1 philosophy of science ii from positivists to thomas kuhn

1

Philosophy of science II

From positivists to Thomas Kuhn

2

Key concepts in the philosophy of science

• Positivism

• Logical positivism

• Falsificationism

• Paradigms

• Anarchy

• Social constructions

3

Positivism Auguste Comte (1798-1857)

• Facts• Facts• More facts• Generalize from those

facts• = induction

4

Comtes evolutionary stages

Law of three phases of civilisation’s evolution

• Theological• Metaphysical• Scientific

The final positive stage

5

Logical positivism• Vienna circle 1920’s- 1930’s

– Moritz Schlick, Rudolf Carnap, Otto Neurath, A. J. Ayer

• Metaphysics ( = not science):– All propositions that are neither verifiable by

empirical observation nor demonstrable as analytic.

– Ex.: religious and ethical statements....

• Scientific method– Induction and verifiability

6

Alfred Ayer (1910-89) in his Language, Truth and Logic first published in 1936.

The first claim of logical positivists is that a statement can only be true only if either

• it is a self-evident analytic, deductive truth of the kind found in mathematics and formal logic (e.g. ‘2+2=4’) or because

• the statement matches reality precisely. A consequence of this was that statements had to be verifiable to be meaningful.

7

Vienna circle project

• Develop an exact and unbiased language for science.– logic, mathematics.

• Demarcation problem – make a clear distinction between science and

metaphysics (not science)

• Reductionism:– Physics, the queen of science.

8

Falsificationism

• Karl R. Popper 1902-1994

• Criticized inductivism and verifiability:– No number of cases of

“A being B” can establish that “all A being B”. All such statements remain disprovable.

9

Principle of falsifiabillity

• Scientific theory can never be accorded more than a provisional acceptance.

• A theory holds until it is disproved.

• Falsification, not verification is the appropriate object of the observational and experimental procedures of science.

• Falsifiability is a necessary part of a scientific theory.

10

Popper’s hypothetico-deductive method

• Enlargements of our temporary knowledge begins with the conversions of hunches or imaginative insights into hypotheses.

• Then, once the conditions for falsification have been established by the application of deductive logic, such hypotheses must be tested through sustained search for negative instances.

11

Assignment• Try to give an examples of theories which are

falsifiable and not falsifiable.• What would Popper say about a theory which is

not falsifiable?• Are popperianism or/and logical positivism

descriptive or normative theories of science? Argue for your answer.

• What does this have to do with the problem of demarcation?

12

Post-Popperian theories

• Both The logical positivists and popperians did not describe reality, they were creating norms about how they thought science should be practiced for the best ( most effective ) results.

• Critics by– Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos, Paul

Feyerabend…

13

Thomas S. Kuhn (1922–96)

• “Structure of the scientific revolution” (1962)

• Paradigm theory– Prescience - normal science

- crisis - revolution - new normal science - new crisis- revolution…

• A theory based on study of history of science

• Attempts to describe how science develops in reality

14

Kuhn's normal science • Grand theory as a paradigm

• Praxis– community of scientists

• social power-relations and structures in the scientific community

– methodological school, exemplars– puzzling reality in terms of the grand theory by

deduction– increasing anomalies lead to crisis

15

Paradigm shift

• In crisis there will be ‘extraordinary science’ where there will be several competing theories

• One theory will win because it will get the greatest number of supporters in the scientific community

• ‘Paradigm shift is an ‘irrational’ process, such as accuracy, scope, simplicity, fruitfulness, and the ‘like’ of each paradigm

16

Kuhns wiew on scientific revolution

• Not (unexpected) new results from research, rather a new perspective or interpretation of data.

17

Assignment

• Exemplify the following concepts:– Paradigm

– Normal-science

– Exemplars

– Anomalies

– Paradigm in crisis

– Extraordinary science

– Paradigm shift

– incommensurability

18

Imre Lakatos

• ‘Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programs’ (1968 )

• Reacts to Kuhn’s views and claims that– there does exist an objective criteria

where scientists can make a rational choice between two competing theories

– it is due to dishonesty that some scientists do not give up their position

19

Lakatos’ scientific research programs

• Research programs are series of theories which can be viewed in two ways– a. negative heuristic that states a ‘untouchable

hard core’ of hypothesis with a protective belt around it, protecting it from falsification

– b. positive heuristic declaring that the core can be altered slightly in order to fit progression

20

Positive heuristic

• is the good one from Lakatos point of view– The development from Copernicus to Newton

is his good example

• Negative heuristic is the less good one – Tyco Brahes geocentric theory is Lakatos

example here

21

The Lakatos view ?

• He revised the Popperian view after Kuhn

• If the Popperian view had been practiced through history none of the progressive theories would have survived

• He wanted to save the sciences from Kuhn's irrational grounds

22

Anarchy

• Paul Feyerabend

• No single correct method in science

• Anything that works is fine

• = epistemological anarchy

23

Social construction of science

• “laboratory life” is disorganized

• Scientific logic vs. availability of equipment, funds, careers etc.