am s n 1q82 - ontario...l from which white prints can be made. l. l ... film (exposed during flight)...

l l l l l

010

AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

MPH CONSUTLING LIMITED

DETOUR LAKE AREA, ONTARIO

PROJECT #24003 APRIL 1982

Am s n 1Q82

MINING LAND* i*

Qucstor Surveys Limited, 6380 Viscounl Road, Mississauga, Ontario L4V 1H3

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

I W (H IIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illinium"""" 11" ^,^— 32E13NE8078 3.4727 ATKINSON LAKE 010C

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION........................ l

MAP COMPILATION..................... l

SURVEY PROCEDURE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

INTERPRETATION ANDRECOMMENDATIONS.................. 3

APPENDIX

l EQUIPMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (i)

l

MARK VI INPUT (R) SYSTEM. . . . . . . . . . . . (i)

SONOTEK P.M.H. 5010PROTON MAGNETOMETER...........(iii)

DATA PRESENTATION.................(iv)

GENERAL INTERPRETATION............(lv)

SAMPLE RECORD

AREA OUTLINE

DATA SHEETS

l l

INTRODUCTION

f This report contains the INPUT airborne electromagnetic

results and an interpretation for the Detour Lake project in

' northeastern Ontario. The survey was flown on February

l 8th, 1982, from Mattagami, for MPH Consulting Limited.

Questor Surveys Limited performed the survey utilizing

l one of their Shorts Skyvan aircraft (C-FQSL), equipped with the

latest Mark VI INPUT system and the following field personnel:-

Crew Chief - Mike Burns

M Pilot - Frank Styger

Navigator - Leigh Jewers

l Operator - Bill Hutchinson

Engineer - Mike Kohlruss

l An outline of the survey area is provided at the end

m of the written portion of this report. It is taken in part

from the National Topographic Series (1:250,000), sheet number

l 32E.

A total of 237 line kilometres was flown for the

l survey. Block A was flown in alternate east-west flight line

m directions while Blocks B and C were flown in alternate north-

south flight line directions.

lMAP COMPILATION

l The base maps are prepared at Questor from uncontrolled

H mosaics, which were constructed from M.N.R. 1:15,840, 1978

photographs. The mosaics were reproduced at a scale of 1:10,000

l from which white prints can be made.

l

l' Flight path recovery is accomplished by the comparison

l of the 35mm continuous strip film (exposed during flight) with

the photo base mosaics. This film is graduated into fiducials

l which are used in annotating points of similar topographic

features. They are accurately plotted using at least one point

B per major fiducial which are approximately 1270 metres apart.

M The INPUT anomalies are plotted in standard notation

with circles identifying their locations on the topography.

l They are labelled with letters facilitating reference to the

flight and records, a computer derived value of the second

l channel amplitude and an apparent conductivity-thickness value

m in Siemens. The magnitude for the anomaly (in terms of the

number of channels) is indicated by the degree of closure of

l the circle.

During the course of INPUT data evaluation, anomaly

l axes are delineated on the INPUT maps to show the possible extent

m of the individual conductive trends. Also, selected conductors

are outlined and numbered to facilitate reference in the report.

l The total field magnetic data are plotted in the con

ventional form of isomagnetic contours at 10 gamma intervals.

lM SURVEY PROCEDURE

~ During the survey, the aircraft maintained a terrain

l clearance as close to 122 metres as possible, with the E. M.

Bird at approximately 48 metres above the ground. A normal

J S-pattern flight path using approximately half-kilometre turns

and a flight line spacing of 200 metres was used. The equipment

operator logged the flight details and monitored the instruments.

l

l l

- 3 -

INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

mm The Detour Lake survey area is located approximately

* 170 kilometres northeast of Timmins, Ontario, with the Quebec

l border forming the eastern boundary. It lies within the

northern part of the Early Precambrian Abitibi Belt of the

g Superior Province. The rocks in this area have undergone

regional metamorphism of the almandine-amphibolite facies rank.

The principal rock types encountered consist of clastic meta-

I sediments, graphitic tuffs, some mafic to intermediate meta-

volcanics and granodiorite.

l This metavolcanic-metasedimentary sequence was folded

into a series of anticlines and synclines by the emplacement of

B large surrounding granitic batholiths, which are partially

B outlined by the longer lakes (ie, Sunday Lake and Detour Lake) .

These intrusives produce trendless magnetic patterns which are

l not distinguishable from sedimentary trends. However, there

are some magnetic anomalies at the intrusive host rock interface,

l possibly the result of contact metamorphism.

m There are several known occurrences of sulphide mineral

ization around the surveyed area (Ontario Ministry of Natural

l Resources, Geological Series, Prelim. Map P. 2242, 1979). Drill

hole intersections often indicate pyrite and pyrrhotite mineral-

| ization in graphitic tuffs and metasediments throughout the area.

mm There is a Au-Cu property about 15 kilometres to the north,

where the mineralization appears to occur in the basal portion

l of a mafic flow sequence and in an intervening intermediate tuff

horizon. Geophysically , the deposit is characterized by high

l conductivities and a direct magnetic association related to

mm pyrrhotite stringer mineralization.

lm Mineralization of this type is amenable to detection

M by the INPUT method. Isolated conductors of short strike length

and high conductivity-thickness values are considered optimum

l targets for massive sulfides, especially if there is direct

magnetic correlation caused by associated pyrrhotite.

l Conductors due to graphite usually display good con-

m tinuity and high conductivity. These conductors rarely have a

direct magnetic correlation,

l Conductor axes have been plotted as accurately as

possible on the final INPUT interpretational maps. They give

m some idea of the number, strike length and direction of

m individual conductors. These axes were interpreted by the

visual comparison of corresponding INPUT anomalies on consecutive

l flight analog profiles. They should be used as a guide only.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

- 5 -

ZONE A-1

Anomalies: 10010B, 10010C, 10020A, 10030D, 10030E,10040A, 10050B, 10060A, 10070A, 10070B,10080A, 10090B, 10090C, 10100A, 10110F,10120A, 10130F, 10140A, 10150E, 10160A,10170C, 10170D, 10180A, 10190D, 19010E,19010F, 19010G, 19010H.

Section A-la:

Best Responses: 10020A, 10030D, 10030E, 10040A, 10060A,10070A, 10070B

Siemens(Respectively): 13, 29, 19, 22, 9, 20, 16.

Gammas: 63, 131* 121 258 251*

Section A-lb:

Best Responses: 10170C, 10180A, 10190D

Siemens: 13 25 18

Gammas: 1091 1670 1941

* Denotes Dip pair.

Comments: The strike of this formation is in a north-south

direction with probable extension beyond the

survey boundaries. The formation appears to consist of three

distinct sections; the section to the south of line 10090

(Section A-la), the section to the north of line 10160 (section

A-lb) and the central section, between the two. The centre

section with low conductance and no magnetic correlation is of

little interest. It may be due to a graphitic source, although

sulphide mineralization may occur within it. The northern

portion has a dip of about 30O to the east and is on a local

magnetic high while the southern end dips 70 to the east and

has within it, two local magnetic highs. The north and south

sections have similar high conductivity-thickness values which

* range from 10-30 Siemens. There is a significant departure

l

B between the two areas in the direct magnetic association.

H The southern end has direct magnetic values which range up to 260

gammas while in the north section they range between 1,000-2,000

l gammas, which indicates a much higher concentration of

pyrrhotite and possibly magnetite. According to drill information

l (M.N.R., O. G. S. Prelim. Map P. 2242), pyrrhotite was intersected

m at the north end while pyrrhotite and pyrite were obtained at

the south end. This suggests the replacement of pyrite with

l pyrrhotite in the north end. The INPUT E.M. anomalies and

associated magnetics suggest that the north and south portions

l of this zone be considered high priority targets. Anomalies

m 10030D and 10180A should be given particular attention due to

their higher conductance.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

- 7 -

ZONE A-2

Anomalies: 10080B, 10090A, 10100B, 10110D, 10110E,10120B, 10130D, 10130E, 10140B, 10150C, 10150D, 10160B, 10170A, 10170B, 10180B, 10190B, 10190C, 19010A, 19010B, 19010C, 19010D.

Best Responses: 10140B, 10190B

Siemens: 10 6

Gammas: 143

Comments: This conductor appears at about line 10080 and

extends north with a dip of 45O to the east.

It runs approximately parallel to the conductor in ZONE 1.

The responses in this zone are characterized by extremely low

conductivity-thickness and no magnetic association with the

exception of 10190B, which may be due to some localized pyrrhotite,

The broad responses, with the above characteristics, suggests a

graphitic source. Anomaly 10140B has a fair conductance which

may be due to disseminated pyrite. Further geophysics is required

to determine the extent of the formation although a low priority

is assigned on the basis of the available data.

l l l l l l

- 8 -

l

l

m

l

l

l

l

l

l

ZONE A-3

Anomalies: 10100D, 10110A, 10110B, 10110C, 10120C,10130A, 10130B, 10140C, 10050A, 10030A,10030B, 10030C, 10020B, 10020D, 10010A

Best Responses: 10100D, 10120C

Siemens: 8 6

Gammas: 140 21

Comments: This formation appears, from the available data,

to strike in a northeast-southwest direction

with a dip of 45O to the southeast and a probable extension

outside the survey area. The responses are characterized by

poor conductivity-thickness (fast decay rates) and with the

exception of the 'best responses', no direct magnetic association,

This suggests that the source may be a graphitic belt. Some

disseminated pyrrhotite may be localized in the vicinity of

the best responses. A further geophysical program to map out

the definite features of this formation should be considered

in the future but on the basis of the available data, a low

priority is assigned.

^Remaining Anomalies:

10020B, 10010C, 10100C, 10130C, 10150A, 10150B, 10190A.

Comments: These responses are characteristically weak

and broad and are therefore probably due to conductive over

burden or a graphitic source. No further investigation is

warranted.

- 9 -

ZONE B-l

l lM Anomalies: 20010A, 20020D, 20021C, 20030AX, 20030A,

l

l

20040D, 20050A, 20050B, 20060D, 20070A, 20070B, 20071A, 20071B, 20081F, 20090B, 20090C.

Best Responses: 20020D, 20021C, 20040D, 20060D.

Siemens: 112 85 40 47

Gammas: 236 239

east-west direction, flanking a magnetic high,

with a probable extension west of the surveyed area. It dips

to the south at approximately 50 . Many of the responses

* Comments: The strike of this zone appears to be in an

l

lwithin this unit are broad with fast decay rates and no

directly associated magnetics. Those indicated as 'best

M responses' are characterized by high conductivity and, in the

case of the first two, a high magnetic correlation. Anomalies

l 20020D, 20021C, indicate an unusually high conductivity-

thickness. The extremely slow decay rate and direct magnetic

l association is suggestive of sulphides, in particular

m pyrrhotite. Also indicated is a localized narrowing of the

zone which is suggested by the width of the responses. A high

l priority is assigned to this zone.

l

l

l

l

l

11

11111111

tZONE B-2

Anomalies :

Best Responses

Siemens:

Gammas :

Comments :

- 10 -

20081G, 20081H, 20090A, 20110A, 20130A, 20130B, 20150A, 20150B,

: 20090A, 20081G.

58 25

690 724

This may be another formational

20120D, 20190A.

trend running

approximately parallel to ZONE B-l. The anomalies

are characterized by high conductance values and

the 'best responses', high associated magnetics.

decay rate is

The conductor

in the case of

The slow

indicative of sulphides particularly pyrrhotite.

axes are not necessarily in the location placed

due to insufficient data. This zone is recommended for further

m geophysics, either an extension of the airborne

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

the extent of

is assigned.

this feature or ground follow-up.

E. M. to determine

A high priority

l l l l

- 11 -

l l l

l l l l

ZONE B-3

Anomalies: 20010B, 20020C, 20021B, 20030B, 20060C,20081E, 20100B, 20120B, 20120C, 20160C, 20180E.

l Comments: The responses are all broad and weak (ie.,

l and 2 channel responses) with no direct

l magnetic association, suggestive of conductive overburden

or a deep graphitic occurrence. This is a low priority zone.

ZONE B-4

Anomalies: 20020B, 20021A, 20040B, 20040C, 20050C,20060B, 29010E, 29010F, 20081D.

Comments: These responses are all characteristically

l broad and weak with no directly associated

magnetics. They are probably due to conductive overburden

or graphite and are therefore not worthy of further attention.

ZONE B-5

Anomalies: 20120A, 20180C, 29010D.

Comments: The zone straddles a local magnetic high.

The responses are extremely weak (ie., barely

m resolvable) and a direct magnetic association with anomaly

20120A may indicate the presence of some disseminated, but

l localized pyrrhotite or magnetite. A low priority is assigned,

l

l

l l

ZONE B-7

Anomalies: 20081B, 20081C, 20090D f 20100A, 20010C,20020A, 20050D.

ZONE B-6

l Anomalies: 20140B, 20150C, 20160B, 20170A, 20180C, " 20180D, 20190C, 29010C.

lComments: The responses are all broad and weak with

J no direct magnetic correlation, suggestive

of conductive overburden or graphite. The continuity favors

" a graphitic source. This zone is not worthy of further attention,

l

l

l Comments: The responses resemble those of ZONE B-6 and

may in fact be of similar origin as they are

l broad and weak with no direct magnetic association. This

zone is not considered to be of any interest.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l - 13 -

l

l l l l l l l

ZONE B-8

lAnomalies: 20040A, 20060A, 20071C, 20071D, 20071E,

H 20081A, 20070D, 20070E.

l Best Responses: 20060A, 20071E

l

l

lComments: These anomalies may be isolated or part of

Siemens: 20 25

Gammas: 131

a larger feature. They lie on what appears

to be a localized magnetic high. Further exploration is

warranted in order to determine the extent of this zone as

l the 'best responses' are characterized by moderate conductances

with longer decay rates indicating a sulphide source. A moderate

l priority is assigned from the available data.

1

1111111111

t

ZONE B-9

Anomalies

- 14 -

: 20140A, 20150D, 20150E, 20160A, 20170B, 20170C, 20180B, 20190D, 20190E.

Best Responses: 20140A, 20150E, 20160A, 20180B

Siemens:

Gammas:

COMMENTS :

14 23 31 15

96 96 34

This feature has a northwest-southeast strike

and appears to extend east of the survey area.

It dips to the southwest at an angle of about 45O . The

responses

which is

20181S.

directly coincide with a linear magnetic high

apparently discontinuous between lines 20170N and

The 'best responses' are characterized by good

conductivity-thickness, and a direct magnetic association.

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

The moderate decay rate indicates that the source may be

sulphides

delineated

. Further exploration eastward is warranted to

the extent of this formation. It should be

considered a high priority area.


- 15 -

ZONE C-l

Anomalies: 30060A, 30060B, 30070B, 30080B, 30090B, 30100A,30100B, 30110C, 30150A, 30171A, 30180A, 30190A,30200A, 30210A, 30220A, 30230B, 30240A, 30250A,30260B, 30270C, 30080A.

Best Responses: 30070A, 30060B, 30060A

Siemens: 22 35 11

Gammas: 310

Comments: This feature is on the flank of a number of

local magnetic highs, and strikes in a east-

west direction with a discontinuity between lines 30120 and

30160. The anomalies to the east of the discontinuity are

characterized by weak responses with no direct magnetic

association. These are therefore not considered to be

worthy of further investigation. The portion to the west

dips 60 to the north. The responses are characterized by

a much slower decay rate with the "best responses' having

a good conductance and anomaly 30070A a direct magnetic

association. This indicates a sulphide source and should

be considered a high priority zone. To the northeast of

this zone, gold and copper have been located on the Amoco

Detour Lake property.

- 16 -l l

Anomalies: 30050A, 30050B

l

ZONE C-2

Siemens: 150

Gammas: 8

l Comments: Response 30050B has an extremely slow decay

rate, with a small direct magnetic association.

l This suggests a sulphide body. The small amplitudes along with

m its conductance indicates a deeper source. These factors, along

with its isolation, make it a high priority target for ground

l follow-up.

l ZONE C-3

m Anomalies: 30110B, 30120A, 30160A

l Comments: Anomaly 30110B is characterized by small

amplitudes with a slow decay rate indicating

l a deeper source. The associated magnetics are active, possibly

H due to metavolcanics. The isolation of this particular

response is noteworthy and along with the aforementioned

8 characteristics implies that a medium priority be assigned.

The remaining anomalies are probably due to conductive

l overburden or graphite.

l

l

l

l


- 17 -

ZONE C-4

Anomalies: 30090A, 30110A, 30230A, 30270A.

Comments: These anomalies occur at the end of their

respective flight lines. Insufficient data

does not permit an interpretation of this zone. Attention,

though, should be brought to anomaly 30090A which displays

a conductivity-thickness of 44 seimens and direct magnetic

association of 53 gammas. The decay rate indicates the

possible presence of sulphides and this warrants an extension

of the survey area into this region to delineate and

determine the significance of this zone.

Note: Anomalies not mentioned (ie. 30270B, 30260A)

are deemed to be due to overburden and

therefore of no interest.

QUESTOR SURVEYS LIMITED

Frank Defi

Geophysicist.

l

APPENDIX

EQUIPMENT

l l l

The aircraft is equipped with a Mark VI INPUT (R)

l airborne E.M. system and Sonotek P.M.H. 5010 Proton

m Magnetometer. Radar altimeters are used for vertical

control. The outputs of these instruments together

l with fiducial timing marks are recorded by means of

galvanometer type recorders using light sensitive

l paper. Thirty-five millimeter continuous strip cameras

are used to record the actual flight path.

l (I) BARRINGER/QUESTOR MARK VI INPUT (R) SYSTEM

The Induced Pulse Transient (INPUT) system is

g particularly well suited to the problems of overburden

penetration. Currents are induced into the ground by

means of a pulsed primary electromagnetic field which

l is generated in a transmitting loop around the aircraft.

By using half sine wave current pulses and a loop of

l large turns-area, the high output power needed for deep

penetration is achieved.

" The induced current in a conductor produces a

U secondary electromagnetic field which is detected and

measured after the termination of each primary pulse,

l Detection is accomplished by means of a receiving coil

towed behind the aircraft on four hundred feet of cable,

l

l

l (ii)

and the received signal is processed and recorded by

l equipment in the aircraft. Since the measurements are

in the time domain rather than the frequency domain

l common to continuous wave systems, interference effects

m of the primary transmitted field are eliminated. The

secondary field is in the form of a decaying voltage

l transient originating in time at the termination of the

transmitted pulse. The amplitude of the transient is,

l of course, proportional to the amount of current induced

H into the conductor and, in turn, this current is propor

tional to the dimensions, the conductivity and the depth

l beneath the aircraft.

The rate of decay of the transient is inversely

l proportional to conductivity. By sampling the decay

curve at six different time intervals, and recording

* the amplitude of each sample, an estimate of the relative

l conductivity can be obtained. By this means, it is

possible to discriminate between the effects due to

l conductive near-surface materials such as swamps and

lake bottom silts, and those due to genuine bedrock

sources. The transients due to strong conductors such

M as sulphides exhibit long decay curves and are therefore

commonly recorded on all six channels. Sheet-like

l surface materials, on the other hand, have short decay

curves and will normally only show a response in the

l

l

first two or three channels.

l (iii)

I

The samples, or gates, are positioned at 334, 498, 744,

1072, 1482 and 1974 micro-seconds after the cessation of the

' pulse. The widths of the gates are 164, 164, 328, 328, 492,

l and 492 micro-seconds respectively.

For homogeneous conditions, the transient decay will be

l exponential and the time constant of decay is equal to the

time difference at two successive sampling points divided by

the log ratio of the amplitudes at these points.

(II) SONOTEK P.M.H. 5010 PROTON MAGNETOMETER

l The magnetometers which measure the total magnetic field

have a sensitivity of l gamma and a range from 20,000 gammas

l to 100,000 gammas.

m Because: of the high intensity field produced by the INPUT

transmitter, the magnetometer results are recorded on a time-

I sharing basis. The magnetometer head is energized while the

transmitter is on, but the read-out is obtained during a short

l period when the transmitter is off. The precession frequency

m is being recorded and converted to gammas during the 0.2

second interval when there is no power in the transmitter loop,

l For this survey, a lag factor has been applied to the

data. Magnetic data recorded on the analogue records at

l fiducial 10.00 for example would be plotted at fiducial 9.95

on the mosaics.

l

l

l

* ^ (iv)

lDATA PRESENTATION

J The symbols used to designate the anomalies are

shown in the legend on each map sheet, and the anomalies

" on each line are lettered in alphabetical order in the

j direction of flight. Their locations are plotted with

reference to the fiducial numbers on the analog record.

l A sample record is included to indicate the method

used for correcting the position of the E.M. Bird and

l to identify the parameters that are recorded.

m All the anomaly locations, magnetic correlations,

conductivity-thickness values and the amplitudes of

l channel number 2 are listed on the data sheets accompany

ing the final maps.

m GENERAL INTERPRETATION

The INPUT system will respond to conductive overburden

l and near-surface horizontal conducting layers in addition to

bedrock conductors. Differentiation is based on the rate of

l transient decay, magnetic correlation and the anomaly shape

B together with the conductor pattern and topography.

Power lines sometimes produce spurious anomalies but

l these can be identified by reference to the monitor channel.

l

l

l

l

* ^ (v)l 9Railroad and pipeline responses are recognized by

f studying the film strips.

Graphite or carbonaceous material exhibits a wide

" range of conductivity. When long conductors without

l magnetic correlation are located on or parallel to known

faults or photographic linears, graphite is most likely

l the cause.

Contact zones can often be predicted when anomaly

B trends coincide with the lines of maximum gradient along

B a flanking magnetic anomaly. It is unfortunate that

graphite can also occur as relatively short conductors

l and produce attractive looking anomalies. With no other

information than the airborne results, these must be

l examined on the ground.

m Serpentinized peridotites often produce anomalies

with a character that is fairly easy to recognize. The

l conductivity which is probably caused in part by magnetite,

is fairly low so that the anomalies often have fairly

l large response on channel #1; they decay rapidly, and

m they have strong magnetic correlation. INPUT E. M. anomalies

over massive magnetites show a relationship to the total

l Fe content. Below 25 - 301, very little or no response at

all is obtained, but as the percentage increases the

l anomalies become quite strong with a characteristic rate

H of decay which is usually greater than that produced by

massive sulphides.

l

l

lA (vi)l *

Commercial sulphide ore bodies are rare, and those

that respond to airborne survey methods usually have

fl medium to high conductivity. Limited lateral dimensions

are to be expected and many have magnetic correlation

l caused by magnetite or pyrrhotite. Provided that the

ore bodies do not occur within formational conductive

l zones as mentioned above, the anomalies caused by them

m will usually be recognized on an E.M. map as priority

targets.

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

Power Line Mom lor ——i e5

4 ! INPUT® EM

' channels

EM

Amplitude

GOO p p m

92m

Radio!20m.

Altimeter

l 54 m

Magnetometer

Fine Scale

20 Gammas

Magnetometer

Coarse Scale

1000 Gommas

Fiducial Timing Markl

Anomaly Location

l028 50

l

Mag Location

Representative INPUT , Magnetometer and Altimeter Recording

32 1:250,000

80"00'

,,. A* ''A'^! '

V * iV* rr'i "C ^•V'- ) \ C * l 7 V- -:-' - Vv^/tii^L,( '*jr4:-cnER V. : -\

, .*-.^:Jj-X^,- -..*,..-*^ ..'i •-k-'-W -.-*) ^ '-v * * *' ^ - , - \ -A..-- * v^j. .*( ! X,, snui-i, \ " " XXX

...r-.i-. ........u ...- v, ^


FINAL ANOMALY

10010AlOOlOfclooioc;loo ion

10020ft300201:10020C30020D

10030A10030f;300301:300301'30030h

100 -'i 'ft

10050 A1 00501:

K. o/,;: K

i i"; li "-" t '. -"

3 UO/v;-

lOOb'O:';

J (,(: g (i f)

100^:10,'VOK10090!';

30100''

1 OH ('l:i 0,1001"JOioor

!i01 'O'''

3 01 K' i:j 03 M; !103301!j 0 J ? Or.

ANOMALY 24003 MAGNETIC (1) FIUUCIAL CHS CHl.AMP CH2.AMP SIEMENS FIIHICIAL VALUE ALT

54,937 1 53 NC - 38455.287 1 34 NC - 40155,698 3 197 88 3 55,75 22 37557,397 1 35 NC 57.45 127 393

60,532 5 792 425 33 60,45 63 41760,893 1 30 NC - 39361,101 3 205 94 3 - 40961,372 4 236 131 3 61,25 132 393

63,687 3 224 103 1 - 40363,859 3 330 138 1 61,80 327 39662,337 2 80 38 NC - 36862, y9/ 6 368 253 29 - 38863,064 t 674 363 19 63,00 33) 380

8,264 6 682 388 22 68,20 121 403

69,176 3 207 94 j - 3/370,087 3 176 *7 } 69,95 131 369

/J:,vvJ : 6*M: 331 ': 7*. 95 2 5 1- 3P5

/' , . -.1 0 t. 4/5 v3fc-; y s i - . xvs76*-*.0'l -: 4*3 213 j 6 /e. 55 25': 39t-

r; 1 . .460 5 580 291 8 81,35 136 403Hi . H 7 3 ' ; 1 3 P 59 NC - 447

H3.^'5 /' 73 B :'^ NC - 357i''.', 653 7 24V K'5 :; -- 36St-;/! . v'O-'i ^ 725 306 2 H3- C 5 'i'~' 3 9 r

89,A20 J 501 200 1 89,25 5H 39 -,;iv, 'v^ 3 208 122 i - 41990,-:57 2' 139 3'1 NC - 42690.VOM ri 6i.1 3/2 o y(',8';. 140 433

" ' "-1 .' ' ^ ^{-: ' ''-'/- ^ '' - J? f-:

V2."-'9A 'i 55? 7 () 3 2 ^2-35" 40 36V92,63!: 7 340 3V; : - 37993, H*- 1 - 2 271 11V NC - 3i;09'!, 5 5? ! J. 35v i^ j - 385

l(

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

FINALANOMALY

t .I-

I0120A30120H10520C

10130A10130B10330L30130H10330E10130F

10340A10140P103401:

30350 A101,50}:10150C10150D30150E-.

l'.!ifc'.:-A: 0: 60!-:

30370A103 /OPI 01 70 L:30170H

J.0380A20180J-:

3 OlVy B103901;30190D

19010A19010';19020!'j 90 10 S'3 901 Or190 I0t190 5 Of:

ANOMALY F IIiUC IAL

94,634

VB.75499,065

300,522

101,224101,910103,399103,552103,832104,29?

108,393308,749110,698

1 11 .563ill ,78y133,602113,9583 1 4 , 4 9 3

lit:, 366

"35* 7 2 0

3 20, 1 ve120,345120,837123 *009

121 , 780j 2 2 i -. ^ '

125,49;;126,999327,202327.752

v. ..'./!!l 28, ''l i.328,996j29,r,b3330,363130,733333 , 2*0

CHS CH1, AMP

2 72

2 2044 5545 405

3 2362 1123 2374 3254 6752 60

2 2205 657 .2 114

2 6060

3 2034 6092 134

l; 9344 4 /B

3 3614 517t; 861l- 449

6 12434 649

2 605 451A 5266 3207

5 339i- 4333 2393 3582 1585 2/14 208

24003CH2.AMP

38

91266234

1448415918131638

10041675

3153

13427259

453259

163234403225

797297

f, i

275256703

19426932220093

216143

MAGNETIC SIEMENS FIDUCIAL VALUE

NC 94 '75 52

NC16 100,55 21

1NC

1 H

12

NC

NC10NC

NC 110,85 138NC

11

NC

5 115,10 5411

11

13 120,90 109:i16

25 121,75 16701

"NC

30 127,10 1282

16 127,80 1941

76 328,65 1431

1NC9 130,80 3912

(2)ALT

381

420446453

396374383418380384

440450418

394397392398353

433420

383414393393

413409

402410408375

40)4124184144 0 945?374

l

f

(

i

t

i

i


FINAL ANOMALY 24003 MAGNETIC . ANOMALY FIUUCIAI. CHS CHl.AMP CH2.AHP SIEMENS FIDUCIAL VALUE ALT

131,55^ 3 352 119 l 383

1i

i

11111111111111111

FINAL

- JBt'W2003 OA200 10 1: 200 10C

20020A 20020I-:200201:2 0020 D

20023ft 2002 3 B20023C

20030AX200,' iK-•'O 03 o;-;

20040A20040H 2 0 0 4 -'! ' :2 0 040 r

I'i'Ot-O.':

20060A••n;', i :'.'-

1 : ; , ' , t 4' . ;'

i :" i''j V 't ".

200/i : J•j()(S ; i i"";!/CO*-:/ f;;.' f--, (i o -. L;

VOC'fVi -'

2' C 0 c;. : r20'^ i :200?: -- H

ftNOMALY niiVU'lftl. CHS CH1, AMP

332.7B6 3 365133,260 2 60 135, 448 2 66

136,687 2 73 138, 27b 2 331138,952 2 1.55139.30* 6 180

342,347 .2 106 143,101 2 175143.415 6 193

144.2 3 120344,38V f 323344.750 i 60

J 47 ,666 7 114M'^3;:/ -' 70 1 4V. 45,5 ',' 202150,45V '- 552

i ^ 5 : ; ; i i ' :- \ 6 j

353.7:.'- , 60

-| C' 1 '"j i~l -' - ^ -i f -l.i . . - 3 . ,j ^ .' * 4 '-J 'j J

•: '.f. -: L . /. -. -i -i /.

?5.',2:-:' 6 630

161.0 5 NC

1 63. .v ; i ;? 1753 6.3,775 3 206 36,^9/./ t J83

I6fi)7 ,,,, ; , K ,if ,:i. i -- i ' L - ,- ,-' :; 73i'-i -v'.''5 ': t'('

] 'j ; -: 'i. . C; /,

j v :i , -.55 -,- :-. v /!?:"^ ' !!"

24003

16634 66

53 6981

184

75 84

225

65153

30

5963 72

334

122

•'* 4 53

27593

110366103306 291

206595656 S/'

1 83306


3NCNC 135,65 111

NC NCNC

112 139,30 236

NC; NC85 143,45 239

ei

NCs

NCNC NC40

i

6 -151/20 109?, 4

NC NC

20 154,20 131NCNC

4 7

51.35

1

J( 1"

V

NCNCNC NCI 625 172,05 724

(4)ALT

418384 387

374 393436412

437 41 B393

400429402

404386 384394

'1 C; V

430 405413

417422397 408

400400409413 409

458•l J 5383388 4374 1 842S

l/-

(lll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

FINAL

2 oft"

20090ft2009QH20090C2 00 9 OD20090E

20100ft20 100H

2011 OA

20320A20l20t20120C20.*201i

20 130 A203 30J-;20130C

/0 14 Of!20i 40 i;

20150ft20150320150C:201501:

2 0 1 f: 0 F

20360A203601201601:

2 017 C*2 017 Ob'203 7 L' C

ZujfeOr- '.? j) ji r; ; i ^

203B(H.201 80 'j30380K

ANOMALY f IMJClfcL

172,161

172,560172,795172,998375,452175,759

377,235179,148

179,935

185,553186,261186.500387,334

167,331 87.696389,300

191 .806li 92 501

, g, |)0 -rj

195.3703.9V .83 4398,247598,423

200,395201,34V202,84V

205,302205,636205,902

206. V7/.'08,000208,522,-'Ob,80fc

210,41V

CHS CHl.ftMP

6 809

6 6844 3283 ' 1152 663 204

2 602 105

4 274

2 602 632. 706 701

f. 7895 4 3 S'2 73

r, ^ ' K

2 60

6 9165 360i' 860 1555 2/4

l 23 X- 432 75

3 1392 603 132

L: 6 0

5 470! 0,

,: 641 73

24003CH2.AMP

397

52518410363

122

6647

144

475653481

58125353

33447

6221473191

144

350

30

413847

3 2275

3 'i


18

58 172,60 69051

NC1 175,70 70

NCNC

7

NC 185,45 190NCNC48

599

NC

l 4NC

318

NCJ 223 1V8,35 -6

33 200,30 162W l:NC

4NC

1 205,85 339

NC15 207,90 34M.NC 208. /'J 3NC 209,50 HO

(5)ALT

414

444458432440422

442442

437

423384369432

412377394

39 S429

40340640"'

42V443

40441?429

4204:i?389

446,'i V 7

42642 V403

1f1f11111111111111111

FINAL ANOMALY- - ^M- "

20190ft20190F20190C 20190!'20390L20590F'

29010ft 29010B290101:29010D290101 2 9 01 Of

20070A20070B 20070C 20070D 20070E

ANOMALY 24003 MAGNETIC FIDUCIAL CHS CHl.AMF CH2.AMP SIEMENS FIDUCIAL VALUE

210,688 5 290 163 28211,608 2 65 34 NC212,743 3 103 38 7 213,054 4 266 103 12213,199 /i 291 150 2213,501 5 303 147 12 213,40 213

214,751 2 91 44 NC - 215,026 6 204 100 4215,520 2 66 30 NC216,815 2 67 30 NC 216,80 204217,552 \ 55 NC 218,056 2 B6 30 NC 218.05 15

ADDITIONS

157.60 6 NC 110 51157.78 5 420 180 17 ~ 160.15 2 120 50 NC 160.30 5 240 120 1 160.46 4 360 140 6

'

U'ALT

426347397 404420438

381 391376384396 386

380400 375 420 390

r

(

r

(

,

C

r SPINAL .^ANOHALY , . .: -. - 24003 ^.vv;v,v v•'CHS CH1.AMP CH24^MP ' SIEHENS'- FIDUCIAL-VALUE

f1^l11b

rrriwi11rrrft

1

30050A,30050ii

30060A30060b'

30070A

30080A30080B

30090A30090 B

30100A

30 150 A 301 10k 30 11 OD

301 20rt

303 t'O A

?03*HV;

30171ft

30 180 f-,

305 0 0ft

278,324 1 40278.632 4 115

281,212 4 159281,289 5 178

287,320 6 535

288,733 4 116288*881 '.4 116

292.955 6 292296,343 3 255

298,094 2 99

301,144 2 149 303,937 2 6B 304.339 6 125

30/.44C 1 5 y

321,902 1 51

324, 4?2 '1 At'

332,824 1 72

335.448 l 82

339,973 2 290

42

7695

299

5261

146118

30

4731

45

-

NC150

1135

22

3016

443

NC

NC NC2

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

NC

278,30 6 422278*60 8 430

419416

287,50 310 440

286,60 348 444451

292,85 53 428392

406

451 425

304,50 319 425

420

322,00 213 ^ 411

440

462

434

340,25 168 400

f

C

c

fc

*c

r

((

i

\

i

i

^^"l

B FINAL - | ANO M ALYf ~ ~ '^^^B *~l 302 "

3021 OAl 30220A

30230Am 3023ot

30240 A

130250A

130260 A

M 30260H

| 30.'?OA 30 '"/y B30 '70.C

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

ANOMALY 24003 MAGNETIC * 8 FIDUCIAL CHS CHl.AMF CH2.AMP SIEMENS FIDUCIAL VALUE ALT

342,045 1 57 NC - 457

346,347 1 71 M t; 346,55 185 439348.53 1 NC 410

350,707 3 198 95 3 - 408353,208 1 37 NC 353,35 187 403

356,327 2 60 30 NC - 381

365.171 2 60 33 NC - 377

363.142 1 36 NC - 424?63.968 1 42 NC - 429

366 ,2t.:.' 2 69 49 NC - 42H 366.843 i 50 NC 367,00 16 453.36B,fcft2 2 64 30 NC - 407

t

rfSlWC-''';,'Ministry off/ fleport of Work

(Geophysica.,Geogica^tgic

TheMinir a. 4737 ATKINSON LAKE 900Type of Survey(s) Township or Area

Claim Holder(s)

'jtf S *

C Prospector's Licence No.

1 Dates (llnecuttlng to-off Ice)

Day l Mo. | Yr. | Day l Mo, j Yr.

Survey Company Total Miles of line Cut

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technlcal report)

Special Provisions Credits RequestedInstruct ioni

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This Inoludn lin* cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Geophyiical

- Electromagnetic

- Mtgnttomtter

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

Man DaysInstructions

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Report CompletedDate of Report RsccHded HglderxSLAgent (Signature)

J4 //^-hl^JJHtCertification Verifying/Report of Work'

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

ferformed on Clelm(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S H- 15

Total Days Credits

E

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected ,,- In columns at right. ^~^

Total number of mining Jrni covered by this

'ork.

l hereby certify that l'have a personal end intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed her^fti, having perfo/med the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name end Postal Address of Person Certifying

Date Certified

A *

ceruued by 18lgn*tu?*lu 2/ fl-ji

Claim No, Days Claim No. Days Claim No. Days Claim No. Days

P-576736P-576737P-576738P-576739P-576740P-576741P-576742P-576743P-576744P-576745P-576746P-576747P-576748P-576749P-576750P-576751P-576752P-576753P-576754P-576755P-576756P-576757P-576758P-576759P-576760P-576761P-576762P-576763P-576764P-576765P-576766

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020


20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020


202020

. 20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

P-594742P-594743P-594940P-594941P-594942P-594943P-594944P-594945P-594946P-594947P-594948P-594949P-594950P-594951P-594952P-594953P-594954P-594955P-596002P-596003P-596004P-596005P-596006P-596007P-596008P-596009P-596010P-596011

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Ministiyrtfw; •tJthural

,ircesOntario

Report of Vyork(Geophysical, Geologica

Dchernical andiExopi ure:

The Mining Act

"Instructions: — Please type or print. :' r v— If number "of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section 'may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr," columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Surveyls)

Claim

Township or Area,

*uL —Prospector's Licence No.

A/61* tSurvey Company

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technlc'al report)

Survey Dates (linecutting to office)

Day l Mo.CO. gl

. l Yr. Day | Mo. l Yr.

Total Miles of. 11 ne Cut

f r*\~if iss^~ I.^ t^ ' f r*s f T ^ n

Special Provisions Credits RequestedInstructions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

' For each additional survey: ' using the same grid:'fi' Enter 20 days (for each)

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

' Man DaysInstructions

' Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions ' credits do not apply

to Airborne Surveys.Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

: Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

ft:

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

15 -

Instructions;. Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's

i choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected ' In columns at right,

Report CompletedDate of Report jcorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying/feport of Work 7

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix

^B!mifis?

Number

ECFIVI

Expend. Days Cr.

NG LAND:

'APR 5 135

-Ri ce

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

V 1982

Q-

Expend. Days Cr.

Total nunwer of mining claims ciwered by this

rtyO/work.

'/4V

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexei-hareto, havingperformed the work •' or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Oat* Certified ^. . J 1*^

Celled by (SlOfatur*) i IU U 7L Iff.

r

:laim No, Days Claim No, Days Claim No. Days Claim No. Days

-576736-576737-576738-576739-576740-576741'-576742-576743'-576744'-576745'-576746'-576747'-576748'-576749-576750'-576751'-576752'-576753'-576754'-576755'-576756'-576757'-576758'-576759'-576760'-576761'-576762'-576763'-576764'-576765 -576766

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

P-576767P-576768P-576769P-576770P-576771P-576772P-576773P-576774P-586332P-586333P-5&6334P-586335P-586336P-586337P-586338P-586339P-586340P-586341P-586342P-586346P-586347P-586361p-586362P-586366P-586367P-586368P-586369P-586370P-586371P-586372P-586373

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020


20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020


20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

f '

l l l

tano

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED JN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

•Type of Survcy(s)Township or Area

fclaim Holder(s)^

Airborne Electromagnetic Atkinson Lake Area^^^—^ Angus Martin

Box 13, R.R. #1, Timmins P4N 7C2

l

t

lurvey Company - uthor of Report.

Questor Surveys Ltd.

Frank Defina

ddress of Author. Toronto, Ontario

rvering Dates of Survey,

btal Miles of Line Cut

Feb. 8, 1982(linecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnet ic.—Magnetometer.——Radiometric———Other——————

DAYS per claim

Geological.Geochemical.

IRBQRNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. -Electromagnetic 20 Radiometric(enter days per claim)l

KATE: APril 27/82 SIGNATURE:. . .., IS Author

l

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

See Attached List(prefix) (number)

.s

g •o

\ i/^^^~-^\j2^^^Cl^i of JWpori or Agent l

es. Geol.. .Qualifications.revious Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

TOTAL CLAIMS 121

l l l

Instrument__________________________________________ Range.•Survey Method —————————--—-——-—————————^-—--—————.-——————.———

SELF POTENTIAL

Corrections made.l

l

lEnergy windows (levels)..———-™——.^-—.^—-^—--———-——-—-——---——————

•j Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument-——Values measured

lSize of detector. Overburden ——-

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

l OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey-—————-———-———————-———-

Instrument __________——————————————

Accuracy_______ Parameters measured.

l

l— Additional information (for understanding results).

lAIRBORNE SURVEYS

• Type of c..rvry(c) Airborne Electromagnetic (Input) Ra y-r-n nrrov Mavlr f, TnTiiTt-. , . Barringer Mark 6 Input Instrument(s) ^ c

(specify for each type of survey)

l Accuracy-————————.——-.—-^—-^-(specify for each type of survey)

A . ,. , Britten Norman Trislander Aircraft used —————^—-—-—.—.———^———--.—.————————

Sensor altitude——_______lNavigation and night path recovery method Visual navigation; in flight 35 mm flight

l strips relative to previously prepared l; 10000 photo jnozaics———-————

Airrraft altitude 122 M_____________________________Line Spacing. 200 M

l Miles flown over total arra 237 Kilometers_________Ovcr c]aims nn]y 121

1 1 11111111111111111

9Claim No.


Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Claim No.


'

,-

Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Claim No.


Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Claim No.


\

Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

l l l l l l l l

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survcy(s). Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)—

Airborne Magnetics

Atkinson Lake Area

Angus Martin

Survey Company ——

Author of Report —— Address of Author — Covering Dates of Survey Feb

Total Miles of Line Cut

Box 13, R.R. #1, Timmins, Ont. P4N 7C

Questor Surveys Ltd.________Frank Defina

Toronto, Ontario1982______

(linccutting to office)

l

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic.

—Magnetometer_—Radiometric——

—Other——————

DAYSper claim

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDIT!? (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne turveyi)

l

CMagnetometer.—2IL-Electromagnetic ——

(enter days per claim

ATE:. April 27, /82SIGNATURE,

.Radiometric

y Author of .Report or Agent

lIRes. Geol.. .Qualifications.

rcvious SurveysFile No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

See Attached List(prefix) (number)

TOTAL CLAIMS


SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument__________________________________________ Range.Survey Method ---—-———--————~—-———-———-—-—-—---———----——-———.———-^--

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.

Values measured .Energy windows (levels)—-———,——-..——.———--——^--^———.-——--—--—.——————.

Height of instrument————-.———.^—————————-—.-—..——.Background Count.

Size of detector—————-—-———-.-————-—————-—.—-..—-.-—-—-——-—————.

Overburden ______________________________________________-(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey-————-———^—-.^--———-..—————

Instrument __________________________ Accuracy___________________________Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of giirvry(s) Airborne MagneticsInstrument(s) Sonotek 50/10 Proton Magnetometer

(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy_____l gamma_______(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used___Britten - Norman Trislander———---

Sensor altitude 122 MNavigation and flight path recovery method Visual navigation; in flight 35 mm flight strips relative to previously prepared l;10000 photo mozaics_________

Aircraft altitude 122 M_________________________Line Spring 200 M————————

Miles flown over total area 237 kilometers__________Over claims only 121

1 1 11l11111111111111

*Claim No.

p-576736P-576737P-576738P-576739P-576740P-576741P-576742P-576743P-576744P-576745P-576746P-576747P-576748P-576749P-576750P-576751P-576752P-576753P-576754P-576755P-576756P-576757P-576758P-576759P-576760P-576761P-576762P-576763P-576764P-576765P-576766

1

Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Claim No.


-

,-

Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Claim No.


Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

Claim No.


Days

20202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020202020

f i

75 A

Ontario

To

Action Timo(,Memo ...- 1

\2S ft?

D p|On

LJ Moid If] Waiting pi Will n "' !^'n ftr' u" l_l Was Here

Message Taker

Qj F(,r YourInformatior

D f "

D , ri For Your Approval r ~i Keep Me r—i Typenra't L J and Signature L.I |., (orrllcrt U f

niyi'f Final [] Circulate In,t.al rj]1ake T] F'er Your Request L-' L ' a'lfl Flelurn L -J Appropriate At lion LJ

D Fteturriec) With Thanks

Comments

Cul/,. yen'-

August 4, 1983

REGISTERED

2.4727

Mr. Angus Martin Box 13R.R. n, Dalton Road Timmins, Ontario P4N 7C2

Dear Sir:RE: Airborne Geophysical (Magnetometer) Survey submitted

on Mining Claims P 576736 et al In the area of Lower Detour Lake.

Enclosed Is a copy of our letter dated February 10, 1983 requesting additional Information for the above mentioned survey.

Unless you can provide the required data by August 18, 1983 the mining recorder will be directed to cancel the work credits recorded on April 7, 1982.

For further Information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly.

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

S. Burst:sc

End:

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

1983 02 10 2.4727

MR. Angus Martin Box 13 R.R. 11 Dalton Road Timmins, Ontario PAN 7C2

Dear Sir:

RE: Airborne Geophysical (Magnetometer) Survey submitted on Mining Claims P 576736 et al 1n the Area of Lower Detour lake.

Enclosed are the plans, In duplicate, for the above mentioned survey. In order to complete your submission we require that all maps must be signed.

For further Information, please contact Mr. F,W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,



A. Barr:se

Ends:

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Onjaririo

GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

Mining Lands Comments

Geophysics

Comments

Wish to see again with correctionsSignatu

"yTo: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

l] Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsSignature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

| | Approved l 1 Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

j [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

1982 05 17 ' 2.4727

Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 60 Wilson Avenue

Timmins, Ontirlo P4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

We have received reports and maps for an Airborne Geophysical (Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims P 576736 et al In the Area of Lower Detour Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,



J. Skura/amc

cc: MPH Consulting Limited Toronto, Ontario

cc: Angus Martin T1nm1ns, Ontario

cc: Frank DeflnaQues+or Surveys Ltd.Mississauga, Ontario

MPH Consulting Limited Suite 706,141 Adelaide St. W. Toronto, Canada M5H 3L5 (416)363-6375 (416)363-4002 Telex 06-219626

April 28, 1982

Mr. F.W. MathewsLand Management BranchMinistry of Natural ResourcesWhitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3

Dear Mr. Mathews:

Please find enclosed two (2) copies of the airborne geophysical survey conducted over 121 claims, owned by Mr. Angus Martin of Timmins, Ontario, in the Detour Lake area of the Porcupine Mining Division.

Should you have any questions, please contact me.

Yours sincerely,

MPH CONSULTING LIMITED

J.H. Tremblay, B.Se

JHT/la Encl.

3 Q 1

MINING LAND*

'f V

Days Claim No. Days Claim No. Days Claim No. Days

/736 S/6737^

/767381//576739I//-576740^-5767411/ -576742I/ -576743^ -576744i/

i f? ^ /" ""J Jl f* I ^"'-576745 l/ •-576746 l/ -5767471/-576748^-5767491^ -576750r -576751^^576752^-576753^-576754"'-576755^ -576756^-5767571/-576758 ^ -576759^ -576760 l/-576761^ -5767621/-576763*'-576764^ -576765*^ -57676W

t \

202020202020 20 20 2020 20 202020 20 2020202020 202020 20 2020 202020 20 20

P-576767*/P-5767681/P-5767691/P-5767701/P-5767711/P-576772^ P-576773^ P-576774*^ P-5863321/P- 586333 ^ P-586334 i/ P-586335(/P-586336*^P-586337l^ P-586338 1^ P-5863391/P-586340^P-586341(/P-586342(/P-5863461/ P-5863471/P-5863611/P-5863624/ P-5863661/ P-586367^/P-586368/X P-5863691/'P-586370//P-586371f/ P-586372*/ P-586373^

.VI

202020202020 20 20 2020 20 202020 20 2020202020 202020 20 2020 202020 20 20

P-586374^P-586375^P-5863761/P-586377^P-586378J/P-586379f P-586380 (X P-5863814^ P-594719*irP-594720^ P-5947211/ P-594722^P-594723U^P-594724l^ P-594725^ P-5947261/P-5947271/P-5947281/P-5947291/P-5947301/ P-5947311/P-594732 l/P-594733 l/ P-5947341/. P-59.4735|TP-594736L/ P-594737 IXP-594738 \SP-594739^ P-594740tXy P-594741 K

'."/l

202020

. 202020 20 20 2020 20 202020 20 2020202020 202020 20 2020 202020 20 20

P-594742 i/f *^ J T * T f* *^^

P-594743 Irf *t J *1 * T *J *r

P-594940 L/i fc^ S *I ^ T V |r^

P-594941//P-594942 VP-594943iXP-594944// P-594945i/ P-5949461/P-59494J.I/ P-5949481/ P-594949 l/i fc/ ** T ^ T ^ *^ ^

p-t:Q4 Qt:n J/i •w' ^ T ^ — * V i^

P-5949511/ P-594952 i/ P-594953 IXJt fcV^'T*'^'*^ ir

P-594954 *XP-594955*XP-596002lXP-596003iX P-59600"3riX'IT fcX^UvW.1 *^

P-596005i/P-596006iX P-596007tx P-596008^P-596009iX P-596010 t/P-596011^X

'7~}rt

202020202020 20 20 2020 20 202020 20 2020202020 202020 20 2020 20*" V

20

inl v l

RPOtumon

' t8 'RECEIVED i

.3

SECT.ON

11*50

V , --- X *

RECEIVED

MINING LANDS SECTION

H , ^-1'

LOWER DETOUR LAKE-M. 260379'

49 052'30

r-CDCD C\J

lLU ^<.J

o:ID oh-UJ Q

UJ -Jr-I-

79930'

49 045

p Vondette?*^ PJ85790 '586583 '5 86582 586581 586580

.595703,5)93TOS; 393715 ' 5937201 395727' ^(393740 995664] 595665] 595666(595667"

P l XP!s l P i P PI Pl\ ' ~f l P ' P : P

586579 1 586578 ———,,, ,•1- - - -f- - - "f - ~ -

P P .P I P

585759 56 5T 60 , ^ , . l ^

P P P P P pP j P l P '- P 'P

585859 i 585845, 585)842 l ' 585776 , 585777,585788586585586586 ' 586587 '586588 586585^ 5865901586 59 l59570 4 l 59 370 7] 395716 j 59371 9)5957281 39573

P P 1~ T , P' * 595663j 98662 \ ! 585835 1585832! 585825,585822 j 585764 . 585763 | 585762 | 585761 | , ,-,-—-L-- T -^-u- -i.- -i - -yi- -- r - -i. - - - - - -h - - \- - - -- - - - - . - --- —-- -

4940,594941 .594942 Is94943585844 585843 l 585834 l , l l . . L ^ .J.- — i— --—i - - ~ — — -— - — ^— -r- - i

585861 '58587z! 585873 ' 585884 l 585885 585890 585891 ' 585898 5 65 767

- . -L - 4. - -p p p p ' p p p'585862,505871)588874 585883 i 585886 1 585889 585892585897 585896 |

1594948 69/949 I 694950 ' 59600S l 596™"

585887585888(5858931585894 1585895

o"~ P IP ~585863,585870 585875

|5 86379 .-' |566\3BO 58636

t/59\4955

585S64 585869 585876 594740| 594741 594742 594743

l585865|585868| 585877

- —l- -6332451633246 16332471633249

19I48 lGI\9|47 |619O58 , 6I 9 059\ 6I 9 066s: arrs;— — -r

P P T O5947301 594731 594732 ' 594733. 58 5 666 5858671 5 8 58 f 8 19141 l ei 9060

P st*., r t/566362l\58636l ] 586360 | 686359 | 586358 l 586357 '594728 594727 J 594726 |594725 | 594724

. -———— ——— ———~ SL ———— ____ ——— J ———— ————— ———— ———— ————— - ——— ———— ———— -i——— ———— —————— - - ———l ——— ———r ———— ——— ———— l———— ————— ————— -———— J————— ————— ————— - - l————— ————. ~- —————— ———l" ————— ————f ————— 4- ~ ————— ~———

A n l , ' l' ~ l" " l ' 594722 ' ~" l ^586343 1586350 586351 '586356 1594719 | 594720 594721 a l ^^^ '594723

p 'p p586344

l 586333 '586341 586349 i 586352 i 586355 5859 619151 6ll44 GI9I43 6I90S2 | 6 l 9 O 6 3 c l 9069: 6 19 070 61 907 35509" 585908 585900

1585246 ,58S227i 58522^ 5 B 5 207i 585206 i 585186 ' 585185 585 l 80f1 586334 ' 586340 15863145 '586346 1586353 i 586354

P S P ' p ip

B 3920, 585917 585^510' 585907 ' 585901 ^5856061 585605 , 5B5604 385603 j 585602 | j

P . Ip

^ l i/586335 |586339

T . l

.585906 ,585902 'gaJseO?' 585608 1585609' 585610 '585611586346 j 585932J58593I ,5859—— — — —j- ~ — 585921! 5^9l6|5f 5911 . ^ ^. . .

T , " *J *~~! ~ ~ f~ ~ ~ "'".A ~t p

585922'5859l5|E859l2i \ ' j \.5851:905^5859031585616^ 585615 i 585614 585613 1 58 56 | 2 ,

, ...7p i p T~P ^r"P ~~n~p~ .-—,---

p i p p585183 '585182

-TP.~p - p

5229,585224 , 585209 l l P 58653C| 586531 l.-^-"'586336 IV 86538 ' 586347 585933 585934

U - -! - - l ^ . "5BS204 i 58JI88

595003 '595004 586535 '586534.5865331586337 .585 19WI 585939 S85938 [585937 5B5936 5856201 585621 l

-- 4- - P i P

31585210.585203 |583I89 l - — J. -- — - — -*— — -------i ,fs583923 585914,585913 585904- —j - — 4— — —P P 'p

'585373 585941 "585942385944 585945 ; 585946 585947 585948 58594ft 58595o! 5B5656 ' 585654 .585^26

-J--- -L- -^ . . . 4. .

(529167 577564l , 595007 l 595008 1595009

1385212 58 5201 1585192 k~ r"" n~ ~~\~P~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ^ ~ Ol O85951 II ' \

1585657 |5\85653 5856271 585628 i 585629 | 585630 l 585631-- - -L. ,. -J j. - J— . .j. . . i . ^ 4- . , l . , ,

J "J" ^ ""'"^ ^50,oXJ:^7t ,S29.85J

p ^pli"? i "p " T p" "l1585965,585964 585963 585962)585961 ' 585960

- - i. - ! . i l 58565/SI 585652P P , P ( P TP .

59671 . . c l P l P 560161 V329I62 529163 (529164P ir 'r j r | r r , r |

585968 : 585969 585970 .585971 ' 585972 ' 585973 |5856 59 l 5B565I '565637 , 585638 '585639,585640158525915852541585239,- — T - — .^ -— J____^.__ -i.- — _L i l li.! "585234

, Pl l Ir. - "

P .PI

P ' P P

' ' 'P IP .O "O ,D KlP

585977 i 585976 1585975 '585974' 585979 585978]

~*"D" ~ T a" tn~ ~ , r

P .P j P j F' "P P [p ip j p

1585987 l 5 B 598 B' 585989 1 585661 ' 585649 .585647 , 585646 i 515643 ' 585 6 42! 585257 i 5 85 2 56l 585Z37 58523

P S6B30 ||^f8300J368Z97l568296 1568293.1385660 l 585650 | 585648 l 585645 l 5(15644 , 585641 ' 585258 l 5 85 235 ' 5 8 5 238. 58 5 235 5

..i . ^. .|. . H .^ L- -l- — -f.- ™ J. - - —I- p l p I p i \ p i p , p n p "lP .568302! 56^2991568298'569295 1566294)

P l p

6332921633253

" ~ T l ^ '576 7BI ! 576780S 1576777 ! 575776 1586303 >

TrlO633254

-.^.4—-^ i p j P IP576779^

1576778 '576775 l 568304l l l

P 'P [P 618873 1618876 |6I9203

619201 .619202 .61920— —L — — 684 557689 55769015769 8

p p p p5576Be 55769 l S37694 5976 97 59839 l |S96394

— — -t- _ — 4— P P

— — 4- — — \— —

P j P P5576 86 l 55 768 7| 55769 2 55 7693 ' 55769 8 l 557S9 O 557395

L. - — '— — J - -. J.

r v L* # -7 I*^^*J**-*TI*^V***W

\ l p T p . ~ ~s 619168 J 619169 '

) l 598700 598703 598706[-T}V596 7 O l

633261 .633262 ( S33263 633264

[598702 1598707 l

-.633268635267 1633266 '6332 6 5

49 0 52'30"

49 0 45'

44' 43' 42'41

40' 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32'31

79045 79 0 30'

KINGROY LAKE-M.2659497793

32E13NE0e78 2.4727 ATKINSON LAKE200

AREA OF

ATKINSON LAKE

DISTRICT OF COCHRANE

PORCUPINE MINING DIVISION

SCALE: 1-INCH — 4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED

C.S.

Loc.LO.

M.R.O. S.R.O.

NOTES400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all lakes and rivers.

DATE OF ISSUE

JAM l 2 1983

Ministry of Natural RSSO ____ TORONTO

NATIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SERIES 32 E 13

PLAN NO.-M. 2622

ONTARIO

MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH

JL

zo

Lil DC Q. CC LU

.li IS '

o O

0 fCM

5L. ^o "2

O cOo

Q.b

C

UJz —iGCD Ot-z o u< sE <O

o

z gto wUJccCLUJ Q

Ot- UlZo

UJGC CC Ooo

s ozLUZz<ro(O

UJZZ<XOin

UJZZ<xu-

Ulzz<xuM

UJzz<x(JCM

UJzz<xoy-

.

> f, * * ~ o-* J * C*: OE ^ 0 "gS

m o^ —- —— 0} '

s^* 1 - Si ?2-3 S 1" - ** -

• - *t c f- u

M UJ OZ UlirUJu,UJ(E

O —a mU) O

o -6

S E S y v E

i*

SI

-SE -o

Q ^3 f!a m r-S cOi ra ozoz

e o

15s yaj V)

SI**Ql Q 11E" 9 o r:z

41 O *

o. 5 "c. ni

3O

m ?C^

S 2

o toC -oo S

o

Se*

O '

— C 4)

a, ct- Q

:O

* F 2|

UJ

LU

CO

LU

CD <

UJ ZZ LUDC HO Z00 ,

CO

O O

o

oz OD COz o oxCL

I i ILU

GC

oh-LLJ Q

oc >0

COdo z oLU ^1

CO o^ 8Q; a> 6

CO (DDO

SG/Off;

Q

1 " - .' '-- ' .' "' ''x---'' - 1 .. - - ^sy 'v. ,vi "-'- 1'' '••'-*.'.1*"^

'•' ' "' -" ' ; - '- ' ' "'— - '.; ;'iJ.y\:' ' - - •^",1 .'' ' -...' . ; ' .'-- --,:'' ' ;- "-''.' - ..^^- , ' tf, ' -*i ' . -•; i s-;--'|Vr " "j '- . ' '-. ' >-.': "' :"'-.v -.--'

' ^ i' ji C^'*r ' ' ' "' ' **

f V-;"-'''-" - ^V ''^?.' ' ( ; . - '.J ' - '- v . . . 'A' -' ". -' ' - ' - - .^ - - -: -'-. ' ' o.- 1 - ;- '..'•f^;

i ;fcs '' ' \ " r 1 ' '" 'N :"' -j '""•. i- ' ""•-•' 'C- '.*-VV'- . ' l v -,-^ ' - - - :;Jr- -\ s . , :x:... -• i . . . - ^; - - - -••••'^ *: --~' - ' '' -,, ' '--'mT- - '-- - -'- ' *'' :- '' " ' -" ' ' ' . ' -u " ,- ' 'vv*-. ' -

*itt :lllKyy

32E13NEB878E 4727 ATKINSON LAKE

230

^-^E-^lif^^/Cg"^/f \\faWteS. -ir^-^-V'' , - 2 "O . .

:;- ..,-- y ,

'^'tf.'AV1 ' •V "/' r , ; V^'-*'^.i'l ''''v Y •/.... /ttf-:.1 / -'. , --- ' - *-it -, ,;.,,^ ,.'/.-. ,.v*

ife^Mfe^S,' 1/ -'' -:-: M^^ffeW^ 'i.•'^#x 4-- - ~

^''4C:m^^^ yMw^ft** W,--'- ,' ; t t-

^plSp,i|0^pf|4^^^flli^iife

P: ^ '^-a|^; .::4;^^n: - :-^-"V ' ^^:;-; :^^r:-*. ' r "-t, 11; - '-. *' -' " '" -'•-!.'i !:: :-'-'- ,:\- *™.(* ;. 'i* H-.'"'.^'^^-"'-;^'' '' -OT.-''.-','.' : ;'^ - ;; "n; --'7 *'-"iv^/^'^^'!!,,''' •."•i*' 1^t

1 * '^ t'?^*---',.'? -' - *'fer* - :'.-',^Xf^

•^ i

INTERPRETATION

Conductor Axis, with reference number (:jond definition)

.~ —— — Conduclor Axis, with reference number(poor definition)

60 c

i

Conductor Dip(magnitude and direction known)

Conductor Dip (direction known)

10 GAMMA CONTOUR LINE



(1 GAMMA - 1 NANOTESLA IN SI UNITS)

MAGNETIC DEPRESSION

Selected Zone, with reference number

Surficial Conductivily

Fault Zone

Conductor Depth, below surface in

6 CHANNEL ANOMALY

5 CHANNEL ANOMALY

-(k- 4 CHANNEL ANOMALY

3 CHANNEL ANOMALY

2 CHANNEL ANOMALY

-; : ;- 1 CHANNEL ANOMALY

h* MAGNETIC CORRELATION

Anomaly Letter

Apparent Conduclm

Cti 2 Amplitude P-P M

Power Line Monitor

INPUT' EM

Wag ne tome le r F i ne Sea le 20 Gammas

Magnetometer Coarse Scale 1000 Gammas

DI* (l

Mag Pos Fiducial Tim'ng Mar'' Anomaly Location

Representative INPUT' . Magnelomeler and Altimeter Recording

DESCRIPTIVE NOTES

The aircrafl is equipped with the BarringertQueslor Mark VI INPUT' airborne E.M. System and Ihe Sonotek PMH 5010 Proton Precession Magnetometer and Sonoiek SDS-1200 Series Data Acquisition Syslem. The INPUT 1 system will respond to conductive over burden and near-surface horizontal conducting layers in addition lo bedrock conductors. Discrimination of conductors is based on the rate of transient decay, magnetic cor relation and the anomaly shape, together with the condunlor paltern and topography

' Registered Trade Mark of Barringer Research Limited

INTERPRETATION REFERENCES

Becker. A. Gauvreau. C., and Colletl, L.S.1972 Scale Model Study ol Time Domain Electromagnelic Response

ol Tabular Conductors; Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin. Volume 65, No 725. p. 90-96.

Dyck. A.V.. Becker, A., and Colletl, L.S1974 Surficial Conductivity Mapping with the Airborne INPUT'

Syslem; Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin. Volume67. No. 744. p 104109.

Lazenby. P G1973: New Development in the INPUT' Airborne E.M Syslem.

Canadian Minino and Metallurgical Bulletin. Volume 66, No. 732, p. 96-104

Nelson, Philip. H.1973 Model Results and Field Checks lor a Time-Domain Airborne

E.M System, Geophysics, Volume 38. No. 5, p. 845-853.

Palacky, G.J., and West G F.1974: Computer Processing of Airborne Electromagnetic Data.

Geophysical Prospecting. Volume 22. No. 3. p. 490-509.

Palacky, G.J 1978 Selection ol a Suitable Model for Quantitative Interpolation

of To*ed-Bird AEM Measurement; Geophysics, Volume 43. No 3. P- 576-587.

Palacky. G.J and Sena. F.O1979: Conductor Identification in Tropical Terrains-Case

Histories from the Itapicura Greenstone Belt Bahia. Brazil; Geophysics, Volume 44. No. 12, p. 1941-1962.

UPPER HARRICANAW RIVER 32ESunday Lake

79 0 45' 79 0 30'

50 0 00'

Detour

49 0 50'

50 0 00'

lake

49 0 50'

30'

Scale V 10000

AIRBORNE MK VI INPUT'SURVEY TOTAL INTENSITY MAGNETIC SURVEY


DETOUR AREA CLAIM BLOCKSProvince of ONTARIO

FILE NO.

24003 BSHEET NO.

1 Of 1

DATE

t- H f ,'Us

DRAWN BY

Dataplottmg Services Inc.

Questor Surveys LimitedMississauga Ontario Canada

^f^. Y'.O-V^ ,;fe-M^av ,v. -s,;-.:- . - ;#'fl&r .vj'j- 1 . s •.-•t ' -^.f - .

mW'W^-

v ;- ?..-^;! -life*'

INTERPRETATION

Conductor Axis, with roferunce number (good definition)

— - — — — Conduclor Axis; with reference number(poor definition)

60"

Vertical Conductor

Conductor Dip(magnitude and direction known)

Conductor Dip (direction known)




(1 GAMMA ^ 1 NANOTESLA IN SI UNITS)

MAGNETIC DEPRESSION

X/X/X/V

Selected Zone, with reference number

Surficial Conductivity

Fault Zone

Conductor Depth, below surlacc in

6 CHANNEL ANOMALY

5 CHANNEL ANOMALY

4 CHANNEL ANOMALY

3 CHANNEL ANOMALY

-0- 2 CHANNEL ANOMALY

-X- 1 CHANNEL ANOMALY

H MAGNETIC CORRELATION

AnomalyLetter

Apparent CorxlLiclmty-WiCtth (Siemens)

CH 2 AmplilubeP.PM

Power Line Monitor

INPUT EM channels

Magnelorneler Fine Scale 20 Gammas

Magnetometer Coarse Scale 1000 Gam mas

Waq Pos Fiducial Timing Mar* Anomaly Location

Repiesemative INPUT' , Magnetometer ana Allimete' Recording

DESCRIPTIVE NOTES

The aircralt is equipped wilh the Barringfir/Questor Mark VI INPUT" airborne E.M. System and the Sonolek PMH 5010 Proton Precession Magnelomeler and Sonotek SDS-1200 Series Data Acquisition Syslem. The INPUT' syslem will respond to conductive over burden and near-surface horizontal conducting layers m addition to bedrock conductors. Discrimination of conduclors is based on the rate of Iransient decay, magnetic cor relation and the anomaly shape, logelher with the conduclor pattern and topography

1 Registered Trade Mark of Barringer Research Limited

INTERPRETATION REFERENCES

Becker. A , Gauvreau, C , and Collett, L.S.1972: Scale Model Study of Time Domain Electromagnetic Response

of Tabular Conductors. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin. Volume 65, No. 725, p 90-96.

Dyck, A V.. Becker, A . and Collett. U.S.1974: Surficial Conductivity Mapping with the Airborne INPUT'

Syslem; Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, Volume67, No 744, p. 104 109

Lazenby, P.G1973: New Developments in Ihe INPUT' Airborne E M System;

Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bullelin. Volume 66, No 732, p 96-104.

Nelson. Phihp. H1973: Model Results and Field Checks for a Time-Domain Airborne

E.M. System, Geophysics. Volume 38, No. 5, p 845-853.

Palacky. G. J. .and Wesl G r1974: Computer Processing of Airborne Electromagnetic Dala.

Geophysical Prospecting, Volume 22, No. 3. p 490-509

Palacky, G.J.1978: Selection ol a Suitable Model for Qualitative Interpretation

ol Towed-Bird AEM Measurements; Geophysics. Volume 43, No. 3, p. 576-587.

Palacky. G J. and Sena, F.O.1979. Conductor Identification in Tropical Terrams-Case

Histories from the llapicura Greenslone Belt. Bahia. Brazil: Geophysics. Volume 44, No. 12, p. 1941-1962

UPPER HARRICANAW RIVER 32E

79 0 45'

50 0 00'

Sunday Lake79 0 30'

Detour

490 50'

50 0 00'

lake

49 0 50'

30'

Scale 1 10000

AIRBORNE MK VI INPUT'SURVEY TOTAL INTENSITY MAGNETIC SURVEY


DETOUR AREA CLAIM BLOCKSProvince of ONTARIO

FILE NO.

24003 CSHEET NO.

1 of 1DATE

Feb 1982

DRAWN BY

Dataplottmg Services Ir.c.

Questor Surveys LimitedMississauga Onlano Canada l \\

am s n 1q82 - ontario...l from which white prints can be made. l. l ... film (exposed during flight)...

Documents