alam et al. 2014, food and bioprocess technology

13
AUTHOR'S PROOF UNCORRECTED PROOF 1 2 3 ORIGINAL PAPER 4 Influence of Particle Size Reduction on Structural 5 and Mechanical Properties of Extruded Rye Bran 7 Syed A. Alam & Jenni Järvinen & Satu Kirjoranta & 8 Kirsi Jouppila & Kaisa Poutanen & Nesli Sozer 9 10 11 Received: 15 June 2013 /Accepted: 31 October 2013 12 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 13 Abstract Rye bran is a high-fibre ingredient also containing 14 starch and protein. The aim of this work was to investigate the 15 effects of extrusion processing and bran particle size on the 16 structural and mechanical properties of extruded rye bran. 17 Native rye bran particle size of 7501,250 μm was milled to 18 produce feed material with three different average particle 19 sizes (coarse, 440 μm; medium, 143 μm; fine, 28 μm). A 20 co-rotating twin screw extruder was used for extrusion with 21 various processing parameters. Extrusion processing did not 22 have a significant (P <0.05) effect on soluble dietary fibre 23 (SDF) content but the amount of insoluble dietary fibre 24 (IDF) increased by 7.19.5 % in medium- and 11.312.3 % 25 in fine-particle-sized rye bran extrudates as compared to the 26 raw material prior to extrusion. Decreasing the particle size of 27 rye bran to 28 μm resulted in lower amounts of IDF and total 28 dietary fibre, but a higher amount of SDF after extrusion 29 compared to coarse-particle-sized rye bran. Decreasing the 30 particle size of rye bran to 28 μm gave more expanded 31 (179223 %), less hard (145336 N), more crispy (2.77.2× 32 10 4 ) and porous (79.283.9 %) extrudates compared to the 33 coarse-particle-sized rye bran extrudates, which were less 34 expanded (151176 %), harder (210433 N), less crispy 35 (0.52.8×10 4 ) and less porous (64.465.1 %). Reduction of 36 the particle size of rye bran significantly (P <0.05) increased 37 the crispiness compared to the extrudates made of coarse- 38 particle-sized rye bran. The results demonstrated that the 39 structural and mechanical properties of rye bran extrudates 40 can be improved without starch addition by reducing the 41 particle size of bran. 42 Keywords Crispiness . Dietary fibre . Extrusion . 43 Microstructure . Micronisation of particle . Texture . X-ray 44 microtomography 45 Introduction 46 The consumer demand for palatable dietary fibre (DF)- 47 enriched food products is currently growing. Several studies 48 have shown that consumption of DF reduces the risk of 49 obesity, cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes (Buttriss 50 and Stokes 2008; Dahm et al. 2010). Despite these health 51 benefits, the daily intake of DF in most developed countries 52 still remains below the recommended level of 2535 g/day. 53 Snack foods have become a part of the prevailing lifestyle 54 especially in the Western countries, and are generally made 55 using refined flour- or starch-based products (e.g. corn, wheat, 56 rice, oats and potatoes) lacking nutritional elements such as 57 dietary fibre (Brennan et al. 2013). Bran is the outer part of the 58 cereal grain, which contains a substantial amount of DF. Brans 59 are separated in the milling process and are an important by- 60 product of the cereal industry, mainly being used as animal 61 feed (Kamal-Eldin et al. 2009). In rye grain, dietary fibre and 62 phytochemicals are mainly concentrated in the bran fraction 63 (Liukkonen et al. 2003; Kamal-Eldin et al. 2009). Rye bran 64 contains 3948 % DF including arabinoxylan (2025 %) and 65 ß-glucan (3.55.3 %), 1328 % starch and 1418 % protein 66 (Kamal-Eldin et al. 2009; Karppinen et al. 2001, 2003). 67 Hence, utilisation of rye bran as a raw material in snack food S. A. Alam : J. Järvinen : K. Poutanen : N. Sozer VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland N. Sozer e-mail: [email protected] S. A. Alam (*) : S. Kirjoranta : K. Jouppila Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Agnes Sjöbergin Katu 2, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki, Finland e-mail: [email protected] S. A. Alam e-mail: [email protected] Food Bioprocess Technol DOI 10.1007/s11947-013-1225-2 JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

Upload: syed-ariful-alam

Post on 14-Aug-2015

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

1

23 ORIGINAL PAPER

4 Influence of Particle Size Reduction on Structural5 and Mechanical Properties of Extruded Rye Bran

7 Syed A. Alam & Jenni Järvinen & Satu Kirjoranta &

8 Kirsi Jouppila & Kaisa Poutanen & Nesli Sozer9

10

11 Received: 15 June 2013 /Accepted: 31 October 201312 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

13 Abstract Rye bran is a high-fibre ingredient also containing14 starch and protein. The aim of this work was to investigate the15 effects of extrusion processing and bran particle size on the16 structural and mechanical properties of extruded rye bran.17 Native rye bran particle size of 750–1,250 μm was milled to18 produce feed material with three different average particle19 sizes (coarse, 440 μm; medium, 143 μm; fine, 28 μm). A20 co-rotating twin screw extruder was used for extrusion with21 various processing parameters. Extrusion processing did not22 have a significant (P <0.05) effect on soluble dietary fibre23 (SDF) content but the amount of insoluble dietary fibre24 (IDF) increased by 7.1–9.5 % in medium- and 11.3–12.3 %25 in fine-particle-sized rye bran extrudates as compared to the26 raw material prior to extrusion. Decreasing the particle size of27 rye bran to 28 μm resulted in lower amounts of IDF and total28 dietary fibre, but a higher amount of SDF after extrusion29 compared to coarse-particle-sized rye bran. Decreasing the30 particle size of rye bran to 28 μm gave more expanded31 (179–223 %), less hard (145–336 N), more crispy (2.7–7.2×32 10−4) and porous (79.2–83.9 %) extrudates compared to the33 coarse-particle-sized rye bran extrudates, which were less34 expanded (151–176 %), harder (210–433 N), less crispy35 (0.5–2.8×10−4) and less porous (64.4–65.1 %). Reduction of

36the particle size of rye bran significantly (P <0.05) increased37the crispiness compared to the extrudates made of coarse-38particle-sized rye bran. The results demonstrated that the39structural and mechanical properties of rye bran extrudates40can be improved without starch addition by reducing the41particle size of bran.

42Keywords Crispiness . Dietary fibre . Extrusion .

43Microstructure .Micronisation of particle . Texture . X-ray44microtomography

45Introduction

46The consumer demand for palatable dietary fibre (DF)-47enriched food products is currently growing. Several studies48have shown that consumption of DF reduces the risk of49obesity, cardiovascular disease, cancer and diabetes (Buttriss50and Stokes 2008; Dahm et al. 2010). Despite these health51benefits, the daily intake of DF in most developed countries52still remains below the recommended level of 25–35 g/day.53Snack foods have become a part of the prevailing lifestyle54especially in the Western countries, and are generally made55using refined flour- or starch-based products (e.g. corn, wheat,56rice, oats and potatoes) lacking nutritional elements such as57dietary fibre (Brennan et al. 2013). Bran is the outer part of the58cereal grain, which contains a substantial amount of DF. Brans59are separated in the milling process and are an important by-60product of the cereal industry, mainly being used as animal61feed (Kamal-Eldin et al. 2009). In rye grain, dietary fibre and62phytochemicals are mainly concentrated in the bran fraction63(Liukkonen et al. 2003; Kamal-Eldin et al. 2009). Rye bran64contains 39–48 % DF including arabinoxylan (20–25 %) and65ß-glucan (3.5–5.3 %), 13–28 % starch and 14–18 % protein66(Kamal-Eldin et al. 2009; Karppinen et al. 2001, 2003).67Hence, utilisation of rye bran as a raw material in snack food

S. A. Alam : J. Järvinen :K. Poutanen :N. SozerVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2,P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland

N. Sozere-mail: [email protected]

S. A. Alam (*) : S. Kirjoranta :K. JouppilaDepartment of Food and Environmental Sciences, University ofHelsinki, Agnes Sjöbergin Katu 2, P.O. Box 66, 00014 Helsinki,Finlande-mail: [email protected]

S. A. Alame-mail: [email protected]

Food Bioprocess TechnolDOI 10.1007/s11947-013-1225-2

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

68 formulations would give rise to fibre-enriched and healthy69 food products.70 Avariety of fibre-enriched snack foods can be prepared by71 extrusion (Lue et al. 1991; Sozer and Poutanen 2013). Extru-72 sion processing is a high-temperature short-time process73 mainly used to produce puffed snacks directly bymodification74 and texturization of the functional properties of food ingredi-75 ents (Singh et al. 2007; Sozer and Poutanen 2013). The76 properties of extruded products depend strongly on the raw77 materials and processing conditions, in which high DF prod-78 ucts exhibit poor macro- and microstructural and mechanical79 properties (Sozer and Poutanen 2013). A higher incorporation80 (10–30 %) of sugar beet fibre and (10–40 %) of soy fibre81 reduced expansion and increased both hardness and density82 along with a reduction in crispiness of corn flour-based ex-83 truded products (Lue et al. 1991; Jin et al. 1995). When a84 mixture of wheat flour and wheat bran (12.6–24.4 % DF) was85 extruded, more expanded extrudates were obtained using high86 screw speed and temperature with low moisture content, but87 increasing the bran concentration reduced the volumetric ex-88 pansion under the same processing conditions (Robin et al.89 2011b). Chassagne-Berces et al. (2011) also reported decrease90 in extrudate expansion by increasing the amount (10–20%) of91 oat and wheat bran in wheat and whole wheat flour extrudates.92 Addition of bran to the extruded mass interferes with the93 continuity of food matrix, which affects both the structural94 and mechanical properties (Lue et al. 1991; Sozer and95 Poutanen 2013).96 Feed material with high amounts of insoluble fibre source97 such as cereal bran could affect structural properties by rup-98 turing the air cell wall of the extruded products, thus99 preventing the full expansion of air cells. Increasing the insol-100 uble fibre content in extruded solid foam matrices increased101 the air cell wall thickness and decreased the cell sizes (Guan102 et al. 2004). This might be the reason for decreased expansion103 and crispiness and increased hardness and density with in-104 creased amounts of bran in the extruded feed material (Lue105 et al. 1990; Moore et al. 1990; Mendonça et al. 2000). Due to106 the adverse effect of cereal bran addition on the structural107 properties of the extrudates, typically 10–30 % of bran has108 been used previously (Sozer and Poutanen 2013). Many re-109 searchers (Lue et al. 1991; Desrumaux et al. 1998; Zhang and110 Hoseney 1998; Mathew et al. 1999; Al-Rabadi et al. 2011)111 reported that more expanded, less hard and crispier extrudates112 could be obtained by decreasing the particle size of the feed113 material (e.g. flour, grit and bran). Particle size of the feed114 material plays an important role in a product’s physical and115 mechanical properties, which may vary considerably depend-116 ing on the feed material type and the composition of the feed117 formulation, such as fibre to flour ratio (Guy 1994; Garber et al.118 1997; Desrumaux et al. 1998; Mathew et al. 1999; Onwulata119 and Konstance 2006; Robin et al. 2011a; Alam 2012). How-120 ever, the effect of particle size on the microstructural and

121mechanical properties of high-fibre extrudates has been report-122ed in only a limited number of studies (e.g. Lue et al. 1990,1231991, Guan et al. 2004; Al-Rabadi et al. 2011; Robin et al.1242011a, b; Alam 2012). For example, Robin et al. (2011a) did125not observe any significant increase in a products’ expansion126with reduced particle size of wheat bran in extrudates based on127wheat flour. However, the average particle size used in their128study was 317 μm for coarse and 224 μm for fine materials.129We believe that a particle size reduction of only 30 % of130the coarse material will not be sufficient to result in any131perceivable structural and mechanical effects at 12 and13224 % bran addition.133The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of134particle size reduction on the structural and mechanical135properties of rye bran extrudates processed under various136extrusion conditions without any flour or starch addition. This137study also aimed to demonstrate how extrusion processing of138rye bran (with various particle sizes) affects the soluble and139insoluble fibre fraction.

140Materials and Methods

141Feed Material Preparation

142Native rye bran (R4000) obtained from Fazer Mill and Mixes143(Lahti, Finland) was milled to three different particle sizes of144coarse, medium and fine (Table 1). Coarse and medium raw145material were prepared at VTT Technical Research Centre of146Finland (Espoo, Finland) by milling native rye bran in an147Alpine fine impact mill at 17,800 rpm (100 UPZ, Hosokawa148Alpine, Augsburg, Germany) twice with 1 and 0.3 mm sieves,149respectively. Fine rye bran was milled using a G-55150Turborotor Mill (Görgens Mahltechnik GhmH, Dormagen,151Germany) using 60 Hz motor cycles and an average feed rate152of 30 kg/h.

153Particle Size Analyses

154Particle size distribution of the milled raw materials was155measured with a laser diffraction particle size analyser156(LDPSA; Beckman Coulter LS 230, Coulter Corporation,157Miami, FL, USA) using the wet module. Particles were mea-158sured with a range of 0.04–2,000 μm.Milli-Q water was used159as background solution. Particle size distributions were160expressed in volume units and the measurements were made161in duplicate. The particle size analysis using LDPSA for162coarse-particle-sized bran was not complete due to the pres-163ence of particles larger than the range of LDPSA. Therefore,164particle size distribution was also determined by sieving165(Table 2). A rye bran sample of 100 g was sieved for 10 min166using a laboratory sieve set (Buhler RP-MUL-300 Brabender,167Duisburgh, Germany). Analyses were made in duplicate, and

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF168 results were reported as averages of two measurements. The

169 median particle size of the native rye bran was 750–1,250 μm170 as analysed by the sieving method.

171 Preliminary Study

172 The effects of extrusion processing conditions on macrostruc-173 ture of rye bran extrudates and bran modification were studied174 in the preliminary studies in order to understand the basis of175 rye bran extrusion. A total of 36 samples were produced with176 coarse, medium and fine rye bran using different extrusion177 process parameters such as screw speed (300 and 500 rpm),178 temperature (40, 70, 75, 75, 90, 110, 110 and 40, 70, 75, 90,179 95, 130, 130 °C in sections 1–6 and in the die), feed moisture180 (17 or 19 %) and hydration regimen (in barrel–water feed (IB)181 and preconditioning (PC)). The macrostructural properties of182 the extrudates were found to be strongly dependent on extrusion183 process parameters. The most important processing parameters184 were screw speed, specific mechanical energy (SME), barrel185 temperature profile and particle size of the feed material. In186 general, a combination of high screw speed and small bran187 particle size resulted in extrudates with highest expansion and188 lowest piece density. Feed moisture level did not affect the189 expansion ratio significantly, although a small decrease in ex-190 pansion rates was observed as the feed moisture increased191 from 17 to 19 %. Neither hydration regimen or barrel192 temperature profile influenced the expansion properties of193 rye bran extrudates.194 The effects of processing parameters on DF content were195 studied only with coarse particle size at a feed moisture level196 of 17 % in order to provide an overview of the effect of197 extrusion on rye bran modification. Extrusion did not signif-198 icantly affect the insoluble dietary fibre (IDF) or total dietary199 fibre (TDF) content of the coarse rye bran in any of the200 processing conditions used in this study, whereas the soluble201 dietary fibre (SDF) content was significantly increased in202 more intensive extrusion processing conditions. The hydration203 regimen had a significant effect on IDF and TDF contents. In

204preconditioned samples, IDF was decreased leading to a de-205crease in TDF. Other processing variables did not influence206the DF components of extruded rye bran.207On the basis of the preliminary study, four samples of each208particle size were selected for the final experiment. Since the209microstructural properties of extrudates were significantly210influenced by screw speed, both 300 and 500 rpm screw211speeds were studied in the final experiments. Hydration reg-212imens (both IB and PC) were also studied as these were the213only parameters influencing DF contents. Feed moisture214(17 %) and temperature profiles (40, 70, 75, 90, 95, 130 and215130 °C) were selected for further studies.

216Extrusion Processing

217Extrusion processing was performed using a co-rotating twin-218screw extruder (Poly Lab System, Thermo Prism PTW24,219Thermo Haake, Dreieich, Germany). The length (L) and di-220ameter (D) of the screw were 672 and 24 mm, respectively,221and thus the L:D ratio was 28:1. The extruder barrel consisted222of seven sections, among which the first one (section 0)223included the gate for solid feed without temperature control;224six had individual temperature control. Each section was22596 mm long. The diameter of the circular die was 5 mm226(Fig. 1). A volumetric co-rotating twin-screw (D =20 mm,227L /D =10) feeder (Brabender, Duisburg, Germany) was used228for the solid feed. A full factorial experimental design was229used for all extrusion trials (Table 3). The feed rate of 67 g/min230was kept constant during the experiments. Screw speeds used231in the extrusion experiments were 300 and 500 rpm. Two232temperature profiles were used: low temperature profile (40,23370, 75, 75, 90, 110 and 110 °C) and high temperature profile234(40, 70, 75, 90, 95, 130 and 130 °C) in sections 1–6 and in the235die. The feed moisture was 17 or 19 %. With 19 % feed236moisture, the water was fed into the extruder barrel immedi-237ately after the dry material feed. The injection gate for liquid238feed was in section 1 and was controlled by a peristaltic pump239(Watson Marlow 505S, Wilmington, MA, USA). This hydra-240tion regimen is referred to as in IB. With 17 % moisture, two

t1:1 Table 1 Composition of coarse-, medium- and fine-particle-sized bran

t1:2 Component (%, dryweight basis)

Coarse Medium Fine

t1:3 Protein 13.8±0.0 x 13.8±0.0 x 13.1±0.1 y

t1:4 Fat 1.6±0.0 x 2.0±0.0 y 1.9±0.0 y

t1:5 Starch 38.4±0.4 x 38.7±0.1 x 44.3±0.2 y

t1:6 Total dietary fibre (TDF) 30.5±0.8 x 29.2±0.8 x 26.7±0.7 y

t1:7 Insoluble dietary fibre (IDF) 25.7±0.4 x 24.1±0.9 y 21.2±0.7 z

t1:8 Soluble dietary fibre (SDF) 4.8±0.4 x 5.1±0.1 xy 5.5±0.1 y

t1:9 Ash 3.7±0.0 x 3.8±0.0 x 2.9±0.1 y

Values followed by the same letters (x–z) in the same row were notsignificantly different (P <0.05)

t2:1Table 2 Median particle size and particle size distribution of coarse-,medium- and fine particle-sized rye bran determined using a laserdiffraction particle size analyser (LDPSA)

t2:2Bran Medianparticlesize (μm)

<1 μm(%)

<10 μm(%)

< 100 μm(%)

< 1000 μm(%)

t2:3Coarse 440±1.3 a 0.0±0.0 a 3.8±0.1 a 23.5±0.2 a 81.8±0.3 a

t2:4Medium 143±1.3 b 0.0±0.0 a 5.8±0.1 b 40.3±0.3 b 99.9±0.0 b

t2:5Fine 28±0.1 c 0.0±0.0 a 16.3±0.1 c 83.6±0.3 c 100.0±0.0 b

Values followed by the same letters (a–c) in the same column were notsignificantly different (P <0.05)

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

241 water addition regimens were used: IB and PC. PC was242 carried out by adjusting the moisture content of the bran243 before extrusion. The bran was mixed in a spiral mixer244 (Diosna SP 12 F/E, Dierks & Söhne, Osnabrück, Germany)245 and the required amount of water was added gradually with246 continuous high-speed mixing. A cover was used to prevent247 moisture loss during mixing. After completion of water addi-248 tion, mixing was continued for another 10 min and the bran249 was hydrated overnight at 4 °C in sealed plastic bags.250 The values of torque, die pressure and die temperature251 were monitored and recorded during the extrusion. SME252 is an important process parameter used to describe pro-253 cessing conditions. SME (Hu et al. 1993) was calculated254 with Eq. 1:

SME kWh kg−1� � ¼ ω

ωr� t

100� Zr

Q: ð1Þ

255256257 Whereω is the screw speed (in rotations perminute, rpm),ω r

258 is the maximum screw speed of the extruder used (1,100 rpm), C259 is the torque (in percent), Z r is the maximum power260 capacity of the extruder (16 kW) and Q is the feed rate (in261 kilogram per hour).

262 Chemical Analyses

263 Analyses of the chemical composition of raw materials and264 extruded samples were made as follows: total protein content265 by American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) meth-266 od no. 46-11A (AACC 2003), fat by Association of Official267 Analytical Chemists (AOAC) method no. 922.06 (AOAC268 2000), total starch by AACC method no. 76.13 (AACC269 1999), total dietary fibre by AOAC method no. 985.29270 (AOAC 1990), insoluble and soluble dietary fibre by AOAC271 method no. 991.43 (AOAC 1992), ash gravimetrically by272 burning at 550 °C in a muffle furnace, and moisture content273 by drying the samples in an oven at 105 °C for 3 h. Total

274protein, fat and ash were analysed as duplicates, whereas275total starch and all fibre analyses were performed as276quadruplicates.

277Macrostructural Analyses

278Extruded samples (20 replicates) of each extrusion experiment279were collected, dried at 105 °C for 20 min and cooled to room280temperature. Length and diameter in three different points of281each sample were measured using a Vernier calliper and the282average diameters of the samples were obtained.283Expansion rate was calculated with Eq. 2:

expansion rate %ð Þ ¼ De

Dd� 100% ð2Þ

Fig. 1 a Extruder design andbarrel temperature profile insections 1–6 and the die (adaptedand modified from De Pilli et al.(2011)). b Configuration of twinscrews inside the barrel. Thekneading elements betweenconveying screws are highlightedin red. The pressurising elementsalso known as extrusion screwsare marked in green

t3:1Table 3 Experimental design for rye bran extrusion

t3:2Sample Particlesize (μm)

Hydrationregimen (IB/PC)

Screw speed(rpm)

t3:3CoarseIB 300 440 IB 300

t3:4CoarseIB 500 440 IB 500

t3:5CoarsePC 300 440 PC 300

t3:6CoarsePC 500 440 PC 500

t3:7MediumIB 300 143 IB 300

t3:8MediumIB 500 143 IB 500

t3:9MediumPC 300 143 PC 300

t3:10MediumPC 500 143 PC 500

t3:11FineIB 300 28 IB 300

t3:12FineIB 500 28 IB 500

t3:13FinePC 300 28 PC 300

t3:14FinePC 500 28 PC 500

Extrudates made of coarse-, medium- and fine-particle-sized rye branprocessed with 17 % feed moisture in two different hydration regimens(in barrel–water feed (IB), preconditioning (PC)) at two different screwspeeds of 300 and 500 rpm at 130 °C

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

284285286 where De is the average diameter measured at three different287 points of the extrudate sample (in millimeter) and Dd is the288 diameter of the die (5 mm).289 Specific length was calculated with Eq. 3:

specific length m kg−1� � ¼ Le

með3Þ

290291292 where Le is the length of the extrudate sample (in meter) and293 me is the mass of the sample (in kilogram). Piece density was294 calculated with Eq. 4:

piece density kg m−3� � ¼ 4� me

π� Deð Þ2 � Leð4Þ

295296297 where me is the mass of the sample (in kilogram), De is the298 average diameter measured at three different points of the299 extrudate sample (in meter) and Le is the length of the300 extrudate sample (in meter).

301 Microstructural Analyses

302 Samples for X-ray microtomography (XMT) were made by303 cutting 10 mm pieces (axial section) from the extrudate sam-304 ples with an electric saw (Power ST-WBS800, Taiwan Sheng305 Tsai Industrial Co. Ltd., Taiwan). Samples were scanned using306 a desktop XMT system (Model 1172, SkyScan, Aartselaar,307 Belgium) consisting of an X-ray tube, an X-ray detector and a308 charge-coupled devices (CCD) camera. The X-ray tube was309 operated at a voltage of 40 kV/250 μA to obtain optimum310 contrast between void (air cells) and matter (cell walls) ac-311 cording to a modified method (Sozer et al. 2011a, b). A 12-bit312 cooled CCD camera (512×1,024 pixels) was used to collect313 the X-ray data. Samples were rotated by a total of 180° during314 the scanning process with a pixel size of 11.65 μm to obtain315 optimum resolution, resulting in a total scanning time of316 18 min. The initial X-ray radiographs or raw images were317 obtained at every 0.7° of rotation. Samples were scanned in318 triplicate. After scanning, radiographs were loaded into319 NRecon reconstruction software (v. 1.6.6). The software com-320 bines the images graphically into a 3-D object fromwhich 2-D321 cross-sectional images can be taken. Before the reconstruc-322 tion, the CS rotation feature was used to rotate the sample323 cross-sections, making them parallel to the view window.324 Beam hardening correction was set to 40 % in order to reduce325 the number of artefacts. Cell walls of the solid matrix appear326 grey, whereas air cells appear black. The reconstructed 2-D327 slices were then loaded into CTAn software (v. 1.12, Skyscan,328 Belgium) to obtain the parameters of porosity, cell wall thick-329 ness (t), cell diameter (D ) and fragmentation index (i.e. degree330 of cell connectedness). In addition, the thickness to diameter331 (t /D) ratio was calculated from the data.

332Mechanical Properties Analyses

333Mechanical properties of extrudates were analysed by the334uniaxial compression test using a texture analyser (Texture335Analyser TA-HDi, HD3071, Stable Micro Systems, UK)336equipped with a 250 kg load cell and a cylindrical 36 mm337aluminium probe. Samples of 10 mm length were cut as338described above and equilibrated at a relative humidity of33943 % at 21 °C. The samples were deformed at 70 % strain340with a test speed of 1 mm/s. The force–deformation (f–d)341curve was obtained to assess the mechanical characteristics342of the extrudate samples. Each measurement was performed343with 20 replicates. Texture Exponent software v.5.1.2.0 (Sta-344ble Micro Systems, UK) was used to obtain values of actual345and smoothed curve length, area under the f–d curve, number346of peaks and hardness (Fmax). The number of peaks represents347the number of cell wall ruptures during compression, and348Fmax is the maximum force needed to initiate cell wall crack.349Different approaches were used to describe the hardness and350crispiness of extrudates such as crushing force, crispiness351work and crispiness index.352Crushing force was calculated with Eq. 5:

crushing force Nð Þ ¼ A

lð5Þ

353354355where A is the area under the f–d curve (N m Q1m) and l is the356distance of compression (in millimeter).357Crispiness work (Cw) was calculated with Eq. 6 (Van Hecke358et al. 1998).

Cw N mmð Þ ¼ A

Nð6Þ

359360361where A is the area under the f–d curve (N mm) and N is the362number of peaks.363Crispiness index (Ci) was calculated with Eq. 7 (Heidenreich364et al. 2004).

Ci ¼ LNA� Fmean

ð7Þ

365366367where LN is the normalised curve length (length of actual368curve/Fmax), A is the area under the f–d curve (N in369millimeter) and Fmean is the sum of the actual force values in370the data file divided by the number of data points (N ).

371Statistical Analyses

372Statistical significance was assessed by one-way ANOVA373(LSD) using a significance level of 0.05. Correlations between374different variables were calculated using two-tailed Pearson375bivariate correlation with significance levels of 0.01 and 0.05.

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

376 Statistical analyses were made using SPSS Statistics 19 (SPSS377 Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software.

378 Results and Discussion

379 Dietary Fibre Content

380 The IDF and TDF contents of rye bran were decreased by381 milling (lowering the particle size from 440 to 28 μm), where-382 as the SDF content increased slightly. IDF and TDF contents383 of fine raw material were significantly lower than the coarse384 and medium materials (Table 1). The SDF content of fine rye385 bran was significantly higher than that of coarse bran. Coarse386 and medium rye bran had a significant difference only in IDF387 content, but both had equal amounts of TDF and SDF. Similar388 findings were reported by Zhu et al. (2010), who found that389 ultrafine milling of wheat bran to a final average particle size390 of 0.344 μm decreased IDF and TDF contents, but increased391 SDF content. The decrease of TDF content is caused by392 degradation of insoluble components (hemicellulose, cellu-393 lose and lignin) into smaller molecular weight compounds.394 On the other hand, decrease of IDF and increase of SDF were395 due to the redistribution of the fibre components from insol-396 uble to soluble fraction. Extrusion processing had no signifi-397 cant effect on the DF composition of coarse rye bran (Table 4).398 However, IDF and TDF contents of medium and fine rye bran399 increased during extrusion processing. IDF contents increased400 by 7.1–9.5 and 11.3–12.3% for extrudedmedium and fine rye401 bran, respectively, compared to the raw material. The TDF402 contents of extruded medium and fine bran increased by 6.2–403 9.9 and 9.0–10.5 %, respectively.404 Extrusion did not have a clear effect on IDF, SDF and TDF405 contents of extruded rye bran samples. Extrusion processing406 has been reported to have less impact on the TDF content as407 compared to other physical DF modification techniques such408 as boiling, autoclaving and steaming (Q2 Meuser 2008). Increase409 of TDF was primarily due to the increase in IDF. The increase410 in IDF could be attributed to formation of resistant starch411 (Gualberto et al. 1997). The increase in SDF is due to the412 transformation of some of the IDF to SDF (Vasanthan et al.413 2002). In the studies of Vasanthan et al. (2002), IDF, SDF and414 TDF contents of pearled grain barley flour increased as a415 result of extrusion. The processing conditions in their study416 were screw speed 50 rpm, varying moisture levels of 20–50%417 and temperature of 90–140 °C. In earlier studies, Lue et al.418 (1991) reported that SDF content slightly increased in extrud-419 ed corn meal and sugar beet fibre samples, but the differences420 were not statistically significant. In their experiments,421 extrusion conditions were mild (200/300 rpm, 25 % feed422 moisture and temperature of 120 °C). Esposito et al. (2005)423 also reported an increase in IDF of durum wheat bran after424 extrusion at 400 rpm and 140 °C. Gajula et al. (2008) and

425Zhang et al. (2011) reported conflicting results regarding IDF,426TDF and SDF contents. In their study, IDF and TDF of wheat427bran decreased during extrusion processing, whereas SDF428content increased. The processing conditions in their studies429were less severe compared to those of the current study430(300/500 rpm, 17/19 % feed moisture and temperature of431110/130 °C). Gajula et al. (2008) used a screw speed of432200 rpm, feed moisture of 30 % and maximum barrel temper-433ature of 40 °C, whereas in the study by Zhang et al. (2011), the434corresponding conditions were 200 rpm, 45 % and 150 °C.435Other studies on other DF sources (wheat bran and orange436pulp) reported an increasing effect of extrusion processing on437SDF content and a decreasing effect on TDF content (Wang438et al. 1993; Larrea et al. 2005). The impact of extrusion439processing on various DF components is related to several440factors such as SME, screw speed, temperature, source of DF441and particle size (Robin et al. 2011b).

t4:1 Q4Table 4 Insoluble (IDF), soluble (SDF) and total dietary fibre (TDF)contents of raw and extruded coarse-, medium- and fine-particle sized ryebran

t4:2Sample Coarse Medium Fine

t4:3IDF (%, dry weight basis)

t4:4Raw 25.7±0.5 abcd, x 24.1±1.0 a, y 21.2±0.7 a, z

t4:5Extruded

t4:6IB 300 26.9±1.1 aef, x 25.8±1.5 bcd, xy 23.8±1.1 b, y

t4:7IB 500 26.7±1.3 bge, x 26.1±0.9 bef, x 23.6±0.5 bc, y

t4:8PC 300 24.6±1.7 ch, x 26.4±0.1 ce, y 22.1±0.2 ad, z

t4:9PC 500 25.2±0.9 dfgh, x 25.3±0.6 adf, x 22.5±0.6 cd, y

t4:10SDF (%, dry weight basis)

t4:11Raw 4.8±0.5 abc, x 5.1±0.1 ab, xy 5.5±0.1 a, y

t4:12Extruded

t4:13IB 300 5.1±0.3 adef, x 5.4±0.3 acde, x 5.4±0.6 a, x

t4:14IB 500 5.4±0.1 dgh, x 5.3±0.2 bc, x 5.9±0.1 a, y

t4:15PC 300 5.3±0.4 begi, x 5.7±0.1 df, x 5.8±0.1 a, x

t4:16PC 500 5.3±0.2 cfhi, x 5.7±0.3 ef, x 5.8±0.0 a, x

t4:17TDF (%, dry weight basis)

t4:18Raw 30.5±0.9 abcd, x 29.2±1.0 a, x 26.7±0.7 a, y

t4:19Extruded

t4:20IB 300 32.0±0.9 aef, x 31.2±1.7 bcd, x 29.1±0.7 b, y

t4:21IB 500 32.2±1.2 be, x 31.3±0.8 bef, x 29.5±0.5 b, y

t4:22PC 300 29.9±1.4 cg, x 32.1±0.1 ce, y 27.9±0.3 ac, z

t4:23PC 500 30.4±0.9 dfg, x 31.0±0.8 df, x 28.3±0.6 c, y

Extrudates made of coarse-, medium- and fine-particle sized rye branprocessed with 17 % feed moisture in two different hydration regimens(in barrel–water feed (IB), preconditioning (PC)) at two different screwspeeds of 300 and 500 rpm at 130 °C

Values followed by the same letters (a–i) in the same column in each fibregroup (IDF, TDF and SDF) were not significantly different (P<0.05).Values followed by the same letters (x–z) in the same row were notsignificantly different (P <0.05)

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

442 Extrusion did not significantly alter the SDF content except443 in the case of preconditioned medium-particle-sized rye bran,444 with which the amount of SDF increased (Table 4). The445 extrudates made of fine-particle-sized bran resulted in lower446 amounts of IDF and TDF and a higher amount of SDF447 compared to the extrudates made from coarse- and medium-448 particle-sized bran. The IDF, SDF and TDF contents of449 extruded samples varied in the ranges 22.1–26.9 %,450 5.1–5.9 % and 27.9–32.2 %, respectively (Table 4).451 Processing parameters such as feed moisture, screw speed452 and SME had no significant effect on the DF contents of453 extruded bran samples.

454 Macrostructural Properties

455 Due to the high content of starch in rye bran, expanded456 products were produced in extrusion evenwithout the addition457 of another starch source. Feed material had a starch content of458 39–44 % of solids and a DF content of 26.7–30.5 % in the459 current study. In most studies, the amount of total starch460 content of the feed material is higher (55–79 %), whereas461 the fibre content is lower (12–30 %; Lue et al. 1991; Robin462 et al. 2011a, b; Saeleaw et al. 2012). The higher amount of463 starch and lower amount of fibre favoured expansion in the464 study by Lue et al. (1991), Robin et al. (2011a, b) and Saeleaw465 et al. (2012). Expansion rates of rye bran extrudates processed466 under different conditions are shown in Table 5. The highest467 expansion rates (223 and 228 %) were for fine rye bran468 extrudates processed with 17 % feed moisture (IB and PC)

469at 500 rpm, whereas the lowest expansion rates (141 and470150 %) were measured for medium rye bran processed with47117 % feed moisture (IB and PC) at 300 rpm.472Reduction of particle size and increase in screw speed473significantly increased the expansion rate of extrudates. Parti-474cle size reduction from 440 (coarse) to 143 μm (medium) had475no significant influence on expansion rate, but further476micronization to 28 μm had a pronounced effect on expan-477sion. Similar results were reported by Robin et al. (2011b),478who found that particle size reduction of wheat bran from 317479(coarse) to 224 μm (fine) did not significantly affect the480expansion properties of wheat flour extrudates containing481wheat bran. The particle reduction in Robin et al. (2011b)482was only 30 % of the coarse (317–224 μm) wheat bran,483whereas in this study particle size reduction was 94 % of the484coarse (440–28 μm) rye bran. Alam (2012) showed that there485is a critical bran concentration above which the effect of486particle size reduction is significant. In this study, 10 % addi-487tion of defatted oat bran concentrate of three different particle488sizes (32, 61 and 213 μm) to defatted oat endosperm flour489(18 μm) did not give rise to any significant changes in the490expansion properties.491These results are supported by the results of an earlier study492by Lue et al. (1991), who found that decreasing the particle493size of sugar beet fibre (from 2,000 to 74 μm) improved radial494expansion of corn flour extrudates containing this DF source.495Lue et al. (1990) suggested that decreased particle size of the496sugar beet fibre favoured expansion due to the presence of497more air cells compared to the coarse fibre. Particle size498reduction of corn flour (or grits) has been reported to increase499expansion in many studies (Garber et al. 1997; Desrumaux500et al. 1998; Zhang and Hoseney 1998; Mathew et al. 1999;501Onwulata and Konstance 2006). Increase of product expan-502sion with particle size reduction was also reported by503Al-Rabadi Q3et al. (2010) in a study of milled barley. During504extrusion, starch molecules entrap the fibre particles and form505starch–fibre matrices. Therefore, fibre particle size has an506important role in forming the cell structure. Lowering the507particle size increased the possibility to obtain an expanded508product by promoting foam expansion (Guan et al. 2004). The509finer the fibre, the greater were the continuities in the starch–510fibre matrices, thus reducing premature cell rupture during the511extrusion. Larger particles have been suggested to restrict the512development of air cells, disrupt the air cell walls and to cause513air cells to collapse before optimal expansion takes place.514Thus, materials with coarse particle resulted in less expanded515products compared to fine materials. In addition, fine particle516size may provide more nucleation sites and thus more air cells,517resulting in better expansion (Lue et al. 1991). In the present518study, increase in expansion rate by reduction of particle size519to 28 μm could also be explained partly by the higher amount520of starch in fine raw material. A lower amount of IDF in fine521raw material could also be the reason for increased expansion.

t5:1 Table 5 Macrostructural properties of rye bran extrudates

t5:2 Sample Expansionrate (%)

Specific length(m/kg)

Piece density(kg/m3)

t5:3 CoarseIB 300 151±4 a 29±0.6 a 781±35 a

t5:4 CoarseIB 500 175±4 bcd 34±1.1 b 494±21 b

t5:5 CoarsePC 300 163±3 e 30±0.5 cd 629±19 c

t5:6 CoarsePC 500 176±3 bfg 35±0.4 efg 466±14 d

t5:7 MediumIB 300 150±4 a 30±1.0 chi 760±31 e

t5:8 MediumIB 500 175±4 cfh 35±0.7 ejk 475±18 d

t5:9 MediumPC 300 141±5 i 31±1.8 l 825±37 f

t5:10 MediumPC 500 165±3 e 35±1.4 fjm 531±21 g

t5:11 FineIB 300 179±10 dgh 30±1.5 dhn 538±60 g

t5:12 FineIB 500 228±11 j 34±1.3 b 292±32 h

t5:13 FinePC 300 217±7 k 29±1.4 ain 368±20 i

t5:14 FinePC 500 223±9 l 36±1.6 gkm 288±21 h

Extrudates made of coarse-, medium- and fine-particle-sized rye branprocessed with 17 % feed moisture in two different hydration regimens(in barrel–water feed (IB), preconditioning (PC)) at two different screwspeeds of 300 and 500 rpm at 130 °C

Values followed by the same letters (a–n) in the same column were notsignificantly different (P <0.05)

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

522 A higher amount of IDF has been reported to reduce expan-523 sion rate since it causes premature rupture of air cells within524 the extrudate structure, reducing the air cell size and thus525 expansion (Yanniotis et al. 2007; Brennan et al. 2008).526 Specific length of rye bran extrudates ranged between 29527 and 35 m/kg (Table 5). Increase in screw speed significantly528 increased the specific length of extrudates. Higher screw529 speed probably decreased melt viscosity because of increased530 shear, resulting in a longer specific length. A similar result was531 reported by Jin et al. (1994) for corn flour and soy fibre532 extrudates. Particle size and hydration regimen did not have533 a significant effect on specific length.534 Piece density of rye bran extrudates ranged between 288535 and 825 kg/m3 (Table 5). Coarse and medium rye bran had the536 highest density, whereas fine rye bran extrudates were least537 dense. Guan et al. (2004) stated that piece density is an indi-538 cator of a products’ porosity and expansion. Decreased piece539 density with decreasing particle size was reported in their study540 when oat (360–420 μm), wood (250–350 μm) and cellulose541 (150–250) fibre was added to starch containing 70 % amylose.542 Increase in screw speed and SME significantly decreased piece543 density, which is in agreement with previous studies (Jin et al.544 1994; Guha et al. 1997). Hydration regimen did not exhibit a545 clear trend with the piece density of extrudates.

546Microstructural Properties

547XMT image analysis was carried out for the extrudates proc-548essed at a screw speed of 500 rpm. Representative 2-D images549of XMT analysis are shown in Fig. 2. Particle size reduction550not only increased the expansion rate but also increased the551diameter of air cells. The largest and most spherical air cells552were observed in the centre of extrudates, whereas cell anisot-553ropy was found close to the outer surface. From the image554analysis data, the porosity increased from 64.4 to 83.9 % by555reducing particle size from 440 to 28 μm (Table 6). Higher556porosity of the fine particle size extrudates indicate that starch557granules were less disrupted and tended to cause higher558expansion compared to coarse and medium rye extrudates.559Similar explanation was reported in the study by Singkhornart560et al. (2014). However, no effect of particle size reduction was561observed between coarse (440 μm) and medium (143 μm) rye562bran extrudates. A good correlation was found between563macro- and microstructural properties (Tables 5 and 6), where564a positive correlation was found between expansion and565porosity (r =0.966, P <0.01). Piece density was negatively566correlated with both expansion (r =−0.994, P <0.01) and po-567rosity (r =−0.971, P <0.01). This correlation indicates that the568increase in expansion gives increased porosity and decreased

Fig. 2 2-D cross-section imagesof extrudates made of coarse-,medium- and fine-particle-sizedrye bran processed with 17% feedmoisture in two differenthydration regimens (IB in barrel–water feed, PC preconditioning)at a screw speed of 500 rpm at130 °C

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

569 piece density and is in agreement with previous work reported570 by Robin et al. (2012) and Singkhornart et al. (2014).571 Average cell diameter ranged between 0.49 and 1.17 mm572 and was significantly affected by reduction of particle size of573 rye bran down to 28 μm. Average cell diameter was highest574 for fine rye bran extrudates (Table 6). More small air cells575 were obtained with coarse- and medium-particle-sized576 extrudates (≈2,800–4,000) as compared to fine extrudates577 (≈1,000) due to early rupture of the precursor air cells578 (Robin et al. 2011b, 2012). The effect of particle size was579 more profound on D than on t , which affects the t /D ratio.580 Micronization of bran resulted in less thick cell walls and581 more expanded cells; the t /D ratio decreased from 0.5 to582 0.18 (Table 6). The thin cell walls of whole wheat extrudates583 also gave expanded and less dense structure in the study by584 Singkhornart et al. (2014). Different hydration regimens had585 no influence on the microstructural parameters of coarse- and586 medium-particle-sized rye bran extrudates. However, precon-587 ditioning of fine-particle-sized bran increased the porosity by588 6 % and decreased the t /D ratio almost by 50 %. The frag-589 mentation index (FI) is a measure of the relative connectivity590 of the cell structure. Low FI values (i.e. higher negative591 values) are an indicator of more connected lattices, whereas592 a high value indicates a more disconnected structure (Hahn593 et al. 1992; Sozer et al. 2011a). FI of rye bran extrudates594 ranged between −0.8 and −4.5 l/mm indicating high connec-595 tivity of the pores (Table 6).

596 Mechanical Properties

597 Mechanical properties are important for expanded prod-598 ucts since they can be used to predict sensory attributes of599 the products. Mechanical properties of rye bran extrudates600 were measured by the uniaxial compression test using a601 texture analyser. An f–d curve for a crispy product consists602 of a jagged curve in which there are many simultaneous603 fracture events.

604Hardness indicates the maximum force needed to cause a605cell wall rupture during compression. Hardness of coarse-,606medium- and fine-particle-sized rye bran extrudates processed607in various operating conditions is shown in Fig. 3a. Extrudates608from fine rye bran were the least hard, ranging between 145609and 336 N, whereas coarse and medium particle size resulted610in extrudates with hardness values from 210 to 460 N.611Extrudates from fine particle size processed at higher screw612speed had hardness values below 200 N, which has been613stated to be a critical threshold for consumer acceptance614(Lobato et al. 2011). Increase in screw speed significantly615increased expansion and in turn decreased hardness of the616products (r =−0.790, P <0.01). Alam (2012) showed that617expansion and hardness of the extrudates made of defatted618whole grain oats was significantly affected by the screw619speed, which had the most significant negative effect on the620hardness compared to other extrusion process parameters such621as moisture content and feed rate. Hardness had a negative622impact on product porosity (r =−825, P <0.05), which is in623agreement with a study by Chanvrier et al. (2013). Hardness624and crispiness index were negatively correlated (r =−0.718,625P <0.01), indicating that extrudates with lower hardness626values were more crispy. In addition to screw speed, particle627size of rye bran was another significant factor affecting the628textural properties of rye bran extrudates. Reducing the parti-629cle size of raw material from 440 to 28 μm resulted in630extrudates with decreased hardness and increased crispiness.631Garber et al. (1997) reported that decreasing the particle size632of corn flour and grits from 1,622 to 50 μm increased the633expansion and decreased the bulk density of the products,634which finally dictated the decrease of hardness.635Crushing force (i.e. the average puncturing force) of636extrudates varied from 35 to 108 N (Fig. 3b). Crushing force637decreased with particle size (r =0.631, P <0.05). Increase in638screw speed decreased crushing force, but the effect was not639significant. Crispiness work varied from 2.95 to 16.6 N mm.640The lowest crispiness work (2.95–4.16 N mm) was obtained641with the fine-particle-sized bran. The higher the crispiness

t6:1 Table 6 Extrudate microstructural properties based on XMT image analysis

t6:2 Sample Porosity (%) t (mm) D (mm) t /D FI (1/mm)

t6:3 CoarseIB 500 64.4±0.4 abc 0.24±0.01 a 0.49±0.02 abc 0.50±0.03 abc −4.5±0.7 abc

t6:4 CoarsePC 500 65.1±0.9 ade 0.24±0.01 a 0.51±0.04 ade 0.46±0.03 ade −4.4±0.2 ade

t6:5 MediumIB 500 65.0±3.3 bdf 0.29±0.02 bc 0.62±0.07 bdf 0.47±0.08 bdf −3.7±1.8 bdf

t6:6 MediumPC 500 64.4±1.7 cef 0.29±0.01 bd 0.63±0.11 cef 0.48±0.10 cef −4.5±1.4 cef

t6:7 FineIB 500 79.2±1.4 g 0.32±0.04 cd 1.17±0.03 g 0.28±0.02 g −0.8±0.7 g

t6:8 FinePC 500 83.9±2.3 h 0.20±0.01 e 1.10±0.14 g 0.18±0.03 g −1.5±0.4 g

t Average cell wall thickness, D average cell diameter, FI fragmentation index

Extrudates made of coarse-, medium- and fine-particle-sized rye bran processed with 17 % feed moisture in two different hydration regimens (in barrel–water feed (IB), preconditioning (PC)) at a screw speed of 500 rpm at 130 °C

Values followed by the same letters (a–h) in the same column were not significantly different (P<0.05)

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

642 work, the more resistant and the harder is the product. Extru-643 sion had similar effects on crispiness work (Fig. 3c) to those644 on crushing force, and the two results were in good agreement.

645The crispiness work obtained with fine-particle-sized bran646(26.7 % TDF) was lower than that of the coarse-particle-647sized bran (30.5 % TDF), which is in contrast to the studies

Fig. 3 a Hardness, b crushing force, c crispiness work and d crispinessindex of the extrudates made of coarse-, medium- and fine-particle-sizedrye bran processed with 17 % feed moisture in two different hydration

regimens (IB in barrel–water feed, PC preconditioning) at two differentscrew speeds of 300 and 500 rpm at 130 °C

Fig. 4 Relationship betweencrispiness index, expansion rateand piece density

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

648 of Carvalho et al. (2010) and Alam (2012). On the other hand,649 in the extrusion study by Alam (2012), 10 % oat bran (particle650 size of 32, 61 and 213 μm) was added to oat flour (18 μm). In651 that study, the total fibre content of the feed material was 7 %,652 at which the concentration of fibre in the feed material was653 insufficient to reflect the impact of particle size reduction on654 structural and textural properties. Thus we hypothesise that655 the presence of less fibre in the feed material with smaller656 particle size might cause it to act as a filler within the starch–657 fibre matrix, which would result in a rigid and less crispy cell658 structure.659 Crispiness index of the extrudates varied from 0.53×10−4

660 to 7.2×10−4. Extrudates with fine-particle-sized bran had the661 highest crispiness indices with all treatments (Fig. 3d). This662 was reflected by the good correlation (r =0.642, P <0.05)663 between particle size and crispiness index. In most samples,664 higher screw speed also increased the crispiness index of665 extrudates significantly (Fig. 3d). Extrudates with higher666 expansion and lower piece density had increased crispiness667 index as shown in Fig. 4. Specific length of extrudates did668 not influence textural parameters, suggesting that radial669 expansion rate is a more significant parameter in predicting670 the textural attributes of extruded food products. Particle671 size reduction increased porosity and reduced cell connected-672 ness (i.e. air cell structure was more open), leading to more673 expanded, less hard and more crispy products. Crispiness index674 showed a negative correlation with microstructural t /D ratio675 (r =−0.876, P <0.05) and a positive correlation with porosity676 (r =0.882, P <0.05) obtained from XMT image analysis. Good677 correlation between crispiness index and porosity suggests that678 crispiness of the product depends on the interior cell structure679 and cell wall morphology of the product (Chanvrier et al. 2013).680 Different particle sizes of rye bran possibly had a different cell681 structure and different cell wall morphology. Chanvrier et al.682 (2013) hypothesised that expanded cell structure and cell wall683 morphology affects the fracture mechanism, which controls the684 fracture events occurring in the cell wall during compression.685 Expanded extrudates with higher porosity had higher crispiness686 index values, whereas small air cells with thicker cell687 walls created foam structures with low crispiness index.688 The energy required to fracture large air cells surrounded689 by thin cell walls is lower than that required for small air690 cells with thick cell walls. Micronization of bran particles691 to 28 μm improved both the structural and mechanical692 properties of the rye bran extrudates.693 Microstructural parameters such as fragmentation index, t /D694 ratio are related to textural parameters. The relationship between695 textural and microstructural parameters was also studied696 by Karkle et al. (2012), who reported that increase in average697 cell diameter increased the frequency of spatial ruptures698 (corresponding to the number of peaks in our study) and699 decreased crispiness work, indicating that extrudates with700 larger air cells were less hard and more crispy.

701Conclusions

702The effects of extrusion processing on rye bran were highly703dependent on particle size of the raw material. The effects on704dietary fibre profile were articulated for medium and fine rye705bran compared to coarse rye bran. Extrusion processing did706not have a significant effect on SDF content but TDF contents707of medium and fine bran were increased by extrusion. De-708creasing the particle size of the rye bran from 440 to 28 μm709caused significant changes in the physical properties of the710extrudates compared to the extrudates made of larger-particle711(143 and 440 μm)-sized rye bran. The physical properties of712rye bran extrudates were not only dependent on the particle713size of the rye bran but also on extrusion process parameters714such as screw speed. Screw speed had a great influence on715product expansion and hardness. Regardless of particle size,716high screw speed gave expanded and less hard extrudates in717all extrusion experiments. Decreasing the particle size im-718proved the crispiness of rye bran extrudates by increased719expansion, air cell size and porosity with reduced hardness.720Expansion properties of extruded products contribute to tex-721tural attributes, such as crispiness which is one of the most722important consumer attributes for expanded snacks and ce-723reals. Reduction of particle size led to a significantly higher724crispiness index for all treatments regardless of screw speed725and application of different hydration regimens. The general726focus of this paper was to understand the effects of extrusion727processing on rye bran by varying bran particle size with an728emphasis on structure–texture–fibre effects. Future work will729focus on starch–fibre interactions in model products.

730Acknowledgments This study was supported by the Academy of731Finland. Prof Jukka Jurvelin and Dr Harri Kokkonen are acknowledged732for providing the X-ray microtomography facilities and for assisting in733the measurements.

734References 735

736American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (1999) Method 76–73713.01, Total starch assay procedure (megazyme amyloglucosidase/738α-amylase method). In: Approved methods of the American739Association of Cereal Chemists, AACC, St. Paul, MN, USA.740American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (2003) Method 46-74111A, crude protein-improved Kjeldahl method, copper catalyst742modification. In: Approved methods of the American Association743of Cereal Chemists (AACC), St. Paul, MN, USA744Alam SA (2012) Effects of extrusion process variables on the physical745properties of oat-containing extrudates. MSc Thesis. Department of746Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki,747Finland748Al-Rabadi, G. J., Torley, P. J., Williams, B. A., Bryden, W. L., & Gidley,749M. J. (2011). Particle size of milled barley and sorghum and750physico-chemical properties of grain following extrusion. Journal751of Food Engineering, 103(4), 464–472.

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

752 Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1990) Method753 985.29, Total dietary fibre. In: Official Methods of Analysis of the754 Association of Official Analytical Chemists: AOAC, Washington,755 DC.756 Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (1992) Method757 991.43, Total, soluble and insoluble dietary fibre in foods. In:758 Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official759 Analytical Chemists, AOAC, Arlington, VA.760 Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (2000) Method761 922.06, Fat in flour. In: Official Methods of Analysis of the762 Association of Official Analytical Chemists, AOAC, Gaithersburg,763 MD.764 Brennan, M. A., Monro, J. A., & Brennan, C. S. (2008). Effect of765 inclusion of soluble and insoluble fibres into extruded breakfast766 cereal products made with reverse screw configuration.767 International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 43(12),768 2278–2288.769 Brennan, M. A., Derbyshire, E., Tiwari, B. K., & Brennan, C. S. (2013).770 Ready–to–eat snack products: the role of extrusion technology in771 developing consumer acceptable and nutritious snacks.772 International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 48 , 893–902.773 Buttriss, J., & Stokes, C. (2008). Dietary fibre and health: an overview.774 Nutrition Bulletin, 33(3), 186–200.775 Carvalho, C. W., Takeiti, C. Y., Onwulata, C. I., & Pordesimo, L. O.776 (2010). Relative effect of particle size on the physical properties of777 corn meal extrudates: effect of particle size on the extrusion of corn778 meal. Journal of Food Engineering, 98(1), 103–109.779 Chanvrier, H., Desbois, F., Perotti, F., Salzmann, C., Chassagne, S.,780 Gumy, J., & Blank, I. (2013). Starch-based extruded cereals781 enriched in fibers: a behavior of composite solid foams.782 Carbohydrate Polymers, 98(1), 842–853.783 Chassagne-Berces, S., Leitner, M.,Melado, A., Barreiro, P., Correa, E. C.,784 Blank, I., Gumy, J., & Chanvrier, H. (2011). Effect of fibers and785 whole grain content on quality attributes of extruded cereals.786 Procedia Food Science, 1 , 17–23.787 Dahm, C. C., Keogh, R. H., Spencer, E. A., Greenwood, D. C., Key, T. J.,788 Fentiman, I. S., Shipley, M. J., Brunner, E. J., Cade, J. E., & Burley,789 V. J. (2010). Dietary fiber and colorectal cancer risk: a nested case–790 control study using food diaries. Journal of the National Cancer791 Institute, 102(9), 614–626.792 De Pilli, T., Derossi, A., Talja, R., Jouppila, K., & Severini, C. (2011).793 Study of starch–lipid complexes in model system and real food794 produced using extrusion-cooking technology. Innovative Food795 Science and Emerging Technologies, 12(4), 610–616.796 Desrumaux, A., Bouvier, J., & Burri, J. (1998). Corn grits particle size797 and distribution effects on the characteristics of expanded798 extrudates. Journal of Food Science, 63(5), 857–863.799 Esposito, F., Arlotti, G., Maria Bonifati, A., Napolitano, A., Vitale, D., &800 Fogliano, V. (2005). Antioxidant activity and dietary fibre in durum801 wheat bran by-products. Food Research International, 38 (10),802 1167–1173.803 Gajula, H., Alavi, S., Adhikari, K., & Herald, T. (2008). Precooked bran–804 enriched wheat flour using extrusion: dietary fiber profile and sen-805 sory characteristics. Journal of Food Science, 73(4), S173–S179.806 Garber, B., Hsieh, F., & Huff, H. (1997). Influence of particle size on the807 twin-screw extrusion of corn meal 1. Cereal Chemistry, 74(5), 656–808 661.809 Gualberto, D., Bergman, C., Kazemzadeh, M., & Weber, C. (1997).810 Effect of extrusion processing on the soluble and insoluble fiber,811 and phytic acid contents of cereal brans. Plant Foods for Human812 Nutrition, 51(3), 187–198.813 Guan, J., Fang, Q., & Hanna, M. (2004). Selected functional properties of814 extruded starch acetate and natural fibers foams. Cereal Chemistry,815 81(2), 199–206.816 Guha, M., Ali, S. Z., & Bhattacharya, S. (1997). Twin-screw extrusion of817 rice flour without a die: effect of barrel temperature and screw speed

818on extrusion and extrudate characteristics. Journal of Food819Engineering, 32(3), 251–267.820Guy, R. C. E. (1994). Raw materials for extrusion cooking processes. In821N. E. Frame (Ed.), The technology of extrusion cooking (pp. 52–72).822Glasgow, UK: Academic.823Hahn, M., Vogel, M., Pompesius-Kempa, M., & Delling, G. (1992).824Trabecular bone pattern factor—a new parameter for simple quan-825tification of bone microarchitecture. Bone, 13(4), 327–330.826Heidenreich, S., Jaros, D., Rohm, H., & Ziems, A. (2004). Relationship827between water activity and crispness of extruded rice crisps. Journal828of Texture Studies, 35(6), 621–633.829Hu, L., Hsieh, F., & Huff, H. (1993). Corn meal extrusion with emulsifier830and soybean fiber. LWT–Food Science and Technology, 26(6), 544–831551.832Jin, Z., Hsieh, F., & Huff, H. E. (1994). Extrusion cooking of corn meal833with soy fiber, salt, and sugar. Cereal Chemistry, 71(3), 227–233.834Jin, Z., Hsieh, F., &Huff, H. E. (1995). Effects of soy fiber, salt, sugar and835screw speed on physical properties and microstructure of corn meal836extrudate. Journal of Cereal Science, 22(2), 185–194.837Kamal-Eldin, A., Lærke, H. N., Knudsen, K. B., Lampi, A., Piironen, V.,838Adlercreutz, H., Katina, K., Poutanen, K., & Åman, P. (2009).839Physical, microscopic and chemical characterisation of industrial840rye and wheat brans from the Nordic countries. Food and841Nutrition Research, 53 .842Karkle, E. L., Alavi, S., & Dogan, H. (2012). Cellular architecture and its843relationship with mechanical properties in expanded extrudates con-844taining apple pomace. Food Research International, 46(1), 10–21.845Karppinen S (2003) Dietary fibre components of rye bran and their846fermentation in vitro. PhD thesis. VTT Biotechnology, Espoo,847Finland.848Karppinen, S., Kiiliäinen, K., Liukkonen, K., Forssell, P., & Poutanen, K.849(2001). Extraction and in vitro fermentation of rye bran fractions.850Journal of Cereal Science, 34(3), 269–278.851Larrea, M., Chang, Y., & Martinez-Bustos, F. (2005). Some functional852properties of extruded orange pulp and its effect on the quality of853cookies. LWT–Food Science and Technology, 38(3), 213–220.854Liukkonen, K., Katina, K., Wilhelmsson, A., Myllymaki, O., Lampi, A.,855Kariluoto, S., Piironen, V., Heinonen, S. M., Nurmi, T., Adlercreutz,856H., Peltoketo, A., Pihlava, J. M., Hietaniemi, V., & Poutanen, K.857(2003). Process-induced changes on bioactive compounds in whole858grain rye. Proceedings-Nutrition Society of London, 62(1), 117–859122.860Lobato, L., Anibal, D., Lazaretti, M., & Grossmann, M. (2011). Extruded861puffed functional ingredient with oat bran and soy flour. LWT–Food862Science and Technology, 44(4), 933–939.863Lue, S., Hsieh, F., Peng, I., & Huff, H. (1990). Expansion of corn864extrudates containing dietary fiber: a microstructure study.865Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft + Technologie, 23(2), 165–173.866Lue, S., Hsieh, F., & Huff, H. (1991). Extrusion cooking of corn meal and867sugar beet fiber: effects on expansion properties, starch gelatiniza-868tion, and dietary fiber content. Cereal Chemistry, 68(3), 227–234.869Mathew, J., Hoseney, R., & Faubion, J. (1999). Effects of corn sample,870mill type, and particle size on corn curl and pet food extrudates.871Cereal Chemistry, 76(5), 621–624.872Mendonça, S., Grossmann, M., & Verhé, R. (2000). Corn bran as a fibre873source in expanded snacks. LWT–Food Science and Technology,87433(1), 2–8.875Meuser, F. (2008). Chapter 23 Technological aspects of dietary fibre. In876B. V. McCleary & L. Prosky (Eds.), Advanced dietary fibre tech-877nology (p. 248). Osney Mead, Oxford: Blackwell.878Moore, D., Sanei, A., Hecke, E., & Bouvier, J. (1990). Effect of ingredi-879ents on physical/structural properties of extrudates. Journal of Food880Science, 55(5), 1383–1387.881Onwulata, C., & Konstance, R. (2006). Extruded corn meal and whey882protein concentrate: effect of particle size. Journal of Food883Processing and Preservation, 30(4), 475–487.

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013

AUTHOR'S PROOF

UNCORRECTEDPROOF

884 Robin, F., Dubois, C., Curti, D., Schuchmann, H. P., & Palzer, S. (2011a).885 Effect of wheat bran on the mechanical properties of extruded886 starchy foams. Food Research International, 44(9), 2880–2888.887 Robin, F., Dubois, C., Pineau, N., Schuchmann, H. P., & Palzer, S.888 (2011b). Expansion mechanism of extruded foams supplemented889 with wheat bran. Journal of Food Engineering, 107(1), 80–89.890 Robin, F., Dubois, C., Pineau, N., Labat, E., Théoduloz, C., & Curti, D.891 (2012). Process, structure and texture of extruded whole wheat.892 Journal of Cereal Science, 56(2), 358–366.893 Saeleaw, M., Dürrschmid, K., & Schleining, G. (2012). The effect of894 extrusion conditions onmechanical-sound and sensory evaluation of895 rye expanded snack. Journal of Food Engineering, 110(4), 532–896 540.897 Singh, S., Gamlath, S., &Wakeling, L. (2007). Nutritional aspects of food898 extrusion: a review. International Journal of Food Science and899 Technology, 42(8), 916–929.900 Singkhornart, S., Edou-ondo, S., & Ryu, G. (2014). Influence of germi-901 nation and extrusion with CO2 injection on physicochemical prop-902 erties of wheat extrudates. Food Chemistry, 143 , 122–131.903 Sozer, N., & Poutanen, K. (2013). Fibre in extruded food products. In904 Delcour & Poutanen (Eds.), Fibre-rich and wholegrain foods—905 improving quality (pp. 226–272). Cambridge, UK: Woodland.906 Sozer, N., Bruins, R., Dietzel, C., Franke, W., & Kokini, J. L. (2011a).907 Improvement of shelf life stability of cakes. Journal of Food908 Quality, 34(3), 151–162.

909Sozer, N., Dogan, H., & Kokini, J. L. (2011b). Textural properties and910their correlation to cell structure in porous food materials. Journal of911Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 59(5), 1498–1507.912Van Hecke, E., Allaf, K., & Bouvier, J. (1998). Texture and structure of913crispy-puffed food products part II: mechanical properties in struc-914ture. Journal of Texture Studies, 29(6), 617–632.915Vasanthan, T., Gaosong, J., Yeung, J., & Li, J. (2002). Dietary fiber916profile of barley flour as affected by extrusion cooking. Food917Chemistry, 77(1), 35–40.918Wang, W.-M., Klopfenstein, C. F., & Ponte, J. G., Jr. (1993). Effects of919twin-screw extrusion on the physical properties of dietary fibre and920other components of whole wheat and wheat bran and on the baking921quality of the wheat bran. Cereal Chemistry, 70(6), 707–711.922Yanniotis, S., Petraki, A., & Soumpasi, E. (2007). Effect of pectin and923wheat fibers on quality attributes of extruded cornstarch. Journal of924Food Engineering, 80(2), 594–599.925Zhang, W., & Hoseney, R. (1998). Factors affecting expansion of corn926meals with poor and good expansion properties. Cereal Chemistry,92775(5), 639–643.928Zhang, H.W., Yang,M.D., & Fan, X. F. (2011). Study onmodification of929dietary fiber from wheat bran. Advanced Materials Research, 183 ,9301268–1272.931Zhu, K., Huang, S., Peng, W., Qian, H., & Zhou, H. (2010). Effect of932ultrafine grinding on hydration and antioxidant properties of wheat933bran dietary fiber. Food Research International, 43(4), 943–948.

934

Food Bioprocess Technol

JrnlID 11947_ArtID 1225_Proof# 1 - 12/11/2013