aggressionaggression: sibling and peer relationships: pro-social and anti-social influences through...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Aggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships:
Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence
![Page 2: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Questions
In the relational model, what is the function of aggression and what determines whether there will be reconciliation?
Describe genetic and environmental factors that could influence the stability of aggressive behaviors
Describe similarities in attachment representations of parents, peers, and intimate partners.
What is relational victimization?
![Page 3: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Relational model. aggressive behavior is one of several ways in which conflicts of interest can be settled.
If there is a strong mutual interest in maintenance of the relationship, reconciliation is most likely. Parties negotiate the terms of their relationship by going through cycles of conflict and reconciliation.
Other possible ways are tolerance (e.g., sharing of resources), or avoidance of confrontation (e.g., by subordinates to dominants).
![Page 4: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Kiss to make-up
Fig. 2. Chimpanzees typically seal a postconflict reunion, or reconciliation, with a mouth-to-mouth kiss, as here by a female (right) to the dominant male.
AggressionDe Waal, F. B. M. (2000). Primates--a natural heritage of conflict resolution. Science, 289(5479), 586-590.
![Page 5: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Most primates show a dramatic increase in body contact between former opponents during post conflict (PC) as compared with matched-control (MC) observations
The cumulative percentage of opponent-pairs seeking friendly contact during a 10-min time window after 670 spontaneous aggressive incidents in a zoo group of stumptail macaques
![Page 6: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Reconciliations allow rhesus monkeys to maintain tight kinship bonds despite frequent intrafamilial squabbles.
Shortly after two adult sisters bit each other, they reunite sitting on the left and right of their mother, the alpha female of the troop, each female holding her own infant. The sisters smack their lips while the matriarch loudly grunts.
![Page 7: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Reconciliation
The nature of the social relationship determines whether repair attempts will be made, or not. If there is a strong mutual interest in maintenance of the relationship, reconciliation is most likely. Parties negotiate the terms of their relationship by going through cycles of conflict and reconciliation.
![Page 8: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Weaning
A weaning compromise has been arrived at between a mother chimpanzee and her 4-year-old son. After repeated nursing conflicts, the son is permitted to suck on a part of the mother's body other than the nipple.
![Page 9: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Human aggression
Types Reactive and proactive aggression Overt and covert anti-social behavior
![Page 10: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Processes
Under-socialized aggressive conduct disorder associated with weak inhibition system (BIS)– Impulsivity a key (Quay)
Information Processing– Real-time processes
Somebody bumps into you at a party
![Page 11: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Temperament and aggression
Difficult temperament associated with aggression – Aggression can lead to rejection– Low levels of positive behaviors– Report less socially competent, but only if shy– Rejection and aggression negatively impact academic
performance and predict dropping out Though some drop-outs are socially competent and
popular
![Page 12: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Families
– Stronger attachment effects in low SES – Parental warmth
Avoiding punitiveness
– Avoiding coercive family processes Parental intrusion, child aversive response, parent
backs off, child stops response
![Page 13: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Real-time coercion
A parent–child dyad may have two main interaction patterns:
A cooperative, mutually positive pattern and a hostile–withdrawn pattern in which the parent berates the child and the child ignores the parent.
As mutual positivity declines in early adolescence, existing habits of withdrawal will constrain the interactions that emerge next.
A repertoire of distance and disengagement may characterize the adolescent period, leading eventually to complete estrangement and alienation in adulthood. (Granic & Patterson, 2006).
![Page 14: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Stability of aggression
The earlier a person start, the more intense the form of aggression and the longer it lasts
Stability of aggression can be as high as .76– Remarkably stable over up to 10 years (801)– The aggressive remain so
One of the more stable psychological characteristics
![Page 15: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Other factors
Impulsivity + coercive familial interactions + peer processes – Peer rejection + deviant peer group
![Page 16: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Granic & Patterson, 2006
![Page 17: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Behavior genetics
One inherits a propensity toward anti-sociality which interacts with an environment in its (non)emergence– Genetic effects greater for self-reported than
adjudicated measures of aggression– Environmental, genetic, and interactive effects
evident in petty crime (806)
![Page 18: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Environmental impacts: TV
Age 8 TV violence viewing predicts self-reported aggression and arrests at age 30 after statistical controls– TV accounts for 10% of child aggression
variance in meta-analyses
– Videogames? The armed forces?
![Page 19: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Relational aggression
“attempts to harm the victim through the manipulation of relationships, threat of damage to them, or both” (Crick et al, ’02 p.98)
Associated with internalizing/externalizing problems and later peer rejection
Is relational aggression a cause for concern or part of everyday life?
Are some people more impacted by relational aggression?
![Page 20: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Development
Pre-school Elementary school Middle school High school / Adolescence …
![Page 21: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Provocation aggression
Physically aggressive children exhibited hostile attributional biases and reported relatively greater distress for instrumental provocation situations– Getting pushed into the mud
Relationally aggressive children exhibited hostile attributional biases and reported relatively greater distress for relational provocation contexts– Not getting invited to a birthday party.
– 662 third- to sixth-grade children Crick et al., 2002. CD.
![Page 22: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
A Longitudinal Study of Forms and Functions of Aggressive Behavior in Early Childhood
Murray-Close & Ostrov, 2009
• Examine/disentangle forms and functions of aggression in early childhood– Forms: physical, relational– Functions: proactive, reactive
• Stability of “pure” aggression subtypes• Potential predictors of aggression subtypes
– Gender, age, social dominance, exclusion
Gangi
![Page 23: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Model of form and function
Gangi
![Page 24: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Findings• Support for distinction between aggression forms
and functions by early childhood• Forms were stable over time, functions were not
– May use distinct forms to meet variety of needs• Predictors of aggression:
– Females more relationally aggressive– Older children less likely to use physical aggression– Dominance associated with concurrent relational
aggression, decreases in physical aggression over time– Exclusion related to increases in relational aggression
over time
Gangi
![Page 25: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Aggression type and gender
Boys more physically victimized by their friends. Girls more relationally victimized. Friend physical victimization was particularly
related to boys adjustment difficulties Friend relational victimization was particularly
related to girls’ adjustment difficulties.– Crick & Nelson, 2002.
![Page 26: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of Peer Maltreatment: Studies of Relational Victimization
(Crick, Casas, & Nelson, 2002)
Kolnick
![Page 27: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Gender differences– Girls may be more victimized, but mixed findings
• Consequences may be worse for girls
• Relational Victimization (RV) & social harm:– RV most commonly cited aggressive act
• Concurrent associations for victimized– Poor peer relationships– Internalizing problems– Externalizing problems
• Longitudinal associations– Future peer rejection
Kolnick
![Page 28: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Gender role development
![Page 29: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Gender segregation
Research on gender typing in individuals is inconclusive– Clustering of gender-typed characteristics weak– Relations to family characteristics weak
Same-sex groupings predominate– From 3 – 12,– Cross-cultural phenomenon
![Page 30: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Same-sex groupings
Boys– Larger groups– More conflict/competition– Cohesiveness– More autonomous from adults
Girls– Smaller, more dyadic– Less conflict, more responsive– Less goal-oriented, more intimate
Differential exposure to these groups influences individual behavior
![Page 31: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Change
12th grade– Boys 5 hrs a week w girls. – Girls 10 hrs a week w boys.
Larger network of other-sex friends increases odds of romantic relationship
![Page 32: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Changing functions of romance
Adolescents mention affiliative features Adolescent romantic relationships are peer
relationships
Young adults mention trust & support
![Page 33: AggressionAggression: Sibling and Peer Relationships: Pro-social and anti-social influences through adolescence](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032705/56649dab5503460f94a99725/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Methods
Movement from questionnaire to interview and observational data
Integrate romance and sexuality