albert pinhasov department of molecular biology ariel university center
DESCRIPTION
Genome-based Diagnostics: Hype, Hope or Reality?. Albert Pinhasov Department of Molecular Biology Ariel University Center. Actual Issues of laboratory medicine of the XXI century Kazakhstan May 22, 2012. We now know how God wrote the book of life - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Albert PinhasovDepartment of Molecular Biology
Ariel University Center
Actual Issues of laboratory medicine of the XXI centuryKazakhstan
May 22, 2012
Genome-based Diagnostics:Hype, Hope or Reality?
We now know how God wrote the book of life
Bill Clinton
But…..
Do we know how to read the book !?
Genetic code
Human Genome contains about 3-billion nucleotides
Approximately 99.9% of our DNA sequence is identical the 0.1% difference between any two individuals
But…………
At the DNA level, this 0.1% difference translates into 3 million sites of genomic variation
DNA Sequencing
“Sequencing” DNA is simply the elucidation of the order of the bases in an organism’s DNA strand
Early techniques were developed in the 1970’s
A variety of approaches now exist
The biggest limitation to sequencing is that the genome is big
DNA Sequencing
First generation sequencing
Next generation sequencing
Third generation sequencing
Sanger sequencing’ has been the only DNA sequencing method for 30
years
Next Generation Sequencing
Miniaturization enables massively parallel analysis
Carrying out millions of sequencing reactions simultaneously in each of 10 million tiny wells
Computer analysis of huge amounts of information allows “assembly" of a given sequence
Cost of Human Genome
Next Generation Sequencing
Efforts are made
REVEAL
Individualized therapy
Individualized therapy
Integrated healthcareIntegrated healthcare
Pharmacoge-nomics
Pharmacoge-nomics
Translational medicine
Translational medicine
Predictive medicine
Predictive medicine
Genotype-based therapy
Genotype-based therapy
Customized drug therapyCustomized
drug therapy
Information-based
medicine
Information-based
medicineSystems medicineSystems
medicinePharmacoprot
eomicsPharmacoprot
eomics
Personalized Medicine
Personalized Medicine
What is it?
What does it mean to us?
How it impacts our life?
How it changes our future?
Personalized Medicine Vision vs. Reality
• Advances in science and technology
• Convergence of molecular biology,
genetics, biotechnology, bioinformatics
• Transformational changes in medicine
– Shift towards prevention
– Reclassification of disease
– Integration and coordination
• Health as a national asset
• Symptom based care
• Fragmented, lack of coordination
• Inefficient use of information
• Huge gaps provider knowledge re
genomics
• Powerful investors in current
system resist change
• Costs growing and unsustainable
Molecular Diagnostics are Transforming Medicine
13
Pre-natal testing
Disease predisposition
Disease detection
Drug selection
Recurrence monitoring
Key questionsIs the baby healthy? “
What diseases is this patient at
risk for?
Has this patient a disease?
What drugs should I
prescribe?
How has the disease returned?
Molecular diagnostics is >a many
billion market
growing at >20%
annually
Current challenges in genomic diagnostics
Personal training
Equipment
Data analysis
Standardization
Role of Central laboratories in development of genomic resources
Developing algorithms
Writing standard operating procedure (SOP)
Quality Control Scheme organization
Training courses at peripheral level
Peripheral laboratories need
Well trained people
SOP and quality assurance culture
Appropriate laboratory equipment
Sample collection and transportation experience
Data collection and registration experience
Clinical and Molecular Diagnostics of neurodegenerative and
psychiatric conditions
Neurodegenerative disorders
Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Epilepsy
Migraine
Multiple sclerosis (MS)
Alzheimer Disease
Signs & Symptoms: Memory loss for recent events Progresses into dementia and almost total
memory loss Inability to converse, loss of language ability Affective/personality disturbance Death from opportunistic infections, etc.
Confirmation of Diagnosis
Neuronal (b-amyloid) plaques
From http://www.rnw.nl/health/html/brain.html
Neurofibrillary tangles
From http://www.rnw.nl/health/html/brain.html
Brain Atrophy
AD: Lab diagnostic’s view
There is currently no biomarker of AD for early detection.
To date there is no definitive blood test available
that can discriminate dementia patients from healthy individuals.
A combination of characteristic plaque markers tau and amyloid b (Ab) may constitute a specific and sensitive cerebrospinal fluid marker for AD.
AD: genetic markers
Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4
Gene Mutations in APP gene on chromosome 21
Apo E polymorphism
Mutations in the presenilin1 gene
Mutations in the presenilin2 gene
Effect Abnormal b- amyloid fragment
Allele dependent susceptibility
Overproduction of the b-amyloid fragment
Overproduction of the b-amyloid fragment
Genotype: Controls AD
E2/E2 1.3% 0%
E2/E3 12.5% 3.4%
E2/E4 4.9% 4.3%
E3/E3 59.9% 38.2%
E3/E4 20.7% 41.2%
E4/E4 0.7% 12.9%
Jarvik G, Larson EB, Goddard K, Schellenberg GD, Wijsman EM (1996) Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the transmission of Alzheimer disease in a community-based sample. Am J Hum Genet 58:191-200
Prevalence of APOE genotypes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and controls
Farrer et al., JAMA, 1997
Odds of Alzheimer’s Disease by APOE and Age
Cupples et al., Genetics in Medicine, 2004Christensen et al., Genetics in Medicine, 2008
Clinical laboratory Diagnostics of
Depression
Neuropeptides Neurotrophins
Depression
PACAP BDNF
Research Strategies
GDPGTP
TM1
TM5
TM4TM3
TM2Asp -
PACAP
N
C
PACAP Receptor
TM7 TM6
Gs protein GDP
αs
AC
i3 loop
GTP
α s
TM1
TM5
TM4TM3
TM2
N
TM7 TM6
Asp -
βγ
ATP
cAMP
GDP
αs
ACβγ
cAMP
cAMPcAMP
Cytoplasm
Extracellular space
RNA pol II
C
CcA
MP
cAMP
cAMP
cAM
P
PKA
C
C
R
R
C
C
C
TATATBP
DNACREB
CREB
PO4
PO4
C
CBP
CBP
CREBCREB
PO4
PO4
CBPCBP
Transcription of BDNF gene
Nucleus
Cytoplasm
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 40
5
10
15
20
25
MDD Control
**
Weeks in Experiment
BDNF in MDD patients
Pre-symptomatic Genetic Testing: Shifting the Emphasis from
Reaction to Prevention
Pre-symptomatic testing
Genetic and biochemical analysis of healthy individuals who are at increased risk for a specific disorder.
Aims of Pre-symptomatic testing
Early detection of disease manifestation
To improve clinical outcome in positive cases
Huntington Disease: A Paradigm for Presymptomatic Genetic Testing
Heritable neuropsychiatric disorder First described by George Huntington in 1872 Prevalence vary among different populations
Highest -5–10 per 100,000 Onset –typically fourth decade of life. death usually occurring in the sixth decade.
No known medical cure No preventive measures available.
Huntington Disease: cause
Single-gene disorder Autosomal dominant
One mutated copy of the gene is necessary for an individual to be affected– each child of an affected parent is at 50% risk to inherit the
disease since only
Responsible Gene – HTT
Huntington Disease: symptoms
• Movement abnormalities – (e.g., chorea, dystonia,
bradykinesia
• Psychiatric disturbances – (e.g., depression and
anxiety)
• Cognitive impairment– (e.g., inattention and
executive dysfunction)
Huntington disease - a triplet repeat disease
The pathogenic mutation in the HTT gene is unstable, expanded CAG trinucleotide repeat in the first exon which encodes an abnormal polyglutamine tract
A run of > 34 glutamine residues causes the protein to aggregate in the brain cells and cause progressive cell death
CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG CAG …... CAG
HD alleles categorization
Normal: 26 or fewer CAG repeats. Intermediate: 27–35 CAG repeats.
These individuals will not develop HD, but may be at risk of having a child with an HD-causing allele.
Reduced penetrance: 36–39 CAG repeats. These individuals are at risk for, but may not develop,
HD more likely to have later onset disease.
Full penetrance: 40 or more CAG repeats. These individuals will develop HD.
Advantages of predictive testing for Huntington disease
Uncertainty of gene status removed. If negative:
concerns about self and offspring reduced
If positive: make plans for the future arrange surveillance/treatment if any inform children/decide whether to have children
Disadvantages of predictive testing for Huntington disease
If positive: removes hope introduces uncertainty (if and when) known risk to offspring impact on self/partner/family/friends potential problems with insurance/mortgage.
If negative: expectations of a ‘good’ result ‘survivor’ guilt.
Potential outcomes of pre-symptomatic HD genetic testing.
Severe Psychological Distress
International testing protocols were established to protect at-risk individuals and to provide guidance for clinical and laboratory personnel
Our Expectations
Greater effectiveness of health care delivery
Improved health
Improved quality of life