agenda ocm - 20100701
TRANSCRIPT
AGENDA ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
TIME: 5.30PM
1 JULY 2010
VENUE – CITY OF STIRLING
Constituent Members: Cities of Perth, Joondalup, Stirling, and Wanneroo. Towns of Cambridge, Victoria Park and Vincent
Managing waste and recovering resources responsibly
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL
NOTICE OF MEETING
25 June 2010 Councillors of the Mindarie Regional Local Government are respectfully advised that an Ordinary Meeting of the Council will be held in the Council Chambers of the City of Stirling, 25 Cedric Street, Stirling, at 5.30pm on Thursday 1 July 2010. The business papers pertaining to the meeting follow. Your attendance is requested.
KEVIN POYNTON Chief Executive Officer MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL - MEMBERSHIP
Cr J Bissett (John) Town of Victoria Park Cr D Boothman (David) City of Stirling Cr R Butler (Rob) City of Perth Cr S Cooke (Sharon) City of Stirling Cr S Farrell (Steed) Town of Vincent Cr R Fishwick (Russ) City of Joondalup Cr L Gray JP (Laura) City of Wanneroo Cr K Hollywood (Kerry) City of Joondalup Cr D Newton JP (Dot) City of Wanneroo Cr C MacRae (Corinne) Town of Cambridge Cr J Robbins (Jason) City of Stirling Cr B Stewart (Bill) City of Stirling
NB: Although some Councils have nominated alternate members, it is a precursor to any alternate member acting that a Council carries a specific resolution for each occasion that the alternate member is to act, referencing Section 51 of the Interpretation Act. The current Local Government Act does not provide for the appointment of deputy or alternate members of Regional Councils. The DLGRD is preparing an amendment to rectify this situation.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 2
AGENDA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
SUBJECT
FILE NO
PAGE NO
1 OATHS/AFFIRMATIONS OF ALLEGIANCE AND DECLARATIONS OF OFFICE N/A P6
2 QUESTION TIME N/A P6
3 ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES N/A P6
4 MINUTES N/A P6
4.1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING – 22 APRIL 2010 N/A P6
4.2 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING – 6 MAY 2010 N/A P6
4.3 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING – 24 JUNE 2010 N/A P6
5 ANNOUNCEMENTS N/A P6
6 DEPUTATIONS N/A P7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 3
7 BUSINESS ARISING FROM A PREVIOUS MEETING TREATED AS AN ORDER OF THE DAY
N/A P7
8 REPORTS (Declaration of Financial/Conflict of Interest to be recorded prior to dealing with each item)
N/A P7
8.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER N/A P7
8.1.1 BUSINESS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 23 APRIL 2010 – 4 JUNE 2010 COR/8 P7
P12-30
8.1.2 RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY UPDATE REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 26 MARCH 2010 – 2 MAY 2010
WST/13-02 P7 P31-84
8.1.3 CONFIDENTIAL ITEM RRFA WASTE DIVERSION TARGET WST/179 P8
P85-92
8.1.4 CONFIDENTIAL ITEM FUTURE LANDFILL SITE INVESTIGATION AND PROPOSAL TO PURCHASE LAND
WST/31 P8 P93-109
8.1.5 AUDIO RECORDING OF MRC COUNCIL MEETINGS GOV/34 P8-9
P110-113
8.1.6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED 31 MARCH 2010 – 30 APRIL 2010 FIN/5-02 P9
P114-135
8.1.7 LIST OF PAYMENTS FOR THE MONTHS ENDED 31 MARCH 2010 – 30 APRIL 2010 Fin/5-02 P9
P136-148
8.2 AUDIT COMMITTEE – 8 JUNE 2010 N/A P9
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 4
8.2.1 APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR FOR NEXT TERM OF THREE YEARS FIN/124 P9
P149-155
8.3 STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE - 14 MAY 2010 N/A P10
8.3.1 STRATEGIC INTEGRATED REGIONAL PLAN WST/176 P10 P161-252
8.3.2 FUTURE LANDFILL SITE INVESTIGATION WST/31 P10 P253
8.3.3 BUDGET 2010/2011 FIN/9 P10 P254-297
9 NOTICE OF MOTION N/A P10
10 GENERAL BUSINESS N/A P10
11 NEXT MEETING N/A P10
12 CLOSURE N/A P11
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 5
1 OATHS/AFFIRMATIONS OF ALLEGIANCE AND DECLARATIONS OF OFFICE 2 QUESTION TIME 3 ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES 4 MINUTES 4.1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING – 22 APRIL 2010 The Minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 22 April 2010 have been printed and circulated to members of the Council. RECOMMENDATION That the Minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting of Council held on 22 April 2010 be taken as read, confirmed and the Chairman invited to sign same as a true record of the proceedings. 4.2 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING – 6 MAY 2010 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held on 6 May 2010 have been printed and circulated to members of the Council. RECOMMENDATION That the Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of Council held on 6 May 2010 be taken as read, confirmed and the Chairman invited to sign same as a true record of the proceedings. 4.3 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING – 24 JUNE 2010 The Minutes of the Special Council Meeting held on 24 June 2010 have been printed and circulated to members of the Council. RECOMMENDATION That the Minutes of the Special Council Meeting of Council held on 24 June 2010 be taken as read, confirmed and the Chairman invited to sign same as a true record of the proceedings. 5 ANNOUNCEMENTS
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 6
6 DEPUTATIONS
7 BUSINESS FROM A PREVIOUS MEETING TREATED AS AN ORDER OF THE DAY
8 REPORTS Declaration of Financial/Conflict of Interest to be recorded prior to dealing with each item. Disclosure of Financial and Proximity Interests (a) Members must disclose the nature of their interest in matters to be discussed at
the meeting. (Section 5.65 of the Local Government Act 1995).
(b) Employees must disclose the nature of their interest in reports or advice when giving the report or advice to the meeting. (Sections 5.70 and 5.71 of the Local Government Act 1995). Disclosure of Interest Affecting Impartiality (a) Members and staff must disclose their interest in matters to be discussed at the meeting in respect of which the member or employee has given or will give advice. 8.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 8.1.1 File No: COR/8 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: BUSINESS REPORT FOR THE PERIOD 23 APRIL 2010 – 4 JUNE 2010 MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council receive this progress report for the period 23 April 2010 – 4 June 2010 against Annual Business Plan 2009/2010. 8.1.2 File No: WST/13-02 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY UPDATE REPORT MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council note the RRF update report.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 7
8.1.3 File No: WST/179 Item and Attachments at Page CONFIDENTIAL ITEM SUBJECT: RRFA WASTE DIVERSION TARGET MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council note the anticipated changes to the Waste Diversion Target in accordance with the RRFA. 8.1.4 File No: WST/31 Item and Attachments at Page CONFIDENTIAL ITEM SUBJECT: FUTURE LANDFILL SITE INVESTIGATION AND PROPOSAL TO
PURCHASE LAND MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council:
(i) note the progress report on investigations to identify a suitable replacement landfill for Tamala Park
(ii) approve the Business Plan for the purpose of giving Statewide public notice under the Local Government Act and to consider any submissions and whether to proceed with the transaction at the next available meeting
8.1.5 File No: GOV/34 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: AUDIO RECORDING OF MRC COUNCIL MEETINGS MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council:
(i) note the investigation and report into a quality audio recording system for MRC Council meetings
(ii) approve the establishment of an audio recording capability for MRC Council meetings
(iii) note the plan to implement this system following the purchase of the recommended audio recording system ‘For the Record’ for the recording of MRC Council meetings
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 8
8.1.6 File No: FIN/5-02 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED 31 MARCH 2010 AND 30 APRIL 2010 MRC RECOMMENDATION That the Financial Statements as attached at Attachment One and Two for the months ended 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010 be noted. 8.1.7 File No: FIN/5-02 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: LIST OF PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE MONTHS ENDED 31 MARCH 2010 AND 30 APRIL 2010 MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council endorse the list of payments made, as per the delegation made to the Chief Executive Officer, for the months ended 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010. 8.2 AUDIT COMMITTEE – 8 JUNE 2010 8.2.1 Audit Com. Item 1 File No: FIN/6 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 8 JUNE 2010 AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council:
(i) accept the quotation submitted by Grant Thornton for the delivery of audit services with following characteristics
• for a period of three years commencing 2009/2010
• maximum total hours of 120 hours per year (360 hours total)
• maximum total cost - $54,750 (ii) appoint Michael Hillgrove and/or alternate partner of Grant Thornton as
the auditor for a term of three years to conduct the Annual audits of Mindarie Regional Council for the financial years 2009/2010 to 2011/2012
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 9
8.3 STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE – 14 MAY 2010 8.3.1 SPC Item 1 File No: WST/176 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: STRATEGIC INTEGRATED REGIONAL PLAN SPC RECOMMENDATION That the Strategic Projects Committee receive the progress report on the development of a strategic integrated regional plan. 8.3.2 SPC Item 2 File No: WST/31 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: FUTURE LANDFILL SITE INVESTIGATION SPC RECOMMENDATION That this project be discussed at the July Strategic Projects Committee meeting. 8.3.3 SPC Item 3 File No: FIN/9 Item and Attachments at Page SUBJECT: BUDGET 2010/2011 SPC RECOMMENDATION Draft report with identified changes be presented at the next Budget Workshop for further discussion. 9 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION AT THE FOLLOWING MEETING 10 GENERAL BUSINESS - SEE NOTE (1) 11 NEXT MEETING 11.1 Ordinary Council Meeting • 26 August 2010
• 5.30pm
• Town of Vincent
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 10
12 CLOSURE - MEETING DECLARED CLOSED Notes
(1) Under this item, members have the opportunity to:
(a) make a statement providing information related to the Council's business;
(b) to ask a question relevant to the Council's business.
Under this item a member shall not raise any matter directly related to any other item on the agenda and shall not foreshadow any motion for consideration at another meeting.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 11
ITEM 8.1.1 BUSINESS REPORT (for the period 23 April 2010 – 4 June 2010) File No: COR/8 (D/10/4121) Attachment(s): 1. Information related to landfill and recycling activity at Tamala Park to end April 2010 2. MRC Marketing and Education Plan – Progress Report 3. Letter – City of Stirling 4. Letter – Town of Vincent Author: Kevin Poynton
SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide Council with current information on all business activities. BACKGROUND The Council at its meeting held in October 2008, resolved, inter alia, to approve a revised Strategic Plan. Council, at Special Council Meeting 28 May 2009, approved Annual Business Plan 2009/2010. This business report is now presented in a format consistent with both the Strategic Plan and approved Annual Business Plan. New information since the last report is provided in ‘bold italics’. DETAIL OBJECTIVE ONE – WASTE MANAGEMENT Objective One is ‘to manage waste in a way that
• Maximises resource recovery
• Minimises waste to landfill
in order to minimise environmental impact. Existing Waste Processing Projects – Tamala Park The table at Attachment One describes business activity for the period 1 July 2009 – 30 April 2010 for member councils, and others, in terms of tonnage (received for processing) and revenue associated with this tonnage. Information related to landfill and recycling activity at Tamala Park to end April 2010 is presented in the table at Attachment One. Current information in relation to Tamala Park landfill and recycling activities is as follows:
• The issue of a contractual dispute with a service provider, in relation to landfill construction work, has progressed to the point where a draft legal document assigning responsibilities from the contractor (JJ MacDonald) to the current owners (WATPAC) has been reviewed. Legal advice has been that the type of assignation is incorrect. Further liaison has continued with WATPAC and the administration is awaiting further WATPAC correspondence
• Utilisation of Tamala Park limestone has continued both onsite and via exploitation of offsite activities
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 12
• An investigation into the characteristics of future gas management plan is in progress with a view to either an extension of the existing arrangement for a finite period, or conduct of another tender exercise for the service. Preparation of a tender package is in progress, following Council decision April 2010 to proceed this way
• Key tasks associated with the groundwater management plan for 2009/2010 are as follows:
- Groundwater sampling, analysis and reporting
- The annual ground water monitoring report, including the results from 18 new bores was presented to DEC in March 2009
- Specialist groundwater monitoring/management consultancy services will be required for planning any groundwater remediation requirements in FY 09/10 that may arise as a result of the leachate plume being detected to the north of Stage I
- Provision of an additional 3 borehole clusters to aid the investigation of the above item
The administration has received the latest groundwater monitoring report. Key points to note are as follows:
- Annual groundwater monitoring for 2009 included 9 additional boreholes along northern boundary
- Results indicate plume is migrating in north westerly direction and some substances of concern are above investigation trigger levels at the northern boundary
- Funding requested in 2010/2011 budget for investigating Monitored Natural Attenuation and Engineered Remediation options
- Consultation with stakeholders to be undertaken with inputs from above investigations to be considered
- A detailed report on the groundwater management program will be presented to the Strategic Projects Committee (SPC) later in 2010
• Access to Federal Government funds to establish a ‘used – fridge management capability’ as an internal rather external service, at a cost saving of $29,000 per annum, has commenced. These funds are being used to train two staff on ‘used fridge management’
Existing Waste Processing Projects – Neerabup Progress against a project to establish and operate a Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) at Neerabup in is contained in a separate report within this agenda. OBJECTIVE TWO – WASTE PROCESSING OPPORTUNITIES Objective Two is to identify, evaluate and implement opportunities for expansion of the waste management business. An Integrated Regional Plan Tasks associated with the development of an integrated regional plan have been progressed as follows:
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 13
• Multi-Criteria Analysis of scenarios
• TWG scenario workshop held on 15 April
• Further Multi-Criteria Analysis of scenarios following input from the TWG workshop
• Numerous attempts to arrange a final scenarios workshop with Elected Members and the TWG (date yet to be confirmed)
Additional Processing Facilities Tasks associated with the establishment of additional processing facilities for operation by Mindarie Regional Council have been progressed as follows:
• Recycling Centre Balcatta (City of Stirling)
- Investigation into Mindarie Regional Council operation of Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) component completed, with a conclusion that any piecemeal transfer of CoS capability to MRC was not workable.
- Alternative approach re ‘takeover’ of ALL the recycling activities at Balcatta is proposed for further action. This further action is discussion with CoS on the issues and workability of this proposal, with respect to land tenure, existing contracts and financial issues.
• ‘Son of Tamala’ Landfill
- Work is progressing to investigate purchase of land for potential purchase for use as a landfill, if required. A separate report on this matter is part of this agenda
OBJECTIVE THREE – INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP AND ADVOCACY Objective Three is to identify and promote industry-wide initiatives for improvements to waste/resource management, particularly in relation to waste minimisation and resource recovery. SWMP Projects Progress on current SWMP projects during the reporting period has been as follows: 1. 2 Bin Trial (clean2stream) This project seeks to address the issue of “which bin to put it in” and study household and non residential sorting and collection systems to be considered for future improvements in recycling recovery and waste processing. The object of this project is to develop and trial a 2 stream collection system that is optimised to suit future organic and non-organic waste recycling for a range of premises, without the introduction of a new “class of waste” stream and the expense associated with the supply of bins, trucks, staff and environmental emissions associated with collection vehicles. Participating Local Government – Town of Cambridge Current Progress:
• Draft Final Report completed, final check and then uploaded to MRC website
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 14
2. Bulky Waste Characterisation This project is designed to identify the composition of the various bulky waste streams delivered to Tamala Park and Recycling Centre Balcatta and identify their sources. This information is then available to the Mindarie Regional Council and the City of Stirling to be considered in the redesign of their respective transfer stations including charging policy and materials handling procedures to increase the amount of waste diverted from landfill. Participating Local Governments: City of Stirling, Mindarie Regional Council. Current Progress:
• Project completed, report on MRC website for public information
3. Best practice bulky hard waste and garden waste verge collections This project seeks to identify best practice recovery of bulky hard and green waste from household verge collections for the purpose of reuse and recycling. During the project officers audit materials placed on verges for collection, interview officers from member councils and collection contractors and collate detail on all member council collection services. Current Progress:
• Draft Final Report completed
• Final check and then uploaded to MRC website 4. Events Recycling The results of these investigations will be used to develop new waste management models and procedures for use throughout the region. The waste management models will also make allowance for the different sizes of events. Participating Local Governments: City of Perth, consultation with all member councils Current Progress:
• Project completed, report on website 5. Council Infrastructure Works Waste Recycling This project is designed to bring together all of the Engineering and Parks operational staff within the region with responsibility for the recycling and disposal of solid waste generated through the construction and maintenance of Local Government infrastructure with a focus on pavement, drainage and parks operations. The object is to identify best practice infrastructure waste avoidance and recycling and seek to adopt the best practices through all member Local Governments through copying techniques and sharing contracts. Participating Local Governments: All member councils Current Progress:
• Draft final report being compiled
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 15
6. Reducing the Direct Environmental Impact from the Transport of Collected Recycling and Waste Materials for Present and Future Scenarios The objective of this project is to identify what opportunities exist and what steps need to be taken to optimise the collection and transport of materials for the purposes of recycling and disposal. The project is intended to identify the optimum travelling distances for kerbside collection vehicles in terms of premises serviced, fuels consumed and emissions to the atmosphere from when a truck is filled to capacity to the point of discharge and to specify what benefits can be derived from:
• Locating processing facilities closer to the point of collection
• Using transfer stations to sort and move waste to more remote recycling facilities and landfill sites.
Participating Local Governments: All member councils Current progress:
• This project forms part of the Hyder Integrated Regional Plan
• Currently work in progress Final Reporting to the DEC on funded projects – final report being prepared. Ongoing discussions with the DEC about future funded projects. Partnership Activities Key partnership activities during the reporting period have been as follows:
• Municipal Waste Advisory Council (MWAC)
- Meeting held April 2010 - Draft Policy Statements on Data and Information Management
was endorsed - Program for e-waste collection days advised - Concern was expressed over uncertainty associated with
funding for SWMP projects
• Forum of Regional Councils (FORC)
- Meeting held 3 May 2010 - Presentation received from representatives of Curtin Centre for
Cleaner Production with a view to establishment of partnership with FORC
- Presentation received from representative of Department of Planning on the waste management issues associated with urban planning in Perth
- Decision made re appointment of communications services provider
- Progress report received on development of presentation to Parliament representatives on FORC – related issues
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 16
• Waste Management Association of WA (WMAA(WA))
- Implementation of project plans for utilisation of $100k from Waste Authority
• Industry Training Council (EUPA)
- Review and revision of waste industry training needs, using levy funds. This work is in progress
OBJECTIVE FOUR – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Objective Four is to engage with the community in the Mindarie region in order to promote behaviour consistent with the region’s operational plans for waste/resource management. A report on progress against Council’s Marketing and Education Plan is at Attachment Two to this Item. Marketing Activities Key marketing activities progressed during the reporting period were as follows:
• Monthly community update advertisements in Community Newspapers in April and May
• CEO Bulletin produced following April 22 Ordinary Council Meeting
• MRC News distributed to all households in the region in April
• Ongoing maintenance and improvements to website; Earth Carers forum and blog project has commenced
• Calendar of waste education activities during May and June circulated to Councillors and other stakeholders
• The bi-annual Stakeholder Survey has been administered during this period with results due shortly
• An update of the corporate brochure “Every Moment Matters” is being worked on
Education Activities Key education activities progressed during the reporting period were as follows:
• Continued support of member councils with the metropolitan-wide battery collection program. Battery bins are now in place in each Council area. Investigation of region-wide contractor to collect batteries. The first delivery of batteries to eastern states for recycling occurred in late March
• Fridge calendars are being finalised for Cambridge, Stirling, and Vincent
• Earth Carers course completed with Graduation Ceremony held on May 12
• RFQ process for internal displays at RRF Visitors Centre has been awarded and work is progressing well
• RRF DVD is in production
• Successful HHW Disposal Day held at Stirling on May 22. Promotion is underway for Cambridge HHHW Disposal day on June 19
• HHW brochure has been produced and circulated
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 17
• Work is continuing on development of waste statistics report card and graphic representation on website
• Stage one of a scoping study into development of a Junior Earth Carers program is underway
• Discussion continued with Western Power re joint promotion of fluoro collection program. This includes the production of a fluoros collection box for distribution through Councils to residents
• Advertising in Community Newspapers across the region for “Change Your Smoke Alarm Battery” Day on April 1st, and to offer free disposal for waste resulting from storm damage during April
• Planning and promotion underway for the Apple e-waste drop-off weekend on June 12 & 13. We have two collection venues within the region
• Support of Tales With a Twist puppet show in schools during Term 2 and at the Wanneroo Shopping Centre during the April school holidays
• Attendance at Garden Week as part of a metropolitan-wide Regional Council waste education display
• Visits to schools to give talks, and tours of our facilities are strongly booked. Bookings now being accepted for July
Community Engagement Advisory Group (CEAG) Activities Key CEAG activities progressed during the reporting period were as follows:
• CEAG has reviewed its Roles & Functions Statement. This was endorsed at the April Ordinary Council Meeting
• CEAG has completed it review of performance against the CPA as of Practical Completion. This was endorsed at the April Ordinary Council Meeting
OBJECTIVE FIVE – ORGANISATIONAL MANAGEMENT Objective Five is to maintain excellent management of the Mindarie Regional Council organisation. Business Systems Key projects associated with this port folio are as follows:
• Implementation of improved budget preparation process, in conjunction with member councils
• Investigation of personnel resourcing mix, prior to Budget 2010/2011. This work has progressed to ‘identification of interviewees’ milestone for Project Manager, Marketing Manager, Environmental Officer
• Progress of improved TWG governance model, in the form of revised officer forums, including the inaugural meeting of Strategic Projects Committee ( Chair: Karen Caple, Deputy” Martyn Glover )
• Progress of a project to develop a revised pricing model. This has resulted in Council resolving to adopt a ‘single fee’ model – a decision which is now in dispute before the Supreme Court
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 18
• Correspondence has been received from Town of Vincent on this matters of the fees decision, and this is at Attachment Four to this Item
Member Council Partnerships Key activities progressed as follows:
• Liaison Tamala Park Regional Council (TPRC) re buffer and associated issues
• Agreement by TPRC on revised buffer plan
• Commencement of preparation of a lease amendment to effect this revised buffer plan
On the matter of Town of Cambridge exemption request, CEO Mindarie Regional Council and CEO Town of Cambridge have agreed that this matter is best left until investigations on a revised pricing model and an ‘exemption approach’ are completed. This is now estimated to be late 2010. On the matter of member Council partnerships, correspondence has been received from City of Stirling on the matter of ongoing utilisation of MRC services (see Attachment Three). Establishment Agreement The administration has received correspondence from Town of Vincent advising a position of support for ‘one vote – one Council’, as distinct to the existing model, in any future draft Establishment Agreement. This position is at odds with other Council positions on this matter i.e. retention of status quo. Attendees at an Officer Business Workshop on 13 August 2009 agreed ‘way ahead’ as follows:
• Finalisation of the draft Establishment Agreement, for MRC endorsement and subsequent consideration by member councils
• Development of a suite of potential Constitution amendments, for consideration by MRC and member councils in the event of non-agreement to the draft Establishment Agreement
The Establishment Agreement work is closely linked to the pricing model, and will occur in synchronisation with this pricing model work. The estimated timeframe for presentation of a final draft Establishment Agreement to Council will depend on pricing model progress. Given that Council has now resolved a ‘single fee’ model, it is proposed to re-commence deliberations on this matter of Establishment Agreement, via a workshop in late July – early August 2010.
CONSULTATION Not applicable STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Not applicable
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 19
POLICY IMPLICATIONS Not applicable STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS This progress report reflects progress against approved activities associated with the Council’s annual Business Plan. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS These activities are conducted within the context of the approved Council budget for any particular financial year. COMMENT Council business is currently being conducted within the framework of the Annual Business Plan. MRC OFFICER RECOMMENDATION That Council receive this progress report for the period 23 April 2010 – 4 June 2010 against Annual Business Plan 2009/2010. AGENA REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING – 11 June 2010 The group agreed the inclusion of additional information on the Attachment associated with the Marketing Plan i.e, sub totals, explanation of any over expenditures. The group agreed that some quotations for facilitation services should be obtained from those facilitators used by member Councils. The Recommendation was not amended as a result of the meeting. MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council receive this progress report for the period 23 April 2010 – 4 June 2010 against Annual Business Plan 2009/2010.
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 20
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 8.1.1
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
INFORMATION RELATED TO LANDFILL AND RECYCLING ACTIVITY AT TAMALA PARK TO END APRIL 2010
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 21
Info
rmat
ion
rela
ting
to la
ndfil
l, re
sour
ce re
cove
ry &
recy
clin
g to
nnag
es y
ear t
o da
te 2
009/
10M
onth
:A
pr-1
0
RR
F A
ctua
lLa
ndfil
l Act
ual
Tota
l Ton
nage
Rev
ised
Bud
get
2009
/10
Targ
et %
Yea
r to
Dat
eA
ctua
l % Y
ear t
o D
ate
Act
ual G
/L $
Rev
ised
Bud
get
2009
/10
Targ
et %
Yea
r to
Dat
eA
ctua
l % Y
ear t
o D
ate
MEM
BER
S
Proc
essa
ble
Cam
brid
ge3,
982.
05
3,20
2.19
7,
184.
24
9,50
0.00
83
.33%
75.6
2%86
5,70
1.54
$
1,
144,
800
$
83
.33%
75.6
2%Jo
onda
lup
21,1
53.6
6
22
,615
.74
43,7
69.4
0
55
,941
.00
83.3
3%78
.24%
5,27
4,21
9.12
$
6,74
0,90
0$
83.3
3%78
.24%
Per
th-
12,0
41.0
0
12
,041
.00
16,0
00.0
0
83
.33%
75.2
6%1,
450,
940.
68$
1,
928,
000
$
83
.33%
75.2
6%S
tirlin
g-
16,6
24.4
3
16
,624
.43
12,0
00.0
0
83
.33%
138.
54%
2,00
3,24
4.23
$
1,44
6,00
0$
83.3
3%13
8.54
%V
icto
ria P
ark
3,20
6.62
6,
477.
77
9,68
4.39
13
,964
.00
83.3
3%69
.35%
1,16
6,03
1.17
$
1,68
2,70
0$
83.3
3%69
.30%
Vin
cent
1,42
8.17
9,
046.
70
10,4
74.8
7
13
,742
.00
83.3
3%76
.23%
1,26
1,18
2.92
$
1,65
5,90
0$
83.3
3%76
.16%
Wan
nero
o17
,643
.15
20,3
27.4
9
37
,970
.64
49,3
00.0
0
83
.33%
77.0
2%4,
574,
455.
44$
5,
940,
700
$
83
.33%
77.0
0%Su
b To
tal P
roce
ssab
le47
,413
.65
90,3
35.3
2
13
7,74
8.97
17
0,44
7.00
83
.33%
80.8
2%16
,595
,775
.10
$
20
,539
,000
$
83.3
3%80
.80%
Non
-Pro
cess
able
Cam
brid
ge2,
185.
98
2,18
5.98
1,
200.
00
83.3
3%18
2.17
%14
4,60
1.69
$
79
,200
$
83
.33%
182.
58%
Joon
dalu
p10
,693
.35
10,6
93.3
5
10
,261
.00
83.3
3%10
4.21
%70
5,91
9.29
$
67
7,20
0$
83
.33%
104.
24%
Per
th45
.25
45.2
5
37
.00
83.3
3%12
2.30
%2,
986.
94$
2,
400
$
83.3
3%12
4.46
%S
tirlin
g62
,277
.70
62,2
77.7
0
83
,000
.00
83.3
3%75
.03%
4,10
1,01
1.95
$
5,47
8,00
0$
83.3
3%74
.86%
Vic
toria
Par
k1,
136.
14
1,13
6.14
68
9.00
83.3
3%16
4.90
%74
,984
.91
$
45
,500
$
83
.33%
164.
80%
Vin
cent
942.
89
94
2.89
484.
00
83
.33%
194.
81%
62,2
30.7
0$
31,9
00$
83.3
3%19
5.08
%W
anne
roo
18,6
24.5
9
18
,624
.59
21,0
00.0
0
83
.33%
88.6
9%1,
234,
680.
75$
1,
386,
000
$
83
.33%
89.0
8%Su
b To
tal N
on-P
roce
ssab
le-
95
,905
.90
95,9
05.9
0
116,
671.
00
83.3
3%82
.20%
6,32
6,41
6.23
$
7,
700,
200
$
83
.33%
82.1
6%O
ther
Sita
Bio
visi
on R
esid
ues
20,5
29.0
7
20
,529
.07
30,0
00.0
0
83
.33%
68.4
3%1,
354,
918.
63$
1,
980,
000
$
83
.33%
68.4
3%S
tirlin
g B
ales
19,4
39.4
8
19
,439
.48
22,0
00.0
0
83
.33%
88.3
6%1,
283,
005.
73$
1,
452,
000
$
83
.33%
88.3
6%W
anne
roo
WR
C9,
863.
65
9,86
3.65
3,
700.
00
83.3
3%26
6.59
%65
1,00
0.96
$
24
4,20
0$
83
.33%
266.
59%
Sub
Tota
l Oth
er-
49
,832
.20
49,8
32.2
0
55,7
00.0
0
83.3
3%89
.47%
3,28
8,92
5.32
$
3,
676,
200.
00$
83.3
3%89
.47%
SUB
TO
TAL
MEM
BER
S47
,413
.65
236,
073.
42
283,
487.
07
342,
818.
00
83.3
3%82
.69%
26,2
11,1
16.6
5$
31,9
15,4
00.0
0$
83.3
3%82
.13%
CA
SUA
LS
Sou
th P
erth
-
14
8.77
148.
77
18
3.33
83.3
3%81
.15%
16,2
29.4
5$
20,0
00$
83.3
3%81
.15%
Trad
e &
Cas
h -
33,7
97.8
5
33
,797
.85
39,9
98.6
7
85
.00%
84.5
0%3,
923,
772.
71$
4,
618,
140
$
85
.00%
84.9
6%Su
b To
tal C
asua
ls-
33
,946
.62
33,9
46.6
2
40,1
82.0
0
84.1
7%84
.48%
3,94
0,00
2.16
$
4,
638,
140
$
84
.17%
84.9
5%TO
TAL
47,4
13.6
5
270,
020.
04
31
7,43
3.69
383,
000.
00
30
,151
,118
.81
$
36,5
53,5
40.0
0$
REC
YCLI
NG
Rec
yclin
g ce
ntre
sal
es38
9,31
8.79
$
24
0,00
0$
83
%16
2%
TON
NA
GE
REV
ENU
E
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 22
ATTACHMENT TWO
TO ITEM 8.1.1
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
MRC MARKETING AND EDUCATION PLAN – PROGRESS REPORT
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 23
MRC MARKETING AND EDUCATION PLAN – PROGRESS REPORT (as at end of May)
ACTIVITY BUDGET YTD ACTUALS
ACTION PRIOR TO JUNE 30
Corporate Communications
Annual Report & Strategic Plan
$18,000 $21,800 Completed – over due to design and printing of Strategic Plan
Waste Conference $15,000 $18,021 Completed – over due to additional registrations
Media activity $10,000 $5,803 Ongoing Website update $45,000 $31,984 Maintenance continuing, plus commencement
of Stage 2 interactive, and development of interactive game. Budget will be fully utilised.
MRC News $65,000 $41,000 Produced and distributed in April to all households in region. Only one issue produced this year; remainder of budget carried forward to 2010/11
Facts n Stats $12,833 $0 Unlikely to spend before end of June Every Moment Matters
$4,167 $0 In production
General advertising $6,000 $3,700 Utilised as required Sub-total $176,000 $122,308
Waste education WESSG support $2,500 $1,880 One more monthly meeting for the financial
year Branding support $21,000 $8,690 Updated Style Guide ready for distribution
Discussing bin sticker support for Stirling which will utilise remaining budget.
Region evaluation tool
$10,000 $0 Work has commenced to develop report card; expected to be well developed within next month
Tours program $20,000 $17,061 Full program up to & beyond June Bus subsidy $15,000 $6,789 Unused funds will be used for purchase of
giveaways for tours Launch of education centre
$4,500 $9,453 Completed – over due to extra activities at launch function.
Mobile display $10,000 -$2,566 Negative expenditure due to final grant payment; developing updated info panels; aiming for completion in next month
Fridge calendar “Waste management & recycling guide”
$56,000 $32,036 Financial year calendars are about to go to print for Stirling and Vincent.
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 24
Earth Carers $60,000 $25,611 5th training program completed. Ongoing EC
events. Development of EC forum and blog for website underway, and scoping a Junior EC program. May fall short of expenditure (balanced by overs in other areas).
HHW promotion $48,000 $21,987 2010 Disposal Day for Cambridge on June 19. Expenditure for Joondalup and Stirling HHW Disposal Days not yet reflected in actuals.
Waste Wise events $14,000 $3,459 Activity funded as RIP project – unlikely to achieve more in next month. An amount to be carried forward to new financial year.
Contaminants education
$6,300 $2,102 Fluoros & batteries focus; collection boxes for distribution to households in production
E-waste $25,000 $0 Apple e-waste day in June 12 & 13. WALGA support has reduced the required MRC contribution to $11,500.
Partnership program $25,000 $23,800 Scheduled performances of Tales With A Twist in schools & at community events completed for this financial year
Schools program $30,000 $3,731 Production of games to be completed and used during incursions for which demand is strong & growing. Planning to introduce schools battery collection program in 2010/11. Will be purchasing battery bins and promotional material in next month.
ESL $10,000 $745 For completion before end of June Advertising $7,000 $7,000 Completed for the year
Sub-total $364,300 $161,778 Projects & SWMP support
Visitors Centre $40,000 $20,000 Completion of Stage 1 fitout by end of June. Variations to fit-out will exceed budgeted amount; expenditure offset against underspending on monthly update ads.
DVD & brochures for RRF
$18,000 $2,348 DVD in production
Monthly update ad $72,000 $39,019 Another monthly ad to appear in June. Not all expenditure to date reflected in actuals.
Sub-total $130,000 $61,367
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 25
ATTACHMENT THREE
TO ITEM 8.1.1
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
LETTER – CITY OF STIRLING
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 26
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 27
ATTACHMENT FOUR
TO ITEM 8.1.1
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
LETTER – TOWN OF VINCENT
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 28
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 29
ITEM 8.1.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 30
ITEM 8.1.2 RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY UPDATE REPORT (for the period 26 March 2010 – 2 May 2010)
File No: WST/13-02 (D/10/4122) Attachment(s): 1. Cardno Power Outage Plan 2. MRC Power Outage Procedure 3. BioVision Power Outage Procedure Author: Ian Watkins
SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide Council with information relating to relevant historical information and operation of the Stage 1 Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) at Neerabup. New information since the last report is provided in ‘bold italics’. BACKGROUND Stage 1 RRF contract was signed with BioVision 2020 on 23 November 2007. Construction commenced on 27 February 2008 with the 20 year operating period commencing on 16 July 2009. DETAIL Operations As at 16 July 2009 facility operations commenced. Typical operational conditions include:
• MRC to deliver 400 tonnes per day - Monday to Friday
• BioVision to process 285 tonnes per day - seven days per week
• 40,000 kilolitres of water consumed per year
• 3 MW hours of power consumed
• Approximately 40,000 tonnes of compost produced annually
• Approximately 30,000 tonnes of residue sent to Tamala Park annually
• 1,200 tonnes of ferrous metal recycled annually Composter Structural Issues Following the completion of short term repairs to the cracked composters, the facility was put back into full operation on 1 February 2010. Subsequent to this date, the facility has operated at greater then 100% Availability, with the only exception being a number of power outages. Standstill Deed (SSD) Update:
• The Standstill Deed (SSD) wording has been agreed between the MRC and BioVision
• The ANZ is agreeable the conditions of the SSD
• The ANZ is in the process of formally signing the SSD
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 31
• The facility is currently being operated as if the SSD was in full effect MRC Current Activities:
• Adjusting weekly delivery tonnage to accommodate operational requirements
• Investigating potential insurance claims
• Monitoring BioVision activity relating to composter long-term repairs BioVision current activities:
• Adjusting facility operations to maximise Availability
• Pursuing insurance claims:
- Feedback from BioVision is that the "Industrial Special Risks" insurer is not responding to the Claim. This is to do with the fact that it has not yet been finalised which party (designer or composter construction contractor) is liable for damages
- BioVision is pursuing legal action against the insurer
- The insurer has subsequently appointed an insurance assessor and technical expert to review the circumstances and possible claim outcome
• Finalising composter long-term repair arrangements BioVision Tonnage Guarantee (assumption is that the SSD will be signed off by all parties):
• As at the end of January 2010 BioVision had a Guarantee shortfall of 5,651 tonnes
• Table No. 1 provides a summary of the BioVision Guarantee shortfall:
MONTH GUARANTEE TONNES
ACTUAL TONNES
GUARANTEE SHORTFALL
January 7,726t 2,076.88t 5,651.13tFebruary 7,360t 8,048.35t 5,351.35tMarch 8,464t 10,164.51t 5,074.89tApril 8,096t 6,435.70t 4,074.89tMay 7,728t 8,668.09t 3,829.99tJune 4,416t 8,400t 0.00t
Note: (1) The monthly change in the Guarantee Shortfall is not
simply the difference between Actual Tonnes and Guaranteed Tonnes as some of the Actual Tones are offset against MRC Deemed Tonnes (under delivered tonnes).
(2) The Actual Tonnes and Guarantee Shortfall for the month of June are estimates.
• During the month of June 2010, BioVision has a scheduled two week maintenance shutdown. During this period there are zero Scheduled Tonnes programmed for delivery. As a result of the need to catch up the Guarantee shortfall, BioVision is planning to postpone the shutdown until the following Contract Year (after 16/07/2010); consequently BioVision should process two weeks of Additional Tonnes (4,000
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 32
tonnes). From Table No. 1, it can be seen that by the end of June, it is most likely that BioVision would have caught up the Guarantee Shortfall
Waste Delivery Under normal operating circumstances the RRF will typically accept approximately 2,000 tonnes of waste per week (Scheduled Tonnes). As a result of the reduced Availability associated with the composter cracks, BioVision is endeavouring to catch up the tonnage shortfall during the remainder of the Contract Year (the Standstill Deed provides an opportunity for BioVision to continue to catch up the tonnage shortfall during the following Contract Year). As a consequence the MRC has been requested to deliver more than the scheduled 2,000 tonnes per week. In order to meet the demand for additional tonnage, the Town of Vincent has commenced delivering waste to the RRF. Consequently, the following Member Councils deliver waste to the RRF:
• City of Wanneroo
• City of Joondalup
• Town of Cambridge
• Town of Victoria Park
• Town of Vincent With the on-set of winter and the corresponding decreased tonnages, should the MRC be requested to deliver additional tonnes, above and beyond what is available from the existing Member Councils delivering to the RRF, the City of Perth and the City of Stirling may be required to commence deliveries. An issue that arose following the Town of Vincent commencing deliveries was that the Received Hall is not designed to accept “rear lift” type vehicles. The Town of Vincent operates two of this type of vehicle. BioVision/SITA opted not to receive waste from these two vehicles; hence, a portion of the Town of Vincent's Processable waste is still being delivered to Tamala Park. The problem with the rear lift type vehicles is that they are unable to reverse back far enough in order to tip into the Receival Hall pit. The only option available is for these vehicles to tip part of the waste on the floor next to the pit. SITA then is required to push the waste into the pit. In addition to the double handling, this activity dirties the tipping floor on which all of the waste delivery vehicles drive; consequently, getting waste on the vehicle tyres and tracking waste on the exit road. The MRC is in discussion with BioVision to resolve the tipping issues associated with rear lift type vehicles. In accordance with the RRFA, the facility is required to accept this type of vehicle. Should the City of Perth be required to deliver waste to the RRF, this issue becomes even more critical as all of the City of Perth waste delivery vehicles are rear lift type vehicles. Graph No. 1 provides detail of the Actual Tonnage of waste delivered in comparison to Scheduled Tonnage.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 33
Graph No. 1 – Actual vs. Scheduled Tonnage
Monthly Waste Delivery
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10
Months
Tonn
age
Scheduled TonnesActual Tonnes
Graph No. 2 – Monthly Availability
Monthly Availability
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
110.0%
Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10
Months
Avai
labi
lity
Availability (6 Monthly)
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 34
Graph No. 3 – Monthly Cost/tonne Delivered (incl. Compost Cost)
Monthly Cost/Tonne Delivered (incl. Compost Cost)
$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
$350.00
$400.00
Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10
Months
Cos
t/Ton
ne D
eliv
ered
Cost/Tonne Delivered
Graph No. 4 – Waste Diversion from Landfill
Waste Diversion From Landfill
-
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
6,000.00
Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10
Months
Tonn
age
of W
aste
Div
erte
d
Waste Diversion
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 35
Key Performance Indicators KPI’s as per the RRFA are as follows: Table No. 1 – KPI Summary KPI Target Previous
6 Months Mar Apr May
Availability 95%* 68.6% 110% 73% 103% Environmental Standard - Number of Breaches
0 0 0 0 0
Waste Diversion 71.4% 47.0% 56.9% 41.6% 47.8% Quality of Compost - Number of Breaches
0 13 1 0 0
Quantity of Recyclable Packaging 0.8% 1.35% 1.08% 1.22% 1.35% Health and Safety - Number of LTI’s
0 0 0 0 0
Community Acceptance - Number of Complaints **
0 16 6 4 0
Project Culture - PAG Chairperson Score
100 100 100 100 100
* The Target Availability during the Initial Operating Period is to achieve an Availability of greater than 95% over a six-month period. ** Numerous complaints relating to a single event are treated as a single complaint. In accordance with the RRFA, during the first Contract Year, the KPI’s relating to waste type (Waste Diversion, Quality of Compost, and Quantity of Recyclable Packaging) are able to be adjusted so far as the variability in the quality impacts a particular KPI. Consequently; there will be no fee abatement for failure to achieve the related KPI’s for the first year of operation, until waste variability has been finalised. Waste Diversion The average waste diversion for the past three months (March, April, May) has been 48.7%. As per the RRFA, the Waste Diversion Target is subject to change. BioVision has requested a change. This matter is the subject of a separate Confidential Item presented to Council. Compost Quality For the Contract Year up to 1 May 2010 there has been 13,543.95 tonnes of compost produced. To date compost has been delivered to the following locations:
• Turf farms
• Olive farms
• Custom Compost facilities north and south of Neerabup for blending, storage blending and then distribution to customers
Within the RRFA there is a maximum lead level of 250mg/kg. 22 tests have been carried out on the compost, of these, 13 tests have lead levels above the stipulated 250mg/kg. The maximum test result has been 380mg/kg.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 36
The majority of the contamination has occurred in the earlier tests carried out. In the last nine tests (14/10/9 to 14/12/9) only two of the test results have produced a lead level of greater than 250mg/kg. Due to the reduced Availability as a result of the composter cracks, the facility was not running at design capacity during this period. Once the composter cracks have been repaired and the facility is back up to full production, the lead contamination trend can be confirmed. Within the Australian Standard (AS 4454) the maximum lead level is 420mg/kg for C2 restricted use compost. Although the lead levels are above the RRFA maximum levels, all tests have been below the C2 (restricted use) maximum level and hence still able to be used for certain applications. The elevated lead levels are a function of the incoming waste stream. The MRC needs to concentrate on community education to remove electronic waste, batteries etc from the waste stream. Further effort will be required to identify what components of the waste stream are contributing to the heavy metals in the compost. No new compost test results have been received during the reporting period. This is as a result of the lack of production of compost due to recent composter cracks and the fact that it takes a minimum of two weeks for the tests to be completed and results received. Quantity of Recyclables The quantity of metals recycled to date has reached 1.05% of total tonnes processed. This is above to the target of 0.8%. Air Quality The City of Wanneroo waste delivery truck drivers have previously raised concern with regards to the quality of the air (odour and dust) within the receival hall. SITA appointed Coffey Environmental to undertake air quality monitoring within the receival hall. Monitoring and reporting was finalised in December 2009, with the report being provided to the MRC in early January 2010. The outcome of the Coffey Environmental monitoring report clearly stated that there were no exposure concerns to the waste delivery truck drivers. A copy of the report was provided to the City of Wanneroo. The City of Wanneroo have advised the MRC that the waste delivery truck drivers have acknowledged the outcome of the monitoring report; however, point out that the report was done during a period of reduced waste delivery and that once the facility was back to full production the drivers would monitor the odour level within the receival hall. On 14 January the City of Wanneroo drivers recommenced waste delivery to the RRF. However on 1 February the drivers again complained about the air quality in the delivery hall and stopped delivering waste to the RRF. City of Wanneroo Manager Waste Operations and despatch supervisor visited site and determined that there was no problem with the air quality and following an internal meeting with the drivers, waste delivery was resumed on 2 February. Following discussions with the TWG, the MRC Administration is investigating the installation of continuous air quality monitoring equipment within the delivery hall. Activities undertaken to date include:
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 37
• Discussions with SITA about:
- Further Receival Hall air quality monitoring to be undertaken by SITA
- The potential for the MRC to undertake additional air quality monitoring
- The consequence of the MRC undertaking additional air quality monitoring
• Issue raised at the PAG meetings, as the MRC would require PAG approval to enter the BioVision Lease area to undertake additional air quality monitoring
• Outcome from the PAG meeting:
- MRC and SITA to meet with the City of Wanneroo to confirm the scope of work for an air quality consultant to further investigate City of Wanneroo driver’s concerns
- Following agreement with the City of Wanneroo, appoint a suitably qualified consultant to undertake the investigation
On 13 May the MRC met with the City of Wanneroo Health Coordinator to view the Receival Hall and driver disposal procedures. No specific concerns were raised during the site visit This remains an ongoing matter that is under investigation. In late 2009 Cardno compiled a Power Outage Plan to identify actions to be undertaken by the various parties in the event of a power outage. This Plan was used by the MRC and BioVision to develop Power Outage Procedures. In early 2010, there were a number of power outages including a 4 day event which resulted in SITA hiring in generators. What those power outages demonstrated was that the RRF was able to be run (@ 100% capacity) under temporary generator power; hence there would never be a need to empty the facility as a result of no power. From the lessons learnt, the Power Outage Procedures were further refined to reflect actual events that were undertaken. The Cardno Power Outage Plan is at Attachment One to this Item. The MRC Power Outage Procedure is at Attachment Two to this Item. The BioVision Power Outage Procedure is at Attachment Three to this Item. Community Complaints During the reporting period there have been 4 complaints received from the golf club during April and none received during May. SITA advise that the biofilter has reached optimum efficiency following the shutdown associated with the composter cracks and this is why there has been a reduction in complaints recently.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 38
Project Advisory Group MRC Representatives: BioVision Representatives: Cr Laura Gray Emmanuel Vivant Kevin Poynton (CEO) Marco Fontana Giusti Eddy Albrecht (City of Stirling) Nial Stock
MRC Alternates: BioVision Alternates: Cr Dot Newton Casimiro da Fonseca Kalwant Dhillon Craig Barker Chris Colyer (Town of Cambridge) Kevin Wilson The PAG recently met on 7 April, 5 May and 2 June 2010 Items dealt with by the group include:
• Composter Structural Issues
• Waste Diversion Target
• Odour Complaints
• BioVision Monthly Report/Update
• Waste Residue Options
• Receival Hall air quality monitoring – City of Wanneroo Driver Concerns
• Power supply - Wanneroo grid connection Following the Budget Workshop on 13 May 2010, there was a query about the PAG Terms of Reference and what the PAG Chairman costs the MRC. In summary, the Project Advisory Group has the primary responsibility of overseeing the execution of the RRFA and ensuring that the agreement runs as smoothly and as efficiently as is possible having regard to the undertakings, commitments and obligations of either party. As part of the RRFA, there is a need to appoint an independent PAG Chairperson and the MRC is responsible for the costs associated with the Chairperson. At the Ordinary Council Meeting o 13 December 2007, the CEO was given delegated authority to appoint the PAG Chairperson. On 11 February 2008 the PAG accepted Mike Wadsworth as the Chairperson. Mike is paid at $220/hr and to date the PAG Chairperson has cost the MRC approximately $880/meeting (4 hours/meeting). With 11 PAG meetings per year, this equates to approximately $10,000/year. MRC Infrastructure Development Visitors Centre Following the completion of building works, the Visitors Centre internal fit-out is currently being carried out.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 39
The MRC has received requests for a vehicle washdown bay at the RRF. It was never intended that a vehicle washdown bay would be provided on site; however, following the member Council requests, the MRC will investigate a concept design scope the work and budget pricing for construction in the 2011/2012 Financial Year. Community Engagement The MRC community engagement program continues to be managed via the Community Engagement and Advisory Group (CEAG). The group last met on 14 April 2010 at the Joondalup Resort. Issues discussed at the meeting included:
• Project update
• Complaints Management
• City of Wanneroo truck driver concerns about odour in the Receival Hall
• Waste Education update
• RRF Stage 2 Development The CEAG meeting of 20 May 2009 was held at the RRF and involved an after-hours walk around the facility. During the visit one of the CEAG members (Althea Malligan) got a small piece of dirt in her eye. This dirt consequently caused an eye irritation which has resulted in the need for ongoing medical assistance. The MRC public liability insurance has been covering the minor costs associated with a couple of visits to doctors and a pair of coverall sunglasses. Recently Althea Malligan lodged a claim against the MRC for $15,000 as final settlement to cover future medical costs and inconvenience. This claim has been passed on to the MRC insurers to process. The investigation continues. RRF Stage 2 Development With regards to the future development of Stage 2 RRF, the MRC is waiting on the following:
• State Waste Strategy
• Hyder Integrated Regional Plan
• City of Stirling direction on available waste tonnages beyond 2013
• Available waste quantities The MRC will reassess the program for the development of RRF Stage 2 prior to the July OCM. CONSULTATION Consultation during the period has occurred with the following groups:
• Freehills
• BioVision2020
• SITA
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 40
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Nil POLICY IMPLICATIONS Nil STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS The development and operation of resource recovery in the region is consistent with the following Principals described in Strategic Plan 2009 – 2029:
• Community Focus
• Innovation
• Partnership
• Leadership In particular, Stage 1 RRF conforms with Objective 1 – Waste Management to maximise resource recovery and minimise waste to landfill in order to minimize environmental impact. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Composter Cracks As mentioned above, by the end of June 2010 BioVision is likely to have caught up the Guarantee shortfall, (92% of Scheduled Tonnes) which means that for the period from 01/01/2010 the MRC has only paid for tonnes of waste that has been delivered to the RRF. The one exception being during April when the facility operated at 73% Availability as a result of a four day power outage, an extremely low day of MRC delivery and a day of unavailability due to essential maintenance of the grapple. The power outage unavailability is the subject of an insurance claim. Composter Crack Insurance Claim The MRC has formally submitted a notification to the project insurers of its intention to submit an insurance claim as a result of the Forced Outage. Discussions are being held with both BioVision and Freehills to assess options open to the MRC with regards to potential insurance claims as a result of the cracked composters. Operational Expenditure The Project Operational Summary below sets out the 2009/10 facility operating budget against which operational costs are tracked throughout the year.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 41
Project Operational Costs Summary for 2009/10 Financial Year – As at 1 May 2010
Item Budget Proposed Revised Budget
Expenditure (to 2/5/10)
% Spent (of Budget)
Capital Expenses
2008/2009 Carryover $ 829,000 $ 885,000 $ 761,462 86.0%Total Capital Expenditure $ 829,000 $ 885,000 $ 761,462 86.0%
Operating Expenses
Consultancy Specialist Project Consultants
$ 120,000 $ 175,000 $ 191,188 109.3%
Project/Contract Management
$ 80,000 $ 90,000 $ 105,410 117.1%
Temporary Staff $ 10,000 $ 45,000 $ 30,000 66.7%Sub-total $ 210,000 $ 310,000 $ 326,598 105.4%
Facility Operations Building Maintenance $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ 7,229 144.6% Building Cleaning $ 5,000 $ 2,500 $ - 0.0% Building Security $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ - 0.0% Fencing and Gate Maintenance
$ 5,000 $ 2,500 $ 38 1.5%
Road Maintenance $ 5,000 $ 2,500 $ 1,808 72.3% Bore and Pipework Maintenance
$ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ - 0.0%
Environmental Monitoring $ 20,000 $ 60,000 $ - 0.0%
Community Monitoring Program
$ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 33,626 74.7%
Landscape and Gardens $ 30,000 $ 40,000 $ 39,494 98.7% MRC Admin Charge $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 91,663 91.7% Utilities $ 10,000 $ 5,000 $ - 0.0% Council Rates $ 27,000 $ 13,000 $ 12,862 98.9% Compost Disposal $ 545,000 $ 320,000 $ 131,908 41.2% RRF Gate Fees $14,600,000 $12,600,000 $ 9,152,834 72.6%
Sub-Total $15,427,000 $13,210,500 $ 9,471,462 71.7%Total Operating Expenses $15,637,000 $13,520,500 $10,559,523 78.1%
MRC OFFICER RECOMMENDATION That Council note the RRF update report.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 42
AGENA REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING – 11 June 2010 The Group discussed the following:
• the need for a vehicle washdown bay
• clarification of the BioVision Guaranteed Shortfall tonnage and the need for an amended table in the report
• the need to clarify the position with regards to the City of Stirling ability to deliver processable waste to the RRF
MRC RECOMMENDATION That Council note the RRF update report.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 43
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 8.1.2
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
CARDNO POWER OUTAGE PLAN
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 44
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Power Outage Plan
September 2009 Job No. V03004-008 MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 45
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 30 October 2009 Commercial in Confidence Page i
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd
ABN 77 009 119 000
Cardno Centre
2 Bagot Road
Subiaco WA 6904
PO Box 155, Subiaco
Western Australia 6904 Australia
Telephone: 08 9273 3888
Facsimile: 08 9388 3831
International: +61 8 9273 3888
www.cardno.com.au
Document Control
Author Reviewer Version Date
Name Initials Name Initials 1 15 September 2008 John King JCK Bill Marchbank WFM
2 7 November 2008 John King JCK Bill Marchbank WFM
3 24 February 2009 Bill Marchbank WFM John King JCK
4 1 September 2009 Bill Marchbank WFM John King JCK
4B 30 October 2009 John King JCK Ronan Cullen RC
"© Cardno. All rights reserved 2008. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of Cardno.”
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 46
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 30 October 2009 Commercial in Confidence Page ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BioVision2020 Pty Ltd (BioVision) has contracted with the Mindarie Regional Council (MRC) to process 100,000 tonnes of household waste per year for a 20-year period. A resource recovery facility (RRF) has been constructed by BioVision in the Neerabup Industrial Area, on land leased from the MRC. The terms of the contract are contained in the Resource Recovery Facility Agreement (RRFA). The Cardno/Meinhardt Joint Venture has been requested by MRC to prepare a plan for dealing with the potential impacts of a power outage that might affect the operations of the RRF. The objectives of this report are to achieve the following:
1. Outline the power requirements of the RRF; 2. Understand the types of disruption to power supplies that may occur; 3. Outline how such disruptions are to be managed, should they eventuate; 4. Outline each party’s responsibilities, should such disruptions occur; and 5. Address concerns relating to potential odour issues.
The report will be used to form an agreed position between the Mindarie Regional Council and BioVision as to how, in operational terms, the requirements of the RRFA that relate to the consequences of a power outage will be managed. The Plan for Dealing with Power Outages (Section 5 of this report) will be included as an appendix in the Operations and Maintenance Manual. The RRF utilises aerobic composting technology to produce compost. The core elements of the RRF are:
1. Two composters for the accelerated decomposition of biodegradable waste; 2. Waste handling, processing, maturation and storage; and 3. The odour management system that manages both odours and particulates.
The operation of the RRF is dependent on it receiving a continuous supply of electricity. The RRF is situated in an area that can be supplied with electricity from Western Power’s distribution networks associated with either the Wanneroo or Yanchep substations. The initial power supply to the RRF has been provided from the Yanchep network on a temporary basis, while infrastructure is built to deliver the permanent supply from the Wanneroo network. Information has been provided by Western Power regarding the reliability of power supplies within the Wanneroo and Yanchep networks during the four years up until the end of January 2009. Western Power has also indicated that it puts a very high priority on maintaining power supply. It implements a range of actions to minimise the impacts of a fault in its system The past performance of the two networks available to service the RRF site in Neerabup suggests that total power disruptions that are likely to be experienced will have durations less that one day, and typically of a few hours. BioVision has a three stage plan for responding to power outages
1. Temporary disruptions (less than 6 hours). Trucks in the waste receival area will be removed and the doors of the facility will be kept closed. No waste that has been received or products will be removed from the facility. The facility will remain closed until the power supply has resumed.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 47
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 30 October 2009 Commercial in Confidence Page iii
2. Short Power Failure (6 hours – 48 hours) same as for a temporary disruption, but a temporary power supply will be hired in and connected to the RRF to drive the odour management system. No waste that has been received or products will be removed from the facility. The odour management system will continue to operate, once the temporary power supply has been connected.
3. Major Failure (>48 hours) same as for a short power failure, but material in the process may need to be removed and transported to landfill.
A power outage has the potential of being a force majeure event if it is beyond the reasonable control of either the MRC or BioVision and results in the failure to perform all or some of the obligations under the RRFA. Two circumstances under which a force majeure event would arise are, if the duration or timing of a power outage is such that it is not be reasonably possible to adjust the scheduled tonnes for the remainder of the year so as to process 100,000 tonnes of waste in the year in question (clause 12.1(d) of the RRFA), or if BioVision is unable to comply with the KPIs (clause 12.5(a)(2)). Under these circumstances, BioVision (as the affected party) will be relieved from performing those of its obligations that it is unable to perform (clause 26.2(a)). In this case, BioVision will not be in breach of the KPIs or the requirement to receive 100,000 tonnes per annum of waste, and the Fee will not be adjusted (clause 16.4(a)). For most power outage events, it is anticipated that BioVision will be able to receive 100,000 tonnes of waste in a year, by using the catch up regime in Section 1 of Annexure I. Under this regime the surplus capacity of the RRF will be used to make up for tonnes of waste not delivered on days when the RRFA is Unavailable. In such cases a force majeure event will not have occurred in respect of the obligation to receive 100,000 tonnes of waste per annum. As part of its mitigation strategy, as soon as the power outage occurs, BioVision will be obliged to notify the MRC not to deliver waste for the duration of the outage. Subsequent to this notification, the Waste Delivery Schedule shall be deemed to be amended so that the following conditions apply. The Waste Delivery Schedule prepared under clause 12.1 by the Contractor should contain a clause such that, in the event of a power outage, the waste to be delivered to the RRF is deemed to be amended so that:
1. No tonnes are scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the RRF cannot receive waste due to the power outage; and
2. Waste up to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnage has been caught up. The parties must agree a Waste Delivery Schedule each year and this deeming provision should be included in the Waste Delivery Schedule (clause 12.1(e)).
The options for providing permanent standby power supplies have been investigated and are detailed in Table E1. Table E1: Options for Permanent Standby Power
Option Power Capacity Level of Operation Estimated Costs 1 1,000 kW Odour management
system $0.4 - $0.5 million
2 2,000 kW Odour management system and composters
$1.0-1.2 million
3 3,000 kW Full RRF operations $1.5 - $1.8 million
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 48
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 30 October 2009 Commercial in Confidence Page iv
The following conclusions can be drawn from this study: 1. Based upon historical information, provided by Western Power, it appears that
there is a low probability of major disruptions to the power supply in the Neerabup area;
2. Detailed information on the frequency and duration of power outages in industrial areas, such as Neerabup, suggests that power outages greater than one day are unlikely to occur;
3. The reliability of power supply to the RRF site will improve significantly, upon the completion of the permanent power feed from the Wanneroo network;
4. Western Power operates an incident management plan, to address major power outage events, as outlined in Section 3;
5. BioVision is required to arrange for standby power to be available to operate the RRF should a power interruption occur on those days agreed to in consultation with the Project Advisory Group;
6. During the rest of the year, BioVision is required to hire in temporary power in the event of a power outage, if it exceeds 6 hours in duration. The temporary power will be sufficient to operate the odour management system to a suitable level of operation during short – term disruptions. The RRF electrical power system has been configured to enable temporary power to be directed to other parts of the plant and operate them, eg composters, compost turners, etc, as required;
7. In the unlikely event that power outages in excess of 6 hours and up to 48 hours were to occur, BioVision will be able to manage the situation without major disruption, other than the cessation of waste deliveries to the RRF;
8. If a power outage lasts for more than 48 hour, BioVision may remove waste and compost material from the RRF and send it to landfill. The decision as to whether the material will be removed from the RRF will be made by BioVision, giving consideration to its obligations under its operating license.
9. The provision of approximately 1,100kW of power should allow for the satisfactory management of any foreseeable power outage events, given the history of power outage durations in the Neerabup area;
10. BioVision should be able to utilise the surplus capacity of the RRF to ‘catch up’ for the lost processing of waste that would occur in most anticipated power outages;
11. If BioVision were to catch up for lost processing of waste due to a power outage, and the RRF does not have to be emptied of material, a force majeure event will not have occurred, and BioVision and the MRC will not be financially disadvantaged on a net revenue/cost basis;
12. If an event occurs which is not the fault of either party, the commercial principle that is usually applied (and which was applied in the case of the RRFA) is that the costs should lie where they fall. That is, the event is neither party’s fault, and both are likely to be disadvantaged (including financially) as a result of it.
13. The Waste Delivery Schedule prepared by BioVision under clause 12.1 should contain a clause such that waste to be delivered is deemed to be amended so that :
i. no waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the RRF cannot receive waste due to the power outage, and
ii. Waste to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnes have been caught up.
14. If an extended power outage was to occur, such that BioVision was not able to catch up within the financial year, utilising the RRF’s surplus capacility, then a force majeure event will have occurred. The MRC would then need to pay BioVision the Capital Cost Rate and Fixed Operating Cost Rate ($99.47 in November 2007 price) for the scheduled tonnes not processed, after allowing for the Additional Tonnes that were processed;
15. Cost estimates received from BioVision for the provision and installation of permanent standby power units for 1,100kW, 2,000kW and 3,000kW are in excess of the costs likely to be incurred by the MRC during any anticipated power outage;
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 49
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 30 October 2009 Commercial in Confidence Page v
16. It is considered that providing permanent backup power for the RRF is not warranted given the associated costs and benefits to the MRC and the low probability of extended power outages in the Neerabup Industrial Area; and
17. The Project Advisory Group should adopt a detailed plan for dealing with power outages, to ensure all parties understand their responsibilities and the processes to be followed in such an event. A draft plan is shown in section 5.
In light of these conclusions, the following recommendation are made to the MRC:
I. Does not seek changes to the strategy adopted by BioVision and reflected in the RRFA to manage interruptions to the operation of the RRF due disruptions to the supply of power to the RRF Site;
II. Does not support a variation to the RRFA to fund the provision of a permanent
standby backup power supply for the RRF;
III. Requires BioVision to use the surplus capacity of the RFF to ‘catch up’ for the lost processing of waste that would occur in most anticipated power outage events, in accordance with the RRFA;
IV. Requires the Waste Delivery Schedule prepared by BioVision under clause 12.1 of
the RRFA to contain a clause such that waste to be delivered is deemed to be amended so that :
a. no waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the RRF cannot receive waste due to a power outage event, and
b. Waste to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnes have been caught up;
V. Recognises that if an extended power outage event was to occur, such that
BioVision was not able to catch up within the financial year, utilising the RRF’s surplus capacity, then a force majeure event will have occurred. The MRC would then need to pay BioVision the Capital Cost Rate and Fixed Operating Cost Rate ($99.47 in November 2007 price) for the scheduled tonnes not processed, after allowing for the Additional Tonnes that were processed;
VI. Seeks the agreement of BioVision, through the PAG, for both parties to adopt a
detailed plan, as shown in Section 5 of this report, for dealing with power outages at the RRF.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 50
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 30 October 2009 Commercial in Confidence Page vi
Mindarie Regional Council Resource Recovery Facility
Power Outage Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. OBJECTIVES OF THIS REPORT ...................................................................................... 1
2. POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RRF........................................................................ 2
3. CAUSES OF POWER OUTAGES ...................................................................................... 3
4. STRATEGY FOR POWER OUTAGES............................................................................... 5
5. DRAFT PLAN FOR DEALING WITH POWER OUTAGES ................................................ 7
6. CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DEALING WITH POWER OUTAGES ......... 9 6.1 Failure to Process 100,000 tpa of Waste ................................................................... 9 6.2 Failure to Meet the Waste Diversion KPI ................................................................. 10 6.3 Availability of the RRF.............................................................................................. 10
7. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS TO MRC ............................................................................. 12
8. OPTIONS FOR PROVIDING PERMANENT STANDBY POWER.................................... 14
9. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................................ 18
10. RECOMMENDATIONS..................................................................................................... 20
11. APPENDIX 1: RRF OPERATING PROCESSES.............................................................. 21
12. APPENDIX 2: FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF POWER OUTAGE................................ 22
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 51
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 1 Commercial in Confidence
1. OBJECTIVES OF THIS REPORT
BioVision2020 Pty Ltd (BioVision) has contracted with the Mindarie Regional Council (MRC) to process 100,000 tonnes of household waste per year for a 20-year period. A resource recovery facility (RRF) has been constructed by BioVision in the Neerabup Industrial Area, on land leased from the MRC. The terms of the contract are contained in the Resource Recovery Facility Agreement (RRFA). The Cardno/Meinhardt Joint Venture has been requested by MRC to prepare a plan for dealing with the impacts of a power outage that would affect the operations of the RRF. The objectives of this report are to achieve the following:
1. Outline the power requirements of the RRF; 2. Understand the types of disruption to power supplies that may occur; 3. Outline how such disruptions are to be managed, should they eventuate; 4. Outline each party’s responsibilities, should such disruptions occur; and 5. Address concerns relating to potential odour issues.
The report will be used to form an agreed position between the Mindarie Regional Council and BioVision as to how, in operational terms, the requirements of the RRFA that relate to the consequences of a power outage will be managed. The Plan for Dealing with Power Outages (Section 5 of this report) will be included as an appendix in the Operations and Maintenance Manual.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 52
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 2 Commercial in Confidence
2. POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RRF
The RRF utilises aerobic composting technology to produce compost. The core elements of the RRF are:
1. Two composters for the accelerated decomposition of biodegradable waste;
2. Waste handling, processing, maturation and storage; and 3. The odour management system that manages both odours and
particulates. Additional elements of the RRF include:
• Administration and support services; and • A public viewing gallery.
An overview of the waste processing activities is provided in Appendix 1. All of the stationary equipment in the RRF, including the waste receival equipment, the composters, the materials handling and screening equipment and the odour management system are powered by electricity. Therefore the operation of the RRF is dependent on a continuous supply of electricity. The following Table 1 details the power required to operate the RRF.
Table 1: Power Requirements of the RRF Level of Operation Electricity Required
- approx Operation of the composters 1,000 kW Waste handling, processing, maturation and storage operations 1,000 kW Operation of the odour management system 1,000 kW Full RRF operation 3,000 kW
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 53
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 3 Commercial in Confidence
3. CAUSES OF POWER OUTAGES
The RRF is situated in an area that can be supplied with electricity from Western Power’s distribution networks associated with either the Wanneroo or Yanchep substations. Information has been provided by Western Power regarding the history of power outages in Perth. Typically, power outages that might occur can be classified, as outlined in the following Table 2. This table also provides information, regarding the reliability of power supplies within the Wanneroo and Yanchep networks during the four years up until the end of January 2009.
Table 2: Power Outages and Network Performance in the Neerabup Area
Causes of Outages Wanneroo Network Yanchep Network Equipment failures of overhead assets
0.61 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 13 minutes
4.72 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 695 minutes
Inadvertent Switching operation
N/A 1.94 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 462 minutes
Lightning strike N/A 2.62 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 306 minutes
Transmission, eg zone substation faults
N/A 1.93 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 171 minutes
Protective operation of the feeder circuit breaker
0.66 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 56 minutes
2.66 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 94 minutes
Motor vehicle collision with pole, resulting in wires down
0.72 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 76 minutes
Minimal history of such events – data is reported in the following category, ie “Other Faults.”
Other faults, which by themselves have minimal or no effect on the statistics
N/A 0.15 interruptions per year with a total outage time of 14 minutes
Power shedding No interruptions due to power shedding
No interruptions due to power shedding
Annual reliability performance
1.98 unplanned interruptions per year with a total outage time of 145 minutes
14 unplanned interruptions per year with a total outage time of 1,742 minutes, or approximately 29 hours
Western Power puts a very high priority on maintaining power supply. It implements a range of actions to minimise the impacts of a fault in its system. For example, while the total failure of major plant in the Western Power network is rare, supplies of power are normally able to be maintained with relatively short outages. In approximately 2001, the Victoria Park zone substation was damaged by fire. Western Power overcame the problem by back-feeding power to the affected area from other networks. If such an event were to occur with either, or both of, the Wanneroo or Yanchep zone substations, power would be supplied from other adjoining networks, such as from the Clarkson &/or Mullaloo zone substations. If there was not enough capacity to maintain power supplies, after taking these steps, Western Power would bring in emergency generators. If that was not adequate, Western Power would then commence load shedding, whereby high priority customers were protected from load shedding to the extent possible. Anecdotal advice from the Southern Metropolitan Regional Council indicates that its resource recovery facility in Canning Vale experiences approximately one minor outage each two years of approximately 2 – 4 hours duration.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 54
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 4 Commercial in Confidence
Table 2 shows that the performance of the Wanneroo network is significantly better than the Yanchep network. This is largely due to the greater distance between Neerabup and the Yanchep substation compared to that between Neerabup and the Wanneroo sub-station. This reduces the risk of damage to the Wanneroo network. Also, a lot of the Wanneroo network infrastructure is newer that the Yanchep network infrastructure. Western Power has indicated that power supply to the RRF will initially be provided from the Yanchep network on a temporary basis, while infrastructure is built to deliver the permanent supply from the Wanneroo network. Subsequent to the permanent supply being provided, BioVision may request to be connected to both networks, ie with permanent supply provided from Wanneroo and backup supply provided from Yanchep. Based upon preliminary information provided by Western Power, such an arrangement can be implemented for an initial fee of $50,000 - $100,000, along with a standby tariff paid for the 3kW of power reserved in the Yanchep network against the contingency that the RRF will need to draw upon this reserve supply, were the Wanneroo network supply to be interrupted. In summary, the past performance of the two networks available to service the RRF site in Neerabup suggests that total power disruptions that are likely to be experienced will have durations of less than one day, and typically of a few hours. BioVision has indicated that they are reassured by the performance statistics provided by Western Power, indicating the network performance reliability in the Neerabup area and, as such, do not anticipate needing to implement a permanent power supply backup arrangement, such as that outlined above.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 55
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 5 Commercial in Confidence
4. STRATEGY FOR POWER OUTAGES
Under the RRFA, BioVision is required to prepare a Risk and Contingency Plan, an Operation and Maintenance Manual, an Odour Management Plan and an Environmental Management System for the RRF. These plans are required to address the contingency plans that would be used in the event of a disruption to the power supply to the RRF. These plans outline the following actions that BioVision will take in the event of power disruption:
1. Temporary disruptions (less than 6 hours has been nominated by
BioVision). Trucks in the waste receival area will be removed and the doors of the facility will be kept closed. No waste that has been received or products will be removed from the facility. The facility will remain closed until the power supply has resumed.
2. Short Power Failure (6 hours – 48 hours) as for a temporary disruption, but a temporary power supply will be hired in and connected to the RRF to drive the odour management system. The odour management system will continue to operate, once the temporary power supply has been connected. No materials will be removed from the facility during this timeframe, however the availability of a temporary drive facility, to enable rotation and emptying of the composters using temporary power, will be secured in case the outage extends for more than 48 hours.
3. Major Failure (>48 hours) as for a Short power failure, but material may need to be removed from the facility and transported to landfill.
Under the Power Outage Plan and as part of its mitigation strategy, as soon as the power outage occurs, BioVision will be obliged to notify the MRC not to deliver waste for the duration of the outage. Were a power outage to extend for a period greater than 48 hours, BioVision would be in a position to commence emptying the plant, should this be warranted, given it will have sourced a temporary power supply and the temporary drive facility to enable it to commence emptying the facility of unprocessed and partly processed material. If the decision was taken to empty the facility, due to an extended power outage, BioVision would direct the necessary temporary power supply to the following areas to enable removal of materials from the facility:
1. Area 100 Receiving: Waste would be removed from the receival pit and
transported to landfill in BioVision’s Hooklift containers; 2. Area 200 Composters: A supplementary drive system would be
mobilised to site to enable the composters to be rotated to enable their being emptied of waste, with the resident material being directed through primary refining and sorting for consignment to landfill in BioVision’s Hooklift containers. In this scenario, the flow of materials through the Primary Refining and Sorting areas would merely be used to transfer the materials to the waste despatch area, for transfer to landfill, rather than being called upon to provide refining or sorting functions;
3. Area 300 Primary Refining and Area 400 Sorting: The Primary Refining and Sorting areas would be emptied of resident material, as well as be used to transfer the materials to the waste despatch area, for transfer to landfill, rather than being called upon to provide refining or sorting functions;
4. Area 500 Maturation: Conveyors and compost turners can be powered to enable the maturation corridors be emptied of resident material for transfer to landfill. Material from the Maturation hall would be consigned
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 56
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 6 Commercial in Confidence
directly to the waste despatch area, via a bypass route to avoid secondary refining and storage, for transfer to landfill;
5. Area 600 Secondary Refining: Conveyors, cyclones and waste separation equipment would be powered to the degree necessary to enable this area to be emptied of resident material. This material would be transferred to Storage and Unloading, as per normal operations, for transfer to landfill;
6. Area 700 Storage and Loading: Following the emptying of all areas of the facility, the stockpile of partly processed material held in this area, would be loaded onto trucks for transfer to landfill. Separate stockpiles of finished materials would be loaded onto trucks for transfer to market; and
7. Area 800 Bio-Filter: Sufficient power would be supplied to maintain the operation of the Odour Management System, which incorporates the Bio-Filter.
A key element of the BioVision strategy is the need to hire a 1,000kW generator to power the odour management system of the RRF. BioVision is responsible for providing the temporary backup power and the supplementary drive system to rotate the composters during a power outage. Schedule 2, clause 3.3.7, of the RRFA states that on those days agreed annually in advance by the Project Advisory Group, BioVision will hire auxiliary power sufficient to operate the RRF should there be a power outage or interruption. This clause was included during contract negotiations in recognition that there are some periods when major events are conducted in Perth, and as a result, it may prove difficult to hire temporary power supplies at short notice.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 57
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 7 Commercial in Confidence
5. DRAFT PLAN FOR DEALING WITH POWER OUTAGES
The current version of BioVision’s plan to manage power outages should be expanded to provide a detailed process to be followed by both BioVision and the MRC. The following plan is proposed for consideration by the Project Advisory Group (PAG):
1. Power disruption occurs; 2. BioVision will notify the MRC’s nominated contact person of the disruption
to power and request that waste deliveries to the RRF be halted until further notice;
3. MRC will arrange for the diversion of waste collection vehicles to deliver waste to landfill;
4. BioVision will arrange for inbound waste collection vehicles and outbound logistics vehicles to exit the plant;
5. BioVision will close the external RRF doors; 6. BioVision will contact their power supply account manager to determine
the cause and extent of the power disruption; 7. BioVision will inform the MRC as to the cause and extent of the power
disruption and the estimated duration of the outage; 8. BioVision will contact the standby generator provider to arrange for its hire
and delivery to the RRF, if the estimated duration of the outage is greater than 6 hours. BioVision will also contact the standby supplementary drive system provider to arrange for its hire and delivery to the RRF, if the estimated duration of the outage is greater than 6 hours. If the estimated duration is less than 6 hours, BioVision will advise their standby generator provider and standby supplementary drive system provider of the outage and confirm the availability of generating plant and supplementary drive system, should the need arise;
9. Should the actual disruption to the supply of power extend beyond 6 hours, BioVision will inform the MRC contact person, mobilise the backup generator to site and maintain the operation of the odour management system. BioVision would also contact the standby supplementary drive system provider to arrange for its hire and delivery to the RRF to secure the ability to rotate the composters, in case the power outage extended beyond 48 hours;
10. Should the disruption to the supply of power extend beyond 48 hours, BioVision will inform the MRC contact person and may commence the process of emptying organic material from the RRF and transporting it to the nominated MRC landfill. The process for removal of materials from the facility is outlined in Section 4 of this report; and
11. BioVision will prepare a process start up plan for the RRF to be implemented when power supply resumes. This plan will outline additional changes to the Waste Delivery Schedule required for the start up period and will be presented to the Project Advisory Group for approval. These changes, if required, will be in addition to the deemed changes to the Waste Delivery Schedule discussed below.
The Waste Delivery Schedule prepared under clause 12.1 of the RRFA by the Contractor shall contain a clause such that, in the event of a power outage, the waste to be delivered to the RRF is deemed to be amended so that:
1. No tonnes are scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the RRF
cannot receive waste due to the power outage; and 2. Waste up to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is
scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnage has been
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 58
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 8 Commercial in Confidence
caught up. The parties must agree a Waste Delivery Schedule each year and this deeming provision should be included in the Waste Delivery Schedule (clause 12.1(e) of the RRFA).
For clarity, it should be agreed between the parties that BioVision will not breach its obligations under the RRFA if it has advised the MRC’s nominated contact person of a power outage and requested that waste deliveries be halted until further notice, in accordance with this Plan.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 59
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 9 Commercial in Confidence
6. CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DEALING WITH POWER OUTAGES
As noted in Section 2 above, a power outage is likely to result in a disruption to the supply of waste to the RRF. In terms of the RRFA, if the delivery of waste cannot be reorganised so that the waste is delivered at a time during the same day when there is no power outage, the RRF would not be available, ie not able to receive the scheduled tonnes of waste for that day. If the power failure is due to a fault in the generation or distribution of power to the site then the RRF would be unavailable due to circumstances that are beyond the reasonable control of either the MRC or BioVision. This circumstance has the potential of being a force majeure event. This would occur if it was to result in BioVision being fully or partially unable to meet its obligations under the RRFA or the Lease. Two circumstances under which a force majeure event would arise are, if the duration or timing of a power outage is such that it is not reasonably possible to adjust the scheduled tonnes for the remainder of the year so as to process 100,000 tonnes of waste in the year in question (clause 12.1(d) of the RRFA), or if BioVision is unable to comply with the KPIs (clause 12.5(a)(2) of the RRFA). Under these circumstances, BioVision (as the affected party) will be relieved from performing those of its obligations that it is unable to perform (clause 26.2(a) of the RRFA). In this case, BioVision will not be in breach of the KPIs or the requirement to receive 100,000 tonnes per annum of waste. The Fee will not be adjusted (clause 16.4(a) of the RRFA) as a consequence of not complying with the KPIs. 6.1 Failure to Process 100,000 tpa of Waste
If the period of disruption is short, eg less than 48 hours, then BioVision has the ability to process additional waste tonnes following resumption of the power supply, and so still meet its obligation to process 100,000 tonnes of waste in the year. (Clause 12 of the RRFA and Clause 1 of Annexure I of the RRFA). This can be achieved by the MRC delivering quantities up to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste (430 tonnes) for the number of days necessary to make up the short fall and so achieve the planned tonnages for the year. The spare capacity of the RRF (the difference between the normally Scheduled Tonnes for a working day and the Maximum Daily Amount) is approximately 30 tonne per day, or 150 tonne per week. If a power disruption was to occur for the duration of a normal working day, then it would take approximately 13 days of operating at the Maximum Daily Amount for the short fall in tonnes to be received at the RRF. The provisions in Clause 12 of the RRFA and Clause 1 of Annexure I of the RRFA have the effect of ensuring that BioVision receives the full Fee otherwise payable to it over a year, if the effects of the unavailability of the RRF can be rectified by utilising the Maximum Daily Amount of the RRF. This would occur if Additional Tonnes are processed to meet the obligation to receive 100,000 tonnes of waste during that year. In such cases a force majeure event will not have occurred in respect of the obligation to receive 100,000 tonnes of waste per annum. If the duration or timing of a power outage that causes the RRF to be unavailable, is such that it is not reasonably possible to adjust the scheduled tonnes for the remainder of the year (which commences 1 July each calendar year) so as to process 100,000 tonnes of waste in the year in question, (ie Additional Tonnes are less than the Unavailable Tonnes) then a force majeure event would arise. Whether or not a force majeure event exists will, in part, depend on when in the financial year the event occurs, and if it is possible to make up for lost tonnes in the remaining portion of the financial year. It will also depend on the duration of the power outage, and the tonnage of waste not processed during that period. It is anticipated that it would take a
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 60
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 10 Commercial in Confidence
period of 3 months to make up for tonnages not processed during a power outage that lasted 1 week. Calculations of the period required to process the Additional Tonnes required for power outages of 1 day and 1 week are shown in Appendix 2. As outlined in section 3 above, it is most unlikely that a power outage of more than few hours will occur, based on the past performance of Western Power’s distribution system serving Neerabup. It is therefore considered that it would be rare for a power outage to be a force majeure event, based on the inability of BioVision to have the RRF Available for 100,000 tonnes per annum. 6.2 Failure to Meet the Waste Diversion KPI
If waste material needs to be removed from the RRF as a consequence of the power outage, then:
1. Fully processed waste material will be able to be sent to market, as
usual; 2. Unprocessed or partly processed material will be classified as Residue
under the RRFA and will be disposed of by BioVision at Tamala Park landfill at the Local Council Rates (see clause 13.3(c)(2) of the RRFA). BioVision will meet the cost of disposal.
The Waste Diversion KPI is a measure of the percentage to waste diverted from landfill and is measured monthly. Therefore an increase in the amount of residue disposed to landfill in a month, as a consequence of emptying material from the RRF, is likely to cause BioVision to fail to comply with this KPI. This will cause the event to be a force majeure event. BioVision will be relieved of responsibility of complying with the Waste Diversion KPI. It will therefore not be in breach of the KPI and the Fee will not be adjusted.
BioVision will be paid the Fee for tonnes delivered to the RRF in accordance with the Waste Delivery Schedule, following resumption of operations of the RRF. This applies even if the RRF had to be emptied of material as a consequence of the power outage. Payment for services is on the basis of the waste delivered, not the waste processed. (The payment is calculated on the basis of Scheduled Tonnes less Unavailable Tonnes. Scheduled Tonnes are those tonnes scheduled to be delivered in the Waste Delivery Plan. Unavailable Tonnes are those tonnes that could not be delivered due to Unavailability (s 1(g) of Annexure I of the RRFA).
As a consequence, MRC will get no relief from the fact that the waste taken to empty the RRF was not processed.
6.3 Availability of the RRF
When a power outage occurs and waste deliveries are stopped, the Availability of the RRF may be affected. Availability of the RRF is measured on the basis of whether the RRF can receive the tonnes that are scheduled to be delivered on a Working Day. If the RRF is unable to receive the tonnes scheduled to be delivered on a Working Day, then the RRF is Unavailable for that Working Day. In this event, when an event of Force Majeure occurs and the RRF is Unavailable, then the payment obligations of clause 26.2(b) of the RRFA applies, being the obligation of the MRC to make certain payments to BioVision, notwithstanding that the RRF is not processing waste, due to an event of Force Majeure.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 61
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 11 Commercial in Confidence
If this payment is made, and BioVision is able to process 100,000 tpa of waste using the spare capacity of the RRF during the period within the year and following the resumption of operations of the RRF, then BioVision will receive a double payment during that year. It will receive payments under clause 26.2(b) while the RRF is Unavailable and then receive payments under section 1 of Annexure I for processing the full amount of waste during the year. This problem can be overcome as follows. As part of its mitigation strategy, as soon as the power outage occurs, BioVision will be obliged to notify the MRC not to deliver waste for the duration of the outage. The Waste Delivery Schedule prepared under clause 12.1 by the Contractor should contain a clause such that, in the event of a power outage, the waste to be delivered to the RRF is deemed to be amended so that:
• No tonnes are scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the RRF
cannot receive waste due to the power outage; and
• Waste to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnage has been caught up. The parties must agree a Waste Delivery Schedule each year and this deeming provision should be included in the Waste Delivery Schedule (clause 12.1(e) of the RRFA).
With these provisions in the Waste Delivery Schedule, then the RRF will not be Unavailable during a power outage as the requirements of the schedule will not be breached. Consideration needs to be given to how the deemed Performance Score of Compliance (PSC) is to be measured during the month in which a power outage occurs. The Waste Diversion (WD) KPI may be affected by the power outage due to the requirement to remove material from the RRF. In this circumstance, the WD KPI score for the period of the power outage plus 31 Days after the resumption of the RRF operations, shall be taken to be the average of the WD KPI scores for the 3 monthly billing periods prior to the power outage event.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 62
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 12 Commercial in Confidence
7. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS TO MRC
If a force majeure event occurs, the commercial principle that is usually applied (and which was applied in the case of the RRFA) is that the costs should lie where they fall. That is, the event is neither party’s fault, and both are likely to be disadvantaged (including financially) as a result of it. For example, in the event of a power outage, waste deliveries will be diverted to landfill at Tamala Park, and the disposal costs will be borne by the MRC. Also, if the RRF is emptied of material due to an extended power outage, then material removed from the RRF will be disposed of as Residue at Tamala Park, and the costs will be borne by BioVision. However, BioVision will be relieved of its obligation to achieve the KPIs, particularly relating to waste diversion, to the extent that it is caused by the additional Residue being disposed at Tamala Park through emptying the RRF. Based on this principle, both parties are contractually responsible for their own costs incurred in responding to the power outage. BioVision’s responsibility extends to the hiring of plant and machinery required to maintain the operation of the RRF, as well as any costs associated with the removal and disposal of materials from the facility. The Local Council Rate would apply for materials removed from the RRF, ie the rates charged by the MRC to Participants for the disposal of waste to Tamala Park. As outlined in section 6 above, and subject to the clauses recommended in Section 6.3 above being included in the Waste Delivery Schedule, the Fee will not be adjusted due to a power outage unless BioVision is unable to receive and process 100,000 tpa of waste. The financial impacts of a disruption of the Availability of the RRF due to a power outage affecting the ability of BioVision to receive 100,000 tonnes per annum of waste have been assessed and details are shown in Appendix 2. Power outages lasting 1 day and 1 week have been considered, to determine the Fee paid to BioVision by the MRC. Two scenarios were then assessed; if the tonnes not processed due to the power outage (Unavailable Tonnes) are subsequently processed as Additional Tonnes (ie 100,000 tonnes processed in the year), and if less than 100,000 tonnes are processed in the year and hence a Force Majeure event occurs. If the power outage lasts for 1 day, it would take approximately three weeks to process the required Additional Tonnes (400 tonnes). This should be possible in most situations within the current financial year. It is therefore considered that in most situations where a power outage of less that 1 day’s duration occurs, a force majeure event will not result. Appendix 2 shows the effects of a power outage of 1 week, to illustrate the impact of timing of the event within the financial year. It should be noted that, as detailed in section 3 above, there is little likelihood of the RRF experiencing a power outage of 1 week, based on the past performance of the Western Power’s distribution system near Neerabup. If the power outage occurs more than three months before the end of a financial year and lasts for a week, then it is possible for BioVision to process sufficient Additional Tonnes to offset the Unavailable Tonnes that would result. If the power outage is not a force majeure event, ie BioVision was able to make up for scheduled tonnes of waste not processed during the outage (Additional Tonnes = Unavailable Tonnes), then MRC will not be financially disadvantaged, in relation to the handling of Processible Waste, over the course of the year. BioVision will have been paid in full for the 100,000 tonnes of waste it processed in the year.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 63
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 13 Commercial in Confidence
If a force majeure event was to occur, the MRC would be obliged to pay to BioVision the Fee, comprising the Capital Cost, adjusted to reflect the average performance of BioVision over the preceding 6 months, the Fixed Operating Cost assuming that the RRF is Available for the period of force majeure, and the Variable Operating Cost for tonnes actually processed (refer to clause 26.2(b) of the RRFA). At the time of Financial Close (November 2007) the Gate Fee per tonne of was:
• Capital Cost Rate - $70.12/tonne • Fixed Operating Cost Rate – $29.35/tonne • Variable Cost Rate - $36.01/tonne • Total - $135.48/tonne
Provided that no Processible Waste is scheduled to be delivered to the RRF during a power outage, a power outage will not be determined to be a force majeure until close to the end of the year when it becomes apparent that the Contractor cannot process 100,000 tonnes of Processible Waste. At that time, the MRC will be required to pay BioVision the Capital Cost and Fixed Operating Cost for the shortfall in tonnes processed (Unavailable Tonnes – Additional Tonnes). As no waste will have been received at the RRF for the duration of the power outage, the Variable Operating Cost will not be payable. Assuming that the performance of BioVision was in line with the KPI's during the previous 6 months, then the MRC will be obliged to pay BioVision the Fee, which at Financial Close in November 2007, equated to $99.47 per tonne of waste scheduled, but not processed in the year. If BioVision was to receive any payment under the project’s business interruption insurance policy, then those funds would need to be paid to MRC. It is unlikely that a force majeure event, associated with a power outage, would be covered by business interruption insurance as the policy has a deductible period of 10 days. That is, a payment is not made for the first 10 days of business disruption. As power outages are likely to only last for a period of less than one day, the business disruption insurance is unlikely to have any impact in this matter.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 64
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 14 Commercial in Confidence
8. OPTIONS FOR PROVIDING PERMANENT STANDBY POWER
BioVision has provided the following summary of provisions for emergency power and advice on the costs and implications of providing permanent stand by power capacity for the RRF. “Summary of present provisions for emergency power to the MRC Resource Recovery Facility For emergency power purposes MCC-002 located within Switchroom 2 incorporates a 1600 Amp circuit breaker which has provisions via copper bus bar tags to connect to an emergency generator set with the output capacity of around 1100kVA maximum. The connections to the copper bus bar tags would be by installing the cabling from the generator set into the switchroom and into the floor trench up to the tags within the MCC-002. The other MCC's within the facility; MCC-001 and MCC-003 are interconnected to MCC-002 via castell keyed circuit breakers. The castell keyed circuit breakers are of each 500 Amp rating; this would enable MCC-001 and MCC-003 to power up equipment to the rating of 290kW. MCC-002 would be able to power up equipment to the value of the operating generator minus the 2 x 290kW (2x500Amps) being utilised by MCC-001 and MCC-003. All switching for loading of the emergency generator would be by manual control under a controlled procedure as implemented by the operator. With the main 185 kW extraction fans powered over two MCC's (MCC-002 & MCC-003) it would be possible to have 2 of these operating under an emergency power situation; along with other equipment throughout the plant up to the kW/kVA rating of the generator being used (1100kVA maximum). It will not be possible to operate the composters on the emergency power generator set as the composters are powered from MCC-001 and the maximum emergency power available through the existing system to MCC-001 is 500 Amps per phase as previously indicated. In addition to the 2 off 185kW fans in operation all lighting throughout the facility could also be connected. The three pricing options required for consideration for the emergency power back-up for the MRC Resource Recovery Facility are as follows:
1. 1MW back-up as presently designed; 2. 2MW back-up system; 3. 3MW back-up system.
Pricing details 1. The cost to supply and install a permanent emergency 1 MVA
generator set to the present installation is in the range of $400,000.00 to $500,000.00, this would cover the following
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 65
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 15 Commercial in Confidence
provisions:
Supply and installation of a standby 1MW generator including an acoustic enclosure;
Interconnections to the existing MCC-002 circuit breaker and change-over facility;
Diesel tank provisions at the base of the generator for 48 hours continuous operation.
2. The cost to supply and install permanent emergency power to the
value of 2 MW to the present installation is in the range of $1,000,000.00 to $1,200,000.00, this would cover the following provisions:
Supply and installation of (2) two off 1MVA generator sets
including acoustic enclosures for each set - one set located at MCC-001 and one set at MCC-002;
Interconnections to the existing MCC-002 circuit breaker and change-over facility as detailed in option 1;
Diesel tank provisions at the base of the generator sets for 48 hours continuous operation;
New change-over switchboard to be located within Switchroom 1, new connections and modification to the existing systems to accommodate the new change-over facility within Switchroom 1.
3. The cost to supply and install permanent emergency power to the
value of 3 MW to the present installation is in the range of $1,500,000.00 to $1,800,000.00, this would cover the following provisions:
Supply and installation of (3) three off 1MVA generator sets
including acoustic enclosures for each set - one set located at MCC-001, one set at MCC-002 and one set at MCC-003;
Interconnections to the existing MCC-002 circuit breaker and change-over facility as detailed in option 1;
Diesel tank provisions at the base of the generator sets for 48 hours continuous operation;
New change-over switchboard to be located within Switchroom 1, new connections and modification to the existing systems to accommodate the new change-over facility within Switchroom 1;
New change-over switchboard to be located within Switchroom 3, new connections and modification to the existing systems to accommodate the new change-over facility within Switchroom 3;
Options 2 and 3 above will require a degree of reconfiguration of the existing castell key system to ensure the MCC’s are not interconnected with multiple generators in operation. The above figures are broad brush figures which have been based on assumptions and are without any preliminary engineering to fully determine exact requirements therefore they would be subject to fluctuation. With options 2 and 3 there would be the opportunity to operate the composters in an emergency power situation.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 66
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 16 Commercial in Confidence
The budgets do not include for any automatic load shedding of loads; all load shedding is manual control under a controlled procedure as implemented by the operator. Should auto Load shedding be required then an additional 30% should be added to the figures. Additionally with the options 2 and 3 and with any respect to auto load shedding there would be implications with respect to the present building schedules and there could be possible delays in the construction program.” Table 3 summarises the options for providing permanent standby power supplies.
Table 3: Options for Permanent Standby Power
Option Power Capacity
Level of Operation Estimated Costs
1 1,000 kW Odour management system
$0.4 - $0.5 million
2 2,000 kW Odour management system and composters
$1.0-1.2 million
3 3,000 kW Full RRF operations $1.5 - $1.8 million
Comments BioVision has made financial provision to hire temporary backup power (approximately 1,000kW) in the event of power failures that last more than 6 hours. The design of the RRF allows for the connection of a power source sufficient to operate the odour management system to the degree necessary to enable the management of odours, while Processible Waste is diverted to landfill and full power is restored. It would be possible to provide a permanent stand by power plant of this capacity (Option 1 in Table 3), rather than relying on hiring in a power plant in the event of an outage. This amount of power would be sufficient to operate the odour management, along with lighting and other equipment up to the capacity of the generator being used. If it were decided to make provision for the connection of additional temporary power to enable more of the RRF to operate during the power outage, then modifications would need to be made to the design of the electrical system of the RRF to accommodate the additional temporary power. The critical element of the RRF that would have the most short term impacts if not functioning, is the odour management system. The odour management system includes the system of aerating the compost in the maturation hall. Without this system there is a risk that odour would build up in the RRF and potentially escape to the atmosphere. There is also a risk that the waste and compost material in the RRF would, in time, become anaerobic and result in spontaneous combustion. This system would need to be operational within hours of a power failure to ensure that these risks are managed and odour does not become a problem. In the event that a reduced amount of power were available (Option 2 in Table 3), the operational advantages of having sufficient power to operate the odour management system and to also turn the composters (2,000kW) relate to increased ease in emptying material from the composters when evacuating material from the RRF. This would also decrease the risk of material in the composters becoming anaerobic. The RRF would not receive and process waste during such an event so the advantages to the MRC are minimal. If the total power supply to run the RRF (3,000kW) remained available (Option 3 in Table 3) then it would be possible for the operations of the RRF to be largely unaffected.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 67
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 17 Commercial in Confidence
As noted above in Sections 2 and 3, the provision of approximately 1100kW of power should allow for the satisfactory management of the foreseeable power outage events, without the need to evacuate material from the RRF, given the history of power outage events, outlined in Section 3.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 68
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 18 Commercial in Confidence
9. CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions can be drawn from this study: 1. Based upon historical information, provided by Western Power, it appears
that there is a low probability of major disruptions to the power supply in the Neerabup area;
2. Detailed information on the frequency and duration of power outages in
industrial areas, such as Neerabup, suggests that power outages greater than one day are unlikely to occur;
3. The reliability of power supply to the RRF site will improve significantly,
upon the completion of the permanent power feed from the Wanneroo network;
4. Western Power operates an incident management plan, to address major
power outage events, as outlined in Section 3 of this report;
5. BioVision is required to arrange for standby power to be available to
operate the RRF should a power interruption occur on those days agreed to in consultation with the Project Advisory Group;
6. During the rest of the year, BioVision is required to hire in temporary
power in the event of a power outage, if it exceeds 6 hours in duration. The temporary power will be sufficient to operate the odour management system to a suitable level of operation during short – term disruptions. The RRF electrical power system has been configured to enable temporary power to be directed to other parts of the plant and operate them, eg composters, compost turners, etc, as required;
7. In the unlikely event that power outages in excess of 6 hours and up to 48
hours were to occur, BioVision will be able to manage the situation without major disruption, other than the cessation of waste deliveries to the RRF;
8. If a power outage lasts for more than 48 hours, BioVision may remove
waste and compost material from the RRF and send it to landfill. The decision as to whether the material will be removed from the RRF will be made by BioVision, giving consideration to its obligations under its operating license;
9. The provision of approximately 1,100kW of power should allow for the
satisfactory management of any foreseeable power outage events, given the history of power outage durations in the Neerabup area;
10. BioVision should be able to utilise the surplus capacity of the RRF to
‘catch up’ for the lost processing of waste that would occur in most anticipated power outages;
11. If BioVision were to catch up for lost processing of waste due to a power
outage, and the RRF does not have to be emptied of material, a force
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 69
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 19 Commercial in Confidence
majeure event will not have occurred, and BioVision and the MRC will not be financially disadvantaged on a net revenue/cost basis;
12. If an event occurs which is not the fault of either party, the commercial
principle that is usually applied (and which was applied in the case of the RRFA) is that the costs should lie where they fall. That is, the event is neither party’s fault, and both are likely to be disadvantaged (including financially) as a result of it;
13. The Waste Delivery Schedule prepared by BioVision under clause 12.1 of
the RRFA should contain a clause such that waste to be delivered is deemed to be amended so that : i. no waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the
RRF cannot receive waste due to the power outage, and ii. Waste to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is
scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnes have been caught up;
14. If an extended power outage was to occur, such that BioVision was not
able to catch up within the financial year, utilising the RRF’s surplus capacity, then a force majeure event will have occurred. The MRC would then need to pay BioVision the Capital Cost Rate and Fixed Operating Cost Rate ($99.47 in November 2007 price) for the scheduled tonnes not processed, after allowing for the Additional Tonnes that were processed;
15. Cost estimates received from BioVision for the provision and installation of
permanent standby power units for 1,100kW, 2,000kW and 3,000kW are in excess of the costs likely to be incurred by the MRC during any anticipated power outage;
16. It is considered that providing permanent backup power for the RRF is not
warranted given the associated costs and benefits to the MRC and the low probability of extended power outages in the Neerabup Industrial Area; and
17. The Project Advisory Group should adopt a detailed plan for dealing with
power outages, to ensure all parties understand their responsibilities and the processes to be followed in such an event. A draft plan is shown in Section 5 of this report.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 70
MRC Resource Recovery Facility Power Outage Plan
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 20 Commercial in Confidence
10. RECOMMENDATIONS
It is recommended that the Mindarie Regional Council:
I. Does not seek changes to the strategy adopted by BioVision and reflected in the RRFA to manage interruptions to the operation of the RRF due interruptions to the supply of power to the RRF Site;
II. Does not support a variation to the RRFA to fund the provision of a permanent standby backup power supply for the RRF;
III. Requires BioVision to use the surplus capacity of the RFF to ‘catch up’ for the lost processing of waste that would occur in most anticipated power outage events, in accordance with the RRFA;
IV. Requires the Waste Delivery Schedule prepared by BioVision under clause 12.1 of the RRFA to contain a clause such that waste to be delivered is deemed to be amended so that :
i. no waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days on which the
RRF cannot receive waste due to the power outage event, and
ii. Waste to the Maximum Daily Amount of Processible Waste is scheduled to be delivered on the days from the RRF being in full operation following the power outage, until the lost tonnes have been caught up;
V. Recognises that if an extended power outage was to occur, such that
BioVision was not able to catch up within the financial year, utilising the RRF’s surplus capacity, then a force majeure event will have occurred. The MRC would then need to pay BioVision the Capital Cost Rate and Fixed Operating Cost Rate ($99.47 in November 2007 price) for the scheduled tonnes not processed, after allowing for the Additional Tonnes that were processed;
VI. Seeks the agreement of BioVision, through the PAG, for both parties to adopt a detailed plan, as shown in Section 5 of this report, for dealing with power outages at the RRF.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 71
Appendix 1: RRF Operating Processes
11. APPENDIX 1: RRF OPERATING PROCESSES
Waste material is received from Member Councils of the MRC in a waste receival hall within the RRF. The waste is held in a receival pit prior to feeding into the process. Pre-treatment sorting is undertaken to remove reject material. Surge capacity and three-day storage are also provided. From the Facility’s receival area, waste is fed to the composters by means of a grapple crane. The composters are driven by plinth mounted friction drive electric motors. The output from the composters is fed to a large trommel screen, where non-biodegradable material is separated to obtain crude compost and residual material. An electromagnetic conveyor belt is used to separate ferrous metals from the residual material for recycling. The crude compost from the primary refining is placed in bays within the maturation hall for a controlled composting process. The bays measure 3 metres wide by 2.4 metres high. A shuttle and tripper belt conveyor automatically feeds the front section of each bay at a constant level. During the 28 days composting period, a compost turner progressively moves the product towards the outlet of the bays. When the product reaches the end of the bay it is moved to secondary refining. Each bay is divided into three aeration zones, each zone having its own air supply from below. Temperature-measuring devices are installed to monitor temperature evolution as compost matures. This process is carried out to maintain aerobic conditions and optimum temperatures during the composting process. During the agitating process, water is added to the compost to maintain its moisture content at the optimal level, while dust generated during the agitating process is also kept to a minimum. The compost is moved from the maturation floor into secondary refining where it is prepared for market. In secondary refining the material passes through screens, inclined conveyors, magnetic separators and pulverisers, all designed to take the small impurities out of the compost. A critical element of the RRF is the odour management system. Odour is generated from most of the waste treatment processes within the RRF. Foul air needs to be captured and cleaned prior to discharge to the atmosphere. Air from within the RRF is captured by a ventilation system and passed through a biofilter. The biofilter removes odours by passing the foul air through a medium of bark and compost. Specialised microbial flora grows on the surface of the medium and consumes the odorous elements in the air, as it passes through the biofilter. All of the stationary equipment in the RRF, including the waste receival equipment, the composter, the materials handling and screening equipment and the odour management system, are powered by electricity. Therefore the operation of the RRF is dependent on a continuous supply of electricity.
Mindarie Regional Council Version 4B 21 Commercial in Confidence ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 72
Appendix 2: Financial
Mindarie Region
Implications of Power Outage
al Council Version 4B 22 Commercial in Confidence
12. APPENDIX 2: FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF POWER OUTAGE
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 73
App
endi
x 2:
Fin
anci
al Im
plic
atio
ns o
f Pow
er O
utag
e
Tonn
es
G
ate
Fee
(Fin
anci
al
Clo
se -
Nov
200
7)
$/
tonn
e $/
tonn
e FM
Day
W
eek
Mon
th
Year
Cap
ital
$
70.1
2 $
7
0.12
S
ched
uled
Ton
nes
400
2000
8,
333.
33
100,
000
Fi
xed
$
2
9.35
$
2
9.35
M
axim
um T
onne
s 43
0 21
50
8,95
8.33
10
7,50
0
Var
iabl
e
$
36
.01
$
-
Tota
l Gat
e Fe
e
$
135
.48
$
99.
47
MR
C C
ost I
mpl
icat
ions
(F
orce
Maj
eure
)
Scen
ario
U
nava
ilabl
e To
nnes
Wor
king
day
s to
pr
oces
s ad
ditio
nal
tonn
ages
Wor
king
day
s pe
r mon
th
(ave
)
Mon
ths
requ
ired
to
proc
ess
addi
tiona
l to
nnag
es
1
day
outa
ge
400
13.3
21
.7
0.6
1
wee
k ou
tage
20
00
66.7
21
.7
3.1
A
ssum
e th
at th
e po
wer
out
age
last
s fo
r 1
wee
k
U
nava
ilabl
e to
nne
fee
is p
aid
by M
RC
to B
ioV
isio
n w
hen
mat
eria
l is
proc
esse
d. A
ssum
ed s
prea
d ov
er re
mai
ning
mon
ths
Opt
ion
1 - A
dditi
onal
Ton
nes
= U
nava
ilabl
e To
nnes
(No
Forc
e M
ajeu
re e
vent
)
Ann
ual A
mou
nts
Mon
th
1-7
8 9
10
11
12
Tota
l Ton
nes
Proc
esse
d FM
Pay
men
t ($
)
Tota
l Pa
ymen
t ($
) A
vaila
ble
Tonn
es
8,33
3.33
6,
333.
33
8,33
3.33
8,
333.
33
8,33
3.33
8,
333.
33
98,0
00
0 $1
3,27
7,04
0 U
nava
ilabl
e To
nnes
0
2000
0
0 0
0 2,
000
0 $
-
Add
ition
al T
onne
s 0
0 65
0 65
0 65
0 50
2,
000
0 $
270,
960
Tota
l Fee
s $
1,1
29,0
00
$
85
8,04
0 $1
,217
,062
$
1,21
7,06
2 $1
,217
,062
$
1,13
5,77
4 10
0,00
0 -
$13,
548,
000
Min
darie
Reg
iona
l Cou
ncil
Ver
sion
4B
23
Com
mer
cial
in C
onfid
ence
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 74
App
endi
x 2:
Fin
anci
al Im
plic
atio
ns o
f Pow
er O
utag
e
O
ptio
n 2
- Add
ition
al T
onne
s <
Una
vaila
ble
Tonn
es (F
orce
Maj
eure
eve
nt o
ccur
s) -
3 m
onth
s re
mai
ning
A F
orce
Maj
eure
fee
is p
aid
for t
he to
nnes
not
pro
cess
ed (i
e U
nava
ilabl
e To
nnes
min
us A
dditi
onal
Ton
nes)
Mon
th
1-8
9 10
11
12
To
tal T
onne
s Pr
oces
sed
FM P
aym
ent
($)
Tota
l Pay
men
t ($)
A
vaila
ble
Tonn
es
8,33
3.33
6,
333.
33
8,33
3.33
8,
333.
33
8,33
3.33
98
,000
$
- $1
3,27
7,04
0 U
nava
ilabl
e To
nnes
0
2000
0
0 0
2000
$
- $
- A
dditi
onal
Ton
nes
0 0
650
650
650
1950
$4
,974
$
269,
160
Tota
l Fee
s $
1,1
29,0
00
$
85
8,04
0 $1
,217
,062
$
1,21
7,06
2 $
1,21
7,06
2 99
,950
$
4,97
4 $
13,5
46,2
00
O
ptio
n 2
- Add
ition
al T
onne
s <
Una
vaila
ble
Tonn
es (F
orce
Maj
eure
eve
nt o
ccur
s) -
1 m
onth
rem
aini
ng
Ann
ual A
mou
nts
Mon
th
1-10
11
12
To
tal T
onne
s Pr
oces
sed
FM
Paym
ent
($)
Tota
l Pay
men
t ($)
A
vaila
ble
Tonn
es
8,33
3.33
6,
333.
33
8,33
3.33
98
,000
$
-
$13,
277,
040
Una
vaila
ble
Tonn
es
0 20
00
0 20
00
$
-
$
-
A
dditi
onal
Ton
nes
0 0
650
650
$ 13
4,28
5 $
222,
347
Tota
l Fee
s $
1,1
29,0
00
$
85
8,04
0 $1
,217
,062
98
,650
$1
34,2
85
$ 13
,499
,387
Min
darie
Reg
iona
l Cou
ncil
Ver
sion
4B
24
Com
mer
cial
in C
onfid
ence
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 75
ATTACHMENT TWO
TO ITEM 8.1.2
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
MRC POWER OUTAGE PROCEDURE
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 76
POWER OUTAGE PROCEDURE Aim: To identify activities to be undertaken by the MRC and BV in the event of a power outage at the RRF. Principals: The guiding principals surrounding a power outage event are as follows:
• Activities to be undertaken to minimise environmental impact (predominantly odour emissions from the facility)
• Activities to be undertaken to minimise facility availability and waste processing ability
• Activities to be undertaken to minimise the financial impact to related parties
• Each party covers the cost associated with its respective responsibility Responsibility: Responsibility is defined as an activity to be undertaken by a party in the event of a power outage. Responsibility relates to the execution of the activity and the payment of all costs associated with the activity. Procedure: Figure 1 sets out the various activities that are to occur and the order in which these activities are carried out. Table 1 sets out the responsibility allocated to each party. Table 1 – Responsibility Allocation
Responsible Party
Activity
MRC • Waste diversion from RRF. • Monitor power outage process/activities. • Receive facility “residue” (includes unprocessed waste in the
event of a clean out). • Re-commence delivery when requested by BV.
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 77
BV • Identify power outage.
• Liaise with Western Power. • Liaise with MRC. • Stop waste delivery to RRF. • Minimise Odour emissions (close doors, etc). • Monitor consequences of power outage
- Odour emissions
- Anaerobic conditions • Arrange backup power and equipment as necessary. • Clean out RRF if necessary. • Re-commence operations on return of power. • Request MRC to re-commence waste delivery.
Impact on Facility Availability: The duration of the power outage and when during the Contract Year the event occurred will determine the ability of BV to “catch up” the lost Availability. Based on facility performance, (early 2010) it is unlikely that the facility will be able to be operated at 10% to 15% extra capacity over an extended duration. This could be maintained for a short period of two to three weeks, but difficult beyond that. It is feasible that the facility could operate at 5% extra capacity (2,100t/wk) over an extended period. The intention would be for both parties to endeavour to catch up lost Availability as a result of the power outage. The extent to which the facility is able to catch up will be governed by the reasonable additional capacity of the process. Financial Impact:
• Each party covers the cost associated with the execution of its respective responsibility
• Payment mechanism is as defined in the RRFA
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 78
Figure 1. POWER OUTAGE
OCCURS
BV notify MRCwaste delivery
halted
BV removes allwaste delivery
vehicles from site
BV contact Western Power to assess the duration of the
power outage
MRC divert allwaste to landfill
BV close allexternal doors
BV advise MRC ofanticipated duration of
the power outage
Power outageestimated @
> 48 hrs
Power outageestimated @
24hrs but < 48 hrs
Power outageestimated
@ < 24 hours
RRF remainsin “Lockdown”
BV arranges thehire of a 1MW
standby generatorand
supplementarydrive system
Standby generatorinstalled on sitewithin 24hrs andsupplementary drive system
installed on sitewithin 48hrs
Odour management
system reactivated
RRF remainsin “Lockdown”
BV arranges thehire of a 1MV
standby generator
BV confirms theavailability of a
standby supplementary drive system
Standby generatorarrives on siteASAP and the
odour management
system reactivated
RRF remainsin “Lockdown”
BV confirms theavailability of a1MW standby
generator
Power outageextends beyond
24hrs
Power returnswithin 24 hrs
Facility start upprocedure
initiated by BV
Facility fullyfunctional
BV advise MRCto recommencewaste deliveries
BV and MRC assess the impact
of the poweroutage on thewaste delivery
schedule
BV monitor repairsituation with
Western Power
BV monitor odourconditions on site
No odourproblems
Odour emissionsstarting to occur
Powerreturns
BV monitor odourand aerobicconditions
Odour emissionsor anaerobic
conditions causeconcern
BV commenceremoval of allmaterial from
the RRF
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 79
ATTACHMENT THREE
TO ITEM 8.1.2
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
BIOVISION POWER OUTAGE PROCEDURE
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 80
Author: Casimiro da Fonseca Mindarie Facility
Procedure Power Failure Reaction
Emission date: 11/11/08
PAGE 1
Document Identification No: 900OPS004PROC
REVISION DETAILS
REVISION
Number
Date
Description
Authorized by
Signed
001 26/03/08 Initial Review
1.0 Purpose This procedure describes the process for to be followed in the event of a power failure. Its purpose is to ensure that power failures are dealt with in a way to guarantee effective odour management and minimize business interruption 2. 0 Scope It is applicable to the Neerabup facility. 3.0 Responsibility This process can be handled by all staff trained in this procedure. The Plant manager is responsible for ensuring that the procedure is carried out. 4.0 Detailed procedure Refer to the following flow chart and text
Revision Number 001 Power failure reaction Revision Date 11/11/08 Authorised:Casimiro da Fonseca Issue Date11/11/08 Issued: Casimiro da Fonseca G:\GOVERNANCE\Meetings-10\ARC 20100611\Attachment 3 to Item 8.1.2.DOC Page 1 of 4
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 81
1Power
interruption
2Advise MRC, cancel trucks
Power Failure Reaction
procedure
3Contact power
supplier
Revision Number 001 Power failure reaction Revision Date 11/11/08 Authorised:Casimiro da Fonseca Issue Date11/11/08 Issued: Casimiro da Fonseca G:\GOVERNANCE\Meetings-10\ARC 20100611\Attachment 3 to Item 8.1.2.DOC Page 2 of 4
9Exit trucks, shut
all doors
4< 24 hrs?
10Power back
on?
6Exit trucks, shut
doors, hire generators (3
MW)
12Resume normal
operations
NO
NO
YES
YES
NO 5>24hrs but <
48hrs?
YES
8Exit trucks, shut doors, hire 1MW
generator
7Connect
generators, start up plant and/or
ventilation system
11Maintain Status
Quo
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 82
Revision Number 001 Power failure reaction Revision Date 11/11/08 Authorised:Casimiro da Fonseca Issue Date11/11/08 Issued: Casimiro da Fonseca G:\GOVERNANCE\Meetings-10\ARC 20100611\Attachment 3 to Item 8.1.2.DOC Page 3 of 4
5.0 Process steps
1. Power interruption A power interruption has occurred.
2. Advise MRC, cancel trucks Contact the MRC representative, advise of the failure and request MSW trucks to be diverted to landfill till further notice. Responsibility: Operations team leader
3. Contact power supplier. Power supplier is to be contacted, to supply all details of the occurrence, and how long it will take for power to be re-established. Responsibility: Operations team leader
4. < 24 hours? Is the duration of the failure expected to be less than 24 hours?
5. >24 hrs but < 48 hrs?
Is failure expected to last between 24 hours and 48 hours?
6. Exit trucks, shut doors, hire generators (3 MW) All trucks in the building are to be exited, and all doors closed ASAP. Hire generators with a total capacity of 3MW minimum. Responsibility: Operations team leader
7. Connect generators, start up plant and / or ventilation system Position generators, connect them, test, start up ventilation system and then all plant. Responsibility: Electrician, electrical contractor, Operations team leader.
8. Exit trucks, shut doors, hire 1MW generator Exit all trucks, shut all doors and hire a generator to supply power to the ventilation system fans
Responsibility: Operations team leader, Maintenance team leader
9. Exit trucks, shut all doors Exit trucks, shut all doors Responsibility: Operations team leader
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 83
Revision Number 001 Power failure reaction Revision Date 11/11/08 Authorised:Casimiro da Fonseca Issue Date11/11/08 Issued: Casimiro da Fonseca G:\GOVERNANCE\Meetings-10\ARC 20100611\Attachment 3 to Item 8.1.2.DOC Page 4 of 4
10. Power back on?
Is the power back on line?
11. Maintain status quo Continue as is situation.
12. Resume normal operations
Advise MRC to re-route the trucks back to the RRF. Initiate normal operations, running the relevant tests prior to resumption. Responsibility: Operations team leader
ITEM 8.1.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 84
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL PAGE 85-92 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA – 1 JULY 2010
CONFIDENTIAL ITEM ITEM 8.1.3 RRFA WASTE DIVERSION TARGET File No: WST/179 (d/10/4166) Attachment(s): Nil Author: Ian Watkins
THIS ITEM IS CONFIDENTIAL, NOT FOR PUBLIC VIEWING.
SEPARATE COVER TO ELECTED MEMBERS
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL PAGE 93 – 109 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA – 1 JULY 2010
CONFIDENTIAL ITEM ITEM 8.1.4 FUTURE LANDFILL SITE INVESTIGATION AND PROPOSAL TO
PURCHASE LAND File No: WST/31 (D/10/4160) Attachment(s): 1. Property Business Plan Author: Ian Watkins
THIS ITEM IS CONFIDENTIAL, NOT FOR PUBLIC VIEWING.
SEPARATE COVER TO ELECTED MEMBERS
ITEM 8.1.5 RECORDING OF MEETINGS OF THE MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL File No: GOV/34 (D/10/4123) Attachment(s): Nil Author: Kathleen van Son
SUMMARY The purpose of this item is to provide information to the Council with regard to the establishment of an audio recording capability for Mindarie Regional Council (MRC) meetings. BACKGROUND At the Special Council Meeting held on 6 May 2010, the following motion was tabled:
1. That Mindarie Regional Council acquires a high quality audio recording system suitable for the purpose of recording council meetings as a matter of urgency.
2. To facilitate the accurate recording of minutes and to improve governance, Mindarie Regional Council, as a matter of priority, introduce a requirement for the audio recording of all council and committee meetings.
3. That the appropriate administrative arrangements be put into place to ensure the maintenance and integrity of such recordings in accordance with the Council’s obligations under the State Records Act 2000.
The proposal to provide an audio recording capability for the Mindarie Regional Council meetings should be evaluated against the following criteria:
1. ability of administration to provide an audio recording service at each location
2. cost of purchasing an audio recording system 3. ability of administration to not only record Member Council meetings but to
manage the recordings within MRC’s Information Management procedures Information has previously been sought by the MRC with regard to sourcing audio recording equipment for recording Council meetings. At the Ordinary Council meeting held on 1 July 2004, a request was raised by the Council to investigate the possibility of recording MRC Council meetings. Consultant Ms Rhonda Evans was retained to conduct this report which was presented to Council. The approach taken was to survey the seven member councils to gain an understanding of their approach to the recording of meetings. The survey commenced with the following questions:
1. Does your Council have procedures relating to the recording of meetings? 2. Does your Council have facilities to tape meetings?
ITEM 8.1.5
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 110
3. If you have facilities, could you provide a service to tape meetings of the Mindarie Regional Council, and if so would fees apply?
Following consideration of this work, no further action occurred.
DETAIL The approach taken for this proposal has been to speak to Hansard staff at the West Australian Parliament. The system utilised at the West Australian Parliament is called ‘For the Record” (FTR) and is deemed to be of a very high quality. A quotation was also sought from one service provider, VizCom Technologies, who also promote the audio system called ‘For The Record’ (FTR). This system is also currently installed at various MRC’s Member Councils as listed below. VizCom Technology Quotation
Component Cost 1 x FTR Hearings 1 x FTR Foot Pedal 1 x FTR software installation 1 x FTR training (Governance Officer) SUB TOTAL COST $4,907.80 1 x Laptop (to be purchased by MRC) $3,000.00 best est. TOTAL COST $7,907.80 pls gst
Member Council Audio Capabilities Currently, the MRC Council meetings are held at all seven Member Council Chambers. The audio system, if purchased, is required to be mobile and compatible with the seven member Councils’ individual audio systems and equally; will need to support the ability to transcribe the recordings. Provision by the individual councils for recording MRC Council meetings will have to be made to accommodate this system. Further investigation with each of the Member Councils has revealed that if purchased, FTR would be compatible. After consultation with each of the Member Councils’ Governance areas, the following audio systems are currently being utilised to record Council meetings:
• City of Joondalup - Currently utilises FTR digital audio recording system
• City of Perth - Currently utilises FTR digital audio recording system
• City of Stirling - Currently utilises Marantz Professional Digital System
• City of Wanneroo - Currently utilises FTR digital audio recording system
ITEM 8.1.5
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 111
• Town of Cambridge - Currently utilises FTR Hearings digital recording system
• Town of Victoria Park - Do not record Council meetings
• Town of Vincent - Currently utilises Auto Log digital audio recording system
Information Management and Archives The Mindarie Regional Council utilises Trim as an Electronic Document Records Management system and adheres to the WA State Records Office, General Disposal Authority for Local Government (GDALG), under section 4.4 which states that tape recordings of Council meetings need to be retained in custody for a recommended period of 30 years. It is worth noting however, that section 4.4 of the GDALG is currently under review. Utilising the FTR System, the digital recorded minutes will be transferred to MRC’s Network Server for storage, access and archive and recorded in Trim. CONSULTATION Consultation on this proposal was sought from VizCom Technologies in Osborne Park and Hansard staff at the West Australian Parliament. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT Not required POLICY IMPLICATIONS A policy on audio recording of Mindarie Regional Council meetings will be required. Should Council approve the purchase of a quality audio recording system, MRC would adhere to the purchasing thresholds within Policy 24B, Purchasing Policy and Tender guide. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Not Applicable FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Should Council agree to progress the arrangement of purchasing a quality audio recording system, an adjustment will be need to be made within the MRC 2010/11 Financial Budget with final adjustments made at the mid year review in 2011. COMMENT The MRC Governance Officer would transport the digital audio recording system to each of the Member Councils for all meetings and would require adequate time to set up the equipment, this could also require support from each Member Council IT department.
ITEM 8.1.5
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 112
It is prudent to note that transporting equipment on a regular basis could give rise to damage over time. MRC OFFICER RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
(i) note the investigation and report into a quality audio recording system for MRC Council meetings
(ii) approve the establishment of an audio recording capability for MRC Council meetings
(iii) note the plan to implement this system following the purchase of the recommended audio recording system ‘For the Record’ for the recording of MRC Council meetings
AGENDA REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING – 11 JUNE 2010 The Group discussed the following:
• wear and tear of equipment while transporting audio equipment to Council meetings
• possibility of utilising member Council audio equipment and MRC being provided the recordings of meetings
MRC RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
(i) note the investigation and report into a quality audio recording system for MRC Council meetings
(ii) approve the establishment of an audio recording capability for MRC Council meetings
(iii) note the plan to implement this system following the purchase of the recommended audio recording system ‘For the Record’ for the recording of MRC Council meetings
ITEM 8.1.5
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 113
ITEM 8.1.6 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED 31 MARCH 2010 AND 30 APRIL 2010 File No: FIN/5-02 (D/10/4124) Attachment(s): 1. Financial Statement for the period ended 31 March 2010 2. Financial Statement for the period ended 30 April 2010 Author: Kalwant Dhillon
SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide financial reporting to meet statutory requirements and to provide useful information to stakeholders of the Council. BACKGROUND Financial Statements as at 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010 are attached and show separate columns for Actual and Adopted/Revised Budget figures. Reporting requirements are defined by regulations 34 and 35 of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1996. There is scope in these regulations to provide other reporting that the Local Government considers appropriate. The financial statements presented for each month consist of:
• Operating Statement by Nature
• Operating Statement by Function
• Statement of Financial Position
• Statement of Investing Activities
• Information on Borrowings DETAIL The reports attached are for the months ended 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010 and are at Attachments One and Two to this Item.
• Statement of Income and Expenditure. Pages 2 to 3 of the Attachment. These statements have been adjusted to include a number of year-to-date estimates that are not finalised until the end of the financial year. These are as follows:
- Deferred Excavation Consumed
- Site Rehabilitation Provision
- Site Monitoring Provision
These are based on the estimated rates per tonne calculated with reference to estimated excavation cost of various stages of the landfill and the life of the landfill. An adjustment is made (if necessary) at the end of the year based on a survey carried out to assess the “air space” remaining.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 114
• Operating Statements by Function and Type. At page 4 of the Attachment. This shows a summary of operating income and expenditures. The Operating Statement by Function may be useful to the reader as a snapshot of the business operations
A complete suite of Financial Statements including Operating Statement and Statement of Financial Position are reported on a monthly basis and include accruals that may be based on estimates to provide meaningful reporting to stakeholders. These reports are at Attachment One and Two to this Item.
MRC OFFICER RECOMMENDATION That the Financial Statements as attached at Attachment One and Two for the months ended 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010 be noted.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 115
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 8.1.6
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 31 MARCH 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 116
MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
FOR THE MONTH ENDED 31 MARCH 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 117
Description Adopted Budget
Revised Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual $ Variance % Variance Note
Revenue form Ordinary Activities User Charges User Charges - City of Perth 1,930,400 1,930,400 1,447,803 1,316,658 User Charges - City of Waneroo 7,570,900 7,570,900 5,678,172 5,844,381 User Charges - City of Joondalup 7,418,100 7,418,100 5,563,575 5,356,849 User Charges - City of Stirling 8,376,000 8,376,000 6,282,000 6,553,975 User Charges - Town of Cambridge 1,224,000 1,224,000 918,000 896,194 User Charges - Town of Vincent 1,687,800 1,687,800 1,265,850 1,186,499 User Charges - Town of Victoria Park 1,728,200 1,728,200 1,296,153 1,122,259 User Charges - RRF Residues 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,485,000 1,106,744 Total Member User Charges 31,915,400 31,915,400 23,936,553 23,383,558 (552,995) -2.31% User Charges - City of South Perth 337,100 337,100 252,828 16,229 (236,599) -93.58% 1 User Charges - Casual Tipping Fees 5,018,140 5,018,140 3,889,060 3,447,508 (441,552) -11.35% 2 Total User Charges 37,270,640 37,270,640 28,078,441 26,847,296 (1,231,145) -4.38% Service Charges Sale of Recyclable Materials 240,000 240,000 180,000 374,666 194,666 108.15% Sale of Limestone Gas Power Generation Sales 550,000 550,000 304,000 297,350 (6,650) -2.19% Grants & Subsidies 320,000 320,000 320,000 360,000 40,000 12.50% Contributions, Reimbursments & Donations 340,100 340,100 274,969 173,939 (101,030) -36.74% 3 Interest Earnings 369,200 369,200 276,903 396,502 119,599 43.19% Other Revenue 10,200 10,200 7,653 73,716 66,063 863.23%
39,100,140 39,100,140 29,441,966 28,523,469 (918,497) -3.12%Expenses from Ordinary Activities Employee Costs 4,300,140 4,300,140 3,298,332 3,273,361 24,971 0.76% Materials and Contracts Consultants and Contract Labour 804,600 923,600 726,555 695,480 31,075 4.28% Communications and Public Consultation 722,800 722,800 546,488 241,167 305,321 55.87% Landfill Expenses 1,057,400 927,400 631,636 660,549 (28,913) -4.58% Office Expenses 259,500 264,500 213,677 166,795 46,882 21.94% Information Systems 399,300 399,300 273,300 226,268 47,032 17.21% Building Maintenance 129,200 112,200 93,394 75,906 17,488 18.72% Plant and Equipment Operating and Hire 1,027,800 1,215,800 1,004,640 946,833 57,807 5.75% RRF Operations 15,355,000 13,174,000 9,371,348 8,316,215 1,055,133 11.26% Waste Minimisation 316,000 316,000 292,174 323,841 (31,667) -10.84% 4 Utilities 131,300 115,300 104,725 77,781 26,944 25.73% Depreciation 1,159,080 1,079,080 809,316 779,813 29,503 3.65% Borrowing Cost Expenses 1,417,000 1,351,000 1,033,803 996,413 37,390 3.62% Insurance 127,400 143,400 143,400 143,899 (499) -0.35% DEP Landfill Levy 4,699,700 4,850,700 2,970,799 3,212,352 (241,553) -8.13% 5 Land Lease/Rental 590,000 590,000 437,251 429,762 7,489 1.71% Other Expenditure Member Costs 149,500 154,500 92,003 61,856 30,147 32.77% Administration 159,000 159,000 119,259 115,586 3,673 3.08% Amortisation (LandFill) 4,054,200 4,339,200 3,325,650 3,279,249 46,401 1.40% Amortisation (RRF) 534,600 534,600 400,950 400,950 0 0.00%
37,393,520 35,672,520 25,888,700 24,424,078 1,464,622 5.66%
Profit on Sale of Assets 27,800 27,800 6,100 9,994 3,894 63.84%Loss on Sale of Assets 28,700 28,700 28,700 8,116 20,584 71.72%
(900) (900) (22,600) 1,879 (16,690) 73.85%
Changes in Net Assets Resulting from Operations 1,705,720 3,426,720 3,530,666 4,101,270 570,604 16.16%
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY NATURE AND TYPE
For the month ended 31 March 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 118
NOTES FOR VARIATIONS - INCOME STATEMENT BY NATURE AND TYPE
Note # Description of Item Nature of Variance where actual is 10% and $5,000 from YTD Budget
1 User Charges - City of South Perth City of South Perth has gone for a tender and they are sending their waste to a commercial landfill.
2 User Charges - Casual Tipping Fees The drop is mainly attributable to the increase in fees as well as seasonal factors.
3 Contributions, Reimbursements & DonationsThe drop in revenue is due to the fact that Tox Free invoices are now directly sent to WALGA for payment. The hazardous waste at Mindarie Regional Council is collected by Tox Free. WALGA has government funding for this cost.
4 Waste Minimisation The additional expenditures will be funded by additional grants expected fom Department of Environment and Conservation this financial year.
5 DEP Landfill Levy
Increase is firstly due to RRF which was not operating from late September 2009 to January 2010, hence, more tonnages of waste were going to Landfill in the seven months to 31st January 2010. Secondly, DEP Levy rate was increased on 1st July 2009 from $7/tonne to $8/tonne and again to $28/tonne on the 1st January 2010. The adjustment in rate increase at the 1st July 2009 was not budgeted due to announcement by DEC after budget approval whilst 1st January 2010 increase was included in the budget. Thirdly, due to the variation in tonnes over first half of the Financial Year and second half of the Financial Year rates were different.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 119
Description Adopted Budget
Revised Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual $ Variance % Variance
Revenues from Ordinary Activities
Operating RevenuesCommunity Ammenties 39,100,140 39,100,140 29,441,966 28,523,469 (918,497) -3.12%Total Operating Revenues 39,100,140 39,100,140 29,441,966 28,523,469 (918,497) -3.12%
Profit on Disposal of AssetsCommunity Ammenties 27,800 27,800 6,100 9,994 3,894 63.84%Total Profit (Loss) on Disposal of Assets 27,800 27,800 6,100 9,994 3,894 63.84%
Expenses from Ordinary Activities
Operating ExpensesGovernance 149,500 154,500 92,003 61,856 30,147 32.77%Community Ammenties 18,604,020 19,017,020 13,816,756 13,729,359 87,397 0.63%Other Property and Sevices 1,868,000 1,976,000 1,574,790 1,320,236 254,554 16.16%Resource Recovery Facility 15,355,000 13,174,000 9,371,348 8,316,215 1,055,133 11.26%Total Operating Expenses 35,976,520 34,321,520 24,854,897 23,427,665 1,427,232 5.74%
Loss on Disposal of AssetsCommunity Ammenties 28,700 28,700 28,700 8,116 20,584 71.72%Total Profit (Loss) on Disposal of Assets 28,700 28,700 28,700 8,116 20,584 71.72%
Borrowing Costs ExpenseCommunity Ammenties 880,400 814,400 621,900 622,312 (412) -0.07%Resource Recovery Facility 536,600 536,600 411,903 374,101 37,802 9.18%Total Borrowing Costs Expense 1,417,000 1,351,000 1,033,803 996,413 37,390 3.62%
NET RESULT 1,705,720 3,426,720 3,530,666 4,101,270 570,604 16.16%
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY DEPARTMENT
For the month ended 31 March 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 120
DescriptionACTUAL
2009/2010 MovementACTUAL
2008/2009CURRENT ASSETS Cash 1,271,015 1,125,322 145,693 Investments 13,050,178 1,736,002 11,314,175 Debtors 3,917,548 1,924,737 1,992,811 Stock 19,953 11,026 8,927 Prepayments 194,512 (57,951) 252,462 Other Current Assets 411,283 (228,132) 639,415TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 18,864,488 4,511,003 14,353,484
NON-CURRENT ASSETS Land 2,658,127 0 2,658,127 Buildings & Improvements 1,632,092 (122,144) 1,754,235 Furniture & Equipment 246,866 (30,667) 277,533 Plant & Equipment 3,241,320 (320,807) 3,562,127 Infrastructure - Other 429,341 (36,932) 466,273 Infrastructure - Excavation 6,806,957 (3,279,249) 10,086,206 Infrastructure - RRF 8,595,772 380,629 8,215,143 Infrastructure - Rehabilitation 2,320,719 0 2,320,719 Work In Progress - Excavation 13,019,239 3,409,151 9,610,088 Work In Progress - Other 16,344 16,344 0 Other Non Current Assets 2,014,547 (78,453) 2,093,000TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS 40,981,324 (62,127) 41,043,451
TOTAL ASSETS 59,845,812 4,448,877 55,396,935
CURRENT LIABILITIES Creditors 5,198,015 3,368,334 1,829,681 Provisions 532,266 43,640 488,626 Loans Leases Overdrafts 599,855 (1,832,870) 2,432,725 Accruals 210,957 (1,413,672) 1,624,629 Other Current Liabilities 0 0 0TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 6,541,094 165,432 6,375,661
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES Loans Leases Overdrafts 19,501,151 0 19,501,151 Other Non Current Liabilities 4,965,045 42,937 4,922,108TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES 24,466,196 42,937 24,423,259
TOTAL LIABILITIES 31,007,290 208,369 30,798,920
NET ASSETS 28,838,522 4,240,507 24,598,015
EQUITYRetained Surplus 26,416,374 4,101,270 22,315,104Reserves 137,999 0 137,999Council Contribution 2,284,149 139,237 2,144,911TOTAL EQUITY 28,838,522 4,240,507 24,598,015
Mindarie Regional CouncilBalance Sheet
For the month ended 31 March 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 121
Description Adopted Budget Revised Budget YTD Actual% to Revised
Budget NotePLANT, VEHICLES AND MACHINERIESPlant and VehiclesReplacement of Operation's Foreman Vehicle 38,500 38,500 35,100 91.17%Replacement of Operation's Manager Vehicle 47,900 47,900 0Replacement of Fire Vehicle 45,500 45,500 43,340 95.25%Replacement of Executive Vehicle 51,000 51,000 51,975 101.91%Replacement of Executive Vehicle 50,000 50,000 37,380 74.76%Replacement of Skid Steer Loader No.2 85,000 85,000 0Replace 2x 30m3 Transfer Bins 27,000 27,000 22,560 83.56%Replacement of Workshop Vehicle 29,500 29,500 34,900 118.31% 1Vehicle Tray - Welder's Vehicle 7,000 7,000 0New Utility Vehicle-Marketing and Education 44,000 44,000 40,346 91.70%Replacement of Water Truck 0 200,000 0
425,400 625,400 265,602 42.47%Machinery and EquipmentNew Tarpomatic System 240,000 240,000 0New LGF Monitoring System 20,000 20,000 0New Paint Can Crusher 30,000 30,000 10,440 34.80%Upgrade Recycling Centre Cameras 7,000 7,000 6,480 92.57%Chemical Toilet Facilities 15,000 15,000 16,563 110.42%New Laser Level 0 6,000 0New Leak Detector / Gas Detector 0 2,000 0Ground Monitor 0 4,000 0Weighbridge DVR Recorder Upgrade 0 6,000 0
312,000 330,000 33,483 10.15%
TOTAL PLANT, VEHICLES AND MACHINERIES 737,400 955,400 299,085 31.30%
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENTComputer EquipmentReplacement of Laptop (Operations Manager) 3,500 3,500 0Replacement of Desktop PC (Finance Officer-Reporting) 1,500 1,500 785 52.34%Replacement of Desktop PC (Foreman) 1,500 1,500 864 57.59%Replacement of Desktop PC (Envrironmental Officer) 1,500 1,500 785 52.34%Replacement of Laptop (Administration Manager) 2,500 2,500 2,149 85.96%Replacement of Laptop (Waste Education Officer) 2,500 2,500 2,149 85.96%Various Replacement Printers and Computing Equipments 15,000 15,000 11,953 79.69%New Desktop PC (Finance Officer-Accts Payable) 1,500 1,500 0Additional UPS System (Admin and Recycling) 2,000 2,000 0Replacement of Servers at Administration Building 0 50,000 0
31,500 81,500 18,685 22.93%Office Furniture and EquipmentReplacement of Furniture and Equipment 26,400 26,400 17,791 67.39%Purchase of New Office Equipment 13,000 13,000 03x Storage Cabinets 5,000 5,000 2,771 55.42%
44,400 44,400 20,562 46.31%
TOTAL FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 75,900 125,900 39,247 31.17%
LAND AND BUILDINGSLandbrought forward item:Land Purchase (New Landfill Site) 12,000,000 12,000,000 0
12,000,000 12,000,000 0 0.00%BuildingsWorkshop Extension (Work in Progress) 250,000 350,000 0Ground Maintenance Shed 10,000 10,000 0
260,000 360,000 0 0.00%
TOTAL LAND AND BUILDINGS 12,260,000 12,360,000 0 0.00%
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTATEMENT OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES
For the month ended 31 March 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 122
Description Adopted Budget Revised Budget YTD Actual% to Revised
Budget Note
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTATEMENT OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES
For the month ended 31 March 2010
INFRASTRUCTUREOperationsLitter Control Fences (Work in Progress) 75,000 75,000 16,344 21.79%Reticulation 7,000 7,000 0Upgrade Recycling Centre Water Main 10,000 19,000 0brought forward item:Surveillance and Boom Gate 15,000 15,000 13,780 91.87%
107,000 116,000 30,124 25.97%Resource Recovery FacilitySite Infrastructure 829,000 829,000 703,126 84.82%
829,000 829,000 703,126 84.82%
TOTAL INFRASTUCTURE 936,000 945,000 733,251 77.59%
LANDFILL EXCAVATIONSExcavation - Phase3 Stage2 (Work In Progress)Construction 8,208,700 3,508,700 0Design 300,000 300,000 126,232Excavation/Earthworks 7,720,000 3,520,000 3,268,907MRC Project Manager 40,000 40,000 7,123Siteworks, Survey, Etc. 20,000 20,000 6,890TOTAL LANDFILL EXCAVATIONS 16,288,700 7,388,700 3,409,151 46.14%
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 123
NOTES FOR VARIATIONS - STATEMENT OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Note # Description of Item Nature of Variance where actual is 10% and $5,000 from YTD Budget
1 Replacement of Workshop Vehicle
The cost over run was due to fittings of additional accessories required for operational purposes. Savings from the replacement of Foreman and Fire vehicle will cover the cost.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 124
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
ON
BO
RR
OW
ING
S
(a)
Loan
Sch
edul
e an
d In
tere
st E
xpen
se
Act
ual
Prin
cipa
l R
epay
men
tsPr
inci
pal
Out
stan
ding
Inte
rest
R
epay
men
tsN
ote
Valu
e of
Loa
n A
ppro
ved
Mat
ures
Inte
rest
R
ates
Prin
cipa
l 01
/07/
2009
Prin
cipa
l D
raw
n D
own
to 3
1/03
/201
0A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10C
omm
unity
Am
eniti
esTa
mal
a Pa
rk L
andf
illLo
an 8
- B
uild
ing
Upg
rade
650,
000
May
-14
6.45
%37
6,43
50
49,1
3432
7,30
117
,173
2Lo
an 1
2 - C
onst
ruct
ion
Sta
ge 2
Pha
se 2
15,0
00,0
00M
ar-1
25.
98%
11,2
49,9
690
1,25
0,01
09,
999,
958
327,
452
3Lo
an 1
3 - R
edra
w fo
r Pha
se 3
Lan
dfill
6,60
0,00
00
00
00
Loan
14
- New
Lan
dfill
Pur
chas
e12
,000
,000
00
00
0R
egio
nal R
esou
rce
Rec
over
y Fa
cilit
yLo
an 1
1 - R
RF
Land
Pur
chas
e3,
500,
000
May
-25
5.97
%1,
940,
815
013
9,23
71,
801,
578
232,
270
2Lo
an 1
0a -
RR
F In
frast
ruct
ure
2,00
0,00
0M
ar-2
56.
16%
1,76
6,65
80
61,1
561,
705,
502
69,7
962
Loan
10b
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e (In
tere
st O
nly)
2,60
0,00
0V
aria
ble
2,60
0,00
00
02,
600,
000
76,1
731
Loan
10c
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e4,
000,
000
Jun-
147.
97%
4,00
0,00
00
333,
333
3,66
6,66
722
8,13
3TO
TAL
46,3
50,0
0021
,933
,877
01,
832,
870
20,1
01,0
0695
0,99
6Fa
cilit
y Fe
e45
,417
Tota
l Bor
row
ing
Cos
ts99
6,41
3
Not
e 1:
Loa
n 10
b - $
2,60
0,00
0 ha
s a
varia
ble
rate
of 4
.31%
for t
he m
onth
of M
arch
201
0N
ote
2: T
otal
Loa
n In
tere
st a
ccru
ed fo
r Mar
ch 2
010
= $3
5,52
9.94
Not
e 3:
Prin
cipa
l pay
men
ts a
re m
ade
quar
terly
.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 125
ATTACHMENT TWO
TO ITEM 8.1.6
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 30 APRIL 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 126
MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
FOR THE MONTH ENDED 30 APRIL 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 127
Description Adopted Budget
Revised Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual $ Variance % Variance Note
Revenue form Ordinary Activities User Charges User Charges - City of Perth 1,930,400 1,930,400 1,608,670 1,453,928 User Charges - City of Waneroo 7,570,900 7,570,900 6,309,080 6,460,137 User Charges - City of Joondalup 7,418,100 7,418,100 6,181,750 5,980,138 User Charges - City of Stirling 8,376,000 8,376,000 6,980,000 7,387,262 User Charges - Town of Cambridge 1,224,000 1,224,000 1,020,000 1,010,303 User Charges - Town of Vincent 1,687,800 1,687,800 1,406,500 1,323,414 User Charges - Town of Victoria Park 1,728,200 1,728,200 1,440,170 1,241,016 User Charges - RRF Residues 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,650,000 1,354,919 Total Member User Charges 31,915,400 31,915,400 26,596,170 26,211,117 (385,053) -1.45% User Charges - City of South Perth 337,100 337,100 280,920 16,229 (264,691) -94.22% 1 User Charges - Casual Tipping Fees 5,018,140 5,018,140 4,265,421 3,924,024 (341,397) -8.00% 2 Total User Charges 37,270,640 37,270,640 31,142,511 30,151,370 (991,141) -3.18% Service Charges Sale of Recyclable Materials 240,000 240,000 200,000 389,319 189,319 94.66% Sale of Limestone Gas Power Generation Sales 550,000 550,000 550,000 539,402 (10,598) -1.93% Grants & Subsidies 320,000 320,000 320,000 360,000 40,000 12.50% Contributions, Reimbursments & Donations 340,100 340,100 296,010 182,272 (113,738) -38.42% 3 Interest Earnings 369,200 369,200 307,670 458,431 150,761 49.00% Other Revenue 10,200 10,200 7,670 81,016 73,346 956.28%
39,100,140 39,100,140 32,823,861 32,161,809 (662,052) -2.02%Expenses from Ordinary Activities Employee Costs 4,300,140 4,300,140 3,632,459 3,643,081 (10,622) -0.29% Materials and Contracts Consultants and Contract Labour 804,600 923,600 792,038 747,097 44,941 5.67% Communications and Public Consultation 722,800 722,800 594,428 318,732 275,696 46.38% Landfill Expenses 1,057,400 927,400 689,304 727,229 (37,925) -5.50% Office Expenses 259,500 264,500 230,626 185,131 45,495 19.73% Information Systems 399,300 399,300 288,300 248,142 40,158 13.93% Building Maintenance 129,200 112,200 99,310 83,144 16,166 16.28% Plant and Equipment Operating and Hire 1,027,800 1,215,800 1,071,807 1,047,339 24,468 2.28% RRF Operations 15,355,000 13,174,000 10,466,683 9,436,141 1,030,542 9.85% Waste Minimisation 316,000 316,000 316,000 408,453 (92,453) -29.26% 4 Utilities 131,300 115,300 108,250 81,334 26,916 24.86% Depreciation 1,159,080 1,079,080 899,240 867,522 31,718 3.53% Borrowing Cost Expenses 1,417,000 1,351,000 1,139,870 1,123,445 16,425 1.44% Insurance 127,400 143,400 143,400 143,899 (499) -0.35% DEP Landfill Levy 4,699,700 4,850,700 3,597,432 3,923,525 (326,093) -9.06% 5 Land Lease/Rental 590,000 590,000 488,168 478,177 9,991 2.05% Other Expenditure Member Costs 149,500 154,500 96,420 61,856 34,564 35.85% Administration 159,000 159,000 132,510 138,855 (6,345) -4.79% Amortisation (LandFill) 4,054,200 4,339,200 3,663,500 3,617,099 46,401 1.27% Amortisation (RRF) 534,600 534,600 445,500 445,500 0 0.00%
37,393,520 35,672,520 28,895,245 27,725,702 1,169,543 4.05%
Profit on Sale of Assets 27,800 27,800 6,100 9,994 3,894 63.84%Loss on Sale of Assets 28,700 28,700 28,700 8,116 20,584 71.72%
(900) (900) (22,600) 1,879 (16,690) 73.85%
Changes in Net Assets Resulting from Operations 1,705,720 3,426,720 3,906,016 4,437,986 531,970 13.62%
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY NATURE AND TYPE
For the month ended 30 April 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 128
NOTES FOR VARIATIONS - INCOME STATEMENT BY NATURE AND TYPE
Note # Description of Item Nature of Variance where actual is 10% and $5,000 from YTD Budget
1 User Charges - City of South Perth City of South Perth has gone for a tender and they are sending their waste to a commercial landfill.
2 User Charges - Casual Tipping Fees The drop is mainly attributable to the increase in fees as well as seasonal factors.
3 Contributions, Reimbursements & DonationsThe drop in revenue is due to the fact that Tox Free invoices are now directly sent to WALGA for payment. The hazardous waste at Mindarie Regional Council is collected by Tox Free. WALGA has government funding for this cost.
4 Waste Minimisation The additional expenditures will be funded by additional grants expected fom Department of Environment and Conservation this financial year.
5 DEP Landfill Levy
Increase is firstly due to RRF which was not operating from late September 2009 to January 2010, hence, more tonnages of waste were going to Landfill in the seven months to 31st January 2010. Secondly, DEP Levy rate was increased on 1st July 2009 from $7/tonne to $8/tonne and again to $28/tonne on the 1st January 2010. The adjustment in rate increase at the 1st July 2009 was not budgeted due to announcement by DEC after budget approval whilst 1st January 2010 increase was included in the budget. Thirdly, due to the variation in tonnes over first half of the Financial Year and second half of the Financial Year rates were different.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 129
Description Adopted Budget
Revised Budget YTD Budget YTD Actual $ Variance % Variance
Revenues from Ordinary Activities
Operating RevenuesCommunity Ammenties 39,100,140 39,100,140 32,823,861 32,161,809 (662,052) -2.02%Total Operating Revenues 39,100,140 39,100,140 32,823,861 32,161,809 (662,052) -2.02%
Profit on Disposal of AssetsCommunity Ammenties 27,800 27,800 6,100 9,994 3,894 63.84%Total Profit (Loss) on Disposal of Assets 27,800 27,800 6,100 9,994 3,894 63.84%
Expenses from Ordinary Activities
Operating ExpensesGovernance 149,500 154,500 96,420 61,856 34,564 35.85%Community Ammenties 18,604,020 19,017,020 15,486,965 15,665,315 (178,350) -1.15%Other Property and Sevices 1,868,000 1,976,000 1,705,307 1,438,945 266,362 15.62%Resource Recovery Facility 15,355,000 13,174,000 10,466,683 9,436,141 1,030,542 9.85%Total Operating Expenses 35,976,520 34,321,520 27,755,375 26,602,257 1,153,118 4.15%
Loss on Disposal of AssetsCommunity Ammenties 28,700 28,700 28,700 8,116 20,584 71.72%Total Profit (Loss) on Disposal of Assets 28,700 28,700 28,700 8,116 20,584 71.72%
Borrowing Costs ExpenseCommunity Ammenties 880,400 814,400 685,900 681,308 4,592 0.67%Resource Recovery Facility 536,600 536,600 453,970 442,137 11,833 2.61%Total Borrowing Costs Expense 1,417,000 1,351,000 1,139,870 1,123,445 16,425 1.44%
NET RESULT 1,705,720 3,426,720 3,906,016 4,437,986 531,970 13.62%
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY DEPARTMENT
For the month ended 30 April 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 130
DescriptionACTUAL
2009/2010 MovementACTUAL
2008/2009CURRENT ASSETS Cash 2,093,338 1,947,645 145,693 Investments 13,050,178 1,736,002 11,314,175 Debtors 4,061,662 2,068,850 1,992,811 Stock 14,751 5,824 8,927 Prepayments 121,438 (131,024) 252,462 Other Current Assets 573,313 (66,103) 639,415TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 19,914,679 5,561,195 14,353,484
NON-CURRENT ASSETS Land 2,658,127 0 2,658,127 Buildings & Improvements 1,618,771 (135,464) 1,754,235 Furniture & Equipment 239,294 (38,239) 277,533 Plant & Equipment 3,202,583 (359,543) 3,562,127 Infrastructure - Other 425,378 (40,895) 466,273 Infrastructure - Excavation 6,469,107 (3,617,099) 10,086,206 Infrastructure - RRF 8,618,275 403,132 8,215,143 Infrastructure - Rehabilitation 2,320,719 0 2,320,719 Work In Progress - Excavation 13,076,704 3,466,616 9,610,088 Work In Progress - Other 31,739 31,739 0 Other Non Current Assets 2,005,830 (87,170) 2,093,000TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS 40,666,528 (376,922) 41,043,451
TOTAL ASSETS 60,581,208 5,184,273 55,396,935
CURRENT LIABILITIES Creditors 4,912,862 3,083,181 1,829,681 Provisions 531,870 43,243 488,626 Loans Leases Overdrafts 545,051 (1,887,674) 2,432,725 Accruals 945,299 (679,329) 1,624,629 Other Current Liabilities 0 0 0TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 6,935,082 559,421 6,375,661
NON CURRENT LIABILITIES Loans Leases Overdrafts 19,501,151 0 19,501,151 Other Non Current Liabilities 4,969,736 47,628 4,922,108TOTAL NON CURRENT LIABILITIES 24,470,887 47,628 24,423,259
TOTAL LIABILITIES 31,405,970 607,049 30,798,920
NET ASSETS 29,175,238 4,577,223 24,598,015
EQUITYRetained Surplus 26,753,090 4,437,986 22,315,104Reserves 137,999 0 137,999Council Contribution 2,284,149 139,237 2,144,911TOTAL EQUITY 29,175,238 4,577,223 24,598,015
Mindarie Regional CouncilBalance Sheet
For the month ended 30 April 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 131
Description Adopted Budget Revised Budget YTD Actual% to Revised
Budget NotePLANT, VEHICLES AND MACHINERIESPlant and VehiclesReplacement of Operation's Foreman Vehicle 38,500 38,500 35,100 91.17%Replacement of Operation's Manager Vehicle 47,900 47,900 0Replacement of Fire Vehicle 45,500 45,500 43,340 95.25%Replacement of Executive Vehicle 51,000 51,000 51,975 101.91%Replacement of Executive Vehicle 50,000 50,000 37,380 74.76%Replacement of Skid Steer Loader No.2 85,000 85,000 0Replace 2x 30m3 Transfer Bins 27,000 27,000 22,560 83.56%Replacement of Workshop Vehicle 29,500 29,500 34,900 118.31% 1Vehicle Tray - Welder's Vehicle 7,000 7,000 0New Utility Vehicle-Marketing and Education 44,000 44,000 40,346 91.70%Replacement of Water Truck 0 200,000 0
425,400 625,400 265,602 42.47%Machinery and EquipmentNew Tarpomatic System 240,000 240,000 0New LGF Monitoring System 20,000 20,000 0New Paint Can Crusher 30,000 30,000 10,440 34.80%Upgrade Recycling Centre Cameras 7,000 7,000 6,480 92.57%Chemical Toilet Facilities 15,000 15,000 16,563 110.42%New Laser Level 0 6,000 4,600 76.67%New Leak Detector / Gas Detector 0 2,000 0Ground Monitor 0 4,000 0Weighbridge DVR Recorder Upgrade 0 6,000 5,380 89.67%
312,000 330,000 43,463 13.17%
TOTAL PLANT, VEHICLES AND MACHINERIES 737,400 955,400 309,065 32.35%
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENTComputer EquipmentReplacement of Laptop (Operations Manager) 3,500 3,500 0Replacement of Desktop PC (Finance Officer-Reporting) 1,500 1,500 785 52.34%Replacement of Desktop PC (Foreman) 1,500 1,500 864 57.59%Replacement of Desktop PC (Envrironmental Officer) 1,500 1,500 785 52.34%Replacement of Laptop (Administration Manager) 2,500 2,500 2,149 85.96%Replacement of Laptop (Waste Education Officer) 2,500 2,500 2,149 85.96%Various Replacement Printers and Computing Equipments 15,000 15,000 11,953 79.69%New Desktop PC (Finance Officer-Accts Payable) 1,500 1,500 0Additional UPS System (Admin and Recycling) 2,000 2,000 0Replacement of Servers at Administration Building 0 50,000 0
31,500 81,500 18,685 22.93%Office Furniture and EquipmentReplacement of Furniture and Equipment 26,400 26,400 17,791 67.39%Purchase of New Office Equipment 13,000 13,000 03x Storage Cabinets 5,000 5,000 2,771 55.42%
44,400 44,400 20,562 46.31%
TOTAL FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 75,900 125,900 39,247 31.17%
LAND AND BUILDINGSLandbrought forward item:Land Purchase (New Landfill Site) 12,000,000 12,000,000 0
12,000,000 12,000,000 0 0.00%BuildingsWorkshop Extension (Work in Progress) 250,000 350,000 0Ground Maintenance Shed 10,000 10,000 0
260,000 360,000 0 0.00%
TOTAL LAND AND BUILDINGS 12,260,000 12,360,000 0 0.00%
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTATEMENT OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES
For the month ended 30 April 2010
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 132
Description Adopted Budget Revised Budget YTD Actual% to Revised
Budget Note
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTATEMENT OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES
For the month ended 30 April 2010
INFRASTRUCTUREOperationsLitter Control Fences (Work in Progress) 75,000 75,000 31,739 42.32%Reticulation 7,000 7,000 5,837 83.39%Upgrade Recycling Centre Water Main 10,000 19,000 0brought forward item:Surveillance and Boom Gate 15,000 15,000 0 0.00%
107,000 116,000 37,576 32.39%Resource Recovery FacilitySite Infrastructure 829,000 829,000 761,462 91.85%
829,000 829,000 761,462 91.85%
TOTAL INFRASTUCTURE 936,000 945,000 799,039 84.55%
LANDFILL EXCAVATIONSExcavation - Phase3 Stage2Construction 8,208,700 3,508,700 0Design 300,000 300,000 183,697Excavation/Earthworks 7,720,000 3,520,000 3,268,907MRC Project Manager 40,000 40,000 7,123Siteworks, Survey, Etc. 20,000 20,000 6,890TOTAL LANDFILL EXCAVATIONS 16,288,700 7,388,700 3,466,616 46.92%
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 133
NOTES FOR VARIATIONS - STATEMENT OF INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Note # Description of Item Nature of Variance where actual is 10% and $5,000 from YTD Budget
1 Replacement of Workshop Vehicle
The cost over run was due to fittings of additional accessories required for operational purposes. Savings from the replacement of Foreman and Fire vehicle will cover the cost.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 134
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
ON
BO
RR
OW
ING
S
(a)
Loan
Sch
edul
e an
d In
tere
st E
xpen
se
Act
ual
Prin
cipa
l R
epay
men
tsPr
inci
pal
Out
stan
ding
Inte
rest
R
epay
men
tsN
ote
Valu
e of
Loa
n A
ppro
ved
Mat
ures
Inte
rest
R
ates
Prin
cipa
l 01
/07/
2009
Prin
cipa
l D
raw
n D
own
to 3
1/03
/201
0A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10C
omm
unity
Am
eniti
esTa
mal
a Pa
rk L
andf
illLo
an 8
- B
uild
ing
Upg
rade
650,
000
May
-14
6.45
%37
6,43
50
49,1
3432
7,30
118
,908
2Lo
an 1
2 - C
onst
ruct
ion
Sta
ge 2
Pha
se 2
15,0
00,0
00M
ar-1
25.
98%
11,2
49,9
690
1,25
0,01
09,
999,
958
375,
873
3Lo
an 1
3 - R
edra
w fo
r Pha
se 3
Lan
dfill
6,60
0,00
00
00
00
Loan
14
- New
Lan
dfill
Pur
chas
e12
,000
,000
00
00
0R
egio
nal R
esou
rce
Rec
over
y Fa
cilit
yLo
an 1
1 - R
RF
Land
Pur
chas
e3,
500,
000
May
-25
5.97
%1,
940,
815
013
9,23
71,
801,
578
241,
110
2Lo
an 1
0a -
RR
F In
frast
ruct
ure
2,00
0,00
0M
ar-2
56.
16%
1,76
6,65
80
78,9
231,
687,
735
78,4
722
Loan
10b
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e (In
tere
st O
nly)
2,60
0,00
0V
aria
ble
2,60
0,00
00
02,
600,
000
86,4
761
Loan
10c
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e4,
000,
000
Jun-
147.
97%
4,00
0,00
00
370,
370
3,62
9,63
027
7,19
0TO
TAL
46,3
50,0
0021
,933
,877
01,
887,
674
20,0
46,2
021,
078,
029
Faci
lity
Fee
45,4
17To
tal B
orro
win
g C
osts
1,12
3,44
5
Not
e 1:
Loa
n 10
b - $
2,60
0,00
0 ha
s a
varia
ble
rate
of 5
.52%
for t
he m
onth
of A
pril
2010
Not
e 2:
Tot
al L
oan
Inte
rest
acc
rued
for A
pril
2010
= $
28,7
16.2
8N
ote
3: P
rinci
pal p
aym
ents
are
mad
e qu
arte
rly.
ITEM 8.1.6
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 135
ITEM 8.1.7 LIST OF PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE MONTHS ENDED 31 MARCH 2010 AND 30 APRIL 2010 File No: FIN/5-02 (D/10/4125) Attachment(s): 1. List of payments made for the month ended 31 March 2010 2. List of payments made for the month ended 30 April 2010 Author: Kalwant Dhillon
SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide details of payments made during the periods identified. It is also a requirement as part of the delegation given to the Chief Executive Officer, to make payments from the Municipal Fund, that a list of payments made since the last Ordinary Council meeting be presented to Council. COMMENT The lists of payments for the months ended 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010 are at Attachment One and Two to this Item and are presented for endorsement. Payments have been made in accordance with delegations that allow payments between meetings and are subsequently required to be presented to the next Council meeting following such payments. Further, at the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 15 October 2009, the Council delegated to the Chief Executive Officer the exercise of its power to make payments from the Municipal Fund. This delegation has been renewed upon annual reviews. In order to satisfy the requirements of Clause 13(2) of the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations, a list of payments made must be submitted to the next Council meeting following such payments. It should be noted that generally all payments are GST inclusive and Mindarie Regional Council is able to claim this tax as an input credit when remittance of GST collected is made each month. Months Ended Account Vouchers Amount 31 March 2010 General Municipal 5339 – 5534
DP 363 – DP 377 EFT 229 – EFT 232 $3,025,104.75
30 April 2010 General Municipal 5535 – 5717 DP 378 – DP 392 EFT 233 – EFT 236 $3,084,343.38
MRC OFFICER RECOMMENDATION That Council endorse the list of payments made, as per the delegation made to the Chief Executive Officer, for the months ended 31 March 2010 and 30 April 2010.
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 136
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 8.1.7
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
LIST OF PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE MONTH ENDED 31 MARCH 2010
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 137
Che
que
Post
ing
Dat
eD
ocum
ent
No.
Vend
or N
ame
Des
crip
tion
Che
que
Am
ount
2/03
/201
053
39A
ster
on P
ortfo
lio S
ervi
ces
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$330
.28
2/03
/201
053
40C
BU
SS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$3
19.0
72/
03/2
010
5341
CH
ILD
SU
PPO
RT
Chi
ld S
uppo
rt A
llow
ance
pay
men
t - D
educ
tion
mad
e fro
m s
taff
sala
ry$4
92.3
02/
03/2
010
5342
Hea
lth In
sura
nce
Fund
of W
AS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$3
81.1
02/
03/2
010
5343
HES
TA S
UPE
R F
UN
DS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$1
,412
.41
2/03
/201
053
44H
OST
PLU
SS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$4
2.32
2/03
/201
053
45M
inda
rie R
egio
nal C
ounc
il St
aff L
otto
Acc
oun t
Sta
ff lo
tto -
Ded
ucte
d fro
m s
taff
sala
ry$3
70.0
02/
03/2
010
5346
Port
folio
focu
s - P
rem
ium
Ret
irem
ent S
ervi
ces
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$3,4
85.0
02/
03/2
010
5347
RES
T Su
pera
nnua
tion
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$437
.02
2/03
/201
053
48Sp
ectr
um S
upe r
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$45.
142/
03/2
010
5349
WA
LGS
PLA
N P
TY L
T DS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$3
3,70
0.79
2/03
/201
053
50W
ESTS
CH
EME
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$823
.64
2/03
/201
053
53O
PTU
S C
OM
MU
NIC
ATI
ON
STe
leph
one
Exp
ense
s $2
,061
.52
3/03
/201
053
54PE
TTY
CA
S HP
etty
cas
h re
imbu
rsem
ent
$587
.00
8/03
/201
053
55PE
TTY
CA
S HP
etty
cas
h re
imbu
rsem
ent
$789
.30
9/03
/201
053
56M
ULT
IPR
OG
RA
MM
ING
PTY
LT D
Com
pute
r Sys
tem
s M
aint
enan
ce N
ov'0
9,D
ec'0
9 &
Jan
'10
$48,
611.
1210
/03/
2010
5357
NO
RTH
SID
E N
ISSA
NP
urch
ase
of re
plac
emen
t veh
icle
PLA
NT6
9$3
8,71
0.00
11/0
3/20
1053
58A
UST
RA
LIA
PO
ST -
PER
T HP
ost o
ffice
box
rene
wal
ser
vice
fee
$79.
5011
/03/
2010
5359
Bun
ning
s B
uild
ing
Supp
lies
Exp
enda
ble
Tool
s$6
10.4
311
/03/
2010
5360
EMR
CC
olle
ctio
n of
mat
tress
es$2
,365
.00
11/0
3/20
1053
61H
ITA
CH
I CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
MA
CH
INER
YR
epai
rs &
mai
nten
ance
of A
rticu
late
d du
mp
truck
$2,3
80.2
811
/03/
2010
5362
Joon
dalu
p O
ffice
Nat
iona
lS
tatio
nery
and
Prin
ting
$692
.89
11/0
3/20
1053
63JO
ON
DA
LUP
RES
OR
TC
EA
G M
eetin
g ex
pens
es$7
18.0
011
/03/
2010
5364
Kap
ish
Ptyl
Ltd
TRIM
Exp
lore
r Lic
ense
s$5
,742
.00
11/0
3/20
1053
65M
AG
NET
IC A
UTO
MA
TIO
N P
TY L
T DM
agne
tic A
utom
atio
n B
oom
gate
- R
RF
$5,8
30.0
011
/03/
2010
5366
Ofa
Fot
uC
ontra
ct la
bour
- A
ustra
lia D
ay S
urve
y$1
65.0
011
/03/
2010
5367
Ric
hard
s M
inin
g Se
rvic
eS
taff
Trai
ning
$4
80.0
011
/03/
2010
5368
TELS
TRA
Tele
phon
e E
xpen
ses
$357
.87
11/0
3/20
1053
69M
iche
lle M
yers
Con
tract
labo
ur -
Aus
tralia
Day
Sur
vey
$520
.00
11/0
3/20
1053
70A
ir W
ell P
umps
Pty
Lt d
Leac
hate
Sys
tem
Man
agem
ent -
Bor
e 2
$47,
364.
5512
/03/
2010
5371
Cla
ire C
herie
Con
tract
labo
ur -
Aus
tralia
Day
Sur
vey
$285
.00
15/0
3/20
1053
72C
athy
Gib
son
Pur
chas
e Le
ave
sche
me
paym
ent
$2,1
27.9
615
/03/
2010
5373
Min
darie
Reg
iona
l Cou
ncil
Staf
f Lot
to A
ccou
n tS
taff
lotto
- D
educ
ted
from
sta
ff sa
lary
$370
.00
16/0
3/20
1053
74R
ydge
s C
ronu
lla B
each
Sta
ff tra
inin
g - r
adia
tion
mon
itorin
g$1
,284
.00
16/0
3/20
1053
75N
ovot
el T
win
Wat
ers
Res
ort
Sta
ff co
nfer
ence
- ro
ad m
arki
ng$5
37.0
016
/03/
2010
5376
Dev
co H
oldi
ngs
Pty
Ltd
Out
boun
d W
eigh
brid
ge re
pairs
$21,
540.
2018
/03/
2010
5377
Bio
visi
on 2
020
Pty
Ltd
Sho
rtpay
men
t - J
uly'
09 C
ontra
ctor
fees
(RR
F)$2
5,14
0.74
18/0
3/20
1053
78Ja
snea
tC
lean
ing
of B
uild
ings
$125
.40
18/0
3/20
1053
79Po
ppy
van
Oor
de-G
rain
ger
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Edu
catio
n - B
atte
ry la
unch
cos
tum
es/d
esig
n$8
00.0
019
/03/
2010
5380
Joon
dalu
p O
ffice
Nat
iona
lS
tatio
nery
and
Prin
ting
$157
.33
19/0
3/20
1053
81Fu
ji Xe
rox
Aus
tral
ia P
ty L
t dP
hoto
copi
er L
ease
$4
13.3
119
/03/
2010
5383
MU
LTIP
RO
GR
AM
MIN
G P
TY L
T DC
ompu
ter S
yste
ms
Mai
nten
ance
& R
RF
expe
nses
- Fe
b'10
$7,5
97.6
519
/03/
2010
5384
IW P
roje
cts
Con
tract
Lab
our E
xter
nal -
RR
F$1
6,60
4.61
19/0
3/20
1053
85D
epar
tmen
t of E
nviro
nmen
t & C
onse
rvat
ion
Tarp
omat
ic W
orks
App
rova
l App
licat
ion
$1,6
90.0
0
Sche
dule
of P
aym
ent f
or M
arch
201
0C
ounc
il M
eetin
g - 1
Jul
y 20
10
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 138
19/0
3/20
1053
86H
SE C
ontr
ol P
ty L
tdC
ontra
ct L
abou
r Ext
erna
l $1
6,50
0.00
19/0
3/20
1053
87C
ALT
EX A
UST
RA
LIA
PET
RO
LEU
M P
T YP
lant
- Fu
el a
nd O
il$5
71.4
819
/03/
2010
5388
AU
STR
ALI
A P
OST
- PE
RT H
Pos
tage
& F
reig
ht
$436
.62
19/0
3/20
1053
89Fu
ji Xe
rox
Aus
tral
ia P
ty L
t dP
hoto
copy
ing
Exp
ense
s - S
uppo
rt se
rvic
es
$96.
4219
/03/
2010
5390
Can
celle
d C
ance
lled
$0.0
022
/03/
2010
5391
PETT
Y C
AS H
Pet
ty c
ash
reim
burs
emen
t$7
64.1
019
/03/
2010
5392
MU
LTIP
RO
GR
AM
MIN
G P
TY L
T DC
ompu
ter S
yste
ms
Mai
nten
ance
incl
udin
g R
RF
$10,
610.
4222
/03/
2010
5393
TOTA
LLY
WO
RK
WEA
RS
taff
Uni
form
$487
.69
22/0
3/20
1053
94M
CIN
ERN
EY F
OR
DP
urch
ase
of re
plac
emen
t car
- pa
ymen
t afte
r tra
de in
PLA
NT7
3$1
3,24
5.25
22/0
3/20
1053
95A
IR M
ET S
CIE
NTI
FIC
PTY
LT D
GE
M20
00 L
FG M
onito
r hire
$165
.00
22/0
3/20
1053
96A
nim
al P
est
Man
agem
ent
Serv
ice s
Bui
ldin
g M
aint
enan
ce -
Pes
t Con
trol
$1,2
76.0
022
/03/
2010
5397
Bio
Bag
Aus
tral
asia
Pty
Ltd
Bio
bags
,Bio
bins
pur
chas
e$3
,102
.00
22/0
3/20
1053
98C
astle
Sec
urity
& E
lect
rical
Pt y
Bui
ldin
g S
ecur
ity m
obile
resp
onse
$542
.50
22/0
3/20
1053
99C
ity o
f Wan
nero
oC
olle
ctio
n of
add
ition
al b
ins
$475
.20
22/0
3/20
1054
00C
oast
al S
wee
ping
Cle
anin
g ex
pens
es -
RR
F$3
53.1
022
/03/
2010
5401
Cor
pora
te E
xpre
ss A
ustr
alia
Lim
ited
Com
pute
r con
sum
able
s $2
2.00
22/0
3/20
1054
02C
oven
trys
Exp
enda
ble
Tool
s$2
,309
.47
22/0
3/20
1054
03D
omai
n C
ater
ing
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Edu
catio
n$1
52.8
022
/03/
2010
5404
DR
IVE
IN E
LEC
TRIC
SA
ir-co
n re
pairs
- In
tern
atio
nal T
ruck
$5,1
91.7
522
/03/
2010
5405
DU
STE X
Sup
ply
Dus
tex
liqui
d co
ncen
trate
$14,
272.
5022
/03/
2010
5406
Exce
l Win
dow
Cle
anin
gC
lean
ing
of B
uild
ings
win
dow
s$3
30.0
022
/03/
2010
5407
Gle
nmar
ri Pt
y Lt
dP
hosp
hite
via
folia
spr
ay/s
tem
inje
ctio
n $5
,100
.00
22/0
3/20
1054
08Ja
snea
tC
lean
ing
of B
uild
ings
$107
.14
22/0
3/20
1054
09K
INR
OSS
SU
PA IG
AS
taff
Am
eniti
es$4
45.0
322
/03/
2010
5410
LGIS
PR
OPE
RT Y
Mun
icip
al P
rope
rty In
sura
nce
prem
ium
$3,7
81.8
222
/03/
2010
5411
MO
BIL
E M
AST
ERS
Ref
it 2
way
and
UH
F to
Pat
rol f
ire u
te$1
84.8
022
/03/
2010
5412
MS
Hel
en G
riffit
hsR
eim
burs
emen
t of t
rave
lling
exp
ense
s - C
EA
G m
eetin
g$4
9.53
22/0
3/20
1054
13N
ever
fail
Sprin
gwat
er L
tdS
taff
Am
eniti
es$9
8.10
22/0
3/20
1054
14N
orth
ern
Dis
tric
ts P
est M
anag
emen
tB
uild
ing
Mai
nten
ance
- P
est C
ontro
l$1
54.0
022
/03/
2010
5415
Patte
r Mer
chan
ts W
A P
ty L
tdTe
leph
one
Exp
ense
s $4
6.90
22/0
3/20
1054
16ST
JO
HN
AM
BU
LAN
CE
Sta
ff tra
inin
g$1
,344
.60
22/0
3/20
1054
17St
aff L
ink
Con
tract
Lab
our h
ire$1
,986
.20
22/0
3/20
1054
18Ve
olia
Env
ironm
enta
l Ser
vice
sB
in h
ire -
Bul
ky w
aste
min
imis
atio
n pr
ojec
t$1
19.1
622
/03/
2010
5419
WA
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t Ass
ocia
tion
Adv
ertis
ing
expe
nses
$3,3
29.9
622
/03/
2010
5420
Wat
er D
ynam
ics
Ser
vice
/repl
ace
sprin
kler
s$8
72.2
622
/03/
2010
5421
WES
T C
OA
ST C
OLL
EGE
OF
TAF E
Sta
ff Tr
aini
ng
$138
.00
22/0
3/20
1054
22W
OR
K C
LOB
BER
Saf
ety
glas
ses
$175
.50
22/0
3/20
1054
23LA
ND
FILL
GA
S &
PO
WER
PTY
LT D
Ele
ctric
ity e
xpen
ses
$3,5
90.9
224
/03/
2010
5424
Aln
ew E
lect
rical
Ser
vice
sS
pare
key
for e
lect
ric g
ate
on-s
ite$4
2.00
24/0
3/20
1054
25C
LEA
N S
WEE
PA
cces
s R
oad
Mai
nten
ance
$1,1
34.3
824
/03/
2010
5426
Cou
pler
s M
alag
aR
ecyc
ling
Con
tract
ors
$191
.52
24/0
3/20
1054
27D
ig E
arth
Con
trac
ting
Sta
ff tra
inin
g$8
50.0
024
/03/
2010
5428
Hay
s Sp
ecia
list R
ecru
itmen
t (A
ustr
alia
) P/ L
Con
tract
labo
ur h
ire -
tem
pora
ry s
taff
$915
.75
24/0
3/20
1054
29H
eggi
es P
ty L
tdC
onsu
ltanc
y - L
andf
ill G
as M
igra
tion
$3,3
55.0
024
/03/
2010
5430
KD
Aire
Mec
hani
cal a
nd E
lect
rical
Ser
vice
sB
uild
ing
Mai
nten
ance
$3
,508
.45
24/0
3/20
1054
31M
il-te
k W
aste
Sol
utio
nsS
uppl
y an
d In
stal
l Can
cru
sher
s$1
1,48
4.00
24/0
3/20
1054
32R
L &
Son
s Tr
ansp
ort
Was
te M
inim
isat
ion
proj
ect -
Cle
an2S
tream
$885
.50
24/0
3/20
1054
33R
ed 1
1 Pt
y Lt
dC
ompu
ter c
onsu
mab
les
$293
.82
24/0
3/20
1054
34Si
gma
Che
mic
als
Bio
dies
el fo
r fue
l tan
ks o
n-si
te$1
32.0
0
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 139
24/0
3/20
1054
35Th
e H
UB
Mar
ketin
g C
omm
unic
atio
n Pt
y Lt
dC
onsu
ltanc
y - W
aste
Min
imis
atio
n pr
ojec
t$3
,129
.50
24/0
3/20
1054
36W
esTr
ac P
ty L
tdE
ngin
e O
il fo
r on-
site
pla
nt v
ehic
les
$1,3
99.1
324
/03/
2010
5437
Yakk
a Pt
y Lt
dS
taff
Uni
form
s/P
rote
ctiv
e C
loth
ing
$361
.50
24/0
3/20
1054
38Ya
kka
Pty
Ltd
Pro
tect
ive
Clo
thin
g S
afet
y ve
sts
$278
.08
24/0
3/20
1054
39Ya
kka
Pty
Ltd
Pro
tect
ive
Clo
thin
g S
afet
y ve
sts
$472
.74
24/0
3/20
1054
40D
ept o
f Pla
nnin
g &
Infr
astr
uctu
re F
rem
antle
Offi
ceV
ehic
le s
earc
h$4
3.50
24/0
3/20
1054
41C
ance
lled
Can
celle
d$0
.00
25/0
3/20
1054
42B
unni
ngs
Bui
ldin
g Su
pplie
sLa
nsca
ping
- R
RF
$3,1
73.7
925
/03/
2010
5443
NA
TIO
NW
IDE
OI L
Rec
yclin
g C
ontra
ctor
s - w
aste
oil
$425
.70
25/0
3/20
1054
44TE
LSTR
ATe
leph
one
expe
nses
$412
.50
25/0
3/20
1054
45C
ity o
f Joo
ndal
upLe
ase
Fee
for L
ot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for A
pril
10$8
,876
.11
25/0
3/20
1054
46To
wn
of V
ince
n tLe
ase
Fee
for L
ot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for A
pril
10$4
,438
.06
25/0
3/20
1054
47C
ity o
f Per
thLe
ase
Fee
for L
ot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for A
pril
10$4
,438
.06
25/0
3/20
1054
48C
ity o
f Stir
ling
Leas
e F
ee fo
r Lot
118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r Apr
il 10
$17,
752.
2325
/03/
2010
5449
City
of W
anne
roo
Leas
e F
ee fo
r Lot
118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r Apr
il 10
$8,8
76.1
125
/03/
2010
5450
Tow
n of
Cam
brid
g eLe
ase
Fee
for L
ot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for A
pril
10$4
,438
.06
25/0
3/20
1054
51To
wn
of V
icto
ria P
ark
Leas
e F
ee fo
r Lot
118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r Apr
il 10
$4,4
38.0
625
/03/
2010
5452
Envi
rote
ch D
rillin
g Pt
y Lt
dLa
ndfil
l Gas
Mon
itorin
g - D
rillin
g$3
4,53
1.75
26/0
3/20
1054
53PE
TTY
CA
S HP
etty
cas
h re
imbu
rsem
ent
$846
.15
26/0
3/20
1054
54C
HIL
D S
UPP
OR
TC
hild
Sup
port
Allo
wan
ce p
aym
ent -
Ded
uctio
n m
ade
from
sta
ff sa
lary
$492
.30
26/0
3/20
1054
55H
ealth
Insu
ranc
e Fu
nd o
f WA
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$381
.10
26/0
3/20
1054
56M
inda
rie R
egio
nal C
ounc
il St
aff L
otto
Acc
oun t
Sta
ff lo
tto -
Ded
ucte
d fro
m s
taff
sala
ry$3
70.0
026
/03/
2010
5457
-547
5C
ance
lled
Can
celle
d - N
ote
1$0
.00
30/0
3/20
1054
76A
RM
AG
UA
RD
Cas
h co
llect
ion
fee
$648
.87
31/0
3/20
1054
77A
ir Li
quid
e W
A P
ty L
t dN
itrog
en g
as -
bottl
e hi
re$8
9.86
31/0
3/20
1054
78A
lanc
e N
ewsp
aper
& M
agaz
ine
Del
iver
yS
ubsc
riptio
ns$2
3.55
31/0
3/20
1054
79C
AR
DN
O (W
A) P
TY L
T DC
onsu
ltanc
y - D
amag
ed c
ompo
ster
s at
RR
F$2
,442
.00
31/0
3/20
1054
80C
ity o
f Wan
nero
oC
olle
ctio
n of
rubb
ish
bins
$356
.40
31/0
3/20
1054
81C
omm
and
A C
omE
FTP
OS
mac
hine
repa
irs a
t wei
ghbr
idge
$335
.50
31/0
3/20
1054
82C
oupl
ers
Mal
aga
Leac
hate
Sys
tem
Man
agem
ent
$631
.37
31/0
3/20
1054
83C
ube
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
tdS
ubsc
riptio
ns -
INX
sys
tem
s In
cont
rol &
In T
uitio
n$7
86.5
031
/03/
2010
5484
EMR
CC
olle
ctio
n of
mat
tress
es$2
,310
.00
31/0
3/20
1054
85Fr
eehi
llsLe
gal E
xpen
ses
$17,
033.
5631
/03/
2010
5486
Fuji
Xero
x A
ustr
alia
Pty
Lt d
Pho
toco
pier
Lea
se
$356
.40
31/0
3/20
1054
87G
eofa
bric
s A
ust.
Pty
Ltd
Rol
l of g
rass
root
s $9
79.0
031
/03/
2010
5488
GO
LDER
ASS
OC
IATE
S PT
Y LT
DC
onsu
ltanc
y - A
nnua
l com
plia
nce
audi
t$2
2,04
1.64
31/0
3/20
1054
89G
reat
Sou
ther
n Sa
nds
Pla
nt h
ire -
Dum
p tru
ck$6
,160
.00
31/0
3/20
1054
90H
& L
GLA
SSFi
t gla
ss p
anes
to B
omag
com
pact
or$3
90.0
031
/03/
2010
5491
HEA
LTH
ON
TH
E M
OV E
Erg
omov
e as
sess
men
ts &
repo
rts$3
43.7
531
/03/
2010
5492
Inst
ant P
rodu
cts
Gro
upS
ervi
ce o
f mob
ile to
ilets
on-
site
$187
.00
31/0
3/20
1054
93Ja
snea
tC
lean
ing
of B
uild
ings
$1
,463
.00
31/0
3/20
1054
94Jo
hn K
ing
Con
sulta
nts
Con
sulta
ncy
- Com
post
er C
rack
s$4
,950
.00
31/0
3/20
1054
95K
eyno
te C
onfe
renc
esW
aste
Con
fere
nce
- 201
0$2
13.0
031
/03/
2010
5496
L &
T V
enab
les
Exp
enda
ble
Tool
s$1
32.3
231
/03/
2010
5497
LAK
E A
NN
E C
ON
SULT
AN
CY
Con
sulta
ncy-
HR
M$6
10.0
031
/03/
2010
5498
LGIS
WO
RK
CA
RE
Wor
kcar
e pr
emiu
m$1
3,43
4.30
31/0
3/20
1054
99M
EEC
Wat
er S
uppl
y Ta
nk C
onne
ctio
ns -
RR
F$1
3,91
7.20
31/0
3/20
1055
00M
ERC
UR
YC
ourie
r cha
rges
$1,0
43.8
331
/03/
2010
5501
MO
BIL
E M
AST
ERS
Fitti
ng o
f tw
o w
ay a
nd U
HF
for w
aste
edu
catio
n ve
hicl
e$3
,078
.35
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 140
31/0
3/20
1055
02M
ULT
IPR
OG
RA
MM
ING
PTY
LTD
RR
F - I
T se
t up
serv
ices
$140
.99
31/0
3/20
1055
03N
ATI
ON
AL
TYR
E SP
unct
ure
repa
irs -
Dum
p tru
ck a
nd c
ater
pilla
r loa
der
$676
.50
31/0
3/20
1055
04N
ever
fail
Sprin
gwat
er L
tdS
taff
Am
eniti
es
$99.
3531
/03/
2010
5505
NEW
CA
STLE
WEI
GH
ING
SER
VIC
ES P
TW
aste
man
Sof
twar
e su
ppor
t $1
1,74
2.50
31/0
3/20
1055
06Pe
rthw
aste
Pty
Ltd
Ass
embl
y &
dis
tribu
tion
of B
iobi
ns$1
6,32
4.92
31/0
3/20
1055
07Po
st N
ewsp
aper
s Pt
y Lt
dA
dver
tisin
g ex
pens
es -
Was
te E
duca
tion
Cen
tre$5
20.9
631
/03/
2010
5508
QU
INN
S R
OC
K C
AB
INET
S &
MA
INTE
NB
obca
t Hire
- R
RF
Land
scap
e$2
,898
.50
31/0
3/20
1055
09Q
UIN
NS
RO
CK
EA
RTH
MO
VIN
GC
allo
ut F
itter
for T
ana
360
$198
.00
31/0
3/20
1055
10R
ed 1
1 Pt
y Lt
dP
urch
ase
of c
ompu
ter e
quip
men
t$9
75.3
731
/03/
2010
5511
Rel
ianc
e Pe
trol
eum
Dis
tilla
te$3
3,30
2.62
31/0
3/20
1055
12SB
S Si
ms
Gro
upE
-Was
te R
ecyc
ling
Con
tract
ors
$12,
228.
4331
/03/
2010
5513
Staf
f Lin
kC
ontra
ct L
abou
r hire
$971
.10
31/0
3/20
1055
14SU
RVE
Y G
RA
PHIC
SP
rofe
ssio
nal s
ervi
ces
- Tam
ala
Par
k A
eria
l Sur
vey
$9,7
27.3
031
/03/
2010
5515
SYN
NO
TT M
ULH
OLL
AN
D M
AN
AG
EMEN
T C
ontra
ct la
bour
- M
arke
ting
& w
aste
edu
catio
n$1
2,36
4.00
31/0
3/20
1055
16TE
LSTR
ATe
leph
one
Exp
ense
s$2
,100
.35
31/0
3/20
1055
17C
ance
lled
Can
celle
d$0
.00
31/0
3/20
1055
18Ti
nt-a
-Car
- C
lark
son
Tint
ing
win
dow
s fo
r Tan
a G
360
$498
.00
31/0
3/20
1055
19U
RS
Con
sulta
ncy
- RR
F In
frast
ruct
ure
$3,6
74.0
031
/03/
2010
5520
Vent
oura
s A
dver
tisin
g &
Des
ign
RR
F -
broc
hure
des
ign
& a
rtwor
k$8
69.0
031
/03/
2010
5521
Woo
dhou
se L
egal
Lega
l Exp
ense
s $1
,608
.20
31/0
3/20
1055
22C
LEA
N S
WEE
PA
cces
s R
oad
Mai
nten
ance
$859
.38
31/0
3/20
1055
23C
ompu
ter I
nfor
mat
ion
Serv
ices
TRIM
Sup
port
$2,2
00.0
031
/03/
2010
5524
OPT
US
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
NS
Tele
phon
e E
xpen
ses
$748
.24
31/0
3/20
1055
25W
esTr
ac P
ty L
tdR
epai
rs &
mai
nten
ance
of M
ulti-
terr
ain
load
er &
Cat
erpi
llar 9
66H
load
er$6
,078
.78
31/0
3/20
1055
26D
RA
GE
SIG
NS
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Edu
catio
n - H
ouse
Hol
d H
azar
dous
Was
te$1
87.0
031
/03/
2010
5527
Equi
libriu
m C
omm
unic
atio
nH
ouse
Hol
d H
azar
dous
Was
te b
roch
ure
- Was
te E
duca
tion
Cen
tre$2
64.0
031
/03/
2010
5528
GH
D P
TY L
T DW
aste
Min
imis
atio
n pr
ojec
t - In
frast
ruct
ure
Was
te m
anag
emen
t$1
,652
.34
31/0
3/20
1055
29H
odge
& C
olla
rdA
rchi
tect
ural
con
sulta
nt -
Tend
er P
repa
ratio
n$2
,244
.00
31/0
3/20
1055
30H
odge
& C
olla
rdA
rchi
tect
ural
con
sulta
nt -
Tend
er P
repa
ratio
n$5
,720
.00
31/0
3/20
1055
31W
este
rn P
lant
Hire
(WA
) Pty
Ltd
Pla
nt h
ire -
JCB
Fas
trac
$4,5
65.0
031
/03/
2010
5532
Wes
tern
Pla
nt H
ire (W
A) P
ty L
tdP
lant
hire
- S
kid
Ste
er$1
,232
.00
31/0
3/20
1055
33En
cycl
e C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
Was
te m
inim
isat
ion
proj
ect -
Sky
wor
ks w
aste
ass
essm
ents
$9,5
86.5
031
/03/
2010
5534
AU
SRA
LIA
N P
C U
SER
Sub
scrip
tions
$74.
95To
tal C
hequ
e Pa
ymen
ts$7
33,6
61.4
8
1/03
/201
0D
P-0
0363
Iinet
Lim
ited
Inte
rnet
VO
IP c
harg
e$4
01.2
91/
03/2
010
DP
-003
64N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kN
atio
nal O
nlin
e Fe
e$5
2.00
15/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0365
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Loan
12
repa
ymen
t$5
65,1
60.0
015
/03/
2010
DP
-003
66N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kN
AB
Con
nect
Fee
$20.
0015
/03/
2010
DP
-003
67N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kB
ill D
raw
dow
n Fe
e$1
50.0
022
/03/
2010
DP
-003
68N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kLo
an F
acili
ty F
ee$9
,999
.96
22/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0369
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Cre
dit C
ard
paym
ent
$10,
627.
1022
/03/
2010
DP
-003
70A
ustr
alia
n Ta
xatio
n O
ffice
BA
S F
ebru
ary
2010
$110
,310
.00
24/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0371
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Ove
rdra
ft Fa
cilit
y fe
e$4
,000
.00
26/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0372
Com
mon
wea
lth B
ank
Loan
10B
repa
ymen
t$8
,596
.38
30/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0373
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Loan
10C
repa
ymen
t$6
1,68
9.95
30/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0374
Can
celle
d C
ance
lled
$0.0
030
/03/
2010
DP
-003
75N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kB
ill D
raw
dow
n Fe
e $1
50.0
031
/03/
2010
DP
-003
76N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kA
ccou
nt K
eepi
ng F
ee$1
43.3
0
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 141
31/0
3/20
10D
P-0
0377
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Faci
lity
Fee
Loan
10C
$4,5
83.3
3To
tal D
irect
Pay
men
ts$7
75,8
83.3
1
12/0
3/20
10E
FT-0
0229
Can
celle
dC
ance
lled
$0.0
012
/03/
2010
EFT
-002
30M
RC
Pay
roll
Em
ploy
ee W
ages
$107
,696
.67
26/0
3/20
10E
FT-0
0231
MR
CP
ayro
ll E
mpl
oyee
Wag
es$1
10,8
11.9
729
/03/
2010
EFT
-002
32B
iovi
sion
202
0 Pt
y Lt
dC
ontra
ctor
s fe
es -
RR
F$1
,297
,051
.32
Tota
l EFT
Pay
men
t s$1
,515
,559
.96
Sum
mar
y Sc
hedu
le o
f Pay
men
ts
Che
que
Paym
ents
Che
que
No.
533
9 to
553
4$7
33,6
61.4
8
Elec
tron
ic P
aym
ents
DP-
003
63 to
DP-
003
77$7
75,8
83.3
1EF
T- 0
0229
to E
FT- 0
0232
$1,5
15,5
59.9
6
Gra
nd T
otal
$3,0
25,1
04.7
5
Not
e 1:
-Th
e ca
ncel
led
cheq
ues
rela
te to
che
que
prin
ting
issu
es o
n N
avis
ion
whi
ch h
ave
now
bee
n re
solv
ed.
CER
TIFI
CA
TE O
F C
HIE
F EX
ECU
TIVE
OFF
ICER
This
sch
edul
e of
acc
ount
s w
hich
was
pas
sed
for p
aym
ent,
cove
ring
vouc
hers
as
abov
e w
hich
was
subm
itted
to e
ach
mem
ber o
f Cou
ncil
on 1
st J
uly
2010
has
bee
n ch
ecke
d an
d is
fully
sup
port
edby
vou
cher
s an
d in
voic
es w
hich
are
sub
mitt
ed h
erew
ith a
nd w
hich
hav
e be
en d
uly
cert
ified
as
to th
e re
ceip
t of g
oods
and
the
rend
ition
of s
ervi
ces
and
as to
pric
es, c
ompu
tatio
ns, a
nd
cost
ing
and
the
amou
nts
due
for p
aym
ent.
CH
IEF
EXEC
UTI
VE O
FFIC
E R
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 142
ATTACHMENT TWO
TO ITEM 8.1.7
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
LIST OF PAYMENTS MADE FOR THE MONTH ENDED 30 APRIL 2010
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 143
Che
que
Post
ing
Dat
eD
ocum
ent
No.
Vend
or N
ame
Des
crip
tion
Che
que
Am
ount
1/04
/201
055
35R
EPC
O A
UTO
PA
RTS
-Cla
rkso
nP
lant
- R
epai
r and
Mai
nten
ance
$480
.77
1/04
/201
055
36C
abch
arge
Aus
tral
ia L
tdTr
avel
ling
Exp
ense
s$7
9.53
1/04
/201
055
37C
oven
trys
Exp
enda
ble
Tool
s$7
38.7
01/
04/2
010
5538
Hyd
er C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
Was
te m
inim
isat
ion
proj
ect -
Inte
grat
ed R
egio
nal P
lan
$14,
132.
911/
04/2
010
5539
Med
vet S
cien
ce P
ty L
tdD
rug
and
Alc
ohol
test
s$8
80.0
01/
04/2
010
5540
MPL
Lab
orat
orie
sA
naly
sis
of w
aste
wat
er tr
eatm
ent p
lant
$1,1
74.2
51/
04/2
010
5541
TUR
NK
EY IN
STR
UM
ENTS
PTY
LTD
Sup
ply
of O
siris
airb
orne
par
ticle
dus
t mon
itors
$5,8
24.5
01/
04/2
010
5542
Ber
twis
tle H
oldi
ngs
Pty
Ltd
Con
sulta
ncy
- Bra
ndin
g$1
,100
.00
1/04
/201
055
43D
isar
ect
Pur
chas
e of
offi
ce e
quip
men
t$3
96.0
01/
04/2
010
5544
Wes
beam
Pty
Ltd
RR
F la
ndsc
apin
g m
ater
ials
$550
.00
1/04
/201
055
45C
.M.I.
Saf
e C
o.P
urch
ase
of n
ew s
afe
for w
eigh
brid
ge$4
,500
.00
1/04
/201
055
46A
ster
on P
ortfo
lio S
ervi
ces
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$381
.33
1/04
/201
055
47A
ustr
alia
n Su
per A
dmin
istr
atio
nS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$1
47.4
11/
04/2
010
5548
CB
US
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$324
.05
1/04
/201
055
49H
ESTA
SU
PER
FU
ND
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$786
.23
1/04
/201
055
50H
OST
PLU
SS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$6
7.71
1/04
/201
055
51Po
rtfo
liofo
cus
- Pre
miu
m R
etire
men
t Ser
vice
sS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$1
,967
.00
1/04
/201
055
52R
EST
Supe
rann
uatio
nS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$4
37.0
21/
04/2
010
5553
Spec
trum
Sup
erS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$6
1.35
1/04
/201
055
54W
ALG
S PL
AN
PTY
LTD
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$36,
341.
721/
04/2
010
5555
WES
TSC
HEM
ES
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$7
18.1
87/
04/2
010
5556
AR
TPR
OO
F PR
INTI
NG
CO
Y PT
Y LT
DP
rintin
g of
ann
ual r
epor
ts$9
,217
.00
7/04
/201
055
57C
anno
n H
ygie
ne A
ustr
alia
Pty
Ltd
Gen
eral
Hyg
iene
Mai
nten
ance
$7
85.1
57/
04/2
010
5558
Dat
a#3
Mic
roso
ft O
ffice
Ann
ual l
icen
ses
$8,3
38.3
07/
04/2
010
5559
DEL
OIT
TEFi
nanc
ial W
orks
hop
Sep
tem
ber'0
9$1
7,01
6.14
7/04
/201
055
60Sa
lmat
Med
iaFo
rce
Flye
rs fo
r Joo
ndal
up H
ouse
hold
Haz
ardo
us (H
HW
) Day
$2
,785
.86
7/04
/201
055
61SA
PMEA
Con
fere
nce
- LG
MA
Nat
iona
l Con
gres
s 20
10$1
,715
.00
7/04
/201
055
62SA
PMEA
Con
fere
nce
- LG
MA
Nat
iona
l Con
gres
s 20
10$1
,715
.00
8/04
/201
055
63A
mbe
r Pro
pert
y M
aint
enan
ceTa
mal
a P
ark
- Bui
ldin
g cl
eani
ng s
uppl
ies
$231
.94
9/04
/201
055
64M
inda
rie R
egio
nal C
ounc
il St
aff L
otto
Acc
ount
Sta
ff lo
tto -
Ded
ucte
d fro
m s
taff
sala
ry$3
70.0
09/
04/2
010
5565
BR
YAN
T M
EDIA
Des
ign
annu
al re
port,
artw
ork
for p
ress
adv
ertis
emen
ts &
sig
nage
at R
RF
$9,5
15.0
012
/04/
2010
5566
AC
TIO
N L
OC
K S
ERVI
CE
Pad
lock
s fo
r HH
W c
ompo
und
$405
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
67A
IR M
ET S
CIE
NTI
FIC
PTY
LTD
Land
fill G
as M
onito
rs -
Hire
cha
rge
$660
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
68A
RTP
RO
OF
PRIN
TIN
G C
OY
PTY
LTD
Prin
ting
of b
roch
ures
- W
aste
Edu
catio
n$4
63.0
012
/04/
2010
5569
Aus
tral
ian
Inst
itute
of M
anag
emen
tS
taff
Trai
ning
$565
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
70B
ULL
IVA
NTS
PTY
LTD
Exp
enda
ble
Tool
s$6
41.3
012
/04/
2010
5571
Cas
tle S
ecur
ity &
Ele
ctric
al P
tyB
uild
ing
Sec
urity
$1,5
29.9
012
/04/
2010
5572
Cha
uffe
ur S
ervi
ces
Bus
tour
of T
amal
a P
ark
- Edu
catio
n C
entre
$200
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
73C
MA
Rec
yclin
gFl
uro
light
recy
clin
g$2
,299
.11
12/0
4/20
1055
74C
OM
MU
NIT
Y N
EWSP
APE
R G
RO
UP
Adv
ertis
emen
t exp
ense
s in
loca
l new
spap
ers
$7,7
16.7
212
/04/
2010
5575
Cor
pora
te E
xpre
ss A
ustr
alia
Lim
ited
Com
pute
r con
sum
able
s$2
90.0
012
/04/
2010
5576
Cub
e C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
Sub
scrip
tions
- IN
X s
yste
ms
Inco
ntro
l & In
Tui
tion
$786
.50
12/0
4/20
1055
77D
ata#
3A
crob
at S
tand
ard
Lice
nces
$237
.07
12/0
4/20
1055
78D
irect
Nat
iona
lO
ffice
Equ
ipm
ent M
aint
enan
ce$1
65.0
012
/04/
2010
5579
Dom
ain
Cat
erin
gC
ater
ing
expe
nses
- E
arth
care
rs c
ours
e$1
,102
.50
Sche
dule
of P
aym
ent f
or A
pril
2010
Cou
ncil
Mee
ting
- 1 J
uly
2010
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 144
12/0
4/20
1055
80D
UST
EXTr
ansp
orta
tion
of p
ick
up b
ins
from
site
$247
.50
12/0
4/20
1055
81EM
RC
Col
lect
ion
of m
attre
sses
$1,0
89.0
012
/04/
2010
5582
Fuji
Xero
x A
ustr
alia
Pty
Ltd
Con
sum
able
s - r
ecyc
led
pape
r $2
19.4
512
/04/
2010
5583
GC
M E
nviro
Pty
Ltd
Rep
lace
men
t of n
ew e
ngin
e fo
r Tan
a G
360
$31,
432.
6112
/04/
2010
5584
Gre
enw
orld
Indo
or G
arde
nsM
onth
ly p
lant
rent
al$3
96.8
412
/04/
2010
5585
Jasn
eat
Cle
anin
g se
rvic
es -
Tam
ala
Par
k bu
ildin
gs$7
39.6
412
/04/
2010
5586
Joon
dalu
p O
ffice
Nat
iona
lS
tatio
nery
and
Prin
ting
$755
.12
12/0
4/20
1055
87Ju
nkbu
ster
sD
ispl
ay a
t Ear
th C
arer
s co
urse
$165
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
88C
ance
lled
Can
celle
d$0
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
89L
& T
Ven
able
sE
xpen
dabl
e To
ols
$159
.55
12/0
4/20
1055
90LI
NC
STR
ATE
GIC
Ann
ual W
ebsi
te h
ostin
g ch
arge
s$7
92.0
012
/04/
2010
5591
MA
CH
INE
SEC
UR
ITY
CO
VER
SS
ecur
ity c
over
s fo
r Tan
a G
360
$1,3
75.0
012
/04/
2010
5592
Mag
icor
p Pt
y Lt
dTe
leph
one
Exp
ense
s - V
oice
mai
l mes
sage
sub
scrip
tion
$103
.40
12/0
4/20
1055
93N
ever
fail
Sprin
gwat
er L
tdS
taff
Am
eniti
es$3
29.9
512
/04/
2010
5594
Nor
ther
n D
istr
icts
Pes
t Man
agem
ent
Bui
ldin
g M
aint
enan
ce -
Pes
t Con
trol
$154
.00
12/0
4/20
1055
95O
RS
GR
OU
PW
elln
ess
Pro
gram
s$1
56.1
512
/04/
2010
5596
PETR
OL
PUM
P R
EPA
IRS
Sup
ply
and
fit n
ew p
ump
mot
or fo
r ons
ite fu
el ta
nks
$1,0
87.4
612
/04/
2010
5597
Pow
er In
dust
rial S
uppl
ies
Saf
ety
glas
ses,
glo
ves,
ear
plug
s$2
,186
.25
12/0
4/20
1055
98TI
LT T
RA
Y R
ENTA
LTr
ansp
orta
tion
of S
kid
Ste
er lo
ader
to s
ervi
ce c
entre
$430
.38
12/0
4/20
1055
99TO
TALL
Y W
OR
KW
EAR
Sta
ff U
nifo
rms/
Pro
tect
ive
Clo
thin
g $1
28.2
112
/04/
2010
5600
Tow
n of
Cam
brid
geB
oule
vard
Cen
tre h
all b
ooki
ng$5
38.0
012
/04/
2010
5601
WA
Loc
al G
over
nmen
t Ass
ocia
tion
Adv
ertis
emen
t exp
ense
s $4
16.1
412
/04/
2010
5602
WES
T C
OA
ST C
OLL
EGE
OF
TAFE
Sta
ff Tr
aini
ng$6
9.00
12/0
4/20
1056
03W
ILSO
N S
ECU
RIT
YS
tatic
gua
rd fo
r wei
ghbr
idge
$4
,039
.13
12/0
4/20
1056
04A
ir W
ell P
umps
Pty
Ltd
Mon
thly
site
insp
ectio
n of
airw
ell p
ump
$686
.80
12/0
4/20
1056
05A
nim
al P
est
Man
agem
ent
Serv
ices
Fera
l cat
trap
ping
& fo
x ba
it pr
ogra
m
$1,9
22.8
012
/04/
2010
5606
Ani
mal
Pes
t M
anag
emen
t Se
rvic
esFe
ral c
at tr
appi
ng&
fox
bait
prog
ram
$2
,194
.50
12/0
4/20
1056
07A
ustr
alia
n R
adia
tion
Serv
ices
Pty
Ltd
Stro
be li
ght &
cab
le fo
r Rad
iatio
n de
tect
ors
$688
.60
12/0
4/20
1056
08In
stan
t Pro
duct
s G
roup
Was
te E
duca
tion
Toile
t Hire
$397
.54
12/0
4/20
1056
09Iro
n M
ount
ain
Aus
tral
ia P
ty L
tdR
ecor
ds m
aint
enan
ce$4
.53
12/0
4/20
1056
10M
cken
na H
ampt
onIn
sura
nce
advi
ce -
RR
F C
ompo
ster
Cra
cks
$412
.50
12/0
4/20
1056
11Pe
rthw
aste
Pty
Ltd
Was
te m
inim
isat
ion
proj
ect -
Cle
an2S
tream
$2,7
74.6
412
/04/
2010
5612
STEV
E'S
MO
BIL
E TY
RE
SER
VIC
ER
epla
ce ty
res
- Hin
o B
in tr
uck
$560
.00
12/0
4/20
1056
13Th
e H
UB
Mar
ketin
g C
omm
unic
atio
n Pt
y Lt
dC
onsu
ltanc
y - W
aste
Min
imis
atio
n pr
ojec
t $9
,802
.98
12/0
4/20
1056
14Vi
bra
Indu
stria
l Filt
ratio
nC
lean
air
filte
rs fo
r ons
ite p
lant
$687
.39
12/0
4/20
1056
15A
LIN
TA G
AS
Gas
$146
.60
13/0
4/20
1056
16M
ULT
IPR
OG
RA
MM
ING
PTY
LTD
Com
pute
r Sys
tem
s M
aint
enan
ce$8
,447
.96
14/0
4/20
1056
17C
ity o
f Per
thR
ates
reim
burs
emen
t 200
9/20
10$5
,232
.81
14/0
4/20
1056
18JU
ST S
PEC
TAC
LES
CLA
RK
SON
Wel
lnes
s P
rogr
ams
$542
.00
14/0
4/20
1056
19A
RM
AG
UA
RD
Cas
h co
llect
ion
fee
$784
.84
14/0
4/20
1056
20A
UST
RA
LIA
PO
ST -
PER
THP
osta
ge &
Fre
ight
$5
07.4
214
/04/
2010
5621
HSE
Con
trol
Pty
Ltd
Con
tract
Lab
our E
xter
nal -
Env
ironm
enta
l Man
agem
ent
$13,
619.
1014
/04/
2010
5622
IW P
roje
cts
Con
tract
Lab
our E
xter
nal -
RR
F &
exc
avat
ion
wor
ks$1
8,98
1.60
14/0
4/20
1056
23C
ALT
EX A
UST
RA
LIA
PET
RO
LEU
M P
TYP
lant
- Fu
el a
nd O
il$6
45.0
214
/04/
2010
5624
CLE
AN
SW
EEP
Acc
ess
Roa
d M
aint
enan
ce
$859
.38
14/0
4/20
1056
25D
ig E
arth
Con
trac
ting
Sta
ff Tr
aini
ng$8
,500
.00
14/0
4/20
1056
26H
ays
Spec
ialis
t Rec
ruitm
ent (
Aus
tral
ia) P
/LC
ontra
ct L
abou
r Ext
erna
l - R
ecep
tioni
st$2
,747
.25
14/0
4/20
1056
27B
T Eq
uipm
ent P
ty L
tdR
epai
rs &
mai
nten
ance
to B
omag
com
pact
or$4
,402
.75
14/0
4/20
1056
28B
unni
ngs
Bui
ldin
g Su
pplie
sE
xpen
dabl
e To
ols
$592
.06
14/0
4/20
1056
29K
INR
OSS
SU
PA IG
AS
taff
Am
eniti
es$6
08.4
8
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 145
15/0
4/20
1056
30W
esTr
ac P
ty L
tdR
epai
rs &
mai
nten
ance
to C
ater
pilla
r 966
H lo
ader
$17,
253.
2515
/04/
2010
5631
CPA
AU
STR
ALI
AC
onfe
renc
e &
Tra
inin
g$5
,795
.00
19/0
4/20
1056
32SY
NER
GY
Util
ities
$74.
8020
/04/
2010
5633
GO
LDER
ASS
OC
IATE
S PT
Y LT
DTa
mal
a P
ark
Sta
ge 2
Pha
se 3
con
stru
ctio
n$3
1,87
5.25
23/0
4/20
1056
34A
dvan
ced
Traf
fic M
anag
emen
t (W
A) P
ty L
tdTr
affic
con
trol a
t wei
ghbr
idge
$2,8
72.1
023
/04/
2010
5635
Ala
nce
New
spap
er &
Mag
azin
e D
eliv
ery
Per
iodi
cals
/ Pub
licat
ions
$59.
4523
/04/
2010
5636
Aus
tral
ian
Inst
itute
of M
anag
emen
tS
taff
Trai
ning
$415
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
37B
elrid
ge B
us C
hart
erTo
urs
- Edu
catio
n ce
ntre
$616
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
38B
T Eq
uipm
ent P
ty L
tdE
ngin
e C
oola
nt$1
,026
.03
23/0
4/20
1056
39B
unni
ngs
Bui
ldin
g Su
pplie
sS
ite O
pera
ting
$475
.04
23/0
4/20
1056
40C
anno
n H
ygie
ne A
ustr
alia
Pty
Ltd
Gen
eral
Hyg
iene
Mai
nten
ance
$7
85.1
523
/04/
2010
5641
CA
TALY
SEM
RC
Sta
keho
lder
Sur
vey
2010
$42,
515.
0023
/04/
2010
5642
Cha
uffe
ur S
ervi
ces
Tour
s - E
duca
tion
cent
re$2
00.0
023
/04/
2010
5643
City
of S
tirlin
gC
ounc
il M
eetin
g E
xpen
ses
- PA
G m
eetin
g$3
5.00
23/0
4/20
1056
44C
ity o
f Wan
nero
oC
olle
ctio
n of
add
ition
al c
arts
- w
aste
man
agem
ent
$357
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
45C
lark
Equ
ipm
ent S
ales
Pty
Ltd
Coo
ling
syst
em p
arts
for L
each
ate
Com
pres
sor
$269
.34
23/0
4/20
1056
46C
LEA
N S
WEE
PA
cces
s R
oad
Mai
nten
ance
$6
87.5
023
/04/
2010
5647
CM
A R
ecyc
ling
Fluo
ro R
ecyc
ling
$888
.25
23/0
4/20
1056
48C
omm
and
A C
omR
epai
rs &
ser
vici
ng o
f EFT
PO
S m
achi
ne &
tele
phon
e lin
es$6
54.5
023
/04/
2010
5649
Con
serv
atio
n C
ounc
il of
Wes
tern
Aus
tral
ia In
c.W
aste
Man
agem
ent E
duca
tion
- Spa
ce h
ire$1
00.0
023
/04/
2010
5650
Cov
entr
ysE
ngin
e oi
l for
Bom
ag c
ompa
ctor
$2,3
67.0
323
/04/
2010
5651
Cub
e C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
Sub
scrip
tions
- IN
X s
yste
ms
Inco
ntro
l & In
Tui
tion
$786
.50
23/0
4/20
1056
52D
ELO
ITTE
Fina
ncia
l Wor
ksho
p N
ovem
ber'0
9$1
5,32
4.14
23/0
4/20
1056
53D
ig E
arth
Con
trac
ting
Sta
ff Tr
aini
ng$8
25.0
023
/04/
2010
5654
Dom
ain
Cat
erin
gC
ater
ing
expe
nses
- E
arth
care
rs c
ours
e$1
,171
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
55D
RA
GE
SIG
NS
Sig
ns &
bar
ricad
es$4
84.0
023
/04/
2010
5656
Elec
tek
Mai
nten
ance
to U
PS
con
nect
ion
$330
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
57EM
RC
Col
lect
ion
of m
attre
sses
$638
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
58Fo
rd &
Doo
nan
RR
F ai
rcon
ditio
ning
inst
allm
ent c
laim
$2,7
50.0
023
/04/
2010
5659
Fuji
Xero
x A
ustr
alia
Pty
Ltd
Pho
toco
pyin
g E
xpen
ses
$2,8
60.9
823
/04/
2010
5660
GH
D P
TY L
TDC
onsu
ltanc
y - W
orks
hop
exte
nsio
n &
min
imis
atio
n of
infra
stru
ctur
e w
aste
$6,1
30.2
523
/04/
2010
5661
HEA
LTH
ON
TH
E M
OVE
Ann
ual H
ealth
Ass
essm
ents
$7,0
04.2
523
/04/
2010
5662
Heg
gies
Pty
Ltd
Land
fill g
as m
onito
ring
- R&
D$1
,258
.13
23/0
4/20
1056
63H
ITA
CH
I CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
MA
CH
INER
YR
epai
rs &
mai
nten
ance
- A
rticu
late
d du
mp
truck
$941
.73
23/0
4/20
1056
64Iro
n M
ount
ain
Aus
tral
ia P
ty L
tdR
ecor
ds m
aint
enan
ce$4
.53
23/0
4/20
1056
65Ja
snea
tC
lean
ing
serv
ices
- Ta
mal
a P
ark
build
ings
$1,4
63.0
023
/04/
2010
5666
Joon
dalu
p O
ffice
Nat
iona
lS
tatio
nery
$282
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
67K
D A
ire M
echa
nica
l and
Ele
ctric
al S
ervi
ces
Rep
air A
ircon
$1,1
31.9
023
/04/
2010
5668
Key
note
Con
fere
nces
Was
te &
recy
cle
2010
con
fere
nce
/ Exh
ibito
r boo
th h
ire$5
,738
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
69M
agic
orp
Pty
Ltd
Tele
phon
e E
xpen
ses
- Voi
cem
ail m
essa
ge s
ubsc
riptio
n$1
03.4
023
/04/
2010
5670
MER
CU
RY
Cou
rier s
ervi
ces
$1,0
02.5
623
/04/
2010
5671
MO
BIL
E M
AST
ERS
Rep
airs
to tw
o w
ay ra
dio
syst
em$2
14.2
823
/04/
2010
5672
MU
LTIP
RO
GR
AM
MIN
G P
TY L
TDS
et u
p of
IT s
ervi
ces
at R
RF
$1,2
62.9
423
/04/
2010
5673
NA
TIO
NW
IDE
OIL
Rec
yclin
g C
ontra
ctor
s - w
aste
oil
$834
.90
23/0
4/20
1056
74N
ever
fail
Sprin
gwat
er L
tdS
taff
Am
eniti
es$2
41.0
523
/04/
2010
5675
Out
door
Clo
thin
g C
once
pts
Pty
Ltd
Was
te M
anag
emen
t Edu
catio
n - C
asua
l sta
ff un
iform
$40.
0423
/04/
2010
5676
PIR
TEK
(MA
LAG
A) P
TY L
TDR
epai
rs &
mai
nten
ance
to B
in tr
uck
$326
.34
23/0
4/20
1056
77R
ed 1
1 Pt
y Lt
dC
ompu
ter c
onsu
mab
les
$112
.70
23/0
4/20
1056
78R
elia
nce
Petr
oleu
mD
istil
late
$41,
290.
9323
/04/
2010
5679
SBS
Sim
s G
roup
E -
was
te R
ecyc
ling
Con
tract
ors
$15,
363.
63
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 146
23/0
4/20
1056
80ST
JO
HN
AM
BU
LAN
CE
Def
ibril
lato
r hea
rtsta
rt ca
se &
Ele
ctro
des
$3,9
90.0
023
/04/
2010
5681
Staf
f Lin
kC
ontra
ct L
abou
r Ext
erna
l - re
cycl
ing
cent
re &
bus
hlan
d m
anag
emen
t$5
,608
.19
23/0
4/20
1056
82SY
NN
OTT
MU
LHO
LLA
ND
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
Con
tract
labo
ur -
Mar
ketin
g &
was
te e
duca
tion
$4,2
24.0
023
/04/
2010
5683
TELS
TRA
Tele
phon
e E
xpen
ses
$412
.96
23/0
4/20
1056
84Th
e H
UB
Mar
ketin
g C
omm
unic
atio
n Pt
y Lt
dC
onsu
ltanc
y - W
aste
Min
imis
atio
n pr
ojec
t (C
lean
2Stre
am)
$3,0
51.4
023
/04/
2010
5685
WA
NN
ERO
O P
LUM
BIN
G S
ERVI
CE
Bui
ldin
g M
aint
enan
ce -
Wor
ksho
p$1
63.5
723
/04/
2010
5686
Woo
dhou
se L
egal
Ref
use
Dis
posa
l Fac
ilitie
s La
w 2
010
$7,9
66.2
023
/04/
2010
5687
WO
RK
CLO
BB
ERS
taff
Uni
form
s/P
rote
ctiv
e C
loth
ing
$254
.48
23/0
4/20
1056
88A
rtis
an M
aint
enan
ceM
aint
ence
of a
rtwor
ks a
nd fe
atur
es in
Ed
cent
re$1
,672
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
89B
lack
woo
ds &
Atk
ins
Mai
nten
ance
of a
rtwor
k at
Edu
catio
n ce
ntre
$223
.96
23/0
4/20
1056
90C
ardn
o B
SD M
einh
ardt
Joi
nt V
entu
reP
roje
ct M
anag
emen
t Fee
- R
RF
Con
stru
ctio
n Fi
nal p
aym
ent
$58,
261.
2323
/04/
2010
5691
Envi
ronm
ent H
ouse
Inco
rpor
ated
Pre
sent
ing
at E
C M
arch
trai
ning
$660
.00
23/0
4/20
1056
92LA
ND
FILL
GA
S &
PO
WER
PTY
LTD
Util
ities
$3,9
07.8
023
/04/
2010
5693
Leed
ervi
lle S
port
ing
Clu
bE
arth
car
ers
cour
se -
spac
e hi
re$2
50.0
023
/04/
2010
5694
W W
CO
NSU
LTIN
G P
TY L
TDC
onsu
ltanc
y - P
AG
mee
tings
Feb
/Mar
ch 2
010
$4,7
19.0
023
/04/
2010
5695
SBS
Sim
s G
roup
E-W
aste
Rec
yclin
g C
ontra
ctor
s$1
,662
.65
23/0
4/20
1056
96C
ity o
f Joo
ndal
upLe
ase
Fee
Lot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for M
ay 2
010
$8,8
76.1
123
/04/
2010
5697
City
of P
erth
Leas
e Fe
e Lo
t 118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r May
201
0$4
,438
.06
23/0
4/20
1056
98C
ity o
f Stir
ling
Leas
e Fe
e Lo
t 118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r May
201
0$1
7,75
2.23
23/0
4/20
1056
99C
ity o
f Wan
nero
oLe
ase
Fee
Lot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for M
ay 2
010
$8,8
76.1
123
/04/
2010
5700
Tow
n of
Cam
brid
geLe
ase
Fee
Lot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for M
ay 2
010
$4,4
38.0
623
/04/
2010
5701
Tow
n of
Vic
toria
Par
kLe
ase
Fee
Lot 1
18 M
arm
ion
Ave
for M
ay 2
010
$4,4
38.0
623
/04/
2010
5702
Tow
n of
Vin
cent
Leas
e Fe
e Lo
t 118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r May
201
0$4
,438
.06
23/0
4/20
1057
03M
inda
rie R
egio
nal C
ounc
il St
aff L
otto
Acc
ount
Leas
e Fe
e Lo
t 118
Mar
mio
n A
ve fo
r May
201
0$3
70.0
023
/04/
2010
5704
PETT
Y C
ASH
Trav
ellin
g E
xpen
ses
$991
.70
28/0
4/20
1057
05A
ster
on P
ortfo
lio S
ervi
ces
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$314
.91
28/0
4/20
1057
06A
ustr
alia
n Su
per A
dmin
istr
atio
nS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$1
79.9
928
/04/
2010
5707
CB
US
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$321
.56
28/0
4/20
1057
08C
HIL
D S
UPP
OR
TC
hild
Sup
port
Allo
wan
ce p
aym
ent -
Ded
uctio
n m
ade
from
sta
ff sa
lary
$492
.30
28/0
4/20
1057
09H
ealth
Insu
ranc
e Fu
nd o
f WA
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$400
.00
28/0
4/20
1057
10H
ESTA
SU
PER
FU
ND
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$742
.72
28/0
4/20
1057
11Po
rtfo
liofo
cus
- Pre
miu
m R
etire
men
t Ser
vice
sS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$2
,221
.00
28/0
4/20
1057
12R
EST
Supe
rann
uatio
nS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$4
37.0
228
/04/
2010
5713
Spec
trum
Sup
erS
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$8
8.16
28/0
4/20
1057
14W
ALG
S PL
AN
PTY
LTD
Sup
eran
nuat
ion
prem
ium
$33,
895.
9228
/04/
2010
5715
WES
TSC
HEM
ES
uper
annu
atio
n pr
emiu
m$7
27.1
929
/04/
2010
5716
REC
OR
DS
MA
NA
GEM
ENT
ASS
OC
IATI
ON
OF
AU
STR
ALI
AR
MA
A b
reak
fast
- W
eb2
soci
al m
edia
tech
nolo
gy$9
2.40
29/0
4/20
1057
17W
A L
ocal
Gov
ernm
ent A
ssoc
iatio
nA
dver
tisem
ent e
xpen
ses
& p
ublic
not
ices
$5,1
20.9
6To
tal C
hequ
e Pa
ymen
ts$6
89,5
15.3
1
21/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0378
Iinet
Lim
ited
Inte
rnet
VO
IP c
harg
e$1
1.44
21/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0379
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Mer
chan
t cha
rges
for M
arch
201
0$9
28.1
621
/04/
2010
DP
-003
80N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kN
atio
nal O
nlin
e A
ccou
nt F
ee$5
7.69
23/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0381
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Cre
dit C
ard
paym
ents
$7,4
85.4
723
/04/
2010
DP
-003
82A
ustr
alia
n Ta
xatio
n O
ffice
BA
S fo
r Mar
ch 2
010
$359
,920
.00
23/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0383
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
NA
B C
onne
ct A
ccou
nt F
ee -
Mar
ch$2
0.00
26/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0384
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
NA
B C
onne
ct A
ccou
nt F
ee -
Apr
il$2
0.00
27/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0385
Com
mon
wea
lth B
ank
Loan
10
B re
paym
ent
$10,
303.
1227
/04/
2010
DP
-003
86C
omm
onw
ealth
Ban
kLo
an 1
0 A
repa
ymen
t$4
3,83
2.53
30/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0387
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Loan
10
A C
omm
erci
al B
ill$6
1,44
0.93
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 147
30/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0388
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Com
mon
wea
lth B
ank
Cre
dit C
ard
Fee
$40.
0030
/04/
2010
DP
-003
89N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kM
erch
ant C
harg
es fo
r Apr
il 20
10$1
,361
.44
30/0
4/20
10D
P-0
0390
Nat
iona
l Aus
tral
ia B
ank
Ban
k O
verd
raft
Inte
rest
pay
men
t$2
20.3
630
/04/
2010
DP
-003
91N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kA
ccou
nt K
eepi
ng F
ee o
n B
usin
ess
Man
agem
ent A
ccou
nt$1
72.4
030
/04/
2010
DP
-003
92N
atio
nal A
ustr
alia
Ban
kB
ill D
raw
dow
n Fe
e$1
50.0
0To
tal D
irect
Pay
men
ts$4
85,9
63.5
4
9/04
/201
0E
FT-0
0233
MR
CP
ayro
ll E
mpl
oyee
Wag
es$1
04,7
08.0
021
/04/
2010
EFT
-002
34B
iovi
sion
202
0 Pt
y Lt
dC
ontra
ctor
Fee
s - R
RF
$1,5
93,3
37.5
123
/04/
2010
EFT
-002
35M
RC
Pay
roll
Em
ploy
ee W
ages
$105
,311
.63
23/0
4/20
10E
FT-0
0236
MR
CP
ayro
ll E
mpl
oyee
Wag
es$1
05,5
07.3
9To
tal E
FT P
aym
ents
$1,9
08,8
64.5
3
Sum
mar
y Sc
hedu
le o
f Pay
men
ts
Che
que
Paym
ents
Che
que
No.
553
5 to
571
7$6
89,5
15.3
1
Elec
tron
ic P
aym
ents
DP-
003
78 to
DP-
003
92$4
85,9
63.5
4EF
T- 0
0233
to E
FT- 0
0236
$1,9
08,8
64.5
3
Gra
nd T
otal
$3,0
84,3
43.3
8
CER
TIFI
CA
TE O
F C
HIE
F EX
ECU
TIVE
OFF
ICER
This
sch
edul
e of
acc
ount
s w
hich
was
pas
sed
for p
aym
ent,
cove
ring
vouc
hers
as
abov
e w
hich
was
subm
itted
to e
ach
mem
ber o
f Cou
ncil
on 1
st J
uly
2010
has
bee
n ch
ecke
d an
d is
fully
sup
port
edby
vou
cher
s an
d in
voic
es w
hich
are
sub
mitt
ed h
erew
ith a
nd w
hich
hav
e be
en d
uly
cert
ified
as
to th
e re
ceip
t of g
oods
and
the
rend
ition
of s
ervi
ces
and
as to
pric
es, c
ompu
tatio
ns, a
nd
cost
ing
and
the
amou
nts
due
for p
aym
ent.
CH
IEF
EXEC
UTI
VE O
FFIC
ER
ITEM 8.1.7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 148
ITEM 8.2.1 AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING – 8 JUNE 2010 File No: COR/22 (D/10/4126) Attachment(s): 1. Minutes of Audit Committee meeting held 8 June 2010 Author: Kalwant Dhillon
BACKGROUND The Internal Audit Committee was established during the 2005/2006 financial year and it held its Inaugural meeting in June 2006. The first meeting for 2009/2010 financial year was held on 7 April 2010. DETAIL Establishment of Audit Committee The Audit Committee was established by Ordinary Council Meeting resolution on 7 July 2005. The Terms of Reference for this Committee were approved by Council at its Ordinary Council Meeting on 27 October 2005. Powers of the Audit Committee, as stated in the Terms of Reference, can be summarised by the following extract: “The Committee is to report to Council and provide appropriate advice and recommendations ....” In short, the Audit Committee does not have delegated authority from Council for decision making. The Audit Committee met on 8 June 2010 to consider the appointment of the Auditor. The Audit Committee reviewed the report on the submissions received in relation to the Appointment of the Auditor and recommends that Grant Thornton be appointed as the Auditor for a term of three years to conduct the Annual audits of the Council for the financial years 2009/2010 to 2011/2012. The minutes of the meeting and the report are attached. STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT An Internal Audit Committee is required under the Local Government Act 1995 and Regulations. The committee is required to meet at least once a year and report any matters discussed and outcomes to the Council. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Not applicable. STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS Not applicable.
ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 149
AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council:
(i) accept the quotation submitted by Grant Thornton for the delivery of audit services with following characteristics (a) for a period of three years commencing 2009/2010 (b) maximum total hours of 120 hours per year (360 hours total) (c) maximum total cost - $54,750
(ii) appoint Michael Hillgrove and/or alternate partner of Grant Thornton as the auditor for a term of three years to conduct the Annual audits of Mindarie Regional Council for the financial years 2009/2010 to 2011/2012
ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 150
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 8.2.1
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING
1 JULY 2010
MINUTES OF AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD 8 JUNE 2010
ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 151
MINUTES
AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY 8 JUNE 2010
TIME: 8.00 AM
VENUE – TOWN OF VICTORIA PARK Meeting Room 3
Managing waste and recovering resources responsibly Constituent Members: Cities of Perth, Joondalup, Stirling, and Wanneroo.
Towns of Cambridge, Victoria Park and Vincent
ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 152
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM
SUBJECT
PAGE NO
1 DECLARATION OF OPENING / ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS 3
2 ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES 3
3 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 3
3.1 MINUTES OF AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 7 APRIL 2010 3
4 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST 3
5 MRC OFFICER REPORTS 4
5.1 APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR FOR NEXT TERM OF THREE YEARS 4
6 FUTURE MEETINGS 4
7 OTHER BUSINESS 4
8 CLOSURE OF MEETING 4
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILAUDIT COMMITTEE MINUTES - 8 JUNE 2010 ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 153
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL’S AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD AT THE TOWN OF VICTORIA PARK, 99 SHEPPERTON ROAD, VICTORIA PARK, WESTERN AUSTRALIA ON 8 JUNE 2010. 1. DECLARATION OF OPENING/ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS Cr Fishwick declared the meeting open at 8.15am. 2. ATTENDANCE AND APOLOGIES Councillors Cr Russell Fishwick City of Joondalup Cr David Boothman City of Stirling External Member Mr Alex Dermedgoglou Officers Mr Kevin Poynton Chief Executive Officer Mr Kalwant Dhillon Chief Financial Officer Apologies Cr Rob Butler City of Perth The Minutes have been confirmed by resolution of the Audit Committee on November 2010. ...............................................................................Chairman 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS 3.1 MINUTES OF AUDIT COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 7 APRIL 2010 The Minutes of the MRC Audit Committee Meeting held on 7 April 2010 have been circulated to members of committee. RECOMMENDATION That the Minutes of the MRC Audit Committee Meeting held on 7 April 2010 be taken as read, confirmed and the Chairman invited to sign same as a true record of the proceedings. (Carried: 3/0) 4. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST Nil.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILAUDIT COMMITTEE MINUTES - 8 JUNE 2010 ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 154
5. MRC OFFICER REPORTS 5.1 APPOINTMENT OF AUDITOR FOR NEXT TERM OF THREE YEARS The tenure for the existing Auditor, WHK Howarth, ended with the audit for the financial year ended 30 June 2009. The Audit Committee, at its last meeting on 7 April 2010, recommended and the Council approved at the 22 April 2010 Ordinary Council Meeting that quotations be obtained, under a Quotation process from the following list of Auditors, for the provision of external audit services to the Regional Council for the next 2 or 3 years.
• WHK Howarth • Grant Thornton • Macri Partners • Haines Norton
Three quotations were received under this process and have been evaluated independently by Alex Dermedgoglou and the report is attached under Appendix I was considered by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s decision is summarised below. AUDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION That Council:
(i) accept the quotation submitted by Grant Thornton for the delivery of audit services with following characteristics
• for a period of three years commencing 2009/2010
• maximum total hours of 120 hours per year (360 hours total)
• maximum total cost - $54,750 (ii) appoint Michael Hillgrove and/or alternate partner of Grant Thornton
as the auditor for a term of three years to conduct the Annual audits of Mindarie Regional Council for the financial years 2009/2010 to 2011/2012
6 FUTURE MEETINGS Next meeting is proposed for late November 2010. 7 OTHER BUSINESS Nil. 8 CLOSURE 8.35am
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILAUDIT COMMITTEE MINUTES - 8 JUNE 2010 ITEM 8.2.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 155
MINUTES
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
Friday 14 May 2010
TIME: 8.30AM
VENUE – Town of Cambridge
Managing waste and recovering resources responsibly Constituent Members: Cities of Perth, Joondalup, Stirling, and Wanneroo.
Towns of Cambridge, Victoria Park and Vincent
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 156
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCIL
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
MINUTES
14 May 2010
A meeting of the Strategic Projects Committee was held at the Town of Cambridge, 1 Bold Park Drive, Floreat, on Friday 14 May 2010. The meeting commenced at 8.30am.
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Delegates Karen Caple (Chairman) Director City Businesses City of Wanneroo Martyn Glover (Deputy Chairman) Director Infrastructure Services City of Joondalup Chris Colyer Director Infrastructure Town of Cambridge Geoff Eves Director of Infrastructure City of Stirling Doug Forster Director of Business Units City of Perth Rick Lotznicker Director Technical Services Town of Vincent Kevin Poynton Chief Executive Officer MRC Anthony Vuleta Director Technical Services Town of Victoria Park Deputy Delegate Jane Pritchard Mgr Infrastructure Mgt Services City of Joondalup Shane Spinks Manager City Business City of Wanneroo
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 2 -
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 157
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUBJECT
PAGE NO
1 DECLARATION OF OPENING AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS P4
2 ATTENDANCE, APOLOGIES P5
3
REPORTS OF MRC OFFICERS
P5
Item 1 – Strategic Integrated Regional Plan P6 – P97
Item 2 – Future Landfill Site Investigation P98
Item 3 – Budget 2010/2011 P99 – P142
4 FUTURE SPC MEETINGS P143
5 DECLARATION OF CLOSURE OF MEETING P143
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 3 -
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 158
1 DECLARATION OF OPENING AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS
The Mindarie Regional Council CEO opening the meeting at 8.30am and welcomed Bruce Wittber and Helen Hardcastle to the meeting. Bruce Wittber and the Strategic Projects Committee (SPC) discussed the following:
• The SPC minutes to be included in the Agenda of the Ordinary Council Meeting for the recommendations and progress reports to be considered
• Observers would be allowed to attend with no voting rights
• Observers would be allowed to speak at the meeting
• A mover and seconder would be required for each recommendation
• Standing Orders to be researched in regards to limitation of number of speeches to an Item at a committee meeting
• Committee Tenure is until the Council elections in October 2011
• The Chairman would have some involvement with the MRC but will not have input into the preparation of the Agenda
The Mindarie Regional Council CEO then called for nominations for Chairman and Deputy Chairman. Moved: M Glover Seconded: A Vuleta Chairman: Karen Caple (Carried: 6/0) Moved: K Poynton Seconded: R Lotznicker Deputy Chairman: Martyn Glover (Carried: 6/0)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 4 -
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 159
2 ATTENDANCE, APOLOGIES
Committee Members Karen Caple (Chairman) Director City Businesses City of Wanneroo (left 9.10am) Martyn Glover (Deputy Chairman) Director Infrastructure Services City of Joondalup (Chaired meeting from 9.10am) Chris Colyer (arrived 9.40am) Director Infrastructure Town of Cambridge Doug Forster Director of Business Units City of Perth Rick Lotznicker Director Technical Services Town of Vincent Kevin Poynton Chief Executive Officer MRC Anthony Vuleta Director Technical Services Town of Victoria Park Shane Spinks Manager City Businesses City of Wanneroo (Deputy Nominee for Wanneroo from 9.10am) Observers Kalwant Dhillon Chief Financial Officer MRC Mike Tolson Operations Manager MRC Ian Watkins Project Manager MRC Lynda Nyssen Governance Officer MRC Visitors Bruce Wittber Helen Hardcastle Apologies Geoff Eves Director Infrastructure City of Stirling 3 REPORTS OF MRC OFFICERS
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 5 -
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 160
ITEM 1 STRATEGIC INTEGRATED REGIONAL PLAN File No: WST/176 Attachment(s): 1. Hyder Options Report 2. Hyder TWG Workbook – 5 February 2010 3. Hyder TWG Workbook – 15 April 2010 Author: Ian Watkins
SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to provide the Strategic Projects Committee with an update of how the development of the Strategic Integrated Regional Plan is progressing. BACKGROUND In the Annual Business Plan 2009/2010, a Proposed Action (Objective Two: Waste/Resource Processing) was to “Develop integrated regional plan for processing of at least municipal solid waste”. This Integrated Regional Plan is to provide the MRC with guidance on how best to progress the further development of resource recovery within the region. The need for the Plan and further resource recovery is driven by State Government push towards Zero Waste to Landfill and the fact that Tamala Park has a finite capacity which is anticipated to be saturated in early 2021. Following a call for tenders, Council resolved (03/09/09) to award the development of the Integrated Regional Plan to Hyder Consulting. On 10 September 2009 Hyder was awarded the contract to perform the work. DETAIL During the course of the project, Hyder consulted widely with the MRC Administration and member Councils to gather relevant base data on which to develop various waste processing options. In late January 2010 Hyder produced an Options Report covering the following aspects:
• Methodology
• Population projections
• Waste growth projections
• Waste quantities and processing capacity
• Waste processing options
• Assessment of options The Hyder Options Report is at Attachment One to this Report. Following further analysis by Hyder, on 5 February 2010, a workshop was held with the Technical Working Group (TWG) at which Hyder presented on the following topics:
• Scenarios developed from a range of options identified
• Complementary initiatives
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 6 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 161
• Assessment criteria The Hyder TWG workshop 5 February 2010 Workbook is at Attachment Two to this report. With the TWG Officers’ feedback from the workshop, Hyder undertook extensive scenario modelling and analysis of modelling outputs. This information was then presented to the TWG at a follow up workshop held on 15 April 2010. At this workshop Hyder presented on the following topics:
• Modelling and evaluation assumptions
• Collection and transport assumptions
• Technology assumptions
• Scenario evaluation – financial assessment
• Summary performance tables
• Detailed costing summary The Hyder TWG workshop 15 April 2010. Workbook is at Attachment Three to this report. Way Forward Following feedback from the TWG Officers and the MRC, Hyder is currently in the process of undertaking a Multiple Criteria Analysis (MCA) of the various options. Thereafter it is proposed to have a joint Elected Members and TWG workshop (date yet to be determined), at which Hyder will present on the scenarios, assumptions and evaluation. Based on feedback from the joint workshop, Hyder will complete the MCA and prepare the final Integrated Regional Plan report. Timeline for Decision Making Based on the MRC long term planning, it is anticipated that Tamala Park will reach maximum capacity by early 2021. This is based on the assumption that RRF Stage 2 will be operational by 2013/14. In order to achieve this, the following RRF Stage 2 development timeline will be required: Option 1 – Similar facility to RRF Stage 1
• June 2010 to September 2010: Identify technology (4 months)
• October 2010 to March 2012: Environmental approvals (18 months)
• October 2010 to March 2011: Compile tender (6 months)
• April 2011 to June 2011: Tender (3 months)
• July 2011 to December 2011: Tender evaluation and contract finalisation (6 months)
• January 2012 to June 2013: Construction (18 months)
• July 2013: Operations
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 7 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 162
Comment on Option 1
• Environmental approval is only achieved after contract finalisation and three months after construction has commenced. This is a totally unacceptable situation.
• Past experience (RRF Stage 1) has proven that anticipated timelines are invariably way shorter than actual timelines due to unexpected turns of events
• The above timeline has been established to fit time available between the present and when RRF Stage 2 has been programmed to occur (and is not possible to be achieved)
• The development of RRF Stage 2 cannot be similar (in process and complexity, not technology) to RRF Stage 1 and fit within the available timeline to suit current business planning
Option 2 – Simplified facility (Sorting and Separation)
• June 2010 to March 2011: Identify technology (10 months)
• April 2011 to September 2011: Environmental approval (6 months)
• April 2011 to September 2011: Compile Tender (6 months)
• October 2011 to December 2011: Tender (3 months)
• January 2012 to June 2012: Tender evaluation and contract finalisation (6 months)
• July 2012 to June 2013: Construction (12 months)
• July 2013: Operations Comment on Option 2
• Insufficient time to develop a complicated waste processing solution, only sufficient time to develop a large–scale sorting and separation facility (bulk verge waste)
• With RRF Stage 1 operational, the vast majority of “Processable Waste” is being processed. Even with the City of Stirling “Processable Waste” there is unlikely to be sufficient organic waste to justify a second composting facility; consequently, the next largest portion of domestic waste is the bulk verge waste
• There is sufficient time available within the current business planning to develop a significant bulk verge waste sorting facility
• This type of solution could be developed in a number of stages dealing with specific components of bulk verge waste (timber/plastic/metal/e-waste/hazardous waste)
Option 3 – new technology (waste to energy)
• June 2010 to June 2011: Identify technology (1 year)
• July 2011 to June 2013: Environmental approval (2 years)
• July 2011 to June 2012: Shortlist preferred suppliers (1 year)
• July 2012 to June 2013: Compile tender (1 year)
• July 2013 to June 2014: Tender evaluation (1 year)
• July 2014 to June 2016: Construction (2 years)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 8 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 163
Comment on Option 3
• Due to the new technology, the environmental approval process is relatively unknown; hence a 2 year period allowed
• An assumption is that the facility will be located at Neerabup. If this is not possible, an alternative site needs to be identified by either the MRC or the contractor
• If the MRC does not own the land, the MRC Constitution would need to be changed to accommodate these arrangements
• This option will take significantly longer to implement than the time available; hence, the business planning timeline can not be complied with and as a consequence, Tamala Park is likely to reach maximum capacity more rapidly. This will have the roll-on effect of putting additional pressure on the future development of an alternative landfill facility.
Comment on the Range of Options
• based on the time available for the development of RRF Stage 2 (by July 2013), there is insufficient time to develop a complex processing facility
• to comply with the time available, the MRC will have to limit its options to more simple solutions, typically sorting and separation operations that are more readily available and acceptable to the regulators and the Community
• to develop complex processing capacity the MRC will have to extend the timeline by a few years (2 to 3) depending on the type of technology proposed
• The MRC 2010/2011 draft Budget does not contain sufficient funding to actively pursue RRF Stage 2, even a simplified solution; consequently, there will be a further slide in the time taken to progress further waste recycling in the Region
• Any delay in developing RRF Stage 2 beyond July 2013 will result in Tamala Park filling up sooner than programmed and hence increase pressure on the development of landfill capacity beyond the life of Tamala Park
• It is essential to actively progress RRF Stage 2 development immediately or divert efforts to ensuring there is sufficient landfill capacity beyond the life of Tamala Park (either contracted out or a MRC operated facility)
Available Waste Processing Solutions Typically there are the following waste processing solutions available to the MRC (in the order of complexity):
• Sorting and Separation (small and large scale)
• Composting of organics (aerobic and anaerobic)
• Waste to energy (a range of available technologies) The more complicated and innovative the solution, the longer the development timeline required to progress the project. Enviro 2020 (21 – 23 July 2010) provides Elected Members and Officers an opportunity to review and learn more about available waste processing technologies that may be represented at the conference.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 9 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 164
Administration Comment The development of RRF Stage 2 will reduce the quantity of waste going to landfill and hence the need to develop landfill capacity beyond the life of Tamala Park as well as provide a more environmentally sustainable waste management solution for the region. Resource recovery is the State Government’s preferred waste management solution, in preference to landfilling. Delaying the development of RRF Stage 2 simply adds pressure to the MRC limited landfill capacity; however, with adequate forward planning, this situation can be appropriately managed. Not developing further resource recovery capability will be contrary to the State Government’s preferred position on waste management as well as relegate the MRC to a lesser environmentally sustainable organisation than it could have been with further resource recovery capacity. MRC ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION That the Strategic Projects Committee receive the progress report on the development of a strategic integrated regional plan. SPC DISCUSSION The CEO advised that the project was continuing with one workshop still to proceed. Then the final Strategic Integrated Regional Plan with a suite of recommendations will be presented to Council. The committee agreed inclusions to the item as follows:
• Timeline of project
• Additional background information
• Information regarding technology assumptions
• Additional section of what Councillors would see at the Enviro Conference SPC RECOMMENDATION MOVED: Mr Doug Forster SECONDED: Kevin Poynton That the Strategic Projects Committee receive the progress report on the development of a strategic integrated regional plan. (Carried: 6/0)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 10 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 165
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 1
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
HYDER OPTIONS REPORT
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 11 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 166
Mindarie Regional Council
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Options report
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 12 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 167
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd
ABN 76 104 485 289
Level 16, 31 Queen Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia
Tel: +61 3 8623 4000
Fax: +61 3 8623 4111
www.hyderconsulting.com
Mindarie Regional Council
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Options report
Author Rebecca Cain
Checker Anne-Marie Bremner, Encycle Consulting
John King, John King Consultants
Approver Bruno Schacher
Report No 2
Date 29 January 2010
This report has been prepared for Mindarie Regional
Council in accordance with the terms and conditions of
appointment for Integrated regional plan for the processing
of municipal solid waste dated 10 September 2009. Hyder
Consulting Pty Ltd (ABN 76 104 485 289) cannot accept any
responsibility for any use of or reliance on the contents of
this report by any third party.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 13 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 168
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page i
CONTENTS
Glossary .......................................................................................................... 1
1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 3
2 Projections of future waste quantities ................................................... 4
2.1 Method.................................................................................................. 4
2.2 Population projections .......................................................................... 4
2.3 Waste growth projections ..................................................................... 6
2.4 Comparison of projected waste quantities and processing capacity ..... 9
3 Waste processing options .................................................................. 12
3.1 Options ............................................................................................... 12
4 Assessing the options......................................................................... 19
5 References ......................................................................................... 20
Appendices
Appendix A
Population projections
Appendix B
Base case waste projections
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 14 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 169
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 1 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
Glossary
Municipal solid waste
Comprises:
� Household garbage collected through kerbside collection systems provided by member
councils
� Residue from resource recovery processes
� Green waste collected through bulk verge collections provided by member councils
� Inert materials collected through bulk verge collections provided by member councils
� Self haul waste deliveries to waste management facilities in the region and drop off
events such as household hazardous waste and e-waste
� Member council civil works wastes, including construction and demolition waste and
garden organics
� Member council office and workshop garbage
� Commercial garbage collected through the kerbside collection system provided by
member councils
Commercial garbage
Material collected from commercial premises through kerbside collection systems, or by specific
collection services for commercial properties using larger (>240l) bins, that is typically disposed
of to landfill or processed at a resource recovery facility. This stream is generally collected along
with residential premises as part of the household waste stream.
Commercial recycling
Material collected from commercial premises through kerbside collection systems, or by specific
collection services for commercial properties using larger (>240l) bins, that is typically sorted at
a materials recovery facility. This stream is generally collected along with residential premises
as part of the household waste stream.
Hazardous waste
Household materials that are hazardous and should not be placed in the kerbside bins. Items
include, but are not limited to, asbestos, gas bottles, batteries, fluorescent lights, fire
extinguishers, household chemicals, pharmaceuticals, radioactive materials.
Household garbage
Material collected through kerbside collection systems that is typically disposed of to landfill or
processed at a resource recovery facility.
Household recyclables
Co-mingled recyclable materials deposited in the yellow lidded bin through the kerbside
collection system which is typically sorted at a materials recovery facility.
Member council C&D waste
Materials generated from road works and construction provided by or on behalf of member
councils.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 15 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 170
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 2 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
Member council office and workshop recycling
Material collected from member council offices and workshops through kerbside collection
systems that is typically sorted at a materials recovery facility. This stream is generally collected
along with residential premises as part of the household waste stream.
Member council office and workshop waste
Material collected from member council offices and workshops through kerbside collection
systems that is typically disposed of to landfill or processed at a resource recovery facility. This
stream is generally collected along with residential premises as part of the household recycling
stream.
Member council parks and gardens waste
Materials generated from parks and gardens maintenance provided by or on behalf of member
councils.
Residue from resource recovery processes
Residue from the sorting or processing of materials from sites that are owned by member
councils or service member councils. Currently, this stream consists of materials received from
the Neerabup resource recovery facility, the ATLAS resource recovery facility and the Wangara
Recycling Centre.
Self haul
Materials delivered to facilities in the region (currently Tamala Park and Balcatta transfer
station) by waste generators that are ultimately disposed of at the Tamala Park landfill. The
materials may be delivered by the household, commercial & industrial and construction &
demolition sectors in vehicles, trailers, skips or trucks.
Verge collected bulky waste
Bulky, typically inert, materials collected through verge collections provided to households by
member councils on a scheduled basis.
Verge collected green waste
Green waste collected through verge collections provided to households by member councils on
a scheduled basis.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 16 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 171
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 3 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
1 Introduction
Mindarie Regional Council’s (MRC) Strategic Plan 2009-2029 includes a strategy to ‘Develop an
integrated regional plan for the processing of at least Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)’. The Plan
will identify the waste processing capacity required to meet the projected waste generation for
identified waste streams in the region for the period to 2029.
This report presents:
� Projected future waste quantities for the duration of the Plan, assuming no major changes
in waste generation or waste management across the region
� A list of options that are available to Mindarie Regional Council and member councils for
the processing of municipal solid waste generated in the region
� Criteria against which the options will be assessed to determine their benefits and
impacts.
This report will be presented to MRC and the member councils at a workshop in late
January/early February 2010 where MRC and members can discuss and approve the options
and assessment criteria, and construct scenarios for future waste processing in the region. This
report and the workshop are the deliverables of Stage 2 of the development of the Plan. Stage 3
will involve the assessment of the options against the financial, environmental, social and other
criteria, and will inform the preparation of the Plan.
Stage 1 – Background paper
Preparation of a background paper to
provide the foundation for the development
of the Plan.
Stage 2 – Detailed analysis & scenario development
Projection of future waste quantities and
the development of waste management
and processing options to manage this
waste.
Stage 4 – Integrated regional plan
Preparation of the integrated regional
plan.
Stage 3 – Scenario modelling & evaluation
Modelling and evaluation of scenarios
(packages of options to address waste
demands) of waste management and
processing, and selection of a preferred
scenario to be adopted in the Plan.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 17 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 172
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 4 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
2 Projections of future waste quantities
This section presents projected future waste quantities over the lifespan of the Plan, assuming
there is no substantial change in waste management practices. This is referred to as the “base
case” and is based on historical waste disposal data and projected future populations for the
MRC member councils.
2.1 Method
Base case waste quantity projections were developed for each local government and each year.
The method for this entailed:
� developing population projections
� determining a ‘starting point’ for the waste projections
� comparing historical growth rates in waste generation with population growth to identify
any differences (e.g. whether waste generation increases at a faster or slower rate
compared to population growth)
� developing a base case projection taking account of population growth adjusted to
account for any difference in growth rates identified above
Historical data for waste generation across the region may differ from the data presented in the
Background paper that was issued in November 2009. Following the circulation of the
Background paper, more up to data was obtained for some councils.
2.2 Population projections
Data sources used to project population growth for each member council over the assessment
timeframe were:
• WA Population Report No. 6, Western Australia Tomorrow, Population projections for
planning regions 2004 to 2031 and local government areas 2004 to 2021 (WA Planning
Commission; 2005)
• Regional Population Growth, Australia, Publication 3218.0 (Australian Bureau of
Statistics; 2009)
To project future populations, the annual percentage changes from the WA Population Report
No 6 were calculated. Using the most recently available estimated resident population from the
Australian Bureau of Statistics (i.e. 2008) as a starting point, the population for each subsequent
year was estimated by applying the percentage change for that year to the population for the
previous year.
The projected population totals across the Mindarie region are shown for selected years in
Table 2-1. A chart of projected population growth by member council is provided in Figure 2-1.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 18 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 173
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 5 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
Table 2-1 Projected populations, Mindarie region
Year 2008 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 % Change
2009 to
2029
Cambridge 25,900 25,900 26,500 26,600 26,000 25,700 -1%
Joondalup 160,000 159,400 158,800 161,700 165,200 165,900 4%
Perth 15,100 16,300 20,800 22,800 23,800 24,200 48%
Stirling 193,300 194,100 202,200 209,000 215,800 225,300 16%
Victoria Park 31,100 31,500 33,700 35,200 37,100 38,600 23%
Vincent 30,500 30,500 31,200 32,400 33,700 35,500 17%
Wanneroo 134,300 141,200 168,600 197,600 226,400 255,900 81%
Mindarie Region 590,200 598,800 641,800 685,400 728,100 771,000 29%
Figure 2-1 Mindarie region, projected population growth by member council
As can be seen the current (2009) regional population is estimated to be 599,000. This is
projected to grow to 771,000 by 2029, an increase of 29%. Population growth varies
considerably across the region, with the highest growth expected in Wanneroo and Perth local
government areas (LGA). By contrast, population in Cambridge and Joondalup LGAs is
expected to remain relatively constant. Detailed historical and projected populations are
provided in Appendix A.
59
0,0
00
59
9,0
00
60
8,0
00
61
6,0
00
62
5,0
00
63
3,0
00
64
2,0
00
65
0,0
00
65
9,0
00
66
8,0
00
67
6,0
00
68
5,0
00
69
4,0
00
70
3,0
00
71
1,0
00
72
0,0
00
72
8,0
00
73
7,0
00
74
5,0
00
75
4,0
00
76
2,0
00
77
1,0
00
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
Wanneroo
Vincent
Victoria Park
Stirling
Perth
Joondalup
Cambridge
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 19 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 174
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 6 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
2.3 Waste growth projections
For the municipal sector, population and consumption patterns are the main influencing factors
in the total quantity of domestic waste and recyclables that enter the waste management
system. Historically, waste quantities have been found to increase at a faster rate than
population.
2.3.1 Projecting future growth rates
Over long time periods such as the 20 year MRC strategic planning period (2009 – 2029), the
assumed rate at which waste is projected to grow or fall above that of population has a
significant impact on final projections.
Figure 2-2 shows projections of garbage generation assuming an initial per capita growth rate of
1% per year (2009-10) trending linearly to an endpoint at 2028-29 ranging from -2% to +2%.
The results show the significant variability in endpoint projections depending on the assumed
growth rate.
Figure 2-2 Variability in garbage generation projections, based on assumed growth rate
It is difficult to predict which trend is most likely. On the one hand, there is community pressure
and government policy commitments to reducing waste, and per capita consumption of
newsprint and glass, for example, seem likely to decline. On the other hand, to date resource
efficiency efforts and declines in particular materials have made little impact on waste growth.
An analysis of historical waste quantity data provides the best indication of the likely future
growth rate.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
To
nnes g
arb
ag
e
Garbage generation grows in 2010 at the annual rate of population + 1%, subsiding in 2029 to population + ….
-2% -1% 0% 1% 2% Population
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 20 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 175
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 7 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
2.3.2 Current growth rates
For this study historical waste quantity data was obtained from each member council in order to
assess current growth rates. Annual data on garbage and recyclables collection quantities was
obtained for the six year period 2003-04 to 2008-09 (except for all 2008/09 data for City of
Wanneroo and 2008/09 recycling data for Town of Victoria Park which was not available) .
A comparative analysis of total waste generation and population was undertaken for the seven
member councils over the six year timeframe. Annual gross state product was also included in
the assessment to test whether this would be a better indicator of total waste generation.
In order to compare the three indicators (population, waste quantity, gross state product) the
value for each of the indicators was adjusted to a common index of 100 for this 2003-04. The
indexed value for subsequent years was calculated by comparing the indicator value for that
year to its value in 2003-04 factored by 100. The results are shown in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 Total household garbage and recyclables generation and population, 2003-04 to 2008-09,
Mindarie region
Parameter Item 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
Quantity
(tonnes)
Household garbage
(Mindarie councils ex Stirling)
133,813 130,318 146,710 150,797 156,370 156,715
Household recyclables
(Mindarie councils ex Stirling)
15,016 15,892 17,298 16,934 24,408 27,849
Household garbage (Stirling) 75,067 79,688 79,063 80,006 79,691 80,252
Total household garbage and
recyclables
223,896 225,898 243,071 247,737 260,469 264,815
Indexed garbage and
recyclables
100 101 109 111 116 118
Population Total (ex Stirling) 349,982 359,164 370,347 383,473 396,882 404,706
Stirling 181,227 183,065 185,485 189,495 193,300 194,139
Mindarie total 531,209 542,229 555,832 572,968 590,182 598,845
Indexed total 100 102 105 108 111 113
% change 2.1% 2.5% 3.1% 3.0% 1.5%
Total + 1% 3.1% 3.5% 4.1% 4.0% 2.5%
Population + 1% 531,209 547,541 566,753 589,893 613,514 628,655
Indexed population + 1% 100 103 107 111 115 118
Gross State
Product
Total 119186 123707 129996 139247 146444
Indexed gross state product 100 104 109 117 123
A plot of indexed data shows a good match between the indices for “population plus 1 %” and
household garbage and recyclables (see Figure 2-3).
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 21 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 176
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 8 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
Figure 2-3 Comparison of population and waste generation indices, 2003-04 to 2008-09, Mindarie region
In developing waste projections for the Mindarie region, it has been assumed that per capita
waste generation is unlikely to increase indefinitely due to an increasingly resource-conscious
community, efficiency improvements (e.g. product light-weighting, reduced packaging), and
behavioural change initiatives. For the purpose of projecting waste quantities therefore, per
capita waste quantities are assumed to increase initially at 1% per year then decrease gradually
to zero by the end of the strategic planning period (2028-29).
2.3.3 Waste projections
Using the population data and assumptions in relation to increases in generation, base case
estimates of future council-collected waste quantities were developed for each local government
area. A summary is presented for selected years in Table 2-3. Detailed data are presented on
an annual basis for each member council in Appendix B.
Projections include garbage and recyclables collected by councils from commercial premises.
There is however considerable uncertainty over the extent to which member councils will
provide these services, which may impact on the tonnes available for future processing.
GSP indexed
population indexed
household garbage and recyclables, indexed
population indexed + 1%
90
100
110
120
130
2003-2004 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009
AcronymsG = GarbageR = Co-mingled recyclablesGSP = Gross State Product
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 22 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 177
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 9 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
Table 2-3 Quantities of council-collected wastes, Mindarie region
Council-collected waste stream Council/Region 2008-09 2013-14 2018-19 2023-24 2028-29
Household garbage
Cambridge 9,000 9,600 10,000 10,000 9,900
Joondalup 54,600 56,900 59,700 62,100 62,700
Perth 5,900 7,900 8,900 9,500 9,600
Stirling 80,000 87,100 92,900 97,700 102,500
Victoria Park 9,900 11,000 11,900 12,800 13,300
Vincent 13,300 14,200 15,200 16,100 17,100
Wanneroo 49,000 61,100 73,900 86,100 97,900
Region 221,700 247,800 272,500 294,300 313,100
Commercial & industrial garbage Region 37,000 45,000 51,800 57,700 62,700
Verge collections - bulky waste Region 25,300 27,700 30,100 32,200 33,900
Verge collections - green waste Region 18,300 20,100 21,700 23,000 24,200
Household recycling Region 23,900 27,300 30,700 33,700 36,300
Commercial & industrial recycling Region 2,000 2,400 2,700 2,800 2,900
Note: Insufficient data are available to develop forward projections of self haul wastes, household hazardous wastes and council office and workshop wastes. Projections have also not been made for council infrastructure works wastes, as these are highly variable and are dependent on budgeted council capital works and maintenance programs.
2.4 Comparison of projected waste quantities and processing capacity
2.4.1 Household garbage
Within the Mindarie region, processing capacity for household garbage is currently provided by
the Neerabup and ATLAS resource recovery facilities (RRF). Additional processing capacity is
currently provided outside the region at the AnaeCo RRF in Shenton Park.
ATLAS resource recovery facility
The ATLAS RRF in Stirling is a sorting facility for household waste collected by the City of
Stirling. At the facility, recyclables (ferrous and non-ferrous metals, recyclable plastics and
glass) and the organic fraction (food scraps, garden organics and paper) are sorted from
household garbage. The recyclables are consolidated and sent to reprocessors for recovery.
The organic fraction is transported to an open windrow composting facility at Calingiri, some
120km north of Perth. Residue from the sorting facility is transported to Tamala Park landfill for
disposal. The processing capacity of the sorting facility is 66,000 tonne/yr. This capacity is
insufficient to handle all of Stirling’s household garbage, which is currently around
80,000 tonne/yr.
The ATLAS RRF is operated by the Atlas Group under a processing contract with the City of
Stirling, which operates a single bin system for household waste. The contract operates to
August 2013, with an optional three year extension to August 2016.
Neerabup resource recovery facility
The Neerabup RRF is a mechanical biological treatment plant for household garbage. The
facility employs a two stage aerobic composting process that converts the organic fraction of the
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 23 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 178
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 10 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
garbage into compost. Metals are also separated for reprocessing. Residue from the facility is
transported to Tamala Park landfill for disposal. The processing capacity of the facility is
100,000 tonne/yr.
The Neerabup RRF is operated by Biovision 2020 under a processing contract with Mindarie
Regional Council. The facility is primarily designed to receive household garbage from areas
that have kerbside recycling programs in place that separately collect and recover packaging
materials and paper. The processing contract for the Neerabup RRF operates for a 20 year
period until 2029.
AnaeCo resource recovery facility
The Western Metropolitan Regional Council (WMRC) has entered into a commercial
arrangement with AnaeCo for the development of an RRF for processing of household garbage
at the WMRC’s Brockway Waste Transfer Station in Shenton Park. The facility includes a
materials sorting process to separate the organic-rich fraction from household garbage, with the
organic fraction conveyed to an enclosed vessel in which hybrid aerobic / anaerobic processing
occurs yielding biogas and an organic product.
The facility is being developed in two stages. At present (December 2009) Stage 1 performance
trials are complete and are being independently assessed against performance criteria. If
successful, Stage 2 development will proceed (subject to securing debt finance and
environmental approvals) which will increase the facility’s processing capacity to
55,000 tonne/yr.
Household garbage generation within WMRC region is in the order of 30,000 tonne/yr.
Assuming Stage 2 proceeds as planned there will therefore be in the order of 25,000 tonne/yr of
spare processing capacity available at the facility. The City of Stirling has entered into an
agreement to utilise the AnaeCo RRF for processing of household garbage in excess of the
capacity of the ATLAS sorting facility.
Processing capacity review
Household garbage generation in Mindarie region is currently 220,000 tonne/yr (Table 2-3).
With the inclusion of the 37,000 tonne/yr of commercial premises garbage, the total quantity of
garbage collected in the Mindarie region by member councils is 257,000 tonne/yr.
The currently contracted MSW processing capacity provided to Mindarie member councils by
the Neerabup and ATLAS RRFs is 166,000 tonne/yr. Some additional processing capacity is
provided to the City of Stirling by the Stage 1 AnaeCo RRF.
Based on the above, in the order of 90,000 of tonne/yr of council collected garbage in the region
is currently not processed and is disposed directly to landfill.
The processing contract between ATLAS and the City of Stirling ends in August 2013 or, if the
contract extension is exercised, in August 2016. At this time (August 2016), it is expected that
around 20,000 tonne/yr of processing capacity may be available to the City of Stirling at the
AnaeCo RRF, assuming it is developed as planned. The combined processing capacity
available from the AnaeCo and Neerabup RRFs will then be around 120,000 tonne/yr,
compared with total projected (household and commercial premises) garbage collected by
councils of around 306,000 tonne/yr.
A summary of contracted processing capacity and garbage generation is provided at various
time points in Table 2-4.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 24 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 179
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 11 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
Table 2-4 Comparison of available processing capacity and projected garbage generation,
Mindarie region
Item 2009-10 2015-16 2029-30
Available processing capacity
Neerabup RRF 100,000 100,000 100,000
ATLAS RRF 66,000 0 0
AnaeCo RRF < 5,000 ≈ 20,000 ≈ 20,000
Total available capacity 170,000 120,000 120,000
Projected quantity of council-collected garbage
Household garbage 227,000 258,000 317,000
Commercial premises garbage 37,000 48,000 63,000
Total garbage 264,000 306,000 380,000
Projected quantity of garbage in excess of available processing capacity
Household garbage only 57,000 138,000 197,000
Total garbage (household & commercial) 94,000 186,000 260,000
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 25 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 180
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 12 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
3 Waste processing options
A wide range of options are available to the MRC for the processing of MSW. When we say
options, we are referring to discrete actions, for example, the establishment of a resource
recovery facility, implementation of an education campaign, or the adoption of a 3 bin collection
system for household waste. To meet the processing needs of the region, MRC will need to
implement multiple complementary options which together address the total quantity of MSW
generated as well as the varying nature of the individual streams that make up MSW. Such a
package of complementary options is referred to as a “scenario”.
The intention of this stage of the project – comprising of this report and a workshop in early
2010 – is to develop a comprehensive list of options available to MRC and member councils for
the processing of MSW generated in the region. Once the list of options is finalised, the impact
of each option will be assessed, which will inform the development of scenarios.
3.1 Options
The various technology, siting and logistical options that are considered to be viable are
presented in this section, sorted by waste stream or theme. Each themed table below is like a
menu from which MRC and member councils may select one or more options that address the
particular waste stream. Some options in the list are complementary and may be packaged
together in a scenario. Some options achieve the same objective or are not complementary to
other options, and these options would not be packaged together in a scenario.
The options address waste streams within the definition of MSW and household and
commercial recyclables.
These options are based on extensive background research including a solid understanding of
the waste profile of member councils, current waste management infrastructure and processing
capacities within the Mindarie region and other Perth regional councils, the legal and policy
restrictions on waste processing, as well as information gathered during meetings and
discussions with representatives from each member council. The base case modelling also
establishes MRC’s future waste processing needs and therefore also informed the options
development process.
The workshop in early 2010 will provide the opportunity for MRC or member councils to discuss
these options further and contribute any other options.
At this stage, we have outlined options at a high level. We have not identified issues such as the
timeframe for implementation, material sources, responsible authority and specific locations.
These details will be influenced by the broader scenario – that will define what options are
packaged together and how they interact with each other –and therefore will be determined at
the scenarios stage.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 26 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 181
Inte
gra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n for
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Hyd
er
Consultin
g P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
Page 1
3h
ttp
://a
us.h
yb
is.in
fo/p
roje
cts
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tio
ns r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Garb
age p
rocess
ing
One o
r m
ore
of
the
op
tio
ns b
elo
w f
or
the p
rocessin
g o
f g
arb
age c
ou
ld b
e s
ele
cte
d.
Facto
rs influ
encin
g th
e d
ecis
ion
to a
do
pt o
ne o
r m
ore
option
s (
i.e.
est
ablis
h o
ne o
r m
ore
fa
cilit
ies)
inclu
de a
va
ilabili
ty o
f la
nd,
geog
raph
ic c
overa
ge
, fa
cili
ty c
apa
city,
fe
edsto
ck a
nd
th
e e
sta
blis
hm
ent
of oth
er
facili
tie
s
(e.g
. a p
urp
ose-b
uilt
sort
ing
facili
ty fo
r se
lf h
au
l a
nd v
erg
e b
ulk
y m
ate
ria
ls).
No
. O
pti
on
G
arb
ag
e
Rec
ycla
ble
s
Household garbage
Commercial garbage
Council garbage
Residue
Verge bulky
Self haul
Council C&D waste
Hazardous waste
Household recyclables
Commercial recyclables
Council recyclables
1
Follo
win
g c
onclu
sio
n o
f exi
sting c
ontr
act arr
ang
em
ents
, sort
ing o
f all
mate
rials
colle
cte
d thro
ugh t
he k
erb
sid
e c
olle
ction s
yste
m fro
m C
ity o
f S
tirl
ing a
t a d
irty
MR
F
locate
d in t
he s
outh
of th
e r
egio
n.
� �
�
� �
�
2
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of a
n a
naero
bic
dig
estion facili
ty in t
he r
egio
n.
� �
�
3
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of a
n a
ero
bic
com
posting facili
ty in t
he r
egio
n.
� �
�
4
Pro
cessin
g o
f a p
roport
ion o
f m
ate
rials
gen
era
ted in t
he s
outh
ern
co
uncils
at th
e
Ana
eC
o f
acili
ty.
� �
�
5
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of a th
erm
al energ
y fr
om
waste
facili
ty, (e
.g.
gasific
ation, pyro
lysis
or
com
bustion)
in t
he r
egio
n.
� �
�
�
�
�
�
6
Pro
cessin
g o
f m
ate
rials
at a t
herm
al energ
y fro
m w
aste
facili
ty locate
d o
uts
ide o
f th
e
regio
n a
nd d
evelo
ped b
y,
or
in c
onju
nction w
ith, a
noth
er
regio
nal co
uncil
e.g
. E
MR
C.
� �
�
�
�
�
�
7
Co
nsolid
atio
n a
nd s
ort
ing o
f m
ate
rials
at sm
all-
footp
rint sort
ing a
nd t
ransfe
r fa
cili
ties
esta
blis
hed c
lose t
o t
he p
oin
t of g
enera
tion,
pri
or
to t
ransport
to landfill
or
a r
esourc
e
recovery
facili
ty.
� �
�
�
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 27 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 182
In
tegra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n f
or
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Page 1
4
Hyd
er
Consulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
h
ttp
://a
us.h
ybis
.info
/pro
jects
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tions r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Colle
ctio
n s
yste
ms
Th
e w
aste
pro
cessin
g te
ch
nolo
gie
s s
ele
cted w
ill la
rge
ly d
ete
rmin
e th
e k
erb
sid
e c
olle
ctio
n s
yste
ms r
equ
ired
to d
eliv
er
the a
ppro
priate
fe
edsto
ck t
o
facili
ties. F
or
exa
mp
le,
if a
gre
en w
ast
e p
rocessi
ng f
acili
ty w
as e
sta
blis
he
d in th
e r
egio
n,
it m
ay
be a
ppro
pri
ate
to in
tro
du
ce a
gre
en
wast
e k
erb
sid
e b
in.
Diff
ere
nt
co
llect
ion s
yste
ms c
an b
e a
dop
ted in d
iffe
rent
me
mb
er
cou
ncils
or
ge
ogra
ph
ic a
rea
s,
influe
nced b
y th
e w
ast
e p
rofile
.
No
. O
pti
on
G
arb
ag
e
Gre
en
R
ec
ycla
ble
s
Household garbage
Commercial garbage
Council garbage
Residue
Verge inert
Self haul
Council C&D waste
Hazardous waste
Household green waste
Verge garden
Council parks & garden waste
Household recyclables
Commercial recyclables
Council recyclables
8
Ado
ption o
f a 1
bin
kerb
sid
e c
olle
ction s
yste
m c
onta
inin
g a
ll m
ate
rials
in t
he C
ity o
f
Stirl
ing.
�
�
�
9
Ado
ption o
f a 2
bin
kerb
sid
e c
olle
ction s
yste
m –
one c
onta
inin
g o
rga
nic
mate
rials
(com
pri
sing f
ood a
nd g
reen w
aste
) and th
e o
ther
conta
inin
g a
ll oth
er
mate
rials
. �
�
�
10
A
do
ption o
f a 2
bin
kerb
sid
e c
olle
ction s
yste
m –
one c
onta
inin
g r
ecyc
lable
mate
rials
(card
board
, p
aper
and r
igid
packagin
g)
and t
he o
ther
conta
inin
g a
ll oth
er
mate
rials
. �
�
�
11
A
do
ption o
f a 3
bin
kerb
sid
e c
olle
ction s
yste
m –
one c
onta
inin
g r
ecyc
lable
mate
rials
(card
board
, p
aper
and r
igid
packagin
g),
one c
onta
inin
g g
reen w
aste
and t
he o
ther
conta
inin
g a
ll oth
er
mate
rials
.
�
�
�
12
A
do
ption o
f a 3
bin
kerb
sid
e c
olle
ction s
yste
m –
one c
onta
inin
g r
ecyc
lable
mate
rials
(card
board
, p
aper
and r
igid
packagin
g),
one c
onta
inin
g o
rganic
mate
rials
(fo
od a
nd
gre
en w
aste
) and th
e o
ther
conta
inin
g a
ll oth
er
mate
rials
.
�
�
�
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 28 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 183
Inte
gra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n for
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Hyd
er
Consultin
g P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
Page 1
5h
ttp
://a
us.h
yb
is.in
fo/p
roje
cts
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tio
ns r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Recyc
lable
s
Th
ere
is
only
one m
ate
ria
ls r
eco
very
fa
cili
ty (
MR
F)
in t
he M
ind
ari
e r
eg
ion
an
d lim
ite
d s
lack c
ap
acity
at
MR
Fs
acr
oss the
Pert
h m
etr
op
olit
an a
rea. It m
ay
the
refo
re b
e a
pri
ority
for
MR
C to e
sta
blis
h M
RF
cap
acity
in the
regio
n t
o r
ed
uce tra
nsport
co
sts
an
d im
pacts
for
mem
ber
cou
ncils
.
No
. O
pti
on
H
ou
seh
old
re
cycla
ble
s
Co
mm
erc
ial
rec
ycla
ble
s
Co
un
cil
re
cycla
ble
s
13
P
urs
ue c
ontinu
ous im
pro
vem
ent
in r
ed
ucin
g r
esid
ue g
enera
ted b
y th
e W
angara
MR
F t
hro
ugh a
ctions
such a
s m
ore
inte
nsiv
e m
ate
rials
separa
tion a
nd e
ducatio
n t
o r
ed
uce c
onta
min
ation.
�
�
�
14
M
RC
to t
ake o
ver
ow
ners
hip
of W
angara
MR
F f
or
the s
ort
ing
of re
cycla
ble
s c
olle
cte
d b
y m
em
ber
councils
.
�
�
�
15
M
RC
to f
acili
tate
a c
ontr
act/s for
the r
egio
n-w
ide s
ort
ing o
f re
cycla
ble
s o
n b
ehalf o
f m
em
ber
councils
to a
chie
ve s
cale
econom
ies.
�
�
�
Gre
en w
aste
Th
e o
ptio
ns b
elo
w r
eflect th
e c
ontinu
ation o
f curr
ent
arr
an
ge
me
nts
an
d a
ltern
ative o
ption
s w
hic
h w
ou
ld m
ost
likely
be c
oord
inate
d b
y M
RC
.
No
. O
pti
on
H
ou
seh
old
gre
en
w
aste
(so
urc
e
sep
ara
ted
)
Verg
e g
reen
C
ou
ncil p
ark
s &
g
ard
en
waste
16
Co
ntinuatio
n o
f exi
sting a
rrangem
ents
for
verg
e-c
olle
cte
d g
reen w
aste
: com
merc
ial opera
tor
is
responsib
le f
or
receiv
al and p
rocessin
g o
f m
ate
rials
colle
cte
d fro
m S
tirlin
g, C
am
bri
dge,
Vic
Park
, V
incent and P
ert
h; council
esta
blis
hes a
rran
gem
ents
for
the r
eceiv
al and p
rocessin
g o
f
mate
rials
colle
cte
d f
rom
Wann
ero
o a
nd J
oondalu
p a
t a f
acili
ty in th
e r
egio
n.
�
17
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of
contr
act
for
the r
eceiv
al an
d p
rocessin
g o
f verg
e-c
olle
cte
d g
reen w
aste
fro
m
Wannero
o a
nd J
oondalu
p.
�
18
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of
contr
act
for
the r
eceiv
al an
d p
rocessin
g o
f verg
e c
olle
cte
d g
reen w
aste
fro
m
all
mem
ber
councils
.
�
19
Esta
blis
hm
ent
of
facili
ties in the r
egio
n to r
ece
ive a
nd p
rocess g
reen w
aste
fro
m a
ll m
em
ber
councils
. �
�
�
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 29 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 184
In
tegra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n f
or
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Page 1
6
Hyd
er
Consulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
h
ttp
://a
us.h
ybis
.info
/pro
jects
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tions r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Inert
wa
ste
s
Th
e fo
llow
ing o
ptio
ns
to a
ddre
ss th
e inert
co
mp
onen
ts o
f verg
e b
ulk
y m
ate
ria
ls,
self h
au
l a
nd c
ou
ncil
C&
D w
ast
e a
re p
redo
min
an
tly
alte
rnative
me
chan
ism
s to
dri
ve m
axim
um
re
covery
and a
chie
ve
a r
esid
ue
that
is s
uitab
le f
or
dis
po
sal at
an in
ert
lan
dfill.
In a
dd
itio
n t
o th
e d
ire
ct fin
ancia
l a
nd
envir
on
men
tal be
ne
fits
of re
coveri
ng
the
se
mate
ria
ls,
div
ers
ion o
f th
e in
ert
ma
teri
als
to
an
ine
rt la
nd
fill
will
co
ntr
ibu
te t
o p
rolo
ng
ing t
he
life
of
Ta
ma
la
Park
.
No
. O
pti
on
G
arb
ag
e
Household garbage
Commercial garbage
Council garbage
Residue
Verge bulky
Self haul
Council C&D waste
Hazardous waste
20
For
verg
e c
olle
cte
d in
ert
waste
s a
nd c
ouncil
C&
D w
aste
, b
uild
min
imum
recovery
targ
ets
into
day labour
perf
orm
ance s
tand
ard
s o
r contr
acts
with
com
merc
ial opera
tors
to d
rive m
axi
mum
recovery
an
d a
chie
ve a
resid
ue t
hat
is s
uitable
for
dis
posal at a
n
inert
lan
dfill.
�
�
21
For
self h
aul w
aste
s, b
uild
min
imum
recovery
targ
ets
in t
o t
he c
ontr
acts
of
opera
tors
of
MR
C o
r m
em
ber
council
ow
ned facili
ties to d
rive m
axi
mum
recovery
and a
chie
ve a
resid
ue t
hat is
suitable
for
dis
posal at
an in
ert
landfill.
�
22
Pro
cess s
elf h
aul and v
erg
e b
ulk
y m
ate
rials
at
a p
urp
ose-b
uilt
sort
ing f
acili
ty.
�
�
23
Requir
e a
ll self h
aul d
eliv
eri
es to b
e s
ort
ed p
rior
to d
isposal th
rou
gh d
esig
n o
f fa
cili
ties
and p
ricin
g.
�
24
Restr
ict dis
posal of
inert
mate
rials
at T
am
ala
Park
to p
reserv
e landfill
space,
eith
er
thro
ugh p
ricin
g o
r oth
er
restr
ictions.
�
�
�
25
Esta
blis
h a
C&
D r
ecyc
ling f
acili
ty/ies in the r
egio
n
�
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 30 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 185
Inte
gra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n for
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Hyd
er
Consultin
g P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
Page 1
7h
ttp
://a
us.h
yb
is.in
fo/p
roje
cts
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tio
ns r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Hazard
ous w
aste
Th
e p
rovis
ion o
f h
aza
rdo
us w
aste
dro
p o
ff p
oin
ts o
r colle
ction
eve
nts
is
critical fo
r pu
blic
health a
nd s
afe
ty a
nd to r
edu
ce c
onta
min
ation o
f str
eam
s th
at
are
be
ing
pro
cess
ed a
t R
RF
s. A
ll five
of th
e o
ption
s b
elo
w a
re c
om
ple
menta
ry a
nd c
ou
ld b
e a
dop
ted
in
on
e s
cen
ario.
No
. O
pti
on
G
arb
ag
e
Household garbage
Commercial garbage
Council garbage
Residue
Verge inert
Self haul
Council C&D waste
Hazardous waste
26
Mem
ber
councils
intr
oduce g
uid
elin
es f
or
the c
orr
ect
managem
ent of cou
ncil
pre
mis
es
(off
ices a
nd w
ork
shops)
waste
s t
o m
axi
mis
e r
esourc
e r
ecove
ry a
nd e
nsure
that
garb
age is p
rocessable
at
resourc
e r
ecovery
facili
ties.
�
�
27
Mem
ber
councils
pro
vid
e r
ecyclin
g f
acili
ties a
t council
pre
mis
es inclu
din
g o
ffic
es a
nd
work
shops for
mate
rials
that
are
not
suitable
for
dis
posal in
the g
arb
age b
ins,
such a
s
fluore
scent glo
bes a
nd o
il filters
.
28
Pro
vid
e H
HW
dro
p o
ff facili
ties a
t all
MR
C o
r m
em
ber
council
waste
manag
em
ent
facili
ties a
nd c
ouncil
pre
mis
es that
receiv
e w
aste
s in t
he r
egio
n.
�
29
Pro
vid
e H
HW
dis
posal d
ays th
roug
hout
the r
egio
n, pre
fera
bly
as p
art
of
a s
tate
wid
e
pro
gra
m.
�
30
Pro
vid
e a
mo
bile
HH
W d
rop o
ff f
acili
ty,
opera
ted b
y M
RC
, th
at can c
olle
ct
mate
rials
at
hig
h tra
ffic
and e
asy t
o a
ccess a
reas s
uch a
s s
hoppin
g c
entr
es.
�
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 31 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 186
In
tegra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n f
or
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Page 1
8
Hyd
er
Consulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
h
ttp
://a
us.h
ybis
.info
/pro
jects
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tions r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Resourc
e r
ecovery
park
s
Th
ere
are
curr
ently
limited d
rop o
ff p
oin
ts f
or
ho
useho
lders
to d
isp
ose
of
waste
in t
he M
ind
ari
e r
eg
ion
. F
or
ho
use
ho
lders
in th
e inn
er,
so
uth
ern
co
un
cils
in t
he r
eg
ion th
e c
lose
st f
acili
ties
are
outs
ide o
f th
e r
eg
ion. R
eso
urc
e r
eco
very
park
s c
ould
pro
vid
e d
rop o
ff f
aci
litie
s fo
r a
ll w
ast
e s
trea
ms, and
could
be
co-l
ocate
d w
ith o
ther
waste
man
age
men
t in
fra
str
uctu
re, su
ch a
s tra
nsf
er
station
s o
r R
RF
s.
No
. O
pti
on
G
arb
ag
e
Gre
en
R
ec
ycla
ble
s
Household garbage
Commercial garbage
Council garbage
Residue
Verge inert
Self haul
Council C&D waste
Hazardous waste
Household green waste
Verge green
Council parks & garden waste
Household recyclables
Commercial recyclables
Council recyclables
31
P
rovi
de r
esourc
e r
ecove
ry p
ark
s thro
ugho
ut
the r
egio
n for
dro
p o
ff o
f househ
old
waste
str
eam
s a
nd s
elf h
aul m
ate
rials
. Locations c
ould
inclu
de B
alc
atta tra
nsfe
r sta
tion,
Tam
ala
Park
, N
eera
bup, W
angara
, O
sborn
e P
ark
, H
erd
sm
ans,
Mala
ga.
�
�
�
�
Dis
posal
Relia
nce o
n la
ndfill
dis
po
sa
l will
re
du
ce
with
th
e e
xpan
sio
n o
f w
ast
e p
roce
ssin
g c
apa
city
in t
he r
egio
n.
Su
ccessi
ve s
tate
go
vern
ments
have
imp
lem
ente
d a
po
licy
that
pro
hib
its
develo
pm
ent
of la
ndfills
on th
e S
wan
Coa
sta
l P
lain
, m
ean
ing t
hat
the
Min
da
rie r
eg
ion w
ill b
e r
elia
nt
on
lan
dfills
loca
ted o
uts
ide o
f th
e r
egio
n. M
RC
could
adop
t on
e o
r bo
th d
isp
osal o
ptio
ns,
in
flu
enced
by
acce
ss
and t
ransport
co
sts
and
im
pa
cts
.
No
. O
pti
on
G
arb
ag
e
Household garbage
Commercial garbage
Council garbage
Residue
Verge inert
Self haul
Council C&D waste
Hazardous waste
32
Dis
posal of
resid
ue fro
m r
esourc
e r
ecovery
pro
cesses a
t S
on o
f T
am
ala
lan
dfill
locate
d in G
in G
in.
�
33
Dis
posal of
resid
ue fro
m r
esourc
e r
ecovery
pro
cesses a
t R
ed H
ill landfill.
�
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 32 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 187
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 19 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
4 Assessing the options
Each option will be assessed against financial, environmental, social and risk criteria, providing
a picture of its overall benefit and impact. This will provide MRC and member councils with the
information needed to develop a preferred scenario, which will form the basis of the Integrated
Regional Plan. The criteria against which the above options will be assessed are outlined in
Table 4-5 below.
Table 4-5 Assessment criteria
Criteria Description
ENVIRONMENTAL
Waste diverted
(tonnes)
Tonnage of waste diverted from landfill.
Resource recovered
(tonnes)
Recovery of recyclable materials
Net energy balance
(qualitative)
A relative assessment of the energy produced such as electricity from biogas or waste combustion
and energy consumed, such as mains electricity, gas, liquid fuels.
Greenhouse impacts
and benefits
(qualitative)
A relative assessment of the greenhouse impacts and benefits. Impacts could include energy
consumed in construction and operation of facilities, energy consumed by waste transport,
alternative and renewable energy generated and energy saved by resource recovery.
Local environmental
impacts (qualitative)
A relative assessment of other impacts upon the local environment such as land use, dust, water
contamination, air quality and attraction of vermin.
FINANCIAL
Financial cost
($ and $/tonne)
Total costs (upfront and ongoing) over the life of the project. Costs will be presented as region
wide, per Council and per household. Cost certainty will be indicated.
SOCIAL
Community
acceptance
(qualitative)
Likely acceptance by the community (including the local community, broader community and
interest groups) based on knowledge of reactions to comparable technologies and facilities.
Behavioural change
(qualitative)
The level of behaviour change required in the community for successful implementation. For
example, changes to segregation of household wastes.
Odour and visual
amenity
(qualitative)
Impacts on the community related to facility siting and technology. Includes the potential for
different types of technologies to generate odours and the potential for successful odour control,
the typical size and potential intrusiveness and the potential for litter generation.
Traffic, noise and
congestion
(qualitative)
The potential for the transportation of waste to and from the facilities to result in noise and amenity
impacts on the community, including other road users.
RISK
Contractual
(qualitative)
Level of contractual control.
Technology related
(qualitative)
The degree of innovation, proveness of the technology or approach, operational complexity, risk,
scalability, compatibility with feedstock and flexibility in feedstock.
Geographic / location
(qualitative)
Risks associated with factors such as environmental characteristics, zoning, access and current
and future uses.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 33 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 188
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Page 20 Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289
http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docx
5 References
Western Australian Planning Commission (2005), WA Population Report No. 6, Western
Australia Tomorrow, Population projections for planning regions 2004 to 2031 and local
government areas 2004 to 2021, Albert Facey House, November 2005
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009), Regional Population Growth, Australia, Publication
3218.0, Released at 11.30am (Canberra time) 23 April 2009
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 34 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 189
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docxions report.docx
Appendix A
Population projections
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 35 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 190
Inte
gra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n for
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Page A
-1
Hyd
er
Consultin
g P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
http
://a
us.h
yb
is.in
fo/p
roje
cts
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tio
ns r
epo
rt.d
ocx
His
tori
cal
Est
ima
ted
Re
sid
en
t P
op
ula
tio
n
Est
ima
ted
Re
sid
en
t p
op
ula
tio
ns
fro
m A
BS
Ca
talo
gu
e 3
21
8.0
Re
gio
na
l Po
pu
lati
on
Gro
wth
, A
ust
ralia
, R
ele
ase
d a
t 1
1.3
0a
m (
Ca
nb
err
a t
ime
) 2
3 A
pri
l 20
09
Co
un
cil
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
Ca
mb
rid
ge
24
,63
8
2
4,8
54
25
,21
5
2
5,5
31
25
,92
4
Joo
nd
alu
p1
57
,84
0
15
7,4
15
1
57
,87
1
15
8,2
27
1
59
,98
6
Pe
rth
9,9
28
11
,26
5
1
2,4
56
13
,63
5
1
5,1
13
Sti
rlin
g1
81
,22
7
18
3,0
65
1
85
,48
5
18
9,4
95
1
93
,30
0
Vic
tori
a P
ark
28
,56
3
2
8,9
43
29
,40
4
3
0,1
56
31
,14
8
Vin
cen
t2
8,3
93
28
,95
4
2
9,5
04
30
,21
8
3
0,4
53
Wa
nn
ero
o1
00
,62
0
10
7,7
33
1
15
,89
7
12
5,7
06
1
34
,25
8
Re
gio
n5
31
,20
9
54
2,2
29
5
55
,83
2
57
2,9
68
5
90
,18
2
Ad
op
ted
Po
pu
lati
on
Pro
ject
ion
Co
un
cil
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
20
30
20
31
Ca
mb
rid
ge
25
,92
4
2
5,9
24
26
,03
1
2
6,1
37
26
,24
4
2
6,3
51
26
,45
7
2
6,5
64
26
,56
4
2
6,5
64
26
,56
4
2
6,5
64
26
,45
7
2
6,3
51
26
,24
4
2
6,1
37
26
,03
1
2
5,9
24
25
,81
7
2
5,8
17
25
,71
1
2
5,7
11
25
,71
1
2
5,7
11
Joo
nd
alu
p1
59
,98
6
15
9,3
64
1
58
,84
5
15
8,5
34
1
58
,43
1
1
58
,53
4
15
8,8
45
1
59
,26
0
15
9,7
79
1
60
,29
7
16
1,0
23
1
61
,74
9
16
2,4
74
1
63
,20
0
16
3,9
26
1
64
,54
8
16
5,1
70
1
65
,58
5
16
5,8
96
1
66
,10
3
16
6,1
03
1
65
,89
6
16
5,6
89
1
65
,37
8
Pe
rth
15
,11
3
1
6,3
44
17
,57
6
1
8,5
83
19
,47
9
2
0,1
51
20
,82
2
2
1,2
70
21
,71
8
2
2,1
66
22
,50
2
2
2,8
37
23
,17
3
2
3,3
97
23
,62
1
2
3,7
33
23
,84
5
2
3,9
57
24
,06
9
2
4,0
69
24
,18
1
2
4,1
81
24
,29
3
2
4,4
05
Sti
rlin
g1
93
,30
0
19
4,1
39
1
95
,18
7
19
6,5
50
1
98
,33
2
2
00
,21
9
20
2,2
10
2
04
,20
2
20
5,8
79
2
07
,13
7
20
8,0
81
2
09
,02
4
20
9,8
63
2
11
,01
6
21
2,3
78
2
14
,05
6
21
5,8
38
2
17
,82
9
21
9,7
16
2
21
,70
8
22
3,4
90
2
25
,27
2
22
6,8
44
2
28
,52
2
Vic
tori
a P
ark
31
,14
8
3
1,4
62
31
,77
5
3
2,1
93
32
,61
1
3
3,1
34
33
,65
7
3
4,0
75
34
,49
3
3
4,8
06
35
,01
5
3
5,2
24
35
,43
3
3
5,7
47
36
,16
5
3
6,5
83
37
,10
6
3
7,6
28
37
,94
2
3
8,2
56
38
,46
5
3
8,5
69
38
,56
9
3
8,6
74
Vin
cen
t3
0,4
53
30
,45
3
3
0,5
66
30
,67
9
3
0,7
93
31
,01
9
3
1,2
45
31
,47
2
3
1,6
98
31
,92
5
3
2,1
51
32
,37
8
3
2,4
91
32
,83
0
3
3,0
57
33
,39
6
3
3,7
36
34
,18
9
3
4,5
28
34
,86
8
3
5,2
08
35
,54
7
3
5,7
74
36
,11
3
Wa
nn
ero
o1
34
,25
8
14
1,1
59
1
47
,64
2
15
3,4
97
1
58
,83
0
1
63
,74
5
16
8,5
54
1
73
,46
9
17
8,8
02
1
84
,76
2
19
1,1
40
1
97
,62
3
20
4,2
10
2
10
,37
9
21
6,0
26
2
21
,25
4
22
6,3
77
2
31
,60
6
23
7,0
43
2
42
,89
8
24
9,1
72
2
55
,86
4
26
2,8
70
2
70
,18
9
Re
gio
n5
90
,18
2
59
8,8
45
6
07
,62
2
61
6,1
75
6
24
,72
0
6
33
,15
2
64
1,7
92
6
50
,31
2
65
8,9
32
6
67
,65
7
67
6,4
75
6
85
,39
9
69
4,1
02
7
02
,92
1
71
1,4
17
7
19
,70
8
72
8,1
03
7
36
,71
8
74
5,0
12
7
53
,72
0
76
2,3
29
7
71
,04
0
77
9,7
49
7
88
,99
1
Re
gio
n (
rou
nd
ed
)5
90
,00
0
59
9,0
00
6
08
,00
0
61
6,0
00
6
25
,00
0
6
33
,00
0
64
2,0
00
6
50
,00
0
65
9,0
00
6
68
,00
0
67
6,0
00
6
85
,00
0
69
4,0
00
7
03
,00
0
71
1,0
00
7
20
,00
0
72
8,0
00
7
37
,00
0
74
5,0
00
7
54
,00
0
76
2,0
00
7
71
,00
0
78
0,0
00
7
89
,00
0
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 36 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 191
Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/02 options paper/f0002-aa002809-aar-03-options report.docxions report.docx
Appendix B
Base case waste projections
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 37 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 192
Inte
gra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n for
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Page B
-1
Hyd
er
Consultin
g P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
http
://a
us.h
yb
is.in
fo/p
roje
cts
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tio
ns r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Ho
use
ho
ld g
arb
ag
e -
pro
ject
ion
- b
ase
ca
se
Co
un
cil
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
Ca
mb
rid
ge
9,0
44
9,1
72
9,2
96
9,4
17
9,5
35
9,6
49
9,7
59
9,8
25
9,8
88
9,9
45
9,9
97
10
,00
4
1
0,0
06
10
,00
2
9
,99
3
9
,97
9
9
,95
9
9
,93
4
9
,94
4
9
,90
8
9
,90
8
Joo
nd
alu
p5
4,5
61
54
,92
9
5
5,3
42
55
,80
1
5
6,3
07
56
,86
2
5
7,4
29
58
,00
9
5
8,5
64
59
,16
8
5
9,7
46
60
,29
7
6
0,8
21
61
,31
5
6
1,7
41
62
,13
7
6
2,4
24
62
,64
0
6
2,7
84
62
,81
7
6
2,7
39
Pe
rth
5,9
16
6,4
21
6,8
50
7,2
42
7,5
52
7,8
64
8,0
91
8,3
16
8,5
40
8,7
19
8,8
95
9,0
68
9,1
94
9,3
16
9,3
89
9,4
58
9,5
23
9,5
82
9,5
92
9,6
42
9,6
42
Sti
rlin
g7
9,9
83
81
,21
5
8
2,5
51
84
,03
8
8
5,5
45
87
,07
2
8
8,5
71
89
,90
4
9
1,0
22
91
,96
3
9
2,8
64
93
,67
7
9
4,5
86
95
,54
5
9
6,6
01
97
,66
0
9
8,7
66
99
,77
8
1
00
,78
7
10
1,6
51
1
02
,46
1
Vic
tori
a P
ark
9,8
67
10
,06
4
1
0,2
92
10
,51
8
1
0,7
75
11
,03
0
1
1,2
48
11
,46
3
1
1,6
40
11
,77
7
1
1,9
09
12
,03
7
1
2,1
94
12
,38
1
1
2,5
64
12
,77
6
1
2,9
83
13
,11
2
1
3,2
34
13
,31
3
1
3,3
49
Vin
cen
t1
3,2
68
13
,45
0
1
3,6
27
13
,79
9
1
4,0
17
14
,23
0
1
4,4
38
14
,64
0
1
4,8
37
15
,02
9
1
5,2
13
15
,33
9
1
5,5
64
15
,72
8
1
5,9
40
16
,14
4
1
6,3
94
16
,58
3
1
6,7
64
16
,93
6
1
7,0
99
Wa
nn
ero
o4
9,0
21
51
,76
2
5
4,3
05
56
,67
8
5
8,9
09
61
,10
4
6
3,3
36
65
,71
7
6
8,3
22
71
,07
6
7
3,8
61
76
,67
3
7
9,3
12
81
,73
3
8
3,9
69
86
,13
5
8
8,3
05
90
,51
8
9
2,8
49
95
,29
6
9
7,8
55
Re
gio
n2
21
,66
0
22
7,0
12
2
32
,26
3
23
7,4
92
2
42
,64
0
24
7,8
10
2
52
,87
2
25
7,8
76
2
62
,81
3
26
7,6
77
2
72
,48
7
27
7,0
95
2
81
,67
6
28
6,0
21
2
90
,19
8
29
4,2
89
2
98
,35
5
30
2,1
46
3
05
,95
5
30
9,5
63
3
13
,05
4
Co
mm
erc
ial
pre
mis
es g
arb
ag
e c
oll
ect
ed
by
co
un
cils
- p
roje
ctio
n -
ba
se
ca
se
Co
un
cil
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
Ca
mb
rid
ge
41
8
4
24
43
0
4
35
44
1
4
46
45
1
4
54
45
7
4
60
46
2
4
62
46
2
4
62
46
2
4
61
46
0
4
59
46
0
4
58
45
8
Joo
nd
alu
p-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pe
rth
8,4
67
9,1
90
9,8
03
10
,36
4
1
0,8
08
11
,25
4
1
1,5
79
11
,90
2
1
2,2
22
12
,47
8
1
2,7
30
12
,97
8
1
3,1
58
13
,33
2
1
3,4
37
13
,53
6
1
3,6
28
13
,71
3
1
3,7
28
13
,79
9
1
3,7
99
Sti
rlin
g7
,20
4
7
,31
5
7
,43
5
7
,56
9
7
,70
5
7
,84
2
7
,97
8
8
,09
8
8
,19
8
8
,28
3
8
,36
4
8
,43
7
8
,51
9
8
,60
6
8
,70
1
8
,79
6
8
,89
6
8
,98
7
9
,07
8
9
,15
6
9
,22
9
Vic
tori
a P
ark
2,7
70
2,8
25
2,8
89
2,9
53
3,0
25
3,0
96
3,1
58
3,2
18
3,2
68
3,3
06
3,3
43
3,3
79
3,4
23
3,4
76
3,5
27
3,5
87
3,6
45
3,6
81
3,7
15
3,7
37
3,7
47
Vin
cen
t9
57
97
0
9
83
99
5
1
,01
1
1
,02
6
1
,04
1
1
,05
6
1
,07
0
1
,08
4
1
,09
7
1
,10
6
1
,12
3
1
,13
4
1
,15
0
1
,16
4
1
,18
3
1
,19
6
1
,20
9
1
,22
2
1
,23
3
Wa
nn
ero
o1
7,1
38
18
,09
6
1
8,9
85
19
,81
5
2
0,5
95
21
,36
2
2
2,1
43
22
,97
5
2
3,8
86
24
,84
9
2
5,8
22
26
,80
5
2
7,7
28
28
,57
4
2
9,3
56
30
,11
3
3
0,8
72
31
,64
5
3
2,4
60
33
,31
6
3
4,2
11
Re
gio
n3
6,9
54
38
,82
0
4
0,5
26
42
,13
1
4
3,5
85
45
,02
7
4
6,3
49
47
,70
2
4
9,1
01
50
,46
0
5
1,8
19
53
,16
8
5
4,4
13
55
,58
5
5
6,6
33
57
,65
8
5
8,6
83
59
,68
2
6
0,6
50
61
,68
7
6
2,6
77
Ve
rge
co
lle
ctio
ns
- b
ulk
y w
ast
e -
pro
ject
ion
- b
ase
ca
se
Co
un
cil
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
Ca
mb
rid
ge
1,1
45
1,1
61
1,1
77
1,1
92
1,2
07
1,2
22
1,2
35
1,2
44
1,2
52
1,2
59
1,2
66
1,2
67
1,2
67
1,2
66
1,2
65
1,2
63
1,2
61
1,2
58
1,2
59
1,2
54
1,2
54
Joo
nd
alu
p1
1,6
60
11
,73
9
1
1,8
27
11
,92
5
1
2,0
33
12
,15
2
1
2,2
73
12
,39
7
1
2,5
16
12
,64
5
1
2,7
68
12
,88
6
1
2,9
98
13
,10
3
1
3,1
95
13
,27
9
1
3,3
40
13
,38
7
1
3,4
17
13
,42
5
1
3,4
08
Pe
rth
41
44
47
50
52
54
56
58
59
60
62
63
64
65
65
66
66
66
66
67
67
Sti
rlin
g6
,31
0
6
,40
7
6
,51
3
6
,63
0
6
,74
9
6
,86
9
6
,98
8
7
,09
3
7
,18
1
7
,25
5
7
,32
6
7
,39
0
7
,46
2
7
,53
8
7
,62
1
7
,70
5
7
,79
2
7
,87
2
7
,95
1
8
,01
9
8
,08
3
Vic
tori
a P
ark
1,3
83
1,4
11
1,4
43
1,4
74
1,5
10
1,5
46
1,5
77
1,6
07
1,6
31
1,6
51
1,6
69
1,6
87
1,7
09
1,7
35
1,7
61
1,7
91
1,8
20
1,8
38
1,8
55
1,8
66
1,8
71
Vin
cen
t5
66
57
4
5
81
58
9
5
98
60
7
6
16
62
5
6
33
64
1
6
49
65
4
6
64
67
1
6
80
68
9
6
99
70
7
7
15
72
2
7
29
Wa
nn
ero
o4
,22
9
4
,46
5
4
,68
5
4
,88
9
5
,08
2
5
,27
1
5
,46
4
5
,66
9
5
,89
4
6
,13
1
6
,37
2
6
,61
4
6
,84
2
7
,05
1
7
,24
4
7
,43
0
7
,61
8
7
,80
8
8
,01
0
8
,22
1
8
,44
1
Re
gio
n2
5,3
34
25
,80
1
2
6,2
72
26
,74
9
2
7,2
31
27
,72
1
2
8,2
08
28
,69
2
2
9,1
66
29
,64
2
3
0,1
12
30
,56
1
3
1,0
05
31
,42
9
3
1,8
30
32
,22
2
3
2,5
96
32
,93
6
3
3,2
74
33
,57
4
3
3,8
54
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 38 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 193
In
tegra
ted r
egio
nal pla
n f
or
the p
rocess
ing o
f m
unic
ipal s
olid
waste
Page B
-2
Hyd
er
Consulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76 1
04 4
85 2
89
h
ttp
://a
us.h
ybis
.info
/pro
jects
0/v
c/a
wa
rde
d/a
a0
02
80
9/f_
repo
rts/0
2 o
ptio
ns p
aper/
f00
02
-aa0
02
80
9-a
ar-
03
-op
tions r
epo
rt.d
ocx
Ve
rge
co
lle
ctio
ns
- g
ree
n w
aste
- p
roje
ctio
n -
ba
se
ca
se
Co
un
cil
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
Ca
mb
rid
ge
1,1
33
1,1
49
1,1
65
1,1
80
1,1
94
1,2
09
1,2
23
1,2
31
1,2
39
1,2
46
1,2
52
1,2
53
1,2
54
1,2
53
1,2
52
1,2
50
1,2
48
1,2
44
1,2
46
1,2
41
1,2
41
Joo
nd
alu
p4
,27
0
4
,29
9
4
,33
1
4
,36
7
4
,40
7
4
,45
0
4
,49
5
4
,54
0
4
,58
3
4
,63
1
4
,67
6
4
,71
9
4
,76
0
4
,79
9
4
,83
2
4
,86
3
4
,88
5
4
,90
2
4
,91
4
4
,91
6
4
,91
0
Pe
rth
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sti
rlin
g9
,60
3
9
,75
1
9
,91
1
1
0,0
90
10
,27
1
1
0,4
54
10
,63
4
1
0,7
94
10
,92
8
1
1,0
41
11
,15
0
1
1,2
47
11
,35
6
1
1,4
71
11
,59
8
1
1,7
25
11
,85
8
1
1,9
80
12
,10
1
1
2,2
04
12
,30
2
Vic
tori
a P
ark
82
1
8
38
85
6
8
75
89
7
9
18
93
6
9
54
96
9
9
80
99
1
1
,00
2
1
,01
5
1
,03
0
1
,04
5
1
,06
3
1
,08
0
1
,09
1
1
,10
1
1
,10
8
1
,11
1
Vin
cen
t5
00
50
7
5
14
52
0
5
28
53
6
5
44
55
2
5
59
56
6
5
73
57
8
5
87
59
3
6
01
60
8
6
18
62
5
6
32
63
8
6
44
Wa
nn
ero
o1
,99
8
2
,10
9
2
,21
3
2
,31
0
2
,40
1
2
,49
0
2
,58
1
2
,67
8
2
,78
4
2
,89
6
3
,01
0
3
,12
5
3
,23
2
3
,33
1
3
,42
2
3
,51
0
3
,59
9
3
,68
9
3
,78
4
3
,88
3
3
,98
8
Re
gio
n1
8,3
25
18
,65
2
1
8,9
90
19
,34
2
1
9,6
98
20
,05
7
2
0,4
12
20
,74
9
2
1,0
62
21
,36
1
2
1,6
52
21
,92
4
2
2,2
03
22
,47
7
2
2,7
50
23
,02
0
2
3,2
88
23
,53
1
2
3,7
77
23
,99
1
2
4,1
96
Ho
use
ho
ld r
ecy
clin
g -
pro
ject
ion
- b
ase
ca
se
Co
un
cil
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
Ca
mb
rid
ge
2,0
13
2,0
41
2,0
69
2,0
96
2,1
22
2,1
47
2,1
72
2,1
86
2,2
00
2,2
13
2,2
25
2,2
26
2,2
27
2,2
26
2,2
24
2,2
21
2,2
16
2,2
10
2,2
13
2,2
05
2,2
05
Joo
nd
alu
p7
,71
6
7
,76
8
7
,82
6
7
,89
1
7
,96
3
8
,04
1
8
,12
1
8
,20
3
8
,28
2
8
,36
7
8
,44
9
8
,52
7
8
,60
1
8
,67
1
8
,73
1
8
,78
7
8
,82
8
8
,85
8
8
,87
9
8
,88
3
8
,87
2
Pe
rth
72
6
7
88
84
1
8
89
92
7
9
65
99
3
1
,02
1
1
,04
8
1
,07
0
1
,09
2
1
,11
3
1
,12
8
1
,14
3
1
,15
2
1
,16
1
1
,16
9
1
,17
6
1
,17
7
1
,18
3
1
,18
3
Sti
rlin
g-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Vic
tori
a P
ark
2,0
94
2,1
35
2,1
84
2,2
32
2,2
86
2,3
40
2,3
86
2,4
32
2,4
70
2,4
99
2,5
27
2,5
54
2,5
87
2,6
27
2,6
66
2,7
11
2,7
55
2,7
82
2,8
08
2,8
25
2,8
32
Vin
cen
t2
,03
7
2
,06
5
2
,09
2
2
,11
9
2
,15
2
2
,18
5
2
,21
7
2
,24
8
2
,27
8
2
,30
7
2
,33
6
2
,35
5
2
,39
0
2
,41
5
2
,44
7
2
,47
9
2
,51
7
2
,54
6
2
,57
4
2
,60
0
2
,62
5
Wa
nn
ero
o9
,30
7
9
,82
8
1
0,3
10
10
,76
1
1
1,1
84
11
,60
1
1
2,0
25
12
,47
7
1
2,9
72
13
,49
4
1
4,0
23
14
,55
7
1
5,0
58
15
,51
8
1
5,9
42
16
,35
3
1
6,7
66
17
,18
6
1
7,6
28
18
,09
3
1
8,5
79
Re
gio
n2
3,8
92
24
,62
4
2
5,3
21
25
,98
6
2
6,6
34
27
,27
9
2
7,9
14
28
,56
7
2
9,2
49
29
,95
1
3
0,6
51
31
,33
2
3
1,9
90
32
,59
9
3
3,1
62
33
,71
1
3
4,2
49
34
,75
8
3
5,2
78
35
,78
9
3
6,2
96
Co
mm
erc
ial
pre
mis
es r
ecy
cla
ble
s co
lle
cte
d b
y c
ou
nci
ls -
pro
ject
ion
- b
ase
ca
se
Co
un
cil
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
Ca
mb
rid
ge
91
92
94
95
96
97
98
99
99
10
0
1
01
10
1
1
01
10
1
1
01
10
0
1
00
10
0
1
00
10
0
1
00
Joo
nd
alu
p-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pe
rth
1,0
04
1,0
90
1,1
62
1,2
29
1,2
82
1,3
34
1,3
73
1,4
11
1,4
49
1,4
80
1,5
10
1,5
39
1,5
60
1,5
81
1,5
93
1,6
05
1,6
16
1,6
26
1,6
28
1,6
36
1,6
36
Sti
rlin
g2
5
2
5
2
6
2
6
2
7
2
7
2
8
2
8
2
8
2
9
2
9
2
9
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
2
3
2
3
2
Vic
tori
a P
ark
15
2
1
55
15
8
1
61
16
5
1
69
17
3
1
76
17
9
1
81
18
3
1
85
18
7
1
90
19
3
1
96
19
9
2
01
20
3
2
04
20
5
Vin
cen
t7
40
75
0
7
60
77
0
7
82
79
4
8
05
81
7
8
28
83
8
8
49
85
6
8
68
87
7
8
89
90
0
9
14
92
5
9
35
94
5
9
54
Wa
nn
ero
o-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re
gio
n2
,01
2
2
,11
2
2
,20
0
2
,28
1
2
,35
2
2
,42
2
2
,47
7
2
,53
1
2
,58
4
2
,62
8
2
,67
1
2
,70
9
2
,74
6
2
,77
9
2
,80
6
2
,83
3
2
,86
1
2
,88
3
2
,89
8
2
,91
7
2
,92
7
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 39 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 194
ATTACHMENT TWO
TO ITEM 1
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
HYDER TWG WORKBOOK – 5 FEBRUARY 2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 40 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 195
Mindarie Regional Council
Integrated regional plan
Workbook
TWG workshop 5 February 2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 41 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 196
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 1 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
AGENDA
10:30 – 10:40 Introduction John King (workshop
facilitator)
10:40 – 10:50 Presentation of scenarios Jessica North (project
manager)
10:50 – 11:20 Discussion John and Jessica
11:20 – 11:30 Presentation of complimentary
initiatives Jessica
11:30 – 11:45 Discussion John and Jessica
11:45 – 11:55 Presentation of assessment criteria Jessica
11:55 – 12:20 Discussion and weighting exercise John and Jessica
12:20 – 12:30 Summary, next steps, and meeting
closure John
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 42 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 197
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 2 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
1 WELCOME Welcome to the TWG Integrated Regional Plan workshop, 5 February 2010.
The objective of the Integrated Regional Plan is:
”To establish and maintain a waste processing capability for at least that MSW generated
within the region”
The objectives of today’s workshop are:
� To review and agree on a set of possible waste processing scenarios for the Mindarie
region
� To review and agree on the criteria for assessing the scenarios, and assign weightings to
the criteria
This workbook provides key information to assist workshop participants to achieve these
objectives, and complements the workshop powerpoint presentation.
The workshop timeframe is tight; therefore, we ask that participants please keep discussions at
a strategic level – we won’t be discussing technical or logistic detail at this time. The focus will
be on the strategic direction of waste processing for MRC.
Your input from the perspective of your Council on the actions that MRC should take on behalf
of member councils is the key objective of today’s session.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 43 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 198
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 3 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
2 SCENARIOS The following three scenarios were developed from a range of options identified in consultation
with MRC. These proposed scenarios are intended to stimulate discussion and lead to the
development of three final scenarios, which will then be assessed against financial, social,
environmental and risk criteria.
The business as usual arrangements have been included as a point of reference and
comparison to the scenarios.
The core of the waste processing scenario is the garbage processing technology and the
collection system that accompanies this technology.
Business as Usual Scenario 1
“Aerobic RRF (MBT)”
Scenario 2
“Anaerobic RRF (MBT)”
Scenario 3
“Thermal treatment”
Garbage processing technology
Aerobic AWT (Neerabup RRF)
Landfill
Aerobic AWT (Neerabup RRF)
Additional aerobic RRF
Mechanical pre-sorting of raw waste; organic fraction composted
Possible separate collection of organic waste for high-quality compost
Aerobic AWT (Neerabup RRF)
Anaerobic AWT (MBT)
Mechanical pre-sorting of raw waste; organic fraction digested (energy recovery)
Possible separate collection of organic waste for high-quality compost
Aerobic AWT (Neerabup RRF)
Thermal treatment RRF (gasification or incineration)
Pre-sorting of raw waste (to remove non-combustibles and bulky items) or RDF
Collection system
2 bin: dry recyclables + residuals
2 bin possibly 3 bin: dry recyclables + residuals (+ organics)
2 bin possibly 3 bin: dry recyclables + residuals (+ organics)
2 bin: dry recyclables + residuals
Recycling
Continuation of current MRF arrangements and maximise recovery rates
Possible establishment of region wide MRF arrangements
Continuation of current MRF arrangements and maximise recovery rates
Possible establishment of region wide MRF arrangements
Continuation of current MRF arrangements and maximise recovery rates
Possible establishment of region wide MRF arrangements
Continuation of current MRF arrangements and maximise recovery rates
Possible establishment of region wide MRF arrangements
Green waste Continuation of current arrangements
Possible establishment of region wide arrangements
Continuation of current arrangements
Possible establishment of region wide arrangements
Continuation of current arrangements
Possible establishment of region wide arrangements
Continuation of current arrangements
Possible establishment of region wide arrangements
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 44 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 199
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 4 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
3 SCENARIOS DISCUSSION The following questions are intended to guide the discussion around the proposed scenarios,
and lead to agreement on three scenarios for assessment.
1 From a strategic point of view, are these the right scenarios that we should be
considering?
2 Are we missing key scenarios for consideration?
3 Are there key elements missing from these scenarios?
4 Would Councils feel comfortable promoting these scenarios to their constituencies?
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 45 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 200
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 5 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
4 COMPLEMENTARY INITIATIVES The following initiatives would complement the scenarios above and address the different
elements of the waste stream. These initiatives would be common across all scenarios (i.e.
independent of the waste collection and processing options).
Possible initiatives
Other process needed
Landfill for residuals
Hazardous waste landfill for fly ash and/or air pollution control
residues if thermal treatment in place
Need for additional
infrastructure
‘Resource recovery parks’ for household waste drop-off, self-haul and possible sorting facility
Transfer stations to consolidate waste prior to transport over longer distances
Inert wastes Establish recovery targets in contracts for bulky waste collections and
transfer stations
Purpose-build a bulky waste and C&D sorting facility
Restrict disposal of inert materials at Tamala Park
Hazardous waste HHW drop-off points at all waste facilities in MRC
Mobile HHW drop-off facility
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 46 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 201
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 6 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
5 COMPLEMENTARY INITIATIVES DISCUSSION
These questions are intended to guide the discussion around the proposed suite of
complementary initiatives, and lead to agreement of their inclusion for assessment.
1 Should we be dealing with these specific waste streams in the Plan?
2 From a strategic point of view, are these the right initiatives that we should be considering
to complement the three scenarios?
3 Are we missing key initiatives for consideration?
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 47 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 202
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 7 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
6 CRITERIA The following criteria are proposed to guide the assessment of waste processing scenarios.
Criteria Description
ENVIRONMENTAL
Waste diverted
(tonnes)
Tonnage of waste diverted from landfill.
Resource recovered
(tonnes)
Recovery of recyclable materials
Net energy balance A relative assessment of the energy produced such as electricity
from biogas or waste combustion and energy consumed, such as
mains electricity, gas, liquid fuels.
Greenhouse impacts
and benefits
A relative assessment of the greenhouse impacts and benefits.
Impacts could include energy consumed in construction and
operation of facilities, energy consumed by waste transport,
alternative and renewable energy generated and energy saved by
resource recovery.
FINANCIAL
Financial cost
($ and $/tonne)
Total costs (upfront and ongoing) over the life of the project. Costs
will be presented as region wide, per Council and per household.
Cost certainty will be indicated.
SOCIAL
Odour and visual
amenity
Impacts on the community related to facility siting and technology.
Includes the potential for different types of technologies to generate
odours and the potential for successful odour control, the typical size
and potential intrusiveness and the potential for litter generation.
RISK
Geographic /
location
Risks associated with factors such as environmental characteristics,
zoning, access and current and future uses.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 48 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 203
Integrated regional plan—Workbook
Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 8 h:\docs\environmental\sustainable resource use documents\rebecca temp folder\docs to keep\perth\mrc\workbook for workshop 5 feb 10.doc
7 CRITERIA DISCUSSION These questions are intended to guide the discussion around the proposed set of criteria, and
lead to agreement of their use in the assessment:
1 Are these the right criteria for assessing the scenarios?
2 Are we missing any key criteria?
3 Do these criteria adequately reflect the concerns of individual Councils?
4 What is the relative importance of each criterion to the assessment? (This question will be
addressed through a weighting exercise during the workshop).
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 49 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 204
ATTACHMENT THREE
TO ITEM 1
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
HYDER TWG WORKBOOK – 15 APRIL 2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 50 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 205
Mindarie Regional Council
Integrated regional plan Briefing documents
TWG workshop 15 April 2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 51 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 206
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 1 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
AGENDA
8:30 Introduction and objective MRC
8:35 Recap of project stages to date Hyder
8:45 Key assumptions in scenario evaluation
Questions / comments Hyder
8:55 Results of scenario evaluation Hyder
9:15 Review and discussion of detailed results in small groups
Hyder
9:30 Selection of option for development in the Plan
MRC
9:50 Summary, next steps, and meeting closure
Hyder
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 52 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 207
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 2 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
1 WELCOME
Welcome to the TWG Integrated Regional Plan scenarios evaluation workshop, 15 April 2010.
The objective of the Integrated Regional Plan is:
”To establish and maintain a waste processing capability for at least that MSW generated within the region”
The objective of today’s workshop is:
To select a residual MSW treatment option to take forward for development in the Integrated Regional Plan.
This set of briefing documents provides key information to assist workshop participants to achieve the objective, and complements the workshop powerpoint presentation. Documents include the following:
A paper detailing the assumptions used to model and evaluate the baseline and AWT scenarios
The graphs of key results, which will be presented during the workshop
Summary performance tables for scenarios (2017 and 2022), including some explanatory notes
Tables of detailed results – these will be clarified during small group discussions
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 53 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 208
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 3 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
2 Modelling and evaluation assumptions To undertake scenario modelling for the study, a range of assumptions in relation to scenario definition, collection and transport and technologies were necessary. A draft list of assumptions was prepared by the project team and reviewed by MRC. The tables below list the final adopted system parameters and associated data values.
Scenario Descriptions The scenarios are described in tabular format in the following pages. For scenarios involving establishment of a new RRF to process household garbage, the assumed location is Neerabup. A sensitivity test was also run assuming the new RRF is located at Balcatta instead of Neerabup to assess the impact on scenario performance.
Scenario 1: Base Case Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Household co–mingled recyclables
Fortnightly MGBs • Existing materials recovery facilities (see Section 5.2 of Background Paper, (Hyder; 2009))
Household garbage Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park until 2020/21 then Son of Tamala at Gingin from 2021/22)
• Neerabup RRF (existing)
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (existing). Post 2013/14, assume Stirling establishes a long term contract for the processing of household garbage at a facility located within its local government area. It is noted Stirling may choose to exercise its contract extension with ATLAS to August 2016.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 54 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 209
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 4 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting – 2 Bin System Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Co–mingled recyclables
Fortnightly MGBs • Existing materials recovery facilities (see Section 5.2 of Background Paper, (Hyder; 2009))
Household garbage Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park) until 2013/14 then new MBT Aerobic Composting Facility at Neerabup from 2014/15
• Neerabup RRF (existing)
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (existing) up to 2013/2014, then MBT Aerobic Composting at Neerabup from 2014/15. This assumes the new facility is able to receive 1 and 2 bin collection systems. It is noted Stirling may choose to exercise its contract extension with ATLAS to August 2016.
Scenario 2B: MBT Aerobic Composting – 1 Bin System Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Single Bin Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park) until 2013/14 then new MBT Aerobic Composting Facility at Neerabup from 2014/15
• Neerabup RRF (existing)
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (until 2013/14 then MBT Aerobic Composting at Neerabup from 2014/15). It is noted Stirling may choose to exercise its contract extension with ATLAS to August 2016.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 55 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 210
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 5 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Scenario 3A: MBT Anaerobic Digestion – 2 Bin System Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Co–mingled recyclables
Fortnightly MGBs • Existing materials recovery facilities (see Section 5.2 of Background Paper, (Hyder; 2009))
Household garbage Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park) until 2013/14 then new MBT Anaerobic Digestion Facility at Neerabup from 2014/15
• Neerabup RRF (existing)
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (until 2013/14 then MBT Anaerobic Digestion at Neerabup from 2014/15). This assumes the new facility is able to receive 1 and 2 bin collection systems. It is noted Stirling may choose to exercise its contract extension with ATLAS to August 2016.
Scenario 3B: MBT Anaerobic Digestion – 1 Bin System Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Single Bin Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park) until 2013/14 then new MBT Anaerobic Digestion Facility at Neerabup from 2014/15
• Neerabup RRF (existing)
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (until 2013/14 then MBT Anaerobic Digestion at Neerabup from 2014/15). It is noted Stirling may choose to exercise its contract extension with ATLAS to August 2016.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 56 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 211
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 6 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Scenario 4A: Thermal – 2 Bin System Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Co–mingled recyclables
Fortnightly MGBs • Existing materials recovery facilities (see Section 5.2 of Background Paper, (Hyder; 2009))
Household garbage Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park) until 2015/16 then new Thermal Facility at Neerabup from 2016/17
• Neerabup RRF (existing)
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (existing) until 2015/16 then thermal facility at Neerabup from 2016/17. note that this assumes the City of Stirling is able to extend the Atlas contract to 2016/17) and that the new facility is able to receive 1 and 2 bin collection systems.
Scenario 4B: Thermal – 1 Bin System Local Government Area
MSW Stream Assumed collection system
Receival / processing facilities
Cambridge Joondalup Perth Wanneroo Vincent Victoria Park
Single Bin Weekly MGBs • Landfill (Tamala Park) until 2015/16 then new Thermal Facility at Neerabup from 2016/17
• Neerabup RRF
Stirling Single Bin Weekly MGBs • ATLAS RRF (until 2015/16 then thermal facility at Neerabup from 2016/17 – note that this assumes the City of Stirling is able to extend the Atlas contract to 2016/17)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 57 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 212
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 7 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Collection and Transport Assumptions Assumptions in relation to waste collection and transport are presented in the table below. These are based on data collated from discussions with plant operators and waste contractors and waste industry professionals.
COLLECTION AND TRANSPORT ASSUMPTIONS
Kerbside collection trucks delivering garbage to landfills, RRFs and transfer stations
7.75 tonnes net (this is based on 7.5 to 8.0 tonne net average load for all vehicles)
Kerbside collection trucks delivering commingled recyclables to MRF 4.5 tonnes net
Driver only side loader kerbside collection trucks assumed to operate in: Cambridge Joondalup Stirling Wanneroo Vincent (some rear loaders (2)) Victoria Park
Driver and “runner” rear loader kerbside collection trucks assumed to operate in: Perth Vincent (2 rear loaders)
“Drive by” collections per hour 175/hr
Bin provision cost $0.15/household/week
Unloading time of kerbside collection trucks at delivery points 10 minutes per load at RRF
15 minutes at landfill.
Capacity of transfer trucks bulk hauling waste between facilities 20 tonnes net (metropolitan haulage)
35 tonnes net (longer distance haulage, e.g. bulk hauling to Son of Tamala landfill, (B-Double configuration))
Transfer truck total loading and unloading time per load (excluding transport time)
35 minutes per load (for metropolitan haulage)
80 minutes (for longer distance haulage employing B-Double trucks)
Driver only side loader kerbside collection trucks running cost $90/hr
Driver and “runner” rear loading kerbside collection trucks running cost $135/hr
Transfer trailer running cost $150/hr (metropolitan haulage )
$200/hr(longer distance haulage with B-Double trucks)
Transfer station operating cost (excluding transport) $25/tonne (includes amortisation of capital expenses (land purchase and construction) and ongoing costs)
Inclusion of waste transfer stations in scenario modelling Waste transfer stations are introduced into a waste management system when travel distances in the collection vehicle become excessive. This varies with collection truck size and is generally introduced when travel times exceed 45 - 60 minutes.
The above framework was adopted in assessing the need for transfer stations for the scenario modelling.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 58 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 213
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 8 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Technology Assumptions LANDFILL • Technology Description Landfill assumed to operate at “best practice” standard incorporating
the following features:
• Waste inspection;
• Composite plastic/clay base liner;
• Leachate collection system;
• Leachate treatment facility; (evaporation ponds used, with recirculating leachate into landfill to promote gas generation.)
• Treated leachate disposal arrangements;(as above)
• Landfill gas collection system;
• Landfill gas energy conversion facility;
• Landfill cap;
• Noise abatement screening;
• Litter collection;
• Adequate buffers.
Final year of Tamala Park Landfill operation FY 2020/21
Location of Son of Tamala landfill Gingin
Commencement of Son of Tamala landfill operations
FY 2021/22
Landfill gate fee $85/tonne
MBT – AEROBIC COMPOSTING Technology Description MBT with aerobic composting of the biological fraction to produce a
lower grade organic product assumed to be used on a range of land applications.
Mechanical pretreatment step to separate recyclables (plastics & metals) with a reject fraction to landfill.
Post treatment of the organic fraction will also produce a reject fraction that is sent to landfill.
Location of facility Neerabup
Lead time to commencement of operations 4 years
Gate fee $150/tonne
Resources recovered in front end separation 80% of metals
50% of plastics (HDPE and PET)
Stabilised organic product 30% of input
Electricity consumption 85 kWh/tonne input for tunnel/enclosed windrow system; 140 kWh/tonne input for rotating drum system
Residual to Landfill 34% of input
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 59 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 214
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 9 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
MBT – ANAEROBIC DIGESTION Technology Description MBT with anaerobic digestion of the biological fraction to produce a
biogas which is converted to electricity. Digestate is aerobically stabilised to produce a lower grade organic product assumed to be used on a range of land applications.
Mechanical pretreatment step to separate recyclables (plastics & metals) with a reject fraction to landfill.
Location of facility Neerabup
Lead time to commencement of operations 4 years
Gate fee $170/tonne
Resources recovered in front end separation 80% of metals
50% of plastics (HDPE and PET)
Organic product 23% of input
Net electricity exported 25 kWh/tonne input
Residual to Landfill 34% of input
Thermal Technology Description Moving grate energy from waste facility with thermal conversion of
waste to produce electricity and heat
Mechanical pretreatment step to separate metals
Cement stabilisation of flyash with disposal to landfill.
Location of facility Neerabup
Lead time to commencement of operations 6 years
Gate fee $200/tonne
Resources recovered in front end separation 80% of metals
Net electricity output 500 kWh/tonne input
Residual to Landfill 30% of input
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 60 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 215
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 10 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Materials Recovery Facilities Technology Description Combination of mechanical and manual separation technologies to
separate materials from commingled household recycling fraction
Location of facility Existing processing facilities for collected commingled household recyclables are assumed to continue operation and be upgraded as quantities increase over time (refer Section 5.2 of Background Paper, (Hyder; 2009)).
Lead time to commencement of operations N/A
Gate fee $50/tonne
Residual to Landfill 15% of input (this assumes an improvement on current rates due to establishment of the glass reprocessing facility serving WA)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 61 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 216
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 11 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Division of Wanneroo into Subareas A Mindarie-wide waste logistics model has been prepared to assist in the scenario assessment. The model estimates the cost of waste delivery, transfer and disposal for a defined network of waste generation areas and receival/processing/disposal facilities. Usually waste generation areas are equivalent to local government areas.
Within Mindarie, the areal extent of each local government area varies considerably. Wanneroo, in particular, covers an area of some 685km2, about 6 times the size of the next largest member council (Stirling).
In order to improve the accuracy of logistics cost estimates, Wanneroo has been divided in to north, central and south zones of approximately equal area. The % waste generated in each zone at various points during the modelling timeframe has been estimated in the table below taking account of population growth. The % estimates in the table are based on area-based population forecasts developed by the City of Wanneroo.1
Zone City of Wanneroo Population Forecast Areas
Assumed Population Centroid (town/suburb)
Estimated % of Waste in 2008-09
Estimated % of Waste in 2018-19
Estimated % of Waste in 2028-29
North Wanneroo Two Rocks, Yanchep, Eglinton-Alkimos
Yanchep 4% 15% 26%
Central Wanneroo Neerabup - Pinjar - Nowergup - Carabooda, Jindalee, Butler, Quinns Rocks, Merriwa, Ridgewood, Clarkson, Mindarie - Tamala Park, Carramar, Banksia Grove
Ridgewood 39% 38% 31%
South Wanneroo Gnangara - Jandabup - Mariginiup, Tapping, Ashby – Sinagra, Wanneroo, Hocking - Pearsall, Madeley - Wangara - Woodvale, Landsdale, Darch, Marangaroo, Alexander Heights, Girraween, Koondala
Pearsall 57% 47% 43%
Total 100% 100% 100%
1 City of Wanneroo population forecasts can be accessed via the city’s website: http://forecast.id.com.au/Default.aspx?id=137&gid=10&pg=30000(accessed 15 March 2010)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 62 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 217
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 12 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Waste Stream Compositions In order to estimate resource recovery rates for each scenario, some understanding of waste stream compositions is necessary. These have been derived separately for the following streams:
Household garbage composition – single bin system
Household garbage composition – two bin system
Household recyclables composition – two bin system
The derivation basis is shown in Appendix A. The derived compositions of each stream are shown in the following tables.
Composition of Household Garbage Stream – Single Bin System (% by weight)
Component % of Total
Food waste 26.7%
Garden waste 20.9%
Non-recyclable paper 8.8%
Newspaper 7.4%
Cardboard 3.7%
Other recyclable paper 2.6%
Other putrescibles 2.0%
Liquid paperboard containers 0.5%
Recyclable glass 5.8%
Recyclable ferrous 1.5%
Recyclable aluminium 0.7%
PET containers 0.7%
HDPE containers 0.7%
Non recyclable plastic 6.3%
Ceramics, dirt, & dust 4.5%
Contaminated plastic 2.5%
Wood and rubber 2.2%
Other metals 1.4%
Hazardous waste 0.6%
Non recyclable glass 0.5%
Total 100%
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 63 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 218
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 13 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Composition of Household Recycling Stream – 2 Bin System (% by weight)
Component % of Total
Newspaper 35.1%
Mixed paper 18.6%
Cardboard/paper 7.4%
Printing / writing paper 0.1%
Waxed paper 0.0%
Directories 3.4%
Container glass 20.6%
Steel cans 2.5%
HDPE 1.5%
PET 1.3%
Aluminium cans 1.3%
Mixed plastics 2.9%
Ferrous metals - non cans 0.1%
Non ferrous metals - non cans 0.0%
"Other" material 4.3%
Organics 0.8%
Total 100%
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 64 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 219
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 14 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Composition of Household Garbage Stream – Two Bin System
Component % of Total
Food waste 31.1%
Garden waste 24.4%
Non-recyclable paper 7.4%
Newspaper 2.7%
Cardboard 3.1%
Other recyclable paper 2.2%
Other putrescibles 2.3%
Liquidpaperboard containers 0.6%
Recyclable glass 3.3%
Recyclable ferrous 1.3%
Recyclable aluminium 0.6%
PET containers 0.6%
HDPE containers 0.6% Non recyclable plastic 6.9%
Ceramics, dirt, & dust 5.0%
Contaminated plastic 2.8%
Wood and rubber 2.4%
Other metals 1.5%
Hazardous waste 0.7%
Non recyclable glass 0.6%
Total 100%
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 65 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 220
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 15 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Attachment A: Derivation of Garbage and Comingled Recyclables Composition Composition of Household Garbage – One Bin System The assumed composition of garbage in areas with one bin systems in place is presented in Table A1. The composition is based on a 1999 household waste composition study undertaken for the City of Stirling by Murdoch University2
Table A1: Household garbage composition, single bin system
.
Component %
Food waste 26.7%
Garden waste 20.9%
Non-recyclable paper 8.8%
Newspaper 7.4%
Cardboard 3.7%
Other recyclable paper 2.6%
Other putrescibles 2.0%
Liquidpaperboard containers 0.5%
Recyclable glass 5.8%
Recyclable ferrous 1.5%
Recyclable aluminium 0.7%
PET containers 0.7%
HDPE containers 0.7% Non recyclable plastic 6.3%
Ceramics, dirt, & dust 4.5%
Contaminated plastic 2.5%
Wood and rubber 2.2%
Other metals 1.4%
Hazardous waste 0.6%
Non recyclable glass 0.5% Source: Summary Report of Waste to Landfill: Perth Metropolitan Region Western Australia (1 July 1998 – 30 June 2002), Waste Management Board (February 2003)
2 Refer p21 of Summary Report of Waste to Landfill: Perth Metropolitan Region Western Australia (1 July 1998 – 30 June 2002), Waste Management Board (February 2003)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 66 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 221
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 16 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Composition of Household Recyclables – Two Bin System The composition of household recyclables in areas with comingled recycling collections has been derived from the Review of Total Recycling Activity in Western Australia 2006/07 (Cardno; 2008). This report provides data on the total quantity of household recyclable materials recovered from MRF’s in Western Australia during 2006/07, as well as the residual fraction disposed to landfill from MRF’s.
The derived composition of household recyclables collected (i.e. recovered as well as disposed following MRF processing) is shown in Table A2.
Table A1: Derivation of household recyclables composition – 2 bin system
Component Tonnes Recovered
Tonnes Landfilled 1
Tonnes Collected
% of Total
Newspaper 47,420 4,351 51,771 35.1%
Mixed paper 25,100 2,303 27,403 18.6%
Cardboard/paper 10,030 920 10,950 7.4%
Printing / writing paper 100 9 109 0.1%
Waxed paper 40 4 44 0.0%
Directories 4,550 417 4,967 3.4%
Container glass 11,970 18,409 30,379 20.6%
Steel cans 2,430 1,214 3,644 2.5%
HDPE 1,440 719 2,159 1.5%
PET 1,270 634 1,904 1.3%
Aluminium cans 1,270 634 1,904 1.3%
Mixed plastics 1,080 3,202 4,282 2.9%
Ferrous metals - non cans 160 160 0.1%
Non ferrous metals - non cans 10 10 0.0%
"Other" material 6,403 6,403 4.3%
Organics 1,201 1,201 0.8%
106,870 40,420 147,290 100% 1 The total quantity of MRF material landfilled by component has been approximated based on the categories included in Cardno (2008) as follows: 46% broken bottles and glass fines; 20% paper and cardboard; 8% recyclable containers; 8% non recyclable plastics and containers; 3% organics; and 16% “other” materials
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 67 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 222
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 17 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Composition of Household Garbage – Two Bin System The composition of household garbage in areas with 2 bin systems has been derived based on the compositions presented above, together with data on the total quantity of household garbage and recyclables collected in areas with two bin systems in place. Within Mindarie, the estimated quantities for 2008-09 are as follows (refer Options report, Hyder; 20010):
Total household recyclables: 23,900 tonnes (14.4% of total)
Total household garbage (all councils except Stirling): 141,700 tonnes (85.6% of total)
The derivation of household garbage composition in areas with 2 bin systems is provided in Table A3. The derivation assumes the data presented in Table A1 represents the typical composition of household waste with no kerbside recycling in place. Once kerbside recycling is introduced, about 14 % of waste is assumed to be diverted to the comingled recycling stream, leaving 86% in the garbage stream. The garbage stream composition is then derived based on the composition of the single bin system (Table A1) with recyclables removed according to the composition shown in Table A2.
Table A1: Derivation of household garbage composition – 2 bin system
Component Total Household
Garbage and
Recyclables % 1
Household Recyclables component
% 2
Household Garbage
component %
Household Garbage
Composition 2 Bin
System
Food waste 26.7% 0.1% 26.6% 31.1%
Garden waste 20.9% 0.0% 20.9% 24.4%
Non-recyclable paper 8.8% 2.5% 6.3% 7.4%
Newspaper 7.4% 5.1% 2.3% 2.7%
Cardboard 3.7% 1.1% 2.6% 3.1%
Other recyclable paper 2.6% 0.7% 1.9% 2.2%
Other putrescibles 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.3%
Liquidpaperboard containers 0.5% 0.5% 0.6%
Recyclable glass 5.8% 3.0% 2.8% 3.3%
Recyclable ferrous 1.5% 0.4% 1.1% 1.3%
Recyclable aluminium 0.7% 0.2% 0.5% 0.6%
PET containers 0.7% 0.2% 0.5% 0.6%
HDPE containers 0.7% 0.2% 0.5% 0.6% Non recyclable plastic 6.3% 0.4% 5.9% 6.9%
Ceramics, dirt, & dust 4.5% 0.2% 4.3% 5.0%
Contaminated plastic 2.5% 0.1% 2.4% 2.8%
Wood and rubber 2.2% 0.1% 2.1% 2.4%
Other metals 1.4% 0.1% 1.3% 1.5%
Hazardous waste 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.7%
Non recyclable glass 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.6%
Total 100% 14.4% 85.6% 100% Notes: 1 From Table A1 – single bin system composition 2 Derived from Table A2 assuming 14.4% by weight diversion to comingled recycling
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 68 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 223
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 18 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
References Carbon Reduction Institute (2009), Greenhouse Gas Life Cycle Impact Analysis: ATLAS Single Bin Waste Treatment vs Two Bin Collection System, September 2009, V1.2, for City of Stirling
Cardno (2008), Review of Total Recycling Activity in Western Australia 2006/07, report for Department of Environment and Conservation, Job no V7113, June 2008
Hyder Consulting (2009), Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste, Background paper, for Mindarie Regional Council, 25 November 2009
Hyder Consulting (2010), Integrated regional plan for the processing of municipal solid waste, Options report, for Mindarie Regional Council
Waste Management Board (2003), Summary Report of Waste to Landfill: Perth Metropolitan Region Western Australia (1 July 1998 – 30 June 2002), p21, Government of Western Australia, Perth, February 2003
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 69 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 224
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 19 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
3 MRC scenario evaluation – financial assessment
3.1 Introduction To comprehensively assess the financial implications of alternative waste management scenarios, the associated collection, transport, processing and disposal operations for each scenario must be considered in an integrated context.
To undertake this Hyder developed a Waste Management Logistics Model for the Mindarie Region. The model estimates the costs of waste delivery, transfer and processing/disposal for a defined network of waste generation areas and receival/disposal facilities.
The waste network assessed by the Waste Management Logistics Model comprises a series of waste generation centres, or catchments, and a surrounding network of waste transfer stations, resource recovery facilities and landfills.
For the Mindarie Region, nine waste generating catchments were defined for modelling purposes. With the exception of Wanneroo, each member council local government area represented a waste generating catchment. Wanneroo, by far the largest local government area within the region by area, was divided into north, central and south catchments to better model logistical implications of the various scenarios. The division of Wanneroo is discussed further in Section 2.
Costs associated with the movement of waste from the catchments to the processing / disposal facilities are estimated by the model using a tabulated matrix of travel times and distances across Perth and core input data on truck capacities, running costs and transfer operations.
The model can be applied to:
optimise a network of waste transfer, processing and disposal facilities; and
undertake scenario modelling to estimate costs and truck hours on a council basis.
Model inputs and outputs are summarised below:
Waste generation rates by catchment (tonne/yr)
Inputs
Location of waste management facilities (by suburb)
Type of facility (i.e., transfer facility, RRF or landfill)
Facility capacity (tonne/yr)
Collection truck payload capacities by local government area (tonne/vehicle)
Collection vehicle running costs by local government area ($/hr)
Allocation of waste catchments to facilities to simulate council cluster arrangements with RRF service providers.
Waste quantities delivered from each catchment to surrounding facilities;
Outputs
Total truck hours, direct delivery and transfer trailers
For each collection council:
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 70 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 225
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 20 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
− Average travel time from catchment to facility (minutes)
− Average one way distance (km)
− Average one way speed (km/hr)
− Annual costs of waste delivery and transfer ($/yr and $/tonne)
The cost of collection from kerbside is estimated separately using industry rates and market costs.
3.2 Logistics modelling undertaken For the financial assessment, logistics modelling of the garbage and recycling streams was carried out for each of the scenarios developed. The logistics modelling considered the various type of vehicles used for kerbside waste collection, bulk hauling from waste transfer stations to the RRF facility and also for the final disposal of any materials to landfill.
Key assumptions To undertake scenario modelling for the study, a range of assumptions in relation to scenario definition, collection and transport and technologies were necessary. A draft list of assumptions was prepared by the project team and reviewed by MRC. The final adopted system parameters and associated data values are presented in Section 2.
Travel times and distances The logistics model is constructed based on the average travel times on the Perth road network, adjusted for changes to the network over the modelling timeframe. Travel times and distance data were sourced from the TRIPS model developed and maintained by the mainroads Western Australia. Datasets of travel times were obtained for the years 2011, 2016, 2021 and 2031 and incorporated into the logistics model
Milestone Analysis Modelling was undertaken at distinct modelling years that were chosen to represent milestone years for which RRF infrastructure was assumed to be fully commissioned, and years that represent key changes to logistical arrangements. Modelling results were developed and presented for the years 2017 and 2022. The year 2017 was chosen to represent the year by which all new RRF infrastructure for each scenario is assumed to be fully commissioned and operable. At this time, the Tamala Park landfill is assumed receive and dispose of process residuals. The year 2022 was chosen to represent the first year for which the Son of Tamala landfill (assumed to be located at Gingin) is available with Tamala Park landfill closed. The cost impacts of relocating the regional landfill from Tamala Park to Gingin can be assessed by comparing the unit costs for these two milestone years.
Results The financial modelling results, presented on a per household, per tonne and total bases are shown for each council in the following graphs.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 71 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 226
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 21
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
$212
$244
$240
$257
$256
$277
$281
$0$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Scen
ario
1: B
ase
case
Scen
ario
2A
: MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
2B:
MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3A
: MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3B:
MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
4A
: The
rmal
-2
Bin
Syst
emSc
enar
io 4
B: T
herm
al -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
2017
$/hhld/yr$/
hhld
All
Coun
cil e
x St
irlin
g, n
ew R
RF
at N
eera
bup,
201
7
Hou
seho
ld re
cycl
able
s
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 72 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 227
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 22
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
$233
$249
$245
$263
$263
$284
$289
$0$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Scen
ario
1: B
ase
case
Scen
ario
2A
: MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
2B:
MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3A
: MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3B:
MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
4A
: The
rmal
-2
Bin
Syst
emSc
enar
io 4
B: T
herm
al -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
2022
$/hhld/yr$/
hhld
All
Coun
cils
ex
Stir
ling,
new
RR
F at
Nee
rabu
p, 2
022
Hou
seho
ld re
cycl
able
s
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 73 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 228
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 23
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
$260
$246
$275
$222
$281
$234
$244
$221
$0$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Cam
brid
geJo
onda
lup
Pert
hVi
ctor
ia P
ark
Vinc
ent
Wan
nero
oA
ll Co
unci
ls e
x St
irlin
gSt
irlin
g
2017
$/hhld/yr$/
hhld
, Sce
nari
o 2A
, 201
7, n
ew R
RF
at N
eera
bup
Hou
seho
ld re
cycl
able
s
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 74 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 229
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 24
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
$260
$246
$275
$222
$281
$234
$2
44
$221
$249
$2
46
$261
$214
$267
$234
$2
40
$209
$0$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Cam
brid
geJo
onda
lup
Pert
hVi
ctor
ia P
ark
Vinc
ent
Wan
nero
oA
ll Co
unci
ls e
x St
irlin
gSt
irlin
g
$/hhld/yr$/
hhld
, Sce
nari
o 2A
, new
RR
F at
Nee
rabu
p ve
rsus
Bal
catt
a
Hou
seho
ld re
cycl
able
s
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge, R
RF a
t N
eera
bup
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge, R
RF a
t Ba
lcat
ta
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 75 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 230
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 25
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
$213
$221
$221
$235
$236
$256
$258
$0$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Scen
ario
1: B
ase
case
Scen
ario
2A
: MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
2B:
MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3A
: MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3B:
MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
4A
: The
rmal
-2
Bin
Syst
emSc
enar
io 4
B: T
herm
al -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
2017
$/hhld/yr$/
hhld
, 201
7, S
tirl
ing
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 76 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 231
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 26
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
$217
$227
$227
$242
$243
$264
$266
$0$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Scen
ario
1: B
ase
case
Scen
ario
2A
: MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
2B:
MBT
A
erob
ic C
ompo
stin
g -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3A
: MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
2 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
3B:
MBT
A
naer
obic
Dig
estio
n -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
Scen
ario
4A
: The
rmal
-2
Bin
Syst
emSc
enar
io 4
B: T
herm
al -
1 Bi
n Sy
stem
2022
$/hhld/yr$/
hhld
, 202
2, S
tirl
ing
Hou
seho
ld g
arba
ge
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 77 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 232
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 27
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
4 Su
mm
ary
perfo
rman
ce ta
bles
Th
e fo
llow
ing
tabl
es p
rovi
de a
sum
mar
y of
the
eval
uatio
n re
sults
for s
cena
rios
in y
ears
201
7 an
d 20
22. O
= c
ompa
rativ
ely
neut
ral;
X =
com
para
tivel
y po
or
perfo
rman
ce; √
= c
ompa
rativ
ely
fair
perfo
rman
ce; √
√ =
com
para
tivel
y go
od p
erfo
rman
ce.
Crit
erio
nS
cena
rio 1
: Bas
e ca
seS
cena
rio 2
A: M
BT
Aer
obic
C
ompo
stin
g - 2
Bin
S
yste
m
Sce
nario
2B
: MB
T A
erob
ic
Com
post
ing
- 1 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
3A
: MB
T A
naer
obic
D
iges
tion
- 2 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
3B
: MB
T A
naer
obic
D
iges
tion
- 1 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
4A
: Th
erm
al -
2 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
4B
: Th
erm
al -
1 B
in
Sys
tem
ENVI
RONM
ENTA
L
152,
000
t20
4,00
0 t
198,
000
t20
4,00
0 t
198,
000
t22
8,00
0 t
226,
000
t(5
1%)
(68%
)(6
6%)
(68%
)(6
6%)
(76%
)(7
5%)
Rec
ycla
bles
: 39
,000
tR
ecyc
labl
es:
44,0
00 t
Rec
ycla
bles
: 20
,000
tR
ecyc
labl
es:
44,0
00 t
Rec
ycla
bles
: 20
,000
tR
ecyc
labl
es:
38,0
00 t
Rec
ycla
bles
: 13
,000
t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 57
,000
tO
rgan
ic P
rodu
ct:
81,0
00 t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 90
,000
tO
rgan
ic P
rodu
ct:
69,0
00 t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 76
,000
tO
rgan
ic P
rodu
ct:
30,0
00 t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 30
,000
t
Net
ene
rgy
bala
nce
(GJ)
-125
,000
GJ
-183
,000
GJ
-178
,000
GJ
-115
,000
GJ
-98,
000
GJ
177,
000
GJ
247,
000
GJ
CH
4 or
CO
2 em
issi
ons
Res
ourc
e re
cove
ry
Ene
rgy
reco
very
FINA
NCIA
LFi
nanc
ial c
ost
($/h
hld/
yr)
$212
/hhl
d$2
36/h
hld
$233
/hhl
d$2
50/h
hld
$250
/hhl
d$2
70/h
hld
$274
/hhl
d
SOCI
ALO
dour
, vis
ual a
men
ity,
and
emis
sion
s pe
rcep
tion
RISK
Geo
grap
hic
/ loc
atio
n
2017
Tonn
age
of w
aste
dive
rted
from
land
fill.
Rec
over
y of
recy
clab
le m
ater
ials
. Inc
lude
s ke
rbsi
de-c
olle
cted
hou
seho
ld
recy
clab
les,
sor
ted
recy
clab
les
at R
RF'
s an
d st
ablis
ed o
rgan
ics.
For
ther
mal
tre
atm
ent,
ther
e m
ay a
lso
be p
oten
tial t
o us
e bo
ttom
ash
as
aggr
egat
e fo
r co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es (a
roun
d 20
0kg/
tonn
e in
put w
aste
).
A re
lativ
e as
sess
men
t of t
he e
nerg
y pr
oduc
ed s
uch
as e
lect
ricity
from
bio
gas
or
was
te c
ombu
stio
n an
d en
ergy
con
sum
ed, s
uch
as m
ains
ele
ctric
ity, g
as, l
iqui
d fu
els.
"+"
is n
et e
nerg
y ge
nera
ted,
"-"
is n
et e
nerg
y co
nsum
ed.
Res
ourc
e re
cove
red
(tonn
es)
Was
te d
iverte
d (to
nnes
& d
ivers
ion
%)
Reg
ion
wid
e pe
r hou
seho
ld c
ost.
Impa
cts
on th
e co
mm
unity
rela
ted
to fa
cilit
y si
ting
and
tech
nolo
gy. I
nclu
des
the
pote
ntia
l for
diff
eren
t typ
es o
f tec
hnol
ogie
s to
gen
erat
e od
ours
and
the
pote
ntia
l for
su
cces
sful
odo
ur c
ontro
l, th
e ty
pica
l siz
e an
d po
tent
ial i
ntru
sive
ness
and
the
pote
ntia
l for
litte
r gen
erat
ion,
and
com
mun
ity p
erce
ptio
n of
the
pote
ntia
l for
toxi
c em
issi
ons
from
diff
eren
t pro
cess
es.
Ris
ks a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith fa
ctor
s su
ch a
s lo
catio
nal c
hara
cter
istic
s, z
onin
g, a
cces
s an
d cu
rrent
and
futu
re u
ses.
Gre
enho
use
impa
cts
and
bene
fits
A re
lativ
e as
sess
men
t of t
he g
reen
hous
e im
pact
s an
d be
nefit
s. Im
pact
s co
uld
incl
ude
ener
gy c
onsu
med
in
cons
truct
ion
and
oper
atio
n of
faci
litie
s, e
nerg
y co
nsum
ed b
y w
aste
tran
spor
t, al
tern
ative
and
rene
wab
le
ener
gy g
ener
ated
and
ene
rgy
save
d by
reso
urce
re
cove
ry.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 78 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 233
Inte
grat
ed re
gion
al p
lan—
Brie
fing
docu
men
ts
H
yder
Con
sulti
ng P
ty L
td-A
BN
76
104
485
289
Pag
e 28
ht
tp://
aus.
hybi
s.in
fo/p
roje
cts0
/vc/
awar
ded/
aa00
2809
/f_re
ports
/06
scen
ario
s ev
alua
tion
and
wor
ksho
p 15
april
10/b
riefin
g do
cum
ents
for
wor
ksho
p 15
apr
il 10
.doc
Crit
erio
nS
cena
rio 1
: Bas
e ca
seS
cena
rio 2
A: M
BT
Aer
obic
C
ompo
stin
g - 2
Bin
S
yste
m
Sce
nario
2B
: MB
T A
erob
ic
Com
post
ing
- 1 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
3A
: MB
T A
naer
obic
D
iges
tion
- 2 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
3B
: MB
T A
naer
obic
D
iges
tion
- 1 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
4A
: Th
erm
al -
2 B
in
Sys
tem
Sce
nario
4B
: Th
erm
al -
1 B
in
Sys
tem
ENVI
RONM
ENTA
L
158,
000
t22
4,00
0 t
218,
000
t22
4,00
0 t
218,
000
t25
2,00
0 t
250,
000
t(4
8%)
(68%
)(6
6%)
(68%
)(6
6%)
(76%
)(7
6%)
Rec
ycla
bles
: 42
,000
tR
ecyc
labl
es:
49,0
00 t
Rec
ycla
bles
: 22
,000
tR
ecyc
labl
es:
49,0
00 t
Rec
ycla
bles
: 22
,000
tR
ecyc
labl
es:
42,0
00 t
Rec
ycla
bles
: 13
,000
t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 59
,000
tO
rgan
ic P
rodu
ct:
89,0
00 t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 99
,000
tO
rgan
ic P
rodu
ct:
75,0
00 t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 83
,000
tO
rgan
ic P
rodu
ct:
30,0
00 t
Org
anic
Pro
duct
: 30
,000
t
Net
ene
rgy
bala
nce
(GJ)
-146
,000
GJ
-202
,000
GJ
-197
,000
GJ
-124
,000
GJ
-106
,000
GJ
214,
000
GJ
292,
000
GJ
CH
4 or
CO
2 em
issi
ons
Res
ourc
e re
cove
ry
Ene
rgy
reco
very
FINA
NCIA
LFi
nanc
ial c
ost
($/h
hld/
yr)
$228
/hhl
d$2
42/h
hld
$240
/hhl
d$2
57/h
hld
$257
/hhl
d$2
78/h
hld
$282
/hhl
d
SOCI
ALO
dour
, vis
ual a
men
ity,
and
emis
sion
s pe
rcep
tion
RISK
Geo
grap
hic
/ loc
atio
n
Tonn
age
of w
aste
dive
rted
from
land
fill.
Rec
over
y of
recy
clab
le m
ater
ials
. Inc
lude
s ke
rbsi
de-c
olle
cted
hou
seho
ld
recy
clab
les,
sor
ted
recy
clab
les
at R
RF'
s an
d st
ablis
ed o
rgan
ics.
For
ther
mal
tre
atm
ent,
ther
e m
ay a
lso
be p
oten
tial t
o us
e bo
ttom
ash
as
aggr
egat
e fo
r co
nstru
ctio
n ac
tiviti
es (a
roun
d 20
0kg/
tonn
e in
put w
aste
).
A re
lativ
e as
sess
men
t of t
he e
nerg
y pr
oduc
ed s
uch
as e
lect
ricity
from
bio
gas
or
was
te c
ombu
stio
n an
d en
ergy
con
sum
ed, s
uch
as m
ains
ele
ctric
ity, g
as, l
iqui
d fu
els.
"+"
is n
et e
nerg
y ge
nera
ted,
"-"
is n
et e
nerg
y co
nsum
ed.
2022
Was
te d
iverte
d (to
nnes
& d
ivers
ion
%)
Res
ourc
e re
cove
red
(tonn
es)
Reg
ion
wid
e pe
r hou
seho
ld c
ost.
Impa
cts
on th
e co
mm
unity
rela
ted
to fa
cilit
y si
ting
and
tech
nolo
gy. I
nclu
des
the
pote
ntia
l for
diff
eren
t typ
es o
f tec
hnol
ogie
s to
gen
erat
e od
ours
and
the
pote
ntia
l for
su
cces
sful
odo
ur c
ontro
l, th
e ty
pica
l siz
e an
d po
tent
ial i
ntru
sive
ness
and
the
pote
ntia
l for
litte
r gen
erat
ion,
and
com
mun
ity p
erce
ptio
n of
the
pote
ntia
l for
toxi
c em
issi
ons
from
diff
eren
t pro
cess
es.
Ris
ks a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith fa
ctor
s su
ch a
s lo
catio
nal c
hara
cter
istic
s, z
onin
g, a
cces
s an
d cu
rrent
and
futu
re u
ses.
Gre
enho
use
impa
cts
and
bene
fits
A re
lativ
e as
sess
men
t of t
he g
reen
hous
e im
pact
s an
d be
nefit
s. Im
pact
s co
uld
incl
ude
ener
gy c
onsu
med
in
cons
truct
ion
and
oper
atio
n of
faci
litie
s, e
nerg
y co
nsum
ed b
y w
aste
tran
spor
t, al
tern
ative
and
rene
wab
le
ener
gy g
ener
ated
and
ene
rgy
save
d by
reso
urce
re
cove
ry.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 79 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 234
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 29 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Qualitative assessments of environmental, social, and risk impacts can be highly subjective. The following notes provide the background discussion used to develop a qualitative assessment of the scenarios under each of the criteria indicated.
Greenhouse gas impacts and benefits The climate change impacts of waste management systems are due to upstream, direct, and downstream GHG contributions. Upstream contributions arise from inputs of energy and ancillary materials; direct emissions are from system operations; and downstream contributions and savings relate to energy and material substitution and carbon storage/sequestration. Some contributions are minor – for example, waste collection and transport usually represents only a small fraction of the overall GHG balance of waste management systems (e.g. less than 5%). Assumptions regarding technology performance, energy substitution, and waste composition have a considerable impact on estimates of GHG impacts and benefits of different waste systems. In most GHG estimates, using life-cycle assessment methods, the GHG savings from recovered resources outweighs any other GHG saving (i.e. from energy recovery or carbon storage).
GHG impacts from landfill are generally dominated by direct emissions of methane from the site. Where efficient landfill gas capture systems (with energy generation) are in place, GHG savings may be achieved through substitution of fossil-fuel energy sources. GHG savings may also be attributed to carbon ‘stored’ for medium to long term in landfill, due to the recalcitrant nature of some carbon materials (i.e. wood, plastics) in anaerobic conditions. Under international GHG reporting conventions (IPCC 2006), savings due to carbon storage are not credited to the waste sector, but are reported in the ‘harvested wood products’ sector.
GHG emissions from incineration are predominantly due to direct emissions of fossil and biogenic CO2 during combustion of materials. Under international GHG reporting conventions (IPCC 2006), biogenic CO2 emissions are not accounted for in the waste sector. GHG savings associated with incineration (with energy recovery) result from the substitution of fossil-fuel energy sources and recovery of metals from the ash. The GHG savings from energy substitution will largely depend on whether heat and/or electricity are being substituted. Heat energy is more efficient and results in much greater GHG savings. Where regulations allow bottom ash to be used as aggregate in construction, additional GHG savings may be counted in the substitution of raw aggregate.
GHG emissions from mechanical biological treatment (MBT) with composting may be dominated by indirect upstream emissions from energy input (this is because the direct process emissions tend to be minimal). GHG savings result from front-end recovery of recyclable materials and substitution of fertilisers or other soil amendments, where regulations permit application of the composted organic output to land. GHG savings may also be attributed to carbon stored in soil; however, under international GHG reporting conventions (IPCC 2006), savings due to carbon storage are not credited to the waste sector.
In addition to the GHG emissions and savings noted above for MBT with composting, MBT with anaerobic digestion gains GHG savings through generation of energy and substitution of fossil-fuel energy sources.
The evaluation of GHG impacts and savings of the MRC waste processing scenarios is based on the following considerations:
Is the main processing technology likely to directly emit substantial quantities of either methane or fossil CO2?
Does the scenario achieve high levels of resource recovery?
Is energy (electricity) recovered by the main processing technology?
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 80 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 235
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 30 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Table 1: GHG impacts and benefits of waste processing scenarios
Criteria Scenario 1: Base case
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System
Scenario 2B: MBT Aerobic Composting - 1 Bin System
Scenario 3A: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 2 Bin System
Scenario 3B: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 1 Bin System
Scenario 4A: Thermal - 2 Bin System
Scenario 4B: Thermal - 1 Bin System
CH4 or CO2 emissions X √ √ √ √ X X
Resource recovery √ √√ X √√ X √ X
Energy recovery √ X X √ √ √√ √√
X = comparatively poor performance; √ = comparatively fair performance; √√ = comparatively good performance.
Odour, visual amenity, and emissions perception This criterion focuses specifically on the different waste processing facilities in each proposed scenario, and examines the likely perceptions of the local community to potential odour, visual amenity (or ‘disamenity’), and emissions from these facilities. Odour and visual amenity impact on human sensory experience, and do not involve an actual physical environmental impact.
The extent of potential impacts is related to facility siting and technology: different types of technologies may vary in their potential to generate odours and their ability for successful odour control; typical size and potential intrusiveness of facilities also varies with technology; litter may be more easily controlled by certain technologies. However, site management (such as odour and litter control) and design (e.g. clever architecture and landscaping) can considerably reduce disamenity issues. Community perception of the potential for toxic emissions from different processes is also considered within this criterion.
Odour, visual amenity, and emissions perception are extremely difficult to assess, with a community’s sensory preferences and perceptions linked to culture, environment, and education/awareness, and often change over time (COWI 2000).
Landfills are generally perceived by society as malodorous, visually displeasing sites. Hedonic price studies3
3 Hedonic pricing methods are used to estimate economic values for ecosystem or environmental services that directly affect market prices. It is most commonly applied to variations in housing prices that reflect the value of local environmental attributes.
, which examine the relationship between real estate trends and disamenity, suggest that house prices decrease with proximity to landfills – people prefer not to live close to a landfill site, and this is true both overseas and in Australia (COWI 2000, Enviros 2004, Travers Morgan 1992). Communities do not tend to raise concerns regarding potentially toxic air emissions from landfill sites; however, residents have recently voiced concerns about emissions from Cranbourne Landfill, Victoria. Due to the size of landfills, and their ‘open-air’ nature, odour, litter, pests, and dust are more difficult to control in practice than at smaller, enclosed waste treatment sites.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 81 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 236
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 31 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
Incinerators may be perceived by some communities as visually displeasing facilities with the potential to emit toxic gases. Odour and litter are less of a concern than emissions. This is in part a cultural perception: in some Northern European cities, incinerators are located in populated, urban areas and appear to be accepted. Modern incinerator stacks are equipped with effective air pollution control systems, which greatly reduce the levels of pollutants emitted (i.e. below levels required by most countries’ regulations). Rigorous monitoring is usually required to ensure these levels are maintained. Minimal levels of dioxins are, however, emitted. Dioxins accumulate over time in ecosystems/organisms, and society may perceive this as a significant impact. Actual environmental and health risks from air emissions are difficult to separate from perceived social risks. In one European hedonic price study (the only one, to our knowledge, that examines incinerators and disamenity), incinerators are considered to have comparable disamenity ‘costs’ to landfills (COWI 2000), although for different reasons.
The modern MBT facility (either composting or anaerobic digestion) considered in the current evaluation is enclosed and kept under slight negative air pressure to minimise odour and visual disamenity associated with open windrow composting. Air emissions from such facilities pass through biofilters prior to exiting to the atmosphere. As with each technology considered, poor management of the facility can lead to odour problems. The concentration of organic waste for biological treatment increases the risk of odour issues. Older, non-enclosed MBT plants in Europe have experienced odour problems, as well as the Canning Vale plant in WA (SMRC), and these may influence public perception. Communities do not tend to raise concerns regarding potentially toxic air emissions from MBT plants.
Table 2: Odour, amenity, and emissions (perception) impacts of waste processing scenarios
Criteria Scenario 1: Base case
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System
Scenario 2B: MBT Aerobic Composting - 1 Bin System
Scenario 3A: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 2 Bin System
Scenario 3B: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 1 Bin System
Scenario 4A: Thermal - 2 Bin System
Scenario 4B: Thermal - 1 Bin System
Odour and visual
amenity X √ √ √ √ √ √
Emissions perception √ √ √ √ √ X X
Overall performance X √ √ √ √ X X
X = comparatively poor performance; √ = comparatively fair performance; √√ = comparatively good performance.
Geographic / location risk Risks associated with factors such as locational characteristics, such as zoning, access and current and future uses are largely site-dependant, but may vary with specific technology. It is assumed that the sites proposed for the current evaluation by MRC (Gingin for the ‘Son of Tamala’ landfill, and Neerabup or Balcatta for a new AWT) have, or are anticipated to have, appropriate zoning and access for these waste processing activities.
The Neerabup site is located within an area zoned for industrial use, but is currently largely used for agriculture. In the future, this agricultural activity is anticipated to progressively change to industrial activity. The closest residential area is approximately 850m from the existing MBT facility. Occasional odour complaints are received from neighbouring residents and users of an adjacent golf course. There do not appear to be any geographic or location risks associated with siting a further MBT at Neerabup. Siting a
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 82 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 237
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 32 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
thermal facility at Neerabup is likely to be more complicated, both due to actual and perceived risks. Fly ash produced by an incinerator is classified as hazardous waste and requires special handling and treatment, either on-site or off-site (which would require regular transport of hazardous material from the site). Surrounding residents and farmers may argue that long-term exposure of the local environment to even minimal levels of emissions (i.e. dioxins) poses a risk to human and ecosystem health, and livelihood.
The Balcatta site is located within an industrial zone, in relatively close proximity (approximately 650m) to residential areas. It is unlikely that the site would provide sufficient land area for a MBT aerobic composting facility. A fully enclosed anaerobic MBT facility may be more suitable for this location. A thermal facility would most likely encounter similar difficulties as for the Neerabup site (apart from concerns from farmers).
The possible landfill site at Gingin is assumed to have appropriate geology to minimise the risk of leachate emissions to groundwater.
Table 3: Locational impacts of waste processing scenarios
Criteria Scenario 1: Base case
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System
Scenario 2B: MBT Aerobic Composting - 1 Bin System
Scenario 3A: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 2 Bin System
Scenario 3B: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 1 Bin System
Scenario 4A: Thermal - 2 Bin System
Scenario 4B: Thermal - 1 Bin System
Geographic / locational
risk O O O O O X X
O = neutral; X = potential risk
References COWI (2000). A Study on the Economic Valuation of Environmental Externalities from Landfill Disposal and Incineration of Waste. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Environment.
Enviros Consulting Limited and EFTEC (2004). Valuation of the external costs and benefits to health and environment of waste management options. Final report for the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), December 2004.
Travers Morgan Pty Ltd (1992). Economics of the Solid Waste Management Industry in Sydney. Report to the NSW EPA.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 83 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 238
Integrated regional plan—Briefing documents Hyder Consulting Pty Ltd-ABN 76 104 485 289 Page 33 http://aus.hybis.info/projects0/vc/awarded/aa002809/f_reports/06 scenarios evaluation and workshop 15april10/briefing documents for workshop 15 april 10.doc
5 Detailed cost summary – financial evaluation of waste scenarios
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 84 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 239
Scenario 1: Base case
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 304,773$ 179,827$ 1,199,579$ 1,684,179$ 10,002 8,908 301,101$ 554,388$ 1,175,176$ 16,994$ 2,047,658$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 1,757,772$ 631,793$ 7,105,103$ 9,494,669$ 61,315 53,182 1,797,566$ 1,501,195$ 7,203,828$ 104,173$ 10,606,762$
Perth 8,540 8,191 404,642$ 222,225$ 1,036,140$ 1,663,007$ 9,316 8,729 431,210$ 569,221$ 1,094,508$ 15,827$ 2,110,766$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 584,761$ 255,830$ 1,412,179$ 2,252,770$ 12,381 14,606 607,590$ 743,421$ 1,454,665$ 21,036$ 2,826,711$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 407,937$ 284,469$ 1,800,106$ 2,492,512$ 15,728 12,497 422,403$ 869,043$ 1,847,897$ 26,722$ 3,166,065$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 2,432,620$ 649,505$ 9,157,973$ 12,240,098$ 91,327 86,060 2,908,828$ 2,051,371$ 10,729,907$ 155,163$ 15,845,268$
178,954 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,223,649$ 21,711,080$ 29,827,234$ 200,070 183,982 6,468,698$ 6,288,638$ 23,505,982$ 339,915$ 36,603,232$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 187,552$ 61,148$ 110,010$ 358,711$ 2,226 8,908 185,293$ 62,368$ 111,289$ -$ 358,950$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 1,081,706$ 108,856$ 414,089$ 1,604,651$ 8,671 53,182 1,106,195$ 114,131$ 433,542$ 12,251.6$ 1,666,120$
Perth 1,048 8,191 234,267$ 26,158$ 52,400$ 312,825$ 1,143 8,729 249,648$ 28,621$ 57,158$ -$ 335,427$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 347,202$ 41,489$ 123,479$ 512,170$ 2,627 14,606 360,756$ 44,486$ 131,344$ -$ 536,587$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 251,038$ 70,411$ 113,900$ 435,350$ 2,415 12,497 259,940$ 75,145$ 120,739$ -$ 455,825$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 1,496,997$ 209,924$ 716,574$ 2,423,495$ 17,339 86,060 1,790,048$ 255,130$ 866,966$ 24,499.8$ 2,936,644$
30,609 167,310 3,598,762$ 517,986$ 1,530,453$ 5,647,201$ 34,421 183,982 3,951,880$ 579,882$ 1,721,039$ 36,751$ 6,289,552$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 34$ 20$ 133$ 187$ 10,002 8,908 34$ 62$ 132$ 2$ 230$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 34$ 12$ 137$ 183$ 61,315 53,182 34$ 28$ 135$ 2$ 199$
Perth 8,540 8,191 49$ 27$ 126$ 203$ 9,316 8,729 49$ 65$ 125$ 2$ 242$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 42$ 18$ 100$ 160$ 12,381 14,606 42$ 51$ 100$ 1$ 194$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 34$ 24$ 149$ 207$ 15,728 12,497 34$ 70$ 148$ 2$ 253$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 34$ 9$ 127$ 170$ 91,327 86,060 34$ 24$ 125$ 2$ 184$
178,954 167,310 35$ 13$ 130$ 178$ 200,070 183,982 35$ 34$ 128$ 2$ 199$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 21$ 7$ 12$ 40$ 2,226 8,908 21$ 7$ 12$ -$ 40$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 21$ 2$ 8$ 31$ 8,671 53,182 21$ 2$ 8$ 0.2$ 31$
Perth 1,048 8,191 29$ 3$ 6$ 38$ 1,143 8,729 29$ 3$ 7$ -$ 38$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 25$ 3$ 9$ 36$ 2,627 14,606 25$ 3$ 9$ -$ 37$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 21$ 6$ 9$ 36$ 2,415 12,497 21$ 6$ 10$ -$ 36$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 21$ 3$ 10$ 34$ 17,339 86,060 21$ 3$ 10$ 0.3$ 34$
30,609 167,310 22$ 3$ 9$ 34$ 34,421 183,982 21$ 3$ 9$ 0.2$ 34$
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 85 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 240
Scenario 1: Base case
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 31$ 18$ 121$ 170$ 10,002 8,908 30$ 55$ 117$ 1.7$ 205$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 30$ 11$ 121$ 162$ 61,315 53,182 29$ 24$ 117$ 1.7$ 173$
Perth 8,540 8,191 47$ 26$ 121$ 195$ 9,316 8,729 46$ 61$ 117$ 1.7$ 227$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 50$ 22$ 121$ 194$ 12,381 14,606 49$ 60$ 117$ 1.7$ 228$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 27$ 19$ 121$ 168$ 15,728 12,497 27$ 55$ 117$ 1.7$ 201$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 32$ 9$ 121$ 162$ 91,327 86,060 32$ 22$ 117$ 1.7$ 173$
178,954 167,310 33$ 12$ 121$ 167$ 200,070 183,982 32$ 31$ 117$ 1.7$ 183$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 85$ 28$ 50$ 163$ 2,226 8,908 83$ 28$ 50$ -$ 161$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 131$ 13$ 50$ 194$ 8,671 53,182 128$ 13$ 50$ 1$ 192$
Perth 1,048 8,191 224$ 25$ 50$ 298$ 1,143 8,729 218$ 25$ 50$ -$ 293$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 141$ 17$ 50$ 207$ 2,627 14,606 137$ 17$ 50$ -$ 204$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 110$ 31$ 50$ 191$ 2,415 12,497 108$ 31$ 50$ -$ 189$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 104$ 15$ 50$ 169$ 17,339 86,060 103$ 15$ 50$ 1$ 169$
30,609 167,310 118$ 17$ 50$ 184$ 34,421 183,982 115$ 17$ 50$ 1$ 183$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $767,823 $13,653,237 $17,137,079 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $725,316 $14,331,750 $17,841,810
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $0.8 $13.7 $17.1 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $0.7 $14.3 $17.8
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $10 $170 $213 1.16 $34 $9 $174 $217
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $8 $150 $188 $29 $8 $150 $187
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 86 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 241
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 304,773$ 194,300$ 1,483,132$ 1,982,204$ 10,002 8,908 301,101$ 178,997$ 1,500,371$ 34,000$ 2,014,469$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 1,757,772$ 659,195$ 8,784,587$ 11,201,554$ 61,315 53,182 1,797,566$ 597,431$ 9,197,272$ 208,419$ 11,800,688$
Perth 8,540 8,191 404,642$ 252,584$ 1,281,059$ 1,938,285$ 9,316 8,729 431,210$ 250,917$ 1,397,380$ 31,666$ 2,111,173$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 584,761$ 274,455$ 1,745,986$ 2,605,202$ 12,381 14,606 607,590$ 269,912$ 1,857,200$ 42,086$ 2,776,788$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 407,937$ 328,421$ 2,225,610$ 2,961,968$ 15,728 12,497 422,403$ 313,974$ 2,359,247$ 53,463$ 3,149,087$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 2,432,620$ 659,329$ 11,322,709$ 14,414,657$ 91,327 86,060 2,908,828$ 705,239$ 13,699,086$ 310,435$ 17,623,588$
178,954 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,368,284$ 26,843,083$ 35,103,872$ 200,070 183,982 6,468,698$ 2,316,471$ 30,010,556$ 680,068$ 39,475,793$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 187,552$ 61,148$ 110,010$ 358,711$ 2,226 8,908 185,293$ 62,368$ 111,289$ -$ 358,950$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 1,081,706$ 108,856$ 414,089$ 1,604,651$ 8,671 53,182 1,106,195$ 114,131$ 433,542$ 12,251.6$ 1,666,120$
Perth 1,048 8,191 234,267$ 26,158$ 52,400$ 312,825$ 1,143 8,729 249,648$ 28,621$ 57,158$ -$ 335,427$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 347,202$ 41,489$ 123,479$ 512,170$ 2,627 14,606 360,756$ 44,486$ 131,344$ -$ 536,587$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 251,038$ 70,411$ 113,900$ 435,350$ 2,415 12,497 259,940$ 75,145$ 120,739$ -$ 455,825$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 1,496,997$ 209,924$ 716,574$ 2,423,495$ 17,339 86,060 1,790,048$ 255,130$ 866,966$ 24,499.8$ 2,936,644$
30,609 167,310 3,598,762$ 517,986$ 1,530,453$ 5,647,201$ 34,421 183,982 3,951,880$ 579,882$ 1,721,039$ 36,751$ 6,289,552$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 34$ 22$ 164$ 220$ 10,002 8,908 34$ 20$ 168$ 4$ 226$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 34$ 13$ 169$ 215$ 61,315 53,182 34$ 11$ 173$ 4$ 222$
Perth 8,540 8,191 49$ 31$ 156$ 237$ 9,316 8,729 49$ 29$ 160$ 4$ 242$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 42$ 20$ 124$ 185$ 12,381 14,606 42$ 18$ 127$ 3$ 190$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 34$ 27$ 184$ 245$ 15,728 12,497 34$ 25$ 189$ 4$ 252$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 34$ 9$ 157$ 200$ 91,327 86,060 34$ 8$ 159$ 4$ 205$
178,954 167,310 35$ 14$ 160$ 210$ 200,070 183,982 35$ 13$ 163$ 4$ 215$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 21$ 7$ 12$ 40$ 2,226 8,908 21$ 7$ 12$ -$ 40$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 21$ 2$ 8$ 31$ 8,671 53,182 21$ 2$ 8$ 0.2$ 31$
Perth 1,048 8,191 29$ 3$ 6$ 38$ 1,143 8,729 29$ 3$ 7$ -$ 38$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 25$ 3$ 9$ 36$ 2,627 14,606 25$ 3$ 9$ -$ 37$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 21$ 6$ 9$ 36$ 2,415 12,497 21$ 6$ 10$ -$ 36$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 21$ 3$ 10$ 34$ 17,339 86,060 21$ 3$ 10$ 0.3$ 34$
30,609 167,310 22$ 3$ 9$ 34$ 34,421 183,982 21$ 3$ 9$ 0.2$ 34$
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 87 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 242
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 31$ 20$ 150$ 200$ 10,002 8,908 30$ 18$ 150$ 3.4$ 201$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 30$ 11$ 150$ 191$ 61,315 53,182 29$ 10$ 150$ 3.4$ 192$
Perth 8,540 8,191 47$ 30$ 150$ 227$ 9,316 8,729 46$ 27$ 150$ 3.4$ 227$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 50$ 24$ 150$ 224$ 12,381 14,606 49$ 22$ 150$ 3.4$ 224$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 27$ 22$ 150$ 200$ 15,728 12,497 27$ 20$ 150$ 3.4$ 200$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 32$ 9$ 150$ 191$ 91,327 86,060 32$ 8$ 150$ 3.4$ 193$
178,954 167,310 33$ 13$ 150$ 196$ 200,070 183,982 32$ 12$ 150$ 3.4$ 197$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 85$ 28$ 50$ 163$ 2,226 8,908 83$ 28$ 50$ -$ 161$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 131$ 13$ 50$ 194$ 8,671 53,182 128$ 13$ 50$ 1$ 192$
Perth 1,048 8,191 224$ 25$ 50$ 298$ 1,143 8,729 218$ 25$ 50$ -$ 293$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 141$ 17$ 50$ 207$ 2,627 14,606 137$ 17$ 50$ -$ 204$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 110$ 31$ 50$ 191$ 2,415 12,497 108$ 31$ 50$ -$ 189$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 104$ 15$ 50$ 169$ 17,339 86,060 103$ 15$ 50$ 1$ 169$
30,609 167,310 118$ 17$ 50$ 184$ 34,421 183,982 115$ 17$ 50$ 1$ 183$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $1,354,824 $13,653,237 $17,724,080 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $1,259,973 $14,331,750 $324,771 $18,701,239
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $1.4 $13.7 $17.7 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $1.3 $14.3 $0.3 $18.7
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $17 $170 $221 1.16 $34 $15 $174 $3 $227
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $15 $150 $195 $29 $13 $150 $3.4 $196
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 88 - ITEM 8.3.1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 243
Scenario 2B: MBT Aerobic Composting - 1 Bin System
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 304,773$ 237,536$ 1,813,163$ 2,355,472$ 12,228 8,908 301,101$ 218,828$ 1,834,238$ 41,566$ 2,395,733$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 1,757,772$ 752,415$ 10,026,855$ 12,537,042$ 69,986 53,182 1,797,566$ 681,916$ 10,497,899$ 237,893$ 13,215,274$
Perth 9,588 8,191 404,642$ 283,578$ 1,438,259$ 2,126,480$ 10,459 8,729 431,210$ 281,708$ 1,568,854$ 35,552$ 2,317,323$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 584,761$ 332,685$ 2,116,422$ 3,033,869$ 15,008 14,606 607,590$ 327,178$ 2,251,232$ 51,015$ 3,237,015$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 407,937$ 378,844$ 2,567,311$ 3,354,092$ 18,143 12,497 422,403$ 362,179$ 2,721,465$ 61,671$ 3,567,718$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 2,432,620$ 784,508$ 13,472,430$ 16,689,559$ 108,667 86,060 2,908,828$ 839,136$ 16,299,985$ 369,374$ 20,417,322$
209,563 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,769,567$ 31,434,440$ 40,096,513$ 234,491 183,982 6,468,698$ 2,710,945$ 35,173,674$ 797,070$ 45,150,386$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 34$ 26$ 201$ 261$ 12,228 8,908 34$ 25$ 206$ 5$ 269$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 34$ 14$ 193$ 241$ 69,986 53,182 34$ 13$ 197$ 4$ 248$
Perth 9,588 8,191 49$ 35$ 176$ 260$ 10,459 8,729 49$ 32$ 180$ 4$ 265$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 42$ 24$ 151$ 216$ 15,008 14,606 42$ 22$ 154$ 3$ 222$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 34$ 31$ 213$ 278$ 18,143 12,497 34$ 29$ 218$ 5$ 285$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 34$ 11$ 187$ 232$ 108,667 86,060 34$ 10$ 189$ 4$ 237$
209,563 167,310 35$ 17$ 188$ 240$ 234,491 183,982 35$ 15$ 191$ 4$ 245$
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 25$ 20$ 150$ 195$ 12,228 8,908 25$ 18$ 150$ 3.4$ 196$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 26$ 11$ 150$ 188$ 69,986 53,182 26$ 10$ 150$ 3.4$ 189$
Perth 9,588 8,191 42$ 30$ 150$ 222$ 10,459 8,729 41$ 27$ 150$ 3.4$ 222$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 41$ 24$ 150$ 215$ 15,008 14,606 40$ 22$ 150$ 3.4$ 216$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 24$ 22$ 150$ 196$ 18,143 12,497 23$ 20$ 150$ 3.4$ 197$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 27$ 9$ 150$ 186$ 108,667 86,060 27$ 8$ 150$ 3.4$ 188$
209,563 167,310 28$ 13$ 150$ 191$ 234,491 183,982 28$ 12$ 150$ 3.4$ 193$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $1,354,824 $13,653,237 $17,724,080 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $1,259,973 $14,331,750 $324,771 $18,701,239
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $1.4 $13.7 $17.7 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $1.3 $14.3 $0.3 $18.7
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $17 $170 $221 1.16 $34 $15 $174 $4 $227
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $15 $150 $195 $29 $13 $150 $3.4 $196
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 89 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 244
Scenario 3A: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 2 Bin System
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 304,773$ 194,300$ 1,607,635$ 2,106,707$ 10,002 8,908 301,101$ 178,997$ 1,632,748$ 34,000$ 2,146,846$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 1,757,772$ 659,195$ 9,522,019$ 11,938,987$ 61,315 53,182 1,797,566$ 597,431$ 10,008,744$ 208,419$ 12,612,160$
Perth 8,540 8,191 404,642$ 252,584$ 1,388,599$ 2,045,825$ 9,316 8,729 431,210$ 250,917$ 1,520,670$ 31,666$ 2,234,464$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 584,761$ 274,455$ 1,892,554$ 2,751,771$ 12,381 14,606 607,590$ 269,912$ 2,021,060$ 42,086$ 2,940,648$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 407,937$ 328,421$ 2,412,441$ 3,148,800$ 15,728 12,497 422,403$ 313,974$ 2,567,403$ 53,463$ 3,357,243$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 2,432,620$ 659,329$ 12,273,206$ 15,365,155$ 91,327 86,060 2,908,828$ 705,239$ 14,907,752$ 310,435$ 18,832,254$
178,954 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,368,284$ 29,096,456$ 37,357,245$ 200,070 183,982 6,468,698$ 2,316,471$ 32,658,378$ 680,068$ 42,123,615$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 187,552$ 61,148$ 110,010$ 358,711$ 2,226 8,908 185,293$ 62,368$ 111,289$ -$ 358,950$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 1,081,706$ 108,856$ 414,089$ 1,604,651$ 8,671 53,182 1,106,195$ 114,131$ 433,542$ 12,251.6$ 1,666,120$
Perth 1,048 8,191 234,267$ 26,158$ 52,400$ 312,825$ 1,143 8,729 249,648$ 28,621$ 57,158$ -$ 335,427$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 347,202$ 41,489$ 123,479$ 512,170$ 2,627 14,606 360,756$ 44,486$ 131,344$ -$ 536,587$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 251,038$ 70,411$ 113,900$ 435,350$ 2,415 12,497 259,940$ 75,145$ 120,739$ -$ 455,825$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 1,496,997$ 209,924$ 716,574$ 2,423,495$ 17,339 86,060 1,790,048$ 255,130$ 866,966$ 24,499.8$ 2,936,644$
30,609 167,310 3,598,762$ 517,986$ 1,530,453$ 5,647,201$ 34,421 183,982 3,951,880$ 579,882$ 1,721,039$ 36,751$ 6,289,552$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 34$ 22$ 178$ 234$ 10,002 8,908 34$ 20$ 183$ 4$ 241$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 34$ 13$ 183$ 230$ 61,315 53,182 34$ 11$ 188$ 4$ 237$
Perth 8,540 8,191 49$ 31$ 170$ 250$ 9,316 8,729 49$ 29$ 174$ 4$ 256$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 42$ 20$ 135$ 196$ 12,381 14,606 42$ 18$ 138$ 3$ 201$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 34$ 27$ 200$ 261$ 15,728 12,497 34$ 25$ 205$ 4$ 269$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 34$ 9$ 171$ 213$ 91,327 86,060 34$ 8$ 173$ 4$ 219$
178,954 167,310 35$ 14$ 174$ 223$ 200,070 183,982 35$ 13$ 178$ 4$ 229$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 21$ 7$ 12$ 40$ 2,226 8,908 21$ 7$ 12$ -$ 40$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 21$ 2$ 8$ 31$ 8,671 53,182 21$ 2$ 8$ 0.2$ 31$
Perth 1,048 8,191 29$ 3$ 6$ 38$ 1,143 8,729 29$ 3$ 7$ -$ 38$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 25$ 3$ 9$ 36$ 2,627 14,606 25$ 3$ 9$ -$ 37$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 21$ 6$ 9$ 36$ 2,415 12,497 21$ 6$ 10$ -$ 36$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 21$ 3$ 10$ 34$ 17,339 86,060 21$ 3$ 10$ 0.3$ 34$
30,609 167,310 22$ 3$ 9$ 34$ 34,421 183,982 21$ 3$ 9$ 0.2$ 34$
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 90 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 245
Scenario 3A: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 2 Bin System
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 31$ 20$ 163$ 213$ 10,002 8,908 30$ 18$ 163$ 3.4$ 215$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 30$ 11$ 163$ 204$ 61,315 53,182 29$ 10$ 163$ 3.4$ 206$
Perth 8,540 8,191 47$ 30$ 163$ 240$ 9,316 8,729 46$ 27$ 163$ 3.4$ 240$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 50$ 24$ 163$ 236$ 12,381 14,606 49$ 22$ 163$ 3.4$ 238$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 27$ 22$ 163$ 212$ 15,728 12,497 27$ 20$ 163$ 3.4$ 213$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 32$ 9$ 163$ 204$ 91,327 86,060 32$ 8$ 163$ 3.4$ 206$
178,954 167,310 33$ 13$ 163$ 209$ 200,070 183,982 32$ 12$ 163$ 3.4$ 211$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 85$ 28$ 50$ 163$ 2,226 8,908 83$ 28$ 50$ -$ 161$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 131$ 13$ 50$ 194$ 8,671 53,182 128$ 13$ 50$ 1$ 192$
Perth 1,048 8,191 224$ 25$ 50$ 298$ 1,143 8,729 218$ 25$ 50$ -$ 293$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 141$ 17$ 50$ 207$ 2,627 14,606 137$ 17$ 50$ -$ 204$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 110$ 31$ 50$ 191$ 2,415 12,497 108$ 31$ 50$ -$ 189$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 104$ 15$ 50$ 169$ 17,339 86,060 103$ 15$ 50$ 1$ 169$
30,609 167,310 118$ 17$ 50$ 184$ 34,421 183,982 115$ 17$ 50$ 1$ 183$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $1,354,824 $14,799,374 $18,870,217 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $1,259,973 $15,596,236 $324,771 $19,965,725
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $1.4 $14.8 $18.9 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $1.3 $15.6 $0.3 $20.0
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $17 $184 $235 1.16 $34 $15 $189 $3 $242
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $15 $163 $207 $29 $13 $163 $3.4 $209
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 91 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 246
Scenario 3B: MBT Anaerobic Digestion - 1 Bin System
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 304,773$ 237,536$ 1,974,490$ 2,516,799$ 12,228 8,908 301,101$ 218,828$ 2,004,701$ 41,566$ 2,566,195$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 1,757,772$ 752,415$ 10,918,997$ 13,429,184$ 69,986 53,182 1,797,566$ 681,916$ 11,473,507$ 237,893$ 14,190,883$
Perth 9,588 8,191 404,642$ 283,578$ 1,566,229$ 2,254,450$ 10,459 8,729 431,210$ 281,708$ 1,714,654$ 35,552$ 2,463,123$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 584,761$ 332,685$ 2,304,731$ 3,222,178$ 15,008 14,606 607,590$ 327,178$ 2,460,448$ 51,015$ 3,446,231$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 407,937$ 378,844$ 2,795,738$ 3,582,519$ 18,143 12,497 422,403$ 362,179$ 2,974,381$ 61,671$ 3,820,634$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 2,432,620$ 784,508$ 14,671,144$ 17,888,272$ 108,667 86,060 2,908,828$ 839,136$ 17,814,803$ 369,374$ 21,932,140$
209,563 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,769,567$ 34,231,330$ 42,893,402$ 234,491 183,982 6,468,698$ 2,710,945$ 38,442,494$ 797,070$ 48,419,206$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 34$ 26$ 219$ 279$ 12,228 8,908 34$ 25$ 225$ 5$ 288$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 34$ 14$ 210$ 258$ 69,986 53,182 34$ 13$ 216$ 4$ 267$
Perth 9,588 8,191 49$ 35$ 191$ 275$ 10,459 8,729 49$ 32$ 196$ 4$ 282$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 42$ 24$ 164$ 229$ 15,008 14,606 42$ 22$ 168$ 3$ 236$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 34$ 31$ 232$ 297$ 18,143 12,497 34$ 29$ 238$ 5$ 306$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 34$ 11$ 204$ 249$ 108,667 86,060 34$ 10$ 207$ 4$ 255$
209,563 167,310 35$ 17$ 205$ 256$ 234,491 183,982 35$ 15$ 209$ 4$ 263$
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 25$ 20$ 163$ 208$ 12,228 8,908 25$ 18$ 164$ 3.4$ 210$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 26$ 11$ 163$ 201$ 69,986 53,182 26$ 10$ 164$ 3.4$ 203$
Perth 9,588 8,191 42$ 30$ 163$ 235$ 10,459 8,729 41$ 27$ 164$ 3.4$ 236$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 41$ 24$ 163$ 228$ 15,008 14,606 40$ 22$ 164$ 3.4$ 230$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 24$ 22$ 163$ 209$ 18,143 12,497 23$ 20$ 164$ 3.4$ 211$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 27$ 9$ 163$ 199$ 108,667 86,060 27$ 8$ 164$ 3.4$ 202$
209,563 167,310 28$ 13$ 163$ 205$ 234,491 183,982 28$ 12$ 164$ 3.4$ 206$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $1,354,824 $14,868,038 $18,938,881 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $1,259,973 $15,663,653 $324,771 $20,033,142
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $1.4 $14.9 $18.9 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $1.3 $15.7 $0.3 $20.0
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $17 $185 $236 1.16 $34 $15 $190 $4 $243
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $15 $163 $208 $29 $13 $164 $3.4 $210
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 92 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 247
Scenario 4A: Thermal - 2 Bin System
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 304,773$ 194,300$ 1,794,390$ 2,293,462$ 10,002 8,908 301,101$ 178,997$ 1,831,314$ 24,387$ 2,335,799$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 1,757,772$ 659,195$ 10,628,167$ 13,045,135$ 61,315 53,182 1,797,566$ 597,431$ 11,225,952$ 149,495$ 13,770,445$
Perth 8,540 8,191 404,642$ 252,584$ 1,549,909$ 2,207,135$ 9,316 8,729 431,210$ 250,917$ 1,705,606$ 22,713$ 2,410,447$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 584,761$ 274,455$ 2,112,407$ 2,971,624$ 12,381 14,606 607,590$ 269,912$ 2,266,850$ 30,188$ 3,174,540$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 407,937$ 328,421$ 2,692,688$ 3,429,047$ 15,728 12,497 422,403$ 313,974$ 2,879,636$ 38,348$ 3,654,361$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 2,432,620$ 659,329$ 13,698,953$ 16,790,901$ 91,327 86,060 2,908,828$ 705,239$ 16,720,751$ 222,669$ 20,557,488$
178,954 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,368,284$ 32,476,515$ 40,737,304$ 200,070 183,982 6,468,698$ 2,316,471$ 36,630,110$ 487,801$ 45,903,080$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 187,552$ 61,148$ 110,010$ 358,711$ 2,226 8,908 185,293$ 62,368$ 111,289$ -$ 358,950$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 1,081,706$ 108,856$ 414,089$ 1,604,651$ 8,671 53,182 1,106,195$ 114,131$ 433,542$ 12,251.6$ 1,666,120$
Perth 1,048 8,191 234,267$ 26,158$ 52,400$ 312,825$ 1,143 8,729 249,648$ 28,621$ 57,158$ -$ 335,427$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 347,202$ 41,489$ 123,479$ 512,170$ 2,627 14,606 360,756$ 44,486$ 131,344$ -$ 536,587$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 251,038$ 70,411$ 113,900$ 435,350$ 2,415 12,497 259,940$ 75,145$ 120,739$ -$ 455,825$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 1,496,997$ 209,924$ 716,574$ 2,423,495$ 17,339 86,060 1,790,048$ 255,130$ 866,966$ 24,499.8$ 2,936,644$
30,609 167,310 3,598,762$ 517,986$ 1,530,453$ 5,647,201$ 34,421 183,982 3,951,880$ 579,882$ 1,721,039$ 36,751$ 6,289,552$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 34$ 22$ 199$ 254$ 10,002 8,908 34$ 20$ 206$ 3$ 262$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 34$ 13$ 204$ 251$ 61,315 53,182 34$ 11$ 211$ 3$ 259$
Perth 8,540 8,191 49$ 31$ 189$ 269$ 9,316 8,729 49$ 29$ 195$ 3$ 276$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 42$ 20$ 150$ 211$ 12,381 14,606 42$ 18$ 155$ 2$ 217$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 34$ 27$ 223$ 284$ 15,728 12,497 34$ 25$ 230$ 3$ 292$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 34$ 9$ 190$ 233$ 91,327 86,060 34$ 8$ 194$ 3$ 239$
178,954 167,310 35$ 14$ 194$ 243$ 200,070 183,982 35$ 13$ 199$ 3$ 249$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 21$ 7$ 12$ 40$ 2,226 8,908 21$ 7$ 12$ -$ 40$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 21$ 2$ 8$ 31$ 8,671 53,182 21$ 2$ 8$ 0.2$ 31$
Perth 1,048 8,191 29$ 3$ 6$ 38$ 1,143 8,729 29$ 3$ 7$ -$ 38$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 25$ 3$ 9$ 36$ 2,627 14,606 25$ 3$ 9$ -$ 37$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 21$ 6$ 9$ 36$ 2,415 12,497 21$ 6$ 10$ -$ 36$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 21$ 3$ 10$ 34$ 17,339 86,060 21$ 3$ 10$ 0.3$ 34$
30,609 167,310 22$ 3$ 9$ 34$ 34,421 183,982 21$ 3$ 9$ 0.2$ 34$
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 93 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 248
Scenario 4A: Thermal - 2 Bin System
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 31$ 20$ 181$ 232$ 10,002 8,908 30$ 18$ 183$ 2.4$ 234$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 30$ 11$ 181$ 223$ 61,315 53,182 29$ 10$ 183$ 2.4$ 225$
Perth 8,540 8,191 47$ 30$ 181$ 258$ 9,316 8,729 46$ 27$ 183$ 2.4$ 259$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 50$ 24$ 181$ 255$ 12,381 14,606 49$ 22$ 183$ 2.4$ 256$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 27$ 22$ 181$ 231$ 15,728 12,497 27$ 20$ 183$ 2.4$ 232$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 32$ 9$ 181$ 222$ 91,327 86,060 32$ 8$ 183$ 2.4$ 225$
178,954 167,310 33$ 13$ 181$ 228$ 200,070 183,982 32$ 12$ 183$ 2.4$ 229$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 85$ 28$ 50$ 163$ 2,226 8,908 83$ 28$ 50$ -$ 161$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 131$ 13$ 50$ 194$ 8,671 53,182 128$ 13$ 50$ 1$ 192$
Perth 1,048 8,191 224$ 25$ 50$ 298$ 1,143 8,729 218$ 25$ 50$ -$ 293$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 141$ 17$ 50$ 207$ 2,627 14,606 137$ 17$ 50$ -$ 204$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 110$ 31$ 50$ 191$ 2,415 12,497 108$ 31$ 50$ -$ 189$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 104$ 15$ 50$ 169$ 17,339 86,060 103$ 15$ 50$ 1$ 169$
30,609 167,310 118$ 17$ 50$ 184$ 34,421 183,982 115$ 17$ 50$ 1$ 183$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $1,354,824 $16,518,578 $20,589,421 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $1,259,973 $17,492,964 $232,953 $21,770,634
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $1.4 $16.5 $20.6 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $1.3 $17.5 $0.2 $21.8
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $17 $206 $256 1.16 $34 $15 $212 $2 $264
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $15 $181 $226 $29 $13 $183 $2.4 $228
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 94 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 249
Scenario 4B: Thermal - 1 Bin System
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 304,773$ 237,536$ 2,216,480$ 2,758,789$ 12,228 8,908 301,101$ 218,828$ 2,260,395$ 29,243$ 2,809,567$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 1,757,772$ 752,415$ 12,257,211$ 14,767,398$ 69,986 53,182 1,797,566$ 681,916$ 12,936,921$ 167,365$ 15,583,768$
Perth 9,588 8,191 404,642$ 283,578$ 1,758,183$ 2,446,404$ 10,459 8,729 431,210$ 281,708$ 1,933,353$ 25,012$ 2,671,282$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 584,761$ 332,685$ 2,587,195$ 3,504,642$ 15,008 14,606 607,590$ 327,178$ 2,774,271$ 35,891$ 3,744,930$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 407,937$ 378,844$ 3,138,379$ 3,925,160$ 18,143 12,497 422,403$ 362,179$ 3,353,755$ 43,388$ 4,181,724$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 2,432,620$ 784,508$ 16,469,215$ 19,686,343$ 108,667 86,060 2,908,828$ 839,136$ 20,087,031$ 259,866$ 24,094,861$
209,563 167,310 5,892,505$ 2,769,567$ 38,426,664$ 47,088,736$ 234,491 183,982 6,468,698$ 2,710,945$ 43,345,725$ 560,764$ 53,086,131$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 34$ 26$ 246$ 306$ 12,228 8,908 34$ 25$ 254$ 3$ 315$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 34$ 14$ 236$ 284$ 69,986 53,182 34$ 13$ 243$ 3$ 293$
Perth 9,588 8,191 49$ 35$ 215$ 299$ 10,459 8,729 49$ 32$ 221$ 3$ 306$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 42$ 24$ 184$ 249$ 15,008 14,606 42$ 22$ 190$ 2$ 256$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 34$ 31$ 260$ 325$ 18,143 12,497 34$ 29$ 268$ 3$ 335$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 34$ 11$ 229$ 274$ 108,667 86,060 34$ 10$ 233$ 3$ 280$
209,563 167,310 35$ 17$ 230$ 281$ 234,491 183,982 35$ 15$ 236$ 3$ 289$
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 12,088 9,017 25$ 20$ 183$ 228$ 12,228 8,908 25$ 18$ 185$ 2.4$ 230$
Joondalup 66,846 52,005 26$ 11$ 183$ 221$ 69,986 53,182 26$ 10$ 185$ 2.4$ 223$
Perth 9,588 8,191 42$ 30$ 183$ 255$ 10,459 8,729 41$ 27$ 185$ 2.4$ 255$
Victoria Park 14,109 14,057 41$ 24$ 183$ 248$ 15,008 14,606 40$ 22$ 185$ 2.4$ 250$
Vincent 17,115 12,069 24$ 22$ 183$ 229$ 18,143 12,497 23$ 20$ 185$ 2.4$ 230$
Wanneroo 89,816 71,971 27$ 9$ 183$ 219$ 108,667 86,060 27$ 8$ 185$ 2.4$ 222$
209,563 167,310 28$ 13$ 183$ 225$ 234,491 183,982 28$ 12$ 185$ 2.4$ 226$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $1,354,824 $16,690,240 $20,761,083 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $1,259,973 $17,661,507 $228,487 $21,934,712
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $1.4 $16.7 $20.8 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $1.3 $17.7 $0.2 $21.9
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $17 $208 $258 1.16 $34 $15 $214 $3 $266
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $15 $183 $228 $29 $13 $185 $2.4 $230
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 95 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 250
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System, RRF at Balcatta
System Costs - Councils ex Stirling
Total $
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 304,773$ 99,245$ 1,483,132$ 1,887,150$ 10,002 8,908 301,101$ 90,318$ 1,500,371$ 34,703$ 1,926,493$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 1,757,772$ 627,695$ 8,784,587$ 11,170,054$ 61,315 53,182 1,797,566$ 573,080$ 9,197,272$ 212,728$ 11,780,645$
Perth 8,540 8,191 404,642$ 138,746$ 1,281,059$ 1,824,448$ 9,316 8,729 431,210$ 137,007$ 1,397,380$ 32,321$ 1,997,918$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 584,761$ 171,021$ 1,745,986$ 2,501,768$ 12,381 14,606 607,590$ 168,984$ 1,857,200$ 42,956$ 2,676,729$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 407,937$ 149,389$ 2,225,610$ 2,782,936$ 15,728 12,497 422,403$ 139,321$ 2,359,247$ 54,568$ 2,975,540$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 2,432,620$ 659,329$ 11,322,709$ 14,414,657$ 91,327 86,060 2,908,828$ 705,239$ 13,699,086$ 316,852$ 17,630,005$
178,954 167,310 5,892,505$ 1,845,425$ 26,843,083$ 34,581,013$ 200,070 183,982 6,468,698$ 1,813,950$ 30,010,556$ 694,127$ 38,987,330$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/yr)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/yr)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/yr)
Total Cost
($/yr)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 187,552$ 61,148$ 110,010$ 358,711$ 2,226 8,908 185,293$ 62,368$ 111,289$ -$ 358,950$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 1,081,706$ 108,856$ 414,089$ 1,604,651$ 8,671 53,182 1,106,195$ 114,131$ 433,542$ 12,251.6$ 1,666,120$
Perth 1,048 8,191 234,267$ 26,158$ 52,400$ 312,825$ 1,143 8,729 249,648$ 28,621$ 57,158$ -$ 335,427$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 347,202$ 41,489$ 123,479$ 512,170$ 2,627 14,606 360,756$ 44,486$ 131,344$ -$ 536,587$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 251,038$ 70,411$ 113,900$ 435,350$ 2,415 12,497 259,940$ 75,145$ 120,739$ -$ 455,825$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 1,496,997$ 209,924$ 716,574$ 2,423,495$ 17,339 86,060 1,790,048$ 255,130$ 866,966$ 24,499.8$ 2,936,644$
30,609 167,310 3,598,762$ 517,986$ 1,530,453$ 5,647,201$ 34,421 183,982 3,951,880$ 579,882$ 1,721,039$ 36,751$ 6,289,552$
$ per household
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 34$ 11$ 164$ 209$ 10,002 8,908 34$ 10$ 168$ 4$ 216$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 34$ 12$ 169$ 215$ 61,315 53,182 34$ 11$ 173$ 4$ 222$
Perth 8,540 8,191 49$ 17$ 156$ 223$ 9,316 8,729 49$ 16$ 160$ 4$ 229$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 42$ 12$ 124$ 178$ 12,381 14,606 42$ 12$ 127$ 3$ 183$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 34$ 12$ 184$ 231$ 15,728 12,497 34$ 11$ 189$ 4$ 238$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 34$ 9$ 157$ 200$ 91,327 86,060 34$ 8$ 159$ 4$ 205$
178,954 167,310 35$ 11$ 160$ 207$ 200,070 183,982 35$ 10$ 163$ 4$ 212$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/hhld)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/hhld)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/hhld)
Total Cost
($/hhld)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 21$ 7$ 12$ 40$ 2,226 8,908 21$ 7$ 12$ -$ 40$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 21$ 2$ 8$ 31$ 8,671 53,182 21$ 2$ 8$ 0.2$ 31$
Perth 1,048 8,191 29$ 3$ 6$ 38$ 1,143 8,729 29$ 3$ 7$ -$ 38$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 25$ 3$ 9$ 36$ 2,627 14,606 25$ 3$ 9$ -$ 37$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 21$ 6$ 9$ 36$ 2,415 12,497 21$ 6$ 10$ -$ 36$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 21$ 3$ 10$ 34$ 17,339 86,060 21$ 3$ 10$ 0.3$ 34$
30,609 167,310 22$ 3$ 9$ 34$ 34,421 183,982 21$ 3$ 9$ 0.2$ 34$
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 96 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 251
Scenario 2A: MBT Aerobic Composting - 2 Bin System, RRF at Balcatta
$ per tonne
Household Garbage
Council
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Garbage
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Garbage
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Garbage
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 9,888 9,017 31$ 10$ 150$ 191$ 10,002 8,908 30$ 9$ 150$ 3.5$ 193$
Joondalup 58,564 52,005 30$ 11$ 150$ 191$ 61,315 53,182 29$ 9$ 150$ 3.5$ 192$
Perth 8,540 8,191 47$ 16$ 150$ 214$ 9,316 8,729 46$ 15$ 150$ 3.5$ 214$
Victoria Park 11,640 14,057 50$ 15$ 150$ 215$ 12,381 14,606 49$ 14$ 150$ 3.5$ 216$
Vincent 14,837 12,069 27$ 10$ 150$ 188$ 15,728 12,497 27$ 9$ 150$ 3.5$ 189$
Wanneroo 75,485 71,971 32$ 9$ 150$ 191$ 91,327 86,060 32$ 8$ 150$ 3.5$ 193$
178,954 167,310 33$ 10$ 150$ 193$ 200,070 183,982 32$ 9$ 150$ 3.5$ 195$
Household Recyclables
Council
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Recyclables
Modelled
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Recyclables
Collection
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Delivery and
Transfer
($/tonne)
Cost of
Recyclables
Processing /
Disposal
($/tonne)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer
($/tonne)
Total Cost
($/tonne)
Cambridge 2,200 9,017 85$ 28$ 50$ 163$ 2,226 8,908 83$ 28$ 50$ -$ 161$
Joondalup 8,282 52,005 131$ 13$ 50$ 194$ 8,671 53,182 128$ 13$ 50$ 1$ 192$
Perth 1,048 8,191 224$ 25$ 50$ 298$ 1,143 8,729 218$ 25$ 50$ -$ 293$
Victoria Park 2,470 14,057 141$ 17$ 50$ 207$ 2,627 14,606 137$ 17$ 50$ -$ 204$
Vincent 2,278 12,069 110$ 31$ 50$ 191$ 2,415 12,497 108$ 31$ 50$ -$ 189$
Wanneroo 14,331 71,971 104$ 15$ 50$ 169$ 17,339 86,060 103$ 15$ 50$ 1$ 169$
30,609 167,310 118$ 17$ 50$ 184$ 34,421 183,982 115$ 17$ 50$ 1$ 183$
System Costs - Stirling
Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Total Cost ($) Quantity
(tonnes)
Households Cost of
Collection ($)
Cost of
Delivery and
Transfer ($)
Cost of
Processing /
Disposal ($)
Additional
Cost of
Residuals
Transfer ($)
Total Cost ($)
Total $Garbage 91,022 80,356 $2,716,019 $457,163 $13,653,237 $16,826,419 95,545 82,389 $2,784,744 $389,047 $14,331,750 $331,485 $17,837,026
Total $MGarbage 91,022 80,356 $2.7 $0.5 $13.7 $16.8 95,545 82,389 $2.8 $0.4 $14.3 $0.3 $17.8
$ per householdGarbage 1.13 $34 $6 $170 $209 1.16 $34 $5 $174 $3 $216
$ per tonneGarbage $30 $5 $150 $185 $29 $4 $150 $3.5 $187
2017 2022
2017 2022
2017 2022
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 97 - ITEM 8.3.1ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 252
ITEM 2 FUTURE LANDFILL SITE INVESTIGATION File No: WST/31 Attachment(s): Nil Author: Ian Watkins
MRC ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION That the Strategic Projects Committee receive the progress report on the search for a future landfill site. SPC DISCUSSION The committee agreed:
• The scope of further work on this project
• That this project be discussed further at the July meeting, prior to consideration by Council
• That this matter be classified CONFIDENTIAL in future SPC RECOMMENDATION MOVED: Mr Kevin Poynton SECONDED: Mr Doug Forster That this project be discussed further at the July Strategic Projects Committee meeting. (Carried: 7/0)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 98 - ITEM 8.3.2
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 253
ITEM 3 BUDGET 2010/2011 File No: FIN/9 Attachment(s): 1. Business Plan 2010/2011 2. Operation Statement by Nature & Type Operation Statement by Program Charts Revenue and Expenditure 3. Schedule of Capital Expenditure Schedule of Disposal of Assets 4. Schedule of Fees – Non Members 5. Supplementary Financial Statements Loan Schedules 6. New Initiatives Author: Kalwant Dhillon
SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to present to Council the draft Budget Papers for 2010/2011 for discussion, suggestion and comments with the view to finalisation by end June 2010. BACKGROUND Council at its meeting held on 22 April 2010, resolved, inter alia, at Item 8.1.1, as follows: That Council:
(i) Note the information in this Item in relation to a review of the MRC member fee model
(ii) Adopt a single fee model as the basis for determining the fee for the acceptance of waste from member Councils for the 2010/2011 budget
(iii) Authorise the CEO to present a report to the Council Budget Workshop scheduled for 13 May 2010, on the characteristics of the ‘Single Fee’ model
Supporting documentation provided as Attachments were as follows:
• Attachment One
- Workshop 31 March 2010 - Agenda
• Attachment Two
- Workshop 31 March 2010 – Deloitte Touché Tohmatsu Presentation
• Attachment Three
- Single Fee Option Presentation by City of Joondalup
• Attachment Four - Letter – City of Stirling
The Council, at its meeting held on 22 April 2010 at Item 8.2.5 resolved: That Council:
(i) note the methodology used for the Budget Planning and Strategic Budget for 2010/2011
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 99 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 254
(ii) note the new initiatives
(iii) note Members’ Single Gate Fee of $113 - $119 (ex GST) for financial year 2010/2011 for budget planning purposes
(iv) Approve the Schedule of Fees and Charges relating to commercial and casual uses at Attachment One in respect of financial year 2010/11
Supporting documentation provided as Attachments were as follows:
• Attachment One
- Schedule of Proposed Fees and Charges 2010/2011
• Attachment Two
- 2010/2011 Members Fees – Additional Budgetary Information
• Attachment Three
- New Initiatives DETAIL The methodology and assumptions used to develop the detailed Budget 2010/2011 have been as follows:
• The Twenty Year Strategic Plan commencing 2009/2010 remains the primary source of reference with regards to business activities
• The Twenty Year Strategic Financial Plan commencing 2008/2009 and approved at the July 2008 Ordinary Council Meeting remains the primary source of reference from a financial and budgetary perspective
• The Non-Members Gate Fees, prepared with reference to the Strategic Financial Plan, Strategic Plan and Business Plan, were approved at 22 April 2010 Ordinary Council Meeting. Estimated Members Fees were presented for Member Councils Budget Planning and noted by Council
• The detailed budget for 2010/2011 has been developed within the parameters of the Strategic Plan, Business Plan, Strategic Financial Plan and taking into account the current economic conditions, demand of business, environmental factors, latest events associated with RRF, new initiatives and other relevant factors to enable the Council to provide the level of service consistent with the Business Plan
The Budget structure and documentation is enclosed in Attachments Two to Six.
• Attachment Two - Operation Statement by Nature and Type
- Operation Statement by Program
- Charts Revenue and Expenditure
• Attachment Three - Schedule of Capital Expenditure
- Schedule of Disposal of Assets
• Attachment Four - Schedule of Fees Non Members
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 100 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 255
• Attachment Five - Supplementary Information – Loan Schedule
• Attachment Six
- New Initiatives The preparation of the draft Budget has been in line with the guidelines provided in the terms of best appropriate practice regarding Budget preparations. Business Concept – 2010/2011 The proposed business concept for 2010/2011 is described in the Business Plan for 2010/2011 at Attachment One for discussion at the Councillors’ Budget Workshop on 13 May 2010. Budget 2010/2011 As mentioned above, the Draft Budget is in line with the Business Plan. Assumptions Major assumptions associated with the Basis of Planning are as follows:
• that the volume of waste for disposal at Tamala Park will be similar to 2009/2010 and in line with the Strategic Financial Plan projections as revised by further updates as part of Budget Planning Process 2010/2011. The Members’ tonnage estimates are based on the estimates provided by Member Councils and casual usage is based on the 2009/2010 usage level and trend
• that the diversion of waste from landfill, measured in tonnes, in relation to RRF facility, is assumed at 70% and the normal diversion of waste to recycling would be in line with previous years’ trend
• the Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) would be fully operational in 2010/2011
• that fees and charges for non-members will be consistent with fees approved by Council at its meeting on 22 April 2009. Members’ Gate Fee will be finalised and approved in conjunction with the approval of the Budget for 2010/2011 in June 2010.
• that the Council will use the revised financial precepts details endorsed at the April 2004 Ordinary Council Meeting as detailed below effective from 1 July 2004. The financial precepts will be reviewed in consultation with the Member Councils in 2010/2011 once the revised Pricing Model is operating smoothly
• DEP Levy is assumed to increase from $28/tonne to $29/tonne. The State Budget will be handed down on 20 May 2010 and if there is any unexpected increase the fee would need to be recalculated
Precepts
a) a cost of equity (or “notional interest:”) will be calculated for funds contributed by Member Councils and retained surpluses, for the purpose of determining the actual cost of tipping
b) additional funds for working capital requirements to be raised either through retention of surplus or external borrowing. Mindarie Regional Council will determine timing of repayment of funds contributed, including retained surpluses
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 101 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 256
c) operational surpluses are distributed to Member Councils in ownership percentages subject to the retention of funds for future requirements
Associated Business Rules Become
a) in setting members’ prices, cost of tipping includes interest to the extent that it relates to funds required for current operations. Interest on funds held for future requirements is not included in cost of tipping
b) interest on Members’ equity will be set at a rate of return that an investor would regard as appropriate for a business of this nature
c) operational surpluses will be calculated in accordance with generally accepted Accounting Principles
d) to the extent that Member-tipping fees differ from actual costs, an adjustment will be made to the distributable surplus at individual Member Council level
e) the distribution of operational surpluses will be calculated as follows:
- operational surplus before member tipping fee adjustment X
- adjustment to member Council tipping charge according to
tonnes tipped, where tipping fees differ from actual cost X/(X)
- operational surplus available for distribution according
to equity ownership percentages X
- LESS: retention of funds for future requirements (X)
- adjustment to member Council tipping charges according
to tonnes tipped, where tipping fees differ from actual cost X/(X)
- amount distributed/(reimbursed) X/(X)
f) lease fee to be set on a commercial basis Assumed that ‘Notional Interest’, for the purpose of the preparation of this Budget, is zero which is consistent with the concept of Cost Recovery Models universally. This is consistent with the Strategic Financial Plan approved by Council at its July 2008 Ordinary Council Meeting. OPERATING Overall Summary The Council has a projected total revenue of $47.6m for 2010/2011 and total expenditure of $43.7m resulting in a surplus of $3.9m approximately. The surplus of $3.9m is mainly attributable to the casual/commercial users ($1.6m) and other income ($2.3m). The other income relates to Recycling Income, Interest, Gas income and other miscellaneous income. Revenue The projected revenue of $47.6m for 2010/2011 represents an increase of $8.5m (21.7%) over last year’s adopted budget. The increases are analysed below:
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 102 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 257
$’m
Increase/(Decrease) over estimated actual
$’m• Members’ User Fees 40.3 8.4• Casual Tipping Fees 5.0 (0.3)• Others 2.3 0.4 47.6 8.5
The increase in fees is mainly due to the following factors:
• Increase in projected contractor’s fees, in relation to RRF, in line with Resource Recovery Facility Agreement
• Full year impact of the DEP Levy ($3.1m increase over 2009/2010)
• New initiatives ($1m)
The projected revenue for 2010/2011 is based on, estimated waste tonnages provided by the Member Councils, and is summarised below. Processable Waste (Tonnage) City of Perth 14,428 City of Stirling 18,100 City of Wanneroo 50,800 Town of Cambridge 8,800 Town of Vincent 13,901 Town of Victoria Park 14,124 City of Joondalup 52,000 172,153 Non Processable Waste (Tonnage) City of Perth 45 City of Stirling 96,750 City of Wanneroo 37,185 Town of Cambridge 2,500 Town of Vincent 489 Town of Victoria Park 1,200 City of Joondalup 11,500 RRF Residue 30,000 179,669 Casual / Commercial 40,000 The waste tonnages for casuals were scaled back in 2010/2011, from the previous years to 40,000 tonnes following the increase in fees and the trend of actual tonnages for 2008/2009. For 2010/2011 there is a commitment from all councils to delivery their estimated tonnages for waste to Tamala Park and MRC administration does not anticipate any major variation to this plan at this stage.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 103 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 258
Expenditure Projections The total expenditure for 2010/2011 is budgeted at $43.7m. This is an increase of $6.3m (16.8%) over last year’s adopted budget and is basically in line with increase in revenue. The bulk of the increase is due to the following:
DEP Levy 1 3.1mRRF Increase 2 1.5mAmortisation (RRF & Landfill) 3 0.3mNew Initiatives 4 1.0mEmployee Costs 5 0.4mCPI Increases 0.1mOthers (0.1m) $6.3m
Budget Item Explanation
1. Landfill Levy $3.1m State Government increased the Landfill Levy from $7/t to $28/t effective 1
January 2010 without any formal consultation with the Industry and a further $1/t is budgeted in line with the previous projections provided by DEC.
2. Resource Recovery Facility (excluding interest expense) $1.5m
The RRF is now fully operational and the increase of $1.5m is mainly related to the following areas:
Contractors Fees • Consultants & Contract Labour
Relates to cover legal costs associated with the composter cracks/repairs/insurance claim
$55,000
• Information System Expenses Relates to management and maintenance of the computer systems which are now installed and fully operational
$12,000
• Compost disposal (RRFA CPI increase) $30,000• BioVision Gate Fee
Increase is relating to RRFA CPI increases, and change in the residue disposal rate at Tamala Park due to the MRC single fee structure as well as full year impact of DEP levy increase of $21/t introduced in January 2010
$1,382,000
• Others $11,000 $1,500,000
3. Amortisation $0.3m
The increase is due mainly to an adjustment in the Provision for Monitoring/Rehabilitation (post – closure) for landfill and adjustment in RRF amortisation of $2.1 pre-operating cost to take account of the interest element revision.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 104 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 259
4. New Initiatives $1.0m
CEO Consultancy - Review of Disability Access & Inclusion Plan 10,000 - Business Information System Review 15,000 - Information Management Strategy Plan 25,000 50,000 Research and Planning - Specialist Consultants – RRF Stage 2 Development 50,000 - Investigation/Toxic Taxi 20,000 - Millipedes Control 10,000 80,000 $130,000Operations Salaries - Technical Officer 70,700 - Recycling CSO 80,900 151,600 Superannuation - Technical Officer 10,600 - Recycling CSO 7,000 17,600 Workers Compensation - Technical Officer 2,800 - Recycling CSO 2,800 5,600 Annual Leave - Technical Officer 5,700 - Recycling CSO 3,800 9,500 Long Service Leave - Technical Officer 1,700 - Recycling CSO 1,200 2,900 Total Employee Costs $187,200 - Limestone Cover - Limestone Cover 420,000 $607,200Projects Contract Labour External - RRF Stage 2 Development 20,000 Zero Waste Plan - MRC Contributions 20,000 $40,000Marketing Salaries - An additional permanent part-time Admin Officer (0.5 FTE) 26,500 - Additional Casuals 20,000 46,500 Corporate Communication Strategy - Brand Council 5,000 - Corporate Function 50,000
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 105 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 260
55,000 Sponsorship - Member Councils 70,000 Waste Management Education - Shopping Centre Program 10,000 Project and SWMP Support - RRF Open Day 30,000 - RRF Stage 2 Promotion 5,000 35,000 Other Administrative Expenses - Artwork Maintenance 5,000
$221,500
Grand Total $998,7005. Employee costs
EBA/Increments $0.3m Associated Superannuation and Annual Leave/Benefits $0.1m $0.4m
Position Current FTE Comment Chief Executive Officer (CEO) 1 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) 1 Administration Manager 1 Senior Finance Officer 2 Human Resources & Payroll Officer
1
Finance Officer – Reporting .5 Permanent Part-Time Accounts Receivable & Sales Officer
1
Finance Officer – Accounts Payable, Budget & IT
1
Waste Minimisation Officer 1 To implement Strategic Waste Minimisation Plan.
Manager Projects & RRF .6 Utilise contract professional. Manager Marketing & Education .5 Utilise contract professional. Sustainability & Waste Education Coordinator
1
Waste Education Officer 1 Administration Officer (Marketing & Education)
.5 Permanent part-time
Administration Officer (Marketing & Education)
.5 Proposed Position
Admin Officer (Reception) 1 Governance Officer 1 Records Officer 1 Operations Manager 1
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 106 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 261
Deputy Operations Manager / Mechanic
1 Covers for Operations Manager when not available. Taken over plant maintenance previously contracted out.
Foreman 1 Environmental Officer .6 Utilise contract professional Plant Operators 5 Highly skilled plant operators Recycling Attendants 8 Provide security and service relating
to hazardous household waste facility operating at the recycling facility. Operation of bin truck from this group.
Recycling Attendant 1 Proposed Position Transfer Station Attendants /truck drivers
4 Multi-skilling – rotating through tasks plus maintain safety standards at transfer station. Operation of water truck from this group.
Grounds Maintenance Officer 1 Ensure compliance with licence Welder 1 Assist with workshop and
maintenance program Risk Management Officer 1 Provides support to Operations
Manager in relation to safety, compliance, minor projects and household hazardous waste issues
Technical Officer 1 Proposed Position Weighbridge Officer 1 Operates weighbridge and monitors
quality of waste entering the site Total 43.2
The ‘make-up’ of the 8 Recycling Attendants are as follows:
FTEPermanent Full Time 5Full Time Equivalent of the 8 permanent part-timers 3Total 8
The 8 permanent part-timers are utilised to cover the weekend and on-going operational requirements as required.
Additional Information - Expenditure
• Marketing and Education $905,900 The details are as follows:
SPONSORSHIPS Sponsorships 70,000 $70,000 CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY DVD Breaking New Ground 10,000 MRC Website 45,000 Annual Report 10,000 Waste Conference 15,000 Media Activities 16,000
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 107 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 262
MRC Newsletter 80,000 Brand Council 5,000 Corporate Function 50,000 CPI 5,300 $236,300 WASTE EDUCATION Branding Support 21,000 Fridge Calendar 80,000 HHW Collection days program and promotion 42,000 Report Card/Waste Audit Project 10,000 Continued Support for WESSG 5,000 Tour Programs, including giveaways 25,000 Bus Sponsorship 20,000 Mobile Display Promotion and Support 5,000 Contaminants Education / Flouros Collections 10,000 Waste Free Events Support 14,000 Earth Carers Outreach Support 60,000 Advertising 7,000 Interactive Resource for Events 10,000 School Program 30,000 English as a Second Language Communication 10,000 E Waste Collection 25,000 Battery Program 30,000 Shopping Centre Program 10,000 $414,000 PROJECTS SUPPORT RRF Visitors Centre 30,000 DVD and brochures for RRF 8,000 Monthly RRF Advertising 72,000 CEAG Support 10,000 RRF Open Day 30,000 RRF Stage 2 Promotion 5,000 CPI 3,600 $158,600 OTHER Advertising and Promotion $27,000
The new initiatives included in above program are as follows: New Initiatives Sponsorships 70,000 Brand Council 5,000 Corporate Function 50,000 Shopping Centre Program 10,000 RRF Open Day 30,000 RRF Stage 2 Promotion 5,000 Artwork Maintenance 5,000 0.5 FTE Admin Officers 27,000 Additional Casual 20,000 $222,000
• Consultants and Labour Cost (Tamala Park) $930,900
Tamala Park $665,900 RRF $265,000
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 108 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 263
Budget 2009/2010 also makes provision for the use of consultants for the execution of designated functions associated with the business. These functions are in addition to, albeit complementary to those functions performed by employees and contracted personnel. Designated functions are as follows: Consultancy - Tamala Park HR Support 25,000 Financial & Business Advice and Modelling 105,000 Environmental Support / Audit 25,000 Technical Support and Advice 20,000 Strategic Plan Review 10,000 Strategic Financial Plan Review 10,000 Development of Policies and Procedures 20,000 Compactor Tender 7,000 Patio and Office Renovation Tender 12,000 Under Cover Parking Tender 7,000 Cardboard and Paper Contract 7,000 Review of Disability Access & Inclusion Plan 10,000 Business Information System Review 15,000 Information Management Strategy Plan 25,000 $298,000 -RRF Specialist Project Consultants 50,000 Financial 10,000 Insurance 15,000 Legal Support 100,000 $175,000 Contract Labour - Tamala Park Admin Staff – Temporary 7,200 Finance Staff – Temporary 30,000 Operator Relieve/Labour Hire 17,000 Mechanic Relief 16,800 Environmental Officer 99,500 Welder Relief 12,400 New Land Purchase - Project Management 15,000 Zero Waste Plan - Project Management 20,000 RRF Stage 2 Development - Project Management 20,000 Marketing and Education Manager 100,000 Corporate Communication 30,000 $367,900 -RRF Project/Contract Management 90,000 $90,000
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 109 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 264
• Research and Planning Cost $420,000 Municipal Waste Advisory Council Standard Contribution
37,000
MWAC 3,000 Regional Plan Development 5,000 Strategic Plan Implementation 5,000 WMAA-A-CAP Project (In Kind/Cash Contributions) 10,000 FORC 20,000 Investigation/Toxic Taxi 20,000 Landfill Gas Migration Investigation 80,000 Ground Water Remediation 30,000 Technical Investigations – Son of Tamala Park 150,000 Specialist Consultant – RRF Stage 2 Development 50,000 Millipedes Control 10,000 $420,000
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2010/2011 Proposals for Capital Expenditure within the context of Budget 2010/2011 are detailed on Attachment Two. The key items are as follows:
• Landfill 2 Capping –
To cap the northern portion of the completed landfill $3.4m
• Landfill Compactor - $1.2m
This relates to the replacement of existing compactor.
• Building - $0.32m
This relates to a number of small extensions in relation to Recycling Lunch Room, Under-Cover Parking, Patio/Office Renovations and Education Centre Toilets.
2009/2010 The following projects are currently in progress and the unexpended budget allocated in 2009/2010 for these items need to be carried forward to 2010/2011 and incorporated as part of the Capital Budget for 2010/2011.
• Landfill Excavation - $8.9m
The excavation is completed and the base lining will be completed by June 2010. Further incremental lining will be done in ‘clay’ and this would be carried over next four to five years. The carried forward amount of $8.9m is relating to the incremental ‘clay’ lining and will be increased at an annual rate of $2m.
• Purchase for Land - $12.0m
This relates to cost of purchase of land for the new landfill site beyond Tamala Park
• Resource Recovery Facility - $0.04m
The weighbridge office and education building has been completed and minor works relating to communication infrastructure to be carried out in July/August 2010
$20.94
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 110 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 265
Funding Plan The proposed funding plan for 2010/2011 budgeted expenditure is as follows:
• operating expenditure is to be covered by income primarily from the Gate fees, gas power generation income, and sale of recyclables resulting in an estimated surplus of $3.9m approximately. This surplus needs to be retained to meet the loan repayments and capital expenditure requirements of the Council in line with the Strategic Financial Plan
• remaining infrastructure costs in relation to the Resource Recovery Facility is to be funded from the existing loan facilities
• the expenditure for Phase 3 will be funded from the surplus funds available. The dedicated Loan facility of $6.6m approved at the July 2008 Ordinary Council Meeting will not be drawn down at this stage.
• purchase of land will be funded by a dedicated loan which will be approved prior to the purchase
• the remaining ongoing Capital Expenditure is to be funded from the surplus of $3.9m projected for the year (as noted above)
The 20 year Strategic Financial Plan was approved at the July 2008 Ordinary Council Meeting. One of the fundamental assumptions of the Strategic Financial Plan is that the annual surpluses will be retained by Mindarie Regional Council to fund the ongoing Capital Expenditure requirements of the organisation with the view to establishing Mindarie Regional Council as a self-funding and viable organisation going forward. In line with this plan, the surpluses to date and future years will be retained by the Mindarie Regional Council as approved by the Council at its August 2005 Ordinary Council Meeting. Overdraft Mindarie Regional Council currently has an overdraft facility of $1m that is reviewable every six (6) months (September and March). It is recommended that this facility be increased to $5m is to cover any shortfall in the working capital of the Council and any payments that may eventuate at short-notice under the terms of RRF agreement. Under the Resource Recovery Facility Agreement, MRC is required to pay the first $5m of any claims, determined in favour of BioVision, promptly within 20 days of determination, as required by the Financing Parties. Loans The loans repayment schedule is in line with the Strategic Financial Plan and at this stage all loans are expected to be repaid by 2016/2017 utilising funds obtained from annual surpluses. Fees The Fee Model used for the computation of the Member Gate Fee is under dispute and an update will be provided in the Budget Papers.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 111 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 266
Other Matters • Members Withdrawal
The process for withdrawal of any Member Councils from MRC is contained in the current Constitution and will be dealt with in line with the terms and conditions of the Constitution.
• Members Conferences
Currently a total amount is provided by MRC to cover the expenses relating to Member Conferences. Suggestion has been made to allocate a specific amount to each Councillor for attendance at Conferences at their discretion. This will be discussed at the Budget Workshop
• RRF Gate Fee
As per the RRFA, the Waste Diversion Target is able to be changed to take into consideration the Perth waste stream composition (organic fraction). It has previously been agreed with BioVision that the Waste Diversion Target will be assessed in the first year of operations. Following the extended Un-Availability as a result of the composter cracks, the MRC is proposing that this assessment be finalised over the first two years of operation, with an interim adjustment at the end of year one.
The issue of whether there is a corresponding RRF gate fee increase is a matter of discussion with BioVision.
If the Waste Diversion Target is adjusted to the extent requested by BioVision (71.4% to 58%) and the MRC is required to adjust the gate fee, the impact has been calculated as $7.41/tonne which will equate to $741,000 for 2010/2011. Based on this, the retrospective catch-up payment for the 2009/2010 financial year has been calculated as $677,000. This total impact over 2009/2010 and 2010/2011 of $1.4m ($741,000 plus $677,000) has not been taken into account for the calculation of 2010/2011 Members’ Gate Fees. Administration recommends that this cost be offset against the estimated $1.5m surplus for 2009/2010 in relation to RRF Operations (mentioned above) if it eventuates. If this liability does not eventuate the surplus will be offset against future year’s Processable Fees.
STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT The draft of the Budget is available for Council consideration and approval prior to end August 2009, in accordance with provision of the Local Government Act 1995 is required. POLICY IMPLICATIONS Not applicable FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS As detailed STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS The draft Budget 2010-/2011 is consistent with the Council’s twenty year Strategic Plan, Strategic Financial Plan (2008/09 – 2027/28) and Annual Business Plan for 2009/2010.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 112 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 267
COMMENT The Budget formulation process has been conducted in accordance with the plan previously approved by Council on 10 December 2009.
• The draft Budget for 2010/2011 is being finalised and is now tabled for Council’s consideration. The Budget is consistent with the information contained in the respective year in the twenty year Strategic Plan and Strategic Financial Plan (2008/09 – 2027/28) and the associated Business plan for 2009/2010 and takes into account the current economic conditions, demand of business, environmental factors, latest events associated with RRF, new initiatives and other relevant factors to enable the Council to provide the level of service consistent with the Business Plan
. MRC ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION Nil provided. SPC DISCUSSION The CEO stated that most comments from the Budget Workshop on 13 May 2010 were valuable and that all comments should be forwarded to Mr Kalwant Dhillon. The Deputy Chairman suggested that in developing a budget, start with a baseline for the business and then include new initiatives, with priorities. The Committee then agreed that any proposed new initiatives not included in the Budget be listed on a ‘Future Projects’ list.
Mr Ian Watkins asked that the new initiative Limestone Cover be a priority. The Deputy Chairman advised that this should be included in the business budget for 2010/2011 as it was a business item. Mr Kalwant Dhillon stated that this suggestion could be done. The committee also agreed:
• That the next iteration of Budget 2010/2011 pages contain options for management of all surplus
• That the matter of creation of reserves be investigated SPC RECOMMENDATION MOVED: Mr Doug Forster SECONDED: Mr Kevin Poynton Draft report with identified changes be presented at the next Budget Workshop for further discussion. (Carried: 7/0)
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 113 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 268
ATTACHMENT ONE
TO ITEM 3
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
BUSINESS PLAN 2010/2011
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 114 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 269
M
IND
AR
IE R
EGIO
NA
L C
OU
NC
IL
A
NN
UA
L B
USI
NES
S PL
AN
201
0/20
11
Prop
osed
Act
ion
C
omm
ents
Obj
ectiv
e O
ne:
Was
te M
anag
emen
t
• O
pera
te e
xist
ing
was
te p
roce
ssin
g pr
ojec
ts a
t, at
leas
t, Ta
mal
a P
ark
(land
fill,
recy
clin
g an
d re
use)
and
Nee
rabu
p (r
esou
rce
reco
very
)
• O
ptim
ize
inco
me
via
was
te p
roce
ssin
g pr
ojec
ts a
t Tam
ala
Par
k i.e
. lan
dfill
gas
, rec
yclin
g
KP
I is
satis
fact
ory
repo
rt ca
rd o
n ec
onom
ic, e
nviro
nmen
tal a
nd s
ocia
l gr
ound
s
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 115 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 270
M
IND
AR
IE R
EGIO
NA
L C
OU
NC
IL
A
NN
UA
L B
USI
NES
S PL
AN
201
0/20
11
Prop
osed
Act
ion
C
omm
ents
Obj
ectiv
e Tw
o: W
aste
/Res
ourc
e Pr
oces
sing
• Im
plem
ent i
nteg
rate
d re
gion
al p
lan
for p
roce
ssin
g of
at
leas
t mun
icip
al s
olid
was
te (M
SW
)
• D
evel
op a
nd im
plem
ent p
lans
for a
dditi
onal
was
te
proc
essi
ng fa
cilit
ies
with
in th
e re
gion
incl
udin
g ‘S
on o
f Ta
mal
a’ la
ndfil
l and
RR
F S
tage
Tw
o
• In
vest
igat
e ad
ditio
nal o
ppor
tuni
ties
for e
xpan
ded
was
te
proc
essi
ng c
apab
ility
e.g
. Bal
catta
Tra
nsfe
r Sta
tion
• Im
prov
e w
aste
pro
cess
ing
at T
amal
a P
ark
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 116 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 271
M
IND
AR
IE R
EGIO
NA
L C
OU
NC
IL
A
NN
UA
L B
USI
NES
S PL
AN
201
0/20
11
Prop
osed
Act
ion
C
omm
ents
Obj
ectiv
e Th
ree:
Ind
ustr
y Le
ader
ship
and
Adv
ocac
y
• P
artic
ipat
e in
def
ined
ext
erna
l ind
ustry
-rel
ated
foru
ms
eg.
MW
AC
, WM
AA
, WA
LGA
, FO
RC
• S
treng
then
par
tner
ship
s w
ith G
over
nmen
t, in
dust
ry a
nd
acad
emic
inst
itutio
ns in
ord
er to
pro
mot
e im
prov
emen
t in
was
te m
anag
emen
t sec
tor p
artic
ular
ly v
ia th
e S
WM
P
prog
ram
me
• Id
entif
y an
d ad
opt c
onte
mpo
rary
app
roac
hes
to
was
te/re
sour
ce m
anag
emen
t, at
leas
t with
in th
e re
gion
KP
I is
intro
duct
ion
of im
prov
ed in
dust
ry-w
ide
prog
ram
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 117 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 272
M
IND
AR
IE R
EGIO
NA
L C
OU
NC
IL
A
NN
UA
L B
USI
NES
S PL
AN
201
0/20
11
Prop
osed
Act
ion
C
omm
ents
Obj
ectiv
e Fo
ur:
Com
mun
ity E
ngag
emen
t
• Im
prov
e M
inda
rie R
egio
nal C
ounc
il un
ders
tand
ing
of
com
mun
ity c
hara
cter
istic
s (i)
V
ia d
evel
opm
ent o
f an
actio
n pl
an fr
om th
e M
inda
rie
360
Sta
keho
lder
sur
vey
• O
pera
te a
n ef
fect
ive
inte
grat
ed m
arke
ting
stra
tegy
for
Min
darie
Reg
iona
l Cou
ncil
stak
ehol
ders
• O
pera
te a
n ef
fect
ive
was
te e
duca
tion
stra
tegy
in o
rder
to
prom
ote
com
mun
ity b
ehav
iour
con
sist
ent w
ith o
pera
tiona
l pl
ans
• M
aint
ain
the
CE
AG
foru
m a
s a
com
mun
ity e
ngag
emen
t ta
ctic
for R
RF
issu
es
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 118 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 273
M
IND
AR
IE R
EGIO
NA
L C
OU
NC
IL
A
NN
UA
L B
USI
NES
S PL
AN
201
0/20
11
Prop
osed
Act
ion
C
omm
ents
Obj
ectiv
e Fi
ve:
Org
anis
atio
nal M
anag
emen
t
• M
aint
ain
and
impr
ove
exis
ting
cont
empo
rary
bus
ines
s sy
stem
s, e
.g. f
inan
ce, p
rocu
rem
ent,
proj
ect m
anag
emen
t, cu
stom
er s
ervi
ce, m
arke
ting,
gov
erna
nce
• S
treng
then
Mem
ber C
ounc
il pa
rtner
ship
s an
d re
latio
nshi
ps
• R
evie
w a
nd w
here
app
ropr
iate
, rev
ise
fund
ing
stra
tegi
es fo
r th
e bu
sine
ss w
ith th
e co
ntex
t of t
he a
ppro
ved
Stra
tegi
c Fi
nanc
ial P
lan
• D
evel
op a
n In
form
atio
n M
anag
emen
t Pla
n fo
r MR
C
• R
evie
w K
ey p
lans
i.e.
Stra
tegi
c P
lan,
Stra
tegi
c Fi
nanc
ial
Pla
n
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 119 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 274
ATTACHMENT TWO
TO ITEM 3
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY2010
OPERATION STATEMENT BY NATURE & TYPE OPERATION STATEMENT BY PROGRAM
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 120 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 275
Note
DescriptionProposed Budget
2010/2011Actual
31 March 2010Adopted Budget
2009/2010Revenue form Ordinary Activities User Charges User Charges - City of Perth 1,657,200 1,316,658 1,930,400 User Charges - City of Waneroo 10,074,300 5,844,381 7,570,900 User Charges - City of Joondalup 7,270,800 5,356,849 7,418,100 User Charges - City of Stirling 13,150,400 6,553,975 8,376,000 User Charges - Town of Cambridge 1,293,900 896,194 1,224,000 User Charges - Town of Vincent 1,647,700 1,186,499 1,687,800 User Charges - Town of Victoria Park 1,754,600 1,122,259 1,728,200 User Charges - RRF Residues 3,435,000 1,106,744 1,980,000 Total Member User Charges 40,283,900 23,383,559 31,915,400 User Charges - City of South Perth 0 16,229 337,100 User Charges - Casual Tipping Fees 5,018,000 3,447,508 5,018,140 Total User Charges 45,301,900 26,847,297 37,270,640 Service Charges Sale of Recyclable Materials 340,000 374,666 240,000 Sale of Limestone 0 0 0 Gas Power Generation Sales 550,000 297,350 550,000 Grants & Subsidies 400,000 360,000 320,000 Contributions, Reimbursements & Donations 202,000 173,939 340,100 Interest Earnings 795,400 282,037 369,200 Other Revenue 10,200 73,716 10,200
47,599,500 28,409,005 39,100,140Expenses from Ordinary Activities Employee Costs 4,936,100 3,273,361 4,300,140 Materials and Contracts Consultants and Contract Labour 665,900 695,480 594,600 Communications and Public Consultation 905,900 241,167 722,800 Landfill Expenses 1,612,800 660,549 1,057,400 Office Expenses 286,200 166,795 254,500 Information System Expenses 465,700 226,268 399,300 Building Maintenance 115,100 75,906 99,200 Plant and Equipment Operating and Hire 1,034,200 1,015,117 1,027,800 RRF Operations Total Cost (excl. Amortisation) 17,717,000 8,316,215 16,173,600 1 Waste Minimisation Project 280,000 323,841 316,000 Utilities 109,500 77,781 94,300 Depreciation 1,133,700 779,813 1,159,080 Borrowing Cost Expenses 691,000 996,413 880,400 Insurance 160,700 143,899 127,400 DEP Landfill Levy 7,785,800 3,212,353 4,699,700 Land Lease/Rental 615,000 429,762 590,000 Other Expenditure Member Costs 169,900 61,856 149,500 Administration Expenses 167,700 115,586 159,000 Amortisation (LandFill) 4,206,050 3,279,249 4,054,200 Amortisation (RRF) 652,259 400,950 534,600 1
43,710,509 24,492,363 37,393,520
Profit on Sale of Assets 0 9,994 27,800Loss on Sale of Assets 18,700 8,116 28,700
(18,700) 1,879 (900)
Changes in Net Assets Resulting from Operations 3,870,291 3,918,521 1,705,720
Note: Adopted Budget 2009/2010 for RRF Total Operations Cost has been re-aligned for comparison to Proposed Budget 2010/2011. No effect on the Net Balance.
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY NATURE AND TYPE
Proposed Budget for 2010/2011
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 121 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 276
Note 1
DescriptionProposed Budget
2010/2011Adopted Budget
2009/2010Revenue form Ordinary ActivitiesExpenses from Ordinary Activities Employee Costs 41,500 0 Materials and Contracts Consultants and Contract Labour 265,000 210,000 Office Expenses 5,200 5,000 Information System Expenses 12,000 0 Building Maintenance 30,900 30,000 RRF Operations Total Cost (excl. Amortisation) 16,764,200 15,355,000 Utilities 24,200 37,000 Borrowing Cost Expenses 574,000 536,600 Other Expenditure Amortisation (RRF) 652,259 534,600
18,369,259 16,708,200
Changes in Net Assets Resulting from Operations 18,369,259 16,708,200
Mindarie Regional CouncilRESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
INCOME STATEMENT BY NATURE AND TYPEProposed Budget for 2010/2011
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 122 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 277
DescriptionProposed Budget
2010/2011Actual
31 March 2010Adopted Budget
2009/2010
Revenue from Ordinary ActivitiesCommunity Amenities 47,599,500 28,409,005 39,100,140Total Operating Revenues 47,599,500 28,409,005 39,100,140
Expenses from Ordinary ActivitiesGovernance 169,900 61,856 149,500Community Amenities 22,648,750 13,729,360 17,787,420Other Property and Services 1,831,600 1,388,519 1,868,000Resource Recovery Facility 17,795,259 8,316,215 16,171,600Total Operating Expenses 42,445,509 23,495,950 35,976,520
Profit on Sale of AssetsCommunity Amenities 0 9,994 27,800Total Profit on Sale of Assets 0 9,994 27,800
Loss on Sale of AssetsCommunity Amenities 18,700 8,116 28,700Total Profit on Sale of Assets 18,700 8,116 28,700
Borrowing Costs ExpenseCommunity Amenities 691,000 620,391 880,400Resource Recovery Facility 574,000 376,022 536,600Total Borrowing Cost Expense 1,265,000 996,413 1,417,000
Net Result 3,870,291 3,918,521 1,705,720
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY PROGRAM
Proposed Budget for 2009/2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 123 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 278
DescriptionProposed Budget
2009/2010Actual
31 March 2010Adopted Budget
2008/2009
Revenue from Ordinary ActivitiesCommunity Amenities 47,599,500 28,418,999 39,127,940Total Operating Revenues 47,599,500 28,418,999 39,127,940
Expenses from Ordinary ActivitiesGovernance 169,900 61,856 149,500Community Amenities 23,358,450 14,357,867 18,696,520Other Property and Services 1,831,600 1,388,519 1,868,000Resource Recovery Facility 18,369,259 8,692,237 16,708,200Total Operating Expenses 43,729,209 24,500,478 37,422,220
Net Result 3,870,291 3,918,521 1,705,720
Mindarie Regional CouncilINCOME STATEMENT BY PROGRAM
Proposed Budget for 2009/2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 124 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 279
Bud
get 1
0/11
To
tal R
even
ue
Con
tribu
tions
, Rei
mb
& D
onat
ions
0%
Gra
nt &
Sub
sidi
es1%
Gas
Pow
er G
ener
atio
n S
ale
1%S
ale
of R
ecyc
labl
e M
ater
ials
1%In
tere
st E
arni
ngs
2% (0
9/10
- 1%
)
Cas
uals
/Non
Mem
bers
11%
(09/
10 -
14%
)
Mem
bers
Fee
s84
% (0
9/10
- 81
%)
Mem
bers
Fee
sC
asua
ls/N
on M
embe
rsIn
tere
st E
arni
ngs
Sal
e of
Rec
ycla
ble
Mat
eria
lsG
as P
ower
Gen
erat
ion
Sal
eG
rant
& S
ubsi
dies
Con
tribu
tions
, Rei
mb
& D
onat
ions
Oth
er R
even
ue
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 125 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 280
Bud
get 1
0/11
Exp
endi
ture
s by
Loc
atio
n
MR
C L
andf
ill F
acili
ty $
25.2
7M55
% (0
9/10
- 55
%)
MR
C R
RF
Faci
lity
$18.
25M
45%
(09/
10 -
45%
)
Tam
ala
Par
kR
RF
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 126 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 281
Bud
get 1
0/11
MR
C L
andf
ill F
acili
ty E
xpen
ditu
res
Offi
ce E
xpen
ses
1%In
form
atio
n S
yste
m E
xpen
ses
2%
Land
Lea
se/R
enta
l2%
(09/
10 -
3%)
Was
te M
inim
isat
ion
Pro
ject
1% (0
9/10
- 2%
)
Em
ploy
ee C
ost
20%
(09/
10 -
21%
)
Bor
row
ing
Cos
t3%
(09/
10 -
4%)
Insu
ranc
e1%
Con
sulta
nts&
Con
tract
s3%
Com
m &
Pub
lic C
onsu
ltatio
n4%
Land
fill E
xpen
ses
6% (0
9/10
- 5%
)
Pla
nt a
nd E
quip
men
t Ope
ratin
g an
d H
ire4%
(09/
10 -
5%)
Mem
ber C
osts
1%
Dep
reci
atio
n4%
(09/
10 -
6%)
DE
P L
andf
ill L
evy
31%
(09/
10 -
23%
)Am
ortis
atio
n (L
andF
ill)
16%
Adm
inis
tratio
n E
xpen
ses
1%
Em
ploy
ee C
ost
Con
sulta
nts&
Con
tract
sC
omm
& P
ublic
Con
sulta
tion
Land
fill E
xpen
ses
Offi
ce E
xpen
ses
Info
rmat
ion
Sys
tem
Exp
ense
sB
uild
ing
Mai
nten
ance
Pla
nt a
nd E
quip
men
t Ope
ratin
g an
d H
ireW
aste
Min
imis
atio
n P
roje
ctU
tiliti
esD
epre
ciat
ion
Bor
row
ing
Cos
tIn
sura
nce
DE
P L
andf
ill L
evy
Land
Lea
se/R
enta
lM
embe
r Cos
ts A
dmin
istra
tion
Exp
ense
sA
mor
tisat
ion
(Lan
dFill
)Lo
ss o
n S
ale
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 127 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 282
Bud
get 1
0/11
MR
C R
RF
Faci
lity
Exp
endi
ture
s
Con
tract
or's
Fee
88%
MR
C O
pera
ting
Cos
t3%
Bor
row
ing
Cos
t3%
Am
ortis
atio
n (R
RF)
4% Com
post
Dis
posa
l3%
Offi
ce E
xpen
ses
Bui
ldin
g M
aint
enan
ceM
RC
Ope
ratin
g C
ost
Util
ities
Bor
row
ing
Cos
tA
mor
tisat
ion
(RR
F)C
ompo
st D
ispo
sal
Con
tract
or's
Cos
t
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 128 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 283
ATTACHMENT THREE
TO ITEM 3
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURE SCHEDULE OF DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 129 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 284
Proposed Budget 2010/2011
Mindarie Regional CouncilNOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE BUDGET
For the year ending 30 June 2010
The following assets are budgeted to be acquired during the year
BY PROGRAMCommunity AmenitiesMachinery and Equipment 31,000 Furniture and Equipment 10,000 Computing Equipment 77,200 Land and Buildings 12,318,000 Infrastructure - Operations 19,500 Infrastructure - Landfill 5,520,000 Infrastructure - RRF 100,000
18,075,700
Other Property and ServicesPlant and Vehicles 1,215,500
1,215,500
19,291,200
BY CLASSPlant and Vehicles 1,215,500 Machinery and Equipment 31,000 Furniture and Equipment 10,000 Computing Equipment 77,200 Land and Buildings 12,318,000 Infrastructure - Operations 19,500 Infrastructure - Landfill 5,520,000 Infrastructure - RRF 100,000
19,291,200
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 130 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 285
Proposed Budget 2010/2011
Mindarie Regional CouncilNOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE BUDGET
For the year ending 30 June 2011
The following assets are budgeted to be acquired during the year.
PLANT, VEHICLES AND MACHINERIESPlant and Vehicles Landfill Compactor 1,200,000 Ride-on Mower 15,500
1,215,500
Machinery and Equipment Hook Lift Bin 14,000 8x Bunded Pallets 5,800 6x Grey Nally Bins 2,500 1x Stacking Turntables 4,200 1x Anionic Resin Exchanger 2,000 1x Refridgerant Recovery Unit 2,500
31,000
TOTAL PLANT, VEHICLES AND MACHINERIES 1,246,500
FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENTFurniture & Fittings Replacement of Furnitures 10,000
10,000
TOTAL FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT 10,000
COMPUTING EQUIPMENTComputing Equipment Replacement of Laptop - CEO 4,000 Replacement of Laptop - Financial Accountant 3,200 Replacement of Desktop - Receptionist 1,500 Replacement of Desktop - Plant Supervisor 1,500 Replacement of Desktop - Project Manager 1,500 Replacement of Desktop - TRIM Computer 1,500 Replacement of Desktop - Recycling Point of Sale 1,500 New Laptop - Marketing and Education Manager 2,500 Replacement of MRCTPS003 Server 25,000 Upgrade Core Switches for the Existing Servers 20,000 Various Replacement of Computing Equipments 15,000
77,200
TOTAL COMPUTING EQUIPMENT 77,200
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 131 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 286
Proposed Budget 2010/2011
Mindarie Regional CouncilNOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE BUDGET
For the year ending 30 June 2011
BUILDINGBuilding Recycling Centre Lunch Room Extension 20,000 Workshop Oil Storage Area 15,000 Under Cover Parking 125,000 Patio and Office Renovation 90,000 Education Centre Toilets 68,000 TOTAL BUILDINGS 318,000
LANDLandbrought forward items: Land Purchase (New Landfill Site) 12,000,000 TOTAL LAND 12,000,000
TOTAL LAND AND BUILDINGS 12,318,000
INFRASTRUCTUREOperations Boom Gates 19,500
19,500
Landfill Phase 3 Development Pumps and Compressor Station 85,000 Design, Superintendence 50,000 Clay Lining 2,000,000 Project Management 15,000
2,150,000
Landfill Stage 2 Capping Design, Superintendence 150,000 Cap Construction 3,000,000 Revegetation 200,000 Project Management 20,000
3,370,000
Resource Recovery Facility Site Infrastructure additional Costs 60,000 brought forward items: Site Infrastructure 40,000
100,000
TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE 5,639,500
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 132 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 287
2009/2010 2010/2011 2010/2011Net Book Value Sale Proceeds Profit (Loss)
DISPOSAL OF ASSETS
The following assets are budgeted to be disposed during the year
BY PROGRAMOther Property and Services Tana G360 (Plant 36) 188,700 (170,000) (18,700)
188,700 (170,000) (18,700)
BY CLASSPlant and Vehicles Tana G360 (Plant 36) 188,700 (170,000) (18,700)
188,700 (170,000) (18,700)
Summary BudgetProfit on Sale of DisposalLoss on Sale of Disposal (18,700)
(18,700)
Mindarie Regional CouncilNOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE BUDGET
For the year ending 30 June 2010
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 133 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 288
ATTACHMENT FOUR
TO ITEM 3
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
SCHEDULE OF FEES – NON MEMBERS
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 134 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 289
PROPOSED Fee (GST
inclusive) from1 July 2009
GST Payable to ATO
PROPOSED Fee (GST
inclusive) from1 July 2010
GST Payable to ATO
1 (a) GENERAL ENTRYGeneral waste and household rubbish (domestic)excepting liquid waste, swill or semi liquid waste.Charge per tonne 120.00 10.91 138.00 12.55 Minimum charge for entry to sit 10.00 0.91 12.00 1.09
(b) Swill or Semi Liquid Waste(c)
failure, maintenance or repairs the following feesshall apply to ( a ) above( I ) All vehicles carrying uncompacted waste -
35.00 3.18 40.00 3.64 Trailer (1.8mx1.2m or less) 35.00 3.18 40.00 3.64 ( II ) All vehicles carrying compacted waste - per wheel of truck or trailer 70.00 6.36 80.00 7.27
(d) 150.00 13.64 200.00 18.18 (e) Unweighed Load (Drive-Aways 50.00 4.55 60.00 5.45
2 SPECIAL BURIALS (SUPERVISED) At the discretion of the Site Controller in addition to the tonnage rates Charge per 5 cubic metres 180.00 16.36 200.00 18.18
3 CONTROLLED WASTE PER TONNE 200.00 18.18 200.00 18.18 4 SPECIAL COMMERCIAL ITEMS
(a) 25.00 2.27 25.00 2.27 (b) Animal carcasses
Small domestic animals 8.00 0.55 8.00 0.73 Large animals (Sheep and cattle etc.) 20.00 1.18 20.00 1.82
(c) 15.00 1.36 18.00 1.64 Per tonne 300.00 22.73 300.00 27.27
(d) Safe sharp containers 7 litre or less each 13.00 1.18 15.00 1.36 Over 7 litres per litre 1.30 0.12 1.50 0.14
(e) Light weight bulk material less 300 kg per cubic metre - each cubic metre 50.00 4.55 60.00 5.45
5 INFRINGEMENT AGENCY COSTS(a) Debt Collection Fee(b) Dishonoured Cheque Fee 15.00 20.00
Motor bodies and old machinery each item
Tyres (Maximum disposal 4 )-per 4 tyre, pro rata for < 4
Debt Collection Agency's Debt Collection Agency's
In the event of weighbridge breakdown due to power
per wheel of truck or trailer (larger than 1.8mx1.2m)
Asbestos - whole loads per tonne (incl burial fee)
In lieu of the charges in1, 2 & 3 above the following apply:
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILNOTES TO AND FORMING PART OF THE BUDGET
For the Year Ending 30 June 2011
Not Accepted Not Accepted
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 135 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 290
ATTACHMENT FIVE
TO ITEM 3
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS LOAN SCHEDULES
SURPLUS RECONCILIATION
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 136 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 291
INFO
RM
ATI
ON
ON
BO
RR
OW
ING
S
(a)
Loan
Rep
aym
ents
Act
ual
Prin
cipa
l R
epay
men
tsPr
inci
pal
Out
stan
ding
Inte
rest
R
epay
men
ts
Valu
e of
Loa
n A
ppro
ved
Inte
rest
R
ates
Prin
cipa
l 01
/07/
2009
Prin
cipa
l D
raw
n D
own
to 3
1/03
/201
0A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10A
ctua
l to
31/0
3/20
10
Sche
dule
d re
paym
ent
date
Proj
ecte
d ea
rly
repa
ymen
t da
teC
omm
unity
Am
eniti
esTa
mal
a Pa
rk L
andf
illLo
an 8
- B
uild
ing
Upg
rade
650,
000
6.45
%37
6,43
50
49,1
3432
7,30
117
,173
31-M
ay-1
430
-Jun
-12
Loan
12
- Con
stru
ctio
n S
tage
2 P
hase
215
,000
,000
5.98
%11
,249
,969
01,
250,
010
9,99
9,95
832
7,45
215
-Dec
-15
30-J
un-1
2R
egio
nal R
esou
rce
Rec
over
y Fa
cilit
yLo
an 1
1 - R
RF
Land
Pur
chas
e3,
500,
000
5.97
%1,
940,
815
013
9,23
71,
801,
578
232,
270
30-M
ay-2
530
-Jun
-15
Loan
10a
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e2,
000,
000
6.16
%1,
766,
658
061
,156
1,70
5,50
269
,796
30-M
ar-2
530
-Jun
-13
Loan
10b
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e (In
tere
st O
nly)
2,60
0,00
0V
aria
ble
2,60
0,00
00
02,
600,
000
76,1
7330
-Apr
-25
30-J
un-1
3Lo
an 1
0c -
RR
F In
frast
ruct
ure
(Inte
rest
Onl
y)4,
000,
000
Var
iabl
e4,
000,
000
033
3,33
33,
666,
667
228,
133
30-A
pr-2
530
-Jun
-13
TOTA
L27
,750
,000
21,9
33,8
770
1,83
2,87
020
,101
,006
950,
996
Faci
lity
Fee
45,4
17To
tal B
orro
win
g C
osts
996,
413
Bud
get
Prin
cipa
l R
epay
men
tsPr
inci
pal
Out
stan
ding
Inte
rest
R
epay
men
ts
Valu
e of
Loa
n A
ppro
ved
Inte
rest
R
ates
Prin
cipa
l 01
/07/
2010
Prin
cipa
l D
raw
n D
own
to 3
0/06
/201
1A
ctua
l to
30/0
6/20
11A
ctua
l to
30/0
6/20
11A
ctua
l to
30/0
6/20
11
Sche
dule
d re
paym
ent
date
Proj
ecte
d ea
rly
repa
ymen
t da
teC
omm
unity
Am
eniti
esTa
mal
a Pa
rk L
andf
illLo
an 8
- B
uild
ing
Upg
rade
650,
000
6.45
%31
0,55
80
70,3
6124
0,19
718
,000
31-M
ay-1
430
-Jun
-12
Loan
12
- Con
stru
ctio
n S
tage
2 P
hase
215
,000
,000
5.98
%9,
583,
290
01,
666,
680
7,91
6,60
852
3,60
015
-Dec
-15
30-J
un-1
2R
egio
nal R
esou
rce
Rec
over
y Fa
cilit
yLo
an 1
1 - R
RF
Land
Pur
chas
e3,
500,
000
5.97
%1,
753,
455
019
9,75
01,
553,
705
99,4
0030
-May
-25
30-J
un-1
5Lo
an 1
0a -
RR
F In
frast
ruct
ure
2,00
0,00
06.
16%
1,69
8,29
30
72,6
471,
625,
646
102,
200
30-M
ar-2
530
-Jun
-13
Loan
10b
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e (In
tere
st O
nly)
2,60
0,00
0V
aria
ble
2,60
0,00
00
02,
600,
000
143,
000
30-A
pr-2
530
-Jun
-13
Loan
10c
- R
RF
Infra
stru
ctur
e (In
tere
st O
nly)
4,00
0,00
0V
aria
ble
4,00
0,00
00
04,
000,
000
318,
800
30-A
pr-2
530
-Jun
-13
TOTA
L27
,750
,000
19,9
45,5
960
2,00
9,43
817
,936
,156
1,20
5,00
0Fa
cilit
y Fe
e60
,000
Tota
l Bor
row
ing
Cos
ts1,
265,
000
Not
e 1.
The
rate
for L
oan
12 is
fixe
d fo
r 5 y
ears
and
will
be
revi
ewed
in M
arch
201
2.N
ote
2. R
epay
men
ts s
ched
ule
for L
oan
10 (b
) and
(c) c
urre
ntly
bei
ng a
rran
ged
with
the
bank
.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 137 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 292
ATTACHMENT SIX
TO ITEM 3
STRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE
14 MAY 2010
NEW INITIATIVES
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 138 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 293
NEW INITIATIVES The new initiatives are summarised below: • Research and Planning relating $70,000
- RRF Stage 2 Development 50,000
- Investigation into a Toxic Taxi 20,000
The toxic Taxi is an additional step to improve the access and convenience of disposing properly of HHW. Envisaged particularly for people who are not mobile, the taxi would be booked by householders to visit properties and collect material, and then bring it to Tamala Park for disposal.
• Additional 2 staff to meet the demands of the operation $187,200
of the Landfill and Recycling Centre at Tamala Park
- Full Time Technical Officer 91,500
MRC receives large volumes of hazardous waste, as that volume and diversity has increased the need to manage this issue constructively has arisen. The person employed in this position would be required to undertake a variety of hazardous waste tasks to ensure the Council operates the Tamala Park Hazardous Waste facility at world’s best practice
standards and that it complies with legislation. The majority of these tasks are an ongoing daily requirement and given their complex chemical nature they not able to be performed by other Council staff. The creation of the Technical Officer would reduce operating costs of hazardous waste collections and provide a point of reference to assist member councils with hazardous collection issues
- Recycling Officer 95,700
In the FY 08/09 the MRC Recycling Centre processed approximately 13,000 paint cans. Early 2010 the Recycling Centre commenced processing paint cans from member councils effectively doubling the daily volume to be processed. Current staffing levels of 4 at weekdays and 5 on weekends at the Recycling Centre cannot sustain the required workload to process the increased paint can volumes. An additional full time staff member is needed to assist with the increased volume of paint material to be recycled from the Balcatta Recycling Centre.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 139 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 294
• Limestone Cover $420,000
For the past three years the limestone cover material was gained from the excavation activities of Landfill Stage II. Since the excavation of Phase II is now complete the cover required is gained from the main limestone stockpile which requires crushing to render it to a usable size for use on the tipface.
• Zero Waste – MRC Contributions $20,000 (in line with DEC funding requirements) • Additional 0.5 FTE for Administration Officer $26,500
This is administrative support for Marketing and Education Program. This would result in a full time FTE for Marketing and Education Administration to meeting the additional demand in services. Currently administration support is provided by 0.5 FTE • Additional Casuals to support the Education Program Activities $20,000
At the start of 2009 MRC identified that the increased number of requests for the Roaming Recycler, together with increased demand for tours, could only be accommodated with the support of additional staff as needed. Employment of staff on a casual basis allowed MRC to bring them in to assist with staffing of the mobile display at a community event which allowed us to meet the growing requests for involvement at these events in a cost-effective way. We have increased the budget from last year to enable casual staff to assist both with The Roaming Recycler and with tours.
• Sponsorship for Member Councils $70,000
The sponsorship budget would be used to support activities that provide an opportunity to establish the MRC brand and build organisational profile. Also through supporting member councils with their community-based waste-related activities we are building strong relationships with member councils, a critical set of stakeholders.
• Corporate Function and Brand Council $55,000
The MRC corporate cocktail function invites major customers, suppliers, politicians, and staff of agencies and industry associations that the MRC works closely with. The corporate presentation by the Chair and CEO enables the MRC’s messages to be communicated to a receptive audience, followed by good opportunity for networking.
The Brand Council would meet quarterly. The costs relate to revenue hire, potentially the services of a facilitator to work with the group initially, and some materials costs.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 140 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 295
• Waste Education Program $10,000
- Shopping Centre Program
Funding is to help MRC make some initial steps into shopping centres. Our aim is to get better visibility for the waste message in shopping centres which could be achieved either through scheduling the Roaming Recycler as a display or through working with shopping centres to create a “green room”, a permanent space (often an unused shop) where people can bring items for recycling – particularly batteries and CFLs – and have waste messages on display. Initial contact with Mirrabooka Square demonstrated some interest.
• Project Support $35,000
- RRF Open Day 30,000
We know that the best way for people to understand the RRF is to see it in operation, hence our expanding tours program. In addition to that, we would like the community close to the facility to be aware of it and what it does, and we would like to know whether there are any issues with the Community now that it is operational. Any opportunity to establish the link between what goes in the bin, the quality of the compost produced, and the benefits of diverting waste successfully from landfill, is an opportunity to be grabbed.
- RRF Stage 2 promotion $5,000
As part of planning for Stage 2 there is likely to be an environmental approvals process to be followed, and the MRC will need to have demonstrated some level of community involvement. This budget allows for initial planning and scoping of the requirements of Stage 2.
• Millipede Control $10,000
This budget item is for purchase of barrier materials, millipede Traps and to investigate methods of control for millipedes.
• Consultancy $50,000
- Review of Disability Access and Inclusion Plan $10,000 to ensure that people with disabilities are included and can access facilities, services and functions.
- Business Information System Review $15,000 concerns from Scoping Project highlighted concerns from staff regarding robustness of software systems.
- Information Management Strategy Plan $25,000 Recognise that our information in and out of MRC is not just a paper record; every area of our business is “information” pertinent to our business as such requires that it be managed strategically.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 141 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 296
• Contract Labour $20,000
Project management of RRF Stage 2 Development.
• Other Administration Expenses $5,000
- Artwork Maintenance A feature of the Education Centre displays and instructional material is a series of frog and ogre sculptures which are fun and demonstrate the value of waste materials. The 2 mtr high ogres in particular receive a lot of attention from school children and they require ongoing maintenance. This minimal allowance covers regular maintenance checks and upkeep by the artist.
Grand Total $998,700
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 142 - ITEM 8.3.3
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 297
4 FUTURE SPC MEETINGS
9 July 2010 – Town of Vincent 10 September 2010 – Town of Vincent 22 October 2010 – Town of Vincent
5 DECLARATION OF CLOSURE OF MEETING
There being no further business, the Deputy Chairman declared the meeting closed at 10.25am.
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILSTRATEGIC PROJECTS COMMITTEE MINUTES - 14 MAY 2010 - 143 -
MINDARIE REGIONAL COUNCILORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA - 1 JULY 2010
Page 298