advantages and inneficiencies of suburban settlements ... · character and infrastructure ›...
TRANSCRIPT
ADVANTAGES AND INNEFICIENCIES OF SUBURBAN SETTLEMENTS
ORIGINS OF PROBLEMS
MEANS TO CONTROL URBAN SPRAWL
Szczecin metropolitain area
Detailed surveys and oppinion polls
Relationship between life quality and the quality of spatial development
www.led.ps.pl
Population growth in villages around Szczecin in 1995-2005
Population growth
Dynamics of growth
www.led.ps.pl
PROPERTY PRICE 14%
EASY PLANNING PROCEDURES
2%
PROXIMITY TO GERMAN BORDER
2%
PROXIMITY TO THE CITY
28%
PROXIMITY TO WORKPLACE
2%
ACCESSIBILITY BY PUBLIC
TRANSPORT 1%
QUALITY OF NATURAL
ENVIRONMENT 16%
PROXIMITY TO FOREST AND/OR
LAKE 13%
FAMILY 11%
OTHER 11%
ECONOMICAL › Growth of tax base › Diversification of local economic base › Growth of commercial services › New markets for farmers
INFRASTRUCTURAL › Development of technical infrastructure › Improved road network › Upgraded social infrastructure
SOCIAL › Refreshed social structure
ENVIRONMENTAL › Diversified character of built environment › Promotion of sustainable behaviour
ECONOMICAL › Dissappeared income tax base › Detrimental impact on existing businesses, village
character and infrastructure › Shrinking of space for farming
INFRASTRUCTURAL › Scattered development / inefficient technical
infrastructure › Substandard new streets and missing public realm › Incompatibility of public infrastructure
SOCIAL › Divided communities
ENVIRONMENTAL › Chaos in built environment › Massive shrinking of natural resources
Insufficient infrastructural capacity
Functional gravity towards the city
Adverse effect on existing local businesses
Detrimental impact on physical integrity of villages
Infrastructure without development
Development with individual and independent media supply
High operational cost of networked infrastructure
Capacity and quality incompatible with community needs and aspirations
Raising costs of outsourcing social services
Inequalities in access to basic social infrastructure
HIGH SCHOOL
PRIMARY SCHOOL
Capacity and quality incompatible with community needs and aspirations
Raising costs of outsourcing social services
Inequalities in access to basic social infrastructure
HIGH SCHOOL
PRIMARY SCHOOL
city-centered road network
Underdeveloped and inefficient public transport
Inefficient street network
Non-existing public realm
city-centered road network
Underdeveloped and inefficient public transport
Inefficient street network
Non-existing public realm
city-centered road network
Underdeveloped and inefficient public transport
Inefficient street network
Non-existing public realm
WARZYMICE
WARZYMICE
city-centered road network
Underdeveloped and inefficient public transport
Inefficient street network
Non-existing public realm
WARZYMICE
WARZYMICE
city-centered road network
Underdeveloped and inefficient public transport
Inefficient street network
Non-existing public realm
MIERZYN
MIERZYN
city-centered road network
Underdeveloped and inefficient public transport
Inefficient street network
Non-existing public realm
MIERZYN
MIERZYN
PEDESTRIANS PRIVATE ROAD PUBLIC ROAD
Poor representation of new residents in local councils
Access to social services dependant on residents’ mobility and wealth
Car/Parent dependant youth
Gated communities
Poor representation of new residents in local councils
Access to social services dependant on residents’ mobility and wealth
Car/Parent dependant youth
Gated communities
Poor representation of new residents in local councils
Access to social services dependant on residents’ mobility and wealth
Car/Parent dependant youth
Gated communities
› Mass scale urban sprawl › loss of local character › privatization of space › no public realm › poor design: ignored context
poor siting
architectural chaos in every dimension
› Mass scale urban sprawl › loss of local character › privatization of space › no public realm › poor design: ignored context
poor siting
architectural chaos in every dimension
› Mass scale urban sprawl
› loss of local character
› privatization of space
› no public realm › poor design: ignored context
poor siting
architectural chaos in every dimension
› Mass scale urban sprawl
› loss of local character
› privatization of space
› no public realm › poor design: ignored context
poor siting
architectural chaos in every dimension
2005
inefficient use of land resources
mono-functional development - loss of healthy mix of uses
scattered development
2010
inefficient use of land resources
mono-functional development - loss of healthy mix of uses
scattered development
PERMITTED INTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
inefficient use of land resources
mono-functional development - loss of healthy mix of uses
scattered development
inefficient use of land resources
mono-functional development - loss of healthy mix of uses
scattered development
PERMITTED EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
› Isolated development planning and management
› Poor control over planning conversions
› Relaxed spatial planning control as an instrument in marketing the place
› Reliance on car based commuting combined with inadequate public infrastructure
› Weak local communities
SET STANDARDS › Detailed and spatial evidence base › Agreed quality standards
PLAN › Coordination of planning and management at the
metropolitan level › Strategic development management and planning at the
local level › Promote good design
INFORM AND EDUCATE › Communication methods and channells › Strengthening local communities › Appretiation of quality of space
COOPERATE › Collaborative planning › Partnerships in delivery › Shared maintenance
Detailed and spatial evidence base
Agreed spatial quality standards: • Integrated and legitimate development planning
• Sustainable management of natural resources
• Recognisable and appreciated local identity
• Spatial structure, including accessibility and services
LEGITIMATE AND INTEGRATED PLANNING
RATIONAL USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES
LOCAL IDENTITY AND IMAGE
FUNCTIONAL AND ACCESSIBLE SPATIAL STRUCTURE
Plans founded on well
recognised community
needs, aspirations and
metropolitan dependancies,
delivered in partnerships
Protection/ sustainable
management of natural
resources
Protection and
enhancement of cultural
heritage, including rural
character
Settlements with a rich
mix of uses and services,
including green and
social infrastructure
Spatial development
integrated and sustainable,
successfully managed by
local authorities
Efficient use of already
developed areas and
existing infrastructure
Recognisable, consistent
and attractive
contemporary character
of settlements
Safe and environmentally
friendly internal and
external transport
provisions
DOŁUJE Mass suburbanisation
RURZYCA Anticipated suburbanisation
PILCHOWO sprawl at reaching capacity
Coordination of planning and management at the metropolitan level
Strategic development management and planning at the local level
Communication methods and channells
Strengthening local communities Appretiation of quality of space
STUDY OF CONDITIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT
STUDY OF CONDITIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT
VDS Belcara (UK)
Collaborative planning
Partnerships in delivery
Shared maintenance
0%
50%
100%
YES NO IT'S HARD TO SAY
local authorities in rural areas
small towns with its rural surroundings
cities
0% 50% 100%
local authorities in rural areas
small towns with its rural surroundings
cities
fully agree agree hard to say partly disagree completely disagree
RETAIL 12% CIVIC
BUILDINGS 4%
SCHOOL 5%
CHURCH 20%
PITCH/PLAYGROUND
8%
NATURE 6%
OLD VILLAGE
4%
NEW ESTATE 2%
BUS STOP 1%
MY OWN HOUSE AND
GARDEN 19%
NONE 19%
RETAIL 4%
CIVIC BUILDINGS
3%
CHURCH 3% SCHOOL
1%
PITCH/PLAYGROUND
6%
NATURE 20%
OLD VILLAGE
3% NEW ESTATE 1%
MY OWN HOUSE AND
GARDEN 29%
NONE 30%
www.led.ps.pl www.strategie.zut.edu.pl