aleukemic leukemia cutis - a preview of systemic ......leukemia cutis can be ruled out with negative...

2
ALEUKEMIC LEUKEMIA CUTIS - A PREVIEW OF SYSTEMIC MALIGNANCY: A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW Abstract We present the case of an 83-year-old female who presented with red macules of varying sizes, including one area of focal ulceration located on the pretibial region of her lower extremities. e lesions had been present for three weeks. She denied any systemic symptoms or current complaints at the time of presentation. Her past medical and surgical histories were non-significant with the exception of a hospitalization for acute colitis three months prior to presentation (12 weeks prior to rash development). Punch biopsies were obtained, and histology showed an atypical lymphocytic infiltrate consistent with leukemia cutis. e patient was referred to Hematology/Oncology. Initial peripheral blood flow cytometry did not reveal atypical leukocytes, resulting in the diagnosis of aleukemic leukemia cutis. Six weeks later, she underwent a core bone- marrow biopsy and a repeat flow cytometry that revealed atypical leukocytes, leading to a final diagnosis of acute monocytic leukemia. Aleukemic Leukemia Cutis - A Preview of Systemic Malignancy: A Case Report and Literature Review Ryan Jones, DO,* Mark Kuriata, DO** *Dermatology Resident, Lakeland Medical Center, Saint Joseph, MI; Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI **Program Director, Dermatology Residency, Lakeland Medical Center, Saint Joseph, MI; Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI Disclosures: None Correspondence: Ryan Jones, DO; 1234 Napier Ave., Saint Joseph, MI 49085; Ph: 269-429-7546; Fax: 269-429-0807; [email protected] Case Report An 83-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of multiple skin lesions on her bilateral lower extremities, in particular on the pretibial regions. e lesions first appeared three weeks prior to presentation to the office. She stated that she awoke with the lesions present and did not note any associated events or activity the night before. ey had not changed in appearance or number of lesions since onset. e lesions did not itch, had no drainage, and were not painful. She denied any other symptoms, including fevers, chills, fatigue, nausea, vision changes, oral lesions, or any other rash/cutaneous changes elsewhere. She also denied a history of lower extremity edema or trauma. Pertinent recent history included a hospitalization three months prior for atrial fibrillation and an acute colitis of unknown etiology. She did not have any cutaneous manifestations prior to, during, or immediately after the hospitalization. e only health change since discharge was an anemia of uncertain etiology without white blood cell count abnormalities, and she had been following up with her primary care provider periodically with no further changes to her health. e patient had a past medical/surgical history of anxiety, arthritis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, breast cancer with mastectomy (right), cholecystectomy, bilateral hip replacements, and squamous cell carcinoma of the upper lip. Social history included no alcohol use and no history of smoking. Current medications included low-dose aspirin, bisoprolol fumarate, digoxin, lisinopril, and pravastatin. She denied any known allergies. Upon examination, the patient had non-pruritic, violaceous, poorly demarcated macules of varying sizes on both pretibial areas (Figure 1). On the patient’s left lower extremity, one of the lesions had focal ulceration with a distinct border; otherwise, no secondary characteristics were appreciated. A full body examination was performed and revealed no other dermatologic involvement. e differential at that time included excoriations, traumatic ecchymosis, vasculopathy, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Schamberg’s disease, and early stasis dermatitis changes. Two 4-mm punch biopsies, one from each lower extremity (right proximal pretibial and left proximal pretibial locations), were obtained and sent for histology. On histologic exam, both specimens showed a superficial dermal infiltrate of atypical inflammatory cells that were enlarged and hyperchromatic with surrounding red blood cell extravasation (Figures 2, 3). A periodic acid-Schiff stain for fungi was negative for both specimens. Immunohistochemistry staining was then applied to the biopsy samples. In both biopsies, the atypical- appearing cells were highlighted by CD68 (Figures 4, 5). CD3 staining was also completed and showed only focally positive in one biopsy specimen and negative in the other. Last, a CD20 stain was Figure 1. Gross presentation of suspicious macules and one focal ulceration, prior to biopsy/treatment. Figure 2. (10x): H&E stain showing superficial dermal and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate. Figure 4. (10x) CD68 stain highlighting monocyte proliferation seen on H&E. Figure 3. (20x): H&E stain showing atypical perivascular inflammatory infiltrate. Figure 5. (20x) CD68 stain highlighting perivascular proliferation of atypical monocytes. Figure 6. Needle core bone-marrow biopsy demonstrating hypercellularity and proliferation of atypical monocytes.

Upload: others

Post on 15-Aug-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aleukemic Leukemia Cutis - A Preview of Systemic ......leukemia cutis can be ruled out with negative CD3 and CD45 staining. Finally, acute T-cell leukemia is differentiated by positive

ALEUKEMIC LEUKEMIA CUTIS - A PREVIEW OF SYSTEMIC MALIGNANCY: A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

AbstractWe present the case of an 83-year-old female who presented with red macules of varying sizes, including one area of focal ulceration located on the pretibial region of her lower extremities. The lesions had been present for three weeks. She denied any systemic symptoms or current complaints at the time of presentation. Her past medical and surgical histories were non-significant with the exception of a hospitalization for acute colitis three months prior to presentation (12 weeks prior to rash development). Punch biopsies were obtained, and histology showed an atypical lymphocytic infiltrate consistent with leukemia cutis. The patient was referred to Hematology/Oncology. Initial peripheral blood flow cytometry did not reveal atypical leukocytes, resulting in the diagnosis of aleukemic leukemia cutis. Six weeks later, she underwent a core bone-marrow biopsy and a repeat flow cytometry that revealed atypical leukocytes, leading to a final diagnosis of acute monocytic leukemia.

Aleukemic Leukemia Cutis - A Preview of Systemic Malignancy: A Case Report and Literature ReviewRyan Jones, DO,* Mark Kuriata, DO**

*Dermatology Resident, Lakeland Medical Center, Saint Joseph, MI; Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI**Program Director, Dermatology Residency, Lakeland Medical Center, Saint Joseph, MI; Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI

Disclosures: NoneCorrespondence: Ryan Jones, DO; 1234 Napier Ave., Saint Joseph, MI 49085; Ph: 269-429-7546; Fax: 269-429-0807; [email protected]

Case ReportAn 83-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of multiple skin lesions on her bilateral lower extremities, in particular on the pretibial regions. The lesions first appeared three weeks prior to presentation to the office. She stated that she awoke with the lesions present and did not note any associated events or activity the night before. They had not changed in appearance or number of lesions since onset. The lesions did not itch, had no drainage, and were not painful. She denied any other symptoms, including fevers, chills, fatigue, nausea, vision changes, oral lesions, or any other rash/cutaneous changes elsewhere. She also denied a history of lower extremity edema or trauma. Pertinent recent history included a hospitalization three months prior for atrial fibrillation and an acute colitis of unknown etiology. She did not have any cutaneous manifestations prior to, during, or immediately after the hospitalization. The only health change since discharge was an anemia of uncertain etiology without white blood cell count abnormalities, and she had been following up with her primary care provider periodically with no further changes to her health.

The patient had a past medical/surgical history of anxiety, arthritis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, breast cancer with mastectomy (right), cholecystectomy, bilateral hip

replacements, and squamous cell carcinoma of the upper lip. Social history included no alcohol use and no history of smoking. Current medications included low-dose aspirin, bisoprolol fumarate, digoxin, lisinopril, and pravastatin. She denied any known allergies.

Upon examination, the patient had non-pruritic, violaceous, poorly demarcated macules of varying sizes on both pretibial areas (Figure 1). On the patient’s left lower extremity, one of the lesions had focal ulceration with a distinct border; otherwise, no secondary characteristics were appreciated. A full body examination was performed and revealed no other dermatologic involvement.

The differential at that time included excoriations, traumatic ecchymosis, vasculopathy, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Schamberg’s disease, and early stasis dermatitis changes. Two 4-mm punch biopsies, one from each lower extremity (right proximal pretibial and left proximal pretibial locations), were obtained and sent for histology. On histologic exam, both specimens showed a superficial dermal infiltrate of atypical inflammatory cells that were enlarged and hyperchromatic with surrounding red blood cell

extravasation (Figures 2, 3). A periodic acid-Schiff stain for fungi was negative for both specimens. Immunohistochemistry staining was then applied to the biopsy samples. In both biopsies, the atypical-appearing cells were highlighted by CD68 (Figures 4, 5). CD3 staining was also completed and showed only focally positive in one biopsy specimen and negative in the other. Last, a CD20 stain was

Figure 1. Gross presentation of suspicious macules and one focal ulceration, prior to biopsy/treatment.

Figure 2. (10x): H&E stain showing superficial dermal and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate.

Figure 4. (10x) CD68 stain highlighting monocyte proliferation seen on H&E.

Figure 3. (20x): H&E stain showing atypical perivascular inflammatory infiltrate.

Figure 5. (20x) CD68 stain highlighting perivascular proliferation of atypical monocytes.

Figure 6. Needle core bone-marrow biopsy demonstrating hypercellularity and proliferation of atypical monocytes.

Page 2: Aleukemic Leukemia Cutis - A Preview of Systemic ......leukemia cutis can be ruled out with negative CD3 and CD45 staining. Finally, acute T-cell leukemia is differentiated by positive

JONES, KURIATA

applied and was negative in both specimens. Based on these findings, leukemia cutis was the suspected diagnosis, and the slides were sent out to a second lab with expertise in this area for final confirmation. This second opinion confirmed the diagnosis.

The patient was referred to Hematology/Oncology after being seen in the office to discuss the pathology results. The hematologist obtained new lab testing, which showed normocytic anemia with a hemoglobin of 10.1 g/dL and no leukemic cells detected in the blood on flow cytometry. Six weeks later, the patient underwent computed tomography-guided bone marrow core biopsy, which showed increased hypercellularity with 60% immature monocytes/promonocytes (Figure 6). She had a repeat flow cytometry completed on the same day, which also found abnormal monocytic cells and monocytic precursors. This was interpreted by the hematologist to be compatible with acute monocytic leukemia (AML). Due to the grave prognosis, the oncologist recommended palliative treatment versus observation only. The patient elected for palliative chemotherapy and was immediately started on azacytidine daily for five consecutive days given every four weeks. At the time of writing, the patient remains alive and well after six months of this treatment regimen.

DiscussionIn the large majority of cases with leukemia-associated cutaneous disease, there is no direct involvement of neoplastic leukocytes in the manifestations. Cutaneous disease usually seen in patients with leukemia includes petechiae, purpura, ecchymosis, vasculitides, neutrophilic dermatoses, thrush, disseminated zoster, and herpes simplex.1 When neoplastic leukocytes directly invade the skin, the disease is known as leukemia cutis. Leukemia cutis is a clinical manifestation of cutaneous lesions resulting from the infiltration of any type of neoplastic leukocytes into the epidermis, dermis, or subcutaneous tissue. Resulting cutaneous manifestations are variable and most commonly include multiple small erythematous/hemorrhagic papules as well as plaques, nodules, ecchymosis, ulceration, and erythroderma.2,3 Sites of involvement most commonly include the legs, followed by the arms, back, face, scalp, and face, with a predilection for areas of current or previous inflammation.1 The tendency of leukemia cutis to present in areas of inflammation has been exemplified in cases involving Sweet’s syndrome.2,4 Overall, leukemia cutis is more commonly seen in children with leukemia than adults.5 Of specific types of leukemia, monocytic leukemias are more commonly associated with direct blast infiltration of the skin, which has been estimated to occur in 10% to 15% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML).1,3

The diagnosis of leukemia cutis requires a full-thickness skin biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis. Histological findings associated with leukemia cutis include a combination of perivascular, periadenexal, interstitial, nodular infiltrates of the dermis and subcutis, with sparing of a narrow area of papillary dermis (grenz zone), and associated stromal fibrosis.1,6 With IHC staining, myeloid subtypes are typically lysozyme- and CD68-positive. Monocytic types are positive for lysozyme, CD68, CD15, CD43, and CD45. Myelomonocytic types are also

positive for lysozyme, CD68, CD15, CD43, and CD45 but can be differentiated from monocytic types by chloroacetate esterase in some cells and a more distinct grenz zone. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cutis can be ruled out with negative CD3 and CD45 staining. Finally, acute T-cell leukemia is differentiated by positive staining with CD3, CD4, CD5, and CD25.5,6

Leukemia cutis is most commonly diagnosed in patients with known/active systemic leukemia; however, in rare cases, skin involvement can occur before involvement of bone marrow or peripheral blood, termed “aleukemic leukemia cutis” or “primary extramedullary leukemia.”1 Aleukemic leukemia cutis is extremely rare, occurring in only 7% of all leukemia cutis cases.7 While rare, there have been reports in the literature regarding this condition since it was first termed and reported in 1948 by Epstein in the Archives of Dermatology and Syphiology.8 The majority of the articles are either case reports or case series reports. No formal, large-scale epidemiology studies have been completed to date, but a review in 2016 by Pena-Romero et al. involving 27 patients found that 60% of those affected were male, the mean age of diagnosis was 42 years, and the predominant leukemia type was acute myeloid leukemia.9 Another review described the observed clinical presentation as polymorphic, varying from a single nodule to erythroderma.7

Overall, the diagnosis of aleukemic leukemia cutis has an associated poor prognosis with an aggressive clinical course after original diagnosis similar to classic leukemia cutis.5,12 The average time between confirmed diagnosis of aleukemic leukemia cutis and involvement of blood or bone marrow is usually several months and typically less than one year.2,3,10 Another recent review found the mean duration between diagnosis and death to be about 10 months.9 However, longer latency periods have been rarely reported, including one case in which the development occurred seven years after original diagnosis.11 Based on the immunologic subtype, patients with aleukemic leukemia cutis are managed the same way as patients with classic leukemia cutis and patients with diagnosed blood or bone marrow involvement.2,12 There are reported cases of successful treatment remission using a variety of regimens in younger adult patients.13,14

ConclusionAleukemic leukemia cutis is a rare cutaneous disease that is an early manifestation of systemic lymphoproliferative disease. The distinctive feature is atypical myeloproliferative cells in the skin prior to their detection in the peripheral blood, a distinguishing characteristic from classic leukemia cutis. The cutaneous manifestations can occur anywhere in the body but tend to favor areas of preexisting inflammation. Progression from histologic diagnosis on skin biopsy to detection in blood typically evolves over several months, although latency periods can rarely last years. When compared to classic leukemia cutis, there is no significant difference in prognosis or progression. Overall, the diagnosis of aleukemic leukemia cutis, much like classic leukemia cutis, carries a very poor prognosis with rapidly progressive disease. Typically, these patients have a high mortality rate, with progression in less than one year. We present this case for clinical interest and to highlight the importance of early recognition of this disease to decrease overall mortality.

References1. Cho-Vega JH, Medeiros LJ, Prieto VG, Vega F.  Leukemia cutis.  Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Jan;129(1):130-42.

2. Desch JK, Smoller BR.  The spectrum of cutaneous disease in leukemias.  J Cutan Pathol. 1993 Oct;20(5):407-10.

3. Horlick HP, Silvers DN, Knobler EH, Cole JT.  Acute myelomonocytic leukemia presenting as a benign-appearing cutaneous eruption. Arch Dermatol. 1990 May;126(5):653-6.

4. Travassos AR, Soares-de-Almeida L, Kutzner H, Guerra L, Alves do Carmo J, Filipe P, Marques MS.  Sweet syndrome-like neutrophilic infiltrate as initial presentation of acute myelogenous leukemia.  Am J Dermatopathol. 2014 Oct;36(10):e167-70.

5. Jin CC, Martinelli PT, Cohen PR. What are These Erythematous Skin Lesions? The Dermatologist. 2012 Mar:20(3).

6. Su WP.  Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical correlations in leukemia cutis. Semin Dermatol. 1994 Sep;13(3):223-30.

7. Yonal I, Hindilerden F, Coskun R, Dogan OI, Nalcaci M. Aleukemic Leukemia Cutis Manifesting with Disseminated Nodular Eruptions and a Plaque Preceding Acute Monocytic Leukemia: A Case Report. Case Rep Oncol. 2011;4(3):547-54.

8. Epstein S.  A case for diagnosis; aleukemic leukemia of the skin? lymphosarcoma? Arch Derm Syphilol. 1948 Mar;57(3 Pt. 2):586-8.

9. Peña-Romero AG, Domínguez-Cherit J, Méndez-Flores S.  Leukemia cutis: clinical features of 27 Mexican patients and a review of the literature.  Gac Med Mex. 2016 Sep-Oct;152(5):439-43.

10. Benez A, Metzger S, Metzler G, Fierlbeck G. Aleukemic leukemia cutis presenting as benign-appearing exanthema.  Acta Derm Venereol. 2001 Jan-Feb;81(1):45-7.

11. Narváez-Moreno B, Pereyra-Rodríguez JJ, Pulpillo-Ruiz A, Cabrera-Pérez R, Espigado-Tocino I, Conejo-Mir J.  Acute myeloid leukemia 7  years after aleukemic leukemia cutis.  Int J Dermatol. 2015 Apr;54(4):459-61.

12. Vishalakshi V, Torsekar RG, Shinde S.  Aleukemic leukemia cutis.  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2007 Mar-Apr;73(2):109-11.

13. Martínez-Poventud G, Fradera J, Pérez S, Fernández A, Pacheco E, Acabá L, López-Enriquez A, Román-Díaz A, Castro-Montalvo J, Vélez-García E.  Aleukemic leukemia cutis preceding acute monocytic leukemia: a case report.  P R Health Sci J. 2008 Sep;27(3):256-8.

14. Chang H, Shih LY, Kuo TT. Primary aleukemic myeloid leukemia cutis treated successfully with combination chemotherapy: report of a case and review of the literature.  Ann Hematol. 2003 Jul;82(7):435-9.