albert einstein middle school · 2019-12-12 · albert einstein middle school school name 2014-15...
TRANSCRIPT
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 1 7/2/2014
Albert Einstein Middle SchoolSchool Name
2014-15 School Development andImprovement Plan
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 2 7/2/2014
Albert Einstein Middle School Vision and Mission
Sacramento City Unified School DistrictStrategic Plan Framework
Pillar I: Career- and College-Ready StudentsPillar II: Family and Community Engagement
Pillar III: Organizational Transformation
Vision:We believe every student should have the opportunity to reach his/her full potential within a postive, challenging, relevant, and secure environment, where care and respect for each other, the school family and the wider community are paramount. We believe every student should achieve the highest standards possible using information and communication resources in order to be college/career ready, and to thrive, grow and contribute in our global economy. It is our vision to help students become enthusiastic, lifelong learners on this path to success.
Mission:In order to fulfill our mission and realize our vision, the school aim:• To develop students who are respectful, responsible, caring, trustworthy and fair citizens.• To provide a caring, friendly, disciplined and supportive learning environment where students are comfortable,and attain the highest academic levels possible.• To help students develop an inquiring mind and the ability to ask good questions and make reasoned judgments and choices.• To recognize students’ different talents and individual needs and provide appropriate learning experiences within which all students will achieve success.• To deliver a broad, trans-disciplinary curriculum accessible to all students.• To help students recognize the needs of others and be able to collaborate to achieve a common purpose.• To work closely with parents and other stakeholders to achieve these aims.
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 3 7/2/2014
Profile of School (DATA)
Guide To Success: Site Level Metrics
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
CAREER AND COLLEGE READINESS
1. State Academic Performance CST “proficiency” in ELA
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Target
Schoolwide 47%
Black or African American 33%
American Indian or Alaska Native 13%
Asian 60%
Filipino 67%
Hispanic or Latino 39%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 50%
White 56%
Two or More Races 56%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 44%
English Learners 6%
Students with Disabilities 27%
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 4 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
CST “proficiency” in Math
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Target
Schoolwide 48%
Black or African American 31%
American Indian or Alaska Native 25%
Asian 69%
Filipino 73%
Hispanic or Latino 39%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 80%
White 56%
Two or More Races 5%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 47%
English Learners 27%
Students with Disabilities 21%
“Proficiency” in Science
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Target
Schoolwide 50%
Black or African American 32%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0%
Asian 52%
Filipino 57%
Hispanic or Latino 41%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 75%
White 64%
Two or More Races 46%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 46%
English Learners 4%
Students with Disabilities 33%
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 5 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
“Proficiency” in History-Social Sciences (pending)
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Target
Schoolwide 48%
Black or African American 27%
American Indian or Alaska Native 0%
Asian 65%
Filipino 57%
Hispanic or Latino 39%
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 50%
White 62%
Two or More Races 46%
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 45%
English Learners 4%
Students with Disabilities 11%
8th grade cohort who graduate
Enrollment and passing rates in AP/IB/dual-credit/college prep
courses*On-track to meeting
UC/CSU requirements (a-g)*
N/A
2. Post High School Preparation
K-2 Literacy Assessment (Team desires to move to
PK-12)N/A
3. 21st Century Skills
Student Guide to Success (pending) N/A
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 6 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
Chronic absenteeism 13.91%
4. AttendanceStaff attendance
Certificated 94.87%
Non-Certificated 95.44%
School Environment (staff, students, families) N/A
School Communication (staff, students, families) N/A5. School
ConnectednessSchool Achievement (staff,
students, families) N/A
Information on the five indicators
ENGAGEMENT
6. Social-Emotional Learning
Suspension Ratesuspension rate per 100 students 13.4
Percent of school year missed (in days) from suspensions 0.28%
CST "catch-up/keep-up" in ELA
Grd. 4 42.86%
Grd. 7 42.86%
Grd. 8 52.99%
CST "catch-up/keep-up" in Math
Grd. 7 58.67%
Grd. 8 46.34%
CST "catch-up/keep-up" in Science
CST Cohort Performance in ELA (2+ consecutive years
at site)
Grd. 8 52.07%
TRANSFORMATION
7. State Academic Performance of
Target Demographics
CST Cohort Performance in Math (2+ consecutive years
at site)
Grd. 8 45.99%
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 7 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
CST Cohort Performance in Science (2+ consecutive
years at site)
Achievement Gap Performance CST ELA
Number Taken Percent Passed Gap
White--- 278 55.76% N/A
African-American 129 33.33% 22.42%
Asian--- 45 60.00% -4.24%
Hispanic/Latino 192 38.54% 17.21%
American Indian 8 12.50% 43.26%
Filipino 16 62.50% -6.74%
Pacific Islander 10 50.00% 5.76%
Two or more ethnicities 25 56.00% -0.24%
Non-Special Ed 608 50.00% N/A
Special Ed 95 26.32% 23.68%
Non-ELL 469 42.64% N/A
ELL----- 66 6.06% 36.58%
Non-Foster Youth 719 46.45% N/A
Foster Youth 4 25.00% 21.45%
Non-FRPL 269 52.04% N/A
FRPL---- 434 43.55% 8.50%
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 8 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
Achievement Gap Performance CST Math
Number Taken Percent Passed Gap
White--- 278 55.76% N/A
African-American 129 31.01% 24.75%
Asian--- 45 68.89% -13.13%
Hispanic/Latino 192 38.54% 17.21%
American Indian 8 25.00% 30.76%
Filipino 16 68.75% -12.99%
Pacific Islander 10 80.00% -24.24%
Two or more ethnicities 25 56.00% -0.24%
Non-Special Ed 608 51.97% N/A
Special Ed 95 20.00% 31.97%
Non-ELL 469 42.64% N/A
ELL----- 66 27.27% 15.37%
Non-Foster Youth 719 47.29% N/A
Foster Youth 4 50.00% -2.71%
Non-FRPL 269 47.58% N/A
FRPL---- 434 47.70% -0.11%
8. Post High School Performance of
Target Demographics
8th Grade Graduation "Cohort Performance"
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 9 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
Achievement Gap 8th Grade Graduation
Number Taken Percent Passed Gap
White---
African-American
Asian---
Hispanic/Latino
American Indian
Filipino
Pacific Islander
Two or more ethnicities
Non-Special Ed
Special Ed
ELL-----
Non-Foster Youth
Foster Youth
Non-FRPL
FRPL----
AP/IB Courses "Cohort Performance"
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 10 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
Achievement Gap AP/IB Enrollment
Number Taken Percent Passed Gap
White---
African-American
Asian---
Hispanic/Latino
American Indian
Filipino
Pacific Islander
Two or more ethnicities
Non-Special Ed
Special Ed
ELL-----
Non-Foster Youth
Foster Youth
Non-FRPL
FRPL----
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 11 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
Achievement Gap AP/IB Passing
Number Taken Percent Passed Gap
White---
African-American
Asian---
Hispanic/Latino
American Indian
Filipino
Pacific Islander
Two or more ethnicities
Non-Special Ed
Special Ed
ELL-----
Non-Foster Youth
Foster Youth
Non-FRPL
FRPL----
UC/CSU On-Track Catch-up and Keep-Up N/A------
UC/CSU On-Track "Cohort Performance" N/A------
Achievement GapUC/CSU On Track N/A------
Literacy "Catch-up and Keep Up" N/A------
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 12 7/2/2014
GUIDE TO SUCCESS FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW
Area of Interest Indicator Metric Measurement
Literacy Cohort Performance (2+
consecutive years at site)N/A------
Achievement Gap Performance Literacy N/A------
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 13 7/2/2014
Profile of School (DATA)
Academic Performance Index – A.P.I.
Groups 2011Base
2012Growth
2011-12GrowthTarget
2011-12Growth
MetTarget
2012Base
2013Growth
2012-13GrowthTarget
2012-13Growth
MetTarget
2013Base
2014Growth
2013-14GrowthTarget
2013-14Growth
MetTarget
Schoolwide 777 801 5 24 Yes 815 766 A -49 No
Black or African American 704 706 5 2 No 727 685 5 -42 No
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian 873 891 895 817
Filipino 918 864 871 792
Hispanic or Latino 743 765 5 22 Yes 781 737 5 -44 No
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 851 918 924
White 818 848 A 30 Yes 858 805 A -53 Yes
Two or More Races 829 820 840 849
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 752 785 5 33 Yes 801 748 A -53 No
English Learners 768 822 5 54 Yes 832 699 A -133 No
Students with Disabilities 561 591 615 589
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 14 7/2/2014
Profile of School (DATA)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Components – Albert Einstein Middle School (PI Status: )
Component 1: Participation Rate
English Language Arts Mathematics
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014Category
RateMetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method Rate
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method Rate
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method Rate
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method Rate
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method Rate
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method
AYP Target 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0 95.0
Schoolwide 100 Yes SH 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes
Black or African American 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes
American Indian orAlaska Native 100 -- 100 -- 100 -- 100 --
Asian 100 -- 100 -- 100 -- 98 --
Filipino 100 -- 100 -- 100 -- 100 --
Hispanic or Latino 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes 99 Yes
Native Hawaiian orPacific Islander 100 -- 100 -- 100 -- 100 --
White 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes
Two orMore Races 100 -- N/A 100 -- 100 -- N/A 100 --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes
English Learners 100 Yes 100 Yes 100 Yes 99 Yes
Students with Disabilities 100 -- 99 Yes 100 -- 98 Yes
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 15 7/2/2014
Profile of School (DATA)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Components – Albert Einstein Middle School (PI Status: )
Component 2: Percent Proficient – Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)
English Language Arts Mathematics
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014CategoryPercent
ProficientMet AYP Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Proficient
Met AYP Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Proficient
Met AYP Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Proficient
Met AYP Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Proficient
Met AYP Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Proficient
Met AYP Criteria
Alt. Method
AYP Target (ES/MS) 78.4 100 79.0 100
AYP Target (HS) 77.8 100 77.4 100
Schoolwide 57.4 Yes SH 49.2 No 52.3 No 50.5 No
Black or African American 33.6 No 35.3 No 34.4 No 34.5 No
American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Asian 73.9 -- 59.6 -- 65.2 -- 71.7 --
Filipino 56.2 -- 62.5 -- 68.8 -- 68.8 --
Hispanic or Latino 54.1 Yes SH 41.3 No 44.1 Yes SH 41.3 No
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 91.7 -- -- -- 75.0 -- -- --
White 66.1 Yes SH 57.8 No 61.7 Yes SH 57.5 No
Two orMore Races 66.7 -- N/A 60.9 -- 53.8 -- N/A 60.9 --
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 54.7 Yes SH 45.0 No 50.2 Yes SH 48.7 No
English Learners 63.5 Yes SH 30.7 No 55.1 Yes SH 44.4 No
Students with Disabilities 47.7 -- 30.4 No 24.4 -- 30.7 No
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 16 7/2/2014
Profile of School (DATA)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Components – Albert Einstein Middle School (PI Status: )
Component 3: Academic Performance Index (API)Additional Indicator for AYP
Component 4: Graduation Rate
2012 2013 2014 2012 2013 2014
Category 2011Growth
API
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method
2012 Growth
API
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method
2013 Growth
API
MetAYP
Criteria
Alt.Method
2011 Grad. Rate
(Class of 2009-10)
MetGrad. Rate
Criteria
Alt.Method
2012 Grad. Rate
(Class of 2010–11)
MetGrad. Rate
Criteria
Alt.Method
2013 Grad. Rate
(Class of2011-12)
MetGrad. Rate
Criteria
Alt.Method
AYP Target 710 740 770
Schoolwide 777 Yes 815 No N/A N/A
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 17 7/2/2014
Profile of School (DATA)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Safe Harbor Targets for Albert Einstein Middle School
Using 2014 Percent Proficient to Determine Minimum Safe Harbor Percent
English-Language Arts Mathematics
GROUPS Valid Scores
Number At or
Above Proficient
Percent At or Above Proficient
Met 2014 AYP
Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Not
Proficient
Safe Harbor Percent Growth
Goal
Safe Harbor Percent Target
Valid Scores
Number At or
Above Proficient
Percent At or Above Proficient
Met 2014 AYP
Criteria
Alt. Method
Percent Not
Proficient
Safe Harbor Percent Growth
Goal
Safe Harbor Percent Target
Schoolwide
Black or African American
American Indian or Alaska Native
Filipino
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
Two or More RacesSocioeconomically Disadvantaged
English Learners
Students with Disabilities
2014 AYP Percent Proficient TargetsES: ELA: 100% / Math: 100%MS: ELA: 100% / Math: 100%HS: ELA: 100% / Math: 100%
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 18 7/2/2014
The SDIP Process
Describe the process that the school has gone through in compiling the SDIP – this page is included so that all stakeholders are reminded of the collaborative process and in order that anyone reading the document is aware that school development and improvement is through a collaborative approach.
[ ] Gather data[ ] Analyze, reflect upon & discuss data[ ] Find Big Messages from Data[ ] Organize Big Messages by Common themes[ ] Identify 2-3 priorities from Big Messages[ ] Plan actions to support prioritiesf[ ] Merge actions, create time line and identify funding[ ] Design evaluation process and structures[ ] Inclusive list and dates of collaborative stakeholder meetings
The school development and improvement planning process has been collaborative including all teachers, the Leadership Team and the School Site Council. The following steps were taken to ensure collaboration by all stakeholders:School-wide student achievement data reports were reviewed at a pre-service meeting, fall staff meetings, a common planning time session, and School Site Council (SSC) meeting. At a staff meeting with SSC representation, the big messages were brainstormed and the top three priotity areas emerged and were mutually agreed upon with consensus. The Leadership Team developed the vision and mission statements, the School Quality Review SEF and action steps for the top three priority areas. At a staff meeting, the teachers reviewed the SDIP draft. The Leadership Team and SSC reviewed the SDIP draft and gave feedback for refinement. The SSC approved the SDIP.
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 19 7/2/2014
Big Messages
From our analysis of current school context, the following BIG messages were identified:
The following big messages emerged as all teachers and SSC representatives brainstormed and discussed the prompt via small groups and whole group share-out. The top three priorities emerged with 100% consensus.School Climate• There is a positive school climate overall.• Teachers and staff have high academic and behavioral expectations for all students.• Students will explore, discover and create in class.Academic Rigor• We are a data driven school and make decisions based on student achievement data.• Academic rigor is a high priority.• Preparing students in high school, college and careers is a priority and an on-going topic of discussion and planning.• Interventions for at-risk learners are essential to closing achievement gaps.• The school library is the hub of literacy learning ad is an essential part of our instructional program.Parent Engagement and Community Outreach• Parent engagement/educations and community outreach are priorities.• Rebuilding the K-12 Rosemont community is important to us.
BLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROWBLANK ROW
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 20 7/2/2014
Priority 1: Increase academic rigor for all students through all departments and curricular areas.Goal: By August 2015, all students will show improved academic achievement as evidenced by (a) increasing our API index of 766, (b) increasing achievement of our EL students and (c) completing school-wide, cross-curricular Units of Study and other Common Core projects/assignments.Rationale: As a Program Improvement School, we are committed to closing the achievement gap for all student groups.
Priority 2: Continue to build a positive and safe school climate.Goal: By June 2015, the school will provide a safe learning environment for all students, more conducive to learning, as evidenced by a reduced number of classroom referrals and student suspension and an increased attendance rate.Rationale: Due to the number of suspensions, attendance hovers near 95%.
Priority 3: Increase parent engagement and community outreach.Goal: By June 2015, community involvement will have increased to build connections with elementary schools and neighborhood groups so that enrollment increases.Rationale: We have made progress in the community, reversing the enrollment trend and receiving an allocation of 2 additional teachers. We need to continue this growth within our community and outside of it.
2014-15 Allocations of Categorical Funds
Title I LCFF – F/R LCFF - EL QEIA Other: Other:
97782 $142087 $14759
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 21 7/2/2014
Parent Engagement and Partnership ActivitiesTo Reach School Priority Goal
To directly support school priority goals (academic, non-academic, climate) in the School Development and Improvement Plan (SDIP), the plan should include a Parent Engagement and Partnership component. The component develops programs, training, and activities in the six Epstein areas below to support the school improvement goal.
Parenting
To reach school priority goal, strategies should be developed to help parents understand how they can assist their children. If the priority goal is to increase reading scores, the school should offer parenting workshops to help instill in children a love of reading, or workshops to help parents understand the content standards in the area of reading and how they can help.
Communication
To reach school priority goal, strategies should be developed to help parents with the information and the vision of the benefits of the improvement goal. If the improvement goal is to increase math scores, a communication strategy may include stories about the importance of learning math in the school’s newsletter or an awareness campaign that culminates in recognition awards.
Home Learning
To reach school priority goal, strategies should be developed that improve the teacher-parent relationship, and that helps the parent to know how to more effectively collaborate and support classroom learning.
Volunteering
To reach school priority goal, strategies should be developed that solicit the assistance of parents in areas that will help the school reach their priority goal. If the school improvement goal is to improve safety in the campus, parent volunteers could be solicited to be hall monitors.
Decision Making
To reach school priority goal, strategies should be developed to strengthen and involve parent and community leaders to partner with the school to achieve all goal. Parent leaders should assist the school in encouraging other parents to provide needed support
Community
To reach school priority goal, strategies should be developed to solicit support from community organizations, local businesses, etc. Partnering with a local business, for example, could provide the school with needed money for projects, resources or volunteers with special kinds of expertise.
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 22 7/2/2014
LCAP Goals and Sub Goals
Goal 1: Increase percent of students who are on track ot graduate college and career ready.
Sub Goal 1:1 Provide standards-aligned curriculum, assessments and high quality instruction to prepare students to graduate college and career ready.
Sub Goal 1.2: Provide a variety of learning supports including differentiated instruction and interventions for all students as needed.
Sub Goal 1.3: Develop an infrastructure for on-going analysis of student performance and progress by providing teacher release time and collaborative learning time.
Goal 2: Schools will provide students with a clean, healthy, physically and emotionally safe learning environment.
Sub Goal 2.1: Students will be provided cleaner, better maintained learning environments.
Sub Goal 2.2: All schools will become safer, more culturally competent environments, where students learn social and emotional skills and receive additional supports to increase their engagement in learning.
Sub Goal 2.3: Schools will provide more varied opportunities for students to become interested in school and learning through technology based activities, project based learning, extended extracurricular, and expanded learning program involvement.
Goal 3: Parents, family and community stakeholders will become more fully engaged as partners in the education of students in SCUSD
Sub Goal 3.1: Stakeholders will have improved opportunities to participate in district/site activities that increase their skills as partners in education.
Sub Goal 3.2 Stakeholders will receive improved district and site communications, including translation/interpretation services.
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 23 7/2/2014
Whole School Priority #1
Priority Goal 1 Increase academic rigor for all students through all departments and curricular areas.Goal: By August 2015, all students will show improved academic achievement as evidenced by (a) increasing our API index of 766, (b) increasing achievement of our EL students and (c) completing school-wide, cross-curricular Units of Study and other Common Core projects/assignments.Rationale: As a Program Improvement School, we are committed to closing the achievement gap for all student groups.
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
Create writing center ELA, Hist dept faculty & Librarian
LCFF F&R$8,000
1.2 Int 1Writing assignments will increase in number, competency and analysis.
Publishing or as an audience for writers sharing their work
Prinicpal & AP observations
Peer observation & coaching
Completion of Units of Study
Writing Assignments
Common Planning Time
.5 Librarian Title 1$56,500
1.2 Int 1Hire librarian full-time
Writing assignments have quality research and citations.
Open library full-time
Int 2students can obtain reading materials as well as research skills.
Develop Common Core instruction in all departments~ELA: Novel studies & ELD support~Math: manipulatives~History: TCI support materials~Science: lab supplies~Electives: technology support~PE: equipment needs
Principal/APAll Teachers
Title 1, Stipends$12,000
1.2 Int 1CPT/staff meeting agendas:More challenging lessons:More library resources;Studetn goal sheets;Formative assessment dataCELDT (decrease in long term level 3 students)CST gaps closing
School wide instructional goals and instructional program presented at Back to School Night, SSC, ELAC and PTSA meetings.
Prinicpal & AP observations
Peer observation & coachingTeachers will implement BEST practices using materials developing hands on lessons.
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 24 7/2/2014
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
Materials CounselorAll teachers
Title 1Materials$16,757
1.3 Int 1Materials will be purchased and implemented into daily instruction. Lessons will be developed and implemented utilziing instructional technology.
Progress, Assessment data will be shared at SSC, ELAC, and PTSA meetings.
Prinicpal & AP observations
Peer observation & coachingTeachers will implement BEST practices using materials developing hands on lessons.
All teachersAdministration
Title 1Equipment $10,000
1.3 Int 1 Materials will be purchased and implemented into daily instruction. Lessons will be developed and implemented utilziing instructional technology.
Progress, Assessment data will be shared at SSC, ELAC, and PTSA meetings.
Prinicpal & AP observations
Peer observation & coachingTeachers will implement BEST practices using materials developing hands on lessons. Student work will be collected and compared identfying progress.
Continue differentiated instruction/interventions including GATE and support classes (additional FTE) & homework club.
Site Instruction Coordinator
LCFF F&R$45,087LCFF EL$14,759
1.1 Int 2Site Instructional Coordinator hired
Meetings with parents, after-school tutoring coordination
Principal observation
Music and Literacy Integration at the Middle Level:
• Integrate the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Technical Subjects (Music)
• Engage students with reading a variety of complex texts related to music.
• Respond to music orally and in writing
Music Teacher
LCFF F&R$14,600
2.3 Int 1Benchmark Assessment Data
Review of Student Work
Classroom Observation Data
Inform parents of student achievement progress, program direction, and strategies to reach the school vision:
• Student performances
• Parent conferences
• Zangle parent connection
Benchmark and data analysis
Examination of student work
Teacher feedback
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 25 7/2/2014
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
Provide targeted tutoring faculty LCFF F&R$27,000
1.2 Int 1
IAs LCFF F&R$1,500
1.2 Int 1Tutors assist in math and ELA classes so that student/teacher time can be increased.
Student performance and common assessments
Principal and APProvide Tutors for Math and ELA
Teachers LCFF F&R$10,571
1.2 Int 2
Faculty LCFF F&R$10,000
1.2 Int 1Training elevate overall competency of teaching
Lesson plans, common assessments, performance data.
Training for teachers
Subs LCFF F&R$7,000
1.2 Int 2
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 26 7/2/2014
Whole School Priority #2
Priority Goal 2 Continue to build a positive and safe school climate.Goal: By June 2015, the school will provide a safe learning environment for all students, more conducive to learning, as evidenced by a reduced number of classroom referrals and student suspension and an increased attendance rate.Rationale: Due to the number of suspensions, attendance hovers near 95%.
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
Principal/APAll teachers
Target Excellence stipends
2.2 Int 1Fewer referralsLessons include character education topicsSafety drill logsIncreased daily attendance in after-school clubsCollege Day activities
Parents/community will:~Advise and support the anti-bullying program~Support Soaring Awards through PTSA funding~Aid in acquiring a crosswalk
Principal & AP observations
LCFF F&RClerical OT $1,500
2.2 Int 2Fewer referrals and suspensionsIncreased time on task monitored by walk through observations.
School wide character ed program presented at Back to School Night, SSC, ELAC and PTSA meetings. Data will be shared at these meetings.
Peer observation & coachingDecreased students sent out of the classroom increasing student time on task.
Implement Anti-bullying program
LCFF F&RMaterials $5,000
2.2 EndSame as above
Collections of data re: 15/5 students every 6 weeks
Integrate character education efforts into daily lessons
Counselor LCFF F&RAdmin supplies$1,500
2.2 Int 1Students will be rewarded and recognized for displaying positive character traits.
Parents will be invited to quarterly assemblies. Program will be shared via web site, connect ed, and newsletter.
Common planning time dialogue and process data
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 27 7/2/2014
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
LCFF F&RTransportation $1,829
2.2 Int 2Increased number of students recognized for displaying positive character traits.
Parents will be invited to quarterly assemblies. Program will be shared via web site, connect ed, and newsletter.
Soaring awards committeePrincipal/AP
EndSchool wide awards assembly recognizing students.
Parents will be invited to quarterly assemblies. Program will be shared via web site, connect ed, and newsletter.
Soaring Awards CommitteePrincipal/AP
Teachers and staff
TTarget Excellence Funding
1.2 Int 1Student participation access.
Programs will be presented at Back to School Night, SSC, ELAC and PTSA meetings. Data will be shared at these meetings. Program will be shared via web site, connect ed, and newsletter.
Student participation will be monitored by adminstration.
Continue after-school programs to provide positive alternatives for students including Target Excellence, athletics, Mathletes, NJHS, MESA, etc.
Int 2Increased participation in programs.
Programs will be presented at Back to School Night, SSC, ELAC and PTSA meetings. Data will be shared at these meetings. Program will be shared via web site, connect ed, and newsletter.
Student participation will be monitored by adminstration.
Int 1
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 28 7/2/2014
Whole School Priority #3
Priority Goal 3 Increase parent engagement and community outreach.Goal: By June 2015, community involvement will have increased to build connections with elementary schools and neighborhood groups so that enrollment increases.Rationale: We have made progress in the community, reversing the enrollment trend and receiving an allocation of 2 additional teachers. We need to continue this growth within our community and outside of it.
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
Admin Title 1$500
2.3 Int 1Increased enrollment by elementary feeder school.
attend back to school nights, carnivals and other events.
Principal, APBuild connections with elementary school communities
Int 2Increase enrollment from non-feeder schools.
Attend and build network meetings into powerful group structure.
Admin Int 1Collaborative efforts between schools increase in frequency and effectiveness.
Meetings that lead to strategies shared by network.
Principal, AP
Increase parent/Community involvement
Title 1$2,025
3.1 Int 1PTSA membership #s
PTSA president and admin
Expand Website Computer class & teacher
LCFF F&R Equipment $1,000
3.1 Int 1our website is visited by families and provides information readily available to partners
Post schedules, activities and email addresses.
Principal, AP
Community and Feeder school Outreach Opportunities
Principal/APstaff, PTSA
LCFF F&RDuplicating services$2,000
3.1 Int 1Collaborative efforts with elementary schools, outreach through programs that connect us with elementary school families, enrollment
elementary school visits at classes, carnivals, back to school nights.
Principal, AP
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 29 7/2/2014
Action Personnel Budget LCAP Goal Success Criteria Parent Engagement and Partnership Activities Ongoing Monitoring
LCFF F&R$5,500
3.2 Int 2Brochures or handouts result in visits or contact with elementary school families.
Literature draws community into school
Principal, AP
The Single Plan for Student AchievementRealizing the Vision
Page 30 7/2/2014
School Site Council Membership: Albert Einstein Middle School
Education Code Section 64001 requires that the SPSA be reviewed and updated at least annually, including proposed expenditures of funds allocated to the through the Consolidated Application, by the school site council. The current make-up of the council is as follows:
Name of Members Principal ClassroomTeacher
OtherSchoolStaff
Parent orCommunity
Member
SecondaryStudents
Garrett Kirkland [X] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Michael Holt [X] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Holly Kosiewicz [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Marie Rodriguez [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
Kenna Montoya [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
Bert Graham [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
Gary Kretzschmar [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [ ]
John Avila [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
Marjeanne Lobese [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] [ ]
Renee Hamlin [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
Kristina Reyes [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] [ ]
Fletcher Chritsian [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
Numbers of members of each category 2 3 4 2 2
At elementary schools, the school site council must be constituted to ensure parity between (a) the principal, classroom teachers, and other school personnel, and (b) parents of students attending the school or other community members. Classroom teachers must comprise a majority of persons represented under section (a). At secondary schools there must be, in addition, equal numbers of parents or other community members selected by parents, and students. Members must be selected by their peer group.