1 george mason school of law contracts i iv.offers f.h. buckley fbuckley@gmu.edu
Post on 26-Mar-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
George Mason School of Law
Contracts I
IV. Offers
F.H. Buckley
fbuckley@gmu.edu
Last classes
Contract law solves the trust problem of PD games and permits credible commitments
2
Last classes
Contract law solves the trust problem of PD games and permits credible commitments
This results in a society which is wealthier, happier, freer and more open
3
Last classes
Promising and contract law assume the existence of promissory conventions (Hume) The libertarian (non-consequentialist)
explanation of promising therefore appears to founder
So too natural law explanations
4
Last classes
Promising and contract law are content-independent
Quasi-contract (restitution) as contract-dependent Was there really a benefit?
5
The Five W’s
Who What Where When Why
6
Basic Questions of Formation
Who are the parties What happens to non-parties?
What Where When Why
7
Basic Questions of Formation
Who are the parties What did they agree to?
What are the terms and conditions
Where When Why
8
Basic Questions of Formation
Who are the parties What did they agree to? Where was the contract formed?
Under which law
When Why
9
Basic Questions of Formation
Who are the parties What did they agree to? Where was the contract formed? When was it formed?
Pre-contractual rights Limitation periods
Why
10
Basic Questions of Formation
Who are the parties What did they agree to? Where was the contract formed? When was it formed? Why did they enter into the contract
The doctrine of consideration
11
Who are the parties? Restatement § 2 (1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to
act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.
(2) The person manifesting the intention is the promisor.
(3) The person to whom the manifestation is addressed is the promisee.
(4) Where performance will benefit a person other than the promisee, that person is a beneficiary.
12
Who are the parties? Restatement § 2 (4) Where performance will benefit a person
other than the promisee, that person is a beneficiary. The old rule of privity of contract
13
What counts as a contract?
14
The need for a “meeting of the minds” Quinn J. in Williams v. Walker-Thomas at
53
Non-promises
2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. What does this exclude?
15
Non-promises
(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. “I may sell my car to you” “I expect to see you at lunch tomorrow”
16
Secret reservations
How about: “I will sell you my car tomorrow” (while privately resolving not to do so)
17
The Objective Standard
Restatement § 2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made. A remedy for “false promising”
18
Lucy v. Zehmer at p. 13
19
Lucy v. Zehmer at p. 13
20
Lucy v. Zehmer
21
Back on State 40 about a half mile from the junction with County 613 the traveler comes upon the FERGUSON PLACE; … The two sections are connected by a passageway—commonly called a colonnade, though quite innocent of columns. The wide-boarded floors, flat-head nails, massive locks, H and L hinges, and hand-carved mantels attest the antiquity of a house well worth the restoration it has not received.
Why does the drinking matter?
22
Why does the drinking matter?
23
Capacity: Restatement § 16 (1) A person incurs only voidable
contractual duties by entering into a transaction if the other party has reason to know that by reason of intoxication (a) he is unable to understand in a reasonable manner the nature and consequences of the transaction, or (b) he is unable to act in a reasonable manner in relation to the transaction
Why does the drinking matter?
Restatement § 2(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.
24
Lucy v. Zehmer
25
What is the role of intention to create legal relations? Restatement § 21: Neither real nor apparent
intention that a promise be legally binding is essential to the formation of a contract, but a manifestation of intention that a promise shall not affect legal relations may prevent the formation of a contract.
Lucy v. Zehmer
26
What remedy is sought and why did that matter? Recall Mansfield in Moses v. Macferlan
Lucy v. Zehmer
27
Even if a contract was made on the Saturday, why couldn’t Zehmer retract on the Sunday?
Lucy v. Zehmer
28
Even if a contract was made on the Saturday, why couldn’t Zehmer retract on the Sunday?
Has there been either any beneficial or detrimental reliance at that point?
Lucy v. Zehmer
29
Even if a contract was made on the Saturday, why couldn’t Zehmer retract on the Sunday?
Has there been either any beneficial or detrimental reliance at that point?
Does the Coase Theorem help?
Lucy v. Zehmer
30
Suppose Lucy knew that Zehmer acted in jest?
Restatement §20. EFFECT OF MISUNDERSTANDING (1) There is no manifestation of mutual assent to an
exchange if the parties attach materially different meanings to their manifestations and
(a) neither party knows or has reason to know the meaning attached by the other; or
(b) each party knows or each party has reason to know the meaning attached by the other.
Leonard v. Pepsico at 18
31
Leonard v. Pepsico at 17
32
Was this really an offer to sell a jet for $700,000?
Leonard v. Pepsico at 17
33
“No objective person could reasonably have concluded that the commercial actually offered consumers a Harrier Jet.”
Leonard v. Pepsico at 17
34
Bargains: Rest. § 3
A bargain is an agreement to exchange promises or to exchange a promise for a performance or to exchange performances.
35
Bargains: Rest. § 3 A bargain is an agreement to exchange
promises or to exchange a promise for a performance or to exchange performances. Wholly executory contracts: promise for
promise Wholly executed contracts: performance
for performance
36
A wholly executed contract:Gleinicke Bridge, Berlin, 1986
37
Formation as a Coordination Game
38
You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time.
Formation as a Coordination Game
39
You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. What day?
Formation as a Coordination Game
40
You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. What city?
Formation as a Coordination Game
41
You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. Where in NYC?
Formation as a Coordination Game
42
You have to meet someone here in the United States. You don’t know anything about him and he knows nothing of you. You don’t know where or when to meet. It could be anywhere in the US and it could be any day or any time. What time?
What side of the road to drive on?Coordination Games
43
Right Left
Right Happy, Happy Death, Death
Left Death, Death Joy, Joy
Player 1
Player 2
Formation as a coordination game
44
Promise No Promise
Promise 10, 10 -10, 0
No Promise 0, -10 0, 0
Player 1
Player 2
Bargaining errors as an avoidable accident
45
What we got here is a failure to communicate
Two kinds of Promissory Accidents
46
Type I: Promisors are found to promise when they really didn’t intend to do so (false positive)
Lucy v Zehmer?
Type II: Promisors are not found to promise where they intended to do so (true negative)
Leonard v. Pepsico
How to reduce promissory accidents? Offer and Acceptance
47
Restatement § 22(1). The manifestation of mutual assent to an exchange ordinarily takes the form of an offer or proposal by one party followed by an acceptance by the other party or parties.
Offers
48
Restatement § 24. An offer is the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.
Acceptance
49
Restatement § 50. Acceptance of an offer is the manifestation of assent to the terms thereof…
How to reduce promissory accidents?
50
What if we could identify the party who could at least cost eliminate the accident?
How to reduce promissory accidents?
51
What if we could identify the party who could at least cost eliminate the accident? Who was this in Bailey?
How to reduce promissory accidents?
52
What if we could identify the party who could at least cost eliminate the accident? And in Zehmer?
The source of promissory accidents
53
What counts as an offer?
The source of promissory accidents
54
What counts as an offer? What counts as an acceptance?
The source of promissory accidents
55
What counts as an offer? What counts as an acceptance? How long do offers and acceptances
stand (i.e., what about retraction?)
What counts as an offer?
56
Offers to the world: unilateral contracts
Offers vs. “Invitations to treat”
Offers vs. “mere puffs”
Offers to the PublicCourteen Seed v. Abraham 207
57
What did the flyer say? Could that have been accepted as an
offer?
Offers to the PublicCourteen Seed v. Abraham 207
58
What did the flyer say? Plaintiff’s wire on Oct. 8
Could that have been accepted as an offer?
Offers to the PublicCourteen Seed v. Abraham 207
59
What did the flyer say? Plaintiff’s wire on Oct. 8 Defendant’s response (I am asking 23
cents a pound) Could that have been accepted as an
offer?
Offers to the PublicCourteen Seed v. Abraham 207
60
Offer v. Invitation to treat Does a course of dealings change
anything?
Offers to the PublicFairmont v. Cruden-Martin 210
61
Can you distinguish this case?
Offers to the PublicFairmont v. Cruden-Martin 210
62
Can you distinguish this case? “for immediate acceptance”?
Offers to the PublicAudio Visual v. Sharp at 212
63
Why might a presumptive rule that ads or flyers are not offers make sense?
Offers to the PublicAudio Visual v. Sharp at 212
64
Why might a presumptive rule that ads or flyers are not offers make sense?
Cf. Newspaper Ad on 213
Lefkowitz 213
65
Offer or Invitation to Treat?
Lefkowitz
66
Could the offeror revoke his offer?
Lefkowitz
67
Could the offeror revoke his offer? Restatement 36(1) An offeree’s power of
acceptance may be terminated by:(c) revocation by the offeror
Lefkowitz
68
Did the offeror revoke in time? Could the offeror revoke through a private
“house rule”?
Lefkowitz
69
Did the offeror revoke in time? Could the offeror revoke through a private
“house rule”? Restatement §42. An offeree's power of
acceptance is terminated when the offeree receives from the offeror a manifestation of an intention not to enter into the proposed contract.
Lefkowitz
70
Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Could it be accepted in that way?
Lefkowitz
71
Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Could it be accepted in that way?
Buyers could only accept by showing up with the $1.
Lefkowitz
72
Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Corbin at 206: unilateral vs bilateral
contracts—what is the difference?
Lefkowitz
73
Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”? Unilateral Contracts: Where the offeree
can accept only by performance Bilateral Contracts: The offeree accepts
by return promise
Lefkowitz
74
Suppose that the Π had written to the Δ and said “I accept”?
Was Lefkowitz obliged to buy the coat?
Lefkowitz
75
Why did the store insist on the offeree showing up at the store?
Why is it so hard to get from one store to another at Pentagon Mall?
76 Pentagon City Mall
Offers to the PublicCarlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball
77
How did the Π accept the offer?
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball
78
Does the offeree have to communicate acceptance in a unilateral contract?
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball
79
Rest. § 54. Where an offer invites an offeree to accept by rendering a performance, no notification is necessary to make such an acceptance effective unless the offer requests such a notification.
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball at 224
80
Should this have been seen as anInvitation to Treat?
How do you tell?
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball at 224
81
Can you think of a reason why the Δ might WANT to assume liability?
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball at 224
82
What’s a “mere puff”
Mere puffs: Simple commendations do not oblige one
83
“simplex commendatio non obligat”
The need for certainty
84
Restatement § 33(1). Even though a manifestation of intention is intended to be understood as an offer, it cannot be accepted so as to form a contract unless the terms of the contract are reasonably certain.
Self-service stores
Barker v. Allied at 215 How would you analyze this?
85
Cole v. Sandel at 215
What was the standard idea agreement? And why wasn’t it an agreement?
86
The Law of Offers serves coordination and efficiency goals
Must seem objectively like real offers Secret reservations Invitations to treat Certainty of terms Cannot be mere puffs
87
top related