albion – raft river aspen united states habitat...
TRANSCRIPT
1
United States Department of Agriculture
Forest Service
February 2017
Albion – Raft River Aspen Habitat Restoration Project
Scoping Report
Minidoka Ranger District, Sawtooth National Forest Cassia County, Idaho and Box Elder County, Utah
Photo looking south towards Almo Park, Albion Division by Scott Soletti, October 6, 2014
2
For More Information Contact:
Stacy Smith Minidoka Ranger District Office
2306 Hiland Ave South Burley, ID 83318 (208) 678-0430
In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and
policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA
programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity
(including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income
derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in
any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and
complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.
Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille,
large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET
Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.
To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-
3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter
addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the
complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C.
20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected]. USDA is an equal opportunity
provider, employer and lender.
Scoping Report
3
Introduction and Current Conditions
Aspen has been identified as a keystone species within ecosystems, contributing to not only
vegetative biodiversity but also abundance of vertebrae and invertebrate organisms (Campbell
and Bartos, 2001.) Quaking aspen (Populous tremuloides) is considered a pioneer species which
regenerates following disturbance through root system clones. Research suggests that sage-brush
and conifer replaces aspen cover types in the absence of frequent fires and heavy livestock and
wildlife browsing (Campbell and Bartos, 2001.) These threats to the aspen cover-type are
currently present on the Minidoka Ranger District (MRD).
The fire return interval on the landscape has significantly been impacted by humans. Areas that
historically burned frequently (for aspen, fire return intervals average between 20 to 60 years)
have not burned in 100+ years. Lack of fire has allowed conifers and sage-brush to encroach
within previously functioning aspen stands.
Properly functioning aspen ecosystems provide benefits for many species and within the project
area including mule deer, moose and elk along with cavity nesting birds, raptors and migratory
birds that all use aspen for completion of their life cycle. Locally, aspen is a critical forage
source for big game, especially during the summer and fall months. During the spring months,
multi-age aspen stands provide excellent cover for mule deer fawns.
The areas identified for the project encompass some of the larger aspen stands in close proximity
to each other. Within the project area, the landscape is naturally broken and has numerous non-
target acres included within the analysis area that are dominated by shrub species. However,
proposed treatment will specifically target acres that have the potential to regenerate healthy,
functioning aspen stands. Prescribed fire is proposed for the majority of treatments to restore
aspen stands, however in some areas, hand treatment and pile burning is proposed where
broadcast burning is not feasible. Figure 1 below shows the proposed treatments.
Project Area
This project is located in the Logger Springs area in the south end of the Albion Mountain Range
near Elba, Idaho and in the George Peak area on the west end of the Raft River Mountains near
Lynn and Yost, Utah. See Figure 1 below.
Scoping Report
4
Figure 1. Project Area Map
Scoping Report
5
Purpose and Need
The purpose of this project is to restore aspen ecosystems in key wildlife habitats on the
Minidoka Ranger District. Implementation of proposed treatments will progress towards meeting
the Sawtooth National Forest Plan goals and Idaho Department of Fish and Game goals under
the Mule Deer Initiative as they relate to aspen habitats. The need for this project is to ensure that
the aspen component within these ecosystems does not decline to a point where it becomes
eradicated from particular areas of the landscape where it exists now. In addition, these
communities currently lack the multi-age structure described in healthy, thriving aspen habitats.
Objectives of the Minidoka Aspen Restoration Project
Improve wildlife habitat and overall biodiversity by restoring and regenerating aspen
stands encroached by conifer.
Improve overall ecosystem conditions by creating a “Properly Functioning Condition”
(Campbell and Bartos, 2001) that is resistant and resilient to future disturbance.
To reduce encroaching conifer species within targeted aspen stands
Trigger aspen re-generation of 1,500 stems per acre from burning, on average.
Improve big game summer and fall habitats to locally support viable, robust big game
populations that meet population goals outlined in state big game management plans.
Proposed Action
The proposed action includes lop and scatter (slashing), cut and hand-pile, and prescribed fire treatments
to reduce conifer encroachment and restore aspen.
In areas with very little conifer encroachment, lop and scatter treatments would be used to remove
conifers. In most areas, conifer encroachment has reached the point where prescribed fire would be used
to set back the conifer species and spur aspen regeneration (Shepperd et. al., 2006.). Cut/hand-pile and/or
lop and scatter treatments would be used for acres where prescribed burning is not feasible due to
resource concerns or holding issues. Currently, 6,210 acres are identified for slashing and broadcast
burning and 2,080 acres for hand cutting and pile burning. No broadcast burning is proposed in the Raft
River Division.
To achieve the desired mortality in the conifer species, slashing may be needed prior to burning
in order to generate fuel loadings that would in turn, create the necessary fire behavior. Slashing
broadens the prescription window so that a helitorch may be used on the target acres with
minimal risk to the non-target acres and lessening the risk of an escape. Other options for
burning would be hand-lighting and plastic sphere dispenser (PSD). Hand-lighting would occur
anytime a black line is needed as a holding feature. Using drip torches allows crews on the
ground to more easily regulate fire intensity and determine whether the unit is in prescription. In
Scoping Report
6
turn, a heli-torch generates more fire intensity than a PSD, so depending on the environmental
and weather factors the burn boss can choose the correct tool for the job.
Pre- and post-treatment monitoring will occur to ensure project objectives are being met. As
post-burn monitoring occurs, project design should provide room for managers implementing
these treatments to adapt their fuels and prescribed fire treatments using adaptive management
techniques to accomplish the project objectives. Based on the need for aspen restoration and
guidelines set forth in the Forest Plan, the goal of these treatments will be to:
Description of Treatment Prescriptions
Three possible treatments would be available depending on the level of conifer encroachment
within aspen stands. Stands with fewer than 50 conifer trees per acre would be lopped and
scattered. This would involve cutting all conifer trees existing within the aspen clone to set back
the conifer encroachment. Slash generated from the cutting would not exceed 24” (2 feet) in
depth and would be scattered away from the bole of the tree to provide nutrients over a broad
area as the material decomposes. Any aspen stems damaged during treatment would also be cut
in order to spur new regeneration to create a multi-aged stand.
The second treatment would target stands with more than 50 conifer trees per acre (on average).
Lopping (slashing) treatments would be applied here as well, although the target would be to
generate desired fuel and fire behavior conditions for prescribed burning. Prescribed burn
objectives would be to create 80-100% mortality of conifer trees within aspen clones, on
average. Cutting of conifer within these prescribed burn areas would be dependent on current
fuel loading and only done where necessary to generate adequate fire behavior. Some areas may
be determined to already possess sufficient ground fuels to generate the targeted fire intensity.
The final treatment would be reserved for areas identified as needing treatment, but where
underburning is not feasible. In these cases, conifer would be cut and hand-piled and then the
piles burned at a later date.
These prescribed fire treatments would be done using a helitorch under conditions that limits fire
spread outside of target vegetation. Fuel loading generated from slashing and ability to generate
heat with the helitorch allows fire managers to burn and meet objectives within the timber
without posing a threat to non-timber vegetation. Short runs caused by preheating above timber
stands would be expected, however, the further away from the heat pulse generated by the
timber, the greater the decrease in pre-heating and associate fire behavior/spread. Fire managers
may also use hand ignition where appropriate (generally required for creating black-line as a
holding feature) and/or plastic sphere dispenser (PSD) in order to meet objectives.
Project Design Features
The Albion-Raft River Aspen Habitat Restoration Project would require certain precautions
during project implementation. Defined Project Design Features would ensure that identified
resources within the project boundary would be protected and/or preserved. All project activities
would be coordinated with the appropriate resource specialist and/or the Interdisciplinary Team.
Scoping Report
7
Areas identified within the project boundaries as having important cultural, botanical,
hydrological, recreational, and wildlife resources that require protection that could not be
protected during implementation would be excluded from treatment. Where applicable to the
Proposed Action, standards for proposed management activities have been identified based on
site-specific conditions. The following proposed project design features could be implemented
by the Proposed Action to avoid and/or minimize effects to resources within the Project Area.
Project Design Features may be added, modified or further refined based on resource issues, data
collection, specialist analysis and public scoping.
Wildlife Resources
If active raptor nests are located, direct ignition into nest tree area would be avoided
when completing broadcast burning operations. Broadcast burning operations would not
occur during the spring in units that would burn through a known active raptor nest.
For hand treatments, a buffer of at least 200 feet would be established around active
raptor nest tree(s) and no project treatments would occur within this buffer area from
March 1 through July 15. Trees with nests will be marked as leave trees and may not be
cut or removed.
No more than 10% of the project area would be burned during the spring in a given year
and no more than 50% of the total project area would be burned during the spring.
Where any active nests or dens of TES, MIS and sensitive species are found during
project implementation, a USFS Wildlife biologist will be consulted prior to any
treatments being conducted or continued. The FS Wildlife Biologist in consultation with
the Line Officer will then develop appropriate BMP's and buffers.
To maximize the edge habitat created between treated and untreated vegetation, the edges
of treatment units shall be irregularly shaped and/or feathered wherever feasible.
Where piles are built within hand treatment areas, up to five piles per acre may be left
unburned to serve as wildlife habitat. Emphasis should be placed on retaining larger piles
that are not mulched down.
When slashing, do not cut down snags and wildlife trees unless needed for safety and fire
control purposes.
Livestock Grazing
Treated areas would be closed to livestock grazing for two growing seasons or until the
following objectives have been met on sites where these measures are applicable:
Scoping Report
8
1) 80% of new aspen sprouts and saplings are above the hedge height of
livestock (six feet) following treatment as measured by one, two meter belt
transects that are 25 meters long transects within treated stands.
2) Aspen has regenerated to a minimum of 1,500 stems per acre in broadcast
burn treatments.
Soils/Water/Riparian/Aquatics (SWRA)
General Requirements for SWRA
Riparian Conservation Areas (RCAs) are delineated as directed in Appendix B of the Forest
Plan. The RCA width boundaries used are based on site specific tree heights for lodgepole
pine of 75 feet.
- 150 feet (two tree heights) either side of perennial and/or fish-bearing streams
- 75 feet (one tree height) either side of intermittent streams
- 75 feet from the edge of ponds, lakes, reservoirs, and wetlands
RCA boundaries are estimates and ground conditions may vary. RCA
objectives/prescriptions will be applied wherever stream channels or wetlands are
encountered within the project area during implementation.
Equipment staging, including fuel storage, and refueling would occur outside RCAs. Care
would be taken to avoid lubricant and fuel spills in all project areas. All equipment will be
free of leaks.
Prescribed fire would not be ignited on slopes having “moderate” or “high” landslide hazard
as delineated by the SinMAP landslide analysis that are in the vicinity of past landslide or
debris flow events identified through review of aerial photography.
Following completion of the project any constructed control features or temporary access
routes would be obliterated and rehabilitated to break compaction and promote revegetation.
Hand piles must be constructed at least 15’ away from any streams.
No mechanical (bulldozer) fire line construction would occur for prescribed fire treatments.
Aquatic Invasive Species
Project activities will adhere to the USFS Intermountain Region Operational Guidance
for 2013 Fire Activities, to avoid the spread of aquatic invasive species. During
prescribed burning activities:
Scoping Report
9
- Avoid drafting from waterbodies with known infestations of aquatic invasive species
- Avoid entering waterbodies or contacting mud and aquatic plants.
- Avoid transferring water between drainages or between unconnected waters within
the same drainage. Do not dump water directly from one stream or lake into another.
Pile Burning and Prescribed Burning
Direct ignition of prescribed fire in RCAs should not be used unless site/project scale
effects analysis demonstrates it would not degrade or retard attainment of soil, water,
riparian, and aquatic desired conditions, except where outweighed by demonstrable short-
or long-term benefits to watershed resource conditions (FMGU06, Forest Plan III-40;
SWRA Standard SWST04, Forest Plan III-22 ).
Recreation Resources
Broadcast burn treatments will not occur on Labor Day weekend or the opening days of
rifle deer seasons in Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s Game Management Unit 55.
Cutting contracts will be implemented with minimal impact on hunting in both Raft River
and ID unit 55.
Signs will be posted to inform the public of broadcast burning when active prescribed fire
operations are ongoing.
Campgrounds and other facilities may have to be temporarily closed to the public to
implement treatments. Signs and public outreach will be posted at least one week prior to
the closure to reduce inconveniences to recreationists and in all cases, outreach would
occur with the public as soon as possible.
If dispersed campsites are encountered during implementation, trees within the dispersed
campsite would be left uncut and avoided being burned during implementation to the
extent practical.
Botanical Resources
Sagebrush communities will be assessed for restoration if 20 continuous acres of
mountain big sagebrush community and/or 5 continuous acres of dwarf sagebrush
community are burned.
Materials from treatments would not be piled within dwarf sagebrush communities and
no pile burning would occur within dwarf sagebrush communities.
Scoping Report
10
Noxious weeds
All seed used on National Forest System lands will be certified to be free of seeds from noxious
weeds listed on the current All States Noxious Weeds List.
All invasive weeds within and/or adjacent to the project sites would be avoided or
treated, per current agency policies and procedures, prior to implementation. Areas
identified as having noxious and invasive plant populations, within the proposed
treatment blocks, would be treated and monitored post treatment implementation. All
noxious weeds would be treated for eradication. Monitoring would be completed by
district weed crews and other forest personnel as available.
No fire ignitions or staging of personnel or equipment would occur in known noxious
weed sites.
A Clean Equipment provision would be included in all service contracts.
Previous year treatments effectiveness would be evaluated and documented by photos
and brief narratives for annual reporting documents.
Vegetation
Aspen treatments will only be undertaken where there is a minimum of 30 live aspen
stems per acre.
Legacy Douglas-fir trees (trees which have survived numerous disturbance events and are
characterized by deep fissures in the bark, few if any knot or whorl indicators visible,
epicormic branching present) will be not be cut and where needed, measures will be
taken to prevent them from being killed during prescribed fire activities. Large (20”+
DBH) limber pine and Douglas-fir will also not be cut.
Stands which currently meet the definition of a large tree stand will be treated in such a
way that they still meet that definition after treatment.
Green tree firewood areas may be made available to the public to help accomplish the
treatment objectives. Temporary overland access may be authorized associated with these
green firewood areas.
Air Quality
Fire Management Staff would generate public notice information for prescribed fires
prior to burn days.
Scoping Report
11
All prescribed burning for this project would be accompanied by an approved prescribed
burn plan that address mitigation measures to minimize smoke impacts to and comply
with the Clean Air Act.
Fire personnel will monitor smoke dispersion and direction of travel and terminate
ignition if causing impacts to local communities during the ignition phase of the burn.
Emphasize ignition during daylight hours when dispersion is favorable, and suspend
ignition activities at night when there is a potential for nighttime inversions.
Smoke sensitive areas will be notified at least one day prior to the burn.
No firing will be initiated without approval from the Idaho/Montana Smoke Management
Unit (for Albion) or Utah Smoke Management (for Raft River).
Burn Days will be during the week whenever possible (not to impact recreationalist
users) however, if a burn window exists during the weekend ignitions may occur with
District Rangers approval, except on weekends identified in this planning document as
being closed to burning (see recreation resources above).
No ignition will be ignited if UT or ID DEQ has an open burn ban posted for Box Elder
(for Raft River pile burning) or Cassia County (Albion Division treatments).
Road Guards (FS personnel) will be posted if there are smoke impacts to major roads
within the project area to address safety concerns associated with low visibility on roads.
Fuels Management / Fire
If the need arises, proposed fire line (handline) construction would be reviewed and
approved by resource specialists prior to implementation, and rehabilitated post-
implementation.
Existing roads, trails, creek drainages, wet meadows, rocky outcrops and other natural
barriers would be used as fire control lines wherever possible. Any handline would be
rehabilitated post-fire.
Piles will be placed in a non-linear pattern in each unit to maintain a mosaic burn pattern.
Maximize the distance between piles when feasible, maintaining a 15 foot average
spacing between piles in each unit to minimize the potential for piles to ignite one
another.
Hand piles would be a maximum size of 6’ wide x 8’ tall and include material no greater
than ten inches in diameter and no longer than six feet in length. Larger diameter logs
Scoping Report
12
will be left out of the piles to help meet Forest course woody debris standards. Piles
should be taller than they are wide.
Standards for piles will be included in service contracts.
Avoid placing piles on trails/roads or on existing downed trees.
Piles will be burned with snow on the ground or enough precipitation where the piles
won’t spread more than 20 foot laterally.
Heritage Resources
Heritage staff will review final prescription for broadcast burn treatment and conduct any
necessary surveys prior to implementation.
Adverse effect to cultural properties both eligible and/or potentially eligible for inclusion
on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) will be mitigated by avoidance or
project design.
Should cultural materials be discovered during the course of the project, work will cease
in the immediate vicinity of the find and the Forest Archaeologist will be notified
immediately in order to assess the discovery.
Inventoried Roadless Areas
To the extent practicable, activities in IRAs will be scheduled to reduce the overall
duration and avoid high use recreation periods to minimize effects to Solitude and
Primitive Recreation.
Proposed project activities will conform to the 2001 Roadless Rule for the Raft River
Division and the 2008 Idaho Roadless rule for the Albion Division.
Timing and Expected Decision Framework
The USFS is anticipating that analysis would be completed under a Categorical Exclusion.
Specifically, Category 6 (36 CFR 220.6(e)(6)): Timber stand and/or wildlife habitat improvement
activities which do not include the use of herbicides or do not require more than one mile of low
standard road construction.
The CE Extraordinary Circumstances would be prepared to assess whether or not any significant
impacts would occur as a result of the proposed action and changes to the project would need to
occur or an EA or EIS would need to be prepared.
Scoping Report
13
Scoping would be completed in early 2017 with field work occurring during the summer of
2017. USFS specialists and IDT members would work on completing specialist reports and
analysis documentation in the fall of 2017. Once archaeological and natural resource surveys
(Wildlife, Botanical, etc.) are completed, any additional design features or mitigation would be
incorporated with the decision document. Implementation could begin as early as fiscal year
2018.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The USFS will set up pretreatment monitoring plots in each dominate project site or burn unit to
collect data on pretreatment vegetation conditions. Monitoring methods will be photo plots at
each monitoring site as well as an ocular check for any noxious weeds. Stems per acre would
also be measured at the monitoring site. The data would be collected again two years post
treatment at the designated monitoring sites to assess the effectiveness of the treatment and
vegetation response.
Request for Comments
I invite your issues, concerns, data and comments specific to this proposal so that they may be
considered early in the analysis. Comments that are site-specific, or based on your knowledge of the
area, will be combined with our data and knowledge of the area and will better help us develop and
evaluate the project. Although comments are welcome throughout the planning process, providing
comments by March 17, 2017 will allow time for your input to be considered during analysis. We
anticipate beginning implementation of this project in Fiscal Year 2018.
Please note that comments are a matter of public record and therefore may be provided to interested
parties upon request. Questions about this proposal should be directed to Stacy Smith (project
contact) at 208-678-0430.
Comments may be submitted by facsimile (FAX), U.S. Mail, or hand-delivery. Electronic comments
may also be submitted by e-mail to [email protected]. Electronic
comments must be submitted in a format such as an e-mail message, plain text (.txt), rich text format
(.rtf), and Word (.docx). Please indicate “Minidoka Aspen Restoration Project” in the subject line.
Office business hours for hand-delivered comments are 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday through
Friday, excluding holidays. Please provide any issues, concerns, suggestions or additional information
you may have regarding this project to:
Stacy Smith
Minidoka Ranger District Office
2306 Hiland Ave
Burley, ID 83340
(208) 678-0430 telephone
(208) 677-4878 FAX
Scoping Report
14
References
Beck, J.L., and J. Peek. 2005. Great Basin summer range forage quality: do plant nutrients meet
elk requirements? Western North American Naturalist 65:516-527.
Bender, L. C., L. A. Lomas, and J. Browning. 2007. Condition, survival, and cause-specific
mortality of adult female mule deer in north-central New Mexico. Journal of Wildlife
Management 71:1118-1124.
Bishop, C. J., G. C. White, D. J. Freddy, B. E. Watkins, and T. R. Stephenson. 2009. Effect of
enhanced nutrition on mule deer population rate of change. Wildlife Monographs 172.
Campbell, Robert B., and Dale L. Bartos. 2001. Aspen ecosystems: objectives for sustaining
biodiversity. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-18.
Di Orio, A. P., R. Callas, and R. J. Schaefer. 2005 Forty-eight year decline and fragmentation of
aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the South Warner Mountains of California. Forest Ecology and
Management 206:307-313.
Idaho Fish and Game. 2008. Mule Deer Management Plan. Boise, ID. 86 p.
Idaho Fish and Game. 2014. Elk Management Plan. Boise, ID. 168 p.
Idaho Fish and Game Mule Deer Initiative. https://idfg.idaho.gov/mdi
Kufeld, R. C., O. C. Wallmo, and C. Feddema. 1973. Foods of the Rocky Mountain mule deer.
USDA Forest Service Research. Paper RM-111, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Leckenby, D.A., Sheehy, D.P., Nellis, C.H., Scherzinger, R.J., Luman, I.D., Elmore,W., Lemos,
J.C.,Doughty, L. & Trainer, C.E. 1982: Wildlife Habitats in Managed Rangelands - The Great
Basin of Southeastern Oregon - Mule Deer. - USDA Forest Service and USDI Bureau of
LandManagement General Technical ReportRNW-139, Portland, Oregon, USA, 40 pp.
Shepperd, Wayne D.; Rogers, Paul C.; Burton, David; Bartos, Dale L. 2006. Ecology, biodiversity,
management, and restoration of aspen in the Sierra Nevada. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-178. Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 122
p.
Shinneman, Douglas J.; Baker, William L.; Rogers, Paul C.; Kulakowski, Dominik. 2013. Fire
regimes of quaking aspen in the Mountain West. Forest Ecology and Management 299. P 22-34.
Swanson, David K.; Schmitt, Craig L.; Shirley, Diane M.; Erickson, Vicky; Schuetz, Kenneth J.;
Tatum, Michael L.; Powell, David C. 2010. Aspen biology, community classification, and
management in the Blue Mountains. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-806. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 117 p.
Sadleir, R. M. F. S. 1982. Energy consumption and subsequent partitioning in lactating black-
tailed deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60:382-386.
Scoping Report
15
Tollefson, T. N., L. A. Shipley, W. L. Myers, D. H. Keisler, and N. Dasgupta. 2010. Influence of
summer and autumn nutrition on body condition and reproduction in lactating mule deer. The
Journal of Wildlife Management 74:974-986.
USDA Forest Service. 2003. Sawtooth National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan.
Revised, July 2003. Amended, June 2012. Twin Falls, ID.