am j clin nutr 1997 patriarca 616 21
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Am J Clin Nutr 1997 Patriarca 616 21
1/6
-
8/12/2019 Am J Clin Nutr 1997 Patriarca 616 21
2/6
-
8/12/2019 Am J Clin Nutr 1997 Patriarca 616 21
3/6
61 8 P T R I R E T L
I W I and W 2 are women and M 1 and M 2 are men.
T A BL E 1
General data on volunteers takingpart in the 62N i study
Subject
W M W2 M2
A ge (y) 30 28 21 30
Weight (kg) 66.2 77.5 59.2 86.5H eight (cm) 162 186 169 179Body surface area (m2) I .70 2.02 1 .68 2.06C reatinine clearance (niL mi n 1.73 m2) 89 1 12 92 22 84 6 100 IlT otal 62N i dose (pg) 670 760 57 1 879
I W I and W 2 are women and M 1 and M 2 are men.2t SD .
62Ni w ere added and analyzed together w ith the plasm a andurine sam ples obta ined from the subjects.
A d d it ion a l a n a lysis
Serum and urine creatin ine concentra tions were determ inedby th e Jaff { 233}25) method on an automated analyzer. Creatinine
clearance w as norm alized to body surfacearea, according to
G ow an and Fraser 26 .
R E S U LT S
D etails on each subject taking part in the study-including
sex, age, weight, height, body surface area ,average creatinineclearance, and 62Ni dose-are given inTable 1 The daily fecaloutput of the tracer 62N i and the excre tion of the fecal m arker(radioopaque pellets) for each volunteer are compared in T able
2. The plasma concentrations of 62N i observed in each of the
four volunteers at various tim e intervals are show n in F igure1
T h e co ncen tr ati on s of 62N i in plasm a and red cellsamples
taken at the sam e tim e intervals for one of the subjects are
compared in Table 3. Cumulative urinary excretion as a per-centage of the absorbed dose is plotted against tim e inFigure2. T he absorbed, excre ted ,and retained fractions ofthe dose of
62Ni for ea ch su b ject a r e sh ownin T a b le 4. T h e d a ta ob ta in ed
in th is study are com pared w ithdata from the study by Sun-
derman et al 10 in Ta b l e 5
D I S C U S S I O N
Th e 62Ni dose given in this s tudy T able 1 w as r ela tiv elysm all and com parable w ith the am ountof nickel that can be
ingested from diets rich in certain types of food, such as dark
chocolate , nuts, and soy products , although several studies
showed that n ickel absorption is greatly reduced w hen inges ted
w ith food (8, 10). The dose 0 .6-0 .9 m g) , al though not phys-io logic in form , w as the closest in s ize to a typical physiologic
dose used to date . S m aller doses eg ,0.4 and 0.6 mg N i) have
been adm inistered during studies of clin ical responses of nick
el-sensitive patien ts to oral nickel intake 7 , 9 , but thes
studies had only a lim ited num ber of nickel determ inations.Gastrointestinal absorption of 62N iwas estimated as the differ-
ence between ingested nickel and nickel excre ted in feces . Th
com pleteness of fecal excretion w asconfirmed by the com plete
recovery of all radioopaque pelle ts in the feces with in5 d ofingestion , although patternsof fecal excretion w ere different from
subject to subject Table 2 .O ne of the volunteers, w ho consum eda v eg etar ian diet, excreted 18 of the20 pe lle ts w ith in 24 h,
w hereas the others required a longer tim e. In all volunteers, the
pattern of excretion of the tracer closely follow ed that of the fec
marker and there w as no evidence of secondary peaks . T herefore,
w e are confident that the recovery of the dose of 62N i not absorbed
from the in tes tine w as also com plete and that reexcretion o
absorbed nickel via the gut w as negligible . T he average transit
time (A U ) ofthe digesta through th e gut w as 47.4 h (SD : 18.3 h;
SE M : 9.1 h a n d , a fter exclu sion of th ev eg eta ria n s ub je ct,54.4 h
(SD : 14.4 h;SEM : 8.3 h). Cummings et al(23) reported an A U
of 54.2 h (SEM : 2.6 h) in 50 subjects given a single dose of pellets
and a shorter A U was observed when additional fiber was in-
cluded in the diet .
T he m ean concentration of dietary nickel observed in th
feces of all subjects except in one basal sam ple, w hich w as
considered incom plete w as 2.2 1. 1 p.g /g w et w t range:
0 .9-5.0 ;.L g/g wet wt; n = 19) and 7.9 3.3 g/g dry wt
range: 3 .5-15 pg/g dry w t; n = 19). Daily fecal excretion of
T ABL E 2
Fecal marker and tracer excreted per day by each subject
W I M 1 W 2 M 2
Fecal Fecal Fecal Fecal
D ay marker T racer marker T racer marker T racer marker T racer
2 4 5 5 2
% o f t ot a ex cr e te d
6 9 9 7 2 5 2 2
3 4 3 6 2 5 9 2 9 5 7
4 2 2 3 5 3 8
5 2 2 5 2 3
r 0.982 0.965 0.953 0.947
-
8/12/2019 Am J Clin Nutr 1997 Patriarca 616 21
4/6
-
8/12/2019 Am J Clin Nutr 1997 Patriarca 616 21
5/6
62 0 PATRIAR CA ET A L
T B L E 4
A bsorption, excretion, and retention of the 62N i dose in each of the four subjec ts, expressed as a percentage of the dose and a percentage
absorbed dose
W M W M i S
Percen tage of dose (% )
Total 62N i dose 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 -
Total fecal excretion 71 .3 67.6 59.9 68.7 66.9 4. 9
A bsorbed dose 28.7 32.4 40.1 31.3 33.1 4. 9Total urinary excretion 14.5 22.3 32.9 18.9 22.1 7.8
Retained am ount 14.2 10.1 7.2 12.4 1 1.0 3. 0
Percen tage of absorbed dose (% )
A bsorbed dose 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Total urinary excretion 50 .4 68.5 82.0 59.8 65.2 13.4
Retained am ount 49.6 31.5 18.0 40.2 34.8 13.4
vitro s tud ie s o f cellu lar up take ofn ic ke l ind ic a te d tha t h ig h
c o nce ntra tio ns o f a lbum in a nd a m ino a c ids m a y pre ve nt nicke l
accum ulation in red cells (3 1, 32). In th is study we observed in
vivo the d is tribu tio n o f nic ke l be tw e e n re d c e lls a n d p la s m a .
The c o n c e n tra tio n o f 6 2 N i w a s d e te rm ine d in re d c e ll s a m ple s
taken from tw o of the volunteers (W 2a n d M2 ) o ve r aperiod of
tim e a fte r ing e s tio n o f th e is o to pe . F o r bo th s u bje c ts , th e
co nce ntra tio n o f 6 2 N i in re d c e lls w a s< 1 6 nm o l/L, ie , m uc h
low er than that in the corresponding p la s m a s a m p le s . B e c a u s e
t he c on ce nt ra ti on s o bs e rve d w e re c lo s e to the de te c tio n lim it o f
th e m e tho d, th e re s u lts c o uld be q ua ntifie d o n ly fo r o n e s u bje c t
(W 2; Table 3).The u pta ke o f 6 2 N i in re d c e lls w a s s m a ll,
d e s pite the hig h 6 2 N i c o nc e n tra tio n in th e s urro u nd in g p la s m a .
Th e peak w a s reached 48 h after ingestion. The d e c re a s e in
6 2 N i c o nc e n tra tio n started w hen th e c o rre s po nd in g p la s m a c o n -
c e n tra tio n s w e re lo w e r tha n tho s e ins id e th e re d c e lls .
As indicated byth e da ta in F ig u re 2 , the re w a s a la rg e be tw e e n -
s ubje ct va ria bility in urina ry nic ke l e xc re tio n, w hichw a s o nly
p a rtia lly e xpla in e d b y th e diffe re nc e s in u rin a ry vo lu m e s a nd
f lows. A verage da ily urina ry vo lu m e fo r a n in divid u a l ra ng e dfrom 1015 to 1755 m L an d th e a ve ra g e urina ry flo w w a s b e tw e e n
0.71 and 1.22 m lJm in. V alues for creatinine clearance and intra-
in div id ual v ar iab ilit y w e re w ith in th e e xp e c te d re fe re nc e ra ng e fo r
h e a lth y s u bje c ts 2 6 ) a n d in dic a te d no rm a l re n a l fun c tio n Ta ble
1 ). A lo w e r d a y -to -d a y va ria bility w a s o bs e rve d fo r th e v e g e ta ria n
su b jec t (W 2), according to the la c k o f d ie ta ry c re a tin in e in ta ke .
Five days after ing e s tio n, th e e lim in a tio n o f n ic ke l w a s n o t c o m -
p le te in a n y o f th e s u bje c ts . The a ve ra g e a m o u nt e xc re te d w a s
65.0 13.5 of the absorbed d o s e .
T B L E S
E stim ates of nickel absorption, excre tion, and retention determ ined by
using naturally occurring nickel or a stable isotope (62Ni)
Sunderman Ct al (
nickel2
10), This study,
62Ni3
% of ose
Fecal excretion 76 19 66.9 4. 9
Urinary excretion 26 14 22.1 7. 8
Total excretion 102 8 89.0 3. 1
A bsorbed frac tion 27 17 33.1 4.9
Retained fraction 0 1 1.0 3. 01 SD .
2 Length of study: 4 d.
Length of study: d.
In th is s tu dy, th e p e rc e n ta g e o f th e o ra l n ic ke l do s e a bs o rb e d
from the gu t w a s fa irly s im ila r in th re e o f th e vo lu n te e rs ,
w he re as the fo urth subject (W 2) had higher gastrointestinal
absorption 25 ) . S he is a yo u ng ve g e ta ria n w o m a n, w ho m a y
ha ve h a d ina de q ua te iro n inta ke . It h a s b e e n re po rte d th a t
n ic ke l a b s o rp tio n in c re a s e d in iro n-de fic ie n t ra ts 3 3 ). Th is
suggests that iro n s ta tu s s ho uld be assessed in volunteers cho-
s e n for studies o f nic ke l a b s o rp tio n . Th e p e rc e n ta g e o f the
absorbed d o s e e x c re te d in u rin e s ho w e d a w id e r va ria b ility
fro m s u b je c t to s u bje c t, w hic h w a s p a rtia lly e xp la in e d in te rm s
of the to ta l a m o un t o f u rin e pa s s e d . The pe rc e n ta g e o f th e d o s e
retained in the bo d y a t the e nd o f th e e xp e rim e nt ra n g e d fro m
1 8% to 49.6% of the absorbed dose (Table 4).
Biliary excretion hasb e en s ug g es te d as a ro u te o f n ic ke l
e lim ina tio n o n th e b a s is o f e v id e n c e o f b ilia ry e xc re tio n in ra t
a nd rabbits (2) a nd th e m e a s u re m e n t o f nic ke l in h u m a n bile
s pe c im e ns 3 4 ). Ho w e ve r, w e o b s e rve d n o e vid e n c e o f e nte ro -
path ic circulation ofn ic ke l, a s ju dg e d by th e a pp e a ra nc e o f
s e c o n da ry p e a ks o f pla s m a o rurinary n ic ke l c o nc e ntra tio ns .
The pattern o f fe c a l e x c re tio n o f nic ke l h a s be e n a s s e s s e d fo rth e firs t tim e b e c a u s e the tra c e r could be distinguished from
na tura lly a b u nd a n t n ic ke l in g e s te d w ith fo o d. Th e e lim in a tio n
of 62N i in fe c e s fo llo w e d thesam e pattern observed forth e
fecal m arker (Table 2) .This suggests tha t biliary excre tion of
nic ke l is ve ry s m a ll o r a b s e nt in hu m a ns .
The results of thisin ve s tig a tio n s ho w e d am uch low er be tw een -
s ub je ct va ria bility tha n that o bserv ed in e a rlie r s tu die s 8 -1 0 ),
which u s e d n a tu ra lly a b u nd a n t nic ke l. Th is is a ttribu te d to the
im proved ability to d is ting uis h th e tra c e r fro m o th e r s o u rc e s o f
e n viro n m e nta l n ic ke l. Th e e s tim a te s o f nic ke l a b s o rp tio n, e xc re
tio n , a n d re te n tio n o b ta in e d in th is s tud y a re c o m p a re d in Ta b le5
w ith those reported by Sunderm an e t a l 1 0 ), the o nly o the r
c o m ple te s tu d y o n hu m a n sub jects. W e observed a higher gastro-
in te s tin a l a b s o rptio n 6 ) a nd lo w e r fe c a l -9 ), u rina ry -4 ),and to tal nickel excretion 1 1 ). Th e m o s t s triking re s u lt ob -
s e rv e d in this s tu d y w a s th a t a c o n s ide ra b le fra c tio n o f theab -
sorbed n ic ke l do s e (34.8 13.4% ) w as s till retained d after
ing e s tio n. The s e re s ults fo r nic ke l re te ntio n a re co ns is te nt w it
th o s e o f re c e nt a n im a l s tu die s [m ic e fe d p hy s io lo g ic do s e s o f 5 7
5 )1 a nd a study by Te m p le to n e t a l 2 1 ), w h o , in a s in g le -s ub je c ts tudy found urinarye xc re tio n o f 6 tN i persis ting 96 h aftera n o ra l
dose of th e is o to pe .
The us e o f a s ta b le is o to pe to inv e s tig a te n ic ke l m e ta b o lis m
in hu m an s has several advan tages; the doses can be reduced
a m o unts c lo s e r to phys io lo g ic o ne s a nd c o nta m ina tio n is e
-
8/12/2019 Am J Clin Nutr 1997 Patriarca 616 21
6/6
NICKEL M ETA BO LISM IN H UM A NS 62 1
fectively re d u c e d b y a fa c to r o f 1 8 .5 , a llo w in g th e fa te o f th e
t racer to be follow ed for a long tim e.
O n the assum ption that nickel absorbed from aqueous solu-
tions during fasting behaves as does nickel absorbed fromth e
d ie t, th e re s u lts o f th is s tu d y s h o w th a t e lim in a tio n o f n ic k e l
fro m th e b o d y ta k e s lo n g e r th a n re p o rte d p re v io u s ly a n d tha t
nickel excretion a n d in te rin d iv id u a l v a ria b ility m ay h a ve b e e n
o v e r e s t i m a t e d . Estim ates of long-term retention o f th e a b -
sorbed nickel fraction shouldb e c o n s id e re d w ith c a u tio n b e -
cause th e n o n e x c h a n g e a b le o r s lo w ly e x c h a n g e a b le fra c tio n s
ca n a p p a re n tly b e in c re a s e d b y a n y lo s s e s o f n ic k e l d u e to
in c o m ple te fe c a l an d u rin e c o lle c tio n s . H o w e v e r, in th is s tu d y
the fecal m arker given with the n ickel dose was com plete ly
recovered from a ll sub jects and the retention of nickelw a s
co n firm ed b y its co n ce n tra tio n in p la s m a a n d u rin e .
T h e in ve s tig a tio n o f th e s ite s w h e re n ick e l is re ta in e d a n d th e
processes inv o lve d in th e s lo w e x ch a n g e o f n ick e l fro m tis s u e s
will re q u ire fu rth e r s tu d ie s . P re lim in a ry re s u lts o n th e k in e tic s
of nickel uptake fro m e ry th ro c y te s in v ivo h a v e b e e n re p o rte d .
A three-com partm ent m athem atical m odelfo r n ic k e l m e ta b -
olism ha s b e e n d e v e lo p e d w ith d a ta fro m th is s tu d y a n d p re -
l im inary results w e re p re s e n te d p re v io u s ly a t th e F ifth C O M -
T X Sym posium on T oxicology a n d C lin ica l C h e m is try o f
Metals (u n p u b lis h e d o b s e rv a tio n s , 1 9 9 5 ). A fu ll d e s c rip tion o f
the m odel w ill b e th e s u b je c t o f a fo rth c o m in g p a p e r. E l
W e are grateful to A ndrew D uncan, D ennis O Reilly , and Naveed S attar
from the G lasgow R oyal Infirm ary , w ho took part in the organization of the
m etabolic s tudy; to the partic ipants of the experim ent; and to Brian M cG aw
(Robert Gordons U nivers ity , A berdeen) for his advice on the isotopic-
dilution techniques. W e are indebted to Ian Brem ner for the use of the
ICP-MS facili ty at the Row ett Research Insti tute, Aberdeen, and to M artin
Reid for his skillful ass istance.
REFERENCES
I In ternational Program m e on Chem ical Safety (IPCS). E nvironm entalhealth criteria 108: nickel. G eneva: W orld Health O rganization, 1991 .
2. O nkelinx C , Becker J, S underm an FW Jr. Com partm enta l analysis of
the m etabolism of 63Ni in rats and rabbits. Res Com m Chem Pathol
P harm acol 197 3;6 :66 3-7 6.
3. Lu C C, M atsum oto N , lijim a S. Placental transfer and body distribu-
tion of nickel chloride in pregnant m ice. T oxicol AppI P harm acol
1981:59:409-13.
4. Carvalho SM , Z iem er PL . D istribution and clearance of 63N i adm in-
istered as 63NiCl, in the rat: intra tracheal study. Arch Environ Contam
T oxicol 1982;l 1:245-8.
N ielsen G D, Andersen 0, Jensen M . Toxicokinetics of nickel in m ice
studied w ith the gam m a-em itting isotope 57Ni. Fundam A ppl T oxicol
1993:21:236-43.
6. Spruits D , B ongaarts PJM . Nickelcontent of plasm a, urine and hair in
contact derm atitis. D erm atologica 1977; 154:291-300.
7. C ronin E , D i M ichiel AD , B row n SS. Oral challenge in nickel sensi-
tive w om en w ith hand eczem a. In: Brown SS, Sunderm an FW Jr. eds.
Nickel toxicology. London: A cadem ic P ress 1980:149-52.
8 . S olom ons N W , Viteri F, Shuler TR, Nie lsen FH . Bioavailability of
nickel in m an: effec ts of food and chem ica lly-defined die tary
cons tituents on the absorption of inorganic nickel. J Nutr
1 98 2; l 1 2: 3 9 5 0
9. G aw krodger D J, Cook S W , Fell GS , H unter JA A. Nickel derm atitis :
the reaction to ora l nicke l challenge . Br J D erm atol 1986:1 15:33-8 .
10. S underm an F W Jr, Hopfer S M , S weeney K R, M arcus AH , M ost BM ,
Creason J . N ickel absorption and kine tics in hum an volunteers. P roc
Soc Exp Biol M ed 1989:191:5-Il.
1 1 . Fom on S J, Janghorbani M , Ting BT , e t al. Erythrocyte incorporation
of ingested 58-iron by infants . Pedia tr Res 1988:24:20-4 .
12. Fom on SJ, Z iegler EE. Rogers RR , et al. Iron absorption from i
food. Pedia tr Res 1989:26:250-5.
13. W hittaker PG . Lind T , W illiam s JG . Iron absorption during norm
hum an pregnancy: a study using stable isotopes. Br J N u
1991:65:457-63.
14. W hittaker P G. Bare tt JF R, W illiam s JG . Precise determ ination of
isotope ratios in w hole blood us ing inductively coupled plasm a m
spectrom etry . J A nal A tom S pectrom 1992:7:109-13.
15. Barett JF R, W hittaker P G. W illiam s JG , L ind T . A bsorption of
haem iron in norm al w om en m easured by the incorpora tion of t
stable isotopes into erythrocytes. Clin Sci 1992:83:213-9.
I 6. Ziegler E E, S erfass RE , Nelson SE, e t al. Effec t of low zinc intake
absorption and excretion of zinc by infants studied w ith7 {176}Zns
extrins ic tag. J N ut r 1 98 9: 11 9: 16 47 -5 3.
17 . Serfass R E, Thom pson JJ, H ouk RS. Isotope ratio determ ination
ICP-MS for zinc bioavailability studies. A nal Chim A cta
1 98 6 ; 1 88 :7 3 -8 4.
18. S erfass RE, Ziegler E E. Edwards BB, Houk RS. Intrinsic and extrin
s table isotopic zinc absorption in infants from form ulas. J N
1 98 9: 1 1 9: 1 66 1 9
19. L yon TD B, Fell G S, G affney D , et a l. U se of a stable copper isoto
(Cu ) in the differentia l diagnosis of W ilsons disease . Clin S
1995;8:727-32.
20. L yon T DB, Fle tcher 5 , Fell G S, Patria rca M . M easurem ent and
plication of stable copper isotopes to inves tigations of hum an m eta
olism . M icrochem J 1996:54:236-45.
21. T em ple ton D M , X u SX , S tuhne-Sekalec L . Isotope-spec ific analys is
N i by IC P-M S : a pp lic atio ns of stable isotope tracers to biokine tics
s tudies . S ci T ota l Environ l994;l48:253-62.
22. P atriarca M , L yon TD B, M cGaw B, Reid M , F ell G S. Assessm ent
N i m etabolism in hum ans us ing stable isotopes and ICP -M S.
H olland G , ed. Recent advances in plasm a source m ass spectrom etry .
E xeter, United Kingdom : BP CW heatons L td. 199 5:224-3 4.
23 . C um ming s JH , Jenkins iDA , W iggings H S. M easurem entof the m ean
transit tim e of die tary res idue through the hum an gut. G
1976: 17:2 10-8.
24 . P atriarca M , L yon TD B, M cG aw BA, Fell GS . D eterm ination
selected nickel isotopes in biological sam ples by ICP -M S. J A
At o m Sp e c t r om 1 9 9 6 : 1 1: 2 97 3 0 2
25 . T ietz N W . F undam entals of clinical chem istry. Philadelphia:
S aunders, 1981.
26. G ow ans EM S, Fraser C G. Biological varia tion of serum and
crea tin ine and creatin ine clearance : ram ifications for interpreta tion
results and patient care . Ann Clin Biochem 1988:25:259-63.
27. N odiya P1. Cobalt and nickel balances in students of an occupationa
technical school. G ig Sanit 1972:37:108-9.
28 . H orak E, Sunderm an F W Jr. F eca l nicke l excre tion by healthy adu
C lin C he m 1 97 3:1 9:4 29 -3 0.
29 . S m art GA , Sherlock JC . N ickel in foods and the diet . F ood Ad
Contam l987;4:61-7 1.
30 . Hopfer SM , Linden JV, Crisostom o M C, C atalanatto FA , Galen
S underm an FW Jr. H ypernickelem ia in hem odialysis patients. T r
E lem M ed 1985:2:68 -72.
31 . N iebor E, Stafford AR, Evans SL , DolovichJ. Cellular binding and/or
uptake of nickel (II) ions. In: Sunderm an F W Jr. ed. Nickel in
hum an environm ent. Lyon: IAR C, 1984:321-31.
32. N iebor E, Tom RT, Sandford W E . Nickel m etabolism in m an. In: S
H , Sigel A eds. M etalions in biological system s: nickel and its ro le i
b iology. N ew York: M arcel D ekker, 1988:91-122.
33 . T allkvist J, M oberg W ing A, Tjhlve H . E nhanced intestinal nick
absorption in iron-deficient rats. Pharm acol T oxicol 1994:75:244-9.
34 . Rezuke W N , Knight JA, Sunderm an F W Jr. Reference values
nickel concentrations in hum an tissues and bile. A m J Ind M
1 9 8 7 : 1 1 : 4 1 9 2 6