agenda 02 07 08
DESCRIPTION
1. GM Survey Statistics 2. Review of AuditsTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Residents Voice 1
LWVFebruary 2,
2008Residents Voice
2/7/8
![Page 2: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Residents Voice 22/7/8
“Following the Money”
2/7/2008
Tonight’s Subjects !
• “Milt Johns & His Statistics!”
• “Review of Audits”
![Page 3: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2/7/8 Residents Voice 3
Milt Johns 1/18/8 TV 6 Interview
Cheryl Walker1/21/8 OC Register Article
PCM Statistics!
![Page 4: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Residents Voice 42/7/8
How Many People Were Included in the Numbers?
• MJ When Interviewed by Rob Merritt– 150-200 people, face to face, letters, emails,
telephone calls, etc.
• OC Register Article– 96 people Face to Face– 76 people via other means
• Total of 176 people
![Page 5: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Residents Voice 62/7/8
Reference to Percentages
Source Positive Neutral Negative Total
1st ref
2nd ref
OC Reg
40%
40%
43%
20%
20%
35%
25%
35%
22%
85%
95%
100%
![Page 6: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Residents Voice 72/7/8
Why the Differences in the Percentages?
• Nervous speaking in front of TV Audience!
• Didn’t have enough time to prepare for TV Interview!
• Who Cares! No one would notice!
![Page 7: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Residents Voice 82/7/8
Conclusion!
• Give PCM at least three chances to come up with the right answer.
![Page 8: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2/7/8 Residents Voice 9
Reviewof
AuditsC. Grundke
![Page 9: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Residents Voice 102/7/8
Type of Audit Overview
• Yearly audit.
• Operational/Organizational Audit.
• Forensic/Detailed Audit.
![Page 10: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Residents Voice 112/7/8
Yearly Audit
• Performed by KPMG to verify that we comply with Government Regulations. It does not verify the input data. Basically verifies the output only.
• Just like verifying that your hand calculator equals 4 when you add 2 + 2.
![Page 11: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Residents Voice 122/7/8
Operational/Organizational Audit
• Understand the responsibilities and risks faced by an auditable department, unit or process, i.e.; Maintenance, MIS, etc.
• Assess the level of control exercised by management.
• Effectiveness and efficiency of operations .
• Safeguarding of assets.
![Page 12: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Residents Voice 132/7/8
Forensic/Detailed Audit
“Forensic” auditing could be defined as the application of auditing skills to situations that have legal consequences.
For us, we would more appropriately require a “Detailed” audit.
![Page 13: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Residents Voice 142/7/8
FRAUDULENT CLAIMS
John B. Richardson III, CPA, CFE
PO Box 26
Gibson Island, MD 21056
---
Tel: (410) 255-5162
Fax: (410) 360-6296
E-Mail: [email protected]
Presented by:
![Page 14: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Residents Voice 152/7/8
FRAUDULENT CLAIMS
Common Types of Fraud Claims
What is Fraud?
Methods of Prevention
![Page 15: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Residents Voice 162/7/8
What is Fraud?
“… all multifarious means which human ingenuity can devise, and which are resorted to by one individual to get advantage of over another by false suggestions or suppression of the truth. It includes all surprise, trick, cunning or dissembling, and any unfair way by which another is cheated.”
![Page 16: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Residents Voice 172/7/8
Fraud Categories
• Misrepresentation of Material Facts • Concealment of Material Facts • Bribery • Conflicts of Interest • Theft of Money or property • Theft of Trade Secrets/Intellectual
Property • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
![Page 17: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Residents Voice 182/7/8
Misrepresentation of Material Facts
• A Material False Statement • Knowledge of its Falsity • Reliance on the False Statement • Damages Suffered
![Page 18: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Residents Voice 192/7/8
Difficulty of Determining Fraud
In every good Fraud there is an:
-- Element of Truth –
I.E.; “We are within the Budget!”
![Page 19: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Residents Voice 202/7/8
Common Types of Fraud Claims
Left to the Imagination
of the
Actors Involved!
![Page 20: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Residents Voice 212/7/8
Common Types of Fraud Claims
• Fictitious costs • Non-allowable costs • Non-allocable costs • False documentation • Inflated costs • Duplicate costs
![Page 21: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Residents Voice 222/7/8
Common Types of Fraud Claims
• Erroneous methodology • Conflicts of interest • Conspiracy • Bid rigging • Related party transactions
![Page 22: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Residents Voice 232/7/8
Detection/Prevention Techniques
Contractual Provisions
• Cost definitions • Cost measurement framework • Access to books and records • Audit Provision • Audit as an entitlement
![Page 23: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Residents Voice 242/7/8
Detection/Prevention Techniques
Project Procedure
• Timely cost variance reporting and variance resolution.
• Question and resolve issues on a monthly basis.• Body of knowledge to measure/report costs. • Adequately staff the job accounting. • Strong project controls.
![Page 24: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Residents Voice 252/7/8
Past Audits
• Yearly audit by KPMG.• Corbin & Wertz MIS audit in 2000.• Ernst & Young audit in 1997.• Science Management Corporation Internal
audit in 1991.
![Page 25: Agenda 02 07 08](https://reader038.vdocument.in/reader038/viewer/2022103000/555d20e4d8b42ac4258b544b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Residents Voice 262/7/8
THE END