1 reading assignment presentations for en0291 s40 “effect of increasing chip density on the...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Reading assignment presentations for EN0291 S40
“Effect of increasing chip density on the evolution of computer architectures,” IBM J. Res & Dev, Vol. 46. Brendan
“Repeater scaling and its impact on CAD,” IEEE Trans. on CAD, Vol. 23(4) Elif
“SOI technology for the GHz era,” IBM J. Res. & Dev., Vol. 46. Cesare
“Turning Silicon on Its Edge,” IEEE Circuits & Devices Magazine, Jan/Feb’04. Yiwen
2
Effect of Increasing Chip Density on the Evolution of Computer Architectures
R. Nair
IBM Journal of Research and Development
Volume 46 Number 2/3 March/May 2002
4
A Billion Transistors on a Chip
• “What functions will be expected of billion-transistor chips, and how will they be organized?”
• Move Memory closer to the processors (physically speaking)
• System on a Chip – integration on the same chip of varied structures such as processors, DRAM, sensors, and transducers
5
Processor Evolution
• New generations depending on prediction algorithms
• Performance benefit decreasing
• Sometimes simpler is better!
6
The Current Techniques (Benchmarks)
• Increasing pipeline depth and frequency
• Fewer applications responding well
7
Cellular Architectures
• Little communication overhead between threads
• Connectionist architecture – large number of processors with little memory
• Advantages– Off-the-shelf commodity parts– Use existing compilers– Possibilities of redundancy
8
System-on-a-Chip
• Integrate functions that are outside processor
• Reduce communication costs between elements
• Current state – performance decrease when combining technologies on one die
• Help with clock skew
9
Conclusions
• Convergence of processors
• Less focus on more computation power
• Scalable, distributed computing
10
The Scaling Challenge:Can Correct-by-Construction Design Help?
P. Saxena N. Menezes P. Cocchini D. A. Kirkpatrick
Intel Labs. (CAD Research)
EN0291
Elif Alpaslan
11
Introduction:FROM LAST LECTURE:
• Cmos scaling in VLSI chips bring new design concerns: • increasing dominance of interconnects • leakage
• In this paper : Results of scaling studies in the context of typical block level wiring distributions, and study the impact of the identified
trends on post-RTL design process.
• Goal of the paper: To show how does exponentially increasing repeater and clocked repeater count will effect logic synthesis, technology mapping, layout and new research problems relevant to future designs.
12
Some Scaling Experiments (SPICE)
Critical repeater length
Min. distance at which inserting repeater speeds up line
Critical sequential length
Max. distance that signal can travel in an optimally sized and buffered interconnect in 1 cycle
CRL for M3 & M6 shrink at the rate of 0.57x per generation ~ faster than normal scaling of 0.7x
CSL shrink at a rate of 0.43x per generation ~ faster than normal scaling and the rate of decrease in CRL
Additional repeaters need to be added during a shrink of an optimal repeated interconnect from one process generation to next.
Ideally shrink interconnects won’t only require additional repeaters but many of them need to be clocked
13
Impact of decrease in critical repeater and sequential lengths
How CRL & CSL are migrated across Block Level Wiring Histogram ?
• # of nets requiring repeaters ~ area under histogram curve to right of line representing critical length
•left migration of critical length exponentially increasing # of nets
14
Impact of decrease in critical repeater and sequential lengths (cont.)
Block Level Wiring Histogram (Zoomed View)
Increasingly steep slope of curve (log scale on y-axis) => # impacted nets Increasingly steep slope of curve (log scale on y-axis) => # impacted nets exploding!exploding!
15
Impact of decrease in critical repeater and sequential lengths (cont.)
• Percentage of block-level nets impacted by repeaters
• Percentage of block-level nets impacted by clocked repeaters
16
Impact on POST-RTL CAD
• Logic Synthesis and Technology Mapping:
– Metrics that drive capacitive load of wires are traditional literal or gate-count and fanout –based wire load metrics and they don’t take into account interconnect repeaters
– Gate count metric can lead to wrong heuristic choices during early stage of synthesis due to more delay migration to repeated interconnects.
– Amount of logic available in a single pipeline stage shrinks
Fanout-based metrics can be misleading due to isolation of some sinks of an interconnect from its driver by a repeater
Maximum possible benefit of a good logic synthesis solution reduces
17
Impact on POST-RTL CAD
• Placement and Routing:– Biggest impact of repeaters on placement stage– # of repeaters required by an interconnect is strongly dependant on placement of cells
• Current Placement Algorithms:– Handle repeater insertion by reserving a certain fraction of block area for repeaters prior placement
and then inserts them into long nets using ECO’s after placement• ECO technique breaks down when more than 5-10%nets in netlist changes
– Block level placement algorithms at any level have to deal with the complications that arising from repeater requirements for nets at any other levels of hierarchy.
– When CSL shrink below to the dimensions of synthesizable block placement algorithms has to handle clocked repeater insertion which is not as straight forward as buffering.
• Routing:– Routers can’t operate in a purely geometric world, it must understand buffering– Complications due to large number of via blockage – Complications due to the multi pin nets
19
SOI technology for the GHz era(by G. G. Shahidi – 2002 IBM)
• Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) : Technology Introduction
• Brief History
• SOI vs. Bulk (power, performance, scaling)
• Applications
• Future Trends
20
smaller Capacitance of the switch
SOI - Introduction
SOI : Process Technology Basic Idea : placing a
thin layer of insulator upon the substrate
G
p-substrate
n+SiO2
Si-polyS D
n+
CSBCDB
A lot of capacitance here (i.e. slow)
p-substrate
n+
SiO2Si-poly D
n+
SiO2
G
B
Faster Transistor!
Less area junction capacitance
B
No capacitance here (i.e. fast)
CSBCDB
n+
S
TBOX
22
SOI : Brief History
• First developed by IBM in early 70s• Not suitable until `90 (expensive process,
progress in bulk CMOS by scaling)• FD(fully depleted)–SOI vs. PD(partially
depleted)–SOI• IBM Fabrication technique : SIMOX
(Separation by Implantation of Oxygen)
Implant Oxigen Annealing
23
SOI vs. Bulk• Pros:
– Less Capacitance (~9-25%) , NO Body effect (floating body, Vbs>0)
– Same frequency but Lower VDD Lower power – Reduced Short Channel Effects (higher doping
concentrations)– No latch-up -> Layout simplicity (no wells, plugs, …) – Same scaling rules of Bulk
• Cons:– History-dependent timing (floating body)– Floating Body (Vsb) Reduced effective VT
(=F(Vsb)) higher off current, Ioff (OSS: on the other hand, we are decreasing VDD Ioff is the same than in Bulk..)
– Self heating (the channel is isolated from the bulk)
24
SOI : Applications & Future Trends
• High Performance processors (servers, Cell Processors, XBOX360..)
• Low-Power Devices (MPSoC)
• Wireless Technology (high-resistivity substrate less crosstalk)
• spacecraft, satellites and military electronics (less sensitive to alpha radiation)
25
TURNING SILICON ON ITS EDGE
--Overcoming Silicon scaling barriers with
double-gate and FinFET technology
by Edward J.Nowak, Ingo Aller, Thomas Ludwig, Keunwoo Kim,
Rajiv V.Joshi, Ching-Te Chuang, Kerry Bernstein, and Ruchir Puri
• Presenter: Yiwen Shi
26
Overcoming Obstacles by Doubling Up
Two dominant barriers
for further CMOS
scaling:• Subthreshold• Gate-dielectric
leakages
Double-gate (DG) FET
Reduce drain-induced-barrier lowering (DIBL) Improve subthreshold swing (S)
Lower threshold voltage for a given off-current Higher drive current at lower power-supply voltage
27
Centering of Double-gate Threshold Voltage• Body doping
• Asymmetric gate work function
• Symmetric mid-gap work- function gate-electrodes
Halo doping Two gate electrodes of differing work functions e.g. degenerately doped n+ & p+ polysilicon
Metal gates
e.g. nickel-silicide
29
FinFET-DGCMOS Process Flow & Circuit Demonstration
• Demonstration of DGCMOS static operation: to prove the device
parametrics can all be centered to the practical values demanded for VLSI (W,L,T)
transient operation: to prove the numerous parasitic elements that can degrade circuit performance can be tamed (inverter delay)
• Achieve numerous landmarks
• May indeed prove manufacturable
A ring of 60 inverters with a single two-way NAND
top related