allocated housing sites information booklet (2 of 2)
TRANSCRIPT
Allocated Housing Sites
Information Booklet (2 of 2)
Local Plan
Foreword
The purpose of this document is to present an easy-to-use guide for each of the housing sites
identified on the published Allocations Plan Proposals Map.
For the sites, various pieces of background information are provided such as:
Site ownership
Current use
Planning history
Site size and location
Impact on the local area
Access issues.
Similar documents have also been prepared for employment sites and mixed use development
sites.
To find out more, please contact
The Planning Strategy Team, Bolton Council, Town Hall, Bolton, BL1 1RU 01204 333218
[email protected] www.bolton.gov.uk/LDF
Page 97
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
61SC Milnthorpe Road
Site Size (Ha) 2.25
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 44
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: 89109/12: ERECTION OF 44 DWELLINGS TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED WORKS IN-
CLUDING NEW ACCESS ROADS AND LANDSCAPING—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 98
The initial site would leave backland unused which would not appeal to green space management. A revised site
area is preferred, possibly the wider site. Discussions have been had about emergency access to Crossdale Road.
Millennium woodland areas and existing access through the site should be retained. In addition the creation of
backland should be avoided through any development of the site.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are a number of ancient hedgerows running across the site and a Millennium
Woodland planted by local children in 2000. These should be protected throughout any
development of the site.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of a public green space that provides an open as-
pect. This should be offset by green space improvements nearby. Development of this site
will reduce the opportunity for antisocial behaviour, both on site and on the green spaces
opposite. Development would support the on-going regeneration of the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 99
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
62SC Deepdale Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.49
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 22
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 100
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of a public green space that provides an open as-
pect. This should be offset by green space improvements nearby. Public walkways that
exist across the site should be considered within any development. Development of this
site will reduce opportunities for antisocial behaviour and would support the on-going re-
generation of the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 101
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
63SC St Andrew’s Primary Playing Field
Site Size (Ha) 1.23
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 55
Source: SHLAA Housing De-
velopment Plan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Lambert Smith Hampton/Salford R.C. Diocesan Trustee
Current Use: Disused playing field
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 102
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of an open green site, however, this is not accessi-
ble to the public. Although development may be viewed negatively by immediate resi-
dents, it would not really impact on the character or appearance of the general area. De-
velopment would support the on-going regeneration of the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 103
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
64SC St Andrew’s Primary School Site
Site Size (Ha) 0.6
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 30
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Lambert Smith Hampton/Salford R.C. Diocesan Trustee
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 86884/11: ERECTION OF A TWO STOREY 90-BED CARE HOME (CLASS C2).—
APPROVED
78757/07: ERECTION OF 30 DWELLINGS. - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 104
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently vacant following the demolition of a school. Development would re-
duce opportunities for antisocial behaviour, improve the appearance of the site and sup-
port local regeneration objectives.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 105
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
66SC Waggon Road
Site Size (Ha) 1.94
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 70
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: 89116/12: ERECTION OF 70 DWELLINGS TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED WORKS IN-
CLUDING NEW ACCESS AND LANDSCAPING—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 106
‘Housing will greatly reduce local access to green areas. The green lawn on the slope down Winchester Way in
used a lot, and is a breathing space (plus provides a spectacular view of Bolton, and of weather patterns). There
are many vacant residences in the area - why not improve the stock of current residences, instead of building new
ones? I am also concerned about run off from the area, if it is turned into residential - Winchester Way is already in
poor condition, if more rainwater is made to go down over the road, it will deteriorate faster. ‘
Council Response: ‘Core Strategy policy CG1 allows some development on informal greenspaces in the urban ar-
ea, provided that it allows for the improvement of remaining green spaces and helps to meet the strategic objec-
tives for housing. Any development of the site should be mitigated through improvements to nearby public spaces.
The boundary has been amended to retain existing trees which contribute to the amenity of the area.’
Current discussion with Matthew Rainer to reduce impact on trees. Named site by Great Places.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of a public green space that provides an open as-
pect. This should be offset by green space improvements nearby. Public walkways that
exist across the site should be considered within any development. Development of this
site will reduce opportunities for antisocial behaviour and would support the on-going re-
generation of the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 107
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
68SC Wasdale Avenue
Site Size (Ha) 0.38
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 19
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Grass verge
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 108
The current site boundary includes a bus turn around which may need to be omitted via an updated boundary.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of a public green space with an open aspect that
enable far reaching views from Wasdale Avenue. This would need to be mitigated within
any scheme. Development has the potential to support the on-going regeneration of the
area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 109
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
69SC Breightmet Hall IV
Site Size (Ha) 1.79
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 80
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Education facility
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 110
Existing uses would need to be relocated before any development could take place.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently occupied by some form of educational use. Development would have
a neutral impact on the appearance and character of the area as the site is largely hidden.
Existing trees and landscaping should be retained within any scheme to reduce the impact
on immediate neighbours.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Access and highway improvements may be necessary.
Page 111
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
70SC St Catherine’s—Woodlands Close
Site Size (Ha) 0.7
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 32
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Disused green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 112
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently unused scrub of low amenity value. Development would provide a
logical extension of Woodland Close, and have very little impact on the appearance or
character of the area supporting local regeneration objectives. Any peripheral trees should
be retained.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
There are good access links to the site, although new highway would be required.
Page 113
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
71SC Earls Farm
Site Size (Ha) 2.34
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 53
Source: SHLAA Housing De-
velopment Plan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Stables, kennels, cattery and residual farmland
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 114
Development on a adjacent field has taken place setting a precedent for the potential development on this site.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site contains a number of farm buildings and fields. Although High quality design,
consideration of levels and views, and retention of the stone wall and hedges bounding
the site along Stitch Mi Lane would reduce the impact and support a good quality housing
scheme.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Improved access and highways would be required.
Page 115
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
72SC Marylawns
Site Size (Ha) 0.48
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 19
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Current Use: Dwelling
Planning History: 75230/06: DEMOLITION OF FORMER RESIDENTIAL REST HOME & ERECTION OF 10
DWELLINGS WITH ASSOCIATED GARAGES/PARKING AND ALTERATIONS TO AC-
CESS—APPROVED
69233/04: OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING REST HOME AND
ERECTION OF DWELLINGSS (MEANS OF ACCESS DETAILS ONLY) - APPROVED
84987/10: PRUNING OF 2NO. BEECH—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 116
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are a number trees across the site, particularly around the periphery that are pro-
tected by TPO’s. These should be retained to reduce the impact of any development and
retain character.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would have very little impact on the appearance and character of the sur-
rounding area if the peripheral landscaping is retained and managed.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Access improvements and new highway may be necessary.
Page 117
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
75SC Radcliffe Road 6
Site Size (Ha) 0.49
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 22
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council and Bolton at Home
Current Use: Landscaped verge
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 118
‘This small strip of land is narrow, how are cars leaving their drives expected to get onto the extremely busy Rad-
cliffe Road? The plan shows the covering in of Ramsden Street. Will this mean that there will only be one way in
and out of the estate? This would be bad news for the emergency services and existing residents. It would also
result in the loss of an important green open space. Any house owners living in the area will have great difficulty
accessing Radcliffe Road with their accompanying vehicles, and will cause further stressful hazards to other road
users. We object to the closing up of this valuable open space. ‘
‘Council Response: The Core Strategy allows some development of sites like these to meet housing objectives.
The site is informal open space which is subject to considerable changes of level and therefore provides only lim-
ited opportunities for recreation other than dog walking. Any development would have to ensure safe access. This
plan is for allocation purposes and therefore this should not be read as affecting Ramsden Street which provides
access.’
Logical infill site. Longer term potential. Bolton @ Home.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently provides a strip of green space that provides some local amenity. Devel-
opment may have a negative impact on the appearance of the site and immediate area.
Development may also be problematic due to the change in levels.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 119
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
76SC Riversdale Mill
Site Size (Ha) 0.59
Density Assumption
(DPH)
30
Yield (Units) 16
Source: SHLAA Mills
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Darcy Industries Limited
Current Use: Various commercial uses.
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 120
‘A site investigation proved contamination was present, making the land unsuitable for housing, merely suited to
industrial units. ‘
Council Response: ‘The re-development of this site for housing, should employment uses cease or be re-located,
would bring about positive benefits to the area. Any contamination arising from its historic uses would have to be
fully investigated and treated as a requirement of normal planning processes.’
Bore hole tests have already shown that this ground is heavily chemically contaminated, and unsuitable for hous-
ing.
Council Response: This is an issue that can be considered at planning application stage.
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Residential development may improve the appearance of the site, The site is occupied by
a mill of unremarkable character that is used by a number of small businesses.as reflect-
ing positively on the local area. Support for the relocation of displaced businesses would
be required to mitigate any loss of premises.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 121
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
77SC Park Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.72
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 39
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 122
‘This area should remain as recreational land for public use, with consideration given to planting more trees in the
future. Building would restrict any view and privacy. Children enjoy playing on the grassed area. This area is totally
unsuitable for houses and there will be upset children of building takes place. his road is too narrow and very dan-
gerous with very bad turns especially near our house. Any development of this land will reduce the selling power of
these homes which cost more to buy when purchased because of their open aspect. This area is a haven for wild-
life. The parking facilities are currently such a problem that the majority of Park Road is permanently down to one
lane and additional houses in this area will only add further impact to this increasing problem. The houses immedi-
ately facing this area are set below the level of the pavement and proposed housing development area and as such
are currently subject to a great deal of run-off water and water logging particularly through the wet winter months.
Increased housing on the green space opposite will only add to the surface water and drainage problems currently
experienced by many residents.’
Council Response: ‘Core Strategy policy CG1 allows some development on informal greenspaces in the urban ar-
ea, provided that it allows for the improvement of remaining green spaces and helps to meet the strategic objec-
tives for housing. Any development of the site should be mitigated through improvements to nearby public spaces.
Highways concerns and the scale of parking required as a result are detailed matters that can be resolved at the
planning application stage. ‘
Logical infill site. Not transferred to Bolton@Home.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site borders the green belt therefore any development should account for appropriate
screening.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The impact on properties facing the site along Park Road would be most profound. The
site currently allows for a pleasant outlook across the valley although in itself is fairly unre-
markable. Development would change the appearance and character of the immediate
area, but could provide good quality accommodation.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 123
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
78SC Victory Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.48
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 26
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 124
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of a public green space with an open aspect. This
should be offset by green space improvements nearby. Public walkways that exist across
the site should be considered within any development. Existing trees should be retained
on site where possible.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 125
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
79SC Lever Gardens
Site Size (Ha) 0.79
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 43
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Sheltered accommodation
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 126
‘The Lever Gardens Site is a proposed housing allocation. Have people in the sheltered housing been consulted?
The allocation would be at their expense. Why has this site been chosen?’
Council Response: ‘It is recognised that this is currently sheltered accommodation sitting within basic landscaped
gardens. There is potential for longer term redevelopment of the site for housing should its current use cease. In
these circumstances detailed discussions would need to be held between Bolton at Home and existing residents. ’
Underused gardens round sheltered accommodation. Long term potential for comprehensive redevelopment of the
site.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently occupied by sheltered accommodation set in basic landscaped gar-
dens. It is possible that more efficient use of the land could be made, although the open
nature of the site should be reflected in any development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access and highways capacity
Page 127
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
80SC Tarmac
Site Size (Ha) 2.24
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 101
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Current Use: Industrial
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 128
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is bound to the north by green belt and to the south by a strip of tress protected
by a TPO. The tress should be protected through any development of the site and consid-
eration must be given to the open nature of the green belt.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently industrial in nature, and any development for housing would help to
improve the appearance of the site. Residential use would reflect the dominant character
of the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access and highways capacity
Page 129
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
81SC Creams Paper Mill
Site Size (Ha) 1.48
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 96
Source: SHLAA Mills
Priority: Long Term
Ownership: MERGON PROPERTY INVESTMENTS 2 LTD
Current Use: Derelict mills
Planning History: 83863/10: ERECTION OF 72 DWELLINGS AND 24 APARTMENTS INCLUDING THE CON-
STRUCTION OF A NEW BRIDGE OVER THE BOLTON/BURY CANAL . (PENDING FINAL
DECISION) - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 130
Owner confirms that the development of site would be medium term.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
Part of the site falls within the Floodzone, therefore appropriate measures to mitigate
against flood events would be required. The site also falls within the green belt, therefore
any development should consider the impact on the surrounding area.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently a derelict industrial site that attracts anti-social behaviour. Any devel-
opment for residential use would improve the appearance of the site, although considera-
tion for level changes and certain physical features would help to build and retain and ex-
isting character .
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Improved highway access would be required.
Page 131
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
83SC Holcombe Close
Site Size (Ha) 0.52
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 23
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal open space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 132
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is bounded by green belt to the south, therefore any development should consid-
er the impact on the surrounding area.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site provides an obvious extension to the existing residential area, however, and ap-
pears to be of minor recreational use.. Loss of recreational open space would be mitigated
by the retention of the remaining football ground, with access retained from Holcombe
Close.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Highway improvements may be necessary.
Page 133
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
84SC Hulme Road
Site Size (Ha) 1.03
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 33
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: IMP Holdings Ltd/Morris Homes (North) Ltd, Lambert Smith Hampton
Current Use: Residential development
Planning History: 81939/09: ERECTION OF 36 HOUSES AND 12 APARTMENTS WITH ASSOCIATED
WORKS. (APPROVED) - APPROVED
88121/12 ERECTION OF 33 HOUSES
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 134
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site overlaps with green belt to the south west. There are a number of trees covered
by a TPO along the south west boundary of the site.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Page 135
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
85SC Gorses Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.85
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 38
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership:
Current Use: Disused railway
Planning History: 80536/08: ERECTION OF 117 DWELLINGS COMPRISING 56 THREE BEDROOM HOUS-
ES AND 61 ONE,TWO AND THREE BEDROOM APARTMENTS TOGETHER WITH CAR
PARKING AND LANDSCAPING DETAILS.—REFUSED
65418/03: ERECTION OF 113 APARTMENTS IN 5 NO. BUILDINGS TO THE WEST OF
LONG LANE TOGETHER WITH THE ERECTION OF 50 HOUSES AND FLATS TO THE
EAST OF LONG LANE.—REFUSED
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 136
‘Application for development on this portion of land has been rejected four times by our Local Planning Committee,
and three times by the Inspectorate. There are a variety of problems with the site including drainage. This particular
site has a lot of history. ‘
Council Response: This railway cutting is previously developed land which has been subject to some natural re-
generation since closure of the railway many years ago. Development for housing would bring this land back into
productive use and form a logical extension to nearby housing, although the relationship with Leverhulme Park will
require careful design. Although the most recent appeal was dismissed this was solely on the basis of impact on
character and appearance of the surrounding area. ‘
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is covered by a TPO protecting a number of trees across the site. Quality tree
species should be retained and protected through any development.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development for housing would form a logical extension to nearby housing, although cur-
rently forms a useful buffer with Leverhulme Park. Trees and buffer zone should be con-
sidered within any development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 137
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
86SC Suffolk Close
Site Size (Ha) 0.43
Density Assumption
(DPH)
40
Yield (Units) 16
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 138
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would reduce the current area designated a recreational open space. The
remaining space should benefit from improvements to offset any loss of. The surrounding
character of the area is residential therefore any such development would logical here at a
relatively low density,
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access. although new highways would be required.
Page 139
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
87SC Long Lane / Radcliffe Road
Site Size (Ha) 1.00
Density Assumption
(DPH)
30
Yield (Units) 27
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Blackthorn Homes Ltd
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 66631/04: ERECTION OF 50 NO. TWO AND THREE STOREY DWELLINGS.—APPROVED
65418/03: ERECTION OF 113 APARTMENTS IN 5 NO. BUILDINGS TO THE WEST OF
LONG LANE TOGETHER WITH THE ERECTION OF 50 HOUSES AND FLATS TO THE
EAST OF LONG LANE.—REFUSED
Core Strategy Area:
Little Lever and Kearsley
Page 140
‘The planning application was rejected by the Local Authority.’
Council Response: This railway cutting is previously developed land which has been subject to some natural re-
generation since closure of the railway many years ago. Development for housing would bring this land back into
productive use and form a logical extension to nearby housing, although the relationship with Leverhulme Park will
require careful design. Although the most recent appeal was dismissed this was solely on the basis of impact on
character and appearance of the surrounding area.
The existing polygon overlaps with 85SC on the other side of Long Lane. This should be redrawn to better reflect this site.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is covered by a TPO protecting a number of different species, however, it is un-
derstood that many of these have been cleared in preparation for development. Any re-
maining trees should be protected.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site appears untidy following evidence of some clearing work, and stalled develop-
ment. Development would reflect the recent transformation of the immediate area for
housing.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 141
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
88SC Minerva Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.71
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 32
Source: SHLAA Expired Per-
mission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: NJW Developments Limited
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 72716/05: DETAILS OF SITING, DESIGN, EXTERNAL APPEARANCE, MEANS OF AC-
CESS AND LANDSCAPING FOR THE ERECTION OF 45No 2 BED FLATS.—APPROVED
66431/03: OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVLOPMENT(MEANS OF AC-
CESS DETAILS ONLY) - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 142
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are number of trees protected by a TPO running along the former railway embank-
ment to the east of the site. These are to be protected from development.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development has commenced, although may have stalled. Development of housing on
this site would improve the appearance of the site and general area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access and highways capacity
Page 143
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
89SC Redgate Way
Site Size (Ha) 1.57
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 70
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Current Use: Hospital buildings and car park
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 144
‘Whilst the buildings here are not listed it is the location of the Bolton Union Workhouse together with cottage
homes and gymnasium and later hospital buildings. I am not sure what remains of these buildings, whether their
significance has been assessed or how development proposals here may affect them. ‘
Council Response: ‘The demolition of the workhouse building has taken place, evaluation on behalf of the Trust
having concluded that it was not economically viable to conserve the building and a report by property consultants
advised that the building could not be disposed of in its current form. ‘
‘Note the continued recognition of the potential for future housing development on any land declared surplus to requirements at
the Royal Bolton Hospital site but make two comments relating to the Sustainability Appraisal. 1. In advance of any sale of
surplus assets any clinical and support services would be relocated to the main spine of the hospital, or off site, so there would
be no loss of facility other than the site for potential future development. A re-provision of alternative car parking would also be a
pre-requisite to any site disposal. 2. The Sustainability Appraisal reads, in relation to the former workhouse, "development
could result in the loss of building of local distinctiveness. Conservation would be a possibility enabling the protection of the
building which would be positive". It is advised that the building has been declared surplus to requirements and all services have
been relocated to the northern side of the Hospital. It has not been economically viable to conserve the building and a report by
property consultants advised that the building could not be disposed of in its current form in the foreseeable future. A decision
has therefore been taken to demolish the building and the demolition is now in progress. ‘
Council Response: ‘Comments noted and will be considered further when the SA is revisited prior to the Publication stage.’
Long term, dependant on whether existing uses can be relocated elsewhere in the hospital.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
This is currently an attractive site with mature trees and grassed area. It includes an im-
posing building of character, that is in the process of demolition. Development would im-
prove the appearance of the resulting derelict site although the loss of such a building is
regrettable. Retention of existing trees would improve any development impact.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New highways may be required.
Page 145
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
90SC Carr Drive
Site Size (Ha) 1.11
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 50
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Current Use: Hospital buildings and car park
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 146
‘Note the continued recognition of the potential for future housing development on any land declared surplus to re-
quirements at the Royal Bolton Hospital site but make two comments relating to the Sustainability Appraisal.
1. In advance of any sale of surplus assets any clinical and support services would be relocated to the main spine
of the hospital, or off site, so there would be no loss of facility other than the site for potential future development. A
re-provision of alternative car parking would also be a pre-requisite to any site disposal.
2. The Sustainability Appraisal reads, in relation to the former workhouse, "development could result in the loss of
building of local distinctiveness. Conservation would be a possibility enabling the protection of the building which
would be positive". It is advised that the building has been declared surplus to requirements and all services have
been relocated to the northern side of the Hospital. It has not been economically viable to conserve the building
and a report by property consultants advised that the building could not be disposed of in its current form in the
foreseeable future. A decision has therefore been taken to demolish the building and the demolition is now in pro-
gress. ‘
Council Response: ‘Comments noted and will be considered further when the SA is revisited prior to the Publication
stage.’
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would have a neutral impact on the appearance and character of the area. A
loss in car parking space at the hospital would have negative implications considering ex-
isting parking arrangements and demand.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access and highways capacity
Page 147
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
91SC Redgate Way
Site Size (Ha) 0.72
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 32
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Current Use: Landscaped green space within hospital grounds
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 148
‘Note the continued recognition of the potential for future housing development on any land declared surplus to re-
quirements at the Royal Bolton Hospital site but make two comments relating to the Sustainability Appraisal.
1. In advance of any sale of surplus assets any clinical and support services would be relocated to the main spine
of the hospital, or off site, so there would be no loss of facility other than the site for potential future development. A
re-provision of alternative car parking would also be a pre-requisite to any site disposal.
Council Response: ‘Comments noted and will be considered further when the SA is revisited prior to the Publication
stage.’
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development for housing would fit in with surrounding uses. There would be a loss of
green space within the hospital grounds. This could be mitigated through the retention of
trees where possible.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 149
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
92SC Highfield Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.4
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 13
Source: Strategic Housing Unit
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: 88831/12: ERECTION OF 13 DWELLINGS INCLUDING NEW ACCESS—PENDING DECI-
SION
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 150
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is bounded by green belt to the south, therefore some form of screening would be
advantageous in reducing the impact.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently provides a recreational green space to the local community, and devel-
opment could be considered negative to the appearance of the area. Any development
should be mitigated through upgrading nearby recreational open space.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 151
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
93SC Dean Close
Site Size (Ha) 1.17
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 25
Source: Strategic Housing Unit
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 152
In the original LDF there was an allocation for 14 units on the Dean Close site in Farnworth, BL4. There has been
some consultation involving 30 units which is obviously doubling the proposed amount. This area, (along with an-
other less than quarter of a mile away) are the two main green spaces in this particular area that are in use. I would
request that these proposals are reconsidered. For and on behalf of Highfield residents. Thank you in anticipation
of your response/consideration.
Council Response: The site at Dean Close is currently in use as informal open space. It is within the urban area of
Farnworth and the allocation of part of the land for housing development is in accordance with the Core Strategy.
The site is required to provide a sufficient quantity and choice of housing sites in Farnworth and across the Bor-
ough.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently provides an open green space, of fairly low amenity value. There are
potential regenerative benefits from residential development here. Any development
should be mitigated through upgrading nearby recreational open space.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 153
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
94SC Blindsill Road
Site Size (Ha) 2.53
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 94
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 154
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently provides an open green space, of fairly low amenity value. Its loss may,
however, be considered detrimental by immediate neighbours. There are potential regen-
erative benefits from residential development here. Any development should be mitigated
through upgrading nearby public open space.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 155
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
95SC Century Motors
Site Size (Ha) 0.64
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 24
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Marantomark Ltd
Current Use: Derelict garage
Planning History: 82453/09: DEMOLITION OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDING AND ERECTION OF A 32 BEDROOM
UNIT TO BE USED AS A HOSPITAL AND/OR RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME (CLASS C2)
TOGETHER WITH ASSOCIATED CAR PARKING AND LANDSCAPING.—APPROVED
77794/07: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING GARAGE AND ERECTION OF TWENTY FOUR
DWELLINGS WITH GARAGES AND PARKING SPACES.—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 156
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
A large part of the site is situated upon historic landfill and therefore appropriate remedia-
tion would be required.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The premises are unused and detract from both the character and appearance of the ar-
ea. Residential development would improve the appearance of the area and reflect the
changing character of the area, adding to the on-going regeneration.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New highway may be required on site.
Page 157
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
96SC Century Lodge
Site Size (Ha) 0.7
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 32
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal green space and access to lodge.
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 158
‘There would appear to be a culvert flowing through this site which could be a source of flood risk. The presence of
the culvert could also be a constraint on any development layout. ‘
Council Response: ‘This issue can be considered as part of the design at the planning application stage’
Access to the lodge must be retained through any development.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of some recreational open space. The site itself ap-
pears fairly untidy, although does provide access to the lodge. This access should be con-
sidered to mitigate development of the site. There would be potential to aid the on-going
regeneration of the area through development and housing fits the developing character.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New highways may be required.
Page 159
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
97SC Manor Garage
Site Size (Ha) 0.61
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 33
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: J. Charlton (Bolton) Ltd
Current Use: Derelict site
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 160
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently appears dilapidated and unused. Development for residential use would
significantly improve the appearance of the site, and would fit in with the residential nature
of the surrounding area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New highway would be required.
Page 161
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
98SC The Hollies
Site Size (Ha) 0.45
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 24
Source: SHLAA Expired Per-
mission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 70246/05: ERECTION OF 54 TWO BEDROOM APARTMENTS INCLUDING NEW PEDES-
TRIAN AND VEHICULAR ACCESSES AND DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS.—
APPROVED
62369/02: ERECTION OF A 52 BEDROOM NURSING HOME BUILT IN TWO PHASES. -
APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 162
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are a number of trees protected by TPO to the eastern side of the site fronting
Worsley Road. These should be protected through any development.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently vacant following demolition. Its appears unsightly and may attracter
antisocial behaviour. Development for residential use would significantly improve the ap-
pearance of the site, and would fit in with the residential nature of the surrounding area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Access is likely to be from Buckley Lane, and new highway through the site would be re-
quired.
Page 163
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
100SC Old Hall Street
Site Size (Ha) 0.42
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 64
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Harrison Homes c/o Dacres Commercial
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 84409/10: APPLICATION TO EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT OF PLANNING PERMISSION
77085/07 (ERECTION OF FIVE APARTMENT BUILDINGS COMPRISING 64 APART-
MENTS).—APPROVED
77085/07: ERECTION OF FIVE APARTMENT BUILDINGS COMPRISING 64 APART-
MENTS.—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 164
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently vacant following demolition. Its appears unsightly and may attracter
antisocial behaviour. Development for residential use would improve the appearance of
the site, and would fit in with the evolving residential character of the area. Development
would also aide the on-going regeneration of Farnworth.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access. although new highways would be required.
Page 165
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Alloca-
tions Plan Proposal Map.
101SC Bent Street Works
Site Size (Ha) 0.69
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 41
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Private Ownership and Bolton Council.
Current Use: Commercial use, scrap yard and informal green space.
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 166
I am both partially objecting and commenting on the proposal to delete land at the site off High Stile Street (102SC)
as a housing site. I agree that part of the site where the sheltered accommodation is located should be taken out of
the plan. However there is a parcel of land to the southeast of the site which is located adjacent to Walton Place
and Carter Street and which backs on to the works depot listed as 101SC - Bent Street Depot.
I believe that 5 units can be built on the part of the site adjacent to Walton Place as there is sufficient access off
Walton Place. Also where Walton Place ends there is a gap between it and the terraced housing of Bolton Road
and 5 terraced units could be built here in this gap between the existing terraced housing - this part of the site was
included in 102SC anyway. This part of the site could therefore yield 10 units.
This is a brownfield site and no objections were received in relation to taking all of this site out of the Draft Alloca-
tions Plan. I therefore believe that the part of the site as mentioned above could still be included in the Draft Alloca-
tions Plan, a developer could include this part of the site for more sheltered housing accommodation or this part of
the site could be merged into 101SC - Bent Street Depot site to make that development site bigger.
Council Response: The additional greenfield land adjacent to the identified Bent Street site would provide an appro-
priate location for housing. It is within the urban area, and its development would be in accordance with the Core
Strategy. Only part of the informal open space would be used for housing
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently appears unsightly and is in use for scrap and storage. Development for
residential use would significantly improve the appearance of the site, and would support
the on-going regeneration of Farnworth.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highway would be required.
Page 167
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
104SC Harrowby Mill
Site Size (Ha) 0.86
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 23
Source: SHLAA NLUD
Priority: Short Term
Ownership:
Current Use: Commercial uses
Planning History: 72850/05: OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (MEANS OF AC-
CESS DETAILS ONLY).— REFUSED
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 168
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is currently appears as a mixture of buildings and spaces used on a piecemeal
basis by a number of businesses. Development for housing has the potential to improve
the appearance of the site and could add to the on-going regeneration of the area. Resi-
dential would fit the evolving character of the area, though support may be needed for dis-
placed businesses.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access. although new highways would be required.
Page 169
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
106SC Clare Court
Site Size (Ha) 1.5
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 79
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Chelford Homes
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 86848/11: CHANGE OF USE TO CAR PARK INCLUDING NEW ACCESS AND EGRESS
FROM KITCHENER WAY, WORKS TO BOUNDARY WALLS AND INSTALLATION OF
LIGHTING.—APPROVED
82288/09: PLOT SUBSTITUTION OF 12 NO. DWELLINGS TO PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
SCHEME (79866/08) .—APPROVED
79866/08: APPROVAL OF DETAILS OF ACCESS, APPEARANCE, LANDSCAPING, LAY-
OUT AND SCALE FOR THE ERECTION OF 83 DWELLINGS. (APPROVED)
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 170
‘Note the continued recognition of the potential for future housing development on any land declared surplus to re-
quirements at the Royal Bolton Hospital site but make two comments relating to the Sustainability Appraisal.
1. In advance of any sale of surplus assets any clinical and support services would be relocated to the main spine
of the hospital, or off site, so there would be no loss of facility other than the site for potential future development. A
re-provision of alternative car parking would also be a pre-requisite to any site disposal.
2. The Sustainability Appraisal reads, in relation to the former workhouse, "development could result in the loss of
building of local distinctiveness. Conservation would be a possibility enabling the protection of the building which
would be positive". It is advised that the building has been declared surplus to requirements and all services have
been relocated to the northern side of the Hospital. It has not been economically viable to conserve the building
and a report by property consultants advised that the building could not be disposed of in its current form in the
foreseeable future. A decision has therefore been taken to demolish the building and the demolition is now in pro-
gress. ‘
Council Response: ‘Comments noted and will be considered further when the SA is revisited prior to the Publication
stage.’
Recent approval for hospital car parking may result in the removal of this site from the Allocations Plan, if the developer
agrees to sell back to NHS Bolton.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are a variety of trees protected by TPO’s along some boundaries to the site. These
should be retained to improve the character and appearance of any development, and
provide a screen between the site and the hospital grounds.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is now vacant following demolition and as such has a negative impact on the ap-
pearance of the area. Development for housing would improve the appearance of the site
and general area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 171
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
107SC Part Street
Site Size (Ha) 1.67
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 90
Source: SHLAA call for sites
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Miscellaneous green space
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 172
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations, although there may be trees species on site that would benefit
from protection by TPO.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently provides an overgrown area of green space that is in no particular use.
Wildlife may have colonised over time, however, the site is not managed and appears un-
tidy. Development for housing would improve the appearance and reflect the residential
nature of the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required. Consideration must be given to existing
capacity on local highways, as the local community consider this to be an issue in West-
houghton.
Page 173
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
108SC James Street
Site Size (Ha) 0.76
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 31
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Miscellaneous green space
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 174
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently provides an open area of grassed space that is in no particular use, alt-
hough the site appears to be managed through grass cutting. Development for housing
would reflect the residential nature of the area, could improve the appearance of the site,
and would reduce the potential for antisocial behaviour..
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required. Consideration must be given to existing
capacity on local highways, as the local community consider this to be an issue in West-
houghton.
Page 175
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
109SC Leigh Common
Site Size (Ha) 1.19
Density Assumption
(DPH)
40
Yield (Units) 43
Source: SHLAA call for sites
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Current Use: Agricultural
Planning History: 75635/06: ERECTION OF DWELLINGS (MORE THAN 35 UNITS) (MEANS OF ACCESS
DETAILS ONLY). - REFUSED
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 176
‘Where is the access to this land going to be? Any new house build on this land would be detrimental to Colling-
wood Way, Peel Road, Grundy Street etc., due to the increase in traffic that this would inevitably bring. The in-
creased traffic would have to feed onto Church Street which is already busy and queuing at times. There is no need
to include greenfield land in the LDF whilst there exists a plentiful and undeveloped supply of brownfield
sites.Access to the land is restricted. It is bounded on two sides by a public footpath and a cemetery and on the
other sides by existing housing.’
Council Response: This site is a remnant piece of agricultural land within the urban areas. While it provides a
pleasant outlook for the immediate properties there is no public access to the site nor does it have a significant role
as open space. The Core Strategy does support up to 20% of housing development on greenfield land while set-
ting as a priority development of housing on brownfield land. This land appears to be largely unused and of limited
amenity value. Land to the west is protected open land and this will be unaffected by development of this site. Lo-
cal concerns over access and highways matters will be addressed should an application come forward for housing.
It is worth noting that while the most recent appeal was dismissed the Inspector considered a safe scheme was
achievable in highway terms.’
Westhoughton Town Council objects to the inclusion of Leigh Common (109SC) in the draft Allocations Plan.
Council Response: Leigh Common and Roscoe’s Farm are both greenfield sites in the urban area of Westhough-
ton. Their development for housing would be in accordance with the Core Strategy, and they are required in order
to provide a sufficient quantity and choice of housing in Westhoughton and across the Borough.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
Part of the site borders the green belt to the west. Appropriate screening should be provid-
ed through any development to reduce impact.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is surplus former agricultural land following the development of housing over time.
There would be a loss of open green area . the land is not accessible to the public. Any
development for housing should be low density to meet the character of the area and to
mitigate the loss of habitat.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required. Consideration must be given to existing
capacity on local highways, as the local community consider this to be an issue in West-
houghton.
Page 177
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
110SC Armor Holdings
Site Size (Ha) 2.3
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 104
Source: Planning permission /
Allocations call for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: BAE Systems
Current Use: Disused factory
Planning History: 86445/11: ERECTION OF 18 DWELLINGS - APPROVED
82700/09: ERECTION OF 21 DWELLINGS (MEANS OF ACCESS AND LAYOUT DETAILS
ONLY).—APPROVED
82157/09: ERECTION OF DWELLINGS (MEANS OF ACCESS DETAILS ONLY) - AP-
PROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 178
Development has commenced on the part of the site with planning permission.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
Development is likely to require remediation of the site.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access being developed.
Page 179
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
111SC Roscoe’s Farm
Site Size (Ha) 3.78
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 170
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Peel Holdings Ltd
Current Use: Agricultural
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 180
‘The site sits in the centre of the town of Westhoughton in a strategically important and highly sustainable location. The site is immediately avail-
able and deliverable for development and represents an opportunity to bring forward a sustainable new housing development to meet identified
requirements. The site has no known fundamental constraints to development. It is largely unconstrained subject to appropriate treatment of
surrounding features and context. Access to the site is achievable through the currently cleared site to the immediate South West of the main
site area. This area already benefits a planning permission which has been commenced, for housing development, and we would suggest that
the Roscoe's Farm allocation should be extended to include this area.’
Council Response: ‘Support Noted’
The green fields are a pleasure to see in the built up area. The traffic is already horrendous on Bolton Road this will only add to the chaos. Bol-
ton road is a busy bendy road particularly where you are suggesting to have access for more housing.
Council Response: Roscoe's Farm is a residual area of agricultural land within urban Westhoughton. The Core Strategy approach of concen-
trating development within the existing built up area while safeguarding protected open land, the majority of which is around Westhoughton will
mean choices have to be made about developing greenfield sites. This is remnant agricultural land which adjoins a larger area of Hall Lee Bank
Park to the east which will remain as open land. The Core Strategy allows up to 20% of new housing on greenfield land. Traffic implications will
need to be fully considered and safe access secured onto Bolton Road.
This allocation is not within the urban area being bounded by a proposed substantial local nature reserve to the west and school playing fields to
the south. It is currently a greenfield site.
Council Response: Roscoe's Farm is a residual area of agricultural land within urban Westhoughton. The Core Strategy approach of concen-
trating development within the existing built up area while safeguarding protected open land, the majority of which is around Westhoughton will
mean choices have to be made about developing greenfield sites. This is remnant agricultural land which adjoins a larger area of Hall Lee Bank
Park to the east which will remain as open land. The Core Strategy allows up to 20% of new housing on greenfield land. Traffic implications will
need to be fully considered and safe access secured onto Bolton Road.
Westhoughton Town Council objects to the inclusion of Roscoe's Farm (111SC) in the draft Allocations Plan.
Council Response: Leigh Common and Roscoe’s Farm are both greenfield sites in the urban area of Westhoughton. Their development for
housing would be in accordance with the Core Strategy, and they are required in order to provide a sufficient quantity and choice of housing in
Westhoughton and across the Borough.
We support the continued inclusion of Roscoe's Farm (111SC) in the proposed allocations.
Council Response: Support - no change required.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site lies adjacent to an SBI, and should therefore maintain an appropriate buffer with
the SBI. There is also a cluster of trees protected by a TPO that should be protected.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site represents surplus agricultural land that provides some visual amenity but is not
accessible for public recreation. Development would result in a loss of open green area
that would be viewed negatively by local residents. Any development for housing should
be low density to meet the character of the area and to mitigate the loss of habitat and
natural drainage..
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 181
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
112SC Edges Farm
Site Size (Ha) 0.56
Density Assumption
(DPH)
40
Yield (Units) 15
Source: Allocations DPD call
for sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Current Use: Agricultural
Planning History: 86179/11: OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR THE DEMOLITION OF HOUSE AND OUTBUILD-
INGS AND ERECTION 15 NO.DWELLINGS (ACCESS AND LAYOUT DETAILS ONLY) -
APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 182
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations, although there are some mature trees on site that should be
protected where possible to retain character and habitat.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site is the remaining part of a farm following the development of surrounding houses
over time. There would be a loss of some green area although this land is not accessible
to the public. Development for housing would reflect the character of the surrounding area
but should be of relatively low density.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 183
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
113SC Lostock Hall Farm
Site Size (Ha) 0.95
Density Assumption
(DPH)
30
Yield (Units) 26
Source: SHLAA Housing De-
velopment Plan
Priority: Long Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Disused agricultural buildings and grounds
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 184
‘This site is adjacent to the grade II* listed former gatehouse to Lostock Hall. It would be helpful to understand how
development on this site would affect the heritage asset and its setting.’
Council Response: The site currently appears abandoned and untidy. Development would improve the appearance
of the site and has the potential to enhance the surrounding area. Development must respect the siting of an adja-
cent listed building the Gatehouse to Lostock Hall. Buildings on site which offer character may be worth retaining.
The building also offers substantial heritage value and should be treated accordingly, we have lost too much herit-
age of late in the name of so called progress can we at least save this unique farm house. The now derelict build-
ings are home to several endangered species, Bats, Barn Owls and others. I would therefore suggest that only the
smaller farm buildings are demolished, with the large barn adjacent to the lodge being left intact and refurbished in
a very sensitive manner for the use of the Lancashire Wildlife trust and the bio-diversity of the site. Which is right at
the beginning of the Green Route into Bolton and near an SSI area.
Council Response: The site currently appears abandoned and untidy. Development would improve the appearance
of the site and has the potential to enhance the surrounding area. Development must respect the siting of an adja-
cent listed building the Gatehouse to Lostock Hall. Buildings on site which offer character may be worth retaining.
The impact on endangered species and potential provision within the design for them within any new or converted
buildings would be considered in determining any planning application under Core Strategy policy CG1 and other
legislation.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is positioned within the context of a Grade II* listed building, therefore any devel-
opment needs to take account of this through scale, siting and design. There are a num-
ber of mature trees on site that add to the character of the area and should be retained
where possible, particularly given the proximity to green belt..
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently appears abandoned and untidy. Development would improve the ap-
pearance of the site and has the potential to enhance the surrounding area. Development
must respect the siting of an adjacent listed building, and should seek to reflect the char-
acter. A building of character on the site may be worth retaining.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Highway and access improvements would be necessary.
Page 185
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
114SC Land at Lostock Lane
Site Size (Ha) 7.83
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 316
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Persimmon Homes NW / Burnden Leisure PLC
Current Use: Residential development in development and additional land to the south east comprising
former sports ground and demolished former British Aerospace factory buildings.
Planning History: 75979/06: APPROVAL OF DETAILS OF LAYOUT, APPEARANCE, SCALE AND LAND-
SCAPING FOR 301 DWELLINGS (137 APARTMENTS AND 164 HOUSES) - APPROVED
62283/02 and 68157/04: Part A - Outline erection of indoor football school, residential devel-
opment and industrial and warehouse development (Class B1 & B8) (means of access details
only). Part B - Full use of former training building for football academy, the laying out and use
of land as playing surfaces and pitches and the laying out of access roads - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 186
Land at Lostock Industrial Estate/former sports ground, Lostock Lane/Hall Lane should be allocated for housing in
the emerging Allocations Plan to meet plan supply.
The site comprises vacant previously developed and underused land within the urban area and is well located in
relation to existing employment opportunities, shops and all main services and facilities. Development would posi-
tively integrate with housing being developed by Persimmon Homes to the north and the allocated site at Lostock
Hall Farm to the south. It will provide an opportunity to regenerate vacant, former industrial land and make active
and beneficial use of an underused site in the urban area. The northern part of the site formed part of the former
sports ground, which is now being developed for housing, and is identified as Recreational Open Space on the
UDP Proposals Map and emerging Allocations Plan. Its allocation is essentially a legacy from the former use of the
wider site as a sports ground and the site no longer performs any recreational function. The southern part of the
south was previously occupied by buildings, now demolished, associated with the former British Aerospace factory.
While the site has permission for a football training academy building on this site there is no intention that this will
be delivered due to other proposals. The site should be identified for housing. It is approximately 1.5 hectares in
size and can accommodate 30-40 dwellings.
Council Response: Include the site for proposed housing development. It is a previously developed site, and would
form a logical extension to the site that is currently being developed for housing to the north.
Site allocation 114SC extended to include land to the south east owned by Burnden Leisure PLC previously intend-
ed for a football training academy.
Additional planning history.
78093/07 DETAILS OF LAYOUT, SCALE, APPEARANCE AND LANDSCAPING OF FOOTBALL ACADEMY/
TRAINING FACILITY WITH ASSOCIATED CAR PARKING—APPROVED
84265/10: Variation on condition 03 on planning application 68157/04 (to allow up to 25 dwellings to be occupied
prior to points A, B and C being implemented). Approved with conditions.—APPROVED
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
Under development.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Page 187
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
115SC Ox Hey Lane
Site Size (Ha) 0.98
Density Assumption
(DPH)
30
Yield (Units) 26
Source: SHLAA NLUD
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: United Utilities
Current Use: Water treatment facility
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 188
‘I support this proposed development, because it is an area of greenspace that as never been used for recreation
purposes, having been the property of firstly Manchester Corporation Water Works and latterly United Utilities.
On the caution side adequate easement will have to be made for the Thirlmere Aqueduct that runs through the
southern part of the site.If Greenspace as to be targeted to meet the requirements of the Published Allocation Plan,
then this is the type of plot you should be seeking to utilise.’
Council Response: ‘Support noted.’
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site borders the green belt, and therefore an appropriate scale of development would
be expected. There is a mature tree on the eastern corner of the site that is probably
worth preserving.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site allows for an open aspect to the rear of properties on Shaftesbury Avenue. Devel-
opment would be unpopular with these addresses. Development of the site for housing
would fit in with the character of the area and could improve the appearance of the site
itself.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New highways and access would be required on site.
Page 189
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
117SC Swallowfield Hotel and Brazley Site
Site Size (Ha) 1.69
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 67
Source: Planning Application /
Corporate Property
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Redrow Homes and Bolton Council on the extended area.
Current Use: Residential development, Community Centre and Day Care Centre.
Planning History: 73431/06: DEMOLITION OF EXISTING HOTEL AND ERECTION OF TWO BUILDINGS
CONTAINING A TOTAL OF 42 APARTMENTS, A CAR PARKING AREA OF 52 SPACES
AND LANDSCAPING. - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 190
‘The Community Centre and car park is well-used by community groups. The site provides a green corridor for pub-
lic access away from Chorley New Road traffic and offers children a safe route for walking and biking to Claypool
Primary School. The site is of high landscape value to our local community and includes large mature trees which
add to the visual amenity of the residential area and should be protected. It would seem to me that development of
housing in place of these facilities would be rather contrary to the Councils Core Strategy policy SC2, which posi-
tively encourages the provision of community facilities within neighbourhoods.
‘What I do object to is the land which covers the Brazley Community Hall and its car park being used for housing. I
believe that the site plan should be amended in this exercise so that only half of this site is allocated - i.e. the south-
ern part of the site covering the Swallowfield site and the former Brazley library and the northern part of the site
covering the Brazley Community Hall and car park should be excluded from 117SC.The loss of the Brazley Com-
munity Hall which is an asset to the local community, would be detrimental if it were to be closed and lost. There-
fore until the future of the Community Hall is decided, the plan should be amended as requested. ‘
Council Response: ‘This proposed housing allocation includes the stalled former Swallowfields Hotel site and other
council owned buildings. Development for housing would bring about positive improvements to the site. The loss
of community facilities would need to be mitigated through the provision of new or improved facilities nearby.’
My objection is on the grounds that to use this area for Housing would under-utilise the area in terms of dwellings. It
should be developed in the same way as the Belong building in Atherton. which accommodates the older genera-
tion, of various capabilities and disabilities. With the construction of such a building would be the ideal way to free
up under occupied social housing in the area, retain the Brazley centre and retain all significant trees in the area.
Council Response: The allocation of the site for housing would not rule out development along the lines of Belong,
which is a 'care village' for older people.
My objection is on the grounds that this informal recreation area 116SC Cedar Avenue should be retained has a
village green. It was created as part of the old Six acre rule and should be retained for future generations.
Council Response: The boundary of the site (116SC) has been changed in the Published Allocations Plan, and
combined with the adjacent site (117SC). The most valuable part of the site is retained as open space.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are a number of trees protected by TPO’s that should be retained.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development has commenced and stalled on part of the site. Development on this part of
the site would improve the site appearance. The site provides a prominent frontage to
Chorley New Road that should be reflected in new development through quality design
improving the character of the wider area. The loss of the community facilities should be
mitigated through improvement of existing of provision of new facilities nearby.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access and highways capacity.
Page 191
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
119SC Mount Street
Site Size (Ha) 2.23
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 71
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Gowerfield Ltd c/o Broompark Management
Current Use: Disused playing field
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 192
St Mary’s Primary School expressed an interest in the site as providing potential for expansion.
Bolton College have expressed an interest in the site, through release of Horwich Campus and potential joint opportunity.
‘There is no public right of way across the adjacent private land of the Horwich Golf Course making this public recreation space
very valuable for local residents and their children between Brazley and Victoria Road. I would suggest that Land 119SC would
be a valuable asset if the popular St Mary's Primary School were to expand in the future, allowing for more classroom space, a
grass recreation field which they do not have at present within their school boundary, while maintaining concessionary public
access between Brazley and Victoria Road. There is also scope for amenity tree planting around the periphery of the recreation
field as this would enhance the landscape quality and cut out traffic noise and pollution/dust from Chorley New Road. ‘
Council Response: This site was historically playing fields but has been unused and not maintained as such for some years.
Development would improve the appearance of the site and surrounding area. It would have to take into account Nellies Clough
which runs under the site in culvert. This may well provide opportunities for open space links through the site including from
Nellies Clough in the Green Belt to the north. The inclusion of proposed additional housing site taking in the buildings and
grounds of Horwich College to allow re-development should educational use cease combined with the Mount Street allocation
119SC may provide scope to investigate possibilities for school expansion.
I agree with the redundant Horwich Campus being developed for housing. It is a brownfield site. However, land at 119SC (Mount
Street) should not be built on because it is a playing pitch and an area of high density housing must have a recreation field facili-
ty. The families in Brazley need somewhere to play ball games.
Council Response: The land at Mount Street is an integral part of the College site, but it is currently unused and overgrown. The
site is privately owned and not allocating it for housing would not, in any case, make the site available for public open space.
The site is within the urban area of Horwich and its development for housing would be in accordance with the Core Strategy. It
is required to provide a sufficient quantity and choice of housing in Horwich.
I object on the grounds that any open recreation space should be replaced with equivalent or better than according to planning
regulations in place, no matter who owns them. Plus public consultation should take place before any such development. Sport
England should be informed of any proposed development as a statutory consultee for its input. This area should be refur-
bished to it former glory and used for local schools joint sports fields. All this because it has been so called in sports use at a
cost of £7000 for the Rugby season within the last five years.
Council Response: The site at Horwich College does contain land that has at some stage in the past been used for playing fields
for the College. However they have been unused for a considerable time, and are not required for College use. The develop-
ment of the site for housing would not have an adverse effect on recreational provision in this location.
The interest expressed by St Mary’s Primary School may be better accommodated on part of the College grounds.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The proximity to a watercourse at Nellies Clough should be protected from and throughout
any development.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The field is currently disused and appears untidy. Development could improve the appear-
ance of the site and raise the standard of the surrounding area, particularly to the east.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 193
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
120SC Chortex Mill and Meadows
Site Size (Ha) 4.17
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 169
Source: Planning permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: The Emerson Group
Current Use: Residential development
Planning History: 76525/07: RESERVED MATTERS DETAILS OF LANDSCAPING IN ASSOCIATION WITH
THE OUTLINE PLANNING PERMISSION GRANTED FOR THE ERECTION OF 149
DWELLINGS UNDER REFERENCE 72253/05. - APPROVED
See subsequent amendment applications.
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 194
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
Under development.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Page 195
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
121SC Berne Avenue
Site Size (Ha) 0.46
Density Assumption
(DPH)
40
Yield (Units) 17
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 196
‘This site does not score highly in the sustainability appraisal for health and wellbeing, neighbourhood quality and
green infrastructure. This is due to the loss of recreational green space, reducing opportunities for excersise Availa-
bility and proximity to green spaces has one of the biggest impacts on increasing physical activity levels. Green
spaces are essential to provide green lungs and help to mitigate air pollution and associated respiratory diseases.
Reduction in urban green spaces and trees could result in a loss of biodiversity and key recreation areas?’
Council Response: ‘Core Strategy policy CG1 allows development on informal greenspace within the urban area
provided it allows for improvements of remaining greenspace and helps meet strategic housing objectives. This
loss should be mitigated through improvements to other public space nearby and new housing taking into account
the character of the existing housing.’
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would be largely hidden from view, therefore visual impacts would be mini-
mal. The site appears rather untidy although would result in the loss of recreational open
space. This should be mitigated through improvements to other public space nearby. In
order to fit in with the immediate character of the area development should be of relatively
low density.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 197
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
122SC Crown Lane
Site Size (Ha) 0.45
Density Assumption
(DPH)
40
Yield (Units) 16
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: A E YATES LIMITED
Current Use: Recreational open space /park
Planning History: None recent
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 198
‘Site 122SC (Crown Lane) contributes positively to the street scene along Crown Lane. It is used by local people informally for recreation and its
loss for a handful of houses would be a disappointment. This is a site that should be enhanced for recreation as it has the potential to be a really
attractive and well used pocket park in an accessible position for many people on this side of Horwich. Again the current green space is of great-
er social and environmental benefit than the development of a few houses on this site. Overall these sites do not score highly in the sustainabil-
ity appraisal for health and wellbeing, neighbourhood quality and green infrastructure. This is due to the loss of recreational green space, reduc-
ing opportunities for exercise. Availability and proximity to green spaces has one of the biggest impacts on increasing physical activity levels.
Green spaces are essential to provide green lungs and help to mitigate air pollution and associated respiratory diseases. Reduction in urban
green spaces and trees could result in a loss of biodiversity and key recreation areas’
Council Response: ‘Core Strategy policy CG1 allows some development on informal greenspaces in the urban area, provided that it allows for
the improvement of remaining green spaces and helps to meet the strategic objectives for housing. Any development of the site should be miti-
gated through improvements to nearby public spaces. There may be scope to retain mature trees and landscaping to assist in retaining the
character of the area and the prominent road frontage will necessitate good design.’
‘I object to the loss of this Greenspace because it was created by infilling a delph, in which a boy drowned in the mid Fifties and one of the rea-
sons it was left as Greenspace, was in his memory.’
Council Response: ‘Historic associations could be investigated and if necessary incorporated in some way.’
‘This number of residential properties (16) would not result in overdevelopment in Horwich but could be considered an infill development. Six-
teen dwellings or less on the site would be compatible with the character of development in the surrounding area. The residential development
of the site would contribute to the Bolton’s housing delivery requirements as identified in the Council’s adopted Core Strategy (March 2011). ‘
Council Response: ‘Support noted.’
The site is privately owned and not maintained by Bolton Council.
While recognising the housing shortage the borough faces, which of course is a national issue, I am concerned that many of the proposed sites
are currently used by a significant number of residents for a variety of recreational & community uses. In identifying suitable locations for future
housing it is vital that recreational space is maintained within the communities of Horwich & Blackrod in order to protect areas of green open
space for the promotion of opportunities for healthy living & the cleaner, greener aspect, enhancing the visual amenity of the local community.
Council Response: Core Strategy policy CG1 allows development on informal greenspace within the urban area provided it allows for improve-
ments of remaining greenspace and helps meet strategic housing objectives. This loss should be mitigated through improvements to other pub-
lic space nearby and new housing taking into account the character of the existing housing.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations. However there are a number of mature trees and landscaping
around the periphery of the site that if retained would help to conserve the character and
quality of the area.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appear-
ance and Regenera-
tion).
The site is a relatively attractive recreational open space, whose loss may be unpopular
amongst the local community. Any development of the site should be mitigated through
improvements to nearby public spaces. The site also occupies a prominent street front-
age. This should be considered in any scheme and reflected through high quality design.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 199
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
125SC Manchester Road
Site Size (Ha) 0.55
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 30
Source: SHLAA Broadway
Malyan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton at Home
Current Use: Informal green space
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 200
‘This is recreational open space, used by the local children. If this was used for housing local children would have
no safe area to play in. The traffic is already oversubscribed in the area and this would make things worse. The
access to this land is a single track, meaning the gardens to the properties on either side of this track would be lost
in order to provide a suitable entrance if housing development were to be approved.
The schools in Blackrod are over-subscribed, the health centre/surgery is full to capacity, the parking spaces within
the village are insufficient and the parking restrictions are causing unnecessary harm to the local shop owners. It
would remove a green space and detract from the rural feel of the village.
There is a covenant on this land which was made between Blackrod U.D.C. and Lancashire C.C. and Governmen-
tal sources - Namely George VI Playing Fields Association.’
While recognising the housing shortage the borough faces, which of course is a national issue, I am concerned that
many of the proposed sites are currently used by a significant number of residents for a variety of recreational &
community uses. In identifying suitable locations for future housing it is vital that recreational space is maintained
within the communities of Horwich & Blackrod in order to protect areas of green open space for the promotion of
opportunities for healthy living & the cleaner, greener aspect, enhancing the visual amenity of the local community.
Council Response: Core Strategy policy CG1 allows development on informal greenspace within the urban area
provided it allows for improvements of remaining greenspace and helps meet strategic housing objectives. This
loss should be mitigated through improvements to other public space nearby and new housing taking into account
the character of the existing housing.
A number of other comments addressed similar issues plus drainage and sewerage concerns and three alternative
sites were suggested at the recycling centre at Blackhorse Street and two off Whitehall Street.
Council Response: Manchester Road, Blackrod, is a greenfield site within the urban area of Blackrod, currently
used as informal open space. Its development for housing would be in accordance with the Core Strategy. It is re-
quired to provide sufficient quantity and choice of housing in Blackrod and across the Borough.
The recycling centre on Blackhorse Street may be appropriate for housing in the future, but it is too small to show
on the Proposals Map. The two sites on Whitehall Lane are in the Green Belt and their identification for housing
would be contrary to the Core Strategy.
Access difficulties would need to be overcome. Properties either side of the existing access are both currently
owned by Bolton at Home providing a realistic opportunity for development. Longer term potential.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Any development would be largely hidden from view, therefore the visual impact on char-
acter and appearance of the local area would be minimal. Development would result in the
loss of recreational open space. This should be mitigated through improvements to other
public space nearby.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways would be required.
Page 201
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
128SC Century Mill
Site Size (Ha) 1.36
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 61
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Simarc Property Management
Current Use: Commercial retail use.
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 202
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The site currently appears unsightly and dilapidated. Development for residential use
would significantly improve the appearance of the site, and would support the on-going
regeneration of Farnworth, linking well with nearby housing allocations.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highway would be required.
Page 203
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
129SC Farnworth Industrial Estate
Site Size (Ha) 1.04
Density Assumption
(DPH)
60
Yield (Units) 52
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Lamb and Swift agents for commercial area.
Current Use: Scrap yard and commercial premises
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 204
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The scrap yard part of the site currently appears unsightly and dilapidated, whilst the re-
mainder is available to let. Development for residential use would significantly improve the
appearance of the site, and would support the on-going regeneration of Farnworth.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access and highways capacity.
Page 205
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
130SC Devonshire Road
Site Size (Ha) 1.68
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 60
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Former school playing field.
Planning History: None
Core Strategy Area:
Inner Bolton
Page 206
‘The site is at the centre of a heavily built up area, and provides the only green space available for local children
and residents to enjoy within the immediate locality; the next nearest park is Moss Bank Park. Moss Bank Park is
about a mile away from our home and can only be accessed by crossing two very busy main roads.‘
A look at the Bolton Street map or Google Earth shows that this site is at the centre of a high density built up area
with little green space. The nearest area where children can enjoy green space is Moss Bank Park which is around
half a mile away and across two very busy main roads. The Heaton and Lostock ward is very poorly serviced by
public facilities and open space and although this site is just outside the ward boundary it has in the past been a
valuable open space asset for people at the high density eastern edge of the ward.
This amendment results in land last used as a playing field being allocated for housing and it could readily be
brought back into active use. The development of this site would result in the permanent loss of playing field land.
There is no indication that any of the criteria set out in paragraph 74 of the NPPF would be satisfied, nor that any of
the specific circumstances set out in Sport England's playing field policy would be met. The allocation of this site
for housing conflicts with national planning policy.
Council Response: ‘The site at Devonshire Road has at some time in the past been used for school purposes, but it
is surplus to educational requirements. Development of the site for housing would be in accordance with the Core
Strategy. It is required in order to provide a sufficient quantity and choice of housing in this part of Bolton and
across the Borough.‘
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development would result in the loss of a recreational open space, however, its appear-
ance scruffy, and usage is low, with aspects of antisocial behaviour apparent. Overall de-
velop could have a positive impact on the area,
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 207
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
131SC Oldhams County Primary
Site Size (Ha) 0.79
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 32
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Former school.
Planning History: 89305/13: PRIOR NOTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED DEMOLITION OF BUILDING—
APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
North Bolton
Page 208
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site lies adjacent to the green belt and benefits from landscaping around the periph-
ery. This should be retained to maintain natural screening.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The buildings are currently vacant with the potential to attract antisocial behaviour. Devel-
opment of the site would have a positive impact in terms of maintaining the appearance of
the area.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 209
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
132SC Horwich College
Site Size (Ha) 1.88
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 76
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Gowerfield Ltd c/o Broompark Management
Current Use: Higher education college
Planning History: None relevant.
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 210
‘The culverted Nellies Clough flows through the site and could be a source of flood risk. The culvert will also be a
constraint on developable area as we will use our land drainage byelaw controls to ensure development is not un-
acceptably close to the culvert.’
Council Response: ‘This issue can be considered as part of the design at the planning application stage’
‘it is likely that the site contains sports facilities. Even assuming the site does become surplus to educational re-
quirements, it does not automatically follow that the site would be surplus to requirements in terms of being able to
meet a community need for sports facilities. Any development of the site would need to comply with the require-
ments of paragraph 74 of the national planning policy framework. On a point of detail, the interactive map shows
the boundary of the golf course and the housing allocation as overlapping.’
Council Response: ‘The site at Horwich College does contain land that has at some stage in the past been used for
playing fields for the College. However they have been unused for a considerable time, and are not required for
College use. The development of the site for housing would not have an adverse effect on recreational provision in
this location.’
My objection is on the grounds of this building should be utilised as school for the proposed Horwich Loco Works
housing development, thus allowing more housing to be built on the afore mentioned site. This building is only
about fifty years old and utilising it is a better proposition than retaining the Chorley New Road School. Thus creat-
ing housing use on that site. Plus if the sports fields are utilised as proposed in my objection to 119SC for all the
local schools it would be a more acceptable situation all round, even though Bolton Council nor the Education De-
partment no longer own the area.
Council Response: The requirement for education provision for the development at Horwich Loco Works is defined
in the Core Strategy and the Loco Works Supplementary Planning Document. There is no need to reserve the Col-
lege buildings for a school to serve the Loco Works housing.
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing educational use ceased.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
The college buildings are prominent but not particularly distinctive. Perimeter planting and
landscaping is worth maintaining in order to help new development blend in to surround-
ings.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 211
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
133SC Singleton Avenue
Site Size (Ha) 1.17
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 53
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Medium Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Informal Open Space
Planning History: None.
Core Strategy Area:
Horwich and Blackrod
Page 212
‘This amendment results in a significant proportion of an existing playing field being allocated for housing. The de-
velopment of this site would result in the permanent loss of playing field land. There is no indication that any of the
criteria set out in paragraph 74 of the NPPF would be satisfied, nor that any of the specific circumstances set out in
Sport England's playing field policy would be met. The allocation of this site for housing conflicts with national plan-
ning policy.’
‘The land is open playing fields which many local people enjoy playing on including children and amateur sports
clubs who practice football on this area of land. The building on this land would result in a recreational loss of
greenspace and would be to the detriment of the area. As such I cannot support a large chunk of Green Lane play-
ing fields being built on and therefore as a Ward Councillor object to this late inclusion and amendment from the
original plan.’
Council Response: ’The site at Singleton Avenue, Horwich, is part of the wider area of Green Lane playing fields,
but is not itself used as a playing pitch. It is within the urban area of Horwich. Its development for housing would be
in accordance with the Core Strategy and is required in order to provide a sufficient quantity and choice of housing
in Horwich and across the Borough. The development of the site would not affect the use of the Green Lane play-
ing pitches. Supporting information shows what alternative recreation facilities to be provided if this site were to be
developed, and assesses existing alternatives. The proposal is in line with NPPF.’
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Although there would be some loss of recreational open space, this area form part of the
playing field that is not used. Loss of this space should be mitigated through upgrading the
remainder of the site.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 213
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
134SC Woodlands
Site Size (Ha) 0.61
Density Assumption
(DPH)
50
Yield (Units) 27
Source: Allocations Call For
Sites
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: None relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Inner Bolton
Page 214
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
There are some protected trees on site that should be retained.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development of this vacant site would improve the appearance of the general area, and
bring an empty site back into use.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 215
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
135SC Campbell Street
Site Size (Ha) 0.85
Density Assumption
(DPH)
N/A
Yield (Units) 35
Source: Planning Permission
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Vacant site
Planning History: 87415/12: OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (ALL MATTERS
RESERVED) - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Inner Bolton
Page 216
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Development of this vacant site would improve the appearance of the general area, bring-
ing an empty site back into use and contributing to the on-going regeneration of Farn-
worth.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 217
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
136SC Romer Street Works and Health Centre
Site Size (Ha) 0.76
Density Assumption
(DPH)
40
Yield (Units) 30
Source: Further Changes to
Allocations Plan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Mr Robert Peace, RMW Properties, c/o Raptech (Eng) Ltd, NHS
Current Use: Commercial Use,/ Health Centre
Planning History: 85037/10: ERECTION OF 18 HOUSES FOLLOWING DEMOLITION OF HEALTH CENTRE
(OUTLINE APPLICATION, ALL MATTERS RESERVED) - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Inner Bolton
Page 218
Site would only come forward for housing development if the existing employment use ceased
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Residential development on the site would be in context to the surrounding residential
properties, and would improve the visual amenity of the area. The site is adjacent to a chil-
dren's playground and allotment gardens. Any development should further enhance these
neighbouring uses.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
New access and highways required.
Page 219
Site Location as displayed on
the Published Allocations Plan
Proposal Map.
138SC Beehive Mills
Site Size (Ha) 3.62
Density Assumption
(DPH)
55
Yield (Units) 200
Source: Further Changes to
Allocations Plan
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Arndale Properties
Current Use: Commercial Use
Planning History: None Relevant
Core Strategy Area:
Inner Bolton
Page 220
The draft Allocations Plan showed Beehive Mill as partly allocated for housing (37SC) and partly for employment.
The proposed change M042 suggested deleting the residential allocation because the mill “is in a well-established
employment use”.
However, Yodel has announced its intention to move out of Beehive Mill because it does not serve the needs of
modern logistics, both in terms of the layout and environment that a modern company expects.
The proposed change is therefore objected to. Indeed the whole site should be allocated for residential develop-
ment, based on conversion of the listed buildings on the site.
Council Response: Allocate the site for housing to encourage regeneration of the mills, which are in a predominant-
ly residential area.
The buildings are vacant from April 2013 onwards.
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Listed Buildings
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
The site has good access. although new highways would be required.
Page 221
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
139SC Crows Nest Farm
Site Size (Ha) 0.89
Density Assumption
(DPH)
55
Yield (Units) 8
Source: Planning Applica-
tions
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Private Ownership
Current Use: Farm
Planning History: 88509/12 | ERECTION OF FARMHOUSE (FOLLOWING DEMOLITION OF EXISTING FARMHOUSE), CON-
VERSION AND EXTENSION OF BARNS TO FORM SEVEN DWELLINGS WITH NEW ACCESS, GARAGE
BLOCK, LANDSCAPING, WALLS AND FENCES, AND ERECTION OF TWO BARNS | CROWS NEST FARM,
JACKS LANE, WESTHOUGHTON, BOLTON, BL5 2DJ - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Westhoughton
Page 222
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site falls within the green belt, therefore any development should consider the impact
on the surrounding area.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Page 223
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
140SC Galebrook Nursing Home
Site Size (Ha) 0.55
Density Assumption
(DPH)
Yield (Units) 3
Source: Planning Applica-
tions
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: G.I.A. Investments
Current Use: Site of former Galebrook Residential Nursing Home
Planning History: 88549/12 | ERECTION OF THREE DETACHED DWELLINGS—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
North Bolton
Page 224
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site falls within the green belt, therefore any development should consider the impact
on the surrounding area. The site lies adjacent to an SBI, and should therefore maintain
an appropriate buffer with the SBI. A Tree Preservation Order protects trees on the site.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Page 225
Site Location as dis-
played on the Published
Allocations Plan Proposal
141SC Lark Hill
Site Size (Ha) 0.41
Density Assumption
(DPH)
Yield (Units) 28
Source: Planning Applica-
tions
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Parkfield Commercial Properties
Current Use: Vacant: Former Albion Mill
Planning History: 87139/11 | OUTLINE APPLICATION FOR THE ERECTION OF 12 TWO STOREY
TOWN HOUSES AND A TWO STOREY APARTMENT BUILDING COMPRISING 16
ASSISTED LIVING APARTMENTS (ACCESS, LAYOUT AND SCALE DETAILS ON-
LY).—APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Farnworth
Page 226
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Page 227
Site Location as displayed
on the Published Allocations
Plan Proposal Map.
142SC Greenroyd Avenue
Site Size (Ha) 0.65
Density Assumption
(DPH)
Yield (Units) 21
Source: Planning Applica-
tions
Priority: Short Term
Ownership: Bolton Council
Current Use: Brownfield Land
Planning History: 88542/12 | ERECTION OF 21 DWELLINGS (11 TWO BEDROOMED AND 10 THREE
BEDROOMED) - APPROVED
Core Strategy Area:
Breightmet
Page 228
External Comments:
Internal Comments:
Proximity to Sensitive
Designations (Physical
or Environmental).
The site is in a good location, as it is in the existing urban area and would have no impact
on sensitive designations.
Impact on Local Area
(Character, Appearance
and Regeneration).
Under development.
Access and Highway
Capacity Issues
Under development.
Planning Strategy
Development and Regeneration
Third Floor
Bolton Town Hall
Bolton
BL1 1RU
Phone: 01204 333218
E-mail:
Bolton Council
The council is currently consulting on the content of the
Published Allocations Plan. This is an opportunity for
you to have your say about an early version of the Plan
and influence what could happen in each part of Bolton.
This particular document highlights the proposed hous-
ing sites that have been identified across the borough to
will enable the delivery of 694 new dwellings per year.