aerospace industry is critical to the economy of the united states: role and importance of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Aerospace Industry is Critical to the Economy of the United States:
Role and Importance of Experimental Fluid Dynamics (Ground Test) Capabilities
Working Draft by DunnSeptember 2013
2
Purpose of his Document
1. Begin the logic layout for defining the role and importance of Experimental Fluid Dynamics (Ground Testing) to the National aeronautics/aerospace and defense industries and, ultimately, to the National economy.
2. Define the attributes/terms to be used for a document review template that will be used to collect and review published information as part of the working group meta-analysis.
3
Aero Industry Markets
RESEARCH (Academia, Industry, Government)
FIXED WING
SPACE LAUNCH TRANSPORATION, SUBORBITAL TRANSPORTATION
MISSILES
UAVs
GEN. AVIATION
FIGHTERS, ISR, HS BOMBERS
ENTRY, DESCENT, LANDING FROM SPACE
SUBSONIC TRANSONIC SUPERSONIC HYPERSONIC0 0.7 1.2 5(Mach Number) 18+
ROTORCRAFT
Commercial Transports, Some Bombers
Annual Market* ($B)USA World
[Note: Where to include RDT&E capability investment and sustainment? Embedded or separate?]
XX.X
XX.X
X.X
XX.X
X.X
X.X
XX.X
XX.X
XX.XX.X
X.X XX.X
X.X XX.X
X.X XX.X
X.X X.X
XXX.XXXX.X
* Data Source: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
4
Environment• Market (customer) needs• Safety requirements and expectations• Stovepiped national capabilities• Uncertain space strategy• Sluggish US economy• Gov’t regulation generally increasing• Uncertain gov’t economic policies
Forces• National defense and force projection needs• US and international competition• Speed to market• Minimalist budget thinking• Government vs. industry roles• Low initial cost vs. life cycle best value
‒ Tax law‒ CR’s, 5 years and counting‒ Affordable Care Act
changes‒ Sequestration‒ “Strategic” is 2 years
‒ Interest rate (Fed Res
policies)‒ Free Trade Agreements
pending‒ Dodd-Frank changes
Research New Product Development
US Economy
World Economy
Spin-offs (non-aero)- Technologies - New Products
Aero Industry Economic Engine
5
Research Engine
Experimental Fluid Dynamics• Basic services infrastructure• Test capability infrastructure• Test techniques/capabilities• Measurement technologies• People trained & certified• Calibration and validation
Code Development• Software tools• Adaptation to purpose• Code validation• Skilled people• Compute infrastructure
Research Element: Can be aero-based or measurement/ capability/ technique – using EFD, CFD, lab or (likely) some combination. Includes researcher subject matter expertise.
Investments required to establish research capabilities
Research Element
Experimental Ground Test/ Laboratories
Computational Methods
System Integration
Prior Research
Prior Products
Experimental Ground Test/ Laboratories
Computational Methods
Prior Research
Prior ProductsScience & Technology
(S&T) Capabilities
6
Product Development Life Cycle
Multiple Research Elements, Systems
Research, and Prior Product
Knowledge Base
New Product
Exploration [Concept
Dev’mt and Selection
Product Devel’mt
Flight Test
Initial Production
Configure Form of Product
Integrated Req’mts
and Basic Concept
Integrated Model/
Code Devel’mt
Go/No-go Decision
Utilize EFD/CFD for Development, Test & Evaluation
Market Need
PRODUCT IDEA!Problem Cycle
Problem
Risk Management and Business Case
Develop Fix
Problem: Resulting from inadequate earlier risk management (hazard identification criticality, mitigation, and system integration)
TechnicalIntegrated performanceMarket need and forces (includes competition)
Includes economic climateRegulatory/government environmentFinancial
CapitalizationCost model, product life cycleRevenue model, life cycle
7
Role of EFD in the RDT&E Process
Crucial to gain understanding of aero physics behavior at each step (fluids, structure/materials, propulsion and propulsion integration, product system integration, and environmental interactions) :• Research• Configuration/form of product• Concept development, refinement, and selection• Product development• Flight test• Initial production• Product modifications
Specific EFD contribution to each step is demonstrable Part of working group effort
8
Risk of Losing Key National EFD Capabilities Is Increasing
• Factors driving risk– Aging and inefficient physical infrastructure– Workforce demographics– Maintenance stretched across old and repurposed facilities– New/updated capability and productivity investments– Organizational stovepiping by capability owners– Funding models/methods variability/inconsistency– Cyclical and declining workloads– Tightening sustainment budgets– Understanding (lack) of role of GT in the aero RDT&E process – Short term outlooks for political cycles and business performance
• Demonstrated responses to these risks– Reduced sustainment and investment (degrades capabilities)– Reduced availability (block, sequential, spaced, limited operations)– Reduced or eliminated capabilities and/or capacities
• Facility/capability stand down or mothball• Facility/capability abandonment/closure
9
Economics of Ground TestingA Possible Scenario
Equation: Capability Development and Sustainment Costs versus Direct and Indirect Benefit to the US and the World
• Assume– Market economy complete product turnover over next 30 years– Average 2% annual growth across all market segments– Baseline is FY2012– Existing GT capabilities are sunk cost
• Costs– Develop and sustain capabilities– Invest in new technologies and applications (capabilities and efficiencies)
• Benefits– GT contribution to research feeds new product development– GT contribution to new product risk management [show relative to contribution at each step of
the RDT&E process]– Estimate range and dollar value of impacts
Extreme case: All EFD facilities are closed/mothballed by 2020 Likely case: EFD workload will continue to decline and capabilities and capacities will
decline by a like amount
10
Working Group Literature ReviewInitial Draft of Topic Areas
• Research needs:– Direct contribution (testing); ability to “try stuff”– Support contribution (code calibration and validation)
• Product development needs– Direct and supportive contributions to each stage of development– Risk management role for each stage
• Market differences?
• Workload projections by market, US and world– By speed range, mission (within market), new products
• Evolving roles and use of EFD and CFD • Detections of product problems, early and for remediation • Aero market spin-offs/contributions to other markets
– Economic impacts, specific products, quality of life• Facility/capability risk factors: status, how being addressed, impacts• Environment factors and market forces over next years• EFD as part of the product business case• Capability investment projections