agr 3 chp
TRANSCRIPT
Module – 2 : The Agricultural Sector
1) Institutional Structure & land reforms in India
2) Technological change
3) Agricultural finance
4) Agricultural Marketing
5) Agricultural Pricing
6) National Agricultural Policy, 2000
INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE & LAND REFORMS
Institutional constraints
Land Reforms:
Objectives
Reforms
Critical evaluation
MODULE 2: CHP 1
Institutional constrains
Defective agrarian structure small & fragmented land
Zamindari mahalwari ryotwari
Low incomeLow productivityNo incentiveUncertaintyExploitationPovertyinequality
Agricultural statistics 2004In 1994-95,Avg.size of land holding 1.42 hec61.6% total land holdings uneconomical.
Reasons : population pressure, law of inheritance, Nuclear family, decline of handicraft industry, debts
Effects : non mechanization, low productivity, poverty, further debts
Land reforms
Objectives
1) Equal distribution of land2) Removal of exploitation3) Land to tiller4) Equality of status & opportunities5) Economic size of land holding6) Create healthy work culture7) Increase productivity8) Generate rural unemployment9) Optimum use of land10)Developing co-operative spirit11)Regulating rent
LAND REFORM MEASURES
1) Abolition of intermediaries zamindari abolition by paying compensation , 20 million cutivators brought into direct contact with state
It led to…… End of absentee land-lordism Ownership of land to actual cultivator Reduction of exploitation Incentive to work hard
2) Tenancy Reforms regulation of rent 1/4th or 1/5th.
Security of tenure land for personal cultivation
Ownership rights for tenants
3) Reorganization ofAgricultureceiling on land holding undistributed, 10 lakh acerIn litigation, unsuitable forCultivation,records manipulation
Consolidation of land holdingFertile land to rich, failed voluntary consolidationLand records
Co-operative farmingLack of motivation,Corrupt administration,Few coop.s by poor farmers,Lack of team spirit,Lack of trust on co-ops.,Emotional attachment to land,Political interference
. Limitations: land for personal useOwnership rights to intermediariesHuge compensation
Occupancy tenantsTenants at willSub tenants
Limitations:Rent not knownNo records of tenancy
LIMITATIONS: zamindari abolition only on paper farmers not aware about rent limit fixed Lack of recordsdominance of landlordsvoluntary surrender of landLow grade landilligal transactions
QUESTIONS:1)Write a note on ‘land reforms (april 2009) (april 2008)2)Describe the reasons for poor implementation of land reforms in Indian( nov 05)
Chp. 2 Technological Change in AgricultureThe New Agricultural Strategy ( Green Revolution) 1966: New Technology was introduced which was a package of measures offered to Indian FarmersTo increase production and productivity and make India self sufficient and self reliant in food grain production
Intensive Agricultural District Programme (IADP) in 1960-61 in 7 districts
Extension in 1966 –Measures undertaken under IADP are 1) use of HYV seeds 2) better water management 3) use of fertilisers & pesticides 4) educating farmers 5) providing better credit & marketing 6) better irrigation 7) better mechnisation
Impact of Green Revolution
Achievements1) Foodgrain production
Wheat: 11 to 76 M. T.(60-61 to 99-00)Rice: 35 to 90 M.T.(60-61 to 99-00)Foodgrains: 212 to 217.3 million T. during 01-02 to 06-07
2) More productivityFoodgrains: 783 to 1626 kgs per hectare (67-68 to 00-01) 3) Changes in Agricultural Practices4)Employment Generation
5) Linkage with Industry6) Changes in attitude of farmers
LimitationsLIMITED COVERAGEINSIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN PRODUCTION & PRODUCTIVITYCAPITALIST FARMINGINCREAED INEQUALITYUNEMPLOYMENT
TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES IN AGRICULTURE
BASIC INPUTS:
Cultivation – Japanese method of rice cultivation.
Seeds – HYV Seeds. Institutional framework has been developed to generate Quality seeds through central & state Government participation. Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) State Agricultural Universities National Seed Corporation (NSC) 15 State Seeds Corporations (SSCs) State Farms Corporation of India (SFCI) & seed companies
Irrigation – major & minor dams, borewells, pumpsets, drip irrigation.
In India about 60% of foodgrains production comes from 39% of irrigated area and 40% of remaining production comes from 61% of rainfed area.
During 50 years of independence, the Government had spent about 231,400/- crores( at 1996-97) prices) on major ,medium and minor irrigation works, leading to growth in The country’s irrigation potential from 23 million hectare (1950-51) to 89 million heatare (1996-97)
Pest Control – pest control methods have been developed to Integrated Pest Management (IPM). Efffective IPM packages are designed & developed for rice, cotton, sugarcane, pulses, oilseeds etc.
FERTILIZERS AND MANURES
YEAR PRODUCTION 000 TONNES
IMPORTS 000 TONNES
CONSUMPTION000 TONNES
CONSUMPTION PER HECTARE OF CROPPED AREA (KG)
1951-52 39 52 70 0.5
1990-91 11,860 2,760 12,550 76.8
2000 -01 14,750 5,253 16,700 90.1
2006-07 16,096 6,058 21,651 112.2
Production, imports & consumption of chemical fertilizers in India
Economic survey 2008-09
Agricultural Engineering - Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) has designed a variety of marketable implements & machines for field operations
Technology Mission on Oilseeds, pulses & maize - launched by the Central Government in 1986 and was extended to pulses, oil palm & maize in 1991, 1992 & 1996 Various schemes were implemented. Oilseeds Production Programme (OPP) National Pulses Development Project (NPDP) Accelerated Maize Development Programme (AMDP) Oil Palm Development Programme ( OPDP)
Extension Services – for farmers trainingKisan Call Centre – introduced in 2004. 144 Call Centre Agents use 21 local dialects toll free number 1551 & 1800-180-1551 from 6am to 10 pm for 7 days Department of Agriculture & Cooperation has developed a data structure Kisan Knowledge Management System (KKMS) to help KCC provide correct answersI.T. use of IT for information & also to update land ownership records
QUESTIONS:WRITE A NOTE ON GREEN REVOLUTION EXPLAIN THE NEW AGRARIAN TECHNOLOGY
AGRICULTURAL PRICINGNeed for agricultural price policy…..???
To provide remunerative pricesTo provide incentivesTo promote capital formationTo have better terms of trade between agri & non-agri sector.To reduce income inequalityTo prevent inbuilt fluctuations
ADMINISTERED PRICES: YEARLY BASIS
Recommendation of Jha committee1964-65Agricultural Price Commission – 1965 recently called as –COMMISSION FOR AGRICULTURAL COSTS & PRICES ( CACP)
FACTORS CONSIDERED WHILE DETERMINING PRICES BY CACP:
cost of production
Risk factors
Effect on industrial cost
Effect on cost of living
Effect on general price level
International price situation
Changes in agricultural input prices
Market prices
Demand & supply
Trends in the past price levels
Floor price/24 cropsJute & sugarcane
ANNOUNCEMENT OF ADMINISTERED PRICES
Generally Lower thanMarket price& higher thanM.S.P.
Lower thanProcurement Prices.
( in 2009-10, issue price per quintal for wheat was 610)- & for rice,795/- for APL for BPL, 415/- for wheat & 565/- for rice; for AAY, it was 300/- per quintal)
M.S.P.: ANNOUNCED EACH YEAR BY CACP.CONSIDERS MANY FACTORS WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON COST FACTOR; IMPORTANT COST CONCEPTS USED ARE C2 & C3 costs:
C2 = all actual expenses in cash and kind incurred in production by actual owner + rent paid for leased land + imputed value of family labor + interest on value of owned capital assets + rental value of owned land ( net of land revenue).
C3 = C2 + 10% of cost to account for managerial remuneration to the farmer.
ADMINISTERED PRICES
1. MINIMUM SUPPORT PRICES (M.S.P.)
MINIMUM SUPPORT PRICES 2009-10 Rs. PER QUINTAL
COMMODITY M.S.P. 2010 -11CROP YEAR
COMMODITY M.S..P. 2009-10CROP YEEAR
KHARIF CROP RABI CROP
paddy (common) 950 + 60 per quintal bonus
Wheat 1,100
Paddy ( grade A) 980 + 50/- per quintal bonus
Masur 1,870
Cotton ( F-414/H-777/J-34)
2,500 Other crop
Groundnut in shell 2,100 sugarcane 129.84
Source: Department of Agriculture & Cooperation
IMPLEMENTATION OF ADMINISTERED PRICES
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (FCI) FOR FOODGRAINSNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION (NAFED) FOR, CEREALS, PULSES & OILSEEDSCOTTON & JUTE CORPORATIONS, TOBACCO BOARD ETC.
AGENCIES:
NATIONAL CROP FORECASTING CENTRE ( NCFC): IN JAN 1999, TO WATCH PRICES ON PRIMARY GOODS &PUT AN ADVANCED WARNING SIGNAL
HIGH POWEREDPRICE MONITORING BOARD: 1999, MONITORING ESSENTIAL COMMODITY PRICES & ANTICIPATING THE NEED FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION
TARGETTED PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM: 5 LAKH FPS
BUFFER STOCKS: BY FCI & NAFED OF ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES.WAREHOUSINGREGULATED MARKETSCREDIT FACILITY
LIMITATIONS
DIFFICULTY IN DECIDING ‘FAIR’ PRICES
NO INTEGRATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT CRITERIA
BENEFIT TO LARGE FARMERS
MOUNTING DEFICIT
EXCESSIVE BUFFER STOCKS
SEASONAL & SHARP RISE IN VEGETABLE PRICES
FLAWS IN PDS
CONTRIBUTION TO INFLATIONARY TREND
NOT ALL COMMODITIES COVERED