1 the role of customary justice systems in fostering the rule of law in post-conflict societies...
Post on 17-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
The Role of Customary Justice Systems in Fostering the Rule of
Law in Post-Conflict Societies
Deborah Isser Senior Rule of Law Advisor, United State Institute of Peace
The Nuts and Bolts of Judicial Reform – Rebuilding Justice Systems in Post-Conflict Settings
World Bank Training Course – Washington DC – April 19th 2006
2
The project
Case studies – analysis of customary system and potential for RoL strategiesPolicy guidance – synthesis of lessons and guidance for programmingOperational assistance – projects in Afghanistan, Sudan, Liberia
Afghanistan Bougainville Burundi Guatemala East Timor Liberia Mozambique Sierra LeoneSomalia Sudan
3
The premise: rule of law in post-conflict societies
Formal system
• Lack infrastructure and equipment
• Lack qualified personnel
• Lack legitimacy: complicit in conflict and past oppression; captured by particular power base; corrupt
• Barriers to access
Child warrior, Sudan
Customary justice systems
• Survive conflict more intact
• Often more trusted as reflecting dominant community norms
• Flexible and accessible
• Used by ~80% of population, in particular the marginalized
4
Characteristics of customary justice systems
General characteristics
• Social and cultural rule-based systems
• Oral law administered by communityauthorities
• Flexible and informal procedures
• Goal to restore community harmony
• No distinction between criminal and civil
Awaiting the Ngcosi (tribal king) outside a tribal courthouse near Port Shepstone in South Africa
5
Examples
Burundi Bashingantahe
Elders of different tribes convene a Jirga near the Pakistani border
Village elders occupy a central community role in Burundi
Afghanistan Jirga
6
Challenges of engaging with customary systems
Negative perceptions and realities
• Non-compliant with international human rights norms
• Undemocratic, lack, accountability, perpetuate entrenched power
• Distorted by history and conflict
• Local, varied, impermeable to outsiders
• Antithetical to rule of law precisely becauseare unregulated by the state
• Backward, rigid, anti-modern
The fact that it is commonly used does not necessarily mean it is effective and legitimate -- it may be the only real option
?
7
Customary systems: the case for engagement
Dealing with reality
• Customary systems are used by 80% of the population
• Customary system may provide order and non-violent resolution of conflict where formal system does not
• Ignoring or abolishing customary system will not change problematic practices
Harnessing potential
• Complement to top-down focus on formal institutions for building culture of ROL
• Customary system may have real advantages over formal -- accessible and relative legitimacy-- better able to handle certain types of disputes
• Constructive engagement with customary system can extend credibility to formal system
8
Finding the right balance
Some options for harnessing the potential of customary systems
• Formal recognition of limited jurisdiction
• Substantive incorporation
• Procedural incorporation
• ADR/mediation
• Co-existence with regulation and oversight
Customarysystem
Formalsystem
9
• Afghanistan (no formal policy of integration; ad hoc interaction at local level)
• Burundi (customary system as pre-trial mediation)
• Mozambique (formal recognition of role of traditional authorities in adjudicating land disputes)
• Southern Sudan (customary law as source of legislation and part of judicial hierarchy)
Policy guidance: strategyExamples of customary-formal integration
Customarysystem
FormalsystemX
Customarysystem
Formalsystem
Customarysystem
Formalsystem
Customarysystem
Formalsystem
10
Guidance for international interventions
General considerations
• Not a neutral, technical activity -- implications for culture, governance and power
• Avoid externally engineered integration -- process matters
• Customary interventions should be part of larger justice reform strategy aimed at increasing access to justice
Entry points for international engagement
• Empirical analysis
• Facilitating stakeholder dialogue
• Promoting legal awareness
• Building capacity and training
• Developing intermediaries and navigators
• Sector specific entry points -- e.g. land disputes
12
Case study: Guatemala
Courthouse in Senahu, 230 miles north of Guatemala City, burnt down by a mob of Guatemalan peasants after they contested a judge’s ruling over a rape case. The judge was murdered by the mob (2001).
13
Case study: Liberia
A typical street sign in Monrovia, calling for the use of legal means to resolve conflicts (2006)
top related