1st attempt-proposal rejection on 10-jan
Post on 03-Jun-2018
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
1/60
Needs improvement
Your project needs improvement. You are
required to submit your project again with the
suggested improvements when new
assignment will be opened on VULMS. Maesure to improve the project according to the
given guidelines.
You need to discuss the !indings and provide
the conclusion based on the data that whether
your all the objectives are met or not
See the analysis section and improve the
project according to the comments as youhave not calculated the mean
"ollow the !ormat o! the project report.
#mprove the literature review.
You have not provided the data in raw !orm as
well so send the e$cel sheet along with the
project ne$t time
You need to calculate correlation between the
variables
Provide the interpretation of all the analysis in detail
You are strongly advised to call at the given
below number !or !urther guidance i! you need
any
I hope it will be clear if there is any confusion you are more than
welcome to ask.
Wish you good luck.
Final ProjectPage | 1
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
2/60
Rewards and recognition as a Source of Motivation
in Engro
A REPORT
SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAEMENTS!IEN!ES" #IRTUA$ UNI#ERSIT% OF PA&ISTAN INPARTIA$ FU$FI$$MENT OF THE RE'UIREMENTS FORTHE DEREE OF MASTER IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Submitted ByShoaib Akbar
Mc100203540
Department of Management Sciences,
Virtual University of Pakistan
Page | 2
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
3/60
Acknowledgement
Page | 3
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
4/60
I would like to articulate my greatest thanks to the people who have
facilitate & supported me right through my project. I am thankful to
my instructor for his incessant support for the project, from initial
advice & acquaintances in the early stages of conceptual beginning &
through ongoing advice & encouragement to this day.
I yearn to thank my parents for their exclusive support and attention
who enthused me and buoyant me to go my own way, without whom I
would be unable to complete my project. At last but not the least I
want to thank my wife who cherished me for my work and provoked
me and finally to Almighty AA! who made all this possible...
Page | 4
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
5/60
Abstract
Increasingly, organi"ations are reali"ing that they have to establish an equitable
#alance between the employee$s contribution to the organi"ation and the
%rgani"ation$s contribution to the employee. stablishing this balance is one of the
main reasons to reward and recogni"e employees. %rgani"ations that follow a strategic
approach to creating this balance focus on the three main components of a reward
system, which includes, compensation, benefits and recognition '(eeprose, )**+.
-tudies that have been conducted on the topic indicates that the most common
problem in organi"ations today is that they miss the important component of
recognition, which is the lowcost, highreturn ingredient to a wellbalanced reward
system. A key focus of recognition is to make employees feel appreciated and valued
'-arvadi, /001. 2esearch has proven that employees who get recogni"ed tend to have
higher selfesteem, more confidence, more willingness to take on new challenges and
more eagerness to be innovative '3ason, /00). 4he aim of this study is to investigate
whether rewards and recognition has an impact on employee motivation. A
biographical and 5ork 3otivation 6uestionnaire was administered to respondents
'(e #eer, )*78. 4he sample group '9: )7+ consists of male and female employees
on postgrade levels 1 to )/. 4he results of the research indicated that there is a
positive relationship between rewards, recognition and motivation.
9otwithstanding the insights derived from the current research, results need to be
Interpreted with caution since a convenience sample was used, thereby restricting the
generalisability to the wider population.
Table of Contents
Page |
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
6/60
CHAPTER 1-------------------------------------------------------------------Page No. 06INTRODUCTIONCHAPTER 2-------------------------------------------------------------------Page No. 12
LITERATURE REVIEW
CHAPTER 3-------------------------------------------------------------------Page No. 53RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
CHAPTER 4--------------------------------------------------------------------Page No. 57DATA ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 5--------------------------------------------------------------------Page No. 69CONCLUSION, RECOMMENDATIONS &LIMITATIONS
References----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page No.76
Appendix/Appendixes------------------------------------------------------------------- Page No.79
Page | !
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
7/60
Section I
CHAPTER No.1
INTRODUCTION
4oday an organi"ations result is highly dependent on the employees work motivation. It
is therefore important for a company to find out what motivates its employees so that it
can plan a suitable reward system and gain better results. 4he right combination of im
material and material rewards can boost up the employees; work motivation and en
hence their commitment to the company.
4he aim of this study is to investigate and analy"e how well the current reward system
Implemented ngro helps generate employee motivation. 3ore specifically it aims
to find out which aspects of the reward system functions well, and which aspects could
be
further developed and improved in order to increase employee satisfaction. ngro
has earlier conducted some smaller research on the overall job satisfaction of the com
pany, however only little research has been made on employee work motivation and at
attitudes towards the reward systems in the company. 4he driving force behind this study
is to enable the employees of ngro to give feedback on their work motivation
and their attitudes towards the reward systems and hence perhaps increase their
commitment to the company. #ased on this information, the research question of this
thesis work is. !ow can the reward systems be further developed=
Page | "
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
8/60
1.1 Background of the project:
mployee motivation is one of the most essential parts in a company$s development
and success. In order to maximi"e the overall performance of the company it is vital for
an employer to understand what motivates the employees and how to increase their
job satisfaction. It might however be challenging for a company to find out what
motivates its employees, especially because different people are motivated by different
things. A well designed and functional reward system is an efficient way to increase
employee work motivation. 4he appropriate type of reward is developed in accordance
to the company;s reward philosophy, strategies and policy. !owever, it might be
challenging to find the right way to combine the company$s integrated policies and
practices together with the employee$s contribution, skill and competence.
'Armstrong, )***, p. 1?*180.
1.2 Introduction of the organization(s)
Engro !or(orationis a public company based in @akistan. 4he company has stakes in
the fertili"er, food, power generation, petrochemicals, automation and terminal storage
industries. ngro underwent an employee led buy out in )**/.
ngro has made some former research on employee work motivation on a general
bases. 4he research has however been concentrated on the employee$s satisfaction
with the employer and the company, not the reward system. 4he unit of ngro has
had some problems with finding the right way to motivate its employees and hence the
manager suggested if the author could conduct a survey that would especially
oncentrate on how to increase work motivation and develop the reward systems.
1.3 Objectives:
An organi"ation can use recognition as a strategic measure to show employees that
their contribution to the organi"ation is recogni"ed, and in so doing, influence their
motivation and job performance. #ased on the findings of the research, the
Page | #
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
9/60
organi"ation could improve and encourage the use of effective recognition in the
feedback process of the performance management system. 4he findings of this
research study could also influence the company to consider a more structured
approach to recognition that would enable the high performance culture it strives to
attain. 4he aim of this research is to investigate the role that reward and recognition
plays in motivating employees. 4he study will explore which of these factors, reward
or recognition, has a greater impact on employee motivation and satisfaction.
4he objectives of the study are. Hreitner and
Hinicki ')**/, p. )?/ postulate that motivation represents, Fthose psychological
processes that cause the arousal, direction and persistence of voluntary actions that are
goal directed.G If it is the role of managers to successfully guide employees toward
accomplishing organi"ational objectives, it is imperative that they understand these
psychological processes.
3otivation is further described as being intentional and directional. 4he word
intentional$ refers to personal choice and persistence of action, whilst directional$
denotes the presence of a driving force aimed at attaining a specific goal. In other
words, a motivated person is always aware of the fact that a specific goal must be
achieved, and would direct their effort at attaining that goal '9el et al., /00).
3ol ')**/ on the other hand distinguishes between the terms movement$ and
Page | 12
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
13/60
motivation$. 5hen a person carries out a task just for the sake of being remunerated,
the person is moved rather than motivated. It is only when individuals carry out a task
because they are enjoying it or are totally involved in it that they are motivated.
According to a 3otta ')**1, motivation is simply the reason individuals have for
doing the things they do. In daytoday society many different things motivate people,
and that which motivates one person may not necessarily motivate another. 4hings
such as a love for life, a desire to succeed, fear of failure, the need for selffulfillment
or selfesteem, are all factors that influence motivation.
In conjunction with this, employee motivation is a process that an organi"ation can
foster and nurture so that it can occur spontaneously. If organi"ations believe that
people are naturally motivated, they must simply provide the environment and
atmosphere that fosters and supports their motivation '#aron, )*7>.
a 3otta ')**1 posits the view that, the common wisdom is that managers have to
learn to motivate people. !e believes that employees bring their own motivation, and
what they need from work is to be liberated, to be involved, to be accountable and to
reach their full potential.
!arris ')**? advances the notion of heart power$, which he defines as employee$s
engaged passion for excellence. In accordance with this, organi"ations that capture the
hearts of their employees seldom have to be concerned about motivation, as engaged
hearts motivate themselves. @eople who are engaged and selfmotivated do not have
to be managed, as they are motivated by doing a job they believe in, in a constructive
direction.
According to awler ')*8> as cited in #arling, Dullagar and #luen ')*78, a theory
of work motivation must account for the control and prediction of behavior. It must
account for the phenomenon of voluntary behavior being initiated, that is, it should
identify the energi"ers of voluntary work behavior. A theory of work motivation
Page | 13
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
14/60
must explain how human behavior is directed or channeled.
)03011 PRE#IOUS RESEAR!H
xtensive research has been conducted on the factors that impact motivation and
satisfaction and therefore job performance. 5yatt$s /00+ -urvey of anadian
-trategic 2ewards and @ay @ractices found that employers are seeking to adopt
reward strategies that provide a competitive advantage by attracting top talent and
engaging employees in a way that drives business results.
4he survey found that 88J of organi"ations have either adopted a total rewards
strategy or plan to do so. 5hile employers seem satisfied with their performance and
reward efforts, the 5atson 5yatt 5ork anada /00+K/001 study shows that only
/+J of employees believe that excellent performance is rewarded at their company
'anadian employers, n.d..
According to 3ason '/00), recognition in various forms is a powerful retention
strategy and that it does not have to be expensive. A study conducted by the L-
(epartment of abor found that +?J of people leave their jobs because they feel
unappreciated.
A landmark federal 5orkife onflict -tudy involving >)100 working anadians
found that Ffrustration and working conditions are the main reasons cited by those
thinking of leaving their jobsG 'Informal 2ecognition, n.d.. Approximately ?0J
intended to leave because of working conditions, 11J cited lack of recognition and
appreciation, and +0J said that they wanted more time for family and personal
activities. In the Lnited -tates, a similar study found that +0J of employees believed
that they were offered meaningful incentivesM 7)J indicated that they did not receive
any reward for a productivity increaseM and 7*J cited that their organi"ations would
Page | 14
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
15/60
perform better if there were incentives for quality and productivity 'Informal
2ecognition, n.d..
A survey by the @rofessional -ecretaries International revealed that as many as >0J
of professional secretaries would prefer a simple letter of appreciation from their
managers, but that only 8J reported ever receiving such a letter.
According to F@eople, @erformance and @ayG study, by the American @roductivity
entre, it generally takes 1J to 7J of an employee$s salary to change behavior if
the reward is cash, but only +J of the employee$s salary if the reward is noncash.
4hus the fewer dollars are money well spent. 3otivation is more likely to occur when
a reward is personali"ed and heartfelt '-tephenson, )**1.
4hrough its /00/ F@eople at 5ork -urveyG, 3ercer concluded that +7J respondents
believed that they were paid fairly, /7J were motivated by their organi"ations
incentive compensation plan, only /*J said that when they do a good job, their
performance get rewarded. In the same study they found that among employees who
say their performance is rewarded when they do a good job, *0J are satisfied with
their jobsM 77J are satisfied with their organi"ations and )/J were seriously
considering leaving 'ompensation & #enefits 2eport, /00>.
2esearch conducted with managers between -eptember )*** to Cune /000, revealed
that *0.1J felt that recogni"ing employees helps them to better motivate their
employeesM 7+.+J indicated that by providing nonmonetary recognition to
employees when they perform well helps to increase their performanceM 7+.+J cited
that recogni"ing employees supplies them with practical feedbackM 70.>J felt that
recogni"ing employees for good work makes it easier to get the work doneM 88.8J
agreed that recogni"ing employees assists them to become more productiveM and that
?*.>J indicated that providing nonmonetary recognition helps the manager to
achieve their personal goals '5iscombe, /00/.
Page | 1
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
16/60
CHAPTER N0.3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
401 Researc+ /et+od
4he purpose of this research is to explore the most important motivating factors and
analy"e the effects of different reward systems in ngro. 3ore specifically it
aims to find out which aspects of the reward system functions well, and which aspects
could be further developed and improved in order to increase employee satisfaction.
4he chosen method for collecting data in this study was a quantitative research ques
tionnaire 'Appendix ) and two qualitative research interviews 'Appendix /. #oth
were adopted from several Internet sources and the literature discussed in the earlier
chapters. 4here are two types of research, quantitative and qualitative. 6uantitative
research is used to gather data that is absolute, such as numerical data, so that it can
be examined in an unbiased manner. 4he aim of this type of research is to classify
features and count them and after this construct a statistical model in an attempt to
explain what has been observed. 6uantitative research is a relatively easy way to
gather data from a large number of respondentsM it can however be time consuming
due to the large quantity of information. 4he research can be either descriptive, this
means that the subject is measured only once, or experimental which means that the
subject is measured before and after. 4his research was designed to be descriptive.
'(aniel 3uijs, /00+ p. )> 6ualitative research answers to the question FwhyG
instead of FhowG through the analysis of unstructured information. 4his type of
research includes many different methods
of collecting information, some of these are interviews, case studies, ethnographic re
Page | 1!
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
17/60
search, emails, feedback forms and discourse analysis. 4he author has used interviews
in order to conduct the qualitative part of this study. ollecting and analy"ing the data
for a qualitative research can be messy and time consuming. xtracting meaning and
finding the relative information from large volumes of materials is challenging. '(aniel 3uisj,/00+ p. )>
4he written questionnaire was handdelivered to the participants in order to gain the
highest possible response rate. In order to minimi"e the frustration of the respondents
and hence the amount of uncompleted questionnaires, the number of questions was li
mited to a minimum. 4he questions were written as short as possible and the respon
dents did not need to write down any answers, only mark with an N whether they
strongly agree, agree, disagree or strongly disagree.
4he questionnaire was divided into five parts. In the first part, the respondents were
asked questions about their age, gender the number of years working for ngro
, the number of years working with the same work tasks and whether they are
fulltime or parttime employees. 4he second part measured the respondent$s attitudes
towards the three reward systems that are currently used in the company and the third
part measured what type of reward the employees consider to be most motivating.
4he fourth part included a list of statements where the respondents were required to
hoose in a scale from one to five, which reward motivated them the most. 4he last
part of the questionnaire contained four open questions. -ome questions were
reversed and asked repeatedly in order to make sure the respondents understand and
read the questions carefully. In total /> employees participated in
the survey. 4he author strongly feels that the research and the questionnaire were conducted in a
carefully and proper manner and due to the high respondent rate it is possible to draw the
conclusion that the results speak generally for the whole ngro work force. In addition to the
questionnaire, some qualitative information was gathered throughout two personal
interviews with the store manager and assistant manager. 4he author chose to
Page | 1"
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
18/60
interview these two individuals due to the fact that they were able to give some in
sight information on the specific opportunities and threats that ngro has been
experiencing concerning the company;s reward systems and the employees work
motivation. 4he interviews were carried out as semistructured. 4he questions were
sent out to the interviewees in beforehand, hence giving them the opportunity to
prepare. 4he interviews lasted approximately one hour and contained *)0 questions.
4he questionnaire and the interview questions can be found in the appendix.
Page | 1#
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
19/60
!HAPTER 5
DATA ANA$%SIS
TRODU!TION
his section the results of the empirical analysis are reported and presented. 4hesentation proceeds with an analysis of the descriptive statistics on the variables
der consideration. 4he statistical program used for the analyses and presentationdata in this research is the -tatistical @ackage for the -ocial -ciences '-@--sion )/. 4o facilitate ease in conducting the empirical analyses, the results of thecriptive analyses are presented first, followed by the inferential statistical analysis.e upper level of statistical significance for null hypothesis testing was set at 1J.
statistical test results were computed at the /tailed level of significance inordance with the nondirectional hypotheses presented '-ekaran, /00).
Page | 1$
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
20/60
SU$TS OF THE *OR& MOTI#ATION AND SATISFA!TIONUESTIONNAIREscriptive statistics in the form of arithmetic means and standard deviations for thepondents were computed for the various dimensions assessed by the 5orktivation and -atisfaction 6uestionnaire. 4he means and standard deviations of therk 3otivation and -atisfaction 6uestionnaire are presented in 4able +.).
-,e 501 Descri(tive statistics for t+e di/ensions of wor6 /otivation andisfactionria-,e
rk ontentymentmotion
cognitionrking onditions
nefitssonal
aderK-upervisorneral
an
>807+?>//ndard Deviation
here high variables correspond to low motivationth respect to the dimensions of work motivation assessed by the work motivation
d satisfaction questionnaire, 4able +.) indicates that the means for the workntent, payment, promotion, recognition, working conditions, benefits, personal,derKsupervisor and general ranged from a low of ).>/ to a high of /.77.
Page | 2%
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
21/60
herefore appears that staff in the sample are relatively motivated, however, thean values for payment, promotion, recognition and benefits were the lowest. 4hesean values indicate the areas that employees were most likely to be demotivated andsatisfied.ble +.) thus shows that staff in the sample is most likely to be motivated due toir working conditions, personal and general dimensions. 4hey are least motivatedthe payment they receive and recognition as determined by the 5ork 3otivation
d -atisfaction 6uestionnaire.01 INFERENTIA$ STATISTI!Shis section the results of the inferential statistical techniques used in the study are
sented. In order to test the research hypotheses, the @earson @roduct 3omentrrelation oefficient was calculated as well as 3ultiple 2egression and AnalysesPariance 'A9%PA. #ased on the results obtained from the research, conclusionsdrawn with respect to each hypothesis generated for the research undertaken in theani"ation at which the research was conducted.
Page | 21
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
22/60
T+ere is no need to ca,cu,ate t+e corre,ation -etween t+e di/ensions of t+eseria-,es wit+ eac+ ot+er so de,ete t+is to(ic is reward recognition and /otivation so
n7t /ention satisfaction in it
ou 8ust +ave to ca,cu,ate t+e /ean of /otivation" reward and recognition -. first,cu,ating t+e /ean of t+eir factors t+en t+e w+o,e varia-,e0ou need to ca,cu,ate t+e corre,ation -etween reward and /otivation t+en of
cognition wit+ /otivation in order to ac+ieve .our o-8ectives0a6e t+e gra(+s to re(resent t+e /ean of eac+ varia-,e and a,so scatter diagra/ to
(resent t+e corre,ation
Page | 22
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
23/60
0101
ORRE$ATIONe @earson$s @roduct 3oment orrelation oefficient was computed for theposes of determining the following relationships/,
0.01 as well as between general and work motivation and satisfaction 'r : 0.>+, p.01.e results indicate that for the intercorrelation matrix exploring the relationshipween the dimensions of the 5ork -atisfaction and 3otivation 6uestionnaire, that
the coefficients were positive. 4he results depicted in 4able +./ indicate that theresignificant statistical relationship between the dimensions of work motivation andsfaction. Accordingly, the null hypothesis is rejected.-,e 50 4e re,ations+i( -etween rewards" recognition and wor6tivation and satisfaction
or6 satisfaction and Motivationwardscognition? OO/ OO
rrelation is significant at the 0.0) level '/tailedere is a statistically significant, direct and positive relationship between rewardsd work satisfaction and motivation 'r : 0.7?, p R 0.0).
Page | 2
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
26/60
nce, if rewards offered to employees were to be altered, then there would be aresponding change in work motivation and it is just motivation not satisfactionsatisfaction. 4he coefficient ofermination, '2 squared : 0 .8+, implies that 8+J of the variation in worktivation and satisfaction of the sample can be attributed to rewards received, whichplies that the remaining /?J can be explained by other factors not considered.e results indicate that there is a statistically significant, direct and positiveationship between recognition and work satisfaction and motivation 'r : 0.*/, p R). 4his implies that if the recognition accorded to employees were to change,re would be a change in work motivation and satisfaction. 4he coefficient ofermination, '2 squared : 0.?0, implies that ?0J of the variation in work
tivation and satisfaction of the sample can be attributed to recognition, while themaining +0J can be attributed to other variables which were not explored in the
rent research.010)
U$TIP$E RERESSION ANA$%SISthe basis of the results obtained indicating a direct positive relationship betweendimensions of work satisfaction and motivation, all the dimensions of the
trument were assessed using multiple regression analysis to ascertain the extent toich they explain the variance in work satisfaction and motivation.
Page | 2!
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
27/60
T+ere is no need to ca,cu,ate t+e /u,ti(,e regression ana,.sis or anova
Page | 2"
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
28/60
-,e 50 5isfaction*+/+/8?)+0+>/>/
*?+11/>+?7/7?7+?/1>+171?11>1/>>7)0+1for #7187?>*0>7187?>*0>+1/?7>1?+)?.1*
?/17+1*>>. D : 0.00OO
>O
0OO
Page | 2#
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
29/60
0OO0OO0OO0OO0OO0OO0OOe results shown in 4able +.+ indicate a relatively high percentage of the variation inrk motivation and satisfaction can be explained by the variables entered in the
uation '2 squared : 7+./8JM 2 squared 'adjusted : 8).+J. 4hus 8)J of the
iance in work motivation and satisfaction can be explained by work content,yment,motion,ognition,rking
nditions,nefits,sonal,derKsupervisor and general dimensions.
Page | 2$
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
30/60
e Dratio of )?.1* 'p R 0.0) indicates the regression of work motivation andsfaction on the dimensions assessed, expressed through the adjusted squaredltiple '2 squared 'adj. : 8).+0J is statistically significant. !ence the null
pothesis is rejected. 4hese variables account for 8)J of the variance in worktivation and satisfaction. 4his finding suggests that other unexplored variables
uld account for the other variance in work motivation and satisfaction.0104 ANA$%SIS OF #ARIAN!E :ANO#A, s : .?*.
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
35/60
-,e 5011O#A9 Differences in rewards and recognition and wor6tivation and satisfaction -ased on educationa, @ua,ificationsucationa, ,eve,tricO
plomagreesters
heran
8>8/
1
0OO+effe7s Testspondents
hucational levels up
tricfernificantly from the
maining groupshere higher scores are indicative of lower rewards and recognition, worksfaction and motivation.R 0.0)
ere is a significant mean difference in the rewards and recognition 'work
tivation and satisfaction experienced by employees with lower levels ofucation. In this instance, those with education levels up to matric indicated the leastrk motivation and satisfaction relative to the other education levels. mployeesh the educational level of matric reported the lowest levels of work motivation andsfaction '3ean : /.), s : .?0 than employees with diplomas ').?8, s : .+8,rees '3ean : ).8>, s : .18, 3asters degrees '3ean : ).?8, s : .?* and other
alifications '3ean ).?/, s : .>+.
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
36/60
-,e 501)O#A9 Differences in rewards and recognition and wor6tivation and satisfaction -ased on 8o- grade
- rade*)0))O)/)>)+)1an)>8+*7/
1
0OO+effe7s Test
)) respondentsfernificantlym the other groups
here higher scores are indicative of lower rewards and recognition, worksfaction and motivation.R 0.0)
ere is a significant mean difference in the rewards and recognition 'worktivation and satisfaction experienced by employees based on their job grade.ployees in @B )) reported the lowest levels of reward and recognition 'worktivation and satisfaction '3ean : /./8, s : .1* than employees in the other jobdes. mployees in @B )1 evidenced the highest work motivation and satisfactionative to the rewards and recognition they received '3ean : ).?/, s : .>?.
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
37/60
-,e 5014O#A9 Differences in rewards and recognition and wor6tivation and satisfaction -ased on tenurenureyearyearsO0 years)1 years/0 years0 yearsan*/?*7/
1
0OO+effe7s Testose employedween ) and 1rs
fernificantly fromse in the otherups
here higher scores are indicative of lower rewards and recognition, work
sfaction and motivation.p R 0.0)ere is a significant mean difference in the rewards and recognition 'worktivation and satisfaction levels of employees with )1 years of experience '3ean.)/, s : ./+ and those with fewer or more years$ service. 4hose with )E1 years$vice reported the lowest rewards and recognition 'work motivation andsfaction compared to the other groups. 4hose with )?/0 years$ service in theani"ation indicated the highest rewards and recognition 'work satisfaction andtivation compared to all the other categories of employees.
-
8/12/2019 1st Attempt-Proposal Rejection on 10-JAN
38/60
e -cheffe$s 4est reflected the following findings in terms of rewards andognition levels based on the work motivation and satisfaction questionnaire and thegraphical variables of the sample
top related