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 156 of 161

Page 157: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

11

wrongdoing of any kind of any of the Individual Defendant Releasees or in any way referred to

for any other reason as against any of the Individual Defendant Releasees, in any civil, criminal or

administrative action or proceeding, other than such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate

the provisions of the Individual Defendant Stipulation;

(c) shall be offered against any of the Plaintiff Releasees, as evidence of, or

construed as, or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession or admission by any of the

Plaintiff Releasees that any of their claims are without merit, that any of the Individual Defendant

Releasees had meritorious defenses, or that damages recoverable in the Action would not have

exceeded the Individual Defendant Settlement Amount or with respect to any liability, negligence,

fault or wrongdoing of any kind, or in any way referred to for any other reason as against any of

the Plaintiff Releasees, in any civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, other than

such proceedings as may be necessary to effectuate the provisions of the Individual Defendant

Stipulation; or

(d) shall be construed against any of the Releasees as an admission, concession,

or presumption that the consideration to be given under the Individual Defendant Stipulation

represents the amount which could be or would have been recovered after trial;

provided, however, that (i) the Settling Parties and the Releasees and their respective counsel may

refer to this Judgment and the Individual Defendant Stipulation to effectuate the protections from

liability granted hereunder and thereunder or otherwise to enforce the terms of the Individual

Defendant Settlement, and (ii) the Released Persons may file the Stipulation and/or this Judgment

in any action that may be brought against them in order to support a defense, claim, or counterclaim

based on principles of res judicata, collateral estoppel, release, good faith settlement, judgment

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 157 of 161

Page 158: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

12

bar or reduction, or any other theory of claim preclusion or issue preclusion or similar defense or

counterclaim.

15. Retention of Jurisdiction – Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any

way, this Court retains continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over: (a) the Settling Parties for

purposes of the administration, interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the Individual

Defendant Settlement; (b) the disposition of the Individual Defendant Settlement Fund; (c) any

motion for an award of attorneys’ fees and/or Litigation Expenses by Lead Counsel in the Action

that will be paid from the Individual Defendant Settlement Fund; (d) any motion to approve the

Plant of Allocation; (e) any motion to approve the Class Distribution Order; and (f) the Individual

Defendant Settlement Class Members for all matters relating to the Action.

16. Separate orders shall be entered regarding approval of a plan of allocation and the

motion of Lead Counsel for an award of attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of Litigation Expenses.

Such orders shall in no way affect or delay the finality of this Judgment and shall not affect or

delay the Effective Date of the Settlement. Any appeal regarding or any challenge regarding

(a) the approval or modification of the proposed Plan of Allocation and/or (b) this Court’s order

or ruling regarding any attorneys’ fee and expense application shall in no way disturb or affect the

finality of this Judgment or the Effective Date of the Individual Defendant Settlement.

17. Settlement Payment – The Court finds that the Individual Defendants have

satisfied their financial obligations under the Individual Defendant Stipulation by causing their

insurers to pay twenty-seven million dollars ($27,000,000.00) in cash to the Individual Defendant

Settlement Fund.

18. Modification of the Agreement of Settlement – Without further approval from

the Court, Plaintiffs and the Individual Defendants are hereby authorized to agree to and adopt

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 158 of 161

Page 159: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

13

such amendments or modifications of the Individual Defendant Stipulation or any exhibits attached

thereto to effectuate the Individual Defendant Settlement that: (a) are not materially inconsistent

with this Judgment; (b) do not materially limit the rights of Individual Defendant Settlement Class

Members in connection with the Settlement, and (c) are consistent with paragraph 48 of the

Individual Defendant Stipulation. Without further order of the Court, Plaintiffs and the Individual

Defendants may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any provisions of the

Individual Defendant Settlement.

19. Termination of Settlement – If the Individual Defendant Settlement is terminated

as provided in the Individual Defendant Stipulation or the Effective Date of the Individual

Defendant Settlement otherwise fails to occur, this Judgment shall be vacated, rendered null and

void and be of no further force and effect, except as otherwise provided by the Individual

Defendant Stipulation, and this Judgment shall be without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiffs, the

other Individual Defendant Settlement Class Members and the Individual Defendants, and the

Settling Parties shall revert to their respective positions in the Action as of immediately prior to

the execution of the Term Sheet on October 13, 2017, as provided in the Individual Defendant

Stipulation.

20. Notice to Federal and State Officials – The Individual Defendants have provided

notification to all appropriate federal and state officials regarding the Settlement as required by 28

U.S.C. §1715.

21. Entry of Final Judgment – There is no just reason to delay the entry of this

Judgment as a final judgment in this Action as against the Individual Defendants pursuant to Rule

54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is expressly

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 159 of 161

Page 160: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

14

directed to immediately enter this final judgment as against the Individual Defendants in this

Action.

SO ORDERED this _______ day of ______________, 2018.

________________________________________ The Honorable Joseph N. Laplante

United States District Judge

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 160 of 161

Page 161: Adam S. Levy, et al. v. Thomas Gutierrez, et al. 14-CV ...securities.stanford.edu/.../2018126_r01x_14CV00443.pdf · Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 4 of 161

15

Exhibit 1

[List of Persons and Entities Excluded from the Individual Defendant Settlement Class Pursuant to Request]

Case 1:14-cv-00443-JL Document 178-1 Filed 01/26/18 Page 161 of 161