- otm sig · networking solutions in otm al drummond, oracle to 6.3 and beyond
Post on 28-May-2020
13 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
<Insert Picture Here>
Networking Solutions in OTM Al Drummond, Oracle
to 6.3 and Beyond
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Safe Harbor Statement
• The preceding is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material, code, or functionality, and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions. The development, release, and timing of any features or functionality described for Oracle’s products remains at the sole discretion of Oracle.
to 6.3 and Beyond
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Multi-Tier Vision Statement • Objective
• Replace the current multi-tier solution with a more robust solver that makes cost based routing decisions for orders across multiple itineraries – taking into account • carrier capacities and commitments • Location capacities • Schedules (voyage and ground)
• Provide ability to route through a network of cross docks and pools
without placing limitations on number and sequence of cross docks and pools.
• Ability to perform staged planning
• Ability to plan order movements across legs – grouping of order movements and sequence of processing the groups
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Topics to be Covered
• Networks and Multi-Tier • Business Applications of Networks • Network Modeling Flexibility • New Objects to Configure • Roadmap
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
NETWORKS AND MULTI-TIER
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Multi-tier
• Multi-Tier is a new Order Routing Method that works with both networks and itineraries • Itineraries are an enumerative way of describing paths for an
order to take. (Pre- 6.3) • Networks are a shortcut to model multiple pathways in a very
simple manner. (New in 6.3)
• The combination of Networks and Multi-Tier provides a very powerful tool to solve routing problems.
to 6.3 and Beyond
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Planning • The new OTM Network capability supports
• Multiple pathways through multiple “through points”. • Determination of best path in combination with other freight
that is flowing through the network. (Synergistic Routing) • Ability to view alternative pathways and “route” orders through
specific “through points”.
• Networking was made possible through the multi-tier enhancement in 6.3 that split the planning process into 2 components. • Path selection of orders and generation of Order Movements • Bulk Plan of Order Movements
• The 2 step process can “pause” after the first step if desired. • This is a prerequisite for “continuous” or “staged” planning.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Order Management in 6.3 • Bulk Plan of Order Releases
• Bulk Plan straight to shipments (Traditional Method) • Bulk Plan of Order Release – create Order Movements only
• Allows creation of OM on all legs at one time. • Example : An order that uses a network with many
sequential “hops” over several days. • Allows planning of OM on a timely basis.
• Plan next day’s shipments now • Hold off planning following day’s shipments until all OM are
known. • Routing
• Allows Show Routing Options – By Path • Allows Routing Constraints to be added to orders. • Order Movements inherit these constraints. • Order constrains can be added by an ADA rule. • Can search for orders by the Routing Constraints
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
New Action – Build Shipments Show Network Routing Options
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
New Action – Build Shipments Show Network Routing Options
Expand each result to show leg details.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
BUSINESS APPLICATIONS OF NETWORKS
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Applications of Network
• Unidirectional – Dispersion of freight from one or more sources to multiple
destinations through an expanding “tree” type network. – Optimization of inbound freight through consolidation and
multi-stop across multiple modes.
• Bidirectional – Facilities support multiple flows at the same time. – Ability to model multiple unidirectional networks regardless of
direction on one large network. – First and Last Mile Order Movements can be combined into
one shipment with capabilities for both pickup and delivery in the same shipment.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Unidirectional Examples
• Consolidated shipments through a network to distribution hubs. • Dispersion by multiple LTL shipments. • Dispersion by Parcel.
• Inbound to facilities by different modes. • Different Paths depending on Order Time Window
• Intermodal or Truck • Different collection points depending on consolidation
opportunities
Only 1 flow is shown on the following diagrams for illustration purposes.. In 6.3, multiple flows are more likely and can be modeled in 1 network.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Appliance Distribution Network
Factory
X Dock and DC
Local Delivery Region
Example of Flow of Goods through Network to One Distribution Region
Columbia, SC
Columbus, OH
Indianapolis, IN
Des Moines, IA
Jackson, MS
Atlanta, GA
Oklahoma City, OK
Amana, IA Clyde, OH
Tulsa, OK
Ft. Smith, AR
Flows will change as additional DCs are delivering orders.
Stoves
Refrigerators
Dryers Washing Machines
50 Customers in NC Each Customer gets One of each appliance.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Last Mile Multi-stop Delivery Shipments Appliance Distribution Case from Columbia, SC to North Carolina Destinations
Capacity Limits Are used for Shipment Building Of Order Movements.
Palmetto Delivery Service has 2 – 28 ft City Box Trucks Daily Swamp Fox Trucking has 3 – 22 ft Straight Trucks Daily
Delivery Routes
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Parcel Distribution from Macon Hub
Inbound Line Haul
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Supports Kewill Inbound Line Haul
Parcel Delivery Shipments
Kewill Registered Origin
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Inbound to Central DC Scenario
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Kankakee DC
BNSF S Seattle Ramp
BNSF Cicero Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
BNSF Hobart Ramp
San Diego Mfg
Full Truckload
BNSF Corwith Ramp
Chehalis Mfg
Rail Ramp
CSXT Boston Ramp
CSXT Chicago BPA Ramp
CSXT Savannah Ramp
Natick Mfg
Full Truckload
Full Truckload
CSXT Chicago C59 Ramp Rail Ramp
CSXT Philadelphia Ramp
Trenton Mfg
Full Truckload
USSAV Port
Kokomo Mfg
Full Load – Truck, Intermodal, Ocean
Rail Ramp
Factory
Rail Ramp
Destination
Cross Dock
Port
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Inbound to Central DC Scenario
Rail Ramp
Kankakee DC Tacoma Mfg
Seattle Hub
San Bernardino Hub
BNSF S Seattle Ramp
BNSF Cicero Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
BNSF San Bernardino Ramp
St Louis Hub
Riverside Mfg Pomona Mfg
LTL LTL
LTL
BNSF Corwith Ramp
Renton Mfg
LTL
Rail Ramp
Boston Mfg
CSXT Boston Ramp
CSXT Chicago BPA Ramp
Nashua Mfg
LTL
LTL
Quincy Mfg
Jackson Hub
Mobile Mfg
LTL
LTL
LTL via Collection Point – Truck or Intermodal
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Inbound to Central DC Scenario
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Kankakee DC Tacoma Mfg
Seattle Hub
San Bernardino Hub
BNSF S Seattle Ramp
BNSF Cicero Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
BNSF Hobart Ramp
BNSF San Bernardino Ramp
St Louis Hub
San Diego Mfg
Riverside Mfg Pomona Mfg
LTL LTL
LTL
Full Truckload
BNSF Corwith Ramp
Renton Mfg
LTL
Chehalis Mfg
Rail Ramp
Boston Mfg
CSXT Boston Ramp
CSXT Chicago BPA Ramp
CSXT Savannah Ramp
Nashua Mfg
Natick Mfg
LTL
LTL
Full Truckload
Full Truckload
Quincy Mfg
CSXT Chicago C59 Ramp Rail Ramp
CSXT Philadelphia Ramp
Trenton Mfg
Full Truckload
USSAV Port
Kokomo Mfg
Jackson Hub
Mobile Mfg
LTL
LTL
Combined Full Load and LTL
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Bidirectional Examples
• Consolidated shipments through a network to distribution hubs. • Dispersion by multiple P & D Shipments.
• Blended Networks • Choice of Rail Intermodal and Highway for full truckload direct
within same network. • Common P&D with choice of Rail Intermodal and internal
highway network for internal traffic between cross dock facilities.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Butte 331 231
380
450 770
Seattle
Minneapolis
Chicago
Segment of Network for P and D Consolidation Problem
1000
641
Minot
620
481
Seattle Chicago P&D Line Haul Line Haul Line Haul Line Haul P&D Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Monday Monday Friday Thursday Wednesday Tuesday Monday
Orders from Seattle Locations to Chicago Locations each day Orders from Chicago Locations to Seattle Locations each day
Sequence Numbers
1000
Pickups
Pickups
Deliveries
Deliveries
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Seattle Area P & D Shipments
Inbound Line Haul
North Side P&D
South Side P&D Outbound Line Haul
Deliveries
Pick Ups
Stops 1-5
Stops 6-8
Starts at terminal
Ends at terminal
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Example Stops for P&D
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
NETWORK MODELING FLEXIBILITY
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Modeling Capabilities
• Great Flexibility in the approach and design of networks. • Variations in operation can be accommodated by simple
changes in the design of the network. • Large networks can be modeled based on simple hub and
spoke diagrams. • Example is an LTL network • Example is an Intermodal Network that is modeled as a
collection of O-D pairs with scheduled service modeled by a Ground Service.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Multiple Designs for Time Differentiated Mode Selection
• Case 2 - Independent Pickup by mode • Intermodal with multi-stop Pickup. • Truck direct with multi-stop Pickup.
• Case 1 – Consolidated Pickup • Intermodal between Hubs • Truck Direct between Hubs
Designs shown are simple cases with one pickup region and one destination region. Some simple designs could be enumerated in 6.2 with multiple itineraries. Case 2 However, more complicated options will require the power of the network.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Intermodal vs Truck – Time Based Decision
Kankakee DC
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
BNSF San Bernardino Ramp
San Diego Mfg Riverside Mfg
Pomona Mfg
BNSF Willow Springs Ramp
Chicago Hub
BNSF $2,000 – 2 D 20 H
Time Sensitive Orders – Require Truck 1) San Diego Mfg to Rockford 2) Riverside Mfg to South Bend 3) Pomona Mfg to Kankakee Non Time Sensitive Orders – Intermodal OK 4) San Diego Mfg to Kankakee 5) Riverside Mfg to Rockford 6) Pomona Mfg to South Bend
Rockford DC
South Bend DC
San Diego Mfg Riverside Mfg
Case 2
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Intermodal vs Truck – Time Based Decision
Kankakee DC
San Bernardino Hub
Rail Ramp
Rail Ramp
BNSF San Bernardino Ramp
San Diego Mfg
Riverside Mfg
Pomona Mfg
BNSF Willow Springs Ramp
Chicago Hub
Time Sensitive Orders – Require Truck 1) San Diego Mfg to Rockford 2) Riverside Mfg to South Bend 3) Pomona Mfg to Kankakee Non Time Sensitive Orders – Intermodal OK 4) San Diego Mfg to Kankakee 5) Riverside Mfg to Rockford 6) Pomona Mfg to South Bend
Rockford DC
South Bend DC
Case 1
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Modeling
It all starts with a sketch!
Modeling a network of hubs and spokes is as easy as it is to draw the network. First get the operational diagrams. (Hubs) Then decide how the network will operate. (Spokes)
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
LTL Trucking Network
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
LTL Trucking Network
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
LTL Trucking Network
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Coutts
Denver
Butte
Salt Lake City
Winnepage
Calgary
Ohlahoma City
Blaine
Des Moines
Vancouver
331
421 521
253
381
621
423
231
333 623 233
850 380
450
582
820
770
650
422
724 455
Albuquerque
San Bernardino
Seattle
Sacramento
Minneapolis
281
283
680
Pembina
Chicago
Detroit
Toronto
Indianapolis
St Louis
LTL Network - Hubs and Spokes – OTM Schematic
Garland
El Paso
San Ysidro
Laredo
722
720
652
654 580
452
382
384 470 420
424
350
520
453
451
525
627 651
335 251
735
641
Minot
Kansas City
620
481
490
601
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Rail Intermodal Operational Diagram
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Rail Intermodal Network is Modeled by O-D Pairs
Seattle
Stockton
San Bernardino
Denver
Houston
Alliance
New Orleans
Spokane Chicago Cicero
Billings
St Paul
Birmingham
East St Louis Memphis
Omaha
Hobart
Los Angeles
Portland Chicago Corwith
Phoenix
Schedules to Chicago From Originating Ramps Kansas City
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
NEW OBJECTS TO CONFIGURE
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
New Objects and Definitions
• Path Finding • Network • Network Leg • Leg Consolidation Group • Routing Constraint
• Shipment Building • Multi-stop Logic Scenario Overrides • Leg Classification
to 6.3 and Beyond
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network – On Itinerary Leg
The itinerary can contain more than 1 leg each with a network.
Itinerary Provides Geography
Itinerary Leg Contains Network
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network
Two Places to Configure The maximum number Of “hops”
to 6.3 and Beyond
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Detail – Joins Network to Network Legs
If Network Legs are created by CSV, you can name them with a naming convention. If Network Legs are created by UI, the ID will be a number.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Leg (Line Haul Example)
Attributes of the Network Leg – Line Haul Source and Destination - For Line Haul, these represent the terminals. Source and Destination Roles – Required for source and destination locations. Mode, Service Provider, Equipment – Profiles provided Expected Cost and Expected Service time Equipment Assignment Type – Optimize or No Equipment Leg Consolidation ID – instructions on how the resulting OM will build shipments.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Detail – Delivery Legs
Naming convention is critical to management of network legs.
Example: Source _ Destination _ Type of leg _ Carrier _ Equipment
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Network Leg (Delivery Example)
Attributes of the Network Leg - Delivery Source and Source Role - For Delivery, this is the delivering terminal or hub. Destination Region (No Role Required) - This is a the geography of the delivery area. (Can be a list of locations, list of zip codes, list of states, list of countries) Mode, Service Provider, Equipment – Can Specify Service Provider and Equipment Expected Cost and Expected Service time Equipment Assignment Type – Optimize and No Equipment Leg Consolidation ID – instructions on how the resulting OM will build shipments.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Leg Consolidation Group Line Haul Delivery Leg Unidirectional Pickup Bidirectional Pickup
Attributes of Leg Consolidation Group ID – This is used to group order movements that should be planned together and also to create different groups to prevent order movements from being planned together. Sequencing Factor – Typically increased from source to destination Multi-stop Logic Scenario – Allows user to specify the parameters of multi-stop as they may be unique to each leg. Also allows user to shut off multi-stop when not needed.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Routing Constraints
OR
OM
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
New Routing Constraint
Allows use to specify locations to visit or not visit during the travel through the network. Options are expressed by use of the sequence number. For visiting, can specify must visit a location during transit. For visiting, can specify must visit one or more locations in a specific order. The same sequence number for 2 locations is an “either condition”.
to 6.3 and Beyond
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Multi-stop Logic Scenario Overrides
Multi-stop Logic config has moved from a global parameter to a leg parameter Though the use of the Multi-stop Logic Scenario Overrides on the Leg Consolidation Group.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
Leg Classifications
The use of Leg Classifications has changed from 6.2 to 6.3. Leg Classifications are used to specify order constraints for specify types of legs. Order release contains the Leg Classification and the constraint Network leg contains the Leg Classification For Example: Order 1234 must be delivered by Carrier Red Star Network delivery Legs must have “Leg Classification” DELIVERY LEG. Order Constraints for Leg Classification must have a Leg Classification DELIVERY LEG and a specified Service Provider RED STAR.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
ROADMAP
Reminder: Everything in this presentation is for future releases and is not available today.
© 2009 Oracle Corporation – Proprietary and Confidential
OR to OMs Actions Ocean Related Re-use Equipment Staged Planning Capacity
to 6.3 and Beyond
top related