aeschylus’ persians “the ancient law of hubris and atē”
Post on 20-Dec-2015
229 views
TRANSCRIPT
- Slide 1
- Aeschylus Persians The Ancient Law of hubris and at
- Slide 2
- Euripides BacchaePerformance Issues Continued
- Slide 3
- Agenda Recap & Update The Issues Clarify Themselves... Play and Background Persia, Persian War, Persians Discussion The Plays Take-Away? 26-Sep-11 Aeschylus Persians 3
- Slide 4
- Recap & Update The Issues Clarify Themselves...
- Slide 5
- Where Weve Got To... INTRO CLASS issues theory of tragedy performative approach ANTIGONE, ARISTOTLE tragedy perfected tragedys aims Dionysus? tragic origins affecting imitation 26-Sep-115 Aeschylus Persians
- Slide 6
- Tragic Epiphany (C.J. Herington on Aeschylus) verbal ambiguity human visual clarity divine to
- Slide 7
- Ancient Law of hubris and at koros (excess, extravagance) hubris (arrogance, violation) ate (delusion, ruin) dik (justice) 26-Sep-117 Aeschylus Persians
- Slide 8
- Play and Background Persia, Persian War, Persians
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Xerxes (486465 BCE)
- Slide 11
- Xerxes Bridge Hellespont / Dardanelles
- Slide 12
- Xerxes somewhere here
- Slide 13
- Persians: Play Facts Production 472 BCE Aeschylus (ca. 525-455 BCE) Choregus: Pericles Tetralogy Phineus Persians Glaucus of Pontiae Prometheus Play Setting: Susa Characters Chorus of Persian Elders Atossa-Queen Messenger Darius ghost Xerxes 26-Sep-1113 Aeschylus Persians
- Slide 14
- Persians: Analysis PARODOS, Persian Elders (pp. 39 ff.) marching anapests lyric narrative, lament EPISODE 1 (44 ff.) Atossas dream Messenger speech (Salamis) STASIMON 1 (66 ff.) Xerxes recklessness Darius sorrow EPISODE 2 (68-69) Atossa to summon Darius ghost STASIMON 2 (69 ff.) Conjuration: Chorus raises dead EPISODE 3 + lyric dialogue (72 ff.) Darius gets bad news Darius, Atossa speak Chorus alternates: speech, song STASIMON 3 (82 ff.) Darius reign EXODOS (94 ff.) Xerxes enters, chanting Lyric dialogue: kommos (lament)
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Discussion Plays Take-Away?
- Slide 17
- Journal Prompt What do you think the larger moral / message / take-away of this play was/is?