ae 499 special topics_jared_cokley
TRANSCRIPT
1
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
1
Electrostatic Adhesion Device for Orbital Debris Removal
Jared M. Cokley1
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, 32114
Currently there are five methods available which can be used to dock an object to another object of
interest. Chemical adhesion, space applicable suction cups, synthetic cups, mechanical grippers, and
electrostatic adhesion. For the applications related to aerospace engineering, electrostatic adhesion was
chosen as the preferred choice. Electrostatic adhesion involves utilizing high voltage circuit pads, to generate
adhesive force along the pad’s surface area. By assimilating a macro-fiber composite (MFC) as an actuator,
designed copper circuit, Kapton tape, and a strain gage a practical model of adhesive gripping is created.
Simulating the device in a zero gravity SimMechanics environment allows the device's behavior to be
observed.
Nomenclature
A = electrode area of EAD device
C = capacitance
d = normal distance between EAD and object of interest
EAD = electrostatic adhesive device
ERAU = Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
e = permittivity of material between electrodes
GF = gage factor of strain gage
MFC = macro-fiber composite
N = normal force
R = resistance
µk = coefficient of kinetic friction µs = coefficient of static friction
V = voltage source
W = energy stored in capacitor
Xe = electric susceptibility of the dielectric
I. Introduction
The ultimate goal of the electrostatic adhesion device is to be able to adhere to any surface with feedback from
attached sensors. In order to design and implement this technology a series of milestones demonstrating the
progression of the pads must be established. Static adhesion is similar to the effect caused by rubbing a balloon
against hair. Once the balloon is pulled away from the hair, electrical forces provide small adhesive forces in the
medium between the two objects.
Implementing electrostatic adhesion requires the use of more than one electrostatic adhesive device (EAD) due
to the current technology available. In order to use this type of gripping mechanism, the design, fabrication, and
testing of one device will be researched and applied to a zero gravity environment. Observing the actuation
capabilities of piezo ceramic devices and their compliance with high voltage pads will validate its practical
capabilities. Figures 1 and 2 show the concept of operations for docking using four smaller nanosatellites equipped
with their own EAD.
1 Student, Aerospace Engineering, 800 S. Clyde Morris Blvd Daytona Beach, FL, AIAA Member Grade: N/A
2
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
2
Figure 1: Concept of Operations for Orbital Debris Removal.
Figure 2: Rocket Body w/ 4 Nanosatellites Attached
II. EAD Design and Fabrication
A. Overview To develop an EAD requires laboratory facilities which allow the circuit design to be printed on copper sheets, a
chemical etching station, high voltage battery supply, and an electrical wiring and strain gage installation station.
B. Equations Observed
F = µk N (1)
F = µs N (2)
C = eA/d (3)
e = (ΔR / R) / GF (4)
3
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
3
C. In-Lab EAD Testing
In ERAU's Spacecraft Development Lab, EAD copper circuits were printed to determine the best type of design
for adhesive purposes. various designs were created in SolidWorks. Figure 3 shows the results of wax printing on
copper sheets.
Figure 3: Wax Circuit Design Printed on Copper Sheets.
In the Material's Lab, the unnecessary copper not apart of the actual circuit design was etched away using ferric chloride. After removing the wax layer on the pad, the desired copper circuit was revealed (shown in Figure 4).
Figure 4: Etched Spiral Design.
4
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
4
Figures 5 and 6 show the result of shear force for the spiral design on different material types. The variation
between the two materials show an EAD will behave differently depending on whether the surface is conductive or
an insulator. In these trials, after observing a trained personnel follow strict safety guidelines with operating a 3,000
V powered EAD the highest adhesive force was 11 N.
Figure 5: Shear Force for Spiral EAD on Aluminum.
Figure 6: Shear Force for Spiral EAD on Glass.
D. MFC Implementation
Macro-fiber composites (MFC) are flexible, durable, and reliable piezo ceramic actuators originally developed at
the NASA Langley Research Center in 1996. Using an MFC with the EAD design provides increased strain actuators
efficiencies and conforms to the object of interest’s surface. Figures 7-12 show the application of an MFC and a strain gage. During testing, the maximum deflection of the MFC was near 15°.
Figure 7: Non-Actuated EAD Layout.
5
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
5
Figure 8: Actuated EAD Layout.
Figure 9: MFC with Back of EAD.
Figure 10: MFC Integrated on Back EAD.
6
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
6
E. Strain Gage Testing
Figure 11: MFC Attached to EAD in Cantilever Beam Assembly.
Figure 12: Digital Multimeter Used to Measure Strain.
Table 1: EAD Strain Gage Values from Test
Test # GFR_o
(Ω)
R_ave
(Ω)
Delta_R
(Ω)
Applied
Voltage (V)
frequency
(Hz)
Strain
(%)1 2 351.17 351.800 0.630 0-5 square 2 0.090
2 2 351.19 351.120 0.070 0-2.5 square 2 0.010
3 2 352.15 352.165 0.015 2.5-5 square 2 0.002
4 2 352.15 351.798 0.352 0-5 square 4 0.050
5 2 351.19 351.115 0.075 0-2.5 square 4 0.011
6 2 352.16 352.150 0.010 2.5-5 square 4 0.001
7 2 351.45 351.877 0.427 0-5 sine 2 0.061
8 2 351.17 351.075 0.095 0-2.5 sine 2 0.014
9 2 351.53 352.190 0.660 2.5-5 sine 2 0.094
10 2 351.53 351.958 0.428 0-5 sine 4 0.061
11 2 351.18 351.085 0.095 0-2.5 sine 4 0.014
12 2 351.19 352.157 0.967 2.5-5 sine 4 0.138
7
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
7
III. Developing EAD in a Zero-G Environment
To simulate the EAD's behavior in a zero gravity environment MATLAB's SimMechanics was used. The main
research focus within MATLAB was simulating the adhesive or frictional effects between the pads and the object
of interest.
F. SimMechanics Familiarization
A double pendulum along a linear rail was modeled to become familiar with the SimMechanics interface. In the
figure below the green block travels at a constant velocity in a zero gravity environment. In this experimental
environment, the pendulum doesn't oscillate due to gravitational acceleration equaling zero and the actuated block
moving in a constant velocity.
Figure 13: Constant Velocity Double Pendulum in Zero-G.
Collision effects within SimMechanics were studied to determine viable applications for final simulation. The
bouncing ball example provides a quick review of the behavior of a bouncing ball on Earth. In this model,
gravitation of 9.81 m/s2 was used. By imposing a penalty force within Simulink to counteract the gravitational force
of a falling ball, the ball's velocity attenuates after contact with the ground plane. The penalty force ultimately
reduced the ball's velocity to zero.
Figure 14: Bouncing Ball with Penalty (Impact) Force.
The same ball was used to study the ball's rolling motion. Modeling a rolling ball along a flat surface shows the
behavior of contact forces which is similar to the penalty force observed above within SimMechanics. In the rolling
ball example, the penalty force doesn't produce enough force to propel the ball away from the simulated ground.
Instead it balances the force between the ball's normal force, as it allows only translational motion along the xy-plane
which rotates the ball along the plane.
8
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
8
G. SimMechanics’s Friction Tools
The first generation of SimMechanics features a small library dedicated to static and kinetic friction. Appropriately
using these blocks permits the ideal simulation of basic frictional force behavior.
H. Velocity Damping from Frictional Effects
Static friction was the best environment to model the behavior of the EAD during adhesive manipulation. This
environment consist of three blocks with the top two blocks generated to have both static and kinetic friction characteristics. The bottom block is considered the actuated block which transfers its momentum to a frictional
block once planar contact is made. A series of experimental tests were conducted to observe the limitations and
capabilities of these frictional blocks.
Initially all three blocks were aligned in the same yz-plane. A sinusoidal input signal was fed to the actuated base
block. The base block was provided an initial position, velocity, and acceleration signal. By varying the signal initial
conditions different block separation positions, velocities, and friction reactions were observed. Offsetting the
location of the base block along the x-axis produced a model which permitted the contact forces to be observed after
only after the time when the blocks become in contact. This trial validated the only acting force on the blocks to be
the result of friction. Eliminating acceleration from the base block removed the possibility to actuate the friction
blocks since an anomaly occurred which applied a velocity to all three blocks instead of only the base block.
Reducing the simulated environment into a two dimensional virtual world provided pure analysis of the
kinematics of the system. frictional effects. Table 2: Initial Conditions Used in SimMechanic Models
Initial Condition Units
µs 0.1
µk 1.65
gE 9.81 m/s2
g 0 m/s2
Figure 15: Initial Offset Frictional Blocks. Figure 16: Elapsed Offset Frictional Blocks.
9
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
9
Figure 17: Offset Frictional Blocks Under Gravity Velocity (Purple) and Position (Yellow) Graph.
I. EAD Friction
Figure 18: Initial Double Pendulum with EAD. Figure 19: Elapesed Double Pendulum with EAD.
Combining everything learned from the double pendulum, bouncing ball, rolling ball, and frictional block
models created the model seen in Figures 18 and 19. Inputting the same signal used in the frictional block model
to the blue base block created a simulation of the EAD in action when equipped with a manipulator. Replacing
the three sinusoidal inputs for position, velocity, and acceleration with one sinusoidal input modified by a general transfer function block to provide a filtered derivative created a more accurate simulation.
10
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
10
Figure 20: Double Pendulum with EAD Adhered to Frictional Block Velocity (Purple) and Position (Yellow)
Graph.
IV. Conclusion
By specifying the known adhesive force produced by the EAD, reverse kinematics can be used to determine the
motion required from the EAD's manipulator. This entire intensive process of designing and simulating an electrostatic
adhesive highligted a few areas of concerns. Providing high voltage levels near 3,000 V to only the EAD in the vacuum
of space will be a challenge. While researching the capabilities of SimMechanics modeling of an EAD, there were
instances where a simulation might not provide actual behavior of the docking method. These issues occur when the
EAD's velocity needs to be simulated to become a constant and linear value. Currently the ability to operate a double
pendulum within SimMechanics is based off a sinusoidal signal. If an object of interest is attached to the base of the
pendulum then an acceleration needs to be provided to the entire mechanism otherwise SimMechanics sets the entire system to travel at the constant velocity and not only the actuated block.
Overall this technology is possible, and its continued development will create an innovative way to dock to objects
of interest and can be applied to objects on Earth.
11
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
11
Appendix
Figure 21: Frictional Blocks Simulink Schematic.
12
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
12
Figure 22: Double Pendulum with Constant Velocity in Zero-Gravity.
Figure 23: Double Pendulum with EAD Adhered to Frictional Block Simulink Schematic.
Figure 22: Frictional Block Simulink Schematic
13
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
13
Acknowledgments
I wouild like to acknowledge Dr. Bogdan Udrea for providing educational and motivational guidance throughout
my time at Embry-Riddle, Walter Saravia for primary assistance in testing the technology, and Dr. Kim for assistance
with MFC devices.
References
Saravia, W., Design, Fabrication, and Testing of a Proprioceptive Electroadhesion Pad for Space Applications, Daytona Beach,
Florida: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2015.