agronomic and grade characteristics of the virginia market type peanut grown in virginia and...

1
Agronomic and Grade Characteristics of the Virginia Market Type Peanut Grown in Virginia and Carolina Region Maria Balota and Thomas Isleib Objectives were to 1) examine the genotype × location interaction for pod yield, value, and grade characteristics, and 2) compare commercial cultivars with advanced breeding lines for value, yield and grade factors. References: 1. http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/np/2812- 1030.pdf Virginia market type peanut is an important cash crop for VA, NC, and SC. It annually brings over $90 million to the economies of this region from approximately 160,000 acres planted every year. For over 35 years, cultivars from VT and NCSU breeding programs are released based upon a multi- year and location selection test as part of a joint research project entitled Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation (PVQE) 1 . Every year, PVQE replicated field plots are conducted at various locations in VA, NC, and SC to determine the potential for yield and grade characteristics of the Virginia market type peanut genotypes. Yield and grade factors are equally important for this crop’s profitability. Materials & Methods: 47 genotypes: 12 commercial varieties 26 NCSU advanced breeding lines 9 VT advanced breeding lines • 5 locations: VA (2), NC (2), and SC (1) •3 replications in a RCB design • Pod yield and crop value • Grade characteristics: fancy pods, extra large kernels (ELK), sound mature kernels, Results: Location, genotype, and location × genotype interaction had a significant effect on yield, crop value and the grade characteristics of the peanut genotypes (Table 1). 2, 000 3, 000 4, 000 5, 000 6, 000 7, 000 8,0 0 0 9, 000 B ailey F lo rid a F a n cy P erry 2,000 3,0 0 0 4,0 0 0 5, 000 6,0 0 0 7,000 8,000 9,000 VT 003069 VT 003185 VT 003194 VT 023002 VT 024051 VT 024060 VT 024077 VT 9506083-3 VT004152 VT024024 2,000 3,000 4,000 5, 000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9, 000 Y ield (kg ha -1 ) N 02009 N 03005J N 03088T N 03089T N 03090T N 03091T N 04042F S m T N 04054F C N 04066C S m T N 04071C T N 04074F C T N 05006 N 05007 N 05008 N 05018 N 05024J N 05031J N 05037J N 05042F N 05047 N 05049J N 05056 N 06027 N 06029 N 06032F N 06044F 0 20 40 60 80 100 B ailey Flo rid a Fa n cy 0 20 40 60 80 100 VT 003069 VT 003185 VT 003194 VT 023002 VT 024051 VT 024060 VT 024077 VT 9506083-3 VT004152 VT024024 0 20 40 60 80 100 E xtra Large K ernels(% ) N 02009 N 03005J N 03088T N 03089T N 03090T N 03091T N 04042F S m T N 04054F C N 04066C S m T N 04071C T N 04074F C T N 05006 N 05007 N 05008 N 05018 N 05024J N 05031J N 05037J N 05042F N 05047 N 05049J N 05056 N 06027 N 06029 N 06032F N 06044F B laden Fl o r en ce M artin Sout ham p to n TAREC 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Y ie ld (k g ha -1 ) B laden Flo ren ce M ar tin Sout ham p to n TAREC 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Y ie ld (k g ha -1 ) B laden Fl o r en ce M artin Sout ham p to n TAREC 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 Y ie ld (k g ha -1 ) CHAMPS B ailey V T 004152 df Extra large kernel s Sound mature kernel s Meat conte nt Fanc y pods Pod Yield Crop value P value Location (L) 4 0.0001 0.0001 0.000 1 0.00 01 0.000 1 0.000 1 Genotype (G) 46 0.0001 0.0001 0.000 1 0.00 01 0.000 1 0.000 1 L × G 184 0.05 0.0001 0.000 1 0.00 01 0.000 1 0.005 Error 368 % % % % Kg ha -1 $/ha Bladen, NC 44 a 67 b 74 c 91 c 6099 c 2471 c Florence, SC 44 a 57 a 73 ab 89 b 5802 b 2004 a Martin, NC 48 b 67 b 72 a 87 a 5518 a 2114 b Southampton, VA 51 c 68 c 73 ab 95 d 6706 d 2661 d Suffolk, VA 48 b 69 c 73 ab 93 e 6634 d 2622 d Table 1. ANOVA results and averages by location for 47 peanut genotypes. Within each column, values with the same letter are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test. Genotypes with less content of grade characteristics had less crop value although yields were high. For example, Wilson had high yield but less content of ELK and VA 98-R had less yield and high ELK content; they had similar crop value (Figs. 1&2). Figure 1. Average pod yield and extra large kernel content of 47 Virginia market type peanut grown at 5 locations in 2008. S uffolk Southam pton M artin F lo ren ce B laden B ailey B ran tley CHAMPS F lo rid a F ancy G eo rg ia 0 5 E G reg o ry N C 12C N C -V 11 P e rry P h illips V A 98R W ilson 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 C ro p V a lu e ($/h a) Figure 2. Average crop value of 12 commercial Virginia peanut cultivars in 2008. Figure 3. Pod yield of three Virginia type peanut genotypes at 5 locations in 2008. For some cultivars and advanced lines, genotype × location interaction was not significant for yield (Fig. 3) and grade characteristics, showing that some genotypes may grow with good net returns in all three states.

Upload: liliana-jefferson

Post on 06-Jan-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Agronomic and Grade Characteristics of the Virginia Market Type Peanut Grown in Virginia and Carolina Region Maria Balota and Thomas Isleib Objectives

Agronomic and Grade Characteristics of the Virginia Market Type Peanut Grown in Virginia

and Carolina RegionMaria Balota and Thomas Isleib

Objectives were to 1) examine the genotype × location interaction for pod yield, value, and grade characteristics, and 2) compare commercial cultivars with advanced breeding lines for value, yield and grade factors.

References:

1. http://www.ext.vt.edu/pubs/np/2812-1030.pdf

Virginia market type peanut is an important cash crop for VA, NC, and SC. It annually brings over $90 million to the economies of this region from approximately 160,000 acres planted every year. For over 35 years, cultivars from VT and NCSU breeding programs are released based upon a multi- year and location selection test as part of a joint research project entitled Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation (PVQE)1. Every year, PVQE replicated field plots are conducted at various locations in VA, NC, and SC to determine the potential for yield and grade characteristics of the Virginia market type peanut genotypes. Yield and grade factors are equally important for this crop’s profitability.

Materials & Methods:

•47 genotypes: 12 commercial varieties 26 NCSU advanced breeding lines 9 VT advanced breeding lines

• 5 locations: VA (2), NC (2), and SC (1)•3 replications in a RCB design

• Pod yield and crop value

• Grade characteristics: fancy pods, extra large kernels (ELK), sound mature kernels, and total meat1.

Results:Location, genotype, and location × genotype interaction had a significant effect on yield, crop value and the grade characteristics of the peanut genotypes (Table 1).

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

BaileyBrantleyCHAMPS

Florida FancyGeorgia 05E

GregoryNC 12C

NC-V 11Perry

PhillipsVA 98RWilson

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

VT 003069

VT 003185

VT 003194

VT 023002

VT 024051

VT 024060

VT 024077

VT 9506083-3

VT004152

VT024024

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Yield (kg ha -1)

N02009N03005JN03088TN03089TN03090TN03091T

N04042FSmTN04054FC

N04066CSmTN04071CT

N04074FCTN05006N05007N05008N05018

N05024JN05031JN05037JN05042F

N05047N05049JN05056N06027N06029

N06032FN06044F

0 20 40 60 80 100

BaileyBrantleyCHAMPS

Florida FancyGeorgia 05E

GregoryNC 12CNC-V 11

PerryPhillipsVA 98RWilson

0 20 40 60 80 100

VT 003069

VT 003185

VT 003194

VT 023002

VT 024051

VT 024060

VT 024077

VT 9506083-3

VT004152

VT024024

0 20 40 60 80 100Extra Large Kernels(%)

N02009N03005JN03088TN03089TN03090TN03091T

N04042FSmTN04054FC

N04066CSmTN04071CT

N04074FCTN05006N05007N05008N05018

N05024JN05031JN05037JN05042F

N05047N05049JN05056N06027N06029

N06032FN06044F

Bladen

Florence

Martin

Southampton

TAREC2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Yiel

d (k

g ha

-1)

Bladen

Florence

Martin

Southampton

TAREC2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Yiel

d (k

g ha

-1)

Bladen

Florence

Martin

Southampton

TAREC2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

Yiel

d(kg

ha

-1)

CHAMPS

Bailey

VT 004152

df Extra large kernels

Sound mature kernels

Meat content

Fancy pods

Pod Yield

Crop value

P value

Location (L) 4 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001Genotype (G) 46 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001L × G 184 0.05 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.005Error 368

% % % % Kg ha-1 $/haBladen, NC 44 a 67 b 74 c 91 c 6099 c 2471 cFlorence, SC 44 a 57 a 73 ab 89 b 5802 b 2004 aMartin, NC 48 b 67 b 72 a 87 a 5518 a 2114 bSouthampton, VA 51 c 68 c 73 ab 95 d 6706 d 2661 dSuffolk, VA 48 b 69 c 73 ab 93 e 6634 d 2622 d

Table 1. ANOVA results and averages by location for 47 peanut genotypes. Within each column, values with the same letter are not significantly different based on Tukey’s HSD test.

Genotypes with less content of grade characteristics had less crop value although yields were high. For example, Wilson had high yield but less content of ELK and VA 98-R had less yield and high ELK content; they had similar crop value (Figs. 1&2).

Figure 1. Average pod yield and extra large kernel content of 47 Virginia market type peanut grown at 5 locations in 2008.

SuffolkSouthamptonMartinFlorenceBladen

Bailey

Brantle

y

CHAMPS

Florida F

ancy

Georgia

05E

Gregory

NC 12C

NC-V 11Perr

y

Phillips

VA 98R

Wilson

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

Cro

p Va

lue

($/h

a)Figure 2. Average crop value of 12 commercial Virginia peanut cultivars in 2008.

Figure 3. Pod yield of three Virginia type peanut genotypes at 5 locations in 2008.

For some cultivars and advanced lines, genotype × location interaction was not significant for yield (Fig. 3) and grade characteristics, showing that some genotypes may grow with good net returns in all three states.