algal biofuels can make a difference - national renewable … · · 2013-10-01• a 500 mw power...
TRANSCRIPT
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.
Algal Biofuels Can Make a Difference
Renewable Energy Roundtable
Philip T. Pienkos
March 27, 2012 NREL/PR-7A40-54590
2
What is Lignocellulosic Biomass?
38-50%
5-13%
23-32% 15-25%
Lignin
Other Cellulose (Glucose sugar)
Hemicellulose (Pentose sugars)
(“Young clean coal”) Softwoods
Grasses
Hardwoods
Crop residues
MSW
(Extractives, ash, etc.)
3
Primary Conversion Routes
Transformation through Intermediates (sugars)
Biochemical Conversion
Thermochemical Conversion
Gasification (reduction to CO, H2) and Pyrolysis
Initial focus on ethanol and mixed alcohols. Now attention turning to
advanced hydroccarbon biofuels
Photo by David Parsons, NREL/PIX 06809
4
Terrestrial Biomass Is Not Enough
• Potential sustainable biomass production: 1.3B tons per year o Ag wastes o Municipal solid wastes o Forestry wastes o Energy Crops
• Convert to 130B gallons ethanol = 87B GGE
Source: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/final_billionton_vision_report2.pdf
5
U.S. Transportation Fuel Demand
2010 2035 Gasoline 126 116 Diesel 43 64
Jet fuel 23 27
Source: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/final_billionton_vision_report2.pdf
Products in a Barrel of Crude (gal)
Gasoline* (Finished Motor Gasoline – E10) (cars & trucks)
Diesel (on-road, rail)
Aviation (jet fuel)
23 bgy
126 bgy
43 bgy
* Peaked in 2004 at 136 bgy
6
U.S. Transportation Fuel Demand
2010 2035 Gasoline 126 116 Diesel 43 64
Jet fuel 23 27
Source: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/final_billionton_vision_report2.pdf
Products in a Barrel of Crude (gal)
Gasoline* (Finished Motor Gasoline – E10) (cars & trucks)
Diesel (on-road, rail)
Aviation (jet fuel)
23 bgy
126 bgy
43 bgy
* Peaked in 2004 at 136 bgy
One billion tons is not enough. Ethanol only addresses the gasoline
fraction.
7
Multiple Paths to Energy Security
• Domestic coal and natural gas reserves can be converted to liquid fuels
• Supplement biomass to provide path to energy security
• Environmental impact o Greenhouse gas emissions o Water usage and
contamination o Land usage
Photo by David Parsons, NREL/PIX 06734
Photo by David Parsons, NREL/PIX 05048
8
What Can Algae Contribute?
• Wigmosta et al. evaluated available US lands appropriate for algal cultivation o 166,000 square miles o 57B gallons oil per year
• Based on conservative productivity estimates o 600 gallons/acre/year o Mascarelli (2009): 1400
gallons/acre/year o Weyer et al. (2010): 3800-5500
gallons/acre year • Job creation
o Total workers: 37,498 o Acres per worker: 144 o Typical farm acres per worker:
100-200
Wigmosta, M. S., A. M. Coleman, R. J. Skaggs, M. H. Huesemann, and L. J. Lane (2011), National microalgae biofuel production potential and resource demand, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00H04, doi:10.1029/2010WR009966. Figure courtesy Mark Wigmosta, PNNL
10
Why Fuels from Algae?
• Algae can produce more lipids per acre than terrestrial plants -- potentially 10x - 100x
• Can use marginal, non-arable land • Can use saline/brackish water • No competition with food, feed, or
fiber • Can utilize large waste CO2
resources • Potential to displace significant
amount of U.S. diesel and jet fuel usage
• An algal biorefinery could produce oils, protein, and carbohydrates and a variety of other products
Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL/PIX 18070
Photo by Warren Gretz, NREL/PIX 01723
11
Input/Output
• Wigmosta et al. evaluated available US lands appropriate for algal cultivation o 166,000 square miles o 57B gallons oil per year o Human Resources
– Total workers: 37,498 – Acres per worker: 144 – Typical farm acres per worker:
100-200 o Evaporative losses of 8 x
1,013 gallons water per year o 1,400 gallon water per gallon
fuel
Wigmosta, M. S., A. M. Coleman, R. J. Skaggs, M. H. Huesemann, and L. J. Lane (2011), National microalgae biofuel production potential and resource demand, Water Resour. Res., 47, W00H04, doi:10.1029/2010WR009966. Figure courtesy Mark Wigmosta, PNNL
12
Bio-based Products from Algae
TAGs
HC Fuels
Fatty Acids TAGs
Algae Cyanobacteria Photosynthetic Bacteria
Commodity Chemicals (Ethylene)
Specialty Chemicals
(Carotenoids)
Image Removed
for Publication
Image Removed for Publication
Image Removed for Publication
Photo by Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility, Dartmouth College, NREL/PIX 19459
Photo by Toshi Otsuki, NREL/PIX 08332
Image Removed
for Publication
13
Comparing Potential Oil Yields
Crop Oil Yield
Gallons/acre Corn 18 Cotton 35 Soybean 48 Mustard seed 61 Sunflower 102 Rapeseed/Canola 127 Jatropha 202 Oil palm 635
Algae (Wigmosta et al.) 600
Algae (Mascarelli) 1,400
Algae (Weyer et al.) 3,800-5,500
Photos by Oak Ridge National Lab, John De La Rosa, Warren Gretz, NREL/PIX 19965, 01768, 03016, 04078
14
Land Usage: A Matter of Scale
Photos by Warren Gretz, Dennis Schroeder, Bob Allan, NREL/PIX 03246, 10512, 19549
15
Land Usage: A Matter of Scale
Corn 144,000 square miles
Energy crops
86,000 square miles
Photos by Warren Gretz, Dennis Schroeder, Bob Allan, NREL/PIX 03246, 10512, 19549
Algae 166,000 square miles
16
What Is the Definition of Marginal Land?
Southwest Desert
Image Removed for Publication
Image Removed for Publication
Image Removed for Publication
Image Removed for Publication
Southeast Coast
Untilled Farmland
Freeport, TX
Ft. Myers, FL
Photos by Warren Gretz, NREL/PIX 08026
18
Design Configuration
Green = algae cell density
Lipid Extraction
Phase Separation
Solvent Distillation
Upgrading (hydrotreater)
Anaerobic Digestion
Algae Growth
CO2
Makeup nutrients
Recycle nutrients/ water
Makeup solvent Solvent recycle
Spent algae + water
Sludge
Biogas for
energy Flue gas from turbine
Hydrogen Offgas
Naphtha
Diesel
Raw oil
Power
Flocculent
Recycle water Blowdown
Makeup water
Centrifuge DAF Settling
0.05% (OP) 0.4% (PBR)
1% 10% 20%
Steam turbine combined cycle
10%
5%
Red = harvesting/extraction losses
10%
19
Results: Baseline Costs
$523
Direct Installed Capital, $MM (PBR) PBR System
CO2 Delivery
Harvesting
Extraction
Digestion
Power Generation
Inoculum System
Hydrotreating
OSBL Equipment
Land Costs
$114
Total = $243MM
Total = $637MM
Baselines show high costs of today’s currently available technologies, opportunities for cost reduction
$9.28
$17.52
$10.66
$19.89
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
OP(TAG)
PBR(TAG)
OP(Diesel)
PBR(Diesel)
Prod
uct s
ellin
g pr
ice
($/g
al)
TAG/Diesel Selling Prices (OP vs PBR)
Operating ($/gal of product) Capital ($/gal of product)
$67
$12
$46 $18
$12
$13
$24
$9
$21
$22
Direct Installed Capital, $MM (Ponds)
Ponds
CO2 Delivery
Harvesting
Extraction
Digestion
Power Generation
Inoculum System
Hydrotreating
OSBL Equipment
Land Costs
20
Sensitivity: Ponds
-$6 -$4 -$2 $0 $2 $4 $6 $8
Evaporation rate (0.15 : 0.3 : 0.6 cm/day)
Water source (underground : utility purchase)
Water recycle (100% : 95% : 80%)
CO2 price ($0 : $36 : $70/ton)
Inoculum costs (50% : base : 150%)
Extraction costs (50% : base : 150%)
Nutrient recycle (100% : base : 0%)
Harvesting costs (50% : base : 150%)
Pond liner (none : add liner)
Operating factor (365 : 330 : 250 days/yr)
Growth rate (50 : 25 : 12.5 g/m2/day)
Lipid content (50 : 25 : 12.5%)
Change to TAG price ($/gal)
Open Pond Sensitivities
More “bang for the buck” targeting lipids vs growth rate (Realistically, difficult to maximize both simultaneously)
21
Projecting future costs
Growth rate 25 g/m2/d 25 g/m2/d 30 g/m2/d 30 g/m2/d 1.25 g/L/d 1.25 g/L/d 1.5 g/L/d 1.5 g/L/d
Lipid content 25% 40% 50% 50% 25% 40% 50% 50%
Harvesting cost Base Cut by 50% Cut by 50% Cut by 50% Base Cut by 50% Cut by 50% Cut by 50%
Extraction cost Base Base Cut by 50% Cut by 50% Base Base Cut by 50% Cut by 50%
Spent biomass utilization
AD AD AD Sell @ $500/ton
AD AD AD Sell @ $500/ton
$9.28
$5.45
$3.99
$2.27
$17.52
$11.19
$7.74
$6.10
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
$20
OP(base)
OP(target 1)
OP(target 2)
OP(high-valuecoproduct)
PBR(base)
PBR(target 1)
PBR(target 2)
PBR(high-valuecoproduct)
Prod
uct s
ellin
g pr
ice
($/g
al)
Capital ($/gal of lipid) Operating ($/gal of lipid)
22
Establishing cost targets (MYPP)
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2022* 2022**
Prod
uct s
ellin
g pr
ice
($/g
al)
Open Pond Learning Curve
Operating ($/gal of lipid)
Capital ($/gal of lipid)
Raw oil price (total)
Diesel price (total)
*Cut extraction costs by 50% **Cut extraction costs by 50% and sell spent biomass @ $500/ton
Cut harvesting cost 50%
Growth rate [g/m2/day]
25 20 20 25 30 30 30 30
Lipid content [dry wt%]
25% 35% 40% 40% 40% 50% 50% 50%
23
Comparison to Biochemical Ethanol Cost Curve
$0.00
$1.00
$2.00
$3.00
$4.00
$5.00
$6.00
$7.00
$8.00
$9.00
$10.00
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Min
imum
Eth
anol
Sel
ling
Pric
e (2
007$
per
gal
lon)
Conversion Feedstock
$3.85 $3.64 $3.57
$3.18 $2.77
$2.62 $2.15
$4.27
$5.33
$6.90
$9.16
24
Multiple Biomechanical Conversion Strategies and Routes of Algal Feedstocks Into Bio Fuels
Ethanol and butanol from extracted algal biomass could add
an additional 24 B GGE. Total contribution of algal biomass could be as high as 90 B GGE.
25
Algal Biofuels Can Reshape the Food vs. Fuel Debate
• Algal biomass used as food supplement since pre-columbian times
• Extracted biomass could provide approximately 180M tons protein per year o Aquaculture o Animal feed o Pet food o Human food
• Indirect land usage very different for algae compared to terrestrial crops
• Possible competition for fertilizer inputs especially potassium o Recycle option for some processes o Capture nutrients from wastewater or
natural blooms
Photos by Roger Taylor NREL/PIX 07491
26
Algae and Carbon Capture
• Algal biomass sufficient to produce 57B gallons oil per year would require approximately 1B tons CO2
• This is equivalent to output from 350 500 MW coal-fired power plants or 70% of US capacity
• A 500 MW power plant would require approximately 200 square miles of algae ponds to capture CO2
• Capture occurs only in daylight hours • Transportation/distribution will add to capital
costs • CO2 pipelines carry fossil CO2
o Collected, transported and re-injected for enhanced oil recover
o Use for algae cultivation will add to greenhouse gases
• Concentrated forms of CO2 (cement kilns, fermentation offgas, anaerobic digester) better scaled and more economical for transport
• Air capture CO2 could be game changer
27
Conclusions
• Even by conservative calculations, algal biomass could surpass terrestrial biomass for contribution to liquid fuel replacements
• Land requirement would be significant (~5% of conterminous US area) o Competition for other uses o Indirect land use mitigated by complexity of shift from
agriculture to algae culture o brine disposal could greatly reduce reliance on freshwater
• Algae could mitigate significant CO2 emissions, but it will be difficult to balance local supplies and demand
• Algae could add to global food supply rather than take away o Issues of scale and quality must be considered