adoption near and far for american adoption workers victor groza, ph. d. professor of social work...
TRANSCRIPT
Adoption Near and Far for American Adoption Workers
Victor Groza , Ph. D.Professor of Social Work
Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences11235 Bellflower Road
Case Western Reserve UniversityCleveland, Ohio 44106
(216) 368‑6682
Prepared for Adoption Opportunities Meeting, March 10-11, 2003, Washington, DC.
Less you be convinced otherwise
My domestic projects of the last few years:– Sibling Project with Northeast Ohio Adoption
Services– Kinship Adoption Project with Bellefaire
Jewish Children's Bureau– Minority Adoption Project with Bellefaire JCB– Case Review Project with Cuyahoga County
DCFS, 1997-2001
The Reasons We Should Understand Adoption from a Larger Perspective
Globalization vs. Parochialism Common issues, common struggles—innovation Increase understanding of kinship, tribal and or community ways of
being that are shared by people world wide. Comparison of models that resemble the early years of child welfare
in America. The perspective from another system helps with a fresh look on the
"system" we know so well. The adoption is final and U.S. citizenship in effect, they are OUR
children, same as any child born here Any adjustment/disruption/search issues (or fall-out) that may arise
over the course of a lifetime, will need to be addressed by social workers in the U.S
Why Families Choose International Adoption
The barriers are fewer The children are younger Fear
– Birth parents– Traumatized children in U. S. system
Racism– Individual– Institutional
Myths– Less damaged– No abuse
The barriers are fewer
Year of Research Study by Country
In-country studies– United States, 1990-1994– Romania, 1999– India, 2001
Studies of International Adoptions to U. S. – Romanian children, 1994, 1995, 1999– Indian children, tentative 2005
In country and Out-of-Country Adoptions
Romania India
In-country1998, 71%1999, 60%2000, 70%2001, 57%,
1996, 62%1998, 56%2000, 56%
InternationalBefore 1990, few1990-1993, 10,000 (one of top sending countries)1998, 8402000, 12912001, 1154
1996, 10001998, 14002000, 1300
The Child Welfare System Differences
Family vs. Institutional Care Child-Centered vs. Family-Centered
COMPARISON OF FAMILY FOSTER CARE TO INSTITUTIONAL CARE
FAMILY CARE love affection structure 1:1 attention individual focus belonging to an extended system of
relations stimulation through relationships
INSTITUTIONAL CARE acceptance/tolerance distance routine 1:8-35 attention group focus belong/identify to the group stimulation thru programs
Risks to Children from Early Institutionalization
– Health– Development– Attachment– Psychosocial (Social, Emotional and
Behavioral) Functioning
Outcomes in International Adoption: A strength or pathology perspective
Resilient Rascals Wounded Wonders
Challenged Children
Other Comparisons
AmericaNon-voluntary termination of parental rightsSubsidyFormal and informal systems of post-placement support
RomaniaAbandonmentNo subsidyMinimal post-placement support
IndiaAbandonmentSavings accountsSome post-placement supportOnly Hindus can adopt in-country; Moslems and Christians have permanent, legal guardianship
0102030405060708090
100
Percentfemale
PercentMoms*
PercentMarried
IndiaRomaniaAmerica
Selected Child and Family Demographics
Parent-Child Relations
00.20.40.60.8
11.21.41.6
Gett
ing A
long
Comm
unicatio
nTru
st
Respec
t
Close
nss
IndiaRomaniaAmerica
Adoption Smoothness*
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Smoother AsExpected
More Upsand Down
IndiaRomaniaAmerica
Adoption Impact
01020
304050
607080
90
VeryPositive
MostlyPositive
Mixed
IndiaRomaniaAmerica
Behavior Problems
India Romania America
Somatic Complaints .68 .37 .38
Anxiety/Depression* 2.2 1.8 .71
Social Problems* 2.3 1.0 2.0
Withdrawal 1.3 .49 1.3
Thought Problems* .91 .18 .63
Attention Problems* 2.7 1.2 2.6
Aggressiveness* 6.6 3.0 5.8
Lessons Learned about Research
Involve parents in study design Pre-test protocol & instruments With good preparation, families are willing to accept
researchers (and foreigners) in their home to talk about their adoptions.
Involve parents in reviewing results Deconstruct major trends to look for nuances Draw from multiple perspective including behavioral
genetics, child development, psychology and social work
Lessons Learned about Families
Families were more similar than they were different Children had more similarities than differences Families had few service needs that went unmet The service system issues were different by country Birth family issues were much more prominent a concern
in Romania and India than with American families. Family environment is powerful in shaping adoption
outcomes and mitigating the risk children bring to families, but there is still so much to learn