agricultural sustainable energy education network teacher ......agricultural sustainable energy...

1
` Agricultural Sustainable Energy Education Network Teacher Professional Development Summer Workshop Jacy Coston*, Steven Kane, Doug Ullrich, Faruk Yildiz, and Robert Lane Sam Houston State University in partnership with the Vocational Agriculture Teachers Association of Texas and Houston Community College Funded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Abstract ASEEN is a three years project managed by the Sam Houston State University Department of Agricultural and Industrial Sciences to promote sustainable energy education in K-12 rural schools in Texas, with a focus on Ag applications Workshops are conducted with high school students in the school year to reinforce STEM concepts and educate students about careers in sustainable energy A renewable energy curriculum is being developed for Texas high school teachers and interested audiences The second teacher professional development summer workshop took place June 9, 2014 with 20 high school AFNR and Science teachers The pre and post workshop understanding of sustainable energy concepts by participants is reported Requirements for Participation AFNR and Science teachers: 1. Must both participate in the 5 day professional development program on the SHSU campus 2. Must currently work in a 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A school district with a largely rural population 3. Should preferentially have between 3 and 15 years of teaching experience in Texas high schools, although other candidates are considered 4. Must commit to teaching across curriculum units, lecture on agricultural sustainable energy, energy safety and conservation, and promote STEM education 5. Must commit to completing a school-wide energy audit with student involvement Partners Surveys In the area of Understanding Ratings, mean post-workshop average scores increased by 0.9 or greater over pre-workshop scores in every subject matter area. The greatest increases of understanding were in the areas of wind energy, geothermal energy and energy audit practices. In the 2013 workshop, only Wind Energy did not experience this level of increased understanding. Hands-On Activities Pre vs. Post Workshop Data Conclusions Among the many results taken from the surveys that were not able to be included as a majority compared to the year before the ASEEN project has improved knowledge of teachers, both agriculture and science, for the better. During the five day work shop eight speakers presented topics based around the ASEEN project. After the speaker presented, teachers were asked to complete a survey of understanding for that certain topic. The results of all sections/topics for understanding among the teachers present did increase as of roughly forty percent post workshop. Pre and Post Workshop Mean Understanding Ratings N Mean Std. Dev. Std. Error Renewable Energy Pre 20 3.10 .72 .16 Post 20 4.20 .62 .14 Energy Conservation Pre 20 3.10 .72 .16 Post 20 4.00 .73 .16 Solar Energy Pre 20 3.10 .72 .16 Post 20 4.10 .85 .19 Wind Energy Pre 20 2.85 .59 .13 Post 20 4.20 .70 .16 Geothermal Energy Pre 20 2.25 .64 .14 Post 20 4.30 .66 .15 Biofuels Pre 20 2.65 .93 .21 Post 20 3.75 .79 .18 Hydropower Pre 20 2.60 .82 .18 Post 20 3.65 .67 .15 Energy Audit Practices Pre 20 2.00 .92 .21 Post 20 3.70 .73 .16 General Workshop Outcomes Ratings Disagree Neither Agree nor Disagree Agree Strongly Agree N % N % N % N % Helped me better understand the issue 0 .0 1 5.0 7 35.0 12 60.0 Provided information relevant to my work 0 .0 2 10.0 12 60.0 6 30.0 Were based on current, up-to-date information 0 .0 1 5.3 7 36.8 11 57.9 Addressed the topic identified in the title 0 .0 0 .0 6 31.6 13 68.4 Were well organized 1 5.0 7 35.0 8 40.0 4 20.0 Were easy to understand 0 .0 4 21.1 8 42.1 7 36.8 Will be of great use to me 0 .0 2 10.5 10 52.6 7 36.8 Sixty percent or more of the responses agreed or strongly agreed with seven positive workshop delivery outcomes. This compares favorably with 2013. MEMBER THE TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM TM Teachers attended presentations from industry/academia and participated in hands-on training on: solar energy, wind power, hydro- power, biofuels, geothermal, and energy audit practices

Upload: others

Post on 17-Nov-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Agricultural Sustainable Energy Education Network Teacher ......Agricultural Sustainable Energy Education Network Teacher Professional Development Summer Workshop Jacy Coston*, Steven

`

Agricultural Sustainable Energy Education Network Teacher Professional Development Summer Workshop

Jacy Coston*, Steven Kane, Doug Ullrich, Faruk Yildiz, and Robert LaneSam Houston State University in partnership with the Vocational Agriculture Teachers Association of Texas and Houston Community CollegeFunded by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)

Abstract• ASEEN is a three years project managed by the Sam Houston

State University Department of Agricultural and Industrial Sciences to promote sustainable energy education in K-12 rural schools in Texas, with a focus on Ag applications

• Workshops are conducted with high school students in the school year to reinforce STEM concepts and educate students about careers in sustainable energy

• A renewable energy curriculum is being developed for Texas high school teachers and interested audiences

• The second teacher professional development summer workshop took place June 9, 2014 with 20 high school AFNR and Science teachers

• The pre and post workshop understanding of sustainable energy concepts by participants is reported

Requirements for ParticipationAFNR and Science teachers: • 1. Must both participate in the 5 day professional development

program on the SHSU campus • 2. Must currently work in a 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A school district with a

largely rural population• 3. Should preferentially have between 3 and 15 years of teaching

experience in Texas high schools, although other candidates are considered

• 4. Must commit to teaching across curriculum units, lecture on agricultural sustainable energy, energy safety and conservation, and promote STEM education

• 5. Must commit to completing a school-wide energy audit with student involvement

Partners

Surveys

In the area of Understanding Ratings, mean post-workshop average scores increased by 0.9 or greater over pre-workshop scores in every subject matter area. The greatest increases of understanding were in the areas of wind energy, geothermal energy and energy audit practices. In the 2013 workshop, only Wind Energy did not experience this level of increased understanding.

Hands-On Activities

Pre vs. Post Workshop Data

Conclusions• Among the many results taken from the surveys that were not able

to be included as a majority compared to the year before the ASEEN project has improved knowledge of teachers, both agriculture and science, for the better.

• During the five day work shop eight speakers presented topics based around the ASEEN project. After the speaker presented, teachers were asked to complete a survey of understanding for that certain topic.

• The results of all sections/topics for understanding among the teachers present did increase as of roughly forty percent post workshop.

Pre and Post Workshop Mean Understanding Ratings N Mean Std. Dev. Std. Error

Renewable Energy Pre 20 3.10 .72 .16 Post 20 4.20 .62 .14

Energy Conservation Pre 20 3.10 .72 .16 Post 20 4.00 .73 .16

Solar Energy Pre 20 3.10 .72 .16 Post 20 4.10 .85 .19

Wind Energy Pre 20 2.85 .59 .13 Post 20 4.20 .70 .16

Geothermal Energy Pre 20 2.25 .64 .14 Post 20 4.30 .66 .15

Biofuels Pre 20 2.65 .93 .21 Post 20 3.75 .79 .18

Hydropower Pre 20 2.60 .82 .18 Post 20 3.65 .67 .15

Energy Audit Practices Pre 20 2.00 .92 .21 Post 20 3.70 .73 .16

General Workshop Outcomes Ratings

Disagree Neither

Agree nor Disagree

Agree

Strongly Agree

N % N % N % N % Helped me better understand the issue 0 .0 1 5.0 7 35.0 12 60.0 Provided information relevant to my work 0 .0 2 10.0 12 60.0 6 30.0 Were based on current, up-to-date information 0 .0 1 5.3 7 36.8 11 57.9 Addressed the topic identified in the title 0 .0 0 .0 6 31.6 13 68.4 Were well organized 1 5.0 7 35.0 8 40.0 4 20.0 Were easy to understand 0 .0 4 21.1 8 42.1 7 36.8 Will be of great use to me 0 .0 2 10.5 10 52.6 7 36.8 Sixty percent or more of the responses agreed or strongly agreed with seven positive workshop delivery outcomes. This compares favorably with 2013.

MEMBER THE TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEMTM

Teachers attended presentations from industry/academia and participated in hands-on training on: solar energy, wind power, hydro-power, biofuels, geothermal, and energy audit practices