aiesec romania report march 2010

15
AIESEC Romania Report March 2010 by Iulian Boia

Upload: brandshout-srl

Post on 12-Jun-2015

425 views

Category:

Business


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

AIESEC Romania Report

March 2010

by Iulian Boia

Page 2: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

Introduction

This report is a summary of the main indicators that

show our organizational performance, created with

graphs for an easier understanding of the data

presented..

It consists of a standard analysis (points 1 to 3) and a

customized one for every month (point 4).

Page 3: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

Summary

1. Exchange status

2. Membership status

3. Financial status

4. LC performance on term 09-10

Page 4: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

1. Exchange status

BV BU CJ CT CR GL IS OR PI PL SB TGM TM0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

20102009

Page 5: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

Conclusions:

TOTAL 41X (+ 9 and 28% to 2009)

21 OGX realisations, 20 ICX realisations

8 LCs exceeded 2009`s X performance: Brasov,

Bucuresti, Constanta, Galati, Iasi, Oradea, Targu Mures

and Timisoara

1 LC stagnated: Pitesti

4 LCs registered decreases: CJ, CR, SB, PL

Page 6: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

2. Membership status

BU BV CJ CR CT GL IS OR PI PL SB TGM TM0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Members leaving the organization

MarFebJan

Page 7: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

2. Membership status

BU BV CJ CR CT GL IS OR PI PL SB TGM TM0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

11973 65 40 53 50

12040 31 17 51 41 74

258

87142

70 56 96

133

7031 32

51 90

120

Active vs Total members

Active Total

Page 8: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

2. Membership status

BU BV CJ CR CT GL IS OR PI PL SB TGM TM0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160Active Mbs. Mar vs Feb

MarFeb

Page 9: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

Conclusions:

AIESEC ROMANIA counts a total of 1236 members

Out of the total number, 774 are active (62%; - 2%

compared to Feb 2010)

In March 2010, 64 members left the organization (4%)

Top 3 LCs which registered most members leaving are:

Iasi(29), Constanta (11), Cluj (7)

Page 10: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

3. Financial status

CT GL BU BV IS CR TM PI SB CJ OR TGM PL

5114

3960 3660

1878 17501250

576 360 350 300 268 90 42

Available cash (euro)

Cash

Page 11: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

3. Financial status

CT GL CR BU BV IS PI TM SB OR CJ PL TGM0

20

40

60

80

100

120

96

79

31 31 2615 12 8 7 7 5 2 2

Cash per active member

Cash/Member

Page 12: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

Conclusions:

AIESEC ROMANIA has a total of 14 485 euro in bank accounts (-6290 euro compared to Feb 2010)

Country reserves amount to 44 139 euro (- 2858 euro compared to Feb 2010)

The country average ratio is 25 euro (available funds/active member) – 1 euro compared to Feb 2010

Top 3 LCs considering cash/activ mb. Ratio are CT (96), GL (79) and CR (31)

LCs which should pay significant attention to financial situation: PL (42) , TGM (90), OR (268), CJ (300), SB (350), PI (360)

Page 13: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

4. Additional reports

ORADEA

BRASOV

CONSTANTA

GALATI

PITEST

I

CRAIOVA

ACY AVER

AGEIASI

TIMISO

ARACLU

JSIB

IU

TG. M

URES

BUCURESTI

PLOIES

TI0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Goals Achievement Rate %

Page 14: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

4. Additional reports

Nr LC Goals Achievement Rate

1 ORADEA 106%

2 BRASOV 105%

3 CONSTANTA 92%

4 GALATI 86%

5 PITESTI 76%

6 CRAIOVA 65%

7 ACY AVERAGE 60%

8 IASI 57%

9 TIMISOARA 53%

10 CLUJ 53%

11 SIBIU 52%

12 TG. MURES 49%

13 BUCURESTI 39%

14 PLOIESTI 35%

Nr LC TERM X REALISATIONS

1 IASI 49

2 BUCURESTI 46

3 CLUJ 33

4 TIMISOARA 29

5 CY AVERAGE 24

6 TG. MURES 23

7 CRAIOVA 22

8 BRASOV 21

9 CONSTANTA 20

10 PITESTI 19

11 GALATI 18

12 ORADEA 18

13 PLOIESTI 10

14 SIBIU 10

Page 15: Aiesec Romania report   march 2010

Conclusions:

Huge congratulations to the following LCs which achieved

their set goals: Oradea, Brasov!

Congratulations to Constanta and Galati which were very

close to their targets!

LCs which need to work more to perform above 50% of

what they aimed for are Ploiesti (35%), Bucharest 39%)

and Targu Mures (49%)