all wars are banker wars

Upload: glue2

Post on 14-Apr-2018

253 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    1/11

    ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS!

    By Michael Rivero

    I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started forno other purpose than to force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so

    that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreignnations. There is ample precedent for this.

    The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act,which forced the colonists to conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from theBank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically differenteconomic system in which the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks likethe Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the people through interest-bearing banknotes.

    "The refusal of King George 3rd to allow the colonies to operate an honest money system,which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, was probably

    the prime cause of the revolution." -- Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father

    But bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to acquire your wealth, and know full wellhow easy it is to corrupt a nation's leaders. Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had utteredhis infamous "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws", thebankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United States,largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief US supporter,Alexander Hamilton. Founded in1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the First Bank of the United States had almost ruined thenation's economy, while enriching the bankers. Congress refused to renew the charter and signaled theirintention to go back to a state issued value based currency on which the people paid no interest at all toany banker. This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild against the US Government,

    "Either the application for renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will find itselfinvolved in a most disastrous war." Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First Bank of theUnited States, whereupon Nathan Mayer Rothschild railed, "Teach those impudent Americans a lesson!Bring them back to colonial status!" The British Prime Minister at the time, Spencer Perceval wasadamently opposed to war with the United States, primarily because the majority of England's militarymight was occupied with the ongoing Napoleonic wars. Spencer Perceval was concerned that Britainmight not prevail in a new American war, a concern shared by many in the British government. Then,Spencer Perceval was assassinated (the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated in office) andreplaced by Robert Banks Jenkinson, the 2nd Earl of Liverpool, who was fully supportive of a war torecapture the colonies. Financed at virtually no interest by the Rothschild controlled Bank of England,Britain then provoked the war of 1812 to recolonize the United States and force them back into theslavery of the Bank of England, or to plunge the United States into so much debt they would be forcedto accept a new private central bank. And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won bythe United States, Congress was forced to grant a new charter for yet another private bank issuing thepublic currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United States.Once again, private bankerswere in control of the nation's money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many Britishand American soldiers had to die for it.

    Once again the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment, and poverty by the predations of theprivate central bank, and in 1832 Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second term asPresident under the slogan, "Jackson And No Bank!" True to his word, Jackson succeeds in blocking

    http://first-thoughts.org/on/Benjamin+Franklin/American+Revolution/http://first-thoughts.org/on/Benjamin+Franklin/American+Revolution/http://first-thoughts.org/on/Benjamin+Franklin/American+Revolution/http://conspiracyanalyst.wordpress.com/tag/bankers/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky2/constitution5.htmhttp://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky2/constitution5.htmhttp://www.ushistory.org/tour/first-bank.htmhttp://www.ushistory.org/tour/first-bank.htmhttp://www.ushistory.org/tour/first-bank.htmhttp://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109776http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109776http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Percevalhttp://www.greenewave.com/the-real-history-of-the-united-states-part-3-the-second-bank-of-the-united-states/http://www.greenewave.com/the-real-history-of-the-united-states-part-3-the-second-bank-of-the-united-states/http://www.greenewave.com/the-real-history-of-the-united-states-part-3-the-second-bank-of-the-united-states/http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/andrew-jackson-shuts-down-second-bank-of-the-ushttp://first-thoughts.org/on/Benjamin+Franklin/American+Revolution/http://first-thoughts.org/on/Benjamin+Franklin/American+Revolution/http://first-thoughts.org/on/Benjamin+Franklin/American+Revolution/http://conspiracyanalyst.wordpress.com/tag/bankers/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/butowsky2/constitution5.htmhttp://www.ushistory.org/tour/first-bank.htmhttp://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109776http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=109776http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spencer_Percevalhttp://www.greenewave.com/the-real-history-of-the-united-states-part-3-the-second-bank-of-the-united-states/http://www.greenewave.com/the-real-history-of-the-united-states-part-3-the-second-bank-of-the-united-states/http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/andrew-jackson-shuts-down-second-bank-of-the-us
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    2/11

    the renewal of the charter for the Second Bank of the United States.

    "Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the UnitedStates. I have had men watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have usedthe funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, youdivided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell methat if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand

    families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you willruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves.I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) Iwill rout you out!" -- Andrew Jackson, shortly before ending the charter of the SecondBank of the United States. From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee ofcitizens sent to meet with President Jackson (February 1834), according to Andrew Jacksonand the Bank of the United States (1928) by Stan V. Henkels

    Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President to actually pay off the National Debt)ended the Second Bank of the United States, there was an attempted assassination which failed whenboth pistols used by the assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire. Lawrence later said that with

    Jackson dead, "Money would be more plenty."

    Of course, the public school system is as subservient to the bankers' wishes to keep certain history fromyou, just as the corporate media is subservient to Monsanto's wishes to keep the dangers of GMOs fromyou, and the global warming cult's wishes to conceal from you that the Earth has actually been coolingfor the last 16 years. Thus is should come as little surprise that much of the real reasons for the eventsof the Civil War are not well known to the average American.

    When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the bankers once again saw the opportunity fora rich harvest of debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south back into the union, but at30% interest. Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by enslaving the white man to thebankers and using his authority as President, issued a new government currency, the greenback. This

    was a direct threat to the wealth and power of the central bankers, who quickly responded."If this mischievous financial policy, which has its origin in North America, shall becomeendurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost.It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on itscommerce. It will become prosperous without precedent in the history of the world. Thebrains, and wealth of all countries will go to North America. That country must bedestroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe." -- The London Times respondingto Lincoln's decision to issue government Greenbacks to finance the Civil War, rather thanagree to private banker's loans at 30% interest.

    In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the United States, urging them to fund

    newspapers that opposed government-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks).

    "Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain such prominent daily and weeklynewspapers... as will oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you alsowithhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are not willing to oppose theGovernment issue of money. Let the Government issue the coin and the banks issue thepaper money of the country... [T]o restore to circulation the Government issue of money,will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore seriously affect your individualprofit as bankers and lenders." -- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jacksonhttp://www.webofdebt.com/articles/lincoln_obama.phphttp://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-democratization-of-money-the-trillion-dollar-coin-joke-or-game-changer/5319603?print=1http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-democratization-of-money-the-trillion-dollar-coin-joke-or-game-changer/5319603?print=1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jacksonhttp://www.webofdebt.com/articles/lincoln_obama.phphttp://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/business/currency/news.php?q=1345907722http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-democratization-of-money-the-trillion-dollar-coin-joke-or-game-changer/5319603?print=1http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-democratization-of-money-the-trillion-dollar-coin-joke-or-game-changer/5319603?print=1
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    3/11

    from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

    "It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length oftime, as we cannot control that." -- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public lifefrom 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

    "Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed. This, Iand my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carrieswith it the care for the laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is for capital tocontrol labor by controlling the wages. THIS CAN BE DONE BY CONTROLLING THEMONEY." -- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920,by Lynn Wheeler

    Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with theexpectation that victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britainconsidered an outright attack on the United States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay byRussia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state central bank similar to the system the

    United States had been founded on.Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war, andLincoln announced his intention to go on issuing greenbacks. Following Lincoln's assassination, theGreenbacks were pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go back to an economybased on bank notes borrowed at interest from the private bankers. Tsar Alexander II, who authorizedRussian militarey assistance to Lincoln, was himself assassinated one year later.

    Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britainand the Warburgs of Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island,Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the UnitedStates, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States money supply once again underthe control of private bankers. Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to"The Federal Reserve" system in order to grant the new bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it

    is a privately owned bank, no more "Federal" than Federal Express. Indeed, in 2012, the FederalReserve attempted to rebuff a Freedom of Information Lawsuit by Bloomberg News on the groundsthat as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the government, the Freedom ofInformation Act did not apply to the "trade secret" operations of the Federal Reserve. 1913 proved to bea transformative year for the nation's economy, first with the passage of the 16th "income tax"Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified.

    "I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16thamendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back andexamined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified thatamendment." - U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan Vs. United States, 2003.

    Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congresspassed the Federal Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed tothe measure were at home. This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vestsCongress with the authority to issue the public currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thusshould have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a private bank. But pass itCongress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would inexchange for generous campaign contributions. Wilson later regretted that decision.

    "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation

    http://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wbova/fn/history/greenbacks.htmhttp://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtmlhttp://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/fed-must-release-bank-loan-data-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/fed-must-release-bank-loan-data-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/fed-must-release-bank-loan-data-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.htmlhttp://thelawthatneverwas.com/http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/http://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://www.voltairenet.org/article169488.htmlhttp://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wbova/fn/history/greenbacks.htmhttp://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtmlhttp://www.jekyllislandhistory.com/federalreserve.shtmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/fed-must-release-bank-loan-data-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/fed-must-release-bank-loan-data-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-21/fed-must-release-bank-loan-data-as-high-court-rejects-appeal.htmlhttp://thelawthatneverwas.com/http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/SullivanVUSA.pdfhttp://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    4/11

    is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion,no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by theopinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- Woodrow Wilson 1919

    The next year, World War One started, and it is important to remember that prior to the creation of theFederal Reserve, there was no such thing as a world war.

    World War One started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, but quickly shifted to focus on Germany,whose industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain, who saw the decline of theBritish Pound as a result of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of agriculture,industrial development, and infrastructure (not unlike the present day United States). Although pre-warGermany had a private central bank, it was heavily restricted and inflation kept to reasonable levels.Under government control, investment was guaranteed to internal economic development, andGermany was seen as a major power. So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the primeopponent of World War One, and not just defeated, but its industrial base flattened. Following the

    Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to pay the war costs of all the participating nations, eventhough Germany had not actually started the war. This amounted to three times the value of all ofGermany itself. Germany's private central bank, to whom Germany had gone deeply into debt to paythe costs of the war, broke free of government control, and massive inflation followed (mostly triggeredby currency speculators) , permanently trapping the German people in endless debt.

    When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it opened the door for the National Socialists totake power. Their first financial move was to issue their own state currency which was not borrowedfrom private central bankers. Freed from having to pay interest on the money in circulation, Germanyblossomed and quickly began to rebuild its industry. The media called it "The German Miracle". TIMEmagazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement in life for the German people and the explosionof German industry, and even named him TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year in 1938.

    http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/ourlittleponzischeme.jpghttp://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/famous-quotations-on-banking/
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    5/11

    Once again, Germany's industrial output became a threat to Great Britain.

    "Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the next 50 years we have led thiswar (WW1) in vain." - Winston Churchill in The Times (1919)

    "We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not." - Winston Churchill (1936broadcast)

    "Germany becomes too powerful. We have to crush it." - Winston Churchill (November1936 speaking to US - General Robert E. Wood)

    "This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany." - WinstonChurchill (- Autumn 1939 broadcast)

    Germany's state-issued value based currency was also a direct threat to the wealth and power of theprivate central banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a global boycott against Germany tostrangle this upstart ruler who thought he could break free of private central bankers!

    Click for larger image

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/judea_declares_war_on_germany.jpg
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    6/11

    As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany'seconomic power looked for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over theboycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse. Years later, in a spirit of candor, the real reasons forthat war were made clear.

    "The war wasn't only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We couldhave, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot,

    but we didn't want to."- Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946)

    "Germany's unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out ofthe world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which theworld-finance couldn't profit anymore. ...We butchered the wrong pig." -WinstonChurchill (The Second World War - Bern, 1960)

    As a side note, we need to step back before WW2 and recall Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In1933, Wall Street bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler andMussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was financing Hitler right up to the day war wasdeclared with Germany. And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United States based on the

    one on Italy would be far better for their business interests than Roosevelt's "New Deal" whichthreatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the working and middle class of America. Sothe Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead the overthrow of the US Government andinstall a "Secretary of General Affairs" who would be answerable to Wall Street and not the people,would crush social unrest and shut down all labor unions. General Butler pretended to go along withthe scheme but then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now in the pocket of the WallStreet bankers, refused to act. When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded the arrest ofthe plotters, but the plotters simply reminded Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison,their friends on Wall Street would deliberatly collapse the still-fragile economy and blame Rooseveltfor it. Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at which time he prosecuted many of theplotters under the Trading With The Enemy act. The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally

    released in 1967 and became the inspiration for the movie, "Seven Days in May" but with the truefinancial villains erased from the script.

    "I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country'smost agile military force -- the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks fromsecond lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent more of my time being ahigh--class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers. In short, Iwas a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. "I suspected I was just a part of a racket at thetime. Now I am sure of it. Like all members of the military profession I never had anoriginal thought until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspendedanimation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in themilitary service. Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil

    interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bankboys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central Americanrepublics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purifyNicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I broughtlight to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China in 1927 Ihelped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, asthe boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. I was rewarded with honors, medalsand promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints. Thebest he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three

    http://www.liberalslikechrist.org/about/FDRcoup.htmlhttp://www.liberalslikechrist.org/about/FDRcoup.html
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    7/11

    continents." -- General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant,1935

    As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. Heunderstood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So

    Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered the US Treasury to issue a new publiccurrency, the United States Note.

    Click for larger

    Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed form the Federal Reserve but created by the USGovernment and backed by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return tothe system of economics the United States had been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedyto do. All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interestpayments to the Federal Reserve and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F.Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and the United States Notes pulled from circulation and

    destroyed (except for samples held by collectors). John J. McCloy, President of the Chase ManhattanBank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren Commission, presumably to makecertain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.

    As we enter the eleventh year of what future history will most certainly describe as World War Three,we need to examine the financial dimensions behind the wars.

    Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win anddictate the post war environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxuryresort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_unitedstatesnote.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_unitedstatesnote.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/diefordollarbill.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_unitedstatesnote.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/SMALL_unitedstatesnote.jpg
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    8/11

    international finance. The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to theUS dollar (part of the price demanded by Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absentthe economic advantages of being the world's "go-to" currency, Britain was forced to nationalize theBank of England in 1946. The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making thedollar the global reserve and trade currency, obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to thedollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two conditions. The first was that the Federal

    Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products and produce fromother nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax. That assurance was backed up bythe second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold at $35 perounce.

    Of course, the Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the US Government, didstart overprinting paper dollars, and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s was theresult of foreign nations' obligations to accept the paper notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 anounce. Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes sitting in their vaults, for which realFrench products like wine and cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government thatthey would exercise their option under Bretton Woods to return the paper notes for gold at the $35 perounce exchange rate. Of course, the United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem the paper notes,

    so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon "temporarily" suspended the gold convertibility of the USFederal Reserve Notes. This "Nixon shock" effectively ended Bretton Woods and many globalcurrencies started to delink from the US dollar. Worse, since the United States had collateralized theirloans with the nation's gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that the US Government did not infact have enough gold to cover the outstanding debts. Foreign nations began to get very nervous abouttheir loans to the US and understandably were reluctant to loan any additional money to the UnitedStates without some form of collateral. So Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, withthe EPA and its various programs such as "wilderness zones", Roadless areas", Heritage rivers","Wetlands", all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the Americanpeople who were technically the owners of those lands. But Nixon had little concern for theenvironment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge

    those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. The plethora ofdifferent programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledgedto foreign lenders as collateral on the government's debts; eventually almost 25% of the nation itself.

    click for full size image

    With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US Government embarked on a new programto shore up sagging international demand for the dollar. The United States approached the world's oilproducing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal. In exchange for only sellingtheir oil for dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations. Theoil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, inparticular in US Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers. The conceptwas labeled the "petrodollar". In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was nowbacking it with oil. Other peoples' oil. And that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to propup the dollar has shaped America's foreign policy in the region ever since.

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ARTICLE2/map.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ARTICLE2/map.jpghttp://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ARTICLE2/map.jpg
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    9/11

    But as America's manufacturing and agriculture has declined, the oil producing nations faced adilemma. Those piles of US Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the UnitedStates because the United States had little (other than real estate) anyone wanted to buy. Europe's carsand aircraft were superior and less costly, while experiments with GMO food crops led to nationsrefusing to buy US food exports. Israel's constant belligerence against its neighbors caused them towonder if the US could actually keep their end of the petrodollar arrangement. Oil producing nations

    started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers chose to use. Iraq, already hostileto the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 andin 2002, the United Nations agreed to allow it under the "Oil for food" program instituted followingDesert Storm. One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq, lynched Saddam Hussein, and placedIraq's oil back on the world market only for US dollars.

    The clear US policy shift following 9-11, away from being an impartial broker of peace in the Mideastto one of unquestioned support for Israel's aggressions only further eroded confidence in thePetrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations started openly talking of oil trade for other globalcurrencies.

    Over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based tradecurrency, the Gold Dinar. Gaddafi announced that Libya's oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar.Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold Dinar and the Euro, even as the US dollar continuedits inflation-driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade. This move had the potentialto seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas Sarkozy reportedlywent so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world. So, the United Statesinvaded Libya, brutally murdered Qaddafi ( the object lesson of Saddam's lynching not being enoughof a message, apparently), imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya's oil output to dollarsonly. The gold that was to have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.

    According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the "dollarification" of the world's oil nationsincluded seven targets, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran (Venezuela, which daredto sell their oil to China for the Yuan, is a late addition). What is notable about the original seven

    nations originally targeted by the US is that none of them are members of the Bank for InternationalSettlements, the private central bankers private central bank, located in Switzerland. This meant thatthese nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations' economies, rather than submit tothe international private banks.

    Now the bankers' gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell theiroil for whatever currency they choose. The war agenda is, as always, to force Iran's oil to be sold onlyfor dollars and to force them to accept a privately owned central bank. Malaysia, one of the new nationswithout a Rothschild central bank, is now being invaded by a force claimed to be "Al Qaeda", and withthe death of President Hugo Chavez, plans to impose a US and banker friendly regime on Venezuelaare clearly being implemented.

    The German government recently asked for the return of some of their gold bullion from the Bank ofFrance and the New York Federal Reserve. France has said it will take 5 years to return Germany'sgold. The United States has said they will need 8 years to return Germany's gold. This suggestsstrongly that the Bank of France and the NY Federal Reserve have used the deposited gold for otherpurposes, most likely to cover gold futures contracts used to artificially suppress the price of gold tokeep investors in the equities markets, and the Central Banks are scrambling to find new gold to coverthe shortfall and prevent a gold run. So it is inevitable that suddenly France invades Mali, ostensibly tocombat Al Qaeda, with the US joining in. Mali just happens to be one of the world's largest goldproducers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for the bankers does not get moreobvious than that!

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/apr/21/libya-muammar-gaddafihttp://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/apr/21/libya-muammar-gaddafi
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    10/11

    Mexico has demanded a physical audit of their gold bullion stored at the Bank of England, and alongwith Venezuela's vast oil reserves (larger than Saudi Arabia), Venezuela's gold mines are a prize lustedafter by all the Central Banks that played fast and loose with other peoples' gold bullion. So we canexpect regime change if not outright invasion soon.

    You have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures you that the reasonsfor all these wars and assassinations are many and varied. The US claims to bring democracy to the

    conquered lands (they haven't; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition of a dictatorship,such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran's democratically elected government ofMohammadMosaddegh and the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's democraticallyelected government of President Salvador Allende, and the imposition ofAugusto Pinochet), or to savea people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired worn-out catch all excuse for invasion,weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as "crazed lone nuts" to obscure thereal agenda.

    The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation.That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates moredebt than money with which to pay that debt. Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; aset of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the owners of the Private Central Bank.The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is theway life is suppoed to be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of. The same was true of twoearlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right and Slavery, both systems built to trick peopleinto obedience, and both now recognized by modern civilizatyion as illegitimate. Now we are enteringa time in human history where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankersissuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate. It only works as long as peopleallow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be.

    But understand this above all; Private Central Banks do not exist to serve the people, the community, orthe nation. Private Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich beyond the dreams ofMidas and all for the cost of ink, paper, and the right bribe to the right official.

    Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred million horrible deaths from all the wars liesa single policy of dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the conditionthat the people of a nation be enslaved to the private central banks. Failing that, said ruler will be killed,and their nation invaded by those other nations enslaved to private central banks.

    The so-called "clash of civilizations" we read about on the corporate media is really a war betweenbanking systems, with the private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddeghhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddeghhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Allendehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochethttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddeghhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddeghhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Allendehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet
  • 7/30/2019 All Wars Are Banker Wars

    11/11

    matter how many millions must die for it. Indeed the constant hatemongering against Muslims lies in asimple fact. Like the ancient Christians (prior to the Knights Templars private banking system) ,Muslims forbid usury, or the lending of money at interest. And that is the reason our government andmedia insist they must be killed or converted. They refuse to submit to currencies issued at interest.They refuse to be debt slaves.

    So off to war your children must go, to spill their blood for the money-junkies' gold. We barely

    survived the last two world wars. In the nuclear/bioweapon age, are the private central bankers willingto risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed their greed?

    Apparently so.

    Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought andbled for by third parties unaware of the true reason they are expected to gracefully be killed andcroppled for. The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its currency as aloan at interest, the public is forced deeper and deeper into debt. When the people are reluctant toborrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government borrow more to keep

    the pyramid scheme working. When both the people and government refuse to borrow any more, that iswhen wars are started, to plunge everyone even deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the warto borrow more to rebuild. When the war is over, the people have about the same as they did before thewar, except the graveyards are far larger and everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the nextcentury. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was funding the rise of Adolf Hitler.

    As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows day there will bepoverty, hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until the Earth itself is sacrificedin flames to Mammon.

    The path to true peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and areturn to the state-issued value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous.