1 societal concerns as wicked problems sandra s. batie michigan state university oecd paris nov 2009
Post on 25-Dec-2015
212 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Societal Concerns as Wicked Problems
Sandra S. Batie
Michigan State University
OECD Paris Nov 2009
2
Societal Concerns
• Accepted values of society
• Appeal to a broad range of people
• Commodity, non-commodity, or processes and production practices
3
Societal Concerns
• Tame vs. Wicked
4
Outline
• What are wicked problems?
• What are tame problems?
• What policy challenges are posed by wicked problems?
5
Outline (cont.)
• Trade liberalization as a tame versus a wicked problem
• Implications for policy development
6
I. Wicked and Tame Problems
7
What are they?
Problems
8
– Animal Welfare
– Global Climate Change
– Biofuel Production
– GMO Foods
– Sustainable Development
– Trade Liberalization
Problems
9
Tame Problems
• Identifying the source of food contamination
• Cost effectiveness of conservation practices
• Costs and benefits of expanding an irrigation project
10
Characteristic
Tame Problem
Wicked Problem
1. The problem Clear definition of problem and potential solutions
Problem does not change overtime
No agreement about what the problem is or what solutions are possible
Creating solutions changes the problem
11
Characteristic
Tame Problem
Wicked Problem
2. The problem Outcome is true or false, successful or unsuccessful
Outcomes are “better” or “worse”
12
Characteristic
Tame Problem
Wicked Problem
3. The role of stakeholders
Limited role for stakeholders
Crucial role for stakeholders who hold different definitions of the “real” problem, its causes and potential solutions
13
Characteristic
Tame Problem Wicked Problem
3. The role of experts
Experts trusted to find causes and identify solutions based primarily on scientific data
Experts are not trusted to decide desirable outcomes
14
Characteristic
Tame Problem
Wicked Problem
4. The “stopping rule”
The task is completed when the problem is solved
No definitive solution.
Endpoint is determined by stakeholders, by political forces, and/or by resource availability
15
Characteristic
Tame Problem
Wicked Problem
5. Nature of the problem
Scientifically based protocols guide the choice of solution(s)
No “optimal/ best practices” available.
Solution-seeking processes are based on “judgments” of multiple stakeholders
16
Characteristic
Tame Problem Wicked Problem
6. Nature of the problem
Low uncertainty as to system components and outcomes
High uncertainty as to system components and outcomes
17
Characteristic
Tame Problem
Wicked Problem
7. Nature of the problem
Shared values as to desirability of outcomes
No shared values as to desirability of outcomes
18
Wicked Problems
• Many interdependencies• Multi-causal• Unintended consequences to solutions• Moving target, unstable• Socially complex• Rarely the responsibility of one organization• Involve changing peoples’ behavior
19
High
Low
HighLow Value Conflict
Wicked Problems
Tame Problems
Uncertainty
20
II. Policy Challenges Posed by Wicked Problems
Problems
21
Normal Science and Policy
• Normal science has a close relationship with the creation of policy alternatives
• Since WWII, normal science has been guided by a linear model
22
Normal Science
• Normal science adds to the details of established theory but does not challenge or test its assumptions
• Normal science is what most disciplines do most of the time (i.e., conventional)
23
Reservoir of knowledge
Appraised by criteria internal to science
Appraised by criteria external to science
Societal benefits: Economic, environmental, medical, industrial, technological, …
Basic research
Applied research
Development
Source: Pielke, R.A. Jr., and R. Byerly Jr. 1998.
24
Normal Science & Policy• Scientific progress leads to social
progress
• Chicago 1933 World’s Fair Motto
“Science Finds, Industry Applies, Man Conforms”
25
Linear Model of Science• Division between researchers and users
• Implies that reaching a consensus on science is a prerequisite for a political consensus
• “What is” conflates with “what ought to be”
• Implies reducing scientific uncertainty reduces political uncertainty
26
Linear Model Assumptions
• More likely to be true when:
– Widespread agreement on what is a desirable outcome
– Low uncertainty about system component parts and outcomes
– That is, when the problem is tame
27
Example
• Developing a vaccine to prevent the spread of a human disease
28
Normal Science is Not Well-suited for Wicked Problems
• Conflict in values over what are desirable outcomes
• Uncertainty about system component parts and outcomes
• Can not gather facts without first discussing values
• Must engage stakeholders
29
Wicked Problems• Even when dialogue
occurs and includes all actors– Clear solutions
rarely emerge– Rather, via
negotiation, processes are identified which are judged better or worse (not right or wrong)
30
Society is changing what it is asking of science, the role of science in decision making is quite complex.
– Pielke 2007
31
III. Trade Liberalization as a Tame Problem
32
Trade Liberalization as a Tame Problem
• Economic (normal) science argues for policy “intervention” toward trade liberalization
• No uncertainty about the desirability of liberalized trade
• No uncertainty about cause and effect
• Conclusion = we “ought” to liberalize trade
33
Trade Liberalization as a Tame Problem
• Undesirable outcomes (e.g. social concerns) are market failures
• Correct with government “intervention”
34
Trade Liberalization as a Tame Problem
• Does not question the wisdom of trade liberalization
• Movements away from trade liberalization that are not market failures are inefficient and to be avoided or banned
Inefficiency
35
GATT and Tame Problems• Early postwar GATT relatively successful
• Few players
• Dominance and leadership by U.S.
• Explicit issues about manufactured goods
• Problems more tame, agreement was more likely– Agriculture sector not as successful, more
wicked
36
Of course, if trade liberalization were a still a tame problem today, the Doha rounds would be completed and a success.
37
IV.Trade Liberalization as a Wicked Problem
• Trade does not benefit all
• There are winners and losers
• Cannot assume that efficiency is a widely shared social goal or that a commonly shared definition of efficiency exists
• Wicked problems challenge normal economic science
38
Trade Liberalization as a Wicked Problem
• Social goals do not come from scientific paradigms
• Social goals come from deliberative, democratic processes
• Social goals are political decisions and not scientific ones
39
Trade Liberalization as a Wicked Problem
• New and many more players with WTO
• No consensus about the desirability of trade liberalization proposals
40
New Social Concerns
• New issues, new publics• Animal welfare• Hormone use
41
New Social Concerns
• Regional foods and labels
• Treatment of workers
• Protection of rural communities
• GMOs…
42
Trade Liberalization as a Wicked Problem
• New and many more players with WTO
• No consensus about the desirability of trade liberalization proposals
• Transaction costs are higher
43
Costs of Decision Making
44
GATT/WTO Members and Length of Negotiations
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Nu
mb
er o
f M
em
bers a
nd
Mo
nth
s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9GATT/WTO Trade Rounds
Members in GATT/WTOMonths of Negotiations
45
Uncertainty About Causeand Effect
• No consensus on the validity of dispute resolution rules
• Limited faith in science’s ability to manage risks
• Rising concern about sustainability • Ease of communications to form virtual
communities of like-minded individuals
46
“I do not care if GMOs are safe, I do not want to eat them!”
47
Scientific Risk Assessments
• Risk assessments do not incorporate all values
• Controversial because they have all the characteristics of a wicked problem
• Dispute resolution rulings do not quell the debate
48
High
Low
HighLow Value Conflict
Wicked Problems
Perceived High Risk Problems
Tame Problems
Perceived Low Risk Problems
Uncertainty
49
Debate continues
• Conflicts over whose values will prevail
• Conflicts over what tradeoffs are worth making
• Conflicts over who should bear the costs and who should gain the benefits
50
Normal Science, Wicked Problems, and Policy
• When values are in conflict, experts cannot dictate policy objectives
• If they try to do so with wicked problems, the frequent outcome is gridlock and controversy
51
V. Implications
• Science can inform wicked problem decisions, but cannot make them
• Science alone cannot decide the adequacy of risk assessments
• Where there are substantial value divergences/conflicts the design of the decision processes is crucial
52
Thank You!
top related