alinp-based leds for e˜cient red and amber emission2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 alinp-based leds for...

1
2.5 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.1 AlInP-Based LEDs for E˜cient Red and Amber Emission Kirstin Alberi 1 , Chris Stender 2 , Phil Ahrenkiel 3 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO 2 MicroLink Devices Inc, Niles IL 3 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City SD Background and Importance Present EQE trend (Al Ga ) In P Overview x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Red and amber phosphide-based LEDs have e˜ciencies well below blue InGaN LEDs, in part due to fundamental intervalley transfer E c E v cladding cladding active MQWs electron leakage Γ A - Γ C X A - Γ Α Bandgap (eV) 620 nm 590 nm 10 20 30 40 50 60 0 550 650 Projected trend 2.5 limitations of the materials from which they are made. The e˜ciencies of these LEDs must be improved to enable next-generation color-mixed white LED architectures. We are addressing the limitations of phosphide-based LEDs by modifying the materials that are used for the active and cladding layers. The objective of this project is to demonstrate the feasibility of fabricating red and amber LEDs from ordered/disordered Al In P heterostructures and to quantify the performance improvements this design x 1-x can yield over incumbent phosphide LEDs. External Quantum E˜ciency (%) 2.0 1.5 ! Color - ./* Wavelength Emitter Type Material Spectral Half PCE (%) PCE (%) Hot/Cold Width @ 25 C @ 85 C Factor 1.0 Blue 459 nm Direct Ga 1-x In x N 20 nm 66 63 0.95 Direct Indirect AlP GaP GaAs InP InAs Al x In 1-x P } Δ 5.6 6.0 Green 530 nm Direct Ga 1-x In x N 30 nm 24 22 0.90 Peak Wavelength (nm) Lattice Constant (A) Amber 595-605 nm Phosphor-Converted Ga 1-x In x N/Phosphor 80 nm 23 18 0.80 Methodology: Power Conversion E˜ciency (PCE) values at 25 C and hot/cold factors are reported for Amber 585-595 nm Direct (Al Ga ) In P 20 nm 19 8 0.40 x 1-x 0.5 0.5 best-known commercially-available devices in each (Al Ga ) In P LEDs su°er from internal intervalley transfer losses and external carrier leakage losses. These losses are fundamental to the x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Red 615 nm Direct (Al Ga ) In P 20 nm 44 24 0.55 x 1-x 0.5 0.5 color range; PCE values at 85 C are computed from (Al Ga ) In P material system and can only be overcome by using another material. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Deep Red 650-670 nm Direct (Al Ga ) In P 20 nm 49 39 0.80 the PCE @ 25 C and hot/cold factors. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Direct bandgap Al In P has a higher direct-indirect bandgap energy crossover, which helps to reduce intervalley transfer. We combine Al In P x 1-x x 1-x with control of spontaneous atomic ordering to increase barriers to electron leakage to improve the e˜ciencies of red and amber LEDs. Al x In 1-x P Properties and Growth Laser Power (mW) Properties Amber Red 0 5 10 15 20 2.6 0.4 10 K 10 K 295 K 295 K Modulated reˆectance Photoluminescence adapted from D. Beaton, et al., J. Appl. Phys., 114, 203504 (2013) 590 nm measured datapoints target range PL Intensity (a.u.) disordered AlInP clad disordered AlInP clad ordered AlInP active metamorphic bu°er GaAs substrate 160 meV clad active 1.0 [111] Disordered Ordered Energy (eV) ΔE G Γ 4 V , Γ 5 V ΔE V Γ C 6 Γ C 6 Al In V Γ 8 P V Γ Γ 6 (2) 7 k = 0 k = 0 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 Al Concentration (%) Al and In atoms can order along alternating [111] planes depending on the growth conditions. Ordering causes the bandgap to decrease via a reduction in the conduction band edge energy. O°set Energy (eV) O°set Energy (eV) 0.3 0.2 0.1 Γ 6 V (1) 0 PL Intensity Normalized to 10 K PL Intensity (a.u.) 8 0.8 0.6 0.4 Ln Counts 6 4 0.2 2 0 25 C 85 C 125 C 3k B T Cladding-Active Layer O°set Energy AlInP AlGaInP 0.19 0.08 0.14 0.2 active clad clad 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Temperature (K) 540 560 580 600 620 640 0 1 2 3 4 Wavelength (nm) Time (ns) 0.2 Al In P emits at 590 nm a compositions ~ 36-43% Al, depending on the ordering. We demonstrated x 1-x Photoluminescence (PL) measurements as a function of temperature and Internal Quantum E˜ciency excitation density provide information about electron loss pathways. 1.0 0.1 PL from the cladding layer is observed at low temperatures, giving an indication of the energy barrier o°set. Time-resolved PL shows two characteristics decay times associated with radiative and non-radiative recombination that can be used to extract 0 Δ(Γ -Γ ) and Δ(X-Γ) o°sets > 140 meV and are moving the composition toward the targeted range. dis ord 600 650 information about the internal quantum e˜ciency. Emission Wavelength (nm) Given the o°sets demonstrated here and in the literature, Al In 1-x P devices, the barriers to electron loss at We initially used the ratio of PL intensity at 295 K/10K to estimate the x amber emission wavelengths are expected to be similar to those in (Al Ga ) In P red LEDs. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 internal quantum e˜ciency of simple Al In P double heterostructures x 1-x PL Intensity Normalized to 10 K state of the art 0.4 Al x In P 0.8 0.6 1-x 0.2 (Al Ga ) In P x 1-x 0.5 0.5 and compared to (Al Ga ) In P samples with similar structures. We are x 1-x 0.5 0.5 0 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 continuing to improve our Al In P material to increase luminescence. Wavelength (nm) x 1-x Metamorphic Growth Electroluminescence Current and Potential Limiting Factors Growth Structure Cross-Sectional Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Image GaAs substrate Al x In 1-x P active layer Al y In 1-y P cladding layer Al z Ga y In 1-y-z As MBL thickness Metamorphic bu°er ÿnal bu°er AlInP <110>Α Current-voltage measurements of double 1. Oxygen impurities heterostructure devices indicate potential Deep traps associated with oxygen impurities increase non-radiative improvements in series resistance. recombination. SIMS measurements indicate our devices have 10 17 cm -3 oxygen impurities due to reactor-speciÿc issues. While we cannot remedy 50 40 (Al x Ga 1-x ) 0.5 In 0.5 P Al x In 1-x P disordered AlInP clad disordered AlInP clad ordered AlInP active metamorphic bu°er GaAs substrate InGaAs contact layer Au top contact Au bottom contact the reactor design, we are looking into the use of higher V/III ratios to prevent oxygen inclusion. 2. Dislocations lattice constant Ordered Domains Di˛raction Pattern High Resolution TEM Image PL Image To prevent threading dislocations, a 0 20 μm <110>Α Al In P (x < 0.43) has a larger lattice x 1-x Current (mA) 30 We have limited the threading dislocations in our devices to 10 5 cm -2 . 20 However, we ÿnd that the pattern of misÿt dislocations within the bu°er layer a°ects the luminescence. We are currently exploring whether this is constant than GaAs. 10 due to strain, composition modulation or non-radiative recombination. 3. Ordered domains and composition modulation metamorphic bu°er layer is used to 0 1 2 3 4 Domain boundaries between ordered variants and composition extend the lattice constant before Voltage (V) modulation on a short scale are observed. We do not yet know the extent to which domain boundaries or composition modulation impact Al In P growth. x 1-x We are currently performing non-radiative recombination. This approach reduces the electroluminescence measurements as a dislocation density to 10 4 - 10 5 cm -2 . 4. Multiple quantum wells function of temperature and drive current to Project Metrics and Milestones determine how ordered/disordered Al In P LEDs The devices we have tested to-date mainly consist of double x 1-x di°er from incumbent (Al Ga ) In P devices in heterostructures without multiple quantum wells. We will begin to add in x 1-x 0.5 0.5 terms of emission e˜ciency. optimized MQW structures to improve radiative recombination. Milestones and Progress Indicators Maximize ordering in Al In P (˛ = 590 nm) to be η > 0.45. x 1-x Demonstrate internal ˝-X o°sets of 130 meV in ordered Al In P (˛ = 590 nm). x 1-x Demonstrate electron conÿnement potentials of 130 meV in ordered/disordered Al In P heterostructures (˛ =590 nm). x 1-x Demonstrate ordered Al In P (˛ = 590 nm) with IQE = 75%. x 1-x Timing (Months) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Results Summary, Future Research and Considerations We have shown that we can achieve large bandgap energy shifts with ordering. Our experiments suggest that we can achieve up to 200 meV direct/indirect and active/clad conduction band o°sets, producing higher barriers to electron loss than incumbent (Al Ga ) In P LEDs. We have also shown that we can metamorphically grow high x 1-x 0.5 0.5 quality Al In P heterostructures on GaAs substrates. Luminescence results indicate areas for improved x 1-x performance by reducing non-radiative recombination sites and optimizing the device structure. Demonstrate (Al Ga ) In P (˛ = 590 nm) wtih IQE = 65%. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Going forward, we will continue to optimize the growth conditions to improve Impact analysis. the Al In P material, incorporate multiple quantum well structures and analyze x 1-x the potential of this approach to improve amber LED e˜ciency. Demonstrate Al In P heterostructure LEDs (˛ =590 nm) with a MQW active layer x 1-x that exhibit higher EQE than equivalent (Al Ga ) 1In P LEDs (˛ = 590 nm). x 1-x 0.5 0.49 Characterize loss channels in Al In P MQW structures. Evaluate the advantages and x 1-x limitations of this approach. This work was authored°in part°by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by°the De- Al 0.36 In 0.64 P barrier Al 0.33 In 0.67 P well Al 0.43 In 0.57 P MQW Clad Clad Energy Al 0.43 In 0.57 P VBM CBM partment of Energy, O˜ce of Energy E˜ciency and Renewable Energy, Solid-State Lighting Program. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains NREL Publication: PO-5K00-75897 and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2.5

    2.4

    2.3

    2.2

    2.1

    AlInP-Based LEDs for E˜cient Red and Amber Emission Kirstin Alberi1, Chris Stender2, Phil Ahrenkiel3

    1National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden CO 2MicroLink Devices Inc, Niles IL

    3South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City SD

    Background and Importance

    Present EQE trend (Al Ga ) In POverview x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Red and amber phosphide-based LEDs have e˜ciencies well below blue InGaN LEDs, in part due to fundamental

    intervalley transfer

    E c

    E v cladding claddingactive

    MQWs

    electron leakage

    ΓA - ΓC

    XA - ΓΑ

    Band

    gap

    (eV

    ) 620

    nm

    590

    nm

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0 550 650

    Projected trend 2.5

    limitations of the materials from which they are made. The e˜ciencies of these LEDs must be improved to enable next-generation color-mixed white LED architectures.

    We are addressing the limitations of phosphide-based LEDs by modifying the materials that are used for the active and cladding layers. The objective of this project is to demonstrate the feasibility of fabricating red and amber LEDs from ordered/disordered Al In P heterostructures and to quantify the performance improvements this design x 1-x can yield over incumbent phosphide LEDs.

    Exte

    rnal

    Qua

    ntum

    cien

    cy (%

    )

    2.0

    1.5

    !

    Color- ./* Wavelength Emitter Type Material Spectral Half PCE (%) PCE (%) Hot/Cold Width @ 25 C @ 85 C Factor

    1.0 Blue 459 nm Direct Ga1-xInxN 20 nm 66 63 0.95

    Direct Indirect

    AlP

    GaP

    GaAs InP

    InAs

    Al x In1-xP}Δ

    5.6 6.0

    Green 530 nm Direct Ga1-xInxN 30 nm 24 22 0.90 Peak Wavelength (nm) Lattice Constant (A) Amber 595-605 nm Phosphor-Converted Ga1-xInxN/Phosphor 80 nm 23 18 0.80 Methodology: Power Conversion E˜ciency (PCE)

    values at 25 C and hot/cold factors are reported for Amber 585-595 nm Direct (Al Ga ) In P 20 nm 19 8 0.40 x 1-x 0.5 0.5 best-known commercially-available devices in each (Al Ga ) In P LEDs su°er from internal intervalley transfer losses and external carrier leakage losses. These losses are fundamental to the x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Red 615 nm Direct (Al Ga ) In P 20 nm 44 24 0.55 x 1-x 0.5 0.5 color range; PCE values at 85 C are computed from (Al Ga ) In P material system and can only be overcome by using another material. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Deep Red 650-670 nm Direct (Al Ga ) In P 20 nm 49 39 0.80 the PCE @ 25 C and hot/cold factors. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Direct bandgap Al In P has a higher direct-indirect bandgap energy crossover, which helps to reduce intervalley transfer. We combine Al In P x 1-x x 1-x with control of spontaneous atomic ordering to increase barriers to electron leakage to improve the e˜ciencies of red and amber LEDs.

    Al x In1-xP Properties and Growth Luminescence Results Laser Power (mW) Properties Amber Red 0 5 10 15 20

    2.6 0.4 10 K

    10 K

    295 K

    295 K

    Modulated reˆectance Photoluminescence

    adapted from D. Beaton, et al., J. Appl. Phys., 114, 203504 (2013)

    590 nm

    measured datapoints

    target range

    X-Γ Conduction Band O°set Γ X

    Ener

    gy

    0.180.11 0.20 0.29 25 C 85 C

    125 C

    3kBT

    AlInP

    AlGaInP

    PL In

    tens

    ity (a

    .u.)

    disordered AlInP clad

    disordered AlInP clad

    ordered AlInP active

    metamorphic bu°er

    GaAs substrate

    160 meV clad

    active

    1.0

    [111]Disordered Ordered

    Ener

    gy (e

    V) ΔEG

    Γ4V, Γ5

    V

    ΔEV

    Γ C 6 Γ C

    6

    Al

    In

    VΓ8 P

    VΓ Γ6(2)

    7

    k = 0 k = 0

    33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 Al Concentration (%)

    Al and In atoms can order along alternating [111] planes depending on the growth conditions. Ordering causes the bandgap to decrease via a reduction in the conduction band edge energy.

    O°s

    et E

    nerg

    y (e

    V)

    O°s

    et E

    nerg

    y (e

    V)

    0.3

    0.2

    0.1

    Γ6V(1) 0 PL

    Inte

    nsit

    y N

    orm

    aliz

    ed to

    10

    K

    PL Intensity (a.u.)

    8 0.8

    0.6

    0.4 Ln C

    ount

    s 6

    4

    0.2

    2 0

    25 C 85 C

    125 C

    3kBT

    Cladding-Active Layer O°set

    Ener

    gy AlInP

    AlGaInP

    0.190.08 0.14 0.2

    active

    clad clad 0 50 100 150 200 250 300

    Temperature (K) 540 560 580 600 620 640 0 1 2 3 4

    Wavelength (nm) Time (ns) 0.2

    Al In P emits at 590 nm a compositions ~ 36-43% Al, depending on the ordering. We demonstrated x 1-x

    Photoluminescence (PL) measurements as a function of temperature and Internal Quantum E˜ciency

    excitation density provide information about electron loss pathways. 1.0

    0.1 PL from the cladding layer is observed at low temperatures, giving an indication of the energy barrier o°set.

    Time-resolved PL shows two characteristics decay times associated with radiative and non-radiative recombination that can be used to extract

    0 Δ(Γ -Γ ) and Δ(X-Γ) o°sets > 140 meV and are moving the composition toward the targeted range. dis ord

    600 650 information about the internal quantum e˜ciency. Emission Wavelength (nm)

    Given the o°sets demonstrated here and in the literature, Al In1-xP devices, the barriers to electron loss at We initially used the ratio of PL intensity at 295 K/10K to estimate the

    x amber emission wavelengths are expected to be similar to those in (Al Ga ) In P red LEDs. x 1-x 0.5 0.5

    internal quantum e˜ciency of simple Al In P double heterostructures x 1-x PL In

    tens

    ity

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    to 1

    0 K

    state of the art

    0.4 Al x In P

    0.8

    0.6

    1-x

    0.2

    (Al Ga ) In P x 1-x 0.5 0.5 and compared to (Al Ga ) In P samples with similar structures. We are x 1-x 0.5 0.5

    0 590 600 610 620 630 640 650

    continuing to improve our Al In P material to increase luminescence. Wavelength (nm) x 1-x

    Metamorphic Growth Electroluminescence Current and Potential Limiting Factors Growth Structure Cross-Sectional Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Image

    GaAs substrate

    Al x In1-xP active layer Al y In1-yP cladding layer

    Al z Ga y In1-y-zAs MBL

    thic

    knes

    s

    Metamorphic bu°er

    ÿnal bu°er

    AlInP Α

    Current-voltage measurements of double 1. Oxygen impurities heterostructure devices indicate potential Deep traps associated with oxygen impurities increase non-radiative improvements in series resistance. recombination. SIMS measurements indicate our devices have 1017 cm-3

    oxygen impurities due to reactor-speciÿc issues. While we cannot remedy 50

    40

    (Alx Ga1-x)0.5In0.5P

    Al x In1-xP

    disordered AlInP clad

    disordered AlInP clad

    ordered AlInP active

    metamorphic bu°er

    GaAs substrate

    InGaAs contact layer Au top contact

    Au bottom contact

    the reactor design, we are looking into the use of higher V/III ratios to prevent oxygen inclusion.

    2. Dislocations

    lattice constant Ordered Domains Di˛raction Pattern High Resolution TEM Image PL Image

    To prevent threading dislocations, a 0

    20 μm

    ΑAl In P (x < 0.43) has a larger lattice x 1-x

    Curr

    ent (

    mA

    )

    30 We have limited the threading dislocations in our devices to 105 cm-2.

    20 However, we ÿnd that the pattern of misÿt dislocations within the bu°er layer a°ects the luminescence. We are currently exploring whether this is

    constant than GaAs. 10 due to strain, composition modulation or non-radiative recombination.

    3. Ordered domains and composition modulation

    metamorphic bu°er layer is used to 0 1 2 3 4 Domain boundaries between ordered variants and composition

    extend the lattice constant before Voltage (V) modulation on a short scale are observed. We do not yet know the extent to which domain boundaries or composition modulation impact Al In P growth. x 1-x We are currently performing non-radiative recombination.

    This approach reduces the electroluminescence measurements as a dislocation density to 104 - 105 cm-2. 4. Multiple quantum wells function of temperature and drive current to

    Project Metrics and Milestones

    determine how ordered/disordered Al In P LEDs The devices we have tested to-date mainly consist of double x 1-x di°er from incumbent (Al Ga ) In P devices in heterostructures without multiple quantum wells. We will begin to add in x 1-x 0.5 0.5 terms of emission e˜ciency. optimized MQW structures to improve radiative recombination.

    Milestones and Progress Indicators

    Maximize ordering in Al In P (˛ = 590 nm) to be η > 0.45. x 1-x

    Demonstrate internal -̋X o°sets of 130 meV in ordered Al In P (˛ = 590 nm).x 1-x

    Demonstrate electron conÿnement potentials of 130 meV in ordered/disordered Al In P heterostructures (˛ =590 nm). x 1-x

    Demonstrate ordered Al In P (˛ = 590 nm) with IQE = 75%.x 1-x

    Timing (Months) 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Results Summary, Future Research and Considerations

    We have shown that we can achieve large bandgap energy shifts with ordering. Our experiments suggest that we can achieve up to 200 meV direct/indirect and active/clad conduction band o°sets, producing higher barriers to electron loss than incumbent (Al Ga ) In P LEDs. We have also shown that we can metamorphically grow high x 1-x 0.5 0.5 quality Al In P heterostructures on GaAs substrates. Luminescence results indicate areas for improved x 1-x performance by reducing non-radiative recombination sites and optimizing the device structure.

    Demonstrate (Al Ga ) In P (˛ = 590 nm) wtih IQE = 65%. x 1-x 0.5 0.5 Going forward, we will continue to optimize the growth conditions to improve Impact analysis. the Al In P material, incorporate multiple quantum well structures and analyze x 1-x

    the potential of this approach to improve amber LED e˜ciency. Demonstrate Al In P heterostructure LEDs (˛ =590 nm) with a MQW active layer x 1-x that exhibit higher EQE than equivalent (Al Ga ) 1In P LEDs (˛ = 590 nm).x 1-x 0.5 0.49

    Characterize loss channels in Al In P MQW structures. Evaluate the advantages and x 1-x limitations of this approach.

    This work was authored°in part°by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by°the De-

    Al 0.

    36 In

    0.64 P

    ba

    rrie

    r

    Al 0.

    33 In

    0.67 P

    w

    ell

    Al 0.

    43 In

    0.57 P

    MQWClad Clad

    Ener

    gy

    Al 0.

    43 In

    0.57 P

    VBM

    CBM

    partment of Energy, O˜ce of Energy E˜ciency and Renewable Energy, Solid-State Lighting Program. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains NREL Publication: PO-5K00-75897 and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.