i

ii

AIPJ2 is supported by the Australian Government and implemented by Cardno

Contact Information

Kerri Amos Senior Consultant Cardno – Jakarta Level 18, International Financial Centre (IFC) Jl. Jenderal Sudirman Kav. 22–23 Jakarta 12920 Indonesia +6221 8086 9802 kerri.amos@cardno.com

Document History

Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by

1 February 2019 AIPJ2 K.Amos

2 April 2019 Adjusted against DFAT feedback AIPJ2 K.Amos

This publication has been funded by the Australian Government through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The views expressed in this publication are the author’s alone and are not necessarily the views of the Australian Government.

Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to DFAT and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with DFAT.

This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by DFAT in accordance with the terms of the engagement. DFAT does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.

iii

Contents

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... vi 1 Summary of activities undertaken..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Foundational activities ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Influencing activities ............................................................................................................ 3 2 Assessment of Progress against AIPJ2 objectives ..........................................................14 2.1 Overview ...........................................................................................................................14 2.2 Pillar 1 – Transparency, Accountability and Anti-Corruption...................................................14 2.3 Pillar 2 – Transnational Crime and Security Strengthening ....................................................18 2.4 Pillar 3 – Preventing Violent Extremism ...............................................................................20 2.5 Pillar 4 – Corrections Reform ..............................................................................................23

3 Summary of implementation challenges ..........................................................................24 3.1 Sustainability – building independence ................................................................................24 3.2 Communication and coordination with GoI and GoA .............................................................25 3.3 Implementation of the K- Hub project ...................................................................................26

4 Changes in Political Economy .........................................................................................26 4.1 Context..............................................................................................................................26 4.2 Australia context ................................................................................................................28 5 AIPJ2 Forward Strategy....................................................................................................28

Annex 1 AIPJ2 staffing and technical advisers....................................................................29

Annex 2 Financial summary ................................................................................................31 Annex 3 List of AIPJ2 implementing partners......................................................................32

Annex 4 AIPJ2 contribution to DFAT Performance Assessment Framework ......................43

Annex 5 AIPJ2 contribution to RPJMN Objectives...............................................................44 Annex 6 Risk register (current at 1 February 2019)..............................................................46

iv

Acronyms

Acronym English Indonesian ABF Australian Border Force Kesatuan Penjaga Perbatasan Australia AFP Australian Federal Police Kepolisian Federal Australia AGO Attorney General's Office Kejaksaan Agung Indonesia AIDA Alliance for Peaceful Indonesia Aliansi Indonesia Damai AIPJ2 Australia Indonesia Partnership for Justice 2 Kemitraan Australia Indonesia untuk Keadilan 2 AMAN Asian Muslim Action Network Asian Muslim Action Network AUSTRAC Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis

Centre Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan Australia

AWP Annual Work Plan Rencana Kerja Tahunan BAPPENAS Indonesia National Planning Body Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional BIMKEMAS Community Correctional Guidance Bimbingan Kemasyarakatan BNPT National Agency for Combatting Terrorism Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme CDS Centre for Detention Studies Centre for Detention Studies CSO Civil Society Organisations Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial

Research Organisation Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

C-SAVE Civil Society Against Violent Extremism Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil melawan kekerasan ekstrimisme

DFAT Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade Kementrian Luar Negeri Australia DGC Directorate General of Corrections Directorate General of Corrections DGCA Directorate General of Civil Aviation Directorate General of Civil Aviation DPO Disabled Peoples Organisations Organisasi Penyandang Disabilitas GEDSI Gender Equality, Disability, and Social

Inclusion Kesetaraan Gender, Disabilitas, dan Inklusi Sosial

GOA Government of Australia Pemerintah Australia GOI Government of Indonesia Pemerintah Indonesia ICJ Institute of Community Justice Institute for Community Justice INP Indonesian National Police Kepolisian Republik Indonesia INSEP Indonesia Institute for Society Empowerment Indonesia Institute for Society Empowerment JARING Indonesia Network for Investigative Journalism Jaringan Indonesia Untuk Jurnalisme Investigasi JRTO Judicial Reform Team Office Kantor Tim Pembaruan Peradilan KIJ Kalijaga Institute for Justice Kalijaga Institute for Justice KPK Corruption Eradication Commission Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi LBH Legal Aid Institute Lembaga Bantuan Hukum LEIP Research and Advocacy Institute for

Independent Judiciary Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Independensi Peradilan

LPA Child Protection Agency Lembaga Perlindungan Anak MAMPU Empowering Indonesian Women for Poverty

Reduction, DFAT program Maju Perempuan Indonesia untuk Penanggulangan Kemiskinan

MAPPI Indonesia’s Judicial Watch Society Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia MEL Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Pengawasan, Evaluasi, dan Pembelajaran PEKKA Association

PEKKA Association Perkumpulan PEKKA

PEKKA Women Headed Household Empowerment Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga PERMA Supreme Court’s Regulation Peraturan Mahkamah Agung PERPRES Presidential Regulation Peraturan Presiden PPATK Financial Transaction and Analysis Center Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi

Keuangan PPMN Association for the Development of Nusantara

Media Perhimpunan Pengembangan Media Nusantara

v

Acronym English Indonesian PSHK Center for Law and Policy Studies Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan PUSHAM UII

Centre for Human Rights Studies, Indonesia Islamic University

Pusat Studi Hak Asasi Manusia Universitas Islam Indonesia

P/CVE Preventing/Countering Violent Extremism Mencegah/Menanggulangi Ekstremisme Kekerasan

PVE Preventing Violent Extremism Mencegah Enstremisme Kekerasan RPP Draft of Government Regulation Rencana Peraturan Pemerintah RANHAM Human Rights Action Plan Rencana Aksi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia SAPDA Centre of Advocacy for Women, People with

Disability, and Children Sentra Advokasi Perempuan Difabel dan Anak

SCC Small Claims Court Small Claims Court SDP Corrections Database System Sistem Database Pemasyarakatan Sekber Joint Secretariat Sekretariat Bersama SIGAB Inclusive Public Centre and Disability

Advocacy Movement Sasana Integrasi dan Advokasi Difabel

SoP Standard Operating Procedures SPAK I am a Woman Against Corruption Saya Perempuan Anti Korupsi TAF The Asia Foundation The Asia Foundation TII Transparency International Indonesia Transparency International Indonesia TNP2K National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty

Reduction Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan

UNICEF The United Nations Children’s Fund The United Nations Children’s Fund WF Wahid Foundation Wahid Foundation WGWC Working Group of Women and Countering

Violent Extremism Kelompok Kerja Perempuan dan Penanggulangan Ekstremisme Kekerasan

YPP Prasasti Perdamaian Foundation Yayasan Prasasti Perdamaian

vi

Executive Summary

The Australia Indonesia Partnership for Justice 2 (AIPJ2) commenced in April 2017, and is a five-year investment with a budget of AU$37 million. By December 31 2018, AIPJ2 has expended AU$14.5 million of its total budget. For the six-month period from 1 July 1 to 31 December 2018, AIPJ2 has expended AU$4.04 million, or 43 per cent of the annual FY18/19 budget. This is slightly behind the forecasted expenditure due to two payments under Pillar 2 (amounting to some AU$350,000) being postponed from December until January 2019. During this six-month reporting period, AIPJ2 maintains an extremely high efficiency ratio with 90 per cent of total expenditure spent on activities. This reflects the low reliance on international advisers and the streamlined operating costs.

The report details and responds to strategic implementation challenges being worked through by AIPJ2 including sustainability, coordination with GoI and implementation of the Knowledge Hub project, as well as changes in the political economy relevant to AIPJ2. These challenges include:

> Forthcoming national election in Indonesia – April 2019: potential violence, risk to reputation and delays in policy.

> Potential human rights abuses being committed in the implementation of the Anti-Terrorism Law which could trigger revenge attacks

> Constitutional Court decision on child marriage in December supported AIPJ2 coalition partners’ position that the legal marriage age for girls should be increased to eighteen, consistent with boys.

> Indonesia leaks media and CSO coalition is exposing corruption but provoking retaliatory legal action from opponents. These court cases will be a test for the integrity of the courts.

> Natural disasters in Lombok and Central Sulawesi have traumatised partners and people in these areas. Some extremists are taking advantage of the disasters to blame traditional practices and some relief has been denied on the basis of religion or political preference, causing divisions.

Progress towards objectives Pillar 1 – Transparency, Accountability and Anti-Corruption

Indonesian partner organisations are embedding transparency, accountability and anti-corruption reforms in process and practice

AIPJ2 is making a direct contribution to the development of the following improved GOI policies, implementation plans and/or systems:

> Governance mechanisms for legal and judicial reform: - Supreme Court organisational restructuring - Restorative Justice Background Study for BAPPENAS - drafting and monitoring of the National Action Plan on Human Rights 2020–2024 - simplification of judicial decision process and template

> Disability rights: - disability law implementing regulation on access to justice - disability law implementing regulation on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Master

Plan on Disability Inclusive Development - disability rights indicators - inclusive courts

> Justice for women and girls: - National Plan of Action for Child Marriage Prevention 2018–2022 - sub-national Policy on Preventing Child Marriage - Medium Term Development Plan 2020–2024 – section on preventing child marriage - Supreme Court Training Centre curricula to implement PERMA 3/2017 on women in

contact with the law

vii

> Corruption prevention: - National Strategy for Corruption Prevention (Stranas PK) - National Action Plan for Corruption Prevention

> E-courts and Small Claims Court: - implementation of Supreme Court decree (PERMA) No. 3 of 2018 on Electronic Court

Case Administration - revised PERMA for Small Claims Courts.

Pillar 2 – Transnational Crime and Security Strengthening Indonesian partner organisations are preventing and investigating transnational crime more effectively Through its financial support to Government of Australia (GOA) implementing partners, AIPJ2 is making a contribution to the development of the following improved GOI policies, implementation plans, and / or institutional capacities (including knowledge, partnerships, and / or systems development):

> Stronger borders - application of new knowledge and skills by frontline customs and immigration officers

participating in the training - enhanced inter-agency cooperation between border authorities - improvements in the DGCE canine program - enhanced knowledge, systems and skills to address global aviation security threats - improved knowledge, systems and regulations for managing advanced technologies - aviation security regulatory enhancement - governance and capability enhancement in transport security agencies - maritime ship and port facility security cooperation

> Investigating illegal financial transactions - enhanced knowledge, partnerships and institutional capacity to tackle money

laundering in capital markets through a KPK guideline and training curriculum on money laundering in capital markets, which is available to relevant law enforcement institutions

- enhanced counter terrorism prevention and detection capacities > Investigating and responding to terrorism and transnational crime

- enhanced knowledge, skills and institutional capacities to detect suspect money flows and plan effective engagement strategies

- enhanced partnerships and collaborative working relationships between Indonesian and Australian agencies

> Law enforcement, cybercrime and preventing violent extremism - enhanced knowledge and institutional capacities to tackle terrorism and organised

crime - enhanced partnerships, either between Indonesian agencies and /or between

Indonesian agencies and those of regional neighbours (including Australia)

Police cooperation extended to disaster victim identification after the natural disasters in Lombok and Central Sulawesi. AIPJ2 funds were used to support on the job training, mentoring and assistance.

Pillar 3 – Preventing Violent Extremism Indonesian partner organisations are preventing violent extremism Improvements in GOI policies, implementation plans and / or systems being supported by AIPJ2 are highlighted below:

> Policy advocacy and coordination: - analysis of the implementation of Counter Terrorism Law No.5/2018 - Wahid Foundation National Strategy for CVE campaign

viii

- Wahid Foundation Policy paper on National Strategy for Strengthening Values and Practices of tolerance in Indonesia

- National Action Plan on Preventing Violent Extremism - National Action Plan for the Protection and Empowerment of Women and Children in

Social Conflict > Direct action related to disengagement:

- community based corrections concept (YPP) - rehabilitation and reintegration SOPs for deportees and returnees and development of

a new Presidential Decree (C-Save) - victims’ rights to compensation (AIDA) - rehabilitation and social reintegration module of the Ministry of Social Affairs (C-Save)

> Influencing actions working with and through schools and universities: - policy brief on preventing violent extremism at the school level (KIJ) - Semarang District Ministry of Education Decree on Islamic Student (ROHIS) forum

(Wahid Foundation) - Solo District Ministry of Education anti-bullying and anti-persecution programs in

schools (Solo Bersimfoni) > Prevention campaigns and programs

- Coalition to support Hasta Laku (Javanese cultural values campaign) in Solo District - Coalition to support peace and social cohesion in Jember and Poso Districts - Statement of Commitment to cooperate in supporting community security with Bima

Government.

Pillar 4 – Corrections Reform Police, courts and correctional services are collaborating to enforce rights and uphold the rule of law Improvements in GOI policies, implementation plans and/or systems being supported by AIPJ2 are summarised below:

> Reform Coordination, including Restorative Justice background study > Corrections Reform Blueprint > Implementation of the Corrections Database System (SDP) > Piloting of alternative sentencing for juveniles > Offender assessment tools > Reasonable accommodation for people with disabilities in the corrections system

Pillar 5 – Partnership Development AIPJ2’s support for GEDSI is integrated into the work of other Pillars (in particular Pillars 1, 3 and 4), and is therefore reported under the relevant pillar. During the reporting period the Management Information System was completed as part of the Knowledge hub project and is now being refined with partners, however this is an internal result and does not directly contribute to an outcome except through enhancing AIPJ2’s efficiency. A range of communications trainings were also provided to partners in pitching and writing, story of change writing, social media, specific PVE communications and in depth reporting training for journalists covering child marriage. Again these contribute directly to knowledge development but not directly to policy change outcomes. Introduction

The Australia Indonesia Partnership for Justice 2 (AIPJ2) commenced in April 2017, and is a five-year investment by the Government of Australia with an indicative budget of AU$37 million. AIPJ2 aims to support cooperation between Australian and Indonesian institutions and civil society organisations to contribute to the overall goal of:

Strong and accessible justice and security institutions that enhance respect for enforceable rights and rule-based governance systems, over time contributing to stability and prosperity in Indonesia and the region.

ix

This third Six-Monthly Progress Report covers the period from 1 July to 31 December 2018.

By 31 December 2018 AIPJ2 has expended AU$14.5 million of the total AU$37 million budget. For the six-month period from 1 July to 31 December 2018 AIPJ2 has expended AU$4.04 million, or 43 per cent of the annual FY18/19 budget. This is slightly behind the forecasted expenditure due to two payments under Pillar 2 (amounting to some AU$350,000) not being processed in December. During this six-month reporting period, AIPJ2 maintains an extremely high efficiency ratio with 90 per cent of total expenditure spent on activities. This reflects the low reliance on international advisers and the streamlined operating costs. AIPJ2 expenditure summary is provided at annex 2.

This report provides information under four main headings:

> summary of activities undertaken > assessment of progress against AIPJ2 objectives > changes in political economy > AIPJ2 forward strategy.

The primary audiences for this report are DFAT and Bappenas. However, AIPJ2 publishes all reports on www.aipj.or.id. The six-monthly reports can provide a useful overview of what AIPJ2 is doing for other interested parties, including partners, civils society organisations (CSOs), other donors, programs in other countries and scholars studying law, justice and security issues in Indonesia.

1

1 Summary of activities undertaken

This section of the report is divided in to two main parts.

> Foundational activities which AIPJ2 directly manages to establish and maintain its capacity to deliver relevant and effective support to and through partners.

> Influencing activities which are AIPJ2’s core services / value added and are primarily delivered by implementing partners (through grant agreements), with technical and administrative support from the AIPJ2 team as required.

1.1 Foundational activities AIPJ2 continues to place emphasis on ensuring that the team has the systems, skills and incentives in place to effectively manage the program and support implementing partners to deliver results. Training for implementing partners in financial management skills, fraud prevention, and child protection is also reported in this section as key elements of ensuring compliance.

Foundational activities implemented during the reporting period have included:

Activity Status (as at 31 December 2018)

Capacity building for AIPJ2 team

Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning through Quarterly Reflections The AIPJ2 team has continued to support the conduct of quarterly reflection meetings w ith all Indonesian CSO implementing partners. These meetings support information sharing, identif ication of progress and problems in activity implementation, ongoing learning and the adaptation of forward plans as required (in line w ith a Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA) approach). The quarterly reflection process remains a key element of AIPJ2’s MEL strategy and our approach to both team and partner capacity building. Over the past six months the AIPJ2 team has successfully led the management of the quarterly reflection process after transitioning this from specialist partner Solidaritas. Feedback from implementing partners on the usefulness of the quarterly reflection meetings has been extremely positive. Questionnaire and Survey w orkshop for AIPJ2 staff. A one-day workshop on 1 November w as conducted on how to develop methodologically valid questionnaires and surveys for testing participant feedback in events and training, led by Jonathan Hampshire (AIPJ2 Senior MEL adviser). The w orkshop was attended by 21 participants (seven male, 14 female), w ho were mainly AIPJ2 full time team members and part time advisers. Participant feedback w as very positive, with overall usefulness of the w orkshop rated as 8.3 out of 10.1

Anti-bribery, workplace behaviours, fraud awareness, and zero harm training. Cardno conducted compulsory training courses on these topics during November. The trainings w ere delivered online, and each staff was required to pass the minimal scoring for completing each training.

Gender Equity, Disability and Social Inclusion (GEDSI)

Team collaboration and GEDSI mainstreaming. Team collaboration on integrating GEDSI mainstreaming across AIPJ2’s portfolio of support continues to be strengthened, including through the quarterly reflection events, GEDSI Clinics and consultations, and joint events betw een relevant pillars and the GEDSI team. GEDSI monitoring questionnaire. This questionnaire has been drafted to get structured feedback from implementing partners relevant to AIPJ2’s monitoring question # 4 (as per the MEL Framew ork), namely: ‘To w hat extent, and in w hat ways, have implementing partners developed a better understanding of how to promote and protect the rights of w omen and girls and people w ith disabilities?’ It is planned to administer this questionnaire in the f irst half of 2019.

Signif icant Policy Change (SPC) narrative. AIPJ2 w ill not submit a SPC narrative in 2019 as there needs to be more progress towards impact in our initiatives. For example, policy changes in disability inclusion and PVE, to w hich AIPJ2 is contributing, are still not progressing sufficiently into implementation. This is expected in 2020 as inclusive courts are introduced and GoI becomes more engaged in PVE planning and coordination, especially in prevention and education programming.

Communications Visibility. AIPJ2 has further disseminated branding guidelines, including on the use of logos, materials supporting public activities (e.g. Festival Mosintuw u, Hari Anti Korupsi Sedunia, new sletter, f lyer, etc) and materials for specif ic segmented audiences (e.g. PVE-related activities and publication).

1 Hampshire, Jonathan. AIPJ2 Questionnaire & Surveys Workshop report, November 2018. Or online version https://mis.aipj.or.id/apps/event_meeting_report

2

Activity Status (as at 31 December 2018)

New w ebsite. After transitioning to a cloud-based server in June 2018, AIPJ2 continued to conduct w ebsite feature testing including accessibility for persons with disabilities. The f inal testing report in September 2018 show ed that AIPJ2 w ebsite is close to meeting the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), w hich are a global standard for accessibility. This ensures AIPJ2 can lead by example in advocating accessibility and inclusive technology for people w ith disabilities. Use of social media by AIPJ2 staff. In late November 2018, AIPJ2 Communications team also circulated an internal Communications Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to guide staff in using social media, especially in the context of the upcoming national election in April 2019. Several relevant principles from the SoP have also been shared to partners as reference and reminder on their contractual obligation.

Knowledge Hub (K-Hub), Management Information System (MIS) development and information sharing platforms

The K-Hub continues to evolve as both an off-line learning and information sharing space and a supporter of online communities of practice. Four online communities are currently being supported, namely for: (i) Anti-Corruption; (ii) Judicial Reform; (iii) PVE; and (iv) Law and Security. Details of the influencing activities conducted during the reporting period are summarised in section 3 of the report. The AIPJ2 Management Information System (MIS) w as launched on 27 August 2018. As immediate follow up, training in use of the MIS w as provided for both AIPJ2 staff and implementing partners on 27–28 August. The MIS w as transferred onto its ow n server in October, and data is now being inputted by partners and AIPJ2 team.

AIPJ2 Partnership Board Meeting

The AIPJ2 Partnership Board meeting w as held on 18 December 2018 in Jakarta. The meeting w as attended by DFAT, Bappenas and representatives of relevant Indonesian partner agencies including the Indonesian Supreme Court, Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Ministry of Law and Human Rights, and Directorate General of Corrections. The meeting review ed the AIPJ2 Annual Work Plan for 2019 and endorsed the activities in Pillar 1,3 and 4 of the Plan. The meeting suggested AIPJ2 to have further engagement w ith the relevant Bappenas Director for Pillar 2 activities.

Operations, staffing and finance

Child protection. DFAT’s Child Protection Compliance Section conducted a child protection review or ‘spot check’ to AIPJ2 and one selected partner, Yayasan Prasasti Perdamaian, on 23 July. The aim of the spot check is to provide DFAT w ith a level of evidentiary assurance that AIPJ2 is meeting its contractual obligations to implement effective child safe systems, processes and risk management in DFAT funded activities; the f inal report has not yet been received by AIPJ2. Fraud Prevention Training for implementing partners. On 18 October a fraud prevention training w as conducted for Solo Bersimfoni. The one-day training included a spot check on the f inancial systems and transactions and a discussion on internal system improvements. Solo Bersimfoni w ill develop their SoP manual as one of the key follow up points from the meeting. Partner Performance Assessment (PPA) w ith implementing partners. This mechanism is used by AIPJ2 to appraise implementing partners’ performance on an annual basis and gather feedback on how AIPJ2 could better support implementing partners if performance issues are identif ied. By December, AIPJ2 had f inalised the PPA w ith The Asia Foundation, Wahid Foundation, C-SAVE, MaPPI, YPP, and SIGAB. A Grant (hibah) report w as submitted for the period April 2017 to June 2018 in response to a request from Bappenas. The report highlights the amount of AIPJ2 funds disbursed to specif ic GoI partners during the reporting period. Quarterly Financial Reports (covering the period April 2017 to September 2018) w ere also submitted to Bappenas. This information w ill be used for BAST (Berita Acara Serah Terima) reporting, as per the requirements of the Ministry of Finance. An Internal Audit w as conducted by the Cardno Corporate Team (as part of AIPJ2 quality assurance processes) utilising the Cardno toolkit on Capacity Building and Financial Monitoring. No signif icant issues w ere found. The recommendations are feeding into the annual updates of the AIPJ2 Operations and Grant Manuals. An additional administrative off icer (Maudy Pritha Amanda). has been recruited to support the adviser and activities based in the Indonesian Supreme Court

To support the communications team and know ledge management functions, AIPJ2 recruited Eka Gona Putri (Gona) as the activity coordinator – communications & know ledge management in October 2018. A list of AIPJ2’s current staffing is provided at annex 1.

3

1.2 Influencing activities AIPJ2 provides the majority of its support through grants to Indonesian and Australian implementing partners. AIPJ2 is currently funding a total of 21 Indonesian CSO partners, plus five Government of Australia partners, to implement approved activities. A list of AIPJ2’s Indonesian CSO partners and Australian implementing partners, including summary information on the scope of their activities, is provided at annex 3.

Reporting on influencing activities is organised under the headings of each of AIPJ2 pillars:

> Pillar 1 – Transparency, accountability and anti-corruption > Pillar 2 – Security and transnational crime > Pillar 3 – Preventing violent extremism > Pillar 4 – Correction system reform > Pillar 5 – Partnership Development.

The quality of these activities and the outputs that they deliver is monitored on an ongoing basis through: (i) regular progress reporting by implementing partners; (ii) quarterly reflection events with implementing partners; and (iii) the use of participant feedback questionnaires for workshops and training events. Some additional work is planned for 2019 to collect and analyse more information on the quality of AIPJ2 supported outputs, for example with respect to knowledge products and partnerships.

With respect to influencing activities, we can report the following highlights:

1.2.1 Pillar 1 – Transparency, Accountability, Anti-Corruption

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Partnership w ith Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Independensi Peradilan (LEIP) - Organisation for Study and Advocacy for an Independent Judiciary

Focus: Governance mechanisms for legal and judicial reform. Key activities undertaken: Betw een August and December, LeIP and the Judicial Reform Team off ice (JRTO) continued to support the Supreme Court’s organisational restructuring through facilitating a series of discussions with the Supreme Court leadership and providing technical options and advice LeIP also continued to investigate the Supreme Court’s decision-making processes through conducting landmark decision research and analysis, in order to help understand, and subsequently improve judicial decision-making processes. As of 1 October, 181 criminal case decisions had been dow nloaded, 520 decisions read and 3,779 civil case decisions dow nloaded and read. LeIP has chosen eight landmark decisions for more detailed analysis (f ive criminal and three civil cases). Regarding CSO coalition coordination meetings, LeIP conducted three events called ‘Cerita Pengadilan / Court Story’ in the period July – December 2018. This ‘Cerita Pengadilan’ is a space for stakeholder discussion on recent problems in judicial reform and aims to promote effective advocacy for reform implementation. LeiP, MaPPI, ICJR, and Centre for Detention Studies are also supporting Bappenas to develop a grand design and implementation strategy for restorative justice in Indonesia. This group of CSO partners is facilitating and providing inputs to a series of discussions involving a range of Government agencies, including MLHR, MoSA, Ministry of Home Affairs, National Narcotics Agency, Attorney General Off ice, Indonesian National Police (INP), the Government’s Witness and Victim Protection Body, and the Supreme Court.

Law and Justice Community of Practice

On 3-5 December AIPJ2, Bappenas, Australian National University and Cardno held the Community of Practice Workshop on the ‘Implementation of Restorative Justice in Indonesia and Australia’. The w orkshop brought together a broad range of stakeholders to share differing perspectives on restorative justice from judicial, police, custodial, community and international (Solomon Islands, Papua New Guinea, Australia) viewpoints.

Joint Secretariat - Ministry of Law and Human Rights and Bappenas

On 5 November the Joint Secretariat held a meeting w ith line ministries for the drafting the 5th Human Rights Action Plan (RANHAM) 2020–2024. The Draft RANHAM w ill be revised w ith inputs from this meeting and AIPJ2 Human Rights Adviser.

Partnerships w ith Sentra Advokasi Perempuan Difabel

Focus: Disability rights Key activities undertaken:

4

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

dan Anak (SAPDA), Sasana Inklusi dan Gerakan Advokasi Difabel (SIGAB) and others

SIGAB has:

Led DPOs inputs to drafting of the Government Regulation on Reasonable Accommodation for People w ith Disability in Access to Justice (RPP Peradilan), and contributed to the Government Regulation on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation of Disability Law (RPP Perencanaan) Delivered stakeholder w orkshops on the draft of the RPP Peradilan, organised monthly discussions with the Ministry of Law and Human Rights and Bappenas, and conducted aw areness raising through community activities, including the National Conference of Temu Inklusi 2018. On 6 September, in collaboration w ith SAPDA and YAKKUM, SIGAB hosted a discussion among Yogyakarta based DPOs to provide additional inputs to the Master Plan on Disability Inclusive National Development (RIPID) Betw een 12–13 November SIGAB participated in a w orkshop organised by AIPJ2 and OHANA to commence formulating the indicators for monitoring the implementation of the Universal Periodic Review on protecting the rights of people w ith disabilities. The results from the w orkshop will be included in the design of the AIPJ2 activity to further develop disability rights indicators. Betw een 22–25 October a Temu Inklusi 2018 w as held in Gunung Kidul District in Yogyakarta. The event w as organised by SIGAB and supported by several donors including AIPJ2. It w as opened by the Vice Governor of Yogyakarta, the Mayor of Gunung Kidul District and DFAT. This year’s theme w as ‘Tow ards Indonesia Inclusive 2030, through Innovation and Collaboration’ In collaboration w ith SAPDA, AIPJ2 advisers and the General and Religious Courts of Wonosari, a baseline or ‘prototype’ of inclusive services for justice seekers living w ith a disability is being developed. This is intended for these courts, and by demonstration other courts, to better understand both the current situation, w hat needs to be improved, and how such improvements might be brought about. Continued to provide legal information through the online platform Solider and support people w ith disabilities w ho are victims of crime through paralegal assistance. SAPDA SAPDA has provided ongoing technical support and advocacy to the Ministry of Social affairs and other DPOs on the Disability Law Implementing Regulations on Social Welfare (RPP Kesejahteraan Sosial), and Habilitation and Rehabilitation (RPP HabRehab). A MoU betw een SAPDA and the State Court of Yogyakarta was signed on 12 July as part of SAPDA’s thirteenth year celebration to promote more legal support for people w ith disabilities.

SAPDA is leading the development of training modules for three professional organisations (Lawyer / Advocates Association or PERADI, Psychiatrists Association or PDSKJI, and Psychologists Association of Ikatan Psikologi Klinis Indonesia). The draft modules are now being piloted. Betw een 18–19 September SAPDA facilitated a peer counsellor training for DPOs, CSOs and local government partners from Yogyakarta, Kupang, Makassar, Lombok and Sumba. A total of 30 people from 16 organisations participated in the training. In December, SAPDA supported the Ministry of Social Affairs to conduct provincial staff training on rehabilitation – aligned w ith the government regulation on rehabilitation rights for people w ith disabilities. The ministerial training w as conducted over a tw o week period and w as attended by 1,200 provincial participants. Betw een October and December, SAPDA collaborated w ith MaPPI to draft a guidebook for judges to provide better legal services for people w ith disability in contact w ith the courts. On 6 November, MaPPI and SAPDA conducted the f irst dialogue in Yogyakarta on identifying the disability challenges and obstacles that are conflicting w ith the law . The FGD w as attended by CSOs, DPOs, Police, Prosecutor, Judges and Court Off icial. MaPPI and SAPDA have compiled the f indings and used them as references in drafting the Guidebook for Judges to provide legal services for people with disability in the court In November, SAPDA collaborated w ith the Ministry of Health at district level to deliver training on violence against w omen w ith disability.

SAPDA continues w orking on the development of its Resource Centre on Disability (Pusat Sumber) to support advocacy, knowledge sharing and learning on the issues of w omen, children and people w ith Disability.

Other w ork on disability On 28 November a kick off meeting w as held w ith LBH Makassar and the Consortium (PPDI, HWDI, and KPI) on their new Inclusive Courts Initiative in South Sulaw esi. This aims to replicate the successful inclusive court model in Gunung Kidul District, Yogyakarta. On 6 November, MaPPI and SAPDA conducted the f irst dialogue in Yogyakarta on identifying the disability challenges and obstacles that are conflicting w ith the law . The FGD w as attended by CSOs, DPOs, Police, Prosecutor, Judges and Court Off icial. MaPPI and SAPDA have compiled the f indings and used them as references in drafting the Guidebook for Judges to provide legal services for people w ith disability in the court.

5

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

On 10 December as part of the celebration of International Disability Day, DFAT, AIPJ2 and PEDULI organised a half day w orkshop on the ‘Inclusion for Everyone’. The w orkshop brought together 60 participants representing policy makers, research organisations, DPOs and CSOs to discuss the signif icant contribution of DPOs in advocating disability rights and inclusion.

Partnerships w ith Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia (MaPPI)

Judicial Monitoring Community Indonesia and Family Court of Australia

Focus: Justice for w omen and girls – courts Key activities undertaken: Specif ically in relation to supporting implementation of PERMA No. 3 of 2017 on w omen and children in contact w ith the law , AIPJ2 has continued to support: (i) development of curricula, modules, and training materials for judge candidates - w hich are now incorporated into the Supreme Court’s Training Centre curricula; (ii) preparation of a Guidebook for judges to examine cases related to w omen w ith disabilities in contact w ith the law ; and (iii) ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the PERMA 3/2017 implementation, in particular through the generation of sex, age and disability disaggregated data, trend analysis and specif ic case learning. Advisers, Cate Sumner and Leisha Lister, w ith local partner e-CEOs, have applied machine-read technology (MR) to analyse 844 family law decisions and compared it w ith person-read (PR) decision analysis. This analysis w ill be presented to the Supreme Court leadership and used to develop a judicial training guide on the know ledge, skills and attitudes required by judges w ho decide marriage dispensation cases. A four-page overview document highlighting the differences between cases brought in the General Courts and Religious Courts has been prepared.2 In collaboration w ith AIPJ2 GEDSI team and Pillar 1, Justice Ryan from the Family Court of Australia and adviser Leisha Lister visited the Wonosari District court and Religious Court. The Australian and Indonesian judges shared lessons learnt regarding how best to provide support to people w ith disabilities accessing justice.

Partnership w ith Rumah KitaB Bersama (Rumah KitaB) plus new partnerships w ith Institute of Community Justice (ICJ) in South Sulaw esi, and Yayasan Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga (PEKKA)

Focus: Justice for w omen and girls - child marriage prevention initiatives Key activities undertaken: Rumah KitaB has been drafting the training modules on ‘Protection of Girls and Gender Equality’, incorporating an accurate interpretation of Islamic values. The BERDAYA series of aw areness trainings on child marriage prevention w as delivered to 120 formal and non-formal leaders and authorities at village and districts level in Kota Makassar (South Sulaw esi), North Jakarta, and Cirebon (West Java).

PEKKA facilitated monthly discussion groups for women and girls to increase critical thinking and know ledge of how to prevent child marriage and family violence. The discussion were held in three districts in three provinces: NTB (Lombok Tengah), West Java (Cianjur), and Aceh (Piddie). Rumah KitaB, PEKKA, and ICJ have contributed to the establishment and strengthened of a netw ork of reform-minded community members in their focus areas and equipped the netw orks with culturally and religiously appropriate arguments against child marriage. On 17 September the ICJ and the Coalition for Preventing Child Marriage organised the launching of the Child Marriage Prevention Program in South Sulaw esi and the signing of the MoU betw een ICJ, the District Government of Maros and the District Parliament of Maros.

On 19–23 September ICJ conducted a Child Marriage Monitoring and Coalition Team training w hich was attended by 25 coalition participants (four men, 21 w omen). Collaboration w ith Religious Affairs office, Courts, and the tw o largest Muslim organisations in Indonesia (Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah) is being promoted to secure institutional commitment to prevent child marriage w ithin existing legal and religious framew orks. Aw areness raising and advocacy on child marriage prevention initiatives is ongoing w ith the South Sulaw esi Provincial authorities through the w ork of the ICJ. On 27 July, AIPJ2 GEDSI Manager facilitated a Child Marriage Coordination meeting among partners (Rumah KitaB, ICJ and PEKKA, and GoI representation from the Ministry of KPPPA and BAPPENAS). Partners’ w orkplans were shared, progress and learning discussed, and as a result, a closer collaboration w as fostered among partners. The meeting w as also attended by tw o Directors from Bappenas and the Ministry for Empow erment of Women and Families, DFAT and AIPJ2 Senior Management. On 14–15 December AIPJ2 participated in the VOICE International Conference organised by PUSKAPA and attended by 286 representatives from 23 countries. AIPJ2 w as invited to host a session on ‘Understanding and Renegotiating Social Norms that are Harmful to Children. The session w as moderated by AIPJ2 Team Leader, Craig Ew ers and three different topics were presented by the team: Disability Inclusion, by Joni Yulianto; Sexual Violence, by Theodora Putri; and Child Marriage Prevention, by Lia Marpaung. The focus on social norms w orked well in creating a multi-disciplinary discussion and the session w ill be presented again to different audiences in 2019.

2 Report on AIPJ2 Women and the Law Activities supported by the Family Court and AIPJ2 advisers, July-December 2018

6

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

In commemoration of 16 HAKTP (16 Days of Anti-Violence Against Women), the AIPJ2 Makassar off ice conducted a range of activities including: i) On 7 December a talk show on ‘Corruption and Child Marriage’; ii) On 10-11 December participating in the Eastern Women Conference in NTT; conducting a Youth Meeting of South Sulaw esi Stop Child Marriage; and conducting Stop Child Marriage ‘Goes to School’.

Partnership w ith Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) & Saya Perempuan Anti Korupsi (SPAK), and Transparansi Internasional Indonesia (TII) Corruption Eradication Commission & I am Women Against Corruption and Transparency International Indonesia Partnership w ith Home Affairs (Australia) and PSHK on money laundering in capital markets

Focus: Corruption prevention Key activities undertaken: TII supported the National Team w ith development of the National Strategy for Corruption Prevention (Presidential Decree No.54 of 2018). TII conducted a w orkshop attended by 20 people (10 men, 10 w omen) consisting of representatives from 18 CSOs and 2 people from the National Team for Corruption prevention. The w orkshop focused on how to monitor and evaluate implementation of the National Action Plan on Corruption Prevention. SPAK delivered a range of training of trainers for Priests in Ambon province, Ministry of Education and Culture, Ministry of Religious Affairs, and Ministry of Transportation. Increasingly these events are being directly funded by ministries w ith limited f inancial support from AIPJ2. SPAK w as awarded the Indonesia Community Engagement Aw ard 2018, Gold Class. This is a national annual aw ard sponsored by a consortium of sponsors open to nominations for private businesses and community organisations for corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs.

SPAK and Indonesia Corruption Watch agreed to collaborate through the Anti-Corruption Academy. SPAK w ill develop specif ic anti-corruption modules and classes for the Academy on w omen and anti-corruption. On 12 November AIPJ2 and Solidaritas presented the SPAK Case Study Review to KPK leadership (the KPK chairman, Agus Rahardjo; The KPK Vice Chairman, Laode Syarif, Basaria Panjaitan and Alex Marw ata). Follow up actions w ere discussed and agreed. On 22–24 October the 3rd Anti-Corruption Summit w as held in Makassar by KPK in collaboration w ith Hasanuddin University w ith AIPJ2 support. On 4-5 KPK held the International Anti-Corruption Day, w here SPAK launched the corruption in child marriage game, SIDAKA. A full draft of the technical guidelines on money laundering in capital markets has been completed and discussions held betw een Home Affairs (Australia), PSHK and KPK on the document. Simulations of the technical guidelines w ith KPK and related law enforcement agencies has been carried out, as part of training in the application of the guidelines (see below in Pillar 2 Department of Home Affairs for further details)

Partnership w ith Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan (PSHK) on Improvement of Supreme Court decree (PERMA) on Small Claim Courts Partnership w ith Supreme Court on e-court development and implementation.

Focus: E-courts and Small Claims Court Key activities undertaken: E-courts The E-Court w orking group conducted a comparative study to Singapore’s national court to see how they have developed and implemented their e-court system, and the f indings from the study are currently being discussed. It is anticipated that the study w ill provide a key reference in e-litigation development in Indonesian. In December the consultants and SC Planning Bureau conducted an evaluation of e-court implementation in tw o jurisdiction, West Sumatra and East Java. Small Claim Courts (SCC) On 8–9 November the Ease of Doing Business Working Group held their f irst meeting to discuss the f indings and recommendations of the Small Claims Court. The w orking group agreed to raise the threshold for SCC cases from IDR 200million to IDR 500million. In addition, they agreed the party in SCC should be represented by legal counsels w hich will solve the problem of one jurisdiction and allow the use of the e-court in the SCC. A research report on SCC has been prepared A draft revised PERMA on the SCC has been prepared.

1.2.2 Pillar 2 – Security and Transnational Crime

The work under this Pillar is delivered primarily through Government of Australia implementing partner agencies.

Based on the Government of Australia partners’ latest six-monthly reports to AIPJ2 we can report the following:

7

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Australian Border Force (ABF)

Focus: Stronger Borders

Key activities undertaken: Passenger Analysis and Targeting Course: September 2018, 40 DGCE and DGI off icers participated in tw o, f ive day passenger analysis and targeting courses. The training w as conducted by Australian based ABF off icers who travelled to Jakarta and Medan over a tw o week period. K9 Cooperation: Visit to ABF National Detector Dog Program (Australia) – October 2018. A BNN delegation led by the Head of BNN travelled to Australia and toured the Melbourne DPP training and breeding centre, met w ith the Commissioner of ABF in Canberra and toured the Sydney shared kennels. Document Examination Course: October 2018, 40, DGI and DGCE off icers attended. The course allow ed DGI and DGCE off icers to improve their understanding of travel document manufacturing processes and common security features.

Women in Leadership Training Course: November 2018, 20 Officers from the DGCE, DGI, BNN, and the BNPT travelled to JCLEC in Semarang, Indonesia to attend the Women in Leadership Program (i-Balance) facilitated by the Australian Institute of Police Management. Tw o ABF Inspectors and Jakarta based Chief Migration Officer also attended as participants and mentors.

Department of Home Affairs – Transport Security

Key activities undertaken: Avsec (Aviation security) Foundations Training. AMS delivered multiple sessions of Avsec Foundations training in various key gatew ay airports, namely:

Adisutjipto International Airport, Yogyakarta : 11-17 July 2018 (f ive sessions); Juanda International Airport, Surabaya : 8-12 October 2018 (f ive sessions) ;

Ngurah Rai International Airport, Denpasar : 29-31 October 2018 (three sessions) Overall, 650 off icers aviation security officers from AP1 have received the training. DGCA w ere also involved in the activities to socialise regulations developed under previous phases of the TSCP program. Advanced Technology Implementation (ATI) Project. AMS partnered with an Australian industry service provider, Trident Security to deliver ATI training sessions in Surabaya and Denpasar betw een 15–26 October 2018. Approximately 150 aviation security off icers in total w ere provided with training on the implementation and use of explosive trace detection equipment at international airports. Aviation Security Regulatory Enhancement. During 3–5 October 2018 AMS delivered a three day w orkshop on ‘Managing Insider Threat’. The w orkshop provided participants from DGCA and AP2 w ith an overview of the trusted insider threat w ithin the aviation sector and information on how to manage and mitigate these threats. DGCA & DGST Governance and Capability Enhancement. From 3–7 December 2018, senior off icials from Indonesia’s DGCA and DGST travelled to Melbourne and Canberra to participate in a f ive day Australia-Indonesia Transport Security Executive Knowledge Exchange Visit. Maritime Ship and Port Facility Security Cooperation. This project, delivered in August and November 2018 included a review of Indonesian maritime port security regulations against the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code, a survey of Indonesian maritime ports and development of a Port Security Situation Report for discussions with DGST.

Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC)

Focus: Investigating illegal f inancial transactions Key activities undertaken: The Australia Indonesia Analyst Exchange Program (AIAEP) and the Philippines based AUSTRAC-AMLC Partnership Program (AAPP). AUSTRAC has brought these tw o programs together to maximise eff iciency of resource, to minimise cost and to provide greater capacity building opportunity through bringing together Australian, Indonesian and Philippines analysts. This exchange involved analysts from AUSTRAC, PPATK, AMLC (The Philippines) and also from UWPBNM (Malaysia). The topic for the analyst exchange w as a terrorist group originating in the Philippines but active in Indonesia, Malaysia and w ith links to Australia. The f irst leg of the exchange w as held over a tw o week period in Canberra in the previous reporting period. The second leg w as held in Jakarta from 2–6 July and the third and f inal leg w as held in Manila from 30 July to 3 August. After each leg of the exchange an Intelligence Brief w as prepared for review and comment by law enforcement agencies.

Department of Home Affairs - Legal

Focus: Investigating and responding to transnational crime Key activities undertaken: Over its second six months, this project supported a number of activities that contribute to the project objectives: KPK Program

8

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Building on the f irst phase of this program, a series of activities w as delivered in partnership w ith KPK to further develop and f inalise the Guidebook on Handling Cases of Money Laundering and Asset Recovery in the Capital Market: 3-4 October, Sentul City – a w orkshop and technical guidebook simulation w ith law enforcement

practitioners tested w hether the draft guidebook w as f it for purpose. The 24 participants (f ive female) represented a range of perspectives and institutions.

Bi-monthly drafting meetings. Home Affairs supported KPK and PSHK on revisions to the draft guidebook, w ith comparative case examples from the Australian context, strategies for recovery of criminal assets, international legal cooperation, and inter-agency coordination.

11 December, Jakarta – multi-discipline training w orkshop on money laundering and capital markets and launch of the Guidebook on Handling Cases of Money Laundering and Asset Recovery in the Capital Market. Participants and presenters joined from PSHK, the Indonesian Stock Exchange, the Indonesian Financial Services Authority, KPK, PPATK, INP and the private sector.

Attorney General Office Program In ongoing support of Indonesia’s capacity to respond to evolving terrorism threats, activities included: 28–30 August, Balikpapan – third training w orkshop on CT and transnational crime law s with 40

provincial prosecutors (five female) from across Kalimantan, and prosecutors from the Directorate. The w orkshop focused on the provisions and requirements of the new ly revised CT law , w ith experts from BNPT, LPSK and US/Australia providing perspectives on better handling of these cases.

30 October – 1 November, Manado – the fourth training w orkshop on CT and transnational crime laws w as conducted with 35 provincial prosecutors (nine female) from across Sulawesi, and prosecutors from the Directorate. The w orkshop focused on the new ly revised CT law , and built know ledge and capacity to implement other priority transnational crime law s, such as Indonesia's human traff icking, people smuggling and f inancial crime law s.

Legal Adviser / Home Affairs (Legal) Post In addition to the above, the AIPJ2 Legal Adviser / Home Affairs Post delivered or otherw ise supported a number of other complementary activities, for example: (i) delivery of regional training in partnership w ith AGO’s Legal and International Bureau to ASEAN and Indonesian law enforcement (25 participants) on countering criminal use of crypto-assets, and international asset recovery; (ii) co-delivery with AGO’s Asset Recovery Centre of a training w orkshop for ARIN-AP (Asset Recovery Interagency Network – Asia Pacif ic) member countries on pursuing criminal assets across international borders; (iii) delivery of training in partnership w ith IOM Indonesia on new trafficking in persons practitioner guidelines, and establishment of a prosecutor mentoring facility; and (iv) support for the delivery of the 2018 Australia-Indonesia Ministerial Council on Law and Security.

Australian Federal Police (AFP)

Key activities undertaken: During this reporting period the AFP facilitated the follow ing approved activities with AIPJ2 funding support:

Counter terrorism Women in Leadership Conference. In September 2018, the AFP facilitated the attendance of an INP female off icer at the Australasian Council of Women and Policing Conference held in Perth, WA. The AFP Police Intelligence Development Program w as held in September 2018. Tw o INP members, one an analyst, undertook this course. Regional Social Media Exploitation Working Group The Regional Social Media Exploitation Working Group is conducted three times a year w ith the most recent being w orking group held in Batam Indonesia, in November 2018. These regular meetings bring together off icers from relevant social media police teams to discuss issues relating to social media analysis impacting police activity, provide an environment for skills sharing and enhancement and discuss best practices relating to gathering social media based evidence. Organised crime Capacity Building – Social Media Analysis Program. The AFP facilitated a social media analysis training package w ith the INP Narcotics Directorate. Participants w ere provided with tools/equipment to enable them to investigate narcotic related crime, conduct analysis of social media and retrieve evidential material for potential prosecutions. Cybercrime and transnational child sexual exploitation International Cybercrime Investigations Workshop: (22 October 2018 – 2 November 2018) tw o weeks w orkshop focused on cybercrime and transnational child sexual exploitation w ith 20 participants from cyber, anti-trafficking in persons and sexual w oman and child investigations directorates, including six w omen from Indonesia and 10 other Asia-Pacif ic countries. Anti-corruption

9

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Capacity Building – Regional Anti-Corruption Investigations Program. In September 2018, the AFP facilitated the Regional Anti-Corruption Investigations Program. The course w as attended by off icers from the INP Anti-Corruption Directorate. AFP has facilitated a number of Working Group meetings w ith the INP Anti-Corruption Directorate. These meetings have provided a valuable forum for each agency to discuss emerging capacity building opportunities and also to evaluate current initiatives and future legislative amendments w ith respect to criminal asset confiscation.

1.2.3 Pillar 3 – Preventing Violent Extremism

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Partnership w ith C-SAVE Indonesia Civil Society Coalition on Countering Violent Extremism Partnership w ith The Wahid Foundation

Partnership w ith Working Group of Women and Countering Violent Extremism (WGWC)

Focus: Policy Advocacy and Coordination Supporting implementation of the Counter Terrorism (CT) Law and supporting GoI in the adoption of rehabilitation and reintegration management guidelines for vulnerable groups. Key activities undertaken Strengthened CSO coalition on CT Law implementation and advocacy through the established consultative forum on countering violent extremism. Development of a presidential regulation on the role and responsibilities of BNPT as mandated in the CT Law . Development of an academic paper for Rehabilitation and Reintegration of former violent extremism inmates. Development of a policy for Rehabilitation and Reintegration management Focus : National Action Plan for Preventing Extremism Key activities undertaken Wahid Foundation has supported:

The National Agency for Countering Terrorism (BNPT) to develop the National Action Plan for Preventing Extremism. Coordination and lobbying w ith various stakeholders including government, religious based organisations, scholars and civil society organisations. Women and PVE WGWC conducted a range of policy advocacy activities to promote improved understanding and policies related to w omen and PVE. This includes: developing guidelines on Gender Analysis on PVE; drafting guidelines on gender mainstreaming in PVE Policy; and conducting training for w omen ulama on PVE. AIPJ2 continues to support the WGWC to establish its operational capacities and w ork plan. AIPJ2 and the WGWC steering committee agreed to choose the Asian Muslim Action Netw ork (AMAN) as its Secretariat, namely to provide activity management and administrative support.

Partnership w ith Yayasan Prasasti Perdamaian (YPP) Organisation for the Promotion of Peace

Focus: Direct action related to disengagement – w orking with prisoners and returning foreign f ighters and countering hate speech Key activities undertaken YPP has supported the Directorate General of Corrections to develop a model of community-based corrections for Violent Extremist Offenders. This has included:

Conducting a series of meetings w ith DGC and Directorate Bimkemas related to preparing a baseline assessment for developing the model. YPP conducted f ield data collection in Poso betw een 12-15 September and in Surabaya betw een 17–20 September 2018. Conducting a FGD w ith a broader group of members of DGC to discuss the drafting of the model. A FGD w as held on 29 November w ith DGC (four men, f ive w omen) to discuss the f indings from YPPs baseline assessment and to enrich the drafting process. Work has also started on researching the issue of w omen and juvenile violent extremist offenders, and how to meet their specif ic rehabilitation and reintegration needs. Advocacy is also being undertaken to promote public understanding of the need for better management of rehabilitation and reintegration programs for Violent Extremist Offenders, including w omen and juveniles.

Partnership w ith PUSAD Paramadina

The drivers of violent extremism PUSAD Paramadina is conducting research on the drivers of violent extremism in contemporary Indonesia – w ith a focus on Poso, Bima and Solo. In this period, PUSAD has accomplished data collection in Poso and developed an initial f indings report.

10

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Partnership w ith Aliansi Indonesia Damai (AIDA)

In addition to their focus on engagement w ith schools, AIDA has also provided analysis and advice through AIPJ2 to Bappenas and DFAT on drivers of extremism in Bima.

Partnership w ith The Wahid Foundation

Partnership w ith Aliansi Indonesia Damai (AIDA) Partnership w ith Kalijaga Institute for Justice (KIJ)

Focus: Inf luencing actions w orking with and through schools and universities Mobilising moderate Civil Society Actors to counter radicalisation through public discourse. The Wahid Foundation has: Facilitated training and w orkshops for religious teacher and school principal at 15 schools in four

provinces (West Java, DKI Jakarta, Central Java, and East Java) under the Development of Peace Culture at School Program.

Provided assistance to Rohis (Rohani Islam) extracurricular at selected schools by working with trained religious teachers and school principals.

AIDA is focused on reducing risk for Indonesian youth w ho are vulnerable to recruitment into ISIS-aff iliated and other violent extremist groups, as w ell as advocacy for victim rights. The key activities they are implementing include peace building training at schools, supporting reconciliation betw een bomb victims and perpetrators, and advocacy on victim rights. KIJ developed draft modules for mainstreaming PVE into the school system. The modules are being developed draw ing upon some of the insights from recent policy papers on extremism and w ill target three groups: teachers; parent-teacher associations; and students. The modules w ill be f ield tested in schools in Klaten near Yogyakarta.

Partnership w ith Peace Generation Partnership w ith Solo Bersimfoni

Focus: Prevention campaigns and programs focused on families and social cohesion Peacebuilding festivals Peace Generation established a Creative Team along w ith two other CSOs (Tanoker in Jember, East Java, and Mosintuw u in Poso, Central Java) w ho designed a community-based aw areness campaign in Poso and Jember to help promote pluralist values and counter extremist ideology. These activities are supported by AIPJ2’s Communications team to advise on messaging, branding, visual designs and developing the festival guides. Community values of harmony Solo Bersimfoni is w orking at sub provincial level in Solo, Central Java. They have developed training modules and conducted training of trainers on values of community harmony for youth and students and how to contest violent extremist messaging. The Solo Bersimfoni team is supported by AIPJ2’s Communications Officer and PVE adviser in Yogyakarta, and the SPAK team.

AIPJ2 direct initiative Terms of reference for a review of AIPJ2’s portfolio of PVE support w ork have been drafted, and it is anticipated that this internal review will be conducted in the f irst half of 2019. The purpose is to take stock of progress to date and identify w hat, if any, changes in strategy or approach should be taken going forward. This internal review will provide an input to the independent mid-term review of AIPJ2 planned for mid 2019.

1.2.4 Pillar 4 – Correctional Services Reform

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

Partnership w ith The Asia Foundation (TAF) w ho manage the follow ing subcontractors: Centre for Detention Studies (CDS), Lembaga Perlindungan Anak NTB, Peka Association, Institute of Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR)

Focus: Strengthening the Corrections Database System (SDP), management of high-risk inmates, and corrections system reform Key activities undertaken Reform Coordination, including Restorative Justice and alternative sentencing policies On 9 and 20 August a series of consultative meetings w ere conducted for f inalising the Corrections Reform Blueprint w ith tw o senior Directors to discuss the revitalisation strategies of the Detention Centre and the Centre of Criminal Asset Confiscation (RUPBASAN). As a result, enhanced functions of RUPBASAN as part of the criminal justice system w ill be included in the latest version of the Blueprint. On 13 November the f inal draft of the Corrections Reform Blueprint w as presented to the Director General of Corrections, Senior Director General of DGC, Ibu Hesti, CDS and AIPJ2/TAF. It w as endorsed by the Ministry and Bappenas and agreed that it w ould be incorporated into the RPJMN. Corrections database system Centre for Detention Studies conducted a series of meetings to support SDP development including: i) on 9 August w ith the Directorate IT and Cooperation to improve the review of SDP and the implementation

11

Partnership Focus of work and activities undertaken

plan of the treatment assessment system for high risk inmates; and ii) on 27 August w ith SDP’s development team of the DGC to develop the guidelines based on the System Development Life Cycle. CDS also supported the development of the guidelines on planning, development and implementation of IT governance. The transition of management of SDP Modules from Bahtera to SDP Technical Unit (under DGC) is nearly completed. The SDP Modules have been handed over to DGC w hile TAF w ill only support the maintenance of the system. There are no further new modules or features to be developed in the SDP. ICJR finalised three chapters of the research and data collection plan for the study on social w ork as an alternative sentencing in order to reduce the overcrowding issue in prisons. High risk inmates In July PEKA obtained approval from the West Java Regional Off ice of Ministry of Law and Human Rights to conduct a study on the management of narcotic inmates in correction facilities A series of activities w ere conducted by CDS to f inalise the high risk inmates assessment tools based on inputs from Senior Parole Officers and testing the tools in Pasir Putih and Batu Prisons. On 25–26 October CDS conducted a Testing of the Assessment tools for Criminogenic factors of high risk prisoners in Gunung Sindur Prison. The piloting (24 men, six w omen) gathered inputs from Parole Officers and narcotic inmates on the instrument questions. On 28 November CDS conducted a w orkshop with 16 participants (12 men, four w omen) from the Inspectorate General of Ministry of Law and Human Rights and CSOs to develop indicators for the audit of High-Risk Prisons and to formulate mechanisms for effective monitoring.

Juvenile justice On 9 October LPA NTB held a FGD mapping on juvenile violence in Bima (17 men, 13 w omen). The discussion identif ied some of the root causes of juvenile violence (note link to PVE). During October LPA also assisted 12 juvenile delinquency cases to support the SPPA (Juvenile Justice System) as part of the implementation of restorative justice. On 21 December CDS conducted a w orkshop to develop Preparation Documents to Integrate Inmates Treatment Appraisement System (SPPN) for Child into the SDP. The w orkshop was attended by 27 participants (18 men, nine w omen) from SDP technical directorate, Correctional Counselling and Child Protection (BISPA). It w as concluded that there is an urgent need for the juvenile SPPN to be integrated into the SDP, including having a common understanding on the business processes and rules.

Disability inclusion In betw een June and December, TAF collaborated w ith AIPJ2 GEDSI team and their partners (SIGAB, CSD, and PUSHAM UII) to conduct a joint assessment study of disability in the prisons in tw o provinces (Lampung and DIY) w hich covered different type of correctional institutions (Detention Centre, Lapas, and Bapas) in those locations. The AIPJ2 Disability Advisor and GEDSI Manager have provided their advice and feedback to the design and methodology of the research, and provide recommendation to enrich the study w ith emphasis on assessing inclusion rather than just accessibility issues. A series of consultations and events w ere subsequently held in Yogyakarta, including through a regional w orkshop to share the f inding w ith broader audiences.

TAF supported the DGC in organising the International Seminar on the Treatment of Elderly Prisoners w hich was held in Jakarta on 16-19 October. AIPJ2 saw this as an opportunity to promote disability inclusion w ithin Indonesian and regional corrections systems. Through AIPJ2/TAF’s support the agenda w as broadened to also include disability issues in prisons and PUSHAM UII presented their preliminary f indings on disability accessibility in corrections facilities.

1.2.5 Pillar 5 – Partnership development

This section of the report focuses on partnership development activities aimed at developing implementing partner capacities.

GEDSI mainstreaming AIPJ2’s support for GEDSI is integrated into the work of other Pillars (in particular Pillars 1, 3 and 4), and is therefore reported under the relevant pillar.

Strategic communications AIPJ2 has continued to implement activities in line with its Communications Strategy. Influencing activities aimed at enhancing implementing partner capacities have included the following:

12

Pitching and writing workshop: A second training was conducted on 4–5 August 2018 in Jakarta and attended by 16 participants (seven male and nine female). Six representatives from Bappenas also participated in the workshop. The training was delivered by the Conversation and organised through Saraswati and AIPJ2 as part of knowledge hub/communications activities. Similar to the previous training, this second class also offered mentoring opportunities. All participants acknowledged the training as providing new knowledge (100 per cent). The pitching and writing workshops have generated eight articles published on The Conversation, and two articles published in The Jakarta Post, with pitching supported by AIPJ2. Two of the articles were produced by AIPJ2 partners on their own initiative (Suharto Alfathi from SIGAB and Nuresti Tristya from PSHK).

Story of change training and mentoring: Sixteen out of 23 participants have completed the mentoring process with Solidaritas and TEMPO. Several participants have also published their articles directly on their organisation’s website. A complete documentation of the story of change capacity building, from workshop, mentoring, to publication, is available here. This documentation will be used for the 2019 workshop.

Social media training: As part of K-Hub activities, AIPJ2 facilitated partners to apply to Catalyst, an initiative by Maverick. Catalyst offered the opportunity for 10 non-profit organisations to join a social media strategy program, from August until December. AIPJ2 facilitated nine partners to apply for the training and two were accepted, MaPPI and Peace Generation. Both MaPPI and Peace Generation completed the program in December 2018. MaPPI was named as the best participant in 2018 based on the outcome and results of their improved social media strategy. Both MaPPI and Peace Generation will share their learning experience in KHUB in early 2019.

Communications in PVE: Following a discovery exercise on 7–8 June 2018, AIPJ2 and the Department of Home Affairs (Australia) CVE Centre organised a strategic communications workshop in Sentul, 8-10 October 2018. There were 29 participants including directors from several organisations attending the last day. The workshop provided a general understanding of the importance of communication, how to develop key messages, how to identify target audiences and provided some theoretical guidelines for developing a strategic communication plan. The CVE Centre funded communications consultants, Love Frankie, to conduct the training. They are continuing with follow up support for partners using funding from the USAID Harmoni project.

In-depth reporting workshop for journalists on child marriage issues: Between 14-16 December 2018, AIPJ2 in collaboration with PPMN / JARING conducted a workshop on in-depth reporting on child marriage issues for 18 selected journalists. Following the workshop, AIPJ2 will support five selected journalists (based on proposal selection in early January 2019) to receive fellowship support and mentoring from PPMN / JARING. Each journalist will be required to publish their in-depth article in their media and share their findings in a public dialogue facilitated by AIPJ2 in March 2019. The Australian Consul General to Makassar and Bappenas will be invited to participate in a panel at the event.

Monitoring, evaluation and learning Quarterly reflections events: The quarterly reflections continue to help enhance participant learning, knowledge sharing and partnerships. 12 quarterly reflection events were run in September 2018, attended by 107 participants from 21 implementing partner organisations (63 men, 44 women). Feedback from implementing partners showed that 98 per cent of participants perceived the quarterly reflections event as useful to them individually (enhancing their understanding of the program) and 99 per cent perceived the quarterly reflection as benefiting their organisations in building capacity to implement such activities The most useful elements of the quarterly reflection meetings are seen to be: (i) providing an opportunity to learn and reflect; (ii) assessing progress towards key results; and (iii) reviewing changes in context. Partner organisations generally seem to appreciate the time and effort put in by AIPJ2 to support a structured face to face reflection on Activity implementation progress. The progressive move towards joint reflections involving multiple partners working on similar issues, also increasingly allows different organisations working on similar issues to share their experiences and collaborate more effectively. A further 12 quarterly reflections were conducted in December 2018 – January 2019 with 25 partners.

Organisational capacity assessment tool: During this reporting period, AIPJ2 finalised and started to administer an Organisational Capacity Assessment Tool with core implementing partners. The purpose of

13

the assessment tool is to: i) help core implementing partners review and reflect on their organisational capacities; ii) help AIPJ2 understand implementing partner organisational capacities and potential support needs; and iii) provide a basic baseline for both implementing partners and AIPJ2 against which to help them assess, as appropriate, any changes in organisational capacity over time.On 2 November AIPJ2 conducted a pre-test with three core partners (Wahid Foundation, YPP, and Rumah KitaB) to gather their inputs before conducting the assessment. The assessment was subsequently conducted jointly with each organisation at their respective offices. The discussions were very open and highlighted a range of issues for consideration which included: organisational performance and learning culture; communication and campaign strategies; staff capacity building in organisational and program management; popular writing versus academics writing; and disability and inclusive approaches. Detailed analysis and reporting on the assessment results will be provided in the first half of 2019, once all assessments have been completed.

Activity evaluation – SPAK Sulawesi Selatan: On 12 November AIPJ2 and Solidaritas presented the SPAK Case Study Review to KPK leadership (the KPK chairman, Bapak Agus Rahardjo; The KPK Vice Chairman, Laode Syarif, Ibu Basaria Panjaitan and Bapak Alex Marwata). This case study was conducted to understand the influence of SPAK movement in Desa Mallari village, and to obtain initial information related to changes that have occurred in the 9 other villages who participated in the training. Follow up actions were discussed and agreed. These will include sharing with KOMPAK team members, utilising the K Hub, given SPAK’s move to independence and the relevance of the findings for accountability in the use of village development funds. This evaluation indicated how MEL has shifted its focus over the cycle of AIPJ2 – with MEL partner Solidaritas moving from hands on facilitation, to mentoring to specialist evaluation work. In 2019, the AIPJ2 internal team will conduct a review of PVE activities, demonstrating self sufficiency now in MEL. Solidaritas will be asked to partner BAPPENAS in specific tasks, building team capacity while achieving key planning tasks for the GoI.

K-HUB A K-HUB co-design workshop was held on 10 September to promote, share and trial the knowledge sharing platform in Makassar. There were 16 participants (five men, 11 women) from AIPJ2 partners and the Child Marriage Prevention Coalition. Workshops were then conducted on 10–11 October with the IJRF and Anti-Corruption Communities. The workshops were conducted to demonstrate the knowledge sharing platform to the partners, explain the functions and features and discuss ways in which the platforms can support their collaboration. The workshops were facilitated by Saraswati.

K-HUB user experience workshop (24 August) was held to test the user (including disability) friendliness of K-HUB interface. There were 12 participants (two people with disability) from AIPJ2 staff and partners. The participants found the K-HUB platform to be well-organised, comprehensive, useful, and easy to use. Having a centralised platform to find new information from organisations is key to many of the participants.

A knowledge sharing session was conducted on 4 October in the K-Hub on Data Innovation. The presenter was Pulse Lab Jakarta who shared the work they have being conducting with the Government on data innovation and provided practical exercises to illustrate the various sources of big data digital footprints. There were 16 participants from Rumah KitaB, AIDA, Wahid Foundation, Wonder, ICJR, AMAN, CDS, Knowledge Sector Initiative, KIAT, AIPJ2 and the event was streamed in the AIPJ2 Makassar office.

A WGWC K-Hub content workshop was held on 9 November with WGWC partners. During the workshop the WGWC partners agreed on the institutional and programmatic background content to be uploaded onto the K-Hub.

Knowledge sharing offline (Cakap Kamisan): On 15 November AIPJ2 held a knowledge sharing session at K-Hub space on ‘Data Management and Visualisation’. The speaker was from Jakarta Legal Hacker. The knowledge sharing had 32 participants (11 men, 21 women) from AIPJ2 partners, Cardno projects, and AIPJ2 staff. The event was also streamed in the AIPJ2 Makassar office.

Management Information System (MIS)

MIS was launched in August with AIPJ2 staff and partners and Refresher trainings (http://mis.aipj.or.id) were then conducted with AIPJ2 CSO partners in Jakarta (9 November), Yogyakarta (21–22 November) and Makassar (29 November). During the training partners Activity Statements, Milestone Schedules and

14

Detailed Workplans were inputted into the MIS. The MIS is being trialled for the monthly dashboard reporting for January.

2 Assessment of Progress against AIPJ2 objectives

2.1 Overview AIPJ2’s broad goals are:

> Indonesian partner organisations are embedding transparency, accountability and anti-corruption reforms in process and practice

> Indonesian partner organisations are preventing and investigating transnational crime more effectively > Indonesian partner organisations are preventing violent extremism 3 > Police, courts and correctional services are collaborating to enforce rights and uphold the rule of law > Justice and legal services promote greater accessibility and enhance gender equality so that the rights to

justice services of women and people with disabilities are fulfilled and that they are included in, and benefit from, development. 4

Under AIPJ2’s theory of change, Indonesian partners work towards each of these broad goals by developing policies and implementation plans that are informed by evidence of sub-national practice, the rights of women and people with disabilities, inputs from CSOs, and / or international good practice. Improved GoI policies and implementation plans are thus the end of facility outcomes that AIPJ2 supports.

AIPJ2 contributes to these locally-led efforts by supporting the following intermediate outcomes.

> Knowledge: GoI and CSO partners have enhanced knowledge of problems and how to solve them based on evidence.

> Partnerships: GoI and CSO partners are working effectively together (partnerships, networks and coalitions) to develop improved policy and support its implementation.

> Institutional capacity development: GoI and CSO partners have enhanced institutional capacity (systems and skills) to support policy development and implementation.

> GEDSI: GoI and CSO partners have enhanced understanding of how to promote and protect the rights of women and people with disabilities.

The following sections therefore provide a description of AIPJ2’s contribution to new or improved policy development and implementation plans, including through supporting enhanced knowledge, partnerships, institutional capacities and / or understanding of GEDSI.

AIPJ2’s contribution to DFAT Performance Assessment Framework objectives is shown in annex 4, and the link between AIPJ2 and the Government of Indonesia’s RPJMN development objectives is shown in annex 5.

2.2 Pillar 1 – Transparency, Accountability and Anti-Corruption

2.2.1 Indonesian partner organisations are embedding transparency, accountability and anti-corruption reforms in process and practice

AIPJ2 is making a direct contribution to the development of the following improved GoI policies and / or implementation plans, through supporting knowledge generation, partnerships, institutional capacity and / or understanding of GEDSI:

3 Previously this w as expressed as ‘promoting tolerance and countering radicalisation’. There w as consensus that the outcome should be w orded more directly around prevention of violence. 4 While this w as originally designed as a separate Pillar 5 objective, it is now largely mainstreamed in to the w ork of other pillars

15

Governance mechanisms for legal and judicial reform Supreme Court organisational restructuring: As a result of work supported by LEIP and the JRTO, the following key reform priorities have been identified to improve SC institutional capacities, namely: i) the SC should be more decentralised; ii) the need to develop the SC as a knowledge organisation; iii) sharpening the role of the appeal court; iv) enhancing leadership; and v) developing IT based business processes. Landmark decision analysis by LEIP is also helping the SC understand how to improve its business processes. Five criminal cases and three civil case decisions have been selected for detailed case study analysis.

Regional (ASEAN) Joint Judicial Training Road Map: AIPJ2’s adviser in the Supreme Court has supported the design of the Indonesian part of the regional road map. The road map was endorsed through the Singapore Declaration in August 2018. The adviser will support implementation of the road map in 2019.

Restorative Justice Background Study: Members of the reform coalition, namely CDS, MaPPI, LeIP, and ICJR, have provided technical inputs to Bappenas which are being incorporated into the Restorative Justice Background Study. Inputs have included plans for building partnerships with relevant institutions, and development of the implementation plan and budget estimates. AIPJ2, Bappenas, Australian National University and Cardno also held the Community of Practice Workshop on ‘Implementation of Restorative Justice in Indonesia and Australia’. This workshop brought together a broad range of international and national stakeholders to share differing perspectives on restorative justice and these inputs are being used by Bappenas to further inform their concept paper. Follow up workshops on the application of restorative justice for specific cases – sexual violence, terrorism and drug offences – are planned for the first half of 2019.

Draft RANHAM 2020–2024: The Draft Human Rights Action Plan (RANHAM) 2020–2024 is being revised and finalised following coordinated inputs from the Joint Secretariat and AIPJ2’s Human Rights Adviser. AIPJ2 is providing an adviser to support both Bappenas and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights to improve the RANHAM and link it to other justice priorities. AIPJ2 is also engaging with the subnational government in South Sulawesi, through our provincial office, to improve performance substantively and in terms of reporting.

Simplification of judicial decision-making process and template: AIPJ2 support has included: (i) research to identify and analyse the problems and opportunity to simplify judicial decisions in the high and district court in four judicial branches; (ii) technical support/assistance to the Supreme Court working group to prepare, improve and simplify the decisions based on data, evidence and recommendations through a participatory process with relevant stakeholders; and (iii) developing training and socialisation material for using the new guidelines and templates for judicial decisions. The AIPJ2, MaPPI and LeIP meeting with the Vice Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court on 28 August resulted in the approval of the workplan for conducting the simplification of the format for decisions at the appeal and district court level.

Disability rights

Disability law implementing regulation on access to justice (RPP Peradilan). SIGAB continues to play a key role in the development of the RPP Peradilan, including helping to coordinate the inputs of other DPOs and CSOs. Specific issues raised during the past few months have been on the need to clarify the authority of judges and some of the procedural law, and the role and function of correctional facilities in ensuring access to justice for people with disabilities.

Disability law implementing regulation on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (RPP Perencanaan). At Bappenas’ request, AIPJ2 supported a Workshop on RPP Perencanaan development led by BAPPENAS in August 2018, at which the draft of the Indonesia’s Master Plan on Disability Inclusive Development (RIPID) was strengthened with inputs and feedback from DPOs, CSOs, and other development partners working on disability inclusion. The Master Plan is a key element of the RPP. The previous draft of the Master Plan was seen as being too specific and prescriptive and would not have been practical to implement by line Ministries and local government.

Master Plan on Disability Inclusive Development (Rencana Induk Pembangunan Inklusif Disabiltas - RIPID). Following up on the AIPJ2-BAPPENAS workshop (above), SIGAB (in collaboration with SAPDA and

16

YAKKUM) hosted a discussion on 6 September among Yogyakarta based DPOs which resulted in additional inputs to the Master Plan. The team of DPOs advised the section on law and politics should be expanded to also address sexual violence against women with disabilities and improving access to justice for all through a more inclusive judicial system. The team also supplemented the draft RIPID with a proposed action plan for implementation.

Disability law implementing regulation of Social Welfare (RPP Kesos) and on Habilitation and Rehabiliation (RPP HabRehab). SAPDA is continuing their assistance to the drafting of these two implementing regulations, both of which are the responsibility of MOSA. However, given that these two RPPs are less relevant to AIPJ2’s mandate, it has been decided by DFAT that support for these RPPs will no longer be supported through AIPJ2 but rather through the MAHKOTA program.

Disability rights indicators. On 12–13 November SIGAB participated in a workshop organised by OHANA. In the workshop DPOs reviewed the current 10 recommendations of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), defined the UPR indicators and identified the subsequent implementation steps. The results from the workshop will be included in the design of the planned AIPJ2 activity on disability rights indicators. It is expected that the indicators will be used as the basis for longitudinal research on disability rights implementation for monitoring the implementation of RIPID.

Inclusive courts initiative in Makassar. AIPJ2’s partnership with the Supreme Court, DPOs and CSOs to pilot inclusive courts was expanded to Makassar on 28 November through the kick off meeting with LBH Makassar and the Consortium (PPDI, HWDI, and KPI) on their Inclusive Courts Initiative in Makassar. The meeting was attended by a wide range of stakeholders in the region, including SIGAB, SAPDA, ICJ, and TAF, and local NGO/DPO partners e.g. PERDIKLBH APIK, and Dewi Keadilan. The courts chosen for the pilot, adding to the Gunung Kidul Court near Yogyakarta, are the General Court and Religious Court of Wonosari near Makassar. The Supreme Court has agreed to piloting in preparation for the Government introducing the regulation on justice for people with disabilities (see above). The pilot is supported by the AIPJ2 team in Makassar.

Justice for women and girls

National Plan of Action for Child Marriage Prevention (RAN-PPA) 2018–2022. AIPJ2 provided comments in relation to BAPPENAS’ draft National Plan of Action for Child Marriage Prevention 2018–2022. The initial comments related principally to Strategy 7 in the RAN-PPA: Improving evidence-based knowledge and information/data. The objective of RAN-PPA is to reduce child marriage rates, especially in areas with high prevalence of child marriage. To be able to measure whether this objective is achieved it is important to have as complete a data set as possible on the age of first marriage of girls and boys in Indonesia and whether they obtained a marriage certificate.

Sub-national Policy on Preventing Child Marriage. AIPJ2 partners have supported sub-national policy and practices that support gender and children rights. For example, PEKKA has contributed to supporting the development of PERDES (Head of Village Decree) on Child Marriage Prevention in Kabupaten Cipanas, West Java. ICJ has supported the provincial government of South Sulawesi in developing the road map for preventing child marriage in the province. ICJ is also played a role in strengthening CSO collaboration and coordination in South Sulawesi to jointly advocate on preventing child marriage and influence local policy making and improvement.

RPJMN 2020–2024. Rumah Kitab, at the invitation of BAPPENAS, has provided inputs into the development of the new RPJMN 2020–2024, including on the issue of preventing child marriage.

Supreme Court Training Centre curricula. Supreme Court Training Centre has decided that the Women in Contact with Law training materials will be incorporated into the Judges Candidate Training.

Justice for women and girls in Aceh. AIPJ2, Bappenas and DFAT visited Aceh to explore potential activities that AIPJ2 could strategically conduct in Aceh, including: i) the protection of women in restorative justice practices (mediation, restitution, diversion), particularly in cases of sexual violence where victims are regularly being blamed and re-victimised ii) supporting PEKKA legal clinics to raise awareness on the areas to negotiate in divorce settlements, including child maintenance, child custody, spousal maintenance and property decisions; and iii) conducting comparative research between the decision analysis at the general

17

court and Syariah court related to cases of women as victims of sexual violence. While AIPJ2 has a Statement of Commitment with the Government of Aceh, and demand from Aceh for further activities, BAPPENAS had not been adequately engaged in discussions. This visit demonstrated a joint approach to engaging with Aceh on justice for women and girls, which is more likely to result in policy change.

Corruption prevention National Strategy for Corruption Prevention (Stranas PK). Following a series of discussions and advocacy by CSOs including TII, the President of Indonesia released Presidential Decree No.54 of 2018 on National Strategy for Corruption Prevention. This policy serves to revise and strengthen the previous Presidential Decree No. 55 of 2012 on National Strategy for Corruption Prevention and Eradication. The latest Presidential Decree is more focused on corruption prevention in the government of Indonesia’s priority sectors, namely: (i) permits and procurement, (ii) state budget, and (iii) law enforcement and bureaucracy reform. Natural resource protection was also a key priority.

National Action Plan for Corruption prevention: In September, TII supported the KPK and the national team by submitting inputs from CSO representatives regarding the draft of National Action Plan for Corruption prevention and conducted a CSOs workshop in 14 November to develop monitoring tools to monitor implementation.

SPAK Sustainability. Increasingly SPAK events and trainings are being directly funded by ministries with limited financial support from AIPJ2. SPAK is now collaborating with Ministry of Education and Culture, Ministry of Religious Affairs, and Ministry of Transportation. Subnational governments are funding SPAK trainings. AIPJ2 is providing strategic and organisational planning advice to the SPAK team as they transition and establish themselves as an independent entity. AIPJ2 also supported the SPAK Perkumpulan (‘Social enterprise’) in establishing independent legal and banking arrangements. SPAK Perkumpulan now has an independent Board, management team and bank account and is starting to fund its own activities. AIPJ2 will stop funding SPAK activities directly on 31 January and develop a grant agreement as one of a number of donors. AIPJ2 will shift its focus to supporting the National Corruption Prevention Strategy, which includes SPAK, so there will be continued engagement at the leadership level by AIPJ2 and KPK with SPAK Perkumpulan, as well as AIPJ2 being a donor. This is consistent with AIPJ2’s role with many other CSO partners and reflects the legacy of SPAK as being generated from KPK and AIPJ2’s partnership.

Guideline for Money Laundering Case Management in the Capital Market. Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan (Center for Law and Policy Study / PSHK) and Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (Commission for Corruption Eradication / KPK) launched the Guideline in December 2018. The Guideline has been developed with substantive technical inputs from AIPJ2 supported stakeholders, including PSHK, Australian Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) and the Department of Home Affairs. The Guideline incorporates international best practice while also taking in to account Indonesian institutional structures and capacities.

E-Courts and Small Claims Court Supreme Court decree (PERMA) No. 3 of 2018 on Electronic Court Case Administration was issued in March 2018. The JRTO have continued to support the Indonesian Supreme Court to prepare and launch the e-court system, as part of their support to the court leadership on promoting transparency, accountability, and anti-corruption efforts in the Indonesian justice system. The e-court is an initiative to reduce the possibility of corruption within court administration and by officials, as indicated in the studies and surveys. The Supreme Court has allocated IDR 175 billion (AU$17.5 million) to support e-court infrastructure in the 2019 budget. The Supreme Court is aiming to use e-court administration for all courts nationally by 31 July 2019.

Revised PERMA for Small Claims Courts. PSHK has completed the PERMA SCC evaluation and PSHK and AIPJ2 have presented the results to the Supreme Court Ease of Doing Business Working Group, who are well advanced in drafting revisions to the PERMA, with AIPJ2 support.

18

2.3 Pillar 2 – Transnational Crime and Security Strengthening

2.3.1 Indonesian partner organisations are preventing and investigating transnational crime more effectively

Through its financial support to Government of Australia (GOA) implementing partners, AIPJ2 is making a contribution to the development of the following improved GoI policies, implementation plans, and / or institutional capacities (including knowledge, partnerships, and / or systems development).

2.3.2 Australian Border Force report

Over the past six months of the Strong Borders program there was a continued focus on frontline operations with DGCE and DGI. Frontline officer training has continued, but courses have been reoriented away from technology based training, moving to soft skills such as questioning, deception detection and real time risk assessment. The need to develop in house capability for partners to create self-sustainable training models has not changed. Sustainable training capacity requires continued engagement, interaction and calibrated capacity building. Outcomes we have directly contributed to include:

Application of new knowledge and skills. Partner agencies continue to provide feedback that the training techniques are relevant and valuable to day-to-day operations and are being implemented by those frontline participants who have received the training. This has been witnessed first-hand by Australian officers during subsequent training visits.

Inter-agency cooperation. There has been a deliberate shift from single agency focused frontline training to multiagency courses where components of the training touch on more than one agency’s priorities. This is aimed at driving greater cooperation and collaboration between border authorities.

Detections of prohibited goods currency and revenue based goods such as tobacco continues to feature prominently in local news reporting.

We have seen improvements in the DGCE canine program including changes to dog kenneling and welfare that are directly related to the study visit which occurred in Melbourne in November 2017.

2.3.3 Department of Home Affairs (Transport Security) report

Activities aim to increase Indonesian regulatory and operational capacity to prevent and investigate transnational crime more effectively by improving knowledge, partnerships, systems and skills for both the regulator (DGCA / DGST) and airport and seaport operators (AP1 / AP2 / Pelindo).

Aviation Security Foundations. This training provided participants with relevant knowledge on global aviation security threats and the information on how to implement and improve systems and skills at an operational and regulatory level to mitigate those threats.

Advanced Technology Implementation. The project has resulted in revisions to existing regulations and a more collaborative approach between DGCA and airport operators. Following the conduct of training at multiple gateways airports in Indonesia, stakeholders have agreed on national consistent SOPs and DGCA are now developing new technical specifications for the implementation and use of the new equipment. Airports have also redesigned screening point operations to incorporate the new technology based on outcomes of the training and by using the new equipment, are meeting international aviation security standards. This training was also designed in preparation of new International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) requirements for the conduct of ETD screening of passenger and cabin baggage from November 2018 to address evolving threats in the aviation sector.

Aviation Security Regulatory Enhancement (Managing Insider Threat). A key outcome of the project is proposed changes to regulations regarding airport identification systems and issuance of airport passes. In early 2019, DGCA will transfer responsibility of the management and issuance of airport ID’s to AP1 and AP2 at all international airports managed by Angkasa Pura.

19

DGCA & DGST Governance and Capability Enhancement. This project provided senior DGCA and DGST officials with the opportunity to meet and exchange ideas with their equivalent officials in Australia. The week long knowledge exchange framework provided an opportunity for DGCA officials to detail the aviation security regulatory framework in Indonesia and identify issues or complications that were difficult for DGCA to adequately address.

Maritime Ship and Port Facility Security Cooperation. This project and the publication of the maritime security report will result in long-term sustainability – once additional work is conducted that starts implementing the findings of the report. The decision to brand the report as a joint Australian-Indonesian report should elicit high-level DGST support for the program of recommended reforms and changes. Through the Australia-Indonesia Transport Security Cooperation Program future activities will start to address specific recommendations systematically from both a regulatory and operational perspective.

2.3.4 Department of Home Affairs (Legal) report

Enhanced knowledge, partnerships and institutional capacity to tackle money laundering in capital markets. In addition to the final practical resource (the Guideline), the process of developing the Guideline also had the effect of improving awareness among participating Indonesian practitioners, regulators and private industry representatives of Indonesia’s capital market money laundering vulnerabilities and legal frameworks. That development process – including the recent desktop exercise and training workshop - provided a series of forums for stakeholders to work towards a shared understanding of the issues and possible solutions for better handling of these cases, e.g. operation of the laws, and gaps or overlapping areas of regulatory or investigative responsibility. The capital markets learnings also feed into KPK’s ongoing reform projects on criminal asset recovery and management.

Counter terrorism capacities. Beyond technical skills and knowledge development, the CT workshops in the Indonesian Prosecutor General’s Office have supported the new Directorate in shaping and implementing its policy strategy for handling an increased number of CT prosecutions involving new offences and more complex evidentiary issues. The Directorate currently has 25 prosecutors to handle over 300 of these complex cases, who are required in court almost daily. The program has contributed to solving this problem by supporting preparations to run prosecution of CT cases in the provinces. The CT workshops have also contributed to more productive working relationships between the Directorate and the Prosecutor General’s provincial prosecutors, and other government partners (LPSK, BNPT, PPATK).

Enhanced Understanding of how to promote and protect the rights of women and PWDs. Through the inclusion of entities like the Witness and Victim Protection agency, UNODC and International Organisation for Migration our programming has promoted international best practice in the protection of the rights of women. Home Affairs has collected sex-disaggregated data wherever possible and actively engaged with, and supported professional development opportunities for, Indonesian women who are law, justice and security officials.

2.3.5 AUSTRAC report

Enhanced knowledge, skills and institutional capacities. Led by the AUSTRAC mentor analyst, the Indonesian participants were provided with capacity building through the sharing of technique and methods of detecting suspect money flows, demonstration of systems and effective engagement strategies deployed by AUSTRAC with partner agencies. The exchanges also develop relations at the critical operational staff level. These relationships will have long lasting positive impacts to operations involving Australian and Indonesian agencies. By having the analysts work on active law enforcement investigations also means that the intelligence product developed at the end of each exchange is of immediate relevance and use to law enforcement and therefore must be of a high standard.

Gender. PPATK has an enhanced understanding for the promotion and protection of the rights of women and people with disabilities through exposure to the Australian public service workspace in AUSTRAC’s. PPATK themselves are also involved in Anti-Money Laundering socialisation campaigns that include educating women on identifying the crime type to prevent them from being unwittingly exploited. It should be noted that of the eight PPATK and AUSTRAC participating analysts in the last exchange, four were women.

20

2.3.6 Australian Federal Police report

Knowledge gained and enhanced institutional capacities to tackle Terrorism and Organised Crime. Learning opportunities provided through the CT and Organised crime activities have provided the individuals involved with additional knowledge and skills relevant to their work responsibilities. The International Cybercrime Investigations Workshop provided participants with knowledge of the underlying issues related to cybercrime and cyber security and the threat this poses to the economic and security stability of Indonesia and wider Asia-Pacific region. Participants have been provided with tools/equipment to enable them to investigate cybercrime and transnational child sexual exploitation, conduct analysis of electronic devices and retrieve evidential material for potential prosecutions.

Partnerships. All activities have helped to promote and enhance partnerships, either between Indonesian agencies and /or between Indonesian agencies and those of regional neighbours (including Australia). For example: (i) the Women in Leadership conference is a networking and leadership development forum which provided the INP officer with the opportunity to develop relationship with women in policing from Australia, New Zealand and Pacific nations; (ii) the regional social media working group meetings enable participants to obtain a regional perspective, enhance skills sharing and develop best practices furthering the expertise of all the countries present; and (iii) the International Cybercrime Investigations Workshop continues to strengthen the partnership between AFP, Indonesian and the wider Asia-Pacific regional partners with the exchange of ideas, skills and threats/vulnerabilities within the cyber environment

GEDSI Mainstreaming. The Women in Leadership Conference directly focuses on promoting and protecting the rights of women and the focus on investigations involving family members, particularly women and children is demonstrating increased application of a gender perspective in police cooperation. The AFP actively promotes the equal participation of men and women in all supported activities and places emphasis in training on crimes where women and children are particularly vulnerable (e.g. people smuggling, human trafficking, and child sexual exploitation).

2.4 Pillar 3 – Preventing Violent Extremism

2.4.1 Indonesian partner organisations are preventing violent extremism

AIPJ2’s Strategy for PVE work identifies three different types of intervention and target groups that AIPJ2 can support, namely: (i) direct action related to disengagement – working with prisoners and returning foreign fighters and countering hate speech, (ii) influencing action working with and through schools and universities; and (iii) prevention campaigns and programs focused on families and social cohesion.5 In addition AIPJ2 works at the broader national policy level to advocate changes in PVE regulations and increase coordination across prevention activities.

Improvements in GOI policies and/or implementation plans being supported by AIPJ2 are summarised below. Strengthened partnerships (coalitions for reform) are also highlighted as appropriate.

2.4.2 Policy Advocacy and Coordination (C-SAVE, Wahid, WGWC)

Counter Terrorism Law No.5/2018. C-SAVE and the CSO coalition have mapped out six articles of the CT Law No.5/2018 that potentially violate human rights: Article 1 about the definition; Article 6 about the sanction which includes the death penalty as the alternative sentencing; Article 25 paragraph 2-6 about the detention days for perpetrators being up to 290 days which is longer than the Civil Criminal Code (170 days); Article 31 about tapping; Article 43C Paragraph 1 about counter-radicalisation; and Article 43I about the role of the military. As a result, C-SAVE and the CSO coalition are advocating for changes to the CT Law. They are also seeking to increase public awareness on CT by distributing soft copies of the law to partners and preparing IEC materials.

National Strategy for CVE campaign. Wahid Foundation as part of their National Strategy for CVE Campaign conducted public consultations with CSOs, developed an infographics to illustrate the National

5 Ew ers, Craig. AIPJ2 Strategy for Subnational PVE w ork. 14 September 2018.

21

Action Plan for Combating Violent Extremism, and provided expert advice to BAPPENAS for incorporating PVE issues into the RPJMN 2020–2015. Wahid Foundation also conducted expert discussion on the Preparation of a Brief Policy on the National Strategy and a public consultation on the National Action Plan for Combating Violent Extremism with various representatives of women organisations, regional organisations from East Java, Central Java and West Java.

Policy paper on the National Strategy for Strengthening Value and Practices of Tolerance in Indonesia. On 25 September Wahid Foundation presented this policy paper to the Assistant Deputy for Social Conflict Coordination of the Coordinating Ministry of Human Development and Culture. The Coordinating Ministry subsequently have invited Wahid Foundation to discuss the policy paper at the inter-ministerial discussion.

National Action Plan on Preventing Violent Extremism. In August, Wahid Foundation completed a policy brief on strategies for strengthening tolerant values and practices in Indonesia. This initiative is expected to be the main reference in countering hate speech and political violence and form part of the National Action Plan. Wahid Foundation has sent the document to Bappenas and also to the Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Culture as part of their contribution to the National Action Plan that has recently been discussed in high-level Government of Indonesia ministry meetings. Wahid Foundation also contributes to the National Action Plan by representing other CSOs and delivering their input to BNPT (National Body for Countering Terrorism).

National Action Plan for the Protection and Empowerment of Women and Children in Social Conflict. At the invitation of the Ministry of Women Empowerment and Child Protection, WGWC members provided input to the National Action Plan on issues of PVE and Gender Mainstreaming. Through discussions with the KPPPA, WGWC have become aware that President Jokowi has instructed all ministries to develop programs related to preventing / countering violent extremism (P/CVE). The ministry will need the support of WGWC members to obtain feedback from CSOs. In a high-level coordination meeting involving 36 ministries, each ministry will present their proposed programs to the president. As a result of the support from WGWC, the ministry team are confident they will take a leading role when presenting their key PVE program for integration into the National Action Plan. WGWC, through AMAN, also continue to support the Government of Indonesia (KPPPA) to develop a Provincial Action Plan (RAD) on Women and Child Protection in Social Conflict in 17 provinces.

2.4.3 Direct Action Related to Disengagement - Prisoners and returning foreign fighters and countering hate speech (C-SAVE, YPP, AIDA)

Community Based Corrections (CBC) concept. The CBC concept has been drafted by YPP and presented to the Directorate General Corrections (DGC). The CBC concept is particularly relevant to helping re-integrate ex-terrorist inmates, deportees, and returnees since one of the gaps in deportee management is the lack of local support and monitoring systems. Indonesian deportees released from social welfare institutions return to their hometown without proper social integration. The CBC concept also aligns with Integrated Justice System Reform and Restorative Justice approaches that aim to reduce overcrowding in prisons. YPP is aiming to strengthen DGC in two areas: BAPAS (the structure in DGC that conducts social client services shortly before inmates are released from corrections) and PK (parole officers).

Rehabilitation and Reintegration SOPs for deportees and returnees and development of a new Presidential Decree. Building on the work already undertaken to develop SOPs for deportee and returnee management, C-SAVE has supported the Ministry of Social Affairs PSMP (Social Welfare unit) leadership to ensure the SOP is still being implemented. C-SAVE has also helped draft an academic document on Rehabilitation and Reintegration as part of its advocacy within the Ministry of Social Affairs and among other stakeholders for a new Presidential decree on Rehabilitation and Reintegration of deportees and returnees. There is a need for a Presidential decree in order to help ensure integrated action across multiple agencies and ministries.

Victims’ rights to compensation. In addition to supporting the Indonesian Ministry of National Education to prevent violent extremism at the sub national level through school training and interactive dialogue at the school level, AIDA is working with the Ministry of Social Affairs to strengthen victims’ rights to compensation in line with the provisions of the Counter Terrorism Law No.5 of 2018.

22

Rehabilitation and social reintegration module of the Ministry of Social Affairs. C-SAVE held a meeting with the General Director of Social Rehabilitation of the Ministry of Social Affairs, which resulted in agreement to develop a rehabilitation and social reintegration module for children and adults who are exposed to radical terrorist groups. Countering hate speech has been a challenge for partners and a number of initiatives have not been continued. There is a reluctance among partners to identify and confront hate speech, and this has increased as Indonesia’s election campaign intensifies and mobilises religious identity. Language used in PVE such as ‘hate speech’, ‘extremism’, ‘radicalisation’, even ‘intolerance’, is adopting new political meanings and associated as either pro or anti-Government. This is discouraging conversations about PVE and shackling PVE activists in a way that their extremist adversaries do not have to experience, as they are free to use language as they wish (some of which could be defined as ‘hate speech’). Mass religious organisations, Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama, have sophisticated social media and communications units. They are more active in monitoring sermons and have intervened to discontinue certain imams who were seen as supporting extremist messaging, including hate speech. It is clear to us now that individual partners would prefer to leave the countering of hate speech to these religious authorities.

2.4.4 Influencing Action working with Universities and Schools (KIJ, WF, Solo Bersimfoni, AIDA)

Policy brief on preventing violent extremism at the school level. KIJ is supporting the Indonesian Ministry of National Education to develop school based programs that help prevent violent extremism at the sub national level through building an environment that facilitates the prevention of violent extremism at the school level. The current program involves conducting school training for teachers, school committees, and students, in Klaten district, Central Java. The results of the program will be documented in a policy brief that will be submitted to the Ministry of Education at the national level.

Semarang District Ministry of Education Decree on Islamic Student (ROHIS) forum. Wahid Foundation contributed to the preparation of this decree based on results of the WF national survey on Rohis perception of extremism conducted in 2017/18. Articles on the survey results are referenced in the footnote below. 6

Solo District Ministry of Education anti-bullying and anti-persecution programs in schools. Solo Bersimfoni is supporting the Ministry of Education at district level to promote 10 local values (Hasta Laku) as the principles for preventing violent extremism at the school level. The Local Government (Kesbangpol / unit of politics and state) is also now using Solo Bersimfon’s training modules on Hasta Laku as a formal module for their training programs aimed at preventing violent extremism in Solo city.

Ministry of Education programs to prevent violent extremism in schools. AIDA is supporting the Indonesian Ministry of Education to prevent violent extremism at the sub national level through interactive dialogue and training at the school level. The intervention aims to reduce the risk of youth recruitment into ISIS-affiliated and other violent extremist groups. AIDA has delivered training for five schools in Serang district, Banten Province, based on the result of a geo-mapping study. Two hundred and fifty students have been involved in the AIDA program during this reporting period, plus 20 victims and three former terrorists have been involved in AIDA reconciliation activities. It is too early to report changes in attitudes as a result of the activities.

2.4.5 Prevention campaigns and programs focused on families and social cohesion (SB, Peace Generation).

Coalition to support Hasta Laku in Solo District. As well as working in schools, Solo Bersimfoni is also promoting Hasta Laku (10 Local Javanese values which emphasise tolerant acts) at the community level. Solo Bersimfon have helped establish a coalition of actors to promote Hasta Laku, consisting of academics, private sector, red cross, local artists, and community leaders – all of whom have significant influence at the community level. A group of volunteers called Sahabat Simphony has also been established which will engage with other community groups and spread the positive values of Hasta Laku at family and community level.

6 http://www.beritasatu.com/aktualitas/414934-survei-wahid-foundation-86-aktivis-rohis-ingin-berjihad-ke-suriah.html

23

Coalition to support peace and social cohesion in Jember and Poso Districts. This coalition consists of three organisations: Peace Generation (Bandung), Tanoker (Jember), and Mosintuwu (Poso). The Tanoker movement is involved in cultural advocacy to the public and local government, and is promoting the concept of peaceful tourism in Jember District, which has been well accepted by local government at village, sub district, district and province levels. Mosintuwu promotes 11 local Poso values, emphasising tolerant acts, which aims to build social cohesion in Poso. Peace Generation supports the activities of both Tanoker and Msintuwu, helping to develop modules based on their local values and context.

2.5 Pillar 4 – Corrections Reform

2.5.1 Police, courts and correctional services are collaborating to enforce rights and uphold the rule of law

Improvements in GOI policies and/or implementation plans being supported by AIPJ2 are summarised below.

Corrections Reform Blueprint: During this reporting period, the final draft of the revised blueprint for corrections reform is finally ready for Ministerial submission following approval from Director General of Corrections and the Secretary of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The blueprint also has undergone consultation process with Bappenas to ensure its consistency and relevancy with Government of Indonesia’s priority as stipulated under 2010–2019 National Mid-Term Development Plan (RPJMN) as well as helping to shape the content of background study for the new RPJMN 2020–2024 on issues related to overcrowding and criminal justice system. It is expected that the blueprint will be officially released under a Minister of Law and Human Rights decree in the first quarter of 2019. AIPJ2 through our partner CDS has successfully facilitate the development process of the blueprint and discussion with relevant government counterpart as well as CSOs to ensure common interest are well accommodated and included in this blueprint.

Implementation of the Corrections Database System (SDP): The SDP continues to enable DGC to provide better services to inmates and helps ensure their rights are upheld. By end of December 2018, SDP has contributed in the saving of more than Rp. 4 billion (AU$400,000) of state budget by assisting DGC to accelerate the process of remission, leave prior to release (CMB), and parole. During this reporting period, AIPJ2 also started to completely hand over the development of SDP modules to DGC officials. With CDS support, AIPJ2 has finalised the development of SOP for SDP modules development to help SDP held desk and relevant Directorates within DGC in developing SDP modules. DGC’s SDP help desk now can manage and design SDP modules with minimum supervision from our consultant.

Juvenile Justice System reforms: CDS has supported the DGC to develop and enact a Director’s decree on the treatment of children in corrections. CDS finalised the Child Assessment Tool for child intervention programs in juvenile correction facilities. The intention is to disseminate and use the instrument nationwide following further testing. In November, LPA NTB conducted training for 10 (five men, five women) Pesantren school managers, teachers and caregivers on using the Child Assessment Tool and the socio-psychology instrument developed by LPA NTB. LPA NTB also conducted training with 25 Parole Officers (19 men, six women) in NTB. This included providing a better understanding of the strategic and effective roles of Parole Offices in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and improving skills in data collection and in developing high quality analytical reports.

Offender assessment tools: Through CDS, AIPJ2 has completed the development of a behavior assessment checklist for high risk inmates. The checklist has been submitted to receive formal endorsement from the DG to become the official standard checklist to monitor the behavior of high-risk inmate. PEKA has helped DGC to develop a standard questionnaire to help assess whether drug related in-mates are users or distributors/dealers. The tool will help influence how corrections institutions select appropriate interventions to help rehabilitate offenders. PEKA has also developed a plan to conduct a study on the management of narcotic inmates in correction facilities with the West Java Regional Office of Ministry of Law and Human Rights. The Regional Office has granted support for the study.

Restorative Justice and Alternative Sentencing policies: ICJR finalised three chapters of the research and data collection plan for the study on social work as an alternative sentencing option in order to reduce

24

the overcrowding issue in prisons. The preliminary findings identified that BAPAS could be given more role in monitoring alternative sentencing as proposed in the draft KUHP. LBH Makassar conducted a public discussion (19 men, 28 women, one PWD) on the implementation of restorative justice for particular crimes to reduce overcrowding in prisons. It was agreed to develop a Restorative Justice Forum as a coordination platform to discuss and share knowledge on restorative justice practices. LPA NTB initial pilots have found that pesantren schools are well suited to perform the role as rehabilitation centres for juveniles during diversion or reintegration programs. LPA NTB are progressively collecting secondary data for profiling of juveniles as well as assisting the management of juvenile cases (recently they assisted 52 cases in NTB).

Disability in the corrections system: PUSHAM UII has completed the study on the disability in corrections. The study found high numbers of people with disabilities in prisons but a lack of appropriate disability sensitive policies or programs. However, a range of good practices and attitudes were identified which potentially could be scaled. Key recommendations from the workshop included: i) a disability assessment is required from the very beginning of the legal process; ii) there is an urgent need to develop a service unit for inmates with disabilities; iii) there is a need to review the seven business process steps within prisons through a disability inclusion lens. The study also identified that there is already demand from DGC to further understand disability inclusion concepts and how this can be implemented in the corrections centres. In October, a follow up meeting was conducted between PUSHAM UII, AIPJ2/TAF, and the Regional Office of Law and Human Rights of Yogyakarta and commitment was made to continue the study and seek to advocate the findings at the national policy level.

3 Summary of implementation challenges

Three primary implementation challenges are now being worked through.

3.1 Sustainability – building independence AIPJ2 and previous phases of cooperation have ‘triggered’ reform by directly funding7 activities, until the desired changes in policy and / or practice have become accepted and embedded within Indonesian partner institutions. As changes reach this point and the partnership matures, partners take the lead in continuing to implement the reforms, including through commitment of funding from government budgets and CSO and DPO partners mobilisation of funds from sources other than AIPJ2. For example, the SPAK movement, which was started with DFAT investments through AIPJ, is now drawing on other funds, and is in transition to its own independent administration, the social enterprise, SPAK Perkumpulan. AIPJ2 will stop funding activities directly on 31 January 2019.

The model of ‘core funding’ of CSO and DPO partners is less relevant now in AIPJ2 than it was in the AIPJ. Organisational strengthening has worked to the point where most partners can now plan their priorities, organise their teams and source funds for both activities and overheads. Our team feels that is time for AIPJ2 to step back from an active role in the organisational development of some of our longer term partners. This transition has started and will be gradual over 2019. Conversations with Yogyakarta DPO partners, SIGAB and SAPDA, have started and core funding for organisational development will be phased out in the next grant agreement. AIPJ2 will continue to be a partner in expanding disability inclusive justice policy, but will encourage SIGAB and SAPDA’s independence to choose their own development priorities and partners, and AIPJ2 will choose other partners if they are more relevant to activities and provide access to influential networks.

PVE partners are also attracting funds from multiple sources, including GoI. AIPJ2 will encourage them to build overhead costs into their grants, including funds for organisational development, so they can ensure they are ready to absorb more activity and more funding, without risk of fraud. Recent key recruitments by

7 Sustainability does not necessarily mean independence from donor funding. CSOs rely on donor funding as a source of income. Income generation through craft or education w ill supplement CSO income, but donors w ill continue to provide grants for activities which serve their interest. Sustainability can be more accurately described in terms of more independent priority setting from CSOs so that donors do not overly dominate the focus of CSOs w ork.

25

PVE partners, for example Wahid Foundation, have demonstrated their commitment to strengthening their management.

With greater independence, there will be less access to these partners for public diplomacy. However, there will be opportunities to communicate the transition positively, and partners will continue to be appreciative of the ongoing support and relationships they have formed with GoI and GoA, through AIPJ2. Partners, like SPAK Perkumpulan, also see the value in DFAT’s attendance at various events in the field, in encouraging commitment from GoI and local leaders.

To assist with this transition AIPJ2 has introduced the organisational capacity assessment tool with core partners. This tool is designed to provide AIPJ2 partners a structured framework to reflect on their organisational capacities, identify areas of strength and where further support and development is required. The tool covers MEL, GEDSI, communication, operational and management aspects and the process is facilitated by the AIPJ2 team who act as the critical friend to assist partners in their internal reflection.

3.2 Communication and coordination with GoI and GoA The postponement of the Partnership Board from November to December demonstrated the challenges in communicating and coordinating AIPJ2’s work across multiple Bappenas Directorates and multiple GoI partners. AIPJ2 has a complex and diverse mix of activities, which involve sensitive government to government communication, as well as development planning and project management. AIPJ2 is referred to as a model partnership by GoI partners but that raises expectations in terms of engagement. The challenge in 2019 is to improve the way AIPJ2 engages through the following mechanisms:

Finalisation of design and implementation of the coordination Platform for Bappenas as part of the K Hub project: this will enable Bappenas, GOI and CSO partners to track and report on development cooperation in the justice and security sectors. The platform will improve coordination and communication across all development programs in the sector, not just AIPJ2. The design and development process started slowly but is moving along well now with engagement from Bappenas and support from AIPJ2 consultants.

Meetings and regular communication with Bappenas Directors: in every case so far, communication issues have been resolved by intensive discussions with Bappenas Directors which enable them to deepen their understanding of activities and issues. All technical staff in AIPJ2 are now capable of holding these discussions and have direct access to Bappenas Directors. AIPJ2 also has a consultant engaged part time in Bappenas to support communication. DFAT and the Team Leader become involved as necessary and in order to confirm agreed policy direction. There is regular WhatsApp contact with all relevant Bappenas Directors and their support teams but we have agreed that this needs to expand so that Bappenas are included in the round of Quarterly Reflections facilitated by AIPJ2. As well as being invited to partner reflections, as appropriate, Bappenas will be invited to a summary quarterly reflection to present and discuss key findings from partner reflections.

Convening discussions which involve GoI partners and Bappenas: at the Partnership Board, it was clear that there were some differences between GoI partners which may need to be resolved in a separate forum. Some Board members were not comfortable having internal Government disputes played out in front of AIPJ2 and DFAT. A key area where AIPJ2 may need to create space for internal Government discussions is preventing violent extremism, where there was debate over priority areas for subnational prevention activities. This is linked to the Joint Secretariat which is still subject to consideration between Bappenas and BNPT. Although strictly internal issues, disputes reflect on AIPJ2 management, who are expected to anticipate them and ensure they are resolved in advance of Board meetings.

Under Pillar 2, AIPJ2 is now working with five Government of Australia agencies with single and multi-year Agreements in place. Pillar 2 activities are still predominately being managed separately as a stand-alone pillar. Concerns were also raised during the discussions around the Partnership Board about the lack of understanding on the work being conducted in Pillar 2, and meetings with the relevant Director in Bappenas are being scheduled to resolve this.

Opportunities are however being realised to try to link the Pillar 2 activities with wider AIPJ2 work, such as the work on Money Laundering Case Management in the Capital Market with KPK, Pillar 1 team and the Department of Home Affairs. In 2019, the AIPJ2 team also plans to seek further ways to improve the

26

collaboration and integration of Pillar 2 activities with wider AIPJ2 work. A MEL planning workshop is scheduled to be delivered by AIPJ2 Senior MEL Adviser with Pillar 2 partners and it is anticipated that the launch of the K-HUB will promote stronger collaboration between the communities.

3.3 Implementation of the K- Hub project The internal AIPJ2 MIS has been established and is now being progressively used by partners and the AIPJ2 team. The knowledge sharing platform is progressing but has been challenging because of the abstract nature of many of the concepts and its reliance on ‘co-design’ with partners. Co-design normally relies on previous expertise in any area, but knowledge management is new to partners, so the process requires sequential learning as part of the design. Learning about design was also critical. The platform is also unusual in that it is a community asset, owned by all but managed by one of the community members. Building the platform has required technology skills and political skills to bring ideas together and ensure partner support. The platform is now reaching a point where clear communities have been established with leaders who will manage content and access for the communities. The communities now have clear authority:

> justice reform: managed by LeIP and including all IJRF members, plus any other contributors (eg from Australian and Indonesian universities)

> anti-corruption: managed by SPAK Perkumpulan to serve SPAK and link with other information on KPK, ICW and TII sites

> PVE: managed by WGWC, but including all PVE partners and linking to international hubs which provide PVE content

> law and security: managed by AIPJ2 on behalf of the Indonesian Co-ordinating Ministry for Police, Law and Security and the Australian Ministry of Home Affairs, capturing bilateral agreements, guides for transnational crime investigation and extraditions, relevant laws and information about joint events, including updates on agreed actions. This community has been approved by both Ministers at a bilateral meeting in 2018.

AIPJ2 has recruited a Knowledge Management Adviser, Jordan Newton, to support this work and are currently reviewing the team composition to ensure there is the right skills to implement this stage of the project. This will result in some changes of duties and potential recruitment or replacement. The Communications Manager is now taking a far more active role in day to day K Hub events, expanding networks to include journalists, and gathering high quality, high reach content, as are technical managers in each pillar.

A copy of AIPJ2’s risk register (as at 1 February 2019) is provided at annex 6.

4 Changes in Political Economy

4.1 Context The AIPJ2 team reviewed the operating context at a workshop on 8 January and identified the following changes in the political economy relevant to AIPJ2.

4.1.1 Indonesian context

Forthcoming National Election in Indonesia – April 2019.

This has the potential to: (i) delay policy making and decisions, especially in relation to PVE and disability rights work that AIPJ2 is supporting; (ii) risk AIPJ2’s reputation of being un-biased and non-political, if CSO partners and / or AIPJ2 team members or consultants are involved in party politics; and (iii) cause social disruption in some areas if hoax news or provocative campaign tactics provoke intimidation or violence.

27

AIPJ2 response: Strengthen coalitions and increase knowledge sharing within coalition to sharpen advocacy. Cash flows may have to be adjusted if activities are delayed. Reinforce AIPJ2 neutrality in terms of political parties, while continuing to advocate on issues, as authorised by the Board. Encourage partners to take Wahid’s lead and restructure to separate political from program activities. Continue civic education initiatives of partners around critical thinking and digital literacy, especially in Solo which has been identified as a political ‘battleground’. Social media and communication guidelines have already been issued. Specific guidance to be issues to staff and consultants indicating that if they become official voices of parties then they have to step aside from AIPJ2 until after the election. This does not restrict political rights. Staff are encouraged to participate as citizens and respect the right of others to choose differently.

Anti-terrorism law

The new law has led to hundreds of arrests since the Surabaya attacks. There have been no further attacks however, the Law has significantly increased the workload of the criminal justice system and contributed to further prison overcrowding. It also opens the potential for abuse of human rights, thereby increasing the risk of violence for revenge. Returnees and deportees are being increasingly treated as suspects rather than reintegrated through special programs.

AIPJ2 response: CSO engagement to advocate for human rights. Restorative justice workshop in early 2019 including specific session on terrorism.

Constitutional Court decision on child marriage

In December, the Constitutional Court ruled that the current Marriage Law specifying a legal marriage age of 16 for girls and 18 for boys was unconstitutional in that it was discriminatory against girls and led to abuse of human rights in terms of physical safety and access to education and health. The Court ruled that the Parliament should revise the law within three years or else the marriage age for both boys and girls would become 18 consistent with the Child Protection Law.

AIPJ2 response: AIPJ2 is now working with coalition partners to expedite Government policy and legal reform to implement the Court’s decision. Some opposition has been expressed by religiously conservative politicians, who see the decision as inconsistent with their interpretation of Islamic law. AIPJ2 will be working with GOI and CSO partners to determine the most appropriate channels to progress this reform.

Indonesia leaks media and CSO coalition is exposing corruption

Political opposition and legal action is mounting against the media and CSO coalition that makes up Indonesia Leaks following exposure of high profile figures for corruption. Indonesia Leaks was formed to provide solidarity and protection for media and activists following a number of cases being opened, and threats of criminal action against them, being made by police in the early stages of the current Government’s term as retaliation to exposure of corruption.

AIPJ2 response: AIPJ2 to monitor court cases against Indonesia leaks.

Natural disasters

Natural disasters, such as the tsunamis and earthquakes of 2018, cause AIPJ2 activities to be disrupted and leave partners and staff traumatised. Disasters can also be exploited by extremist groups, for example in Palu, where the tsunami and liquefaction was described as punishment from God for practicing local cultural traditions or in Lombok where people from other religions or political parties claimed they were excluded by the Government from receiving disaster relief, opening up old divisions and potential conflicts.

AIPJ2 response: Flexibility in support so some funds can be used as part of community recovery and resilience; linking with disaster response to source experts to educate communities on scientific cause of earthquakes, tsunami or liquefaction.

28

4.2 Australia context Australia’s national elections in 2019 are predicted to have limited impact on AIPJ2. There are no other issues which currently affect AIPJ2.

5 AIPJ2 Forward Strategy

Refinements in strategy were covered in depth in the Annual Work Plan which was presented to the Partnership Board on 18 December 2018. There are no significant changes in the month since then. However, the justice for women strategy has been further discussed internally, as we analyse the logic behind some of the activities. The justice for women strategy identifies key problems faced by women which could be addressed through changes in the justice system, but some strategic questions are emerging which warrant discussion:

Sexual violence and domestic violence: AIPJ2 intends to continue to support the implementation of PERMA 3/17 by the Supreme Court and extend knowledge of this to police and prosecutors. Until now, restorative justice (mediation, restitution), has been advised against for sexual and domestic violence cases, because of the perceived power imbalance favouring men in alternative dispute resolution processes. Victims have been encouraged to report matters to police so they could seek justice in court. From the victim’s perspective, this has been unsatisfactory. They are doubly victimised in the criminal justice system due to insensitive officials, being forced to confront their attacker, and accusations that they are bringing their family and community into disrepute. They often choose not to report. In many cases they receive no justice and no protection, so reporting is not rational. Using a restorative justice approach, applied sensitively, they may be able to access justice and community support and protection.

This is a controversial shift in strategy, not necessarily supported by women’s advocates or Komnas Perempuan. However, it is consistent with our commitment to exploring restorative approaches to reach better justice outcomes than the current law provides. In developing the strategy further, AIPJ2 will consult with Komnas Perempuan and DFAT’s gender specialists to ensure their contributions are considered in this debate.

Child marriage: AIPJ2 is supporting coalitions to trial different approaches to prevent child marriage. The Constitutional Court decision of December 2018 focuses us now more on helping the Government implement this decision bureaucratically. This will include drafting support and advocacy to steer the necessary policy documents through Government quickly so the decision is enforced. Efficient processing of this into a legally binding policy will avoid opposition from extreme views which defend child marriage.

Marriage legalisation: AIPJ2 has supported the processes of marriage legalisation and marriage certification because it helped women and children access rights in a divorce, and it helped children with birth registration. Nationally, it is estimated that, among the 40 per cent of the population who are poorest, four out of 10 ‘married’ couples do not have marriage certificates.8 This means women and children in these marriages have no rights in case of divorce, because they can only file for divorce if their marriage is certified. There may be other options for women in this circumstance to have the marriage recognised so they can then claim divorce rights. The courts have the authority to legalise a marriage which has not been certified. This is not exploring de facto rights, which would not have mainstream support, but using the law in a way which is consistent with community norms. AIPJ2 could advocate within the Religious Courts particularly, who legalise Muslim marriages, to extend rights of women and children through this process.

8 PBDT survey 2015.

29

Annex 1 AIPJ2 staffing and technical advisers Long-term Staff

No. Name Position Start date

1. Adhi Ardian Kustiadi Activity Manager – Corrections Service Reform 4 Oct 2017

2. Adi Suryadini Program Performance Manager 17 Apr 2017

3. Afnia Sari Activity Manager – Security Strengthening and Preventing Violent Extremism

17 Apr 2017

4. Andi Sahriah Alam Know ledge Hub Officer Makassar 19 Oct 2017

5. Ajeng Wirdaningsih Activity Coordinator – Transparency, Accountability, Anti-Corruption 09 Nov 2017

6. Craig Ew ers Team Leader 17 Apr 2017

7. Eka Gona Putri Activity Coordinator for Communications & Know ledge Management

15 Oct 2018

8. Harry Candra Sihombing Management Information System (MIS) Officer 01 Dec 2017

9. Helviani Pasang Activity Coordinator for South Sulaw esi Off ice 16 Nov 2017

10. Husaimah Husain Provincial Coordinator for South Sulaw esi Off ice 24 Apr 2017

11. Indriany Know ledge Hub Officer Jakarta 20 Nov 2017

12. Judhi Kristantini Senior Manager – Transparency, Accountability & Anti-Corruption 17 Apr 2017

13. Mochamad Imam Nugraha Grant and Contract Off icer 19 April 2018

14. Maudy P. Amanda Administration Officer for JRTO 1 Sep 2018

15. Mira Renata Tanujaya Communication Manager 17 May 2017

16. Nila Dini Haryanti Activity Coordinator - GEDSI and MEL. 16 Oct 2017

17. Nita Andriasih Senior Grants and Contracts Officer 17 Jul 2017

18. Peter Riddell Carre Deputy Team Leader 16 Apr 2018

19. Ratna Kreshtiana Operations Manager 18 Sept 2017

20. Rina Erlina Berliana Activity Manager - Gender Equality, Disability & Social Inclusion 1 Aug 2017

21. Sarah Sagitta Harmoun Activity Coordinator for Security Strengthening and Preventing Violent Extremism

31 Jul 2017

22. Sumarto Finance Assistant 20 Nov 2017

23. Teguh Sih Prathiw i Senior Finance Officer 12 Jul 2017

24. Theodora Yuni Shah Putri Activity Manager – Transparency, Accountability & Anti-Corruption 17 Apr 2017

25. Yogi Purnami Office Operations Coordinator 12 Jun 2017

National short-term consultants (Core Team)

No. Name Position Start date End date

1. Wahyu Widiana Senior Advisor for Transparency, Accountability, Anti-Corruption

21 June 2017 20 June 2019

2. Muhammad Joni Yulianto Senior Advisor for Disability Inclusion 19 June 2017 18 June 2019

3. Harum Retnadi Galuh Sekartaji Communication Associate 17 July 2017 16 July 2019

4. Muhammad Hafiz M&E for RANHAM 30 Oct 2017 9 Nov 2019

5. Wiw iek Aw iati Senior Consultant Reform Co-ordination and Coalition

26 Feb 2018 25 Feb 2019

6. Aria Suyudi Consultant Ease of Doing Business in Court 9 Jul 2018 30 June 2019

30

National short-term consultants (Specific Assignment)

No. Name Position Start date End date

1. Gandjar Laksamana Bonaprapta Legal Consultant for Transparency, Accountability, Anti-Corruption

2 June 2017 31 Mar 2019

2. Maria Kresentia Consultant for Transparency, Accountability, Anti-Corruption – SPAK Campaigns

2 June 2017 31 Mar 2019

3. M. Solahudin Consultant for Returnees/ Deportees and high-risk inmate management

13 Nov 2017 31 Dec 2019

4. Mukhtar IT Consultant 6 Dec 2017 5 Nov 2019

5 Syafiq Hasyim Adviser to Support PVE Initiatives 7 May 2018 31 Dec 2019

6. Muhammad Wildan, Adviser to Support PVE Initiatives 7 May 2018 31 Dec 2019

7. Hamdan Abbas Mansour Adviser to Support PVE Initiatives 7 Jul 2018 31 Dec 2019

8. Jamhari Makruf Senior Consultant – PVE Coordination 7 Aug 2018 31 Jul 2019

9. Triatmoko Consultant – Legal Analytics System 13 Aug 2018 31 Mar 2019

10. Ariyo Bimmo Consultant – SIPP 13 Aug 2018 28 Feb 2019

11. Haemiw an Zumar Fathony Consultant – Legal Analytics System 10 Sep 2018 31 Mar 2019

12. Yunani Abiyoso E-court Implementation Researcher 26 Nov 2018 30 Apr 2019

International short-term advisers

No. Name Position Start date End date

1. Jonathan Hampshire Senior Adviser Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) 24 Apr 2017 23 Apr 2019

2. Sarah Dyer Senior Adviser Disability 19 Jun 2017 30 Jun 2019

3. Anne Lockley Gender Adviser 12 Dec 2017 30 Jun 2019

4. Cate Sumner Advisor – Women and Court 18 Sep 2018 30 Jun 2019

5. Leisha Lister Advisor – Women and Court 18 Sep 2018 30 Jun 2019

31

Annex 2 Financial summary

AIPJ2 has an FY18/19 annual allocated budget of AU$9,425,906. This includes the initial AU$7.9 million allocation + AU$795,000 from the Maritime Capacity Building Initiative (MCBI) + AU$300,000 secured now under the Disability-Inclusive Development Fund (DID) + an additional AU$430,000 which has been secured through an internal reallocation of funds between DFAT projects. By 31 December 2018, after the first six months of FY18/19, AIPJ2 has spent AU$ 4.04 million (43 per cent) of annual budget. This is slightly behind the forecast due to some delays in the contracting and invoicing of Pillar 2 partners: TN17 Strong Borders Program; and TN15 CSIRO Transport (Aviation and Maritime) Security Program.

AIPJ2 efficiency has been calculated as the percentage of total expenditure spent on activities. Key personnel salaries have been apportioned between activity and operations. Overall efficiency for this six-month period is calculated at 90 per cent, which is a 5 per cent increase from the last six months. This is very high and reflects the low reliance on international advisers and the streamlined operating costs.

adjusted operations…

adjusted activities…

AIPJ2 EfficiencyJuly - December 2018

32

Annex 3 List of AIPJ2 implementing partners Indonesian CSO partners

No Name Location Activity Title Description Contract Period

Contract Value Target Location Start date End date

1 Yayasan Rumah KITAB (Rumah Kita Bersama)

Jakarta Reducing Child Marriage Through Revitalisation of Formal/Non-Formal Institutions, and Empow ering the Role of Informal Community Leaders and Families in Urban Areas

The objectives of the program are: 1. Increased number of formal and non-formal leaders, Religious Affairs Office (KUA) personnel, and community marriage off icers or village-level local religious leaders in project locations actively discouraging child marriage 2. Strengthened relations betw een parents and their daughters and sons in project locations to promote a concept of marriage that is mentally and physically healthy, equal and fair and 3. Empow ering youth at higher risk of child marriage

21-Jun-17 30-Jun-19 IDR 4.229.760.000 National and subnational levels in South Sulaw esi, North Jakarta and West Java-Cirebon)

2 Yayasan Prasasti Perdamaian (YPP)

Jakarta Support Government of Indonesia in developing integrated model for rehabilitation and reintegration of Violent Extremist Offenders, including w omen and juvenile

The expected outcomes for this program are: 1. Support DGC to develop a model of community-based corrections to improve reintegration program for former VEO 2. Support DGC and line ministry to develop baseline research for development of rehabilitation and reintegration for w omen and juveniles on terrorism offences in correction system. 3. Wider public campaign to promote the initiative for better management of rehabilitation and reintegration program for VEO, including w omen and juveniles

31-May-17 31-Dec-19 IDR 2.708.777.347 National and Subnational levels in Palu, NTB

3 Civil Society Against Violent Extremism (CSAVE)

Jakarta Indonesia Civil Society Coalition for Countering Terorism Policy Reform Program

The program objectives are: 1. CSO coalition strengthen and CSO-GOI partnership establish and maintain effective mechanisms for ongoing collaboration, information sharing and dialogue on the implementation of the CT Law .

01-May-17 31-Dec-19 IDR 3.562.832.800 National and subnational levels

33

No Name Location Activity Title Description Contract Period

Contract Value Target Location Start date End date

2. Support GoI to strengthen strategy and capacity of BNPT to implement the CT Law through facilitating the drafting of the government regulation 3. Support GoI for the adoption of rehabilitation and reintegration management guidelines for vulnerable groups as part of disengagement program.

4 Yayasan SAPDA Yogyakarta Social Inclusion Resource Center

The program is focusing on Advocacy of Law protection for Persons with Disabilities base on Social Inclusion in national and provincial level (DIY), develop resource center and strengthening access to justice for w omen and child w ith disabilities conflicting w ith the law

20-Jun-17 30-Jun-19 IDR 2.611.615.000 National and subnational levels in Yogyakarta

5 Sasana Integrasi dan Advokasi Difabel (SIGAB)

Yogyakarta Capacity Building and SIGAB’s Role in Promoting Social Inclusion and Access to Justice for People w ith Disabilities

The program is focusing on supporting government for drafting of Government Regulation regarding Reasonable Accommodation for Persons w ith Disabilities in the Judicial Process (RPP Peradilan) and advocacy to the Communities and law enforcement officers to have better understanding for implementing legal justice and social inclusion for people w ith disabilities.

21-Jun-17 30-Jun-19 IDR 3.468.306.150 National and subnational levels in Yogyakarta

6 The Asia Foundation Jakarta Strengthening Prison Reform in Indonesian (Prison Reform Phase IV)

the proposed program goal is to strengthen prison reform for an effective integrated criminal justice in Indonesia, through the follow ing three objectives: 1. improved quality of corrections data for policy-making and data exchange with other law enforcement agencies; 2. improved polices on overcrowding and prison management; 3. Increased participation of civil society organisations (CSOs) and other relevant stakeholders on prison issues

18-Jul-17 28-Feb-19 AUD 1.263.968 National and subnational levels in Central Java, Lampung, S. Sulaw esi, NTB, Yogyakarta, West Java

7 WAHID Foundation Jakarta Promoting Religious Tolerance through Civil

The objective and key deliverables of this program are:

01-May-17 30-Jun-19 IDR 19.962.292.774 National and subnational levels

34

No Name Location Activity Title Description Contract Period

Contract Value Target Location Start date End date

Society and Government Engagement (PRIORITAS-GO)

1. Support development of national strategy on CVE 2. Support draft national strategy for CVE and act as a bridge to civil society from BNPT 3. Promoting tolerance through empow erment of moderate community and local initiative. 4. Preventing hate speech

in (West Java, DKI, Central Java, East Java, Central Sulaw esi, NTB)

8 Aliansi Indonesia Damai (AIDA)

Jakarta Victim’s Voices Indonesia

The program is focusing on empow erment of victims of terrorism to deliver counter-narratives.

23-Mar-18 31-Dec-19 IDR 1.999.042.900 Subnational levels in Banten - Serang and NTB - Bima, Dompu

9 Solo Bersimfoni Surakarta Strengthening Great Solo Reputation as the Tolerance Area/Menjaga Reputasi Solo Raya sebagai Wilayah yang Toleran

The objectives of the program is promoting local w isdom to prevent violent extremism through cultural events to amplify positive messages.

06-Apr-18 31-Jan-19 IDR 1.499.910.000 Subnational level - Solo Raya

10 Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi (PUSAD) Yayasan Paramadina

Jakarta Research on The Drivers of Radicalism and Violent Extremism in Contemporary Indonesia/Riset Faktor-Faktor Pendorong Radikalisasi dan Kekerasan Ekstremisme di Indonesia

The program is focusing on conducting research on the drivers of radicalism and violent extremism in Indonesia.

23-Mar-18 22-Mar-19 IDR 800.145.000 National and subnational levels in Poso, Bima, Solo

11 Peace Generation Indonesia

Bandung RUMAH KITA (Creativity and Love)

The program goal is empow ering of youth to prevent violent extremism in Poso and Jember through interactive media.

18-Apr-18 31-Mar–20 IDR 2.000.000.000 Subnational levels in Jember - East Java, and Poso - Central Sulaw esi

12 Kalijaga Institute for Justice (KIJ) UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Yogyakarta Policy Paper on Preventing Violent Extremism (PVE) in Schools

The program objective is to develop a policy paper on PVE approach in education system for Ministry of Education and Ministry of Religious Affairs as well as

20-Apr-18 31-Aug-19 IDR 600.330.000 Subnational levels (Klaten, Yogyakarta)

35

No Name Location Activity Title Description Contract Period

Contract Value Target Location Start date End date

Support mainstreaming of preventing violent extremism (PVE) in education system.

13 Institute of Community Justice/Lembaga Advokasi Keadilan untuk Masyarakat (ICJ)

Makassar Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration to End Child Marriage in South Sulaw esi

The objectives of the program are: 1. Strengthen collaboration betw een stakeholder (CSOs and Government) on formulating government regulations and strategy to prevent child marriage in the province; 2. Input and recommendation for the South Sulaw esi Provincial, regencies and municipalities government on a strategy to prevent child marriage; 3. Know ledge sharing between stakeholders in collective movement to stop child marriage in South Sulaw esi and in Indonesia. 4. Improved access of married girls in the focus locations to basic services (education, health, and protection from harm and sexual violence)

23-May-18 24-May-19 IDR 947.060.000 Subnational levels in South Sulaw esi

14 Transparansi International Indonesia (TII)

Jakarta Selatan

Strengthening the Implementation of the National Strategy on Corruption Prevention and Eradication

The program is more focusing on supporting the Timnas Stranas PPK to develop the draft of Corruption and Eradication National Strategy (Stranas PPK - Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi) and increasing the stakeholder netw orks, including CSOs, communities and universities’ understanding on Stranas PPK and RAN/RAD PPK w hich will lead to an effective PPK action plan implementation.

19-Jun-18 18-Jun-19 IDR 946.805.000 National and subnational levels in DKI, South Sulaw esi, Banten, Riau and East Java

15 Yayasan Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga (PEKKA)

Jakarta Empow ering Indonesia Family through Legal Empow erment and Protection

The program is targeting four outcomes: (1) Increased legal services and decisions on family matters in order to be more equitable w ith justice for w omen and children. (2) Increased critical aw areness and know ledge of society related to family law in order to prevent child marriage and family violence.

11-Jun-18 10-Jun-19 IDR 1.180.095.000 Subnational levels in Aceh-Pidi, West Java - Cianjur, NTB- Lombok Tengah

36

No Name Location Activity Title Description Contract Period

Contract Value Target Location Start date End date

(3) Increasing the community role in developing a more equitable and peaceful system of justice (4) Increasing the quality of data as a basis for advocacy for legal reform and social system that is more pro-justice especially for w omen, children and marginalised groups.

16 The Asian Muslim Action Netw ork (AMAN) Indonesia

Jakarta Selatan

Mainstreaming Gender and Social Movement Building for Preventing Violent Extremism

The program is more focusing on enhancing aw areness of partners of WGWC (CSO and targeted government institutions) on gender perspective in PVE and improve their organisational policy and program related to PVE; and conducting advocacy & strengthen collaborative platforms to draft policy on PVE and establish resilience to prevent extremism

11-Jun-18 10-Jun–20 IDR 2.002.306.000 National and subnational levels in Jakarta, Central Java, West Java and East Java.

17 Masyarakat Pemantau Peradilan Indonesia (MaPPI) FHUI

Depok, West Java

Simplif ication of Court Decision Template & Gender Equality in the Courts – Implementing PERMA 3

The targeted outcomes of this programs are: 1. Developing the new methods / approaches in judicial decisions making, referring to the methodologies already developed and applied in various countries, based on the needs from justice seeker, enforceable, and accommodating the electronic court era; 2. Increased judges understanding on the new judicial decision templates that w ill lead to an effective policy implementation

11-Jun-18 10-Jun-19 IDR 2.096.925.000 National and subnational levels in DKI Jakarta and Yogyakarta

18 Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (PSHK)

Jakarta Developing a set of Technical Guidance for investigating and recovering the proceeds of money laundering in the Capital market

The purpose of the program is to support KPK in developing Technical Guidance on Anti Money Laundering and Asset Recovery in Capital Market.

20-Nov-17 15-Dec-18 IDR 944.285.000 National level

Enhancement of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA)

The purpose of the program is to conduct a research on evaluation of Perma No. 2/2015 implementation (w ill served as the new

26-Mar-18 20-Feb-19 IDR 587.370.000

37

No Name Location Activity Title Description Contract Period

Contract Value Target Location Start date End date

No. 2/2015 regarding Small Claim Court (SCC)

PERMA academic paper) and Drafting of the new PERMA on Small Claim Court

19 Lembaga Kajian dan Advokasi Independensi Peradilan (LeIP)

Jakarta Engagement of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) in the Reform of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia through the Judicial Reform Management Team Office (JRTO)

The activity purpose is to : 1. Support Supreme Court in the reform development of Supreme Court and management KTTP more transparent and accountable. 2. Encourage Indonesia CSOs w ho collaborated under Indonesia Justice Reform Forum (IJRF) to exchange information and agree on the w ork focus of each of CSO in judicial reforms, including to agree on the support that can be given to each other in supporting judicial reform

20-Jun-17 31-Jan-19 IDR 1.542.872.735 National level

20 LBH Makassar Makassar Inclusive Legal Aid and Access to Justice for People w ith Disabilities in South Sulaw esi

The outcomes for the activity are: Strengthen legal understanding and the

rights for equal access to justice of vulnerable groups in the Kabupaten Bulukumba and Kota Makassar (people w ith disabilities, w omen, and children).

Improved community legal aid support for vulnerable groups in the pilot areas.

Strengthen community participation to advocate the rights of vulnerable people in accessing justice system and legal aids services in the pilot areas.

Improved capacities of legal enforcement institutions and off icials in providing legal support and services to the vulnerable groups in the pilot areas

02-Nov-18 31-Oct-19 IDR 501.875.000 Subnational levels in South Sulaw esi

21 Yayasan Sebar Inspirasi Indonesia (YSII)

Jakarta Improvements of Wonder Application: a Mobile application (APP) for Victims of Gender-based Violence – Women and Children

The activity purpose is to support YSII for improving a w onder application. It's a Mobile application (APP) for Victims of Gender-based Violence – Women and Children

15-Nov-18 14-Nov-19 IDR 296.900.000 national and subnational levels in Yogyakarta and Makassar South Sulaw esi

38

Government of Australia Partners

Tasking Note GoA Agency GoI Counterpart Program Name Description

Contract Period Total Value

(AUD) Start date Finish Date

TN1 Australian Border Force (ABF)

Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE)/

Dirjen Bea dan Cukai

Directorate General of Immigration/Dirjen Imigrasi

National Agency for Combating Terrorism/BNPT

Australia - Indonesia Strong Borders Program (AISB)

Program Objectives: To provide technical and leadership capability at the frontline to promote change in behaviour in managing border risk including: 1) Increased interagency cooperation in identifying, responding and countering transnational crime and strengthen security at Indonesia’s borders. 2) Increased capability, skill and confidence at an operational level to identify, respond and interdict potential CT threat at the border. 3) Indonesian border agencies have increased transparency, integrity and accountability in the management of Indonesia’s borders

1-Jun-17 31-Dec-18 598,000

TN2 Attorney General's Department (AGD)

Indonesia’s Attorney General’s Off ice (AGO)/ Kejaksaan Agung

Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission/ Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK)

Australia - Indonesia Law and Security Cooperation Project

Program Objectives: 1) Build technical capacity and resources to implement terrorism and transnational crime law s, including through international crime cooperation 2) Enhance interagency and regional coordination in response to terrorism and transnational crime

24-Apr-17 30-Jun-18 220,000

TN2 Attorney General's Department (AGD) / PSHK

Money Laundering Guidelines Development

20-Nov-17 15-Dec-18 90,000

TN6 Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development (DIRD) - has shifted to DoHA

Ministry of Transportation: Directorate-General of

Civil Aviation (DGCA)

Indonesian Sea and Coast Guard/Kesatuan Penjagaan Laut dan Pantai Indonesia (KPLP)

Ministry of State-Ow ned Enterprises:

Angkasa-Pura I and II

Indonesia - Australia Transport Security Cooperative Program

Program Objectives: 1) Strengthen DGCA and airport operators' approach to security management by informing their decision-making thorugh a greater understanding of threat and risk 2) Enhance the technical proficiency of port and airport screening personnel through targeted training 3) Strengthen DGCA and KPLP's national and local (port/airport-level) command and control arrangements in response to a security threat. 4) Strengthen Indonesia's civil aviation regulatory environment to enable natioanlly effective and consistent security outcomes 5) Strengthen Indonesia's maritime security regulatory environment and operational delivery of maritime port security to

4-Aug-17 30-Sep-18 437,553

39

Tasking Note GoA Agency GoI Counterpart Program Name Description

Contract Period Total Value

(AUD) Start date Finish Date

Pelindo support regulatory implementation and compliance w ith the International Maritime Organisation's International Ship and Port Facility Security Code

TN8 Australian Federal Police (AFP)

Indonesian National Police (INP)/Ministry of Communications and Information

Regulating cyber crime Program Objectives: 1) Raise aw areness and improve education about approaches to regulating and investigating cybercrime, including how cybercrimes are defined 2) Build operational capacity of cybercrime practitioners

Nov-17 31-Mar-19 111,000

TN9 Australian Federal Police (AFP)

Indonesian National Police (INP)

Australia - Indonesia Police Cooperation

Project Objectives: 1) Undertake capability/capacity development initiatives w ith the Indonesian National Police (INP) to combat transnational crime in line w ith outcomes identif ied through the bi-lateral AFP/INP Senior Off icers Meeting (SOM) 2) Undertake capability/capacity development initiatives w ith the National Counter Terrorism Agency Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (BNPT), and the National Narcotics Agency Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN)

Dec-17 30-Sep-18 225,762

TN10 Department of Home Affairs (DoHA) - (Transnational Crime Policy Branch and Counter-Terrorism Policy Branch)

1. The Legal and International Relation Bureau of the Attorney General's Off ice of Republic Indonesia

2. International Cooperation Unit, Directorate Fostering Netw orks between Commission and Institutions, KPK

Australia - Indonesia Law and Security Cooperation Project

Desired outcomes from the program include: 1. Greater technical capacity among Indonesian criminal justice agencies to implement terrorism and transnational crime law s, including through international crime cooperation and advanced investigation and prosecution techniques. 2. Increased operational links and information sharing betw een Indonesian law enforcement and justice agencies, and betw een those agencies and their regional counterparts. 3. Enhanced capacity of Indonesian counterparts to engage in bilateral cooperation on money laundering and related asset recovery.

1-Jul-18 30-Jun-19 50,000

TN11 Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC)

Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Australia - Indonesia Analyst Exchange Project (AIAEP)

AIAEP w ill deliver the follow ing activity outcomes: Enhanced capacity of the Indonesian f inancial intelligence

unit PPATK to develop actionable f inancial intelligence for use by law and justice agencies, as w ell as to progress international and regional cooperation to investigate terrorism related, people smuggling and other serious transnational criminal activity

1-Jul-18 30-Jun-19 277,000

40

Tasking Note GoA Agency GoI Counterpart Program Name Description

Contract Period Total Value

(AUD) Start date Finish Date

Strengthened partnership betw een AUSTRAC and PPATK through the close engagement and collaboration of operational level analysts

A fuller understanding of new technologies in the cyber realm to facilitate the movement of funds within and beyond Indonesia

Greater collaboration betw een Indonesian law enforcement agencies and build aw areness of the benefits of using f inancial intelligence.

Increased f inancial information exchange between Australia and Indonesia (and relevant third countries) on serious transnational crimes including terrorism financing and people smuggling.

Production of an actionable f inancial intelligence product by AUSTRAC / PPATK analysts developed in conjunction w ith Australian and Indonesian (and potentially third country) law enforcement.

TN12 DoHA - Maritime

1. Directorate General of Sea Transport, Ministry of Transportation 2. Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Ministry of Transportation 3. Ministry of State-Ow ned Enterprises 4. Angkasa Pura I and II 5. PELINDO 6. Air Cargo - Regulated Agents

Australia- Indonesia Transport Security Cooperation Program

Program aims to achieve a high standard of operational consistency, regulatory frameworks and governance arrangements to ensure the application of security measures for aviation and maritime transportation is consistent, meets international requirements and is proportionate and appropriate for Indonesia.

Home Affairs engages closely with other Governments, partner agencies, peak international bodies such as ICAO and industry, w here possible, to deliver collaborative capacity building activities using best practice expertise in Indonesia. Fostering collaboration betw een the aviation and maritime communities, including government and industry stakeholders, w ill achieve a more streamlined and eff icient approach to addressing regulatory and operational deficiencies in the Indonesian transport system.

To achieve this the AIAEP w ill conduct tw o intensive, real time f inancial intelligence exchanges to support priority law enforcement operations. It w ill entail analysts from AUSTRAC and PPATK w orking in Australia and Indonesia (and potentially a third country) collaboratively on a f inal

1-Jul-18 30-Jun-19 414,838

41

Tasking Note GoA Agency GoI Counterpart Program Name Description

Contract Period Total Value

(AUD) Start date Finish Date

intelligence product and in doing so share latest systems capabilities, methodologies and techniques. This w ill provide interactive learning in a real time environment

The AIAEP also proposes the secondment of an AUSTRAC analyst to PPATK for a period of three months. This person w ould shape and drive the analyst exchange sand provide on the ground analytical training and support to ensure learnings from the exchanges are understood and any operational recommendations implemented

TN13 Australian Federal Police (AFP)

International Relationship Division, Indonesian National Police (INP)/ Divisi Hubungan Internasional, POLRI

Australia - Indonesia Police Cooperation

The desired outcome of the program is to: Advance engagement and cooperation w ith the INP on

corruption investigations and capacity building opportunities through a more formalised w orking group structure; and

Provide assistance to improve INP internal structures and the enhancing of INP’s deterrence and investigation techniques relating to INP corruption and criminal assets investigations involving Indonesian persons, companies, government off icials and foreign entities.

1-Jul-18 30-Jun–20 1,131,000

TN14 Australian Border Force (ABF)

1. Indonesia Maritime Security Agency (BAKAMLA) 2. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP) 3. Directorate of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, Directorate General Customs and Excise, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia

Australia - Indonesia Civil Maritime Cooperation

To build the capacity of the Indonesian maritime agencies (Indonesian Maritime Security Agency (BAKAMLA); Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP); Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DGCE): Strengthen partnerships w ithin Indonesian partner agencies

through common trainig practices, promotion of inter-agency know ledge sharing and best practice

Explore opportunities to exchange data to enhance situational aw areness in the maritime domain

Improve command, control, and coordination in the maritime domain through informed and accountable decision making

Enhance know ledge, skills and capacities of civil maritime off icers

Promote the safe and law ful application of pow ers in the maritime domain

1-Jul-18 30-Jun–20 615,000

TN16 Department of Agriculture and Water

Indonesian Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF)

International Fisheries Negotiation Short Course

Program aims to build the capacity of Indonesian off icials to ensure the sustainable management of marine resources and combat IUU by:

19-Nov-18 30-Jun-19 50,000

42

Tasking Note GoA Agency GoI Counterpart Program Name Description

Contract Period Total Value

(AUD) Start date Finish Date

Resources (DAWR)

improving international f isheries negotiation skills assisting off icials to gain a better understand of

implementation of conservation and management measures agreed through regional fora

TN17 Home affairs - ABF and Immigration

1. Directorate of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia, Directorate General Customs and Excise, Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Indonesia 2. Directorate General of Immigration (DGI) Other agencies to be involved: National Agency for Combating Terrorism (BNPT) National Narcotic Board (BNN) Indonesian Maritime Security Agency (BAKAMLA) Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP)

Australia-Indonesia Strong Border Program

The Australia-Indonesia Strong Borders Program Phase 2 w ill improve leadership capability for frontline border operations and enhance management of border risks through: 1. Increased interagency cooperation in identifying, responding and countering transnational crime and strengthen security at Indonesia’s borders to mitigate irregular migration. 2. Increased capability, skill and confidence at an operational level to identify, respond and interdict potential CT threat at the border. 3. Indonesian border agencies have increased transparency, integrity and accountability in the management of Indonesia’s borders promoting changed behaviours.

6-Dec-18 5-Jun–21 800,000

Annex 4 AIPJ2 contribution to DFAT Performance Assessment Framework

Based on the latest version of DFAT’s Performance Assessment Framework (PAF) of December 2018, AIPJ2 will report on the following milestones in 2019:

PAF Outcomes 2018/2019 Milestones

9. Marginalised groups can advocate for and access basic services

Civil society input ensures a plan is in place to monitor and evaluate implementation of the disability law and a greater number of people w ith disability can access services.

A National Action Plan for Countering Violent Extremism, w ith input from civil society, is f inalised.

AIPJ2 will not submit a Significant Policy Change proposal in 2019, preferring to wait until more progress is made in implementation.

44

Annex 5 AIPJ2 contribution to RPJMN Objectives RPJMN objective for Law and Human Rights Development 2015–2019

‘To Fulfil Law Enforcement and Awareness’

National priorities for politics, law, defence and security

Program Priority Activity priority AIPJ2 contributing activities

Legal certainty Improved quality of law enforcement

Governance mechanisms established to support legal and judicial reform – e.g. Indonesian Judicial Reform Forum, Judicial Reform Technical Off ice, Restorative Justice Working Group.

Disability Rights recognised through legislation, monitoring and advocacy; disability regulations and disability rights indicators.

More accountable and accessible justice institutions through evaluation of small claims, streamlined bankruptcy process, specialised commercial court, enforcement of court judgement and simplif ied templates for judicial decisions.

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates, community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Effective corruption prevention and eradication

Campaigns and initiatives at subnational level implemented to prevent corruption through I am w omen against corruption (SPAK) movement.

Investigating corruption through development of technical guidance on money laundering at stock exchange.

Respect, Protection and Fulf ilment of the Right to Justice

Disability Rights recognised through legislation, monitoring and advocacy; disability regulations and disability rights indicators.

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates, community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Stability of Politics and Security

Strengthening Democracy institutions, civil rights and political rights

Disability Rights recognised through legislation, monitoring and advocacy; disability regulations and disability rights indicators.

Counter-Terrorism and the Handling of Social Conflict

Preventing violent extremism through policy, legislation and coordination.

Mainstreamed gender equality, disability and social inclusion through w omen and preventing violent extremism group coordination and advocacy.

Improved Access and Quality of Public Information

More accountable and accessible justice institutions through evaluation of small claims, streamlined bankruptcy process, specialised commercial court, enforcement of court judgement and simplif ied templates for judicial decisions.

Strengthening Economic Diplomacy and International Development Cooperation

Stronger border, airport security, investigating cyber-crime, investigating illegal f inancial transactions.

Strengthening politics and security diplomacy

Stronger border, airport security, investigating cyber-crime, investigating illegal f inancial transactions.

Establishment of secure condition and rapid response

Stronger border, airport security, investigating cyber-crime, investigating illegal f inancial transactions.

Strengthening in drugs crime handling

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates,

45

Program Priority Activity priority AIPJ2 contributing activities

community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Intelligence and counter intelligence

Stronger border, airport security, investigating cyber-crime, investigating illegal f inancial transactions.

Bureaucracy Reform

Expanding integrated e-government implementation

More accountable and accessible justice institutions through evaluation of small claims, streamlined bankruptcy process, specialised commercial court, enforcement of court judgement and simplif ied templates for judicial decisions.

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates, community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Strengthening Public Services standards implementation and human resource management capacity

More accountable and accessible justice institutions through evaluation of small claims, streamlined bankruptcy process, specialised commercial court, enforcement of court judgement and simplif ied templates for judicial decisions.

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates, community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Strengthening government off icial’s capacity and management

More accountable and accessible justice institutions through evaluation of small claims, streamlined bankruptcy process, specialised commercial court, enforcement of court judgement and simplif ied templates for judicial decisions

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates, community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Strengthening integrity and accountability of bureaucratic performance

More accountable and accessible justice institutions through evaluation of small claims, streamlined bankruptcy process, specialised commercial court, enforcement of court judgement and simplif ied templates for judicial decisions

Corrections Reform through Prisons Database system establishment, management reforms for high-risk inmates, community corrections processes, corrections reform blueprint, corrections reform coalitions.

Strengthening National Defence

Strengthening border areas defence

Stronger border, airport security, investigating cyber-crime, investigating illegal f inancial transactions.

Annex 6 Risk register (current at 1 February 2019) Change from Last Month Number

Increased risk 2 – Risk associated with election, and potential release of Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, particularly in Solo; new risk of delayed decisions due to election

No change 3

Reduced risk 4 – SPAK transition progressing so risk resolved; Bappenas scheduling P2 meeting; Bappenas and partner engagement in know ledge hub.

Category Risk Impact L C Rating Mitigation

Overarching In the lead up to the 2019 national election, increasingly divisive campaigns provoking violence through inflammatory language, including hate speech. Creating political unrest, increased scrutiny and potential adverse pressures on PVE partners w orking on these issues.

AIPJ2 partners re-directing programs to counter provocations and aw ay from planned activities. In the w orst case partners come under direct political attack w hich negatively impacts their public credibility. It may also generate accusations that AIPJ2 and the Australian Government is expressing political bias.

Likely Severe Extreme

See context update. With debate about the potential release of Abu Bakar Ba’asyir, Solo is becoming a centre of political and religious attention, w ith recent incidents of violence in the prison and betw een gangs loosely linked to religious view s. Jordan New ton has provided valuable analytical capacity into the team and w ill help monitor and respond to increased risk in Solo. Management resources and increased frequency of analysis and reporting to mitigate risk.

Risk increased

Decision on policy changes delayed due to attention being focused on elections

Implementation of disability regulations, changes to marriage law and other key policy changes delayed because of elections

Likely Major High AIPJ2 convenes CSO partners to intensify advocacy on key priorities, especially w here the Office of the President openly supports the policies (disability, preventing child marriage).

New risk

Pillar 1 SPAK not transitioning from AIPJ2 support

AIPJ2 attention and resources not available for other priorities

Resolved Resolved Resolved The decision to discontinue direct support for SPAK activities from AIPJ2 on 31 January w as communicated to SPAK Perkumpulan management at a meeting on 16 January. They accepted responsibility for funding activities and preparing an activity proposal for AIPJ2 to consider funding through a grant agreement.

Reduced

Disability regulations to support Law delayed

Law not properly implemented so disability rights not progressed as expected

Unlikely Moderate Moderate Work continuing on RPP Peradilan. After several months of internal advocacy to help Ministries w ork through bureaucratic barriers, the Ijin Prakarsa for the RPP on Reasonable

No change

47

Category Risk Impact L C Rating Mitigation

Accommodation on Access to Justice (RPP Peradilan) w as f inally granted by President Jokow i on 1 February. The RPP w ill now continue to the next stage of inter-ministerial discussions for its harmonisation.

Pillar 2 Bappenas questions governance of Pillar 2 activities because they do not align w ith Director responsibilities

AIPJ2 has to support a different governance mechanism for engaging Bappenas in this pillar

Unlikely Minor Low

Bappenas has advised that a meeting w ill be scheduled as soon as the relevant Director is available.

Reduced

Pillar 3 PVE grant activities expose Australia and Indonesia Government to criticism and reputational damage

AIPJ2 could be accused of being a foreign intervention and funding could be w ithdrawn from supporting this pillar.

Unlikely Major Moderate

Still unclear how Bappenas and BNPT w ill share coordination roles through the Joint Secretariat. This came through at the Partnership Board w ith direct exchanges betw een Polhukam and Bappenas on priority areas and roles. Has not increased overall risk as w orded here because this is internal GoI.

No change

Partnership Development Insuff icient ow nership by Bappenas and partners of know ledge hub

Lack of participation in design and lack of adoption and utilisation

Unlikely Low Low Bappenas is prioritising in the f irst quarter of 2019, w ith accelerated progress.

Reduced

Know ledge hub project delayed because of complexity of partner engagement

Mixed impact – w ill delay utilisation but w ill increase engagement and future utilisation. May require amendments to supplier contract.

Unlikely Minor Low Law and Security Hub now agreed betw een Home Affairs and Polhukam, w ho will brief GoI agencies, using a summary prepared by AIPJ2. Very positive response to concept by Polhukam. Home Affairs compiling Australian content. Re PVE community, managed by WGWC, AIPJ2 to reach out to other PVE partners like PPIM for content.

Reduced risk but already low est rating