1 of nfpcsp formulation phase ii: drawing lessons from phase i sm vl nfpcsp, 05 nov. 07 nfpcsp...
Post on 18-Jan-2018
231 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
1 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSPFormulation of Phase II:
Drawing lessons from Phase I
Dhaka, Monday 5 November 2007
Prof. Sattar Mandal
Vianney Labé
2 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Steps of the formulation of Phase-II• Take stock of Phase-I• Identify issues and challenges• Set objectives, outcomes, outputs and
activities• Flesh-out the project document• Deliver the project document
Withyou
Stepby
step
3 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Objectives of this workshop
• Contribute to Formulation of Phase-II• Together comment, discuss, validate,
and complement the MTR by identifying key Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats of Phase-I
4 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Rules of the workshop• We are all responsible for the success
of the workshop• Respect for others
– I am OK, You are OK, S/he is OK– No mobile, No side conversations– Time respect
• Openness and franknessTea
breaksonly
5 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Method• Use of LogFrame
– Quick reminder– Objective tree of NFPCSP P-I
• “adapted” SWOT by MTR criteria– Presentation of “adapted” SWOT– Application of “adapted” SWOT
Banglawelcome
6 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Time line• 09:30 Introduction• 09:45 Presentation of MTR• 10:30 Tea break• 10:45 Introduction of Work group• 11:00 Work group• 11:30 Tea break• 11:45 Presentations• 12:45 Wrap-up
7 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
LogFrame: reminder
Overall Obj.
Purpose
Results
Activities
OO Indicators
P. Indicators
R. Indicators
Means
OVIIntervention logic
OO SoV
P. SoV
R. SoV
Costs
SoV
Projec
tEn
vironm
ent
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
Assumptions
(Assumptions)
Pre-conditions
8 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
LogFrame: reminder
Project Goal
The big picture is here
The heart of the project:What has to be achieved,
Sustainable benefit(s) for the target group(s)
Objective
What needs to be “produced” to achieve the Objectives
Outputs
What needs to be done to produce the Outputs
Activities
Intervention logic
9 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
LogFrame: objective tree
Project Goal
Objective
Outputs
Activities Activities Activities Activities
Outputs
10 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
LogFrame: objective treeProject Goal
Objective
Outputs
Activities Activities Activities Activities
Outputs
11 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP: objective tree (OB1)To enhance Bangladesh’s capacity to implement a comprehensive, equitable, gender-sensitive and pro‑poor National Food Policy and
Action Plan
To increase the capacity of the FPMU and members of the FPWG and TRT to perform their functions associated with the implementation of
the National Food Policy
Fully staffed and adequately equipped
FPMU
Activities Activities Activities Activities
FPMU staff and TRT members trained in policy analysis and
monitoring
To improve research in Civil Society and dialogues within Civil Society and between Civil Society on the implementation of the National Food Policy
Well-functioning inter-ministerial teams
(FPMU/FPWG/TRTs).
12 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP: objective tree (OB2)To enhance Bangladesh’s capacity to implement a comprehensive, equitable, gender-sensitive and pro‑poor National Food Policy and
Action Plan
To increase the capacity of the FPMU and members of the FPWG and TRT to perform their functions associated with the implementation of
the National Food Policy
Capacity to conduct quality food security
related research within Civil Society (CS)
strengthened
Activities Activities Activities Activities
Dialogue within Civil Society and between Civil Society and GoB
on Food Security enhanced
To improve research in Civil Society and dialogues within Civil Society and between Civil Society on the implementation of the National Food Policy
Programme Research taken over by Civil
Society institution(s) in Phase II
13 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
“adapted” S W O TStrengths:
Achieved results or Good features
Weaknesses:Failures or not so good features
Opportunities:Good / new (expected or
unexpected) features which can/could be used
Threats:new (expected or
unexpected) features which are/could be detrimental
S W
O T
14 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
N F P C S P:
What the Mid-Term Review considers as
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats
15 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP MTR
• Mid Term Review• June/July 2007• Independent• Follows classic criteria of EC reviews• Relevance, efficiency, effectiveness,
sustainability• Report available
16 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Pre-conditions (progress up to date)• Approval of NFP• FPMU posts filled• FPMC // NFP
• Preparing & approving PoA
• PoA = on-the-job training • x
S W
O T
17 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB1: Refurbishment FPMU premises (progress up to date)• Almost achieved• GoB involvement• Good environment
• Delays• Electricity supply
• Annex wing
• Attractive for others• Visibility / Reputation of FPMU
• Electricity supply
S W
O T
18 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB1: On-site training (progress up to date)• High standard• Bespoke training courses• One-to-one training & mentoring• Foundation courses• Training materials
• Heterogeneous trainees• Various needs
• Vacant positions• Insufficient on-the-job
training• Schedules
• Visibility / Reputation of FPMU • Disruption of normal work for other Min reducing
attractiveness
S W
O T
19 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB1: Secretariat & analytical work (progress up to date)• Plan of Actions• Work plans of TRT• Web-site
• x • x
S W
O T
20 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB1: Training abroad (progress up to date)• 1 PhD• 3 MS• Short-term courses
• x • FPMU human resources drained
• Support after end date of Phase I
S W
O T
21 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB2a: RGP, research (progress up to date) • RGP formed• 1st Call for research launched• Research need digest done
• Project deadline:supervision of the RGP
activities?• 2sd call jeopardized
S W
O T
22 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB2b: Dialogue with CS, GoB (progress up to date)• Inception workshop• Consultative workshops on
research
• No real dialogue launched
• High risk of not achieving OB2b
S W
O T
23 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
OB2c: Prog. Research taken over (progress up to date)• Evaluation of CS research
institutions done
S W
O T
24 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Un-planned outputs (progress up to date)• Policy advices
• Create a demand side• Increase visibility / reputation of
FPMU
• Exhaust resources if demand too high
S W
O T
25 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Management (efficiency)• PSC smooth• Planning compliant• Day-to-day mgt effective
• Different reporting requirements
• ABC not available• Expensive non-regional staff
• Lack of sound monitoring
• x • Diversion of resources on reporting
• Difficult cost-effectiveness analysis
• Access theme split into 2:• Difficult advocacy for
NFPCSP
S W
O T
26 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Management (efficiency 2)• Delay in placement of FPMU
staff• Changes in TRT staff
• x • Delay in outcomes• Reduction of impact of capacity strengthening for
TRT staff, if any
S W
O T
27 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Relevance (= respond to a high priority needs)• Objectives relevant • Lack of champion
• Lack of clear definition of capacity strengthening
• x • Authoritative driving force• Lack of ownership
• Intra-governmental mgt
S W
O T
28 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Expected end-of-projectEffectiveness (contribute to project objectives): delivery
• Food policy draws on analysis
• NFPCSP deliver on policy advices an entry point for CS-GoB dialogue
• Implementation of FSP & PoA jeopardized
• Little CS-GoB dialogue
S W
O T
29 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Expected end-of-project Effectiveness (contribute to project objectives): capacity strengthening
• Impact on certain TRT • High turn-over in participants• Load on TRT staff
• Lack of real commitment from senior cadres of other
Ministries
• TRT vulnerable because of horizontal concept vs vertical
organisation
S W
O T
30 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Teabreak
15’
31 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
N F P C S P:
What YOU consider asStrengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats
32 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP SWOT
• Grouping by “role/function”:– Group A: Research Officers– Group B: Directors + Additional Directors– Group C: TRT partners ministries– Group D: TAT (+ Donors)
33 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP SWOT
• 30 minutes• Presentation + discussion: 15 minutes
per group• Focus on the Phase-I & Facts• Comment on MTR• Complement MTR• (Response papers to Consultation team)
34 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Issue: Group:
S W
O T
35 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
“adapted” S W O TStrengths:
Achieved results or Good features
Weaknesses:Failures or not so good features
Opportunities:Good / new (expected or
unexpected) features which can/could be used
Threats:new (expected or
unexpected) features which are/could be detrimental
S W
O T
36 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP: objective tree (OB1)To enhance Bangladesh’s capacity to implement a comprehensive, equitable, gender-sensitive and pro‑poor National Food Policy and
Action Plan
To increase the capacity of the FPMU and members of the FPWG and TRT to perform their functions associated with the implementation of
the National Food Policy
Fully staffed and adequately equipped
FPMU
Activities Activities Activities Activities
FPMU staff and TRT members trained in policy analysis and
monitoring
To improve research in Civil Society and dialogues within Civil Society and between Civil Society on the implementation of the National Food Policy
Well-functioning inter-ministerial teams
(FPMU/FPWG/TRTs).
37 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
NFPCSP: objective tree (OB2)To enhance Bangladesh’s capacity to implement a comprehensive, equitable, gender-sensitive and pro‑poor National Food Policy and
Action Plan
To increase the capacity of the FPMU and members of the FPWG and TRT to perform their functions associated with the implementation of
the National Food Policy
Capacity to conduct quality food security
related research within Civil Society (CS)
strengthened
Activities Activities Activities Activities
Dialogue within Civil Society and between Civil Society and GoB
on Food Security enhanced
To improve research in Civil Society and dialogues within Civil Society and between Civil Society on the implementation of the National Food Policy
Programme Research taken over by Civil
Society institution(s) in Phase II
38 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Presentations start
at 14:00
39 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Presentations
40 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Issue: Group:
S W
O T
41 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Presentations + Discussion• Respect for others
– I am OK, You are OK, S/he is OK– No mobile, No side conversations– Time respect,
• Focus on the Phase-I & Facts• Comment on MTR• Complement MTR• (Response papers to Consultation
team)
5to15’
42 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
When applying reading the SWOT• Based on facts• Remember what level does it relate in
the LFM– A weakness at objective is more important
than a weakness at activity level • Remember who is affected by the
quality– Whole project, part of it?
43 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Steps of the formulation of Phase-II• Take stock of Phase-I (done)• Identify issues and challenges• Set objectives, outcomes, outputs and
main activities• Flesh-out the draft project document• Deliver & present the draft project
document
44 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Thankyou
45 of
NFPCSP Formulation Phase II: drawing lessons from Phase I
SM & VL – NFPCSP, 05 Nov. 07
Photo
top related