airborne wind turbines sean metcalf special thanks: sam musa, joshua owens, and greg hutcheson...

8
AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE : Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind Turbines (AWT) as an alternative way of utilizing wind energy to reduce the use of non- renewable energy sources.

Upload: marcus-dennis

Post on 12-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

AIRBORNE WIND TURBINESSean MetcalfSpecial Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson

OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind Turbines (AWT) as an alternative way of utilizing wind energy to reduce the use of non-renewable energy sources.

Page 2: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

BACKGROUND INFO: • Makani Power, Joby

Energy, KiteFarms and KiteGen have developed working prototypes and designs for high altitude AWTs

• Desired to produce more and consistent energy more cost effective than conventional solar and wind power

• Developed fixed-wing AWT, operational at altitudes of 250 to 600 meters.

• Makani Power tested prototype capable of 30 kW production.

Figure 1: Description of how the AWT operates

Page 3: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

RESEARCH & ANALYSIS:• Research feasibility of

utilizing AWT’s as an alternative source to harvest wind energy in the effort to reduce the use of non-renewable energy sources

• Conduct thermodynamic analysis and compare maximum power output for 30 kW AWT and a 30 kW conventional wind turbine

Figure 2: Makani M30 AWT technical specifications

Page 4: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

COMPARISON:• AWT offshore wind farm

applications• AWT’s perform better at

low wind speeds than conventional wind turbines

• Can produce about twice the power of a traditional wind turbine the same size

• Wind power represents %32 of all new electric capacity additions in the U.S. for 2010

• Accounts for $14 billion in new investment

• U.S. wind power capacity reached 50,000 MW, enough electricity to power 13 million homes annually

Figure 3: Wind energy production comparison (wind power information and figure used from www.energy.gov )

Page 5: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

SAFETY & IMPACT:• Operates below altitude of commercial flights and above the height of

migratory birds• 90% less material than a conventional turbine• Can operate in hurricane conditions with winds in excess of 50 m/s

with gusts reaching 80 m/s• During extreme weather, it can land autonomously until conditions

normalize

Figure 4: Comparison of area and height between conventional turbines and the AWT

Page 6: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

ANALYSIS:

• Reversible process• Control volume• Heat Transfer and Potential

Energy are negligible• Steady-State• Constant wind velocity

Thermodynamic derivation for rate of work or power output for a wind turbine using assumptions:

Assumptions:

It is observed that the energy available in the wind for a turbine is only in the form of kinetic energy. The total power that can be derived from wind using a wind turbine is:

Note: Equations uses constant for Betz ‘ Law, which limits the theoretical max. power efficiency for any turbine design to be %59.

Observations:

Page 7: AIRBORNE WIND TURBINES Sean Metcalf Special Thanks: Sam Musa, Joshua Owens, and Greg Hutcheson OBJECTIVE: Determine the feasibility of using Airborne Wind

CONCLUSION:• AWT system is feasible because it yields more energy more often because it

taps into a more consistent and powerful wind at a higher altitude• Doesn’t harvest most of the energy available to it, but it harvests what

would otherwise remain untouched • Promising solution for harvesting offshore and land renewable wind energy

with low initial investment• Mechanical, electrical, and computer automation systems maintenance for

AWT’s would create more jobs

Type Horizontal Shaft Wind Turbine Airborne Wind Turbine

Make/Model WER FD 10-30/12 (30kW) Makani M30 (30kW)

Sky Area 78.5m2 (5m radius) 1809m2 (8meter wing span)

wind Speed (m/s)

Available power (W)

Actual output (w)

% total Energy

Available power (W)

Actual output (w)

% total Energy

7 9695.4 5300 54.7% 223313.3 15000 0.07%

10 28266.5 1800 6.37% 651059.1 30000 4.6%

13 62101.5 34000 54.7% 1430376.8 30000 2.1%

16 115779.5 29000 25.0% 2666738 30000 1.1%

Table 1: Using the above Power equation the following table shows the power yield for a 30 kW conventional turbine (model # FD 10-30/12 manufactured by Wind Resource Energy) and a 30kW AWT (model M30 Manufactured by Makani).