agenda and papers f ormal meeting of the kent …...agenda and papers for the f ormal meeting of the...
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda and Papers
for the
Formal meeting of the
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board
In Public
to be held at 10am on
Thursday 23 May 2019
in
Rooms 6 and 7 Kent Community Health NHS Foundation
Trust offices Trinity House
110 – 120 Upper Pemberton, Ashford Kent
TN25 4AZ
Meeting of the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board
to be held at 10am on Thursday 23 May 2019 in the Rooms 6 and 7,Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust offices, Trinity
House,110-120 Upper Pemberton, Ashford Kent
TN25 4AZ
This meeting will be held in Public
AGENDA
1. STANDARD ITEMS
1.1
Introduction by Chair
Trust Chair
1.2 To receive any Apologies for Absence
Trust Chair
1.3 To receive any Declarations of Interest
Trust Chair
1.4 To agree the Minutes of the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board meeting held on 28 March 2019
Trust Chair
Page 4
1.5 To receive Matters Arising from the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board meeting held on 28 March 2019
Trust Chair
Page 15
1.6 To receive the Trust Chair’s Report
Trust Chair
Page 19
1.7 To receive the Chief Executive’s Report
Chief Executive Page 26
2. BOARD ASSURANCE/APPROVAL
2.1
To receive the Patient Story Chief Nurse (Interim)
2.2
To receive the Board Assurance Framework
Corporate Services Director
Page 30
Age
nda
Page 1 of 177
Board Committee Reports
2.3
To receive the Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Quality Committee
Page 37
2.4
To receive the Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Strategic Workforce Committee
Page 46
2.5 To receive the Finance, Business and Investment Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Finance, Business and Investment Committee
Page58
2.6
To receive the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Audit and Risk Committee
Page 71
2.7 To approve the 2018/19 Annual
Report and Accounts (i) 2018/19 Annual Quality
Report
Director of Finance Chief Nurse (Interim)
Page
2.8 To receive the Integrated Performance Report
Director of Finance/Executive Directors
Page 74
2.9 To Approve the Digital Strategy Director of Finance Page 120
3. REPORTS TO THE BOARD
3.1 To receive the Patient Experience
and Complaints Report
Chief Nurse (Interim) Page 140
3.2 To receive the Learning From Deaths Report
Medical Director Page 152
3.3
To receive the Freedom To Speak Up Report
Corporate Services Director
Page 165
3.4 To receive the Emergency Planning and Business Continuity Annual Report
Corporate Services Director
Page 168
4. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
To consider any other items of business previously notified to the Trust Chair
Trust Chair
Page 2 of 177
5. QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC RELATING TO THE AGENDA
6. DATE AND VENUE OF NEXT MEETING
Thursday 25 July 2019
Suite 1, The Orchards, New Road, East Malling, West Malling Kent ME19 6BJ
Age
nda
Page 3 of 177
Unconfirmed Minutes
of the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board meeting held at 10am on Thursday 28 March 2019
in Rooms 6 and 7, Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Offices, Trinity House, 110 – 120 Upper Pemberton, Ashford Kent TN25 4AZ
Meeting held in Public
Present: John Goulston, Trust Chair (Chair) Pippa Barber, Non-Executive Director Paul Bentley, Chief Executive Peter Conway, Non-Executive Director Martin Cook, Non-Executive Director Professor Francis Drobniewski, Non-Executive Director Richard Field, Associate Non-Executive Director Gordon Flack, Director of Finance Steve Howe, Associate Non-Executive Director Louise Norris, Director of Workforce, Organisational
Development and Communications Dr Sarah Phillips, Medical Director Dr Mercia Spare, Chief Nurse (Interim) Bridget Skelton, Non-Executive Director Gerard Sammon, Director of Strategy Lesley Strong, Deputy Chief Executive/Chief Operating Officer Jen Tippin, Non-Executive Director Nigel Turner, Non-Executive Director In Attendance: Gina Baines, Committee Secretary (minute-taker) Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director Observer: Nicola Coles, EY Plum Consulting
28/03/1 Introduction by Chair
Mr Goulston welcomed everyone present to the Public Board meeting of Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust (the Trust). Mr Goulston advised that this was a formal meeting of the Board held in public, rather than a public meeting, and as such there would be an opportunity for public questions relating to the agenda at the end of the meeting.
Min
utes
Page 4 of 177
Page 2 of 7
28/03/2 Apologies for Absence
There were no apologies. The meeting was quorate.
28/03/3 Declarations of Interest
No conflicts of interest were declared other than those formerly recorded.
28/03/4 Minutes of the Meeting of 31 January 2019
The Board AGREED the Minutes.
28/03/5 Matters Arising from the Meeting of 31 January 2019
29/11/8 Patient Story – Dr Spare had met with the service manager who had confirmed that it had been a process error. The Trust’s internal root cause analysis had been shared with the feed company. A joint action plan had been developed to teach parents how to order feeds correctly on the system. Action closed. 31/01/13 Integrated Performance Report (IPR) – Operational Report – It was agreed to close the action. 31/01/15 Winter Pressures Update Report – The Rapid Transfer of Care Service would continue to operate throughout the year. Action closed. All other actions were confirmed and closed. The Board RECEIVED the Matters Arising.
28/03/6 Trust Chair’s Report Mr Goulston presented the report to the Board for information.
On 12 March 2019, Mr Goulston had attended the Senior Leaders Conference and not the Council of Governors meeting as indicated in the report. Mr Goulston and Mr Bentley had attended the East Kent Partnership Board earlier in the week. Following his recent meeting with Mr Paul Carter, Leader and Cabinet Member for Health Reform at Kent County Council (KCC), Mr Goulston would be meeting with him again after the Easter break. Mr Cook stated that he had attended two sessions run by the Trust to support the replacement of its Community Information System (CIS). He had been impressed by the number of staff who had attended and participated with energy and enthusiasm. He thanked them on behalf of the Board for their commitment and investment in time. He was satisfied that the process was being well run and that the lessons that had been learnt from the previous CIS procurement exercise had been taken on board.
Page 5 of 177
Page 3 of 7
In response to a comment from Prof Drobniewski regarding considering an alternative venue for future Council of Governor meetings, it was agreed that this would be discussed with the Governors at their Development Day in April 2019. Action – Ms Davies The Board RECEIVED the Trust Chair’s Report.
28/03/7 Chief Executive’s Report Mr Bentley presented the report to the Board for information.
Mr Bentley thanked the non-executive directors for attending the Senior Leaders Conference earlier in the month. Ms Tippin commented that the results from the 2018 NHS Staff Survey had indicated good progress for the Trust and congratulated the Executive Team. Dr Phillips indicated that the Board could follow the range of Quality Improvement (QI) projects that were underway in the Trust by accessing the online Live QI web site. She would circulate the link. Action – Dr Phillips In response to a question from Mr Field regarding how issues were addressed where collaborative arrangements were in place, such as with the South East Coast Ambulance NHS Trust, Ms Strong indicated that previously these were managed through discussions with the commissioners of the service. The Board RECEIVED the Chief Executive’s Report.
28/03/8 Patient Story Dr Spare presented the video to the Board. The story related to a Quality Improvement project to reduce podiatric surgery on-the-day cancellations. Following Ms Barber’s question as to whether a Quality Improvement (QI) approach could be used to pre-empt some of the pre-operational preparation that patients had to undergo, Mr Sammon questioned whether the appointments could be better managed to improve the patient experience and increase service efficiency. Dr Phillips suggested that there could be further QI related tools which the team could use to assess the process further. In response to a question from Mr Howe as to whether the service would address other reasons why a patient’s operation was cancelled on the day, Dr Spare explained that the service had noticed a particular pattern of cancellations because of high blood pressure readings from some patients on the day of their operation and this had triggered this specific project. She suggested that this was the first step. The service would be sharing its
Min
utes
Page 6 of 177
Page 4 of 7
learning with other services. Mr Flack commented that there was an opportunity to liaise with similar services in the acute trusts to avoid working from first principles. Mr Goulston concluded that he had visited the Podiatric Surgery Service at the Queen Victoria Memorial Hospital, Herne Bay and met with Mr Simon Pendleton, Quality Improvement and Podiatric Surgery Manager. They had discussed the project and it had been agreed that the service would look into reaching out to similar services in other trusts to share learning and good practice. It was agreed that the comments from the Board would be fed back to the service. Action – Dr Spare
The Board RECEIVED the Patient Story.
28/03/9 Board Assurance Framework (BAF) Ms Davies presented the report to the Board for assurance.
In response to a question from Mr Conway regarding Risk 102 relating to the workforce, Ms Skelton confirmed that the Strategic Workforce Committee had reviewed it. The wording of the risk had been updated and reflected the Committee’s discussions. In response to a question from Mr Conway regarding Risk 103 relating to the system architecture, there was a discussion as to how the Executive Team had reached its conclusion regarding the risk’s confidence assessment and associated rating. Mr Conway said he was assured as a result of the explanation. Mr Cook MC asked for further assurance which was provided by Ms Davies. In response to a question from Prof Drobniewski regarding Risk 101 relating to Brexit, Ms Davies confirmed that the Trust had been fully involved in preparing the organisation and the wider system in Kent for the potential impact on business continuity if the UK left the European Union without a deal at the end of the month. Preparations had been locally led and managed, feeding in national support as it was available. The Department of Health had been helpful in assessing and managing the potential impact of Brexit on national contractual arrangements. As the BAF was a dynamic document, it was suggested that the Management Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee would continue to review it taking into account the comments made by the Board. The Board RECEIVED the Board Assurance Framework. Ms Tippin left the meeting.
28/03/10 Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Ms Barber presented the report to the Board for assurance.
Page 7 of 177
Page 5 of 7
The Board RECEIVED the Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
28/03/11 Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Ms Skelton presented the verbal report to the Board for assurance.
The Strategic Workforce Committee had met the previous week. There have been wide ranging discussions which had included the improving performance of turnover, sickness absence and retention; the Nursing Academy; the Time to Change programme; the 2018 NHS Staff Survey; workforce hotspots and the use of bank staff in operations; the Transforming Integrated Care in the Community (TICC) programme; E-Rostering. The HR element in the Trust 2019/20 Operational Plan and the People Strategy Implementation Plan had both been approved. The Trust would be publishing its Gender Pay Gap Report at the end of the month and a number of actions had been agreed to enhance performance in this area. In response to a question from Mr Conway regarding the findings of the Trust’s Gender Pay Gap Report, Ms Norris confirmed that the Trust was bucking the national position. Female staff in the Trust were found to have a slightly higher pay rate than male staff. . It was agreed that the report would be circulated to the Board. Action – Ms Norris In response to a question from Prof Drobniewski as to whether the conclusions of the report would be circulated to staff, it was agreed that a message would be communicated via the weekly staff bulletin. Action – Ms Norris The Board RECEIVED the Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
28/03/12 Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Mr Conway presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Board RECEIVED the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
28/03/13 Integrated Performance Report (IPR)
Assurance on Strategic Goals Mr Flack presented the report to the Board for assurance. Quality Dr Spare presented the report to the Board for assurance. In response to a question from Mr Cook regarding the proposed revision to
Min
utes
Page 8 of 177
Page 6 of 7
the sickness absence Key Performance Indicator (KPI), Ms Norris explained that the Trust had demonstrated that it had been doing everything possible that was considered best practice to improve performance. However, the conclusion was that the target would still not be met. Consequently, it had been suggested that the target should also be revised to determine if it was the right one. Benchmarking data would be analysed in order to identify a deliverable target. This would be discussed at the Strategic Workforce Committee meeting in May 2019 and if necessary a recommendation would be made to the Board. In response to a question from Prof Drobniewski regarding the omitted insulin incidents, Dr Spare confirmed that considerable work was being undertaken around reporting and this would be scrutinised further by the Quality Committee. A deep dive report had also been presented to the Patient Safety and Clinical Risk Group recently which explained a QI project that was underway to improve performance. Mr Field commented on the excellent work that staff had undertaken to achieve the high number of Friends and Family Test survey responses. Workforce Report Ms Norris presented the report to the Board for assurance. In response to a comment from Mr Field regarding the number of KPIs included in the report, Mr Flack confirmed that at the beginning of the financial year, there would be a review of those that were included to ensure that they remained relevant. He anticipated that there would be some changes to the 2019/20 IPR. Finance Report Mr Flack presented the report to the Board for assurance. Operational Report Ms Strong presented the report to the Board for assurance. In response to a question from Mr Turner regarding the recent dip in performance by the Paediatric Audiology Service which had contributed to the Trust slipping from Segment One to Segment Two on the Single Oversight Framework, Ms Strong confirmed that the service was working hard to improve its performance. Its ability to meet its Referral To Treatment waiting times (RTT) KPI was specifically linked to its ability to recruit specialist staff . The Service had presented its action plan to the Quality Committee. It was agreed that the service’s presentation would be circulated to the Board. Those other services that had reported a breach of their RTT KPI were now meeting them. Action – Ms Strong
Page 9 of 177
Page 7 of 7
In response to a question from Mr Field as to whether the Trust was improving its performance with regards to the number of End of Life patients with an updated Personalised Care Plan, Dr Spare indicated that there had been some improvement but she was not confident that it was sustainable at this time. A QI approach was being applied which she anticipated would deliver more sustainability by the end of Quarter One. However, aside from this, she was confident that the Trust was delivering good end of life care to its patients. In response to a question from Mr Goulston regarding whether the service which delivered the National Child Measurement Program for year R and Six pupils locally was offering further follow-on services to its commissioner on the back of the data that had been collected. Ms Strong confirmed that discussions were underway with KCC. She would be happy to provide the Board with further information. Action – Ms Strong The Board RECEIVED the Integrated Performance Report. Ms Tippin rejoined the meeting.
28/03/14 Constitutional Amendment Mr Flack presented the report to the Board for approval.
The Board APPROVED the Constitutional Amendment.
28/03/15 Charitable Funds Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Ms Tippin presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Board RECEIVED the Charitable Funds Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
28/03/16 2019/20 Operating Plan Mr Bentley presented the report to the Board for approval.
Strategic Priorities Mr Sammon confirmed that the priorities had been considered by the Management Committee earlier in the week. A minor change to the wording had been proposed to the ‘Join-up care’ priority. In response to a question from Mr Cook regarding the use of the word digital as a noun in the fourth priority, it was agreed that this would be clarified. Action – Mr Sammon
Min
utes
Page 10 of 177
Page 8 of 7
Quality Priorities Dr Spare confirmed that the priorities had been considered by the Management Committee earlier in the week. There had been some debate around the wording at the meeting and the agreed revisions were confirmed to the Board. In response to a comment from Ms Skelton regarding the consistency of language that was used in relation to ‘people’, it was agreed that this would be reviewed. Action – Dr Spare Financial Plan Mr Flack confirmed that the plan had been considered by the Finance, Business and Investment (FBI) Committee the previous day. For clarification, Mr Goulston suggested that a note was added to the plan that the minus notated against the total figure indicated a surplus and not a loss. Action - Mr Flack The Board APPROVED the 2019/20 Operating Plan, incorporating the priorities, subject to the amendments.
28/03/17 2018 NHS Staff Survey Report Ms Norris presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Board RECEIVED the 2018 NHS Staff Survey Report.
28/03/18 Seasonal Infection Prevention and Control Report Dr Spare presented the report to the Board for assurance.
In response to a question from Mr Bentley regarding the recent levelling off of the number of reported Urinary Tract Infections (UTI) and Catheter Associated UTIs, Dr Spare indicated that further data needed to be included. With regards to how the Trust’s performance compared with the previous year, it was agreed that this would be confirmed outside of that day’s meeting. Actions – Dr Spare In response to a question from Mr Goulston as to whether the data related only to UTIs and Catheter Associated UTIs identified in the Trust’s community hospitals, it was suggested that more data would be available in the Annual Infection Prevention and Control Report which the Board would receive in July 2019. Actions – Dr Spare In response to a question from Mr Cook regarding the report that was awaited from the Authorised engineer for decontamination, Dr Spare confirmed that the Quality Committee had received a verbal update at its
Page 11 of 177
Page 9 of 7
meeting the previous week. She confirmed that the Trust was compliant with the sterilisation of its medical devices. The issue that had been identified related to the level of service that the Trust was receiving from its supplier and mitigation was in place to ensure that services were not impacted. It was agreed that the Quality Committee would monitor the decontamination service and provide a further update to the Board through the Committee Chair’s Assurance Report in May 2019. Action – Ms Barber It was confirmed that the Trust was compliant with the Hygiene Code. The Board RECEIVED the Seasonal Infection Prevention and Control Report. The Board APPROVED the Trust’s Infection Prevention and Control Declaration 2019.
28/03/19 Patient Experience and Complaints Report Dr Spare presented the report to the Board for assurance.
In response to a question from Ms Tippin regarding the recent decline in performance of the NHS Friends and Family Test (FFT) scores, Dr Spare indicated that this was a seasonal movement. Dr Phillips suggested that the decline might also reflect natural variation which could be tested further when there were more data points available. It was agreed that this would be monitored. Action – Dr Spare In response to a comment from Mr Bentley, it was agreed that reference to the Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust would be removed from future reports, albeit the performance of the Trust might be a helpful measure. Action – Dr Spare The Board RECEIVED the Patient Experience and Complaints Report
28/03/20 Risk Management Strategy Ms Davies presented the report to the Board for approval.
The Audit and Risk Committee had reviewed the strategy at its meeting in February 2019 and recommended it to the Board. It was confirmed that reference to the Strategic Workforce Committee and Management Committee would be included in the final published version. The Audit and Risk Committee would review the strategy again in September 2019. In response to a comment from Mr Cook regarding reference within the strategy that there joint membership between all the committees, it was agreed that this would be checked for accuracy. Action – Ms Davies
Min
utes
Page 12 of 177
Page 10 of 7
In response to a comment from Mr Goulston regarding the risk grading the Trust applied, it was agreed that the Audit and Risk Committee would consider this further. Action – Ms Davies In response to a comment from Mr Turner regarding whether there should be a policy statement within the strategy explaining why the Trust was reducing the number of clinical audits it was undertaking year on year, it was agreed that such a statement would be included if it was felt to be helpful. Action – Ms Davies In response to a question from Ms Norris as to whether the document was a policy rather than a strategy, Ms Davies indicated that it set out the framework as to how the Trust would measure risk and the strategic aims of the organisation. It was agreed that the Board’s comments would be incorporated into the document. Following scrutiny and approval of the revised version by Mr Conway, Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee, the document would be circulated to the Board for virtual approval. Action – Ms Davies The Board NOTED the Risk Management Strategy.
28/03/21 Use of the Trust Seal Report Ms Davies presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Board RECEIVED the Use of the Trust Seal Report.
28/03/22 Minutes of Charitable Funds Committee Meeting of 29 November 2019 Ms Tippin presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Board RECEIVED the Minutes of Charitable Funds Committee Meeting of 29 November 2019.
28/03/23 Any Other Business
There was no further business to discuss. Mr Goulston thanked Mr Field and Mr Howe for their long service to the Trust. Mr Field had been Vice Trust Chair, Acting Trust Chair and Chair of the FBI Committee. Mr Howe had been the Chair of the Quality Committee. Both had given a tremendous amount of effort into being non-executive directors.
28/03/24 Questions from members of the public relating to the agenda There were no questions from the public.
Page 13 of 177
Page 11 of 7
The meeting ended at 12.45pm.
28/03/25 Date and Venue of the Next Meeting
Thursday 23 May 2019, Rooms 6 and 7, Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Offices, Trinity House, 110 – 120 Upper Pemberton, Kennington, Ashford, TN25 4AZ
Min
utes
Page 14 of 177
MA
TT
ER
S A
RIS
ING
FR
OM
BO
AR
D M
EE
TIN
G O
F 2
8 M
AR
CH
20
19
(P
AR
T O
NE
)
Min
ute
n
um
be
r
Ag
en
da
Ite
m
Ac
tio
n
Ac
tio
n
Ow
ne
r
Sta
tus
28
/03
/6
Tru
st
Ch
air’s
R
ep
ort
To d
iscu
ss w
ith
the
Gove
rno
rs t
he
o
ption
fo
r a
n a
lte
rnative
ve
nu
e fo
r th
e
Co
un
cil
of
Go
ve
rno
rs m
ee
tin
gs.
Ms D
avie
s
Co
mp
lete
– G
ove
rno
rs w
ish
ed
to
sta
y
at
the
cu
rren
t ve
nu
e.
28
/03
/7
Ch
ief
Exe
cu
tive
’s
Re
po
rt
To c
ircu
late
th
e lin
k t
o t
he o
nlin
e L
ife Q
I w
eb
site
.
Dr
Ph
illip
s
Co
mp
lete
.
28
/03
/9
Pa
tie
nt
Sto
ry
To f
eed
ba
ck t
he
com
me
nts
fro
m th
e
Bo
ard
to
th
e s
erv
ice
. D
r S
pa
re
Actio
n o
pen
.
28
/03
/11
Str
ate
gic
Wo
rkfo
rce
C
om
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s
A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
To c
ircu
late
th
e T
rust’s G
end
er
Pa
y
Ga
p R
ep
ort
to
th
e B
oard
.
Ms N
orr
is
Actio
n c
om
ple
te.
28
/03
/11
Str
ate
gic
Wo
rkfo
rce
C
om
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s
A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
To c
om
mu
nic
ate
th
e c
on
clu
sio
ns o
f th
e
Tru
st’s G
end
er
Pa
y G
ap
Re
po
rt t
o s
taff
.
Ms N
orr
is
Actio
n c
om
ple
te.
Mat
ters
Aris
ing
Page 15 of 177
Min
ute
n
um
be
r
Ag
en
da
Ite
m
Ac
tio
n
Ac
tio
n
Ow
ne
r
Sta
tus
28
/03
/13
Inte
gra
ted
P
erf
orm
an
ce
Re
po
rt
To c
ircu
late
to
th
e B
oard
th
e
pre
se
nta
tion
wh
ich
th
e P
aed
iatr
ic
Au
dio
logy S
erv
ice
ha
d m
ade
to
the
Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e.
Ms S
tro
ng
Actio
n c
om
ple
te.
28
/03
/13
Inte
gra
ted
P
erf
orm
an
ce
Re
po
rt
To p
rovid
e t
he
Bo
ard
with
fu
rthe
r in
form
atio
n a
bo
ut th
e p
ote
ntia
l fo
r fo
llow
-on
se
rvic
es f
rom
th
e N
atio
na
l C
hild
Me
asu
rem
en
t P
rogra
mm
e.
Ms S
tro
ng
Actio
n o
pen
.
28
/03
/16
20
19
/20 O
pe
ratin
g
Pla
n
To c
larify
the
use
of
the
wo
rd d
igita
l a
s
a n
ou
n in t
he
fou
rth
prio
rity
. M
r S
am
mo
n
Actio
n c
om
ple
te.
The
wo
rdin
g h
as
be
en
alte
red
to
‘D
eve
lop
ou
r d
igita
l w
ays o
f w
ork
ing’.
28
/03
/16
20
19
/20 O
pe
ratin
g
Pla
n
To r
evie
w t
he
co
nsis
ten
cy o
f la
ngu
age
u
se
d in
re
lation
to
‘p
eop
le’ in
th
e
prio
ritie
s.
Dr
Sp
are
A
ctio
n c
om
ple
te.
28
/03
/16
20
19
/20 O
pe
ratin
g
Pla
n
To a
dd
a n
ote
to
the
pla
n th
at th
e m
inu
s
no
tate
d a
ga
inst
the
to
tal figu
re in
dic
ate
d
a s
urp
lus a
nd
no
t a lo
ss.
M
r F
lack
Th
is r
ela
ted t
o t
he b
udge
t p
ape
r ra
the
r th
an t
he
op
era
tin
g p
lan.
Th
e o
pe
ratin
g
pla
n s
ho
we
d a
su
rplu
s a
s a
po
sitiv
e.
28
/03
/18
Se
ason
al In
fectio
n
Pre
ve
ntio
n a
nd
C
on
tro
l R
epo
rt
To c
onfirm
ho
w t
he
Tru
st’s c
urr
en
t p
erf
orm
an
ce
in
re
latio
n t
o th
e n
um
be
r of
repo
rte
d U
rin
ary
Tra
ct
Infe
ctio
ns
(UT
I) a
nd
Ca
the
ter
Asso
cia
ted
UT
Is
(CA
UT
Is)
com
pa
red
to t
ha
t of
the
pre
vio
us y
ea
r’s.
Dr
Sp
are
Actio
n o
pen
.
Page 16 of 177
Min
ute
n
um
be
r
Ag
en
da
Ite
m
Ac
tio
n
Ac
tio
n
Ow
ne
r
Sta
tus
28
/03
/18
Se
ason
al In
fectio
n
Pre
ve
ntio
n a
nd
C
on
tro
l R
epo
rt
To p
rovid
e m
ore
da
ta in
the
Ann
ua
l In
fectio
n P
reve
ntio
n a
nd
Co
ntr
ol R
ep
ort
re
ga
rdin
g U
TIs
an
d C
AU
TIs
in
co
mm
un
ity s
erv
ice
s a
s w
ell
as
co
mm
un
ity h
osp
ita
ls.
Dr
Sp
are
The
Bo
ard
will
re
ce
ive
th
e r
ep
ort
in J
uly
2
018
.
28
/03
/18
Se
ason
al In
fectio
n
Pre
ve
ntio
n a
nd
C
on
tro
l R
epo
rt
Fo
r th
e Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e to
mon
ito
r th
e d
econ
tam
ina
tio
n s
erv
ice
an
d
pro
vid
e a
fu
rth
er
up
da
te t
o th
e B
oa
rd
thro
ugh
th
e C
om
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s
A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt in
Ma
y 2
01
9.
Ms B
arb
er
Age
nd
a ite
m.
Actio
n c
om
ple
te.
28
/03
/19
Pa
tie
nt
Exp
erie
nce
a
nd
Co
mp
lain
ts
Re
po
rt
To m
on
ito
r th
e m
ove
me
nt
in t
he
Tru
st’s
NH
S F
rie
nd
s a
nd
Fam
ily T
est
sco
res.
Dr
Sp
are
O
ngo
ing.
28
/03
/19
Pa
tie
nt
Exp
erie
nce
a
nd
Co
mp
lain
ts
Re
po
rt
To r
em
ove
th
e r
efe
rence
to
th
e N
orf
olk
C
om
mu
nity H
ea
lth a
nd C
are
NH
S T
rust
in f
utu
re r
epo
rts.
Dr
Sp
are
A
ctio
n c
om
ple
te.
28
/03
/20
Ris
k M
an
age
men
t S
tra
tegy
To c
he
ck fo
r a
ccu
racy w
he
the
r th
ere
w
as jo
int
me
mbe
rsh
ip b
etw
ee
n a
ll co
mm
itte
es.
Ms D
avie
s
Co
mp
lete
.
28
/03
/20
Ris
k M
an
age
men
t S
tra
tegy
Fo
r th
e A
ud
it a
nd
Ris
k C
om
mitte
e
(AR
C)
to c
on
sid
er
furt
he
r th
e r
isk
gra
din
g a
pp
lied
by t
he
Tru
st.
Ms D
avie
s
Will
be
co
nsid
ere
d a
t th
e M
ay A
RC
–
actio
n o
pen
.
Mat
ters
Aris
ing
Page 17 of 177
Min
ute
n
um
be
r
Ag
en
da
Ite
m
Ac
tio
n
Ac
tio
n
Ow
ne
r
Sta
tus
28
/03
/20
Ris
k M
an
age
men
t S
tra
tegy
To c
on
sid
er
inclu
din
g a
po
licy
sta
tem
en
t w
ith
in t
he
str
ate
gy e
xp
lain
ing
wh
y t
he
Tru
st
wa
s r
edu
cin
g t
he
num
be
r of
clin
ica
l au
dits it
wa
s u
nde
rta
kin
g y
ea
r o
n y
ea
r.
Ms D
avie
s
Co
mp
lete
.
28
/03
/20
Ris
k M
an
age
men
t
To in
co
rpo
rate
th
e B
oard
’s c
om
men
ts
into
th
e s
trate
gy.
To f
orw
ard
th
e a
me
nde
d v
ers
ion
to M
r C
on
wa
y,
Ch
air o
f th
e A
ud
it a
nd R
isk
Co
mm
itte
e f
or
ap
pro
val.
To f
orw
ard
th
e C
om
mitte
e a
pp
rove
d
str
ate
gy t
o t
he
Boa
rd fo
r a
pp
rova
l.
Ms D
avie
s
Co
mp
lete
.
Page 18 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 1.6
Agenda Item Title: Trust Chair’s Report
Presenting Officer: John Goulston, Trust Chair
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☒ Assurance ☐
Report Summary
The report sets out the service visits and partnership meetings that were attended by the Trust Chair and non-executive directors between 1 February and 23 May 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
To note the report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director Tel: 01622 211900
Email: [email protected]
Tru
st C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 19 of 177
SERVICE VISITS AND PARTNERSHIP MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE CHAIR AND NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS OF KENT COMMUNITY HEALTH NHS
FOUNDATION TRUST
Period covered - 1 February to 23 May 2019
Name Service visits Stakeholder/ Partnership meetings / events
Other meetings / events
John Goulston
5th February – Whitstable & Tankerton Hospital. 11th February –Victoria Memorial Hospital 18th February – Adult Speech and Language Therapy & Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics (including visit to care home for swallowing assessment) Tonbridge and Edenbridge Community Hospitals 27th February - Estuary View Medical Centre, Whitstable
5th February – Kent and Medway STP clinical lead 13th February - Kent and Medway Integrated Care System Simulation Event 18th February - Hosted Kent & Medway providers chairs and CEOs 22nd February - GP clinical lead for East Kent 12th March - Leader of Kent County Council 13th March - Interview panel member for Kent and Medway STP chair 26th March - East Kent Integrated Care Partnership Board 2nd April – Tonbridge Cottage Hospital - League of Friends Chair and Vice Chair 15th April – Kent & Medway Provider Chairs and CEO meeting 17th April - Stakeholder’s event for prospective Chair candidates of Kent & Medway Partnership NHS Trust 23rd April – GP clinical lead for West Kent 24th April – Chair & CEO meeting with Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells Hospitals NHS Trust 14th May - West Kent
7th February – KCH Council of Governors 12th March – KCH Council of Governors 18th March – Lead and Deputy lead KCH Governors 29th March – NHS Community Network 4th April – Governors’ Development Day 23rd April - Transforming Integrated Community Care – Buurtzorg Masterclass
Tru
st C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 20 of 177
Name Service visits Stakeholder/ Partnership meetings / events
Other meetings / events
Integrated Care Partnership Board
Peter Conway
7th February – KCH Council of Governors 18th February - Extra ordinary QC 20th February - Audit and risk committee. 27th February - Finance, Business and Investment Committee 28th February - joint Management /board meeting. 1st March- Deputy Medical Director Interview 19th March quality committee 20th March – Strategic Workforce Committee 27th March - Finance, Business and Investment Committee 28th March – NED only Meeting 28th March – KCHFT Board Meeting 24th April - Finance, Business and Investment Committee 25th April - KCHFT Board 8th May - CQC inspection interview 15th May - Audit and Risk Committee 15th May - Strategic Workforce Committee
Bridget Skelton
20th February – Audit & Risk Committee 21st February – Niche Training - CQC 28th February - joint
Page 21 of 177
Name Service visits Stakeholder/ Partnership meetings / events
Other meetings / events
Bridget Skelton (continued)
Management /board meeting. 6th March - Meeting Director HR/OD 12th March - Seniors Leaders meeting 27th March – Finance Business Investment Committee 28th March – NED only Meeting 28th March – KCHFT Board Meeting 28th March – Meeting with CEO 4th April – Governors’ Development Day 8th April – Appraisal of Chair KCHFT 8th April – Feedback from CQC 25th April - Meeting Director HR/OD 25th April - KCHFT Board Meeting 9th May - CQC inspection interview 13th May - Nominations Committee 15th May - Audit and Risk Committee 15th May - Strategic Workforce Committee 16th May - Time to Change Conference 20th May - Meeting Director HR/OD 23rd May - KCHFT Board meeting
Pippa Barber
2nd April - Visit to Two Rapid Transfer of Care teams; QEQM and WHH
9th March - Dementia Friends Event, Westgate Halls Canterbury. Public event in partnership with KCHFT and EKHUFT.
6th February - Meeting with chief nurse 6th February - Meeting with niche.
Tru
st C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 22 of 177
Name Service visits Stakeholder/ Partnership meetings / events
Other meetings / events
Pippa Barber (continued)
18th February - Extra ordinary QC 19th February - QC 20th February - Audit and risk committee. 28th February - joint Management /board meeting. 12th March Seniors Leaders meeting 19th March quality committee 28th March – KCHFT Board Meeting 4th April – Governors’ Development Day 16th April – Quality committee 25th April - KCHFT Board 14th May – Quality Committee 15th May - Audit and Risk Committee 16th May - Time to Change Conference 23rd May - KCHFT Board meeting
Martin Cook
6th March – CIS Replacement process – Attended supplier demonstration and moderation day. 2nd April - RTOC service at QEQM and William Harvey 13th May -RTOC service at QEQM and William Harvey
5th February - Well- led for the future: development for NHS Board Members 15th March - Well- led for the future: development for NHS Board Members 28th April – CQC well led interview
Jen Tippen
21st February - Meeting with Niche (Emma & Kate) 27th February - Finance, Business and Investment Committee 28th February - joint
Page 23 of 177
Name Service visits Stakeholder/ Partnership meetings / events
Other meetings / events
Jen Tippin (continued)
Management /board meeting. 20th March – Strategic Workforce Committee 27th March - Finance, Business and Investment Committee 28th March – NED only Meeting 28th March – KCHFT Board Meeting 4th April – Governors’ Development Day 8th April - Board Development 1 - 1 Interviews 25th April – Appraisal John/Jen 25th April - KCHFT Board 15th May - Audit and Risk Committee 15th May - Strategic Workforce Committee 23rd May – Charitable Funds Committee 23rd May - KCHFT Board meeting
Professor Francis Drobniewski
7th February – KCH Council of Governors 28th February - joint Management /board meeting. 19th March- Quality Committee 20th March – Strategic Workforce Committee 28th March – NED only Meeting 28th March – KCHFT Board Meeting 4th April – Governors’ Development Day 16th April- Appraisal John/Francis
Tru
st C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 24 of 177
Name Service visits Stakeholder/ Partnership meetings / events
Other meetings / events
Professor Francis Drobniewski (continued)
16th April- Quality Committee 23rd April - Transforming Integrated Community Care – Buurtzorg Masterclass 15th May - Strategic Workforce Committee 23rd May – Charitable Funds Committee 23rd May - KCHFT Board meeting
Nigel Turner
To be confirmed.
Richard Field
12th March - Senior Managers Conference, Detling Conference Centre
Page 25 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 1.7
Agenda Item Title: Chief Executive’s Report
Presenting Officer: Paul Bentley, Chief Executive
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☒ Assurance ☐
Report Summary
This report highlights key business and service developments in Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust in recent weeks.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
Not applicable.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described.
Paul Bentley, Chief Executive Tel: 01622 211903
Email: [email protected]
Chi
ef E
xecu
tive’
s R
epor
t
Page 26 of 177
CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT
May 2019
As previously I wanted to highlight to the Board the following significant developments since my last formal report during the Board meeting in April 2019, my regular practice is to categorise the report into patients, our people staff teams and partnerships. Patients
1. Makaton Friendly Canterbury
We are one of several organisations involved in a drive to make Canterbury the first Makaton-friendly city in the world. Canterbury is hoping to follow in the footsteps of Romsey, which became the first Makaton-friendly town in the world in February 2018. Canterbury wants to become the first Makaton-friendly city, by May 2020. To achieve this, 40 Canterbury organisations need to join up. Makaton uses signs and symbols to help people communicate and it is used by more than 100,000 children and adults. It is used by people with communication difficulties and the people who share their lives, such as parents and other family members, friends, carers and education and health professionals. 2. National Experience of Care Week This is a national campaign to celebrate the work that’s happening to improve the experiences of care for our patients, families/carers and staff. This will put experience of care in the spotlight and give people the opportunity to share and celebrate work going on locally to better improve their experiences of health and care services. 3. Health visitor’s film
A short film aiming to support Roma women to breastfeed has been premiered at the Turner Contemporary in Margate.
Chi
ef E
xecu
tive’
s R
epor
t
Page 27 of 177
The film was made by one of our health visitor's, Philippa Burden. The project is the result of a year’s work combining her role with us and a Darzi Fellowship post graduate course she has been doing with the Centre for Health Services Studies at the University of Kent. On the course Philippa has been working on a Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly project linked with Yale University in America, together with Professor Sally Kendall. The film is called Roma Women Talk About Breastfeeding and was co-produced with Slovakian Roma mothers living in Margate, Dover and Folkestone. It aims to encourage breastfeeding in the Roma and other migrant communities, where rates are low. It is also to help support women to breastfeed and to educate about the benefits.
Our People
1. CQC Well Led Inspection
The second phase of the inspection conducted by the Care Quality Commission took place in early May, the inspection team including specialist advisors and inspectors from the Commission itself undertook a series of interviews with team members in leadership roles. The lead inspectors met with the Chair and I briefly at the end of the series of interviews and observed how open the Trust was and how patient focussed the Trust was, and wished to thank those who they had met. The inspection process now enters a phase when all the inspection evidence is reviewed by the Commission and then we will have contact from the commission later in the summer. I want to thank all those interviewed by the Commission for the professional and compassionate manner in which they conducted themselves during the process. 2. Launch of the Staff Awards
This years staff awards were launched in March, every year we recognise the efforts of individuals and teams that go above and beyond in their everyday role. The event will take place on 21 June 2019 at the Kent Event Centre, Detling.
3. Celebrating International Nurse’s Day and People’s Day
Sunday, 12 May was International Nurses’ Day, which marked the anniversary of Florence Nightingale’s birth. However, in recognition of the contribution of all our colleagues, we also marked the following day with our own People’s Day – celebrating all that is good about each other and the work we do. Various events across the Trust were arranged including some mad hatters tea parties across east Kent.
Page 28 of 177
Partnerships
1. TICC Masterclass
Board members, Directors, Assistant Directors and Commissioners for both Health and Social care were invited to meet with Jos de Blok, the founder and CEO of Buurtzorg, on 23rd April 2019. The purpose of the event was for Jos to share his views, lessons learnt and how he and his team revolutionised community care in the Netherlands also to discuss the business case behind the model, and what it takes from an organisation and its leadership to adopt it successfully. 2. New architecture of the NHS in Kent and Medway Since the last time we met work has been continuing on the response of the health and social care system to the long term plan for the NHS. In Kent and Medway this has included work on the development of the Integrated Care System, the four Integrated Care Partnerships and the emergent Primary Care Partnerships. The work has continued to align the new architecture to ensure the benefits to patients and the people we serve, not just ensuring that the governance is right. The Trust is heavily involved in all the conversations and will continue to be so.
Paul Bentley Chief Executive May 2019
Chi
ef E
xecu
tive’
s R
epor
t
Page 29 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.2
Agenda Item Title: Board Assurance Framework
Presenting Officer: Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The function of the Board Assurance Framework (BAF) is to inform and elicit discussion about the significant risks which threaten the achievement of the Trust’s strategic objectives.
To provide assurance that these risks are being effectively managed, the BAF details the controls in place to mitigate each risk, any gap in control, assurance of the controls’ effectiveness, the actions planned and being executed together with the date by when the actions are due to be completed.
The full BAF as at 16 May 2019 is shown in Appendix 1.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to note this report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Barry Norton, Head of Risk Management Tel: 01233667744
Email: [email protected]
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 30 of 177
BOARD ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK
1. Introduction
1.1 The Board Assurance Framework (BAF) is comprised of strategic risks
identified against the strategic goals defined within the Integrated Business Plan (IBP) in addition to risks identified against the achievement of business and operational objectives with a high gross (inherent) risk rating.
1.2 The BAF is therefore comprised of high risks. Refer to section 7 below for a definition of high risk.
1.3 Risks may be identified by Services or Directorates and escalated
upwards to the Executive Team, or may be identified at the Board or any of its sub Committees.
1.4 The Executive Team review newly identified high risks to ensure that those
with significant potential to impact on the achievement of strategic goals are recorded on the BAF and reported to the Board. This allows the Board to monitor mitigating actions. As actions are implemented, controls improve and this can enable the exposure to risk to reduce.
1.5 The full BAF as at 10 May 2019 is shown in Appendix 1. This version has
not previously been presented. 2. New risks
2.1 Since the BAF was last presented to the Board there has been one new risk identified against the strategic objectives. BAF ID104 ‘Inability to meet CIP targets as detailed in 19/20 plans as growing reliance on economy level transformation for savings’.
3. Risks that have been closed since the last report
3.1 Since the BAF was last presented to the Board one risk has been closed:
BAF ID 100 - Risk that the organisation’s ‘services may suffer significant challenges as result of the impact of winter pressures’. This risk has been removed as all actions have been completed and the 2018/19 winter period has passed.
4. Risks that have been de-escalated since the last report
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 31 of 177
2
4.1 Since the BAF was last presented to the Board one risk has been de-
escalated: BAF ID 101 – ‘Uncertainty around Brexit may affect our ability to deliver core objectives’. Due to the current political situation relating to Brexit the risk has been decreased. The risk is now scored as 3x3 and therefore de-escalated to appropriate directorate risk register. It is recommended that this risk is reviewed again by the Exec Team in the autumn
5. Risks previously de-escalated to Directorate risk registers that have
closed 5.1 There are no risks that have been de-escalated to Directorate risk
registers that have now closed.
5.2 The total number of risks documented on the BAF is four. Figure 1 (below) provides a visual representation of the organisational risk profile based on the current risk rating within section 1 of the BAF.
5.3 Figure 1: Organisational High Risk Profile
6. High risk definition 6.1 A high risk is defined as any risk with an overall risk rating of 15 or above,
as well as those risks rated as 12 with a consequence score of 4. The risk matrix below provides a visual representation of this.
6.2 Figure 2: Trust risk matrix
← Consequence / Severity →
Page 32 of 177
3
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
↓Likelihood ↓ 1 2 3 4 5
Rare 1 1 2 3 4 5
Unlikely 2 2 4 6 8 10
Possible 3 3 6 9 12 15
Likely 4 4 8 12 16 20
Almost Certain 5 5 10 15 20 25
The scores obtained from the risk matrix are assigned grades as follows:
1 – 6 Low risk
8 – 12 Medium Risk
12 – 25 High Risk
7. Risk Overview 7.1 The total number of open risks within the Trust stands at 310 this is
comprised of 147 low risks, 150 medium risks and 13 high risks. Figure 3 (below) provides a visual representation. Low risks are initially reviewed by Heads of Service with further reviews by the responsible officer at least bi monthly. Medium risks would initially be reviewed by Heads of Service and then onward to the Community Service Director/Assistant Director for approval, these would normally be reviewed on a monthly basis. All risks are extracted by the Risk Team on a weekly basis and the officer responsible for those risks that have passed their review date or target completion date are contacted by the team to prompt a review.
7.2 Figure 3: Organisational Risk Overview.
7.3 Figure 4: Open Risks by Type and Risk Level
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 33 of 177
4
8. Recommendation
8.1 The Board is asked to consider the Board Assurance Framework in Appendix 1 and determine whether sufficient mitigating actions are in place to address these.
Barry Norton Head of Risk 10 May 2019
Page 34 of 177
G A R
ID
Opened
Board Level Risk
Owner
CL
Rating
Co
ntr
ols
Descri
pti
on
Po
sit
ive A
ssu
ran
ces
Gap
s in
co
ntr
ol o
r N
eg
ati
ve A
ssu
ran
ce
CL
Rating
Action owner
Confidence
Assessment
Target Date (end)
Ind
ivid
ual
Acti
on
sO
wn
er
Targ
et
Co
mp
leti
on
(end)
Sta
tus
Re
so
urc
e a
sse
ssm
ent
on-g
oin
g a
s p
art
of
the
pro
ject
go
ve
rna
nce
str
uctu
re.
Gord
on F
lack
Mar
2020
A
Full
busin
ess c
ase
to
be
ap
pro
ve
d b
y B
oa
rdG
ord
on F
lack
May 2
019
A
Pro
ject
Pla
n t
o M
ana
ge
me
nt
Co
mm
itte
e
Gord
on F
lack
June 2
019
A
Op
era
tio
na
l ri
sk a
nd
mitig
atio
n lo
g t
o b
e u
pd
ate
d a
t e
ve
ry
pro
ject
bo
ard
me
eting
Gord
on F
lack
May 2
019
A
Re
cru
itm
ent
to b
e c
om
ple
ted
fo
r im
ple
me
nta
tio
n p
osts
Gord
on F
lack
Sep 2
019
A
Ind
ivid
ual
Acti
on
sO
wn
er
Targ
et
Co
mp
leti
on
(end)
Sta
tus
Pro
actively
seek o
pport
unitie
s t
o s
tabili
se t
he s
yste
m a
nd
support
investm
ent
in local care
Gord
on F
lack
Mar
2019
G
Ag
ree 5
year
contr
act
wit C
CG
sG
ord
on F
lack
June 2
019
A
Form
ula
tion o
f P
CN
off
er
sent
to e
merg
ing
PC
Ns f
or
consid
era
tion
Gerr
ard
Sam
mon
May 2
019
G
Ag
reem
ent
of
furt
her
actions in s
upport
of
PC
Ns
Gerr
ard
Sam
mon
June 2
019
A
Ag
reem
ent
of
Pro
gra
mm
e o
f w
ork
for
east
and W
est
ICP
sP
aul B
entley
Jul 2019
A
Imple
menta
tion o
f above a
s p
er
ag
reed t
imescale
sP
aul B
entley
tba
A
Board
sem
inar
dis
cussio
nP
aul B
entley
June 2
019
A
Continue t
o influence a
t S
TP
level
Paul B
entley
On-g
oin
gA
Join
t B
oard
and M
anag
em
ent
Com
mitte
e m
eeting
to a
gre
e
forw
ard
pla
n.
Paul B
entley
Oct-19
A
Ind
ivid
ual
Acti
on
sO
wn
er
Targ
et
Co
mp
leti
on
(end)
Sta
tus
1.
Robust
Directo
rate
pla
ns a
nd m
itig
ation s
trate
gy
Lesle
y S
trong
Mar
2020
A
2.
Perf
orm
ance m
anag
em
ent
str
uctu
re im
ple
mente
dLesle
y S
trong
Mar
2020
A
3.
Qualit
y I
mpro
vem
ent
Paul B
entley
Mar
2020
A
4.
Perf
orm
ance R
evie
ws
Lesle
y S
trong
Mar
2020
A
5.
FB
I re
vie
ws o
f hig
her
risk C
IP s
chem
es
Lesle
y S
trong
Mar
2020
A
12H
Susta
inabili
ty a
nd T
ransfo
rmation P
lan (
ST
P)
Pro
gra
mm
e B
oard
TO
Rs a
nd m
em
bers
hip
TO
Rs f
or:
Local C
are
Board
s;
Fra
ilty G
roup;
Chie
f E
xecutives
Foru
m
ST
P G
overn
ance S
tructu
res
Directo
r of
Str
ate
gy job d
escription
West
Kent
Impro
vem
ent
Board
term
s o
f re
fere
nce
East
Kent
Tra
nsfo
rmation B
oard
term
s o
f re
fere
nce
NH
S I
/E s
yste
m m
eeting
term
s o
f re
fere
nce
Chie
f E
xecutive a
s S
IRO
for
East
ICP
Chair a
s C
hair f
or
West
ICP
Local C
are
Investm
ent
receiv
ed f
or
both
east
and w
est
Kent
- H
ospital at
Hom
e a
nd
Rapid
Tra
nsfe
r of
Care
schem
e.
Com
munity C
are
Fundin
g incre
ase in
financia
l sett
lem
ent
Chie
f E
xec r
eport
to t
he b
oard
Reg
ula
r S
trate
gic
develo
pm
ent
update
to
the b
oard
Non e
xecutive m
em
bers
hip
of
the S
TP
board
.
Jan 2019
Paul Bentley
Chang
es t
o t
he s
yste
m a
rchitectu
re a
nd c
ontinued f
inancia
l
insta
bili
ty m
ay p
rovid
e u
ncert
ain
ty in t
he f
utu
re d
eliv
ery
of
inte
gra
ted s
erv
ices
43
Gordon Flack
312H
Pre
ve
nt
ill
he
alt
h
12H
Gordon Flack
Ris
k D
escri
pti
on
(Sim
ple
Exp
lan
ati
on
of
the R
isk)
De
ve
lop
Su
sta
ina
ble
Se
rvic
es
(S
tra
teg
ic O
bje
cti
ve
En
ab
lers
)
Jan 2019
312H
Govern
ance s
tructu
re &
pro
ject
pla
n in p
lace
Eng
ag
em
ent
with t
he p
roje
ct
team
deliv
ering
the K
ent
Care
Record
Pro
ject
Leaders
hip
team
job d
escriptions
Phase im
ple
menta
tion p
lan a
nd r
esourc
ing
appro
priate
ly
Com
munic
ation p
lans d
evelo
ped w
ith s
takehold
ers
inc.
com
mis
sio
ners
.
Opera
tional risk a
nd m
itig
ations log
99
Up
date
d 1
6 M
ay
2019
De
fin
itio
ns:
Initia
l R
ating
= T
he r
isk r
ating
at
the t
ime o
f id
entification
Curr
ent
Rating
= R
isk r
em
ain
ing
with c
urr
ent
contr
ols
in p
lace.
This
is
revie
wed m
onth
ly a
nd s
hould
decre
ase a
s a
ctions
take e
ffect.
Targ
et
Date
= M
onth
end b
y w
hic
h a
ll actions s
hould
be c
om
ple
ted
Init
ial ra
tin
gC
urr
en
t ra
tin
g
Ap
pen
dix
1
Ris
ks w
ith a
hig
h n
et risk r
ating w
hic
h h
ave n
ot been tole
rate
d.
Acti
on
sta
tus k
ey:
Actions c
om
ple
ted
On tra
ck b
ut not ye
t deliv
ere
d
Orig
inal ta
rget date
is u
nachie
vable
Pla
nn
ed
Acti
on
s a
nd
Milesto
nes
Bo
ard
Assu
ran
ce F
ram
ew
ork
Secti
on
1
Reg
ula
r B
oard
report
s lin
ked t
o o
ther
pro
jects
Pro
ject
Gro
up r
eport
to E
xec
Team
and
Board
Tim
escale
s t
o im
ple
ment
new
syste
m
Com
pre
hensiv
e p
rog
ram
me p
lan f
or
repla
cem
ent
syste
m t
o b
e d
evelo
ped in
response t
o e
merg
ing
tim
escale
s
Nov 2019
43
High
Inte
gra
te S
erv
ice
s
High
Mar 2021
Paul Bentley
103
Imple
menting
a c
linic
al syste
m inclu
din
g d
ouble
runnin
g w
ith
the e
xis
ting
syste
m a
nd a
t th
e s
am
e t
ime a
s t
he
Kent
Care
Record
is b
ein
g im
ple
mente
d m
ay n
eg
atively
im
pact
on
pro
duction o
f tim
ely
info
rmation a
nd s
erv
ice d
eliv
ery
.
4
43
12H
104
Apr 2019
Lesley Strong
Inabili
ty t
o m
eet
CIP
targ
ets
as d
eta
iled in 1
9/2
0 p
lans a
s
gro
win
g r
elia
nce o
n e
conom
y level tr
ansfo
rmation f
or
savin
gs.
4F
inance B
usin
ess a
nd I
nvestm
ent
ToR
s a
nd a
gendas.
PM
O d
ocum
ente
d p
rocess &
peer
revie
w
Syste
m level B
oard
s -
futu
re t
ransfo
rmation
Executive led b
usin
ess p
lannin
g a
nd r
evie
ws
Whole
syste
m s
trate
gy/S
TP
pro
cess a
nd g
roups
Perf
orm
ance
Revie
ws f
or
all
serv
ices
Reg
ula
r re
port
ing
PM
O g
ate
way r
evie
ws o
f pla
ns
ST
P im
ple
menta
tion p
lans
FB
I re
port
s t
o B
oard
ST
P P
roductivity P
lan A
ctive
Hig
h r
isk s
chem
es d
ependent
on w
hole
syste
m c
hang
es
Mar 2020
43
12H
Lesley Strong
Medium
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 35 of 177
ID
Opened
Board Level Risk
OwnerC
L
Rating
Co
ntr
ols
Descri
pti
on
Po
sit
ive A
ssu
ran
ces
Gap
s in
co
ntr
ol o
r N
eg
ati
ve A
ssu
ran
ce
CL
Rating
Action owner
Confidence
Assessment
Target Date (end)
Ris
k D
escri
pti
on
(Sim
ple
Exp
lan
ati
on
of
the R
isk)
Init
ial ra
tin
gC
urr
en
t ra
tin
g
Pla
nn
ed
Acti
on
s a
nd
Milesto
nes
Ind
ivid
ual
Acti
on
sO
wn
er
Targ
et
Co
mp
leti
on
(end)
Sta
tus
Scopin
g e
xte
nsio
n t
o c
linic
al academ
yLouis
e N
orr
isS
ep 2
019
A
Inte
rnational re
cru
its a
rriv
eLouis
e N
orr
isJun 2
019
A
Deliv
er
the B
ig L
iste
n a
ction p
lan
Paul B
entley
Mar
2020
A
Deliv
er
QI
str
ate
gy a
ction p
lan
Sara
h P
hill
ips
Mar
2020
AD
eliv
er
well
bein
g a
ction p
lan
Louis
e N
orr
isM
ay 2
019
A
Develo
p,
com
mis
sio
n a
nd im
ple
ment
a B
oard
Develo
pm
ent
pro
gra
mm
e
Louis
e N
orr
isN
ov 2
019
A
12H
De
live
r H
igh
Qu
ali
ty C
are
at
Ho
me
an
d i
n t
he
Co
mm
un
ity
102
Jan 2019
Louise Norris
Inabili
ty t
o r
ecru
it a
nd r
eta
in s
taff
could
have a
detr
imenta
l
impact
on m
ain
tain
ing
qualit
y o
f care
and m
ora
le
4
Louise Norris
43
12H
vacancie
s 9
.69%
, tu
rnover
18.1
4%
Medium
Mar 2020
Str
ate
gic
Work
forc
e C
om
mitte
e T
oR
s,
Serv
ice q
ualit
y v
isits
Directo
r of
Work
forc
e J
D;
Work
forc
e S
trate
gy A
gre
ed
Opera
tional w
ork
forc
e r
eport
s
Com
pla
ints
syste
m e
sta
blis
hed a
gain
st
ag
reed p
olic
y
Friends a
nd F
am
ily T
est
Tale
nt
Manag
em
ent
Str
ate
gy
Tim
e t
o C
hang
e C
ham
pio
ns s
yste
m e
sta
blis
hed
Serv
ice v
isit r
eport
ed t
o q
ualit
y c
om
mitte
e,
Work
forc
e r
eport
to b
oard
, IP
R K
PIs
report
ed a
nd r
evie
wed b
y B
oard
, S
afe
r
Sta
ffin
g r
eport
s,
work
forc
e p
lans,
Tim
e t
o
hire b
enchm
ark
s p
ositiv
ely
, bank f
ill r
ate
s
impro
vin
g,
ag
ency u
sag
e r
eport
.
Work
forc
e r
eport
to S
WC
3
Page 36 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.3
Agenda Item Title: Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Pippa Barber, Chair of Quality Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Quality Committee meetings held on 16 April and 14 May 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Pippa Barber, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
sA
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 37 of 177
QU
AL
ITY
CO
MM
ITT
EE
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e m
eetin
g h
eld
on d
ate
16 A
pril 2
01
9.
Ag
en
da i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Key p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Ad
ult L
ea
rnin
g D
isab
ility
Se
rvic
e M
ort
alit
y
Revie
ws
The
Com
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d a
pre
sen
tatio
n f
rom
th
e L
ea
rnin
g
Dis
ab
ility
(L
D)
Se
rvic
e lea
d o
n th
e p
roce
ss b
ein
g
un
de
rta
ken
in
th
e L
D s
erv
ice f
or
revie
win
g d
ea
ths.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s r
ece
ived
th
at th
e p
roce
ss w
as lin
kin
g w
ell
with
th
e T
rust’s M
ort
alit
y S
tee
rin
g G
rou
p a
nd
exte
rna
lly
with
oth
er
pa
rtn
ers
.
The
se
rvic
e a
gre
ed
to
co
ntinu
e to
ra
ise
aw
are
ne
ss o
f w
ha
t th
e L
D s
erv
ice c
ou
ld
pro
vid
e w
ith
co
mm
un
ity n
urs
ing t
ea
ms.
Pa
tie
nt
Safe
ty A
nd
Clin
ica
l R
isk G
rou
p
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s r
ece
ived
rega
rdin
g t
he
De
nta
l S
erv
ice r
isk
rela
tin
g t
o th
e q
ua
lity o
f co
ntr
act
de
live
ry b
y I
HS
S,
the
lo
ca
l
ste
rile
se
rvic
es p
rovid
er,
It
wa
s c
onfirm
ed
th
at th
e r
isk
rela
ted
to
th
e d
eliv
ery
of
instr
um
en
ts a
nd
no
t th
e q
ua
lity o
f
ca
re o
f th
e d
eco
nta
min
atio
n. P
rofe
sso
r D
rob
nie
wski
en
do
rsed
th
is a
s h
e h
ad
re
ce
ive
d s
imila
r re
port
s a
bou
t
IHS
S’s
co
ntr
act
de
live
ry.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s r
eceiv
ed
on
the
mitig
atio
n o
f th
e r
isk
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
sA
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 38 of 177
Ag
en
da i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Key p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Qu
alit
y R
ep
ort
T
he
Com
mitte
e n
ote
d th
e c
on
tin
ue
d g
oo
d p
rogre
ss w
ith
the
red
uction
s o
n p
ressu
re u
lcers
, A
vo
ida
ble
me
dic
atio
n
incid
en
ts c
on
tin
ue
d to
red
uce
as d
id low
ha
rm m
ed
ica
tio
n
incid
en
ts.
Me
dic
al D
evic
es r
ep
ort
T
he
re
po
rt p
rovid
ed
the
Co
mm
itte
e w
ith
assura
nce
th
at
the
re w
as n
ow
an
eff
ective
pro
ce
ss f
or
EM
E m
ain
tena
nce
in p
lace f
or
me
dic
al d
evic
es w
ith
th
e K
ey P
erf
orm
an
ce
Ind
icato
r (K
PI)
of
98
% b
ein
g m
et
con
sis
ten
tly.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s r
ece
ive
d o
n h
ow
th
is w
ou
ld b
e m
ain
tain
ed
and
mo
nito
red g
oin
g f
orw
ard
.
Qu
art
erly r
ep
ort
s w
ill b
e p
rovid
ed
to
th
e
Pa
tie
nt
Safe
ty a
nd
Clin
ical R
isk G
rou
p a
nd
exce
ptio
n r
ep
ort
s w
ill b
e in
clu
de
d in t
he
Ch
air’s
re
po
rt to
the
Qu
alit
y C
om
mitte
e.
Clin
ica
l E
ffe
ctive
ne
ss
Re
po
rt
The
pro
gra
mm
e o
f w
ork
fo
r e
nh
an
cin
g p
erf
orm
an
ce
on
pe
rsona
lise
d p
lan
s o
f ca
re w
as d
escrib
ed t
o th
e
Co
mm
itte
e. T
he
pro
gra
mm
e w
ou
ld b
e d
eliv
ere
d v
ia p
roje
ct
gro
up
s a
nd
re
po
rte
d m
on
thly
to
th
e c
linic
al eff
ective
ne
ss
gro
up
and
qu
art
erly t
o th
e Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e.
Pro
gre
ss h
ad
bee
n m
ad
e w
ith
th
e r
evie
w o
f N
ICE
co
mp
lian
ce
; o
uts
tan
din
g r
evie
ws 3
7 (
pre
vio
usly
88
).
The
Q4 C
QU
IN ta
rge
t of
80
% o
f w
ou
nd
s th
at h
ad
no
t
he
ale
d w
ith
in f
ou
r w
eeks r
ece
ivin
g a
fu
ll w
oun
d
asse
ssm
en
t h
as b
ee
n s
urp
assed
with
95
% in W
est K
en
t
an
d 9
1%
in
Ea
st
Ke
nt.
The
Qua
lity C
om
mitte
e w
ill r
ece
ive
up
da
tes
via
th
e Q
ua
lity P
rio
ritie
s R
ep
ort
.
Page 39 of 177
Ag
en
da i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Key p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
En
d O
f L
ife
Care
(EO
LC
) S
tee
rin
g G
roup
Work
Pla
n
Go
od p
rogre
ss w
as b
ein
g m
ade
on
all
are
as o
f th
e a
ctio
n
pla
n w
ith
EO
LC
ca
re p
lan
s n
ow
re
ach
ing t
he 6
0%
ta
rge
t.
The
20
19/2
0 a
nn
ua
l p
lan
will
in
clu
de
the
follo
win
g a
rea
s:
pla
ns o
f ca
re, le
arn
ing f
rom
pa
tien
t e
xp
erie
nce
inclu
din
g le
arn
ing f
rom
tho
se a
cce
ssin
g th
e s
erv
ice
ove
rnig
ht.
Le
arn
ing F
rom
Mo
rta
lity
Revie
ws
The
Com
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d th
e r
ep
ort
co
ve
rin
g t
he
pe
rio
d
Ja
nua
ry t
o M
arc
h 2
01
9 a
nd n
ote
d t
he le
arn
ing f
rom
th
e
revie
ws a
nd
the
the
mes a
nd s
ub
se
qu
en
t a
ctio
ns in
pla
ce
.
Qu
alit
y I
mp
rove
me
nt
(QI)
Upd
ate
Re
po
rt
Dr
Sa
rah
Ph
illip
s p
resen
ted t
he
re
po
rt t
o t
he
Com
mitte
e f
or
assu
ran
ce
. A
nd
with
go
od
assu
ran
ce
re
ce
ive
d o
n
pro
gre
ss.
Confirm
atio
n w
as r
ece
ive
d t
ha
t ta
rge
ts h
ad
bee
n s
et fo
r th
e n
um
be
r of
pe
op
le w
ho
we
re d
oin
g t
he
QI tr
ain
ing.
Liv
e
QI
wa
s b
ein
g u
sed
to g
ive
ove
rsig
ht
of
all
the
pro
jects
th
at
we
re r
un
nin
g.
Ou
tcom
es m
ea
su
res w
ere
in
pla
ce
with
tw
o
me
asu
res s
et
aga
inst e
ach
drive
r a
nd
the
ou
tco
me
be
nefits
we
re m
ea
su
red
th
rou
gh
the
sta
ff s
urv
ey.
Fu
ture
rep
ort
s w
ill inclu
de
info
rma
tion
on
wh
ere
QI
pro
jects
are
be
ing u
nd
ert
ake
n s
o
the
bre
adth
of
the
sp
rea
d o
f th
e p
roje
ct
are
as c
an
be
see
n.
Clin
ica
l G
uid
an
ce
Fo
r
Pu
blic
He
alth
; H
ea
lth
Vis
itin
g S
erv
ice
Weig
hin
g M
ea
su
rin
g
An
d W
eig
ht
Ma
na
ge
me
nt O
f
Child
ren
Age
0 t
o 5
Ye
ars
The
po
licy w
as r
evie
wed
an
d a
gre
ed
.
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
sA
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 40 of 177
Ag
en
da i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Key p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Qu
alit
y I
mpa
ct
Asse
ssm
en
ts o
f th
e
Co
st
Imp
rove
men
t
Pla
ns
The
Ea
st
Ke
nt
sch
em
es w
ere
scru
tin
ised
by th
e
Co
mm
itte
e w
ith
assu
ran
ce
pro
vid
ed o
n h
igh
ris
k a
rea
s.
Esta
tes s
ch
em
es w
ill b
e s
ubm
itte
d to
th
e
Co
mm
itte
e a
s th
ey a
re d
eve
lop
ed
.
Inte
gra
ted
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Rep
ort
Op
era
tion
al
Dee
p D
ive
The
Ch
ief
Ope
ratin
g O
ffic
er
pre
sen
ted
a r
ep
ort
co
ve
rin
g
Hea
lth
Vis
ito
r a
nte
na
tal vis
its.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s g
ive
n o
n th
e
actio
ns in
pla
ce
to in
cre
ase
pe
rfo
rman
ce
aga
inst
this
targ
et.
Action
s in
clu
de
d im
pro
ve
d c
om
mu
nic
atio
ns w
ith
mid
wife
ry p
rovid
ers
, d
ata
flo
w im
pro
ve
me
nts
, a
nd
ris
k
asse
ssm
en
t of
fam
ilies.
Th
e r
eco
mm
en
da
tio
ns in
the
rep
ort
we
re a
gre
ed
and
su
pp
ort
ed
.
Rap
id T
ran
sfe
r of
Care
Se
rvic
e:
The
Qu
alit
y I
mp
act
Asse
ssm
en
t fo
r th
e s
erv
ice w
as c
on
sid
ere
d b
y t
he
Co
mm
itte
e.
Pro
gre
ss w
ill b
e m
on
ito
red
th
rou
gh
th
e
Inte
gra
ted
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Re
po
rt w
ith
fu
rth
er
up
da
tes to
th
e C
om
mitte
e in t
he
sum
me
r.
A f
urt
he
r u
pd
ate
will
be
ad
de
d to
th
e
Com
mitte
e’s
fo
rwa
rd p
lan
.
Pip
pa
Ba
rber
Ch
air
of
Qu
ali
ty C
om
mit
tee
10
Ma
y 2
01
9
Page 41 of 177
QU
AL
ITY
CO
MM
ITT
EE
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e m
eetin
g h
eld
on 1
4 M
ay 2
01
9
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Bo
ard
Assu
ran
ce
s
Fra
me
wo
rk (
BA
F)
The
BA
F w
as p
rese
nte
d a
nd
re
vie
we
d w
ith
dis
cu
ssio
n o
n
clin
ica
l risks a
nd
sco
rin
g.
Su
gge
stio
ns w
ere
co
nsid
ere
d t
o
risk 1
02
. It w
as f
elt it
larg
ely
en
ab
led
qu
alit
y im
pa
ct
to b
e
reco
gn
ise
d a
nd
man
age
d.
Ho
we
ve
r, it
co
uld
be
str
en
gth
ene
d b
y a
dd
ing
th
e ‘Q
ua
lity R
ep
ort
’ to
the
co
ntr
ols
de
scrip
tio
n.
Wid
er
pe
rfo
rma
nce
are
as w
ill b
e c
on
sid
ere
d
by t
he
Ch
ief
Ope
ratin
g O
ffic
er
an
d
Exe
cu
tive
Te
am
. T
his
wo
uld
be
esca
late
d
thro
ugh
exis
tin
g g
ove
rna
nce
syste
ms if
ne
ed
ed
.
Mo
nth
ly Q
ua
lity R
ep
ort
T
he
Com
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d th
e u
pda
ted
re
po
rt in
a n
ew
form
at
pu
ttin
g m
ore
em
pha
sis
on
com
mu
nity a
s w
ell
as in
pa
tien
t a
rea
s. T
he
repo
rt w
as w
ell
rece
ive
d.
It w
as f
elt
ve
ry h
elp
ful to
ha
ve
the
assu
ran
ce
se
t o
ut
cle
arly f
or
ea
ch
are
a.
The
ne
w n
atio
na
l d
efinitio
ns o
f re
co
rdin
g p
ressu
re
incid
en
ts w
ere
exp
lain
ed
. A
ssu
ran
ce
wa
s g
ive
n o
n
su
ppo
rt t
o W
est
Vie
w In
tegra
ted C
are
Cen
tre
an
d
Ed
enb
rid
ge
and
Dis
tric
t W
ar
Mem
oria
l H
osp
ita
l.
To a
dd
ba
ck in
to t
he
rep
ort
the
ne
ed
fo
r
ha
rms o
n s
hifts
wh
en
on
e R
N w
as d
ow
n.
Qu
alit
y R
ep
ort
20
18
/19
T
he
ye
ar-
en
d p
ositio
n o
f th
e 2
018
/19 Q
ua
lity R
ep
ort
wa
s
pre
se
nte
d to
th
e C
om
mitte
e. T
he
re
po
rt h
as b
een
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
sA
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 42 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
co
nsid
ere
d b
y t
he
au
dito
rs.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s s
ou
gh
t on
th
e
follo
win
g a
rea
s:
En
d O
f L
ife
Ca
re a
ch
ieve
me
nt o
f pe
rso
na
lised
ca
re
pla
nn
ing q
ua
rte
r 4
ach
ieve
me
nt, c
om
mu
nity m
ort
alit
y
revie
ws,
Ca
re Q
ua
lity C
om
mis
sio
n r
equ
ire
me
nt n
otice
follo
win
g H
MP
(H
er
Ma
jesty
’s P
riso
n S
erv
ice
) in
sp
ection
,
pa
tien
ts a
nd
fam
ilie
s s
urv
eye
d o
n th
e r
oo
t cau
se
an
aly
sis
(RC
A)
pro
ce
ss.
Fo
rmat
of
the
Qu
alit
y C
om
mitte
e.
It w
as r
eco
gn
ise
d a
nd
ackn
ow
led
ge
d t
ha
t th
e r
ep
ort
co
nta
ine
d a
hu
ge
am
ou
nt of
exce
llen
t w
ork
th
at
ha
d
de
mo
nstr
ate
d im
pro
ve
d o
utc
om
es a
nd e
xp
erie
nce
s fo
r
pa
tien
ts u
sin
g t
he
Tru
st’s s
erv
ice
s.
The
Com
mitte
e r
ecom
me
nd
ed
ap
pro
va
l b
y t
he
Boa
rd
su
bje
ct to
co
mm
en
ts m
ade
at
the
Com
mitte
e.
Safe
med
Vis
its:
Om
itte
d
An
d D
ela
ye
d D
ose
Re
po
rt
Th
is r
ep
ort
re
qu
este
d b
y t
he
Com
mitte
e r
evie
we
d t
hem
es
an
d tre
nd
s id
en
tifie
d f
rom
mis
sed
, de
laye
d a
nd
om
itte
d
do
se
in
cid
ents
be
twe
en
Sep
tem
be
r 2
01
8 a
nd F
eb
rua
ry
20
19
. A
Qu
alit
y I
mp
rove
men
t (Q
I) a
pp
roa
ch
wa
s b
ein
g
take
n w
ith
te
am
s,
intr
od
ucin
g a
‘m
ed s
avvy’ Q
I a
pp
roa
ch
.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s r
ece
ive
d f
rom
th
e T
rust’s L
ea
d P
ha
rma
cis
t
tha
t im
me
dia
te a
ctio
ns h
ad b
ee
n p
ut
in p
lace
to
sup
po
rt
team
s a
s n
ee
ded
. T
hese
in
clu
de
d th
e p
ee
r re
vie
w
pro
ce
ss fo
r ch
eckin
g fo
rms,
imp
rove
d e
du
ca
tio
n o
n c
ritica
l
Alth
ou
gh
it w
as a
ckn
ow
led
ge
d t
ha
t th
e
nu
mb
er
of
incid
en
ts a
ga
inst
con
tacts
wa
s
low
, it w
as a
gre
ed
tha
t b
en
ch
ma
rkin
g d
ata
wh
ere
ava
ilab
le w
ill b
e s
ou
gh
t a
nd a
dd
ed t
o
the
In
tegra
ted
Pe
rfo
rma
nce
Re
po
rt.
A s
ix m
on
th f
ollo
w u
p r
ep
ort
will
co
me
ba
ck
to t
he
Com
mitte
e t
o t
rack p
rogre
ss.
Page 43 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
m
ed
icin
es a
nd
pro
fessio
na
l o
ve
rsig
ht
an
d s
upp
ort
.
The
‘m
ed
sa
vvy’ fo
rum
s w
ere
in
pla
ce
in e
ast a
nd
we
st
Ke
nt
with
the
aim
of
red
ucin
g o
mitte
d d
ose
s a
nd
imp
rovin
g m
ed
icin
e r
ou
nd
s.
It w
as r
ep
ort
ed
th
at
sta
ff w
ere
en
thu
sia
stica
lly w
ork
ing o
n t
he
le
arn
ing a
nd
imp
rove
men
ts.
Po
licie
s f
or
Ra
tifica
tio
n
The
Syrin
ge
Dri
ve
r P
olic
y w
as r
atifie
d b
y t
he
Co
mm
itte
e.
The
Ca
the
ter
Ma
na
gem
ent
Po
licy f
or
an
Adult P
atien
t w
as
ratified
by t
he
Com
mitte
e.
Le
ga
l R
ep
ort
T
his
rep
ort
co
ve
red
the
pe
riod
Jan
ua
ry t
o M
arc
h 2
019
. A
furt
he
r u
pda
te w
ou
ld b
e p
rovid
ed
by t
he
Me
dic
al D
ire
cto
r
at
the
ne
xt
mee
tin
g
wh
ere
fu
rth
er
info
rma
tion
wa
s b
ein
g
so
ugh
t.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s s
ou
gh
t o
n p
ath
wa
ys o
f ca
re w
ith
de
terio
ratin
g p
atien
ts a
nd
assu
ran
ce
wa
s r
ece
ive
d t
ha
t
this
wa
s a
Qua
lity P
rio
rity
fo
r th
e c
om
ing y
ea
r.
Th
is w
ou
ld
inclu
de
exa
min
ing if
anyth
ing f
urt
he
r co
uld
be d
one
to
ad
dre
ss th
e a
rea o
f p
ressu
re u
lce
rs le
ad
ing o
n to
sep
sis
.
The
Qua
lity T
ea
m a
gre
ed
to
lo
ok a
t h
ow
lea
rnin
g is b
ein
g c
ap
ture
d a
nd
fe
d into
th
e
Pa
tie
nt
Safe
ty A
nd
Clin
ica
l R
isk G
rou
p.
20
18
/19 P
atie
nt
Exp
erie
nce
an
d
Co
mp
lain
ts A
nn
ua
l
Re
po
rt
Ke
y t
hem
es a
nd t
rends w
ere
id
en
tifie
d w
ith
le
arn
ing
cle
arly s
et
ou
t. T
he
num
be
r of
co
mp
lain
ts c
on
tin
ue
d to
red
uce
and
the
lin
k w
ith
QI u
se
d t
o im
pro
ve
pe
rfo
rman
ce
.
It w
as a
ckn
ow
led
ge
d th
at
lo
ts o
f e
xce
llen
t w
ork
wa
s
ca
ptu
red
in
th
e r
ep
ort
with
go
od
exa
mp
les o
f ch
an
ge
s
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
sA
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 44 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
ma
de
wh
en
lea
rnin
g h
ad
be
en id
en
tifie
d .
It w
as p
lea
sin
g
to n
ote
th
e r
ed
uctio
n in P
AL
S e
nqu
ire
s fo
llow
ing t
he
imp
rove
men
ts m
ad
e b
y s
erv
ice
s.
The
Com
mitte
e r
ecom
me
nd
ap
pro
va
l of
the A
nn
ua
l
Re
po
rt a
t th
e B
oa
rd.
Clin
ica
l E
ffe
ctive
ne
ss
Gro
up
An
up
date
on
pro
gre
ss w
ith
th
e T
rust’s Q
ua
lity S
tra
tegy
wa
s d
iscu
sse
d a
nd
goo
d p
rogre
ss in
all
are
as w
as n
ote
d.
Ca
re Q
ua
lity
Co
mm
issio
n (
CQ
C)
Up
da
te
A v
erb
al u
pda
te w
as g
ive
n o
n p
ossib
le t
ime s
ca
les f
or
fee
db
ack f
rom
th
e r
ecen
t in
spe
ctio
n.
Ve
rba
l up
da
tes w
ere
giv
en
on
mo
re r
ece
nt
rep
ort
s fo
r o
the
r p
rovid
ers
wh
ere
KC
HF
T s
erv
ice
s w
ere
als
o p
rese
nt.
CQ
C r
ep
ort
s r
ece
ive
d b
y o
the
r p
rovid
ers
wh
ere
Tru
st
se
rvic
es a
re p
resen
t w
ill b
e
rep
ort
ed
to Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e.
Re
spo
nse
s
will
be
ris
k a
sse
ssed
an
d lea
rnin
g id
en
tifie
d
an
d a
ssu
ran
ce
pro
vid
ed
as r
equ
ire
d.
Te
rms o
f R
efe
ren
ce o
f
the
Qu
alit
y C
om
mitte
e
The
se
we
re c
on
sid
ere
d b
y t
he
Co
mm
itte
e a
nd
som
e
ch
an
ge
s a
gre
ed
. W
ith
th
ese c
han
ge
s t
he
y w
ere
reco
mm
en
ded
to
the
Bo
ard
.
Pip
pa
Ba
rber
Qu
ali
ty C
om
mit
tee
14
Ma
y 2
01
9
Page 45 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.4
Agenda Item Title: Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Bridget Skelton, Chair of Strategic Workforce Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Strategic Workforce Committee meetings held on 20 March and 15 May 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Bridget Skelton, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 46 of 177
ST
RA
TE
GIC
WO
RK
FO
RC
E C
OM
MIT
TE
E C
HA
IR’S
AS
SU
RA
NC
E R
EP
OR
T
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e S
tra
tegic
Wo
rkfo
rce
Com
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
20
Ma
rch
20
19
. A
ge
nd
a i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Ke
y p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Work
forc
e R
ep
ort
T
his
mon
th 1
5/1
8 k
ey m
etr
ics a
re s
tab
le o
r be
tte
r, th
is is a
ve
ry p
ositiv
e p
ositio
n a
nd
th
e m
om
en
tum
ap
pe
ars
to
be
go
ing in
th
e r
igh
t d
ire
ctio
n,
als
o e
vid
en
ced
by th
e
imp
rove
d s
taff
su
rve
y s
co
res.
Tu
rno
ve
r is
ta
ngib
ly r
ed
ucin
g p
art
ly a
s a
re
sult o
f B
IG
Lis
ten
wo
rk a
nd
Qua
lity I
mp
rove
me
nt
(QI)
hea
lth
vis
itin
g
red
esig
n.
Sta
bili
ty:
the
tre
nd is u
p (
ind
ivid
ua
ls s
tayin
g m
ore
th
an
a
ye
ar)
; h
igh
ligh
tin
g t
he
im
po
rta
nce
of
the
on b
oa
rdin
g a
nd
me
nto
rin
g w
ork
. T
he
re is n
o n
ation
al ta
rge
t. W
e h
ave
se
t
a t
arg
et
of
85
% w
hic
h is s
tre
tch
ing b
ut
rea
listic a
nd w
ill b
e
revie
we
d in
six
mo
nth
s.
Sta
rte
r num
be
rs a
re g
ett
ing c
lose
r to
le
ave
r n
um
be
rs. T
he
da
ta f
urt
he
r en
han
ce
d in
th
e f
utu
re b
y o
ve
rla
yin
g t
his
with
va
ca
ncy n
um
be
rs.
Sic
kn
ess is b
ein
g c
ontr
olle
d th
rou
gh
ro
bu
st p
roce
ss a
nd
att
en
tio
n t
o a
llevia
te s
tre
ss,
and
sup
po
rt m
en
tal h
ea
lth
Actio
ns a
nd p
rogre
ss a
ga
inst
the B
AF
Work
forc
e R
isk is t
o b
eco
me
a s
tan
din
g
ite
m o
n th
e S
WC
.
A p
ropo
sa
l to
re
du
ce
th
e r
isk r
atin
g f
rom
16
– 1
2 is t
o b
e p
resen
ted a
t th
e n
ext
SW
C.
The
re is m
uch e
vid
en
ce
to
su
pp
ort
th
e
red
uction
of
the
mo
rale
pa
rt o
f th
e r
isk b
ut
the
SW
C r
equ
este
d a
little
lo
nge
r to
tra
ck
the
im
pro
ve
me
nt a
ga
inst
the q
ua
lity p
art
of
tha
t risk.
A r
ecom
me
nda
tion
is c
om
ing t
o t
he
ne
xt
SW
C t
o r
econ
sid
er
the s
ickn
ess ta
rge
t to
se
t
it a
t a s
tre
tch
ing b
ut
rea
listic t
arg
et
in th
e to
p
qu
art
ile o
f ou
r com
pa
rato
r T
rusts
. It
will
be
revis
ed
fro
m 3
.9%
up
wa
rds b
ut
the
de
gre
e
of
str
etc
h is b
ein
g lo
oke
d a
t.
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 47 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
an
d m
uscu
loske
leta
l (M
SK
) ca
used
sic
kn
ess.
Ma
rgin
al
furt
he
r im
pro
ve
me
nt
ca
n b
e p
ossib
le, b
ut th
e c
urr
en
t
targ
et
is n
ot a
ch
ieva
ble
.
Nu
rsin
g A
ca
dem
y
Up
da
te
Stu
de
nts
are
all
no
w in
th
eir f
irst
pla
cem
ent.
Lo
st fo
ur
due
to p
ers
on
al circum
sta
nce
no
w 4
2. M
erid
ian
Ne
ws 2
0
Ma
rch
film
ed
to p
rom
ote
the
Acad
em
y o
n th
e n
ew
s,
inte
rvie
win
g b
oth
Lou
ise
and
tw
o s
tud
en
ts.
Full
tea
m in
po
st
su
ppo
rtin
g s
tude
nts
, w
ork
ing c
lose
ly w
ith
th
e O
pen
Un
ive
rsity n
ot
with
ou
t te
eth
ing c
ha
llen
ge
s. L
esso
ns a
re
be
ing le
arn
t.
Att
raction
of
the
Acad
em
y h
as p
rom
pte
d m
uch
in
tere
st
into
ho
w it
ca
n b
e e
xte
nd
ed
acro
ss a
rea
s o
f th
e T
rust.
Issu
es o
f cap
acity,
pla
ce
men
t o
ppo
rtu
nitie
s, su
pe
rvis
ion
an
d s
up
po
rt a
t a
lo
ca
l le
ve
l a
re a
ll co
nsid
era
tio
ns b
efo
re
an
y c
om
mitm
en
t.
Op
era
tion
al E
xe
cu
tive
to
de
term
ine
Str
ate
gic
re
so
urc
ing n
ee
ds a
nd
Ma
na
ge
me
nt to
prio
ritise
befo
re a
bu
sin
ess
ca
se
will
co
me
to
Ma
y S
WC
with
exp
an
sio
n
pla
ns fo
r 2
01
9 –
20
20, a
nd
be
yo
nd
.
Re
ten
tio
n U
pd
ate
R
ete
ntio
n h
as b
een
a p
rio
rity
an
d e
ffo
rt t
o a
dd
ress t
his
ha
s r
esu
lte
d in
lo
we
r tu
rno
ve
r. W
ork
on
va
lue
s a
nd
cu
ltu
re,
su
ppo
rtin
g n
ew
sta
rte
rs,
intr
od
ucin
g w
he
re
po
ssib
le f
lexib
le w
ork
ing a
nd
be
tte
r d
eve
lopm
en
t a
nd
ca
ree
r p
lan
nin
g is a
ll ha
vin
g a
po
sitiv
e im
pa
ct o
n s
taff
.
The
ou
tcom
e c
an
be
se
en
no
t o
nly
in
lo
we
r tu
rno
ve
r
figu
res b
ut a
lso
th
e S
taff
Su
rve
y o
utc
om
es a
nd
gre
ate
r
en
erg
y a
nd
po
sitiv
ity p
icke
d u
p in
sta
ff a
nd
tea
m
me
etin
gs.
Page 48 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Pro
du
ctivity a
nd
Eff
icie
ncy o
f th
e H
R
Fu
nctio
n
Usin
g t
he
Mo
de
l H
osp
ita
l d
ata
, th
e C
om
mitte
e lo
oke
d a
t
the
pro
du
ctive
ly a
nd
eff
icie
ncy o
f th
e H
R f
un
ctio
n a
nd
th
e
resu
lts w
ere
po
sitiv
e,
with
so
me
op
po
rtu
nitie
s f
or
refin
ing
ide
ntified
. F
urt
he
r w
ork
ca
n b
e d
one
to s
ho
rten
the
tim
e to
hire
bu
t n
ot
ab
out
co
st/eff
icie
ncy,
mo
re a
bo
ut ca
nd
ida
te
do
cum
en
tatio
n a
nd b
en
efitt
ing f
rom
th
e r
ete
nd
erin
g o
f
Occu
patio
na
l H
ea
lth.
The
ap
pra
isa
l co
mp
letio
n s
co
re is e
xce
llen
t. T
he
re is n
ow
a n
ee
d to
co
ncen
tra
te o
n th
e q
ua
lity o
f th
e a
pp
rais
al.
Fu
rth
er
wo
rk is a
lso
und
erw
ay t
o lo
ok a
t th
e s
tra
tegic
dire
ctio
n o
f E
du
catio
n a
nd
Tra
inin
g a
nd its
str
uctu
re.
Tim
e to
Ch
an
ge
Up
da
te
The
Sta
ff a
nd
Wellb
ein
g G
rou
p d
ete
rmin
ed
the
nee
d to
focu
s o
n m
en
tal h
ea
lth a
nd in
Ju
ly t
he T
rust
agre
ed
to
su
ppo
rt t
he
Tim
e t
o C
ha
nge
in
itia
tive
. It
s p
urp
ose
is to
red
uce
stigm
a a
rou
nd
me
nta
l he
alth
an
d r
ais
e a
wa
ren
ess.
Ove
r 1
00
Tim
e t
o C
han
ge
Ch
am
pio
ns h
ave
be
en
tra
ine
d
to c
onfid
en
tly s
ign
po
st a
nd r
un
eve
nts
to r
ais
e
aw
are
ne
ss.
On 1
6 M
ay C
ha
mp
ion
s c
om
e to
ge
the
r to
sh
are
exp
erie
nce
an
d le
arn
ing.
Po
sitiv
e o
utc
om
es w
ith
nu
mb
er
of
Ch
am
pio
ns, a
nd a
mo
un
t of
activity,
ultim
ate
ly
wo
rkin
g t
ow
ard
s r
ed
ucin
g s
ickn
ess,
de
cre
asin
g s
tre
ss a
nd
en
ga
gin
g p
eo
ple
with
su
ppo
rt.
Sta
ff S
urv
ey
Su
rve
y f
ind
ings f
or
20
18
are
ve
ry p
ositiv
e in
mo
st a
rea
s
with
so
me
sig
nific
an
tly b
ette
r sco
res th
an la
st ye
ar
an
d
Lo
ca
l A
ctio
n p
lan
s t
hen
aggre
ga
ted
are
b
ein
g d
eve
lope
d to
add
ress t
he
po
ore
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
are
as:
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 49 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
co
mpa
red t
o o
ur
na
tion
al com
pa
rato
rs. T
he
se
re
su
lts w
ill
de
mo
nstr
ate
to
sta
ff tha
t w
ha
t th
ey h
ave
to
sa
y r
ea
lly d
oe
s
ma
tte
r an
d th
at a
s a
Tru
st
we
do
lis
ten
an
d w
e d
o a
ct o
n
fee
db
ack.
The
Tru
st
ha
d a
re
sp
on
se
ra
te o
f 5
9.7
%, 2
% le
ss t
han
la
st
ye
ar
bu
t e
xce
llen
t a
ga
inst
an
ave
rage
re
sp
onse
ra
te fo
r
co
mm
un
ity t
rusts
of
53%
an
d n
atio
na
l a
ve
rage
of
45
.7%
.
The
Tru
st
sig
nific
antly im
pro
ve
d in
fiv
e k
ey t
he
me
s –
equ
alit
y,
div
ers
ity a
nd
in
clu
sio
n, im
me
dia
te m
an
age
r, s
afe
en
viro
nm
ent,
safe
ty c
ultu
re,
sta
ff e
nga
ge
men
t) T
his
de
mo
nstr
ate
s th
at th
e d
evo
lve
me
nt
cu
ltu
re p
rogra
mm
e is
co
ntinu
ing t
o h
ave
an
im
pa
ct
an
d th
e s
taff
en
ga
ge
me
nt
wo
rk h
as b
een
po
sitiv
ely
re
ce
ive
d.
When c
om
pa
rin
g t
he
ke
y q
ue
stio
ns K
CH
FT
sco
red
sig
nific
an
tly b
ette
r th
an la
st
ye
ar
in 3
5%
of
qu
estio
ns,
sig
nific
an
tly w
ors
e in
4%
of
qu
estio
ns a
nd t
here
wa
s n
o
sig
nific
an
t d
iffe
ren
ce in t
he
rem
ain
ing 6
1%
com
pa
red
to
last
ye
ar’s f
ind
ings.
•
Sta
ff f
ee
ling p
ressu
rised
to
co
me
to
w
ork
•
En
su
re tra
inin
g a
nd
deve
lop
me
nt
is
ide
ntified
an
d a
ctio
ns
•
Sta
ff e
xp
erie
ncin
g M
SK
pro
ble
ms a
s
a r
esu
lt o
f w
ork
•
Re
du
ce t
he n
um
be
r of e
rro
rs,
ne
ar
mis
se
s th
at
wo
uld
ha
ve
hu
rt s
taff
or
pa
tien
ts.
At
the
sam
e t
ime
pla
ns t
o c
on
tinu
e s
taff
e
nga
ge
men
t w
ill c
on
tinu
e a
s p
art
of
the
cu
ltu
re c
ha
nge
in t
he
Tru
st.
Op
era
tion
al W
ork
forc
e
Re
po
rt
- T
ICC
Up
da
te
- R
evie
w W
inte
r
The
Com
mitte
e d
iscu
sse
d th
e im
pa
ct
of
the
win
ter
ince
ntive
on
th
e u
se o
f b
an
k s
taff
ove
r Ja
nu
ary
an
d
Fe
bru
ary
wh
ich
is in
co
nclu
siv
e.
It
did
in
cre
ase
the
nu
mb
er
on
th
e B
an
k a
lbe
it n
ot
imp
act
po
sitiv
ely
th
e
Fu
rth
er
wo
rk is r
equ
ire
d t
o d
ete
rmin
e w
ha
t
the
in
ce
ntive
sh
ou
ld b
e a
s p
art
of
loo
kin
g a
t
sta
ffin
g n
ee
ds f
or
ne
xt
Win
ter,
and
wh
eth
er
an
y o
the
r m
otiva
tio
ns c
an
be
id
en
tified
to
Page 50 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Pre
ssu
res
pe
rce
nta
ge
fill
ra
te a
s d
em
and
wa
s h
igh
er.
The
Com
mitte
e w
as u
pd
ate
d o
n p
rogre
ss w
ith
esta
blis
hin
g s
elf-m
an
age
d t
eam
s u
nde
r th
e T
ran
sfo
rmin
g
Inte
gra
ted
Ca
re in t
he
Co
mm
un
ity (
TIC
C)
pro
ject.
A n
ew
team
is b
ein
g e
sta
blis
he
d in
Ch
arin
g m
ad
e u
p o
f a
ll o
ur
ow
n s
taff
with
Ke
nt
Cou
nty
Co
un
cil
(KC
C)
man
agin
g t
he
do
mic
ilia
ry c
are
ele
men
t. T
he
se
diffe
ren
t m
od
els
will
pro
vid
e v
alu
ab
le e
vid
en
ce
to
hig
hlig
ht
ch
alle
nge
s o
f se
t
up
, m
an
age
me
nt a
nd
co
ord
inatio
n.
en
cou
rage
mo
re o
nto
th
e B
an
k.
Sic
kn
ess A
bse
nce
Ta
rge
t/ B
en
chm
ark
ing
The
Com
mitte
e r
equ
este
d a
com
pa
riso
n b
etw
ee
n t
he
Tru
st’s S
ickn
ess A
bsen
ce
Ma
na
ge
me
nt P
roce
du
res to
NH
S E
mp
loye
rs G
uid
e.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s g
ive
n t
ha
t th
e
Tru
st
is in
lin
e, a
lbe
it w
ith
som
e m
ino
r e
nh
an
ce
men
ts o
f
gu
ida
nce
to
man
age
rs h
ow
to
su
pp
ort
sta
ff w
ith
a c
an
ce
r
dia
gn
osis
, w
ith
ca
rin
g r
esp
on
sib
ilitie
s a
nd
a m
ore
info
rma
tio
n in
the
tra
inin
g f
or
ma
na
ge
rs.
Giv
en
it
is u
nlik
ely
th
at th
ese im
pro
vem
ents
will
ha
ve
sig
nific
an
t im
pa
ct o
n r
ed
ucin
g
sic
kn
ess f
urt
he
r it w
as p
rop
ose
d to
re
vis
e
the
sic
kne
ss ta
rge
t fr
om
3.9
% to
a t
op
qu
art
ile a
mb
itio
us b
ut re
alis
tic t
arg
et.
A
pro
po
sa
l is
com
ing t
o th
e n
ext
SW
C.
E -
ro
ste
r P
erf
orm
an
ce
(Allo
ca
te in
sig
ht)
The
Tru
st
ha
s c
om
mis
sio
ne
d ‘A
lloca
te,
its e
–ro
ste
r
su
pp
lier
to r
un
an
‘in
sig
ht’ s
erv
ice
pro
vid
ing p
erf
orm
an
ce
me
asu
res a
cro
ss s
ix k
ey m
etr
ics,
hig
hlig
htin
g h
ow
we
are
do
ng n
atio
na
lly a
nd
with
ou
r p
ee
r gro
up
. T
his
is a
va
lua
ble
so
urc
e o
f da
ta to
ide
ntify
ho
t sp
ots
wh
ere
the
re a
re issue
s
with
ap
pro
va
l, u
na
va
ilab
ility
, a
dd
itio
na
l d
utie
s a
nd
unfille
d
ho
urs
, a
s w
ell
as h
igh
ligh
t b
est p
ractice
are
as t
o lea
rn
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 51 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
from
. O
pe
ratio
na
l le
ads w
ill w
ork
with
e-r
oste
r te
am
to
en
su
re m
axim
um
va
lue
is e
xtr
acte
d f
rom
the
da
ta.
Work
forc
e P
lan
D
raft
na
rra
tive
and
num
erica
l p
lan
s d
eve
lop
ed
fro
m t
he
bo
tto
m u
p b
y e
ach
of
the
se
rvic
es illu
str
ate
s fu
rth
er
en
ga
ge
men
t a
nd d
evo
lve
d r
esp
on
sib
ility
ta
kin
g in
to
co
nsid
era
tio
n b
ud
ge
ts, w
ays o
f w
ork
ing a
nd
ch
alle
nge
s
with
re
ga
rds t
o r
ecru
itm
ent.
Re
su
ltin
g in
gre
ate
r
ow
ne
rsh
ip o
f re
so
urc
e p
lan
nin
g a
nd
sta
ff m
ake
up.
NH
S I
mp
rove
me
nt
ha
s p
rovid
ed
po
sitiv
e f
ee
db
ack
ackn
ow
led
gin
g t
ha
t th
e T
rust h
as a
pla
n a
nd th
e p
lan
is o
f
a g
oo
d s
tand
ard
.
Pe
op
le S
trate
gy
Imp
lem
en
tatio
n P
lan
Re
ce
ive
d t
he
pla
n f
or
ne
xt
ye
ar
an
d r
ece
ive
d a
ssu
ran
ce
tha
t th
e P
eo
ple
Str
ate
gy a
nd
wh
at
the
Tru
st
is d
oin
g
dire
ctly lin
ks t
o t
he T
rust’s s
tra
tegy.
Bri
dg
et
Sk
elt
on
Str
ate
gic
Wo
rkfo
rce
Co
mm
itte
e
20
Ma
rch
201
9
Page 52 of 177
ST
RA
TE
GIC
WO
RK
FO
RC
E C
OM
MIT
TE
E CHAIR’S
AS
SU
RA
NC
E R
EP
OR
T
T
his
rep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e S
tra
tegic
Wo
rkfo
rce
Com
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
15
Ma
y 2
019
.
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Work
forc
e R
ep
ort
T
he
wo
rkfo
rce r
ep
ort
co
ntinu
es to
illu
str
ate
an
im
pro
vin
g b
ut
ch
alle
ngin
g p
ictu
re, h
igh
ligh
ts in
clu
de
:
- tu
rno
ve
r in
Ma
rch
saw
an
in
cre
ase
du
e t
o T
UP
E t
ran
sfe
r of
24
from
Esta
tes,
an
d a
hig
h le
ve
l o
f re
tire
es, n
orm
al fo
r th
e t
ime
of
ye
ar.
Ap
ril figu
res h
ave
re
turn
ed
to
no
rma
l le
ve
ls,
with
99
ne
w
sta
rte
rs a
nd
41
le
ve
rs.
- str
ess a
bse
nce c
on
tin
ue
s to
im
pro
ve
, w
ith
Tim
e to
Ch
an
ge
(TT
C)
no
w d
eve
lop
ed b
y a
ll se
rvic
es.
- th
e v
aca
ncy r
ate
ha
s s
ligh
tly in
cre
ase
d to
9.8
% in
Ap
ril
prim
arily
du
e t
o b
ud
ge
ted
esta
blis
hm
en
ts h
avin
g in
cre
ase
d a
nd
no
t ye
t fille
d.
- o
ccu
patio
na
l h
ea
lth
ap
po
intm
en
ts c
on
tin
ue to
be a
pro
ble
m fo
r
recru
itm
en
t, h
en
ce
clo
se
ma
na
gem
en
t of
the
co
ntr
act.
Ca
nd
idate
s fa
ilin
g t
o b
rin
g t
he
ir d
ocu
me
nts
is e
ve
n m
ore
ch
alle
ngin
g.
The
Bo
ard
Assu
ran
ce
Fra
me
wo
rk r
isk o
n W
ork
forc
e w
as
revie
we
d a
nd
assu
rance
re
ce
ive
d b
oth
on
qua
lity issu
es a
nd
mo
rale
to
sa
tisfy
a1
2H
sco
re.
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 53 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Nu
rsin
g A
ca
dem
y
Up
da
te
43
stu
den
ts s
till
on
tra
ck.
Ch
alle
nge
s in
clu
de e
nsu
rin
g t
he
rig
ht
skill
s a
re b
ein
g le
arn
t at
ea
ch
wo
rk b
ase
, a
nd
ho
w t
he
Tru
st
acco
mm
od
ate
s a
ll th
e s
tud
en
ts (
inte
rna
l an
d e
xte
rna
l) w
ith
rou
gh
ly 1
50
pla
cem
en
ts.
Le
arn
ing
fo
r fu
ture
coho
rts t
o e
nsu
re
sca
le o
f p
lacem
en
ts is p
ossib
le.
Work
forc
e f
or
the
Fu
ture
R
ece
ive
d p
ape
r se
ttin
g o
ut
initia
l w
ork
on
the
sh
ape
of
ou
r
futu
re w
ork
forc
e a
nd t
he
pla
ns t
o p
ut
tha
t in
to p
lace
. W
ork
forc
e
pla
ns to
su
sta
in th
e d
eliv
ery
of
se
rvic
es h
ave
hig
hlig
hte
d g
ap
s
in b
oth
cap
acity a
nd c
ap
ab
ility
with
actio
ns t
o a
dd
ress th
ese
issu
es.
An
Aca
dem
y B
oa
rd h
as b
een
set
up
to o
ve
rse
e th
e
de
ve
lop
me
nt
of
ca
ree
r p
ath
wa
ys,
ne
w r
ole
s a
nd
th
e
prio
ritisa
tio
n o
f ap
pre
ntice
sh
ip p
rogra
mm
es a
cro
ss t
he
Tru
st
(Ph
ysio
the
rap
y b
ein
g th
e n
ext
aca
de
my e
xp
an
sio
n).
Fu
rth
er
wo
rk is u
nd
erw
ay t
o d
esig
n a
n
ap
pro
ach
th
at fo
cu
se
s o
n n
ew
an
d
exte
nd
ed
ro
les,
skill
s a
nd
ne
w w
ays o
f
wo
rkin
g.
Mo
re w
ork
is r
equ
ire
d t
o lo
ok a
hea
d a
t
mo
de
ls a
nd
skill
s t
ha
t w
ill b
e r
equ
ire
d
to s
up
po
rt m
ore
com
ple
x p
atie
nts
.
Fu
rth
er
wo
rk o
n fu
ture
le
ad
ers
hip
mo
de
ls a
nd
skill
re
qu
ire
men
ts is a
lso
esse
ntia
l.
Work
forc
e E
qu
alit
y
Sta
nd
ard
s U
pd
ate
WR
ES
an
d W
DE
S r
epo
rts a
re d
ue in
Se
pte
mb
er.
D
ata
ga
the
rin
g,
ana
lysis
an
d a
ction
pla
nn
ing
com
es t
o th
e
Co
mm
itte
e in
Ju
ly.
He
alth
an
d W
ellb
ein
g
Up
da
te –
Tim
e to
Ch
an
ge
TT
C C
ham
pio
ns a
re t
o a
tten
d a
n e
ve
nt
on
16
Ma
y t
o s
ha
re
lea
rnin
g a
nd
in
sig
hts
. T
TC
aim
s t
o r
ais
e a
wa
ren
ess b
ut T
TC
will
als
o b
e a
sked
ho
w t
hey c
ou
ld m
ea
su
re h
ow
th
eir r
ole
s h
ave
ha
d im
pa
ct.
Page 54 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Ge
ne
ral D
ata
Pro
tection
Re
gu
latio
n (
GD
PR
)
Co
mp
lian
ce
Pro
gre
ss
TIA
A a
ud
it p
rovid
ed
‘lim
ited assurance’ in
re
latio
n to
th
e
co
nte
nt,
rete
ntio
n a
nd
de
str
uction
of
pe
rso
nne
l file
s. T
he
Co
mm
itte
e r
ece
ive
d a
ssu
ran
ce
of
actio
ns t
o a
dd
ress issue
s
inclu
din
g e
du
ca
tion
, com
mu
nic
atio
n, m
on
thly
file
re
vie
ws a
nd
the
de
ve
lopm
ent
of
a b
usin
ess c
ase
fo
r e
lectr
on
ic f
ilin
g.
Fu
rth
er
wo
rk t
o id
en
tify
ho
w w
e t
rack
su
cce
ssfu
l p
rogre
ss t
ow
ard
s
co
mp
lian
ce
.
Op
era
tion
al W
ork
forc
e
Re
po
rt
The
Ca
re Q
ua
lity C
om
mis
sio
n (
CQ
C)
requ
este
d a
pap
er
to
evid
en
ce
the
sig
nific
ant
wo
rkfo
rce
inn
ova
tio
ns t
akin
g p
lace in
the
Tru
st. W
ha
t th
is illu
str
ate
d w
as t
he
hu
ge
ra
nge
of
ch
alle
ngin
g a
nd n
ew
wa
ys o
f w
ork
ing t
he
Tru
st
ha
s a
ch
ieve
d
rece
ntly.
Th
ree
se
rvic
es u
nd
erg
oin
g p
ote
ntia
l m
ajo
r cha
nge
and
the
refo
re b
ein
g n
urt
ure
d a
re:
- E
ast
Su
sse
x S
ch
oo
l n
urs
es w
ith
se
rvic
e c
ha
nge
s
- T
he
Min
or
Inju
rie
s U
nit a
t G
rave
se
nd
tra
nsfe
rrin
g t
o D
VH
- S
exu
al H
ea
lth
in
the
we
st
an
d n
ort
h t
ran
sfe
rrin
g t
o t
he
Ma
idsto
ne
an
d T
un
bridge
t W
ells
NH
S T
rust
(MT
W).
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 55 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Actio
n L
ea
rnin
g
Se
ts/C
oa
ch
ing
Ne
two
rk
Bu
dge
t to
ad
dre
ss g
ap in
se
nio
r sta
ff d
eve
lopm
ent
resu
lte
d in
the
pro
cu
rem
en
t of
thre
e in
itia
tive
s –
De
ve
lop
men
t of
coa
ch
ing
skill
s,
actio
n lea
rnin
g s
ets
an
d 1
-1 c
oa
ch
ing. T
he
pro
cu
rem
en
t
pro
ce
ss is liv
e w
ith
th
e f
irst m
od
ule
due
to t
ake
pla
ce
in
Jun
e.
The
in
ten
t is
to
giv
e s
taff
tim
e o
ut to
im
pro
ve
pro
du
ctivity.
De
term
ine
ho
w t
he
Tru
st
co
mb
ine
s
se
lf-m
an
age
d d
eve
lopm
ent
with
str
ate
gic
prio
ritie
s.
Work
with
su
pp
liers
to
esta
blis
h m
ea
ns
of
me
asu
rin
g im
pa
ct
an
d v
alu
e.
De
fin
e h
ow
th
e m
ea
sure
s o
f su
cce
ss
are
go
ing t
o b
e b
uilt
in
to t
he
de
sig
n.
En
su
re m
ech
an
ism
s a
re in
pla
ce
to
ma
na
ge
the
con
tra
ct
we
ll, in
clu
din
g
co
mm
un
ica
tio
ns,
briefin
g,
revie
ws w
ith
on
-go
ing f
ee
db
ack, re
de
sig
n a
nd
eva
lua
tio
n.
Occu
patio
na
l H
ea
lth
Co
ntr
act
The
cu
rre
nt
con
tra
ct exp
ire
s in
Ju
ly,
giv
ing t
he
cu
rre
nt su
pp
lier
a s
ix m
on
th e
xte
nsio
n.
The
ne
w p
rocu
rem
en
t p
roce
ss s
ets
ou
t gre
ate
r cla
rity
aro
un
d
Ke
y P
erf
orm
an
ce
Ind
ica
tors
(K
PIs
) a
nd h
ow
issu
es w
ill b
e
reso
lve
d w
ith
fin
an
cia
l p
ena
ltie
s a
nd
th
e p
ote
ntia
l ea
rly c
losu
re
of
the
con
tra
ct
sh
ou
ld th
ey n
ot
co
mp
ly.
Qu
estion
s to
en
su
re the
Tru
st
tests
po
ten
tia
l sup
plie
rs u
sin
g s
ce
na
rio
s i.e
.
ou
t of
ho
urs
ne
ed
s.
Pa
yro
ll C
on
tra
ct
The
ne
w p
ayro
ll p
rovid
er
(pa
rt o
f K
en
t C
ou
nty
Co
un
cil)
is b
ein
g
clo
se
ly m
an
aged
with
fo
rtn
igh
tly m
ee
tin
gs a
nd
mo
nth
ly K
PIs
, on
an
up
wa
rds t
raje
cto
ry w
ith
a p
ositiv
e a
ttitud
e to
re
so
lvin
g
issu
es.
Page 56 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Re
cru
itm
en
t C
am
pa
ign
20
19
/20
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s g
ive
n o
n th
e p
lan
s fo
r bu
sin
ess a
s u
su
al an
d
ne
w p
lan
s f
or
recru
itm
en
t ca
mp
aig
ns f
or
the
up
com
ing y
ea
r.
Ne
w m
ark
etin
g m
ate
ria
ls,
usin
g ‘Take
a d
iffe
ren
t view’ w
eb
site
,
en
ga
ge
men
t w
ith
Ken
t su
ppo
rte
d E
mp
loym
ent,
and
wo
rkin
g
acro
ss t
he
Su
sta
ina
bili
ty a
nd
Tra
nsfo
rma
tio
n P
art
ne
rsh
ip (
ST
P)
on
Ke
nt-
wid
e in
itia
tive
s.
Usin
g a
tten
dan
ce
at o
pen
/ca
ree
r d
ays
an
d w
ork
ing m
ore
clo
se
ly w
ith
sch
oo
ls.
Lin
k u
p w
ith
Ma
tth
ew
Wrigh
t a
Tru
st
Ap
po
inte
d G
ove
rno
r fr
om
th
e H
ea
d
Tea
ch
ers
Asso
cia
tio
n.
Qu
alit
y I
mp
rove
me
nt (Q
I) r
ecru
itm
en
t
pro
ce
ss,
sco
pe s
till
to b
e d
ete
rmin
ed
an
d s
up
po
rt r
esou
rce
se
cu
red
.
Cle
ve
r T
oge
the
r M
ovin
g t
he
Big
Lis
ten
fo
rwa
rd,
ha
ve
be
en
aw
ard
ed
fu
nd
ing
from
Hea
lth
Ed
uca
tion
En
gla
nd
to
loo
k a
t w
ork
ing w
ith
Dig
ita
l
Cro
wd
So
urc
ing P
latf
orm
to
ga
the
r/de
ba
te s
taff
vie
ws o
n k
ey
issu
es c
om
ing o
ut
of
the
sta
ff s
urv
ey.
Ad
va
nce
d C
linic
al
Pra
ctitio
ne
rs (
AC
P)
up
da
te
All
dire
cto
rate
s h
ave
be
en
in
dis
cu
ssio
ns a
bou
t e
xp
and
ing
th
e
use
of
AC
Ps in
the
se
rvic
es.
A n
ation
al te
nder
is c
urr
en
tly o
n
go
ing w
he
re H
EIs
are
in
tere
ste
d in p
rovid
ing a
co
urs
e. T
he
Tru
st
is in
ten
din
g t
o e
xte
nd t
he
AC
Ps to
a m
inim
um
of
7,
4
fun
de
d b
y u
s a
nd
the
oth
ers
by t
he c
linic
al com
mis
sio
nin
g
gro
up
s (
CC
Gs).
Bri
dg
et
Sk
elt
on
Ch
air
, S
tra
teg
ic W
ork
forc
e C
om
mit
tee
15
Ma
y 2
01
9
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair’
s R
epor
t
Page 57 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.5
Agenda Item Title: Finance, Business and Investment Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Martin Cook, Chair of Finance, Business and Investment Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The reports provide a summary of the meetings that took place on 27 March and 24 April 2019. A verbal update on the meeting held on 22 May 2019 will also be provided.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Finance, Business and Investment Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
None
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒. High level position described and no decisions required.
Martin Cook, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 58 of 177
FIN
AN
CE
, B
US
INE
SS
AN
D I
NV
ES
TM
EN
T C
OM
MIT
TE
E C
HA
IR’S
AS
SU
RA
NC
E R
EP
OR
T
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e F
ina
nce B
usin
ess a
nd I
nve
stm
en
t C
om
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
27
Ma
rch
20
19
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Bu
sin
ess D
eve
lop
me
nt
an
d S
erv
ice
Imp
rove
me
nt R
epo
rt
All
ma
in c
on
tra
cts
are
sig
ne
d a
nd
typ
ica
lly t
he
se
are
pro
vin
g t
o b
e lon
g t
erm
, th
ree y
ea
rs p
lus c
on
tra
cts
, so t
ha
t
the
Tru
st
ca
n b
e c
onfide
nt
tha
t m
an
y in
co
me
str
ea
ms a
re
locke
d in f
or
the
ne
xt fe
w y
ea
rs a
nd
th
at
it c
an
pla
n
acco
rdin
gly
. T
his
is a
gre
at
resu
lt b
y t
he
Tru
st’s
ne
go
tia
tion
team
.
No
ne
the
less, th
e E
ast K
en
t R
AG
ind
ica
tor
is a
t am
be
r
refle
ctin
g t
hat
furt
he
r w
ork
is n
eed
ed
on
the
imp
lem
enta
tion
of
se
rvic
es t
o s
up
po
rt d
ischa
rge
an
d
wh
ole
syste
m f
low
. W
ork
co
ntinu
es in
re
lation
to
urg
en
t
tre
atm
ent
cen
tre
s a
nd
me
etin
gs h
ave
be
en h
eld
with
all
pro
vid
ers
to
esta
blis
h b
ase
line
s a
nd
ne
xt
ste
ps,
alth
ou
gh
no
de
cis
ion
s c
an
ye
t be
ma
de a
bo
ut lo
ca
tio
ns in
ea
st
Ken
t
in t
he a
bse
nce o
f d
ecis
ion
s o
n s
itin
g o
f A
&E
se
rvic
es.
CQ
UIN
ach
ieve
men
t in
ea
st K
ent
ha
s b
ee
n a
gre
ed
at
80
% t
ran
sla
tin
g t
o a
n in
co
me
of
£1
,43
7k.
The
re is s
om
e g
oo
d n
ew
s o
n D
isco
ve
ry O
rth
otics in
tha
t it
A t
ab
le w
ou
ld b
e p
rod
uce
d fo
r th
is r
ep
ort
in
futu
re th
at
wo
uld
sho
w t
he
am
oun
t of fu
ture
inco
me
alre
ad
y s
ecu
red
and
we
igh
ted
fore
ca
sts
aga
inst o
uts
tan
din
g t
en
de
rs t
o
giv
e f
urt
he
r a
ssu
ran
ce
aga
inst
the
in
com
e
line
s in
th
e 2
019
/20
bud
ge
t a
nd
su
bse
qu
en
tly.
A p
ap
er
wo
uld
be
pro
du
ce
d h
igh
ligh
tin
g t
he
me
asu
rab
le b
en
efits
ach
ieve
d t
hro
ugh
the
Qu
alit
y I
mp
rove
me
nt (Q
I) p
rogra
mm
e
ove
rall
so
th
at
the
Tru
st
ca
n h
elp
to
en
su
re
mom
en
tum
is m
ain
tain
ed
as a
ke
y
inve
stm
en
t fo
r o
ur
pe
op
le in
tra
inin
g a
nd
en
ga
ge
men
t.
De
nta
l se
rvic
es s
ho
uld
be
sch
edu
led
in
to
the
fu
ture
wo
rk p
rogra
mm
e fo
r a
fu
ll se
rvic
e
revie
w.
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 59 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
ha
s f
ina
lly la
nd
ed
a £
75
k c
ontr
act
with
Ma
idsto
ne
an
d
Ton
brid
ge
Wells
NH
S T
rust
(MT
W),
ha
s in
cre
ase
d
vo
lum
es in
its
re
latio
nsh
ip w
ith
Gu
ys a
nd
St T
ho
ma
s N
HS
Fo
un
da
tion
Tru
st
an
d h
as fo
und
an
eco
nom
ic u
se
fo
r th
e
vo
id s
pa
ce
at
the
ba
ck o
f th
e fa
cili
ty in
Sa
nd
wic
h.
Co
nve
rse
ly,
the
Tru
st
is s
till
wo
rkin
g w
ith
MT
W to g
et
the
op
era
tio
n o
f S
exu
al H
ea
lth
Se
rvic
es r
eso
lve
d.
An
d in
rela
tio
n to
pu
blic
he
alth
se
rvic
es,
wh
ist
the
re is n
ot
sch
edu
led
to
be
an
y r
e-t
en
de
rin
g b
efo
re M
arc
h 2
02
0,
Ke
nt
Co
unty
Co
un
cil
(KC
C)
is n
ow
to
un
de
rta
ke
a
co
mp
reh
en
siv
e r
evie
w a
s t
o th
e v
alu
e it
de
rive
s f
rom
all
the
ir c
ontr
acts
, of
wh
ich
the
Tru
st d
eliv
ers
abo
ut h
alf.
Th
e
Tru
st
is g
oin
g to
tre
at
this
exe
rcis
e a
s a
sa
les o
ppo
rtu
nity.
Fin
an
ce
Re
po
rt M
on
th
11
The
Tru
st a
ch
ieve
d a
su
rplu
s o
f £
46
64
k y
ea
r to
date
at
the
en
d o
f F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
9 a
nd
th
e C
om
mitte
e c
an
giv
e
str
on
g r
e-a
ssu
ran
ce
tha
t th
e T
rust
will
me
et a s
urp
lus o
f
£5
m a
t ye
ar
en
d.
Th
e ta
ke
-on
of
Hilt
on
Nu
rsin
g P
art
ne
rs is
go
ing w
ell.
T
he
fu
ll yea
rs C
ost
Imp
rove
me
nt P
rogra
mm
e
(CIP
) ta
rge
t of
£4
08
0k is s
till
fore
ca
st
to b
e m
et
alth
ou
gh
the
esta
tes e
lem
en
t is
still
no
t com
ple
tely
se
cu
red
so t
he
RA
G in
dic
ato
r sta
nd
s a
t am
be
r. C
ash is h
ea
lth
y a
t 5
9
da
ys e
xp
en
ditu
re e
qu
iva
len
t.
Ca
pita
l sp
en
d is e
xp
ecte
d t
o
me
et
aro
un
d 9
6%
of
the
pla
n
with
th
e v
aria
nce
due
to
failu
re t
o o
bta
in v
alu
e fo
r m
on
ey t
end
ers
on
en
erg
y
eff
icie
ncy p
roje
cts
, in
clu
din
g n
ew
EV
cha
rgin
g p
oin
ts.
The
Dire
cto
r of
Fin
an
ce
wo
uld
se
e if
the
re
wa
s a
wa
y o
f b
rin
gin
g o
ut
in t
he
na
rra
tive
in
futu
re a
roun
d p
rofit a
nd
lo
sse
s w
he
re th
e
latt
er
inclu
de
d in
ve
stm
en
ts to
se
cu
re lon
ge
r
term
co
ntr
acts
or
oth
erw
ise
re
pre
se
nte
d
inve
stm
en
ts in
Ke
nt-
wid
e p
roje
cts
an
d
initia
tive
s,
with
ou
t com
pro
mis
ing t
he
accu
racy a
nd
tra
nspa
ren
cy o
f th
e T
rust’s
acco
un
ts.
The
Com
mitte
e is a
lso
se
ekin
g c
larifica
tio
n
as t
o w
hy s
om
e c
om
mis
sio
ne
rs’ u
plif
t to
co
ve
r th
e A
ge
nd
a fo
r C
ha
nge
(A
fC)
pa
y
Page 60 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Ea
st
Su
sse
x is y
et
to s
ign
th
e n
ew
20
18
co
ntr
act
alth
ou
gh
it is s
ub
sta
ntia
lly a
gre
ed
.
aw
ard
ha
s n
ot
be
en
app
lied
.
20
19
/20 R
eve
nu
e a
nd
Ca
pita
l B
ud
ge
ts
As p
revio
usly
agre
ed
by t
he
Bo
ard
, aft
er
scru
tin
y,
the
bu
dge
ts r
eco
rd th
e T
rust
as p
lan
nin
g to
ma
ke a
su
rplu
s o
f
£2
.35
m in
20
19
/20
su
pp
ort
ed b
y £
2.2
mill
ion
of
Pro
vid
er
Su
sta
ina
bili
ty F
un
d (
PS
F)
fun
din
g.
Th
e b
ud
ge
ts h
ave
be
en
pro
du
ced
in
lin
e w
ith
pla
nn
ing g
uid
elin
es a
nd
assu
mp
tion
s a
gre
ed p
revio
usly
by t
he
Boa
rd. P
oin
ts
pre
vio
usly
ra
ise
d b
y B
oa
rd a
nd
Co
mm
itte
e m
em
be
rs h
ave
be
en
pro
pe
rly in
co
rpo
rate
d,
fo
r e
xa
mp
le p
hasin
g o
f
ca
pita
l sp
end
, in
pa
rtic
ula
r IT
spe
nd
, is
cle
are
r.
Th
ere
is
als
o a
hig
he
r d
egre
e o
f tr
an
spa
ren
cy a
bou
t th
e m
ain
ris
ks
an
d p
ote
ntia
l u
psid
es to
the
bu
dge
t. In
pa
rtic
ula
r, t
he
Co
mm
itte
e r
ece
ive
d a
ssu
ran
ce
on
ho
w t
he
issu
e o
f
va
ca
ncie
s is t
rea
ted
for
bu
dge
tin
g a
nd
pla
nn
ing p
urp
ose
s,
as t
his
is th
e b
igge
st
sin
gle
“sw
ing”
ite
m.
In e
ffe
ct,
co
nsis
ten
t w
ith
ou
r po
licy o
f de
lega
tin
g b
ud
getin
g t
o
dire
cto
rate
le
ve
l, t
he b
ud
ge
t is
ba
se
d a
rou
nd
agre
ed
co
mp
lem
en
ts th
at
are
als
o a
lign
ed
with
safe
sta
ffin
g
ratio
s. T
he
Com
mitte
e d
oe
s n
ot w
ish
to
re
du
ce
the
co
mm
itm
en
t a
nd
eff
ort
fu
lly t
o r
ecru
it t
o th
at
co
mp
lem
en
t,
alth
ou
gh
re
alis
tica
lly u
nd
ers
pe
nd o
n p
ay,
is th
en
hig
hly
like
ly t
o o
ccu
r. T
his
is th
en
refle
cte
d in
th
e p
ote
ntia
l
up
sid
es a
nd
ma
tch
ed b
y c
orr
esp
on
din
g o
pe
ratio
na
l a
nd
sta
ffin
g r
isks e
lse
wh
ere
.
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 61 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
The
Com
mitte
e r
ecom
me
nd
th
e b
ud
ge
ts f
or
the
Bo
ard
’s
fina
l ap
pro
va
l.
20
19
/20 A
nn
ua
l P
lan
S
imila
rly,
the
Com
mitte
e r
ecom
men
ds to
th
e B
oa
rd to
ap
pro
ve
sub
mittin
g t
he f
ina
l ve
rsio
n o
f th
e A
nn
ua
l P
lan
to
NH
S I
mp
rove
me
nt (N
HS
I).
Th
e p
lan
ha
s n
ow
be
en
up
da
ted in
lin
e w
ith
NH
SI
com
me
nts
on
th
e d
raft
th
e T
rust
su
bm
itte
d in
Feb
rua
ry a
s w
ell
as in
co
rpo
rating p
revio
us
co
mm
en
ts f
rom
Bo
ard
mem
be
rs. T
his
in
clu
des t
he
Tru
st’s
pla
ns to
me
et
the
na
tion
al six
we
ek d
iagn
ostic t
arg
et
in
rela
tio
n to
ch
ildre
n’s
au
dio
logy I
ncid
en
tally
, u
nlik
e m
ost
oth
er
NH
S o
rga
nis
ation
s in
Ke
nt, t
he
Tru
st’s d
raft
re
ce
ive
d
a g
ree
n R
AG
ra
tin
g f
rom
NH
SI,
co
rre
ctly,
in th
e
Co
mm
itte
e’s
vie
w,
refle
ctin
g t
he g
oo
d w
ork
of
the t
ea
m in
pu
ttin
g th
e p
lan
to
ge
the
r.
20
19
/20 C
ost
Imp
rove
me
nt
Pro
gra
mm
e P
ositio
n
We r
ece
ive
d a
n u
pd
ate
on t
he
20
19
/20
Co
st Im
pro
ve
me
nt
Pro
gra
mm
e,
wh
ich
the C
om
mitte
e a
lso r
ecom
me
nd
to t
he
Bo
ard
fo
r ap
pro
va
l. O
f th
e a
gre
ed
ta
rge
t of
£5,2
99
k o
r
2.2
% o
f th
e T
rust’s b
ud
ge
t, 2
6%
of
sch
em
es a
re f
ully
de
ve
lop
ed,
41
% a
re p
lan
s w
ell
in p
rogre
ss 2
8%
are
at
op
po
rtu
nity s
tage
an
d ju
st
7%
are
un
iden
tified,
the b
ulk
in
ea
st
Ke
nt.
Qua
lity I
mpa
ct
Asse
ssm
en
ts fo
r £3
545
k h
ave
no
w b
ee
n a
pp
rove
d b
y t
he
Ch
ief
Nu
rse (
Inte
rim
) a
nd
Me
dic
al D
ire
cto
r, £
55
1k is a
wa
itin
g a
pp
rova
l.
In
acco
rdan
ce
with
po
licy a
ny n
ew
se
rvic
es id
en
tified
or
The
Com
mitte
e w
ill r
evie
w p
rogre
ss a
ga
inst
pla
n a
s a
sta
nd
ing a
gen
da
ite
m.
In
ad
ditio
n
to d
ee
p d
ive
s u
nde
rta
ke
n in
Qu
alit
y
Co
mm
itte
e t
o h
igh
ris
k a
rea
s,
the
Co
mm
itte
e w
ill a
lso
in
ve
stiga
te in
de
pth
are
as o
r se
rvic
es t
ha
t m
ay r
ep
resen
t som
e
hig
he
r risk f
rom
a c
om
me
rcia
l o
r fin
an
cia
l
po
int of
vie
w,
pa
rtic
ula
rly,
the
tra
de
-off
be
twe
en
th
e h
igh
er
savin
gs t
arg
et
allo
ca
ted
to IT
an
d t
he p
rio
rity
th
e T
rust
giv
es t
o d
igita
l
Page 62 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
firm
ed
up
th
rou
gh
th
e y
ea
r, p
art
icu
larly in
esta
tes,
will
be
revie
we
d b
y t
he
Ch
ief N
urs
e (
Inte
rim
) a
nd
Me
dic
al
Dire
cto
r.
in its
str
ate
gy.
Se
rvic
e R
evie
w –
Ra
pid
Tra
nsfe
r of
Ca
re
Th
e C
om
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d a
n in
terim
rep
ort
fro
m th
e E
ast
Ke
nt
Co
mm
un
ity S
erv
ice
s D
ire
cto
r.
A h
uge
am
oun
t of
wo
rk h
ad
bee
n d
one
in t
he
te
eth
of
win
ter
pre
ssu
res in
re
-
en
gin
ee
rin
g t
he e
xis
tin
g s
erv
ice
s a
nd
wh
ilst
the
re w
as s
till
a n
ee
d to
do
mo
re fa
st p
rob
lem
-so
lvin
g o
n t
he
gro
un
d, a
se
rvic
e h
ad
be
en c
on
str
ucte
d th
at
wa
s d
eliv
erin
g
co
nsid
era
ble
va
lue
to
pa
tien
ts,
as s
up
po
rte
d th
rou
gh
an
ecd
ote
ra
the
r th
an
qu
an
tita
tive
da
ta t
o d
ate
. T
his
is a
co
nsid
era
ble
ach
ieve
me
nt
in a
tra
ditio
na
lly d
ifficu
lt
rela
tio
nsh
ip e
nviro
nm
en
t. T
he
re is a
sp
ecific
ou
tsta
nd
ing
fina
ncia
l risk o
f up
to £
0.5
m in
re
latio
n t
o c
are
hom
e
se
rvic
es b
ed
s.
Dis
cu
ssio
ns a
nd
wo
rk a
re o
ngo
ing t
o
esta
blis
h a
gre
ed
en
d to
end
pa
thw
ays,
co
mm
on
pro
ce
du
res a
nd
da
ta s
ets
.
Pip
pa
Ba
rbe
r, N
on
-Exe
cu
tive
Dire
cto
r a
nd
I
will
jo
intly u
nd
ert
ake
a s
erv
ice
vis
it in
Ap
ril to
ge
t a
be
tte
r fe
el fo
r w
ha
t is
ha
ppe
nin
g o
n
the
gro
und
. T
he
Com
mitte
e w
ill t
ake
an
up
da
te a
t th
e e
nd o
f th
e n
ext
qu
art
er
wh
ere
it is e
xp
ectin
g m
an
y o
f th
e o
uts
tand
ing
issue
s t
o h
ave
re
so
lved
to
ste
ad
y s
tate
and
a f
ull
se
rvic
e r
evie
w a
ga
in a
t m
id-y
ea
r.
Te
rms O
f R
efe
ren
ce
Re
vie
w A
nd
Oth
er
Bu
sin
ess
I re
po
rte
d p
ositiv
ely
to
th
e C
om
mitte
e o
n v
isits I
had
ma
de
to p
art
s o
f th
e p
rocu
rem
ent
pro
ce
ss fo
r th
e r
ep
lacem
en
t
for
the C
om
mu
nity I
nfo
rma
tion
Syste
m (
CIS
). A
s w
ell
as
we
ll-ru
n,
the
pro
cu
rem
en
t p
roce
ss is p
ositiv
ely
co
ntr
ibu
tin
g t
o im
ple
me
nta
tio
n in b
uild
ing e
nga
ge
me
nt
an
d a
Tru
st-
wid
e m
en
talit
y a
mo
ngst
ou
r p
eo
ple
and
ch
am
pio
ns f
or
the
ne
w s
yste
m.
I r
eco
gn
ise
d a
nd
th
an
ke
d
The
Com
mitte
e a
gre
ed t
o c
om
ple
te its
Te
rms o
f R
efe
ren
ce
revie
w n
ext
mo
nth
and
in p
art
icu
lar
wo
uld
co
nsid
er
fre
qu
en
cy a
nd
tim
ing o
f m
ee
tin
gs,
with
a r
eb
utta
ble
hyp
oth
esis
th
at six
mee
tin
gs a
ye
ar
mig
ht b
e
a g
oo
d b
ala
nce
be
twe
en
th
e fo
rma
l a
nd
le
ss
str
uctu
red u
se o
f co
mm
itte
e m
em
be
rs’ tim
e.
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 63 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
on
be
ha
lf o
f th
e B
oa
rd th
e c
on
sid
era
ble
in
ve
stm
ent
in t
ime
an
d e
ne
rgy t
he
50
or
so
of
ou
r pe
op
le e
nga
ge
d w
ere
ma
kin
g.
Ma
rtin
Co
ok
Ch
air
, F
ina
nc
e B
us
ine
ss
an
d I
nve
stm
en
t C
om
mit
tee
27
Ma
rch
210
9
Page 64 of 177
FIN
AN
CE
BU
SIN
ES
S A
ND
IN
VE
ST
ME
NT
CO
MM
ITT
EE
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e F
ina
nce B
usin
ess a
nd I
nve
stm
en
t C
om
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
24
Ap
ril 2
019
. A
ge
nd
a i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Ke
y p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Bu
sin
ess D
eve
lop
me
nt
an
d S
erv
ice
Imp
rove
me
nt R
epo
rt
Giv
en
th
e t
eam
’s s
ucce
ss in
lo
ckin
g in
all
of
the
Tru
st’s
ma
jor
blo
cks o
f w
ork
for
a m
inim
um
of
thre
e y
ea
rs,
the
Tru
st h
as th
e r
ela
tive
lu
xu
ry o
f a
pp
roa
ch
ing t
en
de
r w
ork
str
ate
gic
ally
, w
ith
th
e IT
T fo
r E
ast S
usse
x S
ch
oo
l N
urs
ing,
du
e in
Ma
y 2
019
, ta
kin
g p
rio
rity
. W
ork
con
tin
ue
s t
o fu
lly
imp
lem
ent
the
Rap
id T
ran
sfe
r of
Ca
re (
RT
OC
) se
rvic
e in
ea
st
Ke
nt a
nd
wh
ilst
the
com
mis
sio
ne
rs h
ave
aske
d fo
r a
rem
ed
ial p
lan
, th
e T
rust
wa
s g
ive
n a
ssu
ran
ce
th
at th
is
wa
s n
ot
ad
ve
rse
ly a
ffectin
g r
ela
tio
nsh
ips w
ith
co
mm
issio
ne
rs.
Work
con
tin
ue
s o
n u
rge
nt
trea
tmen
t cen
tre
s f
or
the
Sou
th
Ke
nt
Co
ast, w
ith
th
ree
op
tion
s u
nd
er
dis
cu
ssio
n.
The
Com
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d fu
rth
er
info
rma
tio
n a
rou
nd
the
su
cce
ssfu
l D
isco
ve
ry O
rth
otic s
ale
s w
hic
h a
pp
ea
r to
be
of
a lo
we
r vo
lum
e t
ha
n o
rigin
ally
re
po
rte
d. T
he r
ep
ort
ed
£7
5k c
on
tra
ct
with
Ma
idsto
ne
an
d T
un
brid
ge
Wells
NH
S
Tru
st
(MT
W)
is a
ctu
ally
on
ly w
ort
h £
25
k a
s y
et.
The
Tab
les s
ho
win
g o
uts
tan
din
g t
en
de
r
wo
rk w
ill in
futu
re ind
ica
te th
e s
tra
tegic
va
lue
of
ea
ch
te
nd
er
to t
he
Tru
st
an
d th
e
rea
so
n w
hy w
e a
re g
oin
g t
o b
id r
ath
er
than
no
bid
.
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 65 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
No
ne
the
less, th
e s
ale
s f
unn
el sho
ws g
oo
d o
pp
ort
un
itie
s t
o
exp
an
d fu
rth
er,
pa
rtic
ula
rly a
t M
TW
an
d G
uys a
nd
St
Tho
ma
s N
HS
Fou
nda
tio
n T
rust.
Le
sson
s le
arn
ed
fro
m
co
ntr
act n
ego
tiatio
ns
The
pa
pe
r p
resen
ted
by t
he
Bu
sin
ess D
eve
lop
men
t T
eam
em
ph
asis
ed
th
e p
art
pla
ye
d b
y r
ela
tio
nsh
ip-b
uild
ing a
nd
ma
na
ge
me
nt, p
art
icu
larl
y a
mon
gst
all
the c
om
mis
sio
nin
g
gro
up
s in
ea
st
Ke
nt, in
th
e s
ucce
ssfu
l o
utc
om
e t
o c
on
tra
ct
ne
go
tia
tion
s.
Th
e C
om
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d a
ssura
nce
th
at th
e
team
exe
rcis
ed
th
oro
ugh
sta
ke
ho
lde
r m
an
age
men
t in
term
s o
f id
en
tify
ing t
he k
ey p
eo
ple
to b
uild
ing a
nd
ma
inta
inin
g r
ela
tion
sh
ips w
ith
, in
clu
din
g r
ole
s,
ke
y
co
nta
cts
, an
d s
o o
n.
The
Com
mitte
e p
rais
ed
the
wo
rk o
f th
e
ne
go
tia
tion
team
an
d n
ote
d t
ha
t th
e T
rust
wa
s in
a s
tro
ng f
inan
cia
l a
nd
str
ate
gic
po
sitio
n g
oin
g f
orw
ard
. F
urt
he
r
co
nsid
era
tio
n w
ou
ld b
e g
ive
n a
s to
wh
eth
er
an
y s
pe
cific
too
ls m
ight
su
pp
ort
sta
ke
ho
lde
r
ma
na
ge
me
nt a
nd
cu
sto
me
r re
latio
nsh
ips
go
ing f
orw
ard
. I
n a
dd
itio
n,
tho
ugh
t w
ou
ld
als
o b
e g
ive
n a
s t
o h
ow
th
e r
ela
tio
nsh
ips t
he
Tru
st h
ad
cou
ld b
e p
ut o
n a
mo
re
su
sta
ina
ble
fo
otin
g b
y d
eve
lop
ing f
urt
he
r
rela
tio
nsh
ips w
ith
th
e n
ext
tie
r d
ow
n/r
isin
g
sta
rs o
n b
oth
sid
es.
CQ
UIN
Re
vie
w A
nd
Ou
ttu
rn
The
tota
l C
QU
IN o
uttu
rn f
or
20
18
/19
is £
2,7
39,4
45 o
r 87
%
of
the
to
tal va
lue
of
£3
,14
1,6
71,
be
tte
r th
an
fore
ca
st,
bu
t
slig
htly d
ow
n o
n la
st
ye
ar,
du
e p
rim
arily
to
a c
ap
pin
g
agre
em
en
t w
ith
Ea
st K
en
t. T
he
va
lue
of
CQ
UIN
is
red
ucin
g b
y h
alf th
is c
urr
en
t fin
an
cia
l ye
ar
to 1
.25
%. T
he
Co
mm
itte
e r
ece
ive
d a
ssu
ran
ce
th
at,
wh
ilst
this
wa
s g
oo
d
ne
ws in
te
rms o
f re
du
cin
g f
ina
ncia
l risk t
o t
he
Tru
st,
ove
rall,
th
ere
wo
uld
be n
o let
up
on
se
ekin
g t
o im
pro
ve
Page 66 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
pe
rfo
rma
nce
on
th
e th
ings t
ha
t C
QU
IN a
tte
mp
t to
ta
rge
t.
The
re w
as a
rem
ain
ing f
ina
ncia
l risk in
re
sp
ect
of
flu
imm
un
isa
tion
ta
rge
ts in
ea
st
Ken
t a
s t
he
pa
ym
ent
thre
sh
old
is in
cre
asin
g t
o 6
0%
.
Qu
alit
y I
mp
rove
me
nt
(QI)
Qu
art
erly R
evie
w
The
Com
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d a
ssu
ran
ce
tha
t th
ere
had
be
en
co
nsid
era
ble
pro
gre
ss w
ith
th
e T
rust’s Q
ua
lity
Imp
rove
me
nt in
itia
tive
. I
nve
stm
en
t ye
ar
to d
ate
ha
d b
een
low
er
tha
n e
xp
ecte
d b
eca
use
su
pp
ort
had
bee
n p
rovid
ed
by N
HS
Im
pro
ve
men
t ra
the
r th
an
an
exte
rna
l p
rovid
er:
c £
133
k h
ad
be
en
spen
t a
ga
inst a
bu
dge
t of
£3
00
k.
De
sp
ite
th
e u
nde
rsp
end
201
8/1
9, th
e f
ull
£3
00
k b
ud
ge
t w
ou
ld b
e r
eta
ine
d a
nd
is
co
mm
itte
d fo
r th
is f
inan
cia
l ye
ar
to r
efle
ct
the
im
po
rta
nce o
f th
e in
itia
tive
fo
r th
e T
rust.
Fin
an
ce
Re
po
rt M
on
th
12
The
Tru
st
met
all
its d
utie
s f
or
the
eig
hth
ye
ar
in a
ro
w.
It
ach
ieve
d a
su
rplu
s o
f £
5,0
26
k fo
r th
e y
ea
r, inclu
din
g
£2
47
4k P
SF
. T
his
wa
s £
1,8
98
k b
ett
er
tha
n p
lan
. T
he
Tru
st e
xp
ects
fu
rth
er
ge
ne
ral, in
ce
ntive
an
d b
on
us
Pro
vid
er
Su
sta
ina
bili
ty F
un
d (
PS
F)
fund
ing t
akin
g t
he
to
tal
su
rplu
s t
o £
89
02
k.
The f
ull
ye
ar’s C
ost
Imp
rove
men
t
Pro
gra
mm
e (
CIP
) ta
rge
t of
£40
80
k w
as m
et. C
ash
is
he
alth
y a
t 4
7 d
ays e
xp
en
ditu
re e
qu
iva
len
t. C
ap
ita
l sp
end
wa
s £
3,6
52
k a
ga
inst a
re
vis
ed
pla
n o
f £3
,71
6k.
Age
ncy
exp
en
ditu
re w
as a
bo
ve
tra
jecto
ry f
or
Ma
rch
bu
t w
ell
be
low
tra
jecto
ry f
or
the y
ea
r o
ve
rall.
Se
rvic
e R
evie
w –
Mu
scu
loske
leta
l
Ph
ysio
the
rap
y S
erv
ice
Th
e C
om
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d a
fin
an
cia
l re
vie
w o
f th
e
Inte
gra
ted
Mu
scu
loskele
tal se
rvic
es f
or
201
8/1
9 a
s w
ell
as
pla
ns to
ach
ieve
a b
rea
k e
ve
n r
un r
ate
by t
he e
nd o
f
The
pla
ns fo
r 2
01
9/2
0 w
ill b
e r
evie
we
d t
o
inclu
de
im
pa
ct,
tim
eta
ble
to
ach
ieve
and
critica
l su
cce
ss f
acto
rs a
nd s
ent
to t
he
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 67 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Re
vie
w
20
19
/20.
The
re h
ave
be
en
co
nsid
era
ble
challe
nge
s a
nd
ch
an
ge
s to
th
e w
ay t
he
se
se
rvic
es h
ave
be
en
co
mm
issio
ned
ove
r th
e p
ast fe
w y
ea
rs a
nd
wh
ilst
imp
rove
d o
ve
r th
e c
ou
rse
of
the la
st
ye
ar,
th
e s
erv
ice
is
still
run
nin
g a
con
sid
era
ble
deficit o
f ab
out
£1.3
mill
ion
.
Eve
ry a
rea
of
ph
ysio
the
rap
y h
as b
een
re
vie
we
d lea
din
g t
o
pla
ns to
re
du
ce
se
rvic
e o
ve
rhe
ad
s,
rede
sig
n o
f th
e c
linic
al
mo
de
l of
se
rvic
e d
eliv
ery
an
d r
ecru
itin
g t
o r
e-d
esig
ne
d
wo
rkfo
rce
pla
ns.
Com
mu
nity O
rtho
pae
dic
s h
as s
ho
wn
so
me in
cre
ase
d r
efe
rra
ls a
nd
the
re is p
ha
sed
re
cru
itm
en
t
in p
lace t
o e
xp
an
d th
e w
ork
forc
e a
ltho
ugh
re
cru
itm
en
t
ch
alle
nge
s h
ave
co
mpro
mis
ed t
he
opp
ort
un
ity t
o m
ake
the
mo
st of
pa
ym
en
t by t
ariff
op
po
rtu
nitie
s. T
he
Co
mm
un
ity C
hro
nic
Pa
in s
erv
ice
ha
s fa
ced
sig
nific
an
t
ca
pa
city issu
es. B
ut w
aitin
g t
ime
s in
ea
st
Ken
t w
hic
h
pe
ake
d a
t m
ore
th
an
26
we
eks c
urr
en
tly s
tand
s a
t six
to
twe
lve
we
eks,
wh
ich
is g
oo
d p
rogre
ss. T
he
Co
mm
itte
e
rece
ive
d s
om
e a
ssu
ran
ce
th
at th
ere
are
pla
ns in
pla
ce
to
ad
dre
ss th
e d
eficit in
20
19
/20
bu
t w
ill r
evie
w t
he
situa
tio
n
in s
ix m
on
ths.
Co
mm
itte
e o
ff-lin
e.
In
ad
ditio
n,
som
e f
urt
he
r
cla
rity
will
be
pro
vid
ed
on
th
e p
rop
ose
d
tra
jecto
ry in
te
rms o
f e
rad
ica
tin
g t
he
deficit
an
d th
ere
fore
th
e lik
ely
ou
ttu
rn a
t ye
ar
–en
d.
Ele
ctr
on
ic P
atien
t
Re
co
rd U
pda
te
A p
ap
er
wa
s p
resen
ted
sh
ow
ing t
he
ou
tcom
e o
f th
e
pro
cu
rem
ent
exe
rcis
e a
nd
se
ekin
g t
o m
ove
to
the
ne
xt
ste
p o
f cho
osin
g a
pre
ferr
ed
sup
plie
r. T
he
Com
mitte
e
so
ugh
t fu
rth
er
assu
rance
aro
un
d th
e n
atu
re o
f th
e
pa
ss/fa
il te
st fo
r co
re a
pp
lica
tio
n a
nd
ho
stin
g w
hic
h o
nly
Page 68 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
on
e o
f th
e s
up
plie
rs h
ad
fa
iled
, bu
t a
su
pp
lier
with
a m
uch
hig
he
r u
sa
bili
ty s
co
re th
an
th
e p
refe
rre
d s
up
plie
r a
nd
oth
erw
ise
ve
ry c
lose
in
th
e s
co
red
ele
me
nts
. (
Th
is w
as
su
bse
qu
en
tly p
rese
nte
d a
nd
en
do
rse
d to
pro
ce
ed
with
the
pre
ferr
ed
su
pp
lier
at
the
Boa
rd m
eetin
g t
he n
ext
da
y.)
The
Com
mitte
e w
as c
on
ce
rned
tha
t th
e g
ain
s t
ha
t h
ad
be
en
ma
de
th
rou
gh
enga
gin
g s
taff
th
rou
gh
ou
t th
e p
roce
ss
sh
ou
ld n
ot b
e c
om
pro
mis
ed
by c
ho
osin
g a
pre
ferr
ed
su
pp
lier
with
a r
ela
tive
ly lo
w u
sa
bili
ty s
co
re a
nd
th
e
Co
mm
itte
e r
ece
ive
d s
om
e a
ssu
ran
ce
ab
ou
t p
lan
s to
ma
na
ge
th
is r
isk.
Te
rms O
f R
efe
ren
ce
Re
vie
w A
nd
Oth
er
Bu
sin
ess
On
fu
rth
er
revie
w,
the
Co
mm
itte
e h
as d
ecid
ed
to
mo
ve
to
a la
rge
ly b
i-m
on
thly
patt
ern
of m
eetin
gs.
Th
is r
ep
resen
ts
bo
th t
he
fa
ct
tha
t fo
r e
igh
t ye
ars
in
a r
ow
th
e T
rust h
as
ha
d a
n e
xce
llen
t fina
ncia
l p
erf
orm
an
ce
, b
ut a
lso
an
att
em
pt
to r
eb
ala
nce
the
wo
rk o
f th
e e
xe
cu
tive
s a
nd n
on
-
exe
cu
tive
s a
little
fro
m fo
rma
l a
ssu
ran
ce
an
d r
ep
ort
ing t
o
oth
er
pa
rts o
f th
eir r
ole
s.
Th
e C
om
mitte
e a
lso
agre
ed
to
reco
mm
en
d in
co
rpo
ratin
g s
om
e a
dju
stm
en
ts to
the
Te
rms
of
Refe
ren
ce f
or
exam
ple
, to
pla
ce
mo
re e
mph
asis
on
revie
win
g b
en
efits
re
alis
atio
n a
ga
inst
pre
vio
usly
su
bm
itte
d
pla
ns a
nd
in
itia
tive
s a
nd
to
que
ry w
he
the
r su
cce
ssio
n
pla
ns a
nd
ta
len
t w
ith
in th
e F
ina
nce f
un
ctio
n w
as b
est
take
n b
y s
ep
ara
te d
iscu
ssio
n a
nd
me
etin
g b
etw
ee
n t
he
Ch
air a
nd t
he
Dire
cto
r of
Fin
an
ce
rath
er
than
ta
ke
n
The
Com
mitte
e w
ill r
evie
w p
erf
orm
an
ce
la
st
ye
ar
aga
inst
the s
pe
cific
du
tie
s in
th
e te
rms
of
refe
ren
ce t
o id
en
tify
an
y g
ap
s w
e c
an
do
be
tte
r o
n o
r cha
llen
ge
s a
s t
o w
he
the
r th
ose
du
tie
s s
ho
uld
rem
ain
at
all.
The
Te
rms o
f R
efe
rence
of
all
com
mitte
es
are
be
ing r
evie
we
d in
th
e lig
ht
of
the
Boa
rd
de
ve
lop
me
nt w
ork
be
ing d
on
e b
y E
Y/P
lum
.
Bu
t in
pa
rtic
ula
r w
e n
ee
d to
exp
lore
wh
at
is
me
an
t in
pra
ctice b
y t
he
ir r
eco
mm
en
datio
n
tha
t th
e F
BI
Com
mitte
e s
hou
ld ta
ke
ove
rsig
ht
of
pe
rfo
rma
nce
.
Fin
ance
, Bus
ines
s an
dIn
vest
men
t Com
mitt
ee R
epor
t
Page 69 of 177
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
form
ally
at
the
Com
mitte
e’s
me
etin
g.
Ma
rtin
Co
ok
Ch
air
, F
ina
nc
e B
us
ine
ss
an
d I
nve
stm
en
t C
om
mit
tee
30
Ap
ril
21
09
Page 70 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.6
Agenda Item Title: Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Peter Conway, Chair of Audit and Risk Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Audit and Risk Committee meeting held on 15 May 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Peter Conway, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Aud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitt
eeC
hair’
s A
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 71 of 177
AU
DIT
AN
D R
ISK
CO
MM
ITT
EE
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e A
ud
it a
nd
Ris
k C
om
mitte
e (
AR
AC
) m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
da
te 1
5 M
ay 2
01
9.
Are
a
As
su
ran
ce
Is
su
es
an
d/o
r N
ext
Ste
ps
An
nu
al R
epo
rt a
nd A
ccou
nts
1
) A
cco
unts
: th
e A
RA
C c
onsid
ere
d t
hese
in d
eta
il d
urin
g a
te
lecon
on 9
Ma
y 2
01
9. T
hey h
ave
be
en
pre
pa
red t
o a
hig
h s
tanda
rd a
nd t
here
we
re n
o
sig
nific
ant is
su
es. T
his
is t
he T
rust’s e
igh
th y
ear
of
deliv
ering
a s
urp
lus a
nd
va
lue f
or
mo
ne
y
2)
An
nu
al R
epo
rt: at th
e tim
e o
f th
e m
eetin
g, th
e
Re
po
rt h
ad n
ot
bee
n f
inalis
ed. T
he A
RA
C g
ain
ed
a
ssura
nce o
n th
e R
em
un
era
tion
Sta
tem
ent,
Su
sta
inab
ility
Re
po
rt a
nd A
nnu
al G
ove
rna
nce
Sta
tem
ent.
1)
Su
bje
ct to
fin
al ch
ecks b
y t
he A
uditors
(w
hic
h w
ill b
e
advis
ed t
o t
he B
oard
if
the
re a
re a
ny c
hang
es fro
m th
e
ve
rsio
n c
on
sid
ere
d b
y A
RA
C),
th
e A
cco
unts
are
re
com
me
nd
ed f
or
appro
va
l 2
) P
rovid
ed
th
e B
oard
is h
ap
py w
ith
th
e A
nnu
al R
epo
rt,
the A
RA
C r
eco
mm
end
s its
appro
va
l in
clu
din
g t
he A
nnu
al
Go
ve
rnan
ce S
tate
me
nt.
Ris
k M
ana
gem
ent
1)
Bo
ard
Assura
nce
Fra
me
wo
rk (
BA
F):
deta
iled
action
s s
ho
uld
be fo
rwa
rd lo
okin
g w
ith
co
mp
lete
d
action
s d
ele
ted
2)
Ris
k A
ppetite
: th
e A
RA
C a
gre
ed
with
th
e
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Com
mitte
e d
iscu
ssio
ns o
n p
urp
ose,
sco
pe
, b
en
efits
and
alig
nm
ent w
ith
th
e B
oard
d
eve
lopm
ent
pro
gra
mm
e
3)
Ris
k M
ana
gem
ent S
tra
teg
y a
nd
Po
licy: fu
rth
er
am
en
dm
ents
we
re s
ug
ge
ste
d.
1)
the B
AF
will
re
ceiv
e f
urt
her
enh
an
cem
ents
in
clu
din
g
how
Bo
ard
su
b-c
om
mitte
es w
ill g
ain
assura
nce o
n t
he
hig
hest risks
2)
Ms N
ata
lie D
avie
s,
Co
rpo
rate
Se
rvic
es D
ire
cto
r to
d
eve
lop p
rop
osals
on r
isk a
pp
etite
deve
lopm
ent n
ext
ste
ps
3)
Th
e R
isk M
ana
ge
me
nt
Str
ate
gy a
nd P
olic
y w
ill b
e r
e-
writt
en t
o m
ake it m
ore
use
r-fr
iend
ly,
refle
ct cu
rren
t g
ove
rna
nce a
rra
ng
em
ents
and d
iffe
rentia
te b
etw
een
str
ate
gy,
polic
y a
nd
pro
ce
ss. It w
ill a
lso
be
alig
ned
with
risk a
pp
etite
de
ve
lopm
ent,
Aud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitt
eeC
hair’
s A
ssur
ance
Rep
ort
Page 72 of 177
Are
a
As
su
ran
ce
Is
su
es
an
d/o
r N
ext
Ste
ps
Cyb
er
Se
curity
C
urr
ent sta
te a
nd
ong
oin
g a
ssu
rance
we
re
co
nsid
ere
d. T
here
is s
om
e v
ery
go
od
wo
rk g
oin
g
on a
nd
th
e T
rust ca
n b
uild
on
its
go
od p
rog
ress to
date
.
1)
Th
e A
ssu
ran
ce D
ashbo
ard
will
be f
urt
her
deve
lope
d
pro
vid
ing
add
itio
na
l d
eta
il o
n w
hat
by w
hen
2
) T
hird lin
e o
f d
efe
nce a
ssu
ran
ce w
ill b
e c
onsid
ere
d a
t a
futu
re m
eeting
3
) T
here
will
be a
de
ep d
ive
on
busin
ess r
esili
ence
in
Au
gu
st
201
9
4)
Th
ere
will
be a
de
ep d
ive
on
th
ird
part
y r
isks in
D
ecem
ber
201
9.
De
leg
ate
d A
uth
ority
and
E
mp
ow
erm
ent
Th
e A
RA
C id
en
tifie
d in
sta
nce
s w
here
loca
l a
ctions
had
led
to f
inan
cia
l lo
ss. T
his
le
d t
o d
iscu
ssio
n o
f d
evo
lution
, e
mp
ow
erm
en
t, c
entr
alis
ation
, lo
cal
respo
nsib
ilitie
s a
nd
au
tho
rities, e
tc.
Th
e A
RA
C w
ill c
onsid
er
how
best
to g
ain
assura
nce
th
at
De
leg
ate
d A
uth
ority
and
em
po
we
rme
nt is
bein
g d
one
eff
ective
ly.
Pe
ter
Co
nw
ay
Ch
air
, A
ud
it a
nd
Ris
k C
om
mit
tee
Ma
y 2
01
9
Page 73 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.8
Agenda Item Title: Integrated Performance Report Part One
Presenting Officer: Gordon Flack, Director of Finance and Executive Directors
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The Integrated Performance Report is presented with the use of Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts. The use of these charts has been presented and agreed through the Executive Team, as well as the revised summary scorecard. It should be noted that the full Finance, Workforce and Quality reports are presented at their respective committees. The report has been produced in collaboration with the Executive Team and their support teams. This report contains the following sections:
• Corporate Scorecard and Summary
• Quality Report
• Workforce Report
• Finance Report
• Operational Report
Historic data has been provided to show trends, with the SPC charts being used to show a rolling 2 year view of performance for each indicator. Upper and Lower control limits are used to indicate a shift in performance over a sustained period and to highlight where performance deviates from these expected ranges. Key Highlights from report A KPI review is in still in process for the indicators included within the corporate scorecard to ensure all the metrics are still relevant with realistic targets and new indicators are added to ensure our business objectives and quality goals are represented. Further changes are expected in the coming months. Changes made this month are:
• Pressure Ulcers KPI, previously Grades 3/4, re-worked in line with national guidance to be reported as all grades attributable to lapses in care
• Rapid Transfer Excess Bed Days (KPIs 3.6) re-named (previously named EK Home First)
Within NHS Improvement's Single Oversight Framework, KCHFT was moved from segment 1 to segment 2. This level is categorised as "targeted support offer" (segment 1 is "maximum autonomy"). The move from segment 1 to segment 2 was
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 74 of 177
as a result of deterioration in performance in RTT and 6 week diagnostics and while RTT is now meeting target, 6 week diagnostics is failing to meet the 1% standard consistently (99% of the waiting list under 6 weeks). See the operations section for details of actions to improve performance to meet the 1% standard and move KCHFT back to segment 1 planned for June 2019 There are 10 KPIs moving favourable in month and 10 moving unfavourably whilst 27 are in normal variation. There are 8 KPIs consistently failing target including the two system targets tracked of A&E wait times at MTW and EKUFT. The others are:
• KPI 1.1 Stop smoking at 84.6% with some improvement with the model under review
• KPI 1.2 Health checks carried out at 87.8% but with strong positive improvement
• KPI 2.8 Contract activity at 97.8% for 2018-19 and activity targets have been rebased for 2019-20 where necessary e.g. reflecting changes in service model and demography.
• KPI 4.1 Percentage of LTC/ICT Face to Face Contacts carried out in a clinic (target to increase) at 3.7% against 5% target and a measure that is under review for its usefulness.
• KPI 5.3 Turnover (planned and unplanned) at 17.3% against 16.5% target and hovering around the lower control limit.
• KPI 5.6 Stability (% of workforce who have been with the trust for 12 months or more) at 84.7% marginally below the 85% target.
Of the 9 indicators not measured by SPC charts 7 are achieving target and the two that have not are KPI 3.3 CQUIN for Q4 18-19 meeting 86.6% and KPI 2.18 Research: Participants recruited to national portfolio studies with only 18 in April against a 300 annual target or 25 per month which represents a stretch target as performance has historically been good. Quality
• 4 lapses in care identified and pending investigation which
resulted in patients developing pressure ulcer.
• Pressure ulcers identified as Category 2; Category 3. Category
4 and ungradable. The Category 4 is under investigation to
determine whether it meets the serious incident criteria.
• There was one serious incident reported in April for Canterbury
Community Nursing Team relating to a pressure ulcer incident
during March.
• Majority of incidents reported due to ‘administration or supply of
a medicine from a clinical area’.
Workforce
• Increase in turnover in March 2019 but since dropped back to
previous levels. March increase was due to TUPE transfer.
Page 75 of 177
• Sickness absence in March dropped to 3.71% with slight
increase in April to 3.85%.
• Vacancy rates have increased to 9.68% in April.
• An increase in bank shift requests over the last year.
Finance
• £231k of savings for April 19 against risk rated plan of £438k.
£207k behind target.
• Capital Expenditure spend to April was £132k against YTD plan
£169k (78% achieved)
• End of April the Trust achieved surplus £216k (1.1%)
Operations
• NHS Health Checks and Stop Smoking Quits now showing
period of positive variation following recalculation of Control
limits due to new data system.
• New birth visits appears to be experiencing the beginning of an
adverse trend with month 12 below target hoping this will
improve following data cleanse (currently 89%)
• Referral to treatment incomplete wait times for consultant-led
services performing well with 96.4% of waits are now below 18
weeks with the average is 20.8 weeks.
• Audiology 6 week diagnostics has been performing above the
mean for the last 8 months. Although recently marginally below
the challenging 99% target within 6 weeks. The Audiology team
currently has 11.8% of clinical staff on maternity leave and 21%
on term time only contracts. 1 permanent member of staff has
been recruited with another audiologist for the Bank. A tracking
process has also been implemented to forecast and prevent
breaches.
• The End of Life indicator is new for 18/19 with no data available
prior to April 2018. Performance for the year to date equates to
39.7% with the care planning window being monitored and
performance is improving achieving target for first time in M12.
• Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOCs) KCHFT target to reduce to
average 7 per day in East & West Kent which is a rate of 9.5%.
Position has improved month on month with M12 above target at
11.1%.
• Looked After Children the Initial Health Assessment is achieving
target most months. Performance is variable due to late
requests from KCC. The Review Health Assessment has met
target and improving.
• Bed Occupancy is showing varying trend but with no cause for
concern. Months 5-7 and 9 were below target and lower than
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 76 of 177
mean level of occupancy. With improvement to the M10-12
position above mean the dip in performance does not indicate a
concern at this stage.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to note this report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Not Applicable
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Nick Plummer, Assistant Director of Performance and Business Intelligence
Tel: 01233 667722
Email: [email protected]
Page 77 of 177
Integrated
Perform
ance Rep
ort 2
019/20
May 2019 repo
rt
Part One
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 78 of 177
Con
tent
s
P
age
3
P
age
4
Glo
ssar
y of
Ter
ms
Ass
uran
ce o
n St
rate
gic
Goa
ls
Pag
e 5-
8
Cor
pora
te S
core
card
Pag
e 9-
14
Q
ualit
y R
epor
t
Pa
ge 1
5-20
Wor
kfor
ce R
epor
t P
age
21
F
inan
ce R
epor
t
Pa
ge 2
2-36
Ope
ratio
nal R
epor
t P
age
37
A
ppen
dix
1 –
SPC
Cha
rts
Page 79 of 177
Glo
ssar
y of
Ter
ms
SPC
– S
tatis
tical
Pro
cess
Con
trol
LTC
– L
ong
Term
Con
ditio
ns N
ursi
ng S
ervi
ce
ICT
– In
term
edia
te C
are
Ser
vice
Qua
lity
Scor
ecar
d –
Wei
ghte
d m
onth
ly ri
sk ra
ted
qual
ity s
core
card
s
C.D
iff –
Clo
strid
ium
Diff
icile
MR
SA –
Met
hici
llin
Res
ista
nt S
taph
yloc
occu
s A
ureu
s
MIU
– M
inor
Inju
ry U
nit
RTT
– R
efer
ral t
o Tr
eatm
ent
GU
M –
Gen
itour
inar
y M
edic
ine
CQ
UIN
– C
omm
issi
onin
g fo
r Qua
lity
and
Inno
vatio
n
MTW
– M
aids
tone
and
Ton
brid
ge W
ells
NH
S T
rust
WTE
– W
hole
Tim
e E
quiv
alen
t
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 80 of 177
Non
-SPC
KPI
on
targ
etN
on-S
PC K
PI p
erfo
rman
ce u
nder
revi
ewN
on-S
PC K
PI o
ff ta
rget
Spec
ial C
ause
Not
e - t
his
indi
cate
s th
at s
peci
al c
ause
var
iatio
n is
occ
urrin
g in
a K
PI,
with
the
varia
tion
bein
g in
a fa
vour
able
dire
ctio
n.
Hig
h ( H
)spe
cial
cau
se n
ote
indi
cate
s th
at v
aria
tion
is u
pwar
ds in
a K
PI w
here
per
form
ance
is id
eally
abo
ve a
targ
et li
ne e
.g. N
ew B
irth
Vis
its. L
ow (L
) spe
cial
cau
se n
ote
is w
here
the
varia
nce
is d
ownw
ards
for a
bel
ow ta
rget
KP
I e.g
. DN
A R
ate.
1.0
Ass
uran
ce o
n St
rate
gic
Goa
ls
Spec
ial C
ause
Con
cern
- th
is in
dica
tes
that
spe
cial
cau
se v
aria
tion
is o
ccur
ring
in a
KP
I, w
ith th
e va
riatio
n be
ing
in a
n ad
vers
e di
rect
ion.
Lo
w ( L
) spe
cial
cau
se c
once
rn in
dica
tes
that
var
iatio
n is
dow
nwar
ds in
a K
PI w
here
per
form
ance
is id
eally
abo
ve a
targ
et li
ne e
.g. N
ew
Birt
h V
isits
. Hig
h sp
ecia
l cau
se c
once
rn (H
) is
whe
re th
e va
rianc
e is
upw
ards
for a
bel
ow ta
rget
line
KP
I e.g
. DN
A R
ate
Ove
rall,
of t
he 4
1 in
dica
tors
that
we
are
able
to p
lot o
n a
stat
istic
al p
roce
ss c
ontro
l (SP
C) c
hart,
24.
4% a
re e
xper
ienc
ing
favo
urab
le in
-mon
th v
aria
tion
(10,
KPI
s 1.
1, 1
.2, 2
.5, 2
.8, 2
.9, 2
.24,
3.4
, 3.6
, 5.4
and
5.6
), 9.
8% a
re s
how
ing
in- m
onth
adv
erse
var
ianc
e (4
, KPI
s 2.
15, 2
.21,
4.3
and
4.4
) and
the
rem
aini
ng 6
5.9%
(27)
are
sho
win
g no
rmal
var
iatio
n.
26.8
% o
f the
KPI
s ar
e co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
targ
et (K
PIs
1.4,
2.1
2, 2
.13,
2.1
6, 2
.19,
2.2
0, 2
.23,
3.2
, 4.3
, 4.5
and
19
.5%
(KPI
s 1.
1, 1
.2, 2
.8, 3
.5, 3
.7, 4
.1, 5
.3 a
nd 5
.6) a
re c
onsi
sten
tly fa
iling
,
w
ith th
e re
mai
ning
53.
7% v
aria
bly
achi
evin
g ta
rget
with
no
trend
of c
onsi
sten
t ach
ieve
men
t/fai
lure
.
Of t
he 9
indi
cato
rs w
here
an
SPC
cha
rt is
not
app
ropr
iate
, 77.
8% (7
) hav
e ac
hiev
ed th
e in
-mon
th ta
rget
.
With
in N
HS
Impr
ovem
ent's
Sin
gle
Ove
rsig
ht F
ram
ewor
k, K
CH
FT h
ave
been
mov
ed fr
om s
egm
ent 1
to s
egm
ent 2
. Thi
s le
vel i
s ca
tego
rised
as
"tar
gete
d su
ppor
t offe
r" (s
egm
ent 1
is "
max
imum
aut
onom
y").
The
mov
e fr
om s
egm
ent 1
to s
egm
ent 2
is a
s a
resu
lt of
det
erio
ratio
n in
per
form
ance
in R
TT a
nd 6
wee
k di
agno
stic
s an
d w
hile
RTT
is n
ow m
eetin
g ta
rget
, 6 w
eek
diag
nost
ics
is fa
iling
to m
eet t
he 1
%
stan
dard
(99%
of t
he w
aitin
g lis
t und
er 6
wee
ks).
See
the
oper
atio
ns s
ectio
n fo
r det
ails
of a
ctio
ns to
impr
ove
perf
orm
ance
to m
eet t
he 1
% s
tand
ard
and
mov
e K
CH
FT b
ack
to s
egm
ent 1
.
0%20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Preven
t Ill He
alth
Deliver high‐qu
ality
care at
home an
d in th
e commun
ity
Integrate Services
Develop
Sustainab
le Services
Be The
Best E
mployer
Favourable Variance KP
Is (%
)
0%20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Preven
t Ill Health
Deliver high‐qu
ality
care at
home an
d in th
e commun
ity
Integrate Services
Develop
Sustainab
le Services
Be The
Best E
mployer
Common
Variance KP
Is (%
)
0%20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Preven
t Ill He
alth
Deliver high‐qu
ality
care
at hom
e an
d in th
ecommun
ity
Integrate Services
Develop
Sustainab
leServices
Be The
Best E
mployer
Adverse Va
riance KP
Is (%
)
Page 81 of 177
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
1.1
Sto
p Sm
okin
g - 4
wee
k Q
uitte
rsM
arch
201
984
.6%
Fail
100%
71%
83%
96%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g hi
gh p
ositi
ve v
aria
tion,
w
ith th
e la
st 9
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g ab
ove
the
mea
n
KPI i
s cu
rren
tly u
nlik
ely
to m
eet t
arge
t with
out
a pr
oces
s ch
ange
with
the
uppe
r con
trol l
imit
belo
w th
e ta
rget
leve
l
KPI
1.2
Hea
lth C
heck
s C
arrie
d O
ut
Mar
ch 2
019
87.8
%Fa
il10
0%60
%74
%88
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
a pe
riod
of p
ositi
ve
spec
ial c
ause
var
iatio
n w
ith th
e la
st 7
mon
ths
mov
ing
in a
pos
itive
tren
d
KPI i
s cu
rren
tly u
nlik
ely
to m
eet t
arge
t with
out
a pr
oces
s ch
ange
with
the
uppe
r con
trol l
imit
at th
en ta
rget
leve
l
KPI
1.3
Hea
lth V
isiti
ng -
New
Birt
h Vi
sits
Und
erta
ken
by 1
4 da
ysM
arch
201
989
.0%
90%
89%
92%
96%
KPI w
ill m
ostly
ach
ieve
targ
et b
ut th
e co
ntro
l lim
its in
dica
te th
at fa
iling
the
targ
et is
a
poss
ibilt
y w
ithin
the
curr
ent p
roce
ss
KPI
1.4
Hea
lth V
isiti
ng -
6-8
wee
k ch
eck
unde
rtak
en b
y 8
wee
ksM
arch
201
987
.0%
80%
85%
90%
94%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et w
ith
the
low
er li
mit
abov
e th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
faili
ng to
mee
t the
targ
et is
unl
ikel
y to
occ
ur.
KPI
1.5
(N) S
choo
l Hea
lth -
Rec
eptio
n C
hild
ren
Scre
ened
for
Hei
ght a
nd W
eigh
tA
pril
2019
94.0
%90
% (y
ear
end)
KPI i
s cu
mul
ativ
e th
roug
h th
e sc
hool
yea
rKP
I has
ach
ieve
d th
e ta
rget
for t
he 1
8/19
sc
hool
Yea
r
KPI
1.6
(N) S
choo
l Hea
lth -
Year
6
Chi
ldre
n Sc
reen
ed fo
r Hei
ght a
nd
Wei
ght
Apr
il 20
1993
.7%
90%
(yea
r en
d)KP
I is
cum
ulat
ive
thro
ugh
the
scho
ol y
ear
KPI h
as a
chie
ved
the
targ
et fo
r the
18/
19
scho
ol Y
ear
KPI
1.7
LTC
/ICT
- Adm
issi
ons
Avoi
danc
e (u
sing
agr
eed
crite
ria)
Mar
ch 2
019
6385
5257
4414
5778
7142
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
1.8
% L
TC/IC
T pa
tient
s th
at h
ad
at le
ast o
ne v
isit
whi
ch A
void
ed a
H
ospi
tal A
dmis
sion
Mar
ch 2
019
18.8
%15
.0%
12.8
%16
.6%
20.5
%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
Met
ric
18/1
9 YT
D
Actu
al
18/1
9 YT
D
Targ
etK
PI 2
.1 N
umbe
r of T
eam
s w
ith a
n Am
ber o
r Red
Qua
lity
Scor
ecar
d R
atin
g M
arch
201
90
16
8Th
ere
have
bee
n 6
Ambe
r/Red
ratin
gs fo
r the
fin
anci
al y
ear t
o da
te w
ith A
pril
(2) b
eing
the
high
est m
onth
KPI
2.2
(N) N
ever
Eve
nts
Apr
il 20
190
00
0N
o ne
ver e
vent
s ex
perie
nced
this
yea
r. La
st
even
t in
Dec
embe
r 201
6
KPI
2.3
(N) I
nfec
tion
Con
trol
: C.D
iffA
pril
2019
00
10
Last
cas
e in
Jan
uary
201
9
KPI
2.4
(N) I
nfec
tion
Con
trol
: MR
SA
case
s w
here
KC
HFT
pro
vide
d ca
reA
pril
2019
00
40
4 ca
ses
in 2
018-
19 (O
ne in
eac
h of
Apr
il,
Augu
st, S
epte
mbe
r and
Oct
ober
)
Ken
t Com
mun
ity H
ealth
NH
S Fo
unda
tion
Trus
t - C
orpo
rate
Sco
reca
rd
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
1. Prevent Ill Health
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
*NO
TE: N
atio
nal T
arge
ts a
re d
enot
ed b
y (N
) in
the
KPI
nam
e2. Deliver high-quality care at home and in
the community
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 82 of 177
Ken
t Com
mun
ity H
ealth
NH
S Fo
unda
tion
Trus
t - C
orpo
rate
Sco
reca
rd*N
OTE
: Nat
iona
l Tar
gets
are
den
oted
by
(N) i
n th
e K
PI n
ame
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
2.5
Inpa
tient
Fal
ls (M
oder
ate
and
Seve
re H
arm
) per
100
0 O
ccup
ied
Bed
Day
sA
pril
2019
0.00
0.19
-0.1
80.
040.
25KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
pos
itive
var
iatio
n, w
ith
the
last
10
mon
ths
expe
rienc
ing
no m
oder
atre
an
d se
vere
falls
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.6
Avo
idab
le P
ress
ure
Ulc
ers
- La
pses
in C
are
Apr
il 20
194
1-1
.71.
64.
9KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
.
KPI
2.7
Per
cent
age
of E
nd o
f Life
pa
tient
s w
ith a
n up
date
d Pe
rson
alis
ed C
are
Plan
(PC
P)A
pril
2019
60.4
%60
.0%
Cur
rent
ly to
o fe
w d
ata
poin
ts to
plo
t an
SPC
ch
art
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et, w
ith s
igns
of
impr
ovem
ent.
This
KPI
is a
new
targ
et a
nd
data
col
lect
ion.
See
Ope
ratio
nal R
epor
t for
m
ore
deta
il
KPI
2.8
Con
trac
tual
Act
ivity
: YTD
as
% o
f YTD
Tar
get
Mar
ch 2
019
97.8
%10
0.0%
95.8
%97
.8%
99.8
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
high
pos
itive
var
iatio
n,
with
the
last
10
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g ab
ove
the
mea
n
KPI w
ill c
onsi
sten
tly fa
iling
the
targ
et, w
ith th
e up
per l
imit
belo
w th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
achi
evem
ent i
s lik
ely
to b
e do
wn
to c
hanc
e w
ithou
t a p
roce
ss o
r tar
get c
hang
e
KPI
2.9
Tru
stw
ide
Did
Not
Atte
nd
Rat
e: D
NAs
as
a %
of t
otal
act
ivity
Mar
ch 2
019
3.1%
4.0%
3.1%
3.6%
4.1%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g lo
w p
ositi
ve v
aria
tion,
with
th
e la
st 7
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g be
low
the
mea
n
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs.H
owev
er, t
he ta
rget
is n
ear t
he
uppe
r lim
it su
gges
ting
failu
re to
mee
t tar
get i
s un
likel
y.
KPI
2.1
0 LT
C/IC
T R
espo
nse
Tim
es
Met
(%) (
requ
ired
time
varie
s by
pa
tient
)M
arch
201
998
.4%
95.0
%95
.0%
96.9
%98
.8%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs, a
lthou
gh fa
ilure
is u
nlik
ely
with
th
e ta
rget
mar
gina
lly a
bove
the
low
er li
mit
KPI
2.1
1 Pe
rcen
tage
of R
apid
R
espo
nse
Con
sulta
tions
sta
rted
w
ithin
2hr
s of
refe
rral
acc
epta
nce
Mar
ch 2
019
96.4
%95
.0%
88.9
%94
.8%
100.
7%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
2.1
2 (N
) Tot
al T
ime
in M
IUs:
Le
ss th
an 4
hou
rsM
arch
201
999
.5%
95.0
%99
.5%
99.8
%10
0.1%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et w
ith
the
targ
et s
igni
fican
tly b
elow
the
low
er li
mit
KPI
2.1
3 (N
) Con
sulta
nt L
ed 1
8 W
eek
Ref
erra
l to
Trea
tmen
t (R
TT) -
In
com
plet
e Pa
thw
ays
Mar
ch 2
019
95.9
%92
.0%
92.5
%95
.0%
97.6
%KP
I is
now
sho
win
g no
rmal
var
iatio
n fo
llow
ing
a pe
riod
of n
egat
ive
varia
tion
belo
w th
e m
ean
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et w
ith
the
low
er li
mit
abov
e th
e ta
rget
, sug
gest
ing
failu
re to
mee
t tar
get i
s an
unl
ikel
y ev
ent.
KPI
2.1
4 (N
) Con
sulta
nt L
ed 1
8 W
eek
Ref
erra
l to
Trea
tmen
t (R
TT) -
W
aitin
g Li
st S
ize
(>18
wee
ks)
Mar
ch 2
019
216
532
9437
064
6KP
I is
now
sho
win
g no
rmal
var
iatio
n fo
llow
ing
a pe
riod
of n
egat
ive
varia
tion
belo
w th
e m
ean
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.1
5 AH
P (N
on-C
onsu
ltant
Led
) R
efer
ral t
o Tr
eatm
ent T
imes
(RTT
) M
arch
201
989
.5%
92.0
%90
.6%
93.8
%97
.1%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g lo
w a
dver
se v
aria
tion
with
th
e la
st 1
1 m
onth
s be
low
the
mea
n, a
lthou
gh
show
ing
sign
s of
impr
ovem
ent
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.1
6 (N
) Acc
ess
to G
UM
: with
in
48 h
ours
Mar
ch 2
019
100.
0%10
0.0%
100.
0%10
0.0%
100.
0%
Con
sist
ently
mee
ting
targ
et. F
ailu
re to
mee
t ta
rget
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
a c
hanc
e ev
ent
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge.
Has
met
targ
et fo
r th
e la
st 5
yea
rs
KPI
2.1
7 Le
ngth
of C
omm
unity
H
ospi
tal I
npat
ient
Sta
y (M
edia
n Av
erag
e)
Mar
ch 2
019
22.7
21.0
15.0
20.3
25.6
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.1
8 R
esea
rch:
Par
ticip
ants
re
crui
ted
to n
atio
nal p
ortfo
lio
stud
ies
(Yea
r to
Dat
e)A
pril
2019
1830
0KP
I is
cum
ulat
ive
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et o
f 75
per q
uarte
r
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
2. Deliver high-quality care at home and in the community
Page 83 of 177
Ken
t Com
mun
ity H
ealth
NH
S Fo
unda
tion
Trus
t - C
orpo
rate
Sco
reca
rd*N
OTE
: Nat
iona
l Tar
gets
are
den
oted
by
(N) i
n th
e K
PI n
ame
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
2.1
9 Pe
rcen
tage
of p
atie
nt
goal
s ac
hiev
ed u
pon
disc
harg
e fo
r pl
anne
d an
d th
erap
y se
rvic
esM
arch
201
991
.2%
80.0
%85
.8%
90.6
%95
.4%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
sig
nifc
antly
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Th
is w
ould
mea
n fa
ilure
to m
eet t
arge
t wou
ld
likel
y be
due
to c
hanc
e
KPI
2.2
0 (N
) Frie
nds
and
Fam
ily -
Perc
enta
ge o
f Pat
ient
s w
ho w
ould
R
ecom
men
d K
CH
FTA
pril
2019
97.6
%95
.0%
95.4
%97
.1%
98.7
%KP
I is
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng th
e ta
rget
as
the
low
er li
mit
is a
bove
the
targ
et. T
his
sugg
ests
fa
iling
to m
eet t
arge
t is
an u
nlik
ely
even
t.
KPI
2.2
1 Fr
iend
s an
d Fa
mily
Tes
t (P
atie
nts
surv
eyed
for M
IUs
&
Com
m. H
osp)
- R
espo
nse
Rat
eA
pril
2019
15.4
%20
.0%
11.7
%16
.8%
21.8
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
adv
erse
var
iatio
n w
ith
the
last
8 m
onth
s pe
rform
ing
belo
w th
e m
ean
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.2
2 C
linic
al A
udit:
% o
f aud
it re
com
men
datio
ns im
plem
ente
d by
de
adlin
eA
pril
2019
72.0
%45
.0%
49.8
%75
.7%
101.
7%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
2.2
3 (N
) NIC
E Te
chni
cal
Appr
aisa
ls re
view
ed b
y re
quire
d tim
e sc
ales
follo
win
g re
view
Apr
il 20
1910
0.0%
100.
0%10
0.0%
100.
0%10
0.0%
Con
sist
ently
mee
ting
targ
et. F
ailu
re to
mee
t ta
rget
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
a c
hanc
e ev
ent
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge.
Has
met
targ
et fo
r th
e la
st 5
yea
rs
KPI
2.2
4 (N
) 6 W
eek
Dia
gnos
tics
Apr
il 20
1996
.8%
99.0
%80
.8%
92.8
%10
4.9%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g hi
gh p
ositi
ve v
aria
tion,
w
ith th
e la
st 8
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g ab
ove
the
mea
n
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
3.1
Del
ayed
Tra
nsfe
rs o
f Car
e fr
om a
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tal b
ed a
s a
% o
f Occ
upie
d B
ed D
ays
Mar
ch 2
019
11.1
%9.
5%4.
8%10
.0%
15.2
%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
3.2
Per
cent
age
of L
TC/IC
T R
efer
rals
com
ing
from
with
in
KC
HFT
Mar
ch 2
019
15.1
%10
.0%
14.8
%18
.8%
22.9
%KP
I is
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng th
e ta
rget
with
th
e ta
rget
con
side
rabl
y be
low
the
low
er li
mit
KPI
3.3
CQ
UIN
s (%
of C
QU
IN m
oney
ac
hiev
ed to
18/
19 Q
4)M
arch
201
986
.6%
100%
SPC
not
app
ropr
iate
for t
his
met
ricKP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
, with
3 o
f the
last
8 q
uarte
rs
achi
evin
g 10
0%
KPI
3.4
Hom
e Fi
rst i
mpa
ct -
redu
ctio
n in
ave
rage
exc
ess
bed
days
(Wes
t Ken
t)Fe
brua
ry 2
019
0.18
0.20
-0.1
20.
631.
38KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
pos
itive
var
iatio
n w
ith
the
last
9 m
onth
s pe
rform
ing
belo
w th
e m
ean
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
3.5
(N) A
vera
ge w
ait t
ime
(min
utes
) for
MTW
Acc
iden
t and
Em
erge
ncy
Serv
ices
Febr
uary
201
933
924
026
430
835
3
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
perfo
rman
ce is
unl
ikel
y to
dec
reas
e to
mee
t ta
r get
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge
KPI
3.6
Rap
id T
rans
fer i
mpa
ct -
redu
ctio
n in
ave
rage
exc
ess
bed
days
(Eas
t Ken
t)Fe
brua
ry 2
019
0.07
0.20
-0.1
00.
190.
47KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
pos
itive
var
iatio
n w
ith
the
last
9 m
onth
s pe
rform
ing
belo
w th
e m
ean
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
3.7
(N) A
vera
ge w
ait t
ime
(min
utes
) for
EK
HU
FT A
ccid
ent a
nd
Emer
genc
y Se
rvic
esFe
brua
ry 2
019
391
240
282
348
414
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
perfo
rman
ce is
unl
ikel
y to
dec
reas
e to
mee
t ta
rget
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge
3. Integrate Services2. Deliver high-quality care at home and in the community
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 84 of 177
Ken
t Com
mun
ity H
ealth
NH
S Fo
unda
tion
Trus
t - C
orpo
rate
Sco
reca
rd*N
OTE
: Nat
iona
l Tar
gets
are
den
oted
by
(N) i
n th
e K
PI n
ame
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
4.1
Per
cent
age
of L
TC/IC
T Fa
ce
to F
ace
Con
tact
s ca
rrie
d ou
t in
a cl
inic
(tar
get t
o in
crea
se)
Mar
ch 2
019
3.7%
5.0%
2.8%
3.7%
4.6%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et w
ith th
e ta
rget
abo
ve th
e up
per l
imit.
Thi
s su
gges
t ac
hiev
ing
targ
et w
ithou
t a p
roce
ss c
hang
e w
ill
be d
own
to c
hanc
e an
d is
bei
n g re
view
ed
KPI
4.2
Bed
Occ
upan
cy: O
ccup
ied
Bed
Day
s as
a %
of a
vaila
ble
bed
days
Mar
ch 2
019
91.2
%87
.0%
84.1
%89
.4%
94.6
%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
4.3
Inco
me
& E
xpen
ditu
re -
Surp
lus
(%)
Apr
il 20
191.
1%1.
0%1.
1%1.
5%1.
9%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
neg
ativ
e va
riatio
n w
ith
the
curr
ent m
onth
per
form
ing
belo
w th
e lo
wer
co
ntro
l lim
it
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
perfo
rman
ce is
unl
ikel
y to
dec
reas
e to
bel
ow
tar g
et
KPI
4.4
Cos
t Im
prov
emen
t Pla
ns
(CIP
) Ach
ieve
d ag
ains
t Pla
n (%
)A
pril
2019
52.7
%10
0.0%
65.3
%83
.0%
100.
7%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
neg
ativ
e va
riatio
n w
ith
the
curr
ent m
onth
per
form
ing
belo
w th
e lo
wer
co
ntro
l lim
it
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs, e
xpec
ially
ear
ly in
eac
h fin
anci
al y
ear
KPI
4.5
Ext
erna
l Age
ncy
spen
d ag
ains
t Tra
ject
ory
(£00
0s)
Apr
il 20
19£4
96,4
24£6
28,0
00£1
81,2
62£3
99,5
85£6
17,9
08
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e up
per l
imit
is b
elow
the
targ
et. T
his
sugg
ests
pe
rform
ance
is u
nlik
ely
to in
crea
se to
abo
ve
tar g
et
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
5.1
Sic
knes
s R
ate
Apr
il 20
193.
85%
3.90
%3.
81%
4.47
%5.
13%
SPC
sug
gest
s ta
rget
is u
nlik
ely
ot b
e ac
hiev
ed
regu
larly
and
is b
eing
revi
ewed
KPI
5.2
Sic
knes
s R
ate
(Str
ess
and
Anxi
ety)
Apr
il 20
191.
01%
1.15
%0.
99%
1.29
%1.
59%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
5.3
Tur
nove
r (pl
anne
d an
d un
plan
ned)
Apr
il 20
1917
.29%
16.4
7%17
.12%
18.4
1%19
.70%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et w
ith th
e ta
rget
bel
ow th
e lo
wer
lim
it. T
his
sugg
est
achi
evin
g ta
rget
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge
will
be
dow
n to
cha
nce
and
need
s re
view
KPI
5.4
Man
dato
ry T
rain
ing:
C
ombi
ned
Com
plia
nce
Rat
eA
pril
2019
96.0
%85
.0%
94.0
%95
.4%
96.8
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
high
pos
itive
var
iatio
n w
ith
the
last
7 m
onth
s pe
rform
ing
abov
e th
e m
ean
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
KPI
5.5
Gro
ss V
acan
cy F
acto
r (%
of
the
budg
eted
WTE
unf
illed
by
perm
anen
t wor
kfor
ce)
Apr
il 20
199.
7%9.
7%6.
8%9.
0%11
.2%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
5.6
Sta
bilit
y (%
of w
orkf
orce
w
ho h
ave
been
with
the
trus
t for
12
mon
ths
or m
ore)
Apr
il 20
1984
.7%
85.0
%81
.4%
82.8
%84
.3%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g hi
gh p
ositi
ve v
aria
tion
with
th
e la
st 7
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g ab
ove
the
mea
n
New
targ
et h
as b
een
set a
t 85%
. Whi
le th
e ta
rget
cur
rent
ly s
its a
bove
the
uppe
r con
trol
limit,
cur
rent
per
form
ance
sho
uld
see
the
uppe
r lim
it in
crea
se a
bove
targ
et
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
5. Be The Best Employer4. Develop sustainable services
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Page 85 of 177
2.0
2.1
AsQ
ualit
y R
ess
uran
ce o
n Sa
Thre
e co
mw
eigh
ted
riW
ards
inc
rpa
tient
s w
it W
est V
iew
and
the
As
impa
cted
oepor
t af
er S
taffi
ng
mun
ity h
ospi
tal s
sk s
core
of 0
.27
reas
e th
e us
e o
th in
crea
sed
cog
w is
par
t of K
CH
ssoc
iate
Dire
ctor
on A
pril’
s av
erag
s ha
d a
shift
fill
7 bo
th a
re b
elow
of h
ealth
car
e a
gniti
ve im
pairm
e
FT s
ince
Apr
il 2
r of
Gov
erna
nce
ge m
onth
ly s
hifts
rate
bet
wee
n 7
w th
e av
erag
e w
eas
sist
ants
to
exen
t dur
ing
this
tim
2019
and
ther
efe
have
a s
ched
us
data
alo
ng w
ith71.7
and
89.
2. E
eigh
ted
risk
scor
xpan
d ge
nera
l c
me.
fore
incl
uded
wit
uled
vis
it w
ith th
h E
denb
ridge
an
Ede
nbrid
ge h
as
re.
capa
city
esp
ecia
thin
the
com
mu
he te
am. D
ue to
d
QV
MH
a w
eigh
ted
risk
ally
dur
ing
nigh
t
nity
hos
pita
ls d
ath
e va
canc
y ra
tk sc
ore
of 0
.14
a
t sh
ifts.
Thi
s is
ata
set.
The
De
te a
nd lo
w R
N’san
d Q
VM
H h
as
done
to
supp
o
eput
y C
hief
Nur
ss
on s
hift
this
ha
a ort
se
as
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 86 of 177
2.2
A
2.3
A
ssur
ance
on
P r
Dur
ing
Apr
ulce
r. Th
e sin
vest
igat
io
Ther
e w
ere
Ther
e w
asoc
curr
ed d
u
ssur
ance
on
Fa
Ther
e w
ere
duce
d s ire
ssur
e U
lcer
s
il 20
19, 4
occ
asse
wer
e id
entif
ied
on to
det
erm
ine
w
e no
inci
dent
s re
s on
e se
rious
inur
ing
Mar
ch.
alls
re 6
3 fa
lls re
por
ince
Q1
May
20io
ns o
f lap
ses
ind
as a
cat
egor
y w
heth
er it
mee
ts
epor
ted
whe
re p
r
ncid
ent
repo
rted
rted
acro
ss K
CH
17 a
nd re
mai
ns n
care
wer
e id
en2;
cat
egor
y 3;
cs
the
serio
us in
c
ress
ure
ulce
r da
in A
pril
for
Ca
HFT
in A
pril
2019
cons
iste
ntly
lownt
ified
and
pen
dica
tego
ry 4
and
aci
dent
crit
eria
.
amag
e w
as c
aus
ante
rbur
y C
omm
9, n
one
of w
hich
w w
ith a
slig
ht ri
sng in
vest
igat
ion
an u
ngra
dabl
e. T
sed
by a
med
ica
mun
ity N
ursi
ng t
e
wer
e fo
und
to b
se in
Dec
embe
r . Thi
s re
sulte
d in
The
cate
gory
4 p
l dev
ice.
eam
rel
atin
g to
be a
void
able
. Th
and
Febr
uary
w
n pa
tient
s de
vel
pres
sure
ulc
er is
a pr
essu
re u
lc
he n
umbe
r of a
vow
hich
is c
omm
on
opin
g a
pres
sur
cur
rent
ly u
nder
er in
cide
nt w
hic
oida
ble
falls
has
n ca
use
varia
tion
re
r ch
s n.
Page 87 of 177
2.4
Ass
uran
ce o
n M
The
maj
ori
patie
nt’s
ow
adm
inis
tere
Med
icat
ion
inci
d
ty o
f in
cide
nts
wn
hom
es a
nd
ed’.
dent
s
repo
rted
rela
te
31%
occ
urre
d ito
‘adm
inis
tratio
in c
omm
unity
ho
on o
r su
pply
of
ospi
tals
. Th
e hi
g
a m
edic
ine
from
ghes
t ca
tego
ry m
a c
linic
al a
reof
med
icat
ion
in
ea’.
48%
of
inci
dnc
iden
ts r
elat
ed
dent
s oc
curre
d d
to ‘m
edic
ine
n
in
ot
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 88 of 177
2.5
A
2.
5
2.5
All
med
ica
man
agem
e
Med
savv
y pr
ogra
mm
e
ssur
ance
on
Pa
5.1
Mer
idia
n Pa
5,75
7 su
rve
Sur
vey
volu
larg
est i
ncr
and
heal
th
5.2
The
NH
S Fr
In A
pril,
97
to re
com
min
Mar
ch.
disa
bilit
y tetio
n in
cide
nts
aen
t will
als
o fo
rm
is a
Qua
lity
Ime
of w
ork
impl
em
atie
nt E
xper
ien
atie
nt E
xper
ienc
eys
wer
e co
mpl
e
umes
hav
e in
cre
reas
e in
sur
vey
visi
ting.
iend
s an
d Fa
m
7.5%
of o
ur p
atie
end
the
serv
ice
23 o
f the
‘don
’t ea
ms.
The
rem
aare
revi
ewed
by
m p
art o
f the
‘We
mpr
ovem
ent
(Qm
ente
d fo
llow
ing
nce
ce s
urve
y re
sul
eted
by
KC
HFT
ease
d in
Apr
il b
volu
mes
whe
n
ily T
est (
FFT)
ents
reco
mm
end
they
rece
ived
, ckn
ow’ r
espo
nse
aini
ng 1
2 w
ere
foy th
e P
harm
acy
e C
are’
vis
its.
QI)
proj
ect
whi
cg
the
lear
ning
fro
lts
patie
nts,
rela
tiv
by 4
33. T
he n
ewco
mpa
red
with
ded
us, t
his
is s
lico
mpa
red
with
1es
wer
e fro
m c
hor
a v
arie
ty o
f seTe
am w
ho a
re
h ai
ms
to i
mpr
om a
his
toric
al in
es a
nd c
arer
s w
wbo
rn h
earin
g se
Mar
ch.
An
incr
ghtly
hig
her t
ha1%
in M
arch
. 46
hild
ren
and
ther
eer
vice
s.
e un
derta
king
ta
rove
med
icin
e nc
iden
t.
with
a c
ombi
ned
s
ervi
ce, c
omm
unea
se w
as a
lso
s
n M
arch
’s s
core
peo
ple
chos
e th
e w
ere
7 fo
r the
arge
ted
wor
k w
adm
inis
tratio
n a
satis
fact
ion
scor
nity
nur
sing
team
seen
for
the
lym
e (9
5.3%
). In
Apr
he ‘d
on’t
know
’ rde
ntal
ser
vice
aith t
he s
peci
fic
and
patie
nt s
af
re o
f 97.
3% in
A
ms
and
the
dent
mph
edem
a, c
hro
ril, 0
.5%
of o
ur p
resp
onse
in A
pran
d 4
for t
he c
o
team
. M
edic
ine
fety
. Th
is w
as
Apr
il.
al c
linic
s sa
w th
onic
pai
n, p
odia
t
patie
nts
chos
e n
ril c
ompa
red
to 7
omm
unity
lear
nin
es
a he
ry
ot
70
ng
Page 89 of 177
2.6
Ass
uran
ce o
n C
linic
al A
udit
and
Res
earc
h
2.6.
1 A
udit
The
annu
al K
PI t
arge
t is
95%
of c
linic
al a
udit
reco
mm
enda
tions
to b
e im
plem
ente
d. T
his
is a
chie
ved
via
a st
eppe
d ta
rget
dur
ing
the
year
. Th
e ta
rget
for A
pril
was
ach
ieve
d.
2.6.
2 C
linic
al A
udit
Rep
ortin
g
Rep
ortin
g - R
ecei
pt b
y C
linic
al A
udit
of fu
ll re
port
with
in ti
mef
ram
e. T
he a
nnua
l KP
I tar
get i
s 80
% w
ith a
targ
et o
f 50%
for e
ach
mon
th o
f qu
arte
r 1.T
imef
ram
es a
re li
sted
bel
ow:
Rec
eipt
of f
inal
repo
rt fro
m le
ad w
ithin
60
days
of r
ecei
pt o
f das
hboa
rd fo
r aud
its w
ith fu
ll or
sig
nific
ant a
ssur
ance
Rec
eipt
of f
inal
repo
rt fro
m le
ad w
ithin
30
days
of r
ecei
pt o
f das
hboa
rd fo
r aud
its w
ith li
mite
d as
sura
nce
Rec
eipt
of f
inal
repo
rt fro
m le
ad w
ithin
15
days
of r
ecei
pt o
f das
hboa
rd fo
r aud
its w
ith n
o as
sura
nce
Full
repo
rt w
ith a
ctio
n pl
an lo
oked
at b
y qu
ality
or g
over
nanc
e gr
oup
or C
hair
of s
aid
grou
p w
ithin
30
days
of r
ecei
pt
Ann
ual K
PI t
arge
t is
80%
with
mon
thly
targ
et o
f 80%
. Fi
gure
s do
not
app
ly to
this
Apr
il as
no
repo
rts c
ompl
eted
so
not r
equi
red.
KP
Is fo
r re
porti
ng i
ndic
ate
dela
ys e
xist
at
all
stag
es o
f th
e re
porti
ng p
roce
ss;
how
ever
, th
ese
are
activ
ely
mon
itore
d an
d es
cala
ted
with
go
vern
ance
gro
ups.
2.6.
3 R
esea
rch
KC
HFT
wor
ks to
del
iver
an
annu
al re
crui
tmen
t ple
dge
to th
e K
ent S
urre
y an
d S
usse
x C
linic
al R
esea
rch
Net
wor
k to
del
iver
hig
h qu
ality
na
tiona
l stu
dies
(kno
wn
as p
ortfo
lio s
tudi
es) t
o lo
cal p
atie
nts.
Int
erna
lly w
e ex
ceed
this
ple
dge
and
have
set
a m
ore
stre
tchi
ng ta
rget
as
our K
ey P
erfo
rman
ce In
dica
tor f
or re
sear
ch.
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 90 of 177
2.6.
4 N
atio
nal I
nstit
ute
for C
linic
al E
xcel
lenc
e (N
ICE)
In te
rms
of r
ecen
t NIC
E g
uida
nce/
stan
dard
s 14
wer
e is
sued
in M
arch
201
9.
2 of
thes
e w
ere
deem
ed a
pplic
able
to a
t lea
st o
ne s
ervi
ce
thro
ugho
ut th
e Tr
ust.
Th
e ai
m in
tern
ally
is to
hav
e th
e in
itial
rev
iew
com
plet
ed b
y 1
July
201
9 gi
ving
the
nom
inat
ed le
ad 3
mon
ths
to
com
plet
e th
e ba
selin
e as
sess
men
t for
eac
h pi
ece
of g
uida
nce
– th
is is
not
a s
tatu
tory
tim
efra
me.
22
(ou
t of 2
18 is
sued
) pi
eces
of N
ICE
Gui
danc
e fro
m J
anua
ry 2
018-
Jan
uary
201
9 ha
ve b
een
unde
r re
view
for
mor
e th
an 3
mon
ths.
In
addi
tion
a fu
rther
18
from
201
7 ar
e st
ill u
nder
initi
al re
view
. Thi
s is
bei
ng m
onito
red
by C
EG
and
the
NIC
E T
ask
and
Fini
sh G
roup
. D
espi
te th
is s
ubst
antia
l pro
gres
s ha
s be
en m
ade
redu
cing
the
num
ber o
f not
ass
esse
d gu
idan
ce d
own
from
630
to 0
. Sta
tuto
ry ti
mef
ram
e of
90
days
is o
nly
in p
lace
for T
echn
olog
y A
ppra
isal
s (T
A).
Rev
iew
s fo
r TA
s ar
e co
mpl
eted
by
Med
icin
es M
anag
emen
t with
in ti
mef
ram
e.
Page 91 of 177
3.0
3.1
A 3.1
3.1W
orkf
orce
Plea
se n
otpr
oces
ses
ssur
ance
on
Re
1.1
Turn
over
Turn
over
stra
nsfe
r ou
in re
cent
m(4
1 st
aff).
Adi
scus
sion
en
gage
men
1.2
Stab
ility
Sta
bilit
y c o
indi
catin
g a
been
affe
cte R
epor
t: te
that
due
to t
s co
mpl
ete.
Th
eten
tion
saw
an
incr
ease
t o
f 24
staf
f fro
mm
onth
s. T
his
has
Ana
lysi
s of
sta
ffan
d ag
reem
ennt
in th
e co
min
g
ontin
ues
to p
erfo
a co
ntin
ued
stro
ted
by th
e hi
gh lhe
ear
ly p
rodu
cis
incl
udes
Vac
in M
arch
201
9;m
Est
ates
, and
hs
likel
y be
en h
ef e
xit s
urve
ys is
nt o
n w
ays
to a
yea
r and
a fu
rth
orm
abo
ve th
e m
ong
perio
d of
pe
leve
ls o
f lea
versct
ion
of th
is re
pca
ncy
rate
s, A
g
; how
ever
, it h
ahi
gh le
vels
of r
elp
ed b
y hi
gh le
vs
unde
rway
to id
addr
ess
this
. Fo
her d
iscu
ssio
n w
mea
n th
roug
h a
erfo
rman
ce. A
pri
s in
Mar
ch.
port
som
e of
thge
ncy
spen
ds a
s si
nce
drop
ped
tiree
s in
Ope
rat
vels
of n
ew s
tart
dent
ify a
reas
of
ollo
win
g th
is y
ew
ill ta
ke p
lace
at
perio
d of
spe
cia
il’s
perfo
rman
cehe m
etric
s m
ay
and
Abs
ence
ra
d ba
ck d
own
to
ions
. Apr
il’s
tur n
ers
in A
pril
(99
sco
ncer
n w
hich
ar
’s s
taff
surv
eyt t
he M
ay M
anag
al c
ause
var
iatio
e ha
s dr
oppe
d s
chan
ge a
s th
eat
es.
prev
ious
leve
ls.
nove
r lev
els
hav
staf
f), a
nd a
retu
will
be
take
n to
y re
sults
we
hage
men
t Com
mitt
on, a
nd a
chie
ved
light
ly fo
r th
e fir
usu
al m
onth
e
. Thi
s in
crea
se i
ve re
turn
ed b
ack
urn
to m
uch
low
o th
e M
anag
eme
ave
agre
ed t
o c
tee
as to
how
be
d its
new
targ
et
rst t
ime
sinc
e M
aend/
mon
th s
tart
in M
arch
was
du
k to
the
norm
al l
wer
leve
ls o
f lea
ven
t Com
mitt
ee
cont
inue
to
focu
est t
o do
this
.
of 8
5% in
Mar
cay
201
8 as
it h
a
t ue a
TU
PE
le
vels
see
n ve
rs in
Apr
il in
Jun
e fo
r us
on
staf
f
h,
as
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 92 of 177
3.2
A 3.2ss
uran
ce o
n Si
2.1
Sick
ness
Ab
The
in-m
onim
prov
eme
leve
ls o
f an
It sh
ould
be
wai
t for
7 pic
knes
s
bsen
ce
nth
sick
ness
ab
ent i
n pe
rform
annn
ual l
eave
bei
n
e no
ted
that
this
poin
ts o
f sig
nific
absen
ce f
igur
e in
ce
it is
not
ent
ireng
boo
ked.
s do
es n
ot y
et c
oan
t var
iatio
n be
fo
Mar
ch s
harp
ly
ely
unex
pect
ed g
onst
itute
a s
igni
for
e re
cogn
isin
g
drop
ped
to 3
.7gi
ven
that
sic
kne
fican
t shi
ft in
the
a sh
ift in
per
form71
%,
with
a s
liges
s fig
ures
hav
e
e pe
rform
ance
of
man
ce.
ht r
ise
in A
pril
e hi
stor
ical
ly d
ro
f thi
s m
etric
. S
P
to 3
.85%
. W
hiop
ped
in M
arch
,
PC
met
hodo
logi
elst
this
is a
larg
partl
y du
e to
hig
es d
icta
te th
at w
ge
gh
we
Page 93 of 177
3.22.
2 St
ress
Abs
e
Stre
ss a
bsA
pril
2019
.m
omen
tum
The
Tim
e t
OD
BP
s to
16
th M
ay ben
ce
senc
e ha
s co
ntin
How
ever
, as
tm
on
Trus
t ini
tiati
to C
hang
e pr
oje
help
them
iden
tbr
ingi
ng to
geth
ernued
to
refle
ct t
he m
etric
per
for
ives
will
con
tinue
ect c
ontin
ues
wi
tify
good
pra
ctic
r cha
mpi
ons
fromth
e em
ergi
ng t
rerm
ance
con
tinue
e.
ith a
ctio
n pl
ans
ce h
ighl
ight
ed in
m
acr
oss
the
Truen
d of
impr
oved
es to
var
y w
e ar
now
hav
ing
bee
thes
e ac
tion
pla
ust.
d pe
rform
ance
, re
not
yet
con
sid
en d
evel
oped
ban
s.
Ano
ther
timw
ith c
ontin
ued
derin
g a
long
ter
y al
l ser
vice
s.
me
to c
hang
e e
impr
ovem
ent
inrm
cha
nge
to b
e
Thes
e ha
ve b
eeve
nt is
als
o du
en bo
th M
arch
an
e in
pla
ce, a
nd s
en s
hare
d ac
ros
e to
take
pla
ce o
nd
so
ss
on
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 94 of 177
3.3
A 3.3ss
uran
ce o
n Fi
3.1
Esta
blis
hme
The
vaca
nsu
mm
er. T
parti
cula
rlyTr
ust
illin
g Va
canc
ies
ent a
nd V
acan
c
cy r
ate
has
inc
Ther
e ha
ve b
een
y in
Eas
t and
Wes ci
es
crea
sed
sign
ifica
n 2
fact
ors
behi
est K
ent.
Sec
on
antly
to
9.68
%
nd th
is in
crea
send
ly, t
he h
igh
levin
Apr
il. T
his
foe.
Firs
tly, b
udge
vels
of l
eave
rs iol
low
s a
perio
d te
d es
tabl
ishm
ein
Mar
ch h
ave
r
of s
usta
ined
im
ents
hav
e in
crea
redu
ced
the
con m
prov
ed p
erfo
rmas
ed w
ith th
e ne
ntra
cted
sta
ffing
man
ce s
ince
la
ew fi
nanc
ial y
eale
vels
acr
oss
th
st
ar,
he
Page 95 of 177
3.3
3.33.
2 Te
mpo
rary
S
Bot
h to
tal f
stea
dily
inc
Rec
ruitm
enw
ith F
ebru
a
Alth
ough
Tto
tal r
eque
ssh
ift re
ques
3.3
Age
ncy
Spe
The
use
of
incr
ease
d nSt
aff U
sage
fill r
ates
and
ba
crea
sing
ove
r the
nt to
the
Ban
k ha
ary
- 56
and
Ma
Tota
l Fill
rate
s ap
sted
shi
fts fi
lled
sts
and
a lim
ited
end agen
cy a
cros
s nu
mbe
rs o
f shi
ftnk fi
ll ra
tes
are
e la
st y
ear,
with
as a
lso
incr
ease
rch
– 61
leve
ls).
ppea
r st
able
, va
by B
ank
staf
f (F
d po
ol o
f Ban
k w
the
Trus
t has
co
ts s
ent t
o th
e ba
expe
rienc
ing
coM
arch
see
ing
th
ed in
Apr
il, w
ith 7
. aryi
ng a
roun
d th
Fill
Rat
e - B
ank
cw
orke
rs ra
ther
th
ontin
ued
to ri
se i
nk o
ffice
as
noteom
mon
cau
se v
he h
ighe
st le
vels
71 s
taff
curr
ently
e m
ean
of 8
7.5%
char
t bel
ow).
Wan
a re
duct
ion
in
in M
arch
and
Ap
ed in
the
prev
iouva
riatio
n ar
ound
s
of b
ank
requ
es
y go
ing
thro
ugh
%, t
here
doe
s a
We
are
look
ing
inn
Ban
k w
orke
r u
pril
2019
. Th
is fo
us s
ectio
n.
the
mea
n.
De
sts
yet i
n 20
18/2
recr
uitm
ent c
he
appe
ar to
be
a d
to th
is b
ut it
is li
utili
satio
n.
ollo
ws
a pe
riod
oman
d fo
r B
ank
2019
.
ecks
to jo
in th
e B
decl
inin
g tre
nd in
kely
to b
e du
e to
of w
inte
r pre
ssush
ifts
has
been
Bank
(com
pare
d
n th
e nu
mbe
r of
o an
incr
ease
in
res
and
f
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 96 of 177
3.4
A 3.4ss
uran
ce o
n Tr
4.1
Man
dato
ry T
Man
dato
ry
Man
dato
ry
mon
th m
ov
rain
ing
Com
plia
Trai
ning
Com
p
Trai
ning
fig
ure
Trai
ning
sub
jec
ving
it b
ack
in to
ance
lianc
e
s ar
e cu
rren
tly
cts
are
curr
ently
com
plia
nce
in a
sta
te o
f na
y sh
owin
g as
coat
ural
var
iatio
n m
plia
nt w
ith ta
rgarou
nd t
he m
eage
ts. F
ire fo
r co
an,
and
are
con
omm
unity
hos
pit
nsis
tent
ly a
bove
tals
has
incr
ease
e th
e ta
rget
. A
lled
by
3.4%
this
s
Page 97 of 177
4.0
Fina
nce
Rep
ort:
4.1
Ass
uran
ce o
n Fi
nanc
ial S
usta
inab
ility
4.
2 K
ey M
essa
ges
Surplus: Th
e Trust achieved
a surplus of £2
16k (1.1%) to the en
d of April. P
ay und
erspen
t by
£60
8k and
non
‐pay and
dep
reciation/interest have
overspen
t by £9
2k and
£8k re
spectiv
ely. Incom
e has u
nder‐recovered
by £4
78k.
Continuity of S
ervices Risk Rating: EBITD
A Margin achieved
is 2.6%. The
Trust sc
ored
1 against th
e Use of R
esou
rces Rating, th
e be
s t possib
le sc
ore.
CIP: £23
1k of savings has been achieved
for the
mon
th against a risk ra
ted plan
of £
438k which is £20
7k beh
ind target.
Cash and
Cash Eq
uivalents: The cash and
cash eq
uivalents balance was £24
,130
k, equ
ivalen
t to 39 days expen
diture. The Trust recorded
the
following YTD pu
blic se
ctor paymen
t statistics 9
7% fo
r volum
e and 93
% fo
r value
.
Capital: Spe
nd to
April was £13
2k, against a YTD
plan of £16
9k (7
8% achieved).
Agen
cy: Tempo
rary staff costs for Ap
ril w
ere £9
43k, rep
resenting 6.6%
of the
pay bill. Of the
tem
porary staffing
usage in
April, £36
5k related
to
external agency and £1
31k to lo
cums, 3.5% of the
pay bill. Th
ere were gross vacancies of 428
WTE, an increase of 6
8 compared to M
arch, and
9.7%
of th
e bu
dgeted
establishm
ent.
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 98 of 177
5.0
5.1
A 5.1O
pera
tion
ssur
ance
on
Na
1.1
Hea
lth C
hec
Hea
lth C
he
Hea
lth C
heth
e co
ntro
l ne
w IT
sys
outli
ned.
This
is
on
reso
lved
mK
CH
FT a
reas
pos
sibl
e
al re
port
: at
iona
l Per
form
cks
and
SS Q
ui
ecks
ecks
is n
ow e
xpe
limits
due
to th
stem
pro
cure
d b
the
Hea
lth I
mp
mos
t of t
he in
vita
e co
ntin
uing
to e
e.
man
ce S
tand
ard
ts
erie
ncin
g a
perio
e si
gnifi
cant
cha
by K
CC
. KC
C w
a
prov
emen
t ris
k r
atio
n er
rors
that
ex
plor
e ot
her o
pds a
nd C
ontr
ac
od o
f pos
itive
va
ange
whe
n th
eas
aw
are
of th
is
regi
ster
als
o. T
hw
ere
repo
rted.
portu
nitie
s fo
r H
ctua
l Tar
gets
aria
tion
for t
he la
NH
S H
ealth
Ch
s is
sue
and
is p
e
he c
hang
e to
m T
he ta
rget
traj
Hea
lth C
heck
deas
t 7 m
onth
s w
ithe
cks
IT in
frast
ruer
form
ance
man
mon
thly
que
ries
ecto
ry h
as b
een
liver
y in
an
effo
rth a
n im
prov
ing
uctu
re c
hang
ed
nagi
ng th
e co
ntr
has
impr
oved
tn
amen
ded
in li
nrt
to m
aint
ain
an
trend
, fol
low
ing
on th
e 1s
t Apr
ira
ct to
try
and
re
the
qual
ity o
f da
ne w
ith ‘a
mbe
r’ nd
impr
ove
perfo
a re
calc
ulat
ion
ol 2
018
whi
ch is
es
olve
the
issu
e
ata
impo
rted
anfig
ures
, alth
oug
orm
ance
as
muc
of a es
nd
gh
ch
Page 99 of 177
5.1
Stop
Sm
ok
Sto
p S
mok
path
way
s i
inte
rven
tion
supp
ort t
o S
mok
ing
pK
CC
and
K
1.2
Hea
lth V
isiti
New
Birt
h
Per
form
anc
cont
rol l
imi
invo
lves
tere
cord
ed c
mon
thly
diski
ng Q
uits
king
qui
ts a
lso
hin
to o
ne a
s pe
n ou
tcom
es o
nto
upda
te o
utco
me
reva
lenc
e co
ntin
KC
HFT
will
be
m
ing Visi
ts
ce lo
oks
like
it i
t. Th
e m
onth
12
ams
rece
ivin
g a
corr
ectly
. Th
e ta
stric
t lev
el re
portha
d a
sign
ifica
ntr
the
new
con
to
the
new
dat
a es
pul
ling
us in
nu
es to
mov
e in
mee
ting
to d
iscu
s
is e
xper
ienc
ing
2 le
vel w
ill h
opef
a pa
tient
leve
l lis
arge
t of
90%
is
ts a
nd is
sho
wint e
vent
afte
r th
etra
ctua
l ag
reem
syst
em.
Q2-
Q4
line
with
201
7 n
a do
wnw
ards
tss
new
app
roac
h
the
begi
nnin
g o
fully
impr
ove
fol
st o
f chi
ldre
n w
hge
nera
lly b
eing
ng v
aryi
ng p
erfo
r ON
E Y
OU
Ser
ent
with
KC
C,
4 sh
ows
an u
plpe
rform
ance
, wtre
nd, a
nd w
ith t
hes
to e
ngag
ing
of a
n ad
vers
e tr
low
ing
a da
ta c
lho
hav
e ha
d no
g
achi
eved
(ac
hrm
ance
acr
oss
trvic
es h
ad im
ple
mai
nly
impa
ctin
ift fr
om Q
1 as
3w
ith th
e la
st 9
mth
e su
cces
sful
oth
e co
unty
’s to
u
end
with
mon
thle
anse
, clo
ser t
ovi
sit,
DN
A o
r re
ieve
d in
Q4
and
he d
istri
cts.
emen
ted
a ne
w
ng t
he a
bilit
y o
3rd p
artie
s ha
ve
mon
ths
show
ing
outc
omes
of t
he
ughe
st a
nd h
ard
12
perfo
rmin
g o
the
targ
et (c
uref
usal
rec
orde
d d
for
the
year
)
IT s
yste
m c
omb
f ou
r 3rd
par
ties
rece
ived
focu
sea
posi
tive
shift
H
ome
Vis
its fo
res
t to
reac
h sm
o
belo
w ta
rget
an
rren
tly a
t 89%
). T
for
them
to e
nsu
is c
lose
ly m
onitbi
ning
thre
e cl
ies
to u
ploa
d th
eed
and
sus
tain
eab
ove
the
mea
r pre
gnan
t mum
oker
s.
nd n
ear
the
low
eTh
e da
ta c
lean
sur
e th
eir
stat
us
tore
d th
roug
h th
nt
eir
ed
n.
s,
er
se
is
he
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 100 of 177
6-8
Wee
k C
Ther
e w
as
Per
form
anc
and
perfo
rmtre
nds
and C
heck
s
a di
p in
mon
ths
ce h
as s
ince
imp
min
g cl
ose
to t
him
prov
e th
e da
ts 5-
7, w
ith m
ont
prov
ed a
nd h
as
he lo
wer
con
trota
qua
lity
whe
re th
6 p
erfo
rmin
g st
abili
sed,
with
l l
imit.
Mon
thly
is
sues
are
iden
outs
ide
of th
e c
the
targ
et b
eing
proc
esse
s co
ntnt
ified
.
cont
rol l
imits
and
cons
iste
ntly
ach
inue
to
be in
pld
mon
ths
5 an
d hi
eved
, alth
ough
lace
for
loca
litie
7 cl
ose
to th
e lo
h M
onth
12
has
es t
o dr
ill d
own
ower
con
trol l
imw
orse
ned
slig
h tin
to a
ny a
dver
s
it.
tly
se
Page 101 of 177
5.1
5.1
1.3
Nat
iona
l Ch
The
mea
suth
e 90
% ta
1.4
Min
or In
jury
KC
HFT
’s a
with
the
co
ild M
easu
rem
e
urem
ent p
rogr
amar
get f
or th
e sc
ho
y U
nits
(MIU
) 4
achi
evem
ent o
f tnt
rol r
ange
sug
g
Curren
t Mo
18/19 Scho
oYear to
Mar
17/18 Scho
oYear
Annu
al Targen
t Pro
gram
me
mm
e fo
r Yea
r R
ool y
ear
Hou
r Wai
t Tar
g
he 4
hou
r wai
t ta
gest
ing
that
faili
n
Year
R
onth
94.0%
ol
r‐19
94.0%
ol
97.3%
get
90%
(NC
MP)
and
6 pu
pils
has
get
arge
t for
Min
or I
ng ta
rget
is h
igh
Year
6
93.7%
93.7%
95.7%
90%
0.0%
50.0%
100.0%
s m
et th
e tra
ject
Inju
ries
Uni
ts h
aly
unl
ikel
y to
hap
Sep‐18
Oct‐1 to
ry fo
r the
18/
19
as c
onsi
sten
tly b
ppen
.
18Nov‐18
Dec
18/19 Scho
o
Year R
Ye 9 sc
hool
yea
r, w
een
high
, with
v
c‐18
Jan‐19
Fe
ol Year
ear 6
with
bot
h pr
ogra
m
very
littl
e va
riatio
eb‐19
Mar‐19
mm
es a
chie
ving
on fr
om th
e m
ea
g n,
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 102 of 177
5.1
5.11.
5 G
UM
48h
r
Acc
ess
to G
1.6
Con
sulta
nt-
The
prop
o rpe
rform
ing
The
abov
ebe
low
18
wm
eetin
g ta
r
GU
M c
linic
s w
ith
-Led
RTT
Inco
m
rtion
of p
atie
nts
wel
l with
a 5
mo
tab
le s
how
s th
wee
ks,
with
no
wrg
et
KC O C Chin
48hr
s ha
s be
mpl
ete
Wai
ts O
v
on a
con
sulta
nton
th p
erio
d of
no
he c
urre
nt b
reak
wai
ts a
bove
36
KCHF
T To
tal
Chronic Pain
Ortho
paedics
Children's A
udiolog
Community
Paediaee
n co
nsis
tent
ly
ver 1
8 w
eeks
t-led
Ref
erra
l to
orm
al v
aria
tion,
kdow
n of
the
wa
wee
ks.
The
av
0‐12
Wk
528
3797
431
636
5392
gy atrics
y 10
0%, w
ith n
o r
Trea
tmen
t (R
TTbo
th a
bove
the
aitin
g lis
t fo
r al
l ve
rage
wai
t fo
r p
ks12
‐18 Wks
18‐3
38 665 2 161
866
repo
rted
brea
ch
T) p
athw
ay a
t mm
ean
and
targ
e
serv
ices
on
a c
patie
nts
wai
ting
36 W
ks36
‐52 Wks
180
185
00
029
023
20
es
mon
th e
nd w
ho a
et le
vel.
cons
ulta
nt-le
d p
over
18
wee
k s
s52
+ Wks
< 18
09
09
01
09
09
are
wai
ting
less
athw
ay.
96.4
%
s is
20.
8 w
eeks
,
8 Weeks
96.9%
96.0%
00.0%
96.5%
96.4%
than
18
wee
ks
of w
aits
are
no
, w
ith a
ll se
rvic
e
is
ow
es
Page 103 of 177
5.1
1.7
6 W
eek
Dia
g
6 w
eek
dia
perfo
rmin
g ov
er 6
wee
The
1% s
taim
pact
of s
brea
chin
g t
The
Aud
iol
only
con
tr aex
pect
ed to
Ban
k. T
hes
To m
ake
fupr
even
t br
eal
low
s a
pr
As
a co
nse
(rec
eivi
ng tgn
ostic
s (A
udio
agno
stic
s w
aits
ab
ove
the
me a
eks
as p
er N
HS
I
anda
rd is
cha
llesi
ngul
ar p
atie
nts
the
stan
dard
on
ogy
serv
ice
is a
acts
. The
ser
vice
o be
in p
ost b
y J
se m
easu
res
hav
urth
er s
tride
s to
each
es b
y ta
kin
oact
ive
solu
tion
eque
nce
of c
onta
rget
ed s
uppo
rtolog
y)
for
paed
iatri
c a
an. H
owev
er, r
ecS
ingl
e O
vers
igh
engi
ng f
or t
he t
rto
the
achi
evem
aver
age
for t
he
a sm
all t
eam
of 1
e ha
s pr
iorit
ised
Ju
ly b
ut in
the
inve
had
a p
ositi
v
o ac
hiev
ing
the
sng
ear
lier
actio
nfo
cuse
d ap
pro a
tinua
l bre
ache
st)
but w
ill b
e m
ovaudi
olog
y is
exp
cent
per
form
anc
ht F
ram
ewor
k st
rust
to
achi
eve
men
t. A
vera
ge w
stan
dard
to n
ot
12.6
8 W
TE w
hic
new
refe
rral
s a
nter
im th
ey h
ave
e im
pact
on
the
stan
dard
reg
ula
. Th
is t
rack
ing
ach
to c
halle
nge
of
the
1% s
tan
ved
back
to s
eg
perie
ncin
g a
per
ce is
gen
eral
ly m
tand
ard)
.
give
n th
e sm
alw
aitin
g nu
mbe
rs
t be
met
(ofte
n c
ch c
urre
ntly
has
nd
recr
uite
d 1
pe
join
ed K
CH
FT
April
per
form
a n
arly
, the
Aud
iolo
gpr
oces
s is
now
s
that
may
aris
e
ndar
d, K
CH
FT a
gmen
t 1 w
hen
co
riod
of p
ositi
ve
mar
gina
lly b
elow
l vol
umes
of
paat
mon
th e
nd a
caus
ed b
y pa
tien
11.8
% o
f clin
ica
perm
anen
t mem
bst
aff b
ank.
The
nc
e.
gy s
ervi
ce h
as
fully
ope
ratio
nae.
are
with
in s
egm
onsi
sten
t ach
ieve
spec
ial c
ause
vw
the
chal
leng
ing
atie
nts
the
stan
dar
e 43
0, th
eref
ornt
DN
As)
.
al s
taff
on m
ater
ber o
f sta
ff to
co
serv
ice
has
recr
impl
emen
ted
a al
and
wee
kly
te
men
t 2
of t
he N
Hem
ent c
an b
e de
varia
tion,
with
th
g 99
% ta
rget
wit
dard
rel
ates
to
are
it o
nly
requ
ire
rnity
leav
e an
d 2
over
mat
erni
ty le
ruite
d a
furth
er a
track
ing
proc
esel
econ
fere
nces
HS
I S
ingl
e O
ver
emon
stra
ted
he la
st 8
mon
thth
in 6
wee
ks (
1%
and
ther
efor
e th
s 5
patie
nts
to b
21%
on
term
tim
eave
and
they
ar
audi
olog
ist f
or th
s to
fore
cast
an
are
in p
lace
, th
rsig
ht F
ram
ewo
hs
%
he
be
me re
he
nd
his rk
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 104 of 177
5.1
5.11.
8 En
d of
Life
C
The
end
ofth
eir
time
o39
.7%
, the
achi
eved
taa
mon
thly
b
1.9
Del
ayed
Tra
KC
HFT
’s ta
9.5%
as
a tra
nsfe
rs i n
Car
e
f life
indi
cato
r is
of d
eath
; the
refo
e pe
rson
alis
ed c
arge
t for
the
firs
basi
s to
val
idat
e
ansf
ers
of C
are
arge
t for
del
aye
rate
of o
ccup
ied
n ea
st K
ent,
alth
o
Curren
18/19
17/18
Annu
anew
for 1
8/19
, or
e no
tren
d da
care
pla
nnin
g w
it t
ime
in M
12. A
e an
d im
prov
e ar
(DTO
Cs)
d tra
nsfe
rs is
t od
bed
days
. An
ough
the
posi
tio
nt M
onth
60.4%
YTD
39.7%
N/A
al Target
60.0%re
porti
ng th
e pe
ata
is a
vaila
ble
pnd
ow o
n C
IS is
A
new
pro
cess
isre
as o
f und
erpe
o re
duce
to a
n a
incr
ease
d le
vel
on h
as im
prov
ed
% % A %
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
erce
ntag
e of
End
prio
r to
Apr
il 20
bein
g m
onito
res
bein
g se
t up
lorfo
rman
ce.
aver
age
of 7
per
l was
exp
erie
ncm
onth
on
mon
td of
Life
pat
ient
s18
. Whi
le th
e p
d at
a lo
calit
y le
cally
so
that
tea
r da
y in
bot
h ea
sed
in m
onth
s 7
hs s
ince
, with
M
End of Life
PCP
s w
ho h
ad a
n u
erfo
rman
ce fo
r ev
el a
nd p
erfo
rmam
will
rece
ive
d
st K
ent a
nd w
esan
d 8,
cau
sed
M12
abo
ve ta
rgetpd
ated
per
sona
the
year
to d
ate
man
ce is
gen
era
ata
for n
on-c
om
st K
ent,
whi
ch e
by a
n in
crea
sed
t at 1
1.1%
.
alis
ed c
are
plan
e
equa
tes
to o
nal
ly im
prov
ing
anm
plia
nt p
atie
nts
o
equa
tes
to a
roun
d le
vel o
f del
aye
at
nly nd
on
nd
ed
Page 105 of 177
5.1
5.1
5.11.
10 L
ooke
d A
ft
Initi
al H
ealt
still
var
iabl
ean
d w
hich
th
e re
ferr
al
Com
plia
nce
dipp
ed in
M
1.11
NH
S N
umb
NH
S N
umb
a N
HS
num
1.12
Bed
Occ
up
Bed
Occ
uppa
rticu
lar c
the
dip
in p
ter C
hild
ren
Ini
th A
sses
smen
t (e
and
liabl
e to
faK
CH
FT is
stru
gg w
hich
ach
ieve
s
e w
ith th
e R
evie
M9
(but
stil
l met
t
ber C
ompl
eten
e
ber c
ompl
eten
esm
ber a
ssig
ned
(a
panc
y
panc
y is
sho
win
conc
ern.
Alth
oug
perfo
rman
ce s
ho
tial H
ealth
Ass
(IHA
) per
form
anai
ling
targ
et s
omgl
ing
to in
fluen
ces
targ
et m
ost m
o
ew H
ealth
Ass
esta
rget
), th
is h
as
ess
ss a
cros
s K
CH
Fal
thou
gh la
ter u
p
ng a
var
ying
tre
gh m
onth
s 5-
7 a
ould
not
be
of c
oessm
ents
(IH
A
ce is
sho
win
g no
me
mon
ths
(as
ine.
We
have
an
aon
ths.
ssm
ent t
arge
t wa
impr
oved
aga
in
T’s
mai
n sy
stem
pdat
ed) a
nd O
ve
end
with
no
pean
d 9
wer
e be
loon
cern
at t
his
staAs)
and
Rev
iew
orm
al v
aria
tion
an
mon
th 1
1 at
pre
addi
tiona
l KP
I to
as e
xper
ienc
ing
n in
M10
and
M1
ms
are
cons
iste
ner
seas
MIU
atte
n
erio
ds o
f sp
ecia
w ta
rget
and
low
age,
esp
ecia
lly w
Hea
lth A
sses
s
and
is a
chie
ving
esen
t). T
his
is d
o en
sure
that
we
a pe
riod
of p
osi
1 ntly
c.1
00%
, with
ndan
ces.
l ca
use
varia
ti ow
er th
an th
e m
ew
ith th
e im
prov
emen
ts (R
HA
s)
g ta
rget
mos
t mo
ue to
late
requ
e c
ompl
ete
the
IH
tive
varia
tion
ab
h th
e m
ain
exce
p
on o
r ch
ange
s i
ean
leve
l of o
ccu
men
t in
the
M10on
ths.
How
ever
, es
ts b
eing
rece
ivH
A w
ithin
23
day
bove
the
mea
n a
ptio
n be
ing
new
in p
erfo
rman
ce
upan
cy. T
his
ha0-
12 p
ositi
on a
bo
perfo
rman
ce is
ve
d fro
m K
CC
ys
of r
ecei
pt o
f
and
alth
ough
had
birth
s ye
t to
hav
that
wou
ld b
e as
hig
hlig
hted
thov
e th
e m
ean.
d ve a at
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 106 of 177
5.1
5.2
A 5.21.
13 C
QU
IN
The
Q4
CQ
CQ
UIN
S m
ssur
ance
on
ac
2.1
Act
ivity
Dur
ing
Ma r
KC
HFT
are
varia
nces
aQU
IN a
chie
vem
mea
ns th
at a
pro
ctiv
ity a
nd p
rod
rch
2019
KC
HF
e 2.
2% b
elow
ta
are
with
in In
termm
ent
(% o
f po
ten
porti
onal
ly h
ighe
duct
ivity
FT c
arrie
d ou
t 1
arge
t fo
r se
rvic
em
edia
te C
are
Sent
ial i
ncom
e) is
er
val
ue is
pla
ce
68,4
77 c
linic
al c
es t
hat
have
co
rvic
es (-
10.1
%)
at 8
4% (
100%
ed
on
Q4,
cau
sin
cont
acts
, of
whi
ontra
ctua
l act
ivit
and
Spe
cial
ist a
in Q
3),
with
th
ng th
e fu
ll ye
ar p
ich
10,8
20 w
ere
ty t
arge
ts in
pla
and
Ele
ctiv
e S
er
e Y
TD p
ositi
on
posi
tion
to d
rop
e M
IU a
ttend
anc
ace,
the
sam
e a
rvic
es (-
6.3%
).
at 8
6.6%
. Th
eto
86.
6%.
ces.
For
the
yea
as t
he M
11 p
os
wei
ghtin
g of
th
ar t
o M
arch
201
sitio
n. T
he la
rge
he
19
st
Page 107 of 177
The
follo
wi
Ele
ctiv
e S
eC
ondi
tions
ha
s ex
peri
expe
rienc
edu
e to
the
serv
ice
rat h
Hou
se. T
hi
Interm
ediate Care
Community
Hospit
Long Term Con
diti
Service Type
Children's S
pecialis
Learning Disa
bilitie
Dental Service ‐ All
All Services (contr
*Children's U
nivers
All Services (includ
MIU Attendances
Community
Hospit
Specialist a
nd Elect
Community
Hospit in
g ch
arts
sho
wer
vice
s, w
ith b
oan
d S
ES
Ser
vien
ced
low
er t
hed
in A
shfo
rd a
nex
tend
ed h
ours
her t
han
Rap
ids
s ha
s be
en a
dd
tal O
ccupied Be
d Da
ys (EK)
ons
st Services
es ‐ Face to
Face
l currencies
ractua
l)
sal Services
ding
those with
out targets)
tal Adm
issions
tive Services
tal O
ccupied Be
d Da
ys (W
K) w th
e m
onth
ly a
cth
Lon
g Te
rm C
ces
are
both
ex
han
aver
age
lev
d S
outh
Ken
t Cs
intro
duce
d in
s
(hen
ce th
e in
crre
ssed
thro
ugh 54 18 10 2 2 25 3 27 15 8 13 16
M12 ct
ivity
aga
inst
taC
ondi
tions
and
xp
erie
ncin
g pe
riove
ls i
n th
e la
st
Coa
st. W
hile
ther
Long
Ter
m C
onre
ase
in L
TC a
cth
e ac
tivity
pla
ns
4,518
649,941
8,030
231,342
0,820
132,210
181
2,300
2,176
24,934
2,512
27,828
5,312
316,411
3,039
78,817
7,853
777,318
5,743
183,465
8,293
115,482
35,073
1,656,085
68,477
2,125,392
2 Ac
tual
YTD Ac
tual
arge
t for
Lon
g T
Spec
ialis
t an
d E
ods
of n
orm
al v
a9
mon
ths.
On
re h
ave
been
st
nditi
ons
that
has
ctiv
ity a
gain
st p
las
for n
ext y
ear i
n
652,250
‐
257,353
‐1
110,985
1
1,820
2
25,718
‐
337,598
‐
183,291
0
123,645
‐
1,692,660
‐
N/A
YTD Target
YTD
erm
Con
ditio
ns,
Ele
ctiv
e se
rvic
ear
iatio
n; w
ith th
ee
of t
he m
ain
affin
g sh
orta
ges
s re
sulte
d in
a p
an),
as w
ell a
s a
n E
ast K
ent
‐0.4%
Positive
10.1%
Negative
19.1%
Positive
26.4%
Negative
‐3.0%
Positive
Positive
‐6.3%
Positive
Negative
Negative
0.1%
Positive
‐6.6%
Positive
‐2.2%
Positive
N/A
Positive
Mov
emen
tVa
riance
, Int
erm
edia
te C
es s
how
ing
an im
e bi
gges
t con
cere
ason
s fo
r th
iss,
ther
e ha
s be
epo
rtion
of a
ctiv
ita
redu
ced
bed
b
Contra
Internal BRA
G
Car
e S
ervi
ces
am
prov
emen
t in
er
n is
ICT/
Rap
id
s is
due
to
the
en a
redu
ctio
n in
ty n
ow b
een
cap
base
in W
estv
iew
*these figures a
totals as th
ey d
target
act B
RG
nd S
peci
alis
t an
M12
. Lo
ng T
erR
espo
nse
whi
ce
larg
e va
rianc
en
activ
ity th
is y
eapt
ured
with
in th
w a
nd W
estb
roo
Internal
Contract
>+5%
>+10%
>‐5%
>‐10%
+/‐ 2
.5‐5%
n/a
<+/‐ 2.5%
<+/‐ 10%
No Targe t
are no
t included in th
e table
don’t h
ave a contractual
nd
m
ch
es
ar
at
ok
t
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 108 of 177
5.2
5.22.
2 D
NA
rate
s
DN
A ra
tes
This
KP
I is
uppe
r co
ntat
tribu
ted
tse
rvic
es.
2.3
Clin
ic b
ased
cont
inue
to fa
ll s
now
exp
erie
nctro
l lim
it in
dica
to
wor
k w
ithin
C
d ac
tivity
belo
w th
e ta
rge
ing
spec
ial c
aus
ing
that
it
is u
nhi
ldre
n’s
serv
iceet
of 5
%, a
lthou
gse
var
iatio
n w
ithnl
ikel
y th
at l
eve
es to
redu
ce D
Ngh a
re s
igni
fican
h th
e la
st 7
mon
tel
s w
ould
inc
rea
NA
rat
es th
at w
ontly
hig
her w
ithin
ths
now
per
form
ase
abov
e ta
rge
ould
oth
erw
ise
bn so
me
serv
ices
min
g be
low
the
met
. Th
e sp
ecia
l e
impa
ctin
g ac
c , par
ticul
arly
chi
mea
n, w
ith th
e ta
caus
e ca
usin
gce
ss a
nd K
PI t
ar
ildre
n’s
ther
apie
arge
t clo
se to
th t
he r
educ
tion
rget
s w
ithin
thos
s.
he
is
se
Page 109 of 177
5.2
5.2
The
targ
et
incr
ease
d t
achi
eve
thi
limit
is a
rou
revi
ew ta
kin
2.4
Adm
issi
ons
Ther
e ha
veva
riabl
e m
ope
rform
anc
guar
ante
ed
2.5
Rap
id R
esp
Whi
le t
he
gene
rally
imta
rget
, it’s
ufor L
ong
Term
ath
roug
h in
itiat
ive
s ta
rget
with
out
und
4.6%
whi
ch
ng p
lace
for 2
01
s A
void
ed
e be
en a
hig
her
onth
to m
onth
wce
aga
inst
tar
gd.
The
targ
et is
b
onse
refe
rral
s s
mea
n le
vel
of p
mpr
oved
with
Mun
likel
y th
e co
ntand
ICT
serv
ices
es s
uch
as th
e w
som
e fo
rm o
f pr
wou
ld s
ugge
st r
9/20
repo
rting
a
leve
l of a
dmis
sw
ith a
hig
h le
vel
et i
s fa
vour
abl
bein
g re
view
ed f
seen
with
in 2
h
perfo
rman
ce i
s M
12 a
t ov
er 9
6%tro
l lim
its w
ill fu
lls is
to in
crea
se c
wou
nd c
linic
s, w
itro
cess
cha
nge
ore
achi
ng 5
% is
uan
d w
ill b
e re
vise
sion
s av
oide
d in
of
vol
atili
ty, r
esu
e, a
lthou
gh w
itfo
r 201
9-20
hour
s
curr
ently
sitt
ing
%.
If th
is c
ontin
uy
mov
e ab
ove
thclin
ic b
ased
act
ivth
the
proc
ess
lior
re-e
valu
atin
g un
achi
evab
le in
ed
the
last
12
mo n
ultin
g in
a b
road
th p
erfo
rman
ce
g m
argi
nally
bel
ues
the
mea
n s
he ta
rget
leve
l in
vity
to a
t lea
st 5
mits
reca
lcul
ate
the
targ
et. T
he a
the
curr
ent e
nvi
nths
, alth
ough
thd
rang
e be
twee
n b
eing
var
iabl
e
ow t
he t
arge
t le
shou
ld in
crea
se,
n th
e ne
ar fu
ture%
of a
ll ac
tivity
ced
from
Aug
ust 2
abov
e ch
art s
horo
nmen
t, so
is b
he a
bove
cha
rt n
the
uppe
r and
e,
ach
ievi
ng t
he
evel
of
95%
, pe
, al
thou
gh g
iven
e to
giv
e fu
ll as
sucarr
ied
out.
Whi
2017
, we
are
cur
ows
that
the
curr
bein
g lo
oked
at a
indi
cate
s th
at p
elo
wer
con
trol l
ime
targ
et m
onth
erfo
rman
ce s
inc
n th
e vo
latil
ity a
uran
ce o
f con
tin
le th
is h
as
rren
tly u
nlik
ely
tore
nt u
pper
con
troas
par
t of t
he K
P
erfo
rman
ce is
st
mits
. Yea
r to
dat
ly i
s no
t al
way
ce M
ay 2
018
haan
d th
e hi
gh 9
5%ua
l ach
ieve
men
o ol
PI till te
ys
as
%
nt.
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 110 of 177
5.2.
6 Fr
iend
s an
d Fa
Whi
le th
e l
sign
of i
mp
nota
bly
Sh
seen
the
ure
flect
ion
ow
ill fu
rther
amily
Tes
t (Pa
ti
evel
of p
erfo
rma
prov
emen
t with
Mep
pey,
Sitt
ingb
oup
take
is d
iffic
ult
of th
eir v
isit
just
en
cour
age
pati eie
nts
surv
eyed
ance
has
sho
wn
M1
expe
rienc
ing
ourn
e an
d S
eve
t to
ach
ieve
. O
cth
e bo
okin
g in
pen
ts to
com
plet
e
for M
IUs
& C
o
n a
perio
d of
ad
g an
incr
ease
d no
aks.
Pat
ient
s cc
asio
nally
pat
iepr
oces
s. E
mai
line
it.
mm
unity
Hos
p
vers
e va
riatio
n nu
mbe
r of
sur
v ear
e as
ked
to c
oen
ts c
ompl
ete
thng
the
link
to th
eitals
) - R
espo
ns
with
the
last
8 m
eys.
The
dec
line
ompl
ete
the
surv
he s
urve
ys w
hil
e su
rvey
has
beese
Rat
e
mon
ths
perfo
rmi
e ha
s be
en e
vid
veys
bef
ore
they
st t
hey
are
in t
hen
tria
lled
but t
h ing
belo
w th
e m
dent
acr
oss
mos
y le
ave
but o
nce
he w
aitin
g ro
omhi
s ha
s no
t wor
k
mea
n, th
ere
was
st
MIU
site
s, m
oe
they
hav
e be
em
but
thi
s is
not
ke
d. R
ecep
tioni
s
a st
en a
sts
Page 111 of 177
5.3
5.
43 A
ssur
ance
on
Wai
ting
timpe
rform
anc
perfo
rman
cpa
rticu
larly
focu
s on
cl
4 O
utco
mes
Agg
rega
te
outc
ome
i nbe
low
cha
rth
e ra
nge
on Lo
cal W
ait T
im
mes
for
all
non
ce b
eing
bel
ow
ce is
a re
sult
of
y w
ithin
Wes
t Ke
earin
g lo
ng w
ait
outc
omes
are
n
the
vast
maj
orrt
also
sho
ws
tha
of p
erfo
rman
ce vm
es
cons
ulta
nt-le
d th
e m
ean,
wit h
a m
ixtu
re o
f the
ent B
lock
AQ
P P
ts, a
hig
her p
rop
curr
ently
rep
ort
rity
of c
ases
on
at a
chie
vem
ent
vary
ing
mon
th to
AH
P s
ervi
ces
h M
12 f
allin
g b
e cl
earin
g of
the
Phy
siot
hera
py a
porti
on o
f com
ple
ed f
or A
dult
Sp
a co
nsis
tent
ba
of ta
rget
is a
lwa
o m
onth
sho
uld
nare
still
with
in
belo
w t
he t
arge
tba
cklo
g in
som
and
as a
res
ult p
eted
wai
ts is
exp
peci
alis
t an
d C
has
is, w
ith th
e be
ays
likel
y to
occ
uno
t fal
l low
eno
ua pe
riod
of s
pt
leve
l of
92%
. m
e se
rvic
es, w
ithpe
rform
ance
is f
perie
nced
.
hild
ren’
s Th
erap
yel
ow s
how
ing
nour
unl
ess
a pr
ocug
h to
bre
ach
tapeci
al c
ause
va
The
spec
ial
c ah
a vi
ew to
redu
cfo
reca
st to
impr
y se
rvic
es,
with
o sp
ecia
l cau
sece
ss c
hang
e oc
crg
et.
riatio
n w
ith t
he
ause
var
iatio
n in
ced
long
wai
ts o
rove
into
201
9-2
h pa
tient
s re
ceiv
e va
riatio
n in
rec
curs
, as
the
con
last
11
mon
thn
com
plet
ed w
aon
the
wai
ting
lis20
. With
a g
reat
e
ving
a f
avou
rab
cent
mon
ths.
Th
trol l
imits
indi
cat
hs’
ait
st, er
le
he
te
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 112 of 177
The
follo
wi
deta
il on
osu
mm
aris
e
Worsene
Not Ach
Partiall y
Mostly
AFully Achng
tabl
e an
d ch
outc
omes
. E
ach
ed.
S Ele
ed ieved
y Ac
hieved
Achieved
hieved
hart
show
s th
e p
out
com
e w
ill b
pecialist and
ectiv
e Services
C
2.0%
6.9%
31.4%
10.6%
49.1%
prop
ortio
n of
the
be s
peci
fic t
o th
Children's S
peciali
Services
0.0%
2.3%
13.1%
14.4%
70.3%
e gr
adin
g of
eac
he p
atie
nt a
nd w
st
ch o
utco
me
for
tw
ill b
e pe
rson
althe
year
to d
ate
lised
, th
eref
ore
e, s
plit
by s
ervi
cno
t al
low
ing
fuce ty
pe fo
r fu
rthe
rther
det
ail
to b
er
be
Page 113 of 177
App
endi
x - S
core
card
SPC
Cha
rts
1. P
reve
nt Il
l Hea
lth
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
Stop
Smok
ing Quits
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
110.0%
Health Che
cks
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
6‐8 Wee
k Ch
ecks
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
3750
4250
4750
5250
5750
6250
6750
7250
7750
Admission
s Av
oide
d
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
% LT
C/ITC Patie
nts with
an avoide
d ad
mission
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
New
Birth Visits
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Data Outsid
e Limits
Common
Variance
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 114 of 177
2. D
eliv
er h
igh-
qual
ity c
are
at h
ome
and
in th
e co
mm
unity
‐0.30
‐0.20
‐0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
Mod
erate an
d Severe fa
lls per 1,000
bed
days
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
‐3.0
‐2.0
‐1.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Pressure Ulcers (Lapses in
Care)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
Contractua
l activity
against ta
rget
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
DNA Ra
te
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
92.0%
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
LTC/ICT Re
spon
se Tim
es Being
Met
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
% 2Hr
Rap
id Respo
nses m
et
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
101.0%
MIU 4Hr
Target
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
Consultant‐Led
RTT
Incomplete Waits
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
‐1000
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Consultant‐Led
RTT
Incomplete Waits (w
aitin
g list size
>18
wee
ks)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
Page 115 of 177
2. D
eliv
er h
igh-
qual
ity c
are
at h
ome
and
in th
e co
mm
unity
99.0%
99.2%
99.4%
99.6%
99.8%
100.0%
100.2%
GUM Access with
in 48H
rs
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Med
ian length of stay (days)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
Positiv
e ou
tcom
es achieved for p
lann
ed care an
d therap
y services
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
93.00%
94.00%
95.00%
96.00%
97.00%
98.00%
99.00%
Percen
tage of p
atients who
wou
ld re
commen
d ou
r services
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Friend
s an
d Family Respo
nse Ra
te (M
IU and
Inpa
tients)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
Clinical Aud
it Im
plem
entatio
ns by de
adlin
e
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
100.5%
NICE gu
idan
ce re
view
ed with
in timescales
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
87.0%
89.0%
91.0%
93.0%
95.0%
97.0%
99.0%
AHP Non
Con
sulta
nt‐le
d 18
Wee
k complete waits with
in 18
wee
ks
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
60.0%
65.0%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
105.0%
110.0%
6 wee
k Diagno
stics
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 116 of 177
3. In
tegr
ate
Serv
ices
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Delayed Tran
sfers of Care
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Percen
tage of ICT/LTC
Referrals from with
in KCH
FT
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
‐0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
Excess Bed
Days ‐W
est K
ent
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
050100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Average wait tim
e (m
inutes) for Acciden
t and
Emergency
Services (W
est K
ent)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
050100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Average wait tim
e (m
inutes) for Acciden
t and
Emergency
Services (E
ast K
ent)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
‐0.20
‐0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
Excess Bed
Days ‐E
ast K
ent
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
Page 117 of 177
4. D
evel
op s
usta
inab
le s
ervi
ces
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
LTC/ICT % Con
tacts in clin
ic
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
78.0%
80.0%
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
Bed Occup
ancy
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.00
%
0.50
%
1.00
%
1.50
%
2.00
%
2.50
%
Income an
d Expe
nditu
re Surplus vs plan
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
CIP Ac
hieved
Against Plan
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
External Agency Sp
end
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 118 of 177
5. B
e Th
e B
est E
mpl
oyer
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
Absence
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
Absence (Stress)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
22.0%
Turnover (P
lann
ed and
Unp
lann
ed)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
82.0%
87.0%
92.0%
97.0%
102.0%
107.0%
Man
datory Training Ra
te
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
Vacancy Ra
te
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
70.0%
72.0%
74.0%
76.0%
78.0%
80.0%
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
Stab
ility
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
Page 119 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 2.9
Agenda Item Title: Digital Strategy
Presenting Officer: Gordon Flack Director of Finance
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☒ Information ☐ Assurance ☐
Report Summary
This paper is the refreshed Digital Strategy for the period 2019-2024 which has been recommended by the Management Committee for approval. This strategy has been refreshed in line with the other strategies and in line with the Long term Plan. The high level aims are: • Safe to promote and support patient safety • Simplified to reduce complexity for staff and within the infrastructure • Secure to maintain data and information security • Shared to promote the sharing of data for patient benefit • Speedy to provide rapid access to information Underpinned by the implementation principles that:- •Patients: If willing and able to do so, will be empowered by new tools to become more actively involved and engaged in their care. The patient generated data will be interpreted by algorithms enabling personalised self-management and self-care. •Evidence: The introduction of any technology must be grounded in robust research evidence and a fit for purpose and ethical governance framework that patients, public and staff can all trust. •Releasing time to care: Whenever possible, the adoption of technology should be used to give more time for care, creating an environment in which the patient-clinician relationship is enhanced. Specifically there are eight objectives: 1.To review and replace core Digital applications 2.To upgrade network infrastructure 3.To refresh end user devices and operating systems 4.To seek opportunities for infrastructure technologies eg. Cloud enabled, Internet first etc. 5. Build and enhance cyber and information security 6. Work with the STP Digital on developments for the system 7. Seek opportunities to enhance quality of patient care and decrease costs with digital services 8. Develop digital capabilities for all staff.
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 120 of 177
Proposals and /or Recommendations
To approve the Digital Strategy
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
Yes ☒
No issues identified.
Gordon Flack Director of Finance Tel: 01622 211934
Email: [email protected]
Page 121 of 177
Version 1.0 Page 1 of 18 May 2019
Digital Strategy
2019- 2024
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 122 of 177
Version 1.0 Page 2 of 18 May 2019
Document Reference No. TBC
Status Approved
Version Number 1.0
Replacing/Superseded
policy or documents
Information Management and Technology Strategy 2013-
2018
Number of pages 14
Target Audience/ applicable
to
All Trust staff
Author Mark Ashby AD for ICT
Acknowledgements Comments from Management committee and IT steering
group
Contact Point for Queries IT Department
Date Ratified 29th April 2019
Date of
Implementation/distribution 7th May 2019
Circulation Policy Dissemination / Flo
Review date Annualy with full review April 2024
Copyright Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust 2019
Related Policies/Procedures
Document Tracking Sheet
Version Status Date Issued to/approved by
Comments / summary of changes
0.1 Draft 29/11/18 Finance and Business Support Directorate – Senior Team
Minor textural additions plus the inclusion of information from the Topol review
19/11/18 IMT Steering Group Textural additions and points of clarification
0.2 Draft 20/01/19 Exec Team Outcome measures added
0.3 Draft 29/01/19 Management Committee
Extend the work plan to include exploration of Apps
0.4 Draft 29/04/19 IT Steering Group Addition of AHP strategy reference, addition
1.0 Final 07/05/19 Trust Board Updated strategy on a page and minor format changes
Contents
Title Reference
• KCHFT Business Strategy. • KCHFT Estates Strategy. • KCHFT Procurement Policy. • KCHFT People Strategy. • KCHFT Quality Strategy. • KCHFT Standing Financial Instructions
Flo
Page 123 of 177
Version 1.0 Page 3 of 18 May 2019
(i) Foreword
(ii) Strategy on a Page
1 Strategy Aim
2 Alignment with Organisational Strategy
3 Triangulation and Links
4 Strategy Implementation
5 Scope
6 Objectives
7 Annex 1 – Digital Work Programme
8 References
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 124 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 4 of 18 May 2019
(i) Foreword
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust provides out of acute hospital, community-
based NHS healthcare services for over one million people across Kent, Medway, and East
Sussex and within London.
Our Organisational Strategy recognises the importance of providing high quality services and
is central to our vision, mission and values. The Digital Strategy is fundamental in supporting
our goals to empower patients in their own care, use decision support and artificial
intelligence to help clinicians in applying best practice, eliminate unwarranted variation and
support personalised self-management. This will have the positive effect of releasing more
patient facing time for frontline staff.
As outlined in the Long Term Plan (2019) digitally-enabled care will become the mainstream
across the NHS. Technology is continually opening up new possibilities for prevention, care
and treatment. The practical priorities include:
• Ensure that clinicians can access and interact with patient records and care plans
wherever they are.
• Use predictive techniques to support local health systems to plan care for
populations.
• Use intuitive tools to capture data as a by-product of care in ways that empower
clinicians and reduce the administrative burden.
• Encourage a world leading health IT industry in England with a supportive
environment for software developers and innovators.
We have spent the last two years fulfilling a leadership role in the Sustainability and
Transformation Partnership (STP) in the Kent and Medway health economy with the drive to
local care delivered out of acute hospital settings, a greater emphasis on prevention of ill-
health and a greater emphasis on supporting the workforce. Through its experienced Board
and leadership team, we are building stronger relationships with new commissioning leaders,
strengthening the technology capability of the Trust and driving the integration of services
across the local health economy. The Digital Strategy underpins this by substantial
investment in new digital tools including a new electronic patient record system to integrate
with the STP Kent and Medway Care Record.
The Digital Strategy for 2019-24 is to deliver a quintuple aim:
• Safe to promote and support patient safety
• Simplified to reduce complexity for staff and within the infrastructure
• Secure to maintain data and information security
• Shared to promote the sharing of data for patient benefit
• Speedy to provide rapid access to information
We will focus on developing our digital capability to support delivery of high quality services
and build our shared leadership role within the STP. It is our technical staff working closely
with clinicians and other team members who will ensure we deliver our digital aims through
their skill, commitment and imagination.
Gordon Flack (Director of Finance)
Page 125 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 5 of 18 May 2019
(ii) Organisational Strategy on a Page
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 126 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 6 of 18 May 2019
1 Strategic Aims
The Digital strategy’s aims can be summarised as ‘fives S’s’ as follows:-
• Safe to promote and support patient safety
• Simplified to reduce complexity for staff and within the infrastructure
• Secure to maintain data and information security
• Shared to promote the sharing of data for patient benefit
• Speedy to provide rapid access to information
Applied appropriately, digital technology has the capability to enhance many areas of patient
safety and provide an environment where patient safety is paramount. This will underpin the
Trust’s reputation in the delivery of safe patient care and will enhance the Trust's ability to
pursue additional business opportunities.
Simplified architecture and a standardised user experience will assist in staff productivity by
removing more complex procedures and workarounds that exist to alleviate shortcomings in
current systems. This will also allow greater flexibility as service models change and develop
since staff will have a familiar look and feel to their digital experience across the Trust.
Security of data and information, especially in the cyber arena, is essential to ensure all of
the Trust’s digital assets are available for use in patient care. Steps have already been taken
to strengthen the security regime of the Trust but there is more to do as threats develop. All
organisations handling sensitive data will be required to meet minimum standards in data
security in order to conduct and develop their business.
The importance of sharing data in patient care has been evident for many years in national
strategy and this will be essential in the delivery of future new models of care where patient
pathways extend across multiple health and care organisations. The Trust will deploy
systems and services that meet NHS interoperability standards and will allow the information
to follow the patient across care settings.
Clinical information must be made available in a timely manner. Systems and networks will
be optimised to ensure the delivery of information to users will be as fast as possible.
Management information must also be made available rapidly to allow decisions to be taken
quickly. All of this will underpin the ability of the Trust to work in an agile manner to deliver
current and future services.
Digital is recognised as an enabler which will underpin the delivery of the NHS Long Term
Plan (NHSE, 2019) as well as the Trust’s own mission. With appropriate funding and resourcing
the ‘five S’s’ philosophy can support financial viability by working “smarter not harder” and
will support the delivery of sustainable services for the future.
Digital services for the purposes of this document include all of the IT infrastructure and
services internally together with any interaction between the Trust and patients via their own
digital devices.
Page 127 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 7 of 18 May 2019
2 Alignment with Organisational Strategy
The Digital strategy is an enabler to the achievement of KCHFT’s mission which involves
prioritising innovation, transformation, productivity, leadership and partnership working in
order to deliver sustainable services and support the organisational goals:
Strategic Goals
1. Prevent ill health
2. Integrate services
3. Deliver high quality care at home and in the community
4. Develop sustainable services
Fig 1 – Alignment of strategic goals with the Digital strategy
The Digital Strategy promotes innovation that will be the key to unlocking potential in
supporting and developing services. Empowering patients in the management of their
conditions through the development of self-care clinical apps and online access to clinical
records for children (the online red book) are just two examples where digital is supporting
the innovation of care by placing information under the patient’s own control (NHSE, Harnessing
Technology and Evolution, 2017)
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 128 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 8 of 18 May 2019
3 Triangulation and Links
Digital services within and outside of KCHFT provide a means to deliver and enhance the
day to day business activities of the Trust as well as provide support to deliver the ambitions
identified in the other organisational strategies and wider regional and national programmes
of work.
The most relevant links are listed below:-
1. The NHS Long Term Plan. By ensuring that the Trust Digital services support the
strategic ambitions of the NHS Long Term plan and closely align with the “Digitally
Enabled Care” section (chapter 5) and its timetable for delivery
2. Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (by ensuring that affordability and
efficiency are considered at every level as we move to a more preventative and
integrated approach with our partners in the health and care economy)
3. Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP) has identified a Digital work
stream promoting and delivering the Local Digital Roadmap (LDR) to support the new
models of care. The KCHFT Digital strategy will support this initiative as well as the
productivity and local care STP work streams with digitally supported change. The
first deliverable from this work stream is the Kent and Medway Care Record (KMCR)
which provides an integration Health and Social Care record for the Kent citizen.
4. Supporting clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice by ensuring that
relevant digital technology is deployed to assist in particular, areas where there are
limited clinical resources and to support better outcomes for patients.
5. Supporting clinical risk management and patient safety with digital technology
underpinning the delivery of the GIRFT principles (getting it right first time) and
assisting in minimising incidents that adversely impact patient safety.
6. Providing new platforms to support better performance monitoring through the
delivery of new digital tools. This will provide dashboards at organisation,
departmental and team levels as well as deliver contractual key performance
indicators to demonstrate the reliability of the Trust as a provider and partner as well
as support ownership and accountability across operational teams.
7. To deliver the benefits of digital technology, workforce development will need to be
supported to include the necessary competencies for all KCHFT staff. Health
Education England’s digital literacy programme states “Excellent digital capabilities
include a positive attitude towards technology and innovation and its potential to
improve care and outcomes. With improved overall digital literacy capabilities, we
can all maximise that potential”.
8. Digital technology has the ability to support devolution of decision-making and
accountability to the closest point to patient care across the whole organisation in line
with the “People Strategy”. (1c Engaging and empowering our people). Also by
making the digital environment easier to use will assist with recruitment and retention
(3a Recruiting and retaining).
Page 129 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 9 of 18 May 2019
9. All procurement and purchases to support the digital strategy will be in line with the
Procurement Strategy, Statements of Internal Control and Trust Standing Financial
Instructions.
10. Supporting the Estates strategy to deliver a more mobile workforce to drive transformations of care (Principle 1) and facilitating value for money through the more efficient use of estate technology enabled change (Principle 2).
4 Strategy Implementation Digital technology has become part of the mainstream and digital skills are essential for the modern clinical workforce. For this reason, the implementation of this strategy will rely, firstly on the technical specialists to provide the necessary internal infrastructure, secondly for all Trust leaders to work to develop a “digital culture” for the organisation and most importantly, every member of staff to engage in the delivery of digital services for their area of work. Education, both formal and informal will be required in order to develop a “digital culture” for our staff, patients and service users. Principles to be followed during strategy implementation will be:-
• Patients: If willing and able to do so, will be empowered by new tools to become more actively involved and engaged in their care. The patient generated data will be interpreted by algorithms enabling personalised self-management and self-care.
• Evidence: The introduction of any technology must be grounded in robust research evidence and a fit for purpose and ethical governance framework that patients, public and staff can all trust.
• Releasing time to care: Whenever possible, the adoption of technology should be used to give more time for care, creating an environment in which the patient-clinician relationship is enhanced. (Topol Review, 2018)
The additional considerations are as follows:
4.1 Ownership:
The success of this strategy will be reliant on all services taking steps to embed digital in their business as usual processes. To this end the Director of Finance will work with other directors to ensure that the Digital agenda is developed and resourced to meet actual Trust needs and priorities. The NHS ten year plan states “In 2021/22, we will have systems that support population health management in every Integrated Care System across England, with a Chief Clinical Information Officer (CCIO) or Chief Information Officer (CIO) on the board of every local NHS organisation” (NHS Long-term Plan, 2019) Whilst the Trust currently have a CCIO on the Board, the executive responsibility for IT currently rests with the Director of Finance. During the period encompassed by the Digital Strategy the Trust will consider its options in order to meet this milestone.
4.2 Resourcing:
Resourcing the strategy will be through a combination of the existing IT budgets delivering digitally enhanced “business as usual” services and the development of the strategic programme of work supported by specific investment cases for each major element. The organisation will also need to identify “digital champions” within the various services to act as a focal point for the delivery of the local digital agenda and ensure there is sufficient capacity to deliver what is required for the services.
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 130 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 10 of 18 May 2019
4.3 Structure:
The Information Communication Technology (ICT) department resides in the Finance and Business Support Directorate which facilitates close cooperation between these corporate departments. Information received from performance and business development in particular will be of use when modifying the programme of work to deliver the Digital strategy.
4.4 Sharing Intelligence
The Trust has an IT Steering Group which is composed of senior managers from
Trust services and chaired by the Director of Finance. The Assistant Director of ICT
reports progress against all aspects of ICT including the Digital programme of work.
In addition, information is shared at the monthly management committee meetings
informally and formally reported as required.
5 Scope
As stated, digital technology is now mainstream and so the target audience for this strategy
is all managers of the organisation. Additionally, an awareness of digital technology is
required by all KCHFT staff and how this can be used to improve their day to day working
life. This links directly to the duty to safeguard Trust assets and resources and to strive to
develop better ways of working.
In addition to the IT steering group other key groups of staff will have responsibility for
overseeing the development of the Digital agenda within the organisation. This includes:
• Members of the Board
• Directors and Assistant Directors
• Service Leads or Heads of Department
• Finance Business and Investment Committee
• Quality Committee
• Finance and Business Support Directorate
• External agencies and regulators (particularly NHSD and NHSI).
Page 131 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 11 of 18 May 2019
6 Objectives and Targets
This section describes the overarching targets for the Digital strategy over the next five years
which is supplemented by a programme of work outlined in Annex 1. Given the fast moving
nature of digital technology this programme of work will be kept under regular review to
ensure it remains aligned with KCHFT’s business objectives and that it takes account of
changes and advancements in digital services.
1. To review and replace where required KCHFT core Digital applications:
Outcome – to ensure all digital applications are up to date and fit for purpose to
deliver improved patient experiences and support new models of care
2. To upgrade KCHFT’s network infrastructure including wide area and local connections Outcome – to allow faster and more reliable connectivity for all staff to clinical and non-clinical applications. Improving efficiency and resilience
3. To refresh end user devices and operating systems to current versions Outcome – To protect the Trust from the risk of unsupported software and to improve the user experience when accessing their Digital applications
4. To investigate opportunities to refresh infrastructure across the five year horizon in line with national NHS strategy guidelines (i.e. Cloud enabled, Internet first etc.) Outcome – to provide a simplified architecture thus improving the resilience of the Trust’s infrastructure and allowing new opportunities to deliver fresh Digital applications
5. Build and enhance the current level of Trust cyber and information security
Outcome – an improved security infrastructure to ensure patient and other sensitive information remains safe and available for all staff who require legitimate access.
6. To maintain engagement with all areas of the Digital workstream for the STP
Outcome – to ensure better health and social care information exchange by involvement in the design and implementation of the KMCR. Also to influence the development of the Digital agenda across Kent to support the KCHFT strategy
7. Investigate opportunities to deliver services digitally to enhance quality of patient care
and decrease costs Outcome – to adopt new practice underpinned by enhanced Digital services, such as AI. This objective will deliver new ways of working and opportunities for improved patient care and reduction of cost.
8. Develop digital capabilities for all staff through engagement, training and communication. Plans to be developed and implemented
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 132 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 12 of 18 May 2019
Outcome – an engaged and digitally mature workforce who will embrace the new opportunities offered by the new digital services provided through this strategic programme. This will ease future implementations and result clinically led, digitally enabled patient benefit.
Key performance indicators will be reviewed and further ones developed as the strategy is rolled out to ensure changes are having the desired effect and unintended consequences are identified and dealt with accordingly. Improvement against the national Digital Maturity Assessment metrics will also be expected and monitored to benchmark the Trust with similar organisations in England. Reporting on progress will be via the IT Steering group and the Trust Management Committee on a quarterly basis. Strategic objectives will also be translated to personal objectives for all IT (and other) staff and monitored through the normal performance appraisal system.
Page 133 of 177
Kent
Com
munity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
und
ation
Tru
st
Dig
ita
l S
trate
gy
Vers
ion 1
.0
P
age 1
3 o
f 18
M
ay 2
019
7
An
ne
x 1
- D
igit
al
Wo
rk P
rog
ram
me
O
bje
cti
ve
Pro
jects
L
ead
(s)
Ex
pe
cte
d O
utc
om
e
Ye
ar
19/
20
20/
21
21/
22
22/
23
23/
24
1
Rev
iew
an
d r
ep
lac
e
(wh
ere
ap
pli
cab
le)
co
re d
igit
al
ap
plicati
on
s
(safe
secure
, sh
are
d)
Pro
cure
and im
ple
ment
repla
cem
ent
for
curr
ent
CIS
.
Directo
r of
Fin
ance
/Me
dic
al
Directo
r/A
D f
or
ICT
/ C
ISC
P P
roje
ct
Man
ager
Imp
rove
d c
ore
EP
R
functiona
lity t
o p
rovid
e
opp
ort
un
itie
s f
or
syste
m
inte
gra
tio
n a
nd
reducin
g t
he
bure
au
cra
tic b
urd
en o
n f
ront
line
sta
ff t
o a
cco
un
t fo
r n
o
mo
re th
an
10
% o
f clin
ical tim
e.
* *
Pro
cure
Ch
ild H
ealth info
rmation S
yste
m
(Co
ntr
act cessa
tion J
un
e 2
020)
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f IT
Pro
jects
Im
pro
ve
d s
yste
m f
or
colle
ction
of
child
hea
lth
in
form
atio
n
*
Revie
w o
f exis
tin
g T
rust
clin
ica
l syste
ms
•
MIU
•
Lill
ie S
exua
l H
ealth
•
Oth
ers
Assessm
ent fo
r new
Tru
st
syste
ms
•
Ph
arm
acy
•
Be
d/c
apacity m
anagem
ent
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f P
roje
cts
Im
pro
ve
d f
unction
alit
y a
nd
pro
du
ctivity f
or
the
se
rvic
e
dep
art
ments
*
2
To
rev
iew
an
d
up
gra
de t
he K
CH
FT
netw
ork
infr
astr
uctu
re
(Secure
, S
imp
lifie
d,
Spe
edy)
HS
CN
Circuit r
ep
lacem
ent
AD
for
ICT
/ H
ead o
f O
pera
tions/I
T
Infr
astr
uctu
re
manager
Incre
ase
d b
an
dw
idth
(tim
es
two
) to
all
KC
HF
T s
ites to
pro
vid
e a
faste
r re
spon
se
tim
e
for
sta
ff
*
Rep
lacem
ent
of
netw
ork
active
e
quip
ment
(core
and e
dg
e s
witch
es)
AD
for
ICT
/ H
ead o
f O
pera
tions/I
T
Infr
astr
uctu
re
manager
Red
uce
d r
isk o
f fa
ilure
at site
s
(deliv
ering
99.9
% a
va
ilab
ility
) d
ue
to
agin
g e
quip
ment fa
ilure
. In
cre
ase
d s
pe
ed f
or
users
and
incre
ase
d n
etw
ork
ca
pa
city
(x2
) to
accom
mo
da
te
add
itio
na
l u
se
rs
*
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 134 of 177
Kent
Com
munity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
und
ation
Tru
st
Dig
ita
l S
trate
gy
Vers
ion 1
.0
P
age 1
4 o
f 18
M
ay 2
019
O
bje
cti
ve
Pro
jects
L
ead
(s)
Ex
pe
cte
d O
utc
om
e
Ye
ar
19/
20
20/
21
21/
22
22/
23
23/
24
Inve
stig
atio
n a
nd i
mple
menta
tion o
f ne
w t
ools
to
manage n
etw
ork
tra
ffic
AD
Busin
ess
Develo
pm
ent
and
Serv
ice Im
pro
vem
ent
Imp
rove
d u
se
r exp
erie
nce
th
roug
h im
pro
ve
d n
etw
ork
m
ana
gem
ent.
*
*
Assessm
ent
of
add
itio
na
l o
pport
un
itie
s f
or
Voic
e
and d
ata
in
tegra
tio
n (
VO
IP)
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
Red
uce
d c
ost of
on lin
e c
alls
(m
eetin
g C
IP t
arg
ets
),
sim
plif
ica
tion
of
infr
astr
uctu
re
and
im
pro
vem
ent in
use
r e
xp
erie
nce
* *
*
Sim
plif
yin
g u
ser
log
in t
hro
ugh
Sin
gle
Sig
n O
n o
r
Passw
ord
ma
na
gem
ent
solu
tio
ns
Head o
f IT
P
roje
cts
/Head
of
IT
Opera
tions/I
T
Security
Man
ager
Imp
rove
d u
se
r exp
erie
nce
th
roug
h s
implif
ied lo
gin
p
rocess (
one
to
uch
).
*
*
3
To
rev
iew
an
d
refr
esh
en
d u
ser
dev
ices.
(Safe
, S
imp
lifie
d,
Secure
)
To p
lan a
nd r
oll
out
Mic
rosoft
Win
do
ws 1
0 t
o a
ll
KC
HF
T lapto
ps a
nd d
eskto
p d
evic
es
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
Movin
g th
e T
rust to
the
la
test
ve
rsio
n o
f th
e o
pe
rating
syste
m to d
eliv
er
impro
ve
d
use
r e
xp
eri
ence
th
roug
h
enh
an
ce
d f
unctio
nalit
y a
nd
secu
rity
*
Table
t an
d m
obile
revie
w
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
To a
ssess u
se
r ne
ed a
ga
inst
ava
ilab
le e
nd u
ser
de
vic
es
(lapto
ps/tab
lets
/mo
bile
p
ho
ne
s/o
the
r) in
ord
er
to
incre
ase
pro
ductivity a
nd s
taff
u
se
r e
xp
eri
ence
*
*
*
To k
eep
under
revie
w t
he
la
test
de
velo
pm
ent
of
sta
ndard
op
era
ting s
yste
ms (
Win
XX
?)
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
To e
nsure
th
e T
rust
infr
astr
uctu
re d
oes n
ot fa
ll b
eh
ind t
o a
n u
nsupp
ort
ed
ve
rsio
n a
nd m
ain
tain
a g
oo
d
use
r e
xp
eri
ence
to
de
liver
qua
lity c
are
* *
*
To d
eliv
er
str
ate
gy f
or
KC
HF
T “
sta
ndard
users
” a
n
assessm
ent
of
wh
at
de
vic
es
are
re
qu
ired
for
specific
job r
ole
s
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
Su
pp
ort
ing a
more
eff
icie
nt
and
fle
xib
le w
ork
forc
e a
ble
to
d
eliv
er
their s
erv
ices f
rom
a
va
rie
ty o
f lo
ca
tio
ns
* *
*
Page 135 of 177
Kent
Com
munity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
und
ation
Tru
st
Dig
ita
l S
trate
gy
Vers
ion 1
.0
P
age 1
5 o
f 18
M
ay 2
019
O
bje
cti
ve
Pro
jects
L
ead
(s)
Ex
pe
cte
d O
utc
om
e
Ye
ar
19/
20
20/
21
21/
22
22/
23
23/
24
4
To
in
vesti
ga
te
op
po
rtu
nit
ies t
o
refr
esh
infr
astr
uctu
re in
lin
e
wit
h n
ati
on
al N
HS
str
ate
gy g
uid
elin
es
(i.e
. C
lou
d e
nab
led
,
Inte
rnet
firs
t etc
.)
(Safe
, S
imp
lifie
d,
Secure
, S
hare
d)
Revie
w a
nd r
ep
rocure
rep
lacem
ent
Tru
st
serv
ice
desk
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
Pro
vid
e a
re
pla
cem
ent fo
r th
e
core
se
rvic
e d
esk to im
pro
ve
use
r e
xp
eri
ence
wh
en
lo
gg
ing
calls
*
*
Revie
w t
he
Tru
st
serv
er
infr
astr
uctu
re t
o a
sse
ss
options f
or
repla
cem
ent
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
A m
ore
fle
xib
le in
fra
str
uctu
re
allo
win
g IT
to b
e d
ep
loyed
mo
re r
apid
ly a
nd
in
alte
rna
tive
settin
gs to s
up
port
the d
eliv
ery
o
f care
* *
Assess a
nd d
eliv
er
options f
or
deliv
ery
of
soft
ware
serv
ices v
ia s
ecure
Inte
rnet
serv
ices
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
A m
ore
fle
xib
le in
fra
str
uctu
re
allo
win
g IT
to b
e d
ep
loyed
mo
re r
apid
ly a
nd
in
alte
rna
tive
settin
gs to s
up
port
th
e d
eliv
ery
o
f care
*
Assess
optio
ns
for
Directo
ry
Se
rvic
es
Man
ag
em
ent
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
Imp
rove
d in
tegra
tio
n b
etw
een
core
EP
R w
ith a
ctive d
ire
cto
ry
(better,
mo
re s
ecu
re le
ave
r a
nd
sta
rte
r m
anage
me
nt)
*
*
To r
evie
w a
nd
rep
lace
as r
equ
ire
d r
em
ote
access
options
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
Imp
rove
d f
lexib
ility
of
sta
ff to
w
ork
at m
ultip
le s
ite
s to
supp
ort
mo
bile
work
ing a
nd
th
e e
sta
tes r
ation
alis
atio
n
str
ate
gy
*
*
5
Bu
ild
an
d e
nh
an
ce
the c
urr
en
t le
vel o
f
Tru
st
cyb
er
an
d
info
rmati
on
se
cu
rity
(Safe
, S
ecure
)
Revie
w a
nd
refr
esh th
e T
rust
Anti-V
irus s
oft
ware
A
D f
or
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
/Tru
st
IT
Security
Man
ager
En
su
rin
g t
he T
rust
infr
astr
uctu
re is s
ecu
red f
rom
viru
s a
ttack
*
*
Obta
in
“Cyb
er
Essentia
ls
plu
s
cert
ific
atio
n”
(to
inclu
de
data
mappin
g s
oft
ware
and
pro
ve
GD
PR
requirem
ents
are
met)
Head o
f O
pera
tions/I
T
Security
Man
ager
Pro
vid
ing
the
Tru
st users
and
p
atie
nts
with a
ssura
nce
th
at
data
is s
ecu
red
aga
inst cyb
er
thre
at
* *
Revie
w of
curr
ent
se
cu
rity
up
date
/patc
hin
g t
oo
ls
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f P
rovid
ing
the
Tru
st users
and
*
*
*
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 136 of 177
Kent
Com
munity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
und
ation
Tru
st
Dig
ita
l S
trate
gy
Vers
ion 1
.0
P
age 1
6 o
f 18
M
ay 2
019
O
bje
cti
ve
Pro
jects
L
ead
(s)
Ex
pe
cte
d O
utc
om
e
Ye
ar
19/
20
20/
21
21/
22
22/
23
23/
24
(in
cl. t
able
ts)
O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
/Tru
st
IT
Security
Man
ager
patie
nts
with a
ssura
nce
th
at
data
is s
ecu
red
aga
inst cyb
er
thre
at
Revie
w
and
pro
cure
me
nt
of
additio
nal
co
ntr
ol
soft
wa
re a
s re
qu
ired
(i
.e.
Data
lo
ss pre
ve
ntion
,
Phis
hin
g p
latf
orm
s e
tc.)
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
/Tru
st
IT
Security
Man
ager
Pro
vid
ing
the
Tru
st users
and
p
atie
nts
with a
ssura
nce
th
at
data
is s
ecu
red
aga
inst cyb
er
thre
at
* *
*
Con
tin
ua
tio
n
of
the
data
security
im
pro
vem
ent
pro
gra
mm
e
(inclu
din
g
technic
al
and
ope
rationa
l
safe
gu
ard
s)
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f O
pera
tions/H
ea
d o
f P
roje
cts
/Tru
st
IT
Security
Man
ager
Pro
vid
ing
the
Tru
st users
and
p
atie
nts
with a
ssura
nce
th
at
data
is s
ecu
red
aga
inst cyb
er
thre
at
* *
* *
*
6
To
main
tain
en
gag
em
en
t w
ith
all
are
as o
f th
e D
igit
al
wo
rkstr
eam
fo
r th
e
ST
P
(Safe
, S
hare
d)
Kent
an
d M
ed
wa
y C
are
Re
cord
. D
irecto
r of
Fin
ance
/AD
for
ICT
T
he d
eliv
ery
of
a c
are
record
fo
r a
ll K
ent
resid
ents
wh
ere
h
ea
lth a
nd s
ocia
l care
in
form
atio
n is
ava
ilab
le t
o
supp
ort
the n
ew
mode
ls o
f care
* *
*
Dig
ita
l w
ork
str
eam
engage
ment
(inclu
din
g r
efr
esh
of
the L
oca
l D
igita
l R
oadm
ap)
AD
for
ICT
C
loser
co-o
pera
tion w
ith a
ll K
ent
He
alth
an
d S
ocia
l ca
re
part
ners
IT
team
s to d
eliv
er
and
im
ple
ment th
e s
hare
d
vis
ion o
f th
e S
TP
* *
* *
*
7
Inv
esti
gate
op
po
rtu
nit
ies t
o
deliv
er
serv
ice
s
dig
itall
y t
o e
nh
an
ce
qu
ality
of
pa
tie
nt
care
an
d d
ec
rease
co
sts
(Safe
, S
imp
lifie
d,
Assessin
g
specific
re
qu
irem
ents
fo
r dig
ita
lly
enab
led s
erv
ice
s
•
Dig
ita
l X
Ra
y V
iew
ing
•
E R
efe
rrals
•
Colla
bora
tio
n t
oo
ls
•
Tele
me
dic
ine
AD
for
ICT
/ A
ll in
tere
ste
d H
ead
s o
f serv
ice
Imp
rove
d d
eliv
ery
of
ca
re
thro
ug
h th
e u
se
of
targ
ete
d,
dig
ita
lly e
nab
led
se
rvic
es
* *
* *
*
Specific
Ap
p d
evelo
pm
ent
pro
jects
(s)
e.g
. use
of
a g
eogra
ph
ic i
nfo
rmation
syste
m (
GIS
) to
de
liver
AD
for
ICT
/ A
ll in
tere
ste
d H
ead
s o
f T
he d
eliv
ery
of
Tru
st se
rvic
es
dig
ita
lly t
o p
atie
nts
to im
pro
ve
*
* *
* *
Page 137 of 177
Kent
Com
munity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
und
ation
Tru
st
Dig
ita
l S
trate
gy
Vers
ion 1
.0
P
age 1
7 o
f 18
M
ay 2
019
O
bje
cti
ve
Pro
jects
L
ead
(s)
Ex
pe
cte
d O
utc
om
e
Ye
ar
19/
20
20/
21
21/
22
22/
23
23/
24
Spe
edy)
ele
ctr
on
ic m
aps fo
r th
ose
sta
ff w
ho
are
m
obile
and
a
GP
S
serv
ice
to
tie
into
ro
am
ing
sta
ff
devic
es.
serv
ice
e
ffic
iency a
nd
supp
ort
th
e
dig
ita
l a
gen
da
Map
curr
ent
serv
ice u
se o
f A
pps a
nd t
hose u
sed
in s
imila
r o
rgan
isations t
o i
den
tify
opport
unity a
nd
pla
n f
or
ado
ption.
AD
for
ICT
/ A
ll in
tere
ste
d H
ead
s o
f serv
ice
Pla
n f
or
ap
plic
atio
n a
nd r
ollo
ut
of
use
ful A
pps t
hat m
eet T
rust
needs
* *
Hori
zo
n S
ca
nn
ing
(in
clu
din
g lessons learn
ed
fro
m
Dig
ita
l E
xem
pla
rs)
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f IT
Opera
tions/H
ead
o
f IT
Pro
jects
To le
arn
th
e lesso
ns f
rom
the
NH
S G
DE
site
s a
nd
ad
opt
and
a
da
pt
wh
ere
possib
le to
supp
ort
pa
tie
nt
ca
re a
nd
Tru
st
busin
ess
* *
* *
Inve
stig
atin
g
opport
un
itie
s
for
imple
menting
Art
ific
ial In
telli
gence
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f IT
Opera
tions/H
ead
o
f IT
Pro
jects
/All
inte
reste
d h
ea
ds o
f serv
ice
To u
se o
ppo
rtunitie
s f
or
AI
to
deliv
er
routin
e tasks fo
r fr
ontlin
e s
taff
more
eff
icie
ntly
*
* *
*
8
Sta
ff e
ng
ag
em
en
t,
train
ing
an
d
co
mm
un
icati
on
(Spee
dy, S
imp
lifie
d,
Secure
)
Develo
p
an
d
de
live
r a
co
here
nt
co
mm
unic
atio
n
pla
n f
or
the D
igita
l P
rogra
mm
e
AD
for
ICT
/AD
of
Com
ms
A
be
tter
info
rme
d
wo
rkfo
rce
rece
ptive
to
lookin
g
for
Dig
ita
lly
ena
ble
d
so
lutio
ns
to
work
pla
ce issu
es
* *
* *
*
Deliv
ery
of
ne
w tr
ain
ing pla
ns/m
ode
ls to
re
flect
the T
rust le
ve
ls o
f D
igital M
atu
rity
Head o
f IT
O
pera
tions/I
T
train
ing L
ead
A w
ork
forc
e a
ble
to m
ake
better
use o
f D
igital se
rvic
es
due
to
more
hig
her
leve
ls o
f D
igita
l skill
s
* *
* *
*
Pro
vid
e
eng
agem
ent
se
ssio
ns
for
all
sta
ff
(especia
lly clin
icia
ns)
to a
ctive
ly in
vo
lve th
em
in
the c
han
ges a
nd d
evelo
pm
ents
that
are
required
to d
eliv
er
a D
igitally
en
ab
led o
rga
nis
atio
n.
AD
for
ICT
/Head o
f IT
Opera
tio
ns
A b
etter
info
rme
d w
ork
forc
e
rece
ptive t
o lookin
g f
or
Dig
ita
lly e
nab
led s
olu
tio
ns t
o
work
pla
ce issu
es
* *
* *
*
Dig
ital S
trat
egy
Page 138 of 177
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Digital Strategy
Version 1.0 Page 18 of 18 May 2019
9 References and Bibliography External references:
• Department of Health: (2007), Our NHS Our Future. NHS Next Stage Review. Interim Report. Crown Copyright.
• Department of Health and Social Care: (2018), The future of Healthcare: Our vision for digital, data and technology in Health Care.
• NHS (2014), Five Year Forward View. NHS England, Public Health England, TDA, Monitor, CQC.
• NHS: (2019), (The) NHS Long-term Plan. www.longtermplan.nhs.uk
• NHSE: (2019) A Digital Framework for Allied Health Professionals Internet Ref: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/a-digital-framework-for-allied-health-professionals.pdf
• NHSE: (2017) Harnessing Technology and Innovation Internet Ref: https://www.england.nhs.uk/five-year-forward-view/next-steps-on-the-nhs-five-year-forward-view/harnessing-technology-and-innovation/
• STP Local Digital Roadmap (2016) “A Digital Roadmap for Kent and Medway”
• The Topol Review (2018) Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future (Interim report, a call for evidence)
KCHFT Internal References:
• KCHFT Business Strategy.
• KCHFT Estates Strategy.
• KCHFT Procurement Policy.
• KCHFT People Strategy.
• KCHFT Quality Strategy.
• KCHFT Standing Financial Instructions.
Page 139 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 3.1
Agenda Item Title: 2018/19 Patient Experience and Complaints Annual Report
Presenting Officer: Dr Mercia Spare, Chief Nurse (Interim)
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
This report outlines key areas in relation to patient experience and complaints for the year 2018/19 provides assurance to the Board that patients and carers are involved in the review of patient experience data and that learning, and changes in practice are taking place.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
To note the report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Sue Mitchell Tel: 07393 240018
Assistant Director Patient Safety and Experience
Email: [email protected]
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 140 of 177
1
Patient Experience and Complaints Annual Report 2018/19
1.0 Introduction
The aim of this report is to provide assurance that Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust
collected on-going patient feedback in real time, responded to complaints and used that
information to improve services. It contains details of patient and service user feedback for the
period of 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019 captured using a variety of different sources, including
Meridian surveys, on-line forums such as NHS Choices and Care Opinion, contacts with our
Patient, Advice & Liaison Service, compliments and complaints.
2.0 Patient Experience 2.1 Meridian data survey volumes and satisfaction scores 2.1.1 A total of 66,085 surveys were completed by patients, relatives and carers with a combined
satisfaction score of 96.9%. 2.1.2 There was an increase in survey volumes when compared with 2017/18 (63,731) with a similar
overall satisfaction score of 96.8%. 2.1.3 Survey volumes for 2018/19 generally followed the trend seen in 2017/2018 with the exception of
a slight decrease in May 2018 and an increase in August 2018, February and March 2019. The decrease in December for both years is a usual trend due to the Christmas period.
2.1.4 Monthly satisfaction scores for 2018/19 remained more consistent than in the previous year, with
results ranging from 96.6% to 97.2%.
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 141 of 177
2
2.2 Friends and Family Test (FFT) data 2.2.1 64,638 people answered the FFT question in 2018/19 which was an increase on 2017/18
(59,144). The score for 2018/19 demonstrated a positive recommend rate of 96.9%, which was marginally lower than 2017/18 (97.2%).
2.2.2 All surveys with an unlikely or extremely unlikely response to the FFT question were included in
reporting and teams continue to take action and make improvements in response to negative feedback. Of the 5,494 additional surveys completed in 2018/19, 3% fewer patients decided to choose the ‘extremely likely’ option. An additional 2.7% of patients choosing the ‘likely’ answer option.
2.3 National FFT datasets from April 2018 to February 2019 2.3.1 As of 11 April 2019 the latest national datasets published run to February 2019. Therefore
analysis for the 2018/19 year currently includes data from April 2018 through to February 2019. KCHFT has completed 55,405 FFT responses from April 2018 to February 2019. This is the highest of all the service providers that feature on the national community health datasets. As the scatter graph below shows KCHFT’s percentage (97%) recommend for the FFT is above the national average (96%) for the April to February period and at the top of the upper quartile for surveys completed.
Page 142 of 177
3
2.3.2 Most of the service providers that fall in the upper quartile for percentage recommended fall in the lowest quartile for surveys completed. There are 5 service providers with a percentage score over 99.5% and 4 of these are among the lowest 5 for numbers of responses.
2.4 Patient Advice & Liaison Service (PALS) enquiries 2.4.1 The role of PALS is to be the first point of contact for the public, patients and their families/carers
should they have a problem or need information. The team guides people in the right direction by signposting them to services and providing contact details. They liaise with staff and managers to help patients and relatives find a quick resolution to any problems they are experiencing or concerns they may have. More involved concerns or complaints are promptly escalated to the Patient Experience Team for logging and investigation.
2.4.2 The PALS team took a total of 6,308 calls during 2018/2019, less than in 2017/18 (6,871). Calls
received were requests for telephone numbers, appointments and signposting. 2.4.3 The main issue that handled during 2018/19 was for patients wishing to contact the Podiatry
Service. In September 2017 the service changed their appointment booking process and PALS received many calls from patients who were unhappy that they could not access the admin hub, leading to delays in their appointments/care. Following a spike of calls to PALS in Q1 2018/2019, the following improvements were made:
The service successfully recruited admin staff trained specifically for the role.
The network issues on the Queen Victoria Memorial Hospital site in Herne Bay were addressed which increased connectivity speed and improved the volume of calls able to be handled.
Patients not getting through to the team first time have the option of leaving a voice message. These actions significantly improved the accessibility to the service and all calls are responded to within 24 hours. A subsequent non-executive director led deep dive provided further assurance that accessibility to the service had improved.
2.4.4 An identified theme has been patients making calls to PALS thinking they were contacting
services directly. This was due to patients misreading information on service appointment letters. These templates were amended by the Communications Team to prevent future problems and numbers of calls have gradually decreased.
2.4.5 PALS also received calls regarding long waiting times for follow-up appointments with the
Community Paediatric service and missed or delayed community nursing visits.
The Community Paediatric service is working to allocate all new referrals meeting the criteria to an autism assessment within 9 to 12 months of referral. This ensures children receive a diagnosis within a consistent timeframe and enables the service to be clear from the outset about waiting times for this specialist assessment.
Concerns raised regarding missed or delayed community nursing visits are addressed and shared with the teams to prevent similar problems from happening again. Staff in Thanet are working on a project to implement a new local referral unit process to ensure visits are allocated effectively and not missed.
2.5 Patient reviews received during 2018/9 via sources other than Meridian surveys 2.5.1 146 reviews were received using on-line forums such as NHS Choices and Care Opinion, the
patient experience team generic email and social media. 74% were positive, 18% were negative and 8% were mixed.
2.5.2 The main positive themes related to care and compassion, communication, staff attitude and
waiting times. Similarly negative themes related to communication, staff attitude and waiting times.
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 143 of 177
4
2.6 Compliments recorded on Meridian 2.6.1 Two tools were built in 2018/19 for staff to use to record any compliments they receive. This has
worked well with 1,679 compliments being logged from patients/carers/families mainly thanking staff for their kindness and the quality of care received. 107 compliments were also logged from external providers/other organisations. These compliments include positive feedback from school staff and social services regarding their positive interactions and joint working with KCHFT staff.
3.0 Complaints received in 2018/19 3.1 In 2018/2019, 267 complaints for services were received in comparison to 303 in 2017/2018
which was a 12% reduction. This followed a reduction of 10% on the previous year 2016/2017. However it is clear that the complexity of complaints and involvement with other organisations has increased, as 30 (23%) of cases over the last 6 months included liaising with other organisations. This was an increase from 25 (17.5%) of cases in the previous 6 months.
3.1.1 The following graph shows the numbers of complaints received in 2018/2019 which are variable
each month.
01020304050
Number of Complaints
Months
Complaints for April 2018 to March 2019
Complaints
Mean
UCL
LCL
3.2 Levels of complaints 3.1.2 The following graph shows levels 1 to 4 complaints received by month for the last 3 years.
April to March 2016/17 Total 336
April to March 2017/18 Total 303
April to March 2018/19 Total 267
Average 28 per month Average 25 per month Average 22 per month
Page 144 of 177
5
3.2.1 Complaints are logged under levels determined by the nature and complexity of the complaint following the Trust’s Customer Care (Complaints) policy.
Category Description
Level 1 Minor
It should be possible to get a quick solution and does not warrant a full complaint’s investigation
Level 2 Significant
Requires contact with one or more service which involves some correspondence and an investigation to be carried out
Level 3 Major A serious complaint that may involve more than one provider and requires a full investigation.
Level 4 Complex
A serious complaint involving more than one provider (multi-agency).
3.3 Complaints in adult services 3.3.1 Numbers of complaints for adult services for 2018/19 are shown in the chart below.
Community nursing services continue to have the largest number of complaints increasing from 63 in 2017/2018 to 82 in 2018/2019. This service have the highest number of patient contacts (623,506), making a complaint to contact percentage of 0.013%.
The other two services receiving the highest numbers of complaints are community hospital inpatients (53,410 bed days in 2018/19) and the minor injury units (MIUs) (127,184 contacts in 2018/19) with 21 and 18 respectively, which is consistent with 2017/2018.
3.4 Complaints in Public Health and Children’s’ Specialist Services and Dental Services 3.4.1 Numbers of complaints for children’s and dental services for 2018/19 are shown in the following
chart:
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 145 of 177
6
Community Paediatrics had the highest number of complaints for 2018/2019 with 23, an increase of 6 when compared to 2017/2018 (complaints to contacts percentage of 0.195%.
Dental saw a reduction from 30 complaints in 2017/2018 to 18 in 2018/2019 (complaints to contacts percentage of 0.015%).
The Health Visiting service also saw more than a 50% drop in formal complaints from 16 in 2017/2018 to 7 in 2018/19 (complaints to contacts percentage of 0.002%).
Other services remained fairly consistent.
3.5 Themes and trends by subject 3.5.1 The top 3 themes of complaints remained the same as in 2017/18 with clinical treatment as the
most common, followed by communications, appointments, access to treatment and staff.
Clinical treatment - Complaints that fall into this category involve aspects of clinical care provided by health professionals, medical nursing or allied health professionals. They involve complaints about the patient’s diagnosis and treatment, complications that may arise either during or after treatment, patient falls, nutrition and hydration, infection control measures, hygiene and pressure area care.
Communications - Complaints are received which relate to communication across all services between hospitals, GPs, patients, staff and carers.
Appointments including delays and cancellations - This category includes appointments including delays and cancellations and waiting times. For example waiting times to be seen by chronic pain service and cancellations made by the dental service, waiting times for equipment for children, delays and difficulties in getting podiatry and dental appointments, delays in receiving speech and language therapy.
3.6 Complaints Handling 3.6.1 General question on surveys relating to complaints handling During 2018/19, 42,747 people answered the survey question ‘If you recently raised a concern or
complaint directly with this service, do you feel it was responded to and acted upon?’ with a
satisfaction score of 97.2%. This was a higher score than in 2017/18 (92.89%) when less people
answered this question (36,950).
3.6.2 Following a lower than mean score in Q1 and Q2 of 2018/19, results for this question increased
in Q3 and were sustained in Q4. It is anticipated that the introduction of the e-learning
complaints handling training for all staff, in addition to the face to face training package, has
helped to support staff throughout the complaints process.
Page 146 of 177
7
3.7 Complaints training for staff 3.7.1 During 2018/19, 31 staff attended the complaints handling, face to face, half day training intended
for investigators, team leaders and managers delivered by the senior complaints officer. 3.7.2 A total of 169 staff undertook the newly developed complaints handling level 1 e-learning training
designed for all staff to give them an overview of the trust’s complaints procedure and what to do if they are contacted by a patient, relative or member of the public wishing to raise a concern. This is not mandatory but completion is actively encouraged. It is a requirement of staff to complete this e-learning prior to attending the face to face complaints handling training. Staff will continue to be encouraged to undertake complaints handling training through 2019/2020.
3.8 Feedback from complaints survey 3.8.1 The Patient Experience Team surveys complainants to capture feedback on their experience of
the complaints handling process. In 2018/19 a total of 177 surveys were sent to complainants with their complaint response as cases were closed. 22 surveys were returned, giving a response rate of 12.5%. Feedback gathered by this survey was mixed as complainants continue to find it difficult to separate the outcome of their complaint from the way it has been handled by the team. This has been discussed at the Kent and Medway NHS Complaints Managers Network and is a common problem across organisations. Further contact was made with complainants that requested it, either by the service or the Patient Experience Manager. Feedback from complainants has indicated that face to face meetings is beneficial to help resolve any complaints and to provide a more compassionate response. This practice is actively encouraged by the Patient Experience Team on behalf of the trust for all services investigating complaints.
3.9 Audit of complaints management 3.9.1 In July 2018 the Patient Experience Team completed an audit of complaints handled during the
previous financial year to provide assurance that the complaints handling process is of a high standard and to evidence compliance with the KCHFT Customer Care (complaints) policy. The audit was also undertaken to test assurance with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) Responsive domain.
3.9.2 This was the first KCHFT complaints audit and is to be repeated on an annual basis. 10% (31
cases) of level 1 to 4 closed complaints responded to during the previous financial year were audited by peer review.
3.9.3 The audit identified a high number of areas of good practice. For example:
100% of complaints were acknowledged within 3 working days
100% of level 4 complaints (KCHFT leading) were responded to within 60 working days
In 100% of cases, all elements of the complaint had been investigated and responded to 3.9.4 Recommendations and actions from the audit were as follows:
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 147 of 177
8
Continue to encourage all services to seek assistance when comments/concerns are handled locally.
Continue to ensure that complaints are formally logged to ensure that a full investigation is completed and response letters are quality assured following the approval process.
The Patient Experience Team to continue to identify appropriate actions and areas for improvements resulting from complaints’ investigations to facilitate shared learning across KCHFT.
Complaints officers to work together to standardise the method of recording complaints on Datix to ensure uniformity. A document outlining the standards has been created.
3.10 Closed Complaints 3.10.1 During 2018/2019, 271 complaints were closed and of those 241 (88.9%) were closed within the
agreed timeframe.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
%
% Complaints closed within agreed timescale
% Complaints closed
Mean
UCL
LCL
3.10.2 For the 30 complaints that did not meet our timescales, delays were related to receiving the
required information and the completion of the approval process. Complainants are kept updated on any delays using their preferred method of communication. Timeframes are closely monitored and an escalation process forms part of the standard operating procedure which details the trust’s complaints handling process.
3.11.2 This remains a focus for 2019/2020 through early resolution meetings with complainants,
embedding of complaints training throughout the organisation and a review of the process. 3.11 Re-opened complaints 2018/2019 3.11.1 The team monitors the number of re-opened complaints. 35 (12%) complaints re-opened in
2018/2019 which was a reduction on 43 in 2017/2018. 33% (12) re-opened complaints were for children’s services regarding service provision and 22% (8) were for community nursing services and mainly related to communication issues. The remaining 15 reopened cases were for a variety of services. The graph below demonstrates that re-opening is most common in level 1 complaints with 20 cases re-opened are are generally due to mis-communications in the initial response. Level 1 complaints are those which are anticipated to be resolved quickly by the services with support from the Patient Experience Team. There were also 11 level 2 complaints re-opened and 4 level 4.
Page 148 of 177
9
3.12 Benchmarking against other providers 3.12.1 KCHFT is benchmarked against other community trusts via the Benchmarking Network. KCHFT is below
the average number of formal complaints per 1,000 WTE staff members (highlighted in orange below).
3.13 Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) cases 3.13.1 8 cases were opened by the ombudsman in 2018/2019.
4 were opened for enquiry and closed with no investigation undertaken.
1 was opened and closed as not upheld.
1 was opened and closed after investigation as partially upheld.
2 remain open, 1 as an enquiry and 1 as under investigation. 3.13.2 The partially upheld case was from 2015 when a root cause analysis was completed at the time.
Although the PHSO was assured by the changes and learning from this case they felt that these had not been clearly communicated to the complainant. They recommended that KCHFT wrote to apologise and to share the learning from the case. The PHSO was subsequently satisfied that their recommendations were complied with.
4.0 Learning from patient feedback
The Patient Experience Team continues to monitor improvements made by services as a result of patient feedback. In total 108 actions were recorded by the team, 63 resulting from complaints,
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 149 of 177
10
27 from feedback received via Meridian surveys and 18 from other sources. 55 of these actions were uploaded on the KCHFT public website as examples of ‘You said …. We did……’.
4.1 Improvements made as a result of feedback from complaints during 2018/19 include:
Dover/Deal Community Nurses: A family member complained that the patient had not received a visit following an urgent referral from the GP. The process was reviewed and telephone referrals are now processed by the local referral unit and followed up with notes being added to the electronic notes system (CIS) to avoid any miscommunication.
East Canterbury Community Nurses: A patient complained that no contact had been made by the service after a GP referral requesting a repeat continence assessment. A scoping exercise into management of continence assessments was undertaken. The service now holds continence clinics for non-housebound patients to avoid unnecessary delays.
Children’s Speech and Language Therapy: A parent complained that following their child’s paediatric dietetic consultation, no prescription letter request was sent to the GP for calorie supplements. The service now ensures that administration is completed on the same day by seeing fewer children but holding clinics more frequently. A standard operating procedure was created to include the new process re GP prescription requests.
Dental Service, Hainault Health Centre: Patients were not always receiving notification of cancelled or changes to their appointments. Their system was updated so a text message is sent to patients when an appointment is cancelled or changed.
4.2 A selection of improvements made as a result of feedback captured by patient experience
surveys is shown below:
Hawkhurst Community Hospital: Feedback was received from patients regarding disturbance caused by TV noise from single rooms. The League of Friends installed headphones for use with televisions in all side rooms. Patients also reported disturbance on the ward due to the loud noise made by falls’ sensor alarms. Existing alarms were reviewed and a new system installed which alerts staff at the nurses’ station when chair or bed sensor alarms are activated.
Postural Stability service: When attending a group exercise class, patients with a hearing impairment said they found it difficult to hear the presenter. The service tested various types of equipment with patients and found the Roger Pen the most effective. This equipment is now available for patients attending group sessions.
Health Checks: A patient arrived for an appointment on time and had to leave without being seen due to the advisor not being available. In the event of advisor having to leave the clinic rooms, a clear sign is now being displayed on the doors with contact details for the advisor.
Health Visiting Service: Some mothers asked for more advice on food intolerance and reflux. The health visitors have been trained by a dietitian to be able to provide support. Information has also been added to the Red Book signposting where more specialist breastfeeding advice can be obtained.
5.0 Key quality improvements during 2018/19 5.1 The new method of using Meridian for staff to record compliments received from
patients/relatives/carers and other external providers is working well. A wide variety of services
have recorded compliments since the system went live in March 2018. All staff with a Meridian
Desktop login has access to this data to facilitate reporting and sharing with colleagues at team
meetings etc.
5.2 A member of the Patient Experience Team is attending local patient experience group meetings held by services to develop discussions on patient feedback and quality improvement.
5.3 The Patient Experience Team has produced flowchart guidance for new staff to be given as part
of their local induction pack. These cover key information about both the Meridian surveys and
Page 150 of 177
11
the complaints handling process. This is available for new and existing staff to view and print from the Patient Experience Team’s pages on flo.
5.4 Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) – Following feedback from patients and carers the
name changed from the Customer Care Team to PALS. All the alternative formats of the PALS leaflet are available on the Trust’s website and paper copies of the leaflet are available for services in paper format.
5.5 Community Learning Disability Service: A short audio/pictoral survey for use at every
intervention was developed and rolled out at the end of November 2018 and is going well with a total of 160 completed up to 31.03.19. These surveys have an overall satisfaction score of 99.2%. The overall scores were 99.4% for the question ‘Did we help you today?’, 100% for ‘Were you happy with what we did?’ and 98.1% for ‘Would you like us to come back?’.
5.6 The Forget Me Not Patient Feedback form for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of dementia
or those with a cognitive impairment was piloted in Hawkhurst and Faversham community hospitals and rolled out across all community hospitals in January 2019. As at 31.03.19 a total of 143 surveys had been completed with an overall satisfaction score of 85.8%. The introduction of the survey was overseen by the two specialist nurses for dementia and the dementia link workers are assisting the patients to complete the forms. The dementia link workers have received support and guidance from the specialist dementia nurses and their matrons/managers.
5.6.1 As from 15 January 2019, a Client Experience feedback form was also introduced at Edenbridge
Day Hospital. The health activities assistant, who is also the dementia link worker, has undertaken to complete the survey with clients who attend and this survey is planned to be repeated every 6 months to review their experience.
5.7 Dental Services: An easy read/pictoral survey was introduced during December 2018. It is
available in paper format and via the public website. This survey is targeted for completion by patients with learning disabilities and those for whom English is not their first language. The Immigration Removal Centres and London clinics will gain valuable feedback using this survey as they treat patients from diverse cultures. A total of 1,655 surveys were completed by patients accessing 21 dental clinics from 1.12.18 to 31.3.19 with an overall satisfaction score of 99.6%.
6.0 Summary 6.1. The trust has seen an increase in survey volumes in 2018/19 and satisfaction scores remain
high. Services continue to use the feedback from their patients to improve the delivery of care provided. Services are developing new and different ways of capturing feedback are continually being developed to meet the needs of the patients accessing the wide range of services provided by the trust. Texting is to be trialled as an additional option for patients to give their feedback in 2019/20.
6.2. The introduction of complaints training and updated guidance has received excellent feedback
and has supported staff across the organisation to resolve complaints in a compassionate and more timely manner. This work will continue throughout 2019/2020 to further improve the quality of complaints management.
Name: Sue Mitchell Role: AD Patient Safety & Experience 10 May 2019
Pat
ient
Exp
erie
nce
and
Com
plai
nts
Rep
ort
Page 151 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 3.2
Agenda Item Title: Learning From Deaths Report
Presenting Officer: Dr Sarah Phillips, Medical Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
In line with National guidance on learning from deaths KCHFT collects and publishes mortality data and learning points quarterly via a paper to Quality Committee and Public Board. This data includes the total number of the Trust’s inpatient deaths and those deaths that the Trust has subjected to case record review. Of those deaths reviewed, the Trust must provide estimates of how many deaths were judged more likely than not to have been due to problems in care. The dashboard included has been based on national suggested format. As the Board is aware, the KCHFT Mortality Review and Responding to Deaths Policy was developed following recommendations made by the National Guidance on Learning from Deaths (2017). Other national publications were also used to guide the content of the policy. The scope of reviews includes all community hospital inpatient deaths, any patients who die under our care with serious mental health needs and all patients with a learning disability. A sample deaths under the care of our community teams has also been added to the scope from November 2018. Mortality reviews are conducted through a centralised process where the review team is made up of a doctor, a ward matron or other senior clinical staff member, a pharmacist, a quality lead and centralised administrative support. Members rotate monthly to maintain a degree of independence. An internal process for reviewing deaths of patients with Learning Disabilities has been put in place alongside the LeDeR process for additional assurance, best practice and to meet the Trust’s ethical obligations. Learning from these reviews is submitted to the Mortality Surveillance Group and is included in this report. Following scrutiny at Quality Committee, the Board is asked to note that patients who die with learning disabilities and those that die in the community (not inpatients) are generally all receiving multiagency support. For example patients on the community nurse case load may also have been receiving care from their GP or been recently discharged from hospital. Most deaths of patients with learning disabilities occur in acute hospitals. In all cases when deaths are received by KCHFT all care provided by KCHFT is scrutinized and any learning for other organisations is shared. There are also discussions taking place about how to continuously improve this sharing. E.g. at regional level.
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 152 of 177
The committee is asked to note that from February 2019, Mortality Surveillance Group meetings have been reduced from monthly to bi-monthly. This was felt to be appropriate as process changes are significantly less now that procedures are becoming more deeply embedded across the Trust. It is also hoped that less frequent meetings will encourage higher attendance rates. As defined in the Policy, the Trust Board has overall responsibility for ensuring compliance with all legal and statutory duties, along with best practice including having oversight of mortality review processes and awareness of the learning that emerges from reviews that drive improvements in care. The focus of trust mortality review is on quality improvement and sharing meaningful learning.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
For assurance.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Dr Sarah Phillips Tel: 01622 211922
Medical Director Email: [email protected]
Page 153 of 177
LEARNING FROM DEATHS REPORT (JANUARY TO MARCH 2019)
1. Introduction 1.1 National guidance on learning from deaths requires KCHFT to collect and
publish mortality data quarterly via a paper to the Quality Committee and Public Board. The quarterly report must include mortality data and learning points. Guidance states this data should include the total number of the Trust’s inpatient deaths and those deaths that the Trust has subjected to case record review. Of those deaths reviewed, the Trust must provide estimates of how many deaths were judged more likely than not to have been due to problems in care.
2. March Dashboard 2.1 The dashboard below has been based on national suggested format and refers
to deaths in community hospitals.
Total Number of Deaths in Scope
Total Deaths Reviewed
Number of deaths judged to be more likely than not due to problems in healthcare
This Month Last Month This Month Last Month This Month Last Month
5 3 4* 1 0 0
This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter
This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter
This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter
11 13 13 11 0 0
This Year (YTD) Last Year This Year (YTD) Last Year
This Year (YTD) Last Year
11 66 13 66 0 0
*Deaths reviewed in a given calendar month can exceed the number of deaths reported that month because the figure includes deaths which took place in the previous month, but have fallen into the next month for review. 2.2 The graph below shows the number of inpatient deaths in community hospitals
per month this quarter along with the average.
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 154 of 177
3. Learning from Mortality Reviews 3.1 The tables below outline key areas of good practice along with areas for
learning identified in reviews completed this quarter, along with the actions taken. These are also reviewed in the monthly Mortality Surveillance Group (MSG).
3.2 All areas of good practice and areas for learning are reported at monthly matrons’ meetings in the East and West and wider dissemination to all ward staff is encouraged. A monthly report is also reviewed at the End of Life QI Group.
Areas of Good Practice aligned to the Five Priorities for Care of the Dying Person
Recognise
- All medications were written up and ward staff were prepared for an end of life patient – QVMH
- Medication was reviewed and end of life recognised – Faversham
- Advance care plan and ceilings of treatment documented early – QVMH
- Anticipatory care plan and
advance care plan in place. Ceilings of care in terms of use of IV fluids and transfer to acute was clearly documented and there was a further review of ceilings of care as the patient deteriorated – Whitstable & Tankerton
Support
- Good feedback received from the family that they were happy with the care and support received – QVMH
- Documentation of communication with patient’s wife; notes confirm that she was made welcome to stay overnight – QVMH
- Comment recorded from patient’s
Involve
- Thorough documentation that the patient and family were involved with decision making, such as the decision to stop rehab – Sevenoaks
- Good documentation that patient understood risks of aspiration pneumonia if drinking un-thickened fluids but was choosing to take the risk, demonstrating respect for the patient’s wishes – QVMH
- Good documentation of discussion about patient’s wishes after out of hours doctor visited; patient remained on Heron Ward as he did not wish to be transferred to the acute – QVMH
- Very person-centred care shown, e.g. patient was given analgesia just before lunchtime and it was noted that she was happy to remain in bed to eat until afterwards when she could be helped to get up once it had taken effect – Faversham
- Detailed notes on CIS confirm the patient's wishes including details of his desired funeral
Page 155 of 177
daughter that she was very happy with the care her mother received – Whitstable & Tankerton
arrangements – QVMH
- It was documented that it was the patient’s choice to die in hospital – Deal
- This is Me completed by friend of the patient showing a holistic approach. Significant evidence of recognising the patient's needs and wishes, including support for vegan dietary choices and trying to arrange contact with sister (who was an inpatient at QEQM). Clearly documented when patient did not want to eat or drink, evidencing respect for her wishes – Whitstable & Tankerton
- Clear evidence of involvement shown by documentation of attempt to initiate conversation about advance care planning with the patient – Whitstable & Tankerton
- The dietician review provided a clear plan including patient preferences and eating for enjoyment, showing excellent person-centred care – Whitstable & Tankerton
- Clear documentation of effort to involve the family in the decision process as deterioration continued, including exploration of religious and spiritual needs – Whitstable & Tankerton
Plan & Do
- Very good examples of detailed care planning with clear actions, particularly around care of sacral wound – Sevenoaks
- Evidence of clear documentation with initial assessments clearly dated, signed and fully completed,
Communicate
- Good evidence of communication with family that the patient was expected to deteriorate – Sevenoaks
- Excellent detail on CIS around discussions with the patient re end of life which was professionally
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 156 of 177
and very detailed records on CIS about daily care of patient - QVMH
- Pressure ulcer identified promptly on admission and reported on Datix – QVMH
- Prompt, thorough clerking and clear notes around the aim of admission. Appropriate medication written up - Faversham
- Initial assessments completed thoroughly and an individualised plan of care in place. Good detail in notes around reason for admission - QVMH
- All end of life documentation and personalised care plan in place. MCA, Consent and Safeguarding assessments thoroughly completed and very good examples of nursing documentation, such as a detailed rationale for why the decision was made to call an ambulance - Deal
- Thorough assessments completed on admission. Death was verified on the ward so there was no need for a GP visit – Deal
- Efficient handling of the situation when a drug chart from A + E was not transferred over with the patient; staff promptly chased the acute and received it by email shortly after – Whitstable & Tankerton
- Prompt clerking on admission with appropriate referrals. Assessments all completed promptly and thoroughly. Clear documentation of board rounds showing safeguarding and dietician input – Whitstable & Tankerton
and clearly written with strong evidence that the patient’s wishes were being listened to and respected – QVMH
- Good documentation of discussions with the patient and family around being at end of life, evidencing that the patient was aware of the situation and agreed that she was in her final days - Faversham
- Excellent example of communication documented with the patient’s daughter around nutrition and hydration, and understanding the patient was at end of life. Very detailed conversation in line with best practice – Deal
- Very good documentation of communication with case manager as well as contact with the patient’s sister and friend – Whitstable & Tankerton
Page 157 of 177
- Assessment of the patient’s needs
regarding pain and discomfort throughout. Skin, diet and bowel records very well documented on CIS – Whitstable & Tankerton
Themes for Learning
Comments/Actions
Transfers of Care
- In one case handover information from the acute was not clear as to any ongoing or resolved issues with vomiting and nausea.
- In one case, there was a discrepancy of documentation; the acute handover notes stated the patient had a pacemaker but there was no evidence that this was the case, or any mention of it in the GP medical record.
- Staff have been reminded that all
Transfer of Care issues should be reported on Datix. These issues are then taken forward with the acute by the Assistant Director for Patient Safety and Experience as part of the Transfers of Care Task & Finish Group.
Documentation
- In some cases, written care plans do not consistently translate into day-to-day action, and end of life care plans/advance care plans are not always in place.
- In one case, documentation on CIS after death could have been more detailed including support offered to family.
- In one case, an MCA should have
- Feedback from mortality reviews around quality of care plans has been sent to the Assistant Director for Clinical Governance and a wider piece of work around care plans is ongoing, with a report due to be discussed at Clinical Effectiveness Group on 25th March.
- Feedback has been sent to the ward matron for sharing with staff and has been included in the monthly report of learning from mortality reviews which goes to the East and West Matrons’ Meetings as well as the End of Life QI Group.
- Training around Lasting Power of
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 158 of 177
been documented as the patient did not have capacity. In some cases, the advance decision and welfare attorney section on DNA CPR forms are left blank, and there is a lack of confidence and clarity around Lasting Power of Attorney.
- At Deal Hospital, medical documentation printed from the ‘Dragon’ dictation machine is unsigned, undated and stuck loosely into the paper notes, at risk of falling out.
- In one case, suction was given on the day of death and the day before but there was no documentation as to why this decision was made with regard to the patient’s best interests, as glycopyrronium had not been administered.
- In one case, there was a lack of awareness around what to do when a patient dies with no known next of kin leading to a delay in collection of the body.
Attorney is planned for staff at community hospitals, to clarify the difference between LPAs for health and finances and the importance of documenting they have been verified. The Lead Practitioner for Palliative and End of Life Care, and the Head of Quality, Governance and Professional Standards for East Kent will take this forward.
- The Medical Director has
discussed concerns around medical record keeping with the Strategic Delivery Manager for Urgent Care in the East to take forward.
- Feedback has been sent to the ward matron for sharing with staff and has been included in the monthly report of learning from mortality reviews which goes to the East and West Matrons’ Meetings as well as the End of Life QI Group.
- Legal are assisting with producing written guidance to be circulated to community hospitals for clarity This guidance will also be added to the Care After Death policy for future reference.
Recognition
- In some cases, recognition of end of life could have been earlier and there are missed opportunities to start end of life care planning. There is sometimes little evidence of linking care to the Five Priorities for Care of the Dying Person.
- Monthly feedback submitted to Matrons’ Meetings and the End of Life QI Group is now broken down into categories to reflect the Five Priorities; this should make staff more aware of the importance of Recognise, Involve, Plan & Do, Communicate and Support. The Lead Practitioner for Palliative and End of Life Care and the Nurse Consultant for End of Life Care are working to encourage earlier recognition across the Trust.
Page 159 of 177
3.3 Although the Trust is only required to review inpatient deaths in community hospitals and there is no national mandate to review deaths in the community, a process has begun which aims to sample one to two deaths per month from across East and West community teams to incorporate into the existing mortality review process, subject to capacity of the review teams. Deaths are selected by team leaders who identify cases for review where there may be particularly rich learning, such as where there were problems or if something went well despite challenges.
3.4 For assurance, there are processes in place to liaise with PALs, SI and Safeguarding teams so that all deaths where a complaint or concern has been raised will be reviewed, even if not normally in scope. Deaths going through the SI process may not be re-reviewed to avoid duplication, if the RCA already identifies detailed learning. Cases deemed not to be SIs and not subject to an RCA will undergo a mortality review to ensure no learning is missed.
3.5 The tables below outline areas of good practice and areas for improvement identified from the three sample community reviews completed this quarter.
Areas of Good Practice Areas for Learning
Hawkhurst Hospital (flagged for review as patient died at home on day of
discharge)
- All assessments carried out and well documented in a timely manner. Excellent documentation of difficult conversations regarding capacity and encouraging patient to stay in hospital. Good use of safeguarding team for advice.
- Lack of documented conversations about end of life or DNA CPR.
Ashford Community Nursing (flagged for review as complaint received)
- Good documentation throughout
and assessments completed thoroughly including End of Life assessment. Good evidence that team tried to meet all the patient's requests and needs. It was good practice to visit in pairs after a complaint was made as it was noted that one nurse felt intimidated. Good care given despite challenging circumstances. The complaint was responded to appropriately and thoroughly.
- No further areas for learning identified from the mortality review. The response to the complaint had already identified that the Local Clinical Resource Manager in Ashford would address communication styles with the team. Additionally it advised that a new ordering system had been implemented since the concerns were raised (the Online Non-Prescription Ordering Service – ONPOS) which has improved the efficiency
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 160 of 177
of the process for ordering dressings, allowing a designated chemist to deliver dressings to nurses within 72 hours. It is hoped this will be rolled out to other areas soon.
Wateringbury and Paddock Wood Community Nursing
- On several occasions, the
patient’s husband forgot to collect medication but the team did everything possible to contact the dispensing practice and help with collection. Issues were pre-empted and there were regular reviews of medication needs and appropriate increases and reductions in pain medication dosage, all thoroughly documented. The family were present during each visit and were given information about where to seek further advice if needed. No gaps in care provision despite the need to transfer care from Paddock Wood to Wateringbury team due to capacity issues, which was done efficiently and did not result in undue delay. Good liaison with the GP and Hospice doctor.
- No areas for learning identified.
4. Mortality Surveillance Group Meeting Frequency
4.1 The committee is asked to note that from February 2019, Mortality
Surveillance Group meetings have reduced from monthly to bi-monthly. This was felt to be appropriate as process changes are significantly less now that procedures are becoming more deeply embedded across the Trust. Additionally, it is hoped that less frequent meetings will encourage higher attendance rates.
5. Cross-organisational working 5.1 A data sharing agreement with EKHUFT is in progress which would support
the future exchange of information for mortality reviews of mutual patients
Page 161 of 177
5.2 Discussions have taken place with the Interim Head of Patient Safety at KMPT and it has been agreed that we will share learning if either trust identifies a mutual patient during mortality review. This will help us to meet our obligation to ensure that the deaths of any patients with serious mental illness are reviewed.
6. Learning Disability (LD) Mortality Review Process Update 6.1 A separate report is provided by the Learning Disability service which is
embedded below.
Learning Disability review report Jan-March 2019.docx
Sarah Phillips Medical Director April 2019
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 162 of 177
Learning Disability Service – Q4 Mortality Review Report
There have been 97 reported deaths within the CLDT from April 2017 March 2019.
Between January and March 2019 there have been 8 reported deaths.
Month Number
October 10
November 7
December 5
January 1
February 5
March 2
There were no Serious Incidents or any deaths attributable to the service.
Learning Disability mortality review meetings.
There have been 5 multi-professional meetings during January to March 2019. At the meetings enhanced reviews are discussed in detail from a MDT perspective. Outside of these meetings Mandy Setterfield (Specialist Practitioner) continues working on gathering information and completing standard reviews based upon the review criteria.
Table 2 below shows the number of reviews completed and pending overall;
Completed reviews Enhanced Standard
93 22 71
Pending 2 1
TBC 1 0
The 3 pending reviews require more information from the coroner or datix requires more explanation and or further explanation around the person’s death.
The progress to date has been good. The review process is on track to meet the anticipated trajectory by April 2019
Learning and Findings from the reviews from KCHFT perspective
Initial findings indicate that causes of death are similar to those reported nationally (e.g. respiratory, circulatory disorders and cancer).
0
50
100
150
Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19
LD mortality reviews - trajectory
Total (new) Awaiting review
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 163 of 177
The majority of service users were on end of life care.
There were no avoidable/preventable deaths (from KCHFT perspective) or Serious Incidents (the LeDeR reviews will picks up learning from other pathways).
Highlighted good practice around EOL pathway, anticipatory care planning and joint working with GP’s, Hospice etc.
Practitioners who attend the LD mortality review meetings have given very positive feedback.
We have seen an improvement in quality of Datix reporting since the process was introduced.
• Outside of KCHT, through the reviews there remains an issue with End of Life medication being prescribed to late or not at all even when EOL plans and anticipatory care plans are in place. Another area is Do Not Resuscitate, best interest process is not being followed and clinical reason not being used as the decision for the DNACPR. These concerns were due to be feedback to the Kent and Medway LeDer steering group in January this meeting was cancelled so will be feedback in April and picked up there as an action.
Table 3 shows number of deaths and Cause of Death.
Cause of Death Number of deaths
Pneumonia/bronchial, chest infections etc. 23
Cancer (various) 15
Aspirational Pneumonia 11
Heart Failure 9
Kidney failure 5
Sepsis 10
Sudden death in epilepsy 1
Pulmonary embolism 1
Anaphylactic shock due to medication 1
We are awaiting the coroner’s findings for five deaths.
Table 4 identifies ages and number of deaths in age bracket.
Age Deaths
18 - 29 2
30 - 40 2
40 - 50 7
50 - 60 18
60 - 70 22
70 - 80 28
80 – 90 + 10
Awaiting confirmation of 7 people’s Date of Birth.
Mandy Setterfield Specialist Practitioner Mark Anderson Dept. Head of service
17th March 2019
Page 164 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 3.3
Agenda Item Title: Freedom To Speak Up (FTSU) Report
Presenting Officer: Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The report provides a summary of concerns raised by staff between 1 January 2019 and 1 May 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
To note the report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Freedom To Speak Up Policy
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described.
Sarajane Poole, Head of Quality, Governance and Professional Standards/ Freedom To Speak Up Guardian
Tel: 07500 605 263
Email: [email protected]
Fre
edom
To
Spe
ak U
p R
epor
t
Page 165 of 177
FREEDOM TO SPEAK UP GUARDIAN REPORT
1. Introduction
1.1 There are now more than 570 Freedom to Speak Up Guardians and Ambassadors across NHS organisations in England. Some of these are full-time posts, some part-time and some are added to people’s day job. In the period up to March 2018, they had dealt with over 3,000 concerns, 1,240 of which related to patient safety issues and over 60 per cent related to unacceptable behaviour, including alleged bullying and harassment1.
1.2 Sir Robert Francis QC has urged NHS Boards and managers to welcome staff raising concerns (whistleblowing), in the same way as staff are encouraged to report incidents. Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust’s (KCHFT) policy is in line with the national Freedom to Speak Up (Whisteblowing) policy. This says that staff should initially try to raise concerns with their manager or a more senior manager, but if this does not lead to satisfactory action (for example an investigation) or if the staff member feels more comfortable for whatever reason, they can contact the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian for advice and support. It is all in support of creating a more open culture that puts patient and staff safety at the heart of what we do.
1.3 No-one should experience discrimination or be victimised for speaking up,
but we know fear of this can prevent staff from doing so. Those who raise concerns via the Freedom to Speak Up process can expect to receive support and advice from the Trust’s Freedom to Speak Up Guardian, as will managers with whom the concerns are raised. The role of the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian is to be impartial and ensure that a fair and timely investigation into concerns takes place and that outcomes, actions and learning are shared.
1.4 This report covers the period 1 January 2018 to 1 May 2019.
2. Summary of cases
2.1 12 cases have been opened during the period of 1 January to 1 May 2018, this compares to 4 in the previous report. One of these is a collective of 9 members of staff, who whilst part of one case have also sort individual support. Of these cases 2 remain open and staff members are being supported to take the issues forward. A summary of the categories covered is below:
1 Source: National Office of the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian
Fre
edom
To
Spe
ak U
p R
epor
t
Page 166 of 177
• Attitude and behaviour of managers – alleged bullying culture
• Patient safety
2.2 Within the data submitted 0 cases were raised by staff members going through either the Capability or Disciplinary process. This is a change on the previous reporting period.
2.3 A 3 month follow up of the situation is now being offered by the FTSU Guardian to establish that any changes that have been put into place are sustainable.
2.4 It remains difficult to obtain written feedback and the 3 month review has
encouraged staff members to reflect on their experience of speaking up.
3. Fostering a culture of openness
3.1 The number of FTSU champions within the Trust has reduced from 16 to 14 with champions leaving the Trust.
3.2 Following the publication of FTSU details within FLOMail 4 members of
staff across the Trust have expressed interest in becoming champions. A small upskilling session is to take place within June to ensure that they have the confidence to undertake the role.
3.4 The We Care reviews highlighted that some staff members are not aware
of the FTSU Guardian or Ambassadors roles or how to access the service. This has and is being addressed through attendance at team meetings. The yearly We Care programme is underway and FTSU understanding is being looked at to ensure that the work undertake to highlight the role has become embedded.
3.5 The recommendations and action plan shared at the previous meeting is
currently underway and an update will be provided in the next report.
3. Forward Plan
• To continue to implement the action plan that was shared via the previous report.
• A FTSU away day for ambassadors to be developed to ensure that the ambassador role is embedded within services.
4. Recommendation The Board is asked to note the report.
Sarajane Poole Freedom to Speak Up Guardian May 2019
Page 167 of 177
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 23 May 2019
Agenda Number: 3.4
Agenda Item Title: Emergency Planning and Business Continuity Annual Report
Presenting Officer: Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
This report is to provide assurance to the Board that plans and systems are in place to meet the Trust’s obligations with respect Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response and relevant statutory obligations under the Civil Contingencies Act 2004. The report sets out the Trusts state of readiness to respond to major incidents and disruptive events that impact on the delivery of services and performance.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board receives assurance of KCHFT state of preparedness.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Jan Allen, Head of Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response
Tel: 07769 931666
Email: [email protected]
Em
erge
ncy
Pla
nnin
g &
Bus
ines
s C
ontin
uity
Rep
ort
Page 168 of 177
1. Introduction This report describes the work undertaken in 2018/19 on the Trust’s emergency preparedness in order to meet the requirements of the Civil Contingencies Act (CCA) 2004 and the NHS England Emergency Preparedness Framework 2015 The Trust has a mature suite of plans to deal with Major Incidents and Business Continuity issues. These conform to the CCA (2004) and current NHS guidance. All plans have been developed in consultation with partner organisations to ensure cohesion with their plans. The report covers the following;
• The training and exercising programme delivered
• The continuing development of the emergency planning arrangements
• A summary of incidents the Trust has responded to
2. Risk Assessment
The CCA (2004) places a legal duty on responders to undertake risk assessments and publish risks in a Community Risk Register. The purpose of the Community Risk Register is to reassure the community that the risk of potential hazards has been assessed, that preparations are undertaken and that response plans exist. Those standing risks currently identified on the Kent Community Risk Register include;
• Influenza-type disease (pandemic)
• Flooding
• Severe Weather
• EU Exit
As a result of risk assessments with internal services there has been progress made across services in pursuing the necessary actions to control and mitigate the risks. The Head of EPRR and the Resilience Officer have developed a close working relationship with services and assisted in the development of service level business continuity plans including detailed information on the Recovery Time Objectives and the Maximum Tolerable Period of Disruption for Information Technology across services. Within this reporting period the Trust has met four times at the combined On Call/EPRR meeting. Attendance by relevant managers/staff at these meetings has improved throughout 2018 -19, senior management support is in place to ensure appropriate attendance at these meetings. 3. Compliance EPRR remains a key priority for the NHS and forms part of the NHS Commissioning Board Framework (Everyone Counts; Planning for Patients), the NHS Standard
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS RESILIENCE AND RESPONSE (EPRR)
ANNUAL REPORT APRIL 2018 – MARCH 2019
Em
erge
ncy
Pla
nnin
g &
Bus
ines
s C
ontin
uity
Rep
ort
Page 169 of 177
Contract and the NHS Commissioning Board Emergency Planning Framework (2015). A set of core standards for EPRR have been in place since April 2013. All organisations who receive NHS funding are asked to carry out a self- assessment against the NHS Standards for EPRR. KCHFT completed this exercise in August and NHS England agreed with KCHFT’s assessment that it was successful in meeting all of the requirements for rewarding ‘substantial compliance’ consistent with last year’s assessment. 4. Partnership working The Trust works in collaboration with a range of partner agencies through formal standing meetings and ad hoc arrangements. Formal committees of which the Trust is a member include the Kent and Medway Local Health Resilience Partnership (LHRP). The purpose of this group is to ensure that effective and coordinated arrangements are in place for NHS emergency preparedness and response in accordance with national policy and direction from NHS England – South, South East. The LHRP work plan is delivered by the Trust as required. An area of responsibility agreed at the LHRP for the Emergency Preparedness leads across the county is accountability to the local authorities for the medical risk assessment of community events taking place; the Head of EPRR is responsible for the Dover authority. 4.1 Student Placement
The EPRR team facilitated a university student placement in June 2018; the student who was approaching her third year of her university course is considering a career in EPRR
5. Planning 5.1 Major Incident Plan The Major Incident Plan is reviewed annually to ensure it continues to accurately reflect the role of the Trust in a major incident and how this role fits with the plans of other NHS organisations and the emergency services. The Major Incident Plan was reviewed in August 2018 and ratified by the Corporate Assurance Risk Management Committee on behalf of the Executive Management Team
5.2 Emergency Resilience and Business Continuity Policy The Emergency Resilience and Business Continuity Policy outline’s how the Trust will continue to discharge core functions in the event of disruption to business operations. Each service has its own Business Continuity Plan which is reviewed annually. There is a rolling programme of review and work completed with the Minor Injury Units and the Community Teams and Hospitals. 5.3 Heatwave Plan The Heatwave Plan for the Trust was updated as required for 2018. The Trust received health watch alerts for the period 1 June - 15th September 2018 and remained at Level 1 preparedness throughout this period. The plan allows for escalation of operational services, and specific actions would be implemented to safeguard patients and staff as necessary.
Page 170 of 177
5.4 Lockdown Policy The trust is required to have lockdown plans for appropriate sites, such as the Community Hospitals. The Head of EPRR has developed a Lockdown policy and working collaboratively with the Head of Health, Safety and Security to embed this in to the Trust. The Trusts seven Minor Injuries Units are located on National Health Service Property Services (NHSPS) sites, the aim of each of these is to develop and embed multi occupancy Lockdown Plans, this has proved challenging with lack of engagement from NHSPS. 5.5 EU Exit Planning In preparation for an exit from the European Union (EU) the Trust commenced planning in accordance with the EU Exit Operational Readiness Guidance, the guidance summarised the Government’s contingency planning and covered all actions that health and adult social care organisations had to prepare for. In accordance with the guidance and in partnership with multiagency partners the Trust has prepared extensively for an EU Exit, this has included a significant focus on the following; • supply of medicines and vaccines;
• supply of medical devices and clinical consumables;
• supply of non-clinical consumables, goods and services;
• workforce;
• reciprocal healthcare;
• research and clinical trials; and
• data sharing, processing and access.
The Trust was represented at a large number of exercises and meetings set up in anticipation of the UK’s exit from the European Union. Lessons identified and planning required was discussed at the Trust EU Exit exercise facilitated by the Head of Emergency Preparedness Resilience and Response. The exercise allowed these discussions to assist in the formulation of the Trust operational EU Exit plan Strategic meetings took place by weekly, nine work streams reported directly into the strategic meeting. As part of workforce planning Vismo is currently being implemented, this software allows the strategic managers a visual representation of the location of staffs home addresses, and identification of individual staff member’s skills, these may be required to support the delivery of care of Tier One services if the Trust were to instigate locality management. 6. Training and Exercising In order to comply with our obligations the Trust must undertake a number of emergency preparedness activities; these include a robust training programme facilitated by the Head of EPRR, in the current year the Kent Resilience Forum (KRF) facilitated the annual seminar with a focus on response on Recovery of services
Em
erge
ncy
Pla
nnin
g &
Bus
ines
s C
ontin
uity
Rep
ort
Page 171 of 177
following major incident. KCHFT was widely represented with attendance from senior managers. A rolling programme of exercises designed to test and develop our plans are undertaken. These are:
• a communication test every six months
• a desktop exercise once a year
• a major live exercise every three years
• Command Post exercise every 3 years
6.1 Training
Extensive training is delivered to staff throughout the reporting period, this includes
the following;
The Head of EPRR in partnership with the Emergency Planning Officer from
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust facilitated training for staff employed in
the Minor Injuries Unit (MIUs) on the management of a patient presenting with a
possible radiation injury, This training has been cascaded to staff working in the MIU
departments.
Within this reporting period KCHFT IT staffs have undertaken business continuity
awareness training, focusing their awareness of incidents relevant to their service and
the command and control processes in place.
Media training was provided to the Trust on call Directors on 10th September 2018;
this was delivered by staff from Meridian Studios. Attendees commented on the
positive content of the training and skills gained being used in other areas.
6.2 Exercises
Multiple exercises have taken place throughout the reporting period involving staff
from differing services, the exercise include the following;
A walk through Lockdown exercise took place at the Sittingbourne Minor Injuries Unit
on Friday 6th July, the learning identified from the exercise has been used to develop
the Trust Lockdown plan
An entire no notice water failure exercise took place at Hawkhurst Hospital on
Tuesday 11th September, this exercise was facilitated in partnership with South East
Water. Staff were professional and responsive in their response, lessons identified
were discussed at the internal Trust debrief facilitated by the Head of EPRR
. A multiagency evacuation exercise took place on the 30th November; the location of the Rest Centre was Edenbridge Leisure Centre. Staff from KCHFT participated, assessing and treating 21 volunteer patients, lessons were identified and all agreed the exercise was a valuable experience.
Skype for Business has been communicated to staff, the EPRR Team in partnership with IT facilitated a live no notice exercise on February 25th, lessons identified highlighted a lack of understanding for some staff on the process, further testing of the system and staffs understanding of Skype for Business are planned for 2019.
The Trust has therefore exceeded these requirements in 2018/19.
Page 172 of 177
7. Incidents
Throughout the year there have been a number of incidents across the Trust which has involved implementation of Service Level Business Continuity arrangements. Examples of incidents are documented below; The fire alarms at Sittingbourne Hospital were active on July 10th, following on from this incident a debrief took place involving staff from Virgin Health Care, KCHFT, and NHSPS. Challenges remain for multi-agency occupied sites, these are being discussed with partners from other agencies, and an exercise is currently being planned for Sittingbourne Hospital to test planning assumptions.
A Trust wide IT failure 3rd September resulted in activation of business continuity arrangements, no known harm occurred to patients. A report was developed by the IT department detailing the incident and actions taken. The Trust has been fully engaged in the activation of the Local Health Resilience Partnership Outbreak Policy. On Friday 27th April 2018 Head of EPRR for KCHFT received an email from Public
Health England (PHE) informing of individual with Hepatitis A at a hotel in the
Canterbury area. Within three days 85 individual working at the hotel received
vaccinations, this was provided by 3 vaccinators from KCHFT.
At the end of 2018 and within the first three months of 2019 the Trust again provided
an immediate responded to three further outbreaks, a fruit farm in Faversham, a
school in Dartford and a care home in Tonbridge, the interpreter service provided
support to KCHFT staff at the fruit farm incident.
A fire broke out in a supermarket in Folkestone on the 22nd November resulting in an impact on staff working in the area; a command centre was implemented by the Kent Resilience Team led by Kent Fire and Rescue. March 2019 - Sittingbourne Minor Injuries Unit reported a potential Chemical incident, a patient presented with unexplained symptoms; staff immediately recognised the patient presentation as a potential contamination and evoked the Chemical exposure plan. Command and Control was managed by the strategic manager for the Minor Injuries Units in the North of the county
8. Summary The Trust continued to develop its resilience arrangements throughout 2018/19 in 2019/20 this work will continue, ensuring the Trust maintains the ability to respond to emergencies and business continuity incidents. Lessons learned and good practice have been identified and shared amongst staff. On-going embedding of the EPRR arrangements remains a key priority. The focus for the continued development of the service in 2019/20 will be;
• To maintain compliance with the EPRR requirements
• To continue the planned works in respect of Lockdown
• To facilitate exercises for Clinical and Non Clinical Services
Em
erge
ncy
Pla
nnin
g &
Bus
ines
s C
ontin
uity
Rep
ort
Page 173 of 177
The Board is asked to note the progress of the service in 2018/19 and endorse the continued development of the service for 2019/20. Jan Allen Head of Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and Response 10.05.2019
Page 174 of 177
M
ee
ting
of th
e K
en
t Co
mm
un
ity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
un
da
tion
Tru
st B
oa
rd
to b
e h
eld
at 1
0a
m o
n T
hu
rsd
ay 2
3 M
ay 2
01
9 in
the
Ro
om
s 6
an
d 7
,Ken
t Co
mm
un
ity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
un
datio
n T
rus
t offic
es
, Trin
ity
Ho
us
e,1
10
-120
Up
per P
em
be
rton
, A
sh
ford
Ken
t T
N2
5 4
AZ
Th
is m
ee
ting
will b
e h
eld
in P
ub
lic
A
GE
ND
A
1. S
TA
ND
AR
D IT
EM
S
1.1
In
trodu
ctio
n b
y C
ha
ir
Tru
st C
ha
ir
1.2
T
o re
ce
ive
an
y A
po
logie
s fo
r A
bse
nce
T
rust C
ha
ir
1.3
T
o re
ce
ive
an
y D
ecla
ratio
ns o
f In
tere
st
T
rust C
ha
ir
1.4
T
o a
gre
e th
e M
inute
s o
f the
Ke
nt
Com
mu
nity
He
alth
NH
S F
oun
datio
n
Tru
st B
oa
rd m
ee
ting h
eld
on
28
Ma
rch 2
01
9
T
rust C
ha
ir
Pa
ge
4
1.5
T
o re
ce
ive
Ma
tters
Aris
ing fro
m th
e
Ke
nt C
om
mun
ity H
ea
lth N
HS
F
ou
nda
tion
Tru
st B
oa
rd m
ee
ting h
eld
o
n 2
8 M
arc
h 2
019
T
rust C
ha
ir
Pa
ge
15
1.6
T
o re
ce
ive
the T
rust C
ha
ir’s
Rep
ort
T
rust C
ha
ir
Pa
ge
19
1.7
T
o re
ce
ive
the C
hie
f Exe
cu
tive
’s
Rep
ort
C
hie
f Exe
cu
tive
P
age
26
2. B
OA
RD
AS
SU
RA
NC
E/A
PP
RO
VA
L
2.1
To re
ce
ive
the P
atie
nt S
tory
Chie
f Nu
rse
(Inte
rim)
2.2
To re
ce
ive
the B
oa
rd A
ssu
ran
ce
F
ram
ew
ork
Corp
ora
te S
erv
ices
Dire
cto
r P
age
30
Agenda
Page 175 of 177
B
oa
rd C
om
mitte
e R
ep
orts
2.3
To re
ce
ive
the Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e
Cha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
Cha
ir of Q
ua
lity
Com
mitte
e
Pa
ge
37
2.4
To re
ce
ive
the S
trate
gic
Work
forc
e
Com
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
C
ha
ir of S
trate
gic
W
ork
forc
e C
om
mitte
e
Pa
ge
46
2.5
T
o re
ce
ive
the F
ina
nce, B
usin
ess
an
d In
ve
stm
en
t Co
mm
ittee
Cha
ir’s
Assu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
C
ha
ir of F
inan
ce
, B
usin
ess a
nd
In
ve
stm
en
t Com
mitte
e
Pa
ge
58
2.6
To re
ce
ive
the A
ud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
Cha
ir of A
ud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitte
e
Pa
ge
71
2.7
T
o a
pp
rove
the 2
01
8/1
9 A
nn
ua
l R
ep
ort a
nd
Acco
un
ts
(i) 2
018
/19 A
nn
ua
l Qu
ality
R
ep
ort
D
irecto
r of F
inan
ce
C
hie
f Nu
rse (In
terim
)
Pa
ge
2.8
T
o re
ce
ive
the In
tegra
ted
P
erfo
rma
nce R
epo
rt
D
irecto
r of
Fin
an
ce
/Exe
cu
tive
D
irecto
rs
Pa
ge
74
2.9
T
o A
pp
rove
the
Dig
ital S
trate
gy
D
irecto
r of F
inan
ce
P
age
120
3. R
EP
OR
TS
TO
TH
E B
OA
RD
3.1
T
o re
ce
ive
the P
atie
nt E
xp
erie
nce
a
nd
Co
mp
lain
ts R
ep
ort
C
hie
f Nu
rse (In
terim
) P
age
140
3.2
T
o re
ce
ive
the L
ea
rnin
g F
rom
De
ath
s
Rep
ort
M
ed
ical D
irecto
r P
age
152
3.3
To re
ce
ive
the F
ree
dom
To
Sp
ea
k
Up R
ep
ort
C
orp
ora
te S
erv
ices
Dire
cto
r P
age
165
3.4
T
o re
ce
ive
the E
me
rge
ncy P
lan
nin
g
an
d B
usin
ess C
ontin
uity
An
nu
al
Rep
ort
C
orp
ora
te S
erv
ices
Dire
cto
r P
age
168
4. A
NY
OT
HE
R B
US
INE
SS
T
o c
on
sid
er a
ny o
the
r item
s o
f b
usin
ess p
revio
usly
no
tified
to th
e
Tru
st C
ha
ir
T
rust C
ha
ir
Page 176 of 177
5. Q
UE
ST
ION
S F
RO
M M
EM
BE
RS
OF
TH
E P
UB
LIC
RE
LA
TIN
G T
O T
HE
AG
EN
DA
6. D
AT
E A
ND
VE
NU
E O
F N
EX
T M
EE
TIN
G
Th
urs
da
y 2
5 J
uly
20
19
S
uite
1, T
he
Orc
ha
rds
, New
Ro
ad
, Eas
t Ma
lling
, Wes
t Ma
lling
Ken
t ME
19
6B
J
Agenda
Page 177 of 177