aect 2011 web_questincscl
DESCRIPTION
Discusses benefits and limitations of using WebQuests in computer supported collaborative learning, and introduces an example and tools to develop a WebQuest.TRANSCRIPT
Using WebQuests to Engage Students in CSCL
Dabae LeeIndiana University
Using WebQuests in CSCL
• WebQuests as a way to present collaborative learning projects and guide students through the collaboration process (Milson & Downey, 2001).
• Few attempts to use WebQuests in presenting collaborative learning projects and providing students with guidelines
CSCL & WebQuests
CSCL• Students work through
computers or around computers to learn together (Johnson & Johnson, 2007).
• Students use computers to communicate with each other, share their works, or create something together.
WebQuests• A WebQuest is an
inquiry-oriented lesson format in which most or all the information that learners work with comes from the web (Dodge, 2007)
In This Presentation…
• Discuss the benefits and limitations of WebQuests in CSCL
• Introduce a WebQuest used in CSCL• Illustrate technology tools to build
WebQuests
The Five Components of WebQuests
• Capture students’ attention/interest & introduce learning goals
Introduction
• Describe end-products in detail
Task
• Provide step-by step instructions, necessary resources, tools
Process
• Let learners self-evaluate their work
Evaluation
• Reflection , additional resources, credits
Conclusion
Collaboration Model
Benefits
• Clear goals to create goal interdependence (Johnson & Johnson, 2009) by – Describing the project in the task
section – Providing evaluation criteria in the
evaluation section.
Benefits
• Prevent undesirable process-related conflict (Jehn, 1997) by providing structure of the process – Roles & Responsibilities
• Guide students to more appropriate and effective resources given students’ grade level and the topics.
Benefits
• Evaluation serves as mechanisms through which – Students formatively assess their
product– Engage in group processing (Johnson &
Johnson, 2009).
• Contributes to community of practice in education.
Limitations
• Linear process • No interactive feedback• More suited for well-structured
problems
An Example
• Digital Natives WebQuest– Used in an undergraduate course, Using
computers in Education– Learn about the digital natives – Collaboratively create a presentation
about digital natives using a text to movie tool called Xtranormal.
Digital Natives WebQuest
• Capture students’ attention and introduce learning objectivesIntroduction
• Content, Format, Examples Task
• Web resources to learn about digital natives, • Process to create a presentation including brainstorming, writing
script, and creating an Xtranormal movie,• Technology tools to create the movie (Xtranormal.com) and
facilitate collaborative writing (Google Docs), and job aids to help them use the tools.
Process
• A rubric is presented for self-assessment of students’ presentations.
Evaluation
• Project summary, additional resources, and feedback on the WebQuest
Conclusion
Technology Tools
Pre-set templates• Examples available• Step by step instructions• Not entirely free• Tools
– Quest Garden• Featured WebQuest
– Zunal.com
Website-building• Google Sites• Weebly.com• Yola.com• Wix.com
– Example
Collaborative writing• Google Docs
• Real-time editing, chat, and commenting features
• EtherPad• Color-code different users,
chat
Evaluation tools• Rubrics
• iRubric• Rubistar
• Quiz• Zoho Challenge Quiz Make
r• EasyTestMaker
References• Dodge, B. (1995). WebQuests: A Technique for Internet-Based Learning.
Distance Educator, 1(2), 10-13. • Dodge, B. (2001). FOCUS: Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning
and leading with technology, 28(8), 6-9. • Dodge, B. (2007). http://www.webquest.org/• Jehn, K. A. (1997). A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions
in Organizational Groups. [Article]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-557.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2007). Cooperation and the use of technology. In M. J. Spector, D. M. Merrill, J. V. Merrienboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (3 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1017-1044). New York, NY: Erlbaum Associates.
• Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
• Milson, A. J., & Downey, P. (2001). WebQuest: Using Internet Resources for Cooperative Inquiry. Social Education, 65(3), 144-146.
THANK [email protected]