aligning experience and theory

Upload: andrewsmith

Post on 13-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Aligning Experience and Theory

    1/6

    Running Head: EXPERIENCE AND THEORY 1

    Aligning Experience and Theory

    Andrew Smith

    EDU 120: Principles of Instructional Design

    Instructor Buss

    September 24, 2014

  • 7/27/2019 Aligning Experience and Theory

    2/6

    Aligning Experience and Theory 2

    Aligning Experience and Theory

    In this day and age, the word theory gets tossed around so much that people often forget

    what the word theory actually means. A theory is fact-based, relies on evidence, and is used to

    explain or describe something. This is why I do not agree with having creationism taught in

    schools. Evolution is a theory based of scientific research and facts, whereas creationism is

    based solely on a book. As a teacher, in an educational setting, we rely on theories, such as

    learning theories and instructional theories. Learning theories are mostly descriptive, meaning

    they describe how learning occurs, (Smith & Ragan, 2005, P. 23, Par. 5) and instructional

    theories are mostly prescriptive, meaning they suggest that if instruction includes certain

    features, it will lead to certain types and amounts of learning,(Smith & Ragan, 2005, P. 23, Par.

    5).

    Behaviorist Learning Theory:

    The behaviorist learning theory focuses on the aspects of learning that can be directly

    observed, such as when a student uses the correct response to a particular stimulus. Although

    most behaviorists did not deny the existence of mental activity, they did not conjecture about

    these thinking processes, mental states, and other unobservable phenomenon, (Smith & Ragan,

    2005, P. 25, Par. 7). This is different from other learning theories because it does not take into

    account the thought process behind the learning.

    This learning theory finds that learning has occurred when there is a measurable change

    in the frequency of observable performance, (Ludescher, n.d., Par. 102). It has been found that

    the environment plays a critical role in this learning, for instance, how stimuli and consequences

    or reinforcement is presented. Some instructional uses for behaviorism include flashcards and

    other drill and practice routines. Behaviorisms positive and negative reinforcement techniques

  • 7/27/2019 Aligning Experience and Theory

    3/6

    Aligning Experience and Theory 3

    can be very effective . . . in treatments for human disorders such as autism and antisocial

    behavior, (Ludescher, n.d., Par. 142). In working with children with Autism, this learning

    theory has provided much more results than with others, and the instructional design of the

    programs ran heavily reflect the behaviorist learning theory. We rely on the stimulus-response

    principal in order to elicit the proper responses and to decrease or eliminate problematic

    behaviors.

    Cognitive Learning Theory:

    Cognitive learning theory places much more emphasis on factors within the learner and

    less emphasis on factors within the environment than behavioral theories, (Smith & Ragan,

    2005, P. 26, Par. 3). This means that cognitive learning is more focused on how learning occurs

    rather than observable characteristics of learning. With cognitive learning theories, we focus on

    how people think, learn, remember, and even forget. In this learning process, the learner is an

    active participant. They take in the information through listening, seeing, or doing, and

    incorporate this new knowledge into their thinking. During the learning process, the students ask

    questions and receive feedback to further develop their understanding. Then the learning is

    assessed and if needed, further explanation or practice is provided. Using cognitive learning

    theories, the teacher offers a variety of experiences to approach information, assess

    understanding and summarize the combination of information and understanding, (McNeeley,

    2007, Par. 21). In todays classrooms, instructors focus on cognitive learning because it creates a

    deeper understand of information.

    Constructivist Learning Theory:

    The Constructivist Learning Theory states that people construct their own understanding

    and knowledge of the world, through experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences,

  • 7/27/2019 Aligning Experience and Theory

    4/6

    Aligning Experience and Theory 4

    (Educational Broadcasting Corporation, 2004, Par. 1). This learning theory is similar to the

    cognitive learning theory in that is focuses on how we learn, different ways we acquire

    knowledge, and how we integrate that knowledge into our thinking. However, in constructivist

    learning, the instructor plays a different role. Instead of presenting information and facts, they

    act as more of a guide, asking questions and tapping into the studentsprior knowledge and

    experience. The goal is for the students to construct their own knowledge and understanding of

    the material. Although it may sound like it, constructivism does not dismiss the active role of

    the teacher or the value of expert knowledge. Constructivism modifies that role, so that teachers

    help students to construct knowledge rather than to reproduce a series of facts, (Educational

    Broadcasting Corporation, 2004, Par. 6).

    Social Learning Theory:

    Social learning theory combines cognitive learning theory (which posits that learning is

    influenced by psychological factors) and behavioral learning theory (which assumes that learning

    is based on responses to environmental stimuli),(Psychology Today, n.d., Par. 1). This theory

    focuses on learning through observation, imitation, and modeling. In social learning, students

    observe others, and the results of their actions, such as reinforcement. If one student is observed

    receiving reinforcement from an instructor for getting an answer correct or an appropriate

    behavior, other students are more likely to give that answer or model that behavior. The opposite

    is also true, where a student will display an inappropriate behavior and given discipline, or told

    an answer is incorrect and told to try again, others observing will be less likely to model these

    behaviors or give the same incorrect answer. Describing the consequences of behavior

    increases appropriate behavior and decreases inappropriate ones, (Social learning theory, n.d.,

    Par. 17). As a behavior technician for children with Autism, there is a lot of focus on

  • 7/27/2019 Aligning Experience and Theory

    5/6

    Aligning Experience and Theory 5

    appropriate/inappropriate behaviors. Modeling and imitation play a large role in this and through

    reinforcement, both positive and negative, the students are able to learn what is acceptable and

    what is not.

    Conclusion:

    In conclusion, learning how people learn will make teaching much easier. Not all

    students learn the same, so instructors should be knowledgeable in the different learning theories.

    The type of learning or instruction will also depend on the type of learning theory implemented.

    For instance, children with learning or other disabilities may have difficulty learning through

    social learning, but could make great strides if the behaviorist learning theory is implemented.

    Instructors should not limit their teaching to just one theory, but should implement the different

    learning theories as they are needed.

  • 7/27/2019 Aligning Experience and Theory

    6/6

    Aligning Experience and Theory 6

    References

    Educational Broadcasting Corporation. (2004). Constructivism as a paradigm for teaching and

    learning. Retrieved from http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/

    Ludescher, F. (n.d.). Behaviorism. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from

    http://www2.vobs.at/ludescher/Ludescher/LAcquisition/Behaviourist/seite6.htm

    McNeeley, R. (2007). Theories of learning. Retrieved from

    http://web.utk.edu/~rmcneele/classroom/theories.html

    Psychology Today. (n.d.). Social learning theory. Retrieved March 24, 2014, from

    http://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/social-learning-theory

    Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005).Instructional design(3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.

    Social learning theory. (n.d.). Retrieved March 24, 2014, from

    http://www.southalabama.edu/oll/mobile/theory_workbook/social_learning_theory.htm