1 using access for ells ® data to inform instruction presenter: margot downs wida certified...

1

Using ACCESS for ELLS ® Data to Inform Instruction

Presenter: Margot DownsWIDA Certified Consultant

ACCESS for ELLs®, W-APT™, and ELP Standards Trainer

May 2, 2011Maine Department of Education ESL/Bilingual

Programs Professional development online webinar

2

Resources

• Interpretive Guide for Score Reports 2011 http://www.wida.us/assessment/ACCESS/index.aspx

• WIDA Focus Bulletinshttp://www.wida.us/resources/index.asp(Formative Assessment Bulletin)

3

Minh

a454 / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

• US Born

• Linguistic background: Vietnamese

• 6th grade

Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C

2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373

4

ACCESS for ELLs®• As with all assessments, a test score should be

considered one of multiple criteria in making educational decisions.

• ACCESS for ELLs® data is a starting point for teacher planning, collaboration, and differentiation.

• Opportunities to look for patterns in language development from the individual to the district level

• ACCESS for ELLs® should be part of a balanced assessment system which incorporates formative, interim, and summative assessments based on standards and learning targets.

5

Types of Scores

• Raw Scores• Scale Scores• Proficiency Level Scores

6

Raw Scores• The actual number of items/tasks correct out of total number

of items/tasks• Use these scores with caution! Very rough indicator of

student performance and not appropriate to make generalizations or track student growth

Example from Teacher Report (Writing)

7

Scale Scores

• The scale scores allow raw scores across grades and tiers to be compared on a single vertical scale K-12 within a single domain

Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C

2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373

8

Proficiency Level Scores• These scores are an interpretation of scale

scores• Whole number = proficiency level based on WIDA ELP

Standards• Decimal =proportion within proficiency level, not an

interval

Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C

2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373

Composite Score: 15% Listening, 15% Speaking, 35% Reading, 35% Writing

9

Proficiency Level Scores

Grade Scale Score Proficiency Level

5th 303 2.04th 303 2.43rd 303 3.0

Interpretation of scale scores to proficiency level is grade specific.

10

Confidence Bands (Teacher Report)

Graphic representation of Standard Error of Measurement. This reminds test users that a single test score represents a range of possible outcomes and should never be interpreted as the only possible outcome (95% probability that the average score if a student took the test multiple times would fall within the Confidence Band).

11

Starting Point for Collaborative Conversations

www.sedl.org

When making determinations on instruction and language programming, examining individual

student performance in each domain provides a more comprehensive profile.

12

Writing Rubric

What does her writing look like in the content areas?Is she being provided with explicit language instruction

to support writing in the various content areas?

13

Can Do Descriptors (6-8 writing)

Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging

• Create multiple-paragraph essays• Justify ideas • Produce content-related reports • Use details/examples to support ideas • Use transition words to create cohesive passages • Compose intro/body/conclusion• Paraphrase or summarize text • Take notes (e.g., for research)

• Create expository text to explain graphs/charts• Produce research reports using multiple sources/ citations• Begin using analogies • Critique literary essays or articles

14

WIDA ELP StandardsStandard 4: Science

Domain: Writing(model performance indicators)

Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging

Explain uses of different forms of energy depicted visually (eg. ___ is used to ___.)

Evaluate and defend uses of different forms of energy (e.g.; “I think solar energy is most efficient because…”

Integration with other language skills (transformations)

15

MinhYear Grd L L S S R R W W C C

2011 6 4.9 378 6.0 405 3.8 356 4.4 373 4.7 373

2010 5 5.3 375 6.0 403 3.3 334 4.9 376 4.8 365

2009 4 5.6 371 4.8 365 3.4 324 4.2 346 4.3 345

• NECAP, NWEA, Running Records, Grades• Long Term ELL • Need to integrate explicit academic language instruction in daily core instruction

16

Samira (Somali) Foreign Born

Year Grd L L S S R R W W C C

2011 4 6 412 3.9 347 6.0 404 4.5 356 6.0 382

2010 3 5.8 362 6.0 403 6.0 355 4.7 351 5.7 362

2009 2 5.0 324 2.3 297 5.0 312 2.7 273 3.3 298

2008 1 4.0 295 6.0 420 2.5 260 2.7 260 3.5 289

Communicating with Parents• Parent Report• Concrete examples of student work

17

Thank you!