alr mehrnia bcej 2005

Upload: ram-gupta

Post on 05-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Alr Mehrnia Bcej 2005

    1/6

    Biochemical Engineering Journal 22 (2005) 105110

    Gas hold-up and oxygen transfer in a draft-tube airliftbioreactor with petroleum-based liquids

    Mohammad Reza Mehrniaa,b,, Jafar Towfighib, Babak Bonakdarpourc,Mohammad Mehdi Akbarnejadd

    a Chemical Engineering Department, Tehran University, Tehran 11365-4563, Iranb Biotechnology group, Chemical Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran

    c Chemical Engineering Department, Amir Kabir University of Technology, Tehran, Irand Iranian Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran

    Received 11 May 2004; received in revised form 25 August 2004; accepted 3 September 2004

    Abstract

    Gas hold-up (g) and volumetric gasliquid oxygen transfer coefficient (kLa) in a draft-tube airlift bioreactor (24 103 m3 in volume)

    were studied using pure kerosene and diesel and their water-in-oil microemulsions, as the model solutions for petroleum biodesulfurization.

    For comparison, experiments were also done with distilled water. The g and the kLa values for kerosene and diesel systems were in most

    cases significantly higher than the water system. Increase in water-to-oil phase volume ratio () of the microemulsion systems resulted in

    decrease in the values ofg, which was attributed to a decrease in the coalescence-inhibiting tendency of the petroleum liquids. Increase in

    the viscosity (v) of the microemulsion systems to around 32 106 m2/s resulted in the occurrence of the churn turbulent regime with an

    associated decrease in the value ofg, which could not be solely accounted for by the increase in . Furthermore, the kLa values decreased

    with increase in the viscosity of the petroleum-based liquids. However, when churn turbulent conditions prevailed, increase in viscosity alone

    could not account for the decrease observed in the kLa values. Empirical correlations were developed that related g and kLa to and ,

    respectively, under the bubbly flow regime inside the bioreactor. 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Airlift bioreactors; Gas hold-up; Oxygen transfer; Petroleum; Microemulsions; Viscosity

    1. Introduction

    Airlift bioreactors are being considered for use in a variety

    of biotechnological processes, such as biocatalytic desulfu-

    rization (BDS) of petroleum, in which a slurry of bacterial

    cells or aqueous biocatalytic agent (as the dispersed phase)is mixed with high-sulfur distillate to produce a homogenous

    emulsion, preferably a microemulsion [15].

    The majority of hydrodynamics and oxygen transfer data

    for airlift bioreactors have beenobtained with air/water-based

    systems, with properties different from the real conditions of

    the BDS processes, in which petroleum-based media are em-

    Corresponding author. Tel.: +98-21-6498982; fax: +98-21-6461024.

    E-mail address: jtd [email protected] (M.R. Mehrnia).

    ployed that have much lower surface tensions, higher viscosi-

    ties and bubble coalescence inhibiting rather than promoting

    properties.

    It is known that both liquid viscosity and surface tension

    affect gas hold-up (g) [68] and volumetric oxygen trans-

    fer coefficient (kLa) [912] in airlift bioreactors containingwater-based media. The small bubbles formed in liquids with

    reduced surface tension may enhance both g and kLa [9,10].

    An increase in liquid viscosity results in the formation of

    larger bubbles that reduce g, while at the same time the vis-

    cose drag increaseswhich canlead to a decrease in bubble rise

    velocity and hence increase in g [12,13]. Some researchers

    have, therefore, reported a decrease in the value ofg with in-

    creasing liquid viscosity [1215] whereas others have found

    that there is no significant effect of viscosity on g [9,10,16].

    1369-703X/$ see front matter 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.bej.2004.09.007

  • 7/31/2019 Alr Mehrnia Bcej 2005

    2/6

    106 M.R. Mehrnia et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 22 (2005) 105110

    Nomenclature

    a specific gasliquid interfacial area (m2/m3)

    AN two-pair non-ionic surfactants (Arkopal N100

    and N40)

    Dcolumn diameter (m)ESF two-pair non-ionic surfactants (Ethoxylated

    soya fatty acid 2 and 10 M)

    H draft-tube height (m)

    kL liquid-side oxygen transfer coefficient (m/s)

    kLa volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (1/s)

    TS two-pair non-ionic surfactants (Tween 80 and

    Span 80)

    ugr riser superficial gas velocity (m/s)

    v kinematic viscosity (m2/s)

    W/D water-in-diesel microemulsion

    W/K water-in-kerosene microemulsion

    W/O water-in-oil microemulsion

    Greek letters

    g gas hold-up

    density (kg/m3)

    surface tension (N/m)

    water-to-oil phase volume ratio

    Furthermore, increase in liquid viscosity results in decrease

    in the value of kL due to decrease in internal recirculation

    of bubbles [11,12]. Therefore, an increase in liquid viscos-

    ity generally leads to a decrease in kLa [1015,17]. On theother hand, increase in the bubble coalescence inhibiting ten-

    dencies of the liquid phase has been reported to affect the

    relationship between g and gas velocity [18,19].

    Mehrnia et al. [20,21] used a water-in-kerosene (W/K)

    microemulsion with a water-to-oil phase volume ratio () of

    20%, as a cold model of the BDS inside a draft-tube air-

    lift bioreactor (DTAB) with different geometries and found

    somewhat different hydrodynamic and oxygen transfer char-

    acteristics of the bioreactor compared to the results reported

    for water-based media. In BDS processes, various hydrocar-

    bon fractions are used as substrate and also the ratio is

    an important operational variable [14,2224]. The latter, to-

    gether with the type of hydrocarbon fractions used in making

    the microemulsion, determines the viscosity of these systems

    [25,26].

    Thepurpose of the present work, therefore, hasbeen to ob-

    tain gas hold-up and the kLa values inside a DTAB employ-

    ing different petroleum liquids and water-in-oil (W/O) mi-

    croemulsion systems with the in the range 1030%. Higher

    ratioswas notconsideredsince, in BDSprocesses,the useof

    microemulsions with low water-to-oil ratios is recommended

    to reduce vessel size, lower the cost of downstream process-

    ing operations and minimize biocatalyst and water utilization

    with respect to the amount of oil [25,2224]. Furthermore,

    the effect of the type of surfactant used in the preparation of

    the microemulsion system was also investigated. Addition-

    ally, correlations describing the effect of the physicochemical

    characteristicsof petroleum liquids and W/O microemulsions

    on the gas hold-up and the volumetric oxygen transfer coef-

    ficient in the DTAB have been obtained.

    2. Experimental system

    The DTAB was made of Pyrex glass with 0.14 m inside

    diameter. The height of draft-tubes was 1.48 m. The inside

    diameter of draft-tubes was 0.095 m with a wall thickness

    of 0.0025 m, yielding an Ad/Ar ratio of 0.707. There was a

    0.024 m annular gapbeneaththe bottomedge of thedraft-tube

    for fluid circulation. Air was introduced into the draft-tube

    through a set of perforated pipes (ladder-like shape sparger)

    with 30 equally spaced 0.001m holes. The sparger was lo-

    cated 0.06 m above the lower end of the draft-tube. The dis-

    tance between the static liquid surface and the upper edge ofthe draft-tube was 0.1 m.

    The liquids employed in the present work were distilled

    water, kerosene, diesel and different W/O microemulsion

    systems employing different hydrocarbon base and ra-

    tios in the range 1030%. Table 1 lists the properties of

    those liquids at the experimental temperature, i.e., 25 C.

    Three different non-ionic pair of surfactants namely Arkopal

    N100 and N40 (Ethoxylated nonylphenol 10 and 4 M) (AN)

    [Clariant, Germany], Ethoxylated soya fatty acid 10 and 2 M

    (ESF) [Hooman shimi Co., Iran], Tween 80 and Span 80

    (TS) [Aldrich Co. Ltd.] were used in the preparation of the

    microemulsion systems. These systems were prepared asdescribed previously [19,20]. Surfactant pair AN was also

    added to kerosene in one of the experimental runs inside

    the DTAB in order to investigate the influence of the ad-

    dition of surfactants to petroleum liquids on gas hold-up

    and kLa.

    The bed expansion method was used to evaluate the over-

    all gas hold-up in the airlift reactor [12,27]. This was de-

    termined by measuring the difference between the ungassed

    and gassed liquid volume. The volumetric oxygen transfer

    coefficient was determined by the dynamic physical method

    [12,20,27]. Dissolved oxygen concentrations were monitored

    continuously using a dissolved oxygen meter (Mettler Toledo

    4220X, Germany) with a rapid polarographic dissolved oxy-

    gen probe (Mettler Toledo, Inpro 6100/120/T/P, Germany).

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. Gas hold-up

    In Fig. 1, the gas hold-up data obtained inside the DTAB

    with kerosene, diesel, and their various W/O microemulsions

    as a function of riser superficial gas velocity (ugr) is pre-

    sented and compared with the data for distilled water. As

  • 7/31/2019 Alr Mehrnia Bcej 2005

    3/6

    M.R. Mehrnia et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 22 (2005) 105110 107

    Table 1

    Properties of liquids at 25 C

    Liquid Water/oil

    ratio ()

    Surfactants Density

    (kg/m3)

    Kinematic viscosity

    (106 m2/s)

    Surface tension

    (mN/m)

    Symbol in the

    figuresPetroleum soluble Water soluble

    Kerosene 0 801.8 1.74 29.5 Kerosene

    Surfactant-added

    kerosene

    0 AN4 815.5 1.92 29 W/K 0, AN

    Water/kerosene

    microemulsion

    10 AN4 AN10 839.9 3.7 29 W/K 10, AN

    Water/kerosene

    microemulsion

    20 Span 80 Tween 80 862.6 4.87 29.5 W/K 20, TS

    Water/kerosene

    microemulsion

    20 AN4 AN10 869.5 6.52 29.5 W/K 20, AN

    Water/kerosene

    microemulsion

    20 ESF4 ESF10 873.3 9.34 30 W/K 20, ESF

    Water/kerosene

    microemulsion

    30 AN4 AN10 883.8 31.15 30 W/K 30, AN

    Diesel 0 826.3 8.07 32 Diesel

    Water/diesel

    microemulsion

    20 AN4 AN10 892.2 32.3 33 W/D 20, AN

    Water 997 0.897 72 Water

    expected, the value of g for all of the fluids generally in-

    creases with increasing gas velocity. The results also show

    that most of the values ofg for the petroleum liquids and the

    W/O microemulsion systems are significantly higher than

    the water system except for the g values obtained for 30%

    W/K and the 20% water-in-diesel (W/D) microemulsions at

    ugr0.06 m/s. This difference can generally be attributed to

    the much lower surface tension and perhaps the higher co-

    alescence hindering characteristics of the petroleum liquids

    and the microemulsions compared to water, which results

    in the generation of smaller sized bubbles in the bioreactorfilled with these systems. Observation of the two-phase flow

    in the DTAB with petroleum-based systems and distilled wa-

    ter confirmed the presence of smaller sized bubbles in the

    former systems. Similar g values are obtained for diesel and

    kerosene although the former has a viscosity that is more than

    four times higher than the latter (see Table 1). Similarly, re-

    sults presented in Fig. 1 also show that there is no significant

    Fig. 1. Gas hold-up for kerosene, diesel and their various water-in-oil mi-

    croemulsions, and distilled water as a function of superficial gas velocity.

    change in the value ofg when the viscosity is increased by a

    change in the type of surfactant used in making the 20% W/K

    microemulsion systems. However, the addition of water-to-

    diesel and -kerosene, with an associated increase in viscosity,

    hasresulted in a significant reduction in the value ofg. These

    results seem to suggest that for all the petroleum-based sys-

    tems, except 30% W/K and the 20% W/D microemulsions,

    andwith the bioreactor configuration employed in the present

    study, the enhancing effect of viscosity on g due to smaller

    bubble rise velocities (which results in higher residence time

    of bubbles in the draft-tube and a higher rate of recircula-tion of bubbles into the downcomer) balances the negative

    effect of viscosity on g as a result of the generation of larger

    bubble sizes. Different results might be obtained in DTABs

    that have a larger gas disengagement section, such as those

    employed by Mehrnia et al. [20]. The smaller g values ob-

    tained with microemulsion systems as compared to the pure

    petroleum liquids, with an indirect relationship being found

    between g and , can perhaps be attributed to a decrease in

    the coalescence inhibiting tendency of these liquids through

    the addition of the highly coalescence promoting distilled

    water. For all the petroleum-based liquids employed, except

    the30% W/Kand the20% W/Dmicroemulsions, bubbly flow

    was observed over the whole range of ugr employed in the

    present study, and as the results in Fig. 1 show there is no

    significant decrease in the rate of rise ofg with ugr over this

    range. On the other hand, the results for the 30% W/K and the

    20% W/D microemulsions, as well as distilled water, show

    a significant lowering of the rate of rise of g with ugr. Vi-

    sual observations also indicated the occurrence of the churn

    turbulent at ugr around 0.020.04 m/s for distilled water and

    around 0.040.06 m/s for the other two microemulsion sys-

    tems. Observation of Fig. 1 also shows a significant drop in

    theslopeof the curve for distilledwaterat ugr around0.04 m/s

    and the two microemulsion systems at around 0.06 m/s.

  • 7/31/2019 Alr Mehrnia Bcej 2005

    4/6

    108 M.R. Mehrnia et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 22 (2005) 105110

    Fig. 2. Correspondence between predicted and experimental values of gas

    hold-up.

    In terms of the above discussion, for conditions employed

    in the present study which lead to bubbly flow, the gas hold-

    up was affected by the ugr and the water-to-oil phase volumeratio. An exponential multiple regression used on the data

    from the gas hold-up experiments in the DTAB containing

    different petroleum-based fluids for bubbly flow regime gave

    the following correlation:

    g = 1.320[ugr]0.927[1+ ]0.673 (1)

    A comparison between experimental data and calculated

    values of gas hold-up for petroleum-based media is shown

    in Fig. 2. It can be seen that Eq. (1) predicts about 83% of

    the experimental data with 15% error. The data obtained un-

    der conditions in which the churn-turbulent regime prevailed

    in the DTAB could not be satisfactorily correlated with theabove equation. However, due to the smaller number of data

    points available, a suitable correlation for this regime cannot

    be presented here. It should also be noted that change in the

    geometry of the gas disengagement section could also have

    a bearing on the relationship between g and ugr in DTABs

    employing petroleum-based media.

    3.2. Volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient

    Fig. 3 shows the measured kLa as a function ofugr for the

    same liquids employed for gas hold-up measurement pre-

    sented in Fig. 1. Again, the value ofkL

    a for all of the fluids

    increases with increasing gas velocity, the only exception

    being the kLa data for the 30% W/K and the 20% W/D mi-

    croemulsions in which kLa drops when ugr is increased from

    0.04 to 0.06 m/s but further increase in ugr up to 0.08 m/s

    again had lead to an increase in kLa. The kLa data for dis-

    tilled water also shows a significant decline in the slope of

    the plot for ugr > 0.02 m/s. Visual observations of the flow

    regime in the DTAB indicated the occurrence of the churn

    turbulent regime somewhere between 0.02 and 0.04 m/s for

    distilled water and somewhere between 0.04 and 0.06 m/s for

    the 30% W/K and the 20% W/D microemulsions. Therefore,

    the above-mentioned trends could be attributed to a change in

    the flow regime from bubbly to churn-turbulent. It should be

    noted that this trend was also observed to some extend with

    the g data for these liquids (Fig. 1). Similar observations

    have been previously reported in internal loop airlift reactors

    employing aqueous sucrose solutions [18] and seawater [19].

    Similar to the gas hold-up data, in nearly all cases the

    kLa values for all the petroleum-based liquids is higher thandistilled water. However, kLa data for diesel is significantly

    lower than those for kerosene at all ugr employed although

    similar g values were obtained for these liquids inside the

    DTAB. Higher viscosities of solutions generally result in

    lower diffusivities of solutes [28], which in turn results in

    a lowering of kL [17,29]. This can, at least partly, explain

    the difference between the kLa and g results for these two

    liquids. The W/K microemulsions in nearly all cases shows

    higher kLa values. Increase in the value of viscosity, as a re-

    sult of increase in (from 10 to 30%), type of surfactant (in

    the order TS, AN and ESF) or type of petroleum base (from

    kerosene to diesel), has resulted in decrease in the values of

    kLa at constant ugr inside the DTAB. The only exception isthe kLa values at ugr = 0.08 m/s where kLa values for 10% and

    20% W/K microemulsion (prepared with AN surfactant) are

    similar or higher than those for kerosene even though these

    microemulsions have higher viscosities than pure kerosene.

    A closer examination ofFig. 3 shows that for kerosene a drop

    in the rate of riseofkLa with ugr is observed at ugr 0.02 m/s

    whereas for all W/K microemulsions with 20% there is

    no significant drop in this rate for ugr up to 0.08 m/s. When

    kerosene was employed inside the DTAB, stable foam was

    observed at ugr0.02 m/s, with the rate of foaming signif-

    icantly increasing with increasing ugr. However, this phe-

    nomenon was not observed inside the DTAB when the otherpetroleum-based liquids were employed. With kerosene, the

    milky appearance of the fluid inside the DTAB at all air rates

    was also more prominent compared to the other petroleum

    liquids. Foaming, together with the milky appearance, is in-

    dicative of the presence of very small bubbles, and visual

    observations seem to suggest that their population increases

    with increasing ugr. This can result in a decrease in the values

    Fig. 3. kLa for kerosene, diesel and their various water-in-oil microemul-

    sions, and distilled water as a function of superficial gas velocity.

  • 7/31/2019 Alr Mehrnia Bcej 2005

    5/6

    M.R. Mehrnia et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 22 (2005) 105110 109

    Fig. 4. Correspondence between predicted and experimental values ofkLa.

    ofkL [1113,17,29], which might explain the drop in the rate

    of rise ofkLa with ugr at ugr 0.02 m/s.

    The kLa values for 20% W/D is higher than 30% W/K mi-

    croemulsion especially at ugr 0.06 m/s although these twomicroemulsions have similar viscosities. This seems to indi-

    cate an additional influence of water content on kLa, inde-

    pendent of its effect on viscosity, which probably results in

    a decrease in the bubble coalescence-inhibiting tendency of

    the microemulsion system. The results show that this phe-

    nomenon has a more pronounced effect on kLa in the churn

    turbulent regime where due to the high concentration of bub-

    bles, bubble coalescence is expected to be more prominent.

    A multiple-regression analysis, conducted on the data

    from the volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient experiments

    for the different petroleum-based fluids in the DTAB, under

    conditions in which bubbly flow regime prevailed, gave thefollowing correlation:

    kLa = 0.235[ugr]0.757[v]0.11 (2)

    Fig. 4 compares the predicted values and experimental

    data for kLa in the bioreactor containing petroleum-based

    medium. The correlation predicts about 85% of the experi-

    mental data with an error of 20% or less. More work is re-

    quired to develop a suitable correlation for conditions in the

    DTAB in which the churn-turbulent regime prevails.

    4. Conclusions

    Petroleum fractions (i.e., kerosene and diesel) and their

    water-in-oil microemulsions with different water-to-oil vol-

    ume ratio and surfactant types were used to study the gas

    hold-up (g) and volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient (kLa)

    in a draft-tube airlift bioreactor for application in BDS pro-

    cesses. The addition of water as the coalescence promoting

    liquid to the petroleum-based systems, with an associated in-

    crease in and viscosity, resulted in a decrease in g and

    kLa, respectively. Moreover, for all petroleum-based liquids

    with viscosities up to about 8 106 m2/s, as reported pre-

    viously for 20% water-in-kerosene microemulsion [20,21],

    the bubbly flow regime prevailed. However, an increase in

    viscosity to around 32 106 m2/s either through change in

    the petroleum base or the of the microemulsion resulted

    in the onset of churn turbulent regime over most of the air

    rates employed in present study. Appropriate correlations re-

    lating g to and also kLa to viscosity were developed for

    bubbly flow regime, which were found to be less able to ac-curately predict the experimental data in the churn turbulent

    regime. The correlations obtained in this work can be further

    developed for churn turbulent regime and by taking design

    parameters effects into consideration.

    Acknowledgement

    The financial support of Iranian Research Institute of

    Petroleum Industry is gratefully acknowledged.

    References

    [1] D.J. Monticello, Biodesulfurization and the upgrading of petroleum

    distillates, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 11 (2000) 540546.

    [2] F. Monot, S. Abbad-Andaloussi, M. Warzywoda, Biological culture

    containing Rhodococcus erythropolis and/or Rhodococcus rhodnii

    and process for desulfurization of petroleum fraction, U.S. Patent

    No. 6337 204, 2002.

    [3] E.A. Lange, M.A. Pacheco, Advances in biocatalytic desulphuriza-

    tion, PTQ Autumn (1999) 3743.

    [4] M.A. Pacheco, E.A. Lange, P.T. Pienkos, L.Q. Yu, M.P. Rouse, Q.

    Lin, L.K. Linguist, Recent advances in biodesulfurization of diesel

    fuel, in: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of National Petrochem-

    ical and Refiners Association, San Antonio, Texas, 2123 March

    1999, pp. 126. NRPA AM-99-27.[5] D.J. Monticello, J.J. Kilbane, Microemulsion process for direct bio-

    catalytic desulfurization of organosulfur molecules, U.S. Patent No.

    53 58 870, 1994.

    [6] S. Wachi, A.G. Jones, T.P. Elson, Flow dynamics in a draft tube

    bubble column using various liquids, Chem. Eng. Sci. 46 (1991)

    657663.

    [7] M. Kennard, M. Janekeh, Two- and three- phase mixing in a con-

    centric draft tube gas-lift fermentor, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 38 (1991)

    12611270.

    [8] J.B. Snape, M. Fialova, J. Zahradnk, N.H. Thomas, Hydrodynamic

    studies in an external loop airlift reactor containing aqueous elec-

    trolyte and sugar solutions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 47 (1992) 33873394.

    [9] P. Weiland, Influence of draft tube diameter on operation behavior

    of airlift loop reactors, Ger. Chem. Eng. 7 (1984) 374385.

    [10] K. Koide, K. Horibe, H. Kawabata, S. Ito, Gas hold-up and volu-metric liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in solid-suspended bub-

    ble column with draught tube, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 18 (1985) 248

    253.

    [11] D.L. Petrovic, D. Posarac, A. Dudukovic, Hydrodynamics and oxy-

    gen transfer in a draft tube airlift reactor, J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 56

    (1991) 227240.

    [12] Y. Chisti, Airlift Bioreactors, Elsevier Applied Science, London,

    1989.

    [13] J.J. Heijnen, K. Vant Riet, Mass transfer, mixing and heat transfer

    phenomena in low viscosity bubble column reactors, Chem. Eng. J.

    28 (1984) B21B42.

    [14] J.C. Merchuk, N. Ladwa, A. Cameron, M. Bulmer, A. Pickett,

    Concentric-tube airlift reactors: effects of geometrical design on per-

    formance, AIChE J. 40 (1994) 11051116.

  • 7/31/2019 Alr Mehrnia Bcej 2005

    6/6

    110 M.R. Mehrnia et al. / Biochemical Engineering Journal 22 (2005) 105110

    [15] G.Q. Li, S.Z. Yang, Z.L. Cai, J.Y. Chen, Mass transfer and gasliquid

    circulation in an airlift bioreactor with viscous non-Newtonian fluids,

    Chem. Eng. J. 56 (1995) 101104.

    [16] J.C. Merchuk, Hydrodynamics and gas hold-up in airlift reactors, in:

    N.P. Chereminisoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 3,

    Golf Publishing Company, 1986, pp. 14851511 (Chapter 49).

    [17] P.M. Kilonzo, A. Margaritis, The effects of non-Newtonian fermen-

    tation broth viscosity and small bubble segregation on oxygen masstransfer in gas-lift bioreactors: a critical review, Biochem. Eng. J. 17

    (2004) 2740.

    [18] E. Molina, A. Contreras, Y. Chisti, Gas hold-up, liquid velocity and

    mixing behaviour of viscous Newtonian media in a split-cylinder

    airlift bioreactor, Trans. IChE. 77 (1999) 2732.

    [19] J.C. Merchuk, Studies of mixing in a concentric tube airlift biore-

    actor with different spargers, Chem. Eng. Sci. 53 (1998) 709

    719.

    [20] M.R. Mehrnia, J. Towfighi, B. Bonakdarpour, M.M. Akbarnegad,

    Influence of top-section design and draft-tube height on the perfor-

    mance of airlift bioreactors containing water-in-oil microemulsion,

    J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 79 (3) (2004) 260267.

    [21] M.R. Mehrnia, B. Bonakdarpour, J. Towfighi, M.M. Akbarnegad,

    Design and operational aspects of airlift bioreactors for petroleum

    biodesulfurization, Environ. Prog. (2004), in press.

    [22] M.F. Luo, J.M. Xing, Z.X. Gou, S. Li, H.Z. Liu, J.Y. Chen, Desul-

    phurization of dibenzothiophene by lyophilized cells of Pseudomonas

    delafieldii R-8 in presence of dodecane, Biochem. Eng. J. 13 (2003)

    16.

    [23] S.B. Patel, I.I. Kilbane, D.A. Webster, Biodesulphurization of diben-

    zothiophene in hydrophobic media by Rhodococcus sp. (Strain

    IGTS8), J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 69 (1997) 7179.

    [24] S.L. Borgne, R. Quintero, Biotechnological processes for the refiningof petroleum, Fuel Process. Technol. 81 (2003) 155169.

    [25] J.W. Falco, R.D. Walker, D.O. Shah, Effect of phase-volume ratio

    and phase-inversion on viscosity of microemulsions and liquid crys-

    tals, AIChE J. 20 (3) (1974) 512514.

    [26] P. Sherman, Rheological properties of emulsions, in: P. Becker (Ed.),

    Encyclopedia of Emulsion Technology, vol. 3, Marcel Dekker Inc.,

    USA, 1996, pp. 405437.

    [27] Y. Chisti, M. Moo-Young, Hydrodynamics and oxygen transfer

    in pneumatic bioreactor devices, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 31 (1988)

    487494.

    [28] C.R. Wilke, P. Chang, Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute

    solutions, AIChE J. 1 (1955) 264270.

    [29] P.H. Calderbank, Mass transfer in fermentation equipment, in: N.

    Blakeborough (Ed.), Biochemical and Biological Engineering Sci-

    ence, vol. 1, Academic Press, London, 1967.