05 closing cycles

1

Closing Water, Nutrient and Energy

cycles

Starting in wastewater treatment systems…

2

Wastewater in The Netherlands• Production almost 2 billion m3 clean effluent per year• Originating from industry and approximately 7.2 million

households• Treated in 350 WWTP’s• Electricity use of 0.37 kWh/m3 treated wastewater

(but heating of water 60 Mjprimair/m3) • 15-20% of imported phosphate rock ends up in wastewater

3

Wastewater treatment focus;changes in the past 60 years

Removal of Organics

Removal of organics, Nitrogen and phosphate

MultifunctionalArea use

4

Is this enough?• Water Framework Directive (WFD-EU)• Changing focus to more “sustainable” wastewater treatment:

• Grey water, black water and rainwater treatment;• Less energy use + energy recovery;• Wastewater as source

Possibilities & limits of the activated sludge

processSTOWA 2007

5

5

Drinking water purification

N P

P

NProduct formaton

Changes in the next (60) jaar?

E&Q

Wasteprocessing

Nutrient re

covery

Newsanitation

Sewer management

(waste)(water)chain

6

Demand driven research?!Commitments of the waterboards:

• Water Framework Directive EU• Good ecological status surface water (Nutrients, Micro Pollutants,

metals, EDC’s, pharmaceuticals etc.)• Reduction energy consumption

• 2% / year (2005-2020: 30%)• Climate agreement with the National Government, March 2010

• 40% sustainable energy production in 2020• 30% reduction GHG 1990 en 2020• 100% sustainable purchase

• Green deal, October 2011• 12 Energy factories + 5 Phosphorus recovery plants

• Covenant Phosphorus Cycle, October 2011

7

Themes for the coming years

Water reuse

Nutrientrecovery

Energy recovery

8

Roadmap 2030 – “sources-factory”

Water

EnergyNutrients

9

Water reuseWater

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Important characteristics for WWTP configuration

• Physical removal of COD

• Biological removal of N

• Biological and chemical/physical removal of P

• Biological processes based on activated sludge

and attached growth (membrane, sand filters,

activated carbon).

10

Projects• Irrigation in greenhouses

• Pilot at Harnaschpolder with filtration methods;

• Sewermining

• Production of high quality process water from sewer, preferably energy neutral

• Anaerobic Membranes

• uncoupling HRT and SRT, resulting in high quality nutrient rich, pathogen free effluent;

• Fouling, shear and costs

Water

Energy

Water

Energy

WaterWater

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

11

Nutrient recoveryProduct recovery

Important characteristics for WWTP configuration

• Separate nutrients and COD

• Concentrate nutrients (precipitation)

• Recover other products or produce products (bioplastics, other polymers, fine sieve

material, algea?, duckweed?)

EnergyNutrients

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

12

Chances for decentralized treatmentor different wastewater collection

Feaces; 35%

Urine; 47%Grijs water

18%Grey water

Urine; 85%

Feaces; 11,6%

Grijs water 3,4%

NitrogenGrey water

Phosphate

13

Energy production or Energy-factory

Important characteristics for WWTP configuration

• Separation of COD instead of aerobic degradation (optimization biogas production and energy consumption at

aeration)

• Energy: economic removal of N, P and residual COD (anammox)

• Maximal recovery of sludge caloric content

Chances for heat recovery in the sewer

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

14 www.energiefabriek.com

• Realisation• Research/development

• Marketing

15

Research topics formulated by the waterboards

treatmentconcept (11)Separation solids and waterSeparation C and N treatmentRejectionwater treatmentSmall WWTP’sLow energy technologies

Sludge treatment (5)Optimalisation digestionprocesAlternatives digestionCo-digestionFinal sludge treatment

Energyconversion, -supply (7)Energy conversionEnergie supply Heat from watercycle

16

Role of Anammox in the E-factory

Sewage “Sewage treatment with Anammox”

Kartal et al., 2010 - Science

Based on: Lower COD for N-removal (denitrification) more COD for biogas production

Rejection Water“Anammox brings WWTP closer to energy

autarky due to increased biogas production and reduced aeration energy for N-removal”

Siegrist et al., 2008

Revival of the A/B system: Lower COD for N-removal (Anammox in the B-stage) more COD for biogas production

(Biomass production in A-stage)

17

Anammox technology at low temperatures(Paques, TUD, RUN, WSHD, STOWA)

Main concern:Competition ammonium and nitrite oxidizing

bacteria and Anammox at pilot (and full scale) conditions

18

Combining old and new goalsAerobic granular sludge technology: Excellent settling properties sludge Granules without carrier material High biomass concentrations Extensive nutrient removal

Low area requirement Simple single-tank concept Sustainable (energy and additives) Low costs

Activated sludge

Aerobic Granules

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrients

Water

EnergyNutrientsProducts

???!

19

Example of technology development

Successful cooperation needed,In this Nereda Case:University (TUD), Industry (DHV) and Government (waterboards, stowa, stw, EU)

20

Questions?