alignment study
DESCRIPTION
Alignment study. 19 /May/2010 (S. Haino). Summary on Alignment review. Inner layers are expected to be kept “almost” aligned when AMS arrives at ISS Small shifts ( 30~50 μm ) in z-direction will be possible due to (1) Change of gravity (2) Shrink of foam support - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Alignment study
19/May/2010(S. Haino)
![Page 2: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Summary on Alignment review• Inner layers are expected to be kept
“almost” aligned when AMS arrives at ISS
• Small shifts (30~50 μm) in z-direction will be possible due to (1) Change of gravity (2) Shrink of foam support
• Momentum (or Energy) reference is needed for the absolute rigidity calibration
![Page 3: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Alignment methods for AMS-PM • Monitoring Layer 1N/9 movement
8-layer acceptance (8 Layers+ Layer 1N or 9)103~104 protons (E > 10 GV)
• Incoherent alignment (ladder base alignment)Maximum acceptance (~ 0.5 m2sr)> 106 protons (E > 10 GV)
• Coherent alignment (momentum calibration)9-layer +Ecal acceptance (< 0.05 m2sr)~103 e+ and ~104 e- (E > ~100 GeV)
![Page 4: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Alignment monitoringLayer 1NLayer 9
dY dZ
dθxy
MC data generated withGbatch/PGTRACK Alignment accuracy estimated from Gaussian fitting error on the residual of layer 1N/9 hit Proton flux weight above 10 GV
![Page 5: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Coherent alignment• Check of absolute alignment for
outer layersby comparing Rigidity measured by Tracker (RTracker)and Energy measured by Ecal (EEcal)on high energy e+ and e- sample
• Radiation energy loss makes PTracker=|RTracker| smaller w.r.t. EEcal
• Alignment shift makes RTracker shifted to the opposite direction for e+ and e-
![Page 6: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Coherent alignment - simulation• AMS-B Gbatch/PGTRACK simulation
(For details please see presentation by P. Zuccon)
• 108 e- and e+ each are injected in uniform Log10E distribution (10 < E < 500 GeV)isotropically from a plane 2.4m × 2.4m at Z = 1.8m Only trajectories which pass all the Tracker 9 layersare simulated
• Physics switches : LOSS= 1, DRAY= 1, HADR= 0, MULS= 1,BREM= 1, PAIR= 1
![Page 7: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Ecal energy correction• Absolute energy scale • Linearity due to the shower leak
Before
After
![Page 8: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
EEcal/PTracker VS EgenIn case Layer 1N is shifted by ΔY = ±20 μm
![Page 9: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Coherent alignment - simulation• Compare EEcal/PTracker distribution between
RTracker > 0 and RTracker < 0for e+ and e- sample with EEcal > 80 GeV
• Flux weight applied assuminge- flux tuned by Fermi/LAT datae+ flux tuned and extrapolated by Pamela dataSimulated acceptance (full Ecal) :0.025 m2srLive data taking time :
100 days• Kolmogorov probability (P) is calculated
for the compatibility of two scaled histograms with RTracker > 0 and RTracker < 0
![Page 10: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
EEcal/PTracker comparison
P: Kolmogoro
v probability
In case Layer 1N is shifted by ΔY = ±20 μm : T = 100 days
P: Kolmogoro
v probability
![Page 11: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
-Log P VS ΔYIn case Layer 1N is shifted by ΔY : T = 100 days
Estimated error~5 μm
![Page 12: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Alignment methods for AMS-PM• Monitoring Layer 1N/9 movement
2~3 μm accuracy (dY) for 10 min. live time
• Incoherent alignment (ladder alignment)> 106 protons (E > 10 GV) for 1~2 daysStudy in progress
• Coherent alignment (momentum calibration)~5 μm accuracy for 100 days live time
![Page 13: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Backup slides
![Page 14: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Alignment differenceBetween Pre-int. (2008) and Flight-int.
(2009)• Ext. planes seem rotating w.r.t. Int.
planes by order of 100 μm/60 cm ~ 10-2 degrees
• A small (~50 μm) Z-shift found in Ext. planes
• No significant shift found for internal layers
![Page 15: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Alignment differencebetween Pre-int.(2008) and Flight-int.(2009)
Ladder Rotaion (dY/dX)
Ladder Shift (dX)
Ladder Shift (dY)
Ladder Shift (dZ)
![Page 16: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Alignment with test beam• B-off runs with 400 GeV/c proton
beam (4B70D0BF-4b710CBF, 58 points available) are reconstructed with straight tracks
• The following three parameters are tuned w.r.t. the CR alignment (2009)(1) Layer shift along z-axis : ~20 μm(2) Ladder shift along x-axis : 5~10 μm(3) Ladder shift along y-axis : 5~10 μm
![Page 17: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Test beam alignmentLadder Shift (dX) RMS ~5 μm
Layer Shift (dZ) RMS ~15 μm
Ladder Shift (dY) RMS ~5 μm
![Page 18: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Mean of (400GV)/Rigiditybefore alignment
![Page 19: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Mean of (400GV)/RigidityAfter alignment
![Page 20: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Alignment study with B-off/on• The 5 alignment applied to proton
TB runs1. Linear fitting
on B-OFF runs2. Curved fitting (1/R = 0 fixed) on B-
OFF runs3. Curved fitting (1/R free par.) on B-
OFF runs4. Curved fitting (R = 400 GV fixed) on B-ON
runs5. Curved fitting (1/R free par.) on B-
ON runs
![Page 21: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Alignment study with B-off/on
![Page 22: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Alignment study with AMS-01
dZ = 31±44 μm
![Page 23: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Alignment monitoring - simulation• AMS-B Gbatch/PGTRACK simulation
(For details please see presentation by P. Zuccon)
• 108 protons injected in uniform Log10R distribution (1 GV < R < 10 TV)isotropically from a plane 2.4m × 2.4m at Z = 1.8m
• Physics switches : LOSS= 1, DRAY= 1, HADR= 0, MULS= 1
• Alignment accuracy estimated from Gaussian fitting error on the residual of layer 1N/9 hit weighted by proton flux above 10 GV
![Page 24: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
GeometryLayer8 Layer 1N
Layer1Layer 2,3Layer 4,5Layer 6,7
Layer 9
Ecal 65 × 65 cm2
Layer 9
![Page 25: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
External layes are kept as they are
![Page 26: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Elena Vannuccini
In-flight alignment: STEP 1Step 1 Correction for random displacements of the sensors (incoherent alignment)
– Done with relativistic protons – Input trajectory evaluated from (misaligned) spectrometer fit
measured step 1
Flight dataSimulation
X side Y side
protons 7-100 GV (6x6y, all plane included in the fit)
After incoherent alignment:• residuals are centered• width consistent with nominal resolution + alignment uncertainty (~1mm)
Elena Vannuccini
![Page 27: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Elena Vannuccini
In-flight alignment: STEP 2
step 2step 1
After Step1: (possible) uncorrected global distortions might mimic a residual deflection
® spectrometer systematic effect
Step 2 Correction for global distortions of the system (coherent alignment)
– Done with electrons and positrons– Energy determined with the calorimeter
DE/E < 10% above 5GeV
Energy-rigidity match
HOWEVER, the energy measured by the calorimeter can not be used directly as input of the alignment procedure, for two reasons:
1. Calorimeter calibration systematic uncertainty
2. Electron/positron Bremstrahlung above the spectrometer
deflection offset
1
SpeSpeCalCal ΔηηPEP
CalSpe PP
calorimetercalibration uncertanty
ε1EP CalCal
Δη
Elena Vannuccini
![Page 28: Alignment study](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022062301/56815ed9550346895dcd760c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Elena Vannuccini
Bremsstrahlung effectFrom Bethe-Heitler model
The probability distribution of z– depends on the amount of traversed material– does not depend on the initial momentum
it should be the same for electrons and positrons!!
With real data:
– Spectrometer systematic gives a charge-sign dependent effect
– Calorimeter systematic has the same effect for both electrons and positrons
0
Spe
PP
z
*P0
PSpe
PCal~P0
t~0.1X0
g e±
e±
€
z ~ 1PCalηSpe
⏐ → ⏐ 1
PCal 1+ε ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞
⎠ ⎟ ηSpe ±Δη ⎛
⎝ ⎜ ⎜
⎞
⎠ ⎟ ⎟