8/9/2019 Allonge is Not Admissable

1/1

Foreclosure Case Killer!- An Allonge Is Not Admissable

Evidence of Banks Ownership

March 23rd, 2010 4 Comments Foreclosure

Across the country, banks are attaching allonges to original promissory notes, then using theattached allonge to allege their ownership of the note and their standing to foreclose.

The problem for the banks is an allonge is only supposed to be used when there is not sufficientblank space on the front or the back of the original note to stamp a wet endorsement on the

face of that original document to transfer ownership from the lender whose name appears on theface of the note to the next holder of the note.

Attached here is a Motion to Dismiss I just filed which includes all the relevant research from

across the United States that pertains to the use of allonges. It is fascinating to consider that

allonges are being used perhaps millions of times across the country in support of banks effortsto foreclose on homes when the use of allonges in many of these cases may not be supported bythe law or the facts of the case.

I publish this Motion and challenge attorneys, advocates, academics and any interested party to

weigh in on the issueif anyone can find proper legal justification for the widespread use(misuse) of allonges that currently exists in mortgage foreclosure cases, please send me

information and correct mehaving said that, I dont expect that any contrary case law exists.

As weve learned from depositions taken of Angela Nolan (her full deposition here) and other

Robo Signers, allonges are being produced by word processors and not signed by hand (as they

are supposed to be). The original note is not even in possession of the party when the allegedallonge is created and the allonge is merely stapled or affixed at some later date. All of thisviolates the intent and purpose of original wet endorsements on the face of the documents

which are intended to be a permanent record of a negotiable instruments chain of title.

Examine all documents carefully, and challenge the authenticity of everything.this issue isbegging for an appellate court decision!