agn feedback at z~2 in the keck/mosdef survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf ·...

13
AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey Alison Coil UCSD Collaborators: Gene Leung, Mojegan Azadi MOSDEF co-PIs: Alice Shapley, Mariska Kriek, Naveen Reddy, Brian Siana, Bahram Mobasher

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

AGN Feedback at z~2

in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey

Alison CoilUCSD

Collaborators: Gene Leung, Mojegan Azadi MOSDEF co-PIs: Alice Shapley, Mariska Kriek, Naveen

Reddy, Brian Siana, Bahram Mobasher

Page 2: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

MOSDEF surveyNew survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck4 year survey, 48 nights total, started in 2013Full sample will have ~1500 galaxies + ~150 AGN

Targeting CANDELS fields, H-band selected (depth=24.5)Sample spans a wide range of stellar mass and SFR

Kriek et al. (2015)

stellar massH

mag

Page 3: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Data from first 1/2 of the survey.

AGN separate well from galaxies, NII/Ha is crucial.

We are using the Melendez et al. (2014) line to identify

optical AGN- less contaminated than Kauffmann, much more complete than Kewley

MOSDEF BPT Diagram

Azadi in prep.

Galaxies + X-ray and IR-selected AGN

Page 4: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflow Identification

Perform multiple-component Gaussian fits simultaneously to Hβ, [OIII], Hα and [NII]. Allow for an outflow component in all lines

and/or very broad component in Hα and Hβ.

outflow

broad line, no outflow

Page 5: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflow vs Merger

Use HST imaging to remove potential mergers

potential mergers no indication of merger

Page 6: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflow Host Galaxy Properties

All star-forming hosts, log M*~10-11.5, log SFR~0.5-3.5

outflows

potential mergers

MOSDEFSF galaxies at z~2

Page 7: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Incidence of Detected Outflows

• 19 sources have a potential outflow component (ie, a 2nd kinematic component) with S/N>3 in [OIII] and/or Hα

• 12 of those do not appear to be potential mergers in HST

Out of initial sample of 66 AGN (X-ray/IR/optical):

• The detected outflow rate is >18% - this is a lower limit on actual AGN outflow rate, as need high S/N spectra and/or fast outflow to detect (and some mergers could have outflows).

Hα S/N

num

ber

Page 8: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflow Kinematics

• velocity centroid of outflow component ~100-500 km/s• maximum velocity of outflow component ~300-1300 km/s• FWHM ~100-1300 km/s

[OIII] [NII] + Hα

Page 9: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflow Sizes

Spatial extent from 2d spectra:

6 are resolved, FWHM of physical extent is ~3-10 kpc7 are spatially offset from narrow line, with a max. physical offset of ~7 kpc

NLoutflow

outflow

NL

Page 10: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Interesting Source

COSMOS 11223: has 2 outflows, one is spatially offset

#1: velocity offset: 160 km/s, FWHM: 470 km/s, spatial offset: 0 kpc#2: velocity offset: 340 km/s, FWHM: 390 km/s, spatial offset: ~7 kpc

Page 11: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflows on BPT Diagram

outflow component:

log ([NII]/Hα)

log

([O

III]/

Hβ)

Page 12: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Outflow Energy Rate

Energy injection rate into ISM:assuming an energy conserving bubble into a uniform medium

• ~order of magnitude lower than ULIRGs at z~2 (Harrison et al. 2012) - r and v are a bit lower for our sample than in ULIRGs

• bolometric AGN luminosities for our sample ~1043 - 1045 erg/s

r10 is half extent of outflow in 10 kpcv1000 is velocity offset in 1000 km/s

dE/dt ~ 1042 - 1044 erg/s

Page 13: AGN Feedback at z~2 in the Keck/MOSDEF Survey3dhst.research.yale.edu/conference/talks/coil.pdf · MOSDEF survey New survey at 1.4 < z < 3.8 using MOSFIRE on Keck 4 year survey, 48

Conclusions

Have 12 AGN outflows in the current MOSDEF sample (first 1/2 of survey).

AGN-driven outflows occur in at least 18% of X-ray/IR/optical AGN at z~2 in “normal” star-forming galaxies.

Maximum velocities ~300-1200 km/s.

Outflows are often resolved and/or spatially offset. We detect physical sizes (FWHM) of ~3-10 kpc.

These are galaxy-wide outflows.