1 broadband_connection@home for students and employees tom koppen director computing center terena...

1

broadband_connection@home

for students and employeesTom Koppen

director computing center

TERENA Networking Conference 2000Lisbon, 22-25 May

2

And now something totally different

• Different accent

• Not a technical expert

• Case study on home connection for students

3

University of Twente

4

University of Twente

5

University of Twente

• 2000 students living on campus• 4000 students living in town• 2500 staff living in town

6

University of Twente

• technical and social studies• telematics, chip technology,

process engineering, biomedical engineering educational technology

7

The network on campus

• Within buildings: switched Fast Ethernet

• Between buildings: Gigabit Ethernet

• SURFnet:• 1994: 4 Mbps• 1997: 34 Mbps• 1999: 155 Mbps• 2000: 1 Gbps• 2002: 20 Gbps

8

Why connection at home?

• “ICT in education”– Intranet– Internet– File serving– Communication

• Education free of time

• Education free of place

9

Why broadband connection?

• Course Management Systems

• Streaming video

• Multicast

• Videoconferencing

• Collaborative workspace

10

1992: dial back

• Own modem pool• For file-transfer and internal e-mail• 14.4 kbps, later 28.8 kbps• In the beginning: free of charge• Later: 300 minutes/month free

• Results:– Number of accounts slowly growing– Users want to be “always on”

11

1994: CAMPUSnet

• all 2000 student rooms on campus

• 10 Mbps shared Ethernet

• Fee: € 7 per month

• Also: free e-mail account for all students

• Result: from 50 % subscription 100 %

12

1996: ISDN

• Faster: 64 or 128 kbps

• Phone calls possible while surfing

• More used by staff then by students

13

1998: Dial-in

• Special contract with cable company

• PSTN and ISDN

• Free of charge (except phone pulses)

• Local phone tariff everywhere in NL

• Possible by competition in telecom world

• All students and staff an account

14

1999: update CAMPUSnet

• 50 hubs replaced by switches• Faster:

10 Mbps shared 100 Mbps switched• Safer: no sniffling anymore• Paid by raising fee from € 7 to € 10

• Conclusion: once you possess the localloop, updating the technology is affordable.

15

April 2000: cable modems

• Special arrangement with cable company

• Faster: maximum 0.5 Mbps

• Authentication by UT

• Fixed IP-numbers: intranet access

• At last a flat fee: € 19

• Sharing the connection permitted

16

July 2000: ADSL

• Access Pilot with GigaSURF• Partner: datacom company Casene• Concentrators in 6 cities in the region• Minimum 2 Mbps 8 Mbps• Flat fee: € 36

• Results: earlier at our disposal, much more bandwidth, more certainty, a lot cheaper.

17

Menu à la carte

Dial-in PSTN 56 kbps phone pulses

Dial-in ISDN 64 or 128 kbps+ € 9 subscription

phone pulses

Cable modem max 0.5 Mbps € 19

ADSL 2 - 8 Mbps € 38

CAMPUSnet 100 Mbps € 10

18

200X: wireless

• Wireless LAN’s

• GPRS

• UMTS

19

Internet traffic during the day

Twente

Big city

20

Prognosis

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

1999 2000 2002

PSTNISDN

cablemodem

ADSL

FastEthernet

21

How to lower costs and improve quality• The telco only for the local loop• To be done within university:

– Authentication– Access to Internet– E-mail and other network services – Helpdesk– Administration and billing

• Keep administration simple

22

Conclusion

The connections to the homes commercial ISP’s offer are not fast enough for a reasonable price.

Universities should take responsibility for broadband Internet access of their students, if they have any ambition with “ICT in education”.

23