agile vs. traditional project management - a game-based experiment

31
Agile CC by-sa overthefence.com.de FRANKY‘S FABULOUS FENCE GRILL > You kill ‘em, we grill ‘em< PRESENTS THE GREATEST FIGHT IN PROJECT HISTORY “The Waterfall” Traditional VS. DIRECT FROM RINGSIDE AT Meat ‘n Greet SLAUGHTERHOUSE ALL SEATS RESERVED STARTING 25 DOORS ARE O P E N BERLIN IS THE PLACE 2013 2014 2015 *** RINGSIDE ONLY *** NO HOME TV *** NO RADIO *** CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Upload: overthefence

Post on 16-Aug-2015

249 views

Category:

Leadership & Management


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Agile

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

FRANKY‘S FABULOUS FENCE GRILL > You kill ‘em, we grill ‘em<

PRESENTS

THE GREATEST FIGHT IN PROJECT HISTORY

“The Waterfall”

Traditional

VS.

DIRECT FROM

RINGSIDE AT Meat ‘n Greet SLAUGHTERHOUSE

ALL SEATS

RESERVED

STARTING €25 DOORS ARE

O P E N BERLIN IS THE PLACE

2013

2014

2015

*** RINGSIDE ONLY *** NO HOME TV *** NO RADIO *** CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 2: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Agile vs. Traditional: An experiment to challenge project management approaches

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 3: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

The experiment 23 months 1,032 participants 42 nationalities 86 teams

and 12,299 tennis balls

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 4: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

4

the

ballpoint game

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 5: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

5

move as many

balls as possible

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 6: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

6

in

2 minutes!

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 7: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

7

rules of play

Ball must not

touch floor

Start point

is end point

Ball must

have air time

No ball to your

direct neighbor

Everybody must

touch the ball

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 8: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

8

let‘s build two

teams CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 9: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

9

let‘s try different

approaches!

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 10: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

10

Who wins,

quick

iterations or …

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 11: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

11

...in-depth

planning?

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 12: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

12

the case for

team 1

PLAN RUN REVIEW RUN REVIEW RUN …

2 4 5 7 8 16min.

estimate estimate

five quick iterations

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 13: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

PLAN RUN

0 16min.

estimate

one plan

that must be perfect

the case for

team 2

14

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 14: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

14

Repeating the rules … Move tennis balls

As many as possible

In two minutes

Start point = end point (fill the empty basket)

Balls must have air-time

No ball to your direct neighbor

Everybody must touch the ball

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 15: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

15

let‘s

battle! CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 16: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

One way to do it …

Page 17: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

One of many alternatives …

Page 18: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

18

what‘s the

result? CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 19: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Team 1 always wins! >> After 16 minutes (Round 1):

The team with the “iterative approach”

wins 31 of 31 competitions (i.e. has moved

more balls in 2 mins. than the other team)

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 20: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

20

let‘s have a

second round!

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 21: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

21

let‘s swap

approaches!

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 22: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

22

Team 2

becomes agile

PLAN RUN REVIEW RUN REVIEW RUN …

2 4 5 7 8 16min.

estimate estimate

five quick iterations

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 23: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

PLAN RUN

0 16min.

estimate

one plan

that must be perfect

Team 1

does in-depth planning

14

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 24: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

Overview How the entire game was set-up

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

32 Min.0 16 Min.

1st Round 2nd Round

„Team 1“

„Team 2“

Page 25: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

25

Guess, who wins after the 2nd round?

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 26: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Tied game! >> After Round 1 and Round 2

the team which started with an

“iterative approach” wins only

15 of 31 competitions;

the other team wins in 16 cases.

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 27: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Before we start

27

Final experiment … Does a pure “agile“ approach beat the combination of “agile“ and “traditional“?

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 28: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Nope!

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Team B(Pure Approach)

Iterative/IterativeIn-depth/In-depthIterative/IterativeIn-depth/In-depthIterative/IterativeIn-depth/In-depthIterative/IterativeIn-depth/In-depthIterative/IterativeIn-depth/In-depthIterative/IterativeIn-depth/In-depth

Team A(Combined Approach)

Iterative/In-depthIterative/In-depthIterative/In-depthIterative/In-depthIterative/In-depthIterative/In-depthIn-depth/IterativeIn-depth/IterativeIn-depth/IterativeIn-depth/IterativeIn-depth/IterativeIn-depth/Iterative

Game #

123456789

101112

Winner

Combined (A)Combined (A)Combined (A) Combined (A)Combined (A) Combined (A)Combined (A) Combined (A)Combined (A) Combined (A)Combined (A) Combined (A)

Page 29: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

Finding

Combining approaches

is superior to a single approach!

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de

Page 30: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

read the complete blogpost at

overthefence.com.de

Page 31: Agile vs. Traditional Project Management - A Game-based Experiment

CC by-sa overthefence.com.de