Upload File

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...as our superior court...

  • Home
  • Documents
  • afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
12

Upload: truongkhue

Post on 05-May-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 2: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 3: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 4: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 5: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 6: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 7: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 8: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 9: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 10: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 11: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct
Page 12: afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/arindain...As our superior court explained in United States v. Meek, 44 M.J. I (C.A.A.F. 1996), prosecutorial misconduct

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/mccowen-37189.u.pdfSenior Airman JOSHUA E. MCCOWEN United States Air Force ACM 37189 09 April 2009 ... (TB); (3) assaulted

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/ray-s31431.u.pdfUNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL ... namely by wrongfully possessing and wrongfully using methylone,2

Air Force Court of Criminal Appealsof tampering."' United States v. Harris, 55 M.J. 433, 440 (C.A.A.F. 2001) (quoting United States v. Maxwell, 38 M.J. 148, 150 (C.M.A. 1993)). In

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/miller-37869.u.pdf · United States Air Force ... attempted unpremeditated murder. For the

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/.../afcca_opinions/cp/ranney-s31046.u.pdfforfeiture of $409.00 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to E-3, and a reprimand. Appellate Counsel for

Reply Brief (c.a.a.f. Jul. 13, 2012) (Final)

IN THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/witt-36785.pub.pdf · COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES Appellee, v ... followed up with

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/ellano-s31102...UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED STATES Airman Basic SARAH R. ELLANO United States

U.S. Air Force, Appellant...de novo. United States v. Ali, 71 M.J. 256, 261 (C.A.A.F. 2012). As a preliminary matter, this Court has statutory jurisdiction to review the decision of

United States v. Sanders, 66 M.J. 529 (A.F. Ct. …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/sanders-36707.pub.pdf · interview regarding the probability of child pornography being

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/valois-36841.u.pdf · Appellate Counsel for the United States: G. Matt Osborn (argued), Colonel Gerald R. Bruce, and Major

afcca.law.af.milafcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/robinette-s31528.u.pdf · ACC: Under these dates ... Despite expressing under oath at trial his complete satisfaction

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS …afcca.law.af.mil/content/afcca_opinions/cp/2hobbs-misc.dkt.2005-04... · UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS UNITED